alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 35

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 7 (legislative day, February 3), 2022

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 21-26, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on January 31, 2022: Twelve (12) C-1301 
        Super Hercules Aircraft with Four (4) each Rolls Royce AE-2100D 
        Turboprop Engines (installed); Twelve (12) Rolls Royce AE-2100D 
        Turboprop Engines (spares); Thirty (30) Embedded GPS/INS (EGI) 
        with GPS Security Devices (including 6 spares); Seven (7) 
        Multifunctional Information Distribution System--Low Volume 
        Terminal Block Upgrade Two (MIDS-LVT BU2) (including 3 spares); 
        AN/APX-119 Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) Transponders; AN/
        AAR-47 Missile Warning Systems (MWS); AN/ALE-47 Countermeasures 
        Dispensing System (CMDS); AN/ALR-56M Radar Warning Receiver 
        (RWR); AN/AAQ-22 (STAR SAFIRE 380); secure communications, 
        cryptographic equipment, and GPS-aided precision navigation 
        equipment; publications and technical documentation; software 
        and mission critical resources; aircraft support and equipment; 
        unclassified return and repair; integration and testing; 
        personnel training and training equipment; United States 
        Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics 
        support services; and other related elements of logistical and 
        program support.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE: Richard C. OUSTALET, Jr.

NO. 2019-B-0486

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected his clients' legal matters, failed to communicate with his clients, relocated and accepted a position as an attorney with the State without giving notice to his clients, continued representing clients while employed with the State, and failed to return unearned fees and client files upon request. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Richard C. Oustalet, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 27599, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Order entered January 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00893-CV

REFUGIO GOMEZ, ET AL., Appellants

V.

SOL LY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-06613-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s January 12, 2015, motion to dismiss. Appellee moves to 

dismiss this appeal because appellants failed to timely file their brief. Subsequently, appellants 

sought an extension and tendered their brief on the merits for this case. This Court granted the 

extension and ordered the brief filed. Accordingly, we DENY appellee’s motion.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
VILLA VERDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, Appellant, v. KOPELOUSOS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Greene International Real Estate, Inc., W & J Construction Corporation, W & J Construction Co., LLC, Drawdy Brothers Construction II, Inc., et al, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-4112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 29, 2019

Steven R. Schooley, of The Schooley Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellant.

Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee, Kopelousos Construction Company, Inc.

No Appearance for Other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**Quaregna v. Strategic Performance Fund II, Inc.*, 943 So.2d 265, 267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ("[E]ach party seeking a trial de novo must file an individual timely request for trial de novo.").

ORFINGER, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JESSE E. PHILLIPS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-2523-O

§

GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, f.k.a. §

CONSECO FINANCING SERVICES §

CORP., et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney (Doc. # 50), regarding several Defendants, who

have never been served with process, specifically: Hale County, Portia F. Bosse, Attorneys of Dallas

County, Judge Harlin D. Hale, Bankruptcy Court Dallas, Connie Mayfield, John H. Jackson,

Marilyn Greer, Charles R. Statham, Lisa D. Mooneyhan, Navarro County & County Offices County

Personnel, and Amanda Doan. The Court has reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2008.

_________________________________

Reed O’Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHARLES SIDNEY ROBINSON, ) 

#848990, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:04-CV-2611-N

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas )

Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondents. )

ORDER

After making the independent review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that

the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they

are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

Signed August 31, 2005.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02611-N Document 19 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 115
Nolvey STELLY v. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, et al.

NO. 2017-C-2050

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1309

NICK DRAGOVICH,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH M. BUICE, a/k/a ModChipUSA, a/k/a A&M

Enterprises; ANDRE WALLIMAN,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-418)

Submitted: November 14, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph M. Buice, Andre Walliman, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas Wayne

Kenyon, Keri C. Prince, Laurie J. Bremer, HUNTON & WILLIAMS,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph M. Buice and Andre Walliman appeal the district court’s

order entering default judgment against them in this copyright

infringement and breach of contract action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Dragovich v. Buice,

No. CA-00-418 (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2000). Additionally, we deny the

Appellants’ motions for a stay of discovery in Dragovich’s

collection proceeding in the Eastern District of Virginia and to

expedite consideration of the motion. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 00 4

. CHRI STI NE T. STONE v

. BANK OF NEW Y ORK MELLON, f/ k /a

BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE.

Ch ri s t i n e T. St o n e fi l ed an ap pl i cat i o n fo r d is cret i o n ary ap p eal i n t h i s Co u rt

i n wh i ch s h e ch al l en g ed a wri t o f p o s s es s i o n i s s u ed b y t he tri al co u rt o n Ju l y 8

, 2 0 1 5.

We d is m i s s ed t h e ap p l i cat i o n as m o o t

, n o t i n g t hat we affi rm ed t h e ju d g m en t o f t h e

t ri al co u rt i n St o n e’ s cas e in an u n pu b l i s h ed o p i n io n. See Ca s e N o

. A 1 5 D 0 5 0 2,

d i s m i s s ed J u l y 2 9

, 20 1 5

, ci t i ng St o n e v. Ba n k o f New Y o r k Mel l o n

, Cas e No

.

A1 1 A0 31 4 (d eci d ed M arch 8

, 2 0 1 1 ). Ch ri s t i n e T. S t o n e fi led t h i s ap p li cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

, ch al l en g i n g th e s am e o rd er. Th e Su p rem e

Co u rt t ran s ferred t h e ap p l i cat io n t o t h i s Co u rt fo r lack of ju ri s d ict i o n

. Fo r t h e reas on s

s et fo rt h i n o u r p ri o r o rd er, t h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal m u s t b e

DISM ISSED.

“ It i s ax i o m at i c th at t h e s am e is s u e can n o t b e rel i t i g at ed ad i n fi n i t u m .”

(Pu n ct u at i on o m i t t ed .) Na l l y v. Ba r to w Co u n t

y Gr a n d Ju r or s , 2 8 0 Ga. 7 9 0, 7 9 1 (3 )

(6 3 3 SE2 d 3 3 7 ) (2 0 06 ). In at t em p t i ng to litiga

te the sa m e issue m

ultiple ti m es , St o n e

h as fi l ed an ap p l i cat i o n t h at h as n o b as is i n l aw an d i s t hu s fri v o lo u s . Th i s Co u rt i s

em po wered t o i m

p o s e s an ct i on s u p o n a p art y wh o fi l es a fri vo l o u s ap pl i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. See Co u rt o f Ap peal s Ru l e 1 5 (b ). W e cau t io n St o n e ag ai n s t

fi li n g fu t ure m o ti o n s o r pl ead i ng s i n t hi s Co u rt t h at h av e n o s u b s t an t i al b as i s i n l aw

as s u ch m ay

res u l t i n t he i m

p os i t i o n o f s an ct i o ns

. September 15, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/15/2015
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 5 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 6 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 7 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 8 of 9

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-12   Filed 12/14/17   Page 9 of 9
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 30 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL J. PALESE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. DOMINIC PALESE and PATRICIA PALESE, Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-8123 (D.C. No. 97-CV-274-J) (D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BRORBY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Daniel J. Palese appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and-2-

dismiss plaintiff’s appeal as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that, over the past ten years, defendants Dominic and Patricia Palese, private citizens of the State of Wyoming, had entered his residence on a daily basis without permission and had drugged and hypnotized him, and implanted cameras, sensors, and transmitters in his body while he was asleep. He further alleged defendants conspired with an officer at the detention center to monitor his activities by using the implanted cameras, sensors, and transmitters. The district court dismissed the complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The district court granted plaintiff’s request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the entire record on appeal and agree with the district court that plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Further, we conclude plaintiff’s appeal is legally frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heavy Earth Resources, Inc. a Florida corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Anthony Ives, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Heavy Earth Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Heavy Earth Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: August 20, 2012





/s/ Anthony IvesAnthony Ives

Principal Financial Officer










1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce Merati, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VirtGame Corp.
("registrant"):

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003

/s/ Bruce Merati
----------------
Bruce Merati
President
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID 690
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 7 PageID 691
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 3 of 7 PageID 692
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 4 of 7 PageID 693
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 5 of 7 PageID 694
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 6 of 7 PageID 695
Case 3:05-cv-01894-N Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 7 of 7 PageID 696
IIA 

Calendar No. 178 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 29 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2021 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

LEE, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

PAUL, Ms. LUMMIS, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. 

HYDE-SMITH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

ROUNDS, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. COTTON, Ms. ERNST, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. HAWLEY, 

Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. KENNEDY, 

Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. SASSE, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GRAHAM, 

Mr. TILLIS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ROMNEY, and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 29 PCS 

the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘COVID-19 Vaccination 

5 and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard’’ (86 Fed. 

6 Reg. 61402 (November 5, 2021)), and such rule shall have 

7 no force or effect. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 178 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 29 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapgency Temporary Standard’’. to ‘‘COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emer- submitted by the Department of Labor relating ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS