alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 18.1 

May 12, 2008 

Board of Directors 

Language Line, Inc.

Dear Directors: 

We are providing this letter to you forinclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. 

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included inthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and issued our report thereon dated March 25, 2008. Note 1 to such financial statements specifies a change in measurement date for performing the annual test ofimpairment for goodwill from October 1 to December 31. Further, Note 1 to the Form 10-Q describes the reason management has revised the annual measurement date. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accountingover another for changing the measurement date for the annual test of impairment of goodwill has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management’s determinationthat this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgmentabout the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP 

San Francisco, CA 

May 12, 2008
1Although untitled, as the paper filed by Reed on March 14, 2006, responds

to the “United States Magistrate Court,” it should be docketed as written

objections. 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

GREGORY CHARLES REED, §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-517-Y

§

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, §

T.D.C.J., Correctional § 

Institutions Division, §

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

 (With special instructions to the clerk of Court)

In this action brought by petitioner Gregory Charles Reed

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of

the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

March 1, 2006; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on March 14, 2006.1

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Reed’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus should be denied, for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. 

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Reed’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

SIGNED March 28, 2006.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00517-Y Document 15 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 108
Case 3:05-cv-01744-P Document 1 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01744-P Document 1 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01744-P Document 1 Filed 08/29/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01744-P Document 1 Filed 08/29/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01744-P Document 1 Filed 08/29/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01744-P Document 1 Filed 08/29/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
Dwayne DYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

March 31, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14909

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00007-CR-SPM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

RODERICK KENNETH WIMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(March 31, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Roderick Kenenth Wims on this direct

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief

prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.E.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wims’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip E Jennings, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: February 18, 2011








By:           /s/Phillip E Jennings





Phillip E Jennings


President, principal executive officer and secretary
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Shineco, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Secretary of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Shineco, Inc.

*Date: November 20, 2005				                                                    **                                    By: /s/ Yuying Zhang                                        				                                                    **                                          Yuying Zhang				                                                    **                                         Chief Executive Officer and President				                                                    **                                    By:**/s/*Lin Wen                                                 *                                                    **                                          Lin Wen, Secretary*

**End of Filing**18

----
Case 3:05-cv-01235-M Document 4 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 90
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 6041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01065]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20613 and #20614; SOUTH DAKOTA Disaster Number 
SD-20004]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (FEMA-4842-DR), dated 
November 1, 2024.
    Incident: Severe Storm, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.

DATES: Issued on January 8, 2025.
    Incident Period: July 13, 2024 through July 14, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: February 28, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: August 1, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, dated November 1, 2024, 
is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to February 28, 2025.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2025-01065 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

FESTUS OLUSHOLA OMOTOYO, )

#75887824, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-2093-P

) ECF

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, )

Department of Homeland Security, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is further ORDERED that Respondent’s initial motion to dismiss, filed on January 11,

2006 (docket #15) is DENIED as moot. 

SO ORDERED this 27 day of March 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02093-P Document 23 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 147
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 2002

TAQI EYR HHAMUAL HESED EL a/k/a Bro T. Hesed

- El , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ROBIN BRYSON, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, in his individual and official capacity; MISSION HOSPITAL, INC.; ANC HEALTHCARE, INC.; ADAM HERZOG, Employee of Mission Hospital and/or ANC; STIRLING BARLOW, Employee of Mission Hospital and/or ANC , Defendants

- Appellees , and JOHN DOE, Hospital Does 1

- 20, in their individual an d official capacities , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger , Chief District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00305

- MR

- WCM )

Submitted : March 21 , 2023 Decided: March 23, 2023

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2002 Doc: 20 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Bro T. Hesed

- El, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Samuel Daniels, PATLA, STRAUS, ROBINSON & MOORE, PA, As heville, North Carolina; Phillip Theodore Jackson, Daniel H. Walsh, ROBERTS & STEVENS, PA, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam F. Peoples, HALL BOOTH SMITH, PC, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2002 Doc: 20 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Bro. T. Hesed

- El seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some
Defendants outright and dismissing certain of his claims against the remaining Defendants

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Hesed

- El seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-2002 Doc: 20 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (‘‘L-3 Holdings’’) and L-3 Communications Corporation (‘‘L-3 Communications’’; together with L-3 Holdings referred to as ‘‘L-3’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), Michael T. Strianese, President and Chief Executive Officer and Ralph G. D’Ambrosio, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, in each case, of L-3 Holdings and L-3 Communications, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of L-3.

Date: February 28, 2008

/s/ Michael T. Strianese


/s/ Ralph G. D’AmbrosioMichael T. Strianese
President and Chief Executive Office


Ralph G. D’Ambrosio
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---
STATE of Louisiana v. Warren C. REAVIS, III

NO. 2018-KH-1575

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, Secretary, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: March 31, 2006


/s/ Kate Blankenship
-----------------------
Kate Blankenship

Principal Financial Officer

SK 02089 0007 657678
Darwin G. CAIN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-5008

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 19 Filed 05/10/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID 57
Case 3:06-cr-00014-N Document 148 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 436
STATE of Louisiana v. Joe STEPHENS

NO. 2018-KH-0905

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied.
Roderick F. LEE v. Thomas D. SAPP, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, BMW Financial Services, N.A., L.L.C. and Financial Services Vehicle Trust, Inc.

NO. 2018-OC-0044

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

*710Denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Paul O. Bower

Paul O. Bower, Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-98-234) Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. McKinley David Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: McKinley David Littlejohn seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion noting an alleged defect in the indictment as an unauthorized second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Littlejohn has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 3:05-cv-01385-K Document 8 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 62
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01385-K Document 8 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 63
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 17 PageID 570
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 2 of 17 PageID 571
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 3 of 17 PageID 572
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 4 of 17 PageID 573
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 5 of 17 PageID 574
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 6 of 17 PageID 575
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 7 of 17 PageID 576
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 8 of 17 PageID 577
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 9 of 17 PageID 578
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 10 of 17 PageID 579
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 11 of 17 PageID 580
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 12 of 17 PageID 581
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 13 of 17 PageID 582
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 14 of 17 PageID 583
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 15 of 17 PageID 584
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 16 of 17 PageID 585
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 13 Filed 10/31/05 Page 17 of 17 PageID 586
Jamarkous Antonio COLEMAN v. STATE

CR-16-1326

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      13.1







PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report ofGolden
State Petro (IOM 1-A) PLC(the “Company”) onForm 20-F for the annual period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Tor Olav Trøim, the Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
            The information contained inthe Report fairly presents,in all material
      respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSEC or its staff upon
request.







Date:  June 30, 2008







/s/Tor Olav
Trøim




Tor Olav
Trøim


Principal Executive Officer