alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  I, John Michael Coombs, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive
Officer, and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Valley High
Mining Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

     4.   As the Registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including any
          consolidated subsidiary, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report, the Registrant's conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
          based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   As the Registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.

Dated: October 26, 2005                 /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                      -------------------------------
                                      John Michael Coombs,
                                      CEO, President, CFO, and
                                      Chairman of the Board
Nathan C. FLOYD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1062

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY §

COMMISSION §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ NO. 3-05-CV-1063-B 

VS. § 

 §

RENAISSANCE III ORGANIZATION §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed a motion to quash 21

subpoenas issued by Defendant Dallas African American Resource Center, formerly d/b/a

Renaissance III Organization, to former employers of the charging parties in this Title VII racial

harassment case. Each subpoena requires the production of:

[A]ny and all files, notes, papers, employment and/or personnel

records, payroll and/or earning records, insurance records, worker's

compensation records, correspondence, and any other tangible

documents[.]

(Plf. Mot., Exh. A). Plaintiff argues that the subpoenas seek irrelevant information and serve no

purpose other than to harass, oppress, and invade the privacy of the charging parties. Defendant

counters that the employment records of these individuals are reasonably calculated to lead to the

discovery of admissible evidence. The parties have briefed their respective positions in a joint status

report filed on March 29, 2006, and the motion is ripe for determination.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b) allows a party to obtain discovery "regarding any matter, not privileged,

that is relevant to a claim or defense of any party[.]" The information sought need not be admissible

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01063-B-BD Document 34 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 163
at trial "if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible

evidence." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). As the party seeking discovery, defendant must establish this

threshold burden. See Vardon Golf Co., Inc. v. BBMG Golf Ltd., 156 F.R.D. 641, 650 (N.D. Ill.

1994) ("To place the burden of proving that the evidence sought is not reasonably calculated to lead

to the discovery of admissible evidence on the opponent of discovery is to ask that party to prove

a negative. This is an unfair burden, as it would require a party to refute all possible alternative uses

of the evidence, possibly including some never imagined by the proponent."). No such showing has

been made here. In its portion of the joint status report, defendant states only "[t]hese employment

records will likely contain information which will or could affect the value of these employees'

claim." (Jt. Stat. Rep. at 2). Such a conclusory assertion, unsupported by any facts, evidence, or

citations to legal authority, amounts to nothing more than a fishing expedition and does not justify

the wholesale production of confidential employment records. Even if the discovery sought by

defendant is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, the court finds

that the privacy interests of the charging parties far outweigh any likely benefit to defendant in

obtaining the records its seeks. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(iii).

For these reasons, plaintiff's motion to quash [Doc. #29] is granted.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 30, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01063-B-BD Document 34 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 164
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

90 FR 2759, January 13, 2025.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

 Thursday, January 16, 2025, at 2:00 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 16, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., has been changed to Thursday, January 16, 2025, at 1:00 p.m.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 14, 2025.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-01298 Filed 1-14-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60049

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENE ARMOND BERTHIAUME,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95CR40LN-2

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gene Berthiaume appeals his sentence for bank robbery,

contending that the two-level enhancement in his base offense

level for obstruction of justice violates double jeopardy. 

Our review of the record and the briefs of the parties convinces

us that double jeopardy is not implicated. Berthiaume’s

indictment on the escape-from-custody offense cannot constitute

former jeopardy barring sentencing for the instant bank-robbery
No. 96-60049

- 2 -

offense because, at the time he pleaded guilty to the bank

robbery charges and was sentenced therefor, Berthiaume had not

been tried for escape. See Serfass v. United States, 420 U.S.

377, 390-91 (1975). Thus, double jeopardy is not implicated. 

Berthiaume’s sentence is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

d0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144912

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144912

COA: 307985

Wayne CC: 10-013175-FH

DALLAS JASON LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 2:05-cv-00177-J Document 9 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 133
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00177-J Document 9 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 134
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: April 4, 2008  /s/ Cosmo PalmieriChief Executive Officer
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DERRICK BRISCOE, #60259-080, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-78-L

§

DAN JOSLIN, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

This is a habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)

and an order of the court in implementation thereof, this action was referred to the United States

magistrate judge for proposed findings and recommendation. On November 15, 2006, the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, to which no

objections were filed. After making an independent review of the pleadings, file and record in this

case and the magistrate judge’s Report, the court determines that the magistrate judge’s findings

and conclusions are correct. 

Although Petitioner Briscoe has characterized his petition as one brought under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241, his petition attacks or challenges enhancements applied during his sentencing, and it should

have been brought as one pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A petition pursuant to § 2255 must be

brought in the district of the court that sentenced the petitioner. See Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 683

(5th Cir. 1997). In this case, Briscoe would have had to file his petition in the Western District of

Texas. As he has failed to do so, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain his petition, brought

pursuant to § 2241. Accordingly, the court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00078-L Document 9 Filed 01/04/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 38
Order – Page 2

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as those of the court. The court hereby

dismisses this action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. 

It is so ordered this 3rd day of January, 2007.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00078-L Document 9 Filed 01/04/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 39
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 45 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 4 PageID 584
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 45 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 4 PageID 585
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 45 Filed 03/09/06 Page 3 of 4 PageID 586
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 45 Filed 03/09/06 Page 4 of 4 PageID 587
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 133959 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133959 COA: 265071 Jackson CC: 05-000871-FH CRAIG DION RONEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

d1114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2007

Clerk
Case 3:05-cv-02510-N Document 6 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 37
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02510-N Document 6 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 38
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sheldon Goldberg,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  August 14, 2005         /s/ Sheldon Goldberg
                              ------------------------------------
                            By: Sheldon Goldberg, Chief Executive
                                Officer of Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.
Robert D. ABRAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3844

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kerrick Van TEAMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Steven E. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-106043, 333-115137, 333-125918 and 333-139074) and Form
S-3 (No. 333-132183) of FormFactor, Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2007, except for the effects of the restatement described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and
the matter described in the penultimate paragraph of Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting as to which the date is November 13, 2007, relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San
Jose, California
November 13, 2007

---



QuickLinks
Robert Bryan SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Notice of Status Conference Page 1 of 2 

Tracey L. Williams 

twilliams@pecklaw.com

Peckar & Abramson, P.C. 

8080 N. Central Expressway 

Suite 1600, LB 65 

Dallas, Texas 75206 

(214) 523-5100 Telephone 

(214) 521-4601 Facsimile 

Attorneys for M.B., I.B. and J.S. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

§ 

IN RE: MATTHEW GUY LANDGRAF, § Case No. 19-41155-elm7 

Debtor § 

 § 

M.B., I.B. AND J.S., § Chapter 7 

 Plaintiffs, § 

 § 

MATHEW GUY LANDRAF, KEVIN § Adv. Proc. No.: 23-04032-elm 

M. ROSS, TRUSTEE, FOR THE USE § 

AND BENEFIT OF MATTHEW GUY § 

LANDGRAF, KEVIN M. ROSS, § 

INDIVIDUALLY, STi FAMILY § 

HOLDINGS, LP, STi FAMILY § 

MANAGEMENT, LLC AND STi § 

REAL ESTATE, LLC § 

Defendants. § 

NOTICE OF STATUS CONFERENCE 

A Status conference via WebEx has been set in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for June 3, 2024

at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Edward L. Morris at https://us-courts.webex.com/meet/morris to 

consider status of the removed action. 

For WebEx Telephonic Only Participation/Attendance: 

Dial-In: 1.650.479.3207 

Meeting ID: 473 581 124 

Case 23-04032-elm Doc 4 Filed 12/04/23 Entered 12/04/23 15:07:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Notice of Status Conference Page 2 of 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

PECKAR & ABRAMSON, P.C. 

By: /s/ Tracey L. Williams 

 Tracey L. Williams 

 Texas Bar No. 24031954 

 twilliams@pecklaw.com

 Timothy D. Matheny 

 Texas Bar No. 24000258 

 tmatheny@pecklaw.com 

 8080 N. Central Expressway 

 Suite 1600, LB 65 

 Dallas, Texas 75206-1819 

 (214) 523-5100 Telephone 

 (214) 521-4601 Facsimile 

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 

 M.B., I.B. AND J.S. 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that on this the 4th day of December 2023, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth 

Division and emailed a copy of same on all parties and/or counsel of record. 

 /s/ Tracey L. Williams 

Tracey L. Williams 

Case 23-04032-elm Doc 4 Filed 12/04/23 Entered 12/04/23 15:07:48 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Sherry Couturier, CFO of Hammonds Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report
of Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Hammonds Industries, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  February 23, 2010


Sherry Couturier


CFO


/s/ Sherry Couturier
James Robert GALLAGHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4521

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender; and Victor D. Holder, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General; and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges his conviction for two counts of sexual battery of a child-his own biological daughter-when she was between age six or seven, and ten or eleven. We have examined in full and on the merits the four issues he raises on appeal, and find no merit in them. In addition, we find that Appellant failed to preserve his argument that the trial court erred by failing to make an express finding that the State proved by clear and convincing evidence Appellant's similar abuse of two other girls. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, and the record does not indicate that the trial court was unaware of the standard. *See**McLean v. State* , 934 So.2d 1248, 1261-62 (Fla. 2006) (requiring clear and convincing evidence of prior acts of child molestation). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert. L. WHITE

NO. 2019-KH-0089

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 1 of 19

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 19

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 2 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 3 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 4 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 5 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 6 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 7 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 8 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 9 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 10 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 11 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 12 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 13 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 14 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 15 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 16 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 17 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 18 of 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 19 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 19 of 19
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 29, 2020

a0526 

# Order

Clerk May 29, 2020

160565

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160565

COA: 349343

Mecosta CC: 03

- 005118

- FC

SHANNON LADEL KEYS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Octobe r 18, 2019

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Mecosta County

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after

the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.