alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Auction Expenditure 

Justification Report

Fiscal Year 2018
i

Cumulative Cash Receipts

(FYs 1994 - 2018)

$114.6 Billion 

FY 2018 Expenditures

$91.7 Million

0.08% 

Cumulative 

Expenditures 

(FYs 1994 - 2017)

$1.718 Billion 

1.50%

Cash Receipts is the total net winning bids collected for broader government use. Over a 25-year period, the average cash receipts per year is $4.6 Billion.

Cumulative Expenditures (FYs 1994 - 2017) does not include administrative cost of the Spectrum Credit Reform Program.
Compensation: (1100 – 1300 Budget Object Class Code (BOCC) Series)

1) Personnel Compensation

2) Personnel Benefits

3) Benefits for Former Personnel

Travel & Transportation of Persons: (2100 BOCC Series)

1) Domestic Travel

2) Foreign Travel

3) Leased Passenger Vehicles

Transportation of Things: (2200 BOCC Series)

1) Parcel Post

2) Non-Passenger GSA & Commercial Truck

Rent, Communications, Utilities, and Mail: (2300 BOCC Series)

1) GSA Space Rent

2) Non-GSA Space Rent

3) Non-GSA Telephone/Fax

4) GSA Telephones

5) Mail Services – Postage

6) Gas/Electric/Other Utilities

7) Messenger Services

8) Other Equipment Rental

9) Copier Rental

Printing and Reproduction: (2400 BOCC Series)

1) Printing/Reproduction

2) Printing/Binding/Federal Register

Other Contractual Services: (2500 BOCC Series)

1) Contracts Services – Non Federal

2) ADP* Retrieval Service

3) Training/Tuition/Fees

4) Security Investigations – Federal

5) Interagency Contracts

6) Space Repair/Interior/Exterior

7) ADP* Software Maintenance

8) ADP* Equipment Maintenance

9) Repair Office Equipment/Furniture

10) ADP* Service Contracts

Supplies and Materials: (2600 BOCC Series)

1) Supplies & Materials

2) Periodicals & Subscriptions

Equipment: (3100 BOCC Series)

1) Technical Equipment

2) ADP* Equipment 

3) ADP* Software

4) Office Furniture/Equipment

5) Telecommunications Equipment

6) Books

ii *Automated Data Processing
iii

Budget 

Object 

Class Code Expenditures

11 Personnel Compensation $26,453,013

12 Personnel Benefits 8,057,990

13 Benefits for Former Personnel 4,200

21 Travel and Transportation of Persons 231,236

22 Transportation of Things 9,047

23 Rents, Communications, Utilities, and Mail 8,060,694

24 Printing and Reproduction 215,509

25 Other Contractual Services 44,538,488

26 Supplies and Materials 3,513,459

31 Equipment 623,291

TOTAL 1 $91,706,927

Budget Object Class Code Description

SPECTRUM AUCTIONS PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REPORT

1

Does not include obligations for Spectrum Credit Reform Program Administrative Costs to support loan activities. These activities are funded from the 

General Fund of Treasury as provided in the Credit Reform Act. 

Fiscal Year 2018
**EXHIBIT 31.2****NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary N. Monda, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Interstate Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.November 8, 2005/s/ Gary N. Monda
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. LEON M U HAM M AD, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10114

D.C . No. 2:09-c r-00527-R LH M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da R oge r L. Hunt, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Le on M uha

m m a d a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 2 4-m o nth se nte nc e im p ose d upon re voc at ion of supe rvise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . M uha m m a d c onte nds tha

t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble in light 

# FIL ED NOV 21 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).of the a lle ge d ly m inor na ture of his viola

t ions. Thedistric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in im

posing Muha

m m a d’ s se nte nc e . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Even

a c c e pting Muha

m m a d’ s c ha

ra c te riz ation of his viola

tions a s m inor, the24-m onth se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) se nte nc ing fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um sta

nc e s, inc l uding M uha m m a d’ s c rim ina l history

and bre a c h of the c ourt’ s trust. Se eUnite d State s v . Miqbe l , 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th C ir. 2006) (a t a re voc ation se nte nc ing, thec ourt m ay sa nc tion a viola tor for his bre a c h of the c ourt’ s trust). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 0 1 1 4 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.22
                                      Agreed to December 8, 2021        

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall of the 
Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such 
catafalque may be used in connection with services to be conducted 
there for the Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, a Senator from the State of 
Kansas.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 2 1 -0 512 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CLOVIS CHRISTOPHER GENO ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER**
Pursuant to Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the reply brief and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until December 22 , 202 3 , to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 20 2023

11/20/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0512
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PokerTek, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gehrig H. White,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and I, Christopher Daniels, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Date: August 14, 2007
              /s/ Gehrig H. WhiteGehrig H. WhiteChief Executive
                Officer


Date: August 14, 2007
            /s/ Christopher DanielsChristopher DanielsChief Financial
              Officer





42
Sebastian FOMENKO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, The Florida Board of Massage, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2830

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 18, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

*Affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

LASHASTA KNIGHTON, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-538-Y

 §

GINNY VAN BUREN, Warden, §

FMC–Carswell, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Lashasta Knighton under 28

U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following

matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation

of the United States magistrate judge filed on September

15, 2005; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on October 12, 2005.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Knighton’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of habeas

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and

conclusions.

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the

magistrate judge should are ADOPTED.

 Lashasta Knighton’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 be, and is hereby, DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

SIGNED October 19, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00538-Y Document 10 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 57
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 19, 2006



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. DracupChief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

URS Energy & Construction Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract Nos. F A8903-04-D-8680 ) 

F A3002-06-D-OOO I ) 

W9 I 2ER-06-D-0006 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 60796, 60797, 60798 

60799,60800,60801 

Nicole J. Owren-Wiest, Esq. 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. 

Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 3 May 2018 

dmi 1strative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60796, 60797, 60798, 60799, 

60800, 60801, Appeals of URS Energy & Construction Inc., rendered in conformance 

with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
27
28
29
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned James Charles President and acting Treasurer of Christie Fun,
Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Christie Fun, Inc. for the period
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Christie Fun,
Inc.

Dated: August 17, 2005

/s/ James Charles
-----------------
James Charles
President and acting Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial,
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Christopher GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-437

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Garrick Rex RAWLS v. Kristin McDonald RAWLS

2160822

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall of the 
Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such 
catafalque may be used in connection with services to be conducted 
there for the Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, a Senator from the State of 
Kansas.

            Passed the Senate December 7, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall 
 of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to 
  be conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the Honorable Robert 
            Joseph Dole, a Senator from the State of Kansas.
```
<PAGE>

                                 June 14, 2000


Mr. Arthur C. Kellar
106 Ebbtide Drive
North Palm Beach, Florida 33408

Dear Art:

     This letter sets forth the agreement between you and Precision Auto Care,
Inc. (the "Company") concerning your financial backing of the bond required to
be posted in order for the Company to pursue its appeal of an adverse judgment
arising out of litigation in Florida. In return for your agreement to provide a
letter of credit to support the Company's posting of the necessary bond, the
Company agrees to issue you 25,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock.

     You understand and agree that you may be required to reimburse your letter
of credit bank in the full amount of the letter of credit plus interest and
costs, if the bonding company draws on the letter of credit following a call on
their bond, which is likely to occur if the appeal is unsuccessful. If you are
obligated to reimburse your bank for amounts drawn under the letter of credit,
the Company agrees to: (1) increase by the amount of any draws on the letter of
credit the amount due to be paid to you on or before April 15, 2001 under the
Company's Subordinated Debenture; and (2) issue you an additional 25,000 shares
of the Company's Common Stock for each $100,000 in principal amount drawn on the
letter of credit with the understanding that shareholder approval would be
required for such additional issuances of stock to be made, and if shareholder
approval cannot be obtained for the additional shares, to increase the principal
balance of all amounts owed under the Subordinated Debenture by 25% of the
amounts drawn under the letter of credit . In the unlikely event that the letter
of credit and bond remain outstanding at the maturity of the Company's
Subordinated Debenture, the Company agrees to issue to you a demand note in the
principal amount of the outstanding stated amount of the letter of credit plus
interest at the rate(s) specified in the Company's Subordinated Debenture.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC.


                                          By: /s/ Woodley A. Allen
                                              --------------------------
                                              Woodley A. Allen
                                              Chairman of the Board of Directors

Accepted and agreed this 14/th/ day of June, 2000



/s/ Arthur C. Kellar
--------------------
Arthur C. Kellar
Statement

Jeffery S. Hall, Board Member

Farm Credit Administration Board Meeting

March 10, 2016

I support the adoption of Bookletter 67. It provides guidance to the system on the use of Similar 

Entity lending authority, guidance that the House Committee on Agriculture made clear was 

necessary during the Farm Credit Hearing on December 2, 2015. It was also brought up as a 

concern during my confirmation process earlier in the year. 

The Similar Entity authority, which was authorized by Congress more than twenty years ago is 

an important risk mitigation and portfolio diversification tool. It helps the System provide credit in 

good times and in bad as the System’s mission requires. The Bookletter encourages System 

institutions to develop or reevaluate policies, procedures and internal controls around the use of 

this authority. It also promotes greater transparency by expecting periodic reports to System 

bank and association board members. 

Similar Entity lending, by definition, is a loan where Farm Credit System institutions can not 

extend credit under traditional authorities. Similar Entity lending authority is important to the 

safety and soundness of the Farm Credit System. It becomes even more important during times 

when many parts of the traditional portfolio are under stress. Members of Congress have made 

it clear that not all legal uses of the Similar Entity authority are appropriate. Some Similar Entity 

lending, while legal, calls into doubt the System’s focus on its statutory mission. 

With this Bookletter, the FCA Board has taken an important step towards addressing the wishes 

of the authorizing committees. While I believe that more direction could have been included in 

addressing the reputation risks associated with Similar Entity lending, I will support the adoption 

of Bookletter 67 and use the increased examination and reporting requirements to monitor 

whether I believe additional guidance is necessary.
Order entered February 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00144-CV

IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF DAVID EDWARD JOINER

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV1870002

ORDER

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Felicia Pitre to file 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the jury charge and verdict with respect to the 

trial of this matter held on November 5, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). The supplemental 

record shall be filed no later than February 13, 2020. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the parties.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with this
Quarterly Report of Premier Products Group, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2019, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arnold F. Sock, Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | Such
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
    information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019, fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
    October 26, 2020 | By: | /s/
    Arnold F. Sock                 
|-------------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                           |     | Arnold
    F. Sock                     
|                           |     | Interim Chief
        Financial Officer