alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 4 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 4

   Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of not 
                         more than 9 justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2021

  Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Young, Mr. 
 Romney, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Toomey, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Portman, 
 Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Braun) introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of not 
                         more than 9 justices.

Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 
composed of not more than 9 justices.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

Michael J. Astrue has been appointed as the new Commissioner of Social Security,

effective February 12, 2007, and is therefore substituted as Defendant in this matter for Jo

Anne B. Barnhart, per FED. R. CIV. P. 25(d)(1).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

BETTY BEAVER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE1

, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-007-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER

 THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed July 30,

2007 (Doc. 15). No written objections have been filed. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and

Recommendation are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause

is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C.

§ 405(g).

Upon remand the ALJ should determine whether Plaintiff’s past work as companion was at

the level of substantial gainful activity and should determine whether Plaintiff retained the RFC to
2

return to her past relevant work or the ability to perform other work which exists in significant

numbers in the national economy.

Dated August 15, 2007.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
**Exhibit31.1**

**SOUTHERNHERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.FORM 10-QQuarter ended March 31, 2007**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J. Lee Stewart, certify that:

1)             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern HeritageBancshares, Inc.

2)             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period bythis quarterly report;

3)             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thequarterly report;

4)             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

a)             designed such disclosure controlsand procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2007 (the “EvaluationDate”);

c)             presented in this quarterly reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and

d)            disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

5)             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming equivalent function):

a)             all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| /s/ J. Lee Stewart |   |
|--------------------|--------|
| J. Lee Stewart     |   |
| President          |   |
| May 15, 2007       |   |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00783]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Meeting of the Regional Energy Resource Council

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The TVA Regional Energy Resource Council (RERC) will hold a 
meeting on January 31, 2025, to receive an update on the draft 2025 
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The IRP provides strategic direction on 
how TVA will continue to provide low-cost, reliable, resilient, and 
increasingly cleaner electricity to the 10 million residents of the 
Valley region.

DATES: The meeting will be held virtually, on Friday, January 31, 2025, 
from 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. ET. To view the webinar, the public must 
register for the webinar. The registration link and instructions to 
view the meeting will be posted on TVA's RERC website at www.tva.com/rerc. A one-hour public listening session for the public to present 
comments virtually will be held January 31, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. ET. 
Persons who wish to speak during the public listening session must pre-
register by 5 p.m. ET Wednesday, January 29, 2025, by emailing 
[email protected]. Persons who are pre-registered to provide comments 
virtually will be called on during the public listening session to 
share their views for up to five minutes, depending on number of 
registrants. Written comments are also invited and may be emailed to 
[email protected]. Anyone needing special accommodations should email 
[email protected] at least one week in advance.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be fully virtual, and the meeting link will 
be provided at www.tva.com/rerc prior to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bekim Haliti, [email protected] or 931-
349-1894.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RERC was established to advise TVA on 
its energy resource activities and the priorities among competing 
objectives and values. Notice of this meeting is given under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10.
    The meeting agenda includes the following:

January 31

1. Welcome and Introductions
2. IRP Process Update
3. Recap of Draft IRP Public Comment Period
4. IRP Sensitivities
5. Forming the IRP Recommendations
6. Public Listening Session

    Dated: January 10, 2025.
Melanie Farrell,
Vice President, Valley Engagement and Strategy, Tennessee Valley 
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2025-00783 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dennis Gallien v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-22-00398-CR

Trial court case number: 1541083

Trial court: 339th District Court of Harris County

Counsel for appellant has filed a motion to transfer volume 5 of the reporter’s record filed 

in 01-19-00882-CR to this case. Both case number 01-19-00882-CR and this case share the same 

parties and arise from the same trial court case. We held this motion for a response but none was 

filed.

We grant the motion and direct the Clerk of this Court to transfer a copy of Volume 5 

of the reporter’s record in case number 01-19-00882-CR to this case.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Richard Hightower______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___October 6, 2022____
#### Max Alexander SOFFAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 98-20385.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 2001.

James Howard Schropp (argued), Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, DC, C. Henry Kollenberg, Crain, Catón & James, Houston, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Christina Thompson (argued), Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Gary-L. Johnson, and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
ESTATE OF C.J. WILSON, deceased, Daphne Wilson, and Desiree Payne v. William David BARNES and Steven Allen Barnes

2160655

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018 Reh. denied February 16, 2018

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Madison Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 25, 2014 “Chet Idziszek”Chet IdziszekPresident and Chief Executive Officer


---
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President 

on March 13, 2020. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emer4 gencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency de5 clared by the finding of the President on March 13, 2020, 

6 in Proclamation 9994 (85 Fed. Reg. 15337) is hereby ter7 minated. 

Passed the Senate March 3, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the 

President on March 13, 2020.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Valley High Mining Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, John Michael Coombs, CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: May 4, 2006                   /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                          -------------------------------
                                          John Michael Coombs,
                                          CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of
                                          the Board
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KENNETH WAYNE JENKINS, )

ID # 812507, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-1662-P

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 18 day of December 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01662-P Document 9 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 45
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

RICARDO GOMEZ,

Petitioner,

VS.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 4:04-CV-0876-G

)

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

)

) 4:97-CR-011-G

)

ORDER

After reviewing the objections to the findings, conclusions and

recommendation (“Findings”) of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting

a de novo review of those parts of the Findings to which objections have been made, I

am of the opinion that the Findings of the magistrate judge are correct and they are

hereby accepted as the Findings of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that those Findings, are ADOPTED as the findings

and conclusions of the court.

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00876-G Document 1 Filed 04/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1
- 2 -

SO ORDERED.

April 19, 2005.

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00876-G Document 1 Filed 04/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.0

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania (the "Registrant") hereby certify that
the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                    /s/  Thomas A. Vento
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Thomas A. Vento
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 14, 2006


                                    /s/  Joseph R. Corrato
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Joseph R. Corrato
                                    Title: Executive Vice President and Chief
                                      Financial Officer


Date:  August 14, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania
and will be retained by Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         141,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,016,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                    775,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,040,225
<PP&E>                                      20,279,068
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,090,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,162,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,063,898
<BONDS>                                      6,669,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,386
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,197,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,162,691
<SALES>                                     11,321,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,321,693
<CGS>                                        5,956,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,956,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,012,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                280,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                   110,485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   169,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .023
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .023
        

</TABLE>
PONTCHARTRAIN NATURAL GAS SYSTEM, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

NO. 2019-CC-0529

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Stay recalled. Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant and remand for evidentiary hearing.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and remand for evidentiary hearing.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and remand for evidentiary hearing.
II 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 57 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to include 

maple syrup under the seniors farmers’ market nutrition program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. 

KING, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to include maple syrup under the seniors farmers’ market nutrition program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Agricultural 

5 Products Locally Essential Act’’ or the ‘‘MAPLE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 57 IS

1 SEC. 2. MAPLE SYRUP UNDER THE SENIORS FARMERS’ 

2 MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM. 

3 Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural 

4 Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended 

5 by inserting ‘‘maple syrup,’’ before ‘‘and herbs’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2016222EN.01002801.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/28

---

Action brought on 22 April 2016 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER DUO)

(Case T-182/16)

(2016/C 222/35)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Guinot SAS (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MASTER DUO’ — Application for registration No 11 577 574

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 in Case R 2916/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Talmadge Ray SHANEYFELT v. STATE

CR-16-0887

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.