alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24



                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and each of the undersigned directors of the
Company, hereby constitutes and appoints Stephen Adams, Joe McAdams and Mark J.
Boggess, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone),
its/his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for it/him and on its/his
behalf in its/his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign,
execute, affix its/his seal thereto and file the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, including any amendment or amendments thereto, with all
exhibits and any all documents required to be filed with respect thereto with
any regulatory authority.
     
There is hereby granted to said attorneys, and each of the, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, requisite and
necessary to be done in respect of the foregoing as fully as it/he or
itself/himself might or could do if personally present, thereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
     
This Power of Attorney may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same instrument and any of the undersigned directors may execute this
Power of Attorney by signing any such counterpart.
     
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC. has caused this Power of
Attorney to be executed in its name by its President and Chief Executive Officer
on the 16th day of March, 1999.


                                   AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.



                                   By:  /s/ Joe B. McAdams
                                        ----------------------------------
                                            Joe B. McAdams, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer







                                         86

<PAGE>

The undersigned directors of AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC., a Delaware
corporation, have hereunto set their hands as of the 16th day of March, 1999.


/s/ Stephen Adams                            /s/ Thomas A. Donnelly
----------------------------------           ------------------------------
 Stephen Adams                                Thomas A. Donnelly


/s/ Joe B. McAdams                           /s/ David B. Garvin
----------------------------------           ------------------------------
 Joe B. McAdams                               David B. Garvin


/s/ Wayne Boysen                             /s/ David Frith-Smith
----------------------------------           ------------------------------
 Wayne Boysen                                 David Frith-Smith


/s/ John A. Ehlert                           
----------------------------------           
 John A. Ehlert











                                         87
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-0604]

Withdrawal of Food and Drug Administration Notice Regarding Yong 
Sheng Jiao; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing this notice 
to withdraw the December 5, 2024, Federal Register notice entitled 
``Yong Sheng Jiao; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order'' because 
the document provided the incorrect bases for debarment and omitted 
edited language. A corrected notice document is published elsewhere in 
this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Fikes, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., 
Bldg. 1, Rm. 4232, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-9603.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of December 5, 2024 
(89 FR 96655), FDA published a notice entitled ``Yong Sheng Jiao; 
Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order.'' The notice incorrectly 
reflected language for debarment and omitted edited language. The 
published document did not evince all changes and edits relevant to 
this notice. For this reason, the notice, Docket No. FDA-2024-N-0604, 
as published in the Federal Register on December 5, 2024, is hereby 
withdrawn.

    Dated: December 31, 2024.
George M. Warren,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2025-00125 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
```
Hilario Solorzano MEDINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
A00A0274.

#### HAMMOND et al. v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY et al.

(525 SE2d 709)

Decided October 19, 1999.

*Grady K. Dukes,*for appellants.

*McLeod, Benton, Begnaud & Marshall, Michael C. Pruett,*for appellees.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff William R. Hammond and similarly situated police officers sued the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County and James H. Alford, Jr., its Personnel Director, alleging the Unified Government unlawfully paid plaintiffs at a lower rate and grade than certain other officers. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment in an order entered Thursday, June 3, 1999. Plaintiffs’ notice of appeal was filed on Thursday, July 8, 1999. *Held:*

“A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of. . . .” OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court. *Barnes v. Justis,*223 Ga. App. 671, 672 (478 SE2d 402). In this instance, the thirtieth day after entry of summary judgment fell on Saturday, July 3, 1999. The following Monday was an official holiday in remembrance of Independence Day. Under OCGA § 1-3-1 (d) (3), plaintiffs had until Tuesday, July 6, 1999, to perfect their appeal. The notice of appeal filed on July 8, 1999, is not timely. We are without jurisdiction to consider the merits, and so the appeal in Case No. A00A0274 must be dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Johnson, C. J, and Phipps, J., concur.*
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 11 PageID 251
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 11 PageID 252
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 11 PageID 253
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 11 PageID 254
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 5 of 11 PageID 255
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 6 of 11 PageID 256
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 7 of 11 PageID 257
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 8 of 11 PageID 258
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 9 of 11 PageID 259
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 10 of 11 PageID 260
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 11 of 11 PageID 261
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009                    
|                                     
|/s/ Michael F. Schmidt               
|Michael F. Schmidt                   
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Case 5:04-cv-00147-C Document 1 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 1 of 5
Case 5:04-cv-00147-C Document 1 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 2 of 5
Case 5:04-cv-00147-C Document 1 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 3 of 5
Case 5:04-cv-00147-C Document 1 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 4 of 5
Case 5:04-cv-00147-C Document 1 Filed 06/28/2004 Page 5 of 5
Case 3:05-cv-00945-B Document 7 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
Raymond Howard DOUGLAS Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0811

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019

Raymond Howard Douglas Jr, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is DENIED on the merits.

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID 7765
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 2 of 35 PageID 7766
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 3 of 35 PageID 7767
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 4 of 35 PageID 7768
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 5 of 35 PageID 7769
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 6 of 35 PageID 7770
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 7 of 35 PageID 7771
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 8 of 35 PageID 7772
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 9 of 35 PageID 7773
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 10 of 35 PageID 7774
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 11 of 35 PageID 7775
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 12 of 35 PageID 7776
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 13 of 35 PageID 7777
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 14 of 35 PageID 7778
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 15 of 35 PageID 7779
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 16 of 35 PageID 7780
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 17 of 35 PageID 7781
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 18 of 35 PageID 7782
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 19 of 35 PageID 7783
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 20 of 35 PageID 7784
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 21 of 35 PageID 7785
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 22 of 35 PageID 7786
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 23 of 35 PageID 7787
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 24 of 35 PageID 7788
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 25 of 35 PageID 7789
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 26 of 35 PageID 7790
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 27 of 35 PageID 7791
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 28 of 35 PageID 7792
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 29 of 35 PageID 7793
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 30 of 35 PageID 7794
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 31 of 35 PageID 7795
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 32 of 35 PageID 7796
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 33 of 35 PageID 7797
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 34 of 35 PageID 7798
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 35 of 35 PageID 7799
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 5 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 5

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Khanna) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person shall serve as a Representative for more 
than six two-year terms. Service as a Representative for more than one 
year of any two-year term shall be treated as a complete term for 
purposes of this section, without regard to whether the service was 
completed by the individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for more than two 
six-year terms. Service as a Senator for more than three years of any 
six-year term shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 
section, without regard to whether the service was completed by the 
individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not apply to any person who served 
as a Representative or as a Senator during any Congress occurring 
before the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN RICE, §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 3:05-CV-0904-P

§

COCA-COLA, §

Defendant. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the District Court in

implementation thereof, this case has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge. 

The findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as evidenced by

his signature thereto, are as follows:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

Statement of Case: Plaintiff brings this case alleging copyright infringement by

Defendant. Process has not been issued in this case. However, on May 16, 2004, this

court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to submit an amended complaint in compliance

with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) within thirty days. The order notified Plaintiff that failure to

comply would result in a recommendation that the suit be dismissed for failure to

prosecute. As of the date of this recommendation, Plaintiff has not responded to this

order.

Findings and Conclusions: 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) allows a court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure

to prosecute or for failure to comply with the federal rules or any court order. E.g.,

Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)]

flows from the court's inherent power to control its docket and prevent undue delays in

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00904-P Document 7 Filed 07/11/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 17
2

the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v. Graystone Ins. Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399,

401 (5th Cir. 1985), citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). Because

Plaintiff has been given ample opportunity to submit an amended complaint that

complies with Rule 8(a), but has failed or refused to do so, this action should be

dismissed for want of prosecution.

RECOMMENDATION:

For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that this case be dismissed without

prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

A copy of this recommendation shall be mailed to Petitioner. 

Signed this 11th day of July, 2005.

__________________________________

WM. F. SANDERSON, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

In the event that you wish to object to this recommendation, you are hereby

notified that you must file your written objections within ten days after being served with

a copy of this recommendation. Pursuant to Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79

F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc), a party's failure to file written objections to these

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law within such ten-day period may bar a de

novo determination by the district judge of any finding of fact or conclusion of law and

shall bar such party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the

unobjected to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law accepted by the district

court.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00904-P Document 7 Filed 07/11/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 18
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 21 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 1 of 2

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 21

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 21 Filed 05/19/2005 Page 2 of 2
# FCA FY 2021
EX PARTE T.G.

(In re T.G. v. Russell County Department of Human Resources)

2170116

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 31, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Jameth Laron MCDONALD v. STATE

CR-16-1013

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017374EN.01001802.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’Appello di Trento (Italy) lodged on 14 August 2017 — Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR v Fabio Rossato, Conservatorio di Musica F.A. Bonporti

(Case C-494/17)

(2017/C 374/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte d’Appello di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR

Appellant:

Cross-appellant: Fabio Rossato

Cross-appellant

Respondent: Conservatorio di Musica F.A. Bonporti

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC (1) of 28 June 1999, be interpreted as precluding the application of Article 1(95), (131) and (132) of Law No 107 of 2015 of the Italian State, which provides for the conversion of temporary teachers’ fixed-term contracts into contracts of indefinite duration with respect to the future, without retroactive effect and without compensation for damage, as measures that are proportionate, sufficiently effective and a sufficient deterrent to ensure that the measures laid down in the Framework Agreement are fully effective as regards breach of the agreement resulting from abusive repeated renewal of fixed-term contracts during the period prior to that in which the measures set out in the provisions in question are intended to have legal effect?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).

1

---
Nicholas MALLIS, Appellant, v. PALERMO AT THE COLONY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. and Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 1D18-798

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John W. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

John W. White, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*872AFFIRMED . *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b).

Roberts, Ray, and Jay, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Michael Coombs, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive
Officer, and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Valley High
Mining Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including any consolidated subsidiary,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this Quarterly Report, the Registrant's conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.

Dated: August 14, 2006                /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                      -------------------------------
                                      John Michael Coombs,
                                      CEO, President, CFO, and
                                      Chairman of the Board