alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 42 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 42 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 752
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 42 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 2 of 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 42 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 753
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 42 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 3 of 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 42 Filed 07/28/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 754
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 42 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 4 of 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 42 Filed 07/28/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 755
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 42 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 5 of 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 42 Filed 07/28/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 756
Case 1:05-cv-03421 Document 42 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 6 of 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01767-K Document 42 Filed 07/28/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 757
PAGE 42, LLC and Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER TYLER LOFTON, §

Individually and on behalf of the ESTATE §

of CHRISTOPHER M. LOFTON, et al., §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1531-L

§

MCNEIL CONSUMER & SPECIALTY §

PHARMACEUTICALS, a Division of §

MCNEIL-PPC, INC., and JOHNSON & §

JOHNSON, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the court is Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 30,

2010. Defendants McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals and Johnson & Johnson

(“Defendants”) moved to dismiss the remaining claims brought by Plaintiffs Christopher Tyler

Lofton, Lauren Lofton, and Tegan Lofton (“Plaintiffs”). On August 20, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their

response and brief in support. They state: “Based on Texas case law that has come down since the

Original Motion for Summary Judgment and Response were filed, Plaintiffs no longer have

sufficient evidence on [their remaining] claims upon which Defendants move for Supplemental

Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Motion should be granted.” Pls.’ Brief 1-2. 

In light of Plaintiffs’ concession, the record, and applicable law, the court determines that

there is no genuine issue of material fact with respect to Plaintiffs’ remaining claims for defective

design and breach of implied warranty, and Defendants are therefore entitled to judgment as a matter

of law on these claims. The court therefore grants Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary

Order - Page 1

Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 132 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4529
Judgment and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims for defective design and breach of

implied warranty. Because these are Plaintiffs’ only remaining claims, the court will enter judgment

by separate document.

It is so ordered this 24th day of August, 2010.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Order - Page 2

Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 132 Filed 08/24/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4530
Keith R. LONG, DOC #079409, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      David
      Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the three months ended March
      31,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By *:/s/
      David Zaikin*


David
      Zaikin


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





May
      15,
      2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOEL RODRIGUEZ CANTU, §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-467-Y

§

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, §

T.D.C.J., Correctional § 

Institutions Division, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Joel Rodriguez Cantu

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of

the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

October 13, 2005; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on November 4, 2005.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Cantu’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus should be denied, for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. 

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Joel Rodriguez Cantu’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DENIED.

SIGNED November 10, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00467-Y Document 10 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
T. M ARC C ALVERT

B OARD C ERTIFIED P ERSONAL I NJURY T RIAL L AW
T EXAS B OARD OF L EGAL S PECIALIZATION

Phone (713) 290

- 0272

Fax (713) 290

- 0277 

# | Email calvertfirm@calvertfirm.com

Web www.calvertfirm.com 

# | Mailing 15201 Mason Road, Suite 350

Address Cypress, Texas 77433 May 14, 2018

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court Fourteenth Court of Appeals 301 Fannin, Room 245
Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Court of Appeals Number : 14

- 17 -00532- CV

Trial Court Case Number : 2016 -33632

Style: Darnell Pettway, MD v. Maria Olvera

Dear Sir:

Please be advised that I designate the following weeks as my vacation schedule for 2018:

 August 6, 2018

– August 10, 2018;

 August 13, 2018

– August 17, 2018;

 August 20, 2018

– August 24, 2018; and

 August 27, 2018

– August 31, 2018.

I would request that no hearings, depositions or trial be scheduled during this time

Sincerely,

CALVERT & ASSOCIATES

T. Marc Calvert

cc:

Kirk L Pittard Peter M. Kelly Morgan A. McPheeters Kelly, Durham & Pittard, LLP

PO Box 224626 ACCEPTED
14-17-00532-CV
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
5/14/2018 11:03 AM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKChristoph e r A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

May 14, 2018

P age 2

Corey S. Gomel Gomel & Associates, P.C. 1177 West Loop South, Suite 1400
Houston, Texas 77027

TMC/cjs

14 th Court of Appeals

– 2018 Vacation Letter
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ended  September 30, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Thomas E. Walsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Thomas E. Walsh
-----------------------
Thomas E. Walsh
Chief Financial Officer
February 9, 2007
Socorro Marines DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00360-CV

Style: George M. Bishop, et al. v. Chappell Hill Service Company, LLC

and High Meadows Land & Cattle, LLC

Date motion filed*: August 14, 2014

Type of motion: Motion to Dismiss

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional 

motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal, filed within appellees’ response, is 

ordered taken with the case. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to docket the 

appellees’ response and motion to dismiss, which has been filed only as a motion,

also as appellees’ brief.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: August 26, 2014
EXHIBIT 31.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, David F. Knapfel, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Sockeye Seafood Group
Inc.,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Sockeye Seafood Group Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.

                                   Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc., Registrant

Dated: August 14, 2005                /s/ David F. Knapfel
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   By: David F. Knapfel, Chief Financial
                                   Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
STATE EX REL. Frederick Dean JACKSON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2035

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied. See State ex rel. Fleury v. State, 93-2898 (La. 10/13/95), 661 So.2d 488.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

DEBBIE CAMPBELL, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 5:05-CV-0257-C

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, ) ECF

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff is appealing an adverse decision of the Defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The United States

Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on May 23, 2006. No written

objections have been filed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that the abovestyled and -numbered cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated this 18th day of July, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

United States District Judge

 

 Case 5:05-cv-00257-C Document 20 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 149
David J. REYES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1837

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
---

Exhibit 4.DD


PROMISSORY NOTE of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (“BMG”) FOR VALUE RECEIVED, BMG promises to pay to Chet Idziszek of 8000 Old Mine Road, Powell River BC V8A 0E9 (“Lender”) the amount of $20,000.00 (twenty thousand dollars) plus interest at the rate of 6% (six per cent) per annum calculated from March 23, 2016 until the date or dates of repayment on a non-compounding basis not in advance, on the demand of the Lender provided cash funds of $400,000.00 or more have been received by BMG from the proceeds of one or more equity issuances by BMG prior to the time of the demand by the Lender. Executed this 23rdday of March, 2016 on behalf of BMG by: Signed “Ian Brown” Ian BrownChief Financial Officer (having the authority to bind BMG) E-682


---
Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 17 PageID 171
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 17 PageID 172
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 3 of 17 PageID 173
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 4 of 17 PageID 174
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 5 of 17 PageID 175
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 6 of 17 PageID 176
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 7 of 17 PageID 177
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 8 of 17 PageID 178
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 9 of 17 PageID 179
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 10 of 17 PageID 180
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 11 of 17 PageID 181
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 12 of 17 PageID 182
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 13 of 17 PageID 183
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 14 of 17 PageID 184
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 15 of 17 PageID 185
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 16 of 17 PageID 186
 

 Case 3:05-cv-02022-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/06 Page 17 of 17 PageID 187
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** **Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned officers of Gables GP, Inc., the general partner of Gables Realty Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify in his respective capacity as an officer and to his knowledge that the Partnership'sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  

Date:  March 12, 2004   /s/ Chris D. Wheeler                        Chris D. WheelerChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

  /s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr.                  .Marvin R. Banks, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             908
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,800
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        389
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             967
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,019
<LOANS>                                         24,595
<ALLOWANCE>                                        141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,437
<DEPOSITS>                                      25,450
<SHORT-TERM>                                       893
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                392
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  35,437
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,961
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  618
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,579
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,021
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,030
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,549
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       41
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    376
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         227
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   141
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       42
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  141
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               141
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 129908 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 129908 COA: 255254 Berrien CC: 03-402680-FC KEITH LAMAR DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to a ppeal the October 18, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0524 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 31, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  |    
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William J. Zaiser
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                 |  | William J. Zaiser      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:05-cv-01527-M Document 28 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 175
Doug H. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 24, 2019

Doug H. Wilson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.