alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 854 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To designate methamphetamine as an emerging threat, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Methamphetamine Response 

Act of 2021’’. 

SEC. 2. DECLARATION OF EMERGING THREAT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress declares methamphetamine an 

emerging drug threat, as defined in section 702 of the Office of 

National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 

1701), in the United States. 

(b) REQUIRED EMERGING THREAT RESPONSE PLAN.—Not later 

than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director 

of the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall establish and 

implement an Emerging Threat Response Plan that is specific to 

methamphetamine in accordance with section 709(d) of the Office 

of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 

U.S.C. 1708(d)). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sheldon Goldberg,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  November 19, 2005         /s/ Sheldon Goldberg
                              ------------------------------------
                            By: Sheldon Goldberg, Chief Executive
                                Officer of Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.
Meghan SEMPLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-753

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Ashton DAVIS

No. 2018-KH-1447

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEBSTER**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Rodrick JORDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3851

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Maria LOPEZ, DOC #154779, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

The clerk shall enter this Amended Standing Order in each case in which the Court’s

Standing Order of January 3, 2006, has been entered.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TO: All Attorneys of Record in Cases Assigned to the Docket of Judge Sam R.

Cummings, United States District Judge, Northern District of Texas

MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDER1 DESIGNATING CASE FOR

ENROLLMENT IN THE ELECTRONIC CASE FILES “ECF” SYSTEM

The Court’s Standing Order of January 3, 2006, is hereby MODIFIED to permit counsel

of record to file documents electronically if they have registered as an ECF User or to file paper

documents, as they choose.

SO ORDERED this 22nd day of March, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:05-cv-00130-C Document 24 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 169
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles H. PARKER, Jr.

NO. 2018-KH-1178

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review and fails to show that any exception permits his successive filing.

*581State ex rel. Parker v. State, 15-1237 (La. 5/27/16), 193 So.3d 1155.
Gary S. LLOYD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NOS. :2D19-0113 2D19-0119 2D19-0813

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX PARTE James Henry SMITHERMAN

CR-16-1315

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion 

filed June 29, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00027-CV

JDH PACIFIC, INC., Appellant

V.

PRECISION-HAYES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-DCV-261720

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an October 16, 2020 order vacating two writs of 

garnishment. Appellant timely perfected its appeal from that order; however, this 

court must dismiss the appeal because the October 16, 2020 order was void. On 

June 17, 2021, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because the 

underlying order is void. We grant appellee’s motion. 

The record reflects the underlying case was removed to federal court in May 
2

2019. It is undisputed that the case has not been remanded to state court. “Any 

order entered by a state court after the case is removed is void for want of 

jurisdiction.” Hilton v. NBC Bank-Heights, No. 01-96-01366-CV, 1998 WL 

135105, at *2-3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 19, 1998, pet. denied). The 

order underlying this appeal is void and, accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Hassan.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-11206

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUGO CAMPOS-NAVA, also known as Alfonzo Loya-Nava, also known as

Alfonso Loya-Nava, also known as Daniel Fierro,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-98-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hugo Campos-Nava

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Campos-Nava has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-11206 Document: 00511205835 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
No. 09-11206

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 09-11206 Document: 00511205835 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
EX PARTE Julia SHIRAZIFARD

CR-15-1089

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO: 18-PDB-080

NO. 2019-OB-0289

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Leave to appeal denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Tom Djokovich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hinds, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 12, 2004


/s/ Tom Djokovich
-----------------------
Tom Djokovich,
President, Acting CFO, & Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001039797
<NAME> GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,589,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,471,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        755,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     660,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,471,364
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,597
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,949
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64


</TABLE>
Tony Lamar SMITH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3434

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40294

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAZARO HUMBERTO MINTO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-146-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 20, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Lazaro Humberto Minto has filed

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JAMES EDWARD DANIELS, §

§ 

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1739-M

§ ECF

DALLAS COUNTY, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, regarding Defendant Dallas County Hospital

District’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment. The District Court reviewed the proposed

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Dallas County

Hospital District’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment is therefore GRANTED.

SO ORDERED this 16 day of April, 2008. th

_________________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 17

- B G

- 534

IN RE: ALECIA SCHMUHL,

Respondent. Board Docket No. 17

- BD

- 049 Bar Registration No. 994974 DDN: 293

- 16

BEFORE: Beckwith and Easterly, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, S enior Judge.

O R D E R (FILED

– October 26, 2017)

On consideration of the affidavit of Alecia Schmuhl, wherein she consents to

disbarment from the bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of

the Rules of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and it appearing that this court issued an order temporar ily suspending respondent

f rom the practice of law in the District of Columbia, based on a reciprocal proceeding before the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoking the respondent’s license to practice law, it is this 26 th day of October 2017,

ORDE RED that the said Alecia Schmuhl is hereby disbarred by consent, effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files her affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the reciprocal matter pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 11 (d) is hereby dismissed.

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the co urt or upon written consent of the respondent,The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman

of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving

h er notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 a nd 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply

therewith.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 23.1







               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 28, 2000 accompanying the financial
statements of 800 Travel Systems, Inc. that is included in the Company's Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of 800
Travel Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-68973, effective December 15,
1998 and File No. 333-78745, effective May 19, 1999).

/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Tampa, Florida
February 28, 2000
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Enterra Energy Trust (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John Kalman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John KalmanJohn Kalman
Chief Financial Officer
July 14, 2005
EX PARTE Dramaine B. CHISM

CR-17-0098

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 13, 2017

Transferred to Shelby Cir. Ct.
Trenton HUNT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 02, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
NATIONAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC., Petitioner, v. GC FINANCING GROUP, LLC, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-2587

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
(LOGO)
BANKAMERICA




                              REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

We,  as  members  of  management  of Bank of  America,  FSB (the  Company),  are
responsible for complying with the minimum  servicing  standards as set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's UNFORM SINGLE ATTESTTION  PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS  (USAP).  We are also  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining effective internal control over compliance with those standards.  We
have  performed  an  evaluation  of the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum
servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1997 and for the
year then ended. Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended
December 31, 1997,  the Company  complied,  in all material  respects,  with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  the Company,  had in effect  fidelity  bond and
errors and  omissions  policies in the amounts of $200  million and $70 million,
respectively.


Date: MARCH 17, 1998


                                                /s/Donald J. Atkins
                                                Donald J. Artkins
                                                Senior Vice President
                                                National Servicing Director



BankAmerica Mortgage. A Division of Bank of America. FSB
P.O. Box 26388 Richmond, VA 23260-6388