alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 14, 2008 /s/Cosmo Palmieri     Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**














**Certification
      of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**














In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Sockeye Seafood Group,
      Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Knapfel, Principal Accounting Officer
      of
      Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      the
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.







Dated:
      November 8, 2006      /s/
      David
      F. Knapfel




By:
      David
      F. Knapfel, Principal Accounting
      Officer of Registrant
Eber ROBLERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-02496-M Document 5 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 14
Steven A. MCLEOD, DOC #924820, Appellant, v. Ashley MOODY, as Attorney General for the State of Florida and Andrew Warren, State Attorney, 13th Judicial Circuit, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-3923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019

Steven A. McLeod, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katie Salemi Ashby, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Ashley Moody, Attorney General.

No appearance for remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Executive Officer






January
      15, 2007








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal, Chief
      Financial Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Financial Officer




January
      15, 2007
Dane Matthew WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3084

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

Dane M. White, Avon Park, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Ciklin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy M
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2005
/s/ Robert E. Swanson
Robert E. Swanson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-13-2012

Silvia Moreno Garcia v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 10-1311

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Silvia Moreno Garcia v. Atty Gen USA" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 1485.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/1485
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 10-1311

_____________

SILVIA MORENO GARCIA; 

CLAUDIA MORENO GARCIA,

 Petitioners

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

 Respondent

_____________

On Petition for Review from an

Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board Nos. A094-783-360 & A094-783-359)

Immigration Judge: Henry S. Dogin

______________

Argued June 21, 2011

Before: HARDIMAN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges

and RESTANI *Judge.

__________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

__________________

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed 

November 28, 2011, be amended as follows:

Page 14 of the Slip Opinion, the sentence which read:

 

*The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of International 

Trade, sitting by designation.
2

She therefore shares a “common, immutable characteristic” with other 

civilian witnesses who have the “shared past experience” of assisting law 

enforcement against violent gangs that threaten communities in Central 

America.

shall read:

She therefore shares a “common, immutable characteristic” with other 

civilian witnesses who have the “shared past experience” of assisting law 

enforcement against violent gangs that threaten communities in Guatemala.

This amendment does not change the date of filing, November 28, 2011.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Thomas M. Hardiman

Circuit Judge

DATED: January 13, 2012

Smw/cc: Rosa H. Soy, Esq.

Yedidya Cohen, Esq.
A.D., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange                Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition                and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                                                        |                                  |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                                   |                             |
| Date: December              28, 2007 | By:                                                                               | /s/ *Tom              Djokovich* |
|                                      | Name: Tom                DjokovichTitle: Chief                  Executive Officer |
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PokerTek, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark D. Roberson,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:
                May 15, 2008/s/ Mark
                D. RobersonMark
                D. RobersonChief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  May 11, 2010 By: /s/ Ding Lieping  Ding Lieping, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99(b)



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Form 10-KSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December31, 2002, I, Richard I Linhart , Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


 /s/ Richard I Linhart
-----------------------------------------------------
Richard I Linhart
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Company's
form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1997 filed March 31, 1998 with
Securities and Exchange Commission and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          31,453
<SECURITIES>                                     9,380
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                        78
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,038
<PP&E>                                          16,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,641
<BONDS>                                            661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,923
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,903
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    617
<INCOME-TAX>                                        28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

J.P. WASHINGTON, ID # 1163427, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-1932-N

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED March 22, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01932-N Document 44 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 266
Jeffrey Jamar JACKSON v. STATE

CR-16-1125

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 30, 2017

Reh. denied.
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 17 PageID 2
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 3 of 17 PageID 3
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 4 of 17 PageID 4
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 5 of 17 PageID 5
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 6 of 17 PageID 6
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 7 of 17 PageID 7
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 8 of 17 PageID 8
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 9 of 17 PageID 9
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 10 of 17 PageID 10
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 11 of 17 PageID 11
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 12 of 17 PageID 12
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 13 of 17 PageID 13
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 14 of 17 PageID 14
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 15 of 17 PageID 15
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 16 of 17 PageID 16
Case 3:06-cv-00153-N Document 1 Filed 01/24/06 Page 17 of 17 PageID 17
Tymiller D. NEWTON, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Tanicia P. Oliver, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 28, 2019

Carlton Pierce, of Carlton Pierce, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

ORFINGER, HARRIS, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
20
21
22
23
24
Kenneth S. Apfel has been appointed to serve as Commissioner of Social

*

Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

43(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3481

___________

Ralph E. Perkins, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 1, 1998

 Filed: July 6, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ralph E. Perkins, who sought disability insurance benefits and supplemental

security income based primarily on depression and related symptoms, appeals the
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

district court&s grant of summary judgment affirming the Social Security

1

Commissioner&s decision to deny Perkins&s applications for benefits. On appeal,

Perkins argues the administrative law judge did not fully consider various pieces of

evidence of record, and he submitted a number of new documents related to his medical

conditions. 

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties& briefs, we affirm the

judgment of the district court because we conclude that the administrative findings are

supported by substantial evidence. See Piepgras v. Chater, 76 F.3d 233, 236 (8th Cir.

1996). We also conclude that the medical opinions and other documents submitted by

Perkins on appeal, to the extent such material was not already considered during the

administrative proceedings, do not establish cause to remand, but may be used to

support a new application for benefits. See Jones v. Callahan, 122 F.3d 1148, 1154

(8th Cir. 1997).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
C.R.R. v. P.B.M. and J.M.

2160530

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
September 24, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALEJANDRO MORALES CALLES, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00696-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT FO R THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21-0338, DA 21-0339 IN THE MATTER OF: A.J.S. AND A.J.S., Youths In Need Of Care. ORDER Upon consideration of Mother a nd Appellant’s Motion To Consoli date Cases, and with good cause shown , it is hereby ORDERED that the abovecaptioned cases will be consolidat ed for purposes of appeal und er Cause No. DA 21-0338.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 20 2021

08/20/2021