alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Neelam T. UPPAL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
SDC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, Spazio Di Casa, LLC, Spazio Di Casa, Inc., and Italian Mobility, LLC, Appellants, v. LLOYD'S UNDERWRITERS AT LONDON a/k/a Certain Underwriters At Lloyds Insurance Group, Inc., Coastal Insurance Group, Inc., and MARIA L. MARTINEZ, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 18, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 2:05-cv-00037-J Document 17 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 51
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-112927) and Amendment No. 147 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-03214), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 20, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account C for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
Case 3:05-cv-00726-M Document 12 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 135
Shalinly Jontoby HAYES v. STATE

CR-16-0999

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 10, 2005



By:

/s/ Andrew M. SimsName:

Andrew M. SimsTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2016402EN.01005801.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/58

---

Action brought on 7 September 2016 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (QD)

(Case T-650/16)

(2016/C 402/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘QD’ — Application for registration No 13 633 516

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2016 in Case R 2046/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,367,937
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         158,243,971
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     61,792,674
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,999,414
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            61,792,674
<LOANS>                                        168,953,080
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,565,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,087,920
<DEPOSITS>                                     184,700,328
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,957,583
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,515,231
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,914,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 243,087,920
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,858,954
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,697,712
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    67,073
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,623,739
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,058,031
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,692,565
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,931,174
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  66,190
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,782,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,640,674
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,625,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         4.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         4.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.21
<LOANS-NON>                                        105,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                       132,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,376,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      124,000
<RECOVERIES>                                       263,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,565,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HemoBioTech, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,  Mark J.
Rosenblum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

a. the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b. the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: MAY 15, 2006                  /s/ MARK J. ROSENBLUM
                                    MARK J. ROSENBLUM
                                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                    (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PetroHunter Energy Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles
      B. Crowell, CEO (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Charles B.
      Crowell


Charles
      B. Crowell, Chief Executive Officer








August
      24, 2007
Exhibit  32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I,  David  Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Siberian  Energy  Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  June  30,  2006  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Siberian  Energy  Group  Inc.

                                    By:/s/  David  Zaikin
                                    --------------------------
                                    David  Zaikin
                                    Chief  Executive  Officer
August 11,  2006

<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60148

Conference Calendar

 

DENNIS DOBBS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM BILL BLAND; LEE ROY BLACK,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:92-CV-71-B-D

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Dennis Dobbs, Mississippi prisoner # 96145, has filed a

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. 

The district court denied Dobbs’ FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion for

relief from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The

district court denied Dobbs’ motion to appeal IFP and certified

that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving for IFP,
No. 03-60148

-2-

Dobbs is challenging the district court’s certification. See

Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Dobbs has failed to show that the district court abused its

discretion by denying his FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion. Seven

Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981). The

instant appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. 

Accordingly, Dobbs’ request for IFP status is DENIED, and his

appeal is DISMISSED. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-220 (5th

Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Dobbs is cautioned that the dismissal of this appeal as

frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Dobbs 

is also cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g), he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or

appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility

unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
### May Qk, 2015 

### FILEDIN Tashima Everhart COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS Hobby Unit #1925896 742 FM 712 UM062015 Marlin, Texas 76661-4685 

# RECEIVEDIN AbelAcosta,Clerk COURTOFowmimsiappeals MAY0620K Court Of Criminal Appeals Attn: Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk Of The Court ^h&l&r»nef£>PharL- 

### P. 0. Box 12308 -HJWrtCOSia.OWri' Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Everhart vs State 

### Fifth Court.Of.Appeals, Cases: 05-14-00061-CR, 05-14-00062-CR, 05-14-00063-CR, 05-14-00064-CR

Dear Mr. Acosta, Please be advised with this letter that I ask for an extension of the 

### May 6, 2015., deadline to have apetition filed for discretionary review in the Court Of Criminal Appeals. 

### Iwould also like to ask the Court with this letter to appoint me an attorney to represent me in these matters. I am incarcerated with no form of an income and therefore indigent. I cannot afford the proper counsel to perform the duties required to represent me in the Courts. It is my intention to further appeal the most recent,decisions from the Courts pertaining to Trial Court Cause: F13-00363-S from the 

### 282 Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, and the Fifth Court Of Appeals. 

### Please notify me at the above listed address if there are any additional documents to sign or need to be provided to assign an attorney to represent me in theses cases. I also ask that you notify me of the new date to have the petition filed. I forward my gratitude in advance for your prompt attention to this letter! Sincerely., g

Tashima Everhart
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSE SAMUEL TURINCIO, §

 §

Petitioner, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0821-D

VS. §

 §

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas § 

Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

 §

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the

findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.

SO ORDERED.

March 30, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00821-D Document 29 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 163
# C_2019230EN.01000901.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — SF v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst

(Case C-631/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 11(3)(e) - National of a Member State employed as a seaman on board a vessel flying the flag of a third State - Employer established in a Member State other than the worker’s State of residence - Determination of the applicable legislation)

(2019/C 230/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SF

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(3)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, must be interpreted to the effect that a situation such as the one at issue in the main proceedings in which a person, whilst working as a seaman for an employer established in a Member State on board a vessel flying the flag of a third State and travelling outside of the territory of the European Union, maintained his residence in his Member State of origin, falls within the scope of that provision, such that the applicable national legislation is that of the Member State of residence of that person.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-296-CR

EX PARTE TILON LASHON CARTER	

	------------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 

	------------

	Appellant Tilon Lashon Carter was charged with capital murder, and the State indicated that it would seek the death penalty.  Appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the constitutionality of article 37.071 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  In his application, he claimed that he is mentally retarded and because the statute does not preclude the execution of a mentally retarded person, the statute is unconstitutional.  Accordingly, Appellant requested that the State be barred from seeking the death penalty against him.  The trial court granted the writ, held a hearing, and on August 21, 2006 denied the relief sought.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal and the trial court certified that the Appellant has the right of appeal.  The parties filed appellate briefs and the case was set for submission in this court on November 29, 2006.  On November 21, 2006, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot because on November 15, 2006, the case was tried to a jury which returned a sentence of death against Appellant.2  Although the certificate of conference reflects that Appellant’s counsel opposes the motion, counsel has not filed a response thereto.

	Because Appellant was tried during the pendency of this appeal, the requested relief sought by Appellant in his application for writ of habeas corpus is now moot.  See  Ex parte Tucker, 3 S.W.3d 576, 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Guerrero, 99 S.W.3d 852, 853 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (noting that the longstanding rule in Texas regarding a pretrial writ of habeas corpus is that where the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are moot).  Therefore, we GRANT the State’s motion to dismiss.  This appeal is dismissed as moot.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL B:  HOLMAN, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  December 14, 2006
Office of the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

105 Decker Ct

Suite 1150 11th Floor

Irving, TX 75062

(214) 855-9200

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE:

MICHAEL HARRISON FOCHT

DEBTOR

CASE NO: 23-31083-SGJ-13

NOTICE OF FILING FINAL REPORT AND ACCOUNT BY TRUSTEE

Notice is hereby given pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 350 and Bankruptcy Rule 5009 that Thomas D. Powers, Chapter 13 Trustee has 

filed a Final Report and Account in the above styled and numbered case certifying that the estate has been fully administered . 

The Final Report and Account is on file with the CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT , 1100 COMMERCE, ROOM 12-A-24, 

DALLAS, TEXAS, 75242-1496 and is available for review at https://ecf.txnb.uscourts.gov/. A summary of the report is as 

follows:

Petition Date 

Confirmation Date

Disposition

Date Closed

# of Months Case was Pending

Amt of unsecured claims discharged without payment *

Total Paid by or on behalf of Debtor

Less amount Refunded to Debtor

Net Receipts

Total Secured Disbursements

Total Priority Disbursements

General Unsecured Disbursements

Expenses of Administration **

Disbursements to Creditors

Total Disbursements

May 31, 2023

Feb, 22 2024

converted

Jun 17, 2024

14

$0.00

$14,585.00

$11,131.78

$3,453.22

Principal

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$3,453.22

$0.00

$3,453.22

Interest

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

* THE INFORMATION REFLECTED IN THE FINAL REPORT AS TO THE DISCHARGE OF CLAIMS IS NOT INTENDED TO 

RENDER AN OPINION AS TO WHETHER ANY SPECIFIC DEBT IS, OR IS NOT, DISCHARGED. ONLY THE COURT CAN 

ISSUE AN ORDER DETERMINING THE DISCHARGEABILITY OF ANY DEBT OR DEBTS.

** Includes Attorney Fees, Notice Fees, Trustee Fees and Clerk's Fees

 Notice is further given that unless an objection is filed by the United States Trustee or a party in interest within 30 days of 

service of this notice, the Court may declare that the bankruptcy estate has been fully administered and that the Trustee 

should be discharged and further liability on said Trustee's bond with respect to this case can be terminated .

/s/ Thomas D. Powers

Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

By: Jolene Harris

Dated: 07/15/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1244 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1060, K2025-1059.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00870 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```