alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 6044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01208]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 570]

Delegation of Authority--Authorities of the Under Secretary for 
Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs

ACTION: Delegation of Authority.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State Department is publishing a Delegation of Authority 
signed by the Secretary of State on January 10, 2025.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State, 
signed the following ``Delegation of Authority--Authorities of the 
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs'' on January 
10, 2025. The State Department maintains the original document.
    (Begin text.)
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including section 1(a)(4) of the State 
Department Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a(a)(4)), I hereby 
delegate to Scott Weinhold, to the extent authorized by law, all 
authorities vested in or delegated to the Under Secretary for Public 
Diplomacy and Public Affairs by any act, order, determination, 
delegation of authority, regulation, or executive order, now or 
hereafter issued.
    The Secretary, either Deputy Secretary, and the Under Secretary for 
Management may exercise any function or authority delegated herein. 
This delegation of authority does not modify any other delegation of 
authority currently in effect.
    This delegation will take effect on January 17, 2025, and will 
expire, unless sooner revoked, upon the entry upon duty of a confirmed 
or designated Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs 
or Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and shall 
be published in the Federal Register.
    (End text.)

Zachary A. Parker,
Director, Office of Organizational Policy, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2025-01208 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIE LINDLEY, JR.,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division, 

ET AL.,

Respondents.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-1054-G

)

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

After reviewing the petitioner’s objections to the findings and recommendation

(“Findings”) of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of

those parts of the Findings to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion

that the Findings of the magistrate judge are correct and they are hereby accepted as

the Findings of the court. 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01054-G Document 8 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
- 2 -

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings are ADOPTED as the findings and

conclusions of the court.

July 19, 2005.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01054-G Document 8 Filed 07/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 88

Supporting the designation of January 31, 2025, as ``Earned Income Tax 
                        Credit Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2025

  Ms. Sewell (for herself, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Boyle 
of Pennsylvania, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Horsford, and Mr. Suozzi) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of January 31, 2025, as ``Earned Income Tax 
                        Credit Awareness Day''.

Whereas the earned income tax credit is a refundable Federal tax credit 
        available to low- and moderate-income working families and individuals;
Whereas the earned income tax credit strengthens the rewards of work;
Whereas the earned income tax credit has lifted approximately 8,000,000 people 
        out of poverty per year from 2017 to 2021;
Whereas the earned income tax credit provides substantial economic benefit to 
        local economies; and
Whereas an estimated 20 percent of eligible workers do not claim the earned 
        income tax credit: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Earned Income Tax Credit 
        Awareness Day''; and
            (2) calls on Federal, State, and local agencies, community 
        organizations, nonprofit organizations, employers, and other 
        partners to help increase awareness about certain tax credits 
        to ensure that all eligible workers have access to the full 
        range of tax credit benefits available to them, including--
                    (A) the earned income tax credit;
                    (B) other refundable tax credits not described in 
                subparagraph (A); and
                    (C) free tax filing assistance.
                                 <all>
```
Lucrecia A. BALBOA BUIKA and Maria Concepcion Balboa Buika, Appellants, v. ALL PARTS MOVE MANAGEMENT LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1074

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Valley High Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, John Michael Coombs, CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:October 30, 2007By:/s/John Michael CoombsJohn Michael CoombsCEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of the Board
Jesus E. TACORONTE a/k/a Jesus Tacoronte, Appellant, v. CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AMC1, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee; Jesus E. Tacoronte a/k/a Jesus Tacoronte, Trustee Under the Trust Agreement Dated the 25 Day of September 2012 Known as Trust Number 12726a; Panther Trace Homeowners' Association, Inc. ; Unknown Tenant in Possession 1; and Unknown Tenant in Possession 2, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-4597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 8, 2007/s/ Thomas R. VenablesThomas R. VenablesChief Executive Officer
Alek L. NEWPORT, DC #493638, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1921

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Carlton Xavier MATHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-860

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 29, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:05-cv-01232-M Document 14 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 93
Orenthal James GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-2

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
L.F., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph BING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018

Joseph Bing, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Joseph Bing appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. Although the postconviction court erred by denying Bing's motion based on his failure to satisfy rule 3.853(b)(4), we nevertheless affirm because Bing's motion failed to satisfy rule 3.853(b)(2)'s requirements. We therefore affirm without prejudice to Bing for any right he may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion.

While Bing's allegations were inartfully presented, we conclude that they were facially sufficient to satisfy the requirements set forth in rule 3.853(b)(4). Rule 3.853(b)(4) states that a motion for DNA testing must include "a statement that identification of the movant is a genuinely disputed issue in the case and why it *193is an issue *or* an explanation of how the DNA evidence would either exonerate the defendant or mitigate the sentence that the movant received." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(4) (emphasis added); *see also* *Gonzalez v. State*, 41 So.3d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ("[ Rule 3.853(b)(4) ] is written in the alternative: the movant must allege that identification is a genuinely disputed issue *or* he must explain how the DNA evidence would exonerate him."). Bing's allegations were facially sufficient to satisfy rule 3.853(b)(4) because Bing averred that he was linked to the crime only by the victim's identification of him as the perpetrator. *See* *Zollman v. State*, 820 So.2d 1059, 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("[I]dentity is a 'genuinely disputed' issue when the only significant evidence connecting the defendant to the crime is the victim's identification of the defendant."). Alternatively, Bing's allegations were facially sufficient to satisfy rule 3.853(b)(4) because Bing asserted that DNA testing would demonstrate that another particular person was the actual perpetrator, thus exonerating him.

Although we hold that Bing's motion was facially sufficient under rule 3.853(b)(4), Bing failed to include any allegations that would satisfy rule 3.853(b)(2)'s requirement that he provide

> a statement that the evidence was not previously tested for DNA, or a statement that the results of previous DNA testing were inconclusive and that subsequent scientific developments in DNA testing techniques likely would produce a definitive result establishing that the movant is not the person who committed the crime.

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(2).

Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to any right Bing may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. Any such motion should not be considered successive. *See* *Harvey v. State*, 925 So.2d 1111, 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; *Lemay v. State*, 921 So.2d 853, 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7125

DERRICK E. KIRTMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHAPLAIN HELBIG; SIA STIVERS; WARDEN CRUZ; ASSISTANT 

HOSPITAL A WHITEHURST; ASSISTANT WARDEN LANDFORD,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SIA LIEUTENANT DUMBAR; CASE MANAGER MCCELLAN; HOSPITAL 

ADMINISTRATOR, Jane Doe - 1; ASSISTANT WARDEN JOHN DOE 2; 

REGISTER NURSE K. CALUAGO; REGISTER NURSE JANE DOE 3; 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE 4; COUNSELOR PARKER; 

COUNSELOR COATES; UNIT MANAGER HORTON; WARDEN TEWER; MD 

JESUS FERNANDEZ; MD ROSS QUINN; PA HERNANDEZ; PA BRISITTE 

WOLVERTON; E. TOPETE; WARDEN JOHN DOE 5,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr., District Judge. (4:16-cv-02839-AMQ)

Submitted: March 11, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick E. Kirtman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Derrick E. Kirtman appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to Chaplain Helbig, Special 

Investigative Agent Stivers, Warden Cruz, Assistant Hospital Assistant Whitehurst, and 

Assistant Warden Landford (“the Defendants”). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Kirtman v. Helbig, No. 4:16-cv-02839-AMQ (D.S.C. July 27, 2018). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE:

HIGHLAND SELECT EQUITY 

MASTER FUND GP, L.P.

 §

 §

 §

 §

Case No. 23-31039-mvl-7

 

DEBTOR

 §

 §

 §

 

 

Chapter 7

 

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF ASSETS 

AND REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF STATUS

The above titled and numbered proceeding was originally noticed as a no-asset case;

no chapter 7 claims bar date has been established. I hereby request that the status of this 

case be changed to an asset case. Please establish a chapter 7 bar date and notify creditors to file a 

Proof of Claim. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Scott M. Seidel

Scott M. Seidel, Esq.

State Bar No. 17999450

6505 W. Park Blvd, Ste. 306

Plano, Texas 75093

Telephone: 214-234-2500

scott@scottseidel.com

CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 37 Filed 08/18/23 Entered 08/18/23 16:30:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
XsunX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date himself (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.     The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.     The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:     December 29, 2011



|/s/  Joe Grimes                                         
|--------------------------------------------------------
|Name: Joe Grimes                                        
|Titles: President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jump'n Jax, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the year ending June 30, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Steven D. Moulton,
principal  accounting  officer  of the  Company,  certifies  to the  best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   STEVEN D. MOULTON
---------------------------------------
Steven D. Moulton
Principal Accounting Officer
August 15, 2005


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40422 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CRAIG T. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-108-1

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Craig T. Williams on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Williams has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and the brief discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.No. 03-40422 -2- MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01701]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consortium for Rare Earth Technologies

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 11, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consortium for Rare Earth 
Technologies (``CREaTe'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Specifically, Alaska Range Resources, LLC, Palmer, AK; and Orojo 
Resources USA, LLC, Cleveland, GA, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open and CREaTe intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 22, 2022, CREaTe filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 18, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82629).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-01701 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Darrow B. PAYNE v. STATE

CR-16-1235

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR RFMI 2005S7 v. Walter C. DUMAS

NO. 2019-CC-0620

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Reginald POWELL v. STATE

CR-16-0370

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017 Reh. denied November 9, 2017

Affirmed.