alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LINDY RAY MATTHEWS, #504717, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-1217-P

)

WARDEN L.E. FLEMING, et al., )

Defendants. )

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the District Court filed

on July 25, 2005, Plaintiff’s letter filed on July 15, 2005, has been referred to the United States

Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation. The findings, conclusions and

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as evidenced by his signature thereto, are as follows:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

The above referenced letter requests that a copy of Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP), with certificate of inmate trust account, filed on June 14, 2005, in No.

3:05cv1217-P, be transferred to Plaintiff’s newly filed action in Cause No. 3:05cv1408-L. 

Plaintiff correctly notes that No. 3:05cv1217-P was dismissed on the basis of her motion to

withdraw on June 23, 2005.

Plaintiff’s request is no longer necessary. On July 15, 2005, contemporaneously with the

filing of the above referenced letter, Plaintiff’s new complaint with IFP motion were filed and

assigned Cause No. 3:05cv1408. Thereafter, on July 22, 2005, the undersigned granted

Plaintiff’s IFP motion and issued a questionnaire.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01217-P Document 6 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 39
RECOMMENDATION:

For the foregoing reasons, no further action is necessary in response to Plaintiff’s letter.

A copy of this recommendation will be mailed to Plaintiff

SIGNED this 9th day of August, 2005.

____________________________________

WM. F. SANDERSON, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

In the event that you wish to object to this recommendation, you are hereby notified that

you must file your written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of this

recommendation. Pursuant to Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir.

1996) (en banc), a party's failure to file written objections to these proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law within such ten-day period may bar a de novo determination by the district

judge of any finding of fact or conclusion of law and shall bar such party, except upon grounds

of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected to proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law accepted by the district court. 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01217-P Document 6 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 40
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID 142
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 7 PageID 143
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 7 PageID 144
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 7 PageID 145
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 5 of 7 PageID 146
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 6 of 7 PageID 147
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-14 Filed 08/04/06 Page 7 of 7 PageID 148
Kennedy Dwayne PASTURE v. STATE

CR-16-0288

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 975 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 

credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Mr. CARPER (for himself, Mr. BURR, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

and modify the credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing America’s 

5 Clean Fuels Infrastructure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL 

7 VEHICLE REFUELING PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (g) of section 30C of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 975 IS

1 ‘‘December 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2 2029’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

5 December 31, 2021. 

6 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT LIMITATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 30C of 

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘with respect to all’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘with respect to any single item of’’, 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘at a location’’, and 

12 (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$30,000 in 

13 the case of a property’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000 in 

14 the case of any such item of property’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

17 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Jordain Michael BRASSEAUX v. MONCLA MARINE OPERATIONS, LLC, et al.

NO. 2019-CC-0477

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. MARY

PER CURIAM

Granted. The district court did not err in finding there were genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court denying defendants' motion for summary judgment is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7257

LEE A. CLARKE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center; DOCTOR MARSH; WILLIAM FAULKENBERRY; AUGUSTA MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-1100-AM)

Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee A. Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lee A. Clarke, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)

complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000) and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s orders and find that this appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Clarke v. Saunders, No. CA-00-1100-AM (E.D. Va. filed July

13, 2000 and July 28, 2000; entered July 31, 2000). We deny the

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 3:05-cr-00124-M Document 274 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 949
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARVIN GAY PAGE, #684347, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-1617-P

) ECF

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas )

Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 13 day of March 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01617-P Document 13 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
Otis L. JACKSON, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Commission on Offender Review, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-2384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 14, 2019

Ottis L. Jackson, Bushnell, pro se.

Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Florida Commission on Offender Review.

Sheron Wells and Beverly Bartlett Brewster, of Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee, State of Florida Department of Corrections.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-93665), Form S-4 (Nos. 333-81201 and 333-93649)
and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-41749, 333-41751, 333-58651, 333-60537, 333-69421,
333-78311, 333-93649, 333-35330, 333-35334 and 333-35418) of Encompass Services
Corporation of our report dated February 12, 2000, except as to Note 13, which
is as of March 5, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Encompass
Services Corporation, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 13, 2002
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 1 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 1 Filed 09/07/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 1 Filed 09/07/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 1 Filed 09/07/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 1 Filed 09/07/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 1 Filed 09/07/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EMANUEL DELEON FIELDS §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-06-CV-0236-N

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SIGNED May 16, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00236-N Document 19 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 143
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: § 

§ Case No. 22-31641-mvl-7 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC., § 

§ (Chapter 7) 

 Debtor. § 

 § 

 § 

SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE; 

GNET ATC, LLC; MULTIBAND 

FIELD SERVICES, INC., 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING 

NO. 23-03036-mvl 

 Plaintiffs, § 

 § 

v. § 

 § 

JAMES FRINZI; FRINZI FAMILY 

TRUST; MULTIBAND GLOBAL 

RESOURCES, LLC, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Defendants. § 

 § 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 

LLP TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR MULTIBAND GLOBAL RESOURCES, LLC 

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed September 12, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 20 Filed 09/12/23 Entered 09/12/23 17:02:49 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

 UPON CONSIDERATION of McDermott Will & Emery LLP’s Unopposed Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel for Multiband Global Resources, LLC, it is hereby GRANTED as set forth 

herein; and it is hereby: 

 ORDERED that Marcus A. Helt, Debbie E. Green, and the law firm of McDermott Will & 

Emery LLP are permitted to withdraw from representation of Multiband Global Resources, LLC 

in the above-referenced adversary proceeding. 

###End of Order### 

Submitted by: 

/s/ Debbie E. Green 

Marcus A. Helt (Texas Bar No. 24052187) 

Debbie E. Green (Texas Bar No. 24059852) 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

2501 North Harwood Street, Suite 1900 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Tel: 469.715.4979 

Fax: 972.692.7700 

mhelt@mwe.com 

dgreen@mwe.com

Defendant Multiband Global Resources, LLC 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 20 Filed 09/12/23 Entered 09/12/23 17:02:49 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 10, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-16054

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 09-00025-CR-HL-5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARY HUTCHESON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(August 10, 2010)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hutcheson appeals his total sentence of 60-months’ imprisonment,
imposed above the applicable guideline range of 41-51 months, following his

guilty plea to 5 counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2, and 5

counts of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(I) and 2.

The convictions arose out of a scheme where Hutcheson and a codefendant

claimed to be placing investors’ money into a hedge fund when actually they

converted much of the money for their own personal use.

On appeal, Hutcheson argues that his total sentence was procedurally

unreasonable because the district court failed to give an adequate explanation for

the upward variance. He also submits that his total sentence was substantively

unreasonable because the sentence was greater than necessary to comply with the

purposes of § 3553(a)(2), and the court did not properly consider the § 3553(a)

factors. In addition, he argues that the restitution order of $1,618,000 should have

been reduced by $576,000 in legitimate trading losses.

We find no reversible error. At the sentencing hearing the district court

explicitly stated that it considered the § 3553(a) factors, and adequately explained

why a sentence above the top of the applicable guideline range was necessary to

accomplish the goals of the statute. Therefore, the sentence was procedurally

reasonable. Under the totality of the circumstances, Hutcheson’s sentence was

substantively reasonable because it was not greater than necessary to achieve the

2
purposes of § 3553(a), and the court considered the § 3553(a) factors. Pugh, 515

F.3d at 1191.

With reference to restitution, based on a review of the record, the district

court did not err in finding that the trading losses were a direct result of

Hutcheson’s criminal conduct in the course of the entire scheme to defraud

investors. Accordingly, the court properly determined that the trading losses,

totaling $576,000, should be included in the restitution.

AFFIRMED.

3
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-16,678-06
EX P ARTE ERIK THOR TROVE, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D-1-D C-04-904129- A IN THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . C ri m . App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of reta liation and sentenc ed to twenty-five year s’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Trove v. State , No. 03 -0 4-00578-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 14, 2007) (not designated for publication). Applicant conte nds that trial and appe llate counse l were ineffe ctive. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2 d 1 1 4 , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstance s, additional fac ts2

are neede d. As we held in E x part e Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. Applicant appea

rs to be repr esente d by counsel. I f he is not and the trial court elec ts to hold
a hearing, it shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent him at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court s h all make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial and appellate counsel’s conduct wa s deficie nt and Applicant wa s prejudice d. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropriate to the dispositi on of Applica

nt’s claims for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental t ra n s cript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the transc ription of the court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order
. Any extensions of time must be reque sted by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.

Filed: Marc h 20, 2019 Do not publish
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      David
      Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By*:/s/
      David Zaikin*


David
      Zaikin


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





August
      14, 2007
Jesse Lee RAY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah L. Veilleux, Deceased, Appellant, v. FOWLER WHITE BOGGS, P.A., John A. Krentzman, and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
1-800-CRUISES, Inc.
ABC Corporate Services, Inc.
AHI International Corporation
AutoEurope, LLC
AutoNet International, Inc.
Cruise Mart, Inc.
Cruise Masters, Inc.
Cruise Outlets of the Carolinas, Inc.
Cruise Time, Inc.
CruiseOne, Inc.
Cruises, Inc.
Cruises Only, LLC
CruiseWorld, Inc.
D-FW Tours, Inc., d/b/a D-FW Travel Arrangements
Diplomat Tours, Inc., d/b/a International Airline Consolidators
Gold Coast Travel Agency Corporation, Inc., d/b/a Gold Coast Cruise Center
Goodfellow Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a The Travel Company
Jubilee Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a The Travel Dept.
Lexington Services Corporation (formerly Lexington Services, Inc.)
Lexington Services Associates, Ltd.
Lexington Services Limited, Inc.
Landry & Kling, Inc.
Lifestyle Vacation Incentives, Inc.
Ship 'N' Shore Cruises, Inc.
SNS Coachline, Inc.
SNS Travel Marketing, Inc.
The Anthony Dean Corporation, d/b/a Cruise Fairs of America
The Cruise Line, Inc.
Travel 800, LLC d/b/a 1-800-FLY CHEAP
Trax Software, Inc.
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID 105
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID 106
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID 107
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID 108
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID 109
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID 110
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 21 Filed 07/14/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID 111
Case 3:05-cv-02019-D Document 2 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 28
Case 3:05-cv-02019-D Document 2 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 29
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

**(18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350) **

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                |                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                     | /s/                Gregory B. Jones   |
|   | Gregory                B. Jones                     |
|   | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |

|   |                                   |                                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                        | /s/                Nathaniel F. Hughes   |
|   | Nathaniel                F. Hughes     |
|   | President                and Treasurer |

----
William DIAMOND-SLOBODIAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FORECLOSED ASSETS SALES AND TRANSFER PARTNERSHIP, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 03, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.