alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph E. Woodnick, *Appellant,*v. Sam Johnson Company, a Corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed August 1, 1927.

*H. F. Mohr,*Attorney for Appellant;

*Maguire & Voorhis,*Attorneys for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this case the appellant agreed to purchase and one Moscovitz agreed to sell under certain conditions, which are not material to the issue here, certain lands in Orlando, Florida. Moscovitz acknowledged receipt of $1,000.00 on account of the purchase price. This $1,000.00 in the form of a check was delivered to the appellee to be held in escrow until the deal was consum*515mated, or until negotiations were ended. .The appellee cashed the check and held the proceeds.

For reasons which are not material to the issue here the deal was not consummated. The appellant demanded return of the $1000.00. Moseovitz claimed that he was entitled to the $1,000.00 under the terms of the agreement under which it was paid. Appellee refused to return the $1000.00 to appellant. Appellant then sued appellee at law for the $1000.00. Whereupon appellee filed its bill of interpleader making appellant and Moseovitz defendants. Appellant filed demurrer and answer. Moseovitz filed answer. A special Examiner was appointed and testimony was taken. A deceree was entered overruling the demurrer and upon consideration of the report of the Master a decree was entered holding the bill of interpleader to be properely filed and requiring the defendants to interplead and settle the matters in controversy; appointing a Master in Chancery to inquire and make report as to which of the defendants is entitled to the funds in the controversy; with directions to the Master; requiring the $1000.00 to be paid in to the registry of the court; enjoining appellant from prosecuting his suit against the appellee and enjoining Moseovitz from prosecuting any suit against the appellee and that the complainant be dismissed with costs incurred, including $125.00 attorney’s fees, to be paid out of the funds in the registry of the court and reserving the consideration of all questions of costs as between defendants and all other questions and directions until the coming in of the Master’s report, etc., etc.

From the decree above mentioned appeal was taken to this Court.

Mr. Justice Ellis, speaking for the Court in the case of Fogg v. Goode, 78 Fla. 138, 82'Sou. 614, discussed fully *516and stated clearly tbe law applicable to tbe instant case and on authority of the opinion in that case the orders and decrees of the Chancellor should be affirmed. See also South Florida Farms Co. v. Jax Ice and Cold Storage Co., 109 So. 212.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 19 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 

of the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of 

the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2021 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. COTTON) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of the Tomb of the Unknown 

Soldier. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL. 

4 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

5 on November 10, 2021, for a ceremony as part of the com6 memoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of 

7 the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 19 ATS 

1 SEC. 2. PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE CEREMONY. 

2 Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be car3 ried out in accordance with such conditions as the Archi4 tect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colin
Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



/s/ Colin Hendrick
Colin Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
SmartMetric, Inc.
August 2, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) of SYNAVANT Inc. for the
nine months ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,722
<PP&E>                                          13,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,440
<SALES>                                        135,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,905
<CGS>                                          107,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (134,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,557)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (129,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (129,353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.69)


</TABLE>
EX PARTE A.W.

1160823 (2160140, 2160141, 2160142)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YONGJUN TANG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73646 

Agency No. A087-885-130 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Yongjun Tang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73646 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations 

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 

2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies within Tang’s testimony and between Tang’s testimony 

and documentary evidence as to his residence in the U.S., and the dates of his 

marriages and divorce, Tang’s demeanor during the hearing, and the implausibility 

of Tang’s claimed fear of calling his wife. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility 

determination was reasonable under the “totality of the circumstances”). Tang’s

explanations do not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 

1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Tang’s

asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 

1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Further, Tang’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same 

testimony the agency found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel 

the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to 
3 15-73646 

China. See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Order filed October 16, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00605-CV

___________

AMELIA V. KELLY, Appellant

V.

MATTHEW D. WIGGINS, JR. AND D.L. HAMMAKER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 320840122

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the 122nd District Court informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On August 6, 2014, the clerk 

of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that 

do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, 

provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty 

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court 

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10433

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUADALUPE MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-29-1

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Martinez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 12, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-10433 Document: 00511027265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
Case 3:05-cv-01992-P Document 5 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 126
Exhibit 31.2I, Mark D. Mumford, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and wehave: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control overfinancial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date: February 15, 2008 /s/ MARK D. MUMFORD  *Chief Financial Officer*     
71
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Derek Ward, the President, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period ended September 30, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Derek WardName:Derek WardTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:November 19, 2008 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EX PARTE Ronnie Odell PARKER

CR-16-1314

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jump'n Jax, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Steven D. Moulton, principal accounting officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/   STEVEN D. MOULTON
----------------------------
Steven D. Moulton
Principal Accounting Officer
November 2, 2005


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form
10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
disclosure document.
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 284 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 490
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT MILAD ALLAHAM, Petitioner

v. RAOAEH NADAF, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 201 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Derek Ward, the, Chief Executive Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(i)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the Period ended March 31, 2014, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Derek WardName:
Derek WardTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
May 20, 2014




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 4.65  


         

  


n e w s    r e l e a s e 


NORANDA PURCHASES ANTAMINA

NET PROCEEDS INTEREST FROM INMET  


Toronto, Canada; July 16, 2003 — Noranda Inc. (NRD) announced today that it
has purchased the 3.3 percent net proceeds interest ("NPI") relating to the Antamina copper and zinc mine in Peru from Inmet Mining Corporation for US$22.5 million. The purchase was
completed under a previously announced put-call agreement entered into between the two companies in February 2002. 


Noranda Inc. is a leading international mining and metals company with more than 49 mining and metallurgical operations and projects under
development in 17 countries. Noranda is one of the world's largest producers of zinc and nickel and is a significant producer of copper, primary and fabricated aluminum, lead, silver, gold, sulphuric
acid and cobalt. Noranda is also a major recycler of secondary copper, nickel and precious metals. Noranda employs over 15,000 people. It is listed on The Toronto Stock Exchange and The
New York Stock Exchange (NRD).


—30—



For
further information, please contact: 



	Media:	Investors:
	Dale Coffin	Sharon Loung
	Director, External Communications	Director, Investor Relations
	Noranda Inc.	Noranda Inc.
	416-982-7161	416-982-7337
	dale.coffin@toronto.norfalc.com	sharon.loung@toronto.norfalc.com





www.noranda.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN F. HARRIS §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:04-CV-850-Y

 §

JO ANNE B. BARNHART §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On October 25, 2005, the United States magistrate judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings”) in

the above-styled and -numbered cause. In his findings, the magistrate

judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration of the United States (“the Commissioner”)

denying plaintiff John F. Harris’s claim for disability insurance and

supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. The magistrate

judge’s order gave all parties until November 15 to serve and file

with the Court written objections to his proposed findings. The Court

has not received any written objections. As a result, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required.

Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s findings

and conclusions for plain error and has found none. 

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court finds that

the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are

hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. 

Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED November 17, 2005.

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00850-Y Document 25 Filed 11/17/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 85
Rachel DOWNING, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4496

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.