alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 28 

Eliminating the restriction that witnesses may appear remotely at proceedings 

of committees of the House of Representatives only at the discretion 

of the chair of the committee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Ms. PEREZ (for herself and Mr. GOLDEN of Maine) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Eliminating the restriction that witnesses may appear remotely at proceedings of committees of the House of 

Representatives only at the discretion of the chair of 

the committee. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Real 

4 Ideas, Data, and Genuine Experience to Congress Resolu5 tion’’ or the ‘‘BRIDGE to Congress Resolution’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 28 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION THAT WITNESSES 

2 MAY APPEAR REMOTELY AT COMMITTEE 

3 PROCEEDINGS ONLY AT DISCRETION OF 

4 CHAIR. 

5 Section 3(i)(1) of House Resolution 5, agreed to Jan6 uary 3, 2025, is amended by striking ‘‘at the discretion 

7 of the chair of the committee and’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 29,893.

#### W. A. Kirkpatrick and Vera M. Kirkpatrick, as The Joplin Loan and Security Company, *Appellants,*v. E. S. Berry et al., *Appellees.*

(299 Pac. 598.)

Opinion filed June 6, 1931.

*A. D. Schreiner*and *S. C. Westcott,*both of Galena, for the appellants.

*Oscar M. Yount,*of Galena, for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Plaintiffs sued on a promissory note before a justice-of the peace. Defendants' motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was denied, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, and defendants-, appealed. In the district court defendants moved to dismiss for *245want of jurisdiction, the motion was sustained, and plaintiffs appeal.

The bill of particulars disclosed that the note was for $501.25, payable in monthly installments, with interest at 8 per cent per annum from maturity. Default in payment of any installment matured the remaining installments. The first three installments of $42 each were paid. Foreclosure of a chattel mortgage produced the net sum of $80, which was credited on the note. The bill of particulars concluded as follows:

> “That the plaintiffs have received a total of $206 upon said note and indebtedness, and that there is a balance due the plaintiffs from said defendants [in] the sum of $295.55, and for which amount plaintiffs pray for judgment against said defendants, together with the interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum until paid, and for the cost of this action.”

The justice of the peace had jurisdiction to try and determine actions for recovery of money when the amount claimed did not exceed $300. (R. S. 61-102.) On appeal the district court had the same jurisdiction as the justice of the peace. Under the provisions of the note interest commenced to accrue when default was made in payment of the fourth installment. Payment of interest from that time on the whole sum remaining unpaid was just as much a part of the contract as payment of any installment, and the body of the bill of particulars disclosed a claim according to the tenor and effect of the instrument. This claim was for more than $300.

Plaintiffs say the prayer was for judgment for $295.55, together with interest on the judgment only. The bill of particulars took pains to plead that the principal sum should bear interest at 8 per cent from maturity until paid, and to plead conditions which matured the note so that it bore interest. To get interest on the in» debtedness it was necessary for plaintiffs to pray for interest. It was not necessary to pray for interest in order to get interest at the contract rate on the judgment. The law took care of that. (R. S. 41-105.) If it had been the purpose of the pleader specifically to renounce interest during default and to make interest begin, contrary to the contract, with rendition of judgment, no doubt the purpose would have been definitely expressed.

When the court held it had no jurisdiction,' plaintiffs offered to remit interest sued for “if any.” The district court could get jurisdiction of the case only by appeal from the judgment of the justice of the peace.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Farm Credit Administration	 1501 Farm Credit Drive 

McLean, Virginia 22102-5090 

(703) 883-4000 

FACT SHEET ON GOVERNANCE FINAL RULE (1/6/06) 

In January 2005, FCA issued a proposed governance rule to safeguard sound 

governance practices of the Farm Credit System. In developing the final rule, the 

Agency received and considered over 300 comment letters. On January 6, 2006, the 

FCA Board approved the final rule, which appropriately reflects the cooperative structure 

and GSE status of the System and contains all the hallmarks of good governance that 

the marketplace has come to expect. The following points outline the reasons for 

adopting the rule and are followed by a short summary. 

• Safety and Soundness - The final rule is necessary to uphold fundamental 

governance practices that are crucial to the safety and soundness of the System. 

• Consistent Standards - While the Farm Credit System has voluntarily implemented 

many of these emerging best practices, FCA acted to preserve these voluntary 

efforts in our rulemaking effort. Consistent governance standards throughout all 

System institutions preserve the confidence of the System’s stockholders and 

investors and mitigate reputation risk. 

• Tailored to System Structure - The regulation represents an efficient and costeffective regulatory approach tailored to the System’s cooperative structure and 

provides local institutions flexibility in implementing governance policies. 

• Furthering the Mission - The establishment of these sound governance practices 

will further the System’s mission of serving agriculture and rural America by 

maintaining cost-effective financing for farmers and ranchers. 

Summary of the Final Rule: 

Strengthens overall Board effectiveness 

o Requires that boards charter audit and compensation committees to assist boards in 

carrying out their fiduciary and oversight responsibilities to stockholders. 

o Requires that all boards have a financial expert to facilitate boards’ financial 

oversight. 
2

o Requires at least 2 outside directors on bank boards and larger association boards 

to increase technical expertise. 

o Requires that boards develop and implement policies regarding (1) director 

qualifications and desirable skills and experience and (2) director training 

requirements to help maintain boards’ collective skill set. 

o Requires a board self evaluation along with strategies for addressing deficiencies, 

with a summary of the evaluation going to the nominating committee to assist in its 

search for qualified director candidates. 

Enhances core cooperative principle of borrower control 

o Requires nominating committees comprised of members independent of institution 

boards for all System banks and associations. 

o Provides needed resources and information to nominating committees. 

o Requires directors and senior officers publicly disclose other business affiliations in 

annual report. 

o Provides for timely candidate information flow to association and bank stockholders 

voting in director elections.
Diandrew CLARKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

McClain Feed Yard, Inc. Case No.: 23−20084−rlj7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Todd A. Farmer, to represent

Meagan B. Goad, Kinsey Moreland, related to document 106, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed August 23, 2023

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-20084-rlj7 Doc 108 Filed 08/23/23 Entered 08/23/23 16:32:12 Desc

Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Alchemy Enterprises, LTD. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Harold W. Sciotto, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Jonathan R. Read

|   | Jonathan R. Read |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 

May 15, 2006

 
 

 

/s/ Harold W. Sciotto

 

Harold W. Sciotto

 
 

Chief Financial Officer

 

May 15, 2006

 
 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                          WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION
                          PRODUCTION PARTICIPATION PLAN

                This Third Amendment to the WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION
PRODUCTION PARTICIPATION PLAN (the "Plan") is entered into this 30th day of
December, 1997.

                WHEREAS, Whiting Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") is
sponsoring the Whiting Petroleum Corporation Production Participation Plan (the
"Plan") which became effective January 1, 1981; and

                WHEREAS, the Company has amended the Plan by a First Amendment
dated December 2, 1983 and a Second Amendment dated November 9, 1989; and

                WHEREAS, under the Plan the Company reserves to itself, through
action of its Board of Directors, the right to amend the Plan from time to time;
and

                WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in the manner set
forth in this Third Amendment.

                NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1,
1997 as follows:

                1.      The first sentence of Section 4.6 of the Plan is hereby
amended to read as follows:

                The Company may, at its sole option, purchase the entire vested
        interest under the Plan of any terminated or deceased Participant.

                2.      Except as expressly amended by this Third Amendment, the
Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Third Amendment has been executed as of
the day and year first above written.

                                                COMPANY:

                                                WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION


                                                /s/  David A. Frawley
                                                -------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0217

______________

____________

________________________________________ JULIE KOSTELECKY, an individual, on behalf of herself and her minor child S.M.K.; and JASON KOSTELECKY, an individual, on behalf of himself and his minor child S.M.K. , Plaintiffs and Appellants , v. PEAS IN A POD LLC; LACEY ALLEN; ERICA WILLIAMS; JANE AND JOHN DOES 1 - 10, Defendants and Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

**GRANT OF SECON** **D EXTENSION**  Upon consideration of Appellan ts’ second unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefrom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appell an ts are granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 3 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve their opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2021

08/12/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0217
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Manitex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                                             
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David J. Langevin                                       
|Name:  |  | David J. Langevin                                           
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                        
|       |  | (Principal Executive Officer of Manitex
International, Inc.)

Dated: August 13, 2010



|       |  |                                                                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David H. Gransee                                                       
|Name:  |  | David H. Gransee                                                           
|Title: |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                 
|       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)

Dated: August 13, 2010



45
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 3 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 3

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 
    Service relating to ``Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That 
     Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 2025

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Sheehy, 
and Mr. Budd) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 
    Service relating to ``Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That 
     Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to ``Gross 
Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services 
Effectuating Digital Asset Sales'' (89 Fed. Reg. 106928 (December 30, 
2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:05-cv-00801-N Document 9 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 63
Case 3:05-cv-00801-N Document 9 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 64
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall H. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 6, 2011





/s/ Randall H. BrownRandall H. BrownChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice

President, Treasurer and Secretary





In accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
#### White Beach Fruit Company, a Corporation, on its Own Behalf and as Trustee for the Use and Benefit of T. J. Ferrell, George A. Anderson and J. F. Turner, *Appellants,*v. Florida National Bank of Jacksonville, as Executor of the Estate of Albert W. Gilchrist, Deceased, *Appellee.*

Division A.

Decision Filed July 28, 1927.

*Treadwell <& Treadwell,*for Appellants;

*Leitner <& Leitner,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective .parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Bryan Randolph MUSSLEMAN v. STATE

CR-15-1455

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Dismissed.
Case 2:05-cv-00021-J Document 14 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 40
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00021-J Document 14 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 41
*

Wildlife Hazard Mitigation R&D Program (RPD 150)

Contract Funds ($K)‏

Outcomes
        -  Reduce wildlife strike risks       to aircraft
        -  More accurate and timely wildlife strike advisories

Rationale

More accurate and timely information on historical and current wildlife hazards at and near airports will reduce the risk of a severe, potentially catastrophic strike.

$   570

$  375

Wildlife Hazards Information Systems

FAA Strike Database and Analysis

Total (Operation Tasks)

* WA LOA OPS Funds

$350*

$124*

Identification Techniques

$ 1145

$ 1475

Detection and Deterrent Technology

$   785

$  800

Wildlife Hazards Management

FY15

FY14

FY13

$150*

$141*

$500

$2550

Total (R&D Tasks)

$265

$2500

$2500

$510

$350*

$160*

$   750

$ 1200

$   550

*
BTXN 176 (rev. 12/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Carl Gerard Dorvil Case No.: 23−30771−sgj7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO FILE A STATEMENT OF COMPLETION OF

COURSE IN PERSONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(Official Form 423)

Notice is hereby given that, subject to limited exceptions, a debtor must complete an instructional course in personal

financial management in order to receive a discharge under chapter 7 (11 U.S.C. § 727) . Pursuant to Rule 1007(b)(7)

of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the debtor(s) must complete and file Debtor's Certification of Completion of

Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management (Official Form 423)* as described in 11 U.S.C. §

111.

Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that Official Form 423 must be filed before a discharge can

be entered. Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that the debtor(s) must file Official Form 423

within 60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under § 341. Failure to file the certification will

result in the case being closed without an entry of discharge. If the debtor(s) subsequently file(s) a Motion to Reopen

the Case to allow for the filing of the Official Form 423, the debtor(s) must pay the full reopening fee due for filing

the motion.

DATED: 4/26/23 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

*NOTE: Official Form 423 (Debtor's Certification of Completion of Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management) must be

filed in all individual chapter 13 and chapter 7 cases even if the U.S. Trustee has not approved any credit counseling agency or financial

management course for the applicable district. See Rule 1007(b)(7).

Case 23-30771-sgj7 Doc 12 Filed 04/26/23 Entered 04/26/23 18:00:13 Desc Ntc

of req to file FM cert Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO OF ALLIED SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allied Security Holdings LLC (the ‘‘Company’’) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), William C. Whitmore, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William A. Torzolini, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                       |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ William C. Whitmore, Jr.    Name: William C. Whitmore, Jr.Title: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and ManagerDate: May 15, 2007

/s/ William A. Torzolini                        Name: William A. TorzoliniTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 15, 2007

----