alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a
Florida corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), Julie Mirman, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 /s/
      Julie MirmanJulie
      Mirman
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                May
      14, 2009
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GORDON CRITTENDON
, Appellant,

v.

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF EVA MARIE CRITTENDON
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 19

- 1231

[ December 12, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Michael J. Linn , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 312017GA000007 and 312017GA000008

.

Gordon Crittendon , Monticello, pro se

.

Aaron V. Johnson of Collins Brown Barkett, Ch artered

, Vero Beach, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Antonio Jermaine GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-965

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID 63
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 8 PageID 64
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 3 of 8 PageID 65
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 4 of 8 PageID 66
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 5 of 8 PageID 67
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 6 of 8 PageID 68
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 7 of 8 PageID 69
 

 Case 5:05-cv-00234-C Document 17 Filed 07/19/06 Page 8 of 8 PageID 70
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANNA SALINAS, on her behalf and on §

behalf of those similarly situated, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 04-CV-1861-B

§

O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER FOLLOWING MARCH 10, 2005 HEARING

A hearing was held on March 10, 2005 regarding several outstanding motions before the

Court. As stated at the hearing, after considering the arguments of counsel, the relevant briefing,

the evidence presented, and relevant case authorities, the Court makes the following rulings: 

1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

(docket no. 53) is DENIED as moot.

2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend (docket no. 58) is DENIED without prejudice.

3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Take Oral Depositions (docket no. 59) is DENIED

without prejudice.

4) Defendant’s Motion for Protection and to Stay Collective Action Class Discovery

Pending Resolution of Dispositive Motions (docket no. 65) is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that no further discovery will be

permitted except to the extent that Defendant shall provide the Plaintiff with the names and

addresses of Defendant’s employees that are similarly situated to Plaintiff. The parties are

directed to confer with each other in an attempt to agree on how to define such “similarly

situated” individuals. If the parties reach agreement, the Defendant shall produce to Plaintiff

the names and addresses of such similarly situated individuals. If agreement cannot be

reached, the parties may submit briefing on the issue to the Court, including whether there

exists a factual and/or legal nexus binding Plaintiff to potential class members as victims of

a policy or practice of Defendant. Briefing by the Plaintiff shall be due by March 31, 2005.

Defendant’s responsive briefing shall be due 20 days thereafter. Upon review of the briefing,

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 116 Filed 03/11/2005 Page 1 of 2
2

the Court will determine whether to allow a reply brief by Plaintiff, and it will also, if

necessary, determine the scope of discovery, if any, that shall be conducted before Plaintiff

moves for conditional certification. 

5) Plaintiff’s Motion for Continuance Pursuant to Rule 56(f) (docket no. 72) is DENIED

as moot.

6) Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Time to Move for Notice

to Potential Class Members (docket no. 82) is GRANTED. The current October 25, 2004

Scheduling Order is SUSPENDED. The Court will be entering an Amended Scheduling

Order to efficiently manage the disposition of this case.

7) Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Resolve Collective Action

Issue (docket no. 50) is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED March 11th, 2005

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 116 Filed 03/11/2005 Page 2 of 2
RESTORATION 1 OF the TREASURE COAST, INC., a/a/o Christianne Calero, Appellant, v. FIDELITY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY d/b/a Frontline Homeowners Insurance, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1401
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 23 PageID 1402
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 3 of 23 PageID 1403
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 4 of 23 PageID 1404
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 5 of 23 PageID 1405
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 6 of 23 PageID 1406
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 7 of 23 PageID 1407
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 8 of 23 PageID 1408
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 9 of 23 PageID 1409
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 10 of 23 PageID 1410
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 11 of 23 PageID 1411
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 12 of 23 PageID 1412
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 13 of 23 PageID 1413
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 14 of 23 PageID 1414
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 15 of 23 PageID 1415
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 16 of 23 PageID 1416
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 17 of 23 PageID 1417
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 18 of 23 PageID 1418
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 19 of 23 PageID 1419
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 20 of 23 PageID 1420
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 21 of 23 PageID 1421
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 22 of 23 PageID 1422
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01582-M Document 66 Filed 09/11/06 Page 23 of 23 PageID 1423
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ALLEN FITZGERALD CALTON )

)

V. ) 3-05-CV-2022-N

)

DALLAS COUNTY, ET AL )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the

proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court

accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that process shall be issued on Plaintiff’s claims of

deliberate indifference to his serious depression and suicidal tendencies against Officers V.

Williams, Johnson, Terry, Walls and Mitchell as shown in the recommendation.

Signed June 8, 2006.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 18 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 190
USE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ue kris TERN

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF r ST RICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION PILED
|
MAR 2 1 2008
JUAN ANTON! RENO-
‘ONIO MO O-AREVALO, CLERK, US. DISTRICT COURT
Petitioner, ” iy

v. 2:05-CV-0066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

On On Wn LOR 60? WOr COR con Cor

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and
DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE

Petitioner has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence by a person in federal
custody. A Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge and filed
on February 27, 2008. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed of record as
of this date.

The United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the record in this
case and has examined the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The District Judge is
of the opinion the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be, and hereby is,
ADOPTED. It is the further ORDER of the Court that this motion to vacate, set aside or correct
sentence is, in all things, DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this_ ~4/” day of DMiMME 2008.

Wiz “dla Lip Milla

MARYLOU
UNITED STA’ nS ON ict JUD!

2.03-0R-0070 (01)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         254,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               468,147
<PP&E>                                      11,041,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,751,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          307,380
<BONDS>                                      4,284,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,159,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,751,672
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               769,863
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               463,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            149,112      
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 16,640
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   132,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of                the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Lincoln              M. Dastrup                                                              |   |   |   |
| Lincoln                M. DastrupChief                Financial OfficerAugust                17, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
# C_2017038EN.01005001.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/50

---

Action brought on 7 December 2016 — Wenger v. EUIPO — Swissgear (SWISSGEAR)

(Case T-869/16)

(2017/C 038/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wenger SA (Delémont, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Ikas and A. Sulovsky, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Swissgear Sàrl (Baar, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SWISSGEAR’– EU trade mark No 7 197 783

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 September 2016 in Case R 2098/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR.

---
Leo James BOUCHARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2111

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-20653

Al Rushaid Parker Drilling, Limited, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

National Oilwell Varco, L.P., 

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CV-3390

Before Smith, Barksdale, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Plaintiff Al Rushaid Parker Drilling, Limited, raises numerous arguments for setting aside the arbitration award at issue. The district court was 

correct that none of those contentions has the slightest merit. There is no 

basis for either vacating the award under section 10 of the Federal Arbitration 

Act or sending the case back to arbitration. 

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 2, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-20653 Document: 00516565084 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2022
Robert D. WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 28, 2019

Robert D. Wallace, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion to correct illegal sentence rendered by filing with the clerk of the lower tribunal on March 5, 2019. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h). The notice of appeal, filed on April 5, 2019, failed to invoke the Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

Rowe, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Demario Lashawn WEBSTER, DOC #H23555, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2475

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Demario Lashawn Webster, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

_________________________________

JOSEPH BERNARD FOWLER, PRO SE, §

TDCJ-CID #623887, §

A.K.A. Eugene Bernard Fowler, §

A.K.A. Bernard Fowler, §

A.K.A. Joe Fowler §

Previous TDCJ-CID #909414, §

Previous TDCJ-CID #954506, §

Previous TDCJ-CID #997657, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:05-CV-0235

§

GLEN STOUDER, Lt., §

§

Defendant. §

JUDGMENT

Of equal date herewith, the Court has entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order of

Dismissal.

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED and DECREED that the Civil Rights Complaint filed

by plaintiff JOSEPH BERNARD FOWLER is in all things DENIED and is hereby ORDERED

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS AND WITH PREJUDICE FOR PURPOSES OF PROCEEDING IN

AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE,

SECTION 1915(b). Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292 (5th Cir. 1998); 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

The Clerk will mail a copy of this Judgment to the plaintiff and to each attorney of

record by first class mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this 1st

 day of February, 2006.

/s/ Mary Lou Robinson 

MARY LOU ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 2:05-cv-00235-J-BB Document 12 Filed 02/01/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSE LUPIAN BAUTISTA, #1081345, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-2441-P

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, ) 

Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 19th day of January 2007.

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02441-P Document 16 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 160
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 28 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-04999) and Amendment No. 84 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-07645), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 26, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account L for the interests in a separate account under group flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
Waymon SPRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1793

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01225]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's (NSB) Committee on Science and 
Engineering Policy (SEP) hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a 
videoconference for the transaction of National Science Board business 
pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, January 21, 2025, from 2:00 p.m.-2:45 p.m. 
Eastern.

PLACE: The meeting will be held by videoconference through the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA, 22314. 
Members of the public can observe this meeting through a YouTube 
livestream. The YouTube link will be available from the NSB meetings 
web page--https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/index.jsp.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Chair's opening remarks; Discussion of 
Detailed Narrative Outline and vote on Talent report for Indicators 
2026.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is Chris Blair, [email protected], 703-292-7000.

Ann E. Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-01225 Filed 1-14-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```