alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00548

- CR

Wayne Denton Dickerson , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2008

- 397 , THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due February 28, 2022 . On counsel’s

motion s , the time for filing was extended to May 31, 2022 . Appellant’s counsel has now filed a

third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the

motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than Ju ne 30 , 2022. No

further extension of time will be g ranted and failure to comply with this order will result in the

referral of thi s case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on June 9 , 2022.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Do Not Publish
Sharon GRAY v. CITY OF BESSEMER and Arthur Bracy

2160411

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
S. Con. Res. 1 Agreed to January 3, 2021

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the two Houses of Congress shall meet in the Hall 

of the House of Representatives on Wednesday, the 6th day of 

January 2021, at 1 0’clock post meridian, pursuant to the requirements of the Constitution and laws relating to the election of 

President and Vice President of the United States, and the President of the Senate shall be their Presiding Officer; that two tellers 

shall be previously appointed by the President of the Senate on 

the part of the Senate and two by the Speaker on the part of 

the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they 

are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates 

and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which 

certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon 

in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter 

‘‘A’’; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence 

and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes 

as they shall appear from said certificates; and the votes having 

been ascertained and counted in the manner and according to 

the rules by law provided, the result of the same shall be delivered 

to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce 

the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a 

sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and 

Vice President of the United States, and together with a list of 

the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Gary BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Samuel WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  in connection with the Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Biotel Inc.Date:  February 12, 2010
     By:
     /s/ B. Steven SpringroseB. Steven SpringroseChief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)Date:  February 12, 2010
     By:
     /s/ Judy E. NausJudy E. NausChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, February 25, 2025, at the Commission's headquarters and via videoconference.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will be conducted by remote means (videoconference) and at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

                        The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*                         This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging businesses and their investors under the federal securities laws.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 16, 2025.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-01517 Filed 1-16-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2956026-MAY-201109:37 AM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |        |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 30, 2009 |  |        |  |                                      
|                       |  |       
|                       |  | By:    |  | /s/ Andrew M. Sims                   
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Andrew M. Sims                       
|                       |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



36
Judy CLARK v. CIRCLE K STORES, INC.

No. 2019-C-0425

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU**

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

In this slip and fall case, I would grant the writ application of Circle K Stores, Inc., reverse the court of appeal ruling, and reinstate the trial court ruling, thereby dismissing this case. In my view, the trial court correctly concluded that the plaintiff failed to prove the elements of her claim under R.S. 9:2800.6, particularly insofar as the evidence established that only 11 seconds elapsed between the beverage spill and the plaintiff's fall. *See**White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.* , 97-0393 (La. 9/9/97), 699 So.2d 1081 (failure to prove any element of R.S. 2800.6 is "fatal to the claimant's cause of action").
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 2318 V

UNPUBLISHED

ANNA REEVES , on behalf of her minor child, L.R.

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: August 19 , 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On December 21 , 2021

, Anna Reeves filed a petition for compensation on behalf

of her minor child

, L.R.

, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2 Petitioner allege d that L.R. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on June 19, 2019, and those inj uries

worsened after a second human p apillomavirus vaccination on June 1 8, 2020

. ECF N o. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g ). O n August 18 , 202 2

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw

the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Offic e.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
John Wesley MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3703

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

John Wesley Montgomery, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § Criminal Action No. 3:05-CR-0139-L (01)

§

EDWARD EUGENE CADE §

ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver, who entered Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on July 18,

2012, recommending that: (1) Defendant Edward Eugene Cade (“Defendant”) should be granted a

three-day extension of time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4) because he has shown excusable

neglect for the delay in filing a notice of appeal; and (2) his motion to proceed in forma pauperis

should be denied because his appeal presents no legal points of arguable merit. Defendant filed

objections to the Report on August 2, 2012. Defendant objects only to the magistrate judge’s

conclusion that his motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied, contending that his appeal

is deserving of review for a number of reasons without the payment of fees. 

Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions

of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate

judge are correct, accepts them as those of the court, and overrules Defendant’s objections. In

determining whether Defendant should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal as

requested, the magistrate judge properly considered whether the appeal is taken in good faith

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 

Order – Page 1

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00139-L Document 107 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID 737
The court grants Defendant a three-day extension of time to appeal under Fed. R. App.

4(b)(4), and his appeal filed on January 26, 2012, is deemed timely; the court denies Defendant’s

Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 93). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3), the court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. In support of

the finding that the appeal is not taken in good faith, the court adopts and incorporates by reference

its January 5, 2012 order, denying Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the court has certified that the appeal is not taken in good faith,

Defendant may challenge this finding by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal with the Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, within 30 days

of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return this case to the United States Court of

Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 

It is so ordered this 16th day of August, 2012.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Order – Page 2

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00139-L Document 107 Filed 08/16/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID 738
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2006



By:

/s/ William J. ZaiserName:

William J. ZaiserTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
SAMANTHA GROVER,

Appellant,

v.

BRADFORD COUNTY 

SHERIFF'S OFFICE,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5240

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

Phyllis M. Rosier, Judge.

Samantha Grover, pro se, Appellant.

William E. Sexton, Starke, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
| a.   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: December 2, 2009                /s/ ARTHUR P. BOLLON, PH.D._________________________________________                                                             ARTHURP. BOLLON, PH.D.                                                            CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER                                                     (PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 31.2I, Mark D. Mumford, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and wehave: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control overfinancial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date: February 14, 2007 /s/ MARK D. MUMFORD   *Chief Financial Officer*     
80
Theron SAPP, Appellant, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Ronald D. VETETO

(In re: Ronald D. Veteto v. Jeff Dunn et al.)

2170320

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 28, 2017

Dismissed.