alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017293EN.01001901.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 16 June 2017 — Ahmed Shajin v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

(Case C-369/17)

(2017/C 293/22)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ahmed Shajin

Applicant:

Defendant: Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does it follow from the expression ‘that he or she has committed a serious crime’ used in Article 17(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, that the penalty provided for a specific crime under the law of the particular Member State may constitute the sole criterion to determine whether the person claiming subsidiary protection may be excluded from it?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

     Dr. F. Patrick Smith, the Chief Executive Officer and James E. Condon, the
Chief Financial Officer of Tekni-Plex, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Tekni-Plex, Inc.

Date: November 2, 2005


                                        /s/ F. Patrick Smith
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Dr. F. Patrick Smith
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ James E. Condon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: James E. Condon
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |   |                    |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August 13, 2009 |   |   | /s/  Martin Oring  |   |
|                        |   |   | Martin Oring            |   |
|                        |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

----

----
Z.T.D. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160369

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

D. D. H., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-2551

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 25, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Kimberly Phillips Todd, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs 

Cline, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0529 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASSIE LAYDELL WESTERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 9, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2023

02/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0529
STATE of Louisiana v. Reginald W. WILLIAMS

No. 19-KH-0103

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

*286Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Applicant's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. His sentencing claim is also non-cognizable. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Applicant has now fully litigated his fourth application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
STATE of Louisiana v. Shane BADEAUX

NO. 2018-KO-1066

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
Rodriquez V. WEATHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3828

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1276 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1098, K2025-1097.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00920 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary D. Woerz, CEO and CFO of
International American Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30,
2005.

The undersigned certifies that the above annual
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the above annual report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc. and results
of its operations.

Date: October 12, 2006
Gary D. Woerz
CEO and CFO/s/ Gary D. Woerz
Case 3:04-cv-02009-K Document 7 Filed 10/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 61
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40757

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS ALBERTO JASSO-BOTELLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 5:06-CR-579-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Jasso-Botello has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 1, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40757 Document: 00511222341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2010
No. 09-40757

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jasso-Botello has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw because of his appointment as a United States Magistrate Judge is DENIED as moot.

2

Case: 09-40757 Document: 00511222341 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/01/2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 4813)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1252 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1070, K2025-1069.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00878 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 6:05-cv-00008-C Document 25 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 222
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 4 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 4

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy 
    relating to ``Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation 
    Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 2025

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Kennedy, 
 Mr. Sheehy, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Scott of South 
   Carolina, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Banks, and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy 
    relating to ``Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation 
    Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to ``Energy 
Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-
fired Instantaneous Water Heaters'' (89 Fed. Reg. 105188 (December 26, 
2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of Starnet Communications International Inc. on Form S-8 of Starnet
Communications International Inc. of our report dated July 3, 1998, which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Starnet Communications International
Inc. as at and for the year ended April 30, 1998 and 1997 and the period
from May 19, 1995 to April 30, 1996.






Vancouver, Canada                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG          
July 29, 1998                                Chartered Accountants
EX PARTE Eric BILLINGS

CR-17-0020

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 15, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Theron Lamar CHRISTIAN v. STATE

CR-15-1181

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017 Reh. denied October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 18 

Providing for sufficient time for legislation to be read. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. PAUL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for sufficient time for legislation to be read. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. TIME FOR READING OF LEGISLATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order for the 

4 Senate to consider any bill, resolution, message, con5 ference report, amendment between the Houses, amend6 ment, treaty, or other measure or matter until 1 session 

7 day has passed since introduction for every 20 pages in8 cluded in the measure or matter in the usual form plus 

9 1 session day for any number of remaining pages less than 

10 20 in the usual form. 

11 (b) POINT OF ORDER.— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 18 IS 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Any Senator may raise a 

2 point of order that consideration of any bill, resolu3 tion, message, conference report, amendment, treaty, 

4 or other measure or matter is not in order under 

5 subsection (a). A motion to table the point of order 

6 shall not be in order. 

7 (2) WAIVER.—Paragraph (1) may be waived or 

8 suspended only by an affirmative vote of three-fifths 

9 of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. All motions 

10 to waive under this paragraph shall be debatable col11 lectively for not to exceed 3 hours equally divided be12 tween the Senator raising the point of order and the 

13 Senator moving to waive the point of order or their 

14 designees. A motion to waive the point of order shall 

15 not be amendable. 

16 (c) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.—This resolution 

17 is adopted pursuant to the power granted to each House 

18 of Congress to determine the Rules of its Proceedings in 

19 article I, section 5, clause 2 of the Constitution of the 

20 United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Audrey Reich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 21, 2007
|--------------------



|By:/s/ Audrey Reich
|-------------------



| | Audrey ReichChief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00978]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, TEP 2A: SBIR Review Meeting, 
February 24, 2025, 11 a.m. to 3 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady 
Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W534, Rockville, Maryland 20850 
which was published in the Federal Register on December 26, 2024, FR 
Doc 2024-30711, 89 FR 105062.
    This notice is being amended to change the virtual meeting date 
from February 24, 2025, 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. to March 10, 2025, 11 a.m. to 
3 p.m. The meeting times, format, and location will stay the same. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 10, 2025.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00978 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of KDSM, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Amy, Director and Secretary(principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ David B. Amy                              |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   |
| David B. Amy                                  |   |
| Director and Secretary                        |   |
| (principal financial  and accounting officer) |   |
| March 21, 2003                                |   |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

CHARLES M. WOOD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-131-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

September 1, 2006 (Doc. 21). Neither party has filed objections within the period specified in 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

WHEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

Dated September 22, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00131-C Document 22 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 71
EX PARTE Robert Gary SIMS, Jr.

1160859 (CR-15-0402)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Michael MCCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2414

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.