alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STANLEY CARNELL KENDRICKS, §

Petitioner, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1722-N

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

Respondent §

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and

Conclusions of the Court, except as follows. The Director notes that Kendricks did not renew his

ineffective assistance of counsel claim with respect to his conviction for bail jumping and failure

to appear in his subsequent state habeas corpus proceedings, and objects that that claim should be

dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted, rather than dismissed as procedurally barred. The

Court sustains this objection and modifies the recommendation accordingly.

Signed May 1, 2008.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Retention Bonus Agmt- NYCB, Roslyn Bancorp, Roslyn Savings Bank & Daniel Murphy



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
  
 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 
 615 Merrick Avenue 
 Westbury, New York 11590 
  
 June 27, 2003 
  
 Daniel L. Murphy  
 The Roslyn Savings Bank 
 One Jericho Plaza 
 Jericho, New York 11753-8905 
  
 Dear Daniel: 
  
 I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certain additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the
“Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn
Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 
  
 At such time as you become an employee of the Bank under your new employment agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you
will receive a retention bonus of $600,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Time other than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your
new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you will immediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the
product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator of which is 365. 







 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the Merger
Agreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 
  
 Please
acknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 
  

	 	 	 	 	 Sincerely,

				
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Joseph R. Ficalora

 President and Chief Executive Officer

			
	 Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Daniel L. Murphy

	 	 	 	 
	 Daniel L. Murphy
	 	 	 	 

  

 2
J.D.H. v. R.C. and L.A.C.

2160972

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 27, 2018

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Thomas E. Walsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Thomas E. Walsh
-----------------------
Thomas E. Walsh
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEE ROY BROWN, ID # 1027084, §

 Petitioner, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1026-P

§ ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, § Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, § 

 Respondent. §

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and

Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 18 day of January, 2008.

th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

Under Rule 9(b), the court must comply with the requirements of Rule 9(a). Rule 9(a)(1)

provides, in pertinent part, that the court must state in writing the reasons for an order regarding the

detention of a defendant in a criminal case. 

2

The other elements of § 3143(b) are not pertinent. George does not present a risk of flight

or pose a danger to the community, and he is not prosecuting this appeal for purposes of delay.

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Criminal No. 3:05-CR-255-D

VS. §

 §

JEFFREY THOMAS GEORGE, §

 §

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 AND ORDER 

Defendant Jeffrey Thomas George (“George”) has applied to the court pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3143(b) for release pending appeal. For the reasons that follow, see Fed. R. App. P. 9(a)(1) and

(b),1 the court denies the application.

Section 3143(b) provides that a defendant who has been found guilty of an offense and

sentenced to a term of imprisonment shall be detained unless the judicial officer finds, inter alia,

that the appeal raises a substantial question of law or fact.2 A substantial question of law or fact is

one that is nonfrivolous and novel, raising substantial doubt as to the outcome of its resolution, with

the defendant required to show that a contrary appellate ruling would more probably than not result

in reversal, an order for a new trial, a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment, or a

reduced sentence to a term of imprisonment less than the total of the time already served plus the

expected duration of the appeal process. See § 3143(b)(1)(B)(i)-(iv); United States v. Valera-

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00255-D Document 61 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 403
- 2 -

Elizondo, 761 F.2d 1020, 1022-25 (5th Cir. 1985).

To obtain release pending appeal, George relies on his position that the court should have

granted his motion to suppress, contending that reasonable minds might disagree concerning whether

the search in question was constitutional. Based on its April 18, 2006 memorandum opinion and

order, the court holds that George has not demonstrated a substantial question of law or fact under

the standard explained in Valera-Elizondo. For the reasons set out in the court’s April 18, 2006

memorandum opinion and order, George’s estranged wife clearly had authority to consent to the

search of the marital residence in which she resided, including the storage tub and its contents. 

* * *

George’s September 20, 2006 application for release pending ruling on appeal by the United

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is denied. His alternative request for a three-week

extension to report for service of his sentence is also denied. The court is today denying his motion.

He therefore has sufficient time to seek a ruling from the Fifth Circuit before October 10, 2006,

when he must report for service of sentence.

SO ORDERED.

September 22, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00255-D Document 61 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 404
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 28, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01801]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5679-041]

Energy Stream, LLC; Notice of Meeting

    a. Project Name and Number: M.S.C. Hydroelectric Project No. 5679.
    b. Applicant: Energy Stream, LLC (Energy Stream).
    c. Date and Time of Meeting: Thursday, February 6, 2025, from 10:00 
a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.
    d. FERC Contact: John Baummer, (202) 502-6837, or 
[email protected].
    e. Purpose of Meeting: Commission staff will hold a meeting with 
representatives from the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office 
(Connecticut SHPO) and Energy Stream to discuss Commission staff's 
draft Programmatic Agreement for the M.S.C Hydroelectric Project, 
pursuant to section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The 
meeting will be held virtually via Microsoft Teams.
    f. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian Tribes, and other 
interested parties are invited to participate. If meeting attendees 
decide to disclose information about a specific location that could 
create a risk or harm to an archaeological site or Native American 
cultural resource, attendees other than Connecticut SHPO, Tribal 
representatives, and Commission staff will be excused for that portion 
of the meeting.
    g. A summary of the meeting will be placed in the public record of 
this proceeding. As appropriate, the meeting summary will include both 
a public, redacted version that excludes any information about the 
specific location of any archaeological site or Native American 
cultural resource and an unredacted privileged version. Parties 
planning to attend the meeting should notify John Baummer at (202) 502-
6837 or [email protected] by Wednesday, February 5, 2025, to RSVP 
and receive specific instructions for logging in to the meeting.

    Dated: January 22, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01801 Filed 1-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Khalaf MILLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 2019

Khalaf Miller, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Paul James BEAUSOLEIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2622

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kendal Arthur BURGE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1380

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
IIA 

Calendar No. 33 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 13 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating to ‘‘Update of Commission’s Conciliation 

Procedures’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 

to ‘‘Update of Commission’s Conciliation Procedures’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating to 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 13 PCS 

1 ‘‘Update of Commission’s Conciliation Procedures’’ (86 

2 Fed. Reg. 2974; published January 14, 2021), and such 

3 rule shall have no force or effect. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 33 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 13 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapConciliation Procedures’’. Commission relating to ‘‘Update of Commission’s submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LEON MUHAMMAD,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10114

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00527-RLH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Leon Muhammad appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Muhammad contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light

FILED

NOV 21 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
of the allegedly minor nature of his violations. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing Muhammad’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007). Even accepting Muhammad’s characterization of his violations as

minor, the 24-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including

Muhammad’s criminal history and breach of the court’s trust. See United States v.

Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (at a revocation sentencing, the court

may sanction a violator for his breach of the court’s trust).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10114
STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond ROBINSON

NO. 2019-KK-0790

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

21000.0527/11223881.1 1 5:17-cv-00021-LHK

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203)

AUSTIN B. KENNEY (State Bar No. 242277)

LASZLO LADI (State Bar No. 265564)

ll@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

ARASTO FARSAD (SBN 273118) 

FARSAD LAW OFFICE, P.C. 

2905 Stender Way, Suite 76 

Santa Clara, CA 95054 

Telephone: (408) 641-9966 

Facsimile: (408) 866-7334 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CESAR GALINDO and MARIA RIVERA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION

CESAR GALINDO and MARIA RIVERA,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; BSI 

FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00021-LHK

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT OCWEN LOAN 

SERVICING, LLC; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Action Filed: January 4, 2017

Trial Date: February 8, 2019

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs Cesar Galindo and Maria Rivera

(“Plaintiffs”) and defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), that Ocwen be dismissed 

from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and 

that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Case 5:17-cv-00021-LHK Document 88 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

21000.0527/11223881.1 2 5:17-cv-00021-LHK

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DATED: May 24, 2018 FARSAD LAW OFFICE, P.C.

By: /s/ Arasto Farsad

Arasto Farsad

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CESAR GALINDO and MARIA RIVERA 

DATED: May 25, 2018 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Laszlo Ladi

Laszlo Ladi

Attorneys for Defendant 

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

ECF ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures 

indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

/s/ Laszlo Ladi

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC is dismissed with 

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

District Judge

The Clerk shall close the file. 5/24/2018

Case 5:17-cv-00021-LHK Document 88 Filed 05/24/18 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:05-cv-01232-M Document 31 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID 182
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01232-M Document 31 Filed 11/18/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID 183
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01232-M Document 31 Filed 11/18/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID 184
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01232-M Document 31 Filed 11/18/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID 185
**CERTIFICATION        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION        1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF        2002**

| ·   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended                June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ·   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                W. Donald                Brunson     |   |   |   |
| W.                Donald Brunson                        |   |   |        |
| President(Principal                  Executive Officer) |   |   |   |

----
November 1, 2015 

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third District of Texas

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711-2547

512-463-1733

RE: COA No. 03-15-00302-CR

 Trial Court Cause No. D-1-DC-13-900252

 George DeLaCruz v. State of Texas

Dear Mr. Kyle, 

This is my third request for extension in the above-entitled cause, and I would respectfully 

request an additional 30-day extension. Due to a very heavy trial court schedule, I have been 

unable to make much progress in the completion of this record. I have now taken a 30-day 

leave in order to enable me to focus solely on my outstanding appellate records. I currently 

have the above-entitled cause on appeal along with the following records COA No. 

03-15-000424-CR, COA No. 03-15-00154-CR, COA No. 03-15-00066, COA No. 03-15-00306 all 

which are due on the exact same date. I also have COA No. 03-15-00177-CR, which was 

transferred to the First Court of Appeals in Houston, which I have completed and will be filing 

on Monday. Due to the circumstances, I would respectfully request until November 30, 2015.

Thank you for your time, patience, and attention to this matter. If you have any questions, 

please feel free to call me at 512-854-9315 or by email at Kimberly.lee@traviscountytx.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Kimberly Lee 

Official Court Reporter 

147th District Court 

Travis County, Texas 

512-854-9315
Angelo WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2787

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BOCA BEND, LLC, Appellant, v. Leonard MERZEL, Boca Bend Homeowners Association, Inc., and A&W Property Management, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-1508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Connected Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey W. Sass, Chief Executive Officer and Jay Howard Linn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.c. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/  Jeffrey  W. SassJeffrey W. Sass Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Jay Howard LinnJay Howard Linn Chief Financial OfficerChief Accounting Officer  Date: May 22, 2006 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Curtis N. YOUNG, DOC #363850, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida and Julie Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-2847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 21.01

LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES

|SUBSIDIARY NAME                  |  | JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|FormFactor Europe Limited        |  | United Kingdom              
|FormFactor Germany GmbH          |  | Germany                     
|FormFactor Hungary Licensing LLC |  | Hungary                     
|FormFactor International, Inc.   |  | Delaware, United States     
|FormFactor, KK                   |  | Japan                       
|FormFactor Korea, Inc.           |  | South Korea                 
|FormFactor Singapore Pte. Ltd.   |  | Singapore                   

---



QuickLinks