alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eldridge T. BELL, III and Susan Bell v. SPEEG MEDICAL CORP., et al.,

NO. 2019-CC-0503

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1367

TONY E. RUTHERFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,

Plaintiffs,

versus

JOHN ALDERMAN, III; STEPTOE & JOHNSON; MR/MRS

X, Y, AND/OR Z,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-96-617)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: August 13, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony E. Rutherford, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Paul McGowan, Jeffrey

Kent Phillips, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellees.
* Appellant's "Motion to Supplement Docket" is hereby denied.

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (1994). We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting

the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Rutherford v. Alderman, No. CA-96-617 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 1997).*

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

p1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147814

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147814

COA: 315620

Wayne CC: 99-000211-FC

DUANE WILLIAM BELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 1 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 2 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 3 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 4 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 5 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 6 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 7 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 8 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 9 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 10 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 11 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 12 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 13 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 14 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 15 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 16 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 17 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 18 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 19 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 20 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 21 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 22 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 23 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 24 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 25 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 26 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 27 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 28 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 29 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 30 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 31 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 32 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 33 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 34 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 35 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 36 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 37 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 38 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 39 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 40 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 41 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 42 of 43
Case 3:04-cv-01456-B Document 1 Filed 07/06/2004 Page 43 of 43
Eric C. CHRISTU, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Simon C. Fireman, and Eric C. Christu and Kenneth Meewes, as Co-Trustees of the Simon C. Fireman 2005 Revocable Trust, Appellants, v. Stephanie PIZZOLA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-1591 4D18-3028

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE D.E. and T.G.

(In re: Russell County Department of Human Resources v. D.E. and T.G.)

2170574

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 22, 2018

Mand. pet. denied.
Case 3:05-cv-01739-M Document 66 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 282
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50027

Conference Calendar

 

DAVID D. DU VALL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-331

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David D. Du Vall appeals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of the Defendants and the dismissal of

his suit concerning the mistaken re-assignment of his rented post

office box. We do not reach the merits of the appeal as Du

Vall's suit is facially frivolous, insubstantial, and

"insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court." 

Dilworth v. Dallas Cty. Commun. College Dist., 81 F.3d 616, 617
No. 96-50027

- 2 -

(5th Cir. 1996) (civil rights suit in which student complained of

receiving a "B" in English). As Du Vall's suit was so patently

trifling as to fail to invoke federal jurisdiction, his appeal is

frivolous, and it is DISMISSED as such. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

We caution Du Vall that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Du Vall is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 10.15



 




EXHIBIT 10.15




AMENDMENT TO

MANAGEMENT RETENTION AGREEMENT



     WHEREAS, Stratos Lightwave, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”) and Richard C.E. Durrant (“Executive”) entered into a Management
Retention Agreement entered into on or about October 17, 2002 (the “Agreement”);


     WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement
to expand what constitutes a “Change of Control” under the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, Section 9(b) of the Management Retention Agreement
provides that it can be amended at any time by a written agreement executed by
the Executive and an authorized officer of the Corporation.


     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Management Retention Agreement
between the Corporation and Richard C.E. Durrant be and it hereby is amended to
revise Section 5(c)(iii) thereof to read as follows, effective immediately;



		
	 	     (iii) The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the
Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or
consolidation which would result in the Company’s voting securities
outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either
by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities
of the surviving entity or its parent) at least sixty percent (60%) of
the total voting power represented by the Company’s voting securities
or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after
such merger or consolidation; or



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in
the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year
set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	STRATOS LIGHTWAVE, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	By:	 	
/s/ James W. McGinley



	 	By:
	 	/s/ Richard C.E. Durrant



	Name:	 	
/s/ James W. McGinley



	 	 	 	      Richard C.E. Durrant
	Title:	 	
Chief Executive Officer


	 	 	 	 
	 
	Date:	 	
July 1, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT



OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 13350



Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and the
Chief Financial Officer of Veri-Tek International, Corp. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Todd Antenucci                                        
|                        |  |       
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Todd Antenucci                                            
|                        |  |       
|                        |  | Title: |  | President (Principal Executive Officer) of                
|                        |  |       
|                        |  |        |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.                             
|                        |  |       
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Patrick T. Flynn                                      
|                        |  |       
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Patrick T. Flynn                                          
|                        |  |       
|                        |  | Title: |  | Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer) of
|                        |  |       
|                        |  |        |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.                             



20
Craig Allen TULL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-1331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2019

Blaise Trettis, Public Defender, and Nick Kramperth, Assistant Public Defender, Sanford, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition seeking a writ of prohibition. *See**Pilkington v. Pilkington* , 182 So.3d 776, 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ; *Chace v. Loisel* , 170 So.3d 802, 803 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) ; *see also* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.350(d).

PETITION DENIED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
# C_2023161EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2022-2023 SESSION

Sittings of 9 to 10 November 2022

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Manitex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                                            
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:                 |  | /s/ David J. Langevin                                                      
|Name:               |  | David J. Langevin                                                          
|Title:              |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                       
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)               
|                   
|Dated: May 13, 2009
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ David H. Gransee                                                       
|Name:               |  | David H. Gransee                                                           
|Title:              |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                 
|                    |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)
|                   
|Dated: May 13, 2008



38
Exhibit 15.1 

Consent ofindependent registered public accounting firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-92220,333-81564, 333-108833, 333-125075, 333-137354, 333-149631, 333-158154, 333-158155, 333-165591, 333-168020, 333-172919, 333-172920 and 333-172921) of our reports dated March 17, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedules of ING Groep N.V., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ING Groep N.V., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2013. 

Amsterdam, The Netherlands 

March 17, 2014 

Ernst & Young Accountants LLP
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certification
      of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Georgetown Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      E. Balletto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph
      W. Kennedy, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, that we have reviewed the Form 10-QSB and
      that
      to the best of our knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as of the date and
      for the periods covered by the Report.








Date:
                February 10, 2006
            /s/
                Robert E. BallettoRobert
                E. BallettoPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Chief
                Executive Officer)/s/
                Joseph W. KennedyJoseph
                W. KennedySenior
                Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting and Financial Officer)






20
# C_2017424EN.01002501.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 4 October 2017 — Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie v R.

(Case C-583/17)

(2017/C 424/36)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Applicant:

Defendant: R.

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person ... be interpreted as meaning that only the Member State in which the application for international protection was first lodged can determine the Member State responsible, with the result that a foreign national has a legal remedy only in that Member State, under Article 27 of the Dublin Regulation, against the incorrect application of one of the criteria for determining responsibility set out in Chapter III of that Regulation, including Article 9? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person ... be interpreted as meaning that only the Member State in which the application for international protection was first lodged can determine the Member State responsible, with the result that a foreign national has a legal remedy only in that Member State, under Article 27 of the Dublin Regulation, against the incorrect application of one of the criteria for determining responsibility set out in Chapter III of that Regulation, including Article 9?

1

| 2. | In answering Question 1, to what extent is it significant that, in the Member State in which the application for international protection was first lodged, a decision on that application had already been made or, alternatively, that the foreign national had withdrawn that application prematurely? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In answering Question 1, to what extent is it significant that, in the Member State in which the application for international protection was first lodged, a decision on that application had already been made or, alternatively, that the foreign national had withdrawn that application prematurely?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31; ‘the Dublin Regulation’.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of QV Quantum Ventures (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended December  31, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  



| | By:    |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Desmond Ross                 
| | Name:  | Desmond Ross                     
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | February 14, 2007                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
J.D.H. v. R.C. and L.A.C.

2160971

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 27, 2018

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 13350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Veri-Tek International, Corp. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge, Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |     |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ David J. Langevin                     
|                    |  |     |  |                                           
|                    |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  |     |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.             
|                    |  |    
|Dated: May 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ David H. Gransee                      
|                    |  |     |  |                                           
|                    |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                    |  |     |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.