alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: §

§

§

CASE NO. 23-30771

CARL GERARD DORVIL

DEBTORS(S), CHAPTER 7

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST

FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES AND PLEADINGS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance on behalf of: 

ROCKWALL CAD

secured creditor(s) in the above-referenced proceedings. The undersigned hereby requests notice and copies of all motions notices, 

reports, briefs, applications, adversary proceedings, proposed orders, confirmed copies of orders, any proposed disclosure statement 

or plan of reorganization that has been filed with the court, any other documents or instruments filed in the above-referenced 

proceedings and any other matter in which notice is required pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1109(b) and Bankruptcy Rules 2002(a) and 

(b), 3017(a), and 9013 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

 Copies should be mailed to the secured creditor(s) in care of the undersigned at the address set forth below.

LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP

2777 N. Stemmons Freeway

Suite 1000

DALLAS, TX 75207

Telephone: (214) 880-0089

Facsimile: (469) 221-5003

Email: dallas.bankruptcy@lgbs.com

Certificate of Service

I do hereby certify that on day of ,2023, a copy of the above and foregoing has been this date served 

electronically or mailed to the parties listed below:

GUY H. HOLMAN

GUY HARVEY HOLMAN, PLLC

8330 LBJ FWY, SUITE B646

DALLAS, TX 75243

JEFFREY MIMS

FOUNDERS SQUARE, SUITE 560

900 JACKSON STREET

DALLAS, TX 75202

SBN: 00796900 TX

By: 

Sherrel K. Knighton

Case 23-30771-sgj7 Doc 21 Filed 05/02/23 Entered 05/02/23 08:11:15 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
1

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Trans Union, LLC were previously dismissed. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). 

DLI-5986478v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

WENDY BITTICK § 

§ 

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:05-CV-405-Y

§ 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., § 

TRANS UNION, LLC, and EQUIFAX § 

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC § 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss [doc. # 51], filed March 20,

2006. The Court GRANTS the motion. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2). All claims against

Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.1 in the above-styled and numbered cause are

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SIGNED March 23, 2006.

Case 4:05-cv-00405-Y Document 52 Filed 03/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 236
##### 



Burr & Forman LLPGary
W. Farris 
Direct Dial: (404) 685-4250
Direct Fax: (404)214-7388
Email: gfairis@lmrr.com
    
    ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS
POST OFFICE BOX 54617
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 3O3O6
(4O4) 815-3000 (4O4) 817-3244 (FAX)
www.burr.com
  Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested,and Via First Class, U.S. Mail
 
 
 
 
 Re:
    
    Notice of Default, Acceleration of Indebtedness, and Intent toCollect Attorneys Fees Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 13-1-11
  (Regions Bank Lender) (Comstock Atlanta), (Comstock James Road), (Highland Station Borrowers),
 Traditions of
Braselton Loan),
 ALABAMA
    
    
    
    GEORGIA
    
    
    
    MISSISSIPPI
    
    
    
    TENNESSEE




---



##### 



Burr & Forman LLP
 
 Guarantor)
 Post Road
Loan),
 Highland Station Loan),
 2004 Highland Station Loan)
 2006 Highland Station Loan)




---



##### 



Burr & Forman LLP
 
  James Road
Loan)
 Loans Loan Documents.
 IN DEFAULT




---



##### 



Burr & Forman LLP
 
  (1)
    
    Traditions of Braselton Loan:(a) Principal
    
    $
    1,010,557.44(b) Accrued but unpaid interest
    
    $
    3,929.95(c) Accrued but unpaid late fees
    
    $
    0.00Total:
    
    
    
    $
    1,014,487.39(2)
    
    Post Road Loan:(a) Principal
    
    $
    956,250.00(b) Accrued but unpaid interest
    
    $
    3,718.75(c) Accrued but unpaid late fees
    
    $
    0.00Total:
    
    
    
    $
    959,968.75(3)
    
    Highland Station Loan:(a) Principal
    
    $
    6,184,665.46(b) Accrued but unpaid interest
    
    $
    20,974.17(c) Accrued but unpaid late fees
    
    $
    0.00Total
    
    
    
    $
    6,205,639.63(4)
    
    James Road Loan:(a) Principal
    
    $
    2,960,145.10(b) Accrued but unpaid interest
    
    $
    10,617.06(c) Accrued but unpaid late fees
    
    $
    0.00Total
    
    
    
    $
    2,970,762.16Amount Due:
    
    $
    11,150,857.93




---



##### 



Burr & Forman LLP
 
       Sincerely,-s- Gary W. FarrisGary W. Farris
Fact Sheet Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102-5090

January 14, 2016 Contact: Mike Stokke or Christine Quinn, 

703-883-4056

E-mail: info-line@fca.gov

Website: www.fca.gov

Fact Sheet on Farmer Mac Investment Eligibility: 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

The Farm Credit Administration Board adopted a proposed rule on Jan. 14, 2016, to revise its 

regulations in 12 CFR Part 652 governing the eligibility of nonprogram investments held by the 

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac). The proposed rule would replace

references to credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations

(NRSRO) with criteria that place greater due-diligence responsibility on Farmer Mac. 

Summary of Changes 

§ 652.10 Revise investment limits based on concentration risk

Reduce the current limit on maximum exposure to any single obligor from 25 to 10 percent of 

Farmer Mac’s regulatory capital, unless the investments are an obligation of, or fully guaranteed 

by, a U.S. government agency or government-sponsored enterprise (GSE). Retain the current 

50 percent limit for mortgage-backed securities issued by GSEs, but remove other existing 

asset class limits. Calculate investment limits on the carrying value of the investment.

§ 652.20 Remove nonprogram investment table

Replace the existing table of eligible asset classes, maturities, and NRSRO credit ratings with 

criteria to determine the types of eligible nonprogram investments Farmer Mac may hold. For 

example, investment counterparties would have to have a “strong capacity” to meet financial 

commitments and exhibit a very low risk of default. 

§ 652.23 Approval for other nonprogram investments

Clarify the minimum components that Farmer Mac must include in a request to FCA to invest in 

other nonprogram investments (that is, those that do not satisfy the provisions of § 652.20).

§ 652.25 Ineligible Investments

Clarify that any investments deemed ineligible under the regulations must continue to be 

included in the overall regulatory limit on the investment portfolio’s size and remove the existing 

quarterly reporting requirements for investments that become ineligible after purchase.

###
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 15-BG-563

IN RE: ANTHONY MCDANIEL,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 976583 BDN: 140-15

BEFORE: Fisher, Associate Judge, and Newman and Farrell, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - August 27, 2015)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland

disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney

Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. McDaniel, 114 A.3d 708 (Md. 2015), this court’s

June 17, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline

should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal

discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this

court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g),

it is

ORDERED that Anthony McDaniel is hereby disbarred from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In

re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical

reciprocal discipline applies to all casesin which the respondent does not participate). 

It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period

of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary D. Woerz, CEO and CFO of
International American Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above annual
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc. and results
of its operations.

Date: November 13, 2006
Gary D. Woerz
CEO and CFO/s/ Gary D. Woerz
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 43 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 43

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 15, 2025.
    Resolved, That at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, January 20, 2025, the House shall 
proceed to the West Front of the Capitol for the purpose of attending the 
inaugural ceremonies of the President and Vice President of the United States; 
and that upon the conclusion of the ceremonies the House stands adjourned until 
noon on Tuesday, January 21, 2025 for morning-hour debate and 2 p.m. for 
legislative business.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the interim  report of Ecotality, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jonathan R. ReadJonathan
      R. ReadChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      19, 2009/s/ Barry S. BaerBarry
      S. BaerChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      19, 2009


Created
by Morningstar Document Research    
documentresearch.morningstar.comSource:
ECOTALITY, INC., 10-Q, August 14, 2009
---

|Exhibit 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sound Revolution Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: January 23, 2006 | /s/ Penny Green                                           
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Penny Green                                               
|                        | President, Chief Executive Officer,                       
|                        | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
      Office

---
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 1 of 22 PageID 1475
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 2 of 22 PageID 1476
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 3 of 22 PageID 1477
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 4 of 22 PageID 1478
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 5 of 22 PageID 1479
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 6 of 22 PageID 1480
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 7 of 22 PageID 1481
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 8 of 22 PageID 1482
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 9 of 22 PageID 1483
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 10 of 22 PageID 1484
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 11 of 22 PageID 1485
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 12 of 22 PageID 1486
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 13 of 22 PageID 1487
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 14 of 22 PageID 1488
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 15 of 22 PageID 1489
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 16 of 22 PageID 1490
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 17 of 22 PageID 1491
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 18 of 22 PageID 1492
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 19 of 22 PageID 1493
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 20 of 22 PageID 1494
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 21 of 22 PageID 1495
Case 3:05-cv-00880-D Document 117 Filed 06/30/06 Page 22 of 22 PageID 1496
Christopher PACE, DOC #H07495, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2382

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01166-P Document 4 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
Case 3:04-cv-01544-K Document 6 Filed 02/18/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 21
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01544-K Document 6 Filed 02/18/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 22
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01544-K Document 6 Filed 02/18/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 23
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01544-K Document 6 Filed 02/18/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 24
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01544-K Document 6 Filed 02/18/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 25
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1264 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1083, K2025-1082.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00907 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      66,159,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,079,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                   134,985
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            71,281,940
<PP&E>                                       4,463,406
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,967,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,140,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,736,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,235
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,945,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,140,192
<SALES>                                     11,653,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,646,776
<CGS>                                          400,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,192,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,167,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               175,329
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,375,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,117,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,117,795)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,117,795)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.42)


</TABLE>
Annette Land CANTER v. Alan M. CANTER

2160293

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silvergraph International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  June 9, 2009

/s/ James R. Simpson

               James R. Simpson, CEO

               (Principal Executive, Financial and 

                Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MITCHELL GREGORY PECK, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 215 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the 

remaining issue. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Where the drug delivery resulting in death (“DDRD”) statute explicitly 

applies only to deliveries occurring “in violation of section 13(a)(14) 

or (30) of” the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act 

(“The Act”), is violation of the Act an essential element of DDRD?

(2) Where a drug delivery occurs wholly in another state, can that 

delivery violate the Act, which explicitly applies only to deliveries 

occurring “within the Commonwealth?”

(3) If a violation of the Act is an element of DDRD and an out-of-state 

delivery does not violate the Act, did the Superior Court err in 

affirming [Petitioner’s] DDRD conviction based on a delivery 

occurring wholly in Maryland?