alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,368,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  732,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,522
<INVENTORY>                                    794,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,970,211
<PP&E>                                       2,917,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                 312,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,888,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,412,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,764,467
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,038,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,888,200
<SALES>                                     10,559,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,440,643
<CGS>                                        7,106,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,923,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               148,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             208,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                469,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                   136,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            333,178
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   333,178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0511

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.E.,

Respondent and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 10, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 4 2021

01/04/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0511
Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 131 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4527
Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 131 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4528
STATEMENT ON CLIMATE CHANGE

JEFFERY S. HALL, FCA BOARD MEMBER

CHAIRMAN, FCSIC BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION BOARD MEETING

JULY 8, 2021

Climate and weather-related risks uniquely impact agriculture and rural America. This 

nation’s farmers and ranchers have been dealing with short and long-term weather risks for 

decades. As the safety and soundness regulator of the Farm Credit System, we should 

dedicate more resources to identifying the potential impact on the System’s portfolio. Just 

as important are the implications to the Farm Credit Insurance Fund managed by the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation.

This is clearly a very complicated and often politically charged topic, and we must have 

realistic expectations as we formalize a taskforce to continue the work we have already 

started. When tackling a project like this one, it’s important to resist the temptation to try 

to solve the big problems before we identify and address the simple and important 

questions. 

As financial regulators with a unique mission, FCA and FCSIC must recognize and evaluate 

any potential risk that climate poses to the Farm Credit System through possible impacts on 

land values, crop productivity, animal health, and rural economies. That’s why we have 

decided to form a taskforce to take a proactive approach to evaluating any potential risks to 

the System. The taskforce that we announce today will investigate climate-related financial 

risks. If necessary, it will propose tools to manage, stress- test, and hedge the risk of 

climate-related losses on System credit.

This taskforce is chartered with two separate and unique objectives:

• FCA needs to understand the potential safety and soundness risks to the Farm Credit

System portfolio.

• FCSIC needs to understand any potential risk to the Farm Credit Insurance Fund.

These are two different but related objectives, and the taskforce must respect the needs of 

both while keeping the focus narrow to meet these objectives as information is collected.

My expectations for this group are as follows:

1. Collect useful work that has already been completed in this area.

2. Identify reliable data that has already been collected.

3. Identify partnerships where we can collaborate.

4. Allow the process to lead to discovery; don’t start with a conclusion.

5. Report regularly back to the board.

Above all, I expect this group to gain a better understanding of any meaningful risk to the 

Farm Credit System portfolio and the Farm Credit System Insurance Fund through available 

information. This first step of information gathering must be accomplished before allocating 

significant personnel and financial resources to further research. I want to thank Ryan 

Kuhns, Ryan Leist, and Greg Smith for their presentation and the work completed so far. I 

look forward to working with the taskforce to tackle this long-term challenge.
H. Res. 54 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 22, 2025. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Norman, Mr. 

McClintock, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Carter of 

Georgia, Mr. Cline, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Roy, Mr. Stutzman, 

Mr. Moore of Utah, Mr. Estes, Mr. Brecheen, Mr. Obernolte, 

Mr. Carey, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Clyde, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. 

McDowell, Mr. Gill of Texas, Mr. Moore of North Carolina. 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Steil, 

Chair, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Griffith, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Bice, 

Mr. Carey, Ms. Lee of Florida, Mrs. Miller of Illinois. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Chief Executive Officer Certification
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Paul O. BowerPaul O. BowerChief Executive Officer
Case 3:05-cv-01963-H Document 43 Filed 10/17/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 11
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01963-H Document 43 Filed 10/17/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 12
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01963-H Document 43 Filed 10/17/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 13
Martha MAXEY a/k/a Martha Peterson-Maxey; Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, Not Individually but as Trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust, as Assignee of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Daryl Maxey a/k/a Daryl Aaron Maxey; Clerk of Court of Pinellas County, Florida; and Any and All Unknown Parties Claiming by Through, Under, or Against the Herein Named Individual Defendant(s) Who are Not Known to be Dead or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties May Claim an Interest as Spouses, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, or Other Claimants, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1930

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Anthony Terrell EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

Anthony Terrell Evans, Okeechobee, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID 129
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID 130
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID 131
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID 132
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID 133
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID 134
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID 135
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00921-Y Document 13 Filed 04/26/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID 136
Natasha SAVAGE, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Darwin Savage, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-167

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Roy O.
Estridge, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 of Valley Commerce Bancorp;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:





(a.)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b.)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c.)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a.) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b.) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
November 14, 2009








/s/ Roy O. EstridgeRoy
      O. EstridgeChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heavy Earth Resources, Inc. a Florida corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Anthony Ives, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Heavy Earth Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Heavy Earth Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: May 14, 2012





/s/ Anthony IvesAnthony Ives

Principal Financial Officer
# C_2017277EN.01002802.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/28

---

Action brought on 10 July 2017 — European Commission v Republic of Croatia

(Case C-415/17)

(2017/C 277/42)

Language of the case: Croatian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk, M. Mataija and G. von Rintelen, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Croatia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The European Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Republic of Croatia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (OJ 2014 L 158, p. 196), by failing to take the necessary measures, by 17 June 2016, in order to comply with that directive or, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Republic of Croatia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (OJ 2014 L 158, p. 196), by failing to take the necessary measures, by 17 June 2016, in order to comply with that directive or, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission;

| — | impose on the Republic of Croatia, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a daily penalty payment of EUR 9 275,20, with effect from the day on which judgment is given that there has been a failure to comply with the obligation to notify the measures for transposing Directive 2014/59/EU; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose on the Republic of Croatia, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a daily penalty payment of EUR 9 275,20, with effect from the day on which judgment is given that there has been a failure to comply with the obligation to notify the measures for transposing Directive 2014/59/EU;

| — | order the Republic of Croatia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Croatia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Republic of Croatia has failed to fulfil its obligation to inform the Commission of the measures for transposing Directive 2014/56/EU within the time limit laid down in Article 2 of that directive.

---
Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I,
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Trailer Bridge, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify that:

        1.      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Mark A. Tanner
---------------------
Mark A. Tanner
April 14, 2003
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 1 of 7 PageID 331
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 2 of 7 PageID 332
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 3 of 7 PageID 333
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 4 of 7 PageID 334
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 5 of 7 PageID 335
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 6 of 7 PageID 336
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 99 Filed 02/02/04 Page 7 of 7 PageID 337
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 9 PageID 133
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 9 PageID 134
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 9 PageID 135
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 9 PageID 136
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 5 of 9 PageID 137
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 6 of 9 PageID 138
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 7 of 9 PageID 139
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 8 of 9 PageID 140
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-3 Filed 08/04/06 Page 9 of 9 PageID 141
Teresa Lynne CRAIN v. Jerry Barton CRAIN

2160294

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018052EN.01001902.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 20 November 2017 — Skatteverket v Srf konsulterna AB

(Case C-647/17)

(2018/C 052/27)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteverket

Applicant:

Defendant: Srf konsulterna AB

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the expression ‘admission to events’ in Article 53 of the VAT Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that it covers a service in the form of a five-day course on accountancy which is supplied solely to taxable persons and requires advance registration and payment?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006, L 347, p. 1).

1

---
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Najeeb Ghauri,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      September 19, 2007





/s/
      Najeeb Ghauri





Najeeb
      Ghauri, Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

s0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140295 

JEFFREY A. POTTS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140295 

 COA: 289992 

Bay CC: 07-007022-DM 

TONI L. POTTS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.