alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Bernard J. Jacob, Chief Executive Officer of Pruco Life
Insurance Company of New Jersey (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 24, 2006



/s/ Bernard J. JacobName:

Bernard J. JacobTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
American International Holdings Corp. 10-Q



Exhibit 32.1





Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





The undersigned, Daniel Dror, Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Chairman of American International Holdings Corp., formerly Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas
corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly
Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015.





The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly
report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of American International Holdings Corp. and results of its operations.



|Date: | August 19, 2015                                  | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|      |                                                  | 
|By:   | /s/ Daniel Dror                                  | 
|      | Daniel Dror                                      | 
|      | Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JEROME BELL, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-0109-D

VS. §

 §

LISA DEBLANC, § 

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and

conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted. This case is dismissed without prejudice under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) by judgment filed today.

SO ORDERED.

April 12, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00109-D Document 6 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 22
Louise Unita ALEXANDER v. George Clarence KING

2160992

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
PRECON CORPORATION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4844

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 2018

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Granted.
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent
to the incorporation by reference to the Registration Statements of L-3
Communications Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-59281,
333-64389, 333-78317, 333-64300 and 333-103752) and on Form S-3 (File
Nos. 333-75558, 333-84826 and 333-99693) of our report dated January
27, 2004 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the three years ended
December 31, 2003, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York March 3,
2004

---
**EXHIBIT
      32**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:March
                5, 2007
            
            /s/
                Colin HendrickColin
                HendrickPresident
                andChief
                Executive Officer





Date:March
                5, 2007
            
            /s/
                Jay NeedlemanJay
                NeedlemanChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. Troy HAWK

No. 2018-KH-0069

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy Churchey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 6, 2011





/s/ Randy ChurcheyRandy ChurcheyChief Executive Officer





In accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Paul O. Bower, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Education Realty Trust, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Dated this *13*th day of November, 2006.         /s/ Paul O. Bower   Paul O. Bower   Chief Executive Officer
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Dror, Chairman of
International American Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30,
2005.

The undersigned certifies that the above annual
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the above annual report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc. and results
of its operations.

Date: October 12, 2006
Daniel Dror
CEO and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HONORABLE ELAINE L. CHAO §

SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT §

OF LABOR §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-338-Y

VS. §

 §

ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION §

FINAL JUDGMENT

It appearing to the Court that, pursuant to a consent decree

and order of the Court on June 13, 2007, the following has occurred:

(1) Defendant, Allied Pilots Association (“APA”), under the

supervision of Plaintiff, Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, United States

Department of Labor (“Chao”), held a national officer election and

a run-off election that concluded on June 20, 2007.

(2) Chao has filed a “Certification of Election” certifying

the names of the candidates who were duly elected to their respective

offices. Therein, Chao certifies that APA’s national officer election

was conducted in accordance with the provisions of Title IV of the

Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (29, U.S.C.

§ 481 et seq.) (“LMRDA”), and, insofar as lawful and practicable,

in conformity with the constitution and bylaws of the APA;

(3) Chao has also filed the declaration of Cynthia M. Downing,

Chief of the Division of Enforcement, Office of Labor-Management

Standards, United States Department of Labor. Downing states that

an investigation into protests received during APA’s national officer

election found no violations of the LMRDA, and where there had been

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 76 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1318
2

potential violations, those violations had been remedied.

The Court, having considered Chao’s motion for entry of judgment,

is of the opinion that said motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the persons

named in the Certification of Election filed by Chao in support of

her motion for an entry of judgment are duly elected to their

respective offices, and shall serve until the next regularly scheduled

election of officers of APA;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this case be,

and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party bearing its

own costs in this matter, including attorney’s fees. 

 SIGNED September 12, 2007.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 76 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1319
NUMBER 13-15-00051-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MICHAEL HAVEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 10, 2015. On September 3, 2015, this 

Court granted by order appellant’s third motion for extension of time and directed 

appellant to file the brief on or before October 13, 2015. The order notified counsel that 

no further extensions would be granted absent exigent circumstances. On October 23, 
2

2015, counsel filed a motion for leave to file the brief requesting an extension until October 

28, 2015. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file an appellate brief in this matter. 

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email 

address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing 

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
3

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

4

th day of November, 2015.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23






                        Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Group Maintenance America Corp.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-41749, No. 333-41751, No. 333-58651, No. 333-60537 and No. 333-69421) on
Form S-8 and in the registration statements (No. 333-63923 and No. 333-69533) on
Form S-4 of Group Maintenance America Corp. of (i) our report dated February 23,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Group Maintenance America
Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related 
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for 
the year ended December 31, 1998, the ten months ended December 31, 1997 and 
the year ended February 28, 1997, and (ii) our report dated July 11, 1997 
relating to the balance sheets of Group Maintenance America Corp. as of 
December 31, 1996 and April 30, 1997, and the related statements of operations, 
shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the periods then ended, which 
reports appear in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Group 
Maintenance America Corp.

                                                   KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas
March 30, 1999
Anthony GUGLIELMINI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4032

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of L-3Communications Holdings, Inc. (‘‘L-3Holdings’’) and L-3 Communications Corporation(‘‘L-3 Communciations’’; together with L-3Holdings referred to as ‘‘L-3’’) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December  31,  2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), each of Frank C. Lanza, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of L-3 Holdings and L-3 Communications, andMichael T. Strianese, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof L-3 Holdings and L-3 Communications, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                            |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of L-3. |

|                                      |  |                                                   |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| /s/Frank C. Lanza                    |  | /s/ Michael T.Strianese                           |
| Frank C. Lanza                       |  | Michael T.Strianese                               |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| March 9, 2006                        |  | March 9,2006                                      |
|                                      |

----
Order – Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1328-L

§

MEGAFUND CORPORATION, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

This is a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for

alleged violations of the federal securities laws. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the

court in implementation thereof, on February 27, 2006, this action was referred to United States

Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan for pretrial management. On June 2, 2008, the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 412) (the “Report”) were filed,

recommending that the court approve the proposed distribution plan set forth in Receiver’s Final

Report and Proposed Distribution Plan (Megafund Corporation Receivership Estate) (doc. 389)

(“Receiver’s Final Report”) and grant the fee application set forth in Receiver’s Final Application

to Allow and Pay (1) Receiver’s Fees and Expenses; (2) Attorneys Fees and Expenses; and (3)

Accountants Fees and Expenses (Megafund Corporation/CIG, Ltd. Receivership Estate) (doc 390).

No objections to the Report were filed.

The court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s finding and recommendation, record, and

applicable law, and finds that the magistrate judge’s findings are correct. They are therefore

accepted as those of the court. Accordingly, the court approves Receiver’s Final Report and
Order – Page 2 

Proposed Distribution Plan (Megafund Corporation Receivership Estate), attached with its exhibits

as an exhibit to this order and incorporated herein as if repeated verbatim, and grants the Receiver’s

final application for attorney’s fees and accounting fees as set forth in the Report. Accordingly, the

court orders that the Receiver may pay $44,964.00 in fees and $2,801.51 in expenses to the law firm

of Quilling Selander Cummiskey & Lownds, P.C. and $418.50 in fees to the accounting firm of

Litzler, Segner, Shaw & McKenney, LLP. The court also orders that the Receiver is authorized to

reserve $10,000.00 for legal fees, $7,500.00 for accounting fees, and $1,920.00 for storage costs

from funds available for further distribution for future costs. The court further orders that the

Receiver is authorized to make distributions to claimants in accordance with the schedule attached

as Exhibit “C” to the Receiver’s Final Report and to send a cover letter to each claimant in the form

attached as Exhibit “D” to the Receiver’s Final Report. 

It is so ordered this 24th day of June, 2008.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge