alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Central

Texas ACA

Heritage Land

Bank ACA

Capital Farm

Credit ACA

Legacy Ag

Credit ACA

Louisiana

Land Bank

ACA

Mississippi Land

Bank ACA

Southern

AgCredit ACA

Alabama ACA

Alabama Ag

Credit, ACA

Plains Land

Bank, FLCA

AgTrust, ACA

Texas FCS

AgTexas

FCS

Central

Kentucky ACA

ArborOne, ACA

Southwest

Georgia ACA

Horizon ACA

Northwest Florida

ACA

Central

Florida ACA

FC of the

Virginias

ACA

AgCarolina

ACA

AgGeorgia

ACA

Florida ACA

AgSouth

ACA

Ag Credit

ACA

River Valley

AgCredit ACA

First

South ACA

Mandan ACA

Farm Credit

Illinois, ACA

FCS

of America

ACA

Western

Arkansas

ACA

AgHeritage

ACA

Southeast

Missouri, ACA

FCS

Financial,

ACA

Mid-America

ACA

Greenstone

ACA

Idaho

AgCredit,

ACA

Western

AgCredit ACA

Yosemite ACA

Colusa-Glenn ACA

Premier

ACA

Western

Oklahoma,

ACA

Fresno-Madera ACA

Western

Kansas

ACA

Frontier ACA

AgWest ACA

Southern

Colorado ACA

Farm Credit

East, ACA

Golden

State

ACA

AgWest ACA

Oklahoma

AgCredit,

ACA

Colonial ACA

AgCountry ACA

Compeer ACA

High Plains ACA

American

AgCredit ACA

American

AgCredit ACA

American

AgCredit ACA

American

AgCredit ACA

American

AgCredit ACA

Capital Farm

Credit ACA

AgWest ACA

Golden State ACA River Valley

AgCredit ACA

AgTrust, ACA

FCB of Texas

AgFirst FCB

CoBank, ACB

AgriBank, FCB

AgWest, ACA

American

AgCredit, ACA

Puerto Rico ACA

ACAs & FLCAs by District (abbreviated names)

Farm Credit System Institution Territories

December 2023

CoBank District (16)

AgriBank District (11)

AgFirst District (16)

Texas District (13)

ACA Headquarters

FLCA Headquarters

Bank Headquarters
Exhibit 18.1 

May 12, 2008 

Board of Directors 

Language LineHoldings, Inc. 

Dear Directors: 

We are providing this letterto you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. 

We have audited the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and issued our report thereon dated March 25, 2008. Note 1 to such financial statements specifies a change in measurement date for performing the annualtest of impairment for goodwill from October 1 to December 31. Further, Note 1 to the Form 10-Q describes the reason management has revised the annual measurement date. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method ofaccounting over another for changing the measurement date for the annual test of impairment of goodwill has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management’sdetermination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as totheir judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity withStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP 

San Francisco, CA 

May 12, 2008
# C_2017249EN.01001902.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/19

---

Appeal brought on 11 May 2017 by Bank Tejarat against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 March 2017 in Case T-346/15: Bank Tejarat v Council

(Case C-248/17 P)

(2017/C 249/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Bank Tejarat (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy, A. Meskarian, Solicitors, M. Brindle QC, T. Otty, R. Blakeley, Barristers)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | allow this appeal and set aside paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Court's order contained in the second judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow this appeal and set aside paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Court's order contained in the second judgment;

| — | allow the Bank's re-listing application; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the Bank's re-listing application;

| — | annul the contested measures insofar as they apply to the Bank; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measures insofar as they apply to the Bank; and

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of the appeal and the costs of the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of the appeal and the costs of the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court erred in law in that it wrongly attributed no and/or insufficient weight to the evidence adduced by the Bank and thereby distorted the key evidence relevant to the question as to whether the allegations in the contested reasons were substantiated by the Council.

Regardless of the outcome of the first ground of appeal, the General Court erred in law in that it distorted the key evidence relevant to the question as to whether the allegations in the contested reasons were substantiated by the Council and/or erroneously placed the burden of proof of the Bank.

In respect of both the first and second grounds of appeal, had the General Court applied the correct principles and/or had it not distorted the evidence referred to above, it would have annulled the contested measures.

The General Court erred in law in holding that the Council was entitled to re-list the Bank on the basis of reasons that could and should have been advanced prior to the first judgment and that the Council’s conduct did not violate Article 266 TFEU as well as the principles of res judicata and/or legal certainty and/or finality and/or effectiveness and/or the right to effective judicial protection and/or the Bank’s rights under Article 47 of the EU Charter and/or under Article 6 and Article 13 ECHR and/or its rights to good administration and/or the principle of proportionality.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract                               ( print page 4818)                            1262 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1081, K2025-1080.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00905 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 2:04-cv-00254-J Document 10 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 94 

To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major 

non-NATO ally, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of 

Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF THE IS4 LAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AS A MAJOR 

5 NON-NATO ALLY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective beginning on the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act— 

8 (1) the designation of the Islamic Republic of 

9 Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally pursuant to 

10 section 517(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 94 IH

1 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321k(a)(1)) or any other provi2 sion of law is hereby terminated; and 

3 (2) the President may not issue a separate des4 ignation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a 

5 major non-NATO ally pursuant to section 517(a)(1) 

6 of such Act or any other provision of law unless the 

7 President submits to Congress a certification de8 scribed in subsection (b). 

9 (b) CERTIFICATION.—A certification described in this 

10 subsection is a certification that contains a determination 

11 of the President that— 

12 (1) Pakistan continues to conduct military oper13 ations that are contributing to significantly dis14 rupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of 

15 the Haqqani Network in Pakistan; 

16 (2) Pakistan has taken steps to demonstrate its 

17 commitment to prevent the Haqqani Network from 

18 using any Pakistani territory as a safe haven; 

19 (3) the Government of Pakistan actively coordi20 nates with the Government of Afghanistan to re21 strict the movement of militants, such as the 

22 Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan 

23 border; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 94 IH

1 (4) Pakistan has shown progress in arresting 

2 and prosecuting Haqqani Network senior leaders 

3 and mid-level operatives. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 6 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 6

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2025.
    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of daily meeting of the 
House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative 
business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 
Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NUMBER 13-24-00397-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

RAY VILLAGOMEZ AND YANETH PUGA 

AND IN THE INTEREST OF R.V. JR., R.V., AND R.V.

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 476TH DISTRICT COURT

OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to withdraw notice of appeal 

which we construe as a motion to dismiss. Appellant inadvertently filed the notice of 

appeal and does not wish to pursue matter on appeal.

Having considered appellant’s motion to dismiss, we are of the opinion that the 

motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellant’s motion 

to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the 
2

appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs 

against the appellant."). Because the appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained.

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

28th day of August, 2024.
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Amarin Corporation plc (the “Company”)
on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ian R.
Garland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



	 	1.	 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
	 
	 	2.	 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.




	/s/ IAN R. GARLAND
	



	Ian R. Garland

Chief Financial Officer


	 
	Date: July 31, 2003
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of Texas

In re Gonzalez-Lopez , Marcos

Debtor

Case No. 23-43977-13

Chapter 13

AMENDED

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered

or to be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept ................................................................................................................................................ $4,400.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received ................................................................................................................................................ $2,000.00

Balance Due ................................................................................................................................................ $2,400.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

Debtor Other (specify)

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

Debtor Other (specify)

4. I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my

law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a other person or persons who are not members or associates of my

law firm. A copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation, is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor' s financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in

bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statements of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following services:

Page 1 of 2

❑✔ ❑

❑✔ ❑

❑✔

❑

Case 23-43977-elm13 Doc 46 Filed 03/20/24 Entered 03/20/24 10:08:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to

me for representation of the debtor(s) in this bankruptcy proceeding.

03/20/2024

Date

/s/ Clayton L. Everett

Clayton L. Everett

Signature of Attorney

Bar Number: 24065212

Norred Law, PLLC

Norred Law, PLLC

515 E. Border

Arlington, TX 76010

Phone: (817) 704-3984

Norred Law, PLLC

Name of law firm

Page 2 of 2

Case 23-43977-elm13 Doc 46 Filed 03/20/24 Entered 03/20/24 10:08:37 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.1CERTIFICATIONI, Antonio Garcés, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005,of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:June 28, 2006 /s/ Antonio Garcés     Antonio Garcés  Chief Executive Officer  (principal executive officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00868]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
589 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1067, K2025-1066.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00868 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


The Board of Directors of Bradley Real Estate, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
36577) on Form S-3 of Bradley Operating Limited Partnership of our report dated
January 28, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bradley
Operating Limited Partnership and Predecessor Business and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1997 and related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of Bradley Operating Limited
Partnership.



                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 19, 1998
Statement

Jill Long Thompson, Board Member

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Audit Committee Meeting

January 8, 2015

Like my colleagues, I have approached, with an open mind, the issue of oversight of the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation. After considerable study and thought, combined with 

experience serving on the FCSIC Board, I find clarity regarding the approach necessary to 

ensure the appropriate level of oversight for the Corporation. 

I believe, as the Government Accountability Office has recommended, FCSIC needs oversight 

by an Inspector General. I also believe it would be both prudent and efficient for the Farm Credit 

Administration Inspector General to take on this responsibility.

The need for an Inspector General is clear. Any government entity that collects, expends, and 

administers billions of dollars in funds should be subject to the oversight of an Inspector 

General. Good government relies on independence for the oversight of public entities, and an 

auditor hired by FCSIC staff does not have the same level of independence as an Inspector 

General. Also, while audits play an important role in reducing fraud and abuse, they do not 

necessarily identify inefficiencies or waste. I am not aware, for example, of any audits to 

determine the efficiency of the FCSIC operation or its compliance with the statutory 

requirement: “To the extent practicable, the Corporation shall use the personnel and resources 

of the Farm Credit Administration to minimize duplication of effort and to reduce costs.” 

While the Inspector General of the Farm Credit Administration is not directed by statute to also 

serve the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, there is nothing in the law that prohibits 

such oversight. Additionally, in a letter dated March 30, 1990, the Chairman and Ranking 

Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry wrote to the FCA 

Board that their intent in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 was that FCSIC should rely on the 

Farm Credit Administration staff for virtually all its operating activity. Oversight of FCSIC by the 

FCA Inspector General would be both prudent and efficient.

I am hopeful the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board can work together to bring 

Inspector General oversight to the Corporation.
Case 3:05-cv-00687-B Document 7 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54