alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7722

MARC S. CASON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCINTYRE, Sergeant; H. B. MURPHY,

Assistant Warden; MARK RALEY, Officer; OFFICER

BRACHEMAN; DAVID LANCASTER, Officer; DOUGLAS

FRAZEE, Officer; R. RALEY, Officer; STANLEY

RALEY, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL

SERVICES; P.H.S. MEDICAL SERVICE; MARYLAND

DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA03-1139-1-CCB)

Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc S. Cason, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Marc S. Cason, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cason v.

McIntyre, No. CA-03-1139-1-CCB (D. Md. Oct. 23, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 3:04-cv-02731-H Document 10 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
Thomas William WIESE v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES

CR-16-0735

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

1 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

This set of screenshots captures the Renewal of Radio Broadcast Station License flow in the LMS 

application.

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

2 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

3 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

4 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

5 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

6 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

7 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

8 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

9 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019 

 
Approved by OMB 

3060-0110 

See Instructions for public burden estimate 

Form 2100, Schedule 303-S – RENEWAL OF BROADCAST STATION 

LICENSE 

10 

 Form 2100, Schedule 303 

March 2019
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

ex rel. John Becker, §

§ CIVIL NO. 3:05-CV-627-L

Plaintiffs, § (Consolidated with 3:05-CV-2301-L)

§

vs. § ECF

§

TOOLS & METALS, INC., ET AL., § Judge Sam A. Lindsay

§

Defendants. §

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(i), Qui Tam Plaintiff JOHN BECKER hereby voluntarily dismisses this action,

without prejudice and without costs, as against Defendants JHW GREENTREE

CAPITAL, L.P. and ROBERT CHARTENER.

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L Document 193 Filed 10/13/08 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2818
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Thomas W. Mills, Jr. 

Thomas W. Mills, Jr.

 State Bar No. 14167500

tmills@millsandwilliams.com

MILLS & WILLIAMS, LLP

Premier Place, Suite 900

5910 North Central Expressway

Dallas, Texas 75206-5141

Tel: (214)265-9265; Fax: (214)363-3167 

and Co-Counsel

Phillip E. Benson (Pro Hac Vice)

CA Bar No. 97420

philbenson@warrenbensonlaw.com

WARREN # BENSON LAW GROUP 

620 Newport Center Dr., Suite 1100

Newport Beach, CA 92660

Tel: (952)955-3688; Fax: (952)955-5177 

Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff

John Becker

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 13 day of October, 2008, I electronically filed the forgoing th

instrument, using the ECF system of this Court. A copy of ths instrument is being provided to all

pro se parties and counsel of record either electronically or by regular United States mail, as

authorized by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2).

 /s/ Thomas W. Mills, Jr. 

THOMAS W. MILLS, JR.

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L Document 193 Filed 10/13/08 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2819
EXHIBIT 99.6
                                                                    ------------


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection  with the Annual Report of  Abitibi-Consolidated  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John
W.  Weaver,  President  & Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
      Company.


       By: /s/ John W. Weaver
            ------------------------
            John W. Weaver
            President & Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2007
Michael Aaron ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Derrick NELSON v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-00835-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 19, 2019 Closed: May 30, 2019

Certiorari - Granted
Case 3:05-cv-02168-B Document 36 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 181
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02168-B Document 36 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 182
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02168-B Document 36 Filed 03/09/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 183
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

RODNEY CHIMNEY, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-647-Y

 §

COLE JETER, Warden, §

FCI-Fort Worth, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Rodney Chimney under 28

U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

January 10, 2006; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on January 27, 2006.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Chimney’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be denied, for the

reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Chimney’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 is DENIED.

SIGNED April 11, 2006.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00647-Y Document 10 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 125
April 25, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PAUL ANTHONY WELCH, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00430-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OnCure
Technologies Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


         April 11, 2003

                                      /s/ Jeffrey A. Goffman
                                      ----------------------
                                      Jeffrey A. Goffman
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WARWICK LARONALD PLAYER )

)

V. ) 3-05-CV-2119-N

)

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SIGNED September 11, 2006.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02119-N Document 23 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 115
EXHIBIT 21

                                METALS USA, INC.
                             PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES


Affiliated Metals, L.L.C.
Allmet Building Products, L.P.
Fullerton Metals Company, Inc.
Harvey Titanium, Ltd.
i-Solutions Direct, Inc.
Independent Metals L.L.C.
Intsel Southwest Limited Partnership
Jeffreys Steel Company, Inc.
The Levinson Steel Company, L.P.
Meier Metal Servicenters, Inc.
Metals USA Management Co., L.P.
Pacific Metal Company, Inc.
Professional Metals, Inc.
Steel Service Systems, Inc.
Texas Aluminum Industries, Inc.
Uni-Steel, Inc.
Wayne Steel, Inc.
Williams Steel & Supply Co., Inc.
Wolf Brothers, L.L.C.
Christopher COLLIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JESSE A. AGUILAR, ID # 28514-180, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-0679-N

)

DAN JOSLIN, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED September 26, 2005.

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00679-N Document 7 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 106
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT CORP.


     The undersigned, being the President of,WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT CORP. (the
"Company") and being duly authorized by the Board of Directors hereby certifies
that:

     FIRST: The company is authorized to issue a total of 25,000,000 shares of
common stock, $.001 par value per share and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock
having a par value of $.001 per share. The designations, preferences,
limitations and relative rights of the shares of each class of common stock and
preferred stock shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation.

     SECOND: The foregoing amendment was authorized and adopted by resolution of
the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders owning a majority of the
issued and outstanding shares of stock of the Company pursuant to a written
consent of the shareholders in lieu of meeting on August 5, 1997. The number of
votes cast by the shareholders was sufficient for approval.

     THIRD: The effective date of this Certificate of Amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have submitted these Certificate of
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation and affirm the same as true under
penalties of perjury this 5th day of August, 1997.


 /s/  Eilat Lev
---------------------------------
EILAT LEV,  President & Secretary


FILED
97 AUG 11  AM 10:53
SECRETARY OF STATE
TALLAHASSEE  FLORIDA
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00548-CR

Wayne Denton Dickerson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY 

NO. CR2008-397, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due February 28, 2022. On counsel’s 

motions, the time for filing was extended to May 31, 2022. Appellant’s counsel has now filed a

third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the 

motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than June 30, 2022. No 

further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the 

referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on June 9, 2022.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Do Not Publish
|   |  (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |  (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                     |   |                                                       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: February 22, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Jay Needelman                                     |   |
|                     |   | Jay Needelman (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer                                    |   |
|                     |   |                                                       |   |
Rebecca Jane MILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of petition for habeas corpus is transferred to the 20th Judicial Circuit Court for Charlotte County.

MORRIS, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6343
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT PADGETT, a/k/a Snoop, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-98-48, CA-00-788-3) Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 24, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Padgett, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Annette Green, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Padgett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Padgett has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.1****NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Alan R. Spachman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Interstate Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     May 8, 2007       BY: /s/ Alan R. Spachman Alan R. Spachman