alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Claire S. Bean

Claire S. BeanChief Financial Officer
Order – Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1328-L

§

MEGAFUND CORPORATION, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

This is a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for

alleged violations of the federal securities laws. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the

court in implementation thereof, on February 27, 2006, this action was referred to United States

Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan for pretrial management. On June 2, 2008, the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 413) (the “Report”) were filed,

recommending that the court approve the proposed distribution plan set forth in Receiver’s Final

Report and Proposed Distribution Plan (Lancorp Financial Receivership Estate) (doc. 391)

(“Receiver’s Final Report”) and grant the fee application set forth in Receiver’s Final Application

to Allow and Pay (1) Receiver’s Fees and Expenses; (2) Attorneys Fees and Expenses; and (3)

Accountants Fees and Expenses (Lancorp Financial Group Receivership Estate) (doc 392). No

objections to the Report were filed.

The court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s finding and recommendation, record, and

applicable law, and finds that the magistrate judge’s findings are correct. They are therefore

accepted as those of the court. Accordingly, the court approves Receiver’s Final Report and
Order – Page 2 

Proposed Distribution Plan (Lancorp Financial Receivership Estate), attached with its exhibits as

an exhibit to this order and incorporated herein as if repeated verbatim, and grants the Receiver’s

final application for attorney’s fees and accounting fees as set forth in the Report. Accordingly, the

court orders that the Receiver may pay $23,934.00 in fees and $310.72 in expenses to the law firm

of Quilling Selander Cummiskey & Lownds, P.C. The court also orders that the Receiver is

authorized to reserve $10,000.00 for legal fees, $7,500.00 for accounting fees, and $1,920.00 for

storage costs from funds available for further distribution for future costs. The court further orders

that the Receiver is authorized to make distributions to claimants in accordance with the schedule

attached as Exhibit “C” to the Receiver’s Final Report and to send a cover letter to each claimant

in the form attached as Exhibit “D” to the Receiver’s Final Report. 

It is so ordered this 24th day of June, 2008.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge
Christopher A. VAUGHAN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5013

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE
ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Nathan, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of the operation of the
  Company.





/s/Richard
      Nathan(Principal Financial
      Officer)
                Richard Nathan,
      Inc.





This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99(ii)

Amendment No. 1 to Note

This
Amendment to Note (Amendment), made, delivered, and effective as of September 11, 2006, by and between QUANTUM VALUE MANAGEMENT, LLC (Borrower) and COMERICA BANK (Bank).

WHEREAS, Borrower and Bank are parties to that certain Variable Rate  Single Payment Note in the original principal amount of $20,000,000 dated
March 10, 2005 (Note); and

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower desire to amend the Note as set forth
below;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises contained in this Amendment, Borrower and Bank agree as follows:



|1. | The Maturity Date of the Note is now January 2, 2007.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------



|2. | The execution of this Amendment shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any Default or Event of Default.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | All the terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Note shall have the same meaning as used in the Note, unless otherwise defined in this Amendment.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | This Amendment is not an agreement to any further or other amendment of the Note.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Borrower expressly acknowledges and agrees that except as expressly amended in this Amendment, the Note, as amended, remains in full force and effect and is ratified, confirmed and
restated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment on the date set
forth above.



|                              |  |  |  |               |  |      |  | 
|----------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---- |  | 
|QUANTUM VALUE MANAGEMENT, LLC |  |  |  | COMERICA BANK
|                              |  |  |  |              
|By:                           |  |  |  |               |  | By:  |  | 
|                              |  |  |  |              
|Its:                          |  |  |  |               |  | Its: |  | 



---

CONSENT OF GUARANTORS

We consent to the foregoing amendment as of the date thereof and reaffirm and ratify all of our obligations to the Bank under our Guaranties of the
Indebtedness of the Borrower to the Bank.



Patrick FlynnMichael HullLubomir LitchevDavid LangevinRobert J. SkandalarisMichael C. Azar




MANITEX, LLCBy:Its:MANITOWOC BOOM TRUCKS, INC.By:Its:MANITEX SKYCRANE LLCBy:Its:QUANTUM VALUE PARTNERS, L.P.By:Its:
Diana COSTARAKIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-95

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24

Power of Attorney

                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and each of the undersigned directors of the
Company, hereby constitutes and appoints Stephen Adams, Joe McAdams and Mark J.
Boggess, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone),
its/his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for it/him and on its/his
behalf in its/his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign,
execute, affix its/his seal thereto and file the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, including any amendment or amendments thereto, with all
exhibits and any all documents required to be filed with respect thereto with
any regulatory authority.

There is hereby granted to said attorneys, and each of the, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, requisite and
necessary to be done in respect of the foregoing as fully as it/he or
itself/himself might or could do if personally present, thereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorney may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same instrument and any of the undersigned directors may execute this
Power of Attorney by signing any such counterpart.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC. has caused this Power of
Attorney to be executed in its name by its President and Chief Executive Officer
on the 6th day of March, 1998.

                                  AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.



                                            /s/
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Joe B. McAdams, President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                       102
<PAGE>

The undersigned directors of AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC., a Delaware
corporation, have hereunto set their hands as of the 6th day of March, 1998.





       /s/ Stephen Adams                /s/ Thomas A. Donnelly
--------------------------------    -------------------------------
Stephen Adams                       Thomas A. Donnelly


      /s/ Joe B. McAdams                 /s/ David B. Garvin
--------------------------------    -------------------------------
Joe B. McAdams                      David B. Garvin


     /s/ Wayne Boysen                    /s/ David Frith-Smith
--------------------------------    -------------------------------
Wayne Boysen                        David Frith-Smith


     /s/ John A. Ehlert
--------------------------------
John A. Ehlert










                                     103
Case 3:05-cr-00220-M Document 203 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1072
Exhibit 31.2
 HORIZON LINES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ MICHAEL T. AVARAMichael T. AvaraSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### David Lawrence DIXON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Thomas MCBRIDE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-6498.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2004.

Decided May 20, 2004.

David Lawrence Dixon, Appellant pro se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Jon Rufus Blevins, Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

David Lawrence Dixon seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitu*919tional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dixon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Jonathan Pernell MATHIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3723

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 18 

Requiring the Architect of the Capitol, the Secretary of the Senate, and 

the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives to 

contract with food service contractors and vending machine contractors 

for the Capitol Complex that accept cryptocurrency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2021 

Mr. CRUZ submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Requiring the Architect of the Capitol, the Secretary of the 

Senate, and the Chief Administrative Officer of the 

House of Representatives to contract with food service 

contractors and vending machine contractors for the 

Capitol Complex that accept cryptocurrency, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Adopting 

5 Cryptocurrency in Congress as an Exchange of Payment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 18 IS 

1 for Transactions Resolution’’ or the ‘‘ACCEPT Resolu2 tion’’. 

3 SEC. 2. ACCEPTING OF CRYPTOCURRENCY AT RESTAU4 RANTS, VENDING MACHINES, AND GIFT 

5 SHOPS IN THE CAPITOL COMPLEX. 

6 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

7 (1) the term ‘‘Capitol Buildings’’ means the 

8 Capitol Buildings described in section 5101 of title 

9 40, United States Code; and 

10 (2) the term ‘‘digital asset’’ means a natively 

11 electronic asset that— 

12 (A) is recorded on a cryptographically se13 cured distributed ledger; and 

14 (B) is designed to confer only economic or 

15 access rights. 

16 (b) ACCEPTANCE OF CRYPTOCURRENCY.—The Archi17 tect of the Capitol, the Secretary of the Senate, and the 

18 Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representa19 tives shall each, for the Capitol Buildings that are under 

20 their jurisdiction— 

21 (1) subject to subsection (c), solicit and enter 

22 into contracts to provide food service and vending 

23 machines in such Capitol Buildings with persons 

24 that will accept digital assets as payment for goods; 

25 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 18 IS 

1 (2) encourage the gift shops in such Capitol 

2 Buildings to accept digital assets as payment for 

3 goods. 

4 (c) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.—The Architect 

5 of the Capitol, the Secretary of the Senate, and the Chief 

6 Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives 

7 may not enter into contracts described in subsection (b)(1) 

8 if the Architect of the Capitol, in consultation with the 

9 Secretary of the Senate and the Chief Administrative Offi10 cer of the House, reports to the Committee on Rules and 

11 Administration of the Senate and the Committee on 

12 House Administration of the House of Representatives 

13 that entering into such contracts would preclude the selec14 tion of alternatives that are cost-effective and value-cen15 tered for patrons. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: May
14, 2010
 
 
 
 
 By:           /s/Dr.
Thomas E. Sawyer
 
 Dr.
Thomas E. Sawyer
 Chairman
of the Board/Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and
secretary
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Health Holding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Julianna Lu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

May 12, 2006

                                 /s/ Julianna Lu
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Julianna Lu
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                     Officer