alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA

) DEMETRIUS MCLAUG HLIN, ) ) P laintif f, )

) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-2048 (RMC) ) U.S. DEPA RTMENT OF JU STICE , ) ) Defendan t. ) )
M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION The Court def

err ed fina l dispositi on of t his Fr eedom of I nformation Act case — on pa rt ia l r e mand

fr om t he Di str ic t of

Col umb ia Ci rc uit

— p e nd ingDe fe nd ant’ s c lari fi c a tio n o f i ts treatment of responsive pag es 23 and 24. See M e m . O p . o f N o v e mb e r 4 , 2 0 0 9 [ D kt
. # 4 6 ] a t2
. In a supplementa l declar ation, Def endant c onfirms, consistent with the in c am e ra sub m i s s i o n , t h at p age 24 wa s w it

h h e ld in it s e n ti r e ty

b e c a u s e “ a ll th a t w o u ld

r e ma in [a f te r e xc is in g an y

n on-exempt materia l] would be the plaintiff’ s name a n d t h e NA DDI S number with no useful information that
wo uld sh e d li g ht o n h ow the g ov e rnme nt co nd uc ts bus ine ss. ” Se c on d Su pp l. D e c l. o f Wi lli a m C. L ittle, J r. [Dkt. # 49-1] ¶ ¶ 2 -3
. I n ad dition, Mr. L ittle confirms that on Novembe r 25, 2009, he mailed a r edac ted copy

of pag e 23 to Mr . McL aug hlin in response to his claim that he did not rec eive that previously

rele ased pa g e. Id . ¶ 4. On November 23, 2009, Mr. M cL aug hlin moved for r econside ration of the O rder of November

4, 2009, “to pre vent manife st injust ice. . . .” Pl.’s Mot. for Rec ons. and/or in Alternative to A lte r o r A me nd

the Court s’ Or de r P ur su ant t o F e d. R. Civ
. Pr oc . Rul e 59 (e ) [D kt. # 4 8]. ARul e 59(e) motion is discretionar y and nee d not be gra

nted unl ess the district cour t finds that “there is an-2-

interveningchang e of c ontrolling law , the ava ilability of new evidenc e, or the need to corr ect a clea r
err or or pr event manif

est injustice.” Fox v . Am. Airlines Inc. , 389 F.3d 1291, 1296 ( D.C. Cir. 2004) (q u o t i n g Firestone v. Fire stone , 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 ( D.C. Cir. 1996)). A Rule 59(e) m otion is not “simply an opportunity

to rea rg ue fa cts and theor ies upon which a court ha s alrea dy ru l ed.” New Y o r k v. U nited States , 8 8 0 F
. S u

p p . 3 7 , 3 8 ( D
. D
. C
. 1 9 9 5 )
. N o r i s i t an a v e n u e f o r a “ los ing pa rt y

. . . to r aise new issues that could have be en ra ised previously .” Kat tan v . D ist ric t of Col um bia , 995 F.2d 274, 276 ( D.C. Cir. 1993).

Mr . M c L a

ug hli n c la ims that th e wi thh e ld inf or ma tio n s ho uld

be dis c los e d b e c a

us e it is i n the public domain and c ontains exculpatory evidenc e, but the Court alre ady has reje cted suc h arguments. See Mem. Op. at 2-4. Asepar ate f inal Orde r accompanie s this Memorandum Opinion.

Date : Jan ua ry 27 , 2 01 0 /s/ ROSEMARY M. COL L YER Un i t edS t at es Di s t ri ct J u d ge
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 5 Filed 11/03/00 Page 1 of 1 PageID 7
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Highland Select Equity Fund GP, L.P. Case No.: 23−31039−mvl7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jeffrey N. Pomerantz, to

represent Highland Capital Management, L.P., related to document 41, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed October 2, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 46 Filed 10/03/23 Entered 10/03/23 15:39:39 Desc

Page 1 of 1
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 24 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 6 PageID 90
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 24 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 6 PageID 91
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 24 Filed 03/27/06 Page 3 of 6 PageID 92
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 24 Filed 03/27/06 Page 4 of 6 PageID 93
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 24 Filed 03/27/06 Page 5 of 6 PageID 94
Case 3:05-cv-01442-D Document 24 Filed 03/27/06 Page 6 of 6 PageID 95
Victor BAILEY a/k/a Victor Lee Bailey, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee

NO. 2017-CP-00757-COA

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

August 7, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: VICTOR BAILEY (PRO SE)

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BY: SCOTT STUART, JACKSON

BEFORE GRIFFIS, P.J., FAIR AND TINDELL, JJ.

FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. In 2007, Victor Bailey pled guilty to two counts of armed robbery and was sentenced to fifteen years on each count, to be served concurrently. Nearly eight years later, he filed a motion for reconsideration of his sentence.1 Bailey sought a reduction of his sentence based on his exemplary behavior, including earning a general education diploma, completing a barber course and receiving a barber license, and completing courses in anger management and financial literacy.

¶ 2. The circuit court treated the motion as a motion for post-conviction relief and found it time-barred. The court further held that it lacked jurisdiction to reduce Bailey's sentences since the sentencing term had expired. "A reduction or reconsideration of a sentence by a judge must occur prior to the expiration of the sentencing term." *Carr v. State* , 881 So.2d 261, 264 (¶ 8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2003) (citing *Harrigill v. State* , 403 So.2d 867, 868-69 (Miss. 1981) ). "The power to reduce the sentence after the expiration of the term is vested in [the legislature]. The trial judge was correct to deny the request." *Robinson v. State* , 849 So.2d 157 (¶ 4) (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).

¶ 3. On appeal, Bailey abandoned his quest for reconsideration and reduction of his sentence. Instead, for the first time on appeal, he claims that Mississippi Code Annotated section 47-7-3(1)(c)(i) (Rev. 2015) entitles him to parole eligibility because he has served the required ten years.

¶ 4. Since Bailey failed to raise this issue before the circuit court, he is barred from doing so on appeal. Even if this claim was properly before this Court, Bailey would still be ineligible for parole. Section 47-7-3(1)(c)(i) only applies to armed-robbery convictions that occurred between January 1, 1977, and September 30, 1994. Bailey's conviction and sentencing took place in 2007. Armed-robbery convictions that occurred between October 1, 1994, and July 1, 2014, are governed by section 47-7-3(1)(c)(ii). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

¶ 5. **AFFIRMED.**

LEE, C.J., IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES, CARLTON, WILSON, GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS AND TINDELL, JJ., CONCUR.

1

The record and the certified docket sheet do not contain Bailey's motion for reconsideration. However, Bailey filed a mandamus petition with this Court on June 5, 2017, because the circuit court had not yet ruled on his PCR motion. He attached his PCR motion to his mandamus petition. We take judicial notice of our own docket. *See**Gulley v. State* , 870 So.2d 652, 656 (¶ 8) (Miss. 2004) (holding that a circuit court can take judicial notice of its own docket in resolving a PCR motion).
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

# **CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

#  

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Scheid Vineyards Inc.’sRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-47485) of our report on the auditof the consolidated financial statements of Scheid Vineyards Inc., as of December 31,2004, and for the year then ended. Our report, which is dated February 11,2005, except for Note 13, which was dated March 29, 2005, appears in ScheidVineyards Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2004.

 

 
| /s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP     |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|
| Santa Rosa, California |   |
| March 30, 2005    |   |

 

----
#### Margaret G. Schaetz, *Appellant,*v. Gustav K. Schaetz, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 9, 1927.

Petition for rehearing denied December 12, 1927.

*L. D. Simon,*for Appellant;

*Balter, Ziegler & Williams,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *917order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Dontrey Lynch WEBSTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petitioner's motion for State of Florida to concede illegal sentence is denied as an unauthorized filing in this court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00666]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 25-002]

Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a 
forthcoming meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP). The 
ASAP will hold its First Quarterly Meeting for 2025. This discussion is 
pursuant to carrying out its statutory duties for which the Panel 
reviews, identifies, evaluates, and advises on those program 
activities, systems, procedures, and management activities that can 
contribute to program risk. Priority is given to those programs that 
involve the safety of human flight.

DATES: Thursday, January 30, 2025, 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., eastern 
time.

ADDRESSES: Public attendance will be virtual only. See dial-in 
information below under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lisa M. Hackley, ASAP 
Administrative Officer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 
358-1947 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As noted above, this meeting is only 
available telephonically. Any interested person must use a touch-tone 
phone to participate in this meeting. Any interested person may call 
the USA toll free conference call number 888-566-6133; passcode 8343253 
and then the # sign. At the beginning of the meeting, members of the 
public may make a verbal presentation to the Panel limited to the 
subject of safety in NASA, not to exceed 5 minutes in length. To do so, 
members of the public must contact Ms. Lisa M. Hackley at 
[email protected] or at (202) 358-1947 at least 48 hours in 
advance. Any member of the public is permitted to file a written 
statement with the Panel via electronic submission to Ms. Hackley at 
the email address previously noted. Written statements should be 
limited to the subject of safety in NASA.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

--Updates on the Space Station Program
--Updates on the Commercial Crew Program
--Updates on the Moon to Mars Program

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Jamie M. Krauk,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2025-00666 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2




                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Trailer Bridge, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 5, 2004                       /s/ Mark A. Tanner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark A. Tanner
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated: November 11, 2009   /s/ Tristan R. Pico Tristan R. Pico Chief Executive Officer Parks! America, Inc.  Dated: November 11, 2009   /s/ Jon A. Laria Jon A. Laria Chief Financial Officer Parks! America, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parks! America, Inc. and will be retained by Parks! America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Christopher JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4175

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 6, 2019

Christopher Jackson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Rowe, and Makar, JJ., concur.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 54 

To direct the President to withdraw the United States from the Constitution 

of the World Health Organization, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. BURLISON, Ms. 

HAGEMAN, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. CRANE, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Ms. MACE, Mr. 

HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. OGLES, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

EDWARDS, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. MCCORMICK, and Mrs. HARSHBARGER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the President to withdraw the United States from 

the Constitution of the World Health Organization, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘WHO Withdrawal 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 54 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF UNITED STATES FROM THE CON2 STITUTION OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANI3 ZATION; PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

4 Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act— 

5 (1) the President shall withdraw the United 

6 States from the Constitution of the World Health 

7 Organization (62 Stat. 2679; 14 U.N.T.S 186); and 

8 (2) no funds available to any Federal depart9 ment or agency may used to provide for the partici10 pation of the United States in the World Health Or11 ganization or any successor organization. 

12 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF THE ACT OF JUNE 14, 1948. 

13 The Act of June 14, 1948 (Public Law 806–43; 62 

14 Stat. 441; 22 U.S.C. 290 et seq.), providing for member15 ship and participation by the United States in the World 

16 Health Organization and authorizing an appropriation 

17 therefor, is repealed. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
George Locke GALBRAITH et al. v. REGIONS BANK

1160282

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### J. J. Hope et al., *Appellants,*v. Ludy L. Charpia et al., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 7, 1927.

*J. C. Davant,*for Appellants;

*Scofield & Scofield,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. '

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and. Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1408
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 12 PageID 1409
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 3 of 12 PageID 1410
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 4 of 12 PageID 1411
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 5 of 12 PageID 1412
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 6 of 12 PageID 1413
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 7 of 12 PageID 1414
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 8 of 12 PageID 1415
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 9 of 12 PageID 1416
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 10 of 12 PageID 1417
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 11 of 12 PageID 1418
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02951-BD Document 71 Filed 07/26/05 Page 12 of 12 PageID 1419
**Exhibit31.2**

**SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

**FORM 10-QSB**

**Quarterended September 30, 2004**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven W.Ledbetter, certify that:

1)         I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Heritage Bancshares, Inc.

2)         Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period by this quarterly report;

3)         Based on my knowledge,the financial statements and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in the quarterly report;

4)         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

                                                a)         designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

                                                b)         evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2004 (the“Evaluation Date”);

                                                c)         presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and

                                                d)         disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

5)         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing equivalent function):

                                                a)         all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

                                                b)         any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 
| /s/ Steven W. Ledbetter |
|-------------------------|

Steven W. Ledbetter

Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2004
Clifton M. BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 2019

Clifton M. Brooks, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to					18U.S.C. Section 1350,						as Adopted Pursuant to						Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Shineco, Inc., (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, the undersigned, Yuying Zhang, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and		    - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		  			Dated: September 7, 2005			                                                                                    /s/ Yuying Zhang			                                                                                    ________________________			                                                                                    Yuying Zhang