alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Cosmo Palmieri, President and Treasurer of Our Glass, Inc.
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Our Glass, Inc. for the period ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Our Glass, Inc.


Dated: May 19, 2005

/s/ Cosmo Palmieri
------------------
Cosmo Palmieri
President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
V.I. Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-62925, 333-62927, 333-58601, 333-87625, 333-87627, 333-94427,
333-75486 and 333-75484), of V.I. Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January
21, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of V.I. Technologies, Inc.
as of December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2001, which report appears in
the December 29, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K/A of V.I. Technologies, Inc.



Boston, Massachusetts
February 18, 2003
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The Registrant has the following subsidiaries:

     First International Bank, a Connecticut state bank and trust company

First International Bank has the following subsidiaries:

     FNBNE SBA Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     FNBNE Business Loans Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     FNBNE Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation
     FIB Business Loans Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     FIB Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation
     FIB Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     First International Capital Corp. of New Jersey, a New Jersey
     corporation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7311

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ORLANDO LORENZO ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.

(CR-99-86, CA-01-132-7)

Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce A. Pagel, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Anderson, Nos. CR-99-86;

CA-01-132-7 (W.D. Va. filed July 6, 2001; entered July 9, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
The Huntington Mortgage Company                      (LOGO)
7575 Huntington Park Drive                            HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE
Columbus, Ohio 43235                                 COMPANY


                              Report of Management

We, as members of management of The Huntington Mortgage Company (HMC), a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Huntington National Bank, are responsible for
complying with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP).  We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective
internal control over compliance with the minimum servicing standards as set
forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then ended. Based on
this evaluation, we assert that during the year ended December 31, 1997, HMC
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period, HMC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $40,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $8,000,000.


/s/R. Frederick Taylor
R. Frederick Taylor, President


/s/Irving A. Adler
Irving A. Adler, Senior Vice President



A subsidiary of The Huntington National Bank
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID 9133
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 2 of 24 PageID 9134
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 3 of 24 PageID 9135
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 4 of 24 PageID 9136
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 5 of 24 PageID 9137
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 6 of 24 PageID 9138
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 7 of 24 PageID 9139
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 8 of 24 PageID 9140
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 9 of 24 PageID 9141
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 10 of 24 PageID 9142
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 11 of 24 PageID 9143
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 12 of 24 PageID 9144
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 13 of 24 PageID 9145
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 14 of 24 PageID 9146
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 15 of 24 PageID 9147
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 16 of 24 PageID 9148
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 17 of 24 PageID 9149
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 18 of 24 PageID 9150
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 19 of 24 PageID 9151
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 20 of 24 PageID 9152
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 21 of 24 PageID 9153
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 22 of 24 PageID 9154
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 23 of 24 PageID 9155
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 327 Filed 04/26/13 Page 24 of 24 PageID 9156
Rajai Akeem RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 2 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 88
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

V.I. Technologies, Inc.: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-104049, 333-104050, 333-108733 and 333-108734) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-111186 and 333-57418) of V.I. Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2004 relatingto the consolidated balance sheets of V.I. Technologies, Inc. as of December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 27, 2003, which report appears in the December 27, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of V.I. Technologies, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

February 25, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and




---



##### 



a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas R. VenablesThomas R. VenablesChief Executive Officer
Darleen Solomon MEADOWS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lori Ann GARDNER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0943

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KENDRICK ELDER )

)

v. ) 3-05-CV-1650-D

)

JACOB HEATH WHITE, ET AL )

O R D E R

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the

findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed January 31, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01650-D Document 10 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 46
Earl E. HENRY, P.E., Appellant, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Dale Edwin FERGUS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 04, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN RE: Tutorship of Haley JONES

NO. 2018-CC-0050

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DONALD HENLEY, ID # 1234515, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:06-CV-0237-P

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court

construes respondent’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 6) as respondent’s answer to the petition

filed in this action. Consequently, the Clerk of the Court shall terminate the motion for

summary judgment, docket it as respondent’s answer to the petition, and docket petitioner’s

response to the motion (doc. 7) as petitioner’s reply to the answer. By separate judgment, the

Court will formally deny petitioner’s federal petition for writ of habeas corpus consistent with the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation entered in this case. 

SIGNED this 28 day of September 2007. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 1 of 10 PageID 214
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 2 of 10 PageID 215
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 3 of 10 PageID 216
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 4 of 10 PageID 217
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 5 of 10 PageID 218
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 6 of 10 PageID 219
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 7 of 10 PageID 220
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 8 of 10 PageID 221
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 9 of 10 PageID 222
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 73 Filed 12/20/02 Page 10 of 10 PageID 223
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 23 - 00161 - CR LUCIO DELEON YANEZ , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 22nd District Court

Hays County, Texas Trial Court No . CR

- 19 - 3860 - A , Honorable R. Bruce Boyer , Presiding 

### May 16 , 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Lucio Deleon Yanez, proceeding pro se, appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated 1 and sentence to seven years’ confinement. 2 In his notice of appeal, Appellant states that he is indigent and requests court - appointed appellate

1 See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 49.09( b ). 2 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.2

c ounsel. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to determine: (1) whether A ppellant still desires to prosecute the appeal; and (2) whether A ppellant is indigent and entitled to appoint ed counsel. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art 1.051(d)(1). The trial court shall enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with th e Clerk of this C ourt by June 15 , 2023 . If it is determined that A ppellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed counsel , the trial cour t shall appoint counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Newly appointed counsel shall immediately request preparation of the appellate record. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 35.3. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2



                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

       In connection with the Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, of
ABB Ltd (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Voser, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Peter Voser
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Peter Voser
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   July 24, 2003

       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ABB and will be retained by ABB and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Alice MUI, Appellant, v. ELYON GLOBAL INVESTMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Elaine Colpani and Giovanni Colpani, Appellees.

No. 4D18-2761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

Affirmed.
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BOBBY WAYNE LINSCOME, #1127000, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-222-L

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

This is a habeas case brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and

an order of the court in implementation thereof, this action was referred to the United States

magistrate judge for proposed findings and recommendation. On March 21, 2007, the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed. Petitioner

Bobby Wayne Linscome (“Linscome”) filed Petitioner Linsome’s Objections to Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge on April 5, 2007.

After making an independent review of the pleadings, file and record in this case, the

findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, and considering Linscome’s objections, the court

determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct. The magistrate

judge concluded that Linscome’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel lacks merit, and his

claims that his sentence was illegal and that he is actually innocent are procedurally barred.

Linscome has raised multiple points through his objections that the court finds nonsensical, and

utterly without merit, including a claim of a “conflict of interest” against the magistrate judge for,

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00222-L Document 12 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 108
Order – Page 2

among other things, failing to inform him that Respondent’s name was not Douglas Dretke, but

Nathaniel Quarterman. As the court determines that the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions

are correct, and finds none of Linscome’s objections has merit, the findings and conclusions are

accepted as those of the court, and Linscome’s objections are overruled. Accordingly, Linscome’s

petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

It is so ordered this 27th day of April, 2007.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00222-L Document 12 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 109
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 990 

To reauthorize the Northern Rio Grande National Heritage Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Mr. HEINRICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Northern Rio Grande National Heritage 

Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern Rio Grande 

5 National Heritage Area Reauthorization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NORTHERN RIO 

7 GRANDE NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

8 Section 208 of the Northern Rio Grande National 

9 Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 990 IS

1 109–338; 120 Stat. 1790) is amended by striking ‘‘15 

2 years’’ and inserting ‘‘30 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Walter Kenneth BLAIR v. Jeanne Gay Woodard BLAIR

2161031

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 22, 2018

Dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GEORGE NEAL WILLIAMS )

)

V. ) 3:06-CV-0061-D

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, ET AL )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the

findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.

Plaintiff’s request for reinstatement of this action, submitted in his pleadings filed on June

5, 2006, June 22, 2006, and July 10, 2006, is denied.

SO ORDERED.

July 25, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00061-D Document 22 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 121
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Housing & Land Development, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Xiaohong FengXiaohong FengChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)