alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INVESTIGATIONS LOG 

Office of Inspector General 

STATUS/ DATE DATE CRIMNAL DATE ADMIN. CASE AL�EGAtlON OPENED ClOSED REFERRAt. NOJ'ES/Ol!JTC0ME REC'D AC:JilON NUMBER 

*P = P re r 1mmary . nves f 1r 1a f 10n

*P-15-01 3-12-15 Question on employee 3-12-15 5-7-2015 Issued NO CLOSED; memorandum issued; 

Kathy personnel action analysis. allegation not substantiated; no referral 

required. 

*P-15-02 3-30-15 Question regarding Bd. 3-30-15 4-7-15 Requested NO CLOSED; memorandum issued; 

Kathy Member effective relevant administrative action taken. 

/Liz retirement date and records 3-30-

documents 15; 

administrative 

action taken in 

correcting 

erroneous 

records 

*P-15-03 4-9-2015 Question regarding 4-9-15 4-14-15 Requested NO CLOSED; memorandum issued; 

Kathy internal personnel relevant allegations not substantiated; no referral 

selection records 4-13- required. 

15; reviewed 4-

14-15 and

confirmed

action complied

with agency

policy; closed

4-14-2015.

*P-15-04 7-6-2015 Potential 7-6-15 9-28-2015 Referred to NO. CLOSED; no further investigation 

Kathy misrepresentation in DOJ OIG on 7- required; calls stopped and no 

voicemail messages 8-2015; no subsequent follow-up calls received. 

further action

by DOJ and

calls stopped.

*P-15-05 7-9-2015 Allegation regarding Farm 7-9-2015 8-26-2015 Contacted NO CLOSED; no further review required; 

Kathy Credit System institution cognizant clarification request sent to employee by 

employee embellishing Institution's institution ethics officer; no further OIG 

credentials Ethics officer review required. 

for institution 7-

9-2015.

12/27/2016 

12/27/2016 

INVESTIGATIONS LOG 

Office of Inspector General 

STATUS/ DATE DATE CRIMNAL ADMIN. CASE ALLEGATION OPENED CLOSED REFERRAi:. NOtES/OU]COME ACTl0N NUMBER 

functions. review. 

*P-16-01 6-30-2016 Allegation regarding duty 6-30-2016 7-1-2016 Completed NO CLOSED; no referral; allegation not 

Kathy station and travel record review substantiated, but identified for follow-up 

expenses and interview. to confirm. 

*P = Preliminary
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis G. Dracup, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                     
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2008
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|                   |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 21




                    PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES


Subsidiary                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                         -----------------------------
WE JAC Corporation                                 Delaware
Worldwide Drying Systems, Inc.                     Colorado
Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc.                     Virginia
PTW, Inc.                                          Washington
Precision Building Solutions Incorporated          Delaware
Rocky Mountain Ventures, Inc.                      Colorado
Ralston Car Wash, Ltd.                             Colorado
Rocky Mountain Ventures II, Inc.                   Colorado
Miracle Partners, Inc.                             Delaware
Miracle Industries, Inc.                           Ohio
Hydro Spray Car Wash Equipment Co., LLC            Iowa
Indy Ventures, LLC                                 Indiana
Prema Properties, LLC                              Ohio
PAC Mexican Delaware Holding Company, Inc.         Delaware
PAC Mexican Holding Co., LLC                       Virginia
Precision Auto Care Mexico I S.de R.L. de C.V.     Mexico
Promotora de Franquicias Praxis S.A. de C.V.       Mexico
Praxis Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico
Praxis Auto Parts, S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico
Praxis Afinaciones, Puerto Rico, Inc.              Mexico
E.W., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-1153 4D18-1155 4D18-1156

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 2/4/97

TENTH CIRCUIT

CRAIG MILES GOODWIN, a/k/a Curtis

Meyer,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CARMEL, DR.; ALBERT O.

SINGLETON, III, M.D.; MARY LOU

JUDISCAK; LOU BROTHERS; KEN

TAFOYA,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1084

(D.C. No. 95-Z-1236)

(District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge; PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.
- 2 -

Craig Miles Goodwin appeals from an order granting summary judgment on his

complaint alleging certain civil rights violations. We have examined the record and agree

with the recommendations of the magistrate judge and the subsequent holdings of the

district court in substantial part and affirm those holdings essentially for the reasons cited

in the dispositive orders. Although the district court correctly dismissed Mr. Goodwin’s

claim alleging denial of access to the courts, we affirm on a different basis. 

In his complaint, and here on appeal, Mr. Goodwin contends his right of access

was denied because his legal materials were taken away from him; he was not able to mail

legal documents; he was not able to use legal books for research; and, while admitting

consultation with a legal consultant, he was unable to obtain satisfaction from that person,

and was not provided with the services of a lawyer. These alleged deprivations

notwithstanding, Mr. Goodwin has not alleged any consequences occurred because of

them.

He has not claimed, for example, that he was unable to meet a filing deadline in a

court and the time has passed; nor has he suggested he was deprived of the opportunity to

file an action which is now barred. Indeed, he has not related those alleged deprivations

to any legal action, pending or contemplated. In short, he merely alleges a generic claim

of deprivations which were inconsequential. Such assertions do not reach constitutional

proportions and are properly dismissed. See Lewis v. Casey, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 1278-82

(1996).
- 3 -

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 312 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 551
June 11 , 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GUILLERMO GARZA D/B/ A WILHOME BUILDERS & CONSTRUCTION

, Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00724

- CV V.

JESSE CANTU , Appellee

________________________________ This court today issued a substitute opinion. We order this court’s former judgment of April 11, 2013, vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of April 11, 2013, withdrawn. We deny the motion for rehearing filed by appellee, Jesse Cantu.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appelle e, Jesse Cantu, signed, May 10 , 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the j udgment. We therefore order the judgment of the
court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court's opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Jesse Cantu.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Q.B. v. The Matter of A.G., a Minor Child

2160773

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.








Date:   January
      14, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Ming
      Fen LiuMing
      Fen LiuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 421 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 839
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2008

|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/ Dennis G. Dracup                                              
|Dennis G. Dracup                                                  
|Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Marcus Cortez COLEMAN v. STATE

CR-16-0937

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017402EN.01001201.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 11 September 2017 — Wolfgang Wirth and Others v Thomson Airways Ltd.

(Case C-532/17)

(2017/C 402/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Wolfgang Wirth, Theodor Mülder, Ruth Mülder, Gisela Wirth

Applicants:

Defendant: Thomson Airways Ltd.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the concept of ‘operating air carrier’ in Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1), to be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier which leases to another air carrier an aircraft, including crew, for a contractually-stipulated number of flights under a so-called wet lease, but which does not bear the principal operational responsibility for the individual flights, and where it is stated in the passengers’ booking confirmation that the flight is ‘operated by ...’ that very carrier, is the operating air carrier within the meaning of that regulation?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 15.1
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Deloitte Accountants B.V.

Orlyplein 10

1043 DP Amsterdam

P.O.Box 58110

1040 HC Amsterdam

Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)88 288 2888

Fax: +31 (0)88 288 9739

www.deloitte.nl
   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Numbers: 333-74703, 333-81400, 333-84044, 333-127660, 333-128619, 333-128621, 333-140798, 333-145751, and 333-149577 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Numbers: 333-179685, and 333-179685-01on Form F-3and in Registration Statement Number: 333-108304, and 333-108304-01 on Form F-4 of our reports dated March 22, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of RBS Holdings N.V. and subsidiaries appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RBS Holdings N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2011.
  /s/ Deloitte Accountants B.V.

March 22, 2012
Stacey Latrell WIGGINS, DOC #109829, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1794

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Fact Sheet Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102-5090

July 8, 2010 Contact: Michael Stokke or Christine Quinn,

703-883-4056

E-mail: info-line@fca.gov

Website: www.fca.gov

Fact Sheet on Proposed Rule to Amend Regulations 

Related to Lending and Leasing Limits and Risk Management

The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) Board approved a proposed rule to ensure that Farm 

Credit System (FCS or System) institutions manage concentration risks in their lending and 

leasing portfolios. Managing concentration risk involves effectively measuring, limiting and 

monitoring exposures. FCA is proposing to change its rules in sections 614.4352, 614.4353, 

614.4354, and 614.4356 to accomplish all of the following:

1. Lower the lending and leasing limit on loans and leases to a single borrower or lessee

from the current limit of 25 percent to no more than 15 percent of an institution's lending 

and leasing limit base. The revised limit would apply to all System institutions with long-, 

intermediate-, and short-term lending authority under the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as 

amended.

2. Remove § 614.4354 pertaining to Federal Land Bank Associations since such 

associations have all been converted to direct-lending institutions.

3. Require the establishment of System institution board policies that would include all of 

the following elements:

a. A purpose and objective statement

b. Clearly defined and consistently used terms

c. Internal controls that define those authorities delegated to management, define 

those authorities retained for board action, address exceptions to the policy, and

describe reporting requirements

d. Quantitative factors to measure the following:

i. Loan concentrations with a single borrower

ii. Loan concentrations with borrowers in a single industry sector

iii. Loan concentrations with borrowers in a single counterparty

iv. Other concentration risks that may be unique to the institution because of 

its territory, the nature and scope of its activities, and its risk-bearing 

capacity

-more-
2

4. Require all System institutions (including those with title III cooperative lending authority)

to establish written policies within six months from the effective date of the regulations to 

effectively measure, limit and monitor exposures to concentration risks resulting from the 

institutions’ lending and leasing activities.

###
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2006



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. Dracup Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
I, Derek Ward, the President, CEO and Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc.. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  February 17, 2009/s/Derek WardBy:Derek WardPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer