alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2025 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. 

FLEISCHMANN, Mr. ESTES, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. 

BALDERSON, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Ms. FOXX, Mr. ROSE, Mr. BACON, 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. FEENSTRA, Mr. HARRIGAN, 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mrs. CAMMACK, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. 

FINSTAD, Mr. FULCHER, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. 

YAKYM, Mr. GUEST, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mrs. FISCHBACH, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Ms. LETLOW, Mr. THOMPSON of 

Pennsylvania, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mrs. HOUCHIN, Mr. FRY, Mr. EZELL, 

Mr. OGLES, Mr. CISCOMANI, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. 

JACKSON of Texas, Mr. MANN, Mr. ISSA, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. AMODEI of 

Nevada, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. PERRY, Mr. HUIZENGA, Ms. DE LA

CRUZ, Mr. TIMMONS, Mr. ALFORD, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. FLOOD, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mr. GARBARINO, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mrs. BICE, 

Mr. LALOTA, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. HILL of Arkansas, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, 

Mr. LAWLER, Mr. MILLER of Ohio, and Mr. SCHMIDT) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of nine justices. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 28 IH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 

10 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

11 ‘‘The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 

12 composed of nine justices.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 3:05-cv-00940-K Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77
Alfonso CASICA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3192

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 18, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

Affirmed.
Suzanne M. HONIGMAN, Appellant, v. Aaron HONIGMAN, AS TRUSTEE OF the DAN HONIGMAN REVOCABLE TRUST, Jeffrey Skatoff, as Trustee ad litem, and Stacy Meschke, Appellees.

No. 4D18-871

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:03-cv-02133-G Document 22 Filed 07/26/04 Page 1 of 3 PageID 89
Case 3:03-cv-02133-G Document 22 Filed 07/26/04 Page 2 of 3 PageID 90
Case 3:03-cv-02133-G Document 22 Filed 07/26/04 Page 3 of 3 PageID 91
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

     Dr. F. Patrick Smith, the Chief Executive Officer and James E. Condon, the
Chief Financial Officer of Tekni-Plex, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Tekni-Plex, Inc.


Date: September 28, 2006                /s/ F. Patrick Smith
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Dr. F. Patrick Smith
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ James E. Condon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: James E. Condon
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       66
Patrick Jon RAYHA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 20, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

2D19-816 is dismissed as a duplicate of 2D19-776, which was initiated by the notice of appeal filed by Attorney Matthew Wells. Appellant's pro se motion to stay is stricken because Appellant is represented by counsel.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00873]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1247 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1064, K2025-1063.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00873 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Marcus RICHARDSON

No. 2018-KH-0353

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final.

*592Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.
EX PARTE Rashad C. LEE

CR-16-1218

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARVIN L. MALONE )

)

v. ) 3-05-CV-1990-D

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division ) 

O R D E R

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the court finds that the findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the

findings and conclusions of the court.

Signed November 14, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01990-D Document 9 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 88
Dreshawn Tony PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4020

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 7, 2007By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2007
EX PARTE Marcus O. TATE

CR-16-1265

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

s0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140381 & (19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140381 COA: 293550 Wayne CC: 93-002544 GARY MITCHELL BRAYBOY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 3, 2009 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502( G). The motion to hold appeal in abeyance is DENIED.

K ELLY

, C.J., not participating because she se rved on the Court of Appeals panel
that affirmed the defendant’s convictions on direct appeal.
Aron ARIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1058

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
LOUISIANA SCRAP METAL RECYCLING, et al. v. LARSEN INTERMODAL SERVICES, INC.

18-588 18-587

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 7, 2019

Julius Willis Grubbs, Jr., J. P. D'Albor, Haik, Minvielle & Grubbs, 1017 E. Dale St., New Iberia, LA 70560, Telephone: (337) 365-5486, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Larsen Intermodal Services, Inc.

Dennis Ray Stevens, Gibbens & Stevens, 222 West St. Peter, New Iberia, LA 70560, Telephone: (337) 367-8451, COUNSEL FOR: Plaintiffs/Appellants - The Hartford Fire Insurance Company and Louisiana Scrap Metal Recycling

Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Shannon J. Gremillion, and Van H. Kyzar, Judges.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of *Melvin Guidry, et al. v. ABC Trucking Company, et al.* , 18-587 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/19), --- So.3d ----, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to plaintiffs/appellants, Louisiana Scrap Metal Recycling *944and The Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

**AFFIRMED** .
# C_2018455EN.01000902.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 October 2018 — Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA v European Commission

(Case C-145/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Dumping - Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China or consigned from Malaysia - Infringement of the Anti-Dumping Agreement concluded in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Repeal of definitive anti-dumping duties already collected - Non-retroactive effect - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Person individually concerned - Regulatory act that does not entail implementing measures))

(2018/C 455/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA (represented by: C. Cañizares Pacheco, E. Tejedor de la Fuente and A. Monreal Lasheras, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

---
Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 13 PageID 69
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 13 PageID 70
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 3 of 13 PageID 71
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 4 of 13 PageID 72
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 5 of 13 PageID 73
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 6 of 13 PageID 74
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 7 of 13 PageID 75
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 8 of 13 PageID 76
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 9 of 13 PageID 77
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 10 of 13 PageID 78
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 11 of 13 PageID 79
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 12 of 13 PageID 80
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00068-C Document 24 Filed 08/25/05 Page 13 of 13 PageID 81
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 99 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 99

To require a particular jury instruction in Federal civil actions that 
   include a claim for damages based on negligence arising from the 
                        transmission of COVID19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a particular jury instruction in Federal civil actions that 
   include a claim for damages based on negligence arising from the 
                        transmission of COVID19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Businesses From Frivolous 
COVID Lawsuits Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. JURY INSTRUCTION IN FEDERAL CIVIL ACTIONS THAT INCLUDE A CLAIM 
              ALLEGING NEGLIGENCE ARISING FROM THE TRANSMISSION OF 
              COVID-19.

    In a Federal civil action that includes a claim alleging negligence 
arising from the transmission of COVID-19 and a request for damages, 
the court shall instruct a jury that--
            (1) the liability standard is the reasonable person 
        standard,
            (2) a person is negligent if the person either does 
        something that a reasonably careful person would not do in the 
        same situation, or fails to do something that a reasonably 
        careful person would do, in the same situation,
            (3) the act of opening a business, by itself, shall be 
        considered to be reasonable as a matter of law, and
            (4) the negligence may not be found solely on the basis of 
        holding oneself open for business.
                                 <all>
```
Khalaf MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal                               ( print page 4812)                            Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 594 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1102, K2025-1101.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00924 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elena Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: November 19, 2010











By: /s/ Elena Pochapski


Elena Pochapski


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- Page Solo

TRM/chr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

DAVID CORNWALL §

§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-797-Y

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of Social Security §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Court has made an independent review of the following matters

in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States magistrate judge filed on

October 25, 2005; and

3. Plaintiff's objections to the proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the United States

magistrate judge filed on November 15, 2005.

Plaintiff makes the same arguments in his objections that were

addressed in detail in the magistrate judge's findings. This Court,

after de novo review, concludes that the Commissioner's decision

should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's

findings. 

It is ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation

of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED. The

decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 16, 2005.

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00797-Y Document 27 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 183
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 6032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01156]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. C2024-13; Presiding Officer's Ruling No. 7]

Complaint

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission is providing notice that a prehearing 
videoconference is being rescheduled.

DATES: Live WebEx Videoconference: January 23, 2025, at 10 a.m., 
eastern daylight time, virtual.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Procedural Schedule

    A prehearing videoconference is currently scheduled to be conducted 
before the Presiding Officer on January 16, 2025, at 10 a.m. Due to the 
inability of one of the participants to attend, the prehearing 
videoconference will be rescheduled to Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 
10 a.m.

II. Ruling

    1. The prehearing videoconference, scheduled for Thursday, January 
16, 2025, is hereby rescheduled to Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 10 
a.m..
    2. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this ruling (or 
abstract thereof) in the Federal Register.

Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01156 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
```