alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 79 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Mr. BOST submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Af4 fairs (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $12,136,370 for the One Hundred Nine9 teenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 79 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $5,985,270 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2025, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $6,151,100 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2026, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Judy E. Naus, certify that:


1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Biotel Inc.;


2
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely, to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.


|Date:   November 10, 2006 | By: | /s/   Judy E. Naus     
|------------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                          |     | Chief Financial Officer





---
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, George Christopulos, CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: November 4, 2008 /s/ George P. Christopulos George P. Christopulos, CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of the Board    1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 1211)    

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1218 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1024, K2025-1023.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00059 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
STATE of Louisiana v. Rashard NEAL

NO. 2017-KO-1028

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit32**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the quarterly  report of Ecotality, Inc. (the “Company”) onamendment number 1 to Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Jonathan R. Read                                   |   |        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|      Jonathan  R. Read        |   |
|      Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|      August  10, 2007         |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/ Barry S. Baer                                      |   |   |
|      Barry  S. Baer           |   |
|      Chief  Financial Officer |   |
|      August  10, 2007         |   |
|                                                        |        |        |  |

 

----
Peter Thomas BYRA, DOC #948219, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1297

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Peter Byra pleaded no contest to felony battery and was sentenced to a thirty-six-month term of probation. He appeals the trial court's revocation order and the resulting sentence of three years' imprisonment. We write only to address a duplicative judgment entered by the trial court. After careful review, we remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the March 12, 2018, duplicative judgment of *208guilt, which improperly adjudicated Byra guilty a second time for the underlying felony battery conviction. We affirm the revocation order and resulting sentence without comment.

"If probation or community control is revoked, the court shall adjudge the probationer or offender guilty of the offense charged and proven or admitted, *unless he or she has previously been adjudged guilty*...." § 948.06(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2017) (emphasis added). Here, on April 6, 2016, the trial court entered a written judgment adjudicating Byra guilty of the underlying offense, felony battery. The probation office subsequently filed an affidavit of violation of probation, alleging that Byra violated particular terms of his probation. After a hearing, the trial court revoked Byra's probation and sentenced him to thirty-six months' incarceration.

Byra's sentence after revocation was memorialized in a written judgment and sentence rendered on March 12, 2018. The first page of this six-page order contains a duplicative judgment of guilt for the same underlying felony battery offense for which the court had previously adjudicated Byra guilty on April 6, 2016. This duplicative judgment of guilt for the underlying felony battery offense was unauthorized. *See* *Butler v. State*, 195 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Duplicative adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous, are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings."). Thus, we remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the March 12, 2018, unauthorized judgment of guilt for the underlying felony battery conviction because the trial court had already adjudicated him guilty of the underlying offense on April 6, 2016. *See* *Schaufler v. State*, 255 So.3d 929, 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; *West v. State*, 232 So.3d 522, 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). We affirm the revocation order and the corresponding sentence.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# C_2021072EN.01000901.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/9

---

Appeal brought on 2 July 2020 by Peter Sabo, Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK, Hasso Krull, 2 Celsius, Bernard Auric, Tony Lowes, Kent Roberson, Hiite Maja SA, Association de lutte contre toutes formes de Nuisance et de Pollutions sur les communes de Meyreuil et Gardanne (ALNP Meyreuil — Gardanne), Friends of the Irish Environment CLG against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 6 May 2020 in Case T-141/19, Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case C-297/20 P)

(2021/C 72/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Peter Sabo, Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK, Hasso Krull, 2 Celsius, Bernard Auric, Tony Lowes, Kent Roberson, Hiite Maja SA, Association de lutte contre toutes formes de Nuisance et de Pollutions sur les communes de Meyreuil et Gardanne (ALNP Meyreuil — Gardanne), Friends of the Irish Environment CLG (represented by: R. Smith and C. Day, Solicitors, by P. Lockley and B. Mitchell, Barristers and by D. Wolfe QC)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

By order of 14 January 2021, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) decided that the appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.

---
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of China Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Julianna Lu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: 
                August 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ 
                *Julianna Lu*Julianna
                LuChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer
Zackia S. KING-ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Carl A. ANDERSON, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-448

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60753

MAXXAM, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, 

Department of the Treasury,

Respondent-Appellee.

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board

(88-1535-P)

 December 10, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and STEWART Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In its appeal from the refusal of the Federal Home Loan Bank

Board (FHLBB) to grant a petition for review, Petitioner-Appellant

MAXXAM, Inc. asks us to (1) reverse, (2) grant its petition, and

(3) declare it to be the successful bidder, retroactively to 1988,
2

for acquisition of United Savings Association of Texas (USAT).

MAXXAM asserts this bold proposition of unfathomable ramifications

—— characterized, with only the slightest hyperbole, as

“preposterous” by counsel for USAT at oral argument before this

court —— almost eight years after MAXXAM was advised in writing

that its effort to acquire USAT had fallen short of the mark and

that Hyperion Partners had been the successful bidder. Despite

urging in its written and oral arguments to this court that the

letter in question, which admittedly did not transmit a copy of the

“order” and which admittedly was not “served” as required, was not

sufficient actual knowledge to start the applicable 30-day clock

running, MAXXAM nevertheless cannot satisfy (or at least has not

satisfied) us that its filing of the instant action was not

woefully untimely or that the timing of such filing —— shortly

after the commencement of legal action by the government against

MAXXAM’s principal owner and executive —— was not too much of a

coincidence to be a coincidence. Indeed, the water that has passed

under the bridge since MAXXAM’s bid was spurned in favor of

Hyperion has been a veritable torrent, sweeping seven years of

irreversible change so far downstream that this Humpty Dumpty

cannot be put together again. Statutes have been repealed;

agencies have ceased to exist; and assets formerly held by the

target of MAXXAM’s and Hyperion’s acquisition efforts have been

divested and even made illegal. 
3

Our careful consideration of the record in this case, of the

helpful and elucidative briefs of counsel, and of the most able

oral arguments made to this court, convinces us beyond peradventure

that the reversal and relief sought by MAXXAM in this appeal are

unavailable and that the FHLBB committed no reversible error in

denying MAXXAM’s petition for review. The order appealed from is,

therefore, affirmed in all respects. 

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:05-cv-01437-M Document 25 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 113
Case 3:05-cv-01437-M Document 25 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 114
IIA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 7 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Addressing the Homework Gap Through the ERate Program’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2025 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. MORAN, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. BUDD, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. CURTIS, 

Mr. SHEEHY, Mrs. CAPITO, and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Communications Commission relating to 

‘‘Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate 

Program’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Addressing 

5 the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program’’ (89 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 7 IS 

1 Fed. Reg. 67303 (August 20, 2024)), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DAVID L. KINDRED, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1839-N

v. §

§

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the

Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED March 22, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01839-N Document 29 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 96
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


        As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of our reports included in the 
Company's previously filed S-1 Registration Statement File No. 333-27143, S-4 
Registration Statements File No. 333-29435 and 333-53415, S-8 Registration 
Statements File No. 333-48831, 333-48833 and 333-61461.


                                                       /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 26, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.8


                         AMENDMENT TO WARRANT AGREEMENT

                           CLASS A REDEEMABLE WARRANT

                       MEDICAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC.

     WHEREAS, a Warrant Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of November 1,
1996 was entered into between Medical Resources Management, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), and certain parties as listed in Schedule A to
the Agreement, hereinafter collectively called "Holders";

     WHEREAS, in connection with a private placement of 515,540 units (the
"Units") during the period from November 1, 1996 through April 29, 1997, the
Company issued Units to each of the Holders, each Unit consisting of (i) one
share of the Company's common stock, $.001 par value (the "Common Stock"), (ii)
one Class A common stock purchase warrant (the "Class A Warrant") and (iii) one
Class B common stock purchase warrant (the "Class B Warrant");

     WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Agreement, the
right to exercise each Class A Warrant is scheduled to expire on November 1,
1999;

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to extend the expiration date of the Class A
Warrants for a period of an additional two (2) years, until November 1, 2001;

     WHEREAS, on May 11, 1999 the Company's Board of Directors voted to
extend the expiration date of the Class A Warrants until November 1, 2001;

     NOW, THEREFORE, Section 2.(A) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:

               EACH WARRANT SHALL ENTITLE THE HOLDER OF THE CERTIFICATE
          REPRESENTING SUCH WARRANT TO PURCHASE UPON THE EXERCISE THEREOF ONE
          SHARE OF COMMON STOCK, SUBJECT TO THE ADJUSTMENTS PROVIDED IN SECTION
          5 HEREOF, AT ANY TIME UNTIL 5:00 P.M., PACIFIC TIME, ON NOVEMBER 1,
          2001, UNLESS EARLIER REDEEMED PURSUANT TO SECTION 6 HEREOF.



<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this amendment to the
Agreement to be duly executed, effective as of September 26, 1999.

(CORPORATE SEAL)


                                            MEDICAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC.

                                            By:
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   Allen Bonnifield, President

ATTEST:

-------------------------------
Michael Fewer, Secretary