alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jack L. Wyszomierski, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| /s/ JACK L. WYSZOMIERSKI                                       |          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name: Jack L.  Wyszomierski                                    |     |
| Title:***Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* | * * |
| Dated: August 11, 2006                                    | * * |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

PAUL J. BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No.

Defendant. ) 5:04-CV-245-C

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Paul J. Brown, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is appealing a decision of the

Commissioner denying his application for supplemental security income benefits. The United States

Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation on September 30, 2005, and Plaintiff has

filed his objections to such Report and Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of

the records and finds that Plaintiff’s objections should be OVERRULED and that the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED as the findings of this Court. It is,

therefore,

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objections are overruled, that the findings and conclusions of

the Magistrate Judge are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court, and that

the above-styled and numbered cause is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated December 2, 2005.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 31 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 174
https://research.txcourts.gov/CourtRecordsSearch/ViewCasePrint/a159347505375f16a915933b46f0828e

Case Information

First Bank & Trustvs.2B Farms, Inc.,Terry Robinson,Rebecca Robinson

DC-2023-CV-0565

Location

Lubbock County - District Clerk

Case Category

Civil - Contract

Case Type

Debt/Contract - Debt/Collection

Case Filed Date

5/9/2023

Judge

Grace, John

Parties 5

Type Name Nickname/Alias Attorneys

Plaintiff First Bank & Trust C. DUNHAM BILES

Defendant 2B Farms, Inc.

Defendant Rebecca Robinson DAVID M. GUINN

Defendant Terry Robinson DAVID M. GUINN

Other BART JOHN SCHILLING

Events 9

Date Event Type Comments Documents

5/9/2023 Filing Petition Plaintiff's Original Petition

5/10/2023 Filing AFDV - Affidavit Filed Declaration of Bart Schilling Affidavit of Bart Schilling.pdf

5/15/2023 Filing Amended Filing Plaintiff's First Amended

Verified Petition for

Enforcement of Security

Agreements, Money

Damages, ... Application for

TRO, Temporary Injunction,

Application for Writ of

Sequestration

First Bank and Trust - First Amended Petition.pdf

5/15/2023 Filing AGRM - Agreement Notice of Rule 11 Agreement Notice of Rule 11 Settlement Agreement.pdf

5/17/2023 Filing ORSH1 - Order Setting Hearing Order Setting Hearing on

June 2, 2023 at 1:30pm

Order Setting Hearing.pdf

6/1/2023 Filing Counter Claim/Cross

Action/Interpleader/Intervention/Third

Party

Defendants' Original Answer

and Counterclaims

00669688.pdf

6/1/2023 Filing NFOR - Notice Of Filing Of Records Notice of Bankruptcy Filings 00669909.pdf

6/29/2023 Filing APOC - Appearance Of Counsel Appearance of Counsel and

Request for Discovery

AOC - Robinsons .pdf

6/30/2023 Filing MOWC - Motion To Withdraw As

Counsel

Motion to Withdraw as

Attorney of Record

Motion to Withdraw - Robinsons.pdf

© 2023 Tyler Technologies, Inc. | All Rights Reserved

Version: 2023.5.0.35

Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 30-1 Filed 07/13/23 Entered 07/13/23 21:19:40 Desc

Case DC-2023-CV-0565 Docket Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Rachel Lee DOWNS, Jr.

CR-16-1140

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Walker Cir. Ct.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: § 

§ Case No. 22-31641-mvl-7 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC., § 

§ (Chapter 7) 

 Debtor. § 

 § 

 § 

SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE; 

GNET ATC, LLC; MULTIBAND 

FIELD SERVICES, INC., 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING 

NO. 23-03036-mvl 

 Plaintiffs, § 

 § 

v. § 

 § 

JAMES FRINZI; FRINZI FAMILY 

TRUST; MULTIBAND GLOBAL 

RESOURCES, LLC, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Defendants. § 

 § 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 

LLP TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR MULTIBAND GLOBAL RESOURCES, LLC 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 19-1 Filed 09/11/23 Entered 09/11/23 17:26:52 Desc

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
2 

 UPON CONSIDERATION of McDermott Will & Emery LLP’s Unopposed Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel for Multiband Global Resources, LLC, it is hereby GRANTED as set forth 

herein; and it is hereby: 

 ORDERED that Marcus A. Helt, Debbie E. Green, and the law firm of McDermott Will & 

Emery LLP are permitted to withdraw from representation of Multiband Global Resources, LLC 

in the above-referenced adversary proceeding. 

###End of Order### 

Submitted by: 

/s/ Debbie E. Green 

Marcus A. Helt (Texas Bar No. 24052187) 

Debbie E. Green (Texas Bar No. 24059852) 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

2501 North Harwood Street, Suite 1900 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Tel: 469.715.4979 

Fax: 972.692.7700 

mhelt@mwe.com 

dgreen@mwe.com

Defendant Multiband Global Resources, LLC 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 19-1 Filed 09/11/23 Entered 09/11/23 17:26:52 Desc

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
Dion Romero MIXSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-869

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bradley OperatingLimited Partnership (“Bradley OP”) for the period ending December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Thomas C. Prendergast, President and Chief Executive Officerof the sole stockholder of the general partner of Bradley OP, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andthe results of operations of Bradley OP.

March 30,2006
|        | /s/  THOMAS  C. PRENDERGAST                        |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas C. Prendergast*President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL LEWIS HOWARD,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-0614-G

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and

the findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the findings and

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby accepted as

the findings of the court. 

SO ORDERED.

January 3, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00614-G Document 17 Filed 01/03/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 119
EX PARTE Darrel LeShunn WILLIAMS

CR-17-0013

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 1, 2017

Transferred to Etowah Cir. Ct.
Case 3:05-cv-00607-B Document 8 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 27
# C_2017231EN.01000401.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 March 2017 — Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Peek & Cloppenburg KG

(Case C-148/17)

(2017/C 231/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Hamburg

Applicant:

Defendant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the fact that the invalidity or revocation of a national trade mark which forms the basis of a claim for the seniority of an EU trade mark and which has been surrendered or allowed to lapse may be established a posteriori only where the conditions of invalidity or revocation are present not only at the time when the trade mark was surrendered or allowed to lapse but also at the time of the judicial decision establishing its invalidity or revocation, compatible with Article 14 of Directive 2008/95/EC? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the fact that the invalidity or revocation of a national trade mark which forms the basis of a claim for the seniority of an EU trade mark and which has been surrendered or allowed to lapse may be established a posteriori only where the conditions of invalidity or revocation are present not only at the time when the trade mark was surrendered or allowed to lapse but also at the time of the judicial decision establishing its invalidity or revocation, compatible with Article 14 of Directive 2008/95/EC? (1)

1

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative:
  Does claiming seniority under Article 34(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (2) have the effect that the right under the national trade mark lapses and can no longer be used in such a way as to maintain rights attached to it, or is the national trade mark preserved by virtue of EU law, even though it no longer exists in the register of the Member State concerned, with the result that it can and must continue to be used in such a way as to maintain the rights attached to it? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative:

Does claiming seniority under Article 34(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (2) have the effect that the right under the national trade mark lapses and can no longer be used in such a way as to maintain rights attached to it, or is the national trade mark preserved by virtue of EU law, even though it no longer exists in the register of the Member State concerned, with the result that it can and must continue to be used in such a way as to maintain the rights attached to it?

2

---

(1)  Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark, OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1.

2

---
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 14 PageID 650
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 14 PageID 651
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 3 of 14 PageID 652
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 4 of 14 PageID 653
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 5 of 14 PageID 654
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 6 of 14 PageID 655
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 7 of 14 PageID 656
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 8 of 14 PageID 657
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 9 of 14 PageID 658
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 10 of 14 PageID 659
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 11 of 14 PageID 660
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 12 of 14 PageID 661
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 13 of 14 PageID 662
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 69 Filed 03/04/08 Page 14 of 14 PageID 663
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TEKNI-PLEX,
INC. STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 3, 1998 AND BALANCE SHEET AS
AT JULY 3 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                          29,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,326
<INVENTORY>                                     57,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,277
<PP&E>                                         147,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 546,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,380
<BONDS>                                        275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   546,832
<SALES>                                        309,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               309,597
<CGS>                                          232,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Pharmasset, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kurt Leutzinger, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: February 9, 2010 
|                       
|/s/    KURT
LEUTZINGER 
|Kurt Leutzinger        
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pharmasset, Inc. and will be retained by Pharmasset, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
Nathan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





Date:
August 16, 2010


/s/ Richard
      Nathan(Principal
      Financial Officer)
              Richard
      Nathan, Inc.





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MINUTE ORDER

USDC/NDTX/FORT WORTH DIVISION

DATE: June 19, 2006

DISTRICT JUDGE: Terry R. Means

CRT REPORTER: Ana Warren

CRT RM DPTY: J. Smalling

USPO: Blanca E. McCallum

TIME: 9:46/10:09 am

TOTAL COURT TIME: 23 minutes 

4:05-CR-031 (1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, plaintiff §

Christopher Wolfe, Attorney for Government

VS §

FRANK DAVID TREVINO, defendant § Leigh Davis & Francisco Hernandez, Jr., Attorneys for

Defendant, apt

SENTENCING

O Mr. Leigh Davis appeared as counsel for the defendant and the Court deemed Mr. Davis’s appearance in Court today as his entry of

appearance.

O Sentencing Held

O On March 1, 2006, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to count 1, 2, 5 of the seven-count Indictment.

O Plea agreement accepted 

O The deft is committed to the custody of the bureau of prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 240 months; 180 months on Count 1, 60

months on Count 2, and 180 months on Count 5. Counts 1 and 5 will run concurrently. Sentence imposed on Count 2 will run

consecutively to Counts 1 and 5, for a total aggregate sentence of 240 months.

O NO fine ordered

O NO Restitution

O Upon release from imprisonment, the deft shall be placed on supervised release for a term of 4 years on Counts 1 and 2, and 3 years on

Count 5 to run concurrently with each other.

O While on supervised release, the defendant shall also comply with the standard conditions recommended by the US Sentencing

Commission and shall also comply with all conditions set out the Judgment and Commitment order entered in this case.

O It is ordered that the defendant pay a special assessment of $300 due immediately.

O All the remaining counts are dismissed, as to this defendant, upon motion of the Government.

O Deft Advised of Right to Appeal

O The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States marshal. 

 

 Case 4:05-cr-00031-Y Document 62 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 186
Gilberto D. RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2732

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 136 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 3 PageID 4576
Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 136 Filed 09/15/10 Page 2 of 3 PageID 4577
Case 3:05-cv-01531-L Document 136 Filed 09/15/10 Page 3 of 3 PageID 4578
Oscar DOSTER v. STATE

CR-15-0534

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 15, 2017

Affirmed.