alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1263 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1082, K2025-1081.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00906 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 16 (Monday, January 27, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8223-8224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01746]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--America's DataHub Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 28, 2024, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), America's DataHub Consortium 
(``ADC'') has filed written

[[Page 8224]]

notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ADACEN FEDERAL 
LLC, Albuquerque, NM; AT Worthy Technology, Fairfax, VA; Brightquery, 
Inc., Irvine, CA; Careplots, Inc., Malvern, PA; CAS a division of 
American Chemical Society, Columbus, OH; Data Point LLC, Orange, NJ; 
Data Products LLC, Chicago, IL; Generative Medical, Inc., Palo Alto, 
CA; K8R Applications, Inc. dba Future Perfect Engineering, Seattle, WA; 
Node.Digital, Leesburg, VA; Omnicom Consulting Group, Inc., Tarrytown, 
NY; Polaron Technologies, Inc., Miamisburg, OH; Prism Lab at Cornell 
University, Ithaca, NY; and Vistra Communications LLC, Lutz, FL, have 
been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ADC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 11, 2021, ADC filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72628).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 4, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52092).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-01746 Filed 1-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
J.P., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4807

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 892 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that kombucha 

is exempt from any excise taxes and regulations imposed on alcoholic 

beverages. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that kombucha is exempt from any excise taxes and 

regulations imposed on alcoholic beverages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Our Manufac5 turers from Being Unfairly taxed while Championing 

6 Health Act’’ or ‘‘KOMBUCHA’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 892 IS

1 SEC. 2. TAX-FREE PRODUCTION OF KOMBUCHA. 

2 (a) EXCEPTION FROM DEFINITION OF BREWER.— 

3 Subsection (d) of section 5052 of the Internal Revenue 

4 Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(d) BREWER.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this chap7 ter, the term ‘brewer’ means any person who brews 

8 beer or produces beer for sale. 

9 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The term ‘brewer’ shall not 

10 include any person who— 

11 ‘‘(A) produces only beer exempt from tax 

12 under subsection (e) of section 5053, or 

13 ‘‘(B) produces only kombucha exempt from 

14 tax under subsection (i) of such section.’’. 

15 (b) EXEMPTION FROM TAX.—Section 5053 of the In16 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

17 (1) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection 

18 (j), and 

19 (2) by inserting after subsection (h) the fol20 lowing new subsection: 

21 ‘‘(i) PRODUCTION OF KOMBUCHA.— 

22 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to regulation pre23 scribed by the Secretary, any person may, without 

24 payment of tax, produce kombucha for consumption 

25 or sale. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 892 IS

1 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this chap2 ter, the term ‘kombucha’ means a beverage which— 

3 ‘‘(A) is fermented solely by a symbiotic cul4 ture of bacteria and yeast, 

5 ‘‘(B) contains not more than 1.25 percent 

6 of alcohol by volume, 

7 ‘‘(C) is sold or offered for sale as 

8 kombucha, and 

9 ‘‘(D) is derived from— 

10 ‘‘(i) sugar, malt or malt substitute, 

11 tea, or coffee, and 

12 ‘‘(ii) not more than 20 percent other 

13 wholesome ingredients.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to calendar quarters beginning 

16 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2018063EN.01000401.xml

| 19.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/4

---

Order of the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) of 7 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Woonhaven Antwerpen v Khalid Berkani, Asmae Hajji

(Case C-446/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Unfair terms - Rental contract concluded between a recognised social housing association and a tenant - Model rental contract made binding by an act of national legislation - Directive 93/13/EEC - Article 1(2) - Inapplicability of that directive))

(2018/C 063/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Vredegerecht te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Woonhaven Antwerpen

Applicant:

Defendants: Khalid Berkani, Asmae Hajji

Defendants:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 1(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that that directive is not applicable to conditions contained in the social rental contract concluded between a recognised social housing association and a tenant, which are determined by national legislation such as Article 11 of the model rental contract annexed to the Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering tot reglementering van het sociale huurstelsel ter uitvoering van titel VII van de Vlaamse Wooncode (Flemish Government Decree to regulate the social rental system implementing Title VII of the Flemish Housing Code), of 12 October 2007.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall
H. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an
officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
July 20, 2009.
 /s/
      Randall H. BrownRandall
      H. BrownChief
      Financial Officer, Executive Vice
                President,
      Treasurer and Secretary
 
 In
accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the
SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Christopher MOLDOVAN and John Gagne, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 05, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
Guillermina TABORDA, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-640

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2019044EN.01000301.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — Minister for Justice and Equality, Commissioner of An Garda Síochána v Workplace Relations Commission

(Case C-378/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment in employment - Directive 2000/78/EC - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Recruitment of police officers - National body established by law in order to ensure enforcement of EU law in a particular area - Power to disapply national legislation that conflicts with EU law - Primacy of EU law))

(2019/C 44/03)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Minister for Justice and Equality, Commissioner of An Garda Síochána

Respondent: Workplace Relations Commission

Operative part of the judgment

EU law, in particular the principle of primacy of EU law, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which a national body established by law in order to ensure enforcement of EU law in a particular area lacks jurisdiction to decide to disapply a rule of national law that is contrary to EU law.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 28.8.2018.

---
Case 3:05-cv-01486-K-BH Document 18 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 71
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01486-K-BH Document 18 Filed 07/06/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 72
# C_2017239EN.01002701.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 4 May 2017 — XC and Others

(Case C-234/17)

(2017/C 239/33)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: XC, YB, ZA

Applicants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is EU law, in particular Article 4(3) TEU in conjunction with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness inferred from it, to be interpreted as requiring the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court, Austria), upon application by the person concerned, to review a final decision delivered by a criminal court with respect to an alleged infringement of EU law (in this case, Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement), where national law (Paragraph 363a of the Strafprozeßordnung (Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure)) provides for such a review only with respect to an alleged violation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms or one of the protocols thereto?

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RONNIE GLENN TRIPLETT, 15692-064, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-1403-N

)

DAN JOSLIN, Warden, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. Plaintiff/Petitioner filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review

of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. 

The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and DENIES Petitioner’s motion

pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), filed on September 20, 2006 (docket #19). 

SIGNED January 11, 2007.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01403-N Document 28 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 109
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott
Jarus, (Interim) Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Scott
Jarus


Scott
Jarus


(Interim)
Chief Executive Officer


May 15,
2009
Lakita GRANT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0117

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 16
          - [Docket No. FDA-2024-N-3654]
          - RIN 0910-AI97

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 20, 2024, a direct final rule amending the Scope section of our regulation that provides for a regulatory hearing before the Agency. The comment period closed December 4, 2024. FDA is withdrawing the direct final rule because the Agency received significant adverse comment.                    

# DATES:

The direct final rule published at September 20, 2024, 89 FR 77019, is withdrawn effective January 17, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert Schwartz, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 1-877-287-1373,                         *CTPRegulations@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the direct final rule published on September 20, 2024, 89 FR 77019 is withdrawn.

Dated: January 13, 2025.

P. Ritu Nalubola,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-01145 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Case 3:05-cv-01478-B Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 6 PageID 55
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01478-B Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 6 PageID 56
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01478-B Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 3 of 6 PageID 57
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01478-B Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 4 of 6 PageID 58
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01478-B Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 5 of 6 PageID 59
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01478-B Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 6 of 6 PageID 60
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |   |                        |
|--------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| May 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Thomas Kreig       |   |
|         |   | Thomas Kreig                |   |
|         |   | Principal Financial Officer |   |
|         |   |                        |   |
The MIDDLEBERG RIDDLE GROUP v. 201 ST. CHARLES PLACE, LLC

NO. 2019-C-0206

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant
Exhibit 31.1
 HORIZON LINES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ CHARLES G. RAYMOND

Charles G. RaymondPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:06-cv-00032-J Document 5 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 28