alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Derek Ward, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  



| | By:    |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Derek Ward                   
| | Name:  | Derek Ward                       
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | November 15, 2007                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Alan R. Spachman, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Interstate Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
May 12 , 2005     BY: /s/ Alan R. Spachman       Alan R. Spachman   Chairman of the Board and President      (Principal Executive Officer)
Christopher PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 22, 2019

Michael Ufferman, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Christopher Pittman appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine (400 grams or more) and trafficking in methamphetamine (200 grams or more) arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Each of his two motions sought a mistrial for improper testimony. We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the respective motions as neither instance of *947allegedly improper testimony vitiated the entire trial. *See**England v. State* , 940 So.2d 389 (Fla. 2006).

Accordingly, the convictions are AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
| a.   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE:      May 20,      2009               /s/ MARK J.      ROSENBLUM____________________________________                                                  MARK      J. ROSENBLUM                                                 CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER                                    (PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Daniel G. DURAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1654

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 36 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 36

  To protect the seniors of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2025

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
    twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect the seniors of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Seniors Act''.

SEC. 2. POINT OF ORDER FOR REDUCTIONS IN MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY 
              BENEFITS.

    Section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 632) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Medicare and Social Security Point of Order.--
            ``(1) In general.--It shall not be in order in the Senate 
        to consider any bill or resolution (or amendment, motion, or 
        conference report on that bill or resolution) that would reduce 
        benefits under the Medicare program under title XVIII of the 
        Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) or benefits 
        payable under title II of that Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.).
            ``(2) Waiver.--Paragraph (1) may be waived or suspended in 
        the Senate only by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the 
        Members, duly chosen and sworn.''.

SEC. 3. MEDICARE POINT OF ORDER.

    Section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 632), 
as amended by section 3, is further amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(k) Medicare Point of Order.--
            ``(1) In general.--It shall not be in order in the Senate 
        to consider any bill or resolution (or amendment, motion, or 
        conference report on that bill or resolution) for which the 
        total budgetary effects of the measure, as determined by the 
        Congressional Budget Office, use a decrease in outlays, or an 
        increase in revenue, under the health insurance programs under 
        title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) 
        to offset a cost of a provision of the measure that is not for 
        the purpose of carrying out those programs.
            ``(2) Waiver.--Paragraph (1) may be waived or suspended in 
        the Senate only by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the 
        Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of two-
        thirds of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, 
        shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the 
        Chair on a point of order raised under paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Retention Bonus Agmt- NYCB, Roslyn Bancorp, Roslyn Savings Bank, Nancy MacKenzie



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 
 615
Merrick Avenue 
 Westbury, New York 11590 
  

June 27, 2003 
  
 Nancy C. MacKenzie 
 The Roslyn Savings Bank 
 One Jericho Plaza 
 Jericho, New York 11753-8905 
  
 Dear Nancy: 
  
 I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certain
additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between
New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 
  
 At such time as you become an employee of the Bank under your new employment
agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $650,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Time
other than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you will
immediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator of
which is 365. 







 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the Merger
Agreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 
  
 Please
acknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 
  

	 Sincerely,

	
	 Joseph R. Ficalora
 President and Chief Executive Officer



  

	 Acknowledged and Agreed:

	
	 /s/ Nancy C. MacKenzie


	 Nancy C. MacKenzie


  

 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-40512 Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HARVEY QUINONES, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(B-95-CR-219-6)

_________________________________________________________________ March 21, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Harvey Quinones appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with

intent to distribute cocaine. Quinones contends that the district

court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We

hold that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find

Quinones guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. S ee United States v.

Maltos

, 985 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v.- 2 -

Ramirez , 963 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 944

(1992).

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 2 of 12 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 3 of 12 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 4 of 12 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 5 of 12 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 6 of 12 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 7 of 12 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 8 of 12 PageID 8
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 9 of 12 PageID 9
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 10 of 12 PageID 10
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 11 of 12 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-01687-M Document 1 Filed 07/25/03 Page 12 of 12 PageID 12
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 71

 Condemning the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water 
  deliveries on an annual basis to the United States under the treaty 
 between the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the 
           Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2025

Ms. De La Cruz (for herself, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Weber of Texas, 
    Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Crenshaw, and Mr. Roy) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Condemning the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water 
  deliveries on an annual basis to the United States under the treaty 
 between the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the 
           Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives condemns the Government 
of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water deliveries on an annual 
basis to the United States under the treaty between the United States 
and Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers 
and of the Rio Grande.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Harold Sciotto, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alchemy Enterprises, Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  November 8, 2005



/s/ Harold Sciotto

President
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Judy E. Naus, certify that:


1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Biotel Inc.;


2
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely, to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(d)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  February 12, 2007
        
        By:
        /s/ Judy E. NausChief Financial Officer










---