T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RI CK EY A . BEA V ER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. W ESTERN STA TE H O SPI TA L; D R. D E E M, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 35583 D. C . No . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 5 1 3 2 - B HS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on B e nj a m i n H . S e tt l e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B efo re: T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R i ck ey A . B eav er, a ci v i l d et ai n ee atW est ern S t at e H o sp i t al , ap p eal s p ro se f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tde f e nda nt s de ni e d hi m a de qua t e m e di c a l c a r e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 

# FI LED NO V 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 35583 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Ch o l la R ea d y Mi x, In c. v. C i vish , 382 F . 3d 9 6 9 , 9 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f f irm in p a rt, r e v e r s e in p a rt, a n dr e m a n d . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed B eaver’ s c l ai m s f or m on et ary dam ages a g a in s t W e s te rn S ta te H o s p ita l a n dD r . D e e m in h e ro f f ic ia l c ap a c ityo n th e b a s is o f E le v e n th A m e n d m e n t im m u n ity . Se e Fr a n c e s c h i v . Sc h w a r tz , 57 F . 3d 828, 831 ( 9th C i r . 1995) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( E l e ve nth A m e ndm e ntba r s s ui t s i n f e de r a l c ourtf

or d a m a g e s a g a in s t as ta te o ra n a rm o f th e s ta te ) ; s e e al

s o H ol le yv . Cal. D e

p’ t of C o rr ., 5 9 9 F .3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( f o rs o v e r e ig n im m u n ityp u rp o s e s , s u its a ga i ns ts t a t e of

f i c i a l s i n the i rof

f i c i a l c apa c i t i e s a r e tr e a t e d a s s ui t s a ga i ns tthe s ta te ) . H o w e v e r , d is m is s a l o f th e c la im a g a in s t D r . D e e m in h e rin d iv id u a l c ap a c ity on the ba s i s of

qua l i f i e d i m m uni tyw a s i m pr ope ra tthi s e a r l ys t a ge of the p r o c e e d in g s b e c au s e B e a v e r ’s a lle g a tio n s th a t D r . D e e m k n o w in g lyp r e s c r ib e dh im m edi ca t i on t o w hi ch he w as al l er gi c and there af t erkn ow i ng l y f

ai l ed for s ever al w ee ks t o p re sc ri be pai n m edi ca t i on for hi s c hron i c pai n w er e s uffi ci entt o al l ege a v io la tio n o f

ac le a r lye s tab lis h e dc o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t. Se e Sa u c ie rv . Ka tz , 5 3 3 U . S. 1 9 4 , 2 0 1 ( 2 0 0 1 ) , ov e rr ule d i n par t on othe rgr ounds byP e ars on v . Cal lahan , 555 U .S . 2 2 3 ( 2 0 0 9 ) ; Y

ou ng berg v. R om eo , 457 U . S . 307, 323 ( 1982) ( de f e nda nt profes si on al vi ol at es i nv ol un t ar i l y c om m i tt ed pl ai nt i ff’ s c on st i tut i on al ri gh t s w hen10- 35583 3 re nd er i ng deci si on s w i th res pectt o p l ai nt i ff’ s tre atm entthatar e “ a s ub st ant i al departure f

rom ac ce pt ed profes si on al j ud gm ent , prac t i ce , or st andards”) ; s e e al s o Mi r v. L i t t le C o . o

f M a ry H o sp . , 844 F . 2d 646, 649 ( 9th C i r . 1988) ( “ I n r e vi e w i ng a m o tio n to d is m is s w e p r e s u m e th a t th e f a c ts a lle g e din th e c o m p la in t a r e tru e .” ( c i t a t i on a nd i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks om i tt e d) ) . A c c or di ngl y , w e r e ve r s e the j u d g m en tas t o th i s cl ai m , an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng B e a ve r ’ s m ot i on for app oi ntm entof coun se l because B eaver f ai l ed t o d em on stra t e e xcept i on al c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See P alm erv. V aldez , 560 F . 3d 965, 970 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w a nd r e qui r e m e ntof “ e xc e pt i ona l c i r c um s t a nc e s ” f or appo i ntm entof coun se l ). B e a v e r ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . T h e p a rtie s s h a ll b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. AF F I RME D i n p a r t , RE V E RS E D i n p a r t , a n d RE MAND E D.