alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT



Exhibit 10.3



SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT

UAL CORPORATION

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

(Effective as of July 12, 1994)


WHEREAS, UAL Corporation (the "Company") maintains the UAL Corporation
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (effective as of July 12, 1994) (the "Plan");
and

WHEREAS, the Company has, pursuant to Section 13.1(a) of the
Plan, the authority to amend the Plan subject to the approval of ALPA and
the IAM; and

WHEREAS, the Company, with the approval of ALPA and the IAM,
has terminated the Plan, and the Company now wishes to amend the Plan to
clarify the provisions regarding distributions to employees with accounts
under $5,000 in connection with the termination.

NOW, THEREFORE, this Sixteenth Amendment is hereby adopted effective
June 4, 2003, subject to the approval of ALPA and the IAM, as follows:

1.        Section 7.3(c)(i)(B) is
amended to read as follows:

                      
"(B)    A Participant not described in subsection (A) above,
and any Beneficiary or Alternate Payee may elect that his or her ESOP Cash
Account be: (x) transferred to a tax-qualified retirement plan (other than
a plan sponsored by the Company or an Affiliate) or an IRA as a direct
rollover to the extent specified in Section 7.5 and as permitted under
the Code, or (y) distributed to the Participant, Beneficiary or Alternate
Payee. If such a Participant, Beneficiary or Alternate Payee makes no election,
(aa) and the balance in the Participant's Accounts as of the date of the
termination distribution and immediately before the first payment in any
previous series of scheduled periodic distributions does not exceed $5,000,
his or her ESOP Cash Account shall be distributed to him or her in cash,
or (bb) and the balance in the Participant's Accounts as of the date of
the termination distribution and immediately before the first payment in
any previous series of scheduled periodic distributions exceeds $5,000,
his or her ESOP Cash Account shall be transferred to an account established
in his or her name in the appropriate tax-qualified defined contribution
plan sponsored by the Company or an Affiliate."


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Sixteenth Amendment
to be executed on June 4, 2003

 

 
	UAL CORPORATION
	 
	/s/ Frederic F. Brace





 

 

 
	APPROVED BY:
	AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION,
	INTERNATIONAL
	 
	/s/ Duane E. Woerth
	 
	/s/ Paul R. Whiteford, Jr.
	 
	 
	 
	INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
	OF MACHINISTS AND
	AEROSPACE WORKERS
	 
	/s/ Scotty Ford
	 
	/s/ S. R. Canale
Case 2:05-cv-00260-J Document 1 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00260-J Document 1 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00260-J Document 1 Filed 09/19/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00260-J Document 1 Filed 09/19/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00260-J Document 1 Filed 09/19/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00260-J Document 1 Filed 09/19/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
EXHIBIT 31.2

                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, George A. Powell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pride, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 15, 2007


/s/ George A. Powell
-----------------------------------------
George A. Powell
Vice-President, Secretary and Director
EXHIBIT 32

Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2007    |  |  |  | Date: March 13, 2007                                
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Alan W. Dunton      |  |  |  | /s/ Peyton J. Marshall                              
|Alan W. Dunton, M.D.    |  |  |  | Peyton J. Marshall, Ph.D.                           
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

OTIS CHAMBERS §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-1533-D

§

RYERSON & TULL STEEL CO. §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff Otis Chambers, appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, has filed a

motion for appointment of counsel in this race discrimination case brought under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. 

Title VII authorizes the appointment of counsel upon request "in such circumstances as the

court may deem just." Id. § 2000e-5(f)(1). Among the factors the court must consider are: (1) the

merits of the claim; (2) efforts taken to obtain a lawyer; and (3) the financial ability of plaintiff to

retain counsel. See Gonzales v. Carlin, 907 F.2d 573, 580 (5th Cir. 1990). Here, the EEOC has

found reasonable cause to believe that defendant violated the statute. (See Plf. Compl., Exh. A).

That determination is "highly probative" in deciding whether to appoint counsel in a subsequent

judicial proceeding. See Gonzales, 907 F.2d at 580; Caston v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 556 F.2d

1305, 1309 (5th Cir. 1977). In his motion, plaintiff alleges that he has been unable to retain counsel

from legal aid or legal services organizations or individual attorneys without payment of a fee or on

a contingent fee basis. The court previously determined that plaintiff lacks the financial resources

to prosecute this suit. 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01533-D Document 6 Filed 09/01/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 24
After considering the relevant factors, the court exercises its discretion to appoint counsel

for plaintiff in this cause. The following attorney is hereby appointed to represent plaintiff:

Hal K. Gillespie, Esq.

Gillespie Rozen Watsky & Motley, P.C.

3402 Oak Grove Avenue

Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75204

Phone: (214) 720-2009

Fax: (214) 720-2291

Counsel shall file a notice of entry of appearance within 10 days from the date of this order.

Any further pleadings, motions, or communications with the court on behalf of plaintiff must be

made by his counsel of record.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 1, 2005.

cc: Otis Chambers

3609 Haystack Drive

Grand Prairie, Texas 75052

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01533-D Document 6 Filed 09/01/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 25
# C_2018455EN.01001002.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom) — Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd

(Case C-153/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 168 and 173 - Deduction of input tax - Vehicle hire purchase transactions - Goods and services used for both taxable transactions and exempt transactions - Origin and scope of the right to deduct - Proportional deduction))

(2018/C 455/16)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant: Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Article 168 and Article 173(2)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, first, even where the general costs relating to supplies of moveable goods by hire purchase, such as the supplies at issue in the main proceedings, are passed on not in the amount due by the customer in respect of the supply of the goods concerned, that is to say the taxable part of the transaction, but in the amount of the interest due in respect of the ‘finance’ part of the transaction, that is to say the exempt part thereof, those general costs must nonetheless be considered, for the purposes of value added tax (VAT), to be a component of the price of that supply and, second, Member States may not apply a method of apportionment which does not take account of the initial value of the goods concerned when they are supplied, since that method is not capable of ensuring a more precise apportionment than that which would arise from the application of the turnover-based allocation key.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0579

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KEITH PRICE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 14, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 7 2022

01/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0579
Exhibit 13.2








PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-A) PLC (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.








Date: June 18, 2010








/s/ Kate Blankenship


Kate Blankenship


Principal Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 22, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01449]

[[Page 7732]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12637]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``The Book of Esther in the 
Age of Rembrandt'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``The Book of Esther in the Age of 
Rembrandt'' at The Jewish Museum, New York, New York; the North 
Carolina Museum of Art, Raleigh, North Carolina; the Isabella Stewart 
Gardner Museum, Boston, Massachusetts; and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2025-01449 Filed 1-21-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
**Certification      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

| (1)                     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)                     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |                                            |                                                |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                     | **PACIFIC              COAST NATIONAL BANCORP** |
|                |                                       |                                           |
| Dated: May 15, 2006 | By:                                   | /s/ Colin              M.              Forkner |
|                     | Colin M. ForknerChief Executive Officer         |
|                     |                                            |

|                     |                               |                              |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                     |                               |
|                |                          |                         |
| Dated: May 15, 2006 | By:                      | /s/ Terry              Stalk |
|                     | Terry StalkChief Financial Officer |
|                     |                               |

----
Case 5:05-cr-00085-C-BG Document 64 Filed 07/10/09 Page 1 of 1 PageID 137
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01642]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 24, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 16, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1317 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1144, K2025-1144.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-01642 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

                         Publishing in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 21, 2025.                    

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

 Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 2 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

 The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 2 p.m., has been changed to Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 1 p.m.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 17, 2025.

Stephanie J. Fouse, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-01596 Filed 1-17-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1508

WILLIAM E. SCOTT, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CARTER ROAG COAL COMPANY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv
- 00050

- JPB

- MJA )

Submitted : September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William E. Scott, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Curtis Dean, Joseph Umberto Leonoro, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William E. Scott, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Carter Roag Coal Company’s motion to dismiss Scott’s religious discrimination claims, brought pursuant t o Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e

- 17. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its dismissal order on February 27, 2020. Scott filed the notice of appeal on April 29, 2020. Because Scott failed to fil e a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED