alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Report on
Form 10-Q of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2009, I, Frank J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | This Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  |                        
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ FRANK J. WOOD      
|                     |  | Frank J. Wood          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 111 Filed 03/17/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID 371
Exhibit
10.10.3


 


RESOLUTION
A03-20

ACCESS ANYTIME BANCORP, INC.

(the “Company”)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO THE

ACCESS ANYTIME BANCORP, INC.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR RETAINER PLAN


 


This Amendment No. 3 is made by Access Anytime
Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) to be effective as of July, 1, 2003.


 


WHEREAS, the Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Retainer Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by the Company’s
shareholders on May 30, 1997, and became effective on that date; and


 


WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to the Plan,
providing that non-employee directors of subsidiaries or affiliates may be
participants in the Plan, was approved by the Company’s shareholders on April
26, 2001, and became effective on that date; and


 


WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 to the Plan, (1)
providing that non-employee directors of an Approved Subsidiary have the option
to elect not to participate in the Plan and therefore receive all of their
Compensation in cash, and (2) clarifying that the Plan does not award
fractional Stock Units was executed on July 1, 2003; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company reserves the right to
amend the Plan pursuant to Section 6.4, including the right to make
non-material amendments to the Plan that do not require approval of the
Company’s shareholders; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the
Plan to provide that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may
suspend the Plan from time-to-time and provide that, until further action by
the Board, all Compensation shall be payable only in cash to all


 

















 


eligible Participants in the Plan, i.e. all of the non-employee directors of
the Company and any Approved Subsidiary.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends
the Plan as follows:


 


1.                                       Section
II of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the section:


 


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan,
the Board reserves the right to suspend, from time-to-time, the award of Stock
Units under the Plan so that Compensation is payable solely in cash and no
awards of Stock Units shall be made under the Plan until the Board declares
otherwise.


 


2.                                       Capitalized
terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 3 shall have the
meanings set forth in the Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Access Anytime Bancorp,
Inc. has caused this Amendment No. 3 to the Non-Employee Director Plan to be
executed by an authorized officer and to be effective as of July 1, 2003.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  ACCESS
  ANYTIME BANCORP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (Seal)

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/ Norman R.
  Corzine

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Norman R.
  Corzine

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman of the
  Board

  	
   

  
	
  Attest: 

  	
  /s/ Kathy Allenberg

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Kathy Allenberg, Corporate Secretary

  	
   

  	
   

  
								



 


2
# C_2017374EN.01001201.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/12

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Demarchi Gino Sas (C-177/17), Graziano Garavaldi (C-178/17) v Ministero della Giustizia

(Joined Cases C-177/17 and C-178/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 47(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Implementation of EU law - Lack of a sufficiently close connection - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2017/C 374/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Demarchi Gino Sas (C-177/17), Graziano Garavaldi (C-178/17)

Applicants:

Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Piemonte (Regional Administrative Court, Piedmont, Italy) by the decisions of 11 January 2017.

---

(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.

1

---
Scott Dennis ELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1350

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019

Michael Hrdlicka of Gomez & Touger, P.A., Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Michael Schmidt                  
|Michael Schmidt                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of this Report.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 13, 2007



| |  |                                                                |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Michael Schmidt                                            |  | 
| |  | Michael Schmidt                                                |  | 
| |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,Secretary and Director |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 37 PageID 7675
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 2 of 37 PageID 7676
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 3 of 37 PageID 7677
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 4 of 37 PageID 7678
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 5 of 37 PageID 7679
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 6 of 37 PageID 7680
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 7 of 37 PageID 7681
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 8 of 37 PageID 7682
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 9 of 37 PageID 7683
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 10 of 37 PageID 7684
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 11 of 37 PageID 7685
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 12 of 37 PageID 7686
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 13 of 37 PageID 7687
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 14 of 37 PageID 7688
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 15 of 37 PageID 7689
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 16 of 37 PageID 7690
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 17 of 37 PageID 7691
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 18 of 37 PageID 7692
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 19 of 37 PageID 7693
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 20 of 37 PageID 7694
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 21 of 37 PageID 7695
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 22 of 37 PageID 7696
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 23 of 37 PageID 7697
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 24 of 37 PageID 7698
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 25 of 37 PageID 7699
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 26 of 37 PageID 7700
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 27 of 37 PageID 7701
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 28 of 37 PageID 7702
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 29 of 37 PageID 7703
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 30 of 37 PageID 7704
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 31 of 37 PageID 7705
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 32 of 37 PageID 7706
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 33 of 37 PageID 7707
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 34 of 37 PageID 7708
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 35 of 37 PageID 7709
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 36 of 37 PageID 7710
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 302 Filed 03/18/13 Page 37 of 37 PageID 7711
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3055

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Kevin N. Thomas, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 29, 2008 Filed: November 28, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kevin Thomas was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a )(2), and of one count of possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(k) and 922 (a)(1)(B). Thomas was given consecutive sentences of 120 months’ imprisonment on the felon-in-possession charge and 48 months’ imprisonment on the obliterated serial number charge. In imposing sentence, th e district court found that Thomas’s 1991 Missouri state first-degree tampering c onviction, based upon hi s unlawful operation of a motor vehicle without the owner’s cons ent, constituted a crime of violence within the meaning of United States Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.2. See United States v. Thomas , 484 F.3d 542 (8th Cir. 2007).-2- Following our affirmance of Thomas’s c onviction, the United States Supreme Court granted Thomas’s petition for certiora ri, vacated our judgment, and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of Begay v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 1581 (2008). See Thomas v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 2046 (2008).
We recently held that the Missouri crime of tampering does not qualify as a “crime of violence” for purposes of U.S. Se ntencing Guideline § 2K2.1(a)(2), United States v. Williams , 537 F.3d 969, 974-75 (8th Cir. 2008), a term we recognize as synonymous with the term “violent felony” for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, see United States v. Johnson , 417 F.3d 990, 996 (8th Cir. 2007) (“The statutory definition of ‘vio lent felony’ is viewed as interchangeable with the guidelines definition of ‘crime of violence.’”).
Based on the holding in Williams , we vacate Thomas’s sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing.

______________________________
Phyllis Perry LEE EX REL. CITY OF JASPER v. Charles E. PERRY, Nina Perry Morgan, and William A. Morgan

CR-16-0990

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1868

[February 8, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-

23307CF10A and 96-21254CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### C. W. Jennings and Josephine S. Jennings, Edgar B. Busbee, C. S. Skinner and Ella A. Skinner, His Wife, *Appellants,*v. B. J. Bixby, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 14, 1927.

*S. A. Bean,*for Appellants;

*Dewey A. Dye,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Arthur WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
***Exhibit 31.1***

 

***ChiefExecutive Officer Certification of the Quarterly Financial Statements***

*** ***

I, **Saturnino S. Fanlo**, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of KKR Financial Corp.(the “Corporation”);

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.    The Corporation’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Corporation and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theCorporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of theCorporation’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change inthe Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Corporation’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.    The Corporation’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Corporation’s auditors and the audit committeeof the Corporation’s Board of Directors:

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theCorporation’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCorporation’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 10, 2006

 
|   |       | /s/ SATURNINO S. FANLO                                                           |
|--------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ** ** | **Saturnino S. Fanlo   Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)** |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROGER S. INMAN, DOC #523728, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-723 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 13, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Mark J. O’Brien, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Melvin E. GAVRON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3914

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jack L. Wyszomierski, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| /s/ JACK L. WYSZOMIERSKI |                                                     |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                    | Jack L.  Wyszomierski                                    |   |
| Title:                   | *Executive  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer* | * * |
| Dated:                   | November 14,  2005                                  |   |

 

----
Terry BLAND v. STATE

CR-16-1147

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.