alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBERS 13-21-00038-CV, 13-21-00039-CV, 13-21-00040-CV, 

13-21-00041-CV, 13-21-00042-CV, 13-21-00043-CV, & 13-21-00044-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOHNNY PARTAIN, Appellant,

 v.

COMPASS BANK, ET AL., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant Johnny Partain, proceeding pro se, appeals separate judgments and/or 

orders in the foregoing cause numbers.

1 These matters are before the Court for

1 These appeals each arise from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, and consist of 

the following: (1) No. 13-21-00038-CV, Johnny Partain v. Compass Bank; (2) No. 13-21-00039-CV, Johnny 

Partain v. J. E. Eddie Guerra, Carlos Gonzalez, Homer Jasso Sr., Rene Guerra, Rodolfo Gonzalez, Sergio 
2

appellant’s failure to remit a filing fee. On March 9, 2021, the Clerk of the Court notified 

appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee in each appeal. The clerk 

notified appellant that the appeals were subject to dismissal if the filing fees were not paid 

within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution or 

because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a 

court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a 

specified time. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s 

notices and has failed to pay the filing fees for these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals

are dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

27th day of May, 2021. 

Valdez, Guadalupe Trevino, and County of Hidalgo; (3) No. 13-21-00040-CV, Johnny Partain v. Judge 

Manuel Banales; (4) No. 13-21-00041-CV, Johnny Partain v. Judge Robert Blackmon; (5) No. 13-21-00042-

CV, Johnny Partain v. State of Texas; (6) No. 13-21-00043-CV, Johnny Partain v. McAllen Police Chief 

Victor Rodriguez, In His Official And Individual Capacities, and The City of McAllen; and (7) No. 13-21-

00044-CV, Johnny Partain v. Fire Insurance Exchange.
EMBRACE HOME LOANS, INC. v. Linia Thomas BURL a/k/a Linia T. Burl a/k/a Linia Burl

NO. 2018-OC-1876

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Reconsideration denied.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in recognition of the long and distin3 guished service rendered to the Nation by Robert Joseph 

4 Dole, a Senator from the State of Kansas, his remains 

5 be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol 

6 on Thursday, December 9, 2021, and the Architect of the 

7 Capitol, under the direction of the President pro tempore 

8 of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Represent9 atives, shall take all necessary steps for the accomplish10 ment of that purpose. 

Passed the Senate December 7, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

State of Kansas. orable Robert Joseph Dole, a Senator from the for the lying in state of the remains of the Hon-
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert BAILEY

No. 2018-KP-1755

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-00143

Conference Calendar

 

BENJAMIN FORSYTHE,

Plaintiff-Petitioner,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL.,

Defendants-Respondents.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-94-CA-079

- - - - - - - - - -

October 25, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benjamin Forsythe, #521748, petitions this court for

permission to file an interlocutory appeal of the district

court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the

defendants in Forsythe’s civil rights complaint brought pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Subsequent to filing his petition in this

court, Forsythe moved in the district court to have his complaint

withdrawn. In light of the district court’s order granting

Forsythe’s motion and dismissing his complaint, Forsythe’s 
No. 96-00143

- 2 -

interlocutory appeal is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED for

want of jurisdiction.
| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Dated:                January 8, 2008 |  | /s/                Edwin Kroeker                       |
|---------------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |  | Edwin                Kroeker                           |
|                                       |  | President                & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                       |  |                                                        |
|                                       |  |                                                        |
| Dated:                January 8, 2008 |  | /s/                Chad                Burback         |
|                                       |  | Chad                Burback                            |
|                                       |  | Chief                Financial                Officer  |
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Needelman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Dated:
      May 15, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Jay
      NeedelmanJay
      Needelman (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Chief
      Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EMANUEL DELEON FIELDS §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. § 

§ NO. 3-06-CV-0236-N

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

Before the Court is petitioner’s second motion for Certificate of Appealability, entitled

“Petition for Certificate of Appealability,” which was filed June 15, 2007. Following petitioner’s

first Notice of Appeal, which was filed on May 29, 2007, the Court denied petitioner’s first motion

for Certificate of Appealability in an Order dated June 4, 2007. In its Order, the Court adopted and

incorporated by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation filed in this case

on November 6, 2006, in support of its finding that Petitioner had failed to make a substantial

showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See Order, 6/4/07 (citing Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1602, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)). For the same reasons stated in its

Order of June 4, 2007, the Court denies Petitioner’s second motion for Certificate of Appealability.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 20, 2007.

___________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00236-N Document 30 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 165
Jaquan Isaiah WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A.H. v. R.L.A.

2160776

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40667 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

NINO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Nino Ruben Rodriguez, also known as Ruben Rodriguez

- Nino, also known as Ruben Rodriguez

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 191

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nino Rodriguez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v.
California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rodriguez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 6, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40667 Document: 00513220468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2015No. 14

- 40667

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from f urther responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40667 Document: 00513220468 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2015
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Two Rivers Water Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne Harding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:  November 12, 2010
By: /s/ Wayne HardingChief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A.M.J., a child, * From the 318th District Court

 of Midland County

Trial Court No. FM 63,581.

No. 11-19-00047-CV * August 1, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Harold Sciotto, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alchemy Enterprises, Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  August 22, 2005

/s/ Harold Sciotto

President
M.L., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian ad Litem, Appellees.

No. 4D19-196

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

s0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138373 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138373 

 COA: 288501 

Baraga CC: 05-000910-FH 

CLIFFORD MCCORMACK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graham R. Hughes, the Chief Financial Officer of Quantum
Solar Power Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/
      Graham R. Hughes                      
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | GRAHAM R. HUGHES                                
| |        |                                                 
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        |                                                 
| | Date:  | February 28, 2011                               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT LEON WILSON §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-06-CV-0130-N

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

Signed April 28, 2006.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00130-N Document 16 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 1 7

- 0718

_____________________________ R EGINALD A. W ALKER ,
Petitioner
,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Respondent

.

___________________________ Petition for Wr it of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

. March 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

.
R OBERTS , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Reginald A. Walker, pro se, Petitioner.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1819
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 7 PageID 1820
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 3 of 7 PageID 1821
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 4 of 7 PageID 1822
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 5 of 7 PageID 1823
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 6 of 7 PageID 1824
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 87 Filed 01/26/06 Page 7 of 7 PageID 1825