alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 20 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 102
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 20 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 103
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 20 Filed 07/14/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 104
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael Schmidt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 7, 2008



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Schmidt                  
|    |  | Michael Schmidt                      
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 235 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 235

  To recognize the Margaret Woodbury Strong Museum in Rochester, New 
                                 York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

 Mr. Morelle (for himself and Mr. Langworthy) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To recognize the Margaret Woodbury Strong Museum in Rochester, New 
                                 York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Museum of Play Recognition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MUSEUM OF PLAY IN ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.

    (a) Congressional Recognition.--Congress--
            (1) recognizes that the Margaret Woodbury Strong Museum, 
        DBA Strong Museum, located in Rochester, New York, is the only 
        museum of its kind that exists for the exclusive purpose of 
        exploring the ways in which play encourages learning, 
        creativity, and discovery, and how it illuminates cultural 
        history; and
            (2) officially designates the Margaret Woodbury Strong 
        Museum as the National Museum of Play.
    (b) Effect of Recognition; Designation.--The National Museum of 
Play recognized in subsection (a) is not a unit of the National Park 
System and the designation under subsection (a) shall not be construed 
to require or permit Federal funds to be expended for any purpose 
related to the Museum.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 2 of 14 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 3 of 14 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 4 of 14 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 5 of 14 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 6 of 14 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 7 of 14 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 8 of 14 PageID 8
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 9 of 14 PageID 9
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 10 of 14 PageID 10
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 11 of 14 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 12 of 14 PageID 12
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 13 of 14 PageID 13
Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 1 Filed 12/04/03 Page 14 of 14 PageID 14
Kartarius JOHNSON v. Richard JOHNSON

2160586

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT

This agreement dated as of June 30, 2007 amends the loan agreement dated August 31, 2004 as amended on November 30, 2004 and January 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), made by and between Sound Revolution Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), Penny Green, Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company (Green), and Bacchus Entertainment Ltd. (the Lender).

Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

Paragraph 4 of the Agreement shall be amended so that no written request from the Company is necessary for the issuance of further funds by the Lender.

Paragraph 5 of the Agreement, as amended on January 1, 2007, shall be further amended to extend payments to January 1, 2008.

Any additional amounts loaned to the Company by Penny Green or by Bacchus Entertainment Inc. in excess of the amounts stipulated by the Agreement shall unless otherwise stipulated by the parties in writing be deemed amounts loaned pursuant to the Agreement and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.

In witness whereof this Agreement has been executed by or on behalf of the parties hereto, as an instrument under seal as of the date first above written.

Sound Revolution Inc.By: /s/ Penny GreenTitle: President & ChiefExecutive OfficerBacchus EntertainmentLtd.By: /s/ Penny GreenTitle: President/s/ Penny GreenPenny Green


---
STATE of Louisiana v. Jerry Jon KAN

NO. 2018-K-1733

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

*295Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
1

The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and

recommendation of the Honorable Lawrence O. Davis, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

 2The Honorable Clyde S. Cahill, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-3009

___________

Favis Clay Martin, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: February 15, 1996 

 Filed: February 22, 1996 ___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Favis Clay Martin appeals the district court's1 order denying

his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Martin was convicted in 1981,

and his conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal.

Martin v. United States, 691 F.2d 1235 (8th Cir. 1982), cert.

denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983). Martin later filed a section 2255

motion; the district court2 denied relief, and this court affirmed.

Martin v. United States, No. 93-2054, 1993 WL 265072 (8th Cir.)

(unpublished per curiam), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 566 (1993).
We have reviewed the record, and agree with the district court

that Martin's current motion is successive, because both grounds

for relief were rejected in his earlier motion. We also agree that

Martin has not shown his abuse of the writ should be excused. See

28 U.S.C. § 2244(a); McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 493-94

(1991).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of On4 Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Penny Green, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge :





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   September 29, 2010





By:      /s/ Penny Green


Penny Green


Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
EX-4.7



 Exhibit 4.7

AMENDMENT NO. 9 
 INTERNATIONAL
SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC. 401(K) PLAN 
 WHEREAS, International Specialty Products Inc. (the “Company”) maintains for the benefit of certain
employees the International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that
participation and contribution under the Plan will be frozen for Employees of the Company’s Freetown Facility (the “Transferred Employees”). 

Now, THEREFORE, Appendix A of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2013, in the following respects: 

I. Section II of Appendix A shall be amended by adding the following to the end thereof which shall read as follow: 

“Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Plan, effective January 1, 2013, any Transferred Employee who is an Excluded Employee shall not be
eligible to actively participate within the Plan but shall remain a Participant with respect to that portion of Account Balances accrued prior to January 1, 2013.” 

II. Section III of Appendix A shall be amended by adding the following to the end thereof which shall read as follows: 

“Effective as of January 1, 2013, the Special Contribution to the Plan detailed in this Section III of Appendix A shall be suspended.” 

III. In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment this     day of
            , 2013 
  

			
	INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Susan B. Esler

	Its:	 	Authorized Representative
# C_2019112EN.01000701.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/7

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Roma — Italy) — Pina Cipollone v Ministero della Giustizia

(Case C-600/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social policy - Fixed-term work - Magistrates - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 112/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pina Cipollone

Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia

Other party to the proceedings: Unione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (Unagipa)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Giudice di pace di Roma (Justice of the Peace, Rome, Italy) by decision of 25 August 2017 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.

---
Case 3:05-cr-00162-N Document 48 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 110
Robert J. LEVINE v. STATE

CR-16-1256

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 22, 2017

Reh. denied.
EX PARTE T.G.

(In re: T.G. v. Russell County Department of Human Resources)

2170115

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 193 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue guidance 

on payment under the Medicare program for certain items involving 

artificial intelligence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

issue guidance on payment under the Medicare program 

for certain items involving artificial intelligence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maintaining Innova5 tion and Safe Technologies Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 193 IH

1 SEC. 2. GUIDANCE ON MEDICARE PAYMENT FOR CERTAIN 

2 ITEMS INVOLVING ARTIFICIAL INTEL3 LIGENCE. 

4 Not later than January 1, 2027, the Secretary of 

5 Health and Human Services shall use existing communica6 tions mechanisms to issue guidance on requirements for 

7 payment under part B of title XVIII of the Social Security 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.) for remote monitoring de9 vices, such as continuous glucose monitors, that— 

10 (1) use an artificial intelligence component 

11 (such as a continuous adjustment component); and 

12 (2) transmit information to a health care pro13 vider for purposes of management and treatment of 

14 an individual. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1 

Megan M. Adeyemo, Bar No. 24099595 

GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 231-4660 

Facsimile: (214) 461-4053 

Email: madeyemo@grsm.com

Iga W. Todd (pro hac vice) 

GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 

1. N. Wacker, Suite 1600 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Telephone: (312) 980-6794 

Facsimile: (312) 565-6511 

Email: itodd@grsm.com

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

) 

In re: ) 

) Case No. 22-31641-mvl-7 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC., ) 

) (Chapter 7) 

Debtor ) 

) 

) 

SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE; ) 

GNET ATC, LLC; MULTIBAND ) 

FIELD SERVICES, INC., ) Adversary No. 23-03036 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

JAMES FRINZI; MULTIBAND GLOBAL ) 

RESOURCES, LLC; and FEDERAL ) 

INSURANCE COMPANY, ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

) 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 97 Filed 10/16/24 Entered 10/16/24 17:03:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

DEFENDANT FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY’S 

DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL 

Defendant Federal Insurance Company hereby demands trial by jury in this action. 

Dated: October 16, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

GORDON REES SCULLY 

MANSUKHANI, LLP 

By: /s/ Iga W. Todd 

Iga W. Todd (pro hac vice) 

1. N. Wacker, Suite 1600 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Tel: (312) 980-6794 

Fax: (312) 565-6511 

itodd@grsm.com

Megan Adeyemo, Bar No. 24099595 

2200 Ross Ave., Suite 3700 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Tel: (214) 231-4660 

Fax: (214) 461-4053 

madeyemo@grsm.com

Counsel for Defendant 

Federal Insurance Company 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 97 Filed 10/16/24 Entered 10/16/24 17:03:23 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

electronically filed with Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System, which will automatically send 

e-mail notification of such filing to all attorneys of record. 

Dated: October 16, 2024 Respectfully Submitted, 

GORDON REES SCULLY 

MANSUKHANI, LLP 

By: /s/ Iga W. Todd 

Iga W. Todd (pro hac vice) 

1. N. Wacker, Suite 1600 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Tel: (312) 980-6794 

Fax: (312) 565-6511 

itodd@grsm.com

Counsel for Defendant 

Federal Insurance Company 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 97 Filed 10/16/24 Entered 10/16/24 17:03:23 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
STATE of Louisiana v. Rip Dan DAVIS

No. 2018-KH-1040

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 2 of 10 PageID 2
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 3 of 10 PageID 3
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 4 of 10 PageID 4
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 5 of 10 PageID 5
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 6 of 10 PageID 6
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 7 of 10 PageID 7
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 8 of 10 PageID 8
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 9 of 10 PageID 9
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 1 Filed 10/05/04 Page 10 of 10 PageID 10
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   |                                         |                                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | **OCCULOGIX,                INC.**           |
|                                              |                                    |                                  |
| Date:   November                8, 2006 | By:                                | /s/ William                G. Dumencu |
|                                                   |  Chief                Financial Officer |
|                                                   |                                         |
Exhibit 23.3 

**DEGOLYERAND MACNAUGHTON**

5001 Spring Valley Road 

Suite 800 East 

Dallas, Texas 75244 

www.demac.com 

February 27, 2007 

Challenger Minerals, Inc. 

GlobalSantaFe Corporation 

15375 Memorial Drive 

Houston, Texas 77079 

Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to references to our firm andthe inclusion and incorporation by reference of information from our report entitled “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2004 on Reserves owned by Challenger Minerals, Inc. in the West Heather Area of the Broom Field offshore UnitedKingdom” signed February 28, 2005, relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenue of certain interests of Challenger Minerals, Inc., a subsidiary of the GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the “Company”) in (i) Exhibit 99.2 to theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2006, (ii) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2006, and the Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) therein, (iii) the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8(Registration Nos. 333-7070, 333-62708, 333-73878, 333-112670, 333-105015 and 333-111448), (iv) the Company’s Post Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-70268), and(v) the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-127168).
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 70 -CV In re Brian Lee P ope ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M COM AL COUNTY M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator Br ian L ee Pope f iled a petition for wr it of habea s corpus a nd motion for emer g ency

stay on Fe bruar

y 2, 2007, challeng ing the district court’s January 2 9 , 2 0 0 7 order committing him to county jail. By o rd er dated F ebrua ry 2, 2007, we g rante d relator’s motion for e me rg e nc y

sta y of the ord er and

a llo we d h is r e le a se fr om c us tod y pe nd ingour d isp os iti on

of his petition for writ of ha

beas c orpus. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(b)( 3). By order dated Fe bruar

y 12, 2007, the district court va cate d its J anuar y 29, 2007 Orde r HoldingRespondent in Contempt for Fa ilure to Pay Child Support, Gra nting Judgment, a

nd for Commitment to C ounty J ail. Be cause the orde r that is the subject of Pope’ s petition for writ of habea s corpus ha s been va cate d, both the emer g ency stay and h i s p et i t i o n are moot. W e lift the e me rg e nc y

sta y and dis mis s th is p e tit ion

fo r wri t of

ha be a s c or pu s.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Waldrop Filed: F ebrua

ry 21, 2007