alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00431-CR

JAMES COX, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-59110-T

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Jason RODGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1188
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 7 PageID 1189
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 3 of 7 PageID 1190
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 4 of 7 PageID 1191
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 5 of 7 PageID 1192
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 6 of 7 PageID 1193
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 7 of 7 PageID 1194
WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST — Page 1

WE list 20240523 hearing 4861-2621-8687 v.1.docx[1]/4861-2621-8687, v. 1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

FIRST AMENDED WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST

Main Case No: 24-70089-swe11 Name of Debtor: High Plains Radio 

Network, LLC

WITNESSES:1

1. Debtor representative Monte Spearman Judge: Scott W. Everett

2. Courtroom Deputy:

3. Hearing Date: May 23, 2024

4.

5. Any witnesses designated by any other party. Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m.

6. Any rebuttal witnesses as may be necessary. Party’s Name:

Attorney’s Name: Jeff Carruth

Attorney’s Phone: 713-341-1158

Attorney’s email: jcarruth@wkpz.com

Nature of 

Proceeding:

See list below.

List regarding Nature of the Proceeding:

Docket # 65 – Motion of Creditor Vertical Bridge for Entry of an Order (I) Granting Vertical Bridge 

Relief from the Automatic Stay, or (II) Alternatively, Granting (A) Adequate Protection 

to Vertical Bridge with Immediate Payment of Its Administrative Claim for Post-Petition 

Rent and (B) Compelling Immediate Assumption or Rejection of Unexpired Leases of 

Nonresidential Real Property

Docket # 66 – Motion of Creditor Vertical Bridge for Entry of an Order (I) Granting Vertical Bridge 

Relief from the Automatic Stay, or (II) Alternatively, Granting (A) Adequate Protection 

to Vertical Bridge with Immediate Payment of Its Administrative Claim for Post-Petition 

Rent and (B) Compelling Immediate Assumption or Rejection of Unexpired Leases of 

Nonresidential Real Property

1 Movant reserves the right to amend and/or supplement this designation prior to the hearing(s), and to seek relief 

from the Court as might be necessary.

Case 24-70089-swe11 Doc 113 Filed 05/21/24 Entered 05/21/24 22:19:40 Desc

Main Document Page 1 of 3
WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST — Page 2

WE list 20240523 hearing 4861-2621-8687 v.1.docx[1]/4861-2621-8687, v. 1

EXHIBITS

Case 24-70089-swe11 Doc 113 Filed 05/21/24 Entered 05/21/24 22:19:40 Desc

Main Document Page 2 of 3
WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST — Page 3

WE list 20240523 hearing 4861-2621-8687 v.1.docx[1]/4861-2621-8687, v. 1

Dated: May 21, 2024 Respectfully submitted:

WEYCER, KAPLAN, PULASKI & ZUBER, P.C.

By: /s/ Jeff Carruth

JEFF CARRUTH (TX SBN: 24001846)

2608 Hibernia, Suite 105

Dallas, TX 75204-2514

Telephone: (713) 341-1158

Fax: (713) 961-5341

E-mail: jcarruth@wkpz.com

PROPOSED ATTORNEYS FOR 

HIGH PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, LLC,

DEBTOR AND DEBTOR IN POSSESSION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on May 

21, 2024 to all ECF users who have appeared in this case to date, and/or as set forth below.

/s/ Jeff Carruth

JEFF CARRUTH

Case 24-70089-swe11 Doc 113 Filed 05/21/24 Entered 05/21/24 22:19:40 Desc

Main Document Page 3 of 3
# C_2019270EN.01000401.xml

| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2019 — Republic of Austria v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-591/17) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 18, 34, 56 and 92 TFEU - Legislation of a Member State prescribing an infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles - Situation in which owners of vehicles registered in that Member State qualify for relief from motor vehicle tax in an amount corresponding to that charge)

(2019/C 270/04)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Austria (represented by: G. Hesse, J. Schmoll and C. Drexel, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents, and by C. Hillgruber, Rechtsanwalt)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: J. Langer, J.M. Hoogveld and M.K. Bulterman, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren and M. Wolff, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the Federal Republic of Germany, by introducing the infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles and by providing, simultaneously, a relief from motor vehicle tax in an amount at least equivalent to the amount of the charge paid, to the benefit of owners of vehicles registered in Germany, failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 18, 34, 56 and 92 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Federal Republic of Germany, by introducing the infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles and by providing, simultaneously, a relief from motor vehicle tax in an amount at least equivalent to the amount of the charge paid, to the benefit of owners of vehicles registered in Germany, failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 18, 34, 56 and 92 TFEU.

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the Republic of Austria and to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the Republic of Austria and to bear its own costs.

| 4. | Orders the Republic of Austria to bear one quarter of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Republic of Austria to bear one quarter of its own costs.

| 5. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Denmark to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Denmark to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 28 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 28

   Eliminating the restriction that witnesses may appear remotely at 
 proceedings of committees of the House of Representatives only at the 
               discretion of the chair of the committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

Ms. Perez (for herself and Mr. Golden of Maine) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Eliminating the restriction that witnesses may appear remotely at 
 proceedings of committees of the House of Representatives only at the 
               discretion of the chair of the committee.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Bringing Real Ideas, Data, 
and Genuine Experience to Congress Resolution'' or the ``BRIDGE to 
Congress Resolution''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION THAT WITNESSES MAY APPEAR REMOTELY 
              AT COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS ONLY AT DISCRETION OF CHAIR.

    Section 3(i)(1) of House Resolution 5, agreed to January 3, 2025, 
is amended by striking ``at the discretion of the chair of the 
committee and''.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Richard A. YEAGER

CR-16-1248

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 22, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Dale G. MASSAD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida and Chris Nocco, Sheriff of Pasco County, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 9, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

LaROSE C.J., and CASANUEVA and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  David  Zaikin,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Siberian  Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  September  30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.

                               By:/s/ David Zaikin
                               -------------------
                               David Zaikin
                               Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 895 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 895

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
 gross income for mandatory restitution or civil damages as recompense 
                      for trafficking in persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2021

Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Portman, Mr. Carper, Mr. Scott 
of South Carolina, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Wicker, and Ms. Sinema) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
 gross income for mandatory restitution or civil damages as recompense 
                      for trafficking in persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Human Trafficking Survivor Tax 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION RESTITUTION AND CIVIL 
              DAMAGES AWARDED UNDER SECTIONS 1593 AND 1595 OF TITLE 18, 
              UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 9501(b)(4) of the 
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2), is amended by 
inserting before section 140 the following new section:

``SEC. 139J. CERTAIN AMOUNT RECEIVED AS RESTITUTION OR CIVIL DAMAGES AS 
              RECOMPENSE FOR TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS.

    ``(a) Exclusion From Gross Income.--Gross income shall not include 
any civil damages, restitution, or other monetary award (including 
compensatory or statutory damages and restitution imposed in a criminal 
matter) awarded--
            ``(1) pursuant to an order of restitution under section 
        1593 of title 18, United States Code, or
            ``(2) in an action under section 1595 of title 18, United 
        States Code.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for part III of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by inserting before the item relating to section 140 the 
following new item:

``Sec. 139J. Certain amount received as restitution or civil damages as 
                            recompense for trafficking in persons.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANTTO****18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Steven R. Delcarson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Innovative CardTechnologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.

 
| *Dated: August 8, 2008* | *By:*    | */s/ Steven R. Delcarson* |
|------------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
| * *                     | * * | *Steven R. Delcarson*     |
| * *                     | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

I, Charles M. Caporale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Innovative CardTechnologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.

 
| *Dated: August 8, 2008* | *By:*    | */s/ Charles M. Caporale*                            |
|------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------|
| * *                     | * * | *Charles M. Caporale*                                |
| * *                     | * * | *Chief Financial Officer, Chief  Accounting Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.and will be retained by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
William COTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2019187EN.01000701.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-127/17) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport - Directive 96/53/EC - International traffic - Vehicles complying with the limit values for weights and dimensions laid down in that directive - Use of such vehicles, which were registered or put into circulation in one Member State, on the territory of another Member State - Special permit regime - Articles 3 and 7 - 2003 Act of Accession - Transitional arrangements - Point 8.3 of Annex XII)

(2019/C 187/08)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and W. Mölls, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Kamejsza-Kozłowska and J. Sawicka, acting as Agents, and by J. Waszkiewicz, expert)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing on transport undertakings a requirement to be in possession of special permits in order to be able to circulate on certain public roads, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the combined provisions of Articles 3 and 7 of Council Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic, as amended by Directive (EU) 2015/719 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015, read in conjunction with points 3.1 and 3.4 of Annex I to Directive 96/53; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing on transport undertakings a requirement to be in possession of special permits in order to be able to circulate on certain public roads, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the combined provisions of Articles 3 and 7 of Council Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic, as amended by Directive (EU) 2015/719 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015, read in conjunction with points 3.1 and 3.4 of Annex I to Directive 96/53;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of L-3Communications Holdings, Inc. ("L-3Holdings") and L-3 Communications Corporation("L-3 Corporation"; together with L-3Holdings referred to as "L-3") on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), each of Frank C. Lanza, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of L-3 Holdings and L-3 Corporation, andRobert V. LaPenta, President and Chief Financial Officer of L-3Holdings and L-3 Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|           |                                                                                                                                            |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of L-3. |

|                                     |  |                                      |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| /s/Frank C. Lanza                   |  | /s/ Robert V. LaPenta                |
| FrankC. Lanza                       |  | Robert V. LaPenta                    |
| Chairman andChief Executive Officer |  | President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
| March 4, 2004                       |  | March 4,2004                         |
|                                     |

----
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                                |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  May 12, 2011 |   | /s/ Martin B. Oring                            |   |
|                     |   | Martin B. Oring                                     |   |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                     |   |                                                |   |

----

----
Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 1 of 15 PageID 731
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 2 of 15 PageID 732
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 3 of 15 PageID 733
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 4 of 15 PageID 734
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 5 of 15 PageID 735
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 6 of 15 PageID 736
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 7 of 15 PageID 737
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 8 of 15 PageID 738
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 9 of 15 PageID 739
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 10 of 15 PageID 740
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 11 of 15 PageID 741
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 12 of 15 PageID 742
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 13 of 15 PageID 743
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 14 of 15 PageID 744
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00829-M Document 35 Filed 12/14/05 Page 15 of 15 PageID 745