alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JERRY THOMAS McCREARY )

)

V. ) 3-06-CV-192-P

)

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 5 day of September 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00192-P Document 15 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 versus

WILLIAM C. PETTIS, a/k/a Bobby,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief

District Judge. (CR-02-41)

Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter R. Roane, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. John L.

Brownlee, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United

States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William C. Pettis pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute

and possess with intent to distribute more than fifty grams of

cocaine base (Count 1) and possession of a firearm in furtherance

of a drug trafficking crime (Count 8). He was sentenced to 262

months on the drug conviction and to sixty months consecutively on

the gun charge. On appeal, Pettis alleges that his guilty plea was

involuntary because the district court did not inform him that his

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000) conviction carried a mandatory minimum

sentence of five years. Thus, he argues, he would not have pled

guilty but for this error. He also alleges the district court

erred by denying his attorney’s motion to withdraw, and denying his

newly obtained counsel additional time to prepare. For the reasons

that follow, we affirm.

Relying on United States v. Goins, 51 F.3d 400 (4th Cir.

1995), Pettis alleges that he was not informed of the five-year

mandatory minimum for his § 924(c) conviction. To the extent the

district court failed to specifically inform Pettis of this fact at

his plea hearing, the record otherwise reveals that Pettis was

aware of the mandatory minimum sentence prior to pleading guilty.

Accordingly, this claim fails.

Next, we note that an indigent defendant has no right to

a particular attorney and can demand new counsel only for good

cause. United States v. Gallop, 838 F.2d 105, 108 (4th Cir. 1988).
- 3 -

A defendant does not have an absolute right to substitution of

counsel. United States v. Mullen, 32 F.3d 891, 895 (4th Cir. 1994).

We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by

denying Pettis’ motion to substitute his trial counsel prior to

sentencing. Gallop, 838 F.2d at 108. Likewise, we do not find the

court abused its discretion by implicitly denying Pettis’ motion for

a continuance. United States v. Lorick, 753 F.2d 1295, 1297 (4th

Cir. 1985). 

Accordingly, we affirm Pettis’ convictions and sentences.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jose HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3832

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 18, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

MEMORANDUM

DATE: February 28, 2024

TO: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 

Managing Director

FROM: Acting Inspector General

SUBJECT: Performance Audit of Universal Service Fund, Rural Healthcare, 

Telecommunications Program at New River Valley Community Service for FY 

2019 and FY 2020 (Report No. 23-AUD-02-01)

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is

providing the final audit report for the performance audit of New River Valley Community 

Service (CS) (Healthcare Provider No. 34285) pursuant to Title 47 of the Unites States Code of 

Federal Regulations (47 C.F.R), Section 54.631(a). 47 C.F.R. § 54.631(a) states all participants 

under the Telecommunications Program shall be subject to random audits to ensure compliance 

with program rules and orders. We performed this audit consistent with the OIG’s authority 

under the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, including but not limited to sections 2(1),

4(a)(1) and 5.

The objective of this audit was to determine whether New River Valley CS complied with

47 C.F.R. §54.601- §54.607 and §54.619-§54.633 for funding year (FY) 2019 and FY 2020. 

Additionally, we evaluated compliance with FCC rules and orders for rural healthcare providers 

relevant to our audit objective. Specifically, we determined compliance with:

• eligibility of site and entity requirements,

• competitive bidding requirements,

• eligibility of service and equipment,

• rate calculations,

• requests for funding, and

• invoicing.

FCC OIG found that New River Valley CS complied with the RHC Program rules. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report, please contact Robyn 

Williams, Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at (202) 418-7890 or 

robyn.williams@fcc.gov; or Sophila Jones, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at (202) 418-

1655 or sophila.jones@fcc.gov.

Attachment: Final Audit Report (Report No. 23-AUD-02-01, Performance Audit of the 

Universal Service Fund, Rural Healthcare, Telecommunications Program at New 
River Valley Community Services for FY 2019 and FY 2020)

cc: Chief Financial Officer

 Chief of Staff, Office of Managing Director
Lauren Bauer ▪ Krista Ruffini ▪ Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach 

The Effect of Pandemic EBT 

on Measures of Food Hardship

Lauren Bauer

Fellow in Economic Studies | The Hamilton Project | The Brookings Institution

LBAUER@brookings.edu | www.hamiltonproject.org | www.brookings.edu 
Food Hardship in the US 2020 -22
Food Hardship, Pandemic EBT Evaluation Period 
Pandemic EBT

•Grocery vouchers for $ value of school meals lost due to 

school closures (≈ $6/day).

•Issued through EBT cards:

•SNAP recipients: P-EBT automatically loaded to SNAP 

cards.

•SNAP non-recipients: Often had to apply →

disbursement delays.

•Each state had to develop implementation plan, apply, 

disburse benefits authorized period.
Pandemic EBT Rollout, April 2020 - Present
Pandemic EBT Rollout, 2020 -21 School Year
Pandemic EBT Rollout

P-EBT first 

disbursement date(s) to 

SNAP households, oneor two-week window

SNAP Emergency 

Allotment 

disbursements

Food insecurity; 

Sometimes or often 

not sufficient food; 

Children 

sometimes or often 

not enough to eat

Age

Race/ethnicity

Educational attainment

Marital status

Employment status

Number of children

***

Weekly IUR by state

State linear trend

State fixed effects

Week fixed effects
Effect of Pandemic EBT on Food Hardship
Effect of Pandemic EBT on Food Hardship
Effect of Pandemic EBT on Food Hardship
Effect of Pandemic EBT on Non -SNAP Households

Go to:

HAMILTONPROJ ECT.ORG

for all the Pandemic EBT / nutrition assistance resources!

Lauren Bauer

Fellow in Economic Studies | The Hamilton Project | The Brookings Institution

LBAUER@brookings.edu | www.hamiltonproject.org | www.brookings.edu
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 25 PageID 360
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 25 PageID 361
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 3 of 25 PageID 362
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 4 of 25 PageID 363
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 5 of 25 PageID 364
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 6 of 25 PageID 365
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 7 of 25 PageID 366
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 8 of 25 PageID 367
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 9 of 25 PageID 368
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 10 of 25 PageID 369
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 11 of 25 PageID 370
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 12 of 25 PageID 371
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 13 of 25 PageID 372
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 14 of 25 PageID 373
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 15 of 25 PageID 374
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 16 of 25 PageID 375
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 17 of 25 PageID 376
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 18 of 25 PageID 377
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 19 of 25 PageID 378
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 20 of 25 PageID 379
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 21 of 25 PageID 380
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 22 of 25 PageID 381
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 23 of 25 PageID 382
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 24 of 25 PageID 383
Case 3:05-cr-00332-G Document 77 Filed 05/18/06 Page 25 of 25 PageID 384
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navidec  Financial  Service,  Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R. McKowen, Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 14, 2008



By:      /s/ John R. McKowen
         ----------------------------------
         John R. McKowen
         Chief Executive Officer, principal accounting officer
Case 4:16-cv-07340-DMR   Document 5   Filed 12/28/16   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:16-cv-07340-DMR   Document 5   Filed 12/28/16   Page 2 of 2
Latwain MCLAREN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2019

Latwain McLaren, Live Oak, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

*922The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the January 30, 2018 order denying Petitioner's pro se motion for postconviction relief, filed in Case No. 2015-CF-406, Fifth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Marion County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, WALLIS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Roosevelt D. JONES

NO. 2018-K-1993

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.
NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 235

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

TANYA GARCIA

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 107 th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Be navides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant, T a nya Garcia , by and through h er attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss

h er appeal because s he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be enterta ined, and our2

mandate will issue forthwith.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

, Justice

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

17th day of May, 2018

.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements      included in the Report. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    | PACIFIC      COAST NATIONAL BANCORP |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                |
|                                    |                                |
| Date:      November 14, 2008            | By:                                 | /s/  Michael S.    Hahn |
|                                    |                                | Michael      S. Hahn |
|                                    |                                | President      & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    |                                |   |
|                                    |                                |   |
| Date:  November      14, 2008 | By:                                 | /s/  Terry  Stalk |
|                                    |                                | Terry      Stalk |
|                                    |                                | Chief      Financial Officer |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BOBBY WAYNE LINSCOME, 1127000, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:06-CV-222-L

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division )

Respondent. )

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

A Notice of Appeal has been filed in the above captioned action in which: 

(X) the District Court has entered a final order in a habeas corpus proceeding brought pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. 

( ) the District Court has entered a final order in a proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the undersigned

Magistrate Judge recommends as follows:

IFP STATUS:

(X) the party appealing should be GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

( ) the party appealing is proceeding in forma pauperis.

( ) the party appealing should be DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis

for the following reason(s):

( ) the Court recommends that the District Court certify, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)

and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that the appeal is not taken in good faith;

( ) the person appealing is not a pauper because he has paid the appellate filing fee;

( ) the person appealing has not complied with the requirements of Rule 24 of the Federal

Rules of Appellate Procedure and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) as ordered by the Court.

(See Notice of Deficiency and Order entered on ).

COA:

( ) a Certificate of Appealability should be GRANTED. (See issues set forth below).

(X) a Certificate of Appealability should be DENIED. (See reasons stated below).

REASONS FOR DENIAL: For the reasons stated in the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, filed on March 21, 2007, which were adopted by the District Court on April 27, 2007, the

Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 1602, 146 L. Ed .2d 542 (2000). 

SIGNED this 30th day of May, 2007.

_____________________________________

PAUL D. STICKNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00222-L Document 16 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 151
Shawn Jose RUALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4024

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BOBBY RAY HAILEY, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:06-CV-0167-H

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court. 

Petitioner’s Objections to the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, filed on

April 24, 2008, are hereby OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 5 day of May, 2008. th
Our efforts enable families in distress to 

keep their homes or avoid foreclosure.

more than

1.6M

loan workouts

since 2009

approx.

1.3M

home

retention

solutions

more than

365,000

foreclosure

alternatives

SDQ loans are those on which homeowners 

are 90+ days past due in making mortgage 

payments or that are in the foreclosure process. 

The share of single-family loans we hold or 

guarantee that are seriously delinquent (SDQ) 

has declined 17 consecutive quarters. 

(Substantially lower than

private market levels)

1Q

’10

1Q

’11

1Q

’12

1Q

’13

1Q

’14

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

5.47%

SDQ RATE

2.05%

as of 3/31/10

as of 6/30/14

2Q

’14

mortgage

refinancings

12.8

million

home

purchases

4.1 $4.2 Trillion million

rental units

2.3

million

This financing has enabled:

in liquidity to the mortgage market

Since 2009,

we have provided more than:

The country invested

$116.1 billion

in Fannie Mae 

from 2009 to 2012

Fannie Mae expects 

to have paid Treasury 

approximately

$130.5 billion

in dividends as 

of Sept. 30, 2014

FANNIE MAE

Dividends do not offset prior draws.

STRONG PROFITABLE+$

“NEW” BOOK

Loans acquired since 2009, with 

stronger standards, make up a 

growing share of our overall book.

“LEGACY” BOOK

Loans acquired 

pre-2009

SINGLE-FAMILY

BOOK OF BUSINESS

21%

79%

Since Fannie Mae entered 

conservatorship, we have helped to 

stabilize America’s housing market 

and made significant progress in 

supporting the recovery and helping 

to build a sustainable housing finance 

system for the future. We are helping 

homeowners in distress and enabling 

families to buy, refinance, or rent a 

home.

Since 2009, we’ve improved our 

performance and we’re making a difference in people’s lives.

Fannie Mae is making progress.

For more information, see our 2014 Second Quarter Form 10-Q,

filed with the SEC on August 7, 2014.

Data as of or through June 30, 2014, unless otherwise indicated.

Published August 7, 2014.

We enable families to buy, refinance, or rent a home.

We’re strengthening our book of business

and changing the industry.

We work with lenders 

to offer access to affordable 

mortgage credit.

Our second quarter results 

were strong.

We help homeowners 

who are facing hardship.

Our profits go back to

the American people.

$3.7 BILLION 

Comprehensive 

Net income income

$3.7 BILLION 

In Q2 2014 

we reported:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James W. Rogers, as Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to the § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 
|                                               |     |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name: James W. Rogers                         |     |
| Title:*Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer* | * * |
| Date: May 16, 2005                       |     |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 19, 2006



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs IIChief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 14 Filed 06/30/04 Page 1 of 5 PageID 107
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 14 Filed 06/30/04 Page 2 of 5 PageID 108
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 14 Filed 06/30/04 Page 3 of 5 PageID 109
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 14 Filed 06/30/04 Page 4 of 5 PageID 110
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 14 Filed 06/30/04 Page 5 of 5 PageID 111