alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6812

FRANKLIN J. LOFTIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-2185-3-6BC)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin J. Loftis, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Loftis v. Moore, Nos. CA-97-2185-3-6BC (D.S.C. Apr. 2 & May

21, 1998). We also deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Roy O. Estridge, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2010 of Valley Commerce Bancorp;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





(a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c.) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter of 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and







5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date: August 10, 2010





/s/ Roy O. EstridgeRoy O. Estridge

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 14, 2008 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:06-cv-00079-B Document 9 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
Case 3:05-cv-01449-P Document 2 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 24
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01449-P Document 2 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 25
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01449-P Document 2 Filed 08/01/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 26
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Cosmo Palmieri, President and Treasurer of Our Glass, Inc.
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Our Glass, Inc. for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Our Glass, Inc.


Dated: August 17, 2005

/s/ Cosmo Palmieri
------------------
Cosmo Palmieri
President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer)
Case 6:05-cr-00076-C-BG Document 1 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1
Case 6:05-cr-00076-C-BG Document 1 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 2
Case 6:05-cr-00076-C-BG Document 1 Filed 11/09/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 3
Case 6:05-cr-00076-C-BG Document 1 Filed 11/09/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 4
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Menderes Akdag, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) and I, Bruce S. Rosenbloom, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of PetMed Express, Inc. (the Registrant), each certify to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) of the Registrant, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: June 2, 2008



By: /s/  Menderes Akdag

Menderes Akdag

Chief Executive Officer and President



By: /s/  Bruce S. Rosenbloom

Bruce S. Rosenbloom

Chief Financial Officer







---
Dennis REESOR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-1203

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit15.2**

 

 **Deloitte Accountants B.V.**

Orlyplein 10

1043 DP Amsterdam

P.O.Box 58110

1040 HC Amsterdam

Netherlands

 

Tel: +31 (0)88 288 2888

Fax: +31 (0)88 288 9739

www.deloitte.nl

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Numbers:333-74703, 333-81400, 333-84044, 333-127660, 333-128619, 333-128621,333-140798, 333-145751, and 333-149577 on Form S-8, and Registration StatementNumbers: 333-179685, and 333-179685-01 on Form F-3 and in RegistrationStatement Numbers: 333-108304 and 333-108304-01 on Form F-4 of our report dated 27 March 2013 (30 April 2014, as noted inNote 2), relating to the consolidated financial statements and theretrospective adjustments to the consolidated financial statements of RBSHoldings N.V. and subsidiaries for the years ended 31 December 2012, and 31December 2011, appearing in this Annual Report on Form20-F of RBS Holdings N.V. and subsidiaries forthe year ended 31 December 2013.

 

 

 /s/ Deloitte Accountants B.V.

 

 

30 April 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00018-CR

No. 10-09-00019-CR

AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY CO., 

D/B/A TEXAS BONDING CO., SUE A. TAYLOR, 

AGENT, D/B/A BAILMAN BOND CO. (ELLIS COUNTY),

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 08-C-3049 and 08-C-3093

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed motions to dismiss these appeals because the trial court has 

granted Appellant’s motions for new trial. According to the certificates of conference, 

the State does not oppose dismissal of the appeals. Accordingly, they are dismissed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. State Page 2

FELIPE REYNA

Justice 

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 18, 2009

[CV06]
Case 3:06-cv-00189-H Document 10 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 43
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                                         Annual Report Form 10-K
                                                Commission File Number 000-22567


                               The WMF Group, Ltd.
           Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings (Unaudited)
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                              ----------------------------------------------
                                                 1999               1998             1997
                                              -----------      -----------       -----------
<S>                                           <C>              <C>               <C>
     Net income (loss)                        $     1,155      $   (33,322)      $     2,442
                                              ===========      ===========       ===========
Weighted average shares of common
      stock used for Basic computation         10,346,291        5,223,756         4,272,329
                                               ==========        =========         =========
Weighted average shares of common
      stock                                    10,346,291        5,223,756         4,272,329
Diluted adjustment:
      Assumed exercise of options and
        warrants (treasury stock method)          240,251               --           179,936
                                                  -------          -------           -------
      Total weighted average shares and
        equivalents used for Diluted
        computation                            10,586,542        5,223,756         4,452,265
                                               ==========        =========         =========
INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:

        Net income (loss) per common
            share - Basic                     $       .11      $     (6.38)      $       .57
                                              ===========      ===========       ===========
        Net income (loss) per common
            share - Diluted                   $       .11      $     (6.38)      $       .55
                                              ===========      ===========       ===========
</TABLE>
NEIGHBORS FIRST FOR BYWATER, INC., John Andrews, Georgia Ainsworth, Lane Lacoy, Bart Theriot, Joe Brown and Kathy Brown v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS/The NEW ORLEANS CITY COUNCIL

NO. 2018-C-0096

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied.
# C_2017318EN.01000402.xml

| 25.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 1 June 2017 — Gerhard Prenninger and Others

(Case C-329/17)

(2017/C 318/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Gerhard Prenninger, Karl Helmberger, Franziska Zimmer, Franz Scharinger, Norbert Pühringer, Agrargemeinschaft Pettenbach, Marktgemeinde Vorchdorf, Marktgemeinde Pettenbach, Gemeinde Steinbach am Ziehberg

Applicants:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Directive 2011/92/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (the EIA Directive) be interpreted as meaning that the ‘clearance of a path’ for the purpose of the construction of a power supply system and for the duration of its lawful existence constitutes ‘deforestation for the purposes of conversion to another type of land use’ within the meaning of point 1(d) of Annex II to the EIA Directive?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 26, p. 1.

1

---
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 25 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in recognition of the long and distin3 guished service rendered to the Nation by Harry Mason 

4 Reid, Jr., a Senator from the State of Nevada, his remains 

5 be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol 

6 on Wednesday, January 12, 2022, and the Architect of 

7 the Capitol, under the direction of the President pro tem8 pore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Rep9 resentatives, shall take all necessary steps for the accom10 plishment of that purpose. 

Passed the Senate January 5, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 25 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

the State of Nevada. orable Harry Mason Reid, Jr., a Senator from for the lying in state of the remains of the Hon-
Case 24-33155-mvl11    Doc 98    Filed 10/30/24    Entered 10/30/24 14:01:44    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 3

Case 24-33155-mvl11    Doc 98    Filed 10/30/24    Entered 10/30/24 14:01:44    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 3

Case 24-33155-mvl11    Doc 98    Filed 10/30/24    Entered 10/30/24 14:01:44    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Boo-Ali Siddiqui,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
January 31, 2011





/s/
      Boo-Ali SiddiquiBoo-Ali
      Siddiqui,Chief
      Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey C. Grace, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2007



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey C. Grace                    
|Jeffrey C. Grace                        
|Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,
|Secretary and Director
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Eduard Jaeger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  /s/
                  Eduard JaegerEduard JaegerChief Executive OfficerAugust 14,
                  2007
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

Exhibit 21

                           Kendle International Inc.
                                Subsidiary List

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                  Jurisdiction of Organization
----------                                  ----------------------------
<S>                                         <C>
Kendle U.K. Inc.                            Ohio

Kendle GmbH                                 Germany

Kendle Vermogensverwaltungs GmbH            Germany

Kendle International B.V.                   The Netherlands

U-Gene Clinical Research B.V.               The Netherlands

U-Gene Research Biotechnology B.V.          The Netherlands

Kendle International Holdings Limited       United Kingdom

Kendle Branches Limited                     United Kingdom

Kendle International Limited                United Kingdom

Kendle U.K. Limited                         United Kingdom

Kendle International SARL                   France

Kendle R&D Pty Limited                      Australia

Kendle R&D Unit Trust                       Australia

ACER/EXCEL INC.                             New Jersey

AAC Consulting Group, Inc.                  Maryland

Kendle Canada Inc.                          Canada

Kendle International CPU LLC                Ohio

Kendle International Holdings Pty Limited   Australia

Kendle Pty Limited                          Australia

Kendle Unit Trust                           Australia

Kendle International, S.A.de C.V.           Mexico

Kendle Servicios, S.A. de C.V.              Mexico
</TABLE>