alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER—4:16-CV-07346-KAW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND 

JEANNIE GONZALES, an individual,

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF 

AMERICA HOLDINGS, a Delaware 

Corporation; and DOES 1–50, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:16-cv-07346-KAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT LABORATORY 

CORPORATION OF AMERICA 

HOLDINGS’ REQUEST THAT 

CHRISTOPHER J. KONDON BE 

PERMITTED TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY AT MARCH 28, 2017 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

[Assigned to Hon. Mag. Judge Kandis A. 

Westmore] 

Date: March 28, 2017 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Place: Oakland Courthouse 

 1301 Clay Street 

Oakland, CA 94612

 

 HSG HSG 

 2 PM 

Case 4:16-cv-07346-HSG Document 19 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER—4:16-CV-07346-KAW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court has reviewed Defendant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings’ 

(“Defendant”) Request that Christopher J. Kondon be permitted to appear telephonically at the March 

28, 2017 Case Management Conference (the “Request”) and rules as follows: 

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants Defendant’s Request. Christopher J. Kondon 

is hereby permitted to appear telephonically at the March 28, 2017 Case Management Conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________, 2017 _____________________________ 

 Kandis A. Westmore 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge HSG 3/27/2017 Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. 

Case 4:16-cv-07346-HSG Document 19 Filed 03/27/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUAIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          89,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,907
<INVENTORY>                                     42,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,242
<PP&E>                                         361,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 610,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,674
<BONDS>                                        390,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           69,974
<PREFERRED>                                         38
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   610,061
<SALES>                                        902,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               923,810
<CGS>                                          627,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  627,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               277,568
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,101)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,905)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,082)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (27.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (27.59)
        

</TABLE>
Victor TABARRINI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Steve TABARRINI, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4471

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
In re: Helen MOORE, et al. v. MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE REAL ASSETS, et al.

No: 2018-C-0088

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Dear Counsel:

This is to advise that the Court took the following action on your Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit for Supplemental Appendix in the above entitled matter.

GRANTED.
STATE IN the INTEREST OF B.H.

NO. 2019-CJ-0523

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0290

_____________________________

KENNETH MICHAEL GILLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Judge.

January 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Kenneth Michael 

Gilley, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
Case 2:05-cv-00225-J Document 32 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 174
Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 8 Filed 03/07/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 30
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 8 Filed 03/07/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 31
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 8 Filed 03/07/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 32
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 8 Filed 03/07/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 33
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 8 Filed 03/07/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 34
Jamail D. ZIEGLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 2019

Jamail D. Ziegler, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*1248DISMISSED . *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Rowe, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE Derek Tyler HORTON

CR-17-0006

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael Schmidt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2008
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Michael Schmidt                   
|                   |  | Michael Schmidt                       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer and, Secretary
OSA168 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong 

corporation; MABEL MAK, an individual, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation; 

PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an 

individual, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 23-15542 

D.C. No. 4:16-cv-07387-JSW 

Northern District of California, 

Oakland 

ORDER

Appellants’ motion (Docket Entry No. 14) for voluntary dismissal is 

granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court.

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

FILED

DEC 26 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 298 Filed 12/26/23 Page 1 of 1 Case: 23-15542, 12/26/2023, ID: 12841554, DktEntry: 15, Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 25, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|/S/    M. MARK
URBANIA                                                                         
|M. Mark Urbania Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

July 28, 2006
Craig Lazar BENT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida and Louis A. Quinones, Jr., as Chief of Orange County Corrections, Respondents.

Case No. 5D19-1060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Lauren Elizabeth Bobek, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida.

No Appearance for other Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Craig Lazar Bent, petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is illegally detained and entitled to a new hearing to determine reasonable bail. Because we agree that Petitioner is entitled to a hearing, we grant the petition.

On February 21, 2017, Petitioner was charged by information with second-degree felony murder (with a firearm), attempted first-degree murder with a firearm, and shooting at, within, or into an occupied vehicle. At an April 21, 2017 bond hearing, the investigating officer testified that two witnesses, Richardson and Roth, identified Petitioner from a photo lineup as present at the scene of the crime with a firearm. Richardson's identification of Petitioner was unequivocal, while Roth's identification was not as reliable. Based in large part on the positive identifications, the trial court denied the motion to set bond on the second-degree felony murder and attempted first-degree murder with a firearm counts.

However, Richardson later testified during her deposition that the investigating officer pressured her into selecting Petitioner from the photo lineup. Based on this testimony, Petitioner filed a second motion to set bond, which was denied without explanation following a March 12, 2018 hearing.

After the second hearing, the State filed a notice indicating that another officer, who was present during the photo lineup, stated that Richardson's testimony regarding coercion was true. Based on the State's notice, Petitioner filed a third motion to set bond. The next day, the trial judge's judicial assistant informed the parties that the trial judge would not entertain another bond hearing on this case. No written order was entered.

The trial court's refusal to set Petitioner's third motion for a hearing is the basis for the instant petition. In response to this Court's show cause order, the trial court advised that it had held a status conference and determined that the third motion to set bond was insufficient, and therefore, denied both the motion and Petitioner's request for a hearing.

Considering the record before us and Richardson's seeming recantation of the certainty of her identification, which is now allegedly supported by the statement of a law enforcement officer, we conclude the motion was sufficient and the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion without a hearing. Accordingly, we grant *1214the petition and remand this matter to the trial court to promptly conduct a full bond hearing.

PETITION GRANTED; CAUSE REMANDED.

EISNAUGLE, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 1 of 12   PageID 7420

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 2 of 12   PageID 7421

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 3 of 12   PageID 7422

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 4 of 12   PageID 7423

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 5 of 12   PageID 7424

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 6 of 12   PageID 7425

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 7 of 12   PageID 7426

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 8 of 12   PageID 7427

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 9 of 12   PageID 7428

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 10 of 12   PageID 7429

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 11 of 12   PageID 7430

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y   Document 253    Filed 02/11/10    Page 12 of 12   PageID 7431
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health 
   and Human Services relating to ``Vaccine and Mask Requirements To 
       Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start Programs''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human Services relating 
to ``Vaccine and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 
in Head Start Programs'' (86 Fed. Reg. 68052 (November 30, 2021)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate May 3, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health 
   and Human Services relating to ``Vaccine and Mask Requirements To 
       Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start Programs''.
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Gina L. Bennett, Interim Chief Financial Officer, of Organa Technologies Group, Inc.
      (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,
      2008
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 15, 2008By:
            /s/
                Gina L. BennettInterim
                Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EDWARD EARL WINN, 05053574, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-1576-K

)

BILL HILL and GRAND JURY FOREMAN, )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 6th day of November, 2005.

s/Ed Kinkeade

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01576-K Document 5 Filed 11/06/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 14
David Alan SHUEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2808

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 17, 2019

David Alan Shuey, Century, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION




I, Lin Wen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB quarterly report for the period ended September 30, 2005, of Shineco, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this period report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this period report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

16


---

17


---