alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Flag Intermediate Holdings Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenco Goncalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    C. LOURENCO
GONCALVES         
|                      |  |  |  | C. Lourenco Goncalves                
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.12



 



EXHIBIT 10.12




AMENDMENT TO

MANAGEMENT RETENTION AGREEMENT



     WHEREAS, Stratos Lightwave, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”) and James W. McGinley (“Executive”) entered into a Management
Retention Agreement entered into on or about October 17, 2002 (the “Agreement”);


     WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement
to expand what constitutes a “Change of Control” under the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, Section 9(b) of the Management Retention Agreement
provides that it can be amended at any time by a written agreement executed by
the Executive and an authorized officer of the Corporation.


     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Management Retention
Agreement between the Corporation and James W. McGinley be and it hereby is
amended to revise Section 5(c)(iii) thereof to read as follows, effective
immediately;



		
	 	     (iii) The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the
Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or
consolidation which would result in the Company’s voting securities
outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either
by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities
of the surviving entity or its parent) at least sixty percent (60%) of
the total voting power represented by the Company’s voting securities
or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after
such merger or consolidation; or



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in
the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year
set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
STRATOS LIGHTWAVE, INC.
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	By:	 	
/s/ David A. Slack



	 	By:
	 	/s/ James W. McGinley



	Name:	 	
/s/ David A. Slack



	 	 	 	      James W. McGinley
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


	 	 	 	 
	 
	Date:	 	
July 1, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 19, 2006



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. DracupChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Case 3:03-cv-01346-N Document 22 Filed 05/12/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 96
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01346-N Document 22 Filed 05/12/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 97
Exhibit 32.(1)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of International Isotopes, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Form 10-KSB), I, Steve T. Laflin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







March 28, 2008

/s/ Steve T. Laflin

Steve T. Laflin

Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

_________________________________________

LONNIE OLIVER, JR., PRO SE, §

BOP NO. 06099-078, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:04-CV-0280

§

JOEL RICHARDSON, §

 Randall County Sheriff, §

§

 Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff LONNIE OLIVER, JR., proceeding pro se and while a prisoner in the

custody of the Oakdale Federal Correctional Institution, has filed suit pursuant to Title 42,

United States Code, Section 1983 complaining against the above-named defendant and

requesting permission to proceed in forma pauperis.

On April 15, 2005, the Court issued an Order and Notice of Deficiency giving

plaintiff thirty days in which to cure specified deficiencies by paying the filing fee or submitting

an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and an I.F.P. Data Sheet, as well as submitting

copies of any relevant grievances. The Order and Notice of Deficiency was returned to the

Court undelivered and bearing the notation “Refused - Return to Sender.” The Court issued a

May 13, 2005 show cause order giving plaintiff twenty days to respond and show cause why the

instant case should not be dismissed. On May 20, 2005, the show cause order was returned

undelivered and bearing the notation “”RTS, Refused.”

The response periods for the Order and Notice of Deficiency and for the Show

Cause Order have expired and plaintiff has failed to cure the deficiencies or submit any

 

 Case 2:04-cv-00280-J-BB Document 6 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 14
2

responsive pleading or correspondence. It appears plaintiff has abandoned his suit and his

claims for relief.

It is the conclusion of the United States District Judge that plaintiff has

abandoned this cause and such cause should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Link v.

Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962) (court possesses

inherent power to dismiss sua sponte for lack of prosecution).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

The referral of the instant cause to the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby

withdrawn.

This Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

The Clerk will mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff and to any attorney of

record by first class mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this 3rd day of June, 2005.

/s/ Mary Lou Robinson 

MARY LOU ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 2:04-cv-00280-J-BB Document 6 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 15
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 9, 2015

a0831

Order 

Clerk

September 9, 2015

150020(20)(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150020

COA: 321553

Kent CC: 09-001515-FC

GEORGE MICHAEL GRESHAM,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to stay proceedings and hold motion in

abeyance is DENIED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 2 of 8 PageID 2
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 3 of 8 PageID 3
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 4 of 8 PageID 4
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 5 of 8 PageID 5
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 6 of 8 PageID 6
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 7 of 8 PageID 7
Case 3:00-cv-02273-X Document 1 Filed 10/16/00 Page 8 of 8 PageID 8
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 20, 2022

NO. 03-22-00438-CV

G. C. and H. M., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 28, 2022. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellants are indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00479-CV

LIBERTY SPORT AVIATION, L.P.,

Appellant

v.

Barry PRUITT, Bristell USA L.P. and PRM Group, LLC,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-314

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 9, 2015

DISMISSED

The trial court granted an interlocutory summary judgment in trial court number 14-314. 

The trial court subsequently severed the summary judgment into a new cause, trial court number 

14-314A, making the summary judgment final and appealable. Appellant filed notices of appeal 

in both trial court causes. Appellant has advised the court it wishes to proceed only in appeal 

number 04-15-00480-CV, the appeal from the severed cause, trial court number 14-314A. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal from the original cause, trial court number 14-314.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald H. Spair, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald H. Spair                                                
|Ronald H. Spair Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 10, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DAVID STARKS-EL, #05042808 )

)

V. ) 3-05-MC-0080-R

)

LUPA VALDEZ )

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and an order of the District Court in

implementation thereof, the subject cause has previously been referred to the United States

Magistrate Judge. The findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as

evidenced by his signature thereto, are as follows:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

On this date came on to be considered Movant David Starks-El’s Application for Leave to

File his proposed pleadings submitted on the standard form for a petition for writ of habeas corpus

by a person in state custody.

Previously Movant was sanctioned by the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Texas on August 4, 1995, which in pertinent part ordered that he not file any further

complaints or petitions in that court without leave of court. Thereafter on March 16, 2005, a judge

of this court honored and enforced the sanctions imposed by the federal court in the Eastern District

of Texas and entered a judgment which in pertinent part ordered that the Clerk accept no future

action submitted by Mr. Starks-El unless he demonstrates that he has sought and received leave to

file such action. See Starks-El v. Lupa Valdez, et al, No. 3-05-CV-181-D.

 

 Case 3:05-mc-00080-R Document 2 Filed 07/20/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4
2

In compliance with the terms of the judgment in No. 3-05-CV-181-D, Starks-El submitted

his application for leave to file. The motion is wholly without merit. Moreover, the lack of merit

is buttressed by his proposed accompanying pleadings which in fact seek monetary damages against

the State of Texas, the United States Congress and the President of the United States (See pleading

at page 9). Such claims are not cognizable and are wholly frivolous.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the District Court deny Movant’s Application for Leave to File.

A copy of this recommendation shall be transmitted to Movant.

SIGNED this 20th day of July, 2005.

____________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

In the event that you wish to object to this recommendation, you are hereby notified that you

must file your written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of this

recommendation. Pursuant to Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996)

(en banc), a party's failure to file written objections to these proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law within such ten-day period may bar a de novo determination by the district judge

of any finding of fact or conclusion of law and shall bar such party, except upon grounds of plain

error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law

accepted by the district court.

 

 Case 3:05-mc-00080-R Document 2 Filed 07/20/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5
Darrell Jerome BURNSIDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3778

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Steven CAMPBELL

No. 2018-KH-0075

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
March 10, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R.M. AKA E. T.M., AND T.J.W AKA T.W., 

CHILDREN, 

NO. 14-14-00773-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed 

September 4, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court 

below AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
Case 2:05-cv-00094-J Document 6 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap Wing Khai



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

March 31, 2006
Robert Lowell GILLAND v. Brandi LaRae GILLAND

2160545

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tena DANOS, et al. v. LAMORAK INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2019-CC-0180

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 20(b)

                    ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


                          Officer's Certificate
                          ---------------------

     I, George Borst, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Toyota 
Motor Credit Corporation ("TMCC"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a)  a review of the activities of TMCC as Servicer under the 1997-A SUBI 
Servicing Supplement (the "Agreement") dated September 1, 1997 among TMTT, 
Inc., as Titling Trustee, TMCC, as Servicer, and U.S. Bank National 
Association, as Trust Agent, for the period from September 24 through 
September 30, 1997, and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement 
has been made under my supervision;

     (b)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, no default has 
occurred by the Servicer under the Agreement throughout such period; and

     (c)  throughout such period the Servicer has maintained in full force and 
effect the Contingent and Excess Liability Insurance Policies required 
pursuant to Section 4.12 of the Agreement.



Date:  December 22, 1997                          /S/ GEORGE BORST
                                        ------------------------------------
                                                    George Borst
                                                Senior Vice President
                                                 and General Manager
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 85

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to allow the pooling of 
           tips among all employees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
              to the Committee on Education and Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to allow the pooling of 
           tips among all employees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Flexibility Act''.

SEC. 2. TIP POOLING.

    Section 3(m)(2) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 
203(m)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ``employees who 
        customarily and regularly receive tips'' and inserting ``pools 
        of employees described in subparagraph (C)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(C) The pools of employees described in this subparagraph are as 
follows:
            ``(i) Employees who customarily and regularly receive tips.
            ``(ii) Employees who--
                    ``(I) customarily and regularly receive tips and 
                receive a cash wage paid by the employer that is not 
                less than the wage in effect under section 6(a)(1); and
                    ``(II) do not customarily and regularly receive 
                tips.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE, )

ID # 1019577, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-0234-D

 ) 

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED July 31, 2007.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER, D.H. n/k/a D.S. and The Adoption Entity, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2111

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 09, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Courtney SMITH v. STATE

CR-16-0835

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

Affirmed.