alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1
 Steve Jacobs
 1.
    
    Position: President and CEO Macau, listed company (ListCo)
 a.
    
    Reporting into President and COO LVS or CEO/Chairman LVSb.
    
    All staff to be direct reports, including EVP/President, Asia
Development
 2.
    
    Term: 3 years3.
    
    Base Salary and Annual Bonus
 a.
    
    1.3 M base (USD)b.
    
    50% bonus
 i.
    
    25% Achieving annual EBITDAR Performance as
submitted and approved by the BOD for Macauii.
    
    25% Individual Objectives to be mutually agreed on
an annual basis
 4.
    
    Equity
 a.
    
    500,000 options in LVS to be granted date of hire at FMV. Should there
be an IPO of Macau, LVS options to be converted at IPO into sufficient numbers of
ListCo options such that the aggregate FMV of ListCo at the IPO list price is equal
to the aggregate FMV of the LVS stock being converted. Conversion to be tax free.b.
    
    Vesting
 i.
    
    250,000 shares vest Jan 1, 2010ii.
    
    125,000 shares vest Jan 1, 2011iii.
    
    125,000 shares vest Jan 1, 2012
 5.
    
    Expat Package
 a.
    
    10,000 one time fee to cover moving expenses from Atlanta to HKb.
    
    Housing Allowance: 12,000 per month, company pays deposit (if required)c.
    
    Repatriation: Business airfare for employee and dependents, one 20
foot container, company to pay termination fees (if any)d.
    
    Employee agrees to apply for Full Time Resident Status.
 6.
    
    Expense reimbursement/ Business Travel
 a.
    
    Full reimbursement of expenses necessary to conduct business in keeping
with company and IRS policyb.
    
    Business travel: Business class or above subject to prevailing company
policy
 7.
    
    Employee Benefit Plan: Participation in any established plan(s) for senior executives8.
    
    Vacation and Holidays: 4 weeks per annum, with right to carry over should business
demands prevent use9.
    
    Change of Control: Provision to accelerate vest and terminate not for cause should
Sheldon or Miri not be in control of company10.
    
    Termination:
 a.
    
    For Cause  Standard Languageb.
    
    Not For Cause  1 Year severance, accelerated vest. Right to exercise
for 1 year post termination.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

***SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Southern Heritage Bancshares, Inc. (the «Company») on Form10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the «Report»), I, J. Lee Stewart,President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ J. Lee Stewart |   |
|--------------------|--------|
| J. Lee Stewart     |
| President          |
| November 14, 2005  |

 

----
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1122
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 2 of 7 PageID 1123
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 3 of 7 PageID 1124
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 4 of 7 PageID 1125
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 5 of 7 PageID 1126
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 6 of 7 PageID 1127
Case 2:03-cv-00272-J Document 201 Filed 04/02/04 Page 7 of 7 PageID 1128
Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 11 PageID 50
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 11 PageID 51
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 3 of 11 PageID 52
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 4 of 11 PageID 53
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 5 of 11 PageID 54
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 6 of 11 PageID 55
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 7 of 11 PageID 56
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 8 of 11 PageID 57
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 9 of 11 PageID 58
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 10 of 11 PageID 59
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 13 Filed 05/25/05 Page 11 of 11 PageID 60
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmasset, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, P. Schaefer Price, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 5, 2010



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/S/    P. SCHAEFER
PRICE                 
|P. Schaefer Price
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pharmasset, Inc. and will be retained by
Pharmasset, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019206EN.01000301.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Neculai Tarola v Minister for Social Protection

(Case C-483/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Citizenship of the Union - Freedom of movement for persons - Directive 2004/38/EC - Right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States - Article 7(1)(a) - Employees and self-employed persons - Article 7(3)(c) - Right of residence for more than three months - National of a Member State who has worked in an employed capacity in another Member State for a period of two weeks - Involuntary unemployment - Retention of the status of worker for no less than six months - Entitlement to jobseeker’s allowance)

(2019/C 206/03)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Neculai Tarola

Defendant: Minister for Social Protection

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1)(a) and (3)(c) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that a national of a Member State who, having exercised his right to free movement, acquired, in another Member State, the status of worker within the meaning of Article 7(1)(a) of that directive, on account of the activity he pursued there for a period of two weeks, otherwise than under a fixed-term employment contract, before becoming involuntarily unemployed, retains the status of worker for a further period of no less than six months under those provisions, provided that he has registered as a jobseeker with the relevant employment office.

It is for the referring court to determine whether, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment guaranteed in Article 24(1) of Directive 2004/38, that national is, as a result, entitled to receive social assistance payments or, as the case may be, social security benefits on the same basis as if he were a national of the host Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 859 

To terminate the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To terminate the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Visa Lottery Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT VISA 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—Section 203 of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended by striking 

10 subsection (c). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 859 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

3 1151 et seq.) is amended— 

4 (1) in section 201— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)— 

6 (i) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘and’’ 

7 at the end; 

8 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; 

9 and’’ and inserting a period; and 

10 (iii) by striking paragraph (3); and 

11 (B) by striking subsection (e); 

12 (2) in section 203— 

13 (A) by striking subsection (c); 

14 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘sub15 section (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub16 section (a) or (b)’’; 

17 (C) in subsection (e)— 

18 (i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

19 (ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

20 paragraph (2); 

21 (D) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘sub22 section (a), (b), or (c) of this section’’ and in23 serting ‘‘subsection (a) or (b)’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 859 IS

1 (E) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘sub2 sections (a), (b), and (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub3 sections (a) and (b)’’; and 

4 (F) in subsection (h)(2)(B), by striking 

5 ‘‘subsection (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub6 section (a) or (b)’’; and 

7 (3) in section 204— 

8 (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking sub9 paragraph (I); 

10 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘sub11 section (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub12 section (a) or (b)’’; and 

13 (C) in subsection (l)(2)(B), by striking 

14 ‘‘section 203 (a) or (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub15 section (a) or (d) of section 203’’. 

16 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

18 (b), the amendments made by section 2 shall take effect 

19 on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

20 (b) SELECTEES.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), 

21 any alien who registered for the Diversity Immigrant Visa 

22 Program and received notification before the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act that he or she has been selected 

24 to apply for a diversity immigrant visa under section 

25 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 859 IS

1 1153(c)) may submit an application for such visa under 

2 the applicable provisions of law in effect on the day before 

3 such date of enactment. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Donald James KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Donald James Kelly, Bristol, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence rendered against Donald James Kelly after he pled guilty to aggravated assault with intent to commit a felony in violation of section 784.021(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017). However, we remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the judgment, which erroneously cites to section 784.021(1)(a), corresponding to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill.

*873AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
# C_2017202EN.01000902.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 14 March 2017 — Costel Nicușor Mucea v SC Industria Sârmei SA Câmpia Turzii, acting through the receiver SMDA Mureș Insolvency SRL

(Case C-134/17)

(2017/C 202/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Costel Nicușor Mucea

Appellant:

Respondant: SC Industria Sârmei SA Câmpia Turzii, acting through the receiver SMDA Mureș Insolvency SRL

Respondant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 114(3) TFEU, 151 TFEU and 153 TFEU and the provisions of Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (1) and the subsequent specific directives to be interpreted as precluding a Member State of the European Union from laying down time-limits and procedures which restrict access to judicial remedies for the purpose of the classification of work places as places characterised by particular or special conditions, with the result that workers’ rights to safety and health at work deriving from the assessment of those conditions, in accordance with the national provisions described in the request for a preliminary ruling, are not recognised?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis G. Dracup, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                                     
|----- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 11, 2008                   
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|      |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|      |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105260 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Ten of our report dated February 19, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Hartford Life Insurance Company, and of our report dated
February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of Hartford Life
Insurance Company Separate Account Ten, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in
such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
July 31, 2003
Case 3:05-cv-00487-M Document 6 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 21
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 45 

Honoring Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, on reaching the historic 

milestone of 117 years of serving communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2025 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. WILLIAMS

of Georgia, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE, Ms. 

MCCLELLAN, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mrs. SYKES, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. JACKSON

of Illinois, Ms. UNDERWOOD, and Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, on reaching 

the historic milestone of 117 years of serving communities. 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, was founded on 

January 15, 1908, at Howard University in Washington, 

DC, by Ethel Hedgemon, Anna Easter Brown, Beulah 

Elizabeth Burke, Lillie E. Burke, Marjorie Hill, Margaret Flagg, Lavinia Norman, Lucy Diggs Slowe, and 

Marie Woolfolk; 

Whereas these 9 young women founded Alpha Kappa Alpha 

Sorority, Inc.®, on the 5 original core tenets: to cultivate 

and encourage high scholastic and ethical standards; to 

promote unity and friendship among college women; to 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 45 IH 

study and help alleviate problems concerning girls and 

women in order to improve their social stature; to maintain a progressive interest in college life; and to be of 

‘‘Service to All Mankind’’; 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, was successfully incorporated on January 29, 1913; 

Whereas, since its founding in 1908, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, membership now includes over 1,075 chapters internationally, with more than 120,000 active members, and has initiated more than 365,000 members 

worldwide; 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, is dedicated to 

implementing programs of service that enhance the wellbeing of local, national, and international communities; 

Whereas the theme of that service program for 2022–2026 

is ‘‘Soaring to Greater Heights of Service & Sisterhood’’ 

and will involve 6 initiatives, namely— 

(1) Strengthen Our Sisterhood; 

(2) Empower Our Families; 

(3) Build Our Economic Wealth; 

(4) Enhance Our Environment; 

(5) Advocate for Social Justice; and 

(6) Uplift Our Local Community; 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®’s present administration looks to use each of these initiatives to empower members to lead on the front lines of change, education, and advocacy; and 

Whereas, among its many accomplished members, Vice President Kamala Harris, the first woman to occupy the Office of the Vice President of the United States, is a proud 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 45 IH 

member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and commends Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, 

3 Inc.®, on 117 years of service. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2018052EN.01001602.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 15 November 2017 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

(Case C-638/17)

(2018/C 052/22)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Appellant:

Other party:‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

Other party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Must Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/64/EU (1) of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codification) be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘cigars or cigarillos’ covers (or does not cover) cases where part of the wrapper of natural or reconstituted tobacco is additionally covered by another outer (paper) layer, as in the case at issue? Is it relevant to the answer to that question that the use of paper as an additional layer in the outer wrapper of the tobacco product (where the filter is) means that it is visually similar to a cigarette?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 176, p. 24.

1

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
MARIA PRIOR PEREIRA, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 5149

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13

- CV

- 00176

- EJD, Judge Edward J. Damich.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ARIA P RIOR P EREIRA , of Washington, DC, pro se.

J ESSICA R. T OPLIN , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litig ation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC for defendant -appellee. With her on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY , Assistant At to rney General, B RYANT G. S NEE , Acting Director, and S TEVEN J. G ILLINGHAM , Assistant Director.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , M OORE , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 10, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court