alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 3, 2006



| |  |                                      |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
| |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                 |  | 
| |  | Dennis G. Dracup                     |  | 
| |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director |  | 
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Exhibit 31.1
 HORIZON LINES, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ CHARLES G. RAYMONDCharles G. RaymondPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOFALO MATESE BROWN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-17118

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00216-FCDGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Sofalo Matese Brown appeals from the district

court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 2253 and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 6 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-17118

Brown contends that the state prosecutor in his criminal trial denied his

constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial by intimidating a defense

witness who chose not to testify.

The California Court of Appeal’s determination that there was no

prosecutorial misconduct was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of,

clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court, and was not

based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d);

Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782, 792-93 (2001). 

We construe the inclusion of an uncertified issue in the opening brief as a

motion to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e). So

construed, the motion is denied. See Hivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th

Cir. 1999) (per curiam).

Kathleen C. Page’s motion to withdraw as Brown’s counsel is granted. We

construe Brown’s letter dated December 31, 2010, as a motion for appointment of

new counsel, and deny the motion.

AFFIRMED.
Q.B. v. The matter of A.G., a minor child

2160774

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 30 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL J. PALESE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

DOMINIC PALESE and PATRICIA

PALESE,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-8123

(D.C. No. 97-CV-274-J)

(D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, BRORBY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Daniel J. Palese appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights

suit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and
-2-

dismiss plaintiff’s appeal as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that, over the past ten years, defendants Dominic

and Patricia Palese, private citizens of the State of Wyoming, had entered his residence on

a daily basis without permission and had drugged and hypnotized him, and implanted

cameras, sensors, and transmitters in his body while he was asleep. He further alleged

defendants conspired with an officer at the detention center to monitor his activities by

using the implanted cameras, sensors, and transmitters. The district court dismissed the

complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be

granted. The district court granted plaintiff’s request to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis.

We have reviewed the entire record on appeal and agree with the district court that

plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Further, we conclude plaintiff’s appeal is legally frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 43 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury 

and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to ‘‘Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act; Updating Payment Parameters, 

Section 1332 Waiver Implementing Regulations, and Improving Health 

Insurance Markets for 2022 and Beyond’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2022 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. RISCH, Mr. HAGERTY, 

Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. DAINES, 

Mr. CRUZ, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Ms. ERNST, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. HOEVEN, 

Mr. COTTON, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 

Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of the Treasury and the Centers for 

Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to ‘‘Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Updating Payment Parameters, Section 1332 Waiver Implementing Regulations, and Improving Health Insurance Markets for 2022 

and Beyond’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 43 IS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of the Treasury and the Centers for Medicare 

5 & Medicaid Services relating to ‘‘Patient Protection and 

6 Affordable Care Act; Updating Payment Parameters, Sec7 tion 1332 Waiver Implementing Regulations, and Improv8 ing Health Insurance Markets for 2022 and Beyond’’ (86 

9 Fed. Reg. 53412 (September 27, 2021)), and such rule 

10 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 559PA11-2

FILED 12 JUNE 2014

BRUCE LEE GRIFFIN, 

 Petitioner

v.

MIKE BALL, Administrator, A/M Corre. Inst. #4680,

 Respondent 

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order of the 

Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2013), allowing petitioner’s 

petition for writ of habeas corpus and vacating a judgment entered by Judge Laura 

J. Bridges on 11 February 2010 in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the 

Supreme Court on 15 April 2014.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant 

Appellate Defender, for petitioner-appellee.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, 

for the State respondent-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members 

voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the order of the Court of 

Appeals. Accordingly, the order of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed. See, 
GRIFFIN V. BALL

Opinion of the Court

-2-

e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); 

Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.
Carlton CHARLES v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-1441

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01687]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete a service(s) from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES:  Comments must be received on or before: February 23, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 
489-1322, or email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following service(s) are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Service(s)

Service Type: Janitorial/Custodial
Mandatory for: US Army, USACE Buffalo District Reservation, 
(Buildings 1,2,5 & 6), Buffalo, NY
Authorized Source of Supply: Suburban Adult Services, Inc., Elma, NY
Contracting Activity: DEPT OF THE ARMY, W072 ENDIST BUFFALO

Ramon Barreto,
Business Management Specialist, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2025-01687 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BOBBY COOK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1003

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-13685CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Hakorlhle T.**  **K. wllldwm**  **connty ~Awtltos**  **lull county**  **Hlluoro, rncrrr**  **rhrr sirt** **Hon. T.**  **K. Mlhiamo4** 

hgs 2

**As we**  

### underrtaud it, **thi8 putiaular**  **bad tasu**  **ru** for **$9O,OW.** $90,000 d whkh wa8 voted foi a rpedic purpose u 8tatd in the elmthn w det* ustiso. l c., u followst



### ‘ $3&0@0 for the parpo88 

### of pure&4uln# tf<wafmy for **the usa**  **d the**  **Mats Wghwsy**  **Departmeat ta**  **buildJmg**

**paved Stde**  **do-ted bi#wir1~y8**  l ***** **‘ +.**  **” Said**  l **loctlen 8rder**  **wu dated**  **Duembsr 17,193&**  **mnd the**  &et&a was held Jumry 19,l939. bad csrrlsd. Said bonds were Issued ln pursuance d a bead order parsed b7 the 

### ComnXrrfeaerr’ Cew8 tm .Tebrouy 13, 1939. fherebro, Z300 100Q is l aildle to be ued for the par&are of riglrts-d-way 

## f or

St& e derlga ded

hig h wa y s.

N o l **pectfic hl&wey**  **wee designated**  **La the**  **electha order**  **fsf notice**  **of** electton. and ii tbe Cammlssloners’ Conrt did not paa8 an 

### order demiqnrting s 

### rpedflc highway prior te the decttee, t&enit te mew Latheir ~ecrettea **to d8elgneted**  **the** rights-of-wry **for** which the btmd manay will ba uoed. **Bluk** va. .Stren&h, 246 9. w .

. t9j Tlstcher vs. Ely, 53 s. w. (ad) 617. 

### Under ths orders d the Goamnieeleaers’ Ceart ef **.Aprll** If, 1939 and Oateber 9,1939. sr;bmHted **~4th** your **oplaion reqaeot,**  

### wherein **the** Commlsdoaers* Gouti wUen$ hrta UI iyroqment w&b ULO Hilhwny L>a**partment to**  **purehue a**  rlqht-of-wry **for a**  highway **nady** hat **Xbsca ts**  Piles **Valley. the**  **$30,000 beard**  **fmtd l8**  avdlsbl8 **md U**  **musk d**  **it al**  18nece88uy may be ased to puchue thlb p4rtieulri ri&t-of-tiy. E%** ever, it in entirely I4 the diaorotl@m 68 ihe Commlu1ioaers* Court whether they pay for thf8 putttulu 

### rlght?8brsy att of the bad fun&e

### or ent of the avnll8blr rod and bridp ha& Trustiug 

### th8t this sumwerm ysur quutima, we rembln

**APPROVED** NOV 7.1919 

### ATTOXNHY OENERAL **OT TEXAS** 
(Sod.) Gerald C. Mum ATTORN&Y WCNXXAL OP TEXAS

COB-8-81
SKIDMORE WHITT FARM, LLC, et al. v. MADISON COUNTY

1160648

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Order entered September 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01104-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 79,649

ORDER

The trial court is scheduled to conduct a hearing on September 11, 2014 on Becky 

Wheeler’s contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER 

Stacey Landrum, Hunt County District Clerk, to file, on or before September 17, 2014, a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order on the contest.

We GRANT the motion of Becky Wheeler, Official Court Reporter for the 196th Judicial 

District Court of Hunt County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The 

reporter’s record shall be filed on or before Monday, September 22, 2014.

The clerk’s record is past due. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER Stacey Landrum 

to file the clerk’s record on or before Monday, September 22, 2014.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to the Presiding Judge of the 196th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas, 

Becky Wheeler, Stacey Landrum, appellant, and counsel for appellee.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1248 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1065, K2025-1064.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00874 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Network Management Policy      

Customer Support     

Learn about the terms used on this label. Visit the Federal Communications Commission’s Consumer Resource Center.

Phone:Website:

Unique Plan Identifier: F0005937974123ABC456EMC789 

Privacy Policy

(555)  555-5555

https://www.example.com/privacy

https://www.example.com/network-management

https://www.example.com

fcc.gov/consumer

Discounts & BundlesVisit the link below for available billing discounts and pricing options for broadband service bundled with other services like video, phone, and wireless service, and use of your own equipment.

https://www.example.com/discounts

Speeds Provided with Plan

Typical Download Speed 

Charges for Additional Data UsageData Included with Monthly Price

Typical Upload Speed Typical Latency  

MbpsMbpsms

$/GBGB

000000

00

000

https://www.example.com/data-usage

Additional Charges & TermsProvider Monthly Fees

One-Time Purchase Fees 

Early Termination Fee Government Taxes 

$00.00Fee description Fee description Fee description Fee description 

$00.00$00.00

$00.00

Fee description Fee description 

$00.00$00.00

Included/Varies by Location/$00.00$00.00

Monthly Price

This monthly price is an introductory rate Time the introductory rate appliesMonthly price after the introductory rateLength of contract Link to Terms of Contract 

$00.00

YY months$00.00YY months

https://www.example.com/terms-of-contract

Yes / No

Broadband FactsProvider NameService Plan Name and/or Speed Tier [Fixed or Mobile] Broadband Consumer Disclosure
Gerard David MCCREE, Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-1169

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Lacy SLATE

1160484 (CR-15-0507)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 37 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention relating to ‘‘Requirement for Persons To Wear Masks While 

on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. SCOTT of 

Florida, Mr. WICKER, Mr. COTTON, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mrs. HYDESMITH, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. LEE, and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention relating to 

‘‘Requirement for Persons To Wear Masks While on 

Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Cen4 ters for Disease Control and Prevention relating to ‘‘Re5 quirement for Persons To Wear Masks While on ConveyVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:05 Feb 11, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ37.IS SJ37

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 37 IS 

1 ances and at Transportation Hubs’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 8025 

2 (February 3, 2021); determined through a letter of opin3 ion from the Government Accountability Office dated De4 cember 14, 2021, and printed in the Congressional Record 

5 on December 15, 2021, on pages S9206–S9208, that the 

6 order is a rule under the Congressional Review Act), and 

7 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS