alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.22 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO MINING LEASE AND OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made the 13th day of February, 2014, AMONG:  Max Resource, Inc., a corporation pursuant to the laws of Nevada (the Lessee) - and - Max Resource Corp., a corporation pursuant to the laws of Alberta (ParentCo) - and - Claremont Nevada Mines LLC, a limited liability company pursuant to the laws of Nevada (Claremont) - and - JR Exploration LLC, a limited liability company pursuant to the laws of Utah (JRE) (together Claremont and JRE may be referred to herein as the Owners and individually each as an Owner) RECITALS:  A. The Lessee, ParentCo, Claremont and JRE entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement dated as of December 3, 2012, as further amended by an Amendment to Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement dated as of December 3, 2013 (together as amended, the Original Agreement); B. The Parties wish to amend the Original Agreement in the manner set forth below; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants contained in this Amending Agreement, the Parties agree as follows: 1. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement. 2. Subparagraph 5.1.1(b)(ii) of the Original Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 5.1.1(b) (ii) $160,000 payable as follows: (A) $10,000 on or before February 14, 2014; (B) $15,000 on or before March 31, 2014; (C) $16,000 on or before April 30, 2014; (D) $17,000 on or before May 31, 2014; (E) $17,000 on or before June 30, 2014; (F) $17,000 on or before July 31, 2014;  -2-  (G) $17,000 on or before August 31, 2014; (H) $17,000 on or before September 30, 2014; (I)  $17,000 on or before October 31, 2014; and (J) $17,000 on or before November 30, 2014  3. Except as expressly amended herein, the Original Agreement is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed to be in full force and effect. 4. Time is of the essence of this Amending Agreement. 5. This Amending Agreement is governed by and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada and the federal laws of the United States of America applicable therein.  Each Party irrevocably attorns to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Nevada with respect to any matter arising under or relating to this Amending Agreement. 6. This Amending Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which will be deemed to be an original, and all of which taken together will be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. This Amending Agreement may be executed and delivered by electronic means and each of the Parties may rely on such electronic execution as though it were an original hand-written signature IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have executed this Amending Agreement. MAX RESOURCE, INC.Per:/s/ Stuart RogersName: Stuart RogersTitle: PresidentMAX RESOURCE CORP.Per:/s/ Stuart RogersName: Stuart RogersTitle: PresidentCLAREMONT NEVADA MINES LLCPer:/s/ E. L. HunsakerName: E. L. Hunsaker IIITitle:  ManagerJR Exploration LLCPer:/s/ Rick EversonName: Rick EversonTitle:  Manager
Exhibit 10.2
 EDUCATION REALTY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 General Partner Partnership Partnership Agreement
 Section 11.1(a) Section
4.3
 Effective
Date
 Company
 Plan PIUs
 Section 4.3(a)(iii)
 Section 11.1(a)
 1




---



##### 



1. Additional Defined Terms
 Adjustment Event
 Capital Account Limitation Section 7.9(b)
 Common Unit Distribution Section 4.3(d)(ii)
 Common Unit Economic Balance Exhibit B Section
A(12) Exhibit B
 Constituent Person Section 7.9(f)
 Conversion Date Section 7.9(b)
 Distribution Payment Date Section 8.1
 Distribution Period Section
8.1
 Economic Capital Account Balance Exhibit B
 2




---



##### 



PIU Section 4.3(d) Exhibit A
 PIU Unitholder
 Plan
 Rights
 2. Amendments to Existing Definitions
  3. Conforming Changes.
  4. Issuance of PIUs
 ISSUANCE OF PIUs
 3




---



##### 



Section 4.3(d) Sections 7.9 7.10 Section A(12) Exhibit B
  Common Unit
Distribution pari pasu
 4




---



##### 



pari
pasu
  Section A(12) Exhibit B .
 Section 7.9
 Section 7.4 Section 7.9
 Section 7.10
 5. Conversion of PIUs
 Section 7.9 CONVERSION OF PIUs
 Section
4.3(d) Conversion Date Capital Account
Limitation Section 14.5 Section 7.9 Section 7.4(a) provided, however, Section 7.4(b)
 5




---



##### 



Section 7.9(b) Section 7.9(b)
 Constituent Person
  6




---



##### 



Section A(12) Exhibit B
 6. Voting Rights of PIUs. Section 7.10
 VOTING RIGHTS OF PIUs Section 7.10
 Section 7.9(f)
   7




---



##### 



7. Footnote to Exhibit A
  8. Special Allocation of Gain to PIU Unitholder
 Sections A(6) A(7) Exhibit B Exhibit B Section A(12)
 9. Confirmation of Partnership Agreement
  EDUCATION REALTY OP GP, INC., as general partner of
Education Realty Operating Partnership, LPBy:
    /s/
Paul O. BowerName:
    Paul O. BowerTitle:

President 8
Kory SOLTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 1, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Damoorgian, J.

*429Kory Soltis appeals his judgment of guilt and sentence for one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, one count of resisting arrest with violence, one count of felony battery, and one count of culpable negligence. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to make a proper *Nelson*1 inquiry after he filed a motion to dismiss his court-appointed counsel. We affirm because Appellant failed to preserve the issue for appellate review.

Appellant's convictions were the result of a no contest plea. Several months prior to the date the court considered Appellant's plea, Appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss his court-appointed counsel. However, Appellant took no steps to bring his motion to the court's attention despite having the opportunity to do so. Then, at his change of plea hearing, Appellant expressed his satisfaction with the same court-appointed counsel. Under these circumstances, Appellant waived his right to have the trial court conduct a *Nelson* inquiry. *See**Hall v. State* , 92 So.3d 223, 225-26 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding that by failing to bring his pro se motion to dismiss counsel to the court's attention and proceeding to trial with the same court-appointed counsel without voicing any objection, the defendant failed to preserve the court's error in failing to conduct a *Nelson* inquiry); *Sheffield v. State* , 769 So.2d 493, 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (same); *Kinzie v. State* , 696 So.2d 530, 530-31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (same).

*Affirmed.*

Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.

1

*Nelson v. State* , 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 2 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.2
                                       Agreed to January 3, 2021        

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

    Effective from January 3, 2021, the joint committee created by 
Senate Concurrent Resolution 38 (116th Congress), agreed to June 26, 
2020, to make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the 
President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States, is 
continued with the same power and authority provided for in that 
resolution.

SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL.

    The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol are 
authorized to be used on January 10, 2021, January 17, 2021, and 
January 20, 2021 by the joint committee created by Senate Concurrent 
Resolution 38 (116th Congress), agreed to June 26, 2020, in connection 
with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of 
the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice of Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) licenses. Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, to grant Small Business Investment Company licenses under the Small Business Investment Company Program, this notice satisfies the requirement effective August 17, 2023 under 13 CFR 107.501(a) to publish in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     the names of SBICs with date of licensure and Total Intended Leverage Commitments. The following SBICs received SBIC licenses as of the date indicated below:
                    ( print page 3986) SBIC fund name
Date of licensure
Leverage tiers 1DC Small Business Fund, L.P
12/31/2024
1.00xRidgeline Ventures Fund II-S, L.P
12/27/2024
1.25xMidwest Growth Partners IV, L.P
12/27/2024
1.50xBBK Ventures Fund I, L.P
12/27/2024
2.00xStrategic Equality Fund II, L.P
12/20/2024
2.00xGP Capital Partners II, L.P
12/19/2024
2.00xEscalate Capital V, L.P
12/9/2024
2.00xCharter Growth Capital Fund II, L.P
12/6/2024
1.00xRochefort Ventures, L.P
12/6/2024
2.00x1
                         Maximum amount of Leverage expressed as a multiple of Leverageable Capital pursuant to 13 CFR 107.1150. For all SBIC Licensees that submitted a Management Assessment Questionnaire after August 17, 2023, the Notice of SBIC Licenses will include the Total Intended Leverage Commitment at the time of Licensure.
 Bailey DeVries, Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration.


[FR Doc. 2025-00759 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.24

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                  1997 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

WHEREAS, Santa Fe International Corporation ("SFIC") has established a
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (hereafter "Plan") for the benefit of
non-employee Directors of SFIC and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.7 of the plan, the Board of Directors may at any
time or from time to time amend the Plan, provided such amendment does not
adversely affect the vested rights of any participant in the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is appropriate at this
time to amend the Plan in a manner not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan,

NOW THEREFORE, effective this 8th day of December 1998, the Santa Fe
International Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan is amended as
follows:

1.       The current Section 1.6 Maximum Individual Grants is DELETED and the
         following Substituted therefore:

         "1.6 Maximum Individual Grants Subject to adjustment under Section 3.5,
         no Grantee may receive, during any fiscal year of the Company, Options
         covering an aggregate of more than twenty two thousand (22,000) Shares
         of Common Stock..

Dated: December 8, 1998


                               SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



                               By: /s/ CARY A. MOOMJIAN
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                       Santa Fe International Corporation
# C_2019054EN.01001702.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Edward Reich, Debora Lieber, Ella Reich, Ezra Bernard Reich, Zoe Reich v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

(Case C-730/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/24)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,189,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,901,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (945,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,398,000
<PP&E>                                      12,323,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,990,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             135,259,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,868,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,799,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               135,259,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            95,703,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            76,231,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               135,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,450,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,887,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,304,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,583,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,583,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 23, 2025.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

      ( print page 7203)    
Dated: January 16, 2025.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-01519 Filed 1-16-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Nytavis Dajuan BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0836

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 02, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Kevin SINGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018104EN.01001301.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich (Poland) lodged on 9 November 2017 — Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności (PKO) Bank Polski S.A. v Jacek Michalski

(Case C-632/17)

(2018/C 104/16)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności (PKO) Bank Polski S.A.

Applicant:

Defendant: Jacek Michalski

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the provisions of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (1) and in particular Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof, and the provisions of Directive 2008/48/EC of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, (2) and in particular Article 10 and Article 22(1) thereof, be interpreted as precluding the pursuit of a claim by a bank (the creditor) against a consumer (the debtor) on the basis of a banking ledger excerpt, signed by persons authorised to make statements regarding the bank’s property rights and obligations and bearing the bank’s stamp, and on the basis of proof that a request for payment had been submitted to the debtor in writing, in the context of an order-for-payment procedure as defined in Article 485 § 3 et seq. of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

1

(2)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

2

---
STATE EX REL. Hassan A. ABDUL, IV

v.

STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2039

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See *708State ex rel. Abdul v. State, 16-0323 (La. 8/4/17), 223 So.3d 507.
Agreement on the Termination of General Factory Lease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.91 
  
 AGREEMENT ON THE TERMINATION OF GENERAL FACTORY LEASE 
 AGREEMENT (REF. NO.: JQ2001X106H-042) 
  

	Party A:	 	Shanghai Jin Qiao Pte Ltd. 

  

	Party B:	 	i-STT Shanghai Co., Ltd 

  
 Parties A and B arrived at the following consensus after friendly negotiations: 
  

	1.	 	Party A agrees to Party B’s request for an early termination of the “General Factory Lease Agreement” (hereinafter abbreviated as “Lease Agreement”) signed
between both parties on 21 February 2001. 

  

	2.	 	According to the Lease Agreement, Party B shall restore the factory to its original condition and attend to the procedures for returning the premises after it has been inspected by
a property management company engaged by Party A. 

  

	3.	 	As compensation for early termination of the Lease Agreement, Party B agrees to forfeit the deposit previously paid to Party A, being an amount of RMB 462,966. Party B further
agrees to make a one time payment equivalent to one month’s rent, being RMB 231,483, to Party A as compensation within 30 working days from the date of signing this Agreement. 

  

	4.	 	The date of termination for the Lease Agreement shall be 31 March 2003. As Party B’s sub-tenant Jinying International Freight Agent Co., Ltd has yet to pay the rent for the
month of March, Party B agrees to deduct one month’s rent from the deposit paid by Jinying International Freight Agent Co., Ltd for direct remittance to Party A. 

  

	5.	 	With effect from the date of this Agreement, Parties A and B shall abandon all rights, claims and right of recourse that they may have against each other under the said Lease
Agreement and other related agreements or provided by the law. 

  

	6.	 	This Agreement shall take effect upon the signing and official seal by the legal representative or authorised representative from both parties. 









	7.	 	This Agreement shall be signed in duplicate. Parties A and B shall retain a copy each. 

  

	Party A:	 	Shanghai Jin Qiao Pte Ltd. 

  

	  	 	(official seal) 

  
 Legal or authorised representative: (signature) 
  
 21 May 2003 
  

	Party B:	 	i-STT Shanghai Co., Ltd 

  
 Legal or authorised representative: (signature) 
  

	  	 	(official seal) 

  
 21 May 2003 
  
 Certified true translation

 Translated by: Teh Choon Bin
Jibrail HUTCHINSON v. STATE

CR-16-0907

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.