alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, William P. Brand, Jr., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 22, 2006           |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ William P. Brand, Jr.      |   |
|                           |
| William P. Brand, Jr.          |
| Vice President – Finance  |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

1

----
Case 3:05-cv-00584-K Document 14 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 89
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7602

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NAPOLEAN JUSTICE MENSAH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-cr-415; 1:07-cv-207)

Submitted: March 17, 2008 Decided: July 17, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Napolean Justice Mensah, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Nicole Gibson,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Napolean Justice Mensah seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mensah has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of
Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kenneth E. Compton, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                       |  | /s/KENNETH E. COMPTONKenneth E. Compton President and Chief Executive
Officer
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |                                                                              

---



QuickLinks
Demetrius BENJAMIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2462

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No.143717) (admitted pro hac vice) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 2405397) (admitted pro hac vice)

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) (admitted pro hac vice) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) (admitted pro hac vice) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 277-6910/Facsimile: (310) 201-0760

HAYWARD PLLC

Melissa S. Hayward

Texas Bar No. 24044908

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

Zachery Z. Annable

Texas Bar No. 24053075

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106

Dallas, Texas 75231

Tel: (972) 755-7100/Fax: (972) 755-7110

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

In re:

HIGHLAND SELECT EQUITY FUND GP, L.P.,1

Debtor. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Chapter 7 

Case No. 23-31039-mvl7 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF

EMERGENCY MOTION IN LIMINE OF HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. 

TO (I) EXCLUDE RECUSAL EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN CONNECTION WITH 

DEBTORS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE TO DALLAS DIVISIONAL OFFICE, OR, 

(II) IN THE ALTERNATIVE, ADJOURN HEARING

Highland Capital Management, L.P., by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby files 

this Notice of Withdrawal withdrawing the Emergency Motion in Limine of Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. to (i) Exclude Recusal Evidence and Argument in Connection with Debtors’ 

1

 The Debtor’s last four digits of its taxpayer identification number are (9917). The headquarters and service address 

for the Debtor is 100 Crescent Court, Suite 1850, Dallas, TX 75201.

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 58 Filed 10/27/23 Entered 10/27/23 14:10:34 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

Motion to Transfer Case to Dallas Divisional Office, or, (ii) in the Alternative, Adjourn Hearing

[Docket No. 49] (the “Motion”) filed with the Court on October 16, 2023. 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 58 Filed 10/27/23 Entered 10/27/23 14:10:34 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

Dated: October 27, 2023 PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No.143717) (pro hac vice) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 2405397) (pro hac vice) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) (pro hac vice) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) (pro hac vice) 

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com

-andHAYWARD PLLC

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable 

Melissa S. Hayward

Texas Bar No. 24044908 

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

Zachery Z. Annable

Texas Bar No. 24053075 

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Tel: (972) 755-7100 

Fax: (972) 755-7110 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 58 Filed 10/27/23 Entered 10/27/23 14:10:34 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 7 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk June 7 , 2019

15 9 51 8 ( 2 6 )

BLOOMFIELD MERCHANT SERVICES,

LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 159518

v COA: 345936

Oakland CC: 2017

- 157137

- CB

MEGA CARD SOLUTIONS, INC., and

NACK KYUNG CHUNG,

Defendants

- Appellants

.

_________ ______________________________ ___ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted

on June 3 , 2019 , is accepted as timely filed

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS OF GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
     31, 1998,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001039797 
<NAME>                       Gables Realty Limited Partnership 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         15,071
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,681,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,586,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        812,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     718,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,586,317
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,624
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                45,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            45,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   35,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.16
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:04-cv-00855-R Document 18 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 164
2nd Amendment to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 4.6 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
  
 PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 2002 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby amends the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (the
“Plan”), with reference to the following facts: 
  
 A.
The Company maintains the Plan to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive to selected key employees, consultants and directors through the grant of stock
options. 
  
 B. By Section 16 of the Plan, the Board of Directors
of the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan with shareholder approval to the extent necessary or desirable to comply with Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, other Applicable Laws, or the requirements of any
exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted. 
  
 F. The Company wishes to amend the Plan to increase the number of Shares for which Options may be granted by 1,000,000 Shares. 
  

G. This Second Amendment is subject to Section 16(c) of the Plan which requires shareholder approval of any Plan amendment that increases the number of
Shares for which Options may be granted under the Plan. 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, subject to the approval of the Shareholders of the Company, as follows: 
  
 The first paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended to provide in its entirety as follows: 
  
 1. “Stock Subject to Plan. Subject to the provisions of
Section 14 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan will be 2,000,000 Share of Common Stock. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.” 
  
 In all other respects, the terms and provisions of the Plan are hereby
ratified and declared to be in full force and effect. 
  
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Second Amendment to be effective as of March 4, 2003. 
  

	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    JOHN A. GODFREY


	 	 	 John A. Godfrey
 Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel



  

 E-19
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 88 

Supporting the designation of January 31, 2025, as ‘‘Earned Income Tax 

Credit Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Ms. SEWELL (for herself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. BOYLE of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. BEYER, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. HORSFORD, and Mr. 

SUOZZI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of January 31, 2025, as ‘‘Earned 

Income Tax Credit Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas the earned income tax credit is a refundable Federal 

tax credit available to low- and moderate-income working 

families and individuals; 

Whereas the earned income tax credit strengthens the rewards of work; 

Whereas the earned income tax credit has lifted approximately 8,000,000 people out of poverty per year from 

2017 to 2021; 

Whereas the earned income tax credit provides substantial 

economic benefit to local economies; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 88 IH 

Whereas an estimated 20 percent of eligible workers do not 

claim the earned income tax credit: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Earned Income 

3 Tax Credit Awareness Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls on Federal, State, and local agencies, 

5 community organizations, nonprofit organizations, 

6 employers, and other partners to help increase 

7 awareness about certain tax credits to ensure that 

8 all eligible workers have access to the full range of 

9 tax credit benefits available to them, including— 

10 (A) the earned income tax credit; 

11 (B) other refundable tax credits not de12 scribed in subparagraph (A); and 

13 (C) free tax filing assistance. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Biotel Inc.Date:  February 12, 2007
        
        By:
        /s/ B. Steven SpringroseB. Steven SpringroseChief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)






Date:  February 12, 2007
        
        By:
        /s/ Judy E. NausJudy E. NausChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
_____________________________________X

In Proceedings for a Repayment

Plan Under Chapter

Case No : 

Tee Clm No: 

Amount : 

SELLER/ASSIGNOR/TRANSFEROR: PURCHASER/ASSIGNEE/TRANSFEREE:

Telephone: (Servicer)

Telephone: Telecopy: (Servicer)

By: By:

Dated:

TRUSTEE NON-ELECTRONIC

04/13/2004

610-993-8493

610-644-7800

800-347-5515

13 

$ 3516.75

 Crt Clm No:3

3-02-32368-HCA-13

eCAST Settlement Corporation

P.O. Box 35480

Newark, NJ 07193-5480

Discover Bank

Attn: Bankruptcy Department

3311 Mill Meadow Drive

Hilliard, OH 43026

/s/Alane A. Becket

Becket & Lee LLP,

Attorney/Agent for Creditor

(See Attached Waiver)

(01) ************9879 DWD30091

 ************9879

In re:

 CHRISTINE WALKER

 

PO BOX 1469

FORNEY, TX 75126

 Debtor(s)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION

WALKERTX1646 

JOINT NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF CLAIM PURSUANT TO

FRBP RULE 3001(e) (2) AND WAIVER OF OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT

The original Proof of Claim may have been filed under the following name(s): 

DISCOVER CARD, BRAVO, PRIVATE ISSUE, GREENWOOD TRUST CO., NOVUS SERVICES, INC., DISCOVER

FINANCIAL SERVICES

 Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e) (2) and the foregoing assignment, the Purchaser/Transferee/Assignee hereby requests

that it be immediately substituted upon the docketing of this Joint Notice of Transfer of Claim for the Seller/Transferor/Assignor

as the record holder of the Bankruptcy claim for all purposes in these proceedings. The Seller/Transferor/Assignor concurs with

the request and, pursuant to the attached Waiver of Notice of Transfer of Claim, hereby informs the court that it waives it's right

to receive notice of the transfer and declines its opportunity to object under FRBP 3001 (e) (2).

 Discover Bank (the "Seller/Transferor/Assignor") and eCAST Settlement Corporation (the

"Purchaser/Transferee/Assignee") do hereby provide joint notice of the unconditional sale and transfer of all right, title, and

interest in and to the Claims (as such is defined in the Credit Card Purchase and Sale Agreement dated August 01, 2003 by

and between Seller/Transferor/Assignor and Purchaser/Transferee/Assignee) including the Claim referenced above (the

"Bankruptcy Claim").

Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 30 Filed 04/13/04 Entered 04/13/04 08:34:16 Desc 

 Page 1 of 2
Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 30 Filed 04/13/04 Entered 04/13/04 08:34:16 Desc 

 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019187EN.01001501.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — United Kingdom) — Abraxis Bioscience LLC v Comptroller General of Patents

(Case C-443/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medicinal product for human use - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Article 3(d) - Conditions for granting - Grant of first authorisation to place the product on the market as a medicinal product - Authorisation covering a product as a medicinal product constituting a new formulation of a known active ingredient)

(2019/C 187/16)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Abraxis Bioscience LLC

Defendant: Comptroller General of Patents

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(d) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, read in conjunction with Article 1(b) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that the marketing authorisation referred to in Article 3(b) of that regulation, relied on in support of an application for a supplementary protection certificate concerning a new formulation of an old active ingredient, cannot be regarded as being the first marketing authorisation for the product concerned as a medicinal product in the case where that active ingredient has already been the subject of a marketing authorisation as an active ingredient.

---

(1)  OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.

---
Wesley Thomas GRACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2652

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.