alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, William P. Brand, Jr., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 22, 2006           |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ William P. Brand, Jr.      |   |
|                           |
| William P. Brand, Jr.          |
| Vice President - Finance       |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
Case 3:05-cv-00200-L Document 41 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 317
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00200-L Document 41 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 318
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Justin Yorke, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 12, 2010  /s/ Justin YorkeName:Justin YorkeTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Aamir Veljee, Aameerali Lakhani, CSI, LED, LLC, and CSI Factory, Inc.,

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00116

- CV

Trial court case number: 201922849

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order, signed January 9, 2020, compelling relators to obtain and produce bank records. Relators subsequently

filed a motion for emerg ency relief

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10.

The Court grants the motion for emergency relief and stays all proceedings in the trial court pending this Court’s disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus or further orders of this

Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Peter Kelly

___  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ February 11, 2020

____
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**asAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David S.Kalt, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David A. Fisher, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ DAVID S. KALT |                    |
|-------------------|-------------------------|
| Name:             | David S. Kalt           |
| Title:            | Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |                         |  |

 

Date: May 3, 2005

 
| /s/ DAVID A. FISHER |                    |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
| Name:               | David A. Fisher         |
| Title:              | Chief Financial Officer |
|                     |                         |  |

 

Date: May 3, 2005

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and

Claudia Ayers

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 648

- CV

Trial court case number: 1007580

- 102

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

Date motion filed: October 14

, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellant Barrett Wakefield

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justice s Jennings , Keyes, and Bland

Date: November 8 , 2016
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

In re Chapter

Case No. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES PURSUANT TO FED. R. BANKR. P. 2002(g)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that

requests, pursuant to Rules 2002 and 9007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules) 

and sections 102(1), 342 and 1109(b) of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (as amended, 

the Bankruptcy Code), that all notices given or required to be given and all papers served or required to be served 

in this case be also given to and served, whether electronically or otherwise, on: 

Dated: 

By:/s/

FORT WORTH DIVISION FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS JESSIE SANDRA GUTIERREZ and 7

23-40854-mxm7 MARK X MULLIN BANKRUPTCY JUDGE ENRIQUE FUENTES, Debtor(s) PRA Receivables Management, LLC, as authorized agent for Synchrony Bank (PayPal Smart Connect - Last four digits of account: 8635 ), a creditor in the above-captioned chapter 7 case, REQUEST OF PRA RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, LLC Synchrony Bank c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC PO Box 41021 Telephone: (877)885-5919 Facsimile: (757) 351-3257 Assignee Creditor: PayPal Smart Connect - Last four digits of account: 8635 E-mail: Claims_RMSC@PRAGroup.com Norfolk, VA 23541 Norfolk, Virginia March 29, 2023 Valerie Smith Valerie Smith c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC Senior Manager PO Box 41021 Norfolk, VA 23541 (877)885-5919

Case 23-40854-mxm7 Doc 8 Filed 03/29/23 Entered 03/29/23 07:20:03 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### Dothan Coffin and Casket Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. W. S. Whiddon, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Opinion Filed July 15, 1927.

*273
      *Davis & Pepper,*for Plaintiff in Error;

T. J. Swanson, for Defendant in Error.

Ellis, C. J.

The plaintiff in error brought an action against the defendant in error in thfe Circuit Court for Taylor County. The declaration was in five common counts as follows: For goods “bargained, sold and delivered”; for money loaned, money paid by plaintiff to the use of defendant; money had and received; and account stated.

There were three pleas: First, never was indebted; second, satisfaction and discharge; third, payment by promissory note. The ease was tried on the issues presented by the pleas.

When the evidence offered by the plaintiff was submitted the defendant moved for an instructed verdict upon the ground that the party named in the case as plaintiff was not capable of maintaining the cause at the time of trial. “The court intimated and announced its intention to grant the motion,” whereupon the plaintiff took a non-suit with writ of error and bill of exceptions.

The evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the issues made by the pleas. There was no effort on the part of the defendant to support the second and third pleas while the evidence was sufficient to support the first count.

The plea of never was indebted admitted the capacity of the plaintiff to bring the action. See Sullivan v. Honacker, 6 Fla. 372; Rule 57 — 64 Rules of Circuit Court, Law Actions; 3 Thompson on Corporations (Second Ed.), Sec. 3224.

*274There was evidence developed on cross-examination of a witness for the plaintiff that the corporation in January, 1925, which was several months before the action was begun ‘ ‘ did cease to exist and did cease to do business, and upon ceasing to do business, the said Dothan Coffin and Casket Company, a corporation, did authorize C. J. Faulk to wind up its affairs and to collect and settle all of the accounts and outstanding indebtedness of the said corporation, and to such other and further things as were necessary to- wind up the affairs of the said corporation. ’ ’

Aside from the fact that the evidence was addressed to no issue before the Court, it was not sufficient to show that the corporation had become legally non-existent.

The judgment is reversed.

Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion.
!

"# #$ #%&"# 

'

()*+*,-**+
%#+,*

	



 !"#$

#""#$!%  $#&# '


.')/0)-)*0.'	1,2,*.3(

	'45'	'1300	'6'

.	37	0.	0.3	'53	(4	.3

'	8

##%$('5'0	'#&#(#%)#*

##$%	'		5		',,(
((
,*)9:;

:);3'3
	4	0	313 	8	

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed October 5, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-31033-swe13 Doc 45 Filed 10/10/23 Entered 10/10/23 08:02:28 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2

Case 23-01000-rlj Doc 37 Filed 11/01/23 Entered 11/01/23 08:03:13 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
	.4,*<
	4	)-),+-=0<4)

)*+*,-**+
%#+,*

"# #$ #%&"# 

##$%0.4'333	'		>4		

	4		.'	(

+++
,+++

5	! ??.(<>

.(<>0



@,9),/2--


	4,*

,-=


,,=-,,3

540A2=-9)

:),B;/==+C)--?:),B;C9=+-2=/:;

Case 23-31033-swe13 Doc 45 Filed 10/10/23 Entered 10/10/23 08:02:28 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2

Case 23-01000-rlj Doc 37 Filed 11/01/23 Entered 11/01/23 08:03:13 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs IIChief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO*SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002***

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Southern Heritage Bank (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven W. Ledbetter, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Steven W.  Ledbetter |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Steven W.  Ledbetter     |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
| Aug 14, 2006             |

 

----
# C_2018123EN.01000802.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 27 December 2017 — Sebastian Vollmer, Vera Sagalov v Swiss Global Air Lines AG

(Case C-721/17)

(2018/C 123/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Sebastian Vollmer, Vera Sagalov

Applicants:

Defendant: Swiss Global Air Lines AG

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) also exist in the case where a passenger fails to catch a direct connecting flight due to a delay in arrival of less than three hours, with the result that there is a delay in arrival at the final destination of three hours or more, but the two flights were operated by different air carriers? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) also exist in the case where a passenger fails to catch a direct connecting flight due to a delay in arrival of less than three hours, with the result that there is a delay in arrival at the final destination of three hours or more, but the two flights were operated by different air carriers?

1

| 2. | Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 also exist in the case where the different air carriers are part of the same corporate group? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 also exist in the case where the different air carriers are part of the same corporate group?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
Stephen L. CURTIN and Melody L. Curtin v. FIELD ASSET SERVICES, LLC

1160349

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2016410EN.01002801.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/28

---

Action brought on 22 September 2016 — Wirecard v EUIPO (mycard2go)

(Case T-675/16)

(2016/C 410/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Mark at issue: EU trade mark ‘mycard2go’ — Application No 14 303 416

Mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2016 in Case R 282/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the defendant for continuation of the registration procedure concerning EU trade mark No 014303416; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the defendant for continuation of the registration procedure concerning EU trade mark No 014303416;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2016475EN.01002401.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/24

---

Action brought on 7 November 2016 — Nanogate v EUIPO (metals)

(Case T-767/16)

(2016/C 475/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nanogate AG (Quierschied, Germany) (represented by: A. Theis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘metals’ — Application No 14 259 981

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2016 in Case R 2361/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the interim  report of Ecotality, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of
      the
      Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of
                1934;and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Jonathan R. ReadJonathan
                R. ReadChief
                Executive Officer**November
                18, 2008**/s/
                Barry S. BaerBarry
                S. BaerChief
                Financial Officer**November18,
                2008**
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**SOUTHERN
      HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




***SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***










In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Heritage Bank (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Lee Stewart,
      President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.












/s/
      J.
      Lee Stewart


J.
      Lee
      Stewart


President


August
      14, 2007