alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017151EN.01002101.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Contas (Portugal) lodged on 28 February 2017 — Secretaria Regional de Saúde dos Açores v Ministério Público

(Case C-102/17)

(2017/C 151/27)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de Contas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Secretaria Regional de Saúde dos Açores

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministério Público

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 58(4) of Directive No 2014/24/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that described [that is, Article 40(3) and (5)(c) of Regional Legislative Decree No 27/2015/A of 29 December 2015], which, in the area of public procurement, allows a geographical criterion, requiring three public contracts to have been performed previously in the same autonomous region, to be imposed as a qualifying criterion?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC

1

OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
                                   PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1997-1
         FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1, 1997 (INCEPTION) 
                      THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1997
                       FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
             PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
                              $ Millions
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          $        65
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,121
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    88
<BONDS>                               1,098
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,186
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
Kendrick Javon JACKSON v. STATE

CR-16-0823

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jack L. Wyszomierski, asExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to the § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ JACK  L. WYSZOMIERSKI                                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Jack L. Wyszomierski                                     |   |
| Title: *Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer* |   |
| Date: August 12, 2005                                     |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pixelworks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd A. DeBonis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










By:/s/ Todd A. DeBonisTodd A. DeBonisPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:August 9, 2019
Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID 162
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 8 PageID 163
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 3 of 8 PageID 164
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 4 of 8 PageID 165
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 5 of 8 PageID 166
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 6 of 8 PageID 167
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 7 of 8 PageID 168
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00639-A Document 31 Filed 05/10/07 Page 8 of 8 PageID 169
Robert LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 Robert E. Balletto, President and Chief Executive Officer and Joseph W. Kennedy, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Georgetown Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and that to the best of their knowledge:
 
 1.
the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Georgetown Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Georgetown Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 November 15, 2010

/s/ Robert E. BallettoDate

Robert E. BallettoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2010

/s/ Joseph W. KennedyDate

Joseph W. KennedySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Office of Inspector General

Investigation #18-01

Closing Memorandum

August 7, 2018

On March 28, 2018, the Farm Credit Administration (FCA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) 

initiated an investigation on eight allegations concerning a senior government employee and the 

performance of his official duties, including: creating a hostile work environment through 

harassment and retaliation, engaging in prohibited personnel practices, violating provisions of the 

Federal Travel Regulations, instructing staff to disregard instructions of FCA’s contracting officer, 

and purchasing and abandoning Information Technology software that amounted to a gross 

waste of Agency funds. 

The OIG completed its investigative fieldwork on August 2, 2018. The OIG issued Report of 

Investigation #18-01 on August 3, 2018 and requested a response within 90 days regarding any 

action the Agency plans to take in response to the investigation report. One finding of potential 

criminal violations involving voucher reimbursements was declined by the U.S. Department of 

Justice on July 20, 2018. The OIG closed Investigation #18-01 on August 7, 2018.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  report of Asia  Biotechnology  Group Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Feng Yang,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a )or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  September 30, 2006                                By: /s/ Feng Yang
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Feng Yang
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016165EN.01001902.xml

| 10.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/19

---

Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Coesia v EUIPO (Depiction of a circular shape formed by two oblique, symmetrical red lines)

(Case T-130/16)

(2016/C 165/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Coesia SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Depiction of a circular shape formed by two oblique, symmetrical red lines) — Application for registration No 13 681 151

Trade mark at issue

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2016 in Case R 1933/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0587 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSE MARTINEZ JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 27, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2023

01/20/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0587
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Jump’n Jax, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **Steven
      D. Moulton** ,
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/S/ ****STEVEN
      D. MOULTON****





**Steven
      D. Moulton**


Principal
      Accounting Officer


July
      18,
      2006







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
      filed
      as part of the Form 10-SB or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Two Rivers Water Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John McKowen Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:  February 28, 2011
By: /s/ John McKowenChief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board
IN RE FORFEITURE OF: TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT DOLLARS ($221,898) IN U.S. CURRENCY,

Michele Gonzalez and 1st Medical Group, LLC, Appellants, v. City of Tampa, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1510

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report of Cornerstone Bancshares, Inc., a Tennessee
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each
of Nathaniel F. Hughes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Gary W. Petty, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




/s/  Nathaniel F.
      HughesNathaniel
      F. HughesPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)


/s/  Gary W. Petty,
      Jr.Gary
      W. Petty, Jr.Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer and accounting officer)




[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cornerstone Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Cornerstone Bancshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules will hold an in-person meeting in hybrid format with remote attendance options on April 3, 2025 in Atlanta, GA. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. Please see the Supplementary Information section in this notice for instructions on observing the meeting.

# DATES:

April 3, 2025 (meeting date) and March 27, 2025 (registration deadline for in-person observation).

# ADDRESSES:

                        An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *https://www.uscourts.gov/​forms-rules/​records-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Shelly Cox, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

To observe the meeting in person, individuals must contact the office listed above by 5 p.m. (eastern time) on March 27, 2025. After this deadline, only remote observation is permitted. Remote registration is available until the meeting date, provided it is completed before the projected end time.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: January 21, 2025.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2025-01705 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1367
TONY E. RUTHERFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Plaintiffs, versus JOHN ALDERMAN, III; STEPTOE & JOHNSON; MR/MRS X, Y, AND/OR Z, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-617) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: August 13, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony E. Rutherford, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Paul McGowan, Jeffrey Kent Phillips, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.* Appellant's "Motion to Supplement Docket" is hereby denied. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rutherford v. Alderman , No. CA-96-617 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 1997). *We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Kenneth Wayne WHITMORE v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KP-1093

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF E. BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and assigns reasons.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

JOHNSON, C.J., dissenting.

I would grant to remand to the district court with instructions to consider the merits of the application. Because the preceding post-conviction application was withdrawn and dismissed *without prejudice* , the district court erred in finding the present application is procedurally barred as impermissibly successive. The application was also timely filed pursuant to the exception set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A)(1). Accordingly, the claim that the State withheld an unredacted police report, which shows that a witness initially described a suspect markedly different in appearance than the defendant, in violation of *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), should not have been denied on procedural grounds.