alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                               AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO
                                      IXIA
                             1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN

         Section 3 of the Ixia 1997 Stock Option Plan is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows:

         "3. SHARES RESERVED.

                  The maximum aggregate number of Shares reserved for issuance
         pursuant to the Plan shall be 23,500,000 Shares or the number of shares
         of stock to which such Shares shall be adjusted as provided in Section
         12 of the Plan. Such number of Shares may be set aside out of
         authorized but unissued Shares not reserved for any other purpose, or
         out of issued Shares acquired for and held in the treasury of the
         Company from time to time.

                  Shares subject to, but not sold or issued under, any Option
         terminating, expiring or canceled for any reason prior to its exercise
         in full shall again become available for Options thereafter granted
         under the Plan and the same shall not be deemed an increase in the
         number of Shares reserved for issuance under the Plan."

Dated:  March 18, 2003
Kenneth Takvis LIZZAMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Affirmed.
STEVENS CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN, L.L.C. v. ST. TAMMANY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1

No. 2019-CD-0712

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 2019

*ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY*

Writ granted.

WEIMER, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would deny the writ as premature.

WEIMER, J., dissenting.

Out of respect for the court of appeal's authority and prerogative to manage its own docket and because relator neither sought nor requested the relief afforded by the majority, I would deny the writ application as premature. While this court has general supervisory jurisdiction over all other courts and can intervene under its own supervisory powers whether or not an intermediate court has properly acted on the matter, out of proper deference to the lower courts, the court will exercise this jurisdiction only in extraordinary circumstances, which this case does not present. *See*, **Marionneaux v. Hines** , 05-1191, pp. 4-5 (La. 5/12/05), 902 So.2d 373, 376.
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Highland Select Equity Master Fund, L.P. Case No.: 23−31037−swe7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Hayley R. Winograd, to

represent Highland Capital Management, L.P., related to document 34, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed July 20, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-31037-swe7 Doc 36 Filed 07/21/23 Entered 07/21/23 07:44:23 Desc

Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01359]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Information 
Collection Request

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury will submit the following 
information collection requests to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the date of publication of this 
notice. The public is invited to submit comments on these requests.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before February 20, 2025 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submissions may be 
obtained from Melody Braswell by emailing [email protected], calling 
(202) 622-1035, or viewing the entire information collection request at 
www.reginfo.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    Title: IRS Governmental Liaison (GL) Data Exchange Request.
    OMB Number: 1545-NEW.
    Form Number: Form 15426.
    Abstract: Form 15426 is an initial intake form used to establish a 
collaboration between internal IRS business units and external 
stakeholders before the commencement of any agreement of tax return and 
tax return information to be exchanged. The respondents are Federal, 
State, and local agencies that are voluntarily initiating a request for 
data from the IRS.
    Current Actions: There is a new information collection.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Affected Public: Federal, State, and local agencies.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 15.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15.
    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Melody Braswell,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2025-01359 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Flag Intermediate Holdings Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenço Gonçalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2007 |  | /S/ C. LOURENÇO GONÇALVES                                  
|                      |  | C. Lourenço Gonçalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TOMMY ALLEN KROLL,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1080

Opinion filed June 9, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Randall J. Etheridge, Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on 

January 28, 2016, in Escambia County Circuit Court case number 2001-CF-002663-A, 

is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the 

clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. If petitioner qualifies for 

the appointment of counsel at public expense, the lower tribunal is directed to appoint 

counsel to represent him in the belated appeal authorized by this opinion.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.0


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
         the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.



                                        By:/s/ Carolyn M. Mroz
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Carolyn M. Mroz
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           February 14, 2005




                                        By:/s/ Edmund T. Leonard
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Edmund T. Leonard
                                           Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                              Financial Officer
                                           February 14, 2005
# C_2022024EN.01003101.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — VF International v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)

(Case T-518/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC - Earlier non-registered mark GEOGRAPHIC - Relative ground for refusal - Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance - Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 24/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland) (represented by: T. van Innis and A. Van der Planken, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: National Geographic Society (Washington, District of Columbia, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, and C. de Haas, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 May 2020 (Case R 1664/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between VF International and National Geographic Society.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders VF International Sagl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders VF International Sagl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Rudy FRANCIS

No. 2019-K-0227

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIOARI TO FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted in part. Defendant was found guilty of manslaughter in response to the charge of second degree murder. The district court sentenced him to 25 years imprisonment at hard labor without observing the 24-hour sentencing delay required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 873. The district court erred. Defendant did not waive the delay, and the error in failing to observe the delay is not harmless because defendant challenged his sentence. *See**State v. Augustine* , 555 So.2d 1331 (La. 1990). Accordingly, we grant the application in part, vacate the sentence, and remand to the *290district court for resentencing. Defendant's application is otherwise denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

VS. ) CASE NO.: 3:05-CR-254-H (01)

)

JOSHUA ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed

within ten days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning

the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court

accepts the plea of guilty and Plea Agreement and Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. 

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SIGNED this 26 day of January, 2006. th

___________________________________

BAREFOOT SANDERS, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00254-M Document 29 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 65
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of ECOtality, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan R. Read,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Jonathan R. ReadJonathan
      R. ReadChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      16, 2010/s/
      Barry S. BaerBarry
      S. BaerChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      16, 2010
GIBRALTOR REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC, Trustee of the BFA Florida Land Trust #28 Dated January 1, 2017, Appellant, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB; Dennis Castigione; and Chapel Trail Owners Association, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 4D18-1831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Encompass Services Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-41749, No. 333-41751, No. 333-58651, No. 333-60537, No. 333-69421,
No. 333-78311, No. 333-93649, No. 333-35330, No. 333-35334 and No. 333-35418)
on Form S-8, the registration statements (No. 333-81201 and No. 333-93649) on
Form S-4,and the registration statement (No. 333-93665) on Form S-3 of
Encompass Services Corporation of our report dated February 20, 2001, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Encompass Services Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity and other comprehensive income and cash
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of Encompass Services Corporation.


                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

                                              KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 26, 2001
R.W. v. CALHOUN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160701

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ntchrg (rev. 02/21)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Matthew Guy Landgraf

Debtor(s)

 Case No.: 19−41155−elm7

 Chapter No.: 7

M. B. et al.

Plaintiff(s) Adversary No.: 23−04032−elm

 vs.

Matthew Guy Landgraf et al.

Defendant(s)

NOTICE SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

 A status conference via WebEx has been set in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for June 21, 2023 at 01:30 PM

before the Honorable Edward L. Morris at https://us−courts.webex.com/meet/morris to consider

Notice of removal re: Nature(s) of suit: 01 (Determination of removed claim or cause). 13 (Recovery of

money/property − 548 fraudulent transfer) (1)

For WebEx Telephonic Only Participation/Attendance:

Dial−In: 1.650.479.3207

Meeting ID: 473 581 124

DATED: May 24, 2023 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/Karyn Rueter, Deputy Clerk

Case 23-04032-elm Doc 2 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 08:36:24 Desc Notice

setting hearing Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          43,978
<SECURITIES>                                     2,590
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (731)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,742
<PP&E>                                          62,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,045)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 432,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,030
<BONDS>                                        250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,913)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   432,386
<SALES>                                        132,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,683
<CGS>                                           90,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (27,825)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,240)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (294)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (239)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    35.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    35.22


</TABLE>
Ozell L. DESSETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3826

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2021452EN.01003002.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Boshab v Council

(Case T-107/20) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures - Right to private and family life - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Plea of illegality)

(2021/C 452/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Évariste Boshab (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/2109 of 9 December 2019 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2019 L 318, p. 134), and, second, Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/2101 of 9 December 2019 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2019 L 318, p. 1) in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 52 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 4373. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 22, 2022 

Mr. LEAHY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 4373. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of H.R. 4373, the 

3 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 title so as to read: ‘‘Making further continuing appropria5 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, and 

6 for other purposes.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS