alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018455EN.01001701.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — E.G. v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-662/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Asylum policy - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 46(2) - Appeal against a decision refusing to grant refugee status but granting subsidiary protection status - Admissibility - Lack of a sufficient interest where the subsidiary protection status granted by a Member State offers the same rights and benefits as those offered by the refugee status under Union and national law - Relevance of the applicant’s particular circumstances for the purposes of examining whether the rights and benefits are identical))

(2018/C 455/25)

Language of the case: Slovene

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: E.G.

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Operative part of the judgment

The second paragraph of Article 46(2) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection must be interpreted as meaning that subsidiary protection status, granted under legislation of a Member State such as that at issue in the main proceedings, does not offer the ‘same rights and benefits as those offered by the refugee status under Union and national law’, within the meaning of that provision, so that a court of that Member State may not dismiss an appeal brought against a decision considering an application unfounded in relation to refugee status but granting subsidiary protection status as inadmissible on the grounds of insufficient interest on the part of the applicant in maintaining the proceedings where it is found that, under the applicable national legislation, those rights and benefits afforded by each international protection status are not genuinely identical.

Such an appeal may not be dismissed as inadmissible, even if it is found that, having regard to the applicant’s particular circumstances, granting refugee status could not confer on him more rights and benefits than granting subsidiary protection status, in so far as the applicant does not, or has not yet, relied on rights which are granted by virtue of refugee status, but which are not granted, or are granted only to a limited extent, by virtue of subsidiary protection status.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.

---
Case 3:05-cv-02539-M Document 7 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02539-M Document 7 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,912,500
<SECURITIES>                                10,490,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,335,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (471,300)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,690,200
<PP&E>                                       4,627,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,040,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,941,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,319,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,600
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,134,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,941,700
<SALES>                                     26,669,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,669,700
<CGS>                                        3,268,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,616,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             502,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,555,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    76,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,479,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,479,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents 181,026,288 $ 287,766,827 $ 

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 4,507,495,989 A 4,436,617,626 

Accrued Interest Receivable 22,261,451 17,259,151 

Premium Receivable 114,240,000 212,524,000 

Other Receivables 221,543,908 A - 

Prepaid Expenses - - 

General Property, Equipment, and Software, Net 50,415 59,582 

Total Assets 5,046,618,051 $ 4,954,227,186 $ 

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses 481,084 $ 367,049 $ 

Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 5,046,136,967 4,887,799,466 

Allocated Insurance Fund Balance - 66,060,671 

Total Insurance Fund 5,046,136,967 $ 4,953,860,137 $ 

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund 5,046,618,051 $ 4,954,227,186 $ 

June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

A - Reflects a reclassification entry debiting Other Receivables and crediting Investments in U.S. 

Treasury Obligations for $221,543,908 due to maturity of an investment security at June 30, 2019 

which fell on a weekend. The settlement date was not until July 2019.
Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date

June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018

Income

Premiums 114,240,000 $ 106,773,000 $ 

Interest Income on Investments 46,079,124 34,210,856 

Total Income 160,319,124 $ 140,983,856 $ 

Expenses

Administrative Operating Expenses 1,981,623 $ 1,986,754 $ 

$ 1,986,754 1,981,623 $ 

Net Income 158,337,501 $ 138,997,102 $ 

Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 4,953,860,137

Payment to AIRAs Accountholders (66,060,671) 

Net Income 158,337,501 

Balance at June 30, 2019 5,046,136,967 $ 

(Unaudited)

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Revenue and Expense

Period Ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund

Period Ended June 30, 2019

(Unaudited)
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George A. Powell, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pride, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 28, 2005

/s/ George A. Powell
George A. Powell
Vice-President, Secretary and Director
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





F.
      Bryson
      Farrill, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and a Director of
      Stargold Mines, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth
      and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
      2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November , 2008





STARGOLD
                MINES, INC.By:
            /s/Name:
            F.
                Bryson FarrillTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer,
              Chief
                Financial Officer, and a Director
              (Principal
                Executive, Financial, and
              and
                Accounting Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Annual Report of Trust  Licensing,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Jeffrey
Sass, Chief Executive  Officer and Jay Howard Linn,  Chief Financial  Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Jeffrey W. Sass
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Jeffrey Sass, Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ Jay Howard Linn
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Jay Howard Linn, Chief Financial Officer

Date: August   , 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. Emanuel RANDALL

NO. 2019-KH-0094

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

*1270Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 367 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 655
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00516-CV

Kyle KELLAR,

Appellant

v.

AGGREGATE HAULERS I, 

AGGREGATE HAULERS I, L.P.,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-08738

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 22, 2014

DISMISSED

On October 2, 2013, appellant’s motion to abate this appeal was granted for purposes of 

pursuing a settlement. On January 10, 2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, stating 

that the parties have settled. The motion contains a certificate of service to appellee, which has 

not opposed the motion. Therefore, we reinstate the appeal on the docket of this court, grant the 

motion, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed 

against appellant.

PER CURIAM
September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents 4,131,621 $ 148,788,084 $ 

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 4,053,097,256 3,615,304,532 

Accrued Interest Receivable 12,068,916 14,045,309 

Premium Receivable 274,064,337 260,634,000 

Other Receivables - - 

Prepaid Expenses - - 

Total Assets 4,343,362,130 $ 4,038,771,925 $ 

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses 429,518 $ 530,913 $ 

Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 4,342,932,612 4,038,241,012 

Total Insurance Fund 4,342,932,612 4,038,241,012 

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund 4,343,362,130 $ 4,038,771,925 $ 

September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)
Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date

September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015

Income

Premiums 273,969,337 $ 192,611,307 $ 

Interest Income on Investments 33,537,715 23,523,367 

Total Income 307,507,052 $ 216,134,674 $ 

Expenses

Administrative Operating Expenses 2,815,452 $ 2,549,559 $ 

$ 2,549,559 2,815,452 $ 

Net Income 304,691,600 $ 213,585,115 $ 

Balance at January 1, 2016 $ 4,038,241,012

Net Income 304,691,600 

Balance at September 30, 2016 4,342,932,612 $ 

(Unaudited)

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Revenue and Expense

Period Ended September 30, 2016

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund

Period Ended September 30, 2016

(Unaudited)
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2010
 
 
 By:           /s/Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer
 
 Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer
 Chairman of the Board/Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and secretary
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ING Groep N.V., a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 16 2015 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ING Groep N.V. and will be retained by ING GroepN.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.
Glenda TORRES PEREZ, Appellant, v. SEA WORLD OF FLORIDA, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 31, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00731-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF R.A. JR AND S.Y.A., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-18862



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Bridges
By letter filed July 17, 2018, appellant informs us she no lon ger wishes to pursue her
appeal. We construe the letter as a motion to dismiss, grant t he motion, and dismiss the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

180731F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF R.A. JR AND S.Y.A., CHILDREN

No. 05-18-00731-CV On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-18862. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices Brown and Boatr ight participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered July 31, 2018.
Case 2:05-cv-00124-J Document 4 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-61005

Summary Calendar

NASSER MOHAMMEDALI KOTADIYA

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A98 041 289

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nasser Mohammedali Kotadiya, a native and citizen of India, petitions

this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of an appeal from an Immigration

Judge’s order denying a motion to suppress and finding Kotadiya removable.

Kotadiya argues that his attorney was ineffective for arguing only the

suppression issue and failing to request withholding of removal or relief under

the Convention Against Torture. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 14, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-61005

2

Kotadiya did not raise his claim of ineffective counsel before the BIA.

Therefore the issue is unexhausted, and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider

it. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 317-19 (5th Cir.

2009); Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001). In addition,

Kotadiya has abandoned any argument concerning his suppression claim by

failing to brief the issue. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir.

2003).

Accordingly, the petition for review is DISMISSED.
Jermaine A. BROWN, DOC #375222, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
D.P. v. A.G.

2161056

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 30, 2018

Affirmed.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 13 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 

to ‘‘Update of Commission’s Conciliation Procedures’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating to 

5 ‘‘Update of Commission’s Conciliation Procedures’’ (86 

6 Fed. Reg. 2974; published January 14, 2021), and such 

7 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate May 19, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 13 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapConciliation Procedures’’. Commission relating to ‘‘Update of Commission’s submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
Ross SCOPELLITI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jennifer MCCLEAN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3103

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed. Dismissed.
Exhibit 21.1PFCHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC. Subsidiaries and AffiliatedCompaniesP.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.P.F.C.C.B. Club — Frankford, Inc.P.F.C.C.B. Texas, Inc.P.F. Chang’s II, Inc.P.F. Chang’s III, L.L.C.PFC Building III Limited PartnershipFleming/PFC III Corp.PFCCB Marlton LLCPFCCB Licensing, Inc.PFCCB Administration, Inc.PFCCB Equipment, LLCPFCCB Florida Joint Venture LLPPFCCB Halpern, LLCPFCCB Lou Tex Joint Venture LLPPFCCB Mid-Atlantic LLCPFCCB Midwest LLCPFCCB NewTex Joint Venture LLPPFCCB Northwest LLCPFCCB NUCA LLCPFCCB SO CAL II LLCPFCCB SO CAL LLCPFCCB Southeastern LLCPei Wei Asian Diner, IncPei Wei Asian Diner One LLCPei Wei Asian Diner Two (Dallas) LLPPei Wei Asian Diner Three (SoCal) LLCPWAD Texas, Inc.The Arbors Club, Inc.Pei Wei Houston, Inc.P.F. Chang’s VI, Inc.Pei Wei Asian Diner Four (Houston) LLPPei Wei Asian Diner Five (Denver) LLCPFCCB NUCA (2003) LLCPFCCB Midwest (2003) LLCPFCCB So Cal (2003) LLCPFCCB Wichita LLCPWAD — Preston Center Club, Inc.Pei Wei Asian Diner Six (Nevada) LLCPWAD-Forest Lane Club, Inc.PFCCB Pinnacle Peak LLCPei Wei Asian Diner Seven (Central Texas) LLPPei Wei Asian Diner Ten (Florida) LLPPei Wei Asian Diner Eleven (Minnesota) LLCPFCCB Shared Corporate Services, Inc.
59

 
PFCCB Gift Card Inc.Pei-the-Wei, Inc.PFCCB Southeastern (2003) LLCPFCCB Northwest 2004PFCCB Edgewater LLCPFCCB 2005 Partnership LLPTaneko Japanese Tavern, Inc.PFCCB Arkansas, Inc.PFC Hawaii LLC
60
Jerry W. KENT v. Heather HERCHENHAN

2160741

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

Affirmed.