alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas R. Venables
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.2    
    


 
 

THIRTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
  THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF
  LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.    
    


        This THIRTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P., dated as of July
    , 2003 (this "Amendment"), is being executed by AIMCO-GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "General Partner"), as the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"), pursuant to the authority conferred on the General Partner by the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties,
L.P., dated as of July 29, 1994, as amended and/or supplemented from time to time (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined herein, shall have the respective meanings
ascribed thereto in the Agreement. 


        WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 7.3.C(3) of the Agreement, the General Partner is authorized to amend the Agreement, without the Consent of the Limited Partners, to reflect a change
that is of an inconsequential nature and does not adversely affect the Limited Partners in any material respect, or to cure any ambiguity, correct or supplement any provision in this Agreement not
inconsistent with law or with other provisions, or make other changes with respect to matters arising under the Agreement that will not be inconsistent with law or with the provisions of the
Agreement; 


        WHEREAS,
the General Partner has determined that the amendment provided for herein is of an inconsequential nature and does not adversely affect the Limited Partners in any material
respect. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows: 


        1.     Section 2.5
is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 



        "Section 2.5    Term.    The term of the Partnership commenced on May 16, 1994, the date that the
original Certificate was filed in the office of the Secretary of State of Delaware in accordance with the Act, and shall continue until the Partnership is dissolved pursuant to the provisions of
Article 13 hereof or as otherwise provided by law." 




        2.     Except
as specifically amended hereby, the terms, covenants, provisions and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified and continue in full force and effect and,
except as amended hereby, all of the terms, covenants, provisions and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 





 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above. 



	

 	
 	

GENERAL PARTNER:
	

 	
 	

AIMCO-GP, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  TERRY CONSIDINE      

	 	 	 	Name:	 	Terry Considine
	 	 	 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer




2









QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.2


THIRTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard Nathan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





/s/ Richard
      Nathan(Principal
      Financial Officer)
                Richard
      Nathan, Inc.


Date: November 13,
2009





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Valente HUNSU v. James Robert SMITH

2160857

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:04-cr-00318-N Document 48 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 181
Jeffery JACKSON v. STATE

CR-16-1002

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 10.11.7**

**TRAILER BRIDGE, INC.**

**AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

This Amendment to the Trailer Bridge, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”) has been adopted by the Board of Directors of Trailer Bridge, Inc. inorder to conform the Plan to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 

The Plan is herebyamended, effective January 1, 2009, as follows: 

1. The definition of the term “Fair Market Value” is amended in its entiretyto provide as follows: 

“Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a Share, for purposes of determining the minimum exercise priceof an Option on the Grant Date or otherwise, (i) if the Shares are readily tradable on an established securities market, the arithmetic mean of the closing prices of a Share on such market on the ten business days immediately prior to the GrantDate or other measurement date or (ii) if the Shares are not readily tradable on an established securities market, the value determined by the Committee as of the Grant Date or other measurement date through the reasonable application of areasonable valuation method and otherwise in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B).” 

2. Section 4.3 of thePlan is amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end thereof. 

“In no event shall the Committee adjust the terms of theOption in a manner that could cause the Option to be treated as a grant of a new Option for purposes of Section 409A of the Code and Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v).” 

3. New Section 5.3 is added to the Plan to provide as follows: 

“ 5.3 Option Term. In no event shall the term of an Option as established by the Committee at the time of grant be extended or the Option otherwise be exercisable beyond the expiration date of the Optionset forth in the Award Agreement.” 

4. Section 7.1 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence at the endthereof. 

“The Committee may amend any Option Agreement to the extent the Committee determines that such amendment is necessary orappropriate in order to bring the Option Agreement into compliance with Section 409A of the Code.”
Exhibit 10.43
 
 
 April 20, 2010
 EXTENSION N2 TO THE
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF AUGUST 1, 2004
 
 By and between Siberian Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Elena Pochapski (“Employee”) entered into this 20th day of April 2010, and made effective as of January 1, 2010.
 
 WHEREASthe Company and the Employee previously signed the Employment Agreement, which stated the term of employment to start on September 1, 2003 and to end on December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), and the One year term extension agreement for 2009 services;
 
 AND WHEREAS the Company and the Employee wish to further extend the term of the employment agreement;
 
 NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the Company and the Employee agree as follows:
 
 Point 4 “Term” of the employment Agreement to be revised and the term of the Agreement to be extended until June 30, 2010 (the “Extended Term”).
 
 Point 5.1 “Compensation” of the employment Agreement to be revised and annual salary of the Employee to be stated as US$75,000.
 
 Point 6 “Stock Option” of the employment Agreement is to be removed. A new Stock Option agreement will be signed between the Company and the Employee upon the resolution of the Board of directors of the Company.
 
 All other provisions of the Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2003 shall remain in full force and effect until the expiration of the Extended Term.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.
 
 EMPLOYEE
COMPANY/s/ Elena Pochapski
/s/ David ZaikinElena Pochapski
David Zaikin,Chairman and CEOSiberian Energy Group Inc.
Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 12 PageID 576
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 12 PageID 577
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 3 of 12 PageID 578
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 4 of 12 PageID 579
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 5 of 12 PageID 580
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 6 of 12 PageID 581
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 7 of 12 PageID 582
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 8 of 12 PageID 583
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 9 of 12 PageID 584
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 10 of 12 PageID 585
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 11 of 12 PageID 586
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02447-M Document 29 Filed 07/11/06 Page 12 of 12 PageID 587
Dustin ROGERS änd Lacey Rogers v. INTEGRATED EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, LLC

NO. 2019-C-0481

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Claire S. BeanClaire S. BeanChief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41141 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FEDERICO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Alfredo Trevino-Guzman, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-392-ALL

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Federico Garcia-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Hernandez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 02-41141 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Garcia-Hernandez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Garcia-Hernandez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Claire S. BeanClaire S. BeanChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 8 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 8

          Electing Jackie Barber as Secretatry of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Thune submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Electing Jackie Barber as Secretatry of the Senate.

    Resolved, That Jackie Barber of South Dakota, be, and she is 
hereby, elected Secretary of the Senate, effective January 3rd, 2025.
                                 <all>
```
15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 17.2 

National Income and Product Accounts (Chained 2009$)Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4 Gross Domestic Product 0.6 3.9 2.0 1.4 0.5 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7  Personal Consumption Expenditures 1.8 3.6 3.0 2.4 1.9 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0  Residential Fixed Investment 10.1 9.3 8.2 10.1 14.8 4.8 5.5 6.2 6.6 4.9  Business Fixed Investment 1.6 4.1 2.6 -2.1 -5.9 3.6 2.8 2.2 2.1 1.9  Government Consumption & Investment -0.1 2.6 1.8 0.1 1.2 1.9 1.6 0.8 1.2 0.9 Billions of Chained 2009$ Net Exports -541 -535 -546 -552 -567 -573 -581 -586 -586 -600  Change in Business Inventories 113 114 86 78 61 48 48 47 36 37 Price IndicesPercent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4GDP Price Index 0.1 2.1 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.1 1.9 

Consumer Price Index -2.9 2.4 1.4 0.8 -0.3 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.3 1.8 

Consumer Price Index (Quarterly YOY % Change, Annual YOY % Change) -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.5 2.4 Consumer Price Index excl. Food & Energy 1.7 2.3 1.8 2.2 2.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 Consumer Price Index excl. Food & Energy (Quarterly YOY % Change, Annual YOY % Change) 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 EmploymentUnemployment Rate (Percent) 5.5 5.4 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 Employment, Total Nonfarm (% Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4) 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 

Interest Rates (Percent)Federal Funds Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1-Year Treasury Note Yield 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 

May 10, 2016Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from April 29, 2016.Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic & Strategic Research Group

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or expected results, 

are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other 

views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views 

could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie 

Mae or its management.

 Economic Forecast: May 2016

 --------------- 2015 --------------- --------------- 2016 --------------- --------------- 201
Isac Q. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2017402EN.01000702.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/7

---

Appeal brought on 4 July 2017 by Krassimira Georgieva Mladenova against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 April 2017 in Case T-814/16: Krassimira Georgieva Mladenova v European Parliament

(Case C-405/17 P)

(2017/C 402/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Krassimira Georgieva Mladenova

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 10 October 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Maximiliano REY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.