alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BTXN 060 (rev. 10/19)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Frederic Bushe Fiege Case No.: 23−30707−swe7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

The Debtor(s), having been given notice that this case would be dismissed upon the failure to timely file:

Pay the required filing fee in installments as directed in the Order regarding the

Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments, or Order denying/revoking the

Application for Waiver of the Chapter 7 Filing Fee.

List of creditors required to be filed with the petition by N.D.TX L.B.R. 1007−1(a)

within 48 hours from the issuance of the Notice of Deficiency

Schedules pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(c) within 14 days of the filing of the

Petition

Declaration About an Individual Debtor's Schedules (Official Form 106Dec) within 14

days of the date of the filing of the petition.

Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury for Non−Individual Debtors (Official Form 202)

within 14 days of the date of the filing of the petition.

Statement of Financial Affairs pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(c) within 14 days of

the filing of the Petition

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed April 27, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-30707-swe7 Doc 13 Filed 04/28/23 Entered 04/28/23 07:43:46 Desc

Page 1 of 2
page 2

Plan/Plan Summary pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3015 within 14 days of the filing of

the Petition

List of twenty largest unsecured creditors within 48 hours of the date of the filing of

the Petition

Social Security/Tax ID number within 48 hours from the issuance of the Notice of

Deficiency

Form 121 within 48 hours of the date of the Petition

Summary of Assets and Liabilities (Official Form 106Sum/206Sum) within 14 days of

the date of the filing of the Petition

A complete original petition was not filed within 3 days from the issuance of the

Notice of Deficiency

Certificate of completion from an approved credit counseling course completed within

180 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Copies of employee income records within 14 days of the date of the filing of the

Petition

Statement of Current Monthly Income within 14 days of the date of the filing of the

Petition

Chapter 15 Service List within 14 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Cash Flow Statement within 7 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Balance Sheet within 7 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Statement of Operations within 7 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

All required documents pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 521 within 45 days of the filing of the

Petition

Other:

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED that this Order shall not be deemed a bar to refiling under 11 U.S.C. §109(g).

# # # End of Order # # #

Case 23-30707-swe7 Doc 13 Filed 04/28/23 Entered 04/28/23 07:43:46 Desc

Page 2 of 2
Case 3:05-cv-02460-B-BD Document 80 Filed 11/16/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1108
Rufinus LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-461

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Glen A. CREARY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Javonte HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
Case 4:05-cv-00712-A Document 15 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 146
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00712-A Document 15 Filed 06/06/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 147
MARK 7 RELOADING, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AMMOBOT, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0343

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00240-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.L.L. III, ET AL., CHILDREN

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02373

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant’s (Mother’s) 

parental rights to her children. On March 23, 2018, the trial court signed an order of termination. 

On April 11, 2018, Mother timely filed a notice of appeal, challenging the trial court’s order of 

termination. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b) (stating notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days 

after order of termination signed). Thereafter, the appellate record was filed and appellant’s brief 

was due May 14, 2018. See id. R. 38.6 (requiring appellant to file brief within 20 days after 

appellate record filed). Neither a brief nor a motion to extend time to file the brief was filed at 

that time. On May 24, 2018, we ordered Mother to file her brief on or before June 13, 2018. In 

response to our order, Mother filed a motion, requesting additional time to file her brief and 

clarification of the appellate deadlines because a de novo hearing was conducted on May 3, 

2018. Mother further indicates the referring court entered an order on or about June 4, 2018. 

Based on the foregoing, we ORDER all appellate deadlines suspended until further order 

of the court. We further ORDER the district clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the referring court’s order relating to the de novo proceeding and any other pleadings 

associated with the de novo proceeding in this court on or before June 25, 2018. We further 

ORDER the court reporter to file a reporter’s record from the de novo hearing in this court on or 

before June 25, 2018. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district 

clerk, and the court reporter responsible for the de novo hearing. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph DYCZEWSKI

NO. 2019-KK-0671

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief
Executive Officer and Director of Language Line Holdings, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: November 19, 2004



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|    |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director



14
Lamiko Keon JAMES v. STATE

CR-16-0367

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael A. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2762

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT
                                   PRIDE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pride, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Powell,
Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ George A. Powell
-----------------------------------------
George A. Powell
Vice-President, Secretary and Director
May 11, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN RICE, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-746-D

)

MADONNA RITCHIE, ET AL., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After conducting a de novo review, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and

conclusions of the Court.

Signed June 30, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00746-D Document 7 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 29
Matthew Tyrone SIMMONS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-1590

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0341. CASCADE FALLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v.

JENNIFER ROBIN GWIN.

Plaintiff Cascade Falls Homeowners Association, Inc. filed suit against

Defendant Jennifer Gwin to recover unpaid homeowners’ assessments. On September

18, 2018, the trial court entered a final order and judgment in favor of Plaintiff and

against Defendant in the amount of $1,385.49. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a motion for

reconsideration, arguing that the court erred in (1) finding that Plaintiff was not entitled

to recover fees related to matters outside of this case, and (2) crediting payments made

by Defendant on a previous judgment in the instant action. The trial court denied the

motion for reconsideration on January 17, 2019, and Defendant filed the instant

application on February 14, 2019. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 583

(420 SE2d 393) (1992). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept

an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Boyle v.

State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). “It is well established that the

denial of a motion for reconsideration of an appealable order or judgment is not itself

appealable and does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal.” Savage v.

Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). Here, Plaintiff filed its

application 149 days after entry of the trial court’s final order and judgment. Thus, this

application is untimely as to the appealable judgment and invalid as to the order

denying reconsideration.

March 06, 2019
Plaintiff asserts that we should construe its motion for reconsideration as a

motion to set aside pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d).

1

In determining whether a

motion is properly construed as a motion to set aside rather than a motion for

reconsideration, we look to the substance of the motion. See Rogers v. Rockdale

County, 187 Ga. App. 658, 660 (1) (371 SE2d 189) (1988). Here, Plaintiff clearly titled

the motion as one seeking reconsideration, and the motion presented no grounds for

setting aside the order under OCGA§ 9-11-60 (d). Rather, Plaintiff argued that the trial

court should reconsider its calculation of the final award of damages and attorney fees.

Because Plaintiff’s application is not timely from an appealable order, it is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certif y that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 The denial of a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) is properly

brought by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8).

03/06/2019
Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 EXHIBIT 4.1.1 
  
 First Amendment to Powerwave Technologies, Inc. 
 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
  
 Section 10.1 of the Powerwave Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “10.1 LIMITATIONS ON PURCHASE OF SHARES. The maximum number of shares of Company Stock that shall be made available for
sale under the Plan shall be 3,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment under Section 10.4 below. The shares of Company Stock to be sold to Participants under the Plan will be issued by the Company. If the total number of shares of Company Stock that
would otherwise be issuable pursuant to rights granted pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Plan at the Purchase Date exceeds the number of shares then available under the Plan, the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares remaining
available in as uniform and equitable manner as is practicable. In such event, the Company shall give written notice of such reduction of the number of shares to each participant affected thereby and any unused payroll deductions shall be returned
to such participant if necessary.”
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.2

                           [OVERHILL FARMS LETTERHEAD]

April 15, 2003

Mr. Andrew Horvath
Overhill Farms, Inc.
2727 East Vernon Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058

Dear Mr. Horvath:

Pursuant to your agreement with Overhill Farms, we are restructuring your salary
payable under your employment contract of effective as of May 1, 2003. Pursuant
to the terms of your employment agreement you are currently entitled to a
monthly salary of $11,666.67. We have agreed that your salary will be paid at
the monthly rate of $9,166.67 throughout the term of your employment contract,
which expires on October 31, 2003. The remaining $2,000 per month ($12,000
aggregate) will be paid to you in a lump sum upon the expiration of your
employment agreement, if you do not reach satisfactory terms for continued
employment with Overhill Farms. Any offer by the company for continued
employment following the expiration of the primary term of your existing
employment agreement, will take into consideration the deferment. agreed to
herein.

The retraining rights and obligation of each party pursuant to your employment
agreement will not be altered by this agreement and shall remain in full force
and effect.

If the forgoing accurately sets forth our agreement with respect to this matter,
please indicate you acquiescence to the same by executing a copy of this letter
and returning it to me.

Very truly yours.

/s/ JIM RUDIS

Jim Rudis President & CEO
President & CEO

My countersignature of this letter constitutes my agreement to the terms and
conditions hereof.


/S/ ANDREW HORVATH                                APR 15, 2003
----------------------------------                ------------------------------
Andrew Horvath                                    Date
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pixelworks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven L. Moore, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










By:/s/ Steven L. MooreSteven L. MooreVice President,Chief Financial Officer Secretary,                                                                                                               and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)Date:August 9, 2019
Renee Victoria RUCHLEWICZ, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2480

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:06-cr-00013 Document 38 Filed 05/09/2006 Page 1 of 1


Case 3:06-cr-00013-N Document 38 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 76
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 39

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health 
   and Human Services relating to ``Vaccine and Mask Requirements To 
       Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start Programs''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2022

  Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Inhofe, 
 Mr. Lee, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Moran, Mr. Risch, Mr. Rounds, 
   Mr. Rubio, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Wicker, and Mrs. Blackburn) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health 
   and Human Services relating to ``Vaccine and Mask Requirements To 
       Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start Programs''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human Services relating 
to ``Vaccine and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 
in Head Start Programs'' (86 Fed. Reg. 68052 (November 30, 2021)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
A.C.-L., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1449

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sheldon Goldberg,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  July 25, 2005         /s/ Sheldon Goldberg
                              ------------------------------------
                            By: Sheldon Goldberg, Chief Executive
                                Officer of Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.