alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

JMG Exploration Inc.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, I, Joanne R. Finnerty, Chief Financial Officer of JMG Exploration, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | This Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                            
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in this Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JMG Exploration, Inc.. for the periods presented therein.

Date: September 16, 2005

|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Joanne R, Finnerty        |  | 
|                              |  | 
|Joanne R. Finnerty            |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer       |  | 
|(Principal Financial Officer) |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

KENNETH P. MAJKUT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-068-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER

 THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

August 4, 2006 (Doc. 22). No written objections have been filed. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and

Recommendation are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court and that this cause

is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C.

§ 405(g).

Upon remand and after further consideration of the evidence in the record, the ALJ should

appropriately evaluate the severity of Plaintiff’s impairments, determine the limitations imposed by

the combination of Plaintiff’s impairments, and determine Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity

(“RFC”). After determining Plaintiff’s RFC, the ALJ will have the opportunity to present a

hypothetical question to the VE which incorporates limitations which are accepted by the ALJ and

which reflect the RFC finding. The ALJ will again need to consider whether Plaintiff’s impairments

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00068-C Document 23 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 129
2

meet or equal in severity any listing in the Listing of Impairments. Finally, if appropriate, the ALJ

may consider the issue of whether Plaintiff can maintain employment.

DATED this 28th day of August, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00068-C Document 23 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 130
# C_2019155EN.01001001.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 March 2019 — AlzChem AG v European Commission

(Case C-666/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Third indent of Article 4(2) - General presumption of confidentiality of documents relating to an investigation procedure in the field of State aid - Scope)

(2019/C 155/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: AlzChem AG (represented by: A. Borsos, avocat, and J.A. Guerrero Pérez, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and A. Buchet, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders AlzChem AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AlzChem AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph W. Skeehan, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 14­­, 2009  /S/ Joseph W. SkeehanName:Joseph W. SkeehanTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Mario SPAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5286

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### C O U R T O F 

### A P P E A L S

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

TERRIE LIVINGSTON

JUSTICES

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

ANNE GARDNER

SUE WALKER

BOB McCOY

BILL MEIER

LEE GABRIEL TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.2ndcoa.courts.state.tx.us CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

CLARISSA HODGES

February 6, 2014

Timothy T. Mitchell

4422 Ridgeside Dr

Dallas, TX 75244-7521

Hon. Susan H. McCoy

Judge, 153rd District Court

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap St.

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0225

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Scott M. Garelick

McElree & Smith, P.C.

600 N. Pearl St., Ste. 1600

Dallas, TX 75201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Hon. Jeff Walker

Regional Presiding Judge

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 5th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Civil District Clerk, Tarrant County

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap St., 3rd Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Arjana Muhametaj

2221 Murphy Dr., Apt. 2115

Bedford, TX 76021

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-13-00398-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 153-265909-13

Style: Arjana Muhametaj, d/b/a Little Brothers Family Restaurant, a/k/a Family

Restaurant;

v.

Northern Trust Bank of California, N.A. and Bruce R. McAllister et al.

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above-referenced cause.

A copy of the opinion and judgment can be viewed on our Court’s

webpage at: http://www.2ndcoa.courts.state.tx.us/

.

Respectfully yours,02-13-00398-CV

February 6, 2014

Page 2

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kurt A. Braun, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kurt A. Braun      
|                        |  |     |  | Kurt A. Braun          
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 305 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID 7712
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 305 Filed 03/26/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 7713
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 305 Filed 03/26/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 7714
***Exhibit 31.1***

***Chief Executive Officer Certification of the QuarterlyFinancial Statements***

I, **Saturnino S. Fanlo**, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006 of KKR Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”);

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             TheCorporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Corporation and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Corporation, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the Corporation’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Corporation’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             TheCorporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCorporation’s auditors and the audit committee of the Corporation’s Board ofDirectors:

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Corporation’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 8, 2006

 
|        |       | /s/ SATURNINO S.  FANLO                                                           |
|--------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ** ** | **Saturnino  S. Fanlo   Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)** |

 

----
Terrance L. MCCLOUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3176

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

*Affirmed.*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

GILBERTO CONSUEGRA

- BARRETO , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3578

[ February 27, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2018

- CF

- 002416

- A

.
Gilberto Consuegra

- Barreto, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , G ERBE R and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Lizzie Perry et als., *Appellants,*v. W. H. McRainey et als., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 12, 1927.

W. *E. Smith,*for Appellants;

*A. M. Boland,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. ’

Whiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.
EX PARTE BLACK WARRIOR MINERALS, INC.

(In re John T. Crane, Dan Jett, and Linda Jett v. Alabama Surface Mining Commission and Black Warrior Minerals, Inc.)

2160887

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Case 2:05-cv-00184-J Document 3 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 23
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 15, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 15, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25D0009. LEWIS ALVIN BUTLER, II v. JENNIFER BUTLER.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2013V0968
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 1 5 , 2018 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01189 - CV No. 05 - 18 - 01190 - CV IN RE RUDY LOPEZ , Relator Original Proceeding from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F91 - 44984 - R and F93 - 39883 - R 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Before the Court is relator’s Octo ber 4 , 2018 “ Notice of Appeals ,” which we treat as a petition for writ of mandamus. In the petition, r elator complains that the district clerk has refused to file relator’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc and refused to send relator a copy of the motion
. Relator asks this Court to direct the district clerk to file “a special clerk’s record” that includes certain documents from the underlying proceeding. This Court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless i t is necessary to enforce our own jurisdiction. T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(a) (court of appeals may only issue writ of mandamus against district and county judges or as necessary to enforce jurisdiction of appellate court); In re Wilkerson , No. 05

- 16

- 00322

- CV, 2016 WL 1320815, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Apr. 5, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Simpson , 997 S.W.2d 939, 939 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1999, orig. proceeding)). Relator has no appeal pending in– 2

–

this Court and, therefore, our jurisdiction is no t in jeopardy. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

181189F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Kevon M. WILLIAMS, DOC #R78867, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2154

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Wehave issued our report dated September 24, 2007 accompanying theconsolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of PrecisionAuto Care, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30,2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of Precision Auto Care, Inc. on Forms S-8(File No. 333-47165, effective March 2, 1998; File No. 333-47169,effective March 2, 1998; File No. 333-47171, effective March 2,1998; File No. 333-49097, effective April 1, 1998; File No. 333-85877,effective August 25, 1999; File No. 333-85879, effective August 25,1999 and File No. 333-39226, effective June 14, 2000).
| /s/ YOUNT,  HYDE & BARBOUR,  P.C. |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Winchester, Virginia                       |
| September 24, 2007                    |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael Hellenbrand, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: June 22, 2011





By:/s/ Michael HellenbrandMichael Hellenbrand


Chief Executive  Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph W. Skeehan, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 24­­, 2009  /S/ Joseph W. SkeehanName:Joseph W. SkeehanTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 19 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 4 PageID 73
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 19 Filed 02/14/06 Page 2 of 4 PageID 74
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 19 Filed 02/14/06 Page 3 of 4 PageID 75
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 19 Filed 02/14/06 Page 4 of 4 PageID 76
Case 3:04-cv-01127-M Document 10 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53