alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. QUEST SYSTEMS, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company, as successor trustee under the 5107 Erie Road Land Trust, dated October 9, 2012, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

Kimberly S. Mello and Danielle M. Diaz of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa; and Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Lee Segal of Segal & Schuh Law Group, P.L., Clearwater (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's motion for rehearing is granted. The prior opinion dated August 10, 2018, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Quest Systems, LLC, after a bench trial. We reverse and remand for entry of a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Wells Fargo.

At the conclusion of Wells Fargo's case, Quest moved for an involuntary dismissal. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the case based on its determination that Wells Fargo had failed to prove its prima facie case because it had not properly authenticated a loan modification agreement that the court had nevertheless previously admitted into evidence.

While the parties have raised a multitude of issues in this appeal, we need reach only one of them. We conclude that the trial court erred when it refused to consider the loan modification agreement because it had not been properly authenticated. Such agreements are self-authenticating under section 90.902(8), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides that documents *relating to* commercial paper are self-authenticating. Hence, the loan modification agreement should have been considered *599by the court, and the court should have entered a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Wells Fargo based on the amounts due and owing on the note and mortgage, as modified by the loan modification agreement.

In light of this conclusion, we reverse the involuntary dismissal and remand for entry of a judgment in favor of Wells Fargo.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

KELLY and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-filed 7/12/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON FOSTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUITYKEY REAL ESTATE 

INVESTMENTS L.P.,

Defendant.

Case No.17-cv-00067-HRL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 22-25

On May 9, 2017, the court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss as to all claims, granting 

Plaintiff leave to amend as to three claims. The court stated that failure to file an amended 

complaint by the late-May deadline “will result in dismissal of the complaint with prejudice.” 

Dkt. No. 22. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has informed the court that he will not file an 

amended complaint. Dkt. No. 25. The court therefore dismisses this action with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 7/12/2017

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 20 PageID 420
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 20 PageID 421
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 3 of 20 PageID 422
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 4 of 20 PageID 423
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 5 of 20 PageID 424
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 6 of 20 PageID 425
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 7 of 20 PageID 426
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 8 of 20 PageID 427
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 9 of 20 PageID 428
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 10 of 20 PageID 429
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 11 of 20 PageID 430
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 12 of 20 PageID 431
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 13 of 20 PageID 432
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 14 of 20 PageID 433
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 15 of 20 PageID 434
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 16 of 20 PageID 435
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 17 of 20 PageID 436
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 18 of 20 PageID 437
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 19 of 20 PageID 438
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00209-BF Document 22 Filed 07/05/06 Page 20 of 20 PageID 439
Erik Phillip EASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3379

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

RHASHEA LYNN HARMON,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2695 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 72 DB 2019

Attorney Registration No. 312859

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2020, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Rhashea Lynn Harmon is disbarred from 

the practice of law in this Commonwealth. Respondent shall comply with all the provisions 

of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **4 -**  **6001**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. AHMAD DEHAVEN BURWELL , Defendant

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 5 :1 0

- c r - 000 64

- BR

- 1; 5:13

- cv - 00475

- BR )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Ahmad Dehaven Burwell , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy , Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, Shailika K. Shah, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appell ee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ahmad Dehaven Burwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit ju stice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the distri ct court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion st ates a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and d ismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Daneal J. IRONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

Daneal J. Irons, Arcadia, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-21178

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE VILLALBA-FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CR-189-1

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Villalba-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Villalba-Flores contends that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are

unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must

be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8

U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-21178

-2-

conviction only under that provision, and his sentence must be

vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than

two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Villalba-Flores acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of The Wornick Company (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarterended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John F. McQuay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  November 16, 2004

 

 
| By:   | /s/ John F. McQuay                     |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------|
|            | John F. McQuay                         |
|            | Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 10 PageID 70
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 10 PageID 71
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 3 of 10 PageID 72
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 4 of 10 PageID 73
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 5 of 10 PageID 74
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 6 of 10 PageID 75
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 7 of 10 PageID 76
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 8 of 10 PageID 77
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 9 of 10 PageID 78
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00236-C Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 10 of 10 PageID 79
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.W., the Mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2694

[June 10, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacey Schulman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 22-2420DP.

Kathleen K. Pena, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, B.C.S., Miami, for appellee. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd 

Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, 

for Guardian Ad Litem, and Jamie Billotte Moses, B.C.S., of Holland & 

Knight, LLP, Orlando, Pro Bono for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LARRY V. BROWN §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-2477-K 

§

GARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, §

ET AL. §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of

the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the

Court. 

SO ORDERED.

Signed this 7 day of December, 2006. th

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02477-K-BD Document 45 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 221
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Private ADR.” 

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff(s) 

v.

Defendant(s) 

CASE No C 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following 

stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the 

following ADR process: 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

 Private ADR (specify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: 

Date:

U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct 

mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an 

early settlement conference with a Magistrate 

Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this 

form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5.

Attorney 

Jeannie Gonzales 4:16-cv-07346-HSG

■

■

unless otherwise ordered. )

 other requested deadline:

Date: 2/1/2018

Date:

Eric M. Lightman

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

2/28/28 Saman M. Rejali X

3/5/2018
EX PARTE Freeman SMITH

CR-17-0181

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jon A. Marshall,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company. /s/ Jon A. MarshallJon A. MarshallChief Executive OfficerMarch 10, 2004
Charles WILKINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1102

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                     EXPLORATIONS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.


     The undersigned, being the President of, EXPLORATIONS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP,
INC. (the "Company") and being duly authorized by the Board of Directors hereby
certifies that:

     FIRST:  The name of the corporation is hereby changed to
             WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT CORP.

     SECOND: The foregoing amendment was authorized and adopted by resolution of
the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders owning a majority of the
issued and outstanding shares of stock of the Company pursuant to a written
consent of the shareholders in lieu of meeting on April 18, 1997. The number of
votes cast by the shareholders was sufficient for approval.

     THIRD: The effective date of this Certificate of Amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have submitted these Certificate of
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation and affirm the same as true under
penalties of perjury this 18 day of April, 1997.

 /s/  Eilat Lev
-------------------------
EILAT LEV,  president


FILED
97 APR 21  AM 11:15
SECRETARY OF STATE
TALLAHASSEE  FLORIDA
Santoria Devon BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Warner, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 3.

          Certification of Senior Vice President, Corporate Development
                     and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
       Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Pierre Rougeau, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief
Financial Officer of Abitibi-Consolidated Inc., (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended
            December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: May 16, 2003


                                        /s/ Pierre Rougeau
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Pierre Rougeau, Senior Vice
                                        President, Corporate Development
                                        and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01306]

[[Page 7245]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of one entity that has been 
placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons 
List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this entity are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: This action was issued on January 3, 2025. See Supplementary 
Information section for relevant date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 
202-622-2490 or https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website: https://ofac.treasury.gov.

Notice of OFAC Action

    On January 3, 2025, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following entity are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21JA25.225

Lisa M. Palluconi,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2025-01306 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
```
IIA 

Calendar No. 184 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 33 

Joint resolution relating to increasing the debt limit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following joint resolution; which was ordered 

placed on the calendar pursuant to Public Law 117–71 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Joint resolution relating to increasing the debt limit. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the limitation under section 3101(b) of title 31, 

4 United States Code, as most recently increased by Public 

5 Law 117–50 (31 U.S.C. 3101 note), is increased by 

6 $2,500,000,000,000. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 184 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 33 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Joint resolution relating to increasing the debt 

limit. 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Ordered placed on the calendar pursuant to Public Law 

117–71 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-534568

NO. 2019-BA-0291

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

ORDER

Treating petitioner's "Request for Written Reasons" as a petition for reconsideration of this court's February 22, 2019 order,

IT IS ORDERED that reconsideration be and hereby is denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

Hughes, J., would grant.