alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 9 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                         Calendar No. 2
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 9

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be recognized 
 based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2025

 Mr. Tuberville (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Tillis, Mrs. 
    Capito, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
Lankford, Mr. Daines, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Lee, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hagerty, 
Mr. Schmitt, Mr. Budd, Mr. Sheehy, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Paul, 
Mr. Graham, Mr. Scott of Florida, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Ricketts, 
 Mr. Sullivan, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Banks and Mr. Scott of 
South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was read the first 
                                  time

                            January 8, 2025

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be recognized 
 based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Women and Girls in 
Sports Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d)(1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for a recipient 
of Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic 
programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to 
participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for 
women or girls.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be recognized 
based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at 
birth.''.
                                                         Calendar No. 2

119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                  S. 9

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be recognized 
 based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 8, 2025

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105252 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Two of our report dated February 19, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Hartford Life Insurance Company, and of our report dated
February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of Hartford Life
Insurance Company Separate Account Two, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in
such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
July 31, 2003
PLANET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                   FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                    AUGUST 31,      AUGUST 31,
                                                      2000            1999
                                                  ------------    ------------

BASIC & DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations       $   (326,559)   $    474,933
   Less Preferred Stock Dividends                     (311,170)       (353,199)
                                                  ------------    ------------

   Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
   Available to Common Stockholders                   (637,729)        121,734

   Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations,
   net of income taxes                                 (20,526)       (196,471)

   Gain on Disposal of Discontinued Operations,
   net of income taxes                                  35,777              --
                                                  ------------    ------------

   Net Income (Loss) Available to
   Common Stockholders                            $   (622,478)   $    (74,737)
                                                  ------------    ------------

   Weighted Average Shares Outstanding              12,331,834      11,996,114
      Per Share Detail:
         Income (Loss): Continuing Operations     $       (.05)   $        .01
         Income (Loss): Discontinued Operations              *            (.02)
         Gain (Loss) on Disposal of
         Discontinued Operations                             *              --
                                                  ------------    ------------

   BASIC & DILUTED EPS-Total                      $       (.05)   $         --
                                                  ------------    ------------


*LESS THEN $.01 PER SHARE

                                      F-34
ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES


                  For and in consideration of advances made or to be made by IQ
BIOMETRIX, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Assignee"), the undersigned, NETWORK
STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Assignor") transfers, sells,
and assigns to Assignee all of Assignor's accounts receivables, now existing or
hereinafter brought into existence (the "Accounts Receivables"). Assignee agrees
to release the Accounts Receivables from this Assignment when all of the amounts
owed to Assignee by Assignor pursuant to that certain 10% Secured Note dated May
5, 2003, as well as any other indebtedness owed by Assignor to Assignee, is paid
in full.
                  Assignor authorizes and directs the payor of any Account
Receivable to make payment of such amount to Assignee or its assigns and hereby
grants Assignee the authority to notify the payor of such Account Receivable of
this Assignment. Assignor agrees that any amount received by Assignor as a
payment of an Account Receivable shall be immediately endorsed over and
delivered to Assignee.
                  The terms and conditions of any security agreement executed by
Assignor in favor of Assignee are incorporated in this Assignment by this
reference.
                                   "Assignor"

                                             NETWORK STORAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,
                                             a Delaware corporation


Dated:
         ------------------------------
By
                                             TOM MAKMANN, President
Danny PASICOLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D14-2634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Courtenay H. Miller, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General; Lauren Gonzalez and Michael L. Schaub, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

**ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT**

Per Curiam.

Following a jury trial, the appellant, Danny Pasicolan, was convicted of one count of traveling to meet a minor to do unlawful acts after using a computer online service, contrary to section 847.0135(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2013) (Count I); one count of unlawful use of a two-way communications device, contrary to section 934.215, Florida Statutes (2013) (Count II); one count of transmission of material harmful to minors, contrary to section 847.0138(2), Florida Statutes (2013) (Count III); and one count of unlawful use of computer services to solicit a child to engage in sexual conduct, contrary to section 847.0135(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2013) (Count IV). The information alleged that each of these offenses occurred on October 10, 2013. After trial, the appellant timely appealed his convictions and raised three issues on appeal. We affirm the first two issues without further comment.

In his third issue, the appellant argued that two of his convictions violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Specifically, he argued that use of computer services to solicit a minor (Count IV) was subsumed by traveling to meet a minor (Count I) and that unlawful use of a two-way communications device (Count II) was subsumed by the other three counts. We affirmed these convictions under our decision in *Lee v. State* , 223 So.3d 342 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). In 2018, the Supreme Court quashed our opinion in *Lee* and held that a reviewing court should only consider the charging document to determine whether multiple convictions for solicitation, unlawful use of a two-way communications device, and traveling were based upon the same conduct for purposes of double jeopardy.

*280*Lee v. State* , 258 So.3d 1297 (Fla. 2018) ( *Lee II* ). Applying *Lee II* to this case, the appellant's convictions in Counts II and IV are VACATED . The appellant's convictions in Counts I and III are AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Ray, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Jakobie MILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 22, 2019

Jakobie Milton, pro se; Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*934Jakobie Milton appeals his judgment and sentence after entering a nolo contendere plea to charges of possession of a firearm by a felon and resisting an officer without violence. Milton's attorney requested appointment of an expert, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210(b), to determine Milton's competency to proceed to trial. Finding reasonable grounds in support of the motion, the trial court appointed an expert. Milton underwent a psychological evaluation, which concluded he was competent, albeit marginally, to proceed. Defense counsel orally advised the trial court of the evaluation findings.

Milton accepted the State's plea offer and pleaded no contest to the charges. At the hearing, the trial court noted the evaluation ultimately found Milton competent to proceed. But, the trial court accepted Milton's plea and imposed sentence without entering an order determining that Milton was competent to proceed. The trial court's failure to enter a written order requires reversal. *Sheheane v. State* , 228 So.3d 1178, 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

On remand, the trial court must address competency. *Id.* at 1181. If the evidence that existed previously supports a finding that the defendant was competent at the time of trial, the trial court may decide competence, *nunc pro tunc* , with no change in the judgment. *Id.* ; *see also**Brooks v. State* , 180 So.3d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). However, if the trial court is unable to make a retroactive competency determination or if it finds Milton was incompetent, it must hold a new trial, as long as Milton is and remains competent on remand. *Sheheane* , 228 So.3d at 1181 ; *Zern v. State* , 191 So.3d 962, 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

REVERSED and REMANDED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Rowe and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 29

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary 
                              Standard''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2021

 Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Marshall, Mr. 
Lee, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Paul, Ms. 
  Lummis, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. 
  Thune, Mr. Moran, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Burr, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. 
Toomey, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Cotton, Ms. 
 Ernst, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Grassley, 
   Mr. Young, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Daines, Mrs. 
    Fischer, Mr. Graham, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Scott of South 
   Carolina, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
  Portman, Ms. Collins, Ms. Murkowski, and Mr. Romney) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary 
                              Standard''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``COVID-19 
Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard'' (86 Fed. Reg. 
61402 (November 5, 2021)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, William J. Eckert IV, Chief Financial
Officer of PRUCO Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (the "Company"), hereby
certify that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 19, 2004





                                                  s/ William J. Eckert, IV
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  William J. Eckert, IV
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer






The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
AGREED STIPULATION – PAGE 1

DB1/64163163.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOSEPH HOPKINS, et al.,

Plaintiffs

vs.

CORNERSTONE AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4-05-CV-332-Y

(Consolidated with 4-05-CV-333-Y 

and 4-05-CV-334)

ECF

AGREED STIPULATION

It is hereby agreed and stipulated by Plaintiffs Joseph Hopkins, Sherrie Blair, Andrew 

Bowman, Chris Fox, Bob Howell, Mark Mann, Norm Campbell, Mark Croucher, Jeff Gessner, 

Terrance Johanesen, Donnie Klein, Scott Roughen, Steve Woodhead, and Dave Young 

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants, Cornerstone America (“Cornerstone”), Mid-West National Life 

Insurance Company of Tennessee (“Mid-West”) and United Insurance Companies, Inc. (“UICI”) 

(collectively “Defendants”) (collectively referred to herein as “Parties”) that the Parties have 

reached a settlement of Plaintiffs’ claims, including their claims under the Fair Labor Standards 

Act. The settlement was negotiated at arm’s length by experienced counsel who protected the 

rights of the Parties. The Parties stipulate that the settlement reflects a reasonable compromise 

concerning bona fide disputes between their clients with respect to liability and the amount of 

same under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Parties further stipulate that the amounts and 

terms of the settlement are full, fair and just compensation for Plaintiffs’ claims.

 

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y Document 250 Filed 01/20/10 Page 1 of 3 PageID 7407
AGREED STIPULATION – PAGE 2

DB1/64163163.1

Respectfully submitted: 

/s/ Francisco Guerra, IV

Francisco Guerra, IV

Texas Bar No. 00796684

Mikal C. Watts

Texas Bar No. 2098120 

WATTS LAW FIRM LLP

Bank of America Plaza, Suite 100

300 Convent Street

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Telephone: 

Facsimile: 210.527.0501

Larry A. Flournoy, Jr.

JORDAN, HOUSER & FLOURNOY LLP

740 East Campbell Rd., Suite 5600

Richardson, TX 75081

Telephone: 

Facsimile: 214.242.2170

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

/s/ Paulo B. McKeeby

Ronald E. Manthey

Texas Bar No. 12927400

Ron.Manthey@morganlewis.com

Paulo B. McKeeby

Texas Bar No. 00784571

Paulo.McKeeby@morganlewis.com

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1717 Main Street, Suite 3200

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: 214.466.4000

Facsimile: 214.466.4001

Steven R. McCown 

Texas State Bar No. 13466500 

Eduardo F. Cuaderes, Jr.

Texas State Bar No. 05200800

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1500

LockBox 116

Dallas, Texas 75201.2931

214.880.8100

214.880.0181 (Fax)

Linda Ottinger Headley

Texas State Bar No. 15344600

Yvette Gatling

Texas State Bar No. 24007231

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

1301 McKinney Street

Suite 1900

Houston, Texas 77010

713.951-9400

713.951.9212 (Fax)

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y Document 250 Filed 01/20/10 Page 2 of 3 PageID 7408
AGREED STIPULATION – PAGE 3

DB1/64163163.1

David E. Keltner

Texas State Bar No. 11249500

KELLY HART & HALLMAN, LLP

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

(817) 878-3560

(817) 878-9280 (Facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

Case 4:05-cv-00332-Y Document 250 Filed 01/20/10 Page 3 of 3 PageID 7409
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Highland Select Equity Master Fund, L.P. Case No.: 23−31037−swe7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of GREGORY V. DEMO, to

represent HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., related to document #42, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed October 3, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-31037-swe7 Doc 46 Filed 10/03/23 Entered 10/03/23 08:57:34 Desc

Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 12

 Group Maintenance America Corp. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands, except ratio of earnings to fixed charges)
                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Ten months
                                                      Year ended           ended          Year ended      Year ended     Year ended
                                                     December 31,      December 31,      February 28,    February 29,   February 28,
                                                         1998              1997              1997            1996           1995
                                                         ----              ----              ----            ----           ---- 
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>
Earnings available for fixed charges:
      Income (loss) before income tax provision         $ 46,255           $  (810)          $ 3,908         $3,790          $1,700
      Fixed Charges                                        9,963             2,117               514            493             306

                                                     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total                                             $ 56,218           $ 1,307           $ 4,422         $4,283          $2,006
                                                     ==============================================================================

Fixed Charges:
      Interest expense (a)                               $ 6,595           $ 1,542            $   82         $   --          $   --
      Interest portion of rent expense (b)                 3,368               575               432            493             306

                                                     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total                                              $ 9,963           $ 2,117             $ 514           $493            $306
                                                     ==============================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                          5.64               --               8.60           8.69            6.56 

Dollar amount of coverage deficiency                                       $   810
                                                                       ===========
</TABLE>


     (a) - Includes amortization of deferred financing costs.

     (b)  - Estimated at 25% of rent expense.