UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSIONWashington, D. C. 20549FORM 10-Q (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the first quarter ended March 31, 2008 ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to ___________ Commission File Number: 333-119742 TINTIC GOLD MINING COMPANY(Exact name of small business
issuer as specified in its charter)  NEVADA
87-0448400(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER ID NO.)3131 Teton Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah
84109(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)(801) 485-3939
(Issuer's telephone number, including area
code)   Check
whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes
[  ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. Large accelerated filer [
 ] Accelerated
filer [  ] Non-accelerated
filer [  ] Smaller reporting company [X] Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes [X]  No [  ] The
number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date: Class

Outstanding as of
April 30, 2008Common Capital Voting Stock,
$0.001 par value per share

2,109,643
shares FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial
Statements contain forward looking-statements. All statements made in this
Report or in another Report incorporated by reference that are not statements of
historical fact are forward-looking statements. These include but are not
limited to certain statements of expectation concerning the precious metals
industry, the demand for  precious metals,
and the sources and potential for a mining partner or joint venturer who would
be interested in financing or working with us to undertake an exploration
program on our 44 acres of mineral claims. We do not intend to forecast what may
or may not occur in the future, nor will we predict that any   particular
event may or may not occur. Management emphasizes that it can neither control
nor predict many of these risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, we caution the reader not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. Important factors
could cause actual results to differ from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements. PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item
1. Financial Statements.              TINTIC GOLD MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage Company]  UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  March 31, 2008                           2    TINTIC GOLD
MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage Company]     CONTENTS  PAGE  - Unaudited Condensed Balance Sheets, March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 4  - Unaudited Condensed Statements of
Operations, for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and
from inception of exploration stage
on December 31, 1997 through
March 31, 2008 5  - Unaudited Condensed Statements of
Cash Flows, for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and from inception
of exploration stage on December
31,1997 through March 31, 2008 6  - Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements 7
- 8                       3     TINTIC GOLD MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage Company]  UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET    March 31,
2008


December 31,
2007ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash
$
13,975

$
471Total
Current Assets

13,975


471$
13,975

$
471LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (DEFICIT)CURRENT LIABILITIES:Accounts
payable
$
3,836

$
436Related party
advances

16,210


1,210Accrued
interest - related party

15,000


15,000Total
Current Liabilities

35,046


16,646STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT):Common Stock, $.001
par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 2,109,643
shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

2,110


2,110Capital in excess of
par value

194,165


194,165Deficit accumulated
during the exploration stage

(217,346)


(212,450)Total
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)

(21,071)


(16,175)$
13,975

$
471                 The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.  4    TINTIC GOLD
MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage Company]  UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS    From inception ofexploration stageon December 31,For the Three Months
Ended

1997, throughMarch 31,

March 31,2008

2007

2008Revenues

$
                      -

$
                    -

$
                         -Total Revenues

-

-

-ExpensesGeneral & Administrative

4,896

2,966

150,025Failed acquisition costs

-

-

85,758Total Expenses

4,896

2,966

235,783Loss From Operations

(4,896)

(2,966)

(235,783)Other IncomeInterest Income

-

-

8,632Interest Expense

-

-

(44)Gain on Sale of Securities

-

-

8,084Total Other Income

-

-

16,672Loss Before Income Taxes

(4,896)

(2,966)

(219,111)Current Income Taxes (Benefit)

-

-

(1,765)Deferred Tax Expense

-

-

-Net Loss

$
             (4,896)

$
          (2,966)

$
           (217,346)Loss per Share

$
               (0.00)

$
           (0.00)           The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.  5    TINTIC GOLD
MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage Company]  UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS  From inception ofexploration stageon December 31,For the Period
Ended

1997, throughMarch 31,

March 31,

March 31,2008

2007

2008Cash flows used in operating
activities:Net income (loss)
$
     (4,896)

$
     (2,966)

$
          (217,346)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash
usedin operating activitiesNon-cash stock issued for services rendered
-

-

97,846Loss from sale of securities
-

-

(8,086)Change in operating assets and liabilities:Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
3,400

(48)

3,689Accrued liabilities - related party
-

-

15,000(Decrease) in income taxes payable
-

-

(565)Net cash used in operating activities
(1,496)

(3,014)

(109,462)Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of securities
-

-

(7,609)Proceeds from sale of securities
-

-

23,962Net cash flows provided by investing
activities
-

-

16,353Cash flows from financing activities:Proceeds from note payable - related party
-

-

3,501Proceeds from related party advances
15,000

-

16,210Proceeds from sale of common stock
-

-

55,000Net cash flows from financing activities
15,000

-

74,711Net increase (decrease)  in cash
13,504

(3,014)

(18,398)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
471

15,142

32,373Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
$
     13,975

$     12,128

$
            13,975Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow
Information:Cash paid during the periods for:Interest
$
              -

$
              -

$
                     -Income taxes
$
              -

$
              -

$
             3,565Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and
Financing Activities$
              -

$
              -     The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.  6      TINTIC GOLD MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage Company]  NOTES UNAUDITED TO
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  NOTE 1 -- ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  History and Nature
of Business -Tintic Gold Mining Company (the Company) was organized under
the laws of the State of Nevada on March 8, 2004 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Tintic Gold Mining Company (Parent), a Utah corporation, (now known as KIWA
Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation).  The Company was founded for the
purpose of continuing the exploration of the mining claims of its former Parent.
 On March 12, 2004 as part of an acquisition agreement, Parent acquired
KIWA Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation (KIWA).  Following the
organization of the Company, Parent transferred all of its mining claims to the
Company in exchange for 1,009,643 shares of the Companys common stock.
 The mining claims include three patented mining claims known as the
Emerald, Ruby and Diamond Lode Mining Claims located in the central portion of
the Tintic Mining District, Juab County, Utah.  Tintic Gold Mining
Company ("Parent") was incorporated in the State of Utah on June 14, 1933.
 Parent was incorporated for the purpose of mining, milling, ore reducing,
and smelting. At the time of its incorporation, Parent acquired certain patented
mining claims from the Emerald Mining Company, which mining claims the Company
continues to own.  These mining claims are located in the Tintic Mining
District of Juab County, Utah. Prior to December 31, 1997, the Parent was
dormant.  Condensed Financial
Statements.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
by the Company without audit.  In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at
March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the periods then ended have been made.  Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted.  It is suggested that these
condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Companys December 31, 2007 audited
financial statements.  The results of operations for the periods ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results
for the full year.  NOTE 2 - CAPITAL STOCK  Common Stock -The Company has authorized 50,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
value of $.001.  At March 31, 2008, there were 2,109,643 shares issued and
outstanding.        7     TINTIC GOLD MINING COMPANY [An Exploration Stage
Company]  NOTES UNAUDITED TO
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS   NOTE 3 - RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS  Related Party
Advances As of March 31, 2008 officers and shareholders of the Company had
advanced the Company a total of $16,210.  The advances bear no interest and
are due on demand.  Accrued Liabilities
-A shareholder of the Company has performed legal services for a total of
$15,000 which has been accrued for on the Companys books.  Management
Compensation - For the periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
did not pay any compensation to any officer or director of the Company.  Office Space -
The Company has not had a need to rent office space.  An officer of the
Company is allowing the Company to use his address, as needed, at no expense to
the Company.  NOTE 4 - GOING CONCERN  The accompanying
financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate
continuation of the Company as a going concern.  However, the Company was
only recently formed and has not yet been successful in establishing profitable
operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the
Company to continue as a going concern.  In this regard, management is
proposing to raise any necessary additional funds not provided by operations
through loans or through additional sales of its common stock or through a
possible business combination.  There is no assurance that the Company will
be successful in raising this additional capital or in achieving profitable
operations.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.  NOTE 5 - LOSS PER SHARE  The following data
shows the amounts used in computing loss per share:  For the Period EndedMarch 31,2008

2007Loss from continuing operations availableto common shareholders (numerator)

$
      (4,896)

$
    (2,966)Weighted average number of commonshares outstanding used in loss pershare for the period (denominator)

2,109,643

2,109,643  Dilutive loss per share
was not presented, as the Company had no common stock equivalent shares for all
periods presented that would affect the computation of diluted loss per
share.    8    Item 2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. Tintic
Gold Mining Company ("Tintic Gold," "Company," "we" or "us") is a start-up,
exploration stage mining company that has not yet generated or realized any
revenues from its business operations. As a precious metals mineral exploration
company, our goal is to obtain a partner or joint venturer with the funding and
expertise necessary to explore our patented mining claims known as the Emerald,
Diamond and Ruby Claims located in the Tintic Mining District of Juab County,
Utah, approximately one quarter of a mile from the town of Mammoth, Utah
(hereinafter "mineral claims") for their gold and zinc potential. These mineral
claims contain one fairly extensive mine or mining shaft called the Emerald Mine
and two other significant mines, shafts, holes or "prospecting pits," the depths
of which are currently unknown. For safety purposes, that is, to prevent
trespassers from injuring themselves, the Emerald Mine has been fenced off and
is currently inaccessible. At the same time, the shaft collar is also partially
blocked with debris and mine timbers. We
have an OTC Bulletin Board symbol which is TMGG.OB. Having
completed the first phase of our business plan and plan of operation that
involved getting a comprehensive geology report on our claims completed, we have
been in the position for sometime now of pursuing the second phase of our
business plan. This is the phase in which we are attempting to obtain a joint
venture mining exploration partner to finance and engage in the exploration of
our patented mining claims. Without summarizing all that we
have done over the last 31⁄2 years to attract and obtain a joint venture mining
exploration partner, in January of 2008, we contacted the EPA in an effort to
learn whether or not we, or a joint venture mining partner, would be required to
finance or undertake any special clean up or remediation of possible
contamination undertaken by others in the past, if that contamination were on or
near any exploratory activity that we undertake.  We asked this question
because we were under the impression that this possible requirement or
obligation may have scared off a fairly large Canadian mining company that,
during early 2007, had been interested in the Mammoth, Utah, area, an area where
our mineral claims are located.  The following summarizes the EPAs
response to our inquiry, a response we received by email on March 6, 2008: 1.   
The EPA isn't in the position of giving legal advice to a company suchas
yours wanting to conduct mining operations and the EPA does not
provide"comfort letters".2.    If your company
intends to mine in an area already contaminatedor that is part of a
Superfund site, you should refer to theprovisions of CERCLA including
section 122.  Unless we were enteringinto a settlement, the EPA is not
in the position to define exactly what acompany can or can not do in its
mining operations to avoid incurringliability - anything we said could be
open to interpretation and couldbe seen as limiting our enforcement
discretion and ability to enforceCERCLA.3.    If the
company does not cause or contribute to the release orthreat of release of
hazardous substances, it should be able to avoidincurring liability under
CERCLA.4.    We believe that your property is outside the
Eureka Superfund Siteboundary as it is currently defined.  We don't
believe that we haveconducted much if any sampling on your property or in
the vicinity ofyour property so it would be difficult to say whether or not
yourproperty is contaminated. For further information
concerning the progress we have made towards fulfilling our overall business
plan and plan of operation, reference is made to our Plan of Operation below.
Reference is also made to our last Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed in March
2008. As we disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we have had
serious difficulty attracting interest in our mining claims over the last 31⁄2
years.  Since this is NOT due to the enhanced prices of precious metals
since the early 2000s, we have come to believe that this lack of interest is
due to the fact that the land ownership in the Tintic Mining District is very
fragmented, meaning that ownership is held in the names of numerous, numerous
corporations and individuals, many possibly having conflicting ownership rights
and interests.  At the same time, we believe that a serious mining company
or joint venture mining partner would want to be able to tie up an extended or
large area or block of land.  Fragmented land ownership therefore means
that a mining company or joint venture partner would have to spend a lot of time
and energy on land and title work and, when all is said and done, may not be
able to lock up or amass a large block of land or claims.  Accordingly,
extensive land and title work in the overall area  9    of
our mineral claims is a significant expense, cost and drawback that a
prospective joint venture mining partner may NOT be willing to assume. We also believe that the
significant EPA presence in the Eureka, Utah, area, while it completes its
Superfund clean up operations, may also have a negative effect or impact on a
potential mining company or a joint venture mining partner, simply because they
may fear that the EPA might require them to do remediation of other operators
contamination that they wouldnt otherwise be required to do if the EPA were not
highly present and active in the area.  These are the two basic reasons, we
believe, why we have not yet attracted a joint venture mining exploration
partner.  There may be others. If we are unable to fulfill our
business plan and plan of operation, we may be forced to look at other business
opportunities for the Company, the form of which we cannot realistically predict
at this time.  This may include, however, but not be limited, to a change
of control transaction whereby our four (4) insiders and affiliates sell their
stock to persons with another direction for the Company, an amount of stock
which currently represents slightly less than 80% of the Companys total issued
and outstanding shares.  If this occurs and if new people taking control of
the Company did NOT want our mining claims or were concerned about potential
liability to the Company for continuing to hold and own our mining claims,
particularly with the EPAs current presence in the District, we do not know
what we would then do with our mining claims.  It is possible that the
claims could be assigned out in exchange for indemnifications or in exchange for
the excusing of Company debt.  All of this remains to be seen. Selected
Financial Data Because
we had no exploration or other operational mining-related activities during the
quarter that resulted in revenues, selected financial data would not be
particularly meaningful. Reference is thus made to our quarterly financial
statements included in Item 1 above. All of our activities during the quarter
were devoted towards locating a joint venture mining partner. Because
we were running out of capital at the end of our fiscal year, in January of this
year, 2008, four affiliates of us advanced or loaned the Company a total of
$15,000.  This new infusion of investment capital has given us the funding
to pay outstanding bills incurred in 2007 and to further finance our accounting
costs and fees and thus, our reporting obligations into the near future. After paying bills that had accumulated, the cash in our
checking account on March 31, 2008, was $13,975. We currently have $10,275 in
cash in our checking account.  After March 31, 2008, we paid our auditors
$3,500 for our 2007 audit and we also paid our in-house accountant $200 to
prepare our 2007 tax return.  We have no other outstanding bills or
payables that we are aware of as of the date of this report, other than what we
have accrued to our legal counsel. Liquidity
and Capital Requirements Even
with the additional $15,000 of investment capital that was loaned or advanced to
us from four (4) affiliates during our first quarter, we lack the necessary
capital to implement a full-fledged mineral exploration program. Since our
incorporation in Nevada in March 2004 and since the acquisition of our mineral
claims from our then-parent corporation, our working capital has been funded by
an investment made in us from our officers and directors and one
shareholder. Given
that we received a $15,000 cash infusion in January, we believe that we will
only be able to satisfy our cash requirements until the end of this fiscal year.
If more capital is needed by December of this year, these same officers,
directors and the one shareholder will make a further loan or advance to us. We
believe that within the next 18 months, we should be able to complete our
business plan. If not, we will know by then what it will take to complete it.
The ability to locate and "sign up" a joint venture partner or mining company
partner of some kind has so far been unsuccessful, and will depend upon a
variety of factors such as the price of gold and zinc over the next year or two,
the cost of mining exploration at that time, the ability of a joint venture
partner to tie up a lot of ground in the Tintic Mining District, the absence of
future EPA clean up plans in the District, the ability of a joint venture mining
partner to feel comfortable with what the EPA will require of them, and
possibly, interest rates, factors and circumstances that are beyond our  control and which cannot be predicted with any
certainty. We currently have no specific sources of financing, including bank,
private lending sources, or equity capital sources. We also cannot assure anyone
that we will be able to develop any joint venture partner sources in the future.
So far we have been unsuccessful.  Further, we are unable to guarantee that
at the expiration of 18 months from now, that individual members of management
will continue to advance us sufficient money to allow us to continue in our
reporting obligations. We do not mean to imply, however, that individual members
of management will NOT continue to advance us funds beyond the 18 months,
particularly if there is likelihood that we will be able to complete our
business plan if we continue beyond the next 18 months.  As it is, we are
starting to be concerned that the prospects of fulfilling our business plan look
bleak.  If that is indeed the case, we may
have to explore other possibilities for the Company, the form of which we cannot
now predict.  If nothing else, we may have to significantly modify our
business plan or take the Company in another direction. On
the other hand, it is also conceivable that we can locate a joint venture
partner within the next 18 months or, we might learn that we cannot locate a
joint venture partner within that time frame. If management does not desire to
loan or advance sufficient funds to continue beyond the next 18 months for the
simple reason that the prospects of our business plan look bleak, we may be
required to look at other business opportunities, the form of which we cannot
predict at this time as to do so would be highly speculative on our part. To
implement our business plan and engage in an exploratory drilling program on our
Emerald, Diamond and Ruby Claims, we will need substantial additional funding
and expertise from a strategic mining partner or joint venturer.   So far, we have exercised limited methods or plans of
contacting and seeking out such possible joint venture and partnership
candidates. As of the date of this Quarterly Report we have only contacted
perhaps half a dozen persons or entities that we believe would be interested in
so participating. See discussion under "Management's Plan of Operation" below.
At the same time, no assurance can be given that we can or will be able to enter
into a joint venture and or other partnership  10    relationship
necessary to fund the exploration of our mineral claims as contemplated in our
Plan of Operation below, namely, our proposed drilling exploration plan or
program.  At the present time, we lack the capital and have no interest or
other ability to raise the money necessary to carry out a mineral exploration
program of our own. We
have few assets and limited capital, with no operations and no current sources
of income. It
is anticipated that we will require only limited capital to maintain our
corporate viability and the funds necessary for this limited purpose will be
provided by officers and directors for at least the next 18 months or longer.
However, unless we are able to enter into a partnership or joint venture
relationship with an experienced mining entity willing to finance our intended
exploration, it is unlikely that we will be able to achieve our operational
goals. In such event, management will be forced to look at other business
opportunities, the form of which we cannot now predict. In
2002, the EPA declared the Eureka, Utah, area, approximately 3 miles from us, as
a "Super-Fund" site for lead contamination. The EPA is reputedly spending as
much as $40 million in clean-up costs. These clean-up efforts, so we are told,
should be completed within the next 2 to 3 years. Because our mineral claims are
not in Eureka and because we never had a mill or significant mining dump of any
kind on them, we believe that there is little likelihood that the EPA would ever
assess us for any historical pollution or contamination of any kind. Managements
Plan of Operation. As
per our agreement with Tintic-Utah, our former parent corporation, in
consideration for the distribution of our shares to shareholders of Tintic-Utah
on the record date of March 5, 2004, we have been conveyed the subsurface
mineral rights on approximately 44 acres of land located in the heart of the
Tintic Mining District of Juab County, Utah, near the town of Mammoth, Utah
(subject to a 3% net smelter royalty in favor of an individual named Chase
Hoffman). During the next twelve to eighteen months, we will attempt to identify
and contract with a mineral exploration company that will agree to search for
minerals that may underlie our Claims. During the time our search is in
progress, the small amounts of cash required to maintain our operations, as well
as the costs associated with the identification of and contracting with a
mineral exploration company partner, will be provided by what cash we now have
on hand and if that money is exhausted, by our officers and directors. Our
officers and directors have agreed to make the type of equity investment in us
that is necessary for us to complete our work sequences identified below. At the
same time, our officers and directors are NOT under any contractual obligation
with the Company to finance us; they are doing so because they want to. We do
NOT have any written agreement with them in this regard nor do we intend to
enter into one. Future funding by our officers and directors may come from the
exercise of options to purchase our common stock and/or through future
agreements between us and our officers and directors negotiated on terms
equivalent or better than those terms negotiated on an arms-length basis. As a
result, we do not believe there will be the need to raise additional funds
between now and the next 18 months, other than through our officers and
directors, if and when required. Since our officers and directors have agreed to
provide us with the funding necessary to complete our work sequences or
"milestones" identified below, work sequences that are essentially now
completed, we consider this a legal obligation to such extent simply because
investors and shareholders may rely on this funding commitment. Management
is NOT interested at this time in going to the expense or trouble of directly
raising, on a secondary offering or private placement basis, either $517,000 or
$2.141 million to engage in drilling exploration programs of our own  and without the participation of a joint
venture mineral exploration partner.  This is because we lack the expertise
and experience ourselves to implement and oversee such a large project. See the
paragraph below titled "The Phased Nature of Our Planned or Proposed Exploration
Program." We also believe and are informed that such a money raising effort
would be very expensive in terms of the cost thereof and we would rather spend
what limited resources we have on locating a mineral exploration joint venture
partner. We also have no idea what securities brokerage firm, if any, would
possibly be interested in underwriting such an effort. Since the increased price
of metals starting in early 2004 appears to have made the overall exploration
environment more financing-friendly (silver, for example, having attained a
price of over $20 per ounce and gold having attained a price of over $1,000 per
ounce) and based on the history of the Tintic Mining District, we believe that
it makes far more sense to do what is necessary to attract an experienced and
well financed mineral exploration partner or joint venturer. This is our basic
plan of operation at the present time. In
order to attract mineral exploration company partners and pursue an exploration
program of our mineral claims, we need a specific and realistic business plan
for this purpose. We therefore hired Mr. Bruce Yeomans, our expert and
consulting geologist, to prepare an extensive geology report. This task was
finally completed in 2005. Because Mr. Yeomans' report provides a comprehensive
evaluation of our properties, including exploration targets, we have included or
summarized portions of such report below. Our plan to explore our mineral claims now focuses on, based on such report, not
only evaluating certain specific exploration targets identified below but also
completing eight (8) separate work sequences identified below, the cost of which
shall be borne by us with what capital we have.  If not, current officers
and directors have communicated their commitment to fund the cost of these work
sequences, including the cost of paying future Edgarization, accounting and
legal fees and expenses, all by making an additional equity investment in
us. The
specific steps or sequence of events necessary to attract a mineral exploration
partner or joint venturer and otherwise implement a mineral exploration program
are: 1)
Locate the claim corners in the field so that property boundaries are known.
(This step was accomplished two or three years ago by our consulting geologist
when we commissioned his geology report. If we need more specific or exact
markers, we will hire a surveyor to do so. We anticipate that the cost would be
between $1,000 and $2,000. As of now, and unless requested or required by a
mineral exploration partner, we do not believe that this cost or expense will be
necessary.) 2)
Evaluate the status of adjacent mineral claims, so that investor interest will
not be limited to the three claims we hold. Several of the mineral targets trend
off of our claims. (The adjacent claims to which we refer are known as the Grand
Central Claims. While we have not thoroughly evaluated the status of these
adjacent claims, we know the owner and have been in discussions with the owner
over the last several years. This individual, who is also a geologist, has
indicated to us that he would be willing to work out a suitable arrangement with
a mineral exploration  11    partner,
if we can bring one to the table. There is no cost associated with this step or
sequence of events, as what information needs to be known about the Grand
Central Claims and their geology can and would be supplied by the owner.
Accordingly, this step or sequence is essentially complete.) 3)
Collect additional surface rock samples, as indicated by surface mapping or
inspection. If so indicated, sampling will be conducted in accessible portions
of the scattered surface mine diggings and in areas of exposed hydrothermal
alteration. Samples will be analyzed for gold, silver and "pathfinder" elements,
including arsenic and barium. Anomalous areas at the surface may indicate
"leakage" of hydrothermal fluids along faults and fault intercepts from
potential mineralized zones at depth. These areas will be incorporated into a
three-dimensional evaluation of the property for potential drill testing. (Based
on what our consulting geologist tells us, we are not aware that rock samples
are necessary to be obtained at this point. We believe that if an interested
mineral exploration partner is interested in our mineral claims, they would
likely want to do sampling themselves, as they would likely want to analyze the
results themselves. Having said this, our geologist would charge us by the hour
for sampling if necessary and then we would pay for assaying at a recognized
assaying laboratory. This, we believe, would cost between $1,000 and $2,000. We
are not aware that this step or work sequence is necessary at this time.) 4)
Update our more recent, April 24, 2005, report if necessary as a result of any
surface sampling. Contact and distribute the report to target groups familiar
with high-grade underground mineral exploration ventures. (This report was
authored by our consulting geologist and we know of nothing at this point that
would require us to update it. Accordingly, there is no cost that we know of at
the present time associated with this sequence of events or step. So far, we
have distributed our report to several large mining companies, namely, two large
U.S. mining companies and one large Canadian mining company headquartered in
Toronto. Our legal counsel also distributed the report to a Vancouver, Canada,
mining company and also, to a London, England-based mining company. We do not
believe it is appropriate to identify their names without their written
consent.) 5)
Keep abreast of ongoing EPA response activities in the District. (There is no
cost associated with this step or work sequence and we intend to do it ourselves
as an incident to our business. At the same time, our consulting geologist is
aware of EPA and Utah Department of Oil, Gas & Mining responses in the
district and he had indicated a willingness to communicate any changes to us if
they are material to us and our Plan of Operation.) 6)
Contact as many mining and mineral exploration companies as possible who we
believe might be interested in partnering or joint venturing with us to explore
our mineral claims. (This is a task that comprises the principal part of our
business plan at this stage and we have been doing it in the ordinary course of
our business. In late 2006, we had limited discussions with one large U.S.
mining company to whom we sent a copy of our geology report. In September of
2006, a project manager of this mining company accompanied us on a physical tour
of our property.) 7)
Conduct property tours with interested parties. (The only cost associated with
this step is whether we would be accompanied by our consulting geologist. If so,
we would pay him by the hour. The only additional cost is transportation. As
stated above, during September of 2006, we took an employee, actually a project
manager, of a large mining company on a tour of our mineral claims. Mr. Yeomans,
our geologist, was kind enough to accompany us.) 8)
Negotiate a mineral agreement to explore the mineral claims. (This task has
obviously not been accomplished and we believe that the only cost associated
with this might be attorney's fees, if in fact we got to the point where we
would need or want an attorney to review a draft agreement.) We
have NOT identified any one potential mineral exploration partner. There are
several large mining companies in the United States, Canada and elsewhere that
we believe may be interested in our mineral claims. Accordingly, there would be
no reason to target just one or two companies. As stated above, we have provided
our geology report to several mining companies, Canadian, American and British. In January of this year, our
president and chief executive officer had a discussion with another large mining
company headquartered in Idaho but it turned out that this company was similarly
NOT interested in the Tintic Mining District and thus, our properties. As of the date of this report,
we have had NO discussions with any mining or mineral exploration company about
entering into a joint venture agreement of any kind or nature.
 Furthermore, based on our lack of success in this regard over the last 31⁄2
years, we are not particularly optimistic that we will in fact be able to locate
and eventually enter into an agreement with a joint venture mining partner.
  As stated above, we are not sure why there is an overall lack of
interest in the Tintic Mining District by the mining industry, given the
increased prices of precious metals since the early 2000s, but that seems to be
the case.  If this situation continues, we will be forced to look at other
opportunities for the Company, the form of which we cannot at this time
predict.  Tintic
Gold Mining Company Exploration Targets. The
following discusses certain specific and suggested exploration targets on our
mineral claims that we currently believe would be suitable for exploration. We
believe by identifying such targets, we have done significant work, in advance,
on behalf of a potential or prospective mineral exploration partner or joint
venturer. 1.
Background. The
limited past development and production to date from our claims is in part due
to the fact that the stratigraphic (i.e., geology dealing with the earth's
strata) and structural controls to ore formation were not well understood when
the Emerald Mine was originally dug or excavated. The Emerald Mine exploration
and most of the District's exploration and development work was completed
(1880's to 1920's) before G. W. Crane ("Crane"), an engineer for U.S. Smelting
and Refining, compiled the first district-wide mapping in 1930. U.S. Smelting
and Refining owned and operated the Centennial-Eureka Mine, the largest producer
of gold and copper in the District. After reaching an agreement with the
numerous independent mine owners in the Main Tintic District, Crane was
authorized to determine stratigraphic and structural controls to ore deposit
formation by mapping each mine. For the first time in the District's history,
but unfortunately after the District was into the end of its  productive  12    life,
ore controls on mineralization that crossed property boundaries were determined.
Centurion Mines Corporation, a former lessee of our mineral claims, built on
Crane's work in the late 1980's and early 1990's, by having access to all of his
underground mapping and sampling. Crane's ore controls were evaluated within the
more newly developed understanding of the structural complexities of wrench
fault systems, systems that are prevalent in the Tintic Mining District. Exploration
work relating to our Emerald Mine intersected scattered weak mineralization on
all levels of the mine but not in large enough quantities to contribute to
significant development or production. Favorable gold values were reported on
the 600 foot level of the mine and were documented and evaluated by geologist,
G.W. Crane during his District-wide ore controls evaluation. Crane felt that
this mineralization was evidence of the southerly continuation of the Centennial
Ore Channel mined in the Grand Central and Centennial-Eureka Mines. Crane wrote
in an internal report to U.S. Smelting and Refining: "The
Emerald Mine happens to be at the extreme southern, or gold/copper end of the
Gemini or Centennial Channel, the largest producer of five major ore zones, and
for this and other reasons, is due to become a producer of ore consisting of
gold. On the same fissure, to which recent developments in the Emerald Mine have
been directed, ore bodies on the lower levels of the Grand Central Mine have
their principle values in gold and copper, indicating the trend in the direction
of the Emerald." (G. Crane, March 28, 1933). 2.
Generalized Exploration Targets on the Tintic Gold Claims. The
majority of all Tintic Main District ore is preferentially developed within only
five of the numerous Paleozoic carbonate formations that have been found to be
present in the District. Of these units, a formation named the Ajax Formation
has hosted most of the copper-gold production in the District. The Ajax
Formation crops out extensively on the Tintic Gold mineral claims group and is
cut by intersecting faults which are known to be mineralized in the Emerald Mine
workings and in the adjacent Grand Central, Mammoth and Centennial-Eureka Mines.
The Ajax Formation on our claims is near vertical to steeply west dipping and
lies on the western limb of the broad Tintic Syncline. The most persistently
mineralized portion of the formation is the Emerald Unit which lies in the lower
half of the 640 foot thick Ajax Formation. The Emerald is a medium grained
grayish-white colored massive dolomite bed that lies about 100 to 180 feet above
the base of the unit and averages about 30 feet thick. Ore mined in the deepest
portions of the Grand Central (Grand Central Ore Channel) and Centennial-Eureka
Mines (Oklahoma Stopes) which are located directly north of the Tintic Gold
ground, is also hosted by the Ajax Formation. In those mines, however, the Ajax
Formation dips about 45 degrees to the north and the bedding conformable ore is
subhorizontal since they lie near the axial plane of the syncline at a mine
depth of from 1,900 to 2,300 feet. We
believe, at the present time, that the up dip extension of the mineralized Ajax
host in the Grand Central and Centennial-Eureka Mines is the best exploration
target on our claims. The Ajax Formation -- especially the Emerald member -- is
cross cut by the ore controlling, generally steeply west dipping, north trending
sinistral faults, namely, the Iron Break Fissure (Grand Central and
Centennial-Eureka Mines), the West Break Fissure (Grand Central Mine), the West
Mammoth Split Fault (Mammoth Mine), the Mammoth Fault (Mammoth Mine) and the
Grand Central Fault (Grand Central Mine). The sinistral or northerly trending
faults provide the conduits and structural preparation for
potential ore development in the reactive and brittle carbonates that are
present there. We believe that these faults in the Ajax Formation are especially
good targets for exploration where they are intersected by east-west faults. 3.
Specific Exploration Targets on the Tintic Gold Mineral Claims. On
the 600 Level (6,224 feet above mean sea level ("amsl")) of the Emerald Mine,
southeast of the shaft (6,830 feet amsl), a winze was sunk on a vein of gold
bearing quartz in the Ajax Formation. The vein is reported by G. Crane to have
positive gold assays in the winze and small sublevel drift. The vein lies on the
intersection of the east-west striking 245 Fissure in the Emerald Mine and the
sinistral, northeast striking Iron Break Fissure which carries 2 to 3 opt silver
in the Centennial-Eureka Mine 1800 foot level drift (4,935 feet amsl). The Iron
Break Fissure controls north trending ore deposition in the Opohonga Formation
in the Grand Central Mine 1300 to 1800 foot levels (5,828 to 5,347 feet amsl)
and in the large westerly trending Ajax Formation stopes on the 2000 to 2300
foot levels (5,147 to 4,845 feet amsl). Crane believed that this intersection
and the gold-bearing quartz was the top of an irregular ore pipe that was 5 to 6
feet in diameter where exposed in the workings. He felt that additional
prospecting should be conducted below this mineralization in the Ajax and Opex
Formation carbonates. On
the Emerald 600 Level (6,224 feet amsl), drifting on the level to the south of
the quartz vein described above cut various positive gold results approximately
350 feet and 950 feet away in the Ajax and underlying Opex Formations. The
lowest of the assay results was on the lower Ajax formation probably on a fault
but it is not described. The higher or more positive assay value is on a
north-north east striking 60 to 72 degree west dipping fault where it is cut by
an east-west striking fault. Another positive gold result was collected by Crane
on the 600 Emerald Level where the same south drift in the Ajax Formation
crosses into the underlying Opex Formation. We believe that these scattered gold
values found by Crane deserve testing for potential bonanza grade mineralization
in the receptive lower Ajax and underlying Opex Formation carbonates. We
also believe that the 1300 foot long by 1000 foot wide exploration gap between
the southwestern-most stopes on the Grand Central Mine 2000 to 2300 foot levels
(5,147 to 4,845 feet amsl) and the northern-most drifts on the Emerald 700, 900
and 1000  foot levels (6,124, 5,924 &
5,824 feet amsl) should be evaluated. The northeast trending steeply west
dipping West Break (Grand Central Mine), Iron Break Fissure (Grand Central and
Centennial-Eureka Mines), and West Mammoth Split (Mammoth Mine) should be
tested, especially where they are cut by the steeply dipping east-west striking
cross faults. We believe that the prime area for exploration and possible ore
development in this exploration gap is at fault intersections which occur in the
Ajax Formation as it dips towards the Grand Central stopes. If
the reader needs assistance on our use of technical, geologic or mining terms,
reference is made to our seventh amended registration statement on Form SB-2
filed with Commission in early October 2006 which contains a heading titled
"Glossary of Terms to Assist the Reader in Understanding Technical
Terminology."  13    The
Phased Nature of Our Planned or Proposed Exploration Program. The
following discussion sets forth the two phase exploration program that we would
recommend or which we would suggest to an interested joint venture exploration
partner: A
two phase exploration program is recommended and which may involve a total
expenditure of US $2,658,000. We believe our claims have excellent targets for
drill testing as shown by geology, structural controls to known mineralization,
and historic underground sampling results in the Ajax and Opex Formations. The
program would utilize both reverse circulation and core drilling to confirm the
presence, tenor and characteristics of mineralization indicated in the historic
underground sampling results. An
initial surface drilling program of ten reverse circulation drill holes
approximately 840 feet deep would target the 1,000 foot long area of gold
anomalous ground intersected on the Emerald 600 foot level. This area is located
east and southeast of the Emerald Shaft. The drill holes would be collared to
test areas of historic high grade gold sampled by Crane in the late 1920's. Two
additional reverse circulation drill holes would be collared to test the
northeast extension of potential mineralization along the Iron Break Fissure,
located northeast of the Emerald Shaft. Results of historic sampling in the
Centennial-Eureka Mine workings by Crane indicate significant silver
mineralization on the fissure. Drill holes collared in this area would have
completion depths of approximately 1,000 feet and would also test the
prospective Ajax Formation located above the mineralized fissure. Drill holes in
this program would be spaced relatively close to one another because of the
discrete, high-grade nature of mineralization in the Tintic District. Prior
to drilling, patented claim corners would be reestablished in the field using a
licensed surveyor to ensure project activities are conducted within our claims'
boundaries. Surface rock chip samples should be collected by a qualified person
from the scattered cuts and altered rocks that crop out on the property to
determine the potential for additional drill targets. Upon
conclusion of the first phase of exploration, data compilation and analysis,
interpretive drawing of geology, grade and mineralized envelopes in sections and
plans should be completed. Initial metallurgical studies would also be
conducted. The second phase drilling program is contingent upon the compiled
results from the initial drill program. Second
phase drilling, provided that the first phase is successful, would target and
expand on mineralized areas intersected in the first phase of drilling and
should include both core and reverse circulation drilling. Core drilling
provides a better sampling media and a better control for structural analyses,
engineering and metallurgical studies, and on geology. The drilling program
should include a rigorous QA/QC program which includes blanks, repeats,
standards, paired assays and variance studies to ensure that sample preparation
and analytical protocols are not adding unreasonable variance to assay data.
More detailed feasibility and metallurgical studies would also be completed
during this phase and include mineral speciation, mineral liberation/ recovery
and waste stream evaluations.  The
recommended budget for Phase I is US $517,000. The recommended budget for Phase
II is US $2,141,000. If feasibility studies conducted as part of Phase II
indicate the economic viability of mining zones intersected in drilling, then
mine development will probably require the construction of underground access to
develop the claims.  14      Recommended
Phase I Expenditures Item

Expenses in US$Drilling:
Reverse Circ: 10 holes, 8400 ft @ $45/ft

$
378,000Roads and
sites

$
7,500Reclamation

$
8,500Bonding

$
20,000Assays:
FA/AA, 1680 samples @ $25

$
42,000Supplies:
splitter, boxes, bags, etc.

$
5,000Geological
Consultants 1 @ 2 months @ $8000/mo

$
16,000Resource
Estimate

$
10,000Lodging,
meals, expenses

$
5,000Contingency
+/- 5%

$
24,600TOTAL
PHASE I RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURE

$
516,600  Recommended
Phase II Expenditures Item

Expenses in US$Drilling:
Reverse Circ: 20 holes, 20000 ft @ $45/ft

$
900,000Core-HQ-size:
10 holes, 10,000 ft @ $65/ft

$
650,000Roads and
sites

$
15,000Reclamation

$
18,000Bonding

$
40,000Assays:
FA/AA, 6000 samples @ $25

$
150,000Supplies:
splitter, boxes, bags, etc.

$
20,000Geological
Consultants 3 @ 4 months @ $8000/mo

$
96,000Resource
Estimate and Engineering Studies

$
100,000Lodging,
meals, expenses

$
50,000Contingency
+/- 5%

$
101,950TOTAL
PHASE II RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURE

$
2,140,950   The
foregoing recommended expenditures are estimates devised by our consulting
geologist. We have no way of predicting, at this time, whether these estimates
are too high or too low. We have simply come up with these estimates in order to
give a prospective exploration program partner or joint venturer an initial idea
of what it might be looking at spending on any such program(s). Phased
Exploration Plan and How the Results of Prior Phases Will Determine Whether to
Proceed with Further Phases. Surface
exploration work is conducted first, with the purpose of generating valid
drilling targets. Prospecting work is done on the ground by a field geologist to
identify areas with high metal content and showing the signs of hydrothermal
alteration. These data are then compiled on to maps and a report is prepared.
Meetings with the geologist, project manager, property owner and the joint
venture partner would then be held. If the decision is made to conduct the
drilling program, a budget is set up and then managed and administered by the
project manager. Drilling
is the most effective way to locate the suspected mineral deposits that could
occur beneath our claims. Samples of the drill cuttings are collected for each 5
foot to 10 foot drill interval. These samples are labeled as to hole number and
depth and stored in plastic or cloth bags. In addition, a small reference sample
of each 10 foot interval is placed in a chip tray with several compartments. The
drill cuttings are carefully logged by a geologist and a description of each
drill hole is prepared. This description includes the rock type and any evidence
of mineralization or hydrothermal alteration. Based on this inspection,
promising samples are selected for assaying and submitted to a certified
commercial laboratory. All available information is then reviewed by the
geologist. Particular attention is paid to any promising assays, the depth of
any mineral deposits and the potential size of the deposit. A report is then
prepared which discusses the potential mineral deposit, the risks involved and
additional recommended work. If drilling is recommended at the drill sites, the
footage and estimated costs are also included. Another meeting with all the
involved parties is then held and a decision would be made as to whether or not
Phase II drilling, or other additional work, would be conducted. The
determination as to whether to proceed with further phases upon the completion
of each phase will be made by those persons financing the same.  15    Locating
an Exploration Program Joint Venturer or Partner and Plan to Contract with such
Joint Venturer or Partner. Our
plan to contract with a mining company or mineral exploration partner, upon
completion of the forgoing work sequences, includes: *
An investigation of mining and mineral exploration companies, which are
currently operating in the general area of our mineral claims. This
investigation may include the use of industry databases, as well as the
investigation of governmental records and industry experts. We do not expect
this cost to exceed $2,500. *
Initial discussions with those potential mineral exploration company partners as
determined from our investigation. We do not expect this cost to exceed $5,000. *
Contract negotiations with an interested mineral exploration partner. We do not
expect the costs, legal or otherwise, to exceed $10,000. Though no formal
agreement exists between us and our current officers and directors, our current
officers and directors have agreed to fund the costs of such plan to the extent
that these costs do not exceed $25,000. If we are able to contract with a
mineral exploration company, we anticipate that all expenses for exploration and
possible exploitation of our mineral claim properties will be borne by the
mineral exploration company and not by us. In return, we would receive a royalty
fee based on a percentage of the proceeds from the sale of those minerals the
mining or mineral exploration company may recover from our properties. It
is noteworthy that even if we were to complete a successful mineral exploration
program and we successfully identify a mineral deposit (something to which there
can be no assurance whatsoever), we will nonetheless have to obtain substantial
additional funds from a joint venture partner in order to undertake further
drilling and engineering studies (i.e., development) to determine if that
mineral deposit does in fact have commercial viability and if so, how the same
can be extracted through an actual mining extraction program. In short, there
are three phases to mining: exploration, development, and extraction.
Accordingly, if in fact we embark upon and undertake a successful exploration
program, we will still be required to complete the second phase, namely, that of
"developing" the claims in order to determine if it is commercially feasible to
embark upon the final phase, namely, actual mineral extraction. We
are unable to make any guarantees that: *
we will be able to identify and negotiate an arrangement with a mining or
mineral exploration company within the next twelve to eighteen months, *
our mineral claim properties will be found attractive to a prospective mining
company partner, *
we will be able to attract sufficient outside funding or financing necessary to
undertake and complete an exploration program, or *
if commercial quantities of mineralization are found after an exploration
program is carried out, that our properties would produce any saleable minerals
or metals that would result in our receiving any income. While
we believe that such opportunities can be investigated, reviewed and consummated
for minimal costs, we cannot give any assurances that related costs will be
minimal or that we can ultimately afford them or, that our officers, directors
or significant shareholders will agree to continue to make the continued equity
investments necessary to do so. As
disclosed above, in over the last 31⁄2 years, we have had no success getting a
potential joint venture mineral exploration partner interested in our claims.
 Considering the enhanced prices of precious metals since the early 2000s,
we do not know why this is the case.  Having said this and based on the
expense of continuing as a reporting public company, we cannot continue
indefinitely looking for a joint venture partner to no avail.  Employees. We
have no employees. Our officers and directors serve our company without
receiving a salary. However, from time to time as appropriate, they may receive
expense reimbursements and possible stock options. Though we have no formal
written agreement in place, our office space and administrative support is
provided by Mr. George Christopulos, our Chairman of the Board, President, and
CEO out of his home. Other than those costs and expenses previously discussed,
we do not plan on any significant expenditures for new projects of any sort
within the next twelve to eighteen months. Future
Need to Obtain a Mineral Exploration Permit from DOGM. In
the event that we obtain the mining partners or joint venturers necessary to
engage in a mineral exploration program, we, or our partner(s), will have to
incur the added expense of going through the state regulatory process necessary
to obtain the requisite mining exploratory permits. We do not at this time know
the cost of going through the permitting process; however, based on our legal
counsel's discussions with the Utah Department of Oil, Gas & Mining (DOGM),
we do not believe this cost would be substantial. We would hope that any
exploration partner or joint venturer we enter into business with will have gone
through this process before and will thus have the staff, know-how, and other
resources and capabilities to proceed through this process quickly and
efficiently. The permitting process in this regard directly affects our Plan of
Operation because it requires the expenditure of additional funds, funds in
addition to those necessary to actually explore our mineral claims.  Item 3.  Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.  This item is not applicable to
smaller reporting companies.  16    Item
4(T). Controls and Procedures. We
maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Based upon our evaluation of those controls and procedures
performed as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief
executive officer and the principal financial officer (or persons performing
similar functions) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective. As a result of its evaluation, we have made no significant changes in
our internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect the
controls and other procedures already in place. Management's
Quarterly Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Management of the Company is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Our
internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our
management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements.  All internal controls over financial reporting, no matter
how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human
error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.  Therefore, even
effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable,
and not absolute, assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation.  Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness
of internal controls over financial reporting may vary over time. Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may also fail to
prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.  Our management, including our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2008.  In making its assessment of
internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework .  Based on this
evaluation, our management concluded that, as of March 31, 2008, our internal
control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Changes
in internal control over financial reporting.  There have been no changes in internal control over
financial reporting.  PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item
1. Legal Proceedings. None. Item 1A.  Risk Factors. This item is not applicable to
smaller reporting companies. Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. No
shares were issued during the quarter. Item
3. Defaults upon Senior Securities. None. Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. None. Item
5. Other information.  None. Item
6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. (a)
Exhibits 31 302
Certification of George P. Christopulos  17    32 906
Certification (b)
Reports on Form 8-K None.  SIGNATURES Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Issuer has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized. TINTIC GOLD MINING COMPANY(Issuer)   Date:
May 8,
2008

By:
/s/George
P. ChristopulosGeorge
P. ChristopulosChairman
of the Board  Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this
Report has also been signed below by the following person on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.    Date:
May 8,
2008

By:
/s/George
P. ChristopulosGeorge
P. ChristopulosChairman
of the Board       18