alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017309EN.01002201.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm (Germany) lodged on 29 May 2017 — Surjit Singh Bedi v Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Republic of Germany acting on behalf of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-312/17)

(2017/C 309/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Surjit Singh Bedi

Applicant:

Defendants: Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Republic of Germany acting on behalf of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 2(2) of Directive 2000/78/EC (1) establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation to be interpreted as precluding a provision in a collective agreement under which the receipt of interim assistance — granted, on the basis of the basic remuneration laid down in the collective agreement, with the aim of ensuring a reasonable means of subsistence for workers who have lost their jobs until they are able to secure financial protection through entitlement to a pension under the statutory pension scheme — ends once the worker concerned is entitled to receive an early retirement pension, and the application of which is based on the possibility of receiving an early retirement pension on grounds of disability?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

THERESE M. SPENCER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-133-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER

 THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

September 1, 2006 (Doc. 26). No written objections have been filed. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and

Recommendation are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause

is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C.

§ 405(g).

Upon remand and after further consideration of the evidence in the record, the ALJ should

appropriately consider and weigh the opinion of Dr. Orenstein, a treating specialist, on the

limitations imposed by Plaintiff’s impairments, consider the limitations imposed by Plaintiff’s right

upper extremity problems, and consider Plaintiff’s subjective allegations as to the limitations

imposed by her impairments. 

Dated September 22, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00133-C Document 27 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 116
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00203

- CR

RANDOLPH BOWDEN, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 202nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- F

- 920

- 202

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Randolph Bowden has filed pro se a notice of appeal from his conviction of deadly

conduct. On our review of the clerk’s record, we noted that the trial court’s certification of right

of appeal stated that this was a plea agreement case and that Bowden has no right of appeal.

Unless a cert ification showing that a defendant has the right of appeal is in the record, we

must dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows Bowden has no right of appeal

and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v.

State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

We , therefore, dismiss th is appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 20, 2012

Date Decided: December 21, 2012

Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12636]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Van Gogh: The Roulin Family Portraits” at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, in Boston, Massachusetts, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

      ( print page 7230)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2025-01309 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1276 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1098, K2025-1097.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00920 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 30,331.

#### The Wolfe Tire Corporation, *Appellee,*v. James Stanton et al., *Appellants.*

This case was consolidated and submitted with No. 29,335. The errors assigned in this appeal are covered in the earlier appeal of No. 29,335. It follows that the judgment in No. 30,331 is also affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00872

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Wilter Olivia GOMEZ

, Appellee

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12051CR

Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order granting Wilter

Olivia Gomez habeas relief and dismissing his criminal case with prejudice is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 1 5 , 2023.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of XsunX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date himself (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:     December
29, 2010




/s/  Tom DjokovichName:
      Tom DjokovichTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive
                  Officer,
      and Principal Financial and
                  Accounting
      Officer, and
Director





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.43

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is entered into as of this 3rd day of March, 2008 by and between Mac-Gray
Corporation (the "Company") and                        (the "Executive"). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined
shall have the respective meaning so ascribed in that certain Employment
Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2007, by and between the Company and the Executive (the "Employment Agreement"). The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.     Section 9
is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



2.     Section 11(b)
is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



3.     Section 11
is further amended by adding subsections (e) and (f) at the end thereof:



---





4.     In
all other respects the Employment Agreement is hereby affirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as a sealed instrument as of the date first written above on behalf of the Company, by its duly authorized officer, and by the
Executive.

| |  | Mac-Gray Corporation                                                    
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                                     
| |  | Name: Stewart G. MacDonald, Jr.
Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                                                         
| |  | Executive                                                               
| |  | Name:                                                                   

[Signature Page to First Amendment to Employment Agreement]

2

---



QuickLinks
Manuel Vicente ANTUNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2881

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Manuel Vicente Antuna, pro se.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
G.D.A. v. STATE

CR-16-0775

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LAWRENCE EDWARD BELL,

Petitioner,

VS.

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-2092-G

)

) ECF

)

)

)

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the court finds that

the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct,

and they are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.

October 10, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02092-G Document 16 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 138
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Knapfel,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  November 19, 2005        /s/ David F. Knapfel
                              ----------------------------------------
                            By: David F. Knapfel, Chief Financial
                                Officer and Principal Accounting
                                Officer of Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 1 of 14 PageID 259
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 2 of 14 PageID 260
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 3 of 14 PageID 261
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 4 of 14 PageID 262
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 5 of 14 PageID 263
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 6 of 14 PageID 264
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 7 of 14 PageID 265
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 8 of 14 PageID 266
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 9 of 14 PageID 267
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 10 of 14 PageID 268
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 11 of 14 PageID 269
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 12 of 14 PageID 270
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 13 of 14 PageID 271
Case 4:05-cv-00333-Y Document 39 Filed 11/21/08 Page 14 of 14 PageID 272
Case 2:05-cv-00190-J-BB Document 8 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 91
Case 3:05-cv-01383-D Document 224 Filed 08/13/08 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5003
Case 3:05-cv-01383-D Document 224 Filed 08/13/08 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5004
EX PARTE Marcus O. TAITE

CR-16-1356

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 3886)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Microphysiological Aging Systems.                    

*Date:*                         February 24, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant proposals.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 594-7945,                         *kaitlyn.hardell@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 10, 2025.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00842 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 72 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to veterans with traumatic 

brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona (for himself, Mr. CRANE, and Mr. GOSAR) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen 

therapy to veterans with traumatic brain injury or posttraumatic stress disorder. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TBI and PTSD Treat5 ment Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 72 IH

1 SEC. 2. HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY FOR VETERANS 

2 WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY OR POST3 TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 17 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1710E 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic 

8 stress disorder: hyperbaric oxygen ther9 apy 

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary shall furnish 

11 hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a condi12 tion specified in subsection (b) through a health care pro13 vider described in section 1703(c)(5) of this title. 

14 ‘‘(b) COVERED CONDITIONS.—The conditions speci15 fied in this subsection are the following: 

16 ‘‘(1) Traumatic brain injury. 

17 ‘‘(2) Post-traumatic stress disorder.’’. 

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

19 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

20 after the item relating to section 1710E the following new 

21 item: 

‘‘1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder: hyperbaric 

oxygen therapy.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Eduard Jaeger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Eduard Jaeger
-----------------------
Eduard Jaeger
Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2007
Kelly WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.