alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Esdras Donato LOPEZ JUAREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-533

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
c ,_.~. ’ 383.

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF.TEXAS** 

**. AUSllN**  **:**

! Eonomble N. E. Kh$te, Dlreator Texoe Forest Servioe Agrioultwel and Meohanioal College Oollege Station, Texer Dear8lr: Opinion No. OWe&ate reoelved ters you cent tis;-- ':irKiiGiiiii queatlng the opinion of thl osll ‘la~~fullp expend or oont Foreat Fire Fight or&anleatlon, by tab aertlfloates nsldered the letaubmfttod ae reto whether a oounty nd8 to aid the olvlllan &etense of printin& aer- ‘for suoh ~~rvloe. miseloners* court thie State that the O~II+ orlty 88 Is expreeely n It by the Constl’tution find any oonstitutlonal or authorize the commle~lonere~ ty fund6 far the purpose 

### set !
Opinion No. O-4074 oi,this department holds that 8 )ouaty ia not authorized to expend. oountf lulade to aid the :lrr rationflyl and sugar rationing ti!ow* ;

# 1 .- I.

: \ j
gonorable iv, Et’ White, Dire∨ Page’ 2 

### 382

Under the authoritlee!olted in oplnlona Noa. **O-l,529** and O-4074, it ie our opinion that 18 would be illegal for eny oounty in ,Texaa tc ‘expend o6untf funda 

### ror the purposea’ l mentioned ln rour lettrro. !
Jason P. VERSAKOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3758

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Michael DavisMichael Davis

Chief Executive Officer

August 16, 2010





22
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 117
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 118
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 119
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 120
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 121
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 122
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 123
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 124
Case 3:05-cv-00073-P Document 19 Filed 05/18/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 125
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  STATE OF           NAME UNDER WHICH DOING
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY              INCORPORATION                BUSINESS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                             <C>                <C>
PedoAlliance, Inc.                 Delaware        PedoAlliance, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OrthAlliance Finance, Inc.         Delaware        OrthAlliance Finance, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OrthAlliance Services, Inc.        California      OrthAlliance Services, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OrthAlliance Properties, Inc.      California      OrthAlliance Properties, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OrthAlliance New Image, Inc.       Delaware        OrthAlliance New Image, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 11 PageID 28
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 11 PageID 29
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 3 of 11 PageID 30
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 4 of 11 PageID 31
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 5 of 11 PageID 32
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 6 of 11 PageID 33
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 7 of 11 PageID 34
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 8 of 11 PageID 35
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 9 of 11 PageID 36
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 10 of 11 PageID 37
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 15 Filed 05/23/05 Page 11 of 11 PageID 38
Ryan MASSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01298]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  90 FR 2759, 
January 13, 2025.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Thursday, January 
16, 2025, at 2:00 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
January 16, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., has been changed to Thursday, January 
16, 2025, at 1:00 p.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 14, 2025.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01298 Filed 1-14-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Case 3:05-cv-01262-B Document 7 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 51
FOIA Reading Room Certification 

Pursuant to Executive Order 13,392, “Improving Agency Disclosure of Information,” the Attorney 

General Report of May 30, 2008, and the Department of Justice FOIA Post on Executive Order 

13,392 Reading Room requirements, the Chief FOIA Officer has conducted a review of the 

electronic reading room and the conventional reading room on the Freedom of Information 

(FOIA) homepage for the Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency), and found them to be in 

compliance with the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552. 

Internal Review of the FCA Reading Rooms 

The FCA reading rooms were reviewed for the purpose of determining whether they were in 

compliance with the legal requirements for FOIA reading rooms. 

Reading Room Deficiencies 

One deficiency was noted for the conventional reading room and corrected. We have added the 

location of the Agency’s reading room on its FOIA webpage. 

Certification 

After review and remedying of the above-noted deficiency, it is the opinion of the Chief FOIA 

Officer that the Agency’s reading rooms are in compliance with the requirements of the FOIA. 

Thank you for contributing to the success of this important Presidential initiative. If you have 

any questions, please call me at (703) 883-4071. 

Sincerely, 

Jane Virga 

Chief FOIA Officer
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 90 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural Resources 

in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Mr. WESTERMAN (for himself and Mr. HUFFMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Natural Resources in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Natural Re4 sources (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $19,311,600 for the One Hundred 

9 Nineteenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 90 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,655,800 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2025, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,655,800 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2026, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Donjel Lamont Walker, * From the 266th District

 Court of Erath County,

 Trial Court No. CR13673.

Vs. No. 11-12-00122-CR * March 21, 2013

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in 

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the 

trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 10.13



 




EXHIBIT 10.13




AMENDMENT TO

MANAGEMENT RETENTION AGREEMENT



     WHEREAS, Stratos Lightwave, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”) and David A. Slack (“Executive”) entered into a Management
Retention Agreement entered into on or about October 17, 2002 (the “Agreement”);


     WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement
to expand what constitutes a “Change of Control” under the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, Section 9(b) of the Management Retention Agreement
provides that it can be amended at any time by a written agreement executed by
the Executive and an authorized officer of the Corporation.


     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Management Retention Agreement
between the Corporation and David A. Slack be and it hereby is amended to revise
Section 5(c)(iii) thereof to read as follows, effective immediately;



		
	 	     (iii) The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the
Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or
consolidation which would result in the Company’s voting securities
outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either
by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities
of the surviving entity or its parent) at least sixty percent (60%) of
the total voting power represented by the Company’s voting securities
or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after
such merger or consolidation; or



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in
the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year
set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	STRATOS LIGHTWAVE, INC.
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	By:	 	/s/ James W. McGinley



	 	By:	 	/s/ David A. Slack


	Name:	 	
/s/ James W. McGinley



	 	 	 	      David A. Slack
	Title:	 	
Chief Executive Officer


	 	 	 	 
	 
	Date:	 	
July 1, 2003
Case 3:04-cv-02547-B Document 11 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARY J. POLK, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

VS.

CITY OF CORSICANA, ET AL.,

Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------------

DAISY POLK,

Plaintiff,

VS.

CITY OF CORSICANA, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-0861-G

)

)

)

) ECF

)

)

)

) CONSOLIDATED WITH

)

) 3:05-CV-0894-G

)

)

)

ORDER

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00894-G Document 10 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 29
- 2 -

Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of

the court.

SO ORDERED.

February 14, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00894-G Document 10 Filed 02/14/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 30
STATE of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General, Attorney General Ashley Brooke Moody, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STONEBRIER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1867

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 04, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, George Christopulos, CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: August 6, 2009 /s/ George P. Christopulos George P. Christopulos, CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 31.2**I, David A. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(c)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Reserved]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 14, 2006                                       /s/ DAVID A. FISHER   Name:  David A. Fisher   Title:  *Chief Financial Officer*
Garfield GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2706

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-41001

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUDY ALBERTO GONZALEZ-SANTOS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:19-CR-1971-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rudy Alberto 

Gonzalez-Santos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Santos has filed a response. 

The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of 

Gonzalez-Santos’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 1, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-41001 Document: 00515435133 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2020
No. 19-41001

2

decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United 

States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Santos’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-41001 Document: 00515435133 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2020
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs II Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
J.B., Father of M.L.B., Minor Child, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.

No. 1D19-109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019

Jason A. Cobb, DeFuniak Springs, for Petitioner.

Sarah J. Rumph of Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Ray, J.

The father of M.L.B., a minor child, filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this Court seeking review of a post-disposition dependency order that placed the minor child in the sole custody of the child's mother, modified the father's visitation, and terminated protective services supervision. Of the issues presented, we find merit in the father's argument that he was denied due process when the trial court terminated protective services supervision *578at a hearing for which the father was not given notice that the matter would be considered. We reject the father's other arguments without further comment.

Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.345(b) provides that any party requesting termination of agency supervision must do so by written motion or in a written report to the court. No such request was filed in this case. Instead, the termination-of-services issue was first raised by the agency in an *ore tenus* motion at a hearing on custody and visitation. The court granted the requested relief, over the father's objection.

Due process in dependency proceedings requires "fair notice and a real opportunity to be heard." *Dep't of Children & Families v. T.S.* , 154 So.3d 1223, 1226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Because neither was provided in this case, we grant certiorari relief and quash the portion of the order that terminates the agency's protective services supervision. *See**R.H. v. Dep't of Children & Families* , 948 So.2d 898, 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (noting that it was error and a violation of a parent's due process rights to terminate protective supervision without prior notice that the issue would be decided); *A.W.P. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.* , 10 So.3d 134, 135-36 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (issuing a writ of certiorari in a dependency proceeding after finding the trial court violated a parent's due process rights by failing to provide "notice and a real opportunity to be heard").

DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur.