alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 299 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 299

  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of 
   Health and Human Services to make available to the public on the 
 websites of their respective departments certain information relating 
to individuals processed through U.S. Customs and Border Protection or 
   Department of Health and Human Services facilities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

 Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of 
   Health and Human Services to make available to the public on the 
 websites of their respective departments certain information relating 
to individuals processed through U.S. Customs and Border Protection or 
   Department of Health and Human Services facilities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency of Migration Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION RELATING TO INDIVIDUALS 
              PROCESSED THROUGH U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION OR 
              DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security and the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall make available to the 
public on the websites of their respective departments' information 
described in subsection (b) relating to individuals unlawfully present 
in the United States who are--
            (1) apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and 
        sent to a federally owned or run detention center or released 
        into the United States; or
            (2) processed through a Department of Health and Human 
        Services facility.
    (b) Information Described.--Information described in this 
subsection is information relating to the following:
            (1) The daily number of individuals described in subsection 
        (a).
            (2) The countries of origins of such individuals.
            (3) The ages and genders of such individuals.
            (4) The States to which such individuals have been either 
        released or sent.
            (5) The number and types of criminal convictions, if any, 
        such individuals possess.
    (c) Updates.--Information under this section shall be updated 
weekly.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 FORT WORTH DIVISION

MARTIN G. CASTILLO, Jr., §

(TDCJ #695172) §

 §

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:05-CV-218-Y

 §

STATE OF TEXAS § 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS and,

 DISMISSING ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1),

 and UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) 

 Before the Court is the petition for writ of mandamus of

petitioner Martin G. Castillo, along with the April 28, 2005,

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge gave the parties until May

19, 2005, to file written objections to the findings, conclusions,

and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no written

objections have been filed. 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this

case and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge filed on April 28, 2005. The Court concludes that the

petition for writ of mandamus should be dismissed with prejudice

under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 A and 1915(e)(2)(B) for the reasons stated

in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

 It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions and

recommendation of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby,

ADOPTED.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00218-Y Document 7 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 26
2

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of

Mandamus be, and is hereby, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and alternatively, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).

SIGNED May 27, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00218-Y Document 7 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 27
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmasset, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |  |  |  |                                                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ P. SCHAEFER PRICE                                                  
|                       |  |  |  | P. Schaefer Price Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
|                       |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ KURT LEUTZINGER                                                    
|                       |  |  |  | Kurt Leutzinger Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00913]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1269 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1090, K2025-1089.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00913 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Michael S. MEYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3157

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 17, 2019

Michael S. Meyers, Lowell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Statement on the Office of Equal Employment 

Opportunity and Inclusion Presentation

Vincent G. Logan

FCA Board Chairman and CEO

Farm Credit Administration Board Meeting

May 11, 2023

Today’s presentation from the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Inclusion 

underscored the important work being done at FCA to advance equity for all as we carry out 

our duties serving America’s farmers and ranchers. 

I would like to thank my fellow board members, Jeff Hall and Glen Smith, for supporting 

these efforts through our unanimous vote in January to approve the reorganization of the 

Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Inclusion and its elevation to a level equal to 

that of other FCA offices. 

It is a priority of the Biden-Harris administration to take a whole-of-government approach to 

advance diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, and this newly elevated office will 

serve as a platform from which our agency can maximize opportunities to engage with 

underserved groups and place a greater emphasis on our responsibility to address these 

issues.

I’m excited to work with Director Burlew and her team to cultivate and maintain a strong, 

diverse workforce focused on supporting FCA’s vital mission of ensuring a safe, sound, and 

dependable source of credit for all creditworthy and eligible persons in agriculture and rural 

America.
Chasity Yvonne CATES v. STATE

CR-15-1082

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017 Reh. denied November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Steven MAFFIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0798

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The circuit court order under judicial review in this appeal struck appellant's motion for postconviction relief without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion. This circuit court order is a nonfinal, nonappealable order under the authority of Pillaio v. State. 60 So. 3d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), and Lee v. State. 939 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Norman L. SMITH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2505

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is granted.

Denied.
Michael Anthony GURLEY v. STATE

CR-16-0673

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 12.2 I, Ian Brown, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (the “Company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2017 Signed “Ian Brown”Ian Brown, Chief Financial Officer


---
# C_2018022EN.01001702.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/17

---

Appeal brought on 19 September 2017 by Ukraine against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 July 2017 in Case T-346/14 DEP: Yanukovych v Council

(Case C-549/17 P)

(2018/C 022/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ukraine (represented by: M. Kostytska, Advocate)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, Council of the European Union, Republic of Poland, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 23 November 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Jimmy Ray DOTSON, Sr. v. STATE

CR-16-0630

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY . . . - Page Solo

TRM/chr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

PAUL N. WARE and FINANCIAL §

SYSTEMS INNOVATION, L.L.C. §

§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-479-Y

§

PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC., ET AL. §

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF RULE 54(B) FINAL JUDGMENT AND

CHANGING STYLE OF CASE

(With Special Instructions to the Clerk of the Court)

In orders filed in this cause on September 22, 2004, September

29, 2004, March 30, 2005, and April 18, 2005, the claims pending

between Plaintiffs and several of the defendants in this action were

dismissed with prejudice. After review of this matter, the Court finds

that no just cause exists for delaying the entry of final judgment

regarding these claims and DIRECTS the clerk to enter the Partial Final

Judgment issued this same day. See FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b).

As a result of the issuance of this partial final judgment, the

Court concludes that the style of this cause should be and is hereby

CHANGED to the following to accurately reflect the remaining parties:

Paul N. Ware and Financial Systems Innovation, L.L.C. versus WilliamsSonoma, Inc., Linens 'N Things, Inc., and Costco Wholesale Corporation.

The clerk of the Court shall note the new style on the docket in this

cause, and all future pleadings shall bear the new style.

SIGNED December 29, 2005.

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00479-Y Document 82 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 398
Steven COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1415

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6527
MICHAEL MCLEAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER PHILMON; Q. PULLEN, Officer; B. HARRIS, Officer; JAMES BRODY, Officer; OFFICER WIGGINS; OFFICER PITTMAN; OFFICER ROOKS; JAMES GILMORE, Inmate; KEITH ZEBULON, Inmate; BOBBIE FORTHOUSE, Inmate; JAMES NEWKIRK, Inmate; INMATE RAMSUR, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-97-108-5-BR) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McLean v. Philmon , No. CA-97-108-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1997). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

          TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of TravelCenters of
America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edwin P. Kuhn, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the
                  exception that the audited financial statements of an equity
                  investee, Simons Petroleum., Inc., are not, and can not be,
                  included in this Report until such financial statements are
                  brought into compliance with Regulation S-X and audited; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Edwin P. Kuhn
--------------------------------------------------
Edwin P. Kuhn
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
February 26, 2004
Jerry Allen JOINES v. STATE

CR-16-0921

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017 Reh. denied December 1, 2017

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00041]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 574 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1015, K2025-1014.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00041 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Shannon ALEXANDER v. Darrell VANNOY, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

NO. 2018-KH-1556

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied. Applicant shows no error by the lower courts, and has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State v. Alexander, 18-0267 (La. 12/17/18), 259 So.3d 336.