alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000576

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

LIGAYA NAVASCA and RAYMOND SEBASTIAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

ROBERT ROSS, Defendant-Appellant, and

PAUL HAYCRAFT; DAVID YAMADA; WALTER SERGENT; and GENE SORDILLA,

Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

HONOLULU DIVISION

(CIVIL NO. 1DRC-21-10106)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief

were due on or before November 21, 2022, and December 19, 2022,

respectively; 

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant Robert Ross

(Ross) failed to file either document, or request an extension of

time;

(3) On January 20, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice informing Ross that the time for filing the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the

matter would be called to the court's attention on January 30,

2023, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of

the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Ross could request relief from default

by motion;

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000576

19-MAY-2023

08:16 AM

Dkt. 24 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) The appellate clerk mailed the notice of entering

case on calendar and the default notice to Ross at his addresses

on record in this appeal and they were returned as undeliverable;

(5) HRAP Rule 25(f) requires a self-represented party,

within 10 days of any change in mailing address, to file a notice

of change of address with the appellate clerk; and

(6) Ross has not filed a notice of change of address,

and Ross took no further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 19, 2023.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

2
Horace MCKINNEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-34

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jamal BARTLEY

NO. 2017-KO-1924

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.
Mark A. MERRILL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida; Mark S. Inch, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents.

No. 1D18-3998

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 18, 2019

Mark A. Merrill, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

Because this amended petition seeks belated appeal of a lower tribunal order in a civil matter, the amended petition is denied. *See* *Powell v. Fla. Dep't of Corrections* , 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable). Petitioner may seek relief in the lower tribunal by a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. *See* *Welch v. Department of Corrections* , 238 So.3d 1281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  David  Zaikin,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Siberian Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period
ended  March  31,  2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB/A  fairly presents in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.


                                     By:/s/ David Zaikin
                                     --------------------------
                                     David Zaikin
                                     Chief Executive Officer
May 19, 2006

<PAGE>
Frederick E. MELVIN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D18-621

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 23-03038-sgj Doc 5 Filed 05/16/23 Entered 05/16/23 16:11:35 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 23-03038-sgj Doc 5 Filed 05/16/23 Entered 05/16/23 16:11:35 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 16 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 39
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 16 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 40
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Kendle International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Karl Brenkert III, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 15, 2004

/s/ Karl Brenkert III
------------------------------
Karl Brenkert III
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kendle International Inc. and will be retained by Kendle
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6390

CHARLIE WARD, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STEPHEN DEWALT, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-00-856) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlie Ward, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charlie Ward, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We note that, even if the district court had jurisdiction to review Ward’s Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), claim, the sentence would not be in error because his 188-month sentence did not exceed the applicable statutory maximum. See 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West 1999); United States v. Kinter , 235 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Dewalt , No. CA-00-856 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2001; entered Jan. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued April 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-12-00414-CV

ESTHER J. DAMLARKAYA, Appellant

V.

MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 999747

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Esther J. Damlarkaya has neither paid the required filing fee for 

this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs 

must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required 
2

by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012), 

§.51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of 

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and 

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. 

A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was initially due on May 

17, 2012. On March 8, 2013, the Court notified appellant that she had not 

established indigence and that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless the filing 

fee was paid within 10 days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 

42.3 (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal). Appellant did not respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANDY DANTZLER, 812677, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-2164-D

)

WILLIAM STEPHENS, )

Director TDCJ-CID, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and

the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that

the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions,

and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the

Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the court denies a

certificate of appealability. The court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge’s

findings, conclusions, and recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that the

petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this court’s “assessment of the

constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable

whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.473, 484

(2000).

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02164-D-BF Document 26 Filed 02/03/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 703
If petitioner files a notice of appeal,

( ) petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

(X) petitioner must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in

forma pauperis.

SO ORDERED.

February 3, 2014.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

CHIEF JUDGE

2

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02164-D-BF Document 26 Filed 02/03/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 704
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001039223
<NAME>                        GLENBOROUGH PROPERTIES, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         4,019
<SECURITIES>                                   4,019
<RECEIVABLES>                                  44,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                   412
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,782
<PP&E>                                         1,825,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 82,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,876,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,043
<BONDS>                                        708,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     925,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,876,246
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,644
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  75,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               64,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               412
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             53,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                47,755
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            47,755
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (412)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   46,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.74
        


</TABLE>
Keith Patrick HENRY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0347

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019

Keith Patrick Henry, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*686The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. *See**Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n* , 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 15 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller 

of Currency relating to ‘‘National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as Lenders’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. REED, Ms. WARREN, Ms. 

CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. SMITH, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of the Comptroller of Currency relating to 

‘‘National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as 

Lenders’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Of4 fice of the Comptroller of Currency relating to ‘‘National 

5 Banks and Federal Savings Associations as Lenders’’ (85 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 15 IS 

1 Fed. Reg. 68742 (October 30, 2020)), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01332]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP25-351-000.
    Applicants: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement--1/
14/2025 to be effective 1/14/2025.
    Filed Date: 1/13/25.
    Accession Number: 20250113-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/27/25.

    Docket Numbers: RP25-352-000.
    Applicants: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement--01/
14/2025 to be effective 1/14/2025.
    Filed Date: 1/13/25.
    Accession Number: 20250113-5122.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/27/25.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

    Dated: January 14, 2025.
Carlos D. Clay,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01332 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, David F. Knapfel, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.,
    including subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within
    those entities, particularly during the period in which this
    quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
    filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
    our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
    and have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware
    of any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

b)  that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
    our management or other employees who have a significant role in
    our internal controls; and

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.

                                   Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc., Registrant

Dated: May 14, 2005                /s/ David F. Knapfel
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   By: David F. Knapfel, Chief Financial
                                   Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32





BELMOND LTD.





Section 1350 Certification





The undersigned hereby certify that this report of Belmond Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.





/s/ H. Roeland Vos/s/ Martin O’GradyH. Roeland VosMartin O’GradyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer





Dated: April 24, 2019





A signed original of this written certification has been provided to Belmond Ltd. and will be retained by Belmond Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-88502 of Trailer Bridge, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated April 12,
2003. April 23 2004 as to the effects of the restatement described in Note 6
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory
paragraphs relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and
the restatement discussed in Note 6) appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Trailer Bridge, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
May 5, 2004