alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13

- 2 4

- 00 397

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

RAY VILLAGOMEZ AND YANETH PUGA

AND IN THE INTEREST OF R.V. JR., R.V., AND R.V.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 476TH DISTRICT COURT

OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

T his matter is before the Court on appellant ’ s motion to withdraw notice of appeal

which we construe as a motion to dismiss

. Appellant inadvertently filed the notice of

appeal and does not wish to pursue matter on appeal.

H aving considered appellant ’ s motion to dismiss

, we are of the opinion that the

motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellant ’ s motion

to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the2 appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs

against the appellant."). Because the appeal is dismissed at the appellant ’ s request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained.

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

D elivered and filed on the

2 8 th day of August , 20 2 4

.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 972 

To reauthorize the Essex National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Essex National Heritage Area, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

4 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 507 of division II 

5 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act 

6 of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 104–333; 

7 110 Stat. 4260; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314; 128 Stat. 

8 3801) is amended by striking ‘‘2021’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘2036’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 972 IS

1 (b) REPEAL OF TOTAL FUNDING LIMIT.—Section 

2 508(a) of division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

3 Lands Management Act of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 

4 Public Law 104–333; 110 Stat. 4260; 122 Stat. 824; 129 

5 Stat. 2551; 133 Stat. 778) is amended by striking the sec6 ond sentence. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Derek Ward, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the quarter  ended December 31, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Derek WardName:Derek WardTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:February 17, 2010 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
SCWC

- 22

- 0000636

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

IN THE INTEREST OF THE P CHILDREN

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 22

- 0000636; FC

- S NO. 19

- 1

- 0083 and FC

- S NO. 19

- 1

- 0084)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (B y : Eddins , J .)

Upon consideration of the M otion to C orrect December 7,

2023 O rder , filed on December 7, 2023,

It is ordered t hat the document filed at Docket 16, is

corrected as follows:
On page 1 , second paragraph, line 1, the name “Michael” is
deleted and replaced with “Matthew.”

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, December 7, 2023

.

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Associate Justice Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-22-0000636 07-DEC-2023 01:35 PM Dkt. 21 OCOR
Garrett M. KERN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0749

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation



 Exhibit 4.2 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF

 PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 
 a Delaware corporation 
  
 Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.,
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies as follows: 
  
 1. That the first paragraph of ARTICLE IV of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is amended to read in full as follows:

  
 “The amount of the total authorized
capital stock of the corporation is 80,250,000 shares which are divided into two classes as follows: 
  
 250,000 shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of $1.00 per share; and 
  
 80,000,000 shares of Common Stock having a par value of
$0.10 per share.” 
  
 2. The foregoing amendment to the
Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law by approval of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and by the holders
representing a majority of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation, with all such outstanding capital stock voting as a single class and entitled to vote thereon. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment
of Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 3rd of June, 2003.

  

	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    JOHN A.
GODFREY        


	 	 	 John A. Godfrey,
 Senior Vice President and Secretary



  
  

 E-2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2016

No. 0 4

- 16

- 00409

- CR

Adam MARROQUIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR4359

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of tim e to file the appellant’s brief is granted. We order

appellant to file the appella nt’s brief by January 13, 2017.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Flag Intermediate Holdings Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenco Goncalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 12, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ C. Lourenco Goncalves                                  
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | C. Lourenco Goncalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C.C., et al, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lori W. CLIFFORD, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1097

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 02, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6296** 

MICHAEL RICHARD D’ALESSANDRO , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; SUZYK MALAGARY; JOHN DOE, Case Manager; GRANT CLARK, Property Manager , Def endants

– Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv
- 00190

- PJM )

Submitted : May 20, 2010 Decided: May 28, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEME YER, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Richard D’Alessandro, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Lisehora Kane, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael Richard D’Alessandro appeals the district

court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the re asons stated by the
district court. D’Alessandro v. Montgomery County , No. 8:09

- cv
00190

- PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 20, 2009; entered Jan. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the mater ials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit15.1**

 

 Deloitte UK

Hill House

1 Little New Street

London

EC4A 3TR

 

Tel: + +44(0)20 793 63000

www.deloitte.co.uk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatements Numbers: 333-74703, 333-81400, 333-84044, 333-127660, 333-128619,333-128621, 333-140798, 333-145751, and 333-149577 on Form S-8, andRegistration Statement Numbers: 333-179685, and 333-179685-01 on Form F-3 andin Registration Statement Number: 333-108304 and 333-108304-01 on Form F-4 ofour reports dated 30 April 2014, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedules of RBS Holdings N.V. andsubsidiaries appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RBS Holdings N.V.for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

 

30 April 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dennis G. Dracup, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2005



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|    |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director



18
# C_2018408EN.01002601.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/26

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Noord-Holland — Netherlands) — Vision Research Europe BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

(Case C-372/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff headings - Classification of goods - Volatile-memory camera, meaning that recorded images are deleted when the camera is switched off or when new images are captured - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 8525 80 19 and 8525 80 30 - Explanatory Notes - Interpretation - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2014 - Interpretation - Validity))

(2018/C 408/33)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Holland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vision Research Europe BV

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

Operative part of the judgment

Subheading 8525 80 30 of the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013, must be interpreted as covering a camera, such as the camera at issue in the main proceedings, that is capable of capturing a large number of photographic images per second and of storing them in its volatile internal memory — images that are deleted from that memory when the camera is switched off — and that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2014 of 4 February 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature, in so far as it is applicable by analogy to goods that have the characteristics of that camera, is invalid.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
J.

available, however, when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See NRS 34.170; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004).

Petitioners, to the extent that they are aggrieved from the district court's final judgment, will have a speedy and adequate remedy at law in the form of an appeal. Accordingly, we deny the petition. NRAP 21(b); see Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) ("[T]he issuance of a writ of mandamus or prohibition is purely discretionary with this court."). We further deny as moot petitioners' April 22, 2013, motion for a stay of the district court proceedings.It is so ORDERED.

Gibbons

Parra

- guirre

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Law Office of Daniel Marks Andy J. Kay Cremen Law Offices Matthew L. Johnson & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) (947A 2
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20
- 0024

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. FELIPE AGUSTIN TORRES,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pur suant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Shane Vannatta , District Jud ge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 1 2021

09/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0024
Order entered October 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00798-CV

DAVID FLORES, Appellant

V.

BLANCA FLORES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-17367

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 23, 2014 “Motion to Extend Time to File 

Appellate Brief and to File Court Reporter’s Record.” The reporter’s record is past due. On 

September 15, 2014, the Court received a letter from Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter 

for the 330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, informing us that appellant had not 

made any arrangements for payment of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we GRANT

appellant’s motion to the extent that we ORDER appellant to file, by NOVEMBER 4, 2014, 

(1) written verification that appellant has requested the reporter’s record; and (2) written 

verification that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee or written 

documentation that appellant has been found to be entitled to proceed without advance payment 

of costs. If the Court does not receive the requested documentation by November 4, 2014, the 
Court may order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(c).

Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the reporter’s record is filed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
C.R. v. STATE

CR-15-1168

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lifeline
Systems, Inc.



|                        |  |                                                                                                      
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 4, 2005 |  | /s/    Ronald
Feinstein Ronald Feinstein Chief Executive Officer and President                       
|                        | 
|Dated: November 4, 2005 |  | /s/    Mark G.
Beucler Mark G. Beucler Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 10.30


 


* CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH
RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS. 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 4


 


This Amendment
No. 4 (this “Amendment”) to the Collaboration and License Agreements effective
October 29, 1998 between the parties hereto, as amended previously (the
“Agreements”), is effective as of May 29, 2003 (the “Effective Date”) and by
agreement of the parties as of the Effective Date amends the Agreements as
follows:


 


1.                                       All
capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as in the Agreements.


 


2.                                       Section
5.2.4 of the Agreements is hereby amended by adding to the end of such Section
the following:


 


“Pharmacopeia
agrees that, notwithstanding its right under the first sentence of this Section
5.2.4 to remove FTEs from the Collaboration beginning *, it shall not exercise
such right prior to *. As a result, the parties agree that Pharmacopeia shall
continue to provide, and Schering and SPL shall continue to fund, *. In
consideration of Pharmacopeia’s agreement set forth in the preceding two
sentences, *”


 


3.                                       The
remaining terms of the Agreements, except to the extent modified by the terms
of this Amendment, by the agreement letter dated March 29, 1999, by Amendment
No. 1 effective April 15, 1999, Amendment No. 2 effective October 1, 1999 and
Amendment No. 3 effective April 17, 2003, shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by
their authorized representatives and delivered in triplicate originals on the
Effective Date.


 


	
  SCHERING
  CORPORATION

  	
   

  	
  PHARMACOPEIA,
  INC.

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David
  Poorvin

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Stephen
  A. Spearman

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  DAVID
  POORVIN, PH.D.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  STEPHEN A.
  SPEARMAN, PH.D.

  
	
   

  	
  Vice
  President

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Executive
  Vice President and

  
	
  SCHERING-PLOUGH,
  LTD.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Operating Officer

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David
  Poorvin

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  DAVID
  POORVIN, PH.D.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Prokurist
S.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0159

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.