alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 16, 2010 |   |                                                                                                      |   |
|-----------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|            |   |                                                                                                      |   |
|            |   | /s/ MICHAEL GOLDBERG                                                                                 |   |
|            |   | MICHAEL GOLDBERG                                                                                          |   |
|            |   | ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPALFINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER) |
Scot BAIRD and Debbie Baird, Appellants, v. Dennis R. NEUTZE and Arlene C. Neutze, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      12,647,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,647,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   535,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,299,000
<PP&E>                                       7,100,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,886,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,363,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,214,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,016,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,363,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,351,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,854,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,392,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   841,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (736,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (736,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II                                 
|                      |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II Chief Financial Officer and Director
# C_2017300EN.01001001.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich (Poland) lodged on 6 April 2017 — Profi Credit Polska S.A., established in Bielsko-Biała v Mariusz Wawrzosek

(Case C-176/17)

(2017/C 300/13)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Profi Credit Polska S.A., established in Bielsko-Biała

Applicant:

Defendant: Mariusz Wawrzosek

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the provisions of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (1) in particular Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof, and the provisions of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, (2) in particular Article 17(1) and Article 22(1) thereof, be construed as precluding the assertion of a claim, established by means of a duly completed bill of exchange, by a seller or supplier (the creditor) against a consumer (the debtor) in the course of an order for payment procedure pursuant to Article 485(2) et seq. of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure (Kodeks postępowania cywilnego), in conjunction with Article 41 of the Law on consumer credit (Ustawa o kredycie konsumenckim) of 12 May 2011, under which the national court may examine the effectiveness of the claim arising from the bill of exchange exclusively from the point of view of compliance with the formal requirements applicable to the bill of exchange, without examining the relationship underlying it?

1

2

et seq.

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

1

(2)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

2

---
James R. MALONE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Linda R. MALONE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1096

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2017357EN.01000501.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 11 August 2017 — Passengers Rights sp. z o.o. v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-490/17)

(2017/C 357/07)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Passengers Rights sp. z o.o.

Appellant:

Respondent: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does an internal strike organised by a trade union of a carrier’s employees constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, (1) in conjunction with recital 14 of that regulation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does an internal strike organised by a trade union of a carrier’s employees constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, (1) in conjunction with recital 14 of that regulation?

1

| 2. | For a carrier to be exempted from the obligation to pay compensation under Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, in conjunction with recital 14 of that regulation, is it sufficient to make out a probable case, or is it also necessary to prove, that the employees’ strike constitutes an extraordinary circumstance which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures at the carrier’s disposal had been taken? |
| --- | --- |

2.

For a carrier to be exempted from the obligation to pay compensation under Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, in conjunction with recital 14 of that regulation, is it sufficient to make out a probable case, or is it also necessary to prove, that the employees’ strike constitutes an extraordinary circumstance which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures at the carrier’s disposal had been taken?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GABRIEL NATHAN SMITH )

)

v. ) 3:03-CR-300-K

) (3-05-CV-783-K)

UNITED STATES OFA MERICA )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 23rd day of September, 2005.

_/s/_____________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cr-00300-K Document 71 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 178
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00525-CV

Sammy J. Geiger, Appellant

v.

Barry Cohen, Appellee

FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY 

NO. 318128, THE HONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 21, 2022. On December 7, 

2022, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a 

failure to file a satisfactory response by December 19, 2022 would result in the dismissal of this 

appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for 

extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: February 14, 2023
Shawn Michael DICKINSON v. STATE

CR-16-0531

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kassim M. NAGI

NO. 2018-K-0739

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2010



By:

/s/ William J. ZaiserName:

William J. ZaiserTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




33
Phillip KESSLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 09, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
David Patrick MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1211

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

§

Respondent/Plaintiff, §

§ No. 3:04-CR-030-M (2)

v. § No. 3:05-CV-770-M

§

AFFIONG IKPEME EKONG, §

§

Movant/Defendant. §

___________________________________ §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 12, 20007, United States Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan made Findings and a

Recommendation. No objections were filed. The Court thus reviews the Findings and

Recommendation for plain error. Finding no plain error, the Court accepts the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SIGNED this 15thday of January, 2008.

_________________________________

BARBARA M.G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Victor BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3100

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 27, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

__________________________________

CHARLES WESLEY WHEAT *

Petitioner *

v. *

* CA-3:05-CV-1315-H

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, *

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL *

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS *

DIVISION *

Respondent *

O R D E R

Before the Court are the Findings and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, filed July 17, 2006, and Petitioner’s Objections thereto, filed July 27,

2006.

The Court has made the required independent review of the pleadings, files, and

records in this case; the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and

Petitioner’s Objections. Having done so, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are ADOPTED as the

Findings and Conclusions of the Court, and Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 27, 2006

________________________________

BAREFOOT SANDERS, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01315-H Document 20 Filed 07/27/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 134
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Flag Intermediate Holdings Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 24, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert C. McPherson, III                                              
|                         |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
T M F HOTEL PROPERTIES, L.L.C. v. CRESCENT CITY CONNECTIONS 501(C) 7 GRIS-GRIS PLEASURE AIDE & SOCIAL CLUB

NO. 2019-C-0110

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael Schmidt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Date: September 13, 2007              
|                                      
|/s/ Michael Schmidt                   
|Michael Schmidt                       
|Chief Financial Officer and, Secretary