alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 183 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 482
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 183 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 483
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 183 Filed 09/15/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 484
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 183 Filed 09/15/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 485
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 183 Filed 09/15/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 486
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 183 Filed 09/15/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 487
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pegasus Air Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric R.
Boyer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
27th day of July, 2005.



/s/ Eric R. Boyer
-------------------------------
Eric R. Boyer
Treasurer and Secretary
Pegasus Air Group, Inc.
NO. 07-06-0332-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JUNE 8, 2007

______________________________

DR. NYLA PTOMEY, APPELLANT

V.

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 99 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; TH

NO. 2003-523,777; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. SOWDER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Nyla Ptomey perfected appeal from a summary judgment in favor of

Texas Tech University on her claims of employment discrimination and retaliation. The

clerk’s record was filed October 17, 2006. This Court granted motions to extend the time

for filing appellant’s brief on November 28, 2006 and January 10, 2007. Appellant’s third

motion for extension of time became moot on the filing of a twelve-volume supplemental

clerk’s record on April 2, 2007. We granted appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time

on May 7, 2007 and her original brief was received May 11, 2007. By letter dated May 16,
2

2007, we notified appellant her brief did not substantially comply with Rules of Appellate

Procedure 9 and 38. Notably, no copy of the brief was signed, or contained a prayer for

relief or certificate of service. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.1(a), 9.5(e), 38.1(i). Appellant was

directed to file a corrected brief on or before Tuesday, May 29, 2007, and advised the

failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. No brief or other response has

been received. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply

with a directive of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) & (c).

Per Curiam
STATE of Louisiana v. Darrell TAYLOR

NO. 2018-KO-1914

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

*201Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Ex Parte: Carlos Orozco

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 127

- CR

Appeal from the

384 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20000D05432

- 384

- 1 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right

of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the

trial court clerk within twenty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall

p repare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later

than July 6

, 2017.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of June , 2017

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., R odriguez and Palafox

, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, James W. Rogers,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 16, 2005                |     |
|----------------------------------------|----------|
|                                   |     |
| James W. Rogers                        |     |
| *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* | * * |

 

----
AMENDMENT TO SENIOR SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTES



  Exhibit 10.1 
   
 AMENDMENT 
  
 Lionbridge Technologies Holdings, B.V. (“LTBV”) and Morgan Stanley Venture Capital Fund II Annex, L.P. and Morgan Stanley Venture Investors
Annex, L.P., (collectively, “Morgan”), amend the Senior Subordinated Promissory Note issued by LTBV to Morgan on March 9, 1999 by changing the payment date reflected therein to August 12, 2003. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed by their respective officers or duly authorized representatives as of the 29th day of July, 2003. 
  
 MORGAN STANLEY VENTURE CAPITAL FUND II ANNEX, L.P. 
  
 By: Morgan Stanley Venture Partners II, L.P., its General Partner 
  
 By: Morgan Stanley Venture Capital II, Inc., its Managing General Partner 
  
 By: /s/ Debra Abramovitz 
  
 MORGAN STANLEY VENTURE INVESTORS ANNEX, L.P. 
  
 By: Morgan Stanley Venture Partners II, L.P., its General Partner

  
 By: Morgan Stanley Venture Capital II, Inc., its Managing
General Partner 
  
 By: /s/ Debra Abramovitz 

 
 LIONBRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, B.V. 
  
 By: /s/ David W. Dahn 
  

 1
Kenneth H. LOBELL v. Cindy Ann Rosenberg DENN, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0357

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

*1273Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Lobrano.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Lobrano.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 957 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 957

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that certain 
medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs have physical 
    locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PERIODS DURING WHICH ANY INDIVIDUAL MAY 
              DISPOSE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES MEDICATIONS AT 
              FACILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 3009 of the Johnny Isakson and David P. Roe, M.D. Veterans 
Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020 (Public Law 116-315; 
38 U.S.C. 8110 note) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections 
        (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection (b):
    ``(b) Designation of Periods for Any Individual to Dispose of 
Medication.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall designate periods 
        during which any individual may dispose of controlled 
        substances medications at a covered Department medical 
        facility.
            ``(2) Public information campaigns.--The Secretary may 
        carry out public information campaigns regarding the periods 
        designated under paragraph (1).''.

            Passed the Senate April 22, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 957

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that certain 
medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs have physical 
    locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2008              
|                                     
|/s/ Michael Schmidt                  
|Michael Schmidt                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Hendrick,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Dated: November
      19, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Colin
      HendrickColin
      HendrickPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 40 PageID 1
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 40 PageID 2
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 3 of 40 PageID 3
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 4 of 40 PageID 4
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 5 of 40 PageID 5
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 6 of 40 PageID 6
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 7 of 40 PageID 7
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 8 of 40 PageID 8
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 9 of 40 PageID 9
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 10 of 40 PageID 10
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 11 of 40 PageID 11
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 12 of 40 PageID 12
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 13 of 40 PageID 13
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 14 of 40 PageID 14
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 15 of 40 PageID 15
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 16 of 40 PageID 16
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 17 of 40 PageID 17
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 18 of 40 PageID 18
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 19 of 40 PageID 19
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 20 of 40 PageID 20
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 21 of 40 PageID 21
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 22 of 40 PageID 22
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 23 of 40 PageID 23
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 24 of 40 PageID 24
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 25 of 40 PageID 25
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 26 of 40 PageID 26
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 27 of 40 PageID 27
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 28 of 40 PageID 28
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 29 of 40 PageID 29
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 30 of 40 PageID 30
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 31 of 40 PageID 31
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 32 of 40 PageID 32
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 33 of 40 PageID 33
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 34 of 40 PageID 34
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 35 of 40 PageID 35
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 36 of 40 PageID 36
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 37 of 40 PageID 37
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 38 of 40 PageID 38
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 39 of 40 PageID 39
Case 3:05-cv-01399-D Document 1 Filed 07/14/05 Page 40 of 40 PageID 40
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 15, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00240

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.L.L. III, ET AL., CHILDREN

F rom the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02373 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant’s (Mother’s) parental rights to her children

. On March 23, 2018, the trial court signed an order of termination. On April 11, 2018, Mother timely filed a notice of appeal, challenging the trial court’s order of

termination. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b) (stating notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after order of termination signed). Thereafter, the appellate record was filed and appellant’s brief was due May 14, 2018. See id. R. 38.6 (requiring appellant to file brief within 20 days after appellate record filed). Neither a brief nor a mot ion to extend time to file the brief was filed at that time. On May 24, 2018, we ordered Mother to file her brief on or before June 13, 2018. In response to our order, Mother filed a motion, requesting additional time to file her brief and

clarification of the appellate deadlines because a de novo hearing was conducted on May 3, 2018. Mother further indicates the referring court entered an order on or about June 4, 2018.

Based on the foregoing, we ORDER all appellate deadlines suspended until further order

of the court. W e further ORDER the district clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the referring court’s order relating to the de novo proceeding and any other pleadings associated with the de novo proceeding in this court on or befo re J une 25, 2018 . We further

ORDER the court reporter to file a reporter’s record from the de novo hearing in this court on or before J une 25, 2018.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this or der on all counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter responsible for the de novo hearing.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Rayna GOMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4678

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 24, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

FREDDICK LEONDRA JOHNSON, )

ID # 26664-077, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-2454-P

)

DAN JOSLIN, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 15 day of December 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02454-P Document 4 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60
EX PARTE Woodburck NOE

CR-17-0050

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 15, 2017 Reh. denied December 7, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1254 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1072, K2025-1071.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00880 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Cecelia N. KING v. Anna Belle L. NEWMAN

2160042

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, #05081644, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 06-CV-0081-B

§

DALLAS COUNTY, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case on July 11, 2006. Plaintiff filed objections on August 25, 2006, and the District Court has

made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and DENIES Plaintiff’s

motions to appoint counsel, for clarification of court filing fee order, for production and inspection,

to compel, and for temporary restraining and permanent injunction. (Docket # 14, 27, 28, 33, and

35).

SO ORDERED this 6 day of October 2006. th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00081-B Document 64 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 579