alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009                   
|                                    
|/s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|Dennis G. Dracup                    
|Chief Executive Officer and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)       

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6723

THURMAN VAN LILLY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. FRED THOMPSON, Associate Warden; MORRIS ELMORE, Lieutenant EHSO; JAMES BLACKWELL, DHO; MCKITHER BODISON, Associate Warden; D. NUNNALLY, Captain SMU; EUGENE SKIPPER, Contraband; S. JENKINS; L. RANDALL, Grievances; D. MCCOMMONS, Contraband; DORIS GANTT, Property Control, Defendants – Appellees.

No. 09-6775

THURMAN VAN LILLY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. JON OZMINT; STAN BURTT; ADRIAN MARTELL; R. REEVES; ROBERT WARD; FRED B. THOMPSON; THIERRY D. NETTLES; TIM B. ROOF; GILBERT EMRHEIN; MR. WILLIAMS; MR. POWELL; YVETTE BLOWE, Defendants – Appellees,

and

JOHN WARD; C. REEVES

Defendants.Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (2:08-cv-00266-JFA; 2:07-CV-01700-JFA)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Van Lilly, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2PER CURIAM: Thurman Van Lilly seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction because the notices of appeal were not timely filed. The time limits for noting an appeal in a civil case are set forth in Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which effectuates 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (2006). See

Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 208 (2007). Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). A failure to file a notice of appeal in accordance with § 2107 deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction. Bowles , 551 U.S. at 214.

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket on March 10, 2009. The notices of appeal were filed on April 14, 2009, the date they were received in the prison mail

room. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). Because Lilly failed to file timely notices of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument

34 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the Annual Report of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Glenn P. Sblendorio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Glen P. Sblendorio
-------------------------
Glenn P. Sblendorio
Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 837 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 837

 To provide relief to public transportation agencies with projects in 
the Full Funding Grant Agreement stage of the Capital Investment Grants 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 18, 2021

 Mrs. Murray (for herself, Ms. Cantwell, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Padilla, 
  Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Smith, and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide relief to public transportation agencies with projects in 
the Full Funding Grant Agreement stage of the Capital Investment Grants 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
        Transportation; and
            (2) the term ``total project cost'', with respect to a 
        project that receives a grant under section 5309 of title 49, 
        United States Code, means the most recent total project cost 
        stipulated in the full funding grant agreement.
    (b) CIG COVID-19 Emergency Relief Program.--Notwithstanding 
subsection (k)(2)(C)(ii) or (l)(1)(B)(ii) of section 5309 of title 49, 
United States Code, at the request of a project sponsor, the Secretary 
shall provide an additional 30 percent of total project costs for any 
project under subsection (d) or (e) of section 5309 of title 49, United 
States Code, that has a full funding grant agreement entered into under 
such subsection (d) or (e) on or after January 1, 2017.
    (c) Deferred Non-Federal Share.--The Secretary shall allow a 
project sponsor to defer payment of the non-Federal share for any 
project described in subsection (b).
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the costs of a project 
that receives additional funding under this section may not exceed 80 
percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations From General Fund.--There is 
authorized to be appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury 
such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
International Isotopes Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-71655) on Form S-3 and the registration statement (No. 333-71657) on Form
S-8 of International Isotopes Inc. (a development stage enterprise) of our
report dated March 19, 1999, except as to note 1(a) which is as of April 15,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of International Isotopes Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, the period from November 1, 1995
(inception) through December 31, 1996 and the period from November 1, 1995
(inception) through December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31,
1998 annual report on Form 10-K/A2 of International Isotopes Inc.


                                             KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
July 6, 1999
James V. ZIZZI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Carol A. ZIZZI, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1386, 2D18-2290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### Barcus Lumber Company, a Corporation, and F. C. W. Kramer, Jr., *Appellants,*v. City of Leesburg, a Municipal Corporation, and W. A. McKenzie, A. H. Bourlay, A. S. Herlong, W. H. Wiley and C. B. Gamble, as City Commissioners of the City of Leesburg, Lake County, Florida, and C. G. Stephenson, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed July 29, 1927.

Petition for Rehearing Denied October 5, 1927.

*D. Niel Ferguson,*for Appellants;

*Gaines & Futch,*and *Duncan & Hamlin,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Jerome MARSHALL et al. v. BOGGS & BOULDERS, LLC

1150991

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Bennie HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 26, 2019

Affirmed.
Order filed March 7, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00016-CV

____________

SANTIAGO CRUZ, Appellant

V.

DANIELLE JANNETTE CRUZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-77407

ORDER

The record before this court reflects that appellant filed a Statement of 

Inability to Afford Payment of Costs in the trial court on January 10, 2019. On 

January 14, 2019, Barbara K. Nagji, the court reporter, filed a contest to appellant’s 

statement of inability. 

A party who filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs 

in the trial court is not required to pay costs in the appellate court unless the trial 
court overruled the party’s claim of indigence in an order that complies with Texas 

Rule of Civil Procedure 145. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(b)(1). The clerk’s record in this 

appeal, filed February 19, 2019, does not contain the trial court’s ruling on the court 

reporter’s contest to appellant’s statement of inability to afford payment of costs. 

Therefore, we order the Harris County District Clerk and the court reporter 

for the 312th District Court to prepare and file with this court the record of all trial 

court proceedings on appellant’s claim of indigence including the trial court’s order 

on the court reporter’s contest. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(f)(3). The record must be 

provided without charge and filed with this court on or before April 4, 2019.

PER CURIAM
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00857]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Suicide Prevention in Crisis Response and LMIC 
Across the Lifespan.
    Date: February 14, 2025.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Serena Chu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-500-5829, email: 
[email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Precision Mental Health: Develop Tools to Inform 
Treatment Selection in Depression.
    Date: February 18, 2025.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Regina Dolan-Sewell, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20852, (240) 796-6785, email: 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2025.
Bruce A. George,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00857 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellant, v. Charles F. MCCLELLAN & Natasha Nemeth, Appellees.

No. 1D18-128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Waldron Jamine BROWN, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2019065EN.01001101.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Touring Tours und Travel GmbH (C-412/17), Sociedad de Transportes SA (C-474/17)

(Joined Cases C-412/17 and C-474/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 - Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) - Articles 20 and 21 - Abolition of internal border controls in the Schengen area - Checks within the territory of a Member State - Measures having an effect equivalent to border checks - Rules of a Member State requiring a coach travel operator on routes crossing the internal borders of the Schengen area to check passengers’ passports and residence permits - Penalty - Threat to impose a recurring fine))

(2019/C 65/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant: Touring Tours und Travel GmbH (C-412/17), Sociedad de Transportes SA (C-474/17)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 67(2) TFEU and Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), as amended by Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, must be interpreted to the effect that they preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires every coach transport undertaking providing a regular cross-border service within the Schengen area to the territory of that Member State to check the passports and residence permits of passengers before they cross an internal border in order to prevent the transport of third-country nationals not in possession of those travel documents to the national territory, and which allows, for the purposes of complying with that obligation to carry out checks, the police authorities to issue orders prohibiting such transport, accompanied by a threat of a recurring fine, against transport undertakings which have been found to have conveyed to that territory third-country nationals who were not in possession of the requisite travel documents.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.

OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jackie David Alvarez, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 26171A

Vs. No. 11-19-00305-CR * September 2, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HouseValues, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jacqueline Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 8, 2008



/s/ IAN MORRISIan MorrisChief Executive Officer and President/s/ JACQUELINE DAVIDSONJacqueline DavidsonChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 2 Filed 08/22/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 41
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 2 Filed 08/22/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 42
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 2 Filed 08/22/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 43
Raymond RIVAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 9

- 1 0 7 7 5 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

A D A M A L C A N T A R Y A N E Z ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 3 : 0 7

- C R

- 3 5 3

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O
, a n d H A Y N E S
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t A d a m A l c a n t a r Y a n e z
h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s

v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. Y a n e z h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e

. T h e r e c o r d i s
i n s u f f i c i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d t o a l l o w c o n s i d e r a t i o n a t t h i s t i m e o f Y a n e z ’ s c l a i m s o f

i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l ; s u c h c l a i m s g e n e r a l l y “ c a n n o t b e r e s o l v e d o n
d i r e c t a p p e a l w h e n [ t h e y h a v e ] n o t b e e n r a i s e d b e f o r e t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t s i n c e n o

o p p o r t u n i t y e x i s t e d t o d e v e l o p t h e r e c o r d o n t h e m e r i t s o f t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

. ” U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-10775 Document: 00511085637 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010N o

. 0 9

- 1 0 7 7 5

U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. C a n t w e l l
, 4 7 0 F

. 3 d 1 0 8 7 , 1 0 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 6 ) ( i n t e r n a l

q u o t a t i o n m a r k s a n d c i t a t i o n o m i t t e d )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d
,

c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f
, a n d Y a n e z ’ s r e s p o n s e d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d
f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e
5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. Y a n e z ’ s r e q u e s t f o r a p p o i n t m e n t o f c o u n s e l i s D E N I E D

. C f

. U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. W

a g n e r , 1 5 8 F

. 3 d 9 0 1 , 9 0 2

- 0 3 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 9 8 )

.

2 Case: 09-10775 Document: 00511085637 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2010