alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joey RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Not in Its Individual Capacity, But Solely as Trustee for NRZ Pass-Through Trust VI ; Adrian Johnson a/k/a Adrian S. Johnson; UV Assets, LLC; Regions Bank SBM with AmSouth Bank; Concord Station Community Association, Inc. ; Unknown Tenant #1; Unknown Tenant #2, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-2238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.9
Promissory Note

Lender: Corporacion As de Oros, S,A,
Borrower: Inversiones La Ribera, S.A.
Amount: c7,914,529
Currency: Costa Rican Colones
Interest Rate: 8.00% fixed rate
Date of issuance: May 29, 2001
Due date: Due on demand
Case 3:04-cv-02177-B Document 36 Filed 12/20/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 203
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                   |   |
| November      12, 2009 |   | /s/ Scott      Jarus              |   |
|                   |   | Scott      Jarus                       |   |
|                   |   | (Interim)      Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |   |                                   |   |
R.W. v. CALHOUN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160698

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1340 

CAF 13-01090 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF JOHNATHAN CRAIG, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V ORDER

AMBER M. YAKYMOVITCH, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

CHARLES T. NOCE, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KATHLEEN P. REARDON OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

MAUREEN A. PINEAU, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (John B.

Gallagher, Jr., J.), entered May 10, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded

petitioner sole custody of the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
David Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date:
November 13, 2009





By: /s/ David
Zaikin


David
Zaikin


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
STATE of Louisiana v. Willard HALL

No. 2018-KH-0796

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction *1107burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Christopher MCCALLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Florida Department of Children and Families and City of Riviera Beach, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Appellants, v. Michael BARNETT, Individually, as Natural Father and Guardian of R.B., a Minor, and as the Personal Representative of the Estates of Daniel Barnett, Diane Barnett and Bryan Barnett, and Leroy Nelson, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Javon Xavier Nelson, a Minor, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2840

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 9, 2019]

Sheridan Weissenborn of Dutton Law Group, P.A., Miami, for appellant Department of Financial Services.

H.T. Smith of the Law Offices of H.T. Smith, P.A., Coral Gables, and John W. McLuskey of McLuskey, McDonald & Hughes, P.A., Miami, for appellee Michael Barnett.

Vincent E. Miller of the Law Offices of Vincent E. Miller, P.A., Delray Beach, for appellee Leroy Nelson, Jr.

***ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE***

Per Curiam.

*759Unfortunately, our state has experienced a number of high-profile mass shootings in the past several years, some of which have led to negligence complaints against state agencies. In our opinion in the instant case, we narrowly construed section 768.28(5), Florida Statutes (2010), to limit the sovereign immunity waiver to $200,0001 when there are multiple claims arising out of the same negligent act(s) committed by the state agency. However, we acknowledge that a broader reading of the statute could allow a per injury limitation.

Because this issue may continue to arise in the context of mass shootings and other mass injury events, we certify the following question as one of great public importance:

> WHEN MULTIPLE CLAIMS OF INJURY OR DEATH ARISE FROM THE SAME ACT OF NEGLIGENCE COMMITTED BY A STATE AGENCY OR ACTOR, DOES THE LIMITATION ON THE WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN SECTION 768.28(5), FLORIDA STATUTES, CAP THE LIABILITY OF STATE AGENCIES AT $200,000 FOR ALL RESULTING INJURIES OR DEATHS, AS CLAIMS AND JUDGMENTS "ARISING OUT OF THE SAME INCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE"?

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.

1

The statute was amended in 2016 to increase the cap to $300,000 for all claims or judgments.
Case 24-41040-mxm13 Doc 37 Filed 06/12/24 Entered 06/12/24 11:43:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 24-41040-mxm13 Doc 37 Filed 06/12/24 Entered 06/12/24 11:43:23 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00929]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1280 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1104, K2025-1103.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00929 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

GREGORY M. PALUMBO,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2508 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 41 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 46466

(Delaware County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9

th day of August, 2018, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Gregory M. Palumbo is placed on 

temporary suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He 

shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to 

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order are specifically 

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).

The Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline with the meaning of 

Pa.R.D.E. 402, pertaining to confidentiality.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 5877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01130]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-162]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed January 6, 2025 10 a.m. EST Through January 13, 2025 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.
EIS No. 20250013, Draft, TVA, AL, Hillsboro Solar, Comment Period Ends: 
03/03/2025, Contact: Elizabeth Smith 865-632-3053.
EIS No. 20250014, Draft, DOE, KS, DOE/EIS-0554: Phase 1 of the Grain 
Belt Express Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 03/03/2025, 
Contact: Todd Stribley 301-525-5944.
EIS No. 20250015, Draft, NMFS, FL, Amendment 59 to the Fishery 
Management Plan for the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic 
Region, Comment Period Ends: 03/03/2025, Contact: Nikhil Mehta 727-551-
5098.
EIS No. 20250016, Final, TVA, IL, Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 
Significant Boundary Revision 8, Review Period Ends: 02/18/2025, 
Contact: Elizabeth Smith 865-632-3053.

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Mark Austin,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2025-01130 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March 7, 2014 |   | /s/ Martin B. Oring                            |   |
|                      |   | Martin B. Oring                                     |   |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----

----
# C_2016165EN.01001801.xml

| 10.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/18

---

Action brought on 23 March 2016 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — bpost (BEPOST)

(Case T-118/16)

(2016/C 165/20)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: K. Hamacher and G. Müllejans, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bpost NV (Brussels, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘BEPOST’ — Application No 8 897 829

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2016 in Case R 3107/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 13.1




Certification of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of RBS Holdings N.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Jan de Ruiter, the Chairman of the Managing Board, and Pieter van der Harst, the Chief Financial Officer of RBS Holdings N.V., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RBS Holdings N.V.




Date: March 28, 2013





By:
/s/ Jan de RuiterName:
Jan de RuiterTitle:
Chairman of the Managing Board





By:
/s/ Pieter van der HarstName:
Pieter van der HarstTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
TRUSTEE’S STATUS REPORT SOLO PAGE

-

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE:

HIGHLAND SELECT MASTER EQUITY 

FUND, L.P.

 

DEBTOR.

§

§

§ CASE NO: 23-31037-swe-7

§ 

§ Chapter 7

§

TRUSTEE’S MEETING REPORT

The Trustee wishes to advise the Court, creditors, and parties in interest that the Debtor’s 

meeting was held and concluded with assets. The trustee previously requested the Court notify 

creditors of assets and to file a proof of claim [Doc. No. 37] A bar date of November 16, 2023

has previously been established for this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Scott M. Seidel

 Scott M. Seidel

6505 W. Park Blvd., Suite 306

Plano, Texas 75093

Telephone: (214) 234-2500

scott@scottseidel.com

CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

Case 23-31037-swe7 Doc 44 Filed 10/02/23 Entered 10/02/23 14:11:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Jeffery CUNNINGHAM

CR-16-1312

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 15, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Kenyanna Racquel CHEEKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 9, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Kenyanna Racquel Cheeks seeks relief from her judgment and sentence for sale of cocaine and solicitation for prostitution. Ms. Cheeks argues that the evidence was insufficient to overcome her defense of entrapment, the trial court erroneously overruled an objection to the admission of a jail call, and the trial court improperly imposed a discretionary fine pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes, and a surcharge pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes. We reject the first two arguments without comment. However, we agree with the State's concession that the trial court erred when it included the discretionary fine and surcharge in the written judgment and sentence because neither was orally imposed at sentencing. *Lamoreaux v. State* , 88 So.3d 379, 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Accordingly, we strike the $ 5,000 fine and $ 250 surcharge and remand for entry of a corrected judgment and sentence consistent with this opinion. *Id.* ; *see also**Calhoun v. State* , 259 So.3d 288, 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 19 PageID 238
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 19 PageID 239
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 3 of 19 PageID 240
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 4 of 19 PageID 241
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 5 of 19 PageID 242
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 6 of 19 PageID 243
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 7 of 19 PageID 244
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 8 of 19 PageID 245
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 9 of 19 PageID 246
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 10 of 19 PageID 247
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 11 of 19 PageID 248
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 12 of 19 PageID 249
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 13 of 19 PageID 250
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 14 of 19 PageID 251
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 15 of 19 PageID 252
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 16 of 19 PageID 253
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 17 of 19 PageID 254
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 18 of 19 PageID 255
Case 3:05-cv-00844-G Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 19 of 19 PageID 256
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

137153 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137153 

 COA: 286038 

Ingham CC: 06-001171-FH 

DOUGLAS CHARLES HASTINGS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Clifford SCOTT v. STATE

CR-16-0790

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Theron SAPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2399

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 22, 2019

Theron Sapp, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Theron Sapp was convicted in 2006 of aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer. Because the victim was an officer, the aggravated battery charge was a first-degree felony. § 784.07(2)(d), Fla. Stat. And because Sapp was a habitual felony offender, the trial court could sentence him "for life." § 775.084(4)(a)1., Fla. Stat. The trial court sentenced Sapp to forty years with a thirty-year mandatory for being a prison releasee reoffender. *See* § 775.082(9)(a)3., Fla. Stat. Sapp filed a motion to correct illegal sentence arguing that, although he could be sentenced to life imprisonment as a habitual felony offender, he could not be sentenced to forty years. Like the trial court, we disagree.*

The trial court "may sentence" a habitual felony offender convicted "of a life felony or a felony of the first degree, for life." § 775.084(4)(a), Fla. Stat. As Sapp could have been sentenced to life imprisonment, he likewise could be sentenced to forty years imprisonment. *See**Guy v. State* , 632 So.2d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (interpreting a habitualization provision permitting a sentence "for life" and concluding that "the trial court in this case had the discretion to impose any sentence up to life imprisonment for appellant's commission of the first degree felony"). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order denying Sapp's motion to correct illegal sentence.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

*

We reject without further comment Sapp's argument regarding the other ground raised in his motion.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Gary Machetta

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00009

- CV

Trial court case number: 2007

- 50042

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

Relator Gary Machetta has filed a petition for writ of man damus in this court.

Machetta has filed two motions seeking interim relief. On January 12, 2017 , he filed a

“Motion for Immediate Mandamus Relief to Block Prior Restraints on Free Speech.” On

January 18, 2017, he filed an “Emergency Motion for Immediate Stay of Final Trial.”

Both interim motions are DENIED

. The mandamus petition remains pending before the

court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 18, 2017