alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of transfer of responsibility.

# SUMMARY:

This document provides the public with notice that the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) has transferred the responsibilities previously assigned to the Agency Licensing Committee related to the licensing of Small Business Investment Companies and transferred those responsibilities to the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief of Staff through the Agency's internal clearance process.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Arthur Spivey, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Washington, DC 20416; (202) 205-7098 or                         *arthur.spivey@sba.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This document provides the public with notice of the Administrator's transfer of responsibilities previously assigned to the Agency Licensing Committee (September 21, 2023, 88 FR 65222) to review and make recommendations to the Administrator relative to licenses to operate as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and transferred those responsibilities to the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief of Staff through the Agency's internal clearance process.

This transfer reads as follows:

Pursuant to the authority vested in me pursuant to section 301 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, the responsibilities previously assigned to the Agency Licensing Committee to take any and all actions necessary to review applications for licensing under section 301 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and to recommend which such applications should be approved is hereby transferred to the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief of Staff through the agency's internal clearance process.

Isabella Casillas Guzman,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2025-00864 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M.
Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 10, 2010

By:

/s/ Andrew M. SimsName:

Andrew M. SimsTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
Richey MENARD, et al. v. The REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF ACADIANA, LLC, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0382

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Kreig, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Thomas Kreig


Thomas Kreig


Principal Financial Officer


August 11, 2010
Exhibit  32.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Elena Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Siberian  Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  June  30,  2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.

                                   By:/s/  Elena  Pochapski
                                   --------------------------
                                   Elena  Pochapski
                                   Principal  Financial  Officer
August 11,  2006

<PAGE>
Karra LAWSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1552

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.2



                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION


This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (hereinafter referred to as this "AGREEMENT
EXTENSION"), is entered into effective the 1st day of January, 2001, by and
between Bridgeport Savings and Loan Association, a savings and loan association
incorporated under Ohio law (hereinafter referred to as the "EMPLOYER") and Jon
W. Letzkus, an individual (hereinafter referred to as the "EMPLOYEE");

                                   WITNESSETH

       WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE is currently employed as the President and Managing
Officer of the EMPLOYER; and

       WHEREAS, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE are parties to an employment
agreement dated January 1, 1999 (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT"); and

       WHEREAS, Section 1(b) of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT provides that the Board
of Directors of the EMPLOYER may extend the term of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT for
a one-year term beyond the then effective expiration date, provided the Board
has determined that the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT should be extended; and

       WHEREAS, as a result of the skill, knowledge and experience of the
EMPLOYEE, the Board of Directors of the EMPLOYER has determined that the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT should be extended; and

       WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE desires to continue to serve as the President and
Managing Officer of the EMPLOYER and to consent to the extension of the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT;

       NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
herein contained, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE hereby agree as follows:

1. EXTENSION OF TERM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. The term of the EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT is extended for a one year period and shall end on December 31, 2003
(the "EXTENDED TERM"), unless extended by the EMPLOYER with the consent of the
EMPLOYEE as provided in subsection (b) of Section 1 of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT.

2. EFFECT OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS. All of the terms and conditions of the EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect during the EXTENDED TERM.

<PAGE>   2


       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the EMPLOYER has caused this AGREEMENT EXTENSION to
be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the EMPLOYEE has consented to
and signed this AGREEMENT EXTENSION, each as of the day and year first above
written.

Attest:                                 Bridgeport Savings and Loan Association

/s/ John O. Costine                     By:/s/ Manuel C. Thomas
--------------------------------            ------------------------------------
John O. Costine                                Manuel C. Thomas, its Chairman


Attest:


/s/ Patricia Gorham                     /s/ Jon W. Letzkus
---------------------------------       ----------------------------------------
Patricia Gorham                         Jon W. Letzkus



                                      -2-
Garrett F. BRUCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-868

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018022EN.01001602.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 31 July 2017 — Benedikt Brisch v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-455/17)

(2018/C 022/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Benedikt Brisch

Applicant:

Defendant: TUIfly GmbH

Defendant:

By order of 21 September 2017 the case was removed from the register of the Court of Justice.

---
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Leslie COONRADT a/k/a Leslie Lynn Coonradt, et al. Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3142

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 05, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
#### D. S. Lovett and H. W. Lovett, *Appellants,*v. C. C. Lovett, Mrs. Eunice Burnett, Jr., Mrs. Julia Bragdon, Joined by Her Husband, B. Bragdon, and Mrs. H. B. Neel, a Widow, *Appellees.*

En Banc.

Opinion Filed July 6, 1927.

Brown, J.

This appeal was prosecuted from two decrees according to writs of assistance against appellants in behalf of the purchasers of certain lands at a sale held under a decree for the sale of said lands renderd in a partition proceeding, between the same parties, which decree of sale was under review by this Court in the case of Lovett et al. v. Lovett et al., decided on March 29th, during the January term, A. Í). 1927, of this Court. See 112 So. 768. In that case, we reached the conclusion, and so ordered, that, unless the errors pointed out should be cured by the action of the infant defendants within 90 days from the going down of the mandate, the decrees appealed from should stand reversed. Such possible curative proceedings by said infant *117defendants was made conditional upon their having reached the age of twenty-one years or having had their disabilities of non-age lawfully removed during such ninety-day period. By petition filed herein by appellees, it is said that it is impossible for them to cure the errors pointed out in said opinion in the partition suit, and that therefore the decrees appealed from therein will have to stand reversed as ordered by this Court, which will necessarily require the reversal of this cause involving the writs of assistance also. The appellees, in whose behalf the decretal writs of assistance were granted, therefore pray the reversal of such decrees so appealed from, in order that the court below may have full and complete power and jurisdiction to deal with all matters involved in both causes, upon a relitigation of the subject matter between the parties.

As the appellants are, in the cause now before the Court, seeking a reversal of the decrees awarding writs of assistance, and as the appellees now also pray a reversal, and the reasons above referred to appearing sufficient, it is ordered that the orders and decrees appealed from in this cause be and the same are hereby reversed.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 2:05-cv-00022-J Document 12 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 64
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00022-J Document 12 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 65
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 36 Filed 06/01/2005 Page 1 of 2

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 36

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 36 Filed 06/01/2005 Page 2 of 2
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth JACKSON

NO. 2018-KO-1969

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

*305Denied.
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 1 of 12 PageID 39
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 2 of 12 PageID 40
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 3 of 12 PageID 41
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 4 of 12 PageID 42
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 5 of 12 PageID 43
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 6 of 12 PageID 44
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 7 of 12 PageID 45
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 8 of 12 PageID 46
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 9 of 12 PageID 47
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 10 of 12 PageID 48
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 11 of 12 PageID 49
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 15 Filed 02/23/01 Page 12 of 12 PageID 50
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ELIGAH DARNELL,Jr., §

Petitioner, §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-394-Y

 §

DOUGLAS DRETKE, DIRECTOR, §

T.D.C.J.,Correctional § 

Institutions DIV., §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Eligah Darnell Jr. under

28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

July 14, 2005; and

3. The Petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on July 21, 2005.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Petitioner’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus should be dismissed for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's findings and conclusions, and as set forth

herein. 

In his written objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, Petitioner contends that the application to him of

the successive filing provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244 amounts to an

unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. In Felker

v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 658-64 (1996), the Supreme Court specifically held that the restrictions on filing second or successive

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00394-Y Document 10 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 60
1Felker, 518 U.S. at 664.

2

habeas petitions “do not amount to a ‘suspension’ of the writ

contrary to Article 1, § 9 [of the Constitution].”1 Thus, Darnell’s

objection that application of the successive filing provision to

him is an unconstitutional suspension of the writ, is overruled.

Darnell also contends that he is actually innocent of the

underlying state-court conviction for burglary of a habitation.

Darnell must now obtain permission to pursue such a claim from the

court of appeals, consistent with the gatekeeping provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii). His objection on this basis is

overruled. 

 It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby,

ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus be, and is hereby, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his

right to file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for

the Fifth Circuit for leave to file a successive petition.

SIGNED July 26, 2005,

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00394-Y Document 10 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 61
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE, )

ID # 1019577, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-0234-D

 ) 

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

A Notice of Appeal has been filed in the above captioned action in which the Court has entered

a final order in a proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Considering the record in this case and

pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court hereby finds

and orders:

IFP STATUS:

(X) the party appealing is GRANTED in forma pauperis status on appeal.

COA:

(X) a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed on July 11, 2007,

which the District Court accepted on July 31, 2007, the petition for writ of habeas corpus

is barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); Sonnier v. Johnson, 161 F.3d

941, 943-44 (5th Cir. 1998). Petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find

it debatable whether the Court was correct in dismissing his case as time barred. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84

(2000); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

SO ORDERED.

August 27, 2007.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. DracupChief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
**Exhibit 8.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

The following is a list of our subsidiaries (which are also the names under which they dobusiness). The jurisdiction of incorporation of these subsidiaries is Portugal unless otherwise indicated. 

EDP –Gestão da Produção de Energia, S.A. (“EDP Produção”) 

EDP –Distribuição Energia, S.A. (“EDPD”) 

EDP Comercial, S.A. (“EDP Comercial”) 

EDP – Energias do Brasil, S.A. (“Energias do Brasil”) (incorporated in Brazil) 

EBE – Empresa Bandeirante de Energia, S.A. (“Bandeirante”) (incorporated in Brazil) 

Escelsa – Espirito Santo Centrais Eléctricas S.A. (“Escelsa”) (incorporated in Brazil) 

Enersul – Empresa Energética do Mato Grosso do Sul S.A. (“Enersul”) (incorporated in Brazil) 

Hidrocantábrico – Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. (“HidroCantábrico”) (incorporated inSpain) 

Hidrocantábrico Distribuición Eléctrica, S.A.U. (incorporated in Spain) 

Naturcorp Multiservicios, S.A.U. (“Naturcorp”) (incorporated in Spain) 

Genesa I, S.L. (“Genesa I”) (incorporated in Spain) 

Nuevas Energias de Occidente, SL (“Neo Energia”) (incorporated in Spain) 

ONI – Operadora Nacional de Interactivos, S.G.P.S., S.A. (“ONI”) 

Portgás – Sociedade de Produção e Distribuição de Gás, S.A. (“Portgás”)
Danny L. SMITH v. STATE

CR-16-0782

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary D. Woerz, CEO and CFO of
International American Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Amended Quarterly Report for the period ended September
30, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above annual
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc. and results
of its operations.

Date: November 22, 2006
Gary D. Woerz
CEO and CFO/s/ Gary D. Woerz
Leroy JOHNSON, Jr. v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

2160810

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017 Reh. denied December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hemobiotech, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Mark J.
Rosenblum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

a. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Mark J. Rosenblum

                                    -------------------------------

       Date: August 11, 2005        Mark J. Rosenblum
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.