alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Golden State Petro (IOM
     1-B) PLC;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Company's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2005

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
-------------------------
Tor Olav Troim
Director
Joseph J. DEMTY, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20001

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO SALGADO PACHECO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

H-00-CR-467-1

--------------------

September 19, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Pedro Salgado Pacheo appeals his

conviction and sentence for possession with the intent to

distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. Pacheo waived a

jury trial after the district court denied his motion to suppress

evidence, and the district court convicted him based on stipulated

facts. On appeal, Pacheo challenges the district court’s denial of

the motion to suppress. He also urges that the district court

clearly erred in granting him only a two-level reduction in offense

level for acceptance of responsibility and in denying his request
2

for a two-point reduction under U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.1(b)(6) and 5C1.2.

Pacheo argues that the district court should have suppressed

evidence found in a warrantless search because the lessee of the

house, Evelyn Zumaya, lacked authority to consent to a search of a

bedroom that she allegedly subleased to Pacheo. We find no error,

clear or otherwise, in the district court’s determination, based on

testimony in person at the suppression hearing, that Ms. Zumaya had

both actual and apparent authority to consent to the search.

United States v. Foy, 28 F.3d 464, 474 (5th Cir. 1994); United

States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 (1974). We note that, by

failing to brief the issue, Pacheo has abandoned any challenge to

the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress statements

that he made following his arrest.

We find no error in the district court’s determination that,

having received a two-level reduction in offense level for

acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a), Pacheo was

not entitled to an additional one-level reduction in offense level

pursuant to § 3E1.1(b). United States v. Anderson, 174 F.3d 515,

525 (5th Cir. 1999). We also find no error in the district court’s

determination that Pacheo was not entitled to a two-point reduction

under U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.1(b)(6) and 5C1.2. United States v. Edwards,

65 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Sotelo, 97 F.3d

782, 799 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
Marco TORRES, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018436EN.01001001.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Bundeskammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte v ING-DiBa Direktbank Austria Niederlassung der ING-DiBa AG

(Case C-191/17) (1)

((Directive 2007/64/EC - Payment services in the internal market - Concept of ‘payment account’ - Potential inclusion of a savings account enabling its user to make payments and withdrawals by way of a current account opened in his name))

(2018/C 436/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundeskammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte

Defendant: ING-DiBa Direktbank Austria Niederlassung der ING-DiBa AG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(14) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC must be interpreted as meaning that a savings account which allows for sums deposited without notice and from which payment and withdrawal transactions may be made solely by means of a current account does not come within the concept of ‘payment account’.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Trailer Bridge, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark A. Tanner     
|                     |  |  |  | Mark A. Tanner         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

End of Filing
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. Additionally, OFAC is publishing updates to the identifying information of two persons currently included on the SDN List.

# DATES:

                        This action was issued on January 16, 2025. See                         **Supplementary Information**                         for relevant dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 202-622-2490; or                         *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​contact-ofac.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website:                     *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

## Notice of OFAC Action

On January 16, 2025, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 8098)          ( print page 8099)          ( print page 8100)    
      ( print page 8101)    
Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2025-01595 Filed 1-22-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





RIDGEWOOD
      ENERGY M FUND, LLCDated:
            November
      12, 2009
            By:
            /s/
            
            
            ROBERT
      E. SWANSONName:
            
            
            Robert
      E. SwansonTitle:
            
            
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            November
      12, 2009
            By:
            /s/
            
            
            KATHLEEN
      P. MCSHERRYName:
            
            
            Kathleen
      P. McSherryTitle:
            
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy M Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Memorandum to File 

Subject:  Office of Inspector General Report of Investigation 17‐01 – Closing Memorandum 

Date:  August 21, 2017 

The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) initiated an 

investigation on October 5, 2016, on the suitability of an FCA employee and the Agency 

procedures for evaluating Office of Personnel updates and similar notifications regarding 

suitability. On June 9, 2017, the OIG completed its investigation, issued OIG Report of 

Investigation No. 17‐01, and referred such report to FCA management for appropriate action. 

On August 17, 2017, FCA management notified the OIG that it had taken appropriate action. By 

issuance of this Memorandum, OIG Investigation No. 17‐01 is now closed. 

Wendy R. Laguarda 

Inspector General
Exhibit 23.2



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|NSAII NETHERLAND
SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-7070, 333-62708, 333-73878, 333-112670,
333-105015 and 333-111448); (ii) the Post Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-70268); and (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration
No. 333-127168); each of GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the Company), of our report dated February 25, 2005, relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenues of certain interests of Challenger Minerals, Inc., a subsidiary of the
Company, as of December 31, 2004, included as Exhibit 99.1 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005, and of the data extracted from such report appearing in the Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We hereby consent to all references to such report and/or this firm in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 and in each Registration Statement referenced above. We further consent to our being named as an
expert in those Registration Statements and in each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates.



Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.By:

/s/ David B. Cox, P.E.David B. Cox, P.E.Senior Vice President


Houston, Texas

March 2, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TERRENCE LANAIR JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

VS.

DAN JOSLIN, WARDEN,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-2049-G

)

) ECF

)

ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr. made findings,

conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Petitioner filed objections and the

district court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and

recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are OVERRULED

and the court accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

March 31, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02049-G Document 8 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 176
Case 2:04-cv-00314-J-BB Document 3 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 10
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00314-J-BB Document 3 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ARTHUR LINDELL ERVIN §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-1651-K 

§

BILL HILL, ET AL. §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SO ORDERED this 6th day of December , 2005.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01651-K Document 14 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan Finkelstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.

Dated: November 22, 2005            By: /s/ Alan Finkelstein
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Alan Finkelstein
                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                    President and Secretary

I, Bennet Price-Lientz Tchaikovsky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.

Dated: November 22, 2005            By: /s/ Bennet Price-Lientz
                                              Tchaikovsky
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Bennet Price-Lientz Tchaikovsky
                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: October 21, 2010 /s/Cosmo Palmieri     Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7434

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BERNARD BOSTIC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:08-cr-00060-TLW-1)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Bostic, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Bostic seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his “Motion to Rectify the Record.” We dismiss 

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal 

was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on April 3, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on August 19, 

2012.*

 Because Bostic failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED