alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
tiFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN s &moh4n GLIIERAL rmbrury lT, 1999
Hononblo L. A. Woodr **Stat.0 Buprrintomlont**  **Department ot,fdu8ation**  Ovirrule4 bT o-SlB3

Dear air: Oplnlon NO. o-Las

bo reo0mDiandml

t lleptmer 14, 1 ViRiOM in th4 than mandatory?
ldv i80 that wo hare

eanrully Bouae Bill 133, and in our

, and thr prQrlrioIM or

d #hall be on 2110 rlth

l uah 

### l pplloatlon before woh date of each year rhall not be 

### l

llglbla **for aid**  for the **ourrant Joar.8** Who re 8 m ta tok

1 0 l 

### fflmatlr* It 

### 4.0~ 110; aoaeooarll irplr that themo&o or tluo 

### rontlond in it lo rxoluoivo, and dat 

### the set p~ov16ed for, 

### Lr dono at 

### 8 Urronnt tlm8 or In a 

### Ufforent mnur, will 

## at bar* 

## offoot. Lluoh lo the lltoml 

### lmplleatlon, It

Thlo rulo lo uinouuord uul u hola in th* ea.08of Ruooell To%. 8581 51ty 

### or Otr 

### P do va. mlmoy, 145 s.w: 

### Sllr 1ts.S.W.

666b Y9rrio**Pnoo** 

### Btiak Oo. To, Eawkb.8,

in tho 6tateaa #.0 

## or Burtan vo. x00ulra;s 8.R. (6d) 816, 1t 

### lo

**:** z 

### 4008 net 

### clopmdclpon it. ioar, bat 

### 1'~ m the la 

### atdon of tho Lqgiolaturo to **bo am**  l 

### ortaiao4 tram a oonala~ntlon or tho atlro



### Fh.rertoi.,

dth thlo 

### rlmw ln rind ua ho14 that the’ ahtut lo 

### Urratov to 

### the *tent t&t ff the a&leation ti 

### ,tate thm Offloo Of 

### tha St&O Buporlntandont barore 

### oubotantialio % lo 40~1 'mn

the ~lotdbutlonof the irrnd than ho wouldbr ut **libdrty** 

### to OOMlbr the l



### pElloatlon

tiled Itier

**‘ Ootobor**  **1** 

### but ha would n6t **bo** 

### porslttoU

**to tie**  l

**y** the **6irtributlon o?**  

### tha ?un&,aor to dthholl the **ronoy to**  

### take oar0 **o,?** 

### late till **but** thaw would 

### be a xks**unable** l



### onotl%etlon

Ot the timr of f

7 **8;** llng DO a8 

## not to 8olar o

### a bar 

### #oh001U8trloto ln roodring tholrmoney, 

### and if an applloatlo lo *Ilad in-t&w 80 u not to prorentan&w dalq aa 

### In **tin0** for **tho propor**  

### dlotrlbutlon 8f the toad in tho ordlna~~oouro~ of buslnuo, then tha illi after**OOtOb8r**



### "p, of tha 

### l

pplloatlon

wouldnot be too late if filed and suoh tllhg roti& #till **bo** in oonfomlty 

### rlth the sot.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| a.   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   | **HemoBioTech,                Inc.** |                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                                 |                                                        |   |
| Date:                  August 9,                  2007 | By:                                  | /s/ Arthur                P. Bollon, Ph.D.             |   |
|                                                   |                                 | Arthur                P. Bollon, Ph.D.                      |   |
|                                                   |                                 | Chief                Executive Officer                      |   |
|                                                   |                                 | (Principal                Executive                Officer) |   |

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Paul B. Gridley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of US Shipping GeneralPartner LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Paul B. Gridley                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul B. Gridley                      |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 5, 2005                     |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. ShippingPartners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
EX PARTE Don Evan ROBINSON III

1160753

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
             LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


         THIS AMENDMENT is made to the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "Plan") by LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the "Company") on this
15th day of December, 2005.

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, the Company established the Plan effective January 1, 2002 to
provide eligible employees an option to purchase the common stock of the
Company, and amended the Plan effective May 21, 2003;

         WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended at any time by action of the board of
directors of the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company has authorized the
amendment of the Plan to modify the exercise price of shares of stock that are
available under the Plan to reflect a discount of 5% from the market value of
such shares at the end of each Plan year;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as provided below, effective
January 1, 2006:

         SECTION 3.1(a) OF THE PLAN IS RESTATED AS FOLLOWS:

         (a)   The exercise price of each Option shall be 95% of Fair Market
               Value of each share of Stock that is subject to the Option, based
               on the Stock's Fair Market Value that is determined on the
               Exercise Date.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Company has executed
this Amendment on the date first written above.

                                            LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.



                                    By:     William F. Carpenter III
                                            ------------------------

                                    Its:    Executive Vice President & Secretary
                                            ------------------------------------

                                       1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



By:

/s/    William J. ZaiserName:

William J. ZaiserTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
__________________________________________________________________________

April 2023

Contact: pressoffice@faa.gov

FAA FACTS

FAA Harnesses the Sun to Save Energy and Lower Expenses

The Federal Aviation Administration is succeeding where Icarus and Daedalus failed by benefiting from 

the power of the sun to lower its energy expenses and reduce its usage of fossil fuels. The FAA is installing 

solar arrays to provide energy to runways, control towers and other aviation facilities across the country as 

part of its mission to rely on sustainable energy for its operations. FAA solar initiatives include:

Runway Power

Major airports generally have airfield lighting powered by expensive, centralized electrical systems, while 

many smaller airports only have non-illuminated signs, markings, windsocks, and other pilot aids. Can 

solar-powered lighting and signs along runways and taxiways improve airfield visibility at smaller and 

general aviation airports?

The FAA is using solar panels and battery supplies at Penn Yan Airport in New York on 23 lighting safety 

systems — including runway and taxiway edge lights, obstruction lights, elevated runway guard lights, 

windsocks, and signs. 

The next locations for “solar runways” are airports in Arizona and Washington.
Sunny Great Plains

The FAA’s largest solar project to date is coming to the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Centre in Oklahoma 

City, where air traffic controllers, technical operations professionals and aviation inspectors are trained. 

The clean electricity generated from the solar panels on FAA property will help serve the Center’s power 

needs. 

The panels are expected to produce 2,600 megawatt hours annually, the equivalent needed to power 260 

average homes. The project will reduce the Center’s electric bill by an estimated $170,000 – $200,000 

annually.

Desert Energy

One of the earliest solar projects used by the FAA is a 1,600-panel solar farm adjacent to the Tucson, Ariz., 

air traffic control tower. The panels generate enough power to support all of that facility’s electrical needs 

for several hours a day and help cool the building at night.
Aloha Sunshine

The success of the renewable solar energy system in Tucson has been a model for the installation of new 

arrays at FAA air traffic facilities from coast to coast. During 2023, we will be using the light of the sun to 

power control towers in Honolulu, Hilo and Kona in Hawaii, and at the Guam Combined Center-Radar 

Approach Control (CERAP). The FAA also plans to install a solar array for air traffic facilities in Boston.
Felicia ELLISON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-904

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019

George T. Reeves of Davis, Schnitker, Reeves & Browning, P.A., Madison, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, and Benjamin Louis Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Kelsey and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 1 of 30 PageID 1
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 2 of 30 PageID 2
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 3 of 30 PageID 3
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 4 of 30 PageID 4
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 5 of 30 PageID 5
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 6 of 30 PageID 6
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 7 of 30 PageID 7
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 8 of 30 PageID 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 9 of 30 PageID 9
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 10 of 30 PageID 10
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 11 of 30 PageID 11
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 12 of 30 PageID 12
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 13 of 30 PageID 13
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 14 of 30 PageID 14
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 15 of 30 PageID 15
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 16 of 30 PageID 16
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 17 of 30 PageID 17
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 18 of 30 PageID 18
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 19 of 30 PageID 19
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 20 of 30 PageID 20
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 21 of 30 PageID 21
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 22 of 30 PageID 22
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 23 of 30 PageID 23
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 24 of 30 PageID 24
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 25 of 30 PageID 25
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 26 of 30 PageID 26
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 27 of 30 PageID 27
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 28 of 30 PageID 28
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 29 of 30 PageID 29
Case 3:05-cv-00800-M Document 1 Filed 04/22/05 Page 30 of 30 PageID 30
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    Dennis G. Dracup             
|Dennis G. Dracup                    
|Chief Executive Officer and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)       

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
# C_2017392EN.01001302.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 18 August 2017 — Germanwings GmbH v Wolfgang Pauels

(Case C-501/17)

(2017/C 392/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Germanwings GmbH

Appellant:

Respondent: Wolfgang Pauels

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the damage to an aircraft tyre caused by a screw lying on the take-off or landing runway (foreign object damage/FOD) an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
Case 3:04-cv-02247-D Document 12 Filed 05/17/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 32
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02247-D Document 12 Filed 05/17/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 33
Henry B. JOHNSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D14-5910

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Trailer Bridge, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: March 30, 2005                    /s/ John D. McCown
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John D. McCown
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Elena Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Siberian  Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  March  31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.


                                     By:/s/ Elena Pochapski
                                     --------------------------
                                     Elena Pochapski
                                     Principal Financial Officer
May 18, 2006

<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MICHAEL CAPP §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-001-Y

 §

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER §

OF SOCIAL SECURITY §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 2, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge issued

his findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the above-styled and

numbered cause (“the findings”). An order issued that same day gave

all parties until November 23 to serve and file with the Court written

objections to the findings. Plaintiff has not filed any objections.

Thus, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not

required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the findings for plain

error and has found none. After consideration of this matter, the

Court finds that the findings should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the

findings and conclusions of this Court. 

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner

is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 29, 2005.

TRM/ah

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00001-Y Document 18 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 195
Case 3:05-cv-00593-M Document 8 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 43
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00593-M Document 8 Filed 05/13/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 44
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00593-M Document 8 Filed 05/13/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 45
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00593-M Document 8 Filed 05/13/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 46
# Email Protection

## You are unable to access this email address fca.gov

The website from which you got to this page is protected by Cloudflare. Email addresses on that page have been hidden in order to keep them from being accessed by malicious bots. **You must enable Javascript in your browser in order to decode the e-mail address**.

If you have a website and are interested in protecting it in a similar way, you can sign up for Cloudflare.

                  - How does Cloudflare protect email addresses on website from spammers?
                  - Can I sign up for Cloudflare?

Cloudflare Ray ID: **8747903f5ff0e108**•      Your IP:      Click to reveal68.60.74.180•Performance & security byCloudflare
M.E.T., Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-0861

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      David
      Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March
      31,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By *:/s/
      David Zaikin*


David
      Zaikin


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





May
      ___,
      2007
Donald E. WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Curtis DAVIS v. STATE

CR-16-0842

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

Affirmed.
# C_2016364EN.01002201.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/22

---

Action brought on 26 July 2016 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO (медведь)

(Case T-432/16)

(2016/C 364/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH (Bühl, Germany) (represented by: A. Lingenfelser, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark including the word element ‘медведь’ — Application No 14 397 921

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 May 2016 in Case R 240/2016-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and grant the applicant’s application for registration of the trade mark at issue. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and grant the applicant’s application for registration of the trade mark at issue.

Plea in law

| — | The trade mark at issue is not descriptive and has distinctive character. |
| --- | --- |

—

The trade mark at issue is not descriptive and has distinctive character.

---