alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Coast National
      Bancorp (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






PACIFIC
      COAST NATIONAL BANCORP




Dated:
      November 10, 2006


By: /s/
      Colin
      M. Forkner


Colin
      M.
      Forkner


Chief
      Executive Officer




Dated:
      November 10, 2006


By: /s/
      Terry
      Stalk


Terry
      Stalk


Chief
      Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Pacific Coast National Bancorp and will be retained by Pacific
      Coast
      National Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 1 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 10 PageID 740
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 2 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 10 PageID 741
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 3 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 3 of 10 PageID 742
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 4 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 4 of 10 PageID 743
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 5 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 5 of 10 PageID 744
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 6 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 6 of 10 PageID 745
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 7 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 7 of 10 PageID 746
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 8 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 8 of 10 PageID 747
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 9 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 9 of 10 PageID 748
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 35 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 10 of 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 35 Filed 07/15/05 Page 10 of 10 PageID 749
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 246 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on the amount individuals can deduct for certain State and local taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself and Mr. CASTEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on the amount individuals can deduct for 

certain State and local taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SALT Fairness for 

5 Working Families Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR CER7 TAIN STATE AND LOCAL TAXES OF INDIVID8 UALS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b)(6)(B) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 246 IH

1 ‘‘$10,000 ($5,000 in the case of a married individual filing 

2 a separate return)’’ and inserting ‘‘$15,000 (twice such 

3 amount in the case of a joint return)’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 24

   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                    enrollment of the bill S. 1605.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 18 (legislative day, December 17), 2021

   Mr. Reed submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                    enrollment of the bill S. 1605.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the table in section 2301(a), in the item relating 
        to Eielson Air Force Base, strike ``$44,850,00'' in the amount 
        column and insert ``$44,850,000''.
            (2) In section 4601, in the table relating to Military 
        Construction, Navy, in the item relating to AEGIS Ashore 
        Barracks Planning and Design in Redzikowo, Poland, insert ``0'' 
        in the Conference Authorized column.
                                 <all>
```
Steven C. WHITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Sheriff of Polk County Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 11, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Dismissed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAYMOND RAMIREZ

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2823

[ January 31, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 9673 CF10A

.

Raymond Ramirez, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Christina MIKEL v. Bobby MIKEL

2161029

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018 Reh. denied February 16, 2018

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AGUSTIN HERNANDEZHERNANDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71646

Agency No. A097-349-937

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Agustin Hernandez-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro

se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denying his

FILED

JUN 03 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71646

second motion to reconsider the underlying denial of his application for

cancellation of relief based on his failure to establish the requisite hardship to a

qualifying relative. The BIA denied the motion as numerically-barred and

untimely-filed.

Hernandez-Hernandez contends that the BIA erred by not finding

exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his two United States citizen

children. Hernandez-Hernandez also contends there is no rational basis for treating

aliens differently who apply for § 212(c) relief and for cancellation relief.

Hernandez-Hernandez has not raised any challenges to the BIA’s denial of

his second motion to reconsider as numerically barred and untimely, and therefore

he has waived any challenge to that decision. See Martinez-Rios v. Holder, 94

F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument in a brief are

deemed abandoned).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
T.H. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170087

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 16, 2018

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: April 4, 2008 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:05-cr-00291-N Document 27 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO . 09

- 18

- 000393

- CV

____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF V.B.

______________________________________________________ _ __ ___ __ ___ __ _ ____ On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 230,775

_________________________________________________ _ _ ___ _ __ ___ __ ___ __ _ ____ MEMORANDUM OPINION N.B. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his daughter,

V.B. 1 , 2 The trial court found by clear and convincing evidence statutory grounds exist for termination of N.B.’s parental rights, and termination of his rights would
be in V.B. ’s best interest. See Tex. Fam. Code. Ann. § 161.001 (b) ( 1 ) (D ), ( E) (West Supp. 2018 ). Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel submitted a brief in

1 To protect the i dentity of the minor, we use initials for the child and her parents. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2). 2 The mother’s parental rights to V.B. were terminated in an earlier proceeding. She is not a party to this appeal.2 which counsel contends there are no meritorious grounds to be advanced on appeal. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re L.D.T. , 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief provides counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel certified Appellant was served with a copy of the Anders brief filed on his behalf. This Court notified Appellant of his right to file a pro se response, as well as the deadline for filing the response. This
Court did not receive a pro se response from Appellant. We have independently reviewed the appellate record and counsel’s brief, and we agree any appeal would be frivolous. We find no arg uable error requiring us to appoint new counsel to re

brief this appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating N.B.’s parental rights. We deny the motion to withdraw f iled by N.B

. ’s court

- appointed appellate counsel, because an attorney’s duty extends through the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.016(3)(B) (West Supp. 2018 ); In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016). In the event N.B. de cides to pursue an appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas, counsel’s obligations to N.B. can be met “by filing a petition for review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief.” See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d at 27

– 28.3 AFFIRMED.

_________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice Submitted on January 2, 2019 Opinion Delivered January 24, 2019 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rections: 

5 (1) In the table in section 2301(a), in the item 

6 relating to Eielson Air Force Base, strike 

7 ‘‘$44,850,00’’ in the amount column and insert 

8 ‘‘$44,850,000’’. 

9 (2) In section 4601, in the table relating to 

10 Military Construction, Navy, in the item relating to 

11 AEGIS Ashore Barracks Planning and Design in 

12 Redzikowo, Poland, insert ‘‘0’’ in the Conference 

13 Authorized column. 

Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 17), 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 24 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make 

corrections in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 16 (Monday, January 27, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01726]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Rust Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 25, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Rust Foundation has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Open Source 
Science B.V., Breda, NETHERLANDS; PROMOTIC, Lom[eacute], TOGOLESE 
REPUBLIC; and Student Research and Development dba CodeDay, Seattle, 
WA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Rust Foundation intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 14, 2022, Rust Foundation filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 12, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82634).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-01726 Filed 1-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  David  Zaikin,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Siberian  Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  March  31,  2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.


                                     By:/s/ David Zaikin
                                     --------------------------
                                     David Zaikin
                                     Chief Executive Officer
May 18, 2006

<PAGE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**METALS USA, INC.**

 

INFORMATIONAL ADDENDUM TO REPORT ON FORM 10-K

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

NOT FILED PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Pursuant to the requirements ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned chiefexecutive officer and chief financial officer hereby certify that this Reporton Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in thisReport on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Metals USA, Inc.

 

 
| Dated:   March 21, 2003 |                                                      |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                      |
|                         | /s/  C. LOURENÇO GONÇALVES                 |   |
|                         | Name:  C. Lourenço Gonçalves               |
|                         | Title: President  and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                         |                                                      |
|                         |                                                      |
|                         | /s/  TERRY L. FREEMAN                                |   |
|                         |                                                      |
|                         | Name:  Terry L. Freeman                              |
|                         | Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Thomas Kreig, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









/s/
      Thomas
      Kreig


Thomas
      Kreig


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer


November
      14, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Jeffrey Barber, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:



1. the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively (the Form 10-KSB) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. the
information contained in the 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Jeffrey J. Barber  
|-----------------------
|Jeffrey J. Barber      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: November 14, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
                                    (VANJANI)

$150,000.00                                                        JULY 18, 2003

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Chandu Vanjani ("Buyer"), hereby
promises to pay to JMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("Payee"), the principal sum of ONE
HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000.00) in immediately available funds in
lawful money of the United States (the "Principal").

         The principal amount shall be payable in four equal annual installments
of $37,500 commencing on December 1, 2004, with the remaining principal
installments due on December 1, 2005, December 1, 2006 and December 1, 2007.

         The Principal may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, without
premium or penalty.

         The performance of all obligations under this Note is secured by that
certain Pledge Agreement, dated July 18, 2003, between Buyer and Payee.

         The Buyer hereby promises to pay all installments of principal and
other amounts due hereunder on or before the date on which the same is due, and
any payment not so received within ten (10) days after the date that same shall
have been due shall bear interest, to the extent permitted by law, at the rate
equal to fifteen percent (15%) after such amount becomes overdue, such interest
to be payable on demand. All calculations of interest hereunder shall be
calculated on the basis of a 360 day year for the actual number of days elapsed.

         In the event that (i) the Buyer fails to make any payment of principal,
interest or other charge under this Note within thirty (30) days after receipt
of written notice by the Payee that the same was due; or (ii) the Buyer files a
voluntary petition in bankruptcy or applies for the appointment of a receiver
for it or its assets; or (iii) an involuntary petition in bankruptcy is filed
against the Buyer and remains unstayed or undischarged for a period in excess of
one hundred twenty (120) days; the Payee may accelerate the entire balance
outstanding under this Note, and the entire unpaid Principal balance together
with accrued but unpaid interest and other charges hereunder shall be due and
payable fifteen (15) days after receipt by the Buyer of such notice.

         The undersigned Buyer hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of
dishonor, protest and all other demands and notices in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance and enforcement of this Note.

         If this Note is not paid when due, Buyer promises to pay all costs of
collection, including but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, whether or
not suit is filed on this Note.

<PAGE>

         This Note shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of California.

Chatsworth, California                      /s/ Chandu Vanjani
                                            ____________________________________
                                            Chandu Vanjani

                                       2