Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 12 / Tuesday, January 21, 2025 / Notices 7171 

States v. Iron Mountain, Inc., 217 F. 

Supp. 3d 146, 152–53 (D.D.C. 2016) (‘‘In 

evaluating objections to settlement 

agreements under the Tunney Act, a 

court must be mindful that [t]he 

government need not prove that the 

settlements will perfectly remedy the 

alleged antitrust harms[;] it need only 

provide a factual basis for concluding 

that the settlements are reasonably 

adequate remedies for the alleged 

harms.’’ (internal citations omitted)); 

United States v. Republic Servs., Inc., 

723 F. Supp. 2d 157, 160 (D.D.C. 2010) 

(noting ‘‘the deferential review to which 

the government’s proposed remedy is 

accorded’’); United States v. ArcherDaniels-Midland Co., 272 F. Supp. 2d 1, 

6 (D.D.C. 2003) (‘‘A district court must 

accord due respect to the government’s 

prediction as to the effect of proposed 

remedies, its perception of the market 

structure, and its view of the nature of 

the case.’’). The ultimate question is 

whether ‘‘the remedies [obtained by the 

Final Judgment are] so inconsonant with 

the allegations charged as to fall outside 

of the ‘reaches of the public interest.’’’ 

Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1461 (quoting W. 

Elec. Co., 900 F.2d at 309). 

Moreover, the court’s role under the 

APPA is limited to reviewing the 

remedy in relationship to the violations 

that the United States has alleged in its 

Complaint and does not authorize the 

court to ‘‘construct [its] own 

hypothetical case and then evaluate the 

decree against that case.’’ Microsoft, 56 

F.3d at 1459; see also U.S. Airways, 38 

F. Supp. 3d at 75 (noting that the court 

must simply determine whether there is 

a factual foundation for the 

government’s decisions such that its 

conclusions regarding the proposed 

settlements are reasonable); InBev, 2009 

U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84787, at *20 

(concluding that ‘‘the ‘public interest’ is 

not to be measured by comparing the 

violations alleged in the complaint 

against those the court believes could 

have, or even should have, been 

alleged’’). Because the ‘‘court’s authority 

to review the decree depends entirely 

on the government’s exercising its 

prosecutorial discretion by bringing a 

case in the first place,’’ it follows that 

‘‘the court is only authorized to review 

the decree itself,’’ and not to ‘‘effectively 

redraft the complaint’’ to inquire into 

other matters that the United States did 

not pursue. Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1459– 

60. As this Court confirmed in SBC 

Communications, courts ‘‘cannot look 

beyond the complaint in making the 

public interest determination unless the 

complaint is drafted so narrowly as to 

make a mockery of judicial power.’’ 489 

F. Supp. 2d at 15. 

In its 2004 amendments to the APPA, 

Congress made clear its intent to 

preserve the practical benefits of using 

judgments proposed by the United 

States in antitrust enforcement, adding 

the unambiguous instruction that 

‘‘[n]othing in this section shall be 

construed to require the court to 

conduct an evidentiary hearing or to 

require the court to permit anyone to 

intervene.’’ 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(2); see also 

U.S. Airways, 38 F. Supp. 3d at 76 

(indicating that a court is not required 

to hold an evidentiary hearing or to 

permit intervenors as part of its review 

under the Tunney Act). This language 

explicitly wrote into the statute what 

Congress intended when it enacted the 

Tunney Act in 1974. As Senator Tunney 

explained: ‘‘The court is nowhere 

compelled to go to trial or to engage in 

extended proceedings which might have 

the effect of vitiating the benefits of 

prompt and less costly settlement 

through the consent decree process.’’ 

119 Cong. Rec. 24,598 (1973) (statement 

of Sen. Tunney). ‘‘A court can make its 

public interest determination based on 

the competitive impact statement and 

response to public comments alone.’’ 

U.S. Airways, 38 F. Supp. 3d at 76 

(citing Enova Corp., 107 F. Supp. 2d at 

17). 

VIII. Determinative Documents 

There are no determinative materials 

or documents within the meaning of the 

APPA that were considered by the 

United States in formulating the 

proposed Final Judgment. 

Date: January 7, 2025 

Respectfully Submitted, 

lllllllllllllllllllll

Kenneth A. Libby, Special Attorney, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, c/ 

o Federal Trade Commission, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 

20580, Phone: (202) 326–2694, Email: 

klibby@ftc.gov. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01252 Filed 1–17–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—The National Advanced 

Mobility Consortium, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 10, 2024, pursuant to section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The 

National Advanced Mobility 

Consortium, Inc. (‘‘NAMC’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. On February 

3, 2015, the RTC officially changed its 

name to NAMC. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Abaco Systems Inc., 

Huntsville, AL; ACP Technologies, LLC, 

St. Clair Shores, MI; Acutronic USA, 

Inc, Pittsburgh, PA; AEF-Performance, 

LLC, Picayune, MS; AIVOT Robotics, 

Inc., Seattle, WA; All Foam Products Co, 

Middlefield, OH; Amazon Web Services, 

Seattle, WA; American Lithium Energy 

Corporation, Carlsbad, CA; American 

Tooling Center, Inc., Lansing, MI; 

Amphenol Borisch Technologies, Grand 

Rapids, MI; Ascent AeroSystems, 

Wilmington, MA; ATA Engineering, Inc, 

San Diego, CA; ATI, Arlington, VA; AVL 

Mobility Technologies, Inc., Plymouth, 

MI; Banks Technologies, Azusa, CA; 

Beast Code, LLC., Fort Walton Beach, 

FL; Belding Tool and Machine, Belding, 

MI; Bevilacqua Research Corporation, 

Huntsville, AL; BlueSky Mast, Inc., 

Largo, FL; Bosch Rexroth Corporation, 

Bethlehem, PA; Buffalo Armory Group, 

LLC, Buffalo, NY; Cambium 

Biomaterials, Mojave, CA; Canis 

Automotive Labs Inc, Highlands Ranch, 

CO; Canoo Technologies Inc., Torrance, 

CA; Clear Align, Eagleville, PA; 

Compound Eye Inc., Redwood City, CA; 

Computer Access Technologies, LLC, 

Colorado Springs, CO; CoVar, McLean, 

VA; Cryptic Vector, Liberty Township, 

OH; CTC Enterprise Ventures 

Corporation, Johnstown, PA; Cubic 

Defense Applications Inc., San Diego, 

Ca; Cummings Aerospace, Inc., 

Huntsville, AL; Curtiss Wright 901D, 

Monsey, NY; Curtiss-Wright 

(Teletronics Technology Corp), 

Newtown, PA; CVX Instruments, LLC, 

Charlevoix, MI; D–2 Incorporated, 

Bourne, MA; D’Angelo Technologies, 

LLC, Dayton, OH; Detroit Manufacturing 

Systems, LLC., Detroit, MI; Diversified 

Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA; 

Doodle Labs, LLC, Marina Del Rey, CA; 

DTCUBED, LLC, Sewell, NJ; Duality 

Robotics, Inc., San Mateo, CA; Dynetics, 

Inc., Huntsville, AL; Easy Aerial, 

Brooklyn, NY; ELC Industries, d.b.a. 

Aurora Defense Group, Aurora, IL; 

Emelody Worldwide Inc., Peachtree 

Corners, GA; esc Aerospace US, Inc., 

Orlando, FL; Florida Institute for 

Human & Machine Cognition, 

Pensacola, FL; FN America, LLC, 

MCLEAN, VA; Galley Power Inc, 

Hudson, MA; GE Aviation Systems, 

LLC, Grand Rapids, MI; General 

Technical Services, LLC, Wall 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
7172 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 12 / Tuesday, January 21, 2025 / Notices 

Township, NJ; HDT Expeditionary 

Systems, Inc., Operating through its 

BLADE division, Fredericksburg, VA; 

Highland Engineering, Inc, Howell, MI; 

HII Unmanned Systems, Inc., Pocasset, 

MA; Hoverfly Technologies Inc., 

Sanford, FL; HPTechAi, LLC, College 

Station, TX; IDV USA Inc., York, PA; 

Infrared (IR) Telemetrics, Inc., Hancock, 

MI; Kodiak Robotics, Inc., Mountain 

View, CA; Kord Technologies, LLC, 

Huntsville, AL; Latent AI, Skillman, NJ; 

Lawrence Technological University, 

Southfield, MI; Leonardo DRS AISR, 

Beavercreek, OH; Massie MFG., Inc., 

Baraga, MI; MAXISIQ, Lorton, VA; 

Menet Aero, Oak Creek, WI; Miltope 

Corporation, Hope Hull, AL; MOORE 

INTEGRITY ENGINEERING, LLC, SAN 

ANTONIO, TX; NOBLES WORLDWIDE, 

INC., St. Croix Falls, WI; Numerica 

Corporation, Fort Collins, CO; Oasis 

Advanced Engineering, Inc., Lake Orion, 

MI; Oceanit Laboratories, Inc., 

Honolulu, HI; Overland AI Inc, Seattle, 

WA; Palomar Display Products, Inc, 

Carlsbad, CA; Pilot Systems 

International, LLC, Farmington Hills, 

MI; Polymath Robotics, San Francisco, 

CA; Primordial Labs Inc., New Haven, 

CT; Raglan, Wilmington, NC; Raytheon 

BBN Technologies Corp, Cambridge, 

MA; Raytheon Technologies 

Corporation (RTRC), EAST HARTFORD, 

CT; Sabel Systems Technology 

Solutions, LLC, Beavercreek, OH; Safire 

Technology Group, Tysons, VA; SAPA 

Transmission, Shelby Township, MI; 

SECO USA, Inc., Rockville, MD; 

SecureCo, Inc., New York, NY; SeeByte 

Inc., San Diego, CA; Sentry View 

Systems, Inc, Melbourne, FL; Shift5, 

Inc., Rosslyn, VA; Skydex Technologies 

Inc, Centennial, CO; Smart Shooter Inc, 

Herndon, VA; Sparton Aydin, LLC, dba 

Aydin Displays, Birdsboro, PA; Swan 

Technology Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA; 

Swarmbotics AI, Scottsdale, AZ; 

Systems Innovation Engineering, LLC, 

Mullica Hill, NJ; T2S, LLC, Belcamp, 

MD; TeleSwivel, LLC, Durham, NC; 

TeraDAR, Inc., Cambridge, MA; 

ThayerMahan, Groton, CT; The 

MathWorks, Inc., Novi, MI; TrellisWare 

Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA; 

TTTech North America, Inc., Andover, 

MA; Tucson Embedded Systems, Inc. 

(TES-i), Tucson, AZ; Ultra Electronics 

Advanced Tactical Systems, Inc., 

Austin, TX; Unmanned Systems Inc, 

dba Albers Aerospace, McKinney, TX; 

Vertex Modernization and Sustainment, 

a V2X Company, Indianapolis, IN; 

Vision Products, LLC, Campbell, CA; 

Wegmann USA, Inc., Lynchburg, VA; 

Wichita State University, Wichita, KS; 

Wright Electric Inc., Malta, NY, have 

been added as parties to this venture. 

Also, ADI Technologies Inc., 

Chantilly, VA; All Foam Products Co, 

Middlefield, OH; Allied Defense, 

Sarasota, FL; Amerex Corporation, 

Trussville, AL; American Engineering 

Group, LLC, Akron, OH; Andromeda 

Systems Inc DUPLICATE, Jacksonville, 

FL; Applied Systems Engineering Inc. 

dba ASEI, Niceville, FL; Atlas Business 

Consulting, Inc., Southlake, TX; Bell 

Hellicopter Textron Inc., Hurst, TX; 

Citadel Defense Co, National City, CA; 

CITE Armored, Holly Springs, MS; 

CLogic Defense, Augusta, NJ; Compass 

Instruments, Inc., Sugar Grove, IL; 

Cornerstone Research Group, 

Miamisburg, OH; Cummins Corporate 

Research and Technology, Shoreview, 

MN; Czero Inc, Fort Collins, CO; DiSTI 

Corporation, Orlando, FL; Doodle Labs, 

LLC, Marina Del Rey, CA; Dynatrac 

Products Co., Inc., Huntington Beach, 

CA; Dynetics, Inc., Huntsville, AL; ELC 

Industries, d.b.a. Aurora Defense Group, 

Aurora, IL; Emelody Worldwide Inc., 

Peachtree Corners, GA; EngeniusMicro, 

Huntsville, AL; Enginuity Power 

Systems, Alexandria, VA; EnQuanta, 

Minneapolis, MN; Epirus Inc, 

Hawthorne, CA; esc Aerospace US, Inc., 

Orlando, FL; Essex Industries Inc, St. 

Louis, MO; Exyn Technologies, 

Philadelphia, PA; FSI Defense, Fort 

Worth, TX; GC Associates USA, LLC, 

Arlington, VA; General Kinetics, LLC, 

Bedford, NH; GK Mechanical Systems, 

LLC, Brookfield, CT; GRIMM, Stafford, 

VA; GuardKnox Cyber Technologies 

USA, Inc., Livonia, MI; Hawk 

Technologies, LLC, Hancock, MI; HIPPO 

POWER, LLC, dbaHIPPO 

MULTIPOWER, Kansas City, KS; 

HPTechAi, LLC, College Station, TX; 

Hupp and Associates Inc., dba Hupp 

Aerospace Defense, New Haven, IN; 

Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc. 

(IMMI), Westfield, IN; IR Technologies 

(Impact Resources, Inc.), Bristow, VA; 

J.F. Taylor, Inc., Great Mills, MD; 

Leadtank Incorporated, dba RobosoftAI, 

Thousand Oaks, CA; Leonardo DRS 

AISR, Beavercreek, OH; Loch Harbour 

Group, Alexandria, VA; Logistic 

Services International, Inc., 

Jacksonville, FL; Mainstream 

Engineering Corporation, Rockledge, FL; 

Martin Technologies, New Hudson, MI; 

Menet Aero, Oak Creek, WI; Metawave 

Corporation, Carlsbad, CA; MIT Lincoln 

Laboratory, Lexington, MA; NOBLES 

WORLDWIDE, INC., St. Croix Falls, WI; 

Northrop Grumman Systems 

Corporation (Defense Systems), 

Huntsville, AL; NTL Industries Inc., 

Sterling Heights, MI; NVIDIA 

Corporation, Durham, NC; PacStar 

(Pacific Star Communications Inc), 

Portland, OR; Parts Life Inc, 

Moorestown, NJ; Pendar Technologies, 

LLC, Cambridge, MA; PPG Industries, 

Inc., Allison Park, PA; RE2, LLC, a 

wholly owned subsidiary of Sarcos, 

Pittsburgh, PA; ReLogic Research Inc., 

Huntsville, AL; Rocky Mountain 

Scientific Laboratory, Littleton, CO; 

Safe, Inc., Tempe, AZ; Smart Shooter 

Inc, Herndon, VA; Spark Insights, LLC, 

Tampa, FL; Squarehead Technology, 

LLC, Herndon, VA; Swift Engineering 

Inc., San Clemente, CA; Systel Inc., 

Sugar Land, TX; Telefactor Robotics, 

West Conshohocken, PA; The Armored 

Group, LLC, Phoenix, AZ; Ultra 

Advanced Tactical Systems, Austin, TX; 

Unmanned Systems Inc, dba Albers 

Aerospace, McKinney, TX; UVisionUSA Corporation, Purcellville, VA; 

VISIMO, Coraopolis, PA; VTN 

Manufacturing Inc., Fremont, CA; 

Wulco, Inc dba Jet Machine, Cincinnati, 

OH, have withdrawn as parties to this 

venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and NAMC 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On October 15, 2009, NAMC filed its 

original notification pursuant to section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on November 30, 2009 (74 FR 

62599). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on October 11, 2023. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on December 21, 2023 (88 FR 

88411). 

Suzanne Morris, 

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement 

Operations, Antitrust Division. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01249 Filed 1–17–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[Docket No. DEA–1476] 

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances Application: Groff Health, 

Inc. 

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of application. 

SUMMARY: Groff Health, Inc. has applied 

to be registered as a bulk manufacturer 

of basic class(es) of controlled 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1