1

Adam Wolek (pro hac vice) 

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3713 

Tel: 312.836.4063 

Fax: 312.966.8598 

awolek@taftlaw.com 

DAVID A. MAKMAN (SBN 178195)

david@makmanlaw.com

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. MAKMAN 

655 Mariner’s Island Blvd, Suite 306 

San Mateo, CA 94404 

Telephone: (650) 242-1560 

Facsimile: (408) 716-3052 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Parkridge Ltd. and Mabel Mak 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

On Behalf of PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong 

Kong corporation, by Mabel Mak, and MABEL 

MAK, an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, and 

PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-07387 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

Date: July 12, 2018 

Time: N/A 

Dept.: N/A 

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

The Parties respectfully submit the following Joint Status Report pursuant to Docket 24 in the 

above captioned case. The above-captioned case is stayed pursuant to the April 18, 2017 Order. Dkt. 

24, at 9-10. The Parties are participating in arbitration pursuant to the Court’s Order, which is 

currently pending. 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 66 Filed 07/12/18 Page 1 of 4
2

Defendants’ Statement Only 

On April 13, 2018, the Court ordered Randy Dobson, California Management Group a/k/a 

CMG.Asia, California Fitness & Yoga Centers, F8 Vietnam Company Limited, and Boon Global 

Limited (the “Additional Cross-Respondents) “to join the related arbitration for this case in order that 

the arbitrator may decide whether to allow counterclaims against them proceed.” On April 25, 2018, 

the Arbitrator issued an order allowing the counterclaims against the Additional Cross-Respondents 

to proceed, and they have been added as parties to the arbitration. 

Plaintiffs’ Statement Only 

 Plaintiffs believe that Defendants’ separate statements and characterizations are unnecessary, 

and are nevertheless inaccurate and incomplete. While Defendants state that the Arbitrator’s April 

25, 2018 order “allow[ed] the counterclaims . . . to proceed,” the Arbitrator actually ruled that the 

Additional Cross-Respondents are entitled to formal notice and an opportunity to raise jurisdictional 

objections and defenses. Indeed, rather than Defendants’ counterclaims simply proceeding, motions 

to dismiss the pleadings are calendared in the case schedule and are being briefed, with the last 

deadline being July 27, 2018. 

DATED: July 12, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

By: s/ Adam Wolek 

Adam Wolek (pro hac vice) 

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3713 

Tel: 312.836.4063 

Fax: 312.966.8598 

awolek@taftlaw.com 

David A. Makman, SBN 178195 

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. MAKMAN 

david@makmanlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Parkridge Ltd. & Mabel 

Mak 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 66 Filed 07/12/18 Page 2 of 4
3

DATED: July 12, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP 

By: _s/ Ethan Solove_________________ 

Ethan G. Solove, Esq. 

ESolove@structurelaw.com 

Attorneys for DEFENDANTS 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 66 Filed 07/12/18 Page 3 of 4
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that, on July 12, 2018, he caused this document to be electronically 

filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of filing to 

counsel of record for each party. 

Dated: July 12, 2018 Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

 

By:/s/ Adam Wolek 

 Adam Wolek 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 66 Filed 07/12/18 Page 4 of 4