alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 11, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consortium for Rare Earth Technologies (“CREaTe”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Specifically, Alaska Range Resources, LLC, Palmer, AK; and Orojo Resources USA, LLC, Cleveland, GA, have been added as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open and CREaTe intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 22, 2022, CREaTe filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 18, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82629).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-01701 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Bethany L. CARVALLO a/k/a Bethany Cavallo, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3451

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
### Th e Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judg e 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2957

___________ Dara Gen Neal, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States City of Springfield, a * District Court for the Corporation, broken down as to * Western District of Missouri. departments and/or offices * involved: Health Department, * [UNPUBLISHED] City Prosecutor’s Office, * Springfield Police Department, * Rabies Control, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 5, 1997 Filed: May 8, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dara Gen Neal appeals from the district court's or der dismissing her 1 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and pendent state law claims, which arose out of an alleged dog-bite incident; she also appeals f rom the court's subsequent order refusing to grant her relief from the judgment. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district cour t correctly

### -2-

deniedrelief, and that an extended discussion is not warranted . Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
James HICKS and Sheila Hicks v. RLI INSURANCE CO.

2170038

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Culotta,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To the best of my knowledge information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: July 27, 2005

                                                /s/  Michael J. Culotta
                                                -----------------------
                                                Michael J. Culotta
                                                Chief Financial Officer
FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

NO. 2019-CC-0534

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Stay recalled. Writ denied as moot.

HUGHES, J., would grant and remand for evidentiary hearing.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and remand for evidentiary hearing.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and remand for evidentiary hearing.
No FEAR Act Data FY2024 through 12-31 Complaint activity
			Comparative data
			
			FY 2024
			through
			12-31Previous fiscal year data2019
			2020
			2021
			2022
			2023Number of complaints filed
			0
			0
			0
			0
			0
			0Number of complainants
			0
			0
			0
			0
			0
			0Repeat filers
			0
			0
			0
			0
			0
			0
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                  |                                   |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date:              August 14, 2008 |                                                                  | /s/ Mark              D. Roberson |
|                               | Mark                D. RobersonChief                Financial Officer |

----
Phillip Gabe KORNELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3702

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LOUIS B. STREDIC, SR., ID # 789666, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-1193-D

)

VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION, )

Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED December 19, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01193-D Document 15 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 118
Kevin Daniel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and L. Allen Beard, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-1476]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Groff Health, Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled 
                        ( print page 7173)
                        substance(s). Refer to 
                        **Supplementary Information**
                         listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before March 24, 2025. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before March 24, 2025.
 ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov.*
                         If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on September 27, 2024, Groff Health Inc., 2218 South Queen Street, York, Pennsylvania 17402-4631 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
SchedulePsilocybin
7437
IPsilocyn
7438
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances for internal use or for sale to its customers. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Matthew Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2025-01349 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Trailer Bridge, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ John D. McCown     
|                     |  |  |  | John D. McCown         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 2.

       Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
       Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John W. Weaver, President and Chief Executive Officer of Abitibi-Consolidated
Inc., (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended
            December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: May 16, 2003


                                        /s/ John W. Weaver
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John W. Weaver,
                                        President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RAYMOND M. MILLIGAN, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 05-CV-2028-B

§ ECF

MINYARD FOOD STORES, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Joint Motion of the Parties to File Documents Under Seal

and Supporting Memorandum of Law (doc. 18) is of the opinion the motion has merit and should

be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties be permitted to file under seal the

confidential settlement agreement between them. 

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED August 11th, 2006

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 20 Filed 08/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 67
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIE ARTHUR SNEED §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-2032-H

§ 

HUNT COUNTY MEDICAL §

DEPARTMENT, ET AL. §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

Accordingly, plaintiff is permitted to prosecute his claim for lack of adequate dental care

against Nurse Gail Pierce. All other claims are summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2). The court has filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) final judgment today.

The district clerk is directed to issue summonses to, and the United States Marshals Service

is directed to serve them on, defendant Nurse Gail Pierce. 

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2006.

________________________________

BAREFOOT SANDERS, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02032-R Document 16 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 140
First Amending Agreement



 Exhibit 4.20 
  
  
 FIRST AMENDING AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amending Agreement dated as of the 14th day of February, 2003. 

 
 Between: 
  
 MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC. (“Mad Catz”) 
  
 - and - 
  
 FIRE INTERNATIONAL LTD. and its related companies (“Fire”) 
  
 Whereas: 
  

	 	(a)	 	Mad Catz and Fire entered in to an agreement dated January 17, 2003 (the “Agreement”) regarding the manufacture and distribution of certain CD products, as more
particularly described in the Agreement; 

  

	 	(b)	 	Mad Catz and Fire have agreed to amend certain terms of the Agreement, as more particularly set out herein; 

  
 Now therefore for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 	Amendment to the Agreement. Effective as of the date of the Agreement, the Agreement is amended by deleting paragraph 5 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


  
 “5. Mad Catz shall acquire the CD products
produced by Fire at the [* * *]. Fire shall not allow the supplier to increase the cost of goods without the consent of Mad Catz.” 
  

	2.	 	Governing Law. This First Amending Agreement is governed by English law. 

  

	3.	 	Confirmation of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement, as amended hereby, are and remain in full force and effect.


  
 In witness whereof the parties have
executed this First Amending Agreement as of the date set out above. 
  

	
	MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC. 
		
	 Per:
	 	 /s/    MORRIS
PERLIS        


	 	 	 Morris Perlis
 President and CEO

	
	FIRE INTERNATIONAL LTD., for itself and its related companies
		
	 Per:
	 	 /s/    JASON
COOPER        


	 	 	 Jason Cooper
 Managing Director



  
 [*] CERTAIN MATERIAL (INDICATED
BY AN ASTERISK) HAS BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT. THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
Commer RUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2927

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Civil Rights

The FBI, the lead agency for enforcing civil rights law, aggressively investigates hate crime, color of law abuses by public officials, human trafficking and involuntary servitude, and freedom of access to clinic entrances violations.

- Major Cases Major civil rights cases that the FBI has investigated over the years.
- Federal Civil Rights Statutes The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.
- International Human Rights Violations The FBI, through its International Human Rights Unit, plays a vital role in the U.S. government’s coordinated efforts to identify, locate, investigate, and prosecute perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and other related mass atrocities.
- Hate Crimes Investigating hate crimes is the highest priority of the FBI’s civil rights program.
- Publications A listing of FBI publications pertaining to human trafficking and civil rights.
- News News and press releases related to FBI civil rights investigations and initiatives.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CLAYTON EUGENE WEBB, #1067914, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-1374-L

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas )

Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the Court in

implementation thereof, this cause has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge. The

findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, are as follows:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

Type of Case: This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought by a state prisoner

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Parties: Petitioner is presently incarcerated at the Connally Unit of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice -- Correctional Institutions Division (TDCJ-CID) in Kenedy, Texas. 

Respondent is the Director of TDCJ-CID. No process has been issued in this case.

Findings and Conclusions: On July 15, 2005, the magistrate judge issued an order

informing Petitioner that he had $150.35 in his inmate trust account and, thus, that he had to pay

the $5.00 filing fee within thirty days. See Miscellaneous Order No. 6, filed on May 5, 2005, at

Rule 2(a)(4) (providing that a magistrate judge can “grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis to

a person seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 2241 and 2254, if the average six month

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01374-L Document 5 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 29
2

balance of the person’s inmate trust account and other financial resources are less than Fifty

Dollars.”). As of date of this recommendation, the court has received neither the $5.00 filing fee

nor a motion for extension of time to pay the filing fee. 

RECOMMENDATION:

For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that the District Court enter an order

denying Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on July 11, 2005, and directing

that the petition be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee.

The Clerk will mail a copy of this recommendation to Petitioner. 

Signed this 30th of August, 2005.

____________________________________

WM. F. SANDERSON, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

In the event that you wish to object to this recommendation, you are hereby notified that

you must file your written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of this

recommendation. Pursuant to Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir.

1996) (en banc), a party's failure to file written objections to these proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law within such ten-day period may bar a de novo determination by the district

judge of any finding of fact or conclusion of law and shall bar such party, except upon grounds

of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected to proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law accepted by the district court.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01374-L Document 5 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 30
Case 3:05-cr-00134-N Document 3 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5