# C_2018042EN.01000802.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/8

---

Appeal brought on 20 November 2017 by the Hellenic Republic against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 September 2017 in Case T-327/15 Hellenic Republic v European Commission

(Case C-670/17 P)

(2018/C 042/12)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos, Ι. Pachi and A. Vasilopoulou)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that its appeal should be admitted, that the judgment under appeal of the General Court of the European Union of 19 September 2017 in Case Τ-327/15 should be set aside, that the action brought on 2 June 2015 by the Hellenic Republic should be upheld and that the Commission Implementing Decision of 25 March 2015 on applying financial correction on the EAGGF Guidance Section of the Operational Programme CCI No 2000GR061PO021 (GREECE — Objective 1 — Rural Reconstruction), which was published as C(2015) 1936 final, should be annulled.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal the appellant relies on five grounds of appeal.

The first ground of appeal is based on the misinterpretation and misapplication of the transitional provisions of Regulations (EC) 1083/2006 (1) and (ΕU) 1303/2013 (2) read together with the provisions of Regulation (EC) 1290/2005 (3), and also an error of law, with respect to the application of the provisions of Regulation 1260/1999 (4) to the EAGGF — Guidance Section after 01.01.2007 — Insufficient and defective statement of reasons in the judgment under appeal.

1

2

3

4

The second ground of appeal is based on a misinterpretation and misapplication of Article 39 of Regulation (EC) 1260/1999 — Contradictory and insufficient statement of reasons.

The third ground of appeal is based on the misinterpretation and erroneous and selective application of the procedural provisions of Articles 144 and 145 of Regulation (ΕU) 1303/2013 that were held in the judgment under appeal to be applicable, while the judgment under appeal fails to give effect to the procedural safeguard of Article 52(4)(c) of Regulation (ΕU) 1306/2013 (5) which defines in this case the competence ratione temporis of the Commission — Contradictory and insufficient statement in the judgment under appeal.

5

ratione temporis

The fourth ground of appeal is based on the interpretation and application of the principles of legal certainty and the protection of the legitimate expectations of the Member State in the framework of its sincere cooperation with the Commission in the assessment of the consequences of the express acceptance of the final report on the programme which was issued nine months late and the delayed initiation of the procedure for the imposition of a financial correction, contrary to the Commission’s self-imposed obligation to achieve clearance and final payment of operational programmes within a reasonable time.

Last, the fifth ground of appeal is based on the wholly insufficient statement of reasons, in the opinion of the appellant, for the dismissal of the submissions of the Hellenic Republic with respect to the imposition of the multiple and therefore disproportionate financial correction.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (

  OJ 2006, L 210, p. 25).

1

(

OJ 2006, L 210, p. 25).

(2)  Regulation (ΕU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (

  OJ 2013, L 347,p. 320).

2

(

OJ 2013, L 347,p. 320).

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (
  OJ 2005, L 209, p. 1).

3

OJ 2005, L 209, p. 1).

(4)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (
  OJ 1999, L 161, p. 1).

4

OJ 1999, L 161, p. 1).

(5)  Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (

  OJ 2013, L 347, p. 549).

5

(

OJ 2013, L 347, p. 549).

---