alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                              Jurisdiction of       Percentage
Subsidiary                                                                     Incorporation           Owned
----------                                                                     -------------           -----
<S>                                                                            <C>                   <C>
2nd City Land Owners Partnership                                               Florida                   100%
Corpus Christi Acquisition LLC, which does business as                         Delaware                  100%
         CalAllen Regional Cancer Center
FROG/Palatka Acquisition Corp.                                                 Delaware                  100%
Jaxpet/Positech, L.L.C.                                                        Florida                    80%
Mica Flo I, Inc.                                                               California                100%
Mica Flo II, Inc.                                                              Delaware                  100%
OnCure Technologies Corp.                                                      Florida                   100%
Park South Radiation Oncology Center, Ltd., which does business as             Florida                    50%
         Radiation Oncology Center of Bradenton
Radiation Oncology Management Services Corporation                             Delaware                  100%
U.S. Cancer Care, Inc.                                                         Delaware                  100%
USCC Acquisition Corp., which does business as                                 Delaware                  100%
         Valley Regional Cancer Center
         Sonora Cancer Center
         Turlock Regional Cancer Center
USCC Florida Acquisition Corporation, which does business as                   Delaware                  100%
         Florida Radiation Oncology Group
USCC Healthcare Management Corp., which does business as                       California                100%
         St. Teresa Comprehensive Care Center
         East Bay Regional Cancer Center

</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 94 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the work opportunity 

tax credit with respect to hiring veterans who are receiving educational 

assistance under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

or Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2021 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CRAMER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

DAINES, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

the work opportunity tax credit with respect to hiring 

veterans who are receiving educational assistance under 

laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

or Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire Student Veterans 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 94 IS

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT FOR HIRING VET2 ERANS RECEIVING EDUCATIONAL ASSIST3 ANCE UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE 

4 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OR DE5 FENSE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(3)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ 

8 at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period at the 

9 end of clause (iv) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at 

10 the end the following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(v) attending an educational institu12 tion by means of educational assistance 

13 provided under chapter 30, 31, 32, 33, or 

14 34 of title 38, United States Code, or 

15 chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 10, United 

16 States Code.’’. 

17 (b) MODIFICATION OF MINIMUM EMPLOYMENT PE18 RIOD.—Section 51(i)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 

19 of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than a qualified 

20 veteran described in subsection (d)(3)(A)(v))’’ after ‘‘In 

21 the case of an individual’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

24 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
NEW ORLEANS BULLDOG SOCIETY v. LOUISIANA SOCIETY FOR the PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0372

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Julie Mirman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
  /s/
      Julie MirmanJulie
      Mirman
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  August
      19, 2009
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7103** 

ANGELO HAM , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

DARLINGTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE; CALVIN JACKSON; TIM ROBERTSON; JOHN MCLEOD; JAY HODGE; SHERRIE BAUGH; WILL ROGERS; KERNARD REDMOND , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cv
- 01150

- JMC )

Submitted : September 11 , 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Angelo B. Ham appe als the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by th e district court. Ham v. Darlington Cnty. Sheriffs Office , No. 4:11

- cv
- 01150

- JMC (D.S.C.
June 14, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 99.5
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
 st
 (signed Pierre Rougeau)Pierre RougeauSenior Vice-President, Corporate Development andChief Financial OfficerAbitibi-Consolidated Inc.
# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ APPLE INC., A CALIFO RNIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A KOREAN CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNIC ATIONS AMERICA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2014

- 1802

______________________ Appeal from the United Sta tes District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:12

- cv

- 00630

- LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

______________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARI NG EN BANC

______________________

Before P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE , and R EYNA , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

.APPLE INC

. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO ., LTD

. 2

O R D E R
Appell ees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court an d filed by appellant Apple, Inc

. The petition and

response w ere referred to t he panel that heard the appeal

.
IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1) Samsung’s petition for rehearing is granted by a majority of the panel for the limited purpose of modifying the pr eviously filed majority opinion. P age 17 of the original opini on reads: “ Apple did not establish that that these features were the exclusive or significant driver of cu stomer demand, which certainly would have weighed more heavily in its favor. We conclude that this factor weighs in favor o f granting Apple’s injunction. ” The corrected opinion read s :
Apple did not establish that these features were the exclusive driver of customer d emand, which certainly would have weighed more heavily in its favor. Apple did, however, show that “a patented fe ature is one o f several features that cause consumers to make their purchasing dec isions.” Apple III , 735 F.3d at 1364. We conclude that this factor weighs in favor of granting Apple’s injunction.

The dissenting opinion was also amended. Samsung’s petition is denie d in all other respects.

2) The prior opinions in this appeal, which issued on September 17, 2015, and were reported at Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd. , 801 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2015) , are withdrawn and replaced with the revised opinions accompanying this order.APPLE INC

. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO ., LTD

. 3

F OR THE C OURT

December 1 6 , 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Julie Mirman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.






/s/
      Julie MirmanJulie
      Mirman
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                  August
      12, 2008
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 12, 2005



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs IIChief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.



21
Case 5:05-cr-00083-C Document 109 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID 388
 

 Case 5:05-cr-00083-C Document 109 Filed 09/23/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID 389
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

      RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Thomas A. Vento, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Prudential Bancorp,
Inc. of Pennsylvania (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2006               /S/ THOMAS A. VENTO
                                      ---------------------------------------

                                      THOMAS A. VENTO
                                      PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 19 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 19

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
of the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of the 
                      Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 2021

   Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Cotton) submitted the 
  following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
of the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of the 
                      Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on November 10, 
2021, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the 100th 
anniversary of the dedication of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

SEC. 2. PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE CEREMONY.

    Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019093EN.01000901.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 January 2019 — George Haswani v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-313/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Admissibility - Procedure for modifying the application - Need to modify the pleas in law and arguments - Restrictive measures adopted against the Syrian Arab Republic - List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name))

(2019/C 93/10)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: George Haswani (represented by: G. Karouni, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Sikora-Kalėda and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: L. Havas and R. Tricot, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 22 March 2017, Haswani v Council (T-231/15, not published, EU:T:2017:200); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 22 March 2017, Haswani v Council (T-231/15, not published, EU:T:2017:200);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the costs to be reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the costs to be reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---
Case 3:06-cv-00104-L Document 65 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 478
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00104-L Document 65 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 479
# FBI

- /jaxbeach-shootings
- hillcresthighschool
- AlabamaAGExplosion
- kc_superbowl_parade
- traumanotification Alias to VSD training on how to provide trauma notifications with professionalism, dignity, and compassion
- tips.fbi.gov
- tipshatecrime
- PrestonLord
- tampashooting
- LewistonTips_divrt
- LewistonTips
- 14thstreetshooting
- huguenotgraduation
- hollywoodbeachmemorialdayshooting
- cttakeovertips
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





By: /s/ William E. ChadyWilliam E. ChadyChief Financial Officer Dated: December 17, 2013.