alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Jump’n Jax, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lane S. Clissold,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ **LANE
      S. CLISSOLD**





**Lane
      S. Clissold**


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      3,
      2006











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
      filed
      as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document.
GOLDROCK, INC., as trustee, Appellant, v. PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC; Connie E. Robinson; Robert R. Robinson ; Channing Park Property Owners Association, Inc.; and Unknown Tenant Occupant(s) #1, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1852

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Thomas R. Venables

Thomas R. VenablesChief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 7125

DERRICK E. KIRTMAN

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

CHAPLAIN HELBIG; SIA STIVERS; WARDEN CRUZ; ASSISTANT HOSPITAL A WHITEHURST; ASSISTANT WARDEN LANDFORD

,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

SIA LIEUTENANT DUMBAR; CASE MANAGER MCCELLAN; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATOR, Jane Doe

- 1; ASSISTANT WARDEN JOHN DOE 2; REGISTER NURSE K. CALUAGO; REGISTER NURSE JANE DOE 3; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE 4; COUNSELOR PARKER; COUNSE LOR COATES; UNIT MANAGER HORTON; WARDEN TEWER; MD JESUS FERNANDEZ; MD ROSS QUINN; PA HERNANDEZ; PA BRISITTE WOLVERTON; E. TOPETE; WARDEN JOHN DOE 5,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr. , District Judge. ( 4:16

- cv

- 02839

- AMQ )

Submitted : March 11, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Derrick E. Kirtman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Derrick E. Kirtman appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation and grant ing summary judgment to Chaplain Helbig, Special

Investigative Agent Stivers, Warden Cruz, Assistant Hospital Assistant Whitehurst, and

Assistant Warden Landford (“ the Defendants”) . We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Kirtman v. Helbig , No. 4:16

- cv

- 02839

- AMQ (D.S.C. July 27, 2018). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 33 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Joint resolution relating to increasing the debt limit. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the limitation under section 3101(b) of title 31, 

4 United States Code, as most recently increased by Public 

5 Law 117–50 (31 U.S.C. 3101 note), is increased by 

6 $2,500,000,000,000. 

Passed the Senate December 14, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 33 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Joint resolution relating to increasing the debt 

limit.
Harold HOLT v. LIMESTONE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160548

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Reh. denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edward C. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Edward C. Dillon
-----------------------------
Edward C. Dillon
Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2011


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Nelson Stark
-----------------------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2011
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO OF ALLIED SECURITYHOLDINGS LLC PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allied SecurityHoldings LLC (the ‘‘Company’’) for thequarter ended September  30,  2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), William C. Whitmore, Jr., asChief Executive Officer of the Company, and William A. Torzolini, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ William C. Whitmore,Jr.    Name: William C. Whitmore, Jr.Title:President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ofManagersDate: November  14,2006

/s/ William A.Torzolini                        Name:William A. TorzoliniTitle: Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate: November  14,2006

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 946 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 946

   To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the treatment of 
  certain bargain-price options to purchase at less than fair market 
                     value, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 2021

  Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 40, United States Code, to modify the treatment of 
  certain bargain-price options to purchase at less than fair market 
                     value, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DISCOUNTED PURCHASE OPTIONS.

    Section 585 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Limitation on Discounted Purchase Options.--Any bargain-price 
option to purchase at less than fair market value contained in any 
lease agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2021, pursuant to 
this section may be exercised only to the extent specifically provided 
for in subsequent appropriation Acts or other Acts of Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 22-2730

___________

AARON J. BRESSI,

Appellant

v.

TRACY MCCLOUD; BRITTANY DUKE; RONALD MCCLAY;

MATTHEW NARCAVAGE; DANIEL SHOOP; JILL HENRICH;

TERRY KECHEM; PATROLMAN ADAMS; CHRISTOPHER LAPOTSKY;

JOHN GEMBIC; OFFICE CLERKS, Sunbury District Magistrate;

MICHAEL P. TOOMEY; MICHAEL SEWARD; DEGG STARK; JILL FRY;

CHARLES SAYLOR; PAIGE ROSINI; WARDEN SNYDER COUNTY PRISON;

OFFICE CLERKS, Snyder County Prison; EDWARD GRECO; MICHAEL SUIDERS;

JAMES BEST; VINCE ROVITO; RACHAEL GLASSO; AMY STOAK;

KIMBERLY BICKERT; CATHY DUZICK; MICHAEL FANTAGROSSE;

JENNIFER FANTAGROSSE; RICHARD STIENHEART; GINGER STIENHEART; 

JEFFREY LEACH; DENISE CARNUCCIO; JEFFREY LONG; TYLER MUMMY; 

KIMBERLY SEDDON; CHASTITY SEDDON; WARDEN BRUCE KOVACH; 

DEPUTY WARDEN JAMES SMINK; and COUNSELOR SAMUEL KRANZEL

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 4:18-cv-01345)

District Judge: Honorable Matthew W. Brann

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

June 13, 2023

Before: JORDAN, CHUNG, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 16, 2023)

___________
2

OPINION*

___________

PER CURIAM

Proceeding pro se, Aaron Bressi filed a civil rights action against dozens of 

people. The District Court dismissed the action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(a) and 

1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. We affirmed. See Bressi v. McCloud, C.A. Nos. 

20-1077 & 20-1758, 2021 WL 5054351, at *1 (3d Cir. Nov. 1, 2021) (per curiam).

Months later, Bressi twice asked the District Court to “refile” his case. The 

District Court entered a pair of orders denying relief, the second of which stated that 

Bressi had “failed to provide any basis to reopen this case” and that “[t]he Court will not 

entertain any further motions to ‘refile’ in this matter.” This timely appeal of the second 

order followed.

We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Bressi’s opening brief 

merely re-argues the merits of his prior appeal in the underlying litigation, and at times 

mistakenly references a decision of this Court resolving one of his appeals in separate 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
3

litigation. In short, nowhere in the brief does Bressi identify a valid basis to disturb the 

order of the District Court that is the subject of this appeal.

1 Accordingly, we will affirm.

1 Bressi’s post-briefing motion requesting that the Court accept a document from his 

separate, pending habeas proceeding as “evidence towards [this] case” is denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

AKIO MONTRAIL SMITH, §

Petitioner, §

§ No. 3:05-CV-2125-P

v. § ECF

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, §

TDCJ-CID, §

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 2 day of February 2007. nd

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02125-P Document 17 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 88
Case 5:04-cv-00258-C Document 15 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 83
Rafael CENDAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1567

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019. Rehearing Denied March 20, 2019

Rafael Cendan, in proper person.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Cendan appeals an order denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his postconviction motion alleging claims for ineffective assistance of defense counsel. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. We affirm.

To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Cendan must demonstrate both that defense counsel's performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced him. *See* *Strickland v. Washington*, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) ; *Chandler v. State*, 848 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla. 2003). Cendan asserts that his defense counsel was ineffective for counsel's alleged failure to advise Cendan of available defenses prior to Cendan pleading guilty to the underlying charges. To prevail on this claim, Cendan was required to prove both: (i) that defense counsel's performance was deficient; and (ii) that under "the totality of the circumstances surrounding the plea," there was a reasonable probability that, but for defense counsel's deficiency, Cendan would have gone to trial instead of entering a plea. *Grosvenor v. State*, 874 So.2d 1176, 1181-82 (Fla. 2004).

Based on the evidence adduced at the evidentiary hearing conducted below, the trial court concluded that defense counsel was not at all deficient and denied Cendan's rule 3.850 motion. Having reviewed the record, we find no error in the trial court's determination. *See* *Mungin v. State*, 932 So.2d 986, 998 (Fla. 2006) ("In reviewing a trial court's ruling after an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance *1068of counsel claim, this Court defers to the factual findings of the trial court to the extent that they are supported by competent, substantial evidence, but reviews de novo the application of the law to those facts."). We therefore affirm the order denying Cendan's motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Valley Commerce Bancorp
(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
of Donald A. Gilles, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Roy O. Estridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 12, 2008
            /s/
      Donald A. GillesDonald
      A. GillesPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      November 12, 2008
            /s/
      Roy O. EstridgeRoy
      O. EstridgeChief
      Financial Officer








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




36
Travares SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2422

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Financial Condition

March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

(unaudited)

March 31

2011

December 31

2010

Assets

 Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 18,732,754 $ 149,831,122

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 3,208,312,699 2,974,340,739

 Accrued Interest Receivable 16,725,047 21,543,852

 Premiums Receivable 24,711,000 79,969,000

Total Assets $ 3,268,481,500 $ 3,225,684,713

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 376,734 $ 339,113

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,268,104,766 3,225,345,600

 Total Insurance Fund 3,268,104,766 3,225,345,600

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,268,481,500 $ 3,225,684,713
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Revenue and Expense

For the Period Ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010

(unaudited)

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2011

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2010

Income

 Premiums $ 24,711,000 $ 41,399,545

 Interest Income on Investments 18,826,820 15,606,733

Total Income $ 43,537,820 $ 57,006,278

Expenses

 Administrative Operating Expenses $ 778,654 $ 767,430

Total Expenses $ 778,654 $ 767,430

Net Income $ 42,759,166 $ 56,238,848

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund 

For Period Ended March 31, 2011

(unaudited)

Balance at January 1, 2011 $ 3,225,345,600

Net Income 42,759,166

Balance at March 31, 2011 $ 3,268,104,766
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Trend Mining Company (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Loucks,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      that,
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





January
      12, 2007








/s/
      Thomas A. Loucks


Thomas
      A.
      Loucks


Chief
      Executive Officer
Wanda IMBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-92

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cr-00134-N Document 12 Filed 10/17/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 24
 

 Case 3:05-cr-00134-N Document 12 Filed 10/17/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 25
 

 Case 3:05-cr-00134-N Document 12 Filed 10/17/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 26
 

 Case 3:05-cr-00134-N Document 12 Filed 10/17/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 27
 

 Case 3:05-cr-00134-N Document 12 Filed 10/17/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 28