alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Daryl J. Ehrmantraut, the Chief Executive Officer of Quantum
Solar Power Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    |                                      
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        | /s/
      Daryl J. Ehrmantraut       
| | Name:  | DARYL J. EHRMANTRAUT                 
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | February 9, 2011                     



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 315 

To waive certain provisions in the case of an emergency declaration under 

the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mrs. RADEWAGEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To waive certain provisions in the case of an emergency 

declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

and Emergency Assistance Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS. 

4 In the case of an emergency declared pursuant to sec5 tion 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

6 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191), the Admin7 istrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

8 shall not require the application of chapter 83 of title 41, 

9 United States Code, with respect to purchases made or 

10 contracts issued by Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 315 IH

1 American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands of the United 

2 States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 3:05-cv-00535-M Document 42 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 4 PageID 368
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00535-M Document 42 Filed 06/19/06 Page 2 of 4 PageID 369
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00535-M Document 42 Filed 06/19/06 Page 3 of 4 PageID 370
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00535-M Document 42 Filed 06/19/06 Page 4 of 4 PageID 371
Case 3:06-cv-00125-H Document 9 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 38
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 82 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Mr. COMER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform in the One Hundred 

Nineteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

4 Government Reform (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $32,864,613 for the One 

9 Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 82 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $15,907,947 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2025, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $16,956,666 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2026, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Valley High Mining Company (the "Company")
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John HickeyJohn
      HickeyChief
      Executive Officer and President(principal
      executive officer)Date:
      August 16, 2010/s/ John HickeyJohn
      HickeyChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer and principal accounting
  officer)





Date:
August 16, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Valley High Mining Company and will be retained by Valley High Mining Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SENECA LAMBRONE LEE, and CHRIST )

CHRISTIANITY PARTY, )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-01483-D

)

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF ) 

TRANSPORTATION, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After conducting de novo review, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are ADOPTED as the findings and

conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and this action

is DISMISSED for failure to pay the previously imposed monetary sanction. 

Signed August 23, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01483-D Document 9 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
STATE of Louisiana v. Kevias C. HICKS

NO. 2018-KO-1954

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.
Jose Valentin ORTEGA, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 6, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
---

Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Madison Minerals Inc. (the Company) for the year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 25, 2011 Chet IdziszekChet Idziszek
President and Chief Executive Officer


---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Fernando Sanchez, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:



1. the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively (the Form 10-KSB/A), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. the
information contained in the 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    Fernando Sanchez
|Fernando Sanchez       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|Date: April 12, 2004
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00412-CV

In re Raymond Carl Jones

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Filed: June 27, 2008
1The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2763

___________

David N. Hannah, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Dora B. Schriro, Director Missouri * Eastern District of Missouri.

Department of Corrections; James A. *

Gammon, Superintendent Moberly * [UNPUBLISHED]

Correctional Center; Teresa Thornburg, *

Assistant Superintendent, Moberly *

Correctional Center, *

*

Appellees.

___________

 Submitted: December 4, 2000

 Filed: December 8, 2000 

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate David Hannah appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C.
-2-

§ 1915A(b)(1) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see

Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we agree with the

district court that Hannah failed to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, see Wishon

v. Gammon, 978 F.2d 446, 450 (8th Cir. 1992) (requirements for equal protection

claim); Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch. Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir.

1998) (conclusory allegations insufficient to state claim under § 1983).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Dazhan KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2019054EN.01000201.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/2

---

Order of the Court of 28 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich — Poland) — Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności (PKO) Bank Polski S.A. v Jacek Michalski

(Case C-632/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 2008/48/EC - Order for payment procedure based on bank ledger excerpts - Impossible for the court, in the absence of an action brought by a consumer, to examine the unfairness of the contractual terms))

(2019/C 54/02)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności (PKO) Bank Polski S.A.

Defendant: Jacek Michalski

Operative part of the order

Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and Article 10 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which permits the issue of an order for payment, based on a bank ledger excerpt, as evidence of the existence of a debt arising from a consumer credit agreement, where the court dealing with an application for an order for payment does not have the power to examine whether the terms of that agreement are unfair and to ensure that, in that examination, the information referred to in Article 10 is made available, if the detailed rules for exercising the right to lodge an objection against such an order do not enable observance of the rights which the consumer derives from that directive to be ensured.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7271

TYRONE HURT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; UNKNOWN AGENT; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE D.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his Bivens complaint. * We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. United States

Marshal Serv. , No. 1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 24,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
-                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jump'n Jax, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the year ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Steven D. Moulton,
principal  accounting  officer  of the  Company,  certifies  to the  best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   STEVEN D. MOULTON
---------------------------------
Steven D. Moulton
Principal Accounting Officer
May 11, 2005


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00927]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1278 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1100, K2025-1099.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00927 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of KDSM, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Smith, Director and President,(principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ David D.  Smith            |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| David D. Smith                 |   |
| Director and President         |   |
| (principal  executive officer) |   |
| March 21,  2003                |   |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1757

___________

Ibrahim Traore, *

*

Petitioner, * Petition for Review of an

* Order of the Board of

v. * Immigration Appeals.

* 

John Ashcroft, Attorney General * [UNPUBLISHED]

of the United States, *

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: August 25, 2004

Filed: August 31, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ibrahim Traore petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of Traore’s

application for asylum and withholding of removal. After careful review of the

record, we conclude the BIA’s decision on Traore’s asylum application is supported

by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Menendez-Donis v. Ashcroft,

360 F.3d 915, 918-19 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Specifically, the IJ

discredited Traore’s testimony about past persecution he suffered because Traore

failed to raise political persecution in a previous asylum application and his

explanation for failing to do so was unconvincing, and he failed to present
-2-

documentary evidence to support his allegations. We defer to the IJ’s credibility

finding because it was supported by specific, cogent reasons for disbelief. See

Nyama v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 812, 817 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (deference

standard). In addition, we find because Traore failed to meet the burden of proof on

his asylum claim, he failed to meet the higher burden for withholding of removal. See

Francois v. INS, 283 F.3d 926, 932-33 (8th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, we deny Traore’s petition.

______________________________
Lamar J. FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3777

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2019

Lamar J. Floyd, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.