alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2040

CHRISTOPHER T. MANGUM, individually and d/b/a Wrightsville Beach Jet Ski 

Rentals,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH JET SKI RENTALS, INC.; MITCHELL CARSON 

SEITTER, individually and d/b/a Carolina Coast Watersports, LLC; CAROLINA 

COAST WATERSPORTS, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, a North Carolina Corporation and Body 

Politic; TIMOTHY OWENS, individually & in his official capacity as Town 

Manager; JOHN WESSELL, individually & in his official capacity as Town 

Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00029-FL)

Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 22, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher T. Mangum, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Edes, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH 

COLLIER HANLEY & EDES PLLC, Wilmington, North Carolina; Melody Jewell Jolly, 

Elizabeth C. King, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Wilmington, North 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Christopher T. Magnum, who proceeds in this court pro se, seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order denying the various postjudgment motions filed by Magnum’s former 

counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its final order on August 24, 2020. The district court did 

not receive Magnum’s notice of appeal until Thursday, September 24, 2020.*

 Because 

Magnum failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of 

the appeal period, we grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss this appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Given that Magnum was not incarcerated when he filed the notice of appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(c), the so-called “prison mailbox rule,” is not applicable in this case.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HemoBioTech, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Arthur  P.  Bollon,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

a. the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b. the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: NOVEMBER 8,  2006                         /s/ Arthur P. Bollon, Ph.D.
                                                Arthur P. Bollon, Ph.D.
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 14 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 6, 2025. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

(1) COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE.—Ms. Craig. 

(2) COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS.—Ms. 

DeLauro. 

(3) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—Mr. Smith 

of Washington. 

(4) COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET.—Mr. Boyle of 

Pennsylvania. 

(5) COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE.—Mr. Scott of Virginia. 

(6) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE.—Mr. 

Pallone. 

(7) COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES.—Ms. 

Waters. 

(8) COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS.—Mr. 

Meeks. 
2 

•HRES 14 EH 

(9) COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY.—Mr. 

Thompson of Mississippi. 

(10) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY.—Mr. Raskin. 

(11) COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES.—Mr. 

Huffman. 

(12) COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT

REFORM.—Mr. Connolly. 

(13) COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY.—Ms. Lofgren. 

(14) COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS.—Ms. 

Vela ́zquez. 

(15) COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE.—Mr. Larsen of Washington. 

(16) COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS.—Mr. 

Takano. 

(17) COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS.—Mr. Neal. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael R. Dawson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Michael R. Dawson                                      
|Michael R. Dawson Chief Financial Officer February 28, 2007
# C_2019112EN.01000702.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/7

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Roma — Italy) — Alberto Rossi v Ministero di Giustizia

(Case C-626/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social policy - Fixed-term employment - Justices of the Peace - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 112/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di Pace di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alberto Rossi

Defendant: Ministero di Giustizia

Intervener in support of the applicant: Unione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (Unagipa), Associazione Nazionale Guidici di Pace, Coordinamento Nazionale Giustizia di Pace, Organismo Unitario della Magistratura Onoraria — Magistrati Onorari Riuniti, Maria Maddalena Acernese and 656 other Justices of the Peace, Angela Abbondandolo and 139 honorary vice-prosecutors, Santina Adelfio and 101 other honorary judges

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Giudice di Pace di Roma (Justice of the Peace of Rome, Italy), by decision of 17 October 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
Thomas CAMPANIELLO, Appellant, v. Edith EGLIN, John Schaefer, Henry P. Hoffstot, III and Phipps Plaza Condominium Association, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

Nos. 4D18-604 4D18-1072

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2021163EN.01002702.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ LONDON)

(Case T-66/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ LONDON - Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 163/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hauz 1929 Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Lyberis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Houzz, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2019 (Case R 884/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Houzz and Hauz 1929.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hauz 1929 Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hauz 1929 Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 86 

To abolish the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Workforce 

A BILL 

To abolish the Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nullify Occupational 

5 Safety and Health Administration Act’’ or the ‘‘NOSHA 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 86 IH

1 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

2 The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is 

3 repealed. The Occupational Safety and Health Adminis4 tration is abolished. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the
capacities listed below, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                        |                                |                          | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------ | 
|                        | Biotel
 Inc.                  
|                       
|Date: November 15, 2010 | By:                            | /s/ B. Steven Springrose | 
|                        | B. Steven Springrose           |                         
|                        | Chief Executive Officer        |                         
|                        | and President                  |                         
|                        | (principal executive
 officer) |                         
|                        |                                |                          | 
|Date: November 15, 2010 | By:                            | /s/ Judy E. Naus         | 
|                        | Judy E. Naus                   |                         
|                        | Chief Financial Officer        |                         
|                        | (principal financial
 officer) |                         

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Steven Clayton THOMASON v. STATE

CR-17-0114

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 27, 2017

Reh. denied.
K.L. v. Lee County DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170158

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40157

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

JOSE DE JESUS CASTANEDA-GARCIA,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-1198-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Castaneda-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40157 Document: 00513727119 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2016
No. 16-40157

2

Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Garcia has filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and 

Castaneda-Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Castaneda-Garcia’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is 

DENIED.

 Case: 16-40157 Document: 00513727119 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/20/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT L. ROBINSON §

 §

VS. §

 § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:05-CV-214-Y

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of the Social §

Security Administration §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 13, 2006, the United States magistrate judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings”) in

the above-styled and -numbered cause. In his findings, the magistrate

judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration of the United States (“the Commissioner”)

denying plaintiff Robert L. Robinson’s claim for disability insurance

and supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. The magistrate

judge’s order gave all parties until February 7 to serve and file with

the Court written objections to his proposed findings. 

Subsequently, the plaintiff filed his objections, asking this

Court to reject the findings of the magistrate judge. The defendant

did not file a response.

After carefully reviewing the findings, record, case law, and

Plaintiff’s objections, the Court concludes that the findings should

be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this

Court for the reasons stated therein.

Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED February 27, 2006.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00214-Y Document 19 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 75
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 845 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect Federal employees from 

retaliation for the lawful use of Federal records, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect Federal 

employees from retaliation for the lawful use of Federal 

records, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ac5 cess to Information Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST RETALIATION FOR LAWFUL 

7 USE OF FEDERAL RECORDS BY FEDERAL EM8 PLOYEES. 

9 (a) PROTECTION AGAINST RETALIATION.—Section 

10 2302(b)(9) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 845 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘or’’ 

4 after the semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) the employee or applicant for employ7 ment— 

8 ‘‘(i) making a request for information 

9 pursuant to section 552 (commonly re10 ferred to as the ‘Freedom of Information 

11 Act’) or subsection (d) of section 552a 

12 (commonly referred to as the ‘Privacy Act 

13 of 1974’); or 

14 ‘‘(ii) pursuing any administrative or 

15 judicial action with respect to such request, 

16 including seeking assistance or to engage 

17 in dispute resolution, as described in sec18 tion 552;’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) TITLE 5.—Sections 1214, 1215(a)(3)(B), 

21 1221, 2302, and 7703 of title 5, United States 

22 Code, are amended by striking ‘‘or (D)’’ in each in23 stance and inserting ‘‘(D), or (E)’’. 

24 (2) WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ENHANCE25 MENT ACT OF 2012.—Section 116(b)(1)(A) of the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 845 IS

1 Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 

2 (31 U.S.C. 1116 note) is amended by striking ‘‘or 

3 (D)’’ and inserting ‘‘(D), or (E)’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION

MICHELLE NEMOEDE, as next friend of
Deryn Tuz and Madison Tuz, and
ATOYIA CLARK, as next friend of
Randall Tuz and Damian Horn, as
Substitute parties for

DARREN JASON TUZ, Deceased,

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Deputy

Plaintiffs,

v. 2:05-CV-0129

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,

On LR WO? LR WO? COR LO? LO WO? COD WO? COD COR OD LOD

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.
REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER,
and REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

Came for consideration plaintiffs’ appeal of the decision of the Commissioner of Social
Security denying plaintiffs disability benefits. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a
Report and Recommendation on September 8, 2008, recommending therein that the decision of
the Commissioner be reversed and the case remanded to the Commissioner for further
administrative action. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed,
although defendant, on September 19, 2008, gave notice that he does not object to the decision
made in the Report and Recommendation.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of

the record in this case. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge



is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s administrative decision finding
plaintiff not disabled is REVERSED, and the decision is REMANDED to the Commissioner for
further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to all action specified and recommended to be taken
on remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

ENTERED this_ £2 TMaay of Gill till yp) 2008,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EX PARTE David Todd WRIGHT

CR-16-1083

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 23, 2017 Reh. denied November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Elena
      Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the three months ended March
      31,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By:/s/ *Elena
      Pochapski*


Elena
      Pochapski


Chief Financial
      Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)





May
      15,
      2007
James F. BARRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Affirmed.