# C_2018083EN.01001402.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/14

---

Action brought on 22 December 2017 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-729/17)

(2018/C 083/22)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Τserepa-Lacombe and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The European Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by restricting the legal form of mediation training service providers to non-profit companies, which have to be set up by at least one Bar Association and at least one Professional Chamber in Greece, as enacted in Law 3898/2010 and Presidential Decree 123/2011, Greece has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU and Article 15(2)(b) and (c) and (3) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC (1). |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by restricting the legal form of mediation training service providers to non-profit companies, which have to be set up by at least one Bar Association and at least one Professional Chamber in Greece, as enacted in Law 3898/2010 and Presidential Decree 123/2011, Greece has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU and Article 15(2)(b) and (c) and (3) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC (1).

1

| — | declare that, by subjecting the procedure for the recognition of academic qualifications to preconditions: the imposition of additional requirements related to the content of certificates and the imposition of compensatory measures without a prior assessment of real differences, and by maintaining in force provisions which lead to discrimination by requiring applicants for accreditation as professional mediators who have accreditation that was obtained outside Greece or from a recognised provider of training outside Greece following training provided in in Greece, to possess experience of having taken part in at least three mediation procedures, Greece has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU, and Articles 13, 14 and 50(1) of, and Annex VII to, Directive 2005/36/ΕC (2). |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by subjecting the procedure for the recognition of academic qualifications to preconditions: the imposition of additional requirements related to the content of certificates and the imposition of compensatory measures without a prior assessment of real differences, and by maintaining in force provisions which lead to discrimination by requiring applicants for accreditation as professional mediators who have accreditation that was obtained outside Greece or from a recognised provider of training outside Greece following training provided in in Greece, to possess experience of having taken part in at least three mediation procedures, Greece has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU, and Articles 13, 14 and 50(1) of, and Annex VII to, Directive 2005/36/ΕC (2).

2

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

| 1. | Infringement of the right of freedom of establishment laid down in Article 49 TFEU and in Article 15(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC on services in the internal market.

  Article 5(1) of Law 3898/2010 together with the related Presidential Decree D. 123/2011 provides that companies that provide mediation training services must exclusively have the legal form of non-profit companies which are set up by at least one Bar Association and at least one of the Professional Chambers in Greece and that their operation is subject to the granting of authorisation by the authority referred to in Article 7 of that law.
  Those restrictions cover both service providers that seek to be established for the first time in Greece and service providers that seek secondary establishment in the form of a subsidiary.
  No natural or legal person other than the Bar Associations and the Professional Chambers is permitted to found training service providers for the training of mediators who can, on the basis of that training, take the examination for accreditation as professional mediators in Greece, if that person does not have the support of a Bar Association and a Professional Chamber of Greece.
  In addition, the reality is that any service provider the current legal form of which is not non-profit making is excluded from the opportunity to provide, on payment of fees, the training of potential mediator candidates who can, on the basis of that training, take the examination for accreditation as professional mediators in Greece.
  Last, any training provider from another Member State that is interested in providing the service in question on the payment of fees by students who register on mediation training courses is in reality excluded from entering the Greek market and from setting up a secondary establishment in the form of a subsidiary, if its current legal form is not non-profit making and its choice of subsidiary is not confined to non-profit-making entities.
  The Commission considers that the above provisions establish a restriction on the right of freedom of establishment laid down in Article 49 TFEU and Article 15(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC on the internal market.
  That restriction is not covered by the exception in Article 51(1) TFEU because the provision of mediator training services is not an activity that is connected to the State, the exercise of official authority or indeed the ‘administration of justice’. Further there is no legal justification in the interest of protecting the quality of the services, since that has no direct connection with the restriction on the legal form of the training service providers and the ownership of share capital. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Infringement of the right of freedom of establishment laid down in Article 49 TFEU and in Article 15(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC on services in the internal market.

Infringement of the right of freedom of establishment laid down in Article 49 TFEU and in Article 15(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC on services in the internal market.

Article 5(1) of Law 3898/2010 together with the related Presidential Decree D. 123/2011 provides that companies that provide mediation training services must exclusively have the legal form of non-profit companies which are set up by at least one Bar Association and at least one of the Professional Chambers in Greece and that their operation is subject to the granting of authorisation by the authority referred to in Article 7 of that law.

Those restrictions cover both service providers that seek to be established for the first time in Greece and service providers that seek secondary establishment in the form of a subsidiary.

No natural or legal person other than the Bar Associations and the Professional Chambers is permitted to found training service providers for the training of mediators who can, on the basis of that training, take the examination for accreditation as professional mediators in Greece, if that person does not have the support of a Bar Association and a Professional Chamber of Greece.

In addition, the reality is that any service provider the current legal form of which is not non-profit making is excluded from the opportunity to provide, on payment of fees, the training of potential mediator candidates who can, on the basis of that training, take the examination for accreditation as professional mediators in Greece.

Last, any training provider from another Member State that is interested in providing the service in question on the payment of fees by students who register on mediation training courses is in reality excluded from entering the Greek market and from setting up a secondary establishment in the form of a subsidiary, if its current legal form is not non-profit making and its choice of subsidiary is not confined to non-profit-making entities.

The Commission considers that the above provisions establish a restriction on the right of freedom of establishment laid down in Article 49 TFEU and Article 15(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/123/ΕC on the internal market.

That restriction is not covered by the exception in Article 51(1) TFEU because the provision of mediator training services is not an activity that is connected to the State, the exercise of official authority or indeed the ‘administration of justice’. Further there is no legal justification in the interest of protecting the quality of the services, since that has no direct connection with the restriction on the legal form of the training service providers and the ownership of share capital.

| 2. | Infringement of Directive 2005/36/ΕC and Article 49 TFEU on the freedom of establishment.

  The Commission considers that the requirements in paragraph 2 of section Α of the single article of Ministerial Decision No 109088/12.12.2011, in accordance with which the mediation training certificate must confirm the teaching methods, the number of participants, the number and qualifications of the trainers, the procedure for the examination and evaluation of candidates and the means of ensuring the integrity of that procedure, exceed what can be required for the evaluation of the level of professional knowledge and qualifications which the certificate-holder is certified to possess and do not permit a correct assessment of the question whether the training of the person concerned covers matters that are substantially different from those covered by the required accreditation in Greece. For those reasons the abovementioned provision is contrary to Articles 13, 14 and 50 of, and Annex VII to, Directive 2005/36/ΕC.
  Further, paragraph 5 of section Α of the above Ministerial Decision requires foreign mediators with full professional qualifications to demonstrate that in addition they possess experience of having taken part in at least three mediation procedures before their qualifications are recognised in Greece, although that requirement is not imposed on mediators who obtain their professional training in Greece. Consequently, the abovementioned provision is contrary to Article 13 of Directive 2005/36/ΕC, which provides that the competent authority of the host Member State is to permit access to and pursuit of the profession under the same conditions as apply to its nationals to applicants who are certified in another Member State, and is in breach of the principle of the prohibition of discrimination enshrined in Article 49 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Infringement of Directive 2005/36/ΕC and Article 49 TFEU on the freedom of establishment.

Infringement of Directive 2005/36/ΕC and Article 49 TFEU on the freedom of establishment.

The Commission considers that the requirements in paragraph 2 of section Α of the single article of Ministerial Decision No 109088/12.12.2011, in accordance with which the mediation training certificate must confirm the teaching methods, the number of participants, the number and qualifications of the trainers, the procedure for the examination and evaluation of candidates and the means of ensuring the integrity of that procedure, exceed what can be required for the evaluation of the level of professional knowledge and qualifications which the certificate-holder is certified to possess and do not permit a correct assessment of the question whether the training of the person concerned covers matters that are substantially different from those covered by the required accreditation in Greece. For those reasons the abovementioned provision is contrary to Articles 13, 14 and 50 of, and Annex VII to, Directive 2005/36/ΕC.

Further, paragraph 5 of section Α of the above Ministerial Decision requires foreign mediators with full professional qualifications to demonstrate that in addition they possess experience of having taken part in at least three mediation procedures before their qualifications are recognised in Greece, although that requirement is not imposed on mediators who obtain their professional training in Greece. Consequently, the abovementioned provision is contrary to Article 13 of Directive 2005/36/ΕC, which provides that the competent authority of the host Member State is to permit access to and pursuit of the profession under the same conditions as apply to its nationals to applicants who are certified in another Member State, and is in breach of the principle of the prohibition of discrimination enshrined in Article 49 TFEU.

---

(1)  Directive 2006/123/ΕC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (
  OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36).

1

OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36).

(2)  Directive 2005/36/ΕC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005, on the recognition of professional qualifications (
  OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).

2

OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).

---