alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JULIO ALBERTO DOMINGUEZ, )

Defendant-Petitioner, )

 )

vs. ) No. 3:06-CV-1295-D

 ) No. 3:04-CR-357-D

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff-Respondent. )

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the court is of

the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are adopted

as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SIGNED December 29, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00357-D Document 43 Filed 12/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 116
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Alchemy Enterprises, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harold Sciotto, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Harold Sciotto

Harold Sciotto

Chief Executive Officer

September
23, 2005



/s/ Harold Sciotto

Harold Sciotto

Chief Financial Officer

September 23, 2005
Case 3:05-cv-02019-D Document 8 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 73
Case 3:05-cv-02019-D Document 8 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 74
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of independent registered public accounting firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements filed on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-84226, 333-128361, 333-129962, 333-130040 and 333-155937) and in any related Prospectus and (ii) the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (FileNos. 333-92220, 333-81564, 333-108833, 333-125075, 333-137354, 333-149631, 333-158154, 333-158155, 333-165591, 333-168020, 333-172919, 333-172920 and 333-172921) of our reports dated March 12, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedules of ING Groep N.V., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ING Groep N.V., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

Amsterdam, The Netherlands 

March 12, 2012 

Ernst & Young Accountants LLP
**Exhibit 10.11.6**

**TRAILER BRIDGE, INC.**

**AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR**

**STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

This Amendmentto the Trailer Bridge, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”) has been adopted by the Board of Directors of Trailer Bridge, Inc. in order to conform the Plan to the requirements of Section 409A of the InternalRevenue Code of 1986, as amended. 

The Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2009, as follows: 

1. The definition of the term “Fair Market Value” is amended in its entirety to provide as follows: 

“Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a Share, for purposes of determining the minimum exercise price of an Option on the Grant Date orotherwise, (i) if the Shares are readily tradable on an established securities market, the arithmetic mean of the closing prices of a Share on such market on the ten business days immediately prior to the Grant Date or other measurement date or(ii) if the Shares are not readily tradable on an established securities market, the value determined by the Committee as of the Grant Date or other measurement date through the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method andotherwise in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B).” 

2. Section 4.3 of the Plan is amended by the addition ofthe following sentence at the end thereof. 

“In no event shall the Committee adjust the terms of the Option in a manner that couldcause the Option to be treated as a grant of a new Option for purposes of Section 409A of the Code and Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v).” 

3. New Section 5.3 is added to the Plan to provide as follows: 

“ 5.3 Option Term. In noevent shall the term of an Option as established by the Committee at the time of grant be extended or the Option otherwise be exercisable beyond the expiration date of the Option set forth in the Award Agreement.” 

4. Section 7.1 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end thereof. 

“The Committee may amend any Option Agreement to the extent the Committee determines that suchamendment is necessary or appropriate in order to bring the Option Agreement into compliance with Section 409A of the Code.” 

 

2
Matthew STRATIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

Matthew Stratis, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Devion CHAPEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1795

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: August 16, 2010





By: /s/ David Zaikin


David Zaikin


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
Josue COTTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Kristen Kawass, Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Following a protracted evidentiary hearing, appellant failed to "demonstrate both deficiency and prejudice," thus we affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief. *See**Strickland v. Washington*, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) ("A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal ... has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient ... Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense."); *Krawczuk v. State*, 92 So.3d 195, 202 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]his Court has held that for ineffective assistance of counsel claims to be successful, the defendant must demonstrate both deficiency and prejudice.") (citing *Bolin v. State*, 41 So.3d 151, 155 (Fla. 2010) ).
Danny Levon BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 23, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**FCA Handbook Update Notice**

[If you currently maintain a hard copy of the FCA Handbook and plan on continuing to do so, we will indicate when pending or revised documents need to be removed. Otherwise, update notices will summarize the addition of new material for the FCA Handbook.]

***FCA Pending Regulations and Notices***

**Margin Rule (**HM-18-2)****-- The Board, OCC, FDIC, FCA, and FHFA (each an Agency and, collectively, the Agencies) are seeking comment on proposed amendments to the minimum margin requirements for registered swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap dealers, and major security-based swap participants for which one of the Agencies is the prudential regulator. (Published 2/21/2018 (83 FR 7413)); comment period ends 4/23/2018)
Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID 66
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID 67
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID 68
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID 69
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID 70
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID 71
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID 72
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 19 Filed 09/16/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID 73
Annual Report on the Farm Credit System’s 

Young, Beginning, and Small Farmer 

Mission Performance

Salvatore Iannetta, FCA Senior Analyst

Office of Data Analytics and Economics
2022 YBS Lending Report—Summary

• New YBS loans decreased in both volume and count in 2022.

• Outstanding YBS loan volume increased in 2022, but at a lower rate than in 2020 

and 2021.

• Outstanding loan counts to young and beginning increased modestly while small 

loan counts contracted slightly. 

• Key factors impacting YBS lending in 2022 were:

• Rising interest rates

• Reduced refinances

• Slowdown in loan demand for rural lifestyle 

• End of Paycheck Protection Program. 
2022 YBS Lending Report—Definitions

Definitions for FCA Reporting:

• Young Farmer: 35 years of age or younger.

• Beginning Farmer: 10 years or less of farming experience.

• Small Farmer: gross annual farm sales of $250,000 or less.

Important Data Clarifications:

• Borrowers may qualify under more than one category.

• Adding Y, B, and S volumes or counts does not produce an accurate measure of YBS lending as 

borrowers can be in one or more categories.

• Dollar volumes include advances and commitments.
Results for 2022 YBS Lending Activities

YBS Loans Made During 2022—As of December 31, 2022

Category Number of loans

Percentage of 

total number 

Dollar volume of 

loans in millions

Percentage of 

total volume 

Young 56,100 17.9% $13,085 9.7%

Beginning 78,742 25.1% $21,532 16.0%

Small 129,288 41.2% $19,105 14.2%
Results for 2022 YBS Lending Activities

YBS Loans Outstanding—As of December 31, 2022

Category Number of loans

Percentage of 

total number 

Dollar volume of 

loans in millions

Percentage of 

total volume 

Young 188,756 19.7% $39,338 10.3%

Beginning 305,742 31.9% $70,857 18.5%

Small 473,549 49.5% $70,322 18.3%
YBS New Loan Volume and Counts

13.1

21.5

19.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Dollars in Billions

Young Beginning Small

56

79

129

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Loan Counts, Thousands

Young Beginning Small
YBS Outstanding Loan Volume and Counts

39.3

70.9

70.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Dollars in Billions

Young Beginning Small

189

306

474

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Loan Counts, Thousands

Young Beginning Small
Conclusions

• Changes in economic conditions, expiration of pandemic-era support programs, reduced 

demand for rural lifestyle led to slower new YBS business activity for 2022. 

• Share of new and outstanding YBS loans to total lending remained relatively stable. 

• New collection method and process for YBS lending data will be used for reporting in 

2024. 

• Effective January 1, 2024, the definition for small farmers will change from $250,000 to 

$350,000.
Case 2:05-cv-00105-J Document 5 Filed 04/11/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 21
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00105-J Document 5 Filed 04/11/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 22
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00105-J Document 5 Filed 04/11/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 23
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00105-J Document 5 Filed 04/11/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 24
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00105-J Document 5 Filed 04/11/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 25
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,362
<SECURITIES>                                     3,851
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,922
<PP&E>                                           3,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                     822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,331
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,645
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AMARILLO DIVISION

IN RE: §

§

MCCLAIN FEED YARD, INC., et al.,1 § CASE NO. 23-20084-RLJ-7

§

§

Debtors § Jointly Administered

1 The Debtors in these chapter 7 cases are: McClain Feed Yard, Inc. (Case No. 23-20084-

RLJ), McClain Farms, Inc. (Case No. 23-20085-RLJ), and 7M Cattle Feeders, Inc. (Case 

No. 23-20086-RLJ)

ORDER GRANTING RULE 2004 MOTION AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF

DOCUMENT SUBPOENAS TO VARIOUS THIRD PARTIES

This matter is before the Court on the Ex Parte Motion for Rule 2004 Order Authorizing 

the Issuance of Document Subpoenas to Various Third Parties (the “Rule 2004 Motion”) filed in 

all three of the above-entitled Chapter 7 cases by AgTexas Farm Credit Services, AgTexas PCA, 

and Thorlakson Diamond T. Feeders, LP (“Ag Texas” and “Thorlakson” respectively). Pursuant to 

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed August 3, 2023

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-20084-rlj7 Doc 92 Filed 08/04/23 Entered 08/04/23 15:47:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
this Court’s Order of June 28, 2023, all three causes are being jointly administered. Therefore, the 

Rule 2004 Motion and this Order have only been filed in Cause No. 23-20084. 

The Court, having reviewed the Rule 2004 Motion and the subpoena riders attached thereto 

as Exhibit “A,” pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 and Local 

Rule 2004-1, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Rule 2004 Motion shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED.

2. AgTexas and Thorlakson shall be, and hereby is, authorized to issue document 

subpoenas to the following persons or entities for the compelled production of the records and 

documents identified in the subpoena riders attached to the Rule2004 Motion:

A. Oklahoma National Stockyards Company;

B. First Bank & Trust;

C. Community Financial Services Bank; and

D. Angela Powell/ H&R Block Office in Benton, Kentucky/ ADPOWELL, Inc.

3. AgTexas and Thorlakson shall provide each party served with a subpoena pursuant 

to this Order with at least 14 days’ notice of the date and time for any required production of 

records, documents and things.

********************************END OF ORDER*******************************

Order Submitted by:

By: /s/ David L. LeBas Dated July 17, 2023

David L. LeBas

SBN: 12098600

NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE PLLC

8310 N. Capital of Texas Highway, Ste. 490

Austin, Texas 78731

Ph. (512) 479-0300

Fax (512) 474-1901

dlebas@namanhowell.com

Case 23-20084-rlj7 Doc 92 Filed 08/04/23 Entered 08/04/23 15:47:37 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2020019EN.01003801.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, intervener: French Republic

(Case C-569/17) (1)

(2020/C 19/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 20.11.2017.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Ecotality, Inc. (the "Company") on
amendment number 1 to Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jonathan R. Read

Jonathan R. Read

Chief Executive Officer

July
11, 2007







/s/ Barry S. Baer

Barry S. Baer

Chief Financial Officer

July
11, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 21

                         Continental Global Group, Inc.

                Subsidiaries of the Registrant at March 15, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Subsidiaries (1)                         or Organization                         Parent Company
<S>                                      <C>                                     <C>

Continental Conveyor & Equipment         Delaware                                Continental Global Group, Inc.
Company

Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.    Australia                               Continental Conveyor & Equipment
Ltd.                                                                             Company

BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.                   Australia                               Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.
                                                                                 Ltd.

Continental ACE Pty. Ltd.                Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Services Pty. Ltd.       Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental ACE Conveyor Components      Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.
Pty. Ltd.

A. Crane Pty. Ltd.                       Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Continental Control Systems Pty. Ltd.    Australia                               BCE Holdings Pty. Ltd. - 60%
                                                                                 Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.
                                                                                 Ltd. - 40%

Continental Conveyor International Inc.  Delaware                                Continental Conveyor & Equipment
                                                                                 Company

Continental FSW Ltd.                     United Kingdom                          Continental Conveyor International
                                                                                 Inc.

Continental Conveyor Ltd.                United Kingdom                          Continental FSW Ltd.

Continental MECO (Proprietary) Ltd.      South Africa                            Continental Conveyor International
                                                                                 Inc.

MECO McCallum Pty. Ltd.                  Australia                               Continental Conveyor & Equipment Pty.
                                                                                 Ltd.

Goodman Conveyor Company                 Delaware                                Continental Global Group, Inc.
</TABLE>

(1)      Each of the subsidiaries listed is 100% owned by its parent company,
         except for Continental Control Systems Pty. Ltd.
CLASSIC ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., and Kevin Bienfang, Appellants, v. Paul KASAPIS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-255

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kaz Mikol-Charls CATALANO, DOC #C11636, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 13 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
BLUE STAR RESTORATION INC., (a/a/o Rodolfo Berroa), Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A., and Peter Mineo, Jr., and Jordan Bieber (Davie), for appellant.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and Maureen G. Pearcy, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Blue Star Restoration Inc., as assignee of Rodolfo Berroa's homeowners insurance policy, appeals the trial court's order granting Citizens Property Insurance Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment and entering final summary judgment in Citizens' favor and the trial court's order denying Blue Star's Motion for Rehearing/Reconsideration.

"Our standard of review of an order granting summary judgment is *de novo* ." *White v. Ferco Motors Corp.*, 260 So.3d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). "We review the record to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment." *Id*. (citing *Collections, USA, Inc. v. City of Homestead*, 816 So.2d 1225, 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ). Our review of the record discloses genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the interior rain damage exclusion in the homeowners insurance policy precludes coverage for water-damage repairs involved in this case based on the deposition testimony of Blue Star's expert, Rafael Leyva. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and Remanded.