alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Richard Thompson, 610-436-5582, P.O. Box 463, West Chester, PA 19380 In the Twelfth Court ofAppeals 1517 W. Front St., Suite 354 Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel 903 593 8471, Fax 903 593 8474- Appeal: 12-15-00226-CV

From: Cause No. 2014-0349-CCL2 Richard Thompson (heir in Estate ofWm. McGeorge) BLED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12m Court o*Arpoais District

vs. Blackberry LC (aka Bob Anderson) fax 903 232 1881 Motionfor Summary Judgment on Pleadings rwestes. clerk Defendant/Appellant Richard Thompson hereby moves for summaryjudgment on his 

### uncontested "Appeal from an Illegal Taking," dated 9/9/15, at least an immediate stay, and supports his demand by responding to four letters from Katrina McClenny 9/14/15: 1 Extension oftime to give notice in orderto establishjurisdiction is non-essential and moot. 

### 2 My Appeal dated 9/9/15 constitutes a "Docketing Statement," and is a complete brief. 3 Plaintiff/Appellee Blackberry has been served and is required to answer orwilldefault. 4 The exhibits incorporated in my briefconstitute and should be construed as an "Appendix." 5 The "Record" of trial court is inthe public domain online, readily accessible to Appeals Court. 6 Appellee isfree to file exculpable evidence, ifany he has. 7 Thejudgment appealed was final - no more discovery or recourse to Judge Dulweber, Iserved Notice ofAppeal with his court 8/8/15. 8 Trial court oversaw collusion between Plaintiff, Estate Executor, Receiver and Attorney Ad 

### Litemto conceal value ofproperty from heirs, evident bythe record and this Appeal. 9 Upon confirmation this appeal willnot be dismissed on specious grounds, e.g.,jurisdiction, I 

### willimmediatelyforward $205 filing fee. Certificate of Service: Copies mailed 9/24/1!: 

## RichardThompson y^) • .Verification: Sworn under penalty of law. 9/24/15Address List Gregg County Court at Law #2 (Judge Vincent Dulweber) 101 E.Methvin St. Suite 303 (Fax 903 237 2574) Longview Texas 75601 

### Boon Shaver Echols Coleman &Goolsby, fax 903 759 3306 1800 NW Loop 281, Suite 303 (Tel. 903 759 3306) Longview TX,75604 Ethelwynn Bowen 1128 Sky Hawk Mountain Road Hiawasee, GA 30546
Thomas Yocum 2142 Pass Creek Road Castlegar, British Columbia VIN4S9 Tony Rolling P.O. Box 582 White Oak, TX75693 Timothy Eckenrode 709 Wombat Way Kissimmee, FL34759-4224 Timothy Callahan

Christina Frank 3848 Anne Street Drexel Hill, PA 19026 Joseph S. Klimczack, Jr. 7921 West Chester Pike, Upper Darby, PA 19082
Robert A. Klimczack 57 South Church St. 

### Clifton Heights, PA19018
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**SOUTHERNHERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

**FORM 10-QSB**

**Quarterended March 31, 2005**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Steven W. Ledbetter,certify that:

 

1)             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Heritage Bancshares, Inc.

 

2)             Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period by this quarterly report;

 

3)             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in the quarterly report;

 

4)             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31,2005 (the “Evaluation Date”);

 

c)             presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and

 

d)            disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5)             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing equivalent function):

 

a)             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| /s/ Steven W. Ledbetter |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Steven W. Ledbetter     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 17, 2005       |

 

----
# Violent Crime

The FBI, with its law enforcement partners, plays a key role in combating violent crime involving gangs, crimes against children, crimes in Indian Country, fugitives and missing persons, kidnappings, and bank robberies.

- Major Cases Violent Crime and Major Theft major cases.
- Violent Crimes Against Children The overall mission of the FBI's Violent Crimes Against Children program is to protect children against harmful threats, including sex trafficking, online child exploitation, child abductions, and child sex tourism.
- Gangs The FBI is dedicating to disrupting and dismantling the most significant gangs through intelligence-driven investigations and new and longstanding initiatives and partnerships such as Safe Streets Task Forces, the National Gang Intelligence Center, and Transnational Anti-Gang Task Forces.
- Jewelry and Gem Theft The FBI's Jewelry & Gem Theft program offers investigative assistance and intelligence on theft groups to law enforcement and partners in the jewelry industry.
- Art Crime Art and cultural property crime—which includes theft, fraud, looting, and trafficking across state and international lines—leads to billions of dollars in losses every year.
- Indian Country Crime As part of its Indian Country Crime program, the FBI works closely with a range of partners, including tribal police and federal agents from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
- Bank Robbery The FBI, which has had a primary roll in bank robbery investigations since the 1930s, works these investigations today with local law enforcement but focuses mainly on violent or serial cases.
- Most Wanted Violent Crime and Major Thefts Most Wanted
- Publications Violent Crime and Major Theft publications.
- News Violent Crime news and press releases.
- Human Trafficking/Involuntary Servitude Under its human trafficking program, the Bureau investigates matters where a person was induced to engage in commercial sex acts or perform any labor or service through force, fraud, or coercion.
Case 3:05-cv-00169-L Document 7 Filed 03/21/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00169-L Document 7 Filed 03/21/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00169-L Document 7 Filed 03/21/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 17
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Lakeside Financial Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   November 11, 2005                 /s/
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           William F. Webster,
                                           President of Manager
                                           Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Justin Yorke, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 10, 2011  /s/ Justin YorkeName:Justin YorkeTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the
?Report?), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Frank Bauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to the
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Frank Bauer
                                 ----------------------
                                 Frank Bauer
                                 Chief Executive Officer

December 5, 2005




                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the
?Report?), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Norman Becker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to the
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Norman Becker
                                 ----------------------
                                 Norman Becker
                                 Chief Financial Officer

December 5, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Finance Holdings LLC (‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the ‘‘Report’’) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2007, hereby certify as follows:

|  |          |                                                                                             |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                       |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations for Nalco. |

|        |  |  |                                                      |
|--------|--|--|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCE                                 |
|   |  |  | William H. Joyce                                     |
|   |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|   |  |  | Date: August 9, 2007                                 |
|   |  |  | /s/ BRADLEY J. BELL                                  |
|   |  |  | Bradley J. Bell                                      |
|   |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |  |  | Date: August 9, 2007                                 |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

ANITA MENDEZ, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 5:04-CV-262-C

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff is appealing an adverse decision of the Defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The United States Magistrate

Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on June 30, 2005. No written objections have been

filed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation are hereby

ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that the above-styled and numbered

cause is hereby reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

Dated this 8th day of August, 2005.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:04-cv-00262-C Document 15 Filed 08/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
Steven Derrell BROWN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017168EN.01002001.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 February 2017 — KP v LO

(Case C-83/17)

(2017/C 168/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KP

Applicant:

Defendant: LO

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the rule of subsidiarity set out in Article 4(2) of the 2007 Hague Protocol on the law applicable to maintenance obligations to be interpreted as meaning that that rule is applicable only where an application initiating maintenance proceedings is lodged in a State other than the State in which the maintenance creditor is habitually resident?
  If that question is answered in the negative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the rule of subsidiarity set out in Article 4(2) of the 2007 Hague Protocol on the law applicable to maintenance obligations to be interpreted as meaning that that rule is applicable only where an application initiating maintenance proceedings is lodged in a State other than the State in which the maintenance creditor is habitually resident?

If that question is answered in the negative:

| 2. | Is Article 4(2) of the 2007 Hague Protocol on the law applicable to maintenance obligations to be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘unable ... to obtain maintenance’ also refers to cases in which, on the ground of mere failure to comply with certain formal legislative conditions, the law of the previous place of residence does not provide for a right to retroactive maintenance? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 4(2) of the 2007 Hague Protocol on the law applicable to maintenance obligations to be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘unable ... to obtain maintenance’ also refers to cases in which, on the ground of mere failure to comply with certain formal legislative conditions, the law of the previous place of residence does not provide for a right to retroactive maintenance?

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARIO MARCUS DOMINGUEZ §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-05-CV-0269-L 

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Petitioner Mario Marcus Dominguez, appearing pro se, has filed a motion for extension of

time to file a notice of appeal and a motion for certificate of appealability. For the reasons stated

herein, the motion is granted.

A notice of appeal in a civil case must be filed with the district clerk "within 30 days after

the judgment or order appealed from is entered." FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, a district

court may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal if:

(i) a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time

prescribed by this Rule 4(a) expires; and

(ii) regardless of whether its motion is filed before or during the

30 days after the time prescribed by this Rule 4(a) expires, that party

shows excusable neglect or good cause.

FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5)(A). 

Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed in part and denied in part by

judgment entered on December 30, 2005. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due no later than

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00269-L Document 21 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 182
1

 The 30th day after entry of judgment fell on Sunday, January 29, 2006. As a result, petitioner had until the

following Monday, January 30, 2006, to file a notice of appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 26(a)(3). 

January 30, 2006.1 In support of his motion for extension of time, petitioner alleges that he has

limited access to the prison law library and needs more time to research and prepare his notice of

appeal. Such an excuse constitutes "good cause" for an extension of time. See Harris v. Cockrell,

No. 3-01-CV-2492-M, 2003 WL 21500397 at *2 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 9, 2003) (Lynn, J.) ("good cause"

shown where prisoner lacked access to legal materials "due to circumstances beyond his control").

Accordingly, petitioner's motion should be granted.

RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and a motion for certificate

of appealability is granted. The federal rules of appellate procedure provide that "[n]o extension

under this Rule 4(a)(5) may exceed 30 days after the prescribed time or 10 days after the date when

the order granting the motion is entered, whichever is later." FED.R.APP. P. 4(a)(5)(C). Therefore,

petitioner must file a notice of appeal on or before March 1, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 6, 2006.

 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00269-L Document 21 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 183
# C_2016232EN.01002401.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/24

---

Action brought on 27 April 2016 – Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund v EUIPO – Luigi Lavazza (CReMESPRESSO)

(Case T-189/16)

(2016/C 232/32)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Treis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Luigi Lavazza SpA (Torino, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘CReMESPRESSO’ – EU trade mark No 8 919 541

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 in Case R 2823/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision as far as it allows the CTM proprietor’s appeal and annuls the decision of the EUIPO of 24 October 2014 in part, namely for ‘ice cream makers, ice cream machines, and coffee machines’ in Class 11, and ‘electric ice crushers’ in Class 7; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision as far as it allows the CTM proprietor’s appeal and annuls the decision of the EUIPO of 24 October 2014 in part, namely for ‘ice cream makers, ice cream machines, and coffee machines’ in Class 11, and ‘electric ice crushers’ in Class 7;

| — | order the Respondent and Intervener to pay the costs of this Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Respondent and Intervener to pay the costs of this Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) of CTMR. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) of CTMR.

---