alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Markeith D. HORACE v. STATE

CR-16-0952

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017374EN.01001102.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/11

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 July 2017 — CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH v Court of Justice of European Union

(Case C-87/17 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Action for damages - Alleged non-compliance with EU law of the Austrian legislation in respect of gambling contributions - Failure, by the national courts or tribunals, to refer the matter to the Court for a preliminary ruling - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the EU judicature))

(2017/C 374/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH (represented by: A. Schuster, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of European Union

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.

1

---
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 287 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 493
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7271

TYRONE HURT, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; UNKNOWN AGENT; U.S. DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE D.C., 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his Bivens complaint.* We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. United States 

Marshal Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 24, 

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

 *

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of 

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
# C_2019206EN.01000801.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — proceedings brought by Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

(Case C-638/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco - Directive 2011/64/EU - Article 4(1)(a) - Concept of ‘cigars or cigarillos’ - Rolls of tobacco with an outer wrapper of natural tobacco which is partially covered by an additional paper layer)

(2019/C 206/09)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Other party:‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1)(a) of Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco must be interpreted as meaning that tobacco products, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, part of whose outer wrapper of natural tobacco is covered, at the filter, by an additional paper layer, liable to make those products visually similar to cigarettes, fall within the category of cigars or cigarillos, within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs IIChief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T10:59:54Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T10:59:55Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T10:59:55Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="13785">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T10:59:54Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION W o-7493 WAS NEVER ISSUED OR 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Gary Musil, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Logicom Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 19, 2005

 

 /s/ Gary Musil

Gary Musil, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Bryant Williams V. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00017-CR & 01-11-00018-CR

Trial court case number: 08DCR049851 & 08DCR49852

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Date motion filed: September 6, 2012

Party filing motion: Appellant, Bryant Williams

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Date: October 1, 2013
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 240.13a-14

OF GENERAL RULES ANDREGULATIONS OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Bernard Geller, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Anvil Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report.

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared.

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation;

 

c)              disclosed in this annual report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| /s/ Bernard Geller           |                |
|------------------------------|---------------------|
| Chairman of the Board and    |
| Principal Executive  Officer |
|                         |
| Date:                        | April 28, 2006 |   |
|                              |                     |  |  |

 

----
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1



                        SAFE HARBOR COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


        The Company believes that the following factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements set forth
in this Form 10-K.


1.   The Company's ability to grow through affiliations with additional
     orthodontic practices.

2.   The Company's ability to identify suitable affiliation candidates and to
     profitably manage or successfully integrate new Allied Practices with the
     Company and its existing Allied Practices.

3.   The level of competition in the orthodontic practice management industries.

4.   Regulatory development and changes in the United States healthcare
     system and dental and orthodontic professions that may affect the
     profitability of the Company or the enforceability of the Company's
     operative agreements with its Allied Practices and Allied Orthodontists.

5.   The Company's dependence on revenues generated by the Allied Orthodontists
     of the Allied Practices.

6.   The Company's ability to secure capital, and the related cost of such
     capital, needed to fund the future growth of the Company through
     affiliations with orthodontic practices as well as internal growth.

7.   The Company's ability to staff the Allied Practices with appropriate
     qualified personnel.

8.   The continued availability to the Company of adequate insurance.

9.   The Allied Practices' reputation for delivering high-quality patient care
     and their ability to attract and retain patients.

        The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive or as an
admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures previously made by the Company.
All capitalized terms used in this Exhibit 99.1 not otherwise defined herein
have the same meanings as prescribed to such terms in the Form 10-K.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO 23-30745

CHAPTER 11

VERIFICATION OF CREDITOR MATRIX

Supplemental

Builders Direct Sales Group LLC

 The above named Debtor hereby verifies that the attached list of creditors is true and correct to the best of his/her 

knowledge. 

Date

Date

Signature

Signature

5/15/2023 /s/ James Cook

James Cook

Manager

Case 23-30745-swe11 Doc 20 Filed 05/15/23 Entered 05/15/23 18:33:05 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Builder Trade Partners

PO Box 1445

Lake Dallas, TX 75065

Daikin Comfort Technologies Manu.

19001 Kermier Rd

Waller, TX 77484

First Industrial

5310 Harvest Hill

Dallas, Texas 75230

GM Financial

Attn: Accounts Payable

P.0. Box 1630

Independant Bank

P.O. Box 3035

McKinney, Texas 75070

Robert Madden Industries 

2401-2419 Walnut Ridge, 

Dallas, TX 75229

JS Company Owned Stores TX, LLC 

2707 E Interstate 30

Grand Prairie, TX 75050

Jones Sign Co.

2009 Mckenzie Drive, Suite 124, 

Carrollton, TX 75006

Case 23-30745-swe11 Doc 20 Filed 05/15/23 Entered 05/15/23 18:33:05 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
G.B. v. J.H.

2161009

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

Dismissed.
Peter STANLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3813

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

Peter Stanley, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, WALLIS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
31.2





I, Carmen
J. Lotito, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PetroHunter Energy
Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a—15(e) and 15d—15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(f) and 15d—15(f)) for the registrant and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)





(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      May 15, 2008
            /s/ Carmen J. Lotito
      (“Tony”)Carmen
      J. Lotito ("Tony")Executive
      Vice President - Business Development and Director(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Joseph M. SHELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1937

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO JAVIER DURAN

ISORDIA, AKA “Creeper” Moniker,

AKA Francisco Duran, AKA Francisco

Javier Duran-Isordia, AKA Francisco

Javier Isordia,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 17-71064

Agency No. A077-306-235

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2020** 

Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Duran Isordia argues the Board erred in finding he committed a removable

offense because the statute of conviction, California Health and Safety Code

FILED

OCT 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 11379(a), is overbroad under Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016). 

This is incorrect. This Court held in United States v. Barragan that Section 11379

is a divisible statute as to the controlled substance involved in the offense. 871

F.3d 689, 715 (9th Cir. 2017). 

To determine which element of Section 11379 Duran Isordia was convicted

of, we may under the modified categorical approach, as described in United States

v. Torre-Jimenez, 771 F.3d 1163, 1167 (9th Cir. 2014), consider the complaint,

abstract of judgment, and docket sheet that were submitted in this case. They

established that the offense was selling, transporting, or offering to sell

methamphetamine, which is within the coverage of the Federal Controlled

Substance Act, as we held in United States v. Rodriguez-Gamboa, __ F.3d __ (9th

Cir. 2020). Duran Isordia’s argument about solicitation was not raised before the

Board and is in any event foreclosed by Mielewczyk v. Holder, 575 F.3d 992,

996–98, 996 n.1 (9th Cir. 2009). 

The words “as charged” are not necessary to establish the crime to which

Duran Isordia pleaded “when the record is clear,” Torre-Jimenez, 771 F.3d at

1168–69, as it is in this case. 

The petition for review is DENIED. 

2