alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RODERICK D. WATSON §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-0914-K

§

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

ET AL. §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SO ORDERED this 22 day of September, 2005. nd

/s/ Ed Kinkeade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00914-K Document 14 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 83
B.J.S. v. STATE

CR-16-1102

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 09, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 09, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0002. KENNETH BELL v. GILDER TIMBER COMPANY et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CG0265
EX PARTE Denorrious GARNER

CR-17-0039

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 13, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
# C_2017382EN.01003401.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 1 September 2017 — c.v. SNB-REACT u. a. v Deepak Mehta

(Case C-521/17)

(2017/C 382/41)

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Tallinna Ringkonnakohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: c.v. SNB-REACT u. a.

Applicant:

Defendant: Deepak Mehta

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 4(c) of Directive 2004/48/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights to be interpreted as meaning that Member States are required to recognise collecting societies of trade mark proprietors as persons with standing to pursue legal remedies in their own name to defend the rights of trade mark proprietors and to bring actions before the courts in their own name to enforce the rights of trade mark proprietors? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 4(c) of Directive 2004/48/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights to be interpreted as meaning that Member States are required to recognise collecting societies of trade mark proprietors as persons with standing to pursue legal remedies in their own name to defend the rights of trade mark proprietors and to bring actions before the courts in their own name to enforce the rights of trade mark proprietors?

1

| 2. | Are Articles 12, 13 and 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) to be interpreted as meaning that even a service provider whose service consists in registering IP addresses, thus enabling them to be anonymously linked to domains, and in renting out those IP addresses, is to be regarded as a service provider within the meaning of those provisions to whom the exemptions from liability provided for there apply? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are Articles 12, 13 and 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) to be interpreted as meaning that even a service provider whose service consists in registering IP addresses, thus enabling them to be anonymously linked to domains, and in renting out those IP addresses, is to be regarded as a service provider within the meaning of those provisions to whom the exemptions from liability provided for there apply?

2

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45.

1

(2)  OJ 2000 L 178, p. 1.

2

---
Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2001
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2002
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 3 of 11 PageID 2003
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 4 of 11 PageID 2004
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 5 of 11 PageID 2005
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 6 of 11 PageID 2006
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 7 of 11 PageID 2007
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 8 of 11 PageID 2008
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 9 of 11 PageID 2009
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 10 of 11 PageID 2010
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00081-M Document 177 Filed 06/17/11 Page 11 of 11 PageID 2011
Timmy Roel BEWRY, DOC #L32106, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tory R. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019.

Tory R. Williams, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Sheldon Goldberg hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.,
    including subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within
    those entities, particularly during the period in which this
    quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
    filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
    our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
    and have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware
    of any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

b)  that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
    our management or other employees who have a significant role in
    our internal controls; and

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.

                                   Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc., Registrant

Dated: May 11, 2006               /s/ Sheldon Goldberg
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   By: Sheldon Goldberg, Principal Executive
                                   Officer, President and Chairman of the
                                   Board
Alan LEVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

Robin H. Stevenson, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case 2:03-cv-00381-J-BB Document 72 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 481
Gerald BOWERS v. Larry BOWERS

2160766

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:05-cv-01359-M Document 23 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 148
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01359-M Document 23 Filed 11/16/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 149
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01359-M Document 23 Filed 11/16/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 150
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01359-M Document 23 Filed 11/16/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 151
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01359-M Document 23 Filed 11/16/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 152
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01359-M Document 23 Filed 11/16/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 153
Nordeen MAHMOUDI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1432

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2



September 23, 2016
Mr. Kurt Weise




Re: Acknowledgment and Agreement re Retirement


Dear Kurt:


This letter is intended to memorialize our recent discussion during which you expressed your desire to retire from employment with MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) effective as of December 31, 2016. It should go without saying that we greatly appreciate your contributions to the on-going success of the Company and all of your efforts working to integrate the former Central Bank with and into MidWestOne Bank.
As discussed, the employment agreement between you and the Company dated December 12, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”) will be amended, effective as of the date you countersign this letter, as follows:


		
	1.
	The “Employment Period” described in Section 2 of the Employment Agreement will end on December 31, 2016.


		
	2.
	Provided that, on or before January 21, 2017, you sign the Release and Waiver of Claims included with this letter (the “Release”), and the Release becomes irrevocable on or before February 5, 2017, the Company will (a) pay to you the cash severance described in Section 5(c)(i) of the Employment Agreement and (b) provide to you the continuation coverage subsidy described in Section 5(e) of the Employment Agreement.


		
	3.
	Rather than being deemed, pursuant to Section 5(g) of the Employment Agreement, to have resigned your positions as a member of the board of directors of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. and the board of directors of MidWestOne Bank, you are agreeing to remain as a member of both boards.


Again, we greatly appreciate your efforts on behalf of the Company and look forward to your continued service as a board member. Please acknowledge your agreement to these terms, which are intended to be a written amendment of the Employment Agreement in accordance with Section 17 thereof, by signing and dating where indicated below.


Thanks you and best wishes for your retirement.


	
		
	 
	MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ CHARLES N. FUNK

	 
	 

	 
	Charles N. Funk

	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer












1





	
			
	Agreed and Acknowledged:
	 

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ KURT WEISE
	 

	Kurt Weise
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Date:
	September 30, 2016
	 

	 
	 
	 








2
**Exhibit32.2**

**SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO*SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Southern Heritage Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven W. Ledbetter,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| /s/ Steven W. Ledbetter |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Steven W. Ledbetter     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November  14, 2007      |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1851

HESMAN TALL,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03698-SAG)

Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1851 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s

calculation of the amount of underpayment of supplemental security income due to Tall. 

“In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as 

does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold the determination when [the 

Commissioner] has applied correct legal standards and the [Commissioner’s] factual 

findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 

F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial 

evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. 

It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” 

Pearson v. Colvin, 810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The Commissioner

applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Tall’s claim for benefits, and the factual 

findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment upholding the Commissioner’s decision. Tall v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 

8:20-cv-03698-SAG (D. Md. Mar. 31, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1851 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
W. Mark SANDERS, Individually and as Beneficiary of the 10730 Cory Lake Drive Land Trust; Strong Portfolio Holdings, LLC; Diversified Funds, LLC; International Investments of N. America, Inc.; and Brooke Sloane Properties, LLC, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Cory Lake Isles Property Owners Association John Greeson ; James Scott; and Unknown Beneficiaries of 10730 Cory Lake Drive Land Trust, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Affirmed.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Eduard Jaeger       |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Eduard                Jaeger           |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer |   |
| November                14, 2007       |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: November 19, 2010











By: /s/ David Zaikin


David Zaikin


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1282 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1106, K2025-1105.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00931 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
II 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 34 

To address the plea agreements for certain individuals detained at 

Guantanamo, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2025 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To address the plea agreements for certain individuals 

detained at Guantanamo, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for 9/11 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. TRIAL AND POST-TRIAL MATTERS RELATING TO 

6 CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUAN7 TANAMO. 

8 (a) PLEA AGREEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS.—Notwith9 standing the provisions of section 949h of title 10, United 

10 States Code, any plea agreement entered into by Khalid 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 34 IS

1 Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak 

2 Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi for ac3 tions involving the terrorist attack on September 11, 

4 2001, and its related judgment, shall not preclude the trial 

5 of such individual under chapter 47A of such title or any 

6 other provision of law for that terrorist attack. 

7 (b) SENTENCING.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, in any trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, 

9 Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa 

10 Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi under chapter 47A of title 10, 

11 United States Code, or any other provision of law for the 

12 terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, a sentence of 

13 death shall be available. 

14 (c) CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT; TRANSFER.— 

15 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case 

16 of any sentence imposed on Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, 

17 Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa 

18 Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi, such individual— 

19 (1) shall be— 

20 (A) held at United States Naval Station, 

21 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in solitary confine22 ment; 

23 (B) provided no contact with foreign na24 tionals; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 34 IS

1 (C) provided no psychological treatment 

2 except that specifically authorized by medical 

3 authorities at United States Naval Station, 

4 Guantanamo Bay; and 

5 (2) shall not be transferred to the continental 

6 United States or any other country. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Robert BILUS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019

Robert Bilus, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.