alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, J.Chris Steinhauser, certify that:

 

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof GeoPetro Resources Company;

 

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.           The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.           The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August 7, 2008 | /s/ J. Chris Steinhauser |
|----------------------|--------------------------|
|                 | J. Chris Steinhauser,    |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
Kep LAFOON v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-01724-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 7, 2019 Closed: April 25, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
May Qk, 2015

FILED IN

Tashima Everhart COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Hobby Unit #1925896

742 FM 712 UM 06 2015

Marlin, Texas 76661-4685 RECEIVED IN

Abel Acosta, Clerk COURT OF owmimsi appeals

MAY 06 20K

Court Of Criminal Appeals

Attn: Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk Of The Court ^h&l&r»nef£> PharL- P. 0. Box 12308 -HJWrtCOSia.OWri'

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Everhart vs State

Fifth Court. Of. Appeals, Cases: 05-14-00061-CR, 05-14-00062-CR,

05-14-00063-CR, 05-14-00064-CR

Dear Mr. Acosta,

Please be advised with this letter that I ask for an extension of the

May 6, 2015., deadline to have a petition filed for discretionary

review in the Court Of Criminal Appeals.

I would also like to ask the Court with this letter to appoint me

an attorney to represent me in these matters. I am incarcerated with

no form of an income and therefore indigent. I cannot afford the

proper counsel to perform the duties required to represent me in the

Courts.

It is my intention to further appeal the most recent,decisions from

the Courts pertaining to Trial Court Cause: F13-00363-S from the

282 Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, and the Fifth

Court Of Appeals.

Please notify me at the above listed address if there are any additional

documents to sign or need to be provided to assign an attorney to

represent me in theses cases. I also ask that you notify me of the new

date to have the petition filed.

I forward my gratitude in advance for your prompt attention to this

letter!

Sincerely., g

Tashima Everhart
# C_2017030EN.01004901.xml

| 30.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/49

---

Action brought on 18 November 2016 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB

(Case T-809/16)

(2017/C 030/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06 of 15 April 2016 (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06)’), as well as the decision of the Single Resolution Board SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13 of 20 May 2016 (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund supplementing the Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13)’), at least in so far as those decisions concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06 of 15 April 2016 (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06)’), as well as the decision of the Single Resolution Board SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13 of 20 May 2016 (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund supplementing the Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13)’), at least in so far as those decisions concern the applicant;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| — | First plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of a lack of (full) disclosure of the contested decisions. |
| --- | --- |

—

First plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of a lack of (full) disclosure of the contested decisions.

| — | Second plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the contested decisions. |
| --- | --- |

—

Second plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the contested decisions.

---
EX PARTE Marvin Jaamal SMITH

CR-16-0783

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
OFFICE OF THE STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

6851 N.E. Loop 820, Suite 300

North Richland Hills, TX 76180-6608

(817) 770-8500

Fax (817) 770-8511

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE:

DAVID LYN LUTTRELL

Case No: 24-41512-MXM

Court Hearing:

Time & Date: 8:30 AM on

Debtor, Thursday, August 15, 2024

TRUSTEE'S AMENDED OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

TO THE HONORABLE MARK X MULLIN, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

Now comes Tim Truman, the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, and files this his "Trustee's Amended Objection 

to Confirmation" of the Plan heretofore filed herein by Debtor, and for the same would respectfully show the 

Court as follows:

 In addition to the grounds alleged in the previous objection, which are incorporated herein by reference, the 

Trustee objects to Confirmation of the Plan for the following reason(s):

The Plan fails to meet the "feasibility" requirements of 11 U.S.C. Section 1325 (a) (6) of the Bankruptcy 

Code. In this regard, the Trustee would show that the Debtor's proposed Plan provides for the following plan 

payments: 

DEBTOR PAY SCHEDULE NO. 1 (DAVID LYN LUTTRELL)

PAYMENT BEGINNING: 05/31/2024 FOR 1 MONTHS IN THE AMOUNT OF: $1,746.00 

PAYMENTS BEGINNING: 06/30/2024 FOR 59 MONTHS IN THE AMOUNT OF: $1,449.00 

The Debtor's monthly surplus per Schedules I and J is $1,780.82. Therefore, the Plan does not appear to be 

feasible for that reason, and for the following reason(s) if any:

 DAVID LYN LUTTRELL has not provided the Trustee with current pay stubs, a current Profit & Loss 

Statement, or other income verification to support the income information reflected on Schedule I. Until the 

financial affairs of the Debtor are more completely documented and examined, the Trustee is unable to 

recommend Confirmation of the Plan.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Trustee prays that said Plan not be confirmed unless 

and until it has been modified to cure all objections set forth hereinabove, and for general relief.

Case 24-41512-mxm13 Doc 29 Filed 06/25/24 Entered 06/25/24 15:55:59 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
24-41512-MXM DAVID LYN LUTTRELL

Trustee's Amended Objection to Confirmation Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Angela D. Allen

Tim Truman, Bar # 20258000

Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

Angela Allen, Bar # 007869700

Staff Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing "Trustee's Objection to Confirmation" was 

served on all parties listed below in the manner listed below on or before June 27, 2024.

 /s/ Angela D. Allen

Tim Truman, Angela Allen

BY FIRST CLASS MAIL:

DAVID LYN LUTTRELL, 2209 PONTIAC DR, ARLINGTON, TX 76013-0000

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE:

NORRED LAW PLLC, 515 E BORDER, ARLINGTON, TX 76010

POPE HARDWICKE CHRISTIE SCHELL KELLY & TAPLETT, 500 W 7TH ST STE 600, FORT WORTH, TX 76102

LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON LLP, 2777 N STEMMONS FWY #1000, DALLAS, TX 75207

United States Trustee, 1100 COMMERCE STREET, ROOM 976, DALLAS, TX 75242

Case 24-41512-mxm13 Doc 29 Filed 06/25/24 Entered 06/25/24 15:55:59 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 71 

Condemning the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water deliveries 

on an annual basis to the United States under the treaty between 

the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado 

and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2025 

Ms. DE LA CRUZ (for herself, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. WEBER of 

Texas, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mr. ROY) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill 

its water deliveries on an annual basis to the United 

States under the treaty between the United States and 

Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado and 

Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 demns the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its 

3 water deliveries on an annual basis to the United States 

4 under the treaty between the United States and Mexico 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 71 IH 

1 regarding the utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Riv2 ers and of the Rio Grande. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00686]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Modifcation to a Stipulated Order 
Under the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act

    On January 8, 2025, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
modification to Stipulated Order No. 1 that was entered in 2009 by the 
United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands in the 
lawsuit entitled United States v. Commonwealth Utilities Corp. et al., 
Civil Action No. 08-cv-0051 (dkt. No. 14).
    Stipulated Order No. 1 requires the Commonwealth Utilities 
Corporation (CUC) to undertake certain measures to address violations 
of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1311 et seq. and Safe Drinking 
Water Act (SDWA), 42 U.S.C. 300f. et seq. with respect to its 
wastewater treatment and drinking water systems. An EPA inspection in 
December of 2023 found deficiencies in CUC's operation and maintenance 
of its drinking water system. The proposed modification requires CUC to 
correct these deficiencies and undertake certain measures to ensure 
future compliance with the CWA and SDWA.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the proposed modification. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
and should refer to United States v. Commonwealth Utilities Corp. D.J. 
Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-08471. All comments must be submitted no later than 
thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments 
may be submitted either by email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................  [email protected].
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any comments submitted in writing may be filed in whole or in part 
on the public court docket without further notice to the commenter. 
During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined 
and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. If you require assistance 
accessing Consent Decree, you may request assistance by email or by 
mail to the addresses provided above for submitting comments.

Scott Bauer,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-00686 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1250 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                           ( print page 4814)    *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1068, K2025-1067.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00876 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
James Lee BURL v. STATE

CR-16-0400

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
330 E. Warm Springs
Las Vegas, NV 89119
702.528.1984
425.928.2877 (efax)



January 22, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report of
January 22, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Stock Watch Man, Inc. for
the period ended December 31, 2000, in any filings which are necessary now or
in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,



G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
# C_2017374EN.01001502.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 10 August 2017 — K v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-484/17)

(2017/C 374/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: K

Appellant:

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Article 15(1) and (4) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251[, p. 12]) be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which an application for an autonomous residence permit on the part of a foreign national who has resided lawfully for more than five years on the territory of a Member State for family-reunification purposes may be rejected because of non-compliance with conditions relating to integration laid down in national law?

---
IIA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission relating to ‘‘Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing 

of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2025 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. SHEEHY) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission relating 

to ‘‘Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the final guidance submitted 

4 by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission relating 

5 to ‘‘Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Vol6 untary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 9 IS 

1 83378 (October 15, 2024)) and such rule shall have no 

2 force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BOBBY CHARLES DOAK )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-155-N

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed November 9, 2005.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00155-N Document 17 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 106
Frederick WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2987

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Placido H. Canta, Chief Financial Officer of Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.,
the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   May 12, 2006                        /S/ Placido H. Canta
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Placido H. Canta,
                                             Chief Financial Officer of Manager
                                             Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.