alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 35 PageID 2735
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 35 PageID 2736
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 35 PageID 2737
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 4 of 35 PageID 2738
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 5 of 35 PageID 2739
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 6 of 35 PageID 2740
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 7 of 35 PageID 2741
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 8 of 35 PageID 2742
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 9 of 35 PageID 2743
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 10 of 35 PageID 2744
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 11 of 35 PageID 2745
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 12 of 35 PageID 2746
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 13 of 35 PageID 2747
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 14 of 35 PageID 2748
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 15 of 35 PageID 2749
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 16 of 35 PageID 2750
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 17 of 35 PageID 2751
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 18 of 35 PageID 2752
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 19 of 35 PageID 2753
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 20 of 35 PageID 2754
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 21 of 35 PageID 2755
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 22 of 35 PageID 2756
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 23 of 35 PageID 2757
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 24 of 35 PageID 2758
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 25 of 35 PageID 2759
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 26 of 35 PageID 2760
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 27 of 35 PageID 2761
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 28 of 35 PageID 2762
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 29 of 35 PageID 2763
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 30 of 35 PageID 2764
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 31 of 35 PageID 2765
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 32 of 35 PageID 2766
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 33 of 35 PageID 2767
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 34 of 35 PageID 2768
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 122 Filed 04/20/05 Page 35 of 35 PageID 2769
Jeffrey Charles MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Rocco J. Carbone, III, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 858 

To establish criminal penalties for aliens who fail to depart before the 

expiration of their visas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish criminal penalties for aliens who fail to depart 

before the expiration of their visas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Visa 

5 Overstays Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 858 IS

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR ALIENS WHO FAIL TO 

2 DEPART FROM THE UNITED STATES BEFORE 

3 THE EXPIRATION OF THEIR VISAS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274D of the Immigration 

5 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324d) is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 274D. PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO DEPART. 

8 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITED CONDUCT.—It is unlawful for any 

9 alien who is subject to a final order of removal— 

10 ‘‘(1) to willfully fail or refuse— 

11 ‘‘(A) to depart from the United States pur12 suant to such order; 

13 ‘‘(B) to make a timely application in good 

14 faith for travel or other documents necessary 

15 for departure; or 

16 ‘‘(C) to present for removal at the time 

17 and place required by the Secretary of Home18 land Security; or 

19 ‘‘(2) to conspire to or take any action designed 

20 to prevent or hamper the alien’s departure pursuant 

21 to such order. 

22 ‘‘(b) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Any alien who violates sub23 section (a) shall pay a civil penalty of not more than $500 

24 to the Secretary of Homeland Security for each day the 

25 alien remains in violation of such subsection. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 858 IS

1 ‘‘(c) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Any alien who is re2 quired to depart from the United States as a result of 

3 the expiration of the alien’s visa and fails to depart the 

4 United States within the prescribed period shall be fined 

5 under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned for not 

6 more than 1 year, or both. 

7 ‘‘(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec8 tion may be construed to diminish or qualify any penalties 

9 to which an alien may be subject for activities proscribed 

10 under section 243(a) or under any other section of this 

11 Act.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

13 for the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 

14 note) is amended by striking the item relating to section 

15 274D and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 274D. Penalties for failure to depart.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 6010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-919 (Fourth Review)]

Certain Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From Japan; Notice of 
Commission Determination To Conduct a Full Five-Year Review

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether 
revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain welded large 
diameter line pipe from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation 
or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 
A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later 
date.

DATES: December 9, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nitin Joshi (202-708-1669), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436.
    Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by 
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with 
mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access 
to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-
205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The 
public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further 
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general 
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 9, 2024, the Commission 
determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-
year review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that both the domestic and 
respondent interested party group responses to its notice of 
institution (89 FR 71417, September 3, 2024) were adequate, and 
determined to conduct a full review of the order on imports from Japan. 
A record of the Commissioners' votes will be available from the Office 
of the Secretary and at the Commission's website.
    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title 
VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 
Sec.  207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 14, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-01146 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 942 

To provide that the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, Limited Duration Insurance’’ 

shall have no force or effect. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 24, 2021 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. CASEY, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. KAINE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SMITH, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. KING, Mr. BENNET, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. REED, 

Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. CARPER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. LEAHY, 

Mr. BOOKER, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. WARREN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

TESTER, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide that the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, Limited 

Duration Insurance’’ shall have no force or effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Junk Plans Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 942 IS

1 SEC. 2. SHORT-TERM LIMITED DURATION INSURANCE 

2 RULE PROHIBITION. 

3 The Secretary of Health and Human Services, the 

4 Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Labor 

5 may not take any action to implement, enforce, or other6 wise give effect to the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, Limited 

7 Duration Insurance’’ (83 Fed. Reg. 38212 (August 3, 

8 2018)), and the Secretaries may not promulgate any sub9 stantially similar rule. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
BTXN 112 (rev. 10/02)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Metroplex Spoilers, Inc Case No.: 23−31198−sgj7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER APPROVING TRUSTEE REPORT AND DISCHARGING TRUSTEE

 The Trustee appointed in the above listed case has filed the Trustee's Report. It is, therefore

 ORDERED that the trustee be discharged.

DATED: 9/25/23 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/Sheniqua Whitaker, Deputy Clerk

Case 23-31198-sgj7 Doc 7 Filed 09/25/23 Entered 09/25/23 07:31:49 Desc Order

Approving Trustee Report Page 1 of 1
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. v. Dana WILLIAMS

1151177

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dennis G. Dracup, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2005



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|    |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director





23
Vital ANICETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1774

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 5921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01096]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group Pediatrics 
Study Section.
    Date: February 26, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child 
Health and Human Development, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Anita Szajek, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, NIH, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2131D, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-5966, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-01096 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ALLEN FITZGERALD CALTON )

)

V. ) 3-05-CV-2022-N

)

DALLAS COUNTY, et al )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SIGNED August 27, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2018052EN.01002202.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 28 November 2017 — Tratave — Tratamento de Águas Residuais do Ave SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-672/17)

(2018/C 052/32)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tratave — Tratamento de Águas Residuais do Ave SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the principle of neutrality and Article 90 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 preclude national legislation such as Article 78(11) of the Código do Imposto sobre o Valor Acrescentado (Value Added Tax Code), which is interpreted to the effect that the tax may not be adjusted, in the event of non-payment, before the purchaser of the goods or service, being a taxable person, has been notified of the cancellation of the tax for the purposes of rectifying the deduction initially made? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the principle of neutrality and Article 90 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 preclude national legislation such as Article 78(11) of the Código do Imposto sobre o Valor Acrescentado (Value Added Tax Code), which is interpreted to the effect that the tax may not be adjusted, in the event of non-payment, before the purchaser of the goods or service, being a taxable person, has been notified of the cancellation of the tax for the purposes of rectifying the deduction initially made?

1

| 2. | If so, do the principle of neutrality and Article 90 of Directive 2006/112/EC preclude national legislation such as Article 78(11) of the Código do Imposto sobre o Valor Acrescentado, which is interpreted to the effect that the tax may not be adjusted, in the event of non-payment, where the purchaser of the goods or service, being a taxable person, was not notified of the cancellation of the tax within the time-limit for deducting the tax laid down in Article 98(2) of the Value Added Tax Code? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, do the principle of neutrality and Article 90 of Directive 2006/112/EC preclude national legislation such as Article 78(11) of the Código do Imposto sobre o Valor Acrescentado, which is interpreted to the effect that the tax may not be adjusted, in the event of non-payment, where the purchaser of the goods or service, being a taxable person, was not notified of the cancellation of the tax within the time-limit for deducting the tax laid down in Article 98(2) of the Value Added Tax Code?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00209- CR Le lan d AlCr aig , I II, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BURNET COUNTY , 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. 30841 , HO NORAB LE GUILFO RD L. JONES, II I, JUDGE PRESI DING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellan t ’s m o t ion to withdraw notice of appea l is gra

nted. SeeTe x. R. A

pp . P. 42.2(a) . The a

ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Nove mber 22, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

ANTONIO RIOZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No.

Defendant. ) 5:04-CV-235-C

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Antonio Rioz, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is appealing a decision of the

Commissioner denying his application for supplemental security income benefits. The United States

Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation on September 16, 2005, and Plaintiff has

filed his objections to such Report and Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of

the records and finds that Plaintiff’s objections should be OVERRULED and that the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED as the findings of this Court. It is,

therefore,

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objections are overruled, that the findings and conclusions of

the Magistrate Judge are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court, and that

the above-styled and numbered cause is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated December 2, 2005.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:04-cv-00235-C Document 21 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 78
Charles James LAWN, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Karen WEIL, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-1061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Report of VALLEY HIGH MINING COMPANY (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Michael Coombs, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  VALLEY HIGH MINING COMPANY    Date:July 27, 2009By:/s/John Michael CoombsJohn Michael CoombsChairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer (CEO)  Date:July 27, 2009By:/s/John Michael CoombsJohn Michael CoombsChief or Principal Officer (CFO), and Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer