alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 1 of 31 PageID 212
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 2 of 31 PageID 213
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 3 of 31 PageID 214
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 4 of 31 PageID 215
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 5 of 31 PageID 216
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 6 of 31 PageID 217
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 7 of 31 PageID 218
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 8 of 31 PageID 219
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 9 of 31 PageID 220
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 10 of 31 PageID 221
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 11 of 31 PageID 222
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 12 of 31 PageID 223
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 13 of 31 PageID 224
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 14 of 31 PageID 225
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 15 of 31 PageID 226
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 16 of 31 PageID 227
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 17 of 31 PageID 228
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 18 of 31 PageID 229
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 19 of 31 PageID 230
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 20 of 31 PageID 231
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 21 of 31 PageID 232
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 22 of 31 PageID 233
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 23 of 31 PageID 234
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 24 of 31 PageID 235
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 25 of 31 PageID 236
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 26 of 31 PageID 237
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 27 of 31 PageID 238
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 28 of 31 PageID 239
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 29 of 31 PageID 240
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 30 of 31 PageID 241
Case 4:05-cv-00479-A Document 8 Filed 08/08/05 Page 31 of 31 PageID 242
Opinion filed August 24, 2023

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-23-00156-CR

___________

DAVID ANDREW JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 358th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-21-1753-CR

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, David Andrew Jackson, filed a pro se notice of appeal from the 

trial court’s order of dismissal in this cause. We dismiss the appeal. 

When this appeal was docketed, the clerk of this court wrote Appellant and 

informed him that it did not appear that Appellant’s notice of appeal related to a final 

appealable order. We requested that Appellant respond and show grounds to 

continue the appeal. Appellant has responded, but he has not shown grounds upon 

which this appeal may continue.
2

An appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal 

defendant from a final judgment of conviction or as otherwise authorized by law. 

Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Appellant’s notice 

of appeal relates to the trial court’s order dismissing cause number D-21-1753-CR 

based on the State’s motion. In its motion, the State requested that the trial court 

dismiss the criminal action pending against Appellant because he had been

sentenced to forty-six months in federal prison by the United States District Court 

for the District of Wyoming. Because the trial court’s order dismissing Appellant’s 

case is not an appealable order and an appeal is not otherwise authorized by 

law, we do not have jurisdiction to address Appellant’s appeal. Munguia v. State, 

No. 11-18-00059-CR, 2018 WL 1546233, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2018, no 

pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); McCray v. State, No. 01-12-00969-

CR, 2013 WL 6047614, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 14, 2013, 

no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

W. STACY TROTTER

 JUSTICE

August 24, 2023

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Deepwell Energy Services, LLC, * From the 385 th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CV54356

.

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 0 67

- CV * April 2, 2020

Aveda Transportation and Energy * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Services, Jared Brown, Linda Clark, (Panel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Tom Halliday, and Mickey Sims, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal

are taxed against Deep well Energy Services, LLC.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 181 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that artificially 

propagated animals shall be treated the same under that Act as naturally 

propagated animals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide 

that artificially propagated animals shall be treated the 

same under that Act as naturally propagated animals, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF ARTIFICIALLY PROPAGATED 

4 ANIMALS. 

5 Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

6 U.S.C. 1533) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new subsection: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 181 IH

1 ‘‘(j) TREATMENT OF ARTIFICIALLY PROPAGATED

2 ANIMALS.—The Secretary shall not distinguish between 

3 naturally propagated animals and artificially propagated 

4 animals in making any determination under this Act.’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ARTIFICIAL PROPAGATION FOR MITIGATION PUR6 POSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 14 of the Endangered 

8 Species Act of 1973 (relating to repeals of provisions of 

9 law, which have executed) is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘ARTIFICIAL PROPAGATION FOR MITIGATION PURPOSES

11 ‘‘SEC. 14. The Secretary shall authorize the use of 

12 artificial propagation of animals of a species for purposes 

13 of any mitigation required under this Act with respect to 

14 such species.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con16 tents in the first section of such Act is amended by strik17 ing the item relating to such section and inserting the fol18 lowing: 

‘‘Sec. 14. Artificial propagation for mitigation purposes.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. APPLICATION. 

20 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

21 respect to a species without regard to whether the species 

22 was determined to be an endangered species or threatened 

23 species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 181 IH

1 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) before, on, or after the date of enact2 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 4 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 4

   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Thune submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Charles E. Grassley as President of the 
Senate pro tempore.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JackL. Wyszomierski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to the §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated: May 14, 2007                                      |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ JACK L. WYSZOMIERSKI                                      |   |
| Name: Jack L. Wyszomierski                                    |
| Title:*Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
L.M. v. Jefferson County DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160460

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 273 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue to implement 

the Migrant Protection Protocols, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. GILL of Texas (for himself, Ms. MACE, Mr. OGLES, Mr. WEBER of Texas, 

Mr. BURLISON, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Ms. 

MALLIOTAKIS, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. WIED, Mr. MOORE of West Virginia, 

Ms. BOEBERT, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. CRANE, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. SELF, Mr. HUDSON, Mrs. 

HOUCHIN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. MILLS, Mr. PALMER, Mr. 

YAKYM, Mr. RULLI, Mr. BIGGS of Arizona, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. LAWLER, 

Mr. MESSMER, Mr. DOWNING, Mr. MCGUIRE, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. PERRY, 

Mr. HARRIS of Maryland, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. FRY, Mr. BABIN, Ms. VAN

DUYNE, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. HERN of Oklahoma, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. 

HARRIS of North Carolina, Mr. EVANS of Colorado, Mr. HARRIGAN, Mr. 

HUIZENGA, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. 

SMITH of Missouri, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. 

BARRETT, Mr. GOODEN, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. BACON, Mr. 

HAMADEH of Arizona, Mr. MORAN, Mr. HUNT, Mr. GUEST, Mr. BEAN

of Florida, Ms. FOXX, Ms. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. BOST, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. ESTES, 

Mr. ALFORD, Mr. CLYDE, Mrs. LUNA, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. SCHMIDT, Mr. 

TONY GONZALES of Texas, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. CISCOMANI, Mrs. 

FISCHBACH, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. MOORE of Utah, Mr. 

CARTER of Georgia, and Mr. MCDOWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue 

to implement the Migrant Protection Protocols, and for 

other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 273 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Return Excessive Mi5 grants and Asylees to International Neighbors in Mexico 

6 Act of 2025’’ or the ‘‘REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025’’. 

7 SEC. 2. MIGRANT PROTECTION PROTOCOLS. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec9 retary of Homeland Security shall implement the Migrant 

10 Protection Protocols in accordance with the memorandum 

11 of Secretary of Homeland Security Nielsen entitled ‘‘Pol12 icy Guidance for Implementation of the Migrant Protec13 tion Protocols’’, dated January 25, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5834-5835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01133]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2022-OS-0113]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness (OUSD (P&R)), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
18, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open

[[Page 5835]]

for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Evaluation of The U.S. Army 
Barracks Locks Upgrade Initiative (BLUI) submitted under ``DoD-wide 
Data Collection and Analysis for the Department of Defense Qualitative 
and Quantitative Data Collection in Support of the Independent Review 
Commission on Sexual Assault Recommendations''; OMB Control Number 
0704-0644.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 1,660.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,660.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 415.
    Needs and Uses: The Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault 
in the Military recommended that the Department develop a ``state-of-
the-art DoD prevention research capability'' to better understand and 
develop prevention approaches for sexual assault and other crimes. This 
information collection is necessary to understand the impact of the 
U.S. Army's BLUI, which modernized locks in Army barracks, on sexual 
and non-sexual crimes and related outcomes. The study focuses on E1-E4 
Soldiers living in barracks, assessing the upgrades' effectiveness and 
related communications on trust in leadership, fear and perceived risk 
of sexual and non-sexual crimes, and actual victimization/perpetration. 
This information will help support the development of evidence-based 
approaches for prevention.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Once.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Stephanie J. Bost,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2025-01133 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
# C_2019131EN.01000602.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag — Netherlands) — Staat der Nederlanden v Warner-Lambert Company LLC

(Case C-423/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Article 11 - Generic medicinal products - Summary of product characteristics - Exclusion of references referring to indications or dosage forms still covered by patent law at the time when the generic medicine was marketed)

(2019/C 131/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staat der Nederlanden

Defendant: Warner-Lambert Company LLC

Operative part of the judgment

The second paragraph of Article 11 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2012/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a marketing authorisation procedure such as that at issue in the main proceedings, communication to the competent national authority by the applicant or holder of a marketing authorisation for a generic medicinal product of the package leaflet or a summary of the product characteristics of that medicinal product which does not include any reference to indications or dosage forms which were still covered by patent law at the time that medicinal product was placed on the market constitutes a request to limit the scope of the marketing authorisation of the generic medicinal product in question.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
IIA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management relating to ‘‘Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to 

‘‘Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Ocean Energy Management relating to ‘‘Protec5 tion of Marine Archaeological Resources’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 11 IS 

1 71160 (September 3, 2024)), and such rule shall have no 

2 force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Carlos VILA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019.

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 33 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 5 PageID 215
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 33 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 5 PageID 216
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 33 Filed 07/25/06 Page 3 of 5 PageID 217
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 33 Filed 07/25/06 Page 4 of 5 PageID 218
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01793-M Document 33 Filed 07/25/06 Page 5 of 5 PageID 219
# C_2017249EN.01001602.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/16

---

Appeal brought on 18 January 2017 by For Tune sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2016 in Case T-579/15: For Tune sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-23/17 P)

(2017/C 249/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: For Tune sp. z o.o. (represented by: K. Popławska, adwokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 15 June 2017 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Dennis COX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-53

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 850 

Designating October 2024 as ‘‘National Country Music Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. KAINE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 2024 as ‘‘National Country Music 

Month’’. 

Whereas country music, a uniquely American sound, echoes 

from the backroads of the United States to the streets 

of Nashville, Tennessee; 

Whereas Bristol, straddling the Tennessee and Virginia state 

line, is recognized as the ‘‘birthplace of country music’’; 

Whereas the Grand Ole Opry, the most famous stage in country music, has been called the ‘‘home of American 

music’’; 

Whereas the Ryman Auditorium, the original home of the 

Grand Ole Opry, has been described as ‘‘the Mother 

Church of country music’’; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 850 ATS 

Whereas country music reminds every American of the importance of faith, family, freedom, hope, opportunity, and 

patriotism; 

Whereas country music has influenced numerous other genres 

of music; 

Whereas country music is an incredibly diverse genre, appealing to Americans from all walks of life; 

Whereas country music has millions of fans all across the 

United States; 

Whereas the country music industry contributes billions of 

dollars in revenue each year to the economy of the United 

States; 

Whereas the Country Music Association first celebrated ‘‘National Country Music Month’’ in 1964; and 

Whereas President Nixon issued a presidential proclamation 

in 1970 to acknowledge October as ‘‘National Country 

Music Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 2024 as ‘‘National 

3 Country Music Month’’; 

4 (2) honors the contributions of country music 

5 to the story and history of the United States; and 

6 (3) encourages the American people to observe 

7 ‘‘National Country Music Month’’ with appropriate 

8 ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad Huss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  February 27, 2013 By: /s/Conrad Huss Name: Conrad Huss  Title: Director, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer
Patrick Lee CARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.