alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 4, 2011

By:

/s/ William J. ZaiserName:

William J. ZaiserTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:06-cv-00223-K Document 42 Filed 07/01/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 172
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 05a0097n.06

Filed: February 8, 2005

No. 04-5130

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

BAKERSFIELD GRAND CANAL, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

REGAL CINEMAS, INC.,

Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Before: SUHRHEINRICH, ROGERS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Bakersfield Grand Canal, LLC, appeals the district court’s order affirming the

Bankruptcy Court’s grant of summary judgment for Regal Cinemas, Inc., on Grand Canal’s claim

for breach-of-contract damages. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record, the parties’

briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served

by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated by that court and

the Bankruptcy Court in their respective opinions.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SHAUN DEWAYNE TUCKER, et al., §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1591-D

VS. §

 §

DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S § 

DEPARTMENT DETENTION §

DIVISION, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

November 29, 2005 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court

concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct as to plaintiff Julio Cesar Ponce (“Ponce”).

It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge

are adopted as to Ponce, and his action is dismissed without prejudice by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)

judgment filed today. The action of plaintiff Shaun Dewayne Tucker remains pending at this time.

SO ORDERED.

December 21, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01591-D Document 13 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Richard CALIX, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Reizenstein and Associates, P.A., and Philip L. Reizenstein, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

SCALES, J.

After shooting and killing his victim in a robbery, Richard Calix was convicted of first degree murder in 1988, a crime he committed when he was seventeen years old. He was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after twenty-five years. In 2016, Calix filed a post-conviction motion asserting that his sentence was illegal pursuant to *Miller v. Alabama*, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) and *Atwell v. State*, 197 So.3d 1040 (Fla. 2016).1

On November 30, 2016, the trial court granted Calix's motion. The State appealed the trial court's order to this Court and, on April 25, 2018, we affirmed the order in *State v. Calix*, 245 So.3d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). The State then appealed our decision to the Florida Supreme Court and, on January 7, 2019, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our April 25, 2018 opinion on the authority of its recent decision in *Franklin v. State*, 258 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2018).2*State v. Calix*, 44 Fla. L. Weekly S125, 2019 WL 117432 (Fla. Jan. 7, 2019). Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's November 30, 2016 order and remand to *1237the trial court to adjudicate Calix's rule 3.800 motion in light of *Franklin*.

Order vacated; remanded with instructions.

1

These decisions, deriving from *Graham v. Florida*, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), concluded that the imposition of a life sentence on a juvenile homicide offender, without an effective possibility of parole, violated the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. *Franklin v. State*, 258 So.3d 1239, 1240-41 (Fla. 2018). In *Miller v. Alabama*, the United States Supreme Court noted that juveniles, due to their age, have "diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change." 567 U.S. at 479, 132 S.Ct. 2455. On this premise, the Supreme Court in *Graham* and *Miller* refashioned how a trial court should sentence juveniles to life sentences.

2

In both *Franklin* and *State v. Michel*, 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the Florida Supreme Court partly receded from its decision in *Atwell v. State*, and held that a juvenile offender's sentence of life imprisonment *with* a possibility of parole after twenty-five years does not violate the Eighth Amendment, and therefore, the juvenile is not entitled to a re-sentencing. *Franklin*, 258 So.3d at 1241 ; *Michel,*257 So.3d at 8.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WAYNE SMITH, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-06-CV-0144-N

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SIGNED July 21, 2006.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00144-N Document 13 Filed 07/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 95
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00412 -CV In re Raym ond Carl Jones ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM T R A V IS C OU N T Y M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Puryear Filed: June 27, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Manitex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                                             
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David J. Langevin                                       
|Name:  |  | David J. Langevin                                           
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                        
|       |  | (Principal Executive Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)

Dated: November 13, 2009



|       |  |                                                                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David H. Gransee                                                       
|Name:  |  | David H. Gransee                                                           
|Title: |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                 
|       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)

Dated: November 13, 2009



47
Brian A. KEENE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID 9121
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 2 of 12 PageID 9122
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 3 of 12 PageID 9123
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 4 of 12 PageID 9124
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 5 of 12 PageID 9125
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 6 of 12 PageID 9126
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 7 of 12 PageID 9127
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 8 of 12 PageID 9128
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 9 of 12 PageID 9129
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 10 of 12 PageID 9130
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 11 of 12 PageID 9131
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 326 Filed 04/26/13 Page 12 of 12 PageID 9132
# C_2018436EN.01001202.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Dooel Uvoz-Izvoz Skopje Link Logistic N&N v Budapest Rendőrfőkapitánya

(Case C-384/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Road transport - Tax provisions - Directive 1999/62/EC - Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Toll - Obligation of the Member States to establish effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties - Flat-rate fine - Principle of proportionality - Direct applicability of the directive))

(2018/C 436/14)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dooel Uvoz-Izvoz Skopje Link Logistic N&N

Defendant: Budapest Rendőrfőkapitánya

Operative part of the judgment

The requirement of proportionality in Article 9a of Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures, as amended by Directive 2011/76/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011, cannot be regarded as having direct effect.

The national court must, by virtue of its duty to take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure the implementation of that provision, interpret national law in conformity with that provision or, if such an interpretation is not possible, disapply any national provision in so far as its application would, in the circumstances of the case, lead to a result contrary to EU law.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Colin Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15() of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 /s/ Colin HendrickColin Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial OfficerSmartMetric, Inc.February 15, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 8.,
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (132)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,888
<PP&E>                                          70,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,873)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,305
<SALES>                                         79,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,061
<CGS>                                           56,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (118)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,394
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
Mike ALVAREZ v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KP-1693

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

GUIDRY, J., would grant and docket.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Hendrick,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Dated: February
      22, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Colin
      HendrickColin
      HendrickPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7230-7231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01253]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Grandfathering Registration Notice

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists Grandfathering Registration for projects by 
the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in 
DATES.

DATES: December 1-31, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel and 
Secretary to the Commission, telephone:

[[Page 7231]]

(717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email: [email protected]. 
Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists GF Registration for 
projects, described below, pursuant to 18 CFR part 806, subpart E, for 
the time period specified above:
    1. Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission--Cooperative Hatcheries and 
Nurseries, GF Certificate No. GF-202412282, various municipalities and 
counties, Pa.; see Addendum; Reissue Date: December 12, 2024.
    2. New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co., Inc.--Roaring Spring Quarry, GF 
Certificate No. GF-202412283, Taylor Township, Blair County, Pa.; 
Quarry Sump, Halter Creek 1, Well 1, Well 2, and Well 3 (M4); Reissue 
Date: December 12, 2024.
    3. Dover Township--Public Water Supply System, GF Certificate No. 
GF-202412284, Dover Township, York County, Pa.; Wells 2, 3, 4, 5, and 
6; Reissue Date: December 26, 2024.
    4. Tallman Family Farms, L.L.C., GF Certificate No. GF-202412285, 
Porter Township, Schuylkill County, Pa.; Wiconisco Creek #2, Bohr Pond, 
and Wiconisco Creek GET ZIM; Reissue Date: December 26, 2024.
    5. Heidelberg Materials Northeast LLC--Oak Hall Quarry, GF 
Certificate No. GF-202412286, College Township, Centre County, Pa.; 
Well 1; Issue Date: December 27, 2024.
    Authority: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806 and 808.

    Dated: January 14, 2025.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-01253 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
```
Gordon MARSH, Jr. v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY COURT MAGISTRATE

CR-16-0973

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of CuraTech Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Lincoln
        M. Dastrup, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
  /s/
        Lincoln M. Dastrup
 Lincoln
        M. Dastrup
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 May
        13,
        2008
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has
        been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
        certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
        filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
        document.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

Yes x No o

 

**APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:**

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes o No o

 

**APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:**

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 78,499,985

 

 

3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSE I. ZAPATA )

)

V. ) 3-05-CV-2492-G

) (ECF)

MICHAEL ELSEY, ET AL )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Signed April 28, 2006.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02492-N Document 9 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 44
Case 3:05-cr-00252-N Document 62 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 128
Case 3:05-cv-02460-B-BD Document 82 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1113