alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND 

JEANNIE GONZALES, an individual,

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF 

AMERICA HOLDINGS, a Delaware 

Corporation; and DOES 1–50, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:16-cv-07346-HSG

[Assigned to the Hon. Judge Haywood S. 

Gilliam, Jr.] 

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND 

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF ORDER 

MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER 

TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND RELATED 

PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES 

 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Sched

with th

contin

PreJury

Last

Repo

Last

Expe

C los

Disp

IT IS 

Dated

Having co

duling Order 

he supportin

The Joint S

nued and the

Ev

Trial Confe

y Trial 

Ev

 Date to Ser

orts 

 Date to Ser

ert Reports 

se of Expert

positive Mot

SO ORDER

d: November

 

 

nsidered the

to Continue

ng declaratio

Stipulation i

 Scheduling 

vent 

erence 

vent 

rve Expert 

rve Rebutta

t Discovery

tion Hearing

RED.

r 21, 2017 

e Joint Stipul

e Trial and R

on, and good

is GRANTED

Order in thi

Ap

Feb

Ma

Oct

al No

No

g Date Jan

ORDE

lation and R

Related Pre-T

d cause appea

D. The jury

is case is mo

pril 6, 2017 

Ord

bruary 27, 20

arch 12, 2018

August 4

Schedulin

tober 27, 20

vember 10, 

vember 24, 

nuary 11, 20

 

ER

Request for E

Trial Deadlin

aring, the Co

y trial and rel

odified as fol

Scheduling

der 

018 

8

4, 2017 

ng Order

017 

2017 

2017 

18 

 

 

 

Entry of Orde

nes (the “Joi

ourt rules as 

lated pre-tria

llows: 

g Pro

May 29,

June 11,

Pro

January 

February

February

April 12

 _________

 Honorable 

 United Stat

er Modifying

int Stipulatio

follows: 

al deadlines 

oposed New

 2018 

 2018 

oposed New

26, 2018 

y 9, 2018 

y 23, 2018 

2, 2018 

___________

Haywood S

tes District J

g the 

on”), along 

are 

w Dates 

w Dates 

_________

. Gilliam, Jr

Judge 

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40294 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LAZARO HUMBERTO MINTO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-146-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 20, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Lazaro Humberto Minto has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00030-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 211th District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-2590-211

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.R., A CHILD
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On August 5, 2021, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as 

the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, by August 16, 2021, appellant filed 

with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining 

the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 16, 2021
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 16, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 16, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0150. TYRELL AUGUSTIN v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

23B03433
STATE of Louisiana v. Lavar NELSON

No. 2018-KH-1166

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time *688limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Applicant's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Applicant has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Michael Coombs, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Valley High Mining Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report; 4. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including any consolidated subsidiary, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this Quarterly Report, the Registrant's conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.  Dated: May 7, 2007                          /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                                         -------------------------------
                                                         John Michael Coombs,
                                                        CEO, President, CFO, and
                                                        Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: October 25, 2010 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 63

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 
                                 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2022

Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Lee, Mr. Daines, Mr. Cruz, Mr. 
Scott of Florida, Mr. Braun, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Risch) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 
                                 2020.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on March 13, 2020, 
in Proclamation 9994 (85 Fed. Reg. 15337) is hereby terminated.
                                 <all>
```
Figure 1

9.00%

11.00%

13.00%

15.00%

17.00%

19.00%

21.00%

23.00%

25.00%

27.00%

1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85

Age

Proportion uninsured

"True" Proportion uninsured Estimated using population average

Estimated using 0-39/40+ age groups Estimated using five age groups

True proportion uninsured

Estimated using 5 age groups

Estimated using population average

Estimated using 2 age groups

Proportion uninsured across the age span: Hypothetical distribution illustrating 

advantage of finer detail in synthetic estimation
Figure 2

Proportion uninsured by age: Four race groups

Proportion uninsured

Graphs by Four race groups

Age at December interview

White

0

.2

.4

.6

Black

AmerIndian

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0

.2

.4

.6

Asian

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Figure 3

Proportion uninsured by age: Population, White and Nonwhite

Proportion uninsured

Age at December interview

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

0

.1

.2

.3

Nonwhite

White
Figure 4

Proportion uninsured by age: Population, Hispanic and NonHispanic

Proportion uninsured

Age at December interview

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

0

.1

.2

.3

.4

NonHispanic

Hispanic
Figure 5

Proportion uninsured by age: Males versus Females

Proportion uninsured

Age at December interview

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

0

.1

.2

.3

Male

Female
Figure 6

Proportion uninsured by age: simple age model and categorical model

Proportion uninsured

Age at December interview

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

0

.05

.1

.15

.2

Categorical

Simple
Figure 7: Predicted Values by Age, Race, Hispanicity and Sex, and

obtained proportions uninsured for each group, Model 1

Proportion uninsured by age: Eight groups and predicted values

Proportion uninsured

Graphs by Wh/Non by Hisp/Non by M/F

Age at December interview

White NonHisp Female

0

.2

.4

.6

White NonHisp Male White Hisp Female

White Hisp Male

0

.2

.4

.6

Nonwh NonHisp Female Nonwh NonHisp Male

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Nonwh Hisp Female

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0

.2

.4

.6

Nonwh Hisp Male

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Figure 8: Predicted Values by Age, Race, Hispanicity and Sex,

and obtained proportions uninsured for each group, Model 2

Proportion uninsured by age: Eight groups and predicted values

Proportion uninsured

Graphs by Wh/Non by Hisp/Non by M/F

Age at December interview

White NonHisp Female

0

.2

.4

.6

White NonHisp Male White Hisp Female

White Hisp Male

0

.2

.4

.6

Nonwh NonHisp Female Nonwh NonHisp Male

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Nonwh Hisp Female

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0

.2

.4

.6

Nonwh Hisp Male

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 22 

To prospectively repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 9, 2021 

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To prospectively repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of 

Military Force. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROSPECTIVE REPEAL OF 2001 AUTHORIZA4 TION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE. 

5 Effective on the date that is one year after the date 

6 of the enactment of this joint resolution, the Authorization 

7 for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 115 Stat. 

8 224; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8132-8133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01697]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part

[[Page 8133]]

225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a 
bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, 
control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding 
company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank 
holding company, including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 24, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. First Missouri Bancshares, Inc., Brookfield, Missouri; to 
acquire CCSB Financial Corp., and thereby indirectly acquire Clay 
County Savings Bank, both of Liberty, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-01697 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID 158
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 8 PageID 159
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 3 of 8 PageID 160
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 4 of 8 PageID 161
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 5 of 8 PageID 162
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 6 of 8 PageID 163
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 7 of 8 PageID 164
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-12 Filed 05/05/06 Page 8 of 8 PageID 165
Shai MORALI, Appellant, v. Vaida MORALI and The Barkers Pet Center, LLC, Appellees.

No. 4D18-2046

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01947]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM

Recission of Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Selective Service System.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Selective Service System Rescinds its Performance Review Board 
[FR Doc. 2024-24311 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 a.m.] per the President's 
Memorandum on Restoring Accountability for Career Senior Executives, 
dated January 20, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Levells, Human Resources Officer, 
Selective Service System, 1501 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22209, 
telephone: 703-605-4011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sec. 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, 
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or 
more performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the 
initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive. President's 
Memorandum on Restoring Accountability for Career Senior Executives, 
dated January 20, 2025, directs Agency heads to rescind their 
Performance Review Board and re-constitute membership with individuals 
committed to full enforcement of SES performance evaluations that 
promote and assure an SES of the highest caliber. The SSS PRB will be 
established at a later date once the Agency's appointees are in place.

Daniel A. Lauretano, Sr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2025-01947 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8015-01-P
```
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 4 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a President 

pro tempore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. THUNE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election 

of a President pro tempore. 

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be 

2 notified of the election of the Honorable Charles E. Grass3 ley as President of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Computer Audio-Recorded Interviewing (CARI) 

Katherine Mason 

RTI International, USA 

W hat is it? W hy is it needed? How do you do it? This software demonstration will show you how a survey 

instrument can be given CARI capability for collecting sound files during in-person interviews. The 

resulting sound files can be used for reviewing field staff performance, for confirming the authenticity of 

interviews or for evaluating how well a questionnaire item "works" with real subjects. The demonstration 

will include administration of a questionnaire, which captures audio files, followed by demonstration of a 

monitoring system for controlling, managing and evaluating the resulting sound files.