alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Dated: | February 14, 2007 | By:/s/ Brian King
|------ | ----------------- | -----------------
|       |                   |                  
|       |                   |                  



---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 3:03-CR-361-B(1)

)

HECTOR HURTADO-AGUILAR, )

Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections

thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and

Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the defendant’s Motion for Reduction of

Sentence Persuant [sic] to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is DENIED. 

SIGNED this 18th day of August, 2020.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cr-00361-B Document 248 Filed 08/18/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1096
Travis Devon WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 20, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 29, 2019

Travis Devon Watkins, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EUGENE S. BEM, 05067474, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-2030-D

)

LUPE VALDEZ, DALLAS COUNTY )

SHERIFF, ) 

Respondent. )

ORDER

After conducting a de novo review, the court finds that the findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and

conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.

March 22, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02030-D Document 15 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 67
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                  WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
           OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
              AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

In connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund III
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company respectively, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
such officer's knowledge, that: (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                           -------------------------------------
                                           George S. Springsteen
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           April 11, 2005


                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kimberly A. Springsteen
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           April 11, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Torrey D. WALKER, DOC #Y11735, Appellant, v. Honorable Thomas S. REESE; Stephen Russell; and Anthony Kunasek, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

Torrey D. Walker, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Shelley Cridlin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellees Stephen Russel and Anthony Kunasek.

No appearance for remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00059-M-BH Document 45 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 373
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO OF ALLIED SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ William C. Whitmore, Jr.Name: William C. Whitmore, Jr.Title: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and ManagerDate: August 6, 2008/s/ William A. TorzoliniName: William A. TorzoliniTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 6, 2008
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 829 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the TRICARE program 

for certain members of the Retired Reserve of the reserve components. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the 

TRICARE program for certain members of the Retired 

Reserve of the reserve components. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Fairness 

5 for National Guard and Reserve Retirees Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRICARE FOR MEMBERS OF THE RETIRED RE7 SERVE. 

8 (a) ADJUSTMENT OF ELIGIBILITY.—Paragraph (2) 

9 of section 1074(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

10 amended to read as follows: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 829 IS

1 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a member or 

2 former member eligible for retired pay for non-regular 

3 service under chapter 1223 of this title who is under 60 

4 years of age unless such member or former member is in 

5 receipt of such pay (or would be in receipt of such pay 

6 but for section 5304 or 5305 of title 38).’’. 

7 (b) TRICARE RETIRED RESERVE.—Section 

8 1076e(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘who is quali10 fied for a non-regular retirement at age 60 under 

11 chapter 1223 of this title, but is not age 60,’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘described in paragraph (3)’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(3) A member of the Retired Reserve of a reserve 

16 component of the armed forces is described in this para17 graph if the member— 

18 ‘‘(A) is qualified for a non-regular retirement at 

19 age 60 under chapter 1223 of this title; 

20 ‘‘(B) is not age 60; and 

21 ‘‘(C) is not in receipt of retired pay under such 

22 chapter, unless the member is not in receipt of such 

23 retired pay due to the application of section 5304 or 

24 5305 of title 38.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 829 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect January 1, 2022. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, ascreated by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Natural Golf Corporation (the “Company”) and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company hereby certify that:

 

(1)                                  the accompanying AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended November 30,2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or another document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

 

 

Dated: February 27, 2004

 
|   | /s/ ANDREW S. WYANT                               |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Andrew S. Wyant                                   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  Natural Golf Corporation |
|   |                                              |
|   |                                              |
|   | /s/ RICHARD A. MAGID                              |   |
|   | Richard A. Magid                                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  Natural Golf Corporation |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60052 Summary Calendar GHULAM MUHAMMAD,

Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------------------------------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95 319 971

------------------------------------------------------ Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ghulam Muhamma d, a citizen of Pakistan, petitions this court for review of the Board of Im migration Appeal’s (BIA) decision affirming th e immigrat io n judge’s (IJ) order denying his request fo r withholding of removal. When, as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision, we review t he IJ’s decision. S ee Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 2 99, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). This court reviews the BIA’s fa ctual conclusi on that an alien is not eligible for withholding of removal under the substantial-2-

evidence test. C

hun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). Under this standard, “the al ien must show that the evidence was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude against it.” Id

. An IJ’s findings on credibility are accorded great deference. E fe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002). Muhammad argues th at th e BIA erred in denying him wit hholding of removal because he suffered persecution in Pakistan due to his membership in th e Alt af faction of the political party Muttahida Q u ami Movement. In denying withholding of removal, the IJ found that Muhammad’s testimo ny was not credi

ble, that conditions had changed significantly in Pakistan since the events surrounding Muhammad’s 1996 departure, and th at, if Muhammad felt th reatened, he could safely relocate to another part of Pakistan. In affirming t he IJ, the BIA noted that, even assuming arguendo th at Muhammad’s testimo ny regarding his claimed past persecution was credible, th e IJ “correctl y fo und that th e presumption th at the respondent’s life or freedom would be threatened in the future had been rebutted” under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(1)(i). Aft er reviewing the record, we conclude that th e evidence does not com pel a conclusion contrary to the BIA’s denial of wit hholding of removal. See Chun , 40 F.3d at 78. Accordingly, Muhammad’s petition for review is DENIED.
Rodger HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-0352

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 972 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 972

    To reauthorize the Essex National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2021

Mr. Markey (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reauthorize the Essex National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Reauthorization.--Section 507 of division II of the Omnibus 
Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 
Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4260; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314; 128 
Stat. 3801) is amended by striking ``2021'' and inserting ``2036''.
    (b) Repeal of Total Funding Limit.--Section 508(a) of division II 
of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 
320101 note; Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4260; 122 Stat. 824; 129 
Stat. 2551; 133 Stat. 778) is amended by striking the second sentence.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of CONEXUS CATTLECORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Price, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 8, 2015By:/s/ Steven PriceName:Steven PriceTitle:Director and Chief Executive Officer,
Jennifer PEREZ, Appellant, v. Paul Grant DWYER, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1931

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 20, 2019

Jennifer Perez, in proper person.

Filler Rodriguez, LLP, and Catherine M. Rodriguez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Perez (the mother) appeals from an order suspending her timesharing with the parties' child. We review the trial court's order for an abuse of discretion. *Ryan v. Ryan*, 257 So.3d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (noting: "The trial court's limitations on the Former Wife's visitation are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. The court has discretion to restrict or deny visitation to protect the welfare of the child") (citation omitted).

The record on appeal is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review, as Perez has failed to provide this court with a transcript of the hearing conducted by the trial court. Under these circumstances, and given that there are no errors on the face of the order on appeal, we are compelled to affirm. As the Florida Supreme Court held in *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) :

> In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.... When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues *1117so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal. The trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.

*See also**Bisnauth v. Leelum*, 233 So.3d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *Rodriguez v. Lorenzo*, 215 So.3d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *Hill v. Calderin*, 47 So.3d 852, 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Affirmed.
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 84 Filed 12/23/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1381
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 84 Filed 12/23/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 1382
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 84 Filed 12/23/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 1383
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 84 Filed 12/23/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 1384
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

FEBRUARY 11, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD33103

Re: RICHARD COFFMAN and CHARLOTTE

COFFMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs. COLUMBIA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).

1. Case No. SD33295

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs. EDWARD LARON BALL, Defendant-Appellant.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                         (UPDATED AS OF 2/28/99)


               SUBSIDIARIES OF SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Arab Drilling & Workover Company
Caspian Drilling Company Limited
Desert Rig Operations, Inc.
Fortress Energy Services LLC
Key International Drilling Company Limited
Logistics Forwarding Company, Inc.
Merak Petroleum Base
Nigerian Santa Fe Joint Venture
Offshore Drilling Services Company AS
Oilfield Services, Inc.
P.T. Santa Fe-Pomeroy Indonesia
P.T. Santa Fe Supraco Indonesia
Platform Capital N.V.
Platform Financial N.V.
Qatar Drilling Company (W.L.L.)
SAFEMAL Drilling Sdn. Bhd.
Santa Fe AG
Santa Fe Communications, Inc.
Santa Fe Construction Co.
Santa Fe Drilling (N.A.) N.V.
Santa Fe Drilling (Nigeria) Limited
Santa Fe Drilling Company (Canada) Limited
Santa Fe Drilling Company (North Sea) Limited
Santa Fe Drilling Company (Overseas) Limited
Santa Fe Drilling Company (U.K.) Limited
Santa Fe Drilling Operations, Inc.
Santa Fe Drilling Venezuela, C.A.
Santa Fe Finance Ireland
Santa Fe Holding Company (North Sea) Limited
Santa Fe International Services, Inc.
Santa Fe Nederland B.V.
Santa Fe Operations (Nigeria) Limited
Santa Fe Services Netherlands B.V.
Santa Fe Techserv (North Sea) Limited
Saudi Drilling Company Limited
Sphere Supply, Inc.
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 301 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID 7671
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 301 Filed 03/18/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID 7672
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 301 Filed 03/18/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID 7673
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 301 Filed 03/18/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID 7674
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 13350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Veri-Tek International, Corp. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/David J. Langevin
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.             
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/David H. Gransee 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.