alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sproule

Geological and Petroleum EngineeringConsultants







August 11, 2006

Consent of Sproule Associates Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of our report entitled "Evaluation of the P&NG Resources of Rocky Mountain Gas, Inc. Powder River Basin, Wyoming", evaluating reserves of Rocky Mountain Gas, Inc., and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, included in the 2005 Revised Annual Information Form of Enterra Energy Trust (the "AIF"), and to the references to my name in the AIF.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of references to our firm and of information derived from our report entitled "Evaluation of the P&NG Resources of Rocky Mountain Gas, Inc. Powder River Basin, Wyoming", evaluating reserves of Rocky Mountain Gas, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, into the registration statement on Form F-10 Registration Statement (No. 333-129601), the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120996) and the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-1 1 3609 and 333-115318).



Sincerely,



/s/ Ken H. Crowther



Ken H. Crowther, P.Eng. President





900, 140 Fourth Ave SW; Calgary ABT2P.3N3 Canada; Tel: (403) 294-5500, Fax: (403) 294-5590

1675 Broadway, Suite 1130,Denver CO 80202 U.S.A.;Tel: (303) 592-8770, Fax: (303) 592-8771

Toll Free: 1-877-777-6135

info@sproule.com,www.sproule.com
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00916]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1272 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1093, K2025-1092.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00916 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

December 13, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-16741

 

D. C. Docket No. 02-22706 CV-DLG

KEVIN HARDISON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Jim Nicholson, as Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

 

(December 13, 2005)

Before DUBINA and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and STROM*, District Judge.

____________________

*Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by

designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal, the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs appeals

the district court’s grant of summary judgment requiring the Secretary to disclose

certain documents, or portions thereof, to appellee Kevin Hardison pursuant to the

Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552(a). For the reasons that

follow, we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment in a FOIA case de

novo. Office of the Capital Collateral Counsel, N. Region of Fla. v. Dep’t of

Justice, 331 F.3d 799, 802 (11th Cir. 2003).

The FOIA exemption at issue in this appeal, Exemption 6, excludes from

FOIA requests “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of

which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5

U.S.C. § 552(b)(6).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs and having the benefit

of oral argument, we conclude that the district court erred in finding that the

following personal information was not protected under Exemption 6:

(1) the dates of birth, dates of marriages, and spouses’ names;

(2) the residents’ performance evaluations;
3

(3) the residents’ identities, which are included in the activity log and log

summaries; and

(4) the individuals’ professional background and biographical information

unrelated to documenting an individual’s credentials for federal employment. 

Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of Hardison insofar as it requires the disclosure of information not already

released to him by the VA and remand this case with directions that judgment be

entered in accordance with this decision.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
4
Elvirn BURNETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shimoda Marketing, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael B. Cranfill, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   SHIMODA MARKETING, INC.  /s/Michael B. Cranfill MICHAEL B. CRANFILL Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  June 13, 2009
Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 13 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 14 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 15 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 16 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 17 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 18 of 19

Case 23-20085-7    Doc 1    Filed 04/28/23    Entered 04/28/23 15:46:38    Desc MainDocument      Page 19 of 19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STEPHEN ALLARD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-0584-K

) ECF

QUINLAN PEST CONTROL, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any

objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s

Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations, filon

September 25 2008, are OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 2 day of October, 2008. nd

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2008             
|                                    
|/s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|Dennis G. Dracup                    
|Chief Executive Officer and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)       

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-30263

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRIAN DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:13-CR-38-3

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brian Davis pleaded guilty of conspiring to possess cocaine base and 

possession of cocaine base (two counts), and he was sentenced within the 

sentencing guidelines range to concurrent 120-month terms of imprisonment 

and to concurrent four-year periods of supervised release.

Davis has moved for dismissal of his appointed counsel and for leave to 

proceed pro se in this appeal. Although Davis has expressed an unequivocal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 26, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-30263 Document: 00512850773 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/26/2014
No. 14-30263

desire to proceed pro se, his request was untimely because it was made after 

counsel filed his merits brief and after the Government filed its brief. See 

United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The motion is 

DENIED.

Through counsel, Davis contends that the district court erred at 

sentencing in finding him responsible for all of the cocaine purchased and sold 

by his coconspirator/supplier and in failing to make adequate findings with 

respect to that issue in overruling his drug-quantity objection.

The record reflects that Davis trafficked in large quantities of cocaine 

and methamphetamine and was present on at least one occasion when drugs 

were distributed by his supplier to another member of the conspiracy. For 

those reasons, any error on the part of the district court in failing to consider 

adequately whether quantities of drugs distributed by other members of the 

conspiracy were reasonably foreseeable to Davis and in failing to make 

adequate findings on that issue was harmless. See United States v. PuigInfante, 19 F.3d 929, 942 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Sparks, 2 F.3d 574, 

588-89 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-30263 Document: 00512850773 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/26/2014
Tangie L. PAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 17, 2019

Tangie L. Paul, Brooksville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Boo-Ali Siddiqui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: March 10, 2011





/s/ Boo-Ali SiddiquiBoo-Ali Siddiqui,Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer
Tony L. SMITH v. COLDWELL BANKER GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2016-CT-01082-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 12, 2019 Closed: May 23, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Allerton Towne, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Allerton Towne
-----------------------------
Allerton Towne
Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman Becker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Norman Becker
-----------------------------
Norman Becker
Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2009
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

LOUISIANACONVENIENCEAND VAPE STOREASSOCIATION, INC. VERSUS ERNEST P. LEGIER, JR. COMMISSIONER, LOUISIANA ALCOHOLAND TOBACCO CONTROL, AND KEVIN RICHARD, SECRETARY LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NO. 2024 CW 0237



### APRIL2, 2024

InRe: Ernest P. Legier, Jr., Commissioner of the Louisiana Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control and Richard Nelson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, ParishofEast BatonRouge, No. 740120.

BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, JJ. STAY DENIED; WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The district court's February 21, 2024 order denying as moot the motion for suspensive appeal filed by defendants, Ernest P. Legier, Jr., in his official capacity as Commissioner, Louisiana Alcohol and Tobacco Control, and Kevin Richard, in his official capacity as Secretary, Louisiana Department of Revenue, is reversed. The district court has granted a preliminary injunction "which may restrain the execution or enforcement" of enacted laws of the legislature of Louisiana, and "the defendant or defendants or any person or persons affected thereby, may suspensively appeal the order or judgment" pursuant to La. R.S. 13:4431. Accordingly, the district court is ordered to grant defendants' motion for suspensive appeal pursuant to La. R.S. 13:4431 on or before April 9, 2024. See Womack v. Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics, 193 So.2d 777 (La. 1967); See also Manuel v. State, 95-2189 (La. 3/8/96), 692 So.2d 320.

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT 

# a.,.o
DEPUT~ERKOFCOURT FORTHE COURT JEW EW TPS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 708 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 708

  Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the designation of the Gila 
                              Wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2024

   Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mr. Lujan) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the designation of the Gila 
                              Wilderness.

Whereas on June 3, 1924, the Forest Service set aside 755,000 acres as the Gila 
        Wilderness;
Whereas this was the first designated wilderness in the United States and the 
        world;
Whereas this designation marked the beginning of a national system of wilderness 
        areas and helped inspire the Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131 et 
        seq.);
Whereas Aldo Leopold, a Forest Service employee in New Mexico, worked to 
        initiate a Federal wilderness concept in the backcountry of what is now 
        the Gila National Forest;
Whereas Arthur Carhart, a Forest Service employee, argued that wilderness 
        recreation would help to develop individual and national character;
Whereas the Apache and Mimbres people have been stewards of this land from time 
        immemorial; and
Whereas, 100 years later, the character of the Gila Wilderness remains without 
        permanent human-built structures, protected and managed to preserve this 
        condition, and the wilderness remains a place unrestrained by human 
        development: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Congress commemorates the 100th anniversary of the 
designation of the Gila Wilderness.
                                 <all>
```
Darryl L. DIXON v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-0966

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Leo LEWIS, Petitioner v. REBEL RAGS, LLC, Respondent

No. 2017-M-01546-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 21, 2018

***EN BANC ORDER***

MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE FOR THE COURT

*578This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the Petition of Leo Lewis for Permission to Appeal from Interlocutory Order and his request for a stay. Rebel Rags, LLC, has filed a response. After due consideration, the Court finds the petition should be denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition of Leo Lewis for Permission to Appeal from Interlocutory Order is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 21st day of March, 2018.

WALLER, C.J., OBJECTS TO THE ORDER WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT JOINED BY KING, J.

MAXWELL, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.

WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, OBJECTING TO THE ORDER WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT:

¶ 1. For the reasons expressed in my separate statement in *Kobe Jones v. Rebel Rags, LLC* , 2017-M-1529-SCT, I object to this Court's denial of Leo Lewis's petition for interlocutory appeal.

KING, J., JOINS THIS SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1241 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1056, K2025-1055.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00800 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P