alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016145EN.01003501.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/35

---

Action brought on 8 March 2016 — Klausner Holz Niedersachsen v Commission

(Case T-101/16)

(2016/C 145/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH (Saalburg-Ebersdorf, Germany) (represented by: D. Reich, C. Hipp and T. Ilgner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | find that the defendant infringed Article 108 TFEU in conjunction with Article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by failing, following receipt of the applicant’s letter of 13 November 2015, to take the decision provided for in those provisions to close the preliminary examination procedures in cases SA.37113 and SA.375009 pursuant to Article 4 of that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

find that the defendant infringed Article 108 TFEU in conjunction with Article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by failing, following receipt of the applicant’s letter of 13 November 2015, to take the decision provided for in those provisions to close the preliminary examination procedures in cases SA.37113 and SA.375009 pursuant to Article 4 of that regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, even if the action should serve no purpose by reason of the adoption of a measure by the European Commission in the course of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, even if the action should serve no purpose by reason of the adoption of a measure by the European Commission in the course of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law by which it claims that the Commission failed to take, within a reasonable period, a decision closing the preliminary examination procedure pursuant to Article 4(2) to (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589, (1) despite being called upon to act pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 265 TFEU.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
           ---------------------------------------------------------


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                         BIOTEL INC.

Date: February 11, 2005                  By: /s/ B. Steven Springrose
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             B. Steven Springrose
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             and President
                                             (principal executive officer)

                                         By: /s/ Judy E. Naus
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Judy E. Naus
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (principal financial officer)



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX PARTE NEWPORT TELEVISION, LLC

1160775 (2150770)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Delta Seaboard International, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  August 15, 2011


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
Dennis Eugene BISHOP III v. STATE

CR-16-0815

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 2:03-cv-00088-J Document 14 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 141
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 836 

Recognizing Hispanic Restaurant Week and the contributions of Hispanic 

restaurant owners and employees to the restaurant industry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. CRUZ) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

DECEMBER 10, 2024 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Hispanic Restaurant Week and the contributions 

of Hispanic restaurant owners and employees to the restaurant industry. 

Whereas Hispanic Restaurant Week is celebrated from September 22, 2024, through October 3, 2024, during the 

national celebration of Hispanic Heritage Month from 

September 15, 2024, through October 15, 2024; 

Whereas, in 2020, the Bureau of the Census estimated that 

41,817 owners of accommodation and food service businesses were Hispanic; 

Whereas the restaurant industry plays a significant role in 

the economy of the United States as the second-largest 

private sector employer in the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 836 ATS 

Whereas 25.9 percent of workers in the restaurant industry 

are Hispanic; 

Whereas, according to a 2023 State of Latino Entrepreneurship report, published by the Stanford Graduate School 

of Business, during the last decade, Hispanic entrepreneurs have started small businesses, including restaurants, at a higher rate than any other demographic; 

Whereas, of the nearly 5,000,000 Hispanic-owned businesses 

in the United States, the restaurant industry has the second highest number of Hispanic owners; 

Whereas 8 in 10 restaurant owners started their restaurant 

industry careers in entry-level positions; 

Whereas 63 percent of adults in the United States have 

worked in the restaurant industry, making it ‘‘the Nation’s training ground’’; and 

Whereas the restaurant industry employs more minority managers than any other industry: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) celebrates Hispanic Restaurant Week; and 

3 (2) acknowledges— 

4 (A) the contributions of Hispanic owners 

5 and staff of the restaurant industry to the 

6 United States economy; and 

7 (B) the fact that the restaurant industry 

8 provides restaurant owners, chefs, dishwashers, 

9 and other staff the opportunity to work hard, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

SRES 836 ATS 

1 persevere, support their families, and live the 

2 American Dream. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 2:03-cv-00085-J Document 22 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 103
# C_2017318EN.01000301.xml

| 25.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 18 May 2017 — Andreas Niemeyer v Brussels Airlines SA/NV

(Case C-269/17)

(2017/C 318/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Andreas Niemeyer

Applicant:

Defendant: Brussels Airlines SA/NV

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the second sentence of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) (‘the Regulation’) to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘distance’ relates only to the direct distance calculated between the point of departure and the last destination on the basis of the ‘great circle’ method, regardless of the distance actually flown?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 DALLAS DIVISION 

T-NETIX, INC. )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant )

) 

 v. )

)

VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, )

 INC. ) Case No. 3-05-654-D

)

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff )

 v. )

)

SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. )

)

Counter-Defendant )

 )

ORDER GRANTING VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

The Court, having considered Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Value-Added

Communications, Inc.’s (“VAC”) Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, finds good cause for

GRANTING the Motion for Leave. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that VAC’s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal

[Doc. #310] is GRANTED, and it is hereby:

FURTHER ORDERED that the following documents shall be filed under seal:

(1) Value-Added Communications, Inc.’s Objections to the United States

Magistrate’s March 28, 2013 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations, and 

Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof; and

(2) Value-Added Communications, Inc.’s Appendix in Support of Objections to the

United States Magistrate’s March 28, 2013 Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendations.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-3 Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID 8362
Dated: _________________, 2013 ___________________________

Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 311-3 Filed 04/11/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID 8363
# C_2017038EN.01005201.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/52

---

Action brought on 9 December 2016 — Karelia v EUIPO (KARELIA)

(Case T-878/16)

(2017/C 038/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ino Karelia (Kalamata, Greece) (represented by: M. Karpathakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘KARELIA’ — Application for registration No 964 502

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2016 in Case R 1562/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sound Revolution Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: July 23, 2007 | /s/ Penny Green        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Penny Green            
|                     | Chief Financial Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 79

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' 
            Affairs in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2025

Mr. Bost submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' 
            Affairs in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $12,136,370 for the One Hundred 
Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,985,270 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $6,151,100 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID 238
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 2 of 8 PageID 239
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 3 of 8 PageID 240
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 4 of 8 PageID 241
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 5 of 8 PageID 242
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 6 of 8 PageID 243
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 7 of 8 PageID 244
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00846-D Document 23 Filed 12/15/06 Page 8 of 8 PageID 245
Exhibit 10.46








August 26, 2010


EXTENSION N3 TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2003





By and between Siberian Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Elena Pochapski (“Employee”) entered into this 26th day of August, 2010, and made effective as of July 1, 2010.





WHEREASthe Company and the Employee previously signed the Employment Agreement, which stated the term of employment to start on September 1, 2003 and to end on December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), and subsequent extensions for the year 2009 and for six months of 2010 till June 30, 2010;





AND WHEREAS the Company and the Employee wish to further extend the term of the employment agreement;





NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the Company and the Employee agree as follows:





Point 4 “Term” of the employment Agreement to be revised and the term of the Agreement to be extended until December 31, 2010 (the “Extended Term”).





Point 5.1 “Compensation” of the employment Agreement to be revised and annual salary of the Employee to be stated as US$75,000.





Point 6 “Stock Option” of the employment Agreement is to be removed. A new Stock Option agreement will be signed between the Company and the Employee upon the resolution of the Board of directors of the Company.





All other provisions of the Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2003 shall remain in full force and effect until the expiration of the Extended Term.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.






EMPLOYEE
COMPANY/s/ Elena Pochapski
/s/ David ZaikinElena Pochapski,
David Zaikin,Address: 152 Mullen Drive,
Chairman and CEOThornhill, ON, L4J 2V3
Siberian Energy Group Inc.Canada
Exhibit 10.21
 L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
 Effective Date
 Definitions
 Actual Bonus
 Affiliate
 Annual Compensation
  Anticipatory Termination
 Average Bonus provided provided further




---



##### 



2 provided further
 Base Salary
 Board
 Bonus Fraction
 Bonus
 Cause
      Change in Control




---



##### 



3     COBRA
 Code
 Committee
 Company
 Director
 Disability
 Elected Officer
 Eligible Employee




---



##### 



4  Employee
 Employer
 Exchange Act
 Executive
 Fiscal Year
 Good Reason




---



##### 



5   provided
   Plan
 Plan Year
 Release
 Severance Multiple




---



##### 



6  Target Bonus
 Vice President
 Severance Benefits
 Severance Pay
  multiplied
 multiplied
  multiplied




---



##### 



7 provided however
 Medical, Dental and Life Insurance Benefit Continuation
 Executive Welfare Continuation Period provided however
 Employee Welfare Continuation
Period




---



##### 



8 provided however
 Outplacement
 Accrued Benefits
 Form and Time of Payment provided




---



##### 



9  Tax Withholding and Section 409A
 Limitation of Certain Payments
 Parachute Amount times Employee Base Amount times Reduced Amount provided




---



##### 



10  Overpayment Underpayment
 Plan Administration Committee
 Dispute Resolution




---



##### 



11 Applicable Law
 Legal Fees
 Plan Amendment and Termination provided
 Nature of Plan and Rights
 Entire Agreement; Offset; No Interference
 provided




---



##### 



12  Anticipatory Changes Anticipatory
Change
 Spendthrift Provision
 Notice




---



##### 



13 Effectiveness
 L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    /s/
Steven M. PostName:
    Steven M. PostTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



A-1 Exhibit A
 CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-COMPETITION RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
 I.
 II.
 III.




---



##### 



A-2  IV.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1232 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1049, K2025-1048.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00791 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX PARTE Alfred P. MONTGOMERY

CR-16-1067

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 25, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Tracey Michelle GRISSOM v. STATE

CR-16-0834

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.