alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CRANE CO., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., and Hollingsworth & Vose Co., Appellants, v. Richard DELISLE and Aline Delisle, His Wife, Appellees.

Nos. 4D13-4351 4D14-146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 6, 2019]

Rebecca C. Kibbe of K & L Gates LLP, Miami, for appellant Crane Co.

Elliot H. Scherker, Sabrina R. Gallo, Julissa Rodriguez, Brigid F. Cech Samole, and Stephanie L. Varela of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for appellants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Hollingsworth & Vose Co.

Gary M. Farmer, Sr. of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and David A. Jagolinzer of The Ferraro Law Firm, Miami, for appellees.

***ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT***

Per Curiam.

In accordance with the mandate of the supreme court, this case is remanded to the trial court to reinstate the final judgment.

Warner, Ciklin, and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**COASTAL BANCSHARES ACQUISITION CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, W. Donald Brunson, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Coastal Bancshares Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

|   | • |   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: February 2, 2006

 

|                                                                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ W. Donald Brunson

W. Donald Brunson

Co-Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |
|                                                                                                |
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








OCCULOGIX, INC.Date : May 13,  2010
By:
/s/ Elias VamvakasChairman & Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  David  Zaikin,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Siberian  Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.

Date:  November 21, 2005

                                        By: /s/ David Zaikin
                                            ----------------
                                            David Zaikin
                                            Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 14 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 14

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2025.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
            (1) Committee on agriculture.--Ms. Craig.
            (2) Committee on appropriations.--Ms. DeLauro.
            (3) Committee on armed services.--Mr. Smith of Washington.
            (4) Committee on the budget.--Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania.
            (5) Committee on education and workforce.--Mr. Scott of Virginia.
            (6) Committee on energy and commerce.--Mr. Pallone.
            (7) Committee on financial services.--Ms. Waters.
            (8) Committee on foreign affairs.--Mr. Meeks.
            (9) Committee on homeland security.--Mr. Thompson of Mississippi.
            (10) Committee on the judiciary.--Mr. Raskin.
            (11) Committee on natural resources.--Mr. Huffman.
            (12) Committee on oversight and government reform.--Mr. Connolly.
            (13) Committee on science, space, and technology.--Ms. Lofgren.
            (14) Committee on small business.--Ms. Velazquez.
            (15) Committee on transportation and infrastructure.--Mr. Larsen of 
        Washington.
            (16) Committee on veterans affairs.--Mr. Takano.
            (17) Committee on ways and means.--Mr. Neal.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
WATERMARK REALTY, INC. d/b/a Prudential Florida Realty, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Anthony VACCA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3408

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismiss is granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00922]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
592 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1087, K2025-1086.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00922 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2017202EN.01000901.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 14 March 2017 — Dănuț Podilă and Others v Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători ‘CFR Călători’ SA București

(Case C-133/17)

(2017/C 202/14)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Dănuț Podilă and Others

Appellants:

Respondent: Societatea Națională de Transport Feroviar de Călători ‘CFR Călători’ SA București

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Articles 114(3), 151 and 153 TFEU, and the provisions of Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (1) and the subsequent specific directives to be interpreted as precluding a Member State of the European Union from laying down time limits and procedures which limit access to judicial remedies for the purposes of classifying work places as characterised by particular or special conditions, with the result that workers’ rights to safety and health at work deriving from the assessment of those conditions, in accordance with the national provisions described in the request for a preliminary ruling, are not recognised? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 114(3), 151 and 153 TFEU, and the provisions of Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (1) and the subsequent specific directives to be interpreted as precluding a Member State of the European Union from laying down time limits and procedures which limit access to judicial remedies for the purposes of classifying work places as characterised by particular or special conditions, with the result that workers’ rights to safety and health at work deriving from the assessment of those conditions, in accordance with the national provisions described in the request for a preliminary ruling, are not recognised?

1

| 2. | Does Article 9(a) of Directive 89/391/EEC preclude a national law which does not sanction an employer’s failure to obtain an assessment of the risks to safety and health during the period of employment? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 9(a) of Directive 89/391/EEC preclude a national law which does not sanction an employer’s failure to obtain an assessment of the risks to safety and health during the period of employment?

---

(1)  Council Directive of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit
      32





CERITIFCATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Europa Trade Agency Ltd., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending October 31,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Thomas Lamb, President and Principal Executive Officer and
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
            The
                Report duly complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Thomas Lamb


________________________________


Thomas
      Lamb, President and


Principal
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      12,
      2006
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 279 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 279

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
    unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
    unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIP CODE FOR FAIRLAWN, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Commonwealth of Virginia is the only State in the 
        United States where all cities are independent from their 
        surrounding counties;
            (2) these independent cities are not politically a part of 
        the surrounding counties, even if they are located within their 
        borders;
            (3) in Virginia these independent cities are subject to 
        separate revenue collection and distribution practices related 
        to roads, resources, and sales tax than neighboring counties;
            (4) the sales tax collected from electronic commerce from 
        the unincorporated community of Fairlawn, Virginia, located in 
        Pulaski County, is often misallocated to the independent city 
        of Radford, Virginia, because they share the same ZIP Codes; 
        and
            (5) Fairlawn, Virginia, should be eligible to obtain a 
        separate and unique ZIP Code from the neighboring independent 
        city of Radford, Virginia, for tax purposes.
    (b) ZIP Code Designation.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the United States Postal Service shall 
designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to Fairlawn, Virginia.
                                 <all>
```
Asaru EL-BEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 12 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the consideration of a concurrent resolution to provide for a recess of the House 

after July 31 of any year unless the House has approved each regular 

appropriation bill for the next fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. WITTMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit the consideration of a concurrent resolution to 

provide for a recess of the House after July 31 of any 

year unless the House has approved each regular appropriation bill for the next fiscal year. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Stay on Sched4 ule (S.O.S.) Resolution’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 12 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING RECESS DURING AUGUST UNTIL AP2 PROVAL OF ALL REGULAR APPROPRIATION 

3 BILLS. 

4 Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representa5 tives is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 clause: 

7 ‘‘Concurrent resolution providing for adjournment 

8 during August 

9 ‘‘13. If by July 31 of any calendar year the House 

10 has not passed each of the regular appropriation bills for 

11 the fiscal year which begins on October 1 of that calendar 

12 year, it shall not be in order to consider a concurrent reso13 lution to provide that the House stand adjourned during 

14 any day occurring during August of that calendar year 

15 until the House has passed each such bill. For purposes 

16 of this clause, term ‘regular appropriation bill’ means any 

17 annual appropriation bill which is under the jurisdiction 

18 of a single subcommittee of the Committee on Appropria19 tions of the House of Representatives (as may be provided 

20 under the Rules for the fiscal year involved).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Statement

Jill Long Thompson, Board Chair

Farm Credit Administration Board Meeting

September 12, 2013

With the Board’s vote today on the merger of two associations, we are again reminded 

of the fluidity that characterizes the financial sector, in general, and agriculture lending, 

in particular. As the arm’s-length regulator tasked with ensuring the safety and 

soundness, as well as the mission service, of the Farm Credit System, we take very 

seriously the responsibility of evaluating and acting upon proposed consolidation within 

the System.

In considering such proposed mergers, I believe it is as important to consider the impact 

on the entire System, as it is to evaluate the impact on the specific territory being served 

by the merged institution. I know fellow Board Member Spearman, as well as FCA staff,

share in this belief and commitment. It is no easy task, however, to evaluate the longterm impact on the System.

As we look to the future, I believe we have a responsibility to gather and analyze 

complete information that will help guide us on how best to serve agricultural borrowers 

today and tomorrow. We know that consolidation among the institutions can both 

improve efficiencies and reduce risk. In addition, we know that consolidation may also 

create challenges in meeting the credit needs of all eligible borrowers.

While further consolidation will likely always be a part of growth and change in the 

financial sector, it is important to “do it right.” Toward that end, I look forward to working 

with my Board colleagues to reach out to the System and others to gather the 

information and data necessary to make decisions that will lead to the continued growth, 

strength, and soundness of the Farm Credit System. This cooperative System of 

agricultural lenders is so vital to the agriculture sector and rural communities in our 

country.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,720
<SECURITIES>                                    19,524
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,648
<PP&E>                                          23,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,066)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,646
<SALES>                                        117,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,151
<CGS>                                           61,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (992)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,729
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65


</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Cowan and Nancy Cowan

, * From the 266 th District Court

of Erath County,

Trial Court No. 34694

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 041

- C V * January 6, 2022

Rex Worrell and Paige Worrell

- Burrus

, * Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against James Cowan and Nancy Cowan.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund III (theregistrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        **Date:**April 2, 2007   */s/*Kimberly A. Springsteen   Kimberly A. Springsteen   Chief Financial Officer  
34