7708 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 22, 2025 / Notices 

Gina Allery, Office of Tribal Justice, 950 

Penn Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20530, 

(202) 514–8812, gina.allery@usdoj.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Abstract: This rule establishes the 

procedures for an Indian tribe that is 

subject to Public Law 280 (18 U.S.C. 

1162(a)) to request that the United 

States accept concurrent criminal 

jurisdiction within the tribe’s Indian 

country, and for the Attorney General to 

decide whether to consent to such a 

request. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a previously approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Assumption of Concurrent Federal 

Criminal Jurisdiction in Certain Areas of 

Indian Country. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

1105–0091, Office of Tribal Justice. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as the 

obligation to respond: Affected Public 

State, local and tribal governments. The 

obligation to respond is voluntary. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: The total or estimated number 

of respondents fewer than 350 

respondents. 

The time per response is 80 hours. 

6. An estimate of the total annual 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: Ex: The total annual burden 

hours for this collection is 28,000 hours. 

7. An estimate of the total annual cost 

burden associated with the collection, if 

applicable: $1,174,058. 

TOTAL BURDEN HOURS

Activity Number of 

respondents 

Frequency 

(annually) 

Total annual 

responses 

Time per 

response 

(hours) 

Total annual 

burden 

(hours) 

Ex: Survey (individuals or households) ............................... 350 1 1 80 28,000 

Unduplicated Totals ............................................................. 350 ........................ 1 ........................ 28,000 

If additional information is required 

contact: Darwin Arceo, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W–218, 

Washington, DC. 

Dated: January 15, 2024. 

Darwin Arceo, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01404 Filed 1–21–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On January 16, 2025, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the District of Columbia in the 

lawsuit entitled United States v. Fayat 

S.A.S., et al., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv120. 

The United States filed a Complaint, 

on behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

against Fayat S.A.S. and its subsidiaries 

BOMAG GmbH, BOMAG Americas, 

Inc., BOMAG (China) Construction 

Machinery Co., Ltd., MARINI S.p.A., 

RAVO B.V., Charlatte of America, Inc., 

PTC S.A.S., Secmair S.A.S., and 

MATHIEU S.A. alleging violations of 

sections 203(a) and 213(d) of the Clean 

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522(a) and 7547(d), 

and implementing regulations, by their 

importation, introduction into 

commerce, and sale of nonroad 

equipment containing diesel engines 

that were not certified to model year 

engine emission standards. The 

Complaint also alleges related violations 

of labeling and reporting requirements 

and seeks civil penalties and 

appropriate injunctive relief. 

Under the proposed Consent Decree, 

the Defendants will pay a civil penalty 

of $11,000,000 and will complete a 

project to mitigate harm caused by 

excess nitrogen oxide and particulate 

matter emissions from the noncompliant 

engines. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States v. Fayat S.A.S., et 

al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–12522. All 

comments must be submitted no later 

than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Any comments submitted in writing 

may be filed by the United States in 

whole or in part on the public court 

docket without notice to the commenter. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined and downloaded at this 

Justice Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

If you require assistance accessing the 

proposed Consent Decree, you may 

request assistance by email or by mail 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 22, 2025 / Notices 7709 

to the addresses provided above for 

submitting comments. 

Jason A. Dunn, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01485 Filed 1–21–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Water 

Act 

On January 15, 2025, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the District of Idaho in the 

lawsuit entitled United States of 

America v. City of Driggs, Idaho, et. al. 

Civ. No. 4:22–cv–00444. 

The United States filed a complaint 

under the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’) 

against the City of Driggs, Idaho (‘‘the 

City’’) and State of Idaho seeking 

injunctive relief and civil penalties for 

violations of the requirements of the 

City’s National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System (‘‘NPDES’’) permit 

and violations of an administrative 

order with the Environmental Protection 

Agency (‘‘EPA’’). The proposed Consent 

Decree would resolve the claims in the 

complaint, require the City to perform 

injunctive relief measures to ensure 

future compliance, and require the City 

to pay a penalty of $400,0000. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States of America v. City 

of Driggs, Idaho, et. al. Civ. No. 4:22– 

cv–00444, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1– 

12596. All comments must be submitted 

no later than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Any comments submitted in writing 

may be filed by the United States in 

whole or in part on the public court 

docket without notice to the commenter. 

During the public comment period, 

the consent decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

If you require assistance accessing the 

consent decree, you may request 

assistance by email or mail to the 

addresses provided above for submitting 

comments. 

Kathryn C. Macdonald, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01480 Filed 1–21–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2006–0040] 

SGS North America, Inc.: Grant of 

Expansion of Recognition 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA 

announces the final decision to expand 

the scope of recognition for SGS North 

America, Inc., as a Nationally 

Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). 

DATES: The expansion of the scope of 

recognition becomes effective on 

January 22, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Information regarding this notice is 

available from the following sources: 

Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank 

Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of 

Communications, U.S. Department of 

Labor, telephone: (202) 693–1999; 

email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov. 

General and technical information: 

Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson, Director, 

Office of Technical Programs and 

Coordination Activities, Directorate of 

Technical Support and Emergency 

Management, Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration, U.S. Department 

of Labor, phone: (202) 693–2300 or 

email: robinson.kevin@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Notice of Final Decision 

OSHA hereby gives notice of the 

expansion of the scope of recognition of 

SGS North America, Inc. (SGS) as a 

NRTL. SGS’s expansion covers the 

addition of six test sites and one test 

standard to the NRTL scope of 

recognition. 

OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies 

that the organization meets the 

requirements specified in 29 CFR 

1910.7. Recognition is an 

acknowledgment that the organization 

can perform independent safety testing 

and certification of the specific products 

covered within the scope of recognition. 

Each NRTL’s scope of recognition 

includes (1) the type of products the 

NRTL may test, with each type specified 

by the applicable test standard; and (2) 

the recognized site(s) that has/have the 

technical capability to perform the 

product-testing and productcertification activities for test standards 

within the NRTL’s scope. Recognition is 

not a delegation or grant of government 

authority; however, recognition enables 

employers to use products approved by 

the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that 

require product testing and certification. 

The agency processes applications by 

a NRTL for initial recognition and for an 

expansion or renewal of this 

recognition, following requirements in 

Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This 

appendix requires that the agency 

publish two notices in the Federal 

Register in processing an application. In 

the first notice, OSHA announces the 

application and provides a preliminary 

finding. In the second notice, the agency 

provides the final decision on the 

application. These notices set forth the 

NRTL’s scope of recognition or 

modifications of that scope. OSHA 

maintains an informational web page for 

each NRTL, including SGS, which 

details the NRTL’s scope of recognition. 

These pages are available from the 

OSHA website at http://www.osha.gov/ 

dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html. 

SGS submitted five applications to 

OSHA to expand recognition as a NRTL. 

The first application was received on 

March 20, 2022 (OSHA–2006–0040– 

0084), requesting the addition of one 

test site in Brussels, Belgium. This 

application was revised on January 9, 

2024 (OSHA–2006–0040–0089) to 

update the address on the original 

application. The second expansion 

application was received on March 29, 

2022 (OSHA–2006–0040–0085), 

requesting the addition of one test site 

in Yokohama, Japan. This application 

was revised on May 9, 2024 (OSHA– 

2006–0040–0091) requesting an 

additional test standard in addition to 

the Yokohama site. The third expansion 

application was received on March 30, 

2022 (OSHA–2006–0040–0086), 

requesting the addition of one test site 

in Munich, Germany. This application 

was revised on January 9, 2024 (OSHA– 

2006–0040–0090) to update the address 

on the application to Puchheim, 

Germany. The fourth (OSHA–2006– 

0040–0087) and fifth (OSHA–2006– 

0040–0088) applications were received 

on April 1, 2022, requesting the 

addition of two test sites in New Taipei 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1