alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE STATE OF SOUTH C AROLINA In The Supreme Court

In the Interest of Christopher H., a Juvenile under the age of Seventeen, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2021

- 000371

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal f rom Richland County W. Greg Seigler, Family Court Judge

Opinion No. 28097 Submitted April 6, 2022

- Filed June 8, 2022

DISMISSED

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, of Columbia; Solicitor , Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Samuel R.

Hubbard III , of Lexington , all for Petitioner

.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia

, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals decision in Int. of Christopher H. , 432 S.C. 600, 854 S.E.2d 853 (Ct. App. 2021) . We agreed to address whether the court of appeals : 1) improperly interpreted subsection 23

- 3

- 430(D) of the South Carolina Code (2007) and thelegislative intent behind it; 2) improperly ignored the proper standard of appellate review by weighing evidence and substituting its own interpretation of the evidence for that of the family court ; and 3) improperly based its decision only on testimony presented at the family court hearing while i gnoring the other evidence supporting the family court's determination of good cause

. Shortly before oral argument was to be heard in this Court, the Governor signed into law Act 221 of 2022, which substantially amended subsection 23

- 3

- 430(D) and enacted section 23

- 3

- 436. Act No. 221, 2022 S.C. Acts ___, ___. After reviewing Act 221, the Court directed its Clerk to write the parties asking them to be prepared to discuss justiciability at oral argument. The State then filed a motion to dismiss its petiti on on the ground Act 221 rendered the issues moot and asking the Court to vacate the opinion of the court of appeals. Respondent filed a return indicating his consent to the dismissal but opposing the State's request to vacate the opinion of the court of appeals. After careful consideration, we agree the issues before the Court are now moot, and without reaching the merits of those issues, we dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari. We decline, however, to vacate the opinion of the court of appeals

.

DISMISSED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur. JAMES, J., not participating.
1608221242.2 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC. 

Debtor. 

Chapter 7 

Case No. 22-31641 (MVL) 

In re: 

ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

Adv. Case No. 23-03035 (MVL) 

ORDER FURTHER ABATING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING 

At the Status Conference held on March 19, 2024, Plaintiff ARRIS Solutions, Inc. 

(“ARRIS”), Defendant James Goodman (“Goodman”), and Scott M. Seidel, Trustee of the 

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed April 10, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-03035-mvl Doc 28 Filed 04/10/24 Entered 04/10/24 13:54:26 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

1608221242.2 

bankruptcy estate of Goodman Networks, Inc. d/b/a Goodman Solutions (the “Trustee” and 

together with ARRIS and Goodman, the “Parties”) requested the above-captioned adversary 

proceeding (the “Adversary”) be further abated for an additional 180 days, subject to the conditions 

set forth below (the “Request”). After considering the request of the Parties, agreement of counsel 

and applicable authority, the Court finds and concludes the Request should be GRANTED. It is 

therefore 

ORDERED that the Request is GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Adversary, and any deadlines therein or related thereto, are abated for 

180 days from the date of entry of this Order, after which the Court will consider whether the 

Adversary should remain abated; provided the abatement is without prejudice to any party to the 

Adversary requesting the abatement be lifted prior to the 180-day deadline and the right of any 

other party to oppose such request; and it is further 

ORDERED this Order shall not affect any rights, claims, and defenses of each party with 

respect to the Adversary, all of which are expressly reserved; and it is further 

ORDERED the Adversary is scheduled for a Status Conference on October 2, 2024 at 

9:30 a.m. (CT) to discuss the abatement of this case. 

# # # END OF ORDER # # # 

PREPARED BY: 

 /s/ Noah M. Schottenstein 

James P. Muenker (SBN 24002659) 

james.muenker@us.dlapiper.com 

Noah M. Schottenstein (SBN 24100661) 

noah.shottenstein@us.dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

1900 North Pearl Street, Suite 2200 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Counsel for ARRIS Solutions, Inc. 

Case 23-03035-mvl Doc 28 Filed 04/10/24 Entered 04/10/24 13:54:26 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2018083EN.01001002.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/10

---

Appeal brought on 21 September 2017 by Cafés Pont SL against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 20 July 2017 in Case T-309/16: Cafés Pont v EUIPO — Giordano Vini

(Case C-559/17 P)

(2018/C 083/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Cafés Pont SL (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Giordano Vini SpA

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 11 January 2018 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Ellis Dale FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0004

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 3, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CARNELL CORNELIUS ROLLINS, §

Petitioner, §

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-1534-R

§ ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 27th day of November, 2006.

_________________________________

JERRY BUCHMEYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01534-R Document 22 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 159
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”). Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(b) or 15d - 14(b) and to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Christophe Hidalgo, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:

(i)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 27, 2018

By:/s/ Christophe Hidalgo

Name: Christophe Hidalgo

Title:    Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The State of Florida ex rel. J. C. Stewart, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Frank Karel, Sheriff of Orange County, Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 6, 1927.

*W. H. Poe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred II. Davis,*Attorney General, and *H. E. Garter,*Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
EX PARTE Ronald Eugene ROBERTSON

(In re Ronald Eugene Robertson v. State et al.)

2170047

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Ct. of Crim. App. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Jonathan POWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-191

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Echevarria v. State*, 271 So.3d 108, 109-10 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (holding that a juvenile's concurrent sentences of thirty-five years each for a homicide crime and a non-homicide crime do not violate the United States Supreme Court decision in *Graham v. Florida*, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) ); *see**Pedroza v. State*, 244 So.3d 1128, 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), *review granted*, No. SC18-964, 2018 WL 6433136 (Fla. Dec. 6, 2018).
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Jarus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Scott Jarus


Scott Jarus


Chief Executive Officer


August 11, 2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 16 (Monday, January 27, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01739]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institution effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992, issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions that have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation website at www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html, or contact the Chief, Receivership 
Oversight at [email protected] or at Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, FDIC, 600 North Pearl Street, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 
75201.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          FDIC Ref. No.                    Bank name                   City             State       Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10548...........................  Pulaski Savings Bank......  Chicago..............  IL               01/17/2025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on January 21, 2025.
Jennifer M. Jones,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01739 Filed 1-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P.
```
Exhibit 99.2

                       [KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Letterhead]

                         Independent Accountants' Report

Board of Directors
Headlands Mortgage Company:

We have examined management's assertion about Headlands Mortgage Company's (the
Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31,
1997 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company has complied in all
material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year ended December 31, 1997 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


                                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Francisco, California
February 13, 1998


                                       11
<PAGE>

                  [HEADLANDS MORTGAGE COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, Headlands Mortgage Company (the
"Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy both
in the amount of $5.5 million.

                               HEADLANDS MORTGAGE COMPANY


                               By: /s/ Dennis Tussey
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                   Dennis Tussey
                                   Senior Vice President,
                                   Loan Administration


                                       12
Nathan GORZELANCZYK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2019

W. Charles Fletcher, Law Office of W. Charles Fletcher, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the November 13, 2017 judgments and sentences rendered in Case Nos. 2016-CF-100692, 2016-CF-103880, 2016-CF-103808, 2016-CF-103807, and 2016-CF-103763, in the Seventh Circuit Court in and for Volusia County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

WALLIS, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 21

                         Continental Global Group, Inc.

                Subsidiaries of the Registrant at March 15, 2000


                              Jurisdiction of
                              Incorporation
Subsidiaries (1)              or Organization     Parent Company

Continental Conveyor &        Delaware            Continental Global Group, Inc.
Equipment Company

Continental Conveyor &        Australia           Continental Conveyor &
Equipment Pty. Ltd.                               Equipment Company

BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.        Australia           Continental Conveyor &
                                                  Equipment Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Pty. Ltd.     Australia           BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Services      Australia           BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.
Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Conveyor      Australia           BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.
Components Pty. Ltd.

A. Crane Pty. Ltd.            Australia           BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental Control           Australia           BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd. - 60%
Systems Pty. Ltd.                                 Continental Conveyor &
                                                  Equipment Pty. Ltd. - 40%

Continental Conveyor          Delaware            Continental Conveyor &
International Inc.                                Equipment Company

Continental FSW Ltd.          United Kingdom      Continental Conveyor
                                                  International Inc.

Continental Conveyor Ltd.     United Kingdom      Continental FSW Ltd.

Continental MECO              South Africa        Continental Conveyor
(Proprietary) Ltd.                                International Inc.

MECO McCallum Pty. Ltd.       Australia           Continental Conveyor &
                                                  Equipment Pty. Ltd.

Goodman Conveyor Company      Delaware            Continental Global Group, Inc.

(1) Each of the subsidiaries listed is 100% owned by its parent company, except
    for Continental Control Systems Pty. Ltd.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellant,

v.

NELSON VACHON , Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 424

[ January 6, 2016 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Robert F. Diaz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 17516MM10A

.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney Genera l, West Palm Beach, for appellant

.
No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
We reverse the county court’s order finding the mandatory $5,000 civil penalty imposed for soli citation of prostitution under s ection 796.07(6), Florida Statutes (2014), to be unconstitutionally excessive. See State v. Jones

, No. 4D14

- 3019 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 2, 2015). We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and Remanded.

G ROSS , G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31.
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  |    
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Andrew M. Sims
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:              |  | Andrew M. Sims                       
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer