alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 13 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.13

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's Conciliation 
                              Procedures''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 
to ``Update of Commission's Conciliation Procedures'' (86 Fed. Reg. 
2974; published January 14, 2021), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-164

_____________________________

CAROL ANN CONTOS,

Appellant,

v.

PHILIP DAVID LYNN,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack Schemer, Judge.

December 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Carol Ann Contos, pro se, Appellant.
2

Philip David Lynn, pro se, Appellee.
Dennis PARMLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jennifer A. PARMLEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3567

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Tyler BIGHAMES, DOC #Y48245, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STEPHEN M. HUCKEBA, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1851-D

VS. §

 §

ALLSTATE INSURANCE, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

October 20, 2005 findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the

findings and conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted.

After the magistrate judge filed his findings and recommendation, plaintiff Stephen M.

Huckeba (“Huckeba”) filed on November 4, 2005 an application to proceed in forma pauperis and

a “writ of mandamus.” The application to proceed in forma pauperis appears to be unnecessary,

because the magistrate judge granted such leave by September 23, 2005 order. The court therefore

denies the motion as unnecessary at this time.

In Huckeba’s “writ of mandamus,” he seeks to amend his complaint to allege damages in

excess of the minimum jurisdictional amount. The court treats the “writ of mandamus” as an

amended complaint, filed as of right. Nevertheless, Huckeba still has not demonstrated that the

court has subject matter jurisdiction over his case. First, as the magistrate judge explains in his

findings and recommendation, the court lacks federal question jurisdiction. Second, the court lacks

diversity jurisdiction. Even if the amount in controversy now exceeds $75,000 (Huckeba says he

is raising the amount to $75,000, and refers to costs up to $75,000, but the court will assume that

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01851-D Document 13 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 64
- - 2

he is raising it above that amount), Allstate Insurance’s citizenship is still based on that of its

insured. Huckeba admitted in response to the magistrate judge’s questions that he and the insured

are both citizens of the state of Texas.

Accordingly, because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this suit is dismissed

without prejudice by judgment filed today.

SO ORDERED.

November 8, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01851-D Document 13 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 65
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0**  **9 -**  **8257**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,
v. BASHIRI ALAGBALA POWELL , Defendant

– Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 2 : 0 6

- c r - 0 0 0 1 3

- B O

- 1 ; 2:09

- cv - 00035

- BO )

Submitted : June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss e d by un published per cur iam opinion
. Bashiri Alagbala Powell , Appellant Pro Se
. An ne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bashiri Alagbala Powell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 20 1 0 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certific ate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reaso nable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief o n procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Powell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
1 Michael J. Astrue has been appointed as the new Commissioner of Social Security,

effective February 12, 2007, and is therefore substituted as Defendant in this matter for Jo Anne B.

Barnhart, per FED. R. CIV. P. 25(d)(1).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

MARIAN L. RICH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,1 )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 6:05-CV-066-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

March 13, 2007 (Doc. 21). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on

March 26, 2007 (Doc 22). The court has made a de novo determination of the Report and

Recommendation after consideration of Plaintiff’s objections, the submissions of the parties, and

the transcript of the administrative proceedings. 

The court finds the objections to be without merit. The court further finds that the ALJ

applied the correct legal standards and that substantial evidence supports his decision. The court

also finds that the Report and Recommendation applied the correct legal standards.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the

court.

 

 Case 6:05-cv-00066-C Document 23 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 103
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

Dated March 28, 2007.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 6:05-cv-00066-C Document 23 Filed 03/28/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 104
Blas GARCIA-MANRIQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-43

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                       ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

WHEREAS the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Santa Fe
International Corporation ("Board") having been expressly authorized by the
Board, has effective November 22, 1999, authorized and approved an amendment of
the definition of "Change of Control" contained within the Santa Fe
International Corporation Annual Incentive Compensation Plan ("Plan") to address
a "merger of equals" transaction; and

WHEREAS, Section 10.7 of the Plan authorizes the Board in this instance to amend
the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Santa Fe International Corporation Annual Incentive Plan,
which was adopted June 28, 1995 and effective July 1, 1994, and which was
restated in its entirety effective June 13, 1997, is hereby amended effective
November 22, 1999 as follows:

1.   A new Subparagraph (vi) of Section 9.2 "Change of Control" thereof is ADDED
     to the Plan to read as follows:

         (vi) there is consummated a `merger of equals' (which for purposes of
         this Subsection shall mean a merger with another company of relatively
         equal size) to which the Company is a party as a result of which the
         persons who were equityholders of the Company immediately prior to the
         effective date of such merger shall have beneficial ownership of less
         than 55% of the combined voting power for election of members of the
         Board (or equivalent) of the surviving entity or its parent following
         the effective date of such merger, provided that the Board shall have
         authority to increase said percentage as may in its sole discretion be
         deemed appropriate to cover a specific transaction.


Dated:  December 1, 1999



By: /s/ Cary A. Moomjian
    --------------------------------------------
    Santa Fe International Corporation
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Connected Media Technologies, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
      31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      herein (the “Report”), I, Mark Mayo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      respectively, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Mark
                MayoMark
                Mayo
              Chief
                Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
              May
                18, 2007





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Connected Media Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Connected Media
      Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.]
Dennis LONG, Appellant, v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 8, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Valley Commerce Bancorp (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of Allan W. Stone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Roy O. Estridge, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date: May 16, 2011

/s/ Allan W. StoneAllan W. StonePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 16, 2011

/s/ Roy O. EstridgeRoy O. EstridgeChief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
J.A.S., Appellant, v. H.B.D., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2918

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CAROLYN F. BRADLEY §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-391-Y

 §

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER §

OF SOCIAL SECURITY §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 27, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge issued

his findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the above-styled and

numbered cause (“the findings”). An order issued that same day gave

all parties until March 20 to serve and file with the Court written

objections to the findings. Neither party has filed objections.

Thus, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not

required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the findings for plain

error and has found none. After consideration of this matter, the

Court finds that the findings should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the

findings and conclusions of this Court. 

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner

is REVERSED and REMANDED solely for the purposes of calculation and

payment of disability benefits commencing December 31, 1992.

SIGNED March 21, 2006.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00391-Y Document 19 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 128
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul O.
Bower, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an
officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
July 20, 2009.
 /s/
      Paul O. BowerPaul
      O. BowerPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and
                Chairman
      of the Board of Directors
 
 In
accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the
SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Gregory HUNTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-432

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
****


****Exhibit 21.1**

**SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**Subsidiary**
**Jurisdiction**
**of Organization**
**Other Names Under**
**Which Subsidiary Does Business**Gables Residential Services, Inc.
Texas
Gables Corporate AccomodationsGables-Tennessee Properties, L.L.C.
Tennessee
NoneGables Construction, Inc.
Texas
NoneGBP Services, Inc.
Florida
NoneCandlewood-Indian Creek Limited Partnership
Georgia
NoneGables Champions Limited Partnership
Texas
NoneGables Realty GP, LLC
Texas
NoneGables River Oaks Limited Partnership
Texas
NoneGables Lions Head Limited
Texas
NoneGables Rivercrest II Limited
Texas
NoneGRT Villas Limited Partnership
Texas
NoneMetropolitan Apartments Venture
Texas
NonePin Oak Green
Texas
NonePin Oak Park Apartments
Texas
NoneState Thomas GP LLC
Delaware
NoneState Thomas LP
Delaware
NoneBoca Place LLC
Florida
NoneBoynton Beach LLC
Florida
NoneGables Jupiter LLC
Delaware
NoneKings Colony LLC
Florida
NoneMizner I LLC
Florida
NoneNorthlake Boulevard, LLC
Delaware
NoneSan Michele LLC
Florida
NoneSan Michele II LLC
Delaware
NoneSan Remo LLC
Florida
NoneBoynton Beach II LLC
Florida
NoneTown Colony LLC
Florida
NoneTown Colony II LLC
Florida
NoneSQ 157-AB Limited Partnership
District of Columbia
NoneGables Ambassador House LLC
District of Columbia
NoneVinings Realty Partners LLC
Florida
NoneIPX Northside, LLC
Georgia
NoneMV Gablechamp Limited Partnership
Delaware
NoneMV Gables Champion/Austin, LLC
Delaware
NoneGables at Stuart LLC
Florida
NoneMetropolitan III LLC
Delaware
NoneGables Rothbury LLC
Maryland
NoneIncome Growth Property Management, Inc.
California
None**
EXHIBIT 4.(b)(11) São Paulo, August 8th, 2016  ToCasino, Guichard-Perrachon148, rue de l’Université75007 Paris  Attn: Jean-Charles Naouri  RE: Project Delphes – Commitment letter  Dear Sirs,  We hereby inform you that, on this date, the Board of Directors of Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição (“Company”) has unanimously resolved that the Company(i)shall cause its voting rights to be exercised at any shareholders meeting of Cnova N.V. (“Cnova”) in favor of the reorganization between Via Varejo S.A. and the Brazilian subsidiary of Cnova, Cnova Comércio Eletrônico S.A., as agreed under Reorganization Agreement; and(ii)will not tender any of its Cnova shares, held directly or indirectly, in the cash tender offers that Casino, Guichard-Perrachon has undertaken to launch for the ordinary shares of Cnova upon completion of the reorganization (the “Tender Offers”), nor to dispose of or transfer, directly or indirectly, Shares in any other manner or through any other instrument, in particular any derivative instruments, until the end of the Tender Offers. CBD will stand alongside and cooperate with CGP in the subsequent squeeze-out procedure, if any, aimed at having Casino obtain the shares of the remaining Cnova minority shareholders, for the avoidance of doubt excluding CBD shares.  Finally, we reiterate our agreement to all the terms of the letter agreement that CGP and CBD have executed, whereby CGP takes certain commitments vis-à-vis CBD in relation to their future relationships as shareholders of Cnova.  Yours sincerely,  /s/ Ronaldo Iabrudi  Companhia Brasileira de DistribuiçãoRonaldo IabrudiChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Boo-Ali Siddiqui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: September 16, 2011





/s/ Boo-Ali Siddiqui


------------------


Boo-Ali Siddiqui,


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Najeeb Ghauri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: September 16, 2011





/s/ Najeeb Ghauri


------------------


Najeeb Ghauri,


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Executive Officer
Wilfred GARRARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1301

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

Wilfred Garrard, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an amended motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and to attach a certified copy of the transcript of appellant's plea and sentencing hearing that establishes the existence of an error in appellant's written judgment and sentence. *See* *Nielson v. State*, 984 So.2d 587, 588-89 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; *see also* *Williams v. State*, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007).

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Joseph KOLWE, Jr. v. CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.

NO. 2019-C-0483

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.