alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2006
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II             
|                       |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II                 
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director
Ciara Abigail ROSENBLATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1477

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Givens ST. FLEUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3587

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

Affirmed.
Terry COLLINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 11, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Denied.
Case 3:05-cv-01769-B Document 5 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 45
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Amended Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Najeeb
      Ghauri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 10, 2008





/s/
      Najeeb
      Ghauri


Najeeb
      Ghauri, Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:04-cv-02162-K Document 56 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1709
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02162-K Document 56 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 1710
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02162-K Document 56 Filed 05/16/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 1711
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02162-K Document 56 Filed 05/16/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 1712
# C_2017347EN.01001601.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 8 August 2017 — AS Viking Motors, OÜ TKM Beauty Eesti, AS TKM King, Kaubamaja AS, Selver AS v Tallinna linn, Maksu- ja Tolliamet

(Case C-475/17)

(2017/C 347/20)

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: AS Viking Motors, OÜ TKM Beauty Eesti, AS TKM King, Kaubamaja AS, Selver AS

Applicants:

Defendants: Tallinna linn, Maksu- ja Tolliamet

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 401 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) to be interpreted as precluding a national tax which applies generally and is proportionate to the price, but which, pursuant to the relevant provisions, is to be levied only at the stage of the sale of goods or services to a consumer, with the result that the final tax burden rests ultimately with the consumer, and which compromises the operation of the common system of value added tax and distorts competition?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

ARNOLDO MARTINEZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 5:05-CV-163-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER

Plaintiff is appealing an adverse decision of the Defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The United States Magistrate

Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on March 27, 2006. No written objections have

been filed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation are

hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that the above-styled and

-numbered cause is hereby reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

Dated this 19th day of April, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:05-cv-00163-C Document 18 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 83
Case 3:05-cv-00183-B Document 18 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 104
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. DracupChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Anthony Jackson, the, Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(i)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period ended March 31, 2014, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Anthony JacksonName:
Anthony JacksonTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
May 20, 2014




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EX PARTE Joshua WARD

(In re: Joshua Ward v. Johnathan Motors, LLC, and Jacques Chahla)

2170181

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PETER FRANKL and JOHN DECKARD, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 05-CV-1757-B

§

NETOPIA, INC., §

§

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial (doc. 178). After consideration of the

Motion and related briefing, the Court DENIES the Motion.

 Plaintiffs title their Motion a “Motion for New Trial.” However, Plaintiffs challenge the

Court’s granting of Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, rather than the outcome of

a jury trial or nonjury trial. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a). Therefore, the Court considers the Motion

to be a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. V. Fair Grounds Corp., 123 F.3d 336, 339

(5th Cir. 1997); Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc., 77 F.3d 782, 785 n.1 (5th Cir. 1996). 

A Rule 59(e) motion “calls into question the correctness of a judgment.” Templet v.

HydroChem, Inc., 367 F.3d 473, 478 (5th Cir. 2004). A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a

judgment “is not the proper vehicle for rehashing evidence, legal theories, or arguments that could

have been offered or raised before the entry of judgment.” Templet, 367 F.3d at 479 (citing Simon

v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990)). Rather, the Rule 59(e) motion serves the

“narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly
discovered evidence.” Id.; Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp., 332 F.3d 854, 863–64 (5th Cir. 2003) (quoting

Simon, 891 F.2d at 1159). The Fifth Circuit has noted that “[r]econsideration of a judgment after

its entry is an extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly.” Templet, 367 F.3d at 479.

In their Motion, Plaintiffs do not allege that the Court has committed a “manifest error of

law or fact” and do not present any newly discovered evidence. Plaintiffs merely rehash the evidence

considered by the Court on summary judgment and argue that they have established the existence

of questions of material fact in regard to their Sarbanes-Oxley and defamation claims. The Court

has already considered the evidence on summary judgment. Plaintiffs have not established that they

are entitled to have the judgment altered or amended. See Templet, 367 F.3d at 479. 

Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial (doc. 178) is DENIED. Furthermore, the

Court finds that Netopia’s Motion to Strike Reply Arguments and Evidence or, Alternatively,

Motion for Leave to File a Surreply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial (doc. 183) is MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED November 4, 2008

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Marcus Antonio TRIBBITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Marcus Antonio Tribbitt, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Galindez v. State*, 955 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2007) ; *Tucker v. State*, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1999) ; *Knight v. State*, 6 So. 3d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                Second Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company                for the                fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities                and                Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 8, 2008 | By:    | */s/                Jeff Huitt*                                                |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Name:  | Jeff                Huitt                                                           |
|                               | Title: | Chief                Financial Officer (Principal                Financial Officer) |

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2****NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Julie A. McGraw, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Interstate Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     May 8, 2007       BY: /s/ Julie A. McGraw Julie A. McGraw
NO. SCWC-28901

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,

vs.

Robert J. McKnight, Jr.,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NOS. 28431 & 28901; CR. NO. 06-1-0352(1))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Trader, in place of Duffy, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee Robert 

J. McKnight, Jr.’s application for writ of certiorari, filed 

April 19, 2012, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for 

oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate 

clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 31, 2012.

Benjamin E. Lowenthal, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner/defendantappellant-cross-appellee /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

on the application and reply.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry,

and Marissa H.I. Luning, /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

for respondent/plaintiffappellee-cross-appellant /s/ Rom A. Trader

on the response.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-28901

31-MAY-2012

09:24 AM
Carl FICKE, Appellant, v. Kyle DAVIS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

Shane M. Smith, of Shane M. Smith, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.

Paulo R. Lima, and Elizabeth K. Russo, of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
# Terrorism

To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic extremists and help dismantle terrorist networks worldwide.

- Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Group The FBI’s Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Group helps evaluate whether a person or entity, such as scientific researchers, can have access to biological select agents and toxins.
- High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG) brings together intelligence professionals from the U.S. Intelligence Community to conduct interrogations that strengthen national security and that are consistent with the rule of law.
- Joint Terrorism Task Forces The FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces, or JTTFs, are our nation’s front line on terrorism.
- Major Cases Significant terrorism cases worked by the FBI and its partners over the course of FBI history.
- Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center (TEDAC) The FBI Laboratory’s Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center (TEDAC)  coordinates bomb-related evidence and intelligence collection.
- Terrorist Screening Center The Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) maintains the U.S. government’s consolidated terrorism watchlist.
- Most Wanted A listing of the FBI's most wanted individuals for terrorism.
- Publications FBI Publications on Terrorism
- News Terrorism news and press releases.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sound Revolution Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Catherine LeBlanc, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:




/s/
 Catherine LeBlanc


Catherine
LeBlanc


Chief Executive
Office, Chief Financial Officer




October 10,
2008
Exhibit23.1

 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos.  333-84826, 333-99693 and 333-129949) and on Form S-8 (Nos.333-59281, 333-64389, 333-78317, 333-64300, 333-103752, 333-120393 and333-123424) of L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries ofour report dated March 9,  2006 relating to the financialstatements, management’s assessments of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 9,2006

----