alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos.
333-47570, 333-93529 and 333-39176 on Forms S-3 and Nos. 333-92049 and 333-42590
on Form S-8 of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports
dated January 23, 2002 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of XM
Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and
2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001, and related schedule, which reports appear in the December
31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and
subsidiaries.

Our reports, dated January 23, 2002, contain an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company is dependent upon additional debt or equity financing,
which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

                                               /s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, VA
March 18, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANDRE PATRICK KIZZEE, )

a.k.a. Dosier Perkins, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-2131-K

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, )

Director, Texas Department of )

Criminal Justice, Correctional )

Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any

objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 25 day of September, 2006. th

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02131-K Document 5 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 71
# C_2019255EN.01000501.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 — VM Vermögens-Management GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH

(Case C-653/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 - Invalidity proceedings - Word mark Vermögensmanufaktur - Declaration of invalidity - Right to a fair hearing - Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Retrospectivity - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Statement of reasons for judgments)

(2019/C 255/06)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: VM Vermögens-Management GmbH (represented by: T. Dolde and P. Homann, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent), DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders VM Vermögens-Management GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders VM Vermögens-Management GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60049 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GENE ARMOND BERTHIAUME, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95CR40LN-2

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gene Berthiaume appeals his sentence for bank robbery, contending that the two-level enhancement in his base offense level for obstruction of justice violates double jeopardy. Our review of the record and the briefs of the parties convinces us that double jeopardy is not implicated. Berthiaume’s indictment on the escape-from-custody offense cannot constitute former jeopardy barring sentencing for the instant bank-robberyNo. 96-60049 - 2 - offense because, at the time he pleaded guilty to the bank robbery charges and was sentenced therefor, Berthiaume had not been tried for escape. See Serfass v. United States , 420 U.S. 377, 390-91 (1975). Thus, double jeopardy is not implicated. Berthiaume’s sentence is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Case 4:05-cv-00434-A Document 4 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 7

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 7

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 7

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 7

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 5 of 7

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 6 of 7

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-16   Filed 12/14/17   Page 7 of 7
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Amarin Corporation plc (the “Company”)
on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard A.B. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



	 	1.	 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
	 
	 	2.	 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.




	/s/ RICHARD A. B. STEWART
	

	Richard A.B. Stewart

Chief Executive Officer

	 
	Date: July 31, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1285 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1109, K2025-1108.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00934 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105257 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Ten of our report dated February 19, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Hartford Life Insurance Company, and of our report dated
February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of Hartford Life
Insurance Company Separate Account Ten, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in
such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
July 31, 2003
Victor MALDONADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Matthew Funderburk, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, WALLIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-106043, 333-115137, 333-125918, 333-139074, 333-148198 and 333-149411) of FormFactor, Inc. of our report
dated February 24, 2010 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San
Jose, California
February 24, 2010

---



QuickLinks
Darrell Leon WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2332

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 14 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.14

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
     United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
  Protection Agency relating to ``Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission 
    Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency relating to ``Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for 
New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review'' (85 Fed. Reg. 57018 
(September 14, 2020)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case 3:05-cv-01924-K Document 1 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:05-cv-01924-K Document 1 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
Case 3:05-cv-01924-K Document 1 Filed 09/28/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
Case 3:05-cv-01924-K Document 1 Filed 09/28/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
Case 3:05-cv-01924-K Document 1 Filed 09/28/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
Case 3:05-cv-01924-K Document 1 Filed 09/28/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
Anthony Terrell EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-4010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

GREGORY G. EBERHARDT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-163-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

September 1, 2006 (Doc. 22). Neither party has filed objections within the period specified in 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

WHEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

Dated September 22, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00163-C Document 23 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 170
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jump'n Jax, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Lane S. Clissold, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/   LANE S. CLISSOLD
-----------------------
Lane S. Clissold
Chief Executive Officer
November 2, 2005


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form
10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. LAMAR OGELSBY, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 85 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 8th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
D.A.S. v. CULLMAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161002

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 16, 2018

Affirmed.
Lorenzo Tranard JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             49,065
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,390,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (18,940)
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,725,531
<PP&E>                                            271,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                    213,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,516,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,400,584
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           19,680
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,096,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,516,459
<SALES>                                         7,513,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,513,490
<CGS>                                           4,463,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,662,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 57,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,816,580
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,816,580
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,816,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01638]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 24, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 13, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
596 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1113, K2025-1112.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-01638 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Case 3:05-cv-02516-BD Document 1-2 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CR-0293-H

§ NO. 3-06-CV-1039-H

§

MATTHEW HARVEY, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2006.

________________________________

BAREFOOT SANDERS, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00293-B Document 33 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 81
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                   Independent Auditors' Report on Schedule
                   ----------------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
TSI International Software Ltd.


Under date of February 4, 1998, we reported on the balance sheets of TSI
International Software Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1997,
and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, as
contained in the 1997 annual report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits
of the aforementioned financial statements, we also audited the related
financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index under Item
14(A)2 of this document. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement scheduled based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly,
in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
February 4, 1998
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-51035

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TAVICHE MARQUISE GRIMES, also known as Taviche M. Grimes,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-97-CR-63-1-S

--------------------

October 20, 1999

Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Taviche Marquise Grimes

has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Grimes and

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Grimes has responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review

of the brief, the record, and Grimes’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, Grimes’s court-appointed

attorney’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorney is excused

from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 
No. 

-2-

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2
# ECAP

Select the images of suspects to display more information.

- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JOHN DOE 47 
- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JANE DOE 46 
- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JOHN DOE 41 
- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JOHN DOE 40 
- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JANE DOE 39 
- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JANE DOE 36 
- UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL - JANE DOE 37 
- Seeking Information Collage 
- SEEKING INFORMATION 
- UNKNOWN SUSPECT  -  JOHN DOE 5 
- UNKNOWN SUSPECT  -  JOHN DOE 19 
- UNKNOWN SUSPECT -  JOHN DOE 8 
- UNKNOWN SUSPECT  -  JOHN DOE 17 
- UNKNOWN SUSPECT  -  JOHN DOE 13
Marquis BLOUNT v. STATE

CR-16-0647

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Edwin George SCHONFELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 8, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED.
Cynthia SIMONEAUX, et al. v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2019-CC-0360

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Granted. See Order Attached.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.