alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 17, 2005



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II             
|    |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II                 
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director





27
CARLOS MARINO, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Action No. 06-1255 (GK) 

DRUG ENFORCEMENT 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) _____________________________ ) 

ORDER 

Deceased Plaintiff Carlos Marino filed this action against 

the United States Drug Enforcement Administration under the 

Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking 

documents related to a Government cooperator who testified at 

his criminal trial. 

This matter is presently before the Court on Griselle 

Marino's Motion to Substitute [Dkt. No. 77]. Upon consideration 

of the Motion, Opposition, and Reply, and the entire record 

herein, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying sealed 

Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED, that Griselle Marino's Motion to Substitute is 

granted. 

December 5, 2013 Glad}TSKeier= 

United 

G~~ States District Judge 

Copies to: attorneys on record via ECF
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5922-5923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01232]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, NIDCD.
    This is a virtual meeting and will be open to the public as 
indicated below. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute On Deafness And Other Communication Disorders, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would

[[Page 5923]]

constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    Date: March 17, 2025.
    Open: 1:00 p.m. to 1:25 p.m.
    Agenda: Reports from the institute staff.
    Address: Porter Neuroscience Research Center, Building 35A, 35 
Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
    Virtual Meeting.
    Closed: 1:25 p.m. to 6:05 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Address: Porter Neuroscience Research Center, Building 35A, 35 
Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Lisa L Cunningham, Ph.D., Scientific Director, 
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, 35A Convent Drive, Rockville, MD 
20850, (301) 443-2766, [email protected]
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/advisory-committees, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 14, 2025.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-01232 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 90

    Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural 
           Resources in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2025

  Mr. Westerman (for himself and Mr. Huffman) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural 
           Resources in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Natural Resources (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $19,311,600 for the One Hundred 
Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $9,655,800 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $9,655,800 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Nivardo PARRA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Case 2:05-cv-00165-J Document 4 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 15
EX PARTE Maurice C. STOVALL

CR-16-1184

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Connected Media Technologies, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Jeffrey W. Sass, Chief Executive Officer and Mark Mayo, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:











1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Jeffrev W. SassJeffrey
                W. SassChief
                Executive Officer





/s/
                Mark MayoMark
                Mayo,Chief
                Financial OfficerChief
                Accounting Officer







Date:
      November 20, 2006






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2008



By:

/s/ Andrew M. SimsName:

Andrew M. SimsTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Regina SHEPPARD, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2388

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 29, 2019

Scot E. Samis and Christopher Shand of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

State Farm Florida Insurance Company appeals an interlocutory order denying its motion to compel appraisal. We have jurisdiction, *see* Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), and our review is de novo, *MKL Enters. LLC v. Am. Traditions Ins. Co.* , 265 So.3d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

After Appellee Regina Sheppard suffered water damage in her home, she filed a claim with State Farm. State Farm agreed to pay for the water damage, but it refused to cover costs of repairing the leaky pipes that caused the damage. Sheppard then sued State Farm, and State Farm demanded an appraisal under the policy terms. State Farm then moved to abate the litigation and compel appraisal. The trial court denied the motion.

On appeal, State Farm argues that because it acknowledges coverage for some portion of Sheppard's claim, appraisal is appropriate. Sheppard, on the other hand, argues that whether the pipes are covered is a coverage question for judicial resolution, not for appraisal.

Based on our recent decision in *MKL Enterprises* , we conclude that because State Farm acknowledged that some portion of the total loss is covered, the trial court should have granted the motion to compel appraisal. *See**id.* (noting that by tendering partial payment, insurer "admitted coverage for some damage while declining to cover all repair costs [and therefore] did not 'wholly deny' coverage"); *see also**Johnson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.* , 828 So.2d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 2002) (concluding that "causation is a coverage question for the court when an insurer wholly denies that there is a covered loss and an amount-of-loss question for the appraisal panel when an insurer admits that there is covered loss, the amount of which is disputed"); *People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Tracey* , 251 So.3d 931, 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (reversing and remanding for trial court to compel appraisal where "the insurer admitted coverage for the interior damage, but declined to repair the roof").

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Lewis, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID 2
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID 3
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID 4
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID 5
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID 6
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID 7
Case 3:05-cv-02042-K Document 1-2 Filed 10/14/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID 8
Statement

Glen R. Smith, FCA Board Chairman and CEO

Farm Credit Administration Board Meeting

August 12, 2021

My wife and I started out as young, beginning farmers in the early ’80s, so I am extremely 

sensitive to the credit needs of young, beginning, and small farmers and ranchers. 

The Farm Credit Act imposes responsibilities on the Farm Credit System concerning service 

to young, beginning, and small (or as we say, YBS) farmers. It requires each FCS 

association to have a program “for furnishing sound and constructive credit and related 

services to young, beginning, and small farmers and ranchers.” In addition, the Farm Credit

Act requires that FCS banks report annually to FCA about the operations and achievements 

of their associations’ lending and service programs for YBS farmers. 

These provisions were added to the act during the 1980s, which were difficult times for 

agriculture. I personally believe these provisions were added to help address the decline in 

the numbers of farmers by ensuring the availability of credit necessary to develop a new 

generation of farmers. 

Many years have passed since the 1980s. The Farm Credit System has made consistent 

efforts to serve YBS farmers, but the average age of American farmers has continued to 

rise. USDA reported in 2017 that the average age of U.S. farm producers was 57.5 years, 

up 1.2 years from 2012. 

There obviously is work to be done in continuing to improve and advance the System’s YBS 

programs. It makes sense from a business development standpoint. It makes sense for the 

security of American agriculture.

Over the past year FCA staff has been considering revisions to our YBS regulations. In 

February 2019, we issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking. Since then, our staff 

has been working to modernize the collection of data and reduce the burden for System 

institutions to report it. They’ve been working to improve our ability to track FCS service to 

YBS producers and to identify best practices for serving YBS producers. They’ve also been 

coordinating with other government agencies to serve YBS borrowers and to develop 

metrics for understanding and ultimately evaluating programs. 

FCA staff is now working on a proposed YBS rule for FCA board consideration. I anticipate 

that the proposed rule will be designed to create a rating system that evaluates each 

institution’s program and measures each institution’s year-over-year progress in lending 

and nonlending support provided to the YBS population. I look forward to hearing more 

from staff in the coming months.
Jason K. FULLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3849

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

Jason K. Fuller, Sneads, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur.
# C_2019383EN.01001402.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — European Commission v Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd, European Bicycle Manufacturers Association

(Case C-709/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing regulation (EU) 2015/776 - Import of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines - Extension to those imports of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 13 - Circumvention - Assembly operations - Provenance and origin of bicycle parts - Parts consigned from China to Sri Lanka, worked in Sri Lanka and then consigned from Sri Lanka to Pakistan for assembly)

(2019/C 383/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: M. França, J.-F. Brakeland and A. Demeneix, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd (represented by: P. Bentley QC), European Bicycle Manufacturers Association, (represented by: J. Beck, Solicitor, and by L. Ruessmann, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 October 2017, Kolachi Raj Industrial v Commission (T-435/15, EU:T:2017:712); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 October 2017, Kolachi Raj Industrial v Commission (T-435/15, EU:T:2017:712);

| 2. | Dismisses the action for annulment brought by Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action for annulment brought by Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) in relation to both the proceedings at first instance and the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) in relation to both the proceedings at first instance and the appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
Don CIOETA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE T.M.

1160861 (2160271)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EX PARTE T.G.

(In re: T.G. v. Russell County Department of Human Resources)

2170113

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
**EXHIBIT23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-47485 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 24,2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Scheid VineyardsInc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, appearing in the Annual Reporton Form 10-KSB of Scheid Vineyards Inc. for the year ended December 31,2004.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| San Jose, California          |
| March 30, 2005           |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of HeritageProperty Investment Trust, Inc.and Unitholders of Bradley Operating Limited Partnership:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-116298 and 333-121578) on Form S-4/Aof Heritage Property Investment Trust, Inc. of our report dated March 27,2006 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bradley OperatingLimited Partnership and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2005, and the related financial statement schedule as of December 31,2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-Kof Bradley Operating Limited Partnership.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 28, 2005

----
Marvin Lee KING, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5293

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

1

 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10061

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN PUGA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:97-CR-75-2-Y)

August 18, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court appointed counsel for Juan Puga has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California,

1

and hasmoved to withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Puga’s

response and supplement, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue which may be

presented herein. Accordingly, counsel’s motion is granted, and counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein. Puga has filed a motion to appoint counsel. Puga’s motion
 

2 See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

2

is denied. The appeal is DISMISSED.2