alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Edward S. RHODES, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-982

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Paul Matthew CALZETTA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida and Bryan R. Holt, Chief of Corrections, Osceola County, Florida. Respondents.

Case No. 5D19-1065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 22, 2019

Anton J. Nace, of Law Office of Anton J. Nace, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

*274Petitioner, Paul Matthew Calzetta, seeks a writ of habeas corpus directing the lower court to hold a hearing for the purposes of setting a new bond and reasonable conditions for pretrial release. We grant the petition, quash the order denying the motion to set bond after recommitment, and remand to the lower court for a hearing.

The State charged Petitioner with Trafficking in 200 Grams or More of Methamphetamine and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Sell or Deliver, which are felony offenses. Petitioner bonded out of custody, but later violated a condition of his pretrial release by failing to complete a drug test. The State filed a motion to revoke Petitioner's pretrial release, which the lower court granted. The court then set Petitioner's bond at zero. Subsequently, Petitioner filed a motion to set a new bond, which was denied without a hearing.

As required by both statute and rule, "[a]n application for modification of bail on any felony charge must be heard by a court in person, at a hearing with the defendant present, and with at least three hours' notice to the state attorney." § 903.035(2), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; *cf.* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131(d)(2). Thus, Petitioner's motion to set a new bond was improperly denied without a hearing. *See**Moore v. State*, 247 So.3d 672, 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the order under review, and remand this matter to the lower court for a proper hearing.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; and CAUSE REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 360

- C V

Style: George M. Bishop, et al. v. Chappell Hill Service Company, LLC

and High Meadows Land & Cattle, LLC

Date motion filed * : August 14, 201 4

Type of motion: Motion to Dismiss

Party filing motion: Appell ee

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional

motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Appell ee s ’ motion to dismiss the appeal , filed within appellee s ’ response , is

ordered taken with the case. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to docket the

appellee s ’ response and motion to dismiss, which has been filed only as a motion,

also as appellee s ’ brief.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting

Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: August 26, 2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                               [KPMG LETTERHEAD]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
Eagle Geophysical Inc.

ENERGY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL AND EAGLE GEOPHYSICAL OFFSHORE INC.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Research International
and consolidated subsidiaries and of Eagle Geophysical Offshore Inc and the
related consolidated statements of operations for the period August 11, 1997 to
December 31, 1997 and for the year ended December 31, 1997, not presented
separately herein. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the companies' management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the consolidated financial statements for the purposes of
consolidation by Eagle Geophysical Inc, based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with the accounting instructions of Eagle Geophysical Inc, the
companies' parent, for use in preparing its consolidated financial statements.
These instructions do not require a consolidated statement of stockholders'
equity, a consolidated statement of cash flows or footnote disclosure.

In our opinion the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Energy Research
International and consolidated subsidiaries and Eagle Geophysical Offshore Inc
as of December 31, 1997, and the results of their operations for the period
August 11, 1997 to December 31, 1997, in conformity with the accounting
instructions of Eagle Geophysical Inc and with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the boards of
directors of Eagle Geophysical Inc, Energy Research International and Eagle
Geophysical Offshore Inc and should not be used for any other purpose, without
our prior consent.


/s/ KPMG
KPMG                                                            26 FEBRUARY 1998
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditors
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016 521613 

________________________________

In the Matter of ERIC TOLLIVER,

Petitioner,

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner

of Corrections and Community

Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 19, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Eric Tolliver, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent. 

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of

violating certain prison disciplinary rules. 

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 521613 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 299 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 528
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 299 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 529
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 299 Filed 01/27/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 530
STATE of Louisiana v. Marlon Romaine CARTER

NO. 2019-KO-0246

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Solar Power Corp (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal Quarter ended December 31, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Desmond RossName:Desmond RossTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:February 13, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

T.C. ANDERSON §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-05-CV-1489-P 

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner T.C. Anderson, appearing pro se, has filed a motion to withdraw his application

for writ of habeas corpus. As grounds for his motion, petitioner acknowledges that he has a state

writ pending before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and must exhaust his state remedies before

seeking federal habeas relief.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) provides that “an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without

order of court [ ] by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of

an answer or of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs . . .” FED. R. CIV. P.

41(a)(1). Respondent has not yet served an answer or a motion for summary judgment.

Consequently, petitioner is entitled to a dismissal without prejudice.

RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner’s motion to dismiss should be granted. This case should be dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01489-P Document 5 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 72
A copy of this report and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the manner

provided by law. Any party may file written objections to the recommendation within 10 days after

being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The failure to file

written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal

conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon

grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th

Cir. 1996).

DATED: August 17, 2005.

 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01489-P Document 5 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 73
Cynthia HOLLIDAY v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LSU AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE, et al.

NO. 2019-CC-0363

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
# C_2018022EN.01001703.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/17

---

Appeal brought on 19 September 2017 by Ukraine against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 July 2017 in Case T-347/14 DEP: Yanukovych v Council

(Case C-550/17 P)

(2018/C 022/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ukraine (represented by: M. Kostytska, Advocate)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Olga Stanislavivna Yanukovych, as heir of Viktor Viktorovych Yanukovych, Council of the European Union, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 23 November 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Joseph L. TOMLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4822

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 23, 2019

Joseph L. Tomlin, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED as untimely.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01352]

[[Page 7136]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12549-01-R6]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to 
State Operating Permit for Shell Chemical LP, Harris County, Texas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an Order dated December 19, 2024, denying a petition dated June 11, 
2024, from Air Alliance Houston (the Petitioner). The petition 
requested that the EPA object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V 
operating permit issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental 
Quality (TCEQ) to Shell Chemical LP, for its Deer Park Chemical Plant 
located in Harris County, Texas. In addition, and as a part of the 
Order, the EPA Administrator found that cause exists to reopen the 
Shell Chemical Deer Park Chemical Plant permit pursuant to 40 CFR part 
70.7.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Ehrhart, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Air Permits Section, (214) 665-2295, [email protected]. The 
final order and petition are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Air 
Alliance Houston dated June 11, 2024, requesting that the EPA object to 
the issuance of operating permit no. O1668, issued by TCEQ to Shell 
Chemical LP, for its Deer Park Chemical Plant located in Harris County, 
Texas. On December 19, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an order 
denying the petition while concurrently making a finding that cause 
exists to reopen the Shell Chemical Deer Park Chemical Plant permit 
under 40 CFR 70.7. The order itself explains the basis for the EPA's 
decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than March 24, 2025.

    Dated: January 14, 2025.
James McDonald,
Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2025-01352 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Z.G. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160916

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.
Samuel BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5053

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to
the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Claire S. Bean
--------------------------------------------
Claire S. Bean
Chief Financial Officer

B. Date: May 16, 2005
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 34 

Congratulating the Washington University in St. Louis Bears women’s soccer 

team for winning the 2024 NCAA Division III Women’s Soccer Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2025 

Mr. SCHMITT (for himself and Mr. HAWLEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Washington University in St. Louis Bears 

women’s soccer team for winning the 2024 NCAA Division III Women’s Soccer Championship. 

Whereas, on December 8, 2024, the Washington University 

in St. Louis Bears women’s soccer team (referred to in 

this preamble as the ‘‘Bears’’) defeated the nationally 

ranked William Smith Herons, 3 to 0, to win the 2024 

NCAA Division III Women’s Soccer Championship; 

Whereas the Bears demonstrated extraordinary teamwork, 

skill, and hard work throughout this victory and the entire season; 

Whereas the Bears attained a 23–0–2 record during this season; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 34 ATS 

Whereas the Bears achieved the top ranking in the 2024 

NCAA Division III Women’s Soccer season; 

Whereas the coaching staff led by head coach Jim Conlon 

provided outstanding leadership and strategy, contributing significantly to the victories throughout the season, 

culminating with the end-of-year victory in the 2024 

NCAA Division III Women’s Soccer Championship; 

Whereas Olivia Clemons was named Offensive Player of the 

Year, Rookie of the Year, and All-Tournament Offensive 

Player, finishing the season with an impressive 22 goals 

and 6 assists; 

Whereas head coach Jim Conlon and assistant coaches Brandon Santel, Amanda Kesler, and Katharine Zaber were 

named Coaching Staff of the Year; 

Whereas 4 players earned First-Team honors, 2 players 

earned honorable mention nods, and 4 players were selected to the All-Tournament Team; and 

Whereas fans of the Bears demonstrated enthusiasm and loyalty in supporting their team throughout the 2024 NCAA 

Division III soccer season: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Washington University in St. 

3 Louis Bears women’s soccer team on winning the 

4 2024 Division III Women’s Soccer Championship; 

5 (2) recognizes the achievements, contributions, 

6 and dedication of the players, coaches, management, 

7 and support staff of the Bears; 

8 (3) congratulates the alumni, students, and fac9 ulty of the Washington University in St. Louis; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 34 ATS 

1 (4) recognizes the hard work and commitment 

2 of the staff of the Francis Olympic Field and Peter 

3 Johann Memorial Field; and 

4 (5) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

5 Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu6 tion to— 

7 (A) the Chancellor of the Washington Uni8 versity in St. Louis, Andrew D. Martin; 

9 (B) the Director of Athletics of the Wash10 ington University Bears, Anthony J. Azama; 

11 and 

12 (C) the head coach of the Washington Uni13 versity Bears women’s soccer team, Jim 

14 Conlon. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GORDON CRITTENDON,

Appellant,

v.

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF EVA MARIE CRITTENDON,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-1231

[December 12, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Michael J. Linn, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

312017GA000007 and 312017GA000008.

Gordon Crittendon, Monticello, pro se.

Aaron V. Johnson of Collins Brown Barkett, Chartered, Vero Beach, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 09

- 00018

- CR

No. 10

- 09

- 00019

- CR

AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY CO.,

D/B/A TEXAS BONDING CO., SUE A. TAYLOR,

AGENT, D/B/A BAILMAN BOND C O. (ELLIS COUNTY)

,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No s

. 0 8

- C

- 3049 and 08

- C

- 3093

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed motion s to dismiss th e s e appeal s because the trial court has

granted Appellant’s motions for new trial . A ccording t o the certificates of conference,

th e State does not oppose dismissal of the appeals . Accordingly, the y are dismissed.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. State Page 2 FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal s dis missed

Opinion delivered and filed February 18, 2009

[CV06]
S. DISTRICT COURT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CQURFHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FULED

AMARILLO DIVISION
SEP - 5 2008
TOMMY DeWAYNE JOHNSON, CLERK,US. DISTRICT COURT
"y Deputy
Petitioner, ~
v. 2:05-CV-0202

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director,
Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
Correctional Institutions Division,

OR 2 UO? LOD 007 WO OD OD UO? LOR LO?

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner has filed with this Court a petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus. On August
13, 2008, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this cause,
recommending therein that the instant habeas application be denied. As of this date, no objections to
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed of record.

Having made an independent examination of the record in this case, the undersigned United
States District Judge is of the opinion the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be,

and hereby is, ADOPTED. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED.

ITIS SO ORDERED. f
ENTERED this “& day osx of 7 .cs 0s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE