alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

VS.

THOMAS SHANNON DARR,

Defendant.

)

)

)

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:88-CR-157(03)-G

)

) ECF

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the court is the motion of the defendant, Thomas Shannon Darr

(“Darr” or “the defendant”), to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to former Federal

Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is

denied.

I. BACKGROUND

The defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years for possession with intent

to distribute methamphetamine. The defendant committed the offense on

December 4, 1986, and now claims that the sentence imposed exceeded the statutory

maximum as it existed on that date.
*

 Prior to November 1, 1987, Rule 35(a) read as follows: “(a) Correction

of Sentence. The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time and may correct a

sentence imposed in an illegal manner within the time herein for the reduction of

sentence” (emphasis added). That provision was not retained in the current version

of Rule 35, which only allows the defendant seven days to correct a sentencing error.

- 2 -

II. ANALYSIS

The defendant moves to correct his sentence pursuant to the former version of

Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.*

 The defendant’s argument is

essentially one of timing; he claims that the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (“ADAA”)

was not in effect at the time he committed the underlying offense, and as a result the

maximum sentence that could be imposed was fifteen years. See Defendant’s Motion

at 3. 

However, the ADAA was signed into law by Congress on October 27, 1986,

and the Act became effective immediately. See Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, attached

to Government’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence as

Exhibit 1; Gozlon-Peretz v. United States, 498 U.S. 395, 404 (1991) (noting that absent

any clear indication by Congress to the contrary, a law takes effect on the date of its

enactment). Consequently, Darr is not entitled to the relief he seeks, and his motion

must be denied.

III. CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal

sentence is DENIED.
- 3 -

SO ORDERED.

May 8, 2008.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 943 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 943

  To prohibit the use of Federal funds to close or realign the Marine 
     Corps Recruit Depot located at Parris Island, South Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 2021

Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Scott of South Carolina) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of Federal funds to close or realign the Marine 
     Corps Recruit Depot located at Parris Island, South Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parris Island Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Marine Corps Recruit Depot located at Parris 
        Island, South Carolina (in this section referred to as ``Parris 
        Island''), has served the United States as a home to the Marine 
        Corps since 1891.
            (2) Parris Island was the first facility to integrate women 
        in boot camp training for the Marine Corps in the United 
        States.
            (3) Female recruits have trained at Parris Island since 
        1949.
            (4) The first integrated company of male and female 
        recruits graduated from Parris Island in 2019.
            (5) Parris Island has cultivated a legacy of excellence and 
        faithful service to the United States.
            (6) Parris Island is and shall remain the physical home of 
        the U.S. Marine Corps Eastern Recruiting Region.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF CLOSING OR REALIGNMENT OF MARINE CORPS RECRUIT 
              DEPOT LOCATED AT PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    No Federal funds may be used to close or realign Marine Corps 
Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina, or to conduct any 
planning or other activity related to such closure or realignment.
                                 <all>
```
Calvin Dmarcus Martise FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2964

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 25, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Rust Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Open Source Science B.V., Breda, NETHERLANDS; PROMOTIC, Lomé, TOGOLESE REPUBLIC; and Student Research and Development dba CodeDay, Seattle, WA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Rust Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 14, 2022, Rust Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 12, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82634).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-01726 Filed 1-24-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Approved by OMB

 3060-0228

 Estimated Time Per Response: 10 Minutes

 

United States of America

VESSEL BRIDGE-TO-BRIDGE RADIOTELEPHONY CERTIFICATE

 

Name of Ship Official Number Radio Call Sign Port of Registry Gross Tonnage Vessel Type

 

The Government of the United States of American certifies that the bridge-to-bridge station on board the above described vessel 

complies with all relevant provisions of the Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Radiotelephone Act, the Rules and Regulations of the 

Commission made pursuant thereto, and the terms of the station license.

This certificate will remain in force until Issued at Date

Signature of licensed inspector

This certificate, upon request, shall be presented for

inspection to the US. Coast Guard. It shall be retained on

board the vessel until its expiration, or until superseded by

a subsequent issuance.

 

 FCC Form 827 – Page 1

 August 2012
OMB Control Number 3060-0228

Notice to Individuals Required by the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

The solicitation of information requested in this form is authorized by th e Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The 

Commission will use FCC-licensed technicians to conduct ship inspections and determine if the radio installation is in compliance

with the requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. All information provided in this form, as well as the form 

itself, will be available for public inspection.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response. Our estimate includes the 

time to read the instructions, look through existing records, gather and maintain required d ata, and actually complete and review the 

form or response. If you have any comments on this estimate, or on how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it 

causes you, please write the Federal Communications Commission, Office of Managing Director, AMD-PERM, Washington, DC 

20554, Paperwork Reduction Act Project (3060-0228). We will also accept your PRA comments via the internet if you sent an email to PRA@fcc.gov.

Please DO NOT SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. You are not required to respond to a collection of information 

sponsored by the Federal government, and the government may not conduct or sponsor this collection, unless it displays a currently 

valid OMB control number and/or we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number 

of 3060-0228.

THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-579, DECEMBER 31,1974, 5 U.S.C. SECTION 

552a(e)(3) AND THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACTION OF 1995, PUBLIC LAW 104-13, OCTOBER 1,1995, 44 U.S.C. 

SECTION 3507.

 FCC Form 827 – Page 2

 August 2012
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CuraTech Industries, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I,  Lincoln
      Dastrup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ **LINCOLN
      DASTRUP**






**Lincoln
      Dastrup**


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      10, 2006







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
      filed
      as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 1 of 15 PageID 13
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 2 of 15 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 3 of 15 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 4 of 15 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 5 of 15 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 6 of 15 PageID 18
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 7 of 15 PageID 19
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 8 of 15 PageID 20
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 9 of 15 PageID 21
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 10 of 15 PageID 22
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 11 of 15 PageID 23
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 12 of 15 PageID 24
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 13 of 15 PageID 25
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 14 of 15 PageID 26
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02449-N Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 15 of 15 PageID 27
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors

Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-128135, No. 333-124894, No. 333-123997, No. 333-123781, No. 333-113182, No. 333-111186, No. 333-57418 andNo. 333-132740) on Form S-3 and No. 333-104049, No. 333-104050, No. 333-108733, No. 333-108734 and No. 333-124089 on Form S-8 of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a development stage company), of our reports datedMarch 9, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable preferredstock and stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the period from September 29, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2006, which included an explanatory paragraph regardingthe adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments”, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

Our report on the cumulative consolidated statements of operations, redeemable preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the periodSeptember 29, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2006 include amounts for the period from September 29, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2004, which were audited by other auditors and our opinion, insofar as it relates to theamounts included for the period September 29, 1999 through December 31, 2004 is based solely on the report of other auditors. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 9, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1256 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1074, K2025-1073.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00882 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of CuraTech Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Lincoln M. Dastrup, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Lincoln M. DastrupLincoln
      M. DastrupChief
      Financial OfficerDecember
      10, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

S & H Transport, Inc. :

:

v. : No. 242 C.D. 2017

:

City of York, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2017, the opinion filed

October 5, 2017, in the above-captioned matter shall be designated Opinion rather 

than Memorandum Opinion, and it shall be reported.

________________________________

DAN PELLEGRINI, Senior Judge
J.R. v. MORGAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160951

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 16, 2018

Affirmed.
Rinat KHAYBULLIN; Svetlana Kuznetsova a/k/a Svetlana Kouznetsova, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR the CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF the LXS 2006-4N TRUST FUND; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., acting solely as nominee for First Magnus Financial Corporation, an Arizona Corporation; and Greyhawk Landing Property Owners Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-152

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Richard Neal GILLESPIE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
. 

## 313

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Railroe Condn~rsionof mxer Aurtln, Taxes

~cprstete 

### corn-

. 939, you stete nit& Transport 

### CORF-y, Ino., ioa in Cklahome 

### 0dcilt3altltNa e e r3tenaara inmrance to potebt ita (Iprovision8 or sootion uler :%ealon of the i‘ortp

### sea by the Torty-third 

### tarc0nt0naathat sinar otion of the Interstate hot be required to file mob tlon imurenae.
etate or recta, you ask the opinion of the queetioa shother euoh operator la done of Seation 13 of the Aot above eating the proteation of elnployeerof a notoroarrlrr by teking 

### out work&en*8 

### aompenaatlon lasurMOO. Seotlon 13 of the hot rofarred to, lnciofer as it coaaernsthe qcestlon or workuen~r aompenratlon tnruranoo, 

### provider am r0ii0wf8 Isbilroea Com.las1oa 

### 0r ToxaIl, m&3 a

*Each motor aerrier shall also protoot 

### his ofiployoao

by taking out wor'mea'a aoqennaetion lnsurenoo, afther as prorided by the

### I:‘orkmn*s Compensation Laws of the State of 

### Texe8, or la a reliable lnearanco oompeny authorized to writs 

### workon’ oomp.snaatlon lmureaoo 

### epprovad bT the COn;;ai8GiOA.* The porsr'~onforrod **upon** the Congress by the Constltutlonof the United Staten to reeulato ao~%eroo batwren **the** atatoe, :whFhen

exerted, oxalunes and aupsroeaoa atete lsglslrtion in.-roapat to the aeao matter. Congress, in exerting

## its poser to reeulato euch phase oi intaretato oomceroo, nay alrcmaoribo ite rogulatlon in such manner as 

### to leavea Fert .ofthe aubjoot to atata notion. The purr088 of Con&rosa exclusively to roecleto mey be implied, but not unloasthe Fedora1 Loaaure, when feSrly interpreted, 1s plain17lnoonsiatontv:ithatete roguletion of the ae&!# izetter. cllveryt.~CuyahogeVellop Failway Compenp, 292 U. 3. 57, 64 6. ct. 573, 34, 78 L. Ed. 1123,



### There 10 nothing iA the Foderel LlotorCarrier Aat, 49 0. IZ*

C. A., 

### foctiona 301~E27, -ronotely suggesting 

### a purpose to rugulato the liability of erglogore engaged in la W-18 

### tppi0r lnteretate ao~orae to 

### their employees.~ As Congrese hee Aot ~000 rlt to 

### iAVeaethis field 

### 0r reeulatlonof intoratete domerae by motor aarrlers, the authority or the State or Terae over thB subjeot ren;niAsunimpalrod,and the provisions or Section 13, above quoted, are epplioobleto intereteta uommo~ carrier oortlfloato

### holders. StAto ox rol :‘;eahingMn r.otorcoach Co. V. Kelly, Dlrootor or the Deportment 0r Labor and Induatrisa, (Sup. Ct. or Eeahington)74 Tao. (24) 16.

30 trust that ‘the foregoing atiliabntl~ 

### anairora your laquiry. Very trnly yours ATTOiILURT

GENERAL OF TKXJU

R) W. F'r

Abrrr "-aa.
Haydee Alfaro GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D18-2242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Rex E. Russo, Coral Gables, for petitioner.

Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and Kerri L. McNulty, Sr. Appellate Counsel, for respondent.

Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

***ON MOTION FOR REHEARING***

Upon consideration of Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing, we grant rehearing and withdraw the opinion of February 20, 2019, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

***ON PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR***

Petitioner Haydee Alfaro Gonzalez seeks to reinstate two separate appeals, which the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Appellate Division consolidated and then dismissed.1 The City of Miami concedes that there was no basis to dismiss the appeal from the Code Enforcement Board (Case No. 18-88 AP). With respect to the appeal from the Unsafe Structures Panel (Case No. 18-249 AP), we hold that dismissal was improper because the notice of appeal was timely filed. We therefore grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the appellate division's dismissal order, and remand for reinstatement of the consolidated appeals.

Petition granted; order quashed.

1

Petitioner appealed (1) an order from the Code Enforcement Board (Case No. 18-088 AP) and (2) an order from the City's Unsafe Structures Panel (Case No. 18-249 AP).