alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-650

_____________________________

ADRIAN FRANCIS WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

September 17, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Adrian Francis Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 129384(164) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND Stephen J. Markman, CONTRACTORS, SAGINAW Justices VALLEY AREA CHAPTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 129384 COA: 234037 Midland CC: 00-002512-CL DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES, and MIDLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Defendants-Appellees,

and

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, MI CHIGAN CHAPTER, MICHIGAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, MICH IGAN CHAPTER OF SHEET METAL & AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS, and MICHIGAN STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,Defendants/IntervenorsAppellees,

and

SAGINAW COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Intervenor-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of February 27, 2006 is considere d, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
Noerr
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT : -
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS" ~ oy

AMARILLO DIVISION | | |
, DEC TT a8
Lo
CLERK,UE Do Y
JOHN MATHIS, poRy
4
Petitioner,
v. 2:06-CV-0022

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director,
Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
Correctional Institutions Division,

OP Or On WO? On WO? CO? COD COD UO? OD

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner has filed with this Court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a prison
disciplinary case. On November 25, 2008, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation in this cause, recommending therein that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be
denied. As of this date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed of record.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the
record in this case. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.
Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
; —_ /
ENTERED this Z Wha day of & LLLD VPA 2008.

2

74, of -

MARY/LOU ROBINSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pride, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 28, 2005

/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
Bobby Gene MILES v. STATE

CR-16-1222

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 943 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to close or realign the Marine Corps 

Recruit Depot located at Parris Island, South Carolina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 24, 2021 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to close or realign 

the Marine Corps Recruit Depot located at Parris Island, 

South Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parris Island Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The Marine Corps Recruit Depot located at 

9 Parris Island, South Carolina (in this section reVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:08 Apr 17, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S943.IS S943

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 943 IS

1 ferred to as ‘‘Parris Island’’), has served the United 

2 States as a home to the Marine Corps since 1891. 

3 (2) Parris Island was the first facility to inte4 grate women in boot camp training for the Marine 

5 Corps in the United States. 

6 (3) Female recruits have trained at Parris Is7 land since 1949. 

8 (4) The first integrated company of male and 

9 female recruits graduated from Parris Island in 

10 2019. 

11 (5) Parris Island has cultivated a legacy of ex12 cellence and faithful service to the United States. 

13 (6) Parris Island is and shall remain the phys14 ical home of the U.S. Marine Corps Eastern Re15 cruiting Region. 

16 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF CLOSING OR REALIGNMENT OF 

17 MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT LOCATED 

18 AT PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA. 

19 No Federal funds may be used to close or realign Ma20 rine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina, 

21 or to conduct any planning or other activity related to 

22 such closure or realignment. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Kaleb Javon LAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-872

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOTICE OF HEARING PAGE 1 OF 2

Melissa S. Hayward

 Texas Bar No. 24044908

 MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

HAYWARD PLLC

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106

Dallas, Texas 75231

Tel./Fax: (972) 755-7100

Special Counsel for the Debtor

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re:

CARL GERARD DORVIL,

Debtor.

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 23-30771-sgj7

Chapter 7

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing to consider the Emergency Motion for Relief 

from the Automatic Stay [Dkt. No. 48] filed by Carl Gerard Dorvil has been set on Thursday, 

September 14, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Stacey G. C. Jernigan.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that any parties who wish to participate in the 

hearing may appear as follows:

i. For WebEx Video Participation/Attendance:

Link: https://us-courts.webex.com/meet/jerniga

ii. For WebEx Telephonic Only Participation/Attendance:

Dial-In: 1.650.479.3207

Meeting ID: 479 393 582

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Court requests that, in advance of the 

hearing, all parties familiarize themselves with the Court’s Webex Information and Tips at:

https://www.txnb.uscourts.gov/content/judge-stacey-g-c-jernigan

DATED: September 12, 2023.

Case 23-30771-sgj7 Doc 51 Filed 09/12/23 Entered 09/12/23 11:42:27 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF HEARING PAGE 2 OF 2

Respectfully submitted,

HAYWARD PLLC

By: /s/ Melissa S. Hayward 

Melissa S. Hayward

 Texas Bar No. 24044908

 MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

10501 N. Central Expy., Ste. 106

Dallas, Texas 75231

Tel./Fax: (972) 755-7100

Special Counsel for Carl Gerard Dorvil

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Hearing 

was sent electronically by the clerk of court on September 12, 2023 to counsel for Masons, the 

U.S. Trustee, and all parties requesting notice in this Bankruptcy Case.

/s/ Melissa S. Hayward

Melissa S. Hayward

Case 23-30771-sgj7 Doc 51 Filed 09/12/23 Entered 09/12/23 11:42:27 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EX PARTE Timothy DEMPSEY

CR-17-0012

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Transferred to Sup. Ct.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





Dated:
            May
      15, 2008
            
            
            
            RIDGEWOOD
      ENERGY M FUND, LLCBy:
            /s/
            
            ROBERT
      E. SWANSONName:
            
            Robert
      E. SwansonTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            May
      15, 2008By:
            /s/
            
            KATHLEEN
      P. MCSHERRYName:
            
            Kathleen
      P. McSherryTitle:
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy M Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL ANDREW BAIN, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 05-CV-909-B

§ ECF

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

 Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions and

a recommendation in this case. Petitioner and Respondent filed objections. The undersigned

District Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions to which objections were made

and DENIES the objections as follows. 

 Petitioner Bain objects to twelve separate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The Court

finds no merit to these objections and overrules them. Respondent Dretke, does not object to

the Magistrate Judge’s ultimate conclusion that Bain’s habeas petition should be denied. But

Dretke does take issue with the Magistrate Judge’s determination that Bain’s claim that his

counsel failed to investigate his mental health and drug abuse history was fairly presented and

thus exhausted at the state court level. The Court finds Respondent Dretke’s objection in this

regard to be without merit. Although some evidence regarding Bain’s mental health and drug

abuse was submitted to the Magistrate Judge that was not at the state court level, the Court

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00909-B Document 28 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 115
- 2 -

finds, as did the Magistrate Judge, that this additional evidence merely supplemented Bain’s state

court claim but did not fundamentally alter the claim presented to the state courts. See Anderson

v. Johnson, 338 F.3d 382, 386-87 (5 Cir. 2003)(“‘dismissal is not required when evidence

th

presented for the first time in a habeas proceeding supplements but does not fundamentally alter

the claim presented to the state courts.’”)(emphasis in original) 

Accordingly, Petitioner Bain’s and Respondent Dretke’s objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s findings and recommendation are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s findings and

recommendation are ACCEPTED as those of this Court. 

SO ORDERED.

JULY 10, 2006

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00909-B Document 28 Filed 07/10/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 116
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 6316** 

EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND; WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN; MAJOR MELLOTT; CAPTAIN STOTLER; M. YACENCH; LT. DALE SMITH; LT. GEORGE MCALPINE; LIEUTENANT MANUEL; J. GARY SINDY; SERGEANT FORNEY; L.O. MILLER; LT. R. FRITZ; LIEUTENANT THOMAS; J.R. MALLOW; G. MALLOW; LOWERY; J. HARTMAN; D.S. CAPLE; D. MICHAEL; J. E. WIEMER; C. PRESTON; J. WILT; S. LIPSCOMB; OFFIC ER WILSON; J. W. REIEKE; J. FARRIS; RYAN KALBAUGH; CRAIG PETERS; LUKE GIRVIN; OFFICER ORT; OFFICER VETOR AE; D. SYVERSTAD; M. KISNER; M.E. PRICE; A. LODGSON; D. J. SMITH; ROMESBURG; M. BUCHOLTZ ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv
- 02656

- DKC )

Submitted : July 2 1 , 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,2 for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit

.3 PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court ’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of
the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and f ind no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Sewell v. Office of the Attorney Gen.

of Md. , No. 8:12

- cv
- 02656

- DKC (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edward C. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Edward C. Dillon
-----------------------------
Edward C. Dillon
Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Nelson Stark
-----------------------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2009
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 67 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to the fundamental right to vote. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. 

HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to the fundamental right to vote. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 67 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Every citizen of the United States, who 

3 is of legal voting age, shall have the fundamental right 

4 to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in 

5 which the citizen resides. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The fundamental right of citizens of the 

7 United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by 

8 the United States or by any State or political subdivision 

9 within a State unless such denial or abridgment is in fur10 therance of a compelling governmental interest and is the 

11 least restrictive means of furthering that compelling gov12 ernmental interest. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. The portion of section 2 of the four14 teenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

15 United States that consists of the phrase ‘or other crime,’ 

16 is repealed. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress shall have the power to 

18 enforce this article and protect against any denial or 

19 abridgement of the fundamental right to vote by legisla20 tion.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2005



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II             
|    |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II                 
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director



24