alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(TS DISTRICT COEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURORTHERN STRICT OF TEXAS
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION

LARRY DENTON, on behalf of
Sandin Denton, a minor,

Plaintiff,
v. 2:04-CV-0331

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

OR OR WO? 00? LOR LOD WO? WOR LOR LOA OD

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION and AFFIRMING DECISION OF COMMISSIONER

Plaintiff has appealed the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
denying the minor plaintiff disability benefits. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report
and Recommendation on March 7, 2008, recommending therein that the decision of the Commissioner
be affirmed. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on March 20, 2008.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the
record in this case. The undersigned hereby OVERRULES plaintiff's objections to the Report and
Recommendation, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and AFFIRMS
the administrative decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this_ 2/ “tay of SW l2i Lil ) 2008.

UNITED S' ‘ATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3009523-SEP-201108:15 AM
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Finkelstein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Innovative Card
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005            By  /s/ Alan Finkelstein
                              Alan Finkelstein
                              Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
                              (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00871]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1245 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1062, K2025-1061.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00871 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 296 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 296

  To address the plea agreements for certain individuals detained at 
   United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

Mr. Lawler (for himself, Ms. Tenney, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Fitzpatrick, 
  Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Ellzey, and Mr. 
  Crenshaw) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To address the plea agreements for certain individuals detained at 
   United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for 9/11 Act''.

SEC. 2. TRIAL AND POST-TRIAL MATTERS RELATING TO CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS 
              DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, 
              CUBA.

    (a) Plea Agreements and Judgments.--Notwithstanding the provisions 
of section 949h of title 10, United States Code, any plea agreement 
entered into by Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak 
Bin `Attash, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi for actions involving the 
terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, and its related judgment, shall 
not preclude the trial of such individual under chapter 47A of such 
title or any other provision of law for that terrorist attack.
    (b) Sentencing.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in any 
trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin 
`Attash, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi under chapter 47A of title 
10, United States Code, or any other provision of law for the terrorist 
attack of September 11, 2001, a sentence of death shall be available.
    (c) Conditions of Confinement; Transfer.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, in the case of any sentence imposed on Khalid Shaikh 
Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin `Attash, or Mustafa Ahmed 
Adam al Hawsawi, such individual--
            (1) shall be--
                    (A) held at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 
                Bay, Cuba, in solitary confinement;
                    (B) provided no contact with foreign nationals; and
                    (C) provided no psychological treatment except that 
                specifically authorized by medical authorities at 
                United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and
            (2) shall not be transferred to the continental United 
        States or any other country.
                                 <all>
```
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 11
Case 23-50096-rlj12 Doc 37 Filed 07/20/23 Entered 07/20/23 17:37:08 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 11
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 2703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00491]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pursuant to Public Law 92-
463. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--DP25-038, Epilepsy Incidence 
Among Children in the United States.
    Date: March 19, 2025.
    Time: 10 a.m.-6 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference/Web Conference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Catherine Barrett, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S106-3, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341-3717. Telephone: (404) 718-7664; Email: [email protected].
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2025-00491 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
Case 3:05-cv-00534-K-BF Document 19 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 212
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 28 Filed 05/24/2005 Page 1 of 4

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 28

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 28 Filed 05/24/2005 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 28 Filed 05/24/2005 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 28 Filed 05/24/2005 Page 4 of 4
# C_2017053EN.01004201.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/42

---

Action brought on 22 December 2016 — Chefaro Ireland v EUIPO — Laboratoires M&L (NUIT PRECIEUSE)

(Case T-905/16)

(2017/C 053/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chefaro Ireland DAC (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and J. Muyldermans, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laboratoires M&L SA (Manosque, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘NUIT PRECIEUSE’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 063 952

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 October 2016 in Case R 2596/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Chefaro Ireland. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Chefaro Ireland.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 2:05-cv-00043-J Document 15 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 06-2044 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . JOSE JIMENEZ, Def endan t, Ap pellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 31, 2007 is amended as follows: Page 5, line 21, "goverment" is amended to read "government Page 5, the citation "United States v. Turner, 2007 U.S. App LEXIS 20981, at *26 (1st Cir. Aug. 31, 2007)" should more properly be "United States v. Turner, 501 F.3d 59, 72 (1st Cir. 2007)" Page 6, "Fed. R. Evid." is underlined twice, once in the body in the first full paragraph, and once in note 2. It should not be. Page 9, remove the extra space after "unless" on line 11. Page 10, n5 italicize "inter alia" Page 11, the citation "Turner, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS, at *12" should more properly be "Turner, 501 F.3d at 67" Page 11, the citation "United States v. Brown, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20061, at *24 (1st Cir. Aug. 22, 2007)" is more properly "United States v. Brown, 500 F.3d 48, 59 (1st Cir. 2007)" Page 14, after "felonies" on line 14 there should be a semicolon instead of a comma. Page 16, "grievous" should be not underlined but instead italicized.
#### John S. Taylor, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Potomac Savings Bank, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed August 1, 1927.

*Kelly & Casler,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Zetrouer <& Ware,*for Defendant in Error.

Per. Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel *455for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.52



COMPANY:   GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the "Company")

ITEM:      Preambles and Resolution of the Board of Directors

SUBJECT:   Non-Employee Director Compensation Schedule

DATE:      December 5, 2001


                  WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Company has recommended a schedule of compensation for the Company's
non-employee directors; and

                  WHEREAS, having carefully considered the recommendations of
the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors desires to approve a
non-employee director compensation schedule;

                  IT IS THEREFORE RESOLVED that, effective immediately and until
such time as revised by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company, the
compensation schedule annexed hereto as Exhibit A shall be applicable to the
Company's non-employee directors.




<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT A



                            GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION

               Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



                              --------------------



         Annual Retainer                             $32,000


         Committee Chairman Annual Retainer          $ 4,000


         Board Meeting Fee                           $ 2,000(1)


         Committee Meeting Fee                       $ 2,000(1)


         Special Assignment Fee (per day)            $ 1,000


         New Member Stock Option Grant (#)            10,000(2)


         Annual Stock Option Grant (#)                 8,000(2)



--------------------
(1)  The fee will be $1,000 if participation is by telephone.
(2)  All stock options will vest 50% one year from date of grant and the
remaining 50% two years from date of grant.
Statement Regarding Strategic Alliances

Leland A. Strom, Board Member

Farm Credit Administration

December 1, 2014

Recently, two Farm Credit System association boards of directors chose to form a strategic 

alliance between their associations, consolidating their staff and functions but keeping their 

boards separate.

Although each board of directors remains separate and responsible for its own association, the 

two associations have appointed a coordinating committee to make recommendations to each 

board. In this way, the corporate charters of both associations will remain intact under the 

governance of each individual board, but the institutions will have joint management and a 

common business model and platform. 

According to the associations involved, the alliance will help them better serve their agricultural 

borrowers now and into the future by integrating their day-to-day business operations, 

technology systems and management teams.

System institutions have formed alliances in the past, mainly as joint management agreements. 

The FCA Board does not have a statutory approval role over alliances, but I want to take this 

opportunity to express some thoughts on this current alliance. 

The anticipated advantages the associations have identified may provide the planned 

efficiencies, but this alliance is the first of its kind and we do not know for certain that it will 

produce these benefits. Therefore, it is important for the boards of these associations to remain 

vigilant and responsive to the needs of the member-borrowers who elected them and whom 

they serve.

As a former board member myself in various System institutions, I know firsthand the important 

role that directors play in the success of the institution, and I believe it is important to ensure

that any alliance structure does not interfere with a board’s ability to serve its members in any 

way.

In any nonmerger alliance between associations, each individual board remains accountable,

and continues to have a fiduciary duty, to its stockholders. Therefore, each association’s board 

of directors remains responsible for ensuring that its association operates in a safe and sound 

manner, complies with all laws and regulations, and serves as an independent board to meet 

the needs of its member-borrowers.

In my opinion, FCA should continue to expect each board of directors to remain autonomous 

and to provide independent leadership for its association.
Cheryl L. PAXTON, Appellant, v. Conrad A. MURPHY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3071

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MAURICE CHARLES HENRY,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:03-CV-1467-G

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

After reviewing de novo the findings, conclusions, and recommendation

(“Findings”) of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the

Findings of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings of

the court, except that on page 3, lines 17-19, the quotation should read “in the light

most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the

essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443

U.S. 307, 319 (1979) (emphasis in original).

 

 Case 3:03-cv-01467-G Document 13 Filed 04/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 44
- 2 -

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, except as modified herein, are

ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.

April 19, 2005.

 

 Case 3:03-cv-01467-G Document 13 Filed 04/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 45
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Biotel Inc.Date: February 12, 2007
        By:
        /s/ B. Steven SpringroseB. Steven Springrose
Chief Executive Officer
and President
(principal executive officer)Date: February 12, 2007
        By:
        /s/ Judy E. NausJudy E. Naus
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
Case 3:04-cv-01554-BD Document 50 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 506