alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 24 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

154 First Avenue East in Jerome, Idaho, as the ‘‘Representative Maxine 

Bell Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 154 First Avenue East in Jerome, Idaho, 

as the ‘‘Representative Maxine Bell Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPRESENTATIVE MAXINE BELL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 154 First Avenue East in Je6 rome, Idaho, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rep7 resentative Maxine Bell Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 24 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Representative Maxine 

3 Bell Post Office’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2006



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs II Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Z.T.D. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160368

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CallWave, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended June 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Stubbs, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                      
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 26, 2008 |  | /S/    JEFFREY
CAVINS                                
|                         |  | Jeffrey Cavins, President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to					18U.S.C. Section 1350,						as Adopted Pursuant to						Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Shineco, Inc., (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, the undersigned, Lin Wen, the Secretary and Acting Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and		    - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		  			Dated: September 7, 2005                                                                                      /s/ Lin Wen_____________			                                                                                    Lin Wen
Aloysius T. HENRY v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-0993

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Steven
      Delcarson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Innovative Card
      Technologies, Inc.




Dated:
                November 19, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Steven
                DelcarsonSteven
                DelcarsonChairman
                and CEO




I,
      Charles Caporale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.




Dated:
                November 19, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Charles
                CaporaleCharles
                CaporaleChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Innovative Card
      Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Chelsey FERGUSON v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-CRIMINAL

2017-CT-00912-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: February 19, 2019 Closed: May 9, 2019

Motion Desc: Appellee Amended Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Granted.
# C_2017347EN.01001802.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 14 August 2017 — Hoteles Piñero Canarias, S.L. v Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton)

(Case C-491/17)

(2017/C 347/24)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Hoteles Piñero Canarias, S.L.

Appellant:

Respondent: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton)

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1) | Is it a requirement of Article 11.3 (1) that the injured person's claim against the policy holder/insured involves a matter relating to insurance in the sense that it raises a question about the validity or effect of the policy? |
| --- | --- |

1)

Is it a requirement of Article 11.3 (1) that the injured person's claim against the policy holder/insured involves a matter relating to insurance in the sense that it raises a question about the validity or effect of the policy?

1

| 2) | Is it a requirement of Article 11.3 that there is a risk of inconsistent judgments unless joinder is permitted? |
| --- | --- |

2)

Is it a requirement of Article 11.3 that there is a risk of inconsistent judgments unless joinder is permitted?

| 3) | Does the court have a discretion whether or not to permit joinder of a claim which falls within Article 11.3? |
| --- | --- |

3)

Does the court have a discretion whether or not to permit joinder of a claim which falls within Article 11.3?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1)

1

---
EX PARTE Alvin KENNARD

CR-16-1230

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2  

AMENDMENT TO THE 

ASHLAND INC. UNION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN 

WHEREAS, Ashland Inc. (the “Corporation”) maintains the Ashland Inc. Union Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”) for
the benefit of employees eligible to participate therein; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XX of the Plan, the Corporation, as
sponsor of the Plan, has retained the authority to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; and 
 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United
States invalidated section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act for federal tax law purposes; consequently, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19 detailing the rules for identifying same-sex spouses in a qualified
retirement plan (collectively, the “Guidance”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to conform to the
Guidance; and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended retroactively to be effective as of
June 26, 2013 as follows: 
  

	I.	The following definition of Spouse shall be added to Section 2.1 of the Plan: 


Spouse. The spouse of a Participant determined by Federal law applicable to Code 

§401(a) as announced in Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19; provided that to the extent required by an court order which is determined to be a
qualified domestic relations order pursuant to the terms of this Plan, a former Spouse of the Participant shall be treated as the Spouse of the Participant. 
  

	II.	The term “spouse” wherever found in the Plan shall be amended to be a capitalized word and carry with it the definition of Spouse as provided herein. 


 

	III.	In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed
this 26 day of Sept., 2014. 
  

					
	ATTEST:	 		  	ASHLAND INC.
			
	 /s/ Peter J. Ganz
	 		  	 By: /s/ Robin Swanson

	Secretary	 		  	Title: Director, Global HR Opns. & Benefits


  
 -2-
EX PARTE Dale William GILLEY, Jr.

CR-17-0005

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0553 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. RAYMOND BERRY,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 1 , 2024 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 26 2024

03/26/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0553
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnM. Ballbach, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to the § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Dated: November 14, 2006

| /s/ JOHN M. BALLBACH                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: John M. Ballbach                          |
| Title: *President and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
Lila Jeanne POTTER, Appellant, v. MAXIM ALLEGIS GROUP/MAXIM HEALTHCARE, Ace USA, and ESIS, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1034

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019

Michael J. Winer and John F. Sharpless of Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Clinton C. Lyons, Jr., of Moran Kidd Lyons Johnson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
AP ATLANTIC, INC., a North Carolina Corporation Successor by Assignment From AP Gulf States, Inc., a Texas Corporation, d/b/a Adolfson & Peterson Construction, Appellant, v. SILVER CREEK ST. AUGUSTINE, LLLP, a Florida Limited Partnership, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1656

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

Lauren V. Purdy and William E. Adams, Jr., of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Robert J. Hauser, of Pankauski Hauser PLLC, West Palm Beach, Frederick R. Brock, of Gartner, Brock and Simon, Jacksonville, and Robert A. Sweetapple, of Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkas, PL, Boca Raton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, AP Atlantic, Inc., a non-signatory to a construction contract, appeals the denial of its motion to compel arbitration after the trial court concluded that the contract's arbitration provision did not apply to non-signatories. The construction contract was signed by Appellee, Silver Creek St. Augustine, LLLP, and Appellant's affiliate, AP Gulf States, Inc. We *866reverse because a non-signatory may enforce an arbitration provision when a signatory makes a claim against the non-signatory that arises out of the contract.

Generally, "a non-signatory to a contract containing an arbitration agreement ... cannot compel a signatory to submit to arbitration." *Koechli v. BIP Int'l, Inc.* , 870 So.2d 940, 943 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). However, an exception to this rule is "when the claims relate directly to the contract and the signatory is relying on the contract to assert its claims against the non-signatory." *Id.* at 944 (citations omitted).

In this case, Appellee is a signatory and has alleged claims below against Appellant directly related to both performance and payment under the contract. In these rare circumstances, Florida courts have determined that a non-signatory to the contract may enforce an arbitration provision against a signatory. *See, e.g.* , *Roman v. Atl. Coast Constr. & Dev., Inc.* , 44 So.3d 222, 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ; *Koechli* , 870 So.2d at 945 ; *Cuningham Hamilton Quiter, P.A. v. B.L. of Miami, Inc.* , 776 So.2d 940, 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Appellant's motion to compel arbitration and remand with directions that the trial court grant the motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ Michael SchmidtMichael SchmidtChief Financial Officer and Secretary


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
**EXHIBIT**
**      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|         |                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | STARGOLD MINES, INC. |
|    |            |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|              | By:        | /s/                Marcus U. Segal                                                                                                                                                                        |
|         | Name:                | Marcus                U. Segal                                                                                                                                                                            |
|         | Title:               | President,                  Chief Executive Officer,Chief                  Financial Officer, and Director (Principal                  Executive, Financial, and and                  Accounting Officer) |

----
__________________________________________________________________________

April 2023

Contact: pressoffice@faa.gov

FAA FACTS

Accelerating to the Future: The FAA’s CLEEN Research Initiative

The Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise (CLEEN) Program is the FAA's principal 

environmental effort to accelerate development that will result in a fleet of new aircraft that 

produces less noise, fewer emissions, and uses less fuel.

Through the CLEEN Program, the FAA partners with the aviation industry via a cost-sharing 

approach to enable the industry to expedite integration of environmentally beneficial 

technologies into current and future aircraft. These technologies support the overall 

environmental performance goals of the FAA’s Next Generation Air Transportation System 

(NextGen) to achieve environmental protection.

The FAA announced CLEEN Phase III awardees on September 10, 2021. For more information 

on the CLEEN Program, its benefits, and accomplishments to date, see the CLEEN Program 

Summary and Status Report.

Current participants in CLEEN include: America’s Phenix/Delta TechOps/GKN 

Aerospace/MDS Coating Technologies Corporation, Boeing, Collins Aerospace, GE Aerospace, 

Honeywell Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney, Rohr Inc., Rolls-Royce and 

Safran Nacelles.

According to analysis done by the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2021, the accomplishments 

from the first five-year phase of CLEEN will reduce U.S. fleet-wide fuel burn by 1.4 percent by 

2030 and 2.6 percent by 2050. This will provide a cumulative savings of 9.3 billion gallons of jet 
fuel. The CO2 savings from this reduced fuel burn are the equivalent of taking 781 thousand cars 

from the road from 2020 to 2050. In addition, technologies from the first phase of CLEEN will 

contribute to a 14 percent decrease in the land area exposed to significant aviation noise.

CLEEN Phase II technologies are expected to enter operational service by 2026, providing 

further benefits to fuel burn, emissions, and noise. An ongoing assessment of CLEEN Phase II’s 

projected fleet-wide benefits has estimated that the program will reduce fuel consumption 2.4 

percent by 2030 and 8.8 percent by 2050, bringing the contribution of CLEEN Phase I and II to 

11.5 percent fuel burn reduction in the fleet by 2050.

Cumulatively, CLEEN Phases I and II are estimated to reduce consumption of fuel by 36.1

billion gallons by 2050, reducing CO2 emissions by 420 million metric tons. These CO2 

reductions are equivalent to removing 3 million cars from the road from 2020 to 2050.
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 2 of 16 PageID 2
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 3 of 16 PageID 3
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 4 of 16 PageID 4
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 5 of 16 PageID 5
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 6 of 16 PageID 6
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 7 of 16 PageID 7
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 8 of 16 PageID 8
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 9 of 16 PageID 9
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 10 of 16 PageID 10
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 11 of 16 PageID 11
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 12 of 16 PageID 12
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 13 of 16 PageID 13
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 14 of 16 PageID 14
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 15 of 16 PageID 15
Case 3:04-cv-00090-B Document 1 Filed 01/16/04 Page 16 of 16 PageID 16
Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 1 of 10 PageID 226
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 2 of 10 PageID 227
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 3 of 10 PageID 228
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 4 of 10 PageID 229
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 5 of 10 PageID 230
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 6 of 10 PageID 231
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 7 of 10 PageID 232
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 8 of 10 PageID 233
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 9 of 10 PageID 234
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 31 Filed 10/01/03 Page 10 of 10 PageID 235
STATE of Louisiana v. Andrew J. HUNTER, Jr.

NO. 2018-KO-1583

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.