alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Statement of FCA Board Member Jill Long Thompson

at the Farm Credit Administration Board Meeting

April 12, 2012

It will come as no surprise to anyone that I am especially proud of the Farm Credit 

Administration today. I thank my fellow Board members, Chairman Strom and Board Member 

Spearman, for supporting this regulation, and I thank the staff for their hard work that has 

brought us to this point. Gary Van Meter, Barry Mardock, Jacqui Melvin, Ira Marshall, Jennifer 

Cohn, and Thais Mootz have put a great deal of time, energy, and thought into this rulemaking 

process. I thank Bill Hoffman for his counsel and leadership from the very beginning when I 

raised the issue of diversity in the System shortly after joining the Board. The Farm Credit 

System also deserves recognition for their overwhelming response to the proposed rule during 

the public comment period.

I wasn’t very old when I first began to understand the significant economic role the Farm Credit 

System plays in agriculture and rural America. The Production Credit Association and Federal 

Land Bank were front and center in my home county, and I am completely convinced the 

System made it possible for farm families to become an integral part of the middle class that has 

long been a defining aspect of making America the strong world leader we are. As times have 

changed, so have the roles of men and women. Today we see an increasing number of women 

in top management positions in production agriculture and agribusiness. And the face of our 

nation has changed dramatically. We know African American and other minority farmers have 

faced real discrimination. For rural America to be a full participant in global economic 

opportunities, we have to make sure that we are aggressive in reaching out to all who have the 

potential to add value to our economy. Our gross domestic product cannot realize its full 

potential if we don’t do all we can to reach out to those who have something to add to it.

This regulation will ensure that every institution in the Farm Credit System, through its strategic 

plan, includes outreach to the entire population of potential borrowers in its territory. I believe 

that over the next several years, this kind of strategic planning and implementation will do more 

than create new opportunities for the national economy. This regulation is the right thing to do 

for economic reasons. Even more, it is the right approach for a system built as a Governmentsponsored enterprise. Our nation has always stood for equality of opportunity. While I also 

believe the System has long been committed to outreach to all, this regulation will ensure the 

strategic commitment to make it happen.
# C_2018104EN.01001202.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 8 November 2017 — Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Orange Polska S.A.

(Case C-628/17)

(2018/C 104/15)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów

Appellant:

Respondent: Orange Polska S.A.

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Is Article 8, in conjunction with Articles 9 and 2(j), of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the use of standard forms for the conclusion of distance contracts relating to the provision of telecommunications services, under which a consumer is required to make the final business decision in the presence of the courier handing over the standard-form contract (general terms and conditions), an aggressive commercial practice by a trader owing to undue influence:

1

| (a) | always, where the consumer, during the courier’s visit, is unable freely to take cognisance of the content of the standard-form contract; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

always, where the consumer, during the courier’s visit, is unable freely to take cognisance of the content of the standard-form contract;

| (b) | only where the consumer has not previously and individually received all standard forms (for example, at his e-mail address or home address), even if he himself had the opportunity, prior to the courier’s visit, to take cognisance of their content on the trader’s website; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

only where the consumer has not previously and individually received all standard forms (for example, at his e-mail address or home address), even if he himself had the opportunity, prior to the courier’s visit, to take cognisance of their content on the trader’s website;

| (c) | only if additional findings were to point to unfair actions on the part of the trader, or on his behalf, for the purpose of restricting the consumer’s decision-making freedom in regard to the business decision which he has to make? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

only if additional findings were to point to unfair actions on the part of the trader, or on his behalf, for the purpose of restricting the consumer’s decision-making freedom in regard to the business decision which he has to make?

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.

1

---
(LOGO) ERNST & YOUNG LLP



                                        Suite 1700            Phone 415 951 3000
                                        555  California Street
                                        San  Francisco, California 94104


                        Report of Independent Accountants
Mr. Art Ringwald
Group Executive Vice President
BA Mortgage, a Division of Bank of America, FSB

          We have examined management's assertion,  included in the accompanying
          report titled  REPORT OF  MANAGEMENT,  that Bank of America,  FSB (the
          Company)  complied with the minimum sen, icing  standards set forth in
          the  Mortgage   Bankers   Association  of  America's   UNIFORM  SINGLE
          ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS (USAP) during the year ended
          December  31,  1997.  Management  is  responsible  for  the  Company's
          compliance with those  requirements.  Our responsibility is to express
          an opinion on management's  assertions about the Company's  compliance
          based on our examination.

          Our examination  was made in accordance with standards  established by
          the  American   Institute  of  Certified   Public   Accountants   and,
          accordingly,  included examining,  on a test basis, evidence about the
          Company's compliance with those requirements and performing such other
          procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
          that our examination  provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
          examination  does not provide a legal  determination  on the Company's
          compliance with specified requirements.

          In our opinion, management's assertion, that the Company complied with
          the  aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended  December 31,
          1997, is fairly stated, in all material respects.



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 17, 1998

Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Jarus, (Interim) Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Scott Jarus




(Interim) Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated:  February 14, 2017 | By: | /s/ C. Hendrick                                       | 
|------------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                          |     | C. Hendrick                                           | 
|                          |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
STATE EX REL. Percy M. TAYLOR v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2038

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Taylor v. State, 16-0190 (La. 3/14/16), 186 So.3d 653.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

AMY R. SMITH, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL A. ROWLAND, DECEASED,
Petitioner

v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND OWNER OF AND/OR PARENT OF AND/OR SUCCESSOR TO AND/OR F/K/A MINI, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND SUBSIDIARY OF AND/OR PARENT OF AND/OR A/K/A AND/OR F/K/A BORG & BECK, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., SUCCESSOR TO BENDIX CORPORATION AND BENDIX MINTEX PTY, LTD., JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC INDIVIDUALLY AND ITS PREDECESSORS, SUCCESSORS, PRESENT AND/OR FORMER PARENTS, SUBSIDIARIES AND/OR DIVISIONS, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK, PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO ABEX CORPORATION AND QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 488 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER[488 EAL 2014] - 2

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED . The Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is also
DENIED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      I, Richard L. Federico, Chief Executive Officer of P.F. Chang's China
Bistro, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, based on my knowledge:

     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
     certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
     the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
     (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.



Dated: February 12, 2003                      /s/ Richard L. Federico
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Richard L. Federico
                                              Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 10 Filed 01/11/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID 13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

VS. ) CASE NO. 3:05-CR-120-P(01)

 )

WILLIAM BRENT )

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed

within ten days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning

the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court

accepts the plea of guilty and Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed in

accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SIGNED this 14 day of November 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00120-P Document 88 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 306
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 2 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 2

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

    Effective from January 3, 2021, the joint committee created by 
Senate Concurrent Resolution 38 (116th Congress), agreed to June 26, 
2020, to make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the 
President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States, is 
continued with the same power and authority provided for in that 
resolution.

SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL.

    The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol are 
authorized to be used on January 10, 2021, January 17, 2021, and 
January 20, 2021 by the joint committee created by Senate Concurrent 
Resolution 38 (116th Congress), agreed to June 26, 2020, in connection 
with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of 
the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United States.

            Passed the Senate January 3, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 2

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
Ceremonies and authorizing the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall 
   of the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted 
  for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-
                      elect of the United States.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, §

Petitioner, §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:06-CV-047-Y

 §

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, §

T.D.C.J.,Correctional § 

Institutions DIV., §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Nathaniel Washington

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of

the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the United States magistrate

judge filed on March 31, 2006; and

3. The Petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on April 20, 2006.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Petitioner’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred

under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, for the reasons stated in the magistrate

judge's findings and conclusions. 

Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Petitioner Nathaniel Washington’s petition for writ of habeas

corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

SIGNED April 24, 2006.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00047-Y Document 9 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 67
STATE of Louisiana, BY AND THROUGH Its Attorney General James CALDWELL v. FOURNIER INDUSTRIE ET SANTE and Laboratories Fournier, S.A., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie, Inc.

NO. 2018-C-2065

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-30596

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCELLUS QUECHEZ REYNOLDS, also known as Tittymoe,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CR-20145-9

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marcellus Quechez Reynolds, now federal prisoner # 38960-179, has

appealed the denial of his motions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) requesting a

reduction of his sentence in light of recent amendments to the Sentencing

Guidelines pertaining to cocaine base offenses. Section 3582(c)(2) permits the

discretionary modification of a defendant’s sentence in certain cases where the

sentencing range has been subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission.

See United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 237 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 18, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-30596 Document: 00511114754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010
No. 09-30596

2

517 (2009). Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines modified the

guideline ranges applicable to cocaine base offenses to reduce the disparity

between cocaine base and powder cocaine sentences. U.S.S.G. Supp. to App. C,

Amend. 706; Doublin, 572 F.3d at 236. 

Section 3582(c)(2) permits the discretionary modification of a defendant’s

sentence only where the defendant’s sentencing range is actually lowered by the

Sentencing Commission. See § 3582(c)(2). Because Reynolds was accountable

for more than 4.5 kilograms of cocaine base, Amendment 706 did not change his

guidelines sentence range. See Amend. 706.

“A § 3582(c)(2) motion is not a second opportunity to present mitigating

factors to the sentencing judge, nor is it a challenge to the appropriateness of the

original sentence.” United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir.

1995); see also U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, p.s. Thus, Reynolds was not entitled to have

the district court recalculate his base offense level.

Because Reynolds is ineligible for relief, the district court’s order is

AFFIRMED. Reynolds’s request in his brief for appointment of counsel for

presentation of oral argument is DENIED.

Case: 09-30596 Document: 00511114754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/18/2010
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Randall H. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in my
capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
November 4, 2010


/s/ Randall H. BrownRandall
      H. BrownChief
      Financial Officer, Executive Vice
                    President,
      Treasurer and Secretary





In
accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the
SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Chad Brian BALENTINE v. STATE

CR-16-0265

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2











CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Elena Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: May
20, 2008





By: /s/ Elena
Pochapski


Elena
Pochapski


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TIMOTHY SHAUN JOHNSON §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-2526-R

§ 

DAN JOSLIN, Warden §

FCI-Seagoville §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

(filed February 7, 2006), and the Objections to Findings and Recommendation (filed February 16,

2006), the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct

and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:

1. Defendants Motion for Relief from Judgment is treated as a second motion to correct, vacate,

or set aside sentence and DISMISSED without prejudice pending review by a three-judge panel of

the court of appeals.

2. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment and the Order Accepting the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to Petitioner. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

FILED

March 20, 2006

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02526-R Document 7 Filed 03/20/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 60
SO ORDERED this 20th day of March, 2006.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02526-R Document 7 Filed 03/20/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 61