8032 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 14 / Thursday, January 23, 2025 / Notices 

Agreement Name: CMA CGM/COSCO 

North Europe—USEC/USWC Service 

Agreement. 

Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; COSCO 

SHIPPING Lines Co. Ltd. 

Filing Party: Robert Magovern, Cozen 

O’Connor. 

Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes 

CMA CGM to charter space to COSCO 

in the Trade between the ports in North 

Europe (United Kingdom, Netherlands, 

Germany, Belgium), ports in Central 

America and Caribbean (Panama, 

Colombia, Dominican Republic) and 

ports in U.S. East Coast on the one 

hand, and U.S. West Coast, on the other 

hand. 

Proposed Effective Date: January 10, 

2025. 

Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ 

FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ 

AgreementHistory/88592. 

Agreement No.: 201446–001. 

Agreement Name: CMA CGM/COSCO 

North Europe—USEC/USWC Service 

Agreement. 

Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; COSCO 

SHIPPING Lines Co. Ltd. 

Filing Party: Robert Magovern, Cozen 

O’Connor. 

Synopsis: The Amendment adds 

France to the geographic scope of the 

Agreement. 

Proposed Effective Date: January 13, 

2025. 

Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ 

FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ 

AgreementHistory/88592. 

Agreement No.: 201447. 

Agreement Name: CMA CGM/ 

COSCO/ONE/OOCL MED–USEC Vessel 

Sharing Agreement. 

Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; COSCO 

SHIPPING Lines Co. Ltd.; Ocean 

Network Express Pte. Ltd.; and Orient 

Overseas Container Line Limited and 

OOCL (Europe) Limited (acting as a 

single party). 

Filing Party: Joshua Stein, Cozen 

O’Connor. 

Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes 

the Parties to charter and exchange 

space on one another’s vessels and to 

coordinate and cooperate with respect 

to the Parties’ transportation services 

and operations in the trade between, on 

the one hand, ports in the 

Mediterranean (Spain and Italy), and on 

the other hand, U.S. ports in the 

Atlantic coast range. 

Proposed Effective Date: January 13, 

2025. 

Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ 

FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ 

AgreementHistory/88593. 

Dated: January 17, 2025. 

Alanna Beck, 

Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01586 Filed 1–22–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1432] 

Certain Mobile Electronic Devices; 

Notice of Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 17, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Maxell, Ltd of Kyoto, Japan. 

Supplements to the Complaint were 

filed on December 26, 2024 and January 

6, 2025. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain mobile electronic devices by 

reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,130,280 (the 

‘‘ ’280 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

11,490,004 (the ‘‘ ’004 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 11,750,915 (the ‘‘ ’915 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,509,953 (the 

‘‘ ’953 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

12,108,103 (the ‘‘ ’103 patent’’); and U.S. 

Patent No. 11,445,241 (the ‘‘ ’241 

patent’’). The complaint, as 

supplemented, further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. The complainant requests that 

the Commission institute an 

investigation and, after the 

investigation, issue a limited exclusion 

order and cease and desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Orndoff, The Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 16, 2025, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–11 and 14–17 of the ’280 patent; 

claims 1, 2, 4, 7–12, and 14–20 of the 

’004 patent; claims 1, 4, 5, 7–11, and 

14–19 of the ’915 patent; claims 1–30 of 

the ’953 patent; claims 1–3, 5–7, 9, and 

11–21 of the ’103 patent; and claims 1– 

3, 5–14, 17–23, and 25–28 of the ’241 

patent, and whether an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘smartphones and 

tablets, i.e., those branded and sold by 

Samsung’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Maxell, Ltd., 1 Koizumi, Oyamazaki, 

Oyamazaki-cho, Otokuni-gun, Kyoto, 

618–8525 Japan. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint and supplement is 

to be served: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129 

Samsung-Ro (Maetan-dong), 

Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-Shi, Gyeonggido, 16677 Republic of Korea. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 14 / Thursday, January 23, 2025 / Notices 8033 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 

Challenger Road, Floor 7, Ridgefield 

Park, NJ 07660–2118. 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not be a party to this 

investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint, as supplemented, and in this 

notice may be deemed to constitute a 

waiver of the right to appear and contest 

the allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 17, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01587 Filed 1–22–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1376] 

Certain Electronic Devices, Including 

Mobile Phones, Tablets, Laptops, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Commission Determination To Review 

in Part and, on Review, Affirm a Final 

Initial Determination Finding No 

Violation; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has 

determined to review in part a final 

initial determination (‘‘FID’’) issued by 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) finding no violation of section 

337. On review, the Commission affirms 

the determination of no violation. The 

investigation is hereby terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl 

P. Bretscher, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2382. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 17, 2023, the Commission 

instituted the present investigation 

based on a complaint, as supplemented, 

filed by Ericsson AB of Stockholm, 

Sweden and Telefonaktiebolaget LM 

Ericsson of Stockholm, Sweden 

(collectively ‘‘Ericsson’’), alleging 

violations of section 337 of Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

(‘‘section 337’’), due to the importation 

into the United States, sale for 

importation, or sale in the United States 

after importation of certain electronic 

devices, including mobile phones, 

tablets, laptops, components thereof, 

and products containing the same, that 

allegedly infringe one or more of the 

asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

9,313,178 (‘‘the ’178 patent’’); 

10,972,654 (‘‘the ’654 patent’’); 

9,509,273 (‘‘the ’273 patent’’); 7,151,430 

(‘‘the ’430 patent’’); and 11,122,313 

(‘‘the ’313 patent’’). 88 FR 80337–338 

(Nov. 17, 2023). The complaint alleges 

that a domestic industry exists. Id. The 

notice of investigation names the 

following respondents: Motorola 

Mobility, LLC of Chicago, Illinois; 

Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility 

Technologies Communication Company 

Limited of Wuhan, China; Lenovo 

(United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North 

Carolina; Lenovo Group Limited of 

Hong Kong, SAR, China; Lenovo 

(Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co., 

Ltd. of Shanghai, China; Lenovo Beijing 

Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China; Lenovo PC 

HK Limited of Hong Kong, SAR, China; 

and Lenovo Information Products 

(Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, China 

(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). Id. at 

80337. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is not a party to this 

investigation. Id. 

The Commission subsequently 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to certain patents and patent 

claims that were withdrawn by the 

Ericsson. Order No. 29 (June 3, 2024), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (June 25, 

2024) (terminating the ’430 patent in its 

entirety, asserted claims 1–5 of the ’178 

patent, and asserted claims 1–4 and 6 of 

the ’313 patent); Order No. 34 (July 15, 

2024), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Aug. 6, 2024) (terminating all 

remaining claims of the ’313 patent, 

claim 18 of the ’178 patent, claims 9, 10, 

and 15 of the ’654 patent, and claims 1– 

3, 7–10, 12–14, and 16 of the ’273 

patent); Order No. 39 (Aug. 9, 2024), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Sept. 9, 

2024) (terminating all remaining claims 

of the ’273 patent). 

On July 5, 2024, the Commission 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to respondent Lenovo Group 

Limited for good cause because it does 

not import into the United States, sell 

for importation, or sell in the United 

States after importation any accused 

products. Order No. 30 (June 20, 2024), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (July 5, 

2024). 

On August 13, 2024, the Commission 

granted in part Ericsson’s unopposed 

motion for summary determination that 

it has satisfied the economic prong of 

the domestic industry requirement 

under section 337(a)(3)(A) with respect 

to the ’178 and ’654 patents. Order No. 

32 (July 12, 2024), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Aug. 13, 2024). 

On November 15, 2024, the presiding 

ALJ issued the subject FID, finding no 

violation of section 337 with respect to 

either the remaining ’178 patent or the 

’654 patent. With regard to the ’178 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1