alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Louise King Cromartie and B. A. Cromartie, Her Husband, and Sue C. King and Edwin Bird King, *Appellants,*v. Everglades Lumber Company, a Corporation, Organized and Doing Business Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 25, 1927.

*Farrington & Lockhart,*for Appellants;

*Price, Price, Neeley*c§ *Kehoe,*and *McCune, Casey, Hiaasen & Fleming,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

-This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J., concur.
Showanda PALMER v. CLARK CLINIC, INC.

2017-CT-01048-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 23, 2019 Closed: May 30, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Certiorari of Appellant Showanda Palmer.

Certiorari - Denied.
Angel Luis RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-1

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 23, 2019

Angel Luis Rodriguez, Clermont, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**Hannah v. State*, 869 So.2d 692, 693 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (citing *Butler v. State*, 838 So.2d 554 (Fla. 2003) ).

EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Lloyd CARR

NO. 2018-KO-1815

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
Carl Michael EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1
**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**
I, John P. Calamos, Sr., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
May 12, 2005   /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.  John P. Calamos, Sr.  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer  and Co-Chief Investment Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan Finkelstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.


Dated: August 15, 2005           By: /s/ Alan Finkelstein
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Alan Finkelstein
                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                    President and Secretary


I, Bennet P. Lientz, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.


Dated: August 15, 2005           By: /s/ Bennet P. Lientz, Jr.
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Bennet P. Lientz,Jr.
                                    Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017309EN.01002902.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 10 July 2017 — UAB ‘Roche Lietuva’ v VšĮ Kauno Dainavos poliklinika

(Case C-413/17)

(2017/C 309/39)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UAB ‘Roche Lietuva’

Applicant:

Other party: VšĮ Kauno Dainavos poliklinika

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Should the provisions of Articles 2 and 23 of, and of Annex VI to, Directive 2004/18 (1) (whether together or separately, but without limitation to those provisions), be interpreted and understood as meaning that, in the case where a contracting authority — a human health care institution — intends to acquire supplies (medical diagnostic equipment and materials) or specific rights thereto by way of a public procurement procedure in order to be able to carry out tests by itself, its discretion includes the right to lay down in the technical specifications only such requirements for those supplies as do not describe in isolation the individual operational (technical) and use-related (functional) characteristics of the equipment and/or materials but instead define the qualitative parameters of the tests to be carried out as well as the performance of the testing laboratory, the content of which must be separately described in the specifications of the public procurement procedure in question?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Kendle International Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-57577 and 333-34261) of our
report dated February 15, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Kendle International Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
March 29, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1275 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1097, K2025-1096.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00919 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# Counterintelligence

The FBI is the lead agency for exposing, preventing, and investigating intelligence activities, including espionage, in the U.S.

- Emerging and Advanced Technology The FBI protects emerging and advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and quantum information science.
- Transnational Repression Some countries’ governments harass and intimidate their own citizens living in the U.S. This violates U.S. law and individual rights and freedoms.
- Threat Intimidation Guide If someone communicates any statement or indication of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action in an illegal manner, to include in a manner that manipulates the U.S. legal system, that's a threat.
- The Iran Threat Threats from the Iranian regime and its terrorist partners are far reaching. The FBI is committed to identifying and disrupting all Iranian intelligence and military operations that threaten American citizens or our nation's security and critical infrastructure.
- The China Threat The counterintelligence and economic espionage efforts emanating from the government of China and the Chinese Communist Party are a grave threat to the economic well-being and democratic values of the United States. Confronting this threat is the FBI’s top counterintelligence priority.
- Combating Foreign Influence The FBI, as the lead federal agency responsible for investigating foreign influence operations, established its Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) to identify and counteract these operations targeting the U.S.
- Major Cases Significant counterintelligence and espionagecases worked by the FBI and its partners over the course of FBI history.
- Most Wanted FBI Most Wanted Counterintelligence posters.
- Publications Publications and documents relating to counterintelligence.
- News Counterintelligence news and press releases.
Case 3:05-cv-00678-B Document 16 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60
# C_2018013EN.01000501.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 26 September 2017 — Związek Gmin Zagłębia Miedziowego w Polkowicach v Szef Krajowej Administracji Skarbowej

(Case C-566/17)

(2018/C 013/05)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Związek Gmin Zagłębia Miedziowego w Polkowicach

Applicant:

Defendant: Szef Krajowej Administracji Skarbowej

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 168(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) and the principle of VAT neutrality preclude a national practice where the right is granted to a full deduction of input tax in connection with the purchase of goods and services used both for the purposes of a taxable person’s transactions falling within the scope of VAT (taxed and exempted) and falling outside the scope of VAT, owing to the absence in national law of methods and criteria for apportioning the input tax in relation to those types of transaction?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
MONIQUE LAFAYE 

CLEMENTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0253

Opinion filed August 18, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Thomas M. Jaworski, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Brenda L. Roman, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

GW EQUITY LLC, GWBS, INC. ) 

and GREAT WESTERN BUSINESS ) 

SERVICES, LLC. ) 

 ) NO. #3-05CV0.800-R 

v. ) 

 ) 

PBS GLOBAL, INC. f/k/a PRUDENTIAL ) 

BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., JOHN ) 

PERSAUD, RICHARD MEIER, LAHNY ) 

McCRAY, DALE GRANGER, JOSEPH C. ) 

KISER, WAYNE LEE, WILLIAM JACOBS ) 

and FRED RODDA ) 

______________________________________ ) 

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS OF RYAN BINKLEY, 

ELLEN LALLI, STRICK HULLENDER, GENE SARTIN, AND 

JOHN BINKLEY 

 

 Comes counsel for PBS Global, Inc., J. Persaud, Dale Granger, Stephanie Kraft, and Fred 

Rodda, and hereby notices the taking of the depositions of the following named persons on the 

days and at the times indicated (CST): 

September 27, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. (CST)

Ryan Binkley 

September 27, 2005 at 1:00 p.m. (CST)

Ellen Lalli 

September 27, 2005 at 3:00 p.m. (CST)

Strick Hullender 

September 28, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. (CST)

Gene Sartin 

September 28, 2005 at 1:00 p.m. (CST)

John Binkley 

Counsel will, at the offices of Hon. Molly Steele, Thomspon & Knight, 1700 Pacific 

Avenue, Ste. 3300, Dallas, Texas 75201-4693, on the days and at the times indicated (CST), take 

Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 46 Filed 08/18/2005 Page 1 of 3

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 46

Dockets.Justia.com
the depositions of the persons named above, in accordance with Rule 30.02 of the Rules of Civil 

Procedure. The undersigned counsel will continue taking said depositions from day to day until 

completed, to be used for all purposes allowed under the Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Stuart E. Alexander III 

Stuart E. Alexander, III 

Kathleen M.W. Schoen 

Tilford Dobbins Alexander Buckaway 

 & Black, LLP 

401 W. Main Street, Suite 1400 

Louisville, KY 40202 

Tel. (502) 584-1000 

Fax. (502) 584-2318 

Co-Counsel for PBS Global, Inc.; J. Persaud; Dale 

Granger; Stephanie Kraft and Fred Rodda 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing was this 18th day of August, 2005 mailed to the 

following parties of record by U.S. Postal Service, postage pre-paid, and by via-facsimile 

wherein indicated. 

Cory Shane Hartsfield chartsfield@mccrearylaw.com

David S. McCreary dmccreary@mccrearylaw.com

MCCREARY & STOCKFORD 

18383 Preston Rd., Ste. 150 

Dallas, Texas 75252-5476 

(214) 291-0800 

(214) 291-0801; FAX 

Counsel for GW Equity, LLC, GWBS, Inc., and Great Western Business Services, LLC 

Molly Steele molly.steele@tklaw.com

Amber B. Shockey 

THOMPSON & KNIGHT 

1700 Pacific Avenue, Ste. 3300 

Dallas, Texas 75201-4693 

(214) 969-1254 

(214) 969-2583; FAX 

Counsel for PBS Global, Inc.; J. Persaud; Dale Granger; Stephanie Kraft; and Fred Rodda 

2 

Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 46 Filed 08/18/2005 Page 2 of 3
3 

Court Reporting Services 

6013 Brownsboro Park Blvd., Ste. A 

Louisville, Kentucky 40207 

United American Reporting Services, Inc. 

1201 Elm Street, Ste. 5220 

Dallas, Texas 75270 

 /s/Stuart E. Alexander III 

 Stuart E. Alexander, III

Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 46 Filed 08/18/2005 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2




                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Trailer Bridge, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2006                    /s/ Mark A. Tanner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark A. Tanner
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                    Page 64
SING KEUNG CHEUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3947

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN RICE )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-904-P

)

COCA-COCA )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this16th day of August 2005.

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00904-P Document 8 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
LEBLANC MARINE, L.L.C. v. State of Louisiana, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF FACILITY PLANNING AND CONTROL

NO. 2019-C-0053

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
#### Olive B. Brown, Also Known as Olive Brown, Joined by Her Husband and Next Friend Foy G. Brown, *Appellants,*v. M. S. May and Lee Harlan May, His Wife, and W. Frank Blanton, *Appellees.*

Decision Filed September 21, 1927.

*Gilbert G. Robinson,*for Appellants;

*Botts, Davis, Davis <& Field,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam:.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.