alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, George P. Christopulos, CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 2, 2007By:/s/George P. ChristopulosGeorge P. ChristopulosCEO, President, CFO and Chairman of the Board
ACCEPTED03-14-00570-CR3650067THIRD COURT OF APPEALSAUSTIN, TEXAS1/5/2015 1:52:06 PMJEFFREY D. KYLECLERKBoardCertifiedCriminalLawAndCriminalAppellateLawbyRICHARDE.WETZELATTORNEYATLAW1411WESTAVENUE,SUITE100AUSTIN,TX78701(512)469-7943TheTexasBoardofLegalSpecialization(512)474-5594-faxwetzel_law@1411west.comwww.TexasCriminalAppealsLawyer.comHeatherKellarDistrictClerk150N.SeguinAvenueSte.304NewBraunfels,TX78130January5,2015Re:StateofTexasv.EricByronCrayton,CauseNo.CR2012-225,inthe20i11DistrictCourtofComalCountyandEricByronClaytonv.StateofTexas,No.03-14-00570-CRDearClerkKellar:PursuanttoTEX.R.APP.P.34.5(c)(l),thisletterwillserveasmyofficialrequestforyoutoprepareandfileasupplementalClerk'sRecordintheabove-styledandnumberedcause.TheClerk'sRecordpreviouslyfileddoesnotcontainJudgeRobison'sfmdingsoffactandconclusionsoflawofJuly1,2014,onCrayton'smotiontosuppress.TheRegisterofActionsreflectstheywerefiledonthatdate.IneedthosefindingsandconclusionsinordertoeffectivelyrepresentMr.Craytononappeal.Thankyouforyourattentionandcooperationinthismatter.cc:CourtofAppealsACDAPresleySincerely,RichardE.WetzelAttorneyatLaw
Michael Lee JACKSON, III, DOC #Y14095, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4983

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Affirmed.
# C_2017293EN.01002101.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö, migrationsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 6 July 2017 — A v Migrationsverket

(Case C-404/17)

(2017/C 293/26)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö, migrationsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A

Applicant:

Defendant: Migrationsverket

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is an application in which the applicant’s information is deemed to be reliable and so is taken as the basis for the assessment, but insufficient to form the basis of a need for international protection on the ground that the country-of-origin information suggests that there is acceptable protection, to be regarded as clearly unfounded under Article 31(8) of the recast Asylum Procedure Directive? (1)

1

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

1

---
# C_2019025EN.01001302.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Ahmad Shah Ayubi v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land

(Case C-713/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/95/EU - Rules relating to the content of international protection - Refugee status - Article 29 - Social protection - Different treatment - Refuges with temporary right of residence))

(2019/C 25/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ahmad Shah Ayubi

Defendant: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 29 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that refugees with a temporary right of residence in a Member State are to be granted social security benefits which are less than those received by nationals of that Member State and refugees who have a permanent right of residence in that Member State. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 29 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that refugees with a temporary right of residence in a Member State are to be granted social security benefits which are less than those received by nationals of that Member State and refugees who have a permanent right of residence in that Member State.

| 2. | A refugee may rely on the incompatibility of legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, with Article 29(1) of Directive 2011/95 before the national courts in order to remove the restriction on his rights provided for by that legislation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

A refugee may rely on the incompatibility of legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, with Article 29(1) of Directive 2011/95 before the national courts in order to remove the restriction on his rights provided for by that legislation.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 9.4.2018.

---
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, George Christopulos, CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: May 8, 2008 /s/ George P. Christopulos George P. Christopulos, CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of the Board
Case 3:05-cv-01500-M Document 10 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 94
# C_2022311EN.01001001.xml

| 16.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.)

(Case T-502/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - European Union word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. - Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the goods and services - No aesthetic complementarity - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Rights of the defence)

(2022/C 311/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Munich, SL (La Torre de Claramunt, Spain) (represented by: M. del Mar Guix Vilanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Acting as agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tone Watch, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. López Martínez, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 March 2020 (case R 2472/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between the applicant and the intervener.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Munich, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Munich, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
# C_2016156EN.01005302.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/53

---

Action brought on 11 March 2016 — Aldi Einkauf v OHIM — Weetabix (Alpenschmaus)

(Case T-103/16)

(2016/C 156/72)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Weetabix Ltd (Kettering, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark with the word element ‘Alpenschmaus’ — Application for registration No 10 198 992

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2016 in Case R 2725/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the purpose of complying
with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.

      Dr.F. Patrick Smith, the Chief Executive Officer and James E. Condon, the
Chief Financial Officer of Tekni-Plex, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Tekni-Plex, Inc.

Date: October 15, 2004

                                              /s/ F. Patrick Smith
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Name: Dr. F. Patrick Smith
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                              /s/ James E. Condon
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Name: James E. Condon
                                              Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 May 22, 2007 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge No. 06-1535 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs-Appellee,

v. DEBRA LOGGINS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 04 CR 537 Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Judge.

O R D E R The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled case on May 9, 2007 is hereby amended as follows: Page 7, The first sentence of the first full paragraph, currently reads: “Here, the evidence lacks this exculp atory significance and the reliability necessary to support a Sixth Amendment.” It should read as follows: “Here, the evidence lacks this exculp atory significance and the reliability necessary to support a Sixth Amendment violation.”
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ralph Hamers, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of ING Groep N.V.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 13, 2017
Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 170
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 171
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 172
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 173
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 174
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 175
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 176
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 177
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00668-P Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 178
Motion Denied; Order filed October 12, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00682-CV

____________

MARIO TORRES AND ANA PATRICIA TORRES, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

A/N/F OF N.T., A MINOR, Appellants

V.

TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AND DR. JOHN DOE AND DR. JANE 

DOE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-61396

ORDER

Appellants have filed a third emergency motion for relief under Rule 29.3 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On the morning of October 9, 2020, this 

court issued its opinion and judgment disposing of this interlocutory appeal and 

providing for this court’s order of October 5, 2020, granting emergency relief, to 

remain in full force and effect until 5:00 p.m. on October 12, 2020. The same
morning appellants filed a second emergency motion, seeking further relief in this 

court. We deemed that motion moot in this court in light of our disposition of the

interlocutory appeal and stated that any further relief should be pursued in the 

Supreme Court of Texas. In their third emergency motion, appellants seek a further 

extension of this court’s October 5, 2020 order. We deny appellants’ third 

emergency motion. This court’s order of October 5, 2020, granting emergency 

relief, remains in full force and effect until 5:00 p.m. on October 12, 2020. 

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Bourliot.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S. C. § 1350, as adopted), Jane Shaw,the Chief Executive Officer of Aerogen, Inc. (the “Company”), and RobertBreuil, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that,to the best of his or her knowledge:

1.                 The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004,to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “AnnualReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and

2.                 The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This Certificationaccompanies the Annual Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of theAnnual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

April 15,2005
| /s/  JANE E. SHAW |     | /s/  ROBERT S. BREUIL |
|-----------------------------|----------|---------------------------------|
| Jane E. Shaw                |     | Robert S. Breuil                |
| *Chief  Executive Officer*  | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer*      |

 

----
Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 44
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 45
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 46
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 47
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 48
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 49
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 50
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 51
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00296-C Document 13 Filed 06/10/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 52
Maurice L. LATHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3911

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 22, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01478]

[[Page 7657]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-50-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 49; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Merck, Sharp & Dohme LLC; (Pharmaceutical Products for 
Research and Development); Rahway, New Jersey

    On September 18, 2024, Merck, Sharp & Dohme LLC submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within Subzone 49Y, in Rahway, New Jersey.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (89 FR 78845, September 26, 2024). On 
January 16, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: January 16, 2025.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01478 Filed 1-21-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```