alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS I, Desmond Ross , the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of  , Quantum Solar Power Corp..(the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:November 12, 2009/s/ Desmond RossBy:Desmond RossTitle:Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
EX PARTE Lewis CLARK

CR-16-1253

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Andrew David HAWTHORNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

Candice Kaye Brower, Office of Regional Conflict, Gainesville, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Makar and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenço Gonçalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2007 |  | /s/ C. LOURENÇO
GONÇALVES                                  
|                      |  | C. Lourenço Gonçalves President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
 

 Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID 2
 

 Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID 3
 

 Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID 4
 

 Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID 5
 

 Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID 6
 

 Case 7:05-cv-00107-R Document 1 Filed 06/07/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID 7
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DAVID G. SHIPP, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-683

LT Case No. 2005-CF-3682-C

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed April 25, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County, 

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Matthew R. McLain, of McLain Law, 

P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, BOATWRIGHT and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Bruce J. Labovitz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by otherswithin that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 9, 2006             /s/ Bruce J. Labovitz   Bruce J. Labovitz   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017283EN.01001601.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 15 May 2017 — Bernhard Schloesser, Petra Noll v Société Air France SA

(Case C-255/17)

(2017/C 283/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Bernhard Schloesser, Petra Noll

Applicants:

Defendant: Société Air France SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In circumstances where a contract has been entered into with an operating air carrier for a journey comprising two legs, and providing for a change of aircraft by the passenger, and the first leg of the journey is subject to a significant delay, do the courts of the place of final destination have jurisdiction in respect of a claim for compensation brought against that air carrier pursuant to Regulation No 261/2004? (1)

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Tommie C. MOLETTE, a.k.a. Tucker Molette

NO. 2018-KO-1955

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.
EX PARTE Montavious Kentrell ASKEW

1160773 (CR-15-0056)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, William A. Torzolini, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this Quarterly Report ("Report") onForm 10-Q of Allied Security Holdings LLC;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this Report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a.    Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a.    All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information;and

b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|  | /s/ William A. Torzolini            William A. Torzolini Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: May 13,2005

----
Danilo Baldemar PEREZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1365

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2019004EN.01000401.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma — Italy) — Martina Sciotto v Fondazione Teatro dell’Opera di Roma

(Case C-331/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 5 - Measures to prevent the misuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships - National legislation excluding the application of those measures in the sector of activity of operatic and orchestral foundations)

(2019/C 4/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Martina Sciotto

Defendant: Fondazione Teatro dell’Opera di Roma

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 5 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded on 18 March 1999, which is set out in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, pursuant to which the common law rules governing employment relationships and intended to penalise the misuse of successive fixed-term contracts by the automatic transformation of the fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration if the employment relationship goes beyond a specific date are not applicable to the sector of activity of operatic and orchestral foundations, where there is no other effective measure in the domestic legal system penalising abuses identified in that sector.

---

(1)  OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.

---
Elijah L. UNION, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 18, 2019

Elijah L. Union, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*837DISMISSED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).

Lewis, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Case 3:05-cv-00586-P Document 9 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
# C_2018005EN.01001701.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 18 August 2017 — Thomas Krauss v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-500/17)

(2018/C 005/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Thomas Krauss

Applicant:

Defendant: TUIfly GmbH

Defendant:

By order of 28 September 2017, the Court removed the case from its Register.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 99-50384 Summary Calendar

___________________

In The Matter Of: TEXAS HYDROGEN ENERGY CORPORATION, Debtor.

CLARENCE T. V. JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS HYDROGEN ENERGY CORPORATION; HYDROGEN ENERGY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees.

_______________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(MO-98-CV-140)

_________________________________________________________________

November 1, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

At issue is the non-award of attorney’s fees for a T exas

declaratory judgment action removed to bankruptcy court, the fees

being claimed under that Texas statute or for an alleged “bad

faith” claim under F ED

. R. B ANKR

. P. 9011.

In April 1990, by promissory note, Clarence Johnson lent money

to Texas Hydrogen Energy Corporation (THEC) and Hydrogen Ener g y

Corporation (HEC). An action against the loan, secured by a deed

of trust on an oil and gas lease, became time barred, at the- 2 -

latest, in October 1994. But, in 1996, the debt was acknowledged

in writing by THEC and HEC without new c onsideration. In 1997,

Johnson initiated foreclosure, which THEC and HEC contested in the

state declaratory judgment action, challenging the validity of the

debt.

Before the state court proceedi ng began, both corporations

filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy prot ection, removed the case to

bankruptcy court, and challenged the debt acknowledgment as a

fraudulent transfer or in valid preference. D uring the course of

the bankruptcy procee ding, our court decided I n Re Vineyard Bay

Development Co., Inc.

, 132 F.3d 269 (5th Cir. 1998), establishing,

under Texas law, the validity of the acknowledgment. Id. at 271.

The bankruptcy court held the debt was valid; the

acknowledgmen t was neither a fraudulent transfer nor invalid

preference; denied the declaratory judgment request; did not grant

Johnson a declaratory judgment; and made the parties responsible

for their own costs and attorney’s fees. On reconsideration, the

bankruptcy court acknowledged that Johnson could seek attorney’s

fees under the Texas statute, but denied them. I n a comprehensive

and well-reasoned opinion, the district court affirmed.

For essentially the rea sons stated in the district court’s

opinion, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its d iscretion in

denying attorney’s fees.

Johnson also contends that he should be awarded such fees

under F ED

. R. B ANKR

. P. 9 011, claiming that the state action was

brought in “bad faith”. The bankruptcy court found otherwise.- 3 -

Again, for essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s

opinion, this factual finding is not clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED
Jason Matthew BRADLEY, DOC# 539841, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Jason Matthew Bradley, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, AND SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Tony HOPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018104EN.01001701.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 28 December 2017 — Edward Reich, Debora Lieber, Ella Reich, Ezra Bernard Reich v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

(Case C-730/17)

(2018/C 104/22)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Edward Reich, Debora Lieber, Ella Reich, Ezra Bernard Reich

Applicants:

Defendant: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 3, 5, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1) (‘Regulation No 261/2004’) to be interpreted as meaning that — in the case where an operating Community air carrier, for the purposes of Regulation No 261/2004, concludes a contract for the carriage of passengers by air with consumers that includes a train journey from a railway station located in the territory of a Member State in which those consumers reside to an airport located in the territory of a second Member State from which the consumers will take their flight to their final destination, namely an airport located in the territory of a non-Member country, and those consumers have no legal connection with the company carrying out the train journey but the air carrier clearly has agreements with that company, and there was a long delay in the train journey, which is included in the contract, that resulted in those consumers being unable to catch their flight from the airport located in the territory of the second Member State — those consumers may rely on the rights provided for by Regulation No 261/2004 and demand compensation in accordance with Articles 5, 6 and 7 of that regulation?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---