alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joel Lincoln WEINHOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-725

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Leslie G. LOWE

1160916 (CR-16-0777)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
No. 29,890.

#### The City of Eureka, *Appellee,*v. The Kansas Electric Power Company, *Appellant.*

(3 P. 2d 484.)

Opinion denying a rehearing filed October 10, 1931.

(For original opinion of affirmance, see *ante,*p. 238, 299 Pac. 938.)

*Gilbert H. Frith,*of Emporia, *Thomas C. Forbes,*of Eureka, and *Raymond F. Rice,*of Lawrence, for the appellant.

*J. Fred Darby,*of Eureka, *E. H. Rees, O. T. Atherton*and *W. L. Huggins,*all of Emporia, for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sloan, J.:

The petition for rehearing in this case presents and argues questions, with one exception, that were considered and disposed of in the written opinion.

It is insisted in the petition for rehearing that the court should direct the trial court to make a specific finding as to whether the two per cent charge was allowed by the utilities commission as an item of operating expense. The judgment of the trial court was not an accounting between the parties. It only directed the appellant to open its books to the audit of the city in so far as the books covered the five-year period immediately preceding the beginning of the action, and the further judgment is:

> “It is further ordered that, upon the audit of said books, further hearing be had herein by the court for the purpose of determining the amount of the recovery to which the plaintiff is entitled herein.”

Under this judgment the trial court retained full jurisdiction to determine the amount, if any, the appellee should recover from the appellant. The trial court, therefore, has jurisdiction on the further hearing of this case to make an equitable accounting between the parties, charging the appellee with any consideration it may have received on the two per cent franchise charge.

The motion for rehearing is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2514

DEBORAH D. HARDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OCONEE COUNTY; OCONEE COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE;

OCONEE COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE; OCONEE

COUNTY SUPERVISOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA03-4114-8-26-B1)

Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 14, 2005

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborah D. Harden, Appellant Pro Se. James William Logan, Jr.,

LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Deborah D. Harden seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss one claim, granting

Harden leave to amend another claim, and recommitting the matter to

the magistrate judge. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The order Harden seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ORDER FOR RULE 2004 EXAMINATION PAGE 1 OF 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

_____________________________________

In Re: 

CARL GERARD DORVIL, 

Debtor. 

_____________________________________

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

 Case No. 23-30771-sgj7 

ORDER GRANTING RULE 2004 MOTION FOR PRODUCTION 

OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

On this day, came on for consideration the Rule 2004 Motion for Production of 

Documents from the Internal Revenue Service [Docket No. 64] (the “Motion”) filed on October 

20, 2023, by Jeffrey H. Mims, Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”). Having considered the Motion, 

the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED to the extent set out below. It is therefore 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as set out below; it is further

ORDERED that the Internal Revenue Service shall produce for examination and 

copying, all tax returns filed by the Debtor since January 1, 2015, including any and all tax

transcripts maintained by the Internal Revenue Service for the Debtor. 

### END OF ORDER ### 

Signed November 17, 2023

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-30771-sgj7 Doc 88 Filed 11/20/23 Entered 11/20/23 11:19:01 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
ORDER FOR RULE 2004 EXAMINATION PAGE 2 OF 2 

Order submitted by:

Charles B. Hendricks

State Bar No. 09451050

CAVAZOS HENDRICKS POIROT, P.C.

Suite 570, Founders Square

900 Jackson Street

Dallas, TX 75202

Direct Dial: (214) 573-7302 

Email: chuckh@chfirm.com 

Attorneys for Jeffrey H. Mims, Chapter 7 Trustee

Case 23-30771-sgj7 Doc 88 Filed 11/20/23 Entered 11/20/23 11:19:01 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### NUMBER S 13 - 2 1 - 0 0 038 - CV , 13 - 21 - 00039 - CV, 13 - 21 - 00040 - CV, 13 - 21 - 00 0 41 - CV, 13 - 21 - 00042 - CV, 13 - 21 - 00043 - CV, & 13 - 21 - 00044 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOHNNY PARTAIN , Appellant , v. COMPASS BANK , ET AL. , Appellee s .

_

___________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 332 nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa , and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
Appellant Johnny Partain , proceeding pro se, appeals separate judgments and/or orders in the foregoing cause numbers

. 1 These matters are before the Court for

1 The se appeals each arise from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas , and consist of the following : (1) No. 13

- 21

- 00038

- CV , Johnny Partain v. Compass Bank ; (2) No. 13

- 21

- 0 0 039

- CV , Johnny Partain v
. J. E. Eddie Guerra, Carlos Gonzalez, Homer Jasso Sr., Rene Guerra, Rodolfo Gonzalez, Sergio2 appellant’s failure to remit a filing fee. On March 9 , 202 1 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee in each appeal

. The clerk notified appellant that the appeal s w ere subject to dismissal if the f iling fee s w ere not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b), (c). This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution or because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC , 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice s and has failed to pay the filing fee s for these appeals . Accordingly, the appeal s
are dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b), (c).

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 27th day of May, 2021.

Valdez, Guadalupe Trevino, and County of Hidalgo ; (3) No. 13

- 21

- 00040

- C V , Johnny Partain v . Judge Manuel Banales ; (4) No. 13

- 21

- 00041

- CV, Johnny Partain v. Judge Robert Blackmon ; (5) No. 13

- 21

- 00042

- CV, Johnny Partain v . State o f Texas ; (6) No. 13

- 21

- 00043

- C V , Johnny Partain v . Mc A llen Police Chief Victor Rodriguez, In His Official And Individual Capacities, a nd The City o f Mc A llen ; a nd (7) No. 13

- 21

- 00044

- C V , Johnny Partain v . Fire Insurance Exchange

.
# C_2016243EN.01004602.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/46

---

Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Biogena Naturprodukte v EUIPO (ZUM wohl)

(Case T-236/16)

(2016/C 243/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Biogena Naturprodukte GmbH & Co KG (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: I. Schiffer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark including the word elements ‘ZUM wohl’ — Application No 13 666 871

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 in Case R 1982/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare that the sign applied for under the number 013 666 871 be allowed to proceed to registration as an EU trade mark in respect of all the goods and services in Classes 29, 30, 32 and 43 for which registration is sought in the application of 23 January 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the sign applied for under the number 013 666 871 be allowed to proceed to registration as an EU trade mark in respect of all the goods and services in Classes 29, 30, 32 and 43 for which registration is sought in the application of 23 January 2015;

| — | order EUIPO to pay all the costs which the applicant for the EU trade mark has incurred as a result of the application procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay all the costs which the applicant for the EU trade mark has incurred as a result of the application procedure;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graham R. Hughes, the Chief Financial Officer of Quantum
Solar Power Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

| | By:    | /s/
      Graham R. Hughes                      
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                 
| | Name:  | GRAHAM R. HUGHES                                
| |        |                                                 
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        |                                                 
| | Date:  | November 9, 2010                                
| |        |                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1094
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 14 PageID 1095
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 3 of 14 PageID 1096
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 4 of 14 PageID 1097
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 5 of 14 PageID 1098
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 6 of 14 PageID 1099
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 7 of 14 PageID 1100
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 8 of 14 PageID 1101
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 9 of 14 PageID 1102
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 10 of 14 PageID 1103
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 11 of 14 PageID 1104
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 12 of 14 PageID 1105
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 13 of 14 PageID 1106
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00001-M Document 60 Filed 03/29/06 Page 14 of 14 PageID 1107
Fact Sheet Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102-5090

April 8, 2010 Contact: Michael Stokke or Christine Quinn,

703-883-4056

E-mail: info-line@fca.gov

Web site: www.fca.gov

Proposed Rule on Loan Purchases from FDIC

The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) proposes an amendment to its regulations to allow Farm 

Credit System (System) institutions with direct-lending authority to purchase loans from the

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). In accordance with the eligibility and scope-offinancing requirements that are contained in the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended, and 

FCA regulations, System institutions would be allowed to purchase loans made to farmers, 

ranchers, aquatic producers or harvesters of aquatic products, and eligible cooperatives. 

FCA is proposing this rule in response to questions from the FDIC, System institutions, and 

others as to whether System institutions could provide a source of credit and liquidity to farmers 

whose operations are financed with agricultural or cooperative loans affected by commercial 

bank failures.

The proposed rule would:

1. Permit System institutions with direct-lending authority to purchase individual, or pools 

of, eligible loans from the FDIC.

2. Require due-diligence reviews before and after the loan purchases to determine if the 

loans meet the eligibility and scope-of-financing requirements of the Act and FCA 

regulations.

3. Require that a System association obtain approval from its funding bank for individual 

loans or pools of agricultural loans that exceed 10 percent of the association’s total 

capital.

4. Require the System institution to offer membership status to borrowers whose loans are 

purchased, provided the loans meet the eligibility and scope-of-financing requirements of 

the Act and FCA regulations.

5. Require System institutions to provide borrower rights to borrowers with distressed 

agricultural loans.

6. Require divestiture, when financially feasible, of loans purchased (a) that are ineligible or 

(b) that are eligible but whose borrowers elect not to become members of the System 

institution.

7. Allow System institutions, which have authority to make long-term mortgage loans or 

short- and intermediate-term production loans, to purchase loans outside their chartered 

territory without receiving permission to do so from the System institutions in whose 

territories the loans are held. However, the purchasing System institutions would be 

required to notify these institutions of the purchase.
Antonio GUALANDI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0825

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
HAYWARD PLLC

Melissa S. Hayward

Texas Bar No. 24044908

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

Zachery Z. Annable

Texas Bar No. 24053075

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106

Dallas, Texas 75231

Tel: (972) 755-7100

Fax: (972) 755-7110

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

In re:

HIGHLAND SELECT EQUITY FUND GP, L.P.,

Debtor.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Chapter 7

Case No. 23-31039-mvl7

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR

SERVICE OF NOTICES AND OTHER PAPERS

Zachery Z. Annable of Hayward PLLC, as counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

(“HCMLP”), appears in the above-captioned bankruptcy case (the “Bankruptcy Case”). Pursuant 

to Rules 2002 and 9007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Mr. Annable requests that 

all notices, motions, pleadings, orders, plans, and disclosure statements filed, served, or entered in 

this Bankruptcy Case be served upon him at the following address:

Zachery Z. Annable

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106

Dallas, Texas 75231

This Notice of Appearance and Request for Service of Notices and Other Papers (the 

“Notice of Appearance”) is not a waiver of any rights, including, without limitation, the right: (i) 

to have final orders in non-core matters entered only after de novo review by a judge of the 

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 25 Filed 07/14/23 Entered 07/14/23 12:26:39 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

appropriate United States District Court; (ii) to trial by jury in any proceeding so triable in this 

Bankruptcy Case or any case, controversy, or proceeding related to this Bankruptcy Case; and (iii) 

to have the United States District Court withdraw the reference in any matters subject to mandatory 

or discretionary withdrawal.

Dated: July 14, 2023

HAYWARD PLLC

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable

Melissa S. Hayward

Texas Bar No. 24044908

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

Zachery Z. Annable

Texas Bar No. 24053075

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106

Dallas, Texas 75231

Tel: (972) 755-7100

Fax: (972) 755-7110

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P., 

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 25 Filed 07/14/23 Entered 07/14/23 12:26:39 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 4.1

                             SUBSCRIPTION FOR SHARES


TO:     The  Board  of  Directors  of
     CYPACIFIC  TRADING  INC.
     (the  "Company")


The  undersigned hereby subscribes for 2,000,000 Common Shares without par value
in  the  capital  of  the  Company  and  encloses herewith the payment of $2,000
payable  to  the  Company  in  respect  of  such  shares.

The  share  certificate  should  be  made  out  to:

     Name:        Andrew  Seokwoo  Lee

     Address:     6874  Radisson  St.
                  Vancouver,  B.C.  V6S  3W9




DATED  as  of  the  30th  day  of  April  2003.


/s/  Andrew  SeokWoo Lee
-------------------------
Andrew  Seokwoo  Lee












WARNING:

     THE  COMPANY ACT (BRITISH COLUMBIA) REQUIRES THAT SHARES BE FULLY PAID UPON
SUBSCRIPTION.  THEREFORE  YOU  SHOULD  DEPOSIT  THE  SUBSCRIPTION  PRICE  IN THE
COMPANY'S BANK ACCOUNT AND RETAIN A COPY OF YOUR CANCELLED CHEQUE AS EVIDENCE OF
PAYMENT.
# C_2019016EN.01003201.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/32

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 19 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Fédération des fabricants de cigares, Coprova, E-Labo France, Smakq développement v Premier ministre, Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé, interveners: Société J. Cortès France, Scandinavian Tobacco Group France, Villiger France

(Case C-288/17) (1)

(2019/C 16/40)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

---
---

Exhibit 13.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Madison Minerals Inc. (the Company) for the year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 25, 2011 Ian BrownIan Brown
Chief Financial Officer


---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01053]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Office of the Director; Notice of Charter Renewal

    In accordance with title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal 
Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the 
charter for the National Toxicology Program Special Emphasis Panel was 
renewed for an additional two-year period on January 7, 2025.
    It is determined that the National Toxicology Program Special 
Emphasis Panel, is in the public interest in connection with the 
performance of duties imposed on the National Institutes of Health by 
law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and 
counsel of this group.
    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or 
[email protected].

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-01053 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Collie Edward STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1701

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.