alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Steven BURNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2019

Steven Burns, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Steven Burns was sentenced in 1999 to eight concurrent sentences of thirty-five years' imprisonment for the offenses of second-degree murder, robbery with a firearm, and two counts of armed burglary, among others. He was fourteen when he committed the crimes. He now appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He asserts that his sentence is illegal under *Kelsey v. State* , 206 So.3d 5 (Fla. 2016). We disagree and affirm.

Burns' thirty-five year sentences do not violate *Kelsey* . *Id.* He was not sentenced to a life, mandatory life, or a de facto life sentence. *See**Davis v. State* , 214 So.3d 799 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Furthermore, as Burns was not sentenced to life with possibility of parole after twenty-five years, the *1290decision of *State v. Michel* , 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018), is inapplicable.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
# C_2017239EN.01002601.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2017 — M.G. Tjebbes and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

(Case C-221/17)

(2017/C 239/32)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: M.G. Tjebbes, G.J.M. Koopman, E. Saleh Abady, L. Duboux

Appellants:

Defendant: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Must Articles 20 and 21 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in the light of, inter alia, Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted — in view of the absence of an individual assessment, based on the principle of proportionality, with regard to the consequences of the loss of nationality for the situation of the person concerned from the point of view of EU law — as precluding legislation such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides:

| (a) | that an adult, who is also a national of a third country, loses, by operation of law, the nationality of his or her Member State, and consequently loses citizenship of the Union, on the ground that, for an uninterrupted period of 10 years, that person had his or her principal residence abroad and outside the European Union, although there are possibilities for interrupting that 10-year period; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

that an adult, who is also a national of a third country, loses, by operation of law, the nationality of his or her Member State, and consequently loses citizenship of the Union, on the ground that, for an uninterrupted period of 10 years, that person had his or her principal residence abroad and outside the European Union, although there are possibilities for interrupting that 10-year period;

| (b) | that under certain circumstances a minor loses, by operation of law, the nationality of his or her Member State, and consequently loses citizenship of the Union, as a consequence of the loss of the nationality of his or her parent, as referred to under (a) above? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

that under certain circumstances a minor loses, by operation of law, the nationality of his or her Member State, and consequently loses citizenship of the Union, as a consequence of the loss of the nationality of his or her parent, as referred to under (a) above?

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1056

ALBERT D. PEABODY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA; NATIONSBANK, N.A.; WILLIAM ISENBERG; HENRY HANDY; STEVEN M. SORENSEN; KIM LEFTWICH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-624-3) Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert D. Peabody, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Henry Cannon Spalding, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia; JonathanP. Harmon, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (1994) and denying his motions for appointment of counsel and default judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Appellant’s action under § 1983 was barred by the statute of limitations and was not cognizable against the private Defendants. Appellant also failed to state a claim under Title VII. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

      ( print page 4817)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1259 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1077, K2025-1076.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00885 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Thomas MCDUFFIE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0741

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Clayton Joseph MCCARTY v. STATE

CR-16-1180

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

SupplyCore, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63057

)

Under Contract No. SPE8EJ-21-D-0023 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: William E. Hughes, III, Esq.

Emily A. Constantine, Esq.

 Husch Blackwell

 Milwaukee, WI

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

 DLA Chief Trial Attorney

Kelly L. Diaz-Albertini, Esq.

Lindsay A. Salamon, Esq.

Anne P. Steel, Esq.

Stacey E. Hirsch, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 Defense Logistics Agency

 Philadelphia., PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 17, 2023

MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63057, Appeal of SupplyCore, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: March 20, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EX PARTE Charles Edward DRAPER

CR-16-1151

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 25, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-51099

Summary Calendar

MARCOS GONZALEZ, and those other inmates similarly situated in the

custody of the Attorney General,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

J. MCLAUGHLIN, Clinical Director, in his official and/or individual capacity,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CV-582

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marcos Gonzalez, federal prisoner # 65613-079, appeals from the district

court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. J. McLaughlin on his claims

of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Gonzalez’s claims amount

to a disagreement with the medical care he received, which is not actionable

under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971). See Gobert v. Caldwell, 463 F.3d 339, 346 (5th Cir. 2006).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 27, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-51099 Document: 00512389453 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2013
No. 12-51099

Gonzalez has abandoned all other claims by failing to brief them adequately. 

See Mapes v. Bishop, 541 F.3d 582, 584 (5th Cir. 2008); Brinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

McLaughlin’s motion for summary affirmance and his alternative motion for an

extension of time to file a brief are DENIED as moot. 

2

 Case: 12-51099 Document: 00512389453 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2013
- 606 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

296 Nebraska Report

STATE v. ARTIS

Cite as 296 Neb. 606

State of Nebraska, appellee, v.

Tareik Q. Artis, appella

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed May 5, 2017. No. S-16-464.

supplemental opin

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: Lor

A. Maret, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinio

modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, Sarah E. Marfisi, 

and Nathan A. Liss for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel,

Kelch, and Funke,

Per Curiam

Case No. S-16-464 is before this court on the appellee’s motion for rehearing concerning our opinion in State v. 

Artis.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we modify the original 

opinion as follows: In the section entitled “V. ANALYSIS,” 

under subheading “2. Plain Error,” subsection “(a) Arti

Sentence Is Indeterminate,” we withdraw the third and fourth 

sentences of the single paragraph of that subsection, which 

now reads:

1 State v. Artis, ante p. 172, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2017).

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

05/05/2017 08:13 AM CDT
- 607 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

296 Nebraska Report

STATE v. ARTIS

Cite as 296 Neb. 606

(a) Artis’ Sentence 

Is Indeterminate

[9-12] The State has mischaracterized Artis’ sentence 

of “not less than 2 years, nor more than 2 years” as a 

determinate sentence. A determinate sentence is imposed 

when the defendant is sentenced to a single term of years, 

such as a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment. See State v. 

White, 256 Neb. 536, 590 N.W.2d 863 (1999). In contrast, 

when imposing an indeterminate sentence, a sentencing 

court ordinarily articulates either a minimum term and 

maximum term or a range of time for which a defendant 

is to be incarcerated. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (Reissue 

2016); State v. White, supra. In Nebraska, the fact that the 

minimum term and maximum term of a sentence are the 

same does not affect the sentence’s status as an indeterminate sentence. See, State v. Marrs, 272 Neb. 573, 723 

N.W.2d 499 (2006); State v. Urbano, 256 Neb. 194, 589 

N.W.2d 144 (1999). Thus, we conclude that Artis’ sentence for his Class IV felony is an indeterminate sentence 

in which the minimum and maximum terms are the same. 

Such sentence complies with L.B. 1094’s requirement that 

the court impose an indeterminate sentence for a Class IV 

felony when that sentence is imposed consecutively with 

a Class IIA felony, and we therefore find no plain error in 

this regard.2

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modif

 Motion for rehearing overru

2 Id. at 179-80, ___ N.W.2d at ___.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2675-2676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00585]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 15, 2025--10:00 a.m. (See MATTERS TO 
BE CONSIDERED)

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the public (10:00 a.m.); Closed 
Meeting will follow immediately after conclusion of the public meeting.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

[[Page 2676]]

Open Session

Briefing Matter on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking--Safety Standard for 
Lithium-Ion Batteries Micromobility Products
A live webcast of the meeting can be viewed at the following link: 
https://events.gcc.teams.microsoft.com/event/7ba35e5b-216d-40a2-b183-9f382a696b3e@7f5de26c-a63d-475c-9b6c-4126a914e132
Dial in by telephone: +1 469-676-2705, CODE,191380541#

Closed Session

Briefing Matter

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: January 8, 2025
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00585 Filed 1-8-25; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 30, 2009 |  |        |  |                        
|                       |  |       
|                       |  | By:    |  | /s/ William J. Zaiser  
|                       |  | Name:  |  | William J. Zaiser      
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



37
Case 3:04-cv-02669-L Document 24 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 136
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02669-L Document 24 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 137
<PAGE>

                       L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
                       AND L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       L-3
                                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       2002            2001            2000             1999            1998
                                                  -------------   -------------   --------------   -------------   -------------
<S>                                               <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>
Earnings:
 Income before income taxes and
   extraordinary items ........................     $ 330,210       $ 186,222       $  134,079       $  95,430       $  53,450
 Add:
   Interest expense ...........................       115,100          80,002           87,308          56,686          47,015
   Amortization of debt expense ...............         7,392           6,388            5,724           3,904           2,564
   Interest component of rent expense .........        22,342          14,332           11,882           7,500           4,664
                                                    ---------       ---------       ----------       ---------       ---------
 Earnings .....................................     $ 475,044       $ 286,944       $  238,993       $ 163,520       $ 107,693
                                                    ---------       ---------       ----------       ---------       ---------
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense ...........................       115,100          80,002           87,308          56,686          47,015
   Amortization of debt expense ...............         7,392           6,388            5,724           3,904           2,564
   Interest component of rent expense .........        22,342          14,332           11,882           7,500           4,664
                                                    ---------       ---------       ----------       ---------       ---------
 Fixed charges ................................     $ 144,834       $ 100,722       $  104,914       $  68,090       $  54,243
                                                    ---------       ---------       ----------       ---------       ---------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ............           3.3x            2.8x             2.3x            2.4x            2.0x
                                                    =========       =========       ==========       =========       =========
</TABLE>
J.R. v. K.R.

2170092

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 15, 2017

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3801-3802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE572]

South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will

[[Page 3802]]

hold a meeting of the Law Enforcement Advisory Panel (AP) in February.

DATES: The Law Enforcement AP meeting will be held via webinar on 
February 5, 2025. The meeting will be held from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m., 
EST.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The meeting will be held via webinar. The webinar 
is open to members of the public. Registration is required. Webinar 
registration, an online public comment form, and briefing book 
materials will be available two weeks prior to the meeting at: https://safmc.net/advisory-panel-meetings/.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myra Brouwer, Deputy Director for 
Management, SAFMC; phone: (843) 571-4366 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Law Enforcement Advisory Panel will 
discuss modifications to the Law Enforcement Officer of the Year award 
process, background check practices for state agency appointments to 
advisory groups, potential actions to improve the Southeast For-Hire 
Integrated Electronic Reporting Program, and other enforcement issues 
as needed.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aid should be directed to the Council office 
(see ADDRESSES) 10 days prior to the meeting.
    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are subject 
to change.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 8, 2025.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-00654 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
EXHIBIT 21


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Travel 800, LLC, d/b/a 1-800-FLY CHEAP
D-FW Tours, Inc., d/b/a D-FW Travel Arrangements
Cruises Only, LLC
Cruises Inc.
Auto Europe, LLC
The Anthony Dean Corporation, d/b/a Cruise Fairs of America
Ship `N' Shore Cruises, Inc.
SNS Coachline, Inc.
Cruise Time, Inc.
Cruise Mart, Inc.
SNS Travel Marketing, Inc.
CruiseOne, Inc.
CruiseWorld, Inc.
Diplomat Tours, Inc., d/b/a International Airline Consolidators
Gold Coast Travel Agency Corporation, Inc. d/b/a Gold Coast Cruise Center
Trax Software, Inc.
R.W. v. Calhoun County DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160699

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.