alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Sheldon Goldberg hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Sockeye
Seafood Group Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Sockeye Seafood Group
Inc.,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Sockeye Seafood Group Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.

                                   Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc., Registrant

Dated: November 19, 2005               /s/ Sheldon Goldberg
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   By: Sheldon Goldberg, Chief Executive
                                   Officer, President and Chairman of the
                                   Board
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

UPDATE

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (No. 333-111272 , No. 333-115813,and No. 333-109971) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-115804,No. 333-104299, No. 333-65518 and 333-50038) ofAerogen, Inc. of our reports, dated March 31, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|--------------------------------|
| San Jose, California           |
| April14, 2005                  |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

WHITBURN, LLC, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-1639 

 ) 2D15-4046 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., )

CARLOS RAMIREZ; EDERLE ) CONSOLIDATED 

GREENE RAMIREZ; BOYETTE ) 

CREEK HOMEOWNERS ) 

ASSOCIATION, INC., ) 

 ) 

 Appellees. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed January 20, 2017. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Raul C. Palomino, 

Jr., and Wayne S. Timmerman, Senior 

Judges. 

Jamie A. Cummings and Heather A. 

DeGrave of Walters Levine Klingensmith 

& Thomson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. 

Alan M. Pierce of Liebler Gonzalez & 

Portuondo, Miami, for Appellee, Bank of 

America, N.A. 

No appearance for remaining Appellees. 

PER CURIAM. 

 In appeal number 2D15-1639, we affirm the order on appeal denying 

Whitburn, LLC's motion to intervene in the underlying foreclosure proceeding. See 
- 2 -

Weber v. Pennymac Loan Trust 2010‒NPL1, 193 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) 

(citing Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 190 So. 3d 1087 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)). 

In appeal number 2D15-4046, we dismiss Whitburn's appeal from the final judgment of 

foreclosure entered in that proceeding. See id. 

 Affirmed in part and dismissed in part. 

NORTHCUTT, WALLACE, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Z.J.L., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Craig R. Atack, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Hakorlhle T. K. wllldwm 

connty ~Awtltos 

lull county 

Hlluoro, rncrrr 

rhrr sirt 
Hon. T. K. Mlhiamo4 

hgs 2 

As we underrtaud it, thi8 putiaular bad tasu ru for $9O,OW. 

$90,000 d whkh wa8 voted foi a rpedic purpose u 8tatd in the elmth n wdet* ustisol . c ., u followst 

‘$3&0@0 for the parpo88 of pure&4uln# tf<wafmy for 

the usa d the Mats Wghwsy Departmeat ta buildJmg paved 

Stde do-ted bi#wir1~y8 l * ‘+.” 

Said l loctlen 8rder wu dated Duembsr 17,193& mnd the &et&a was 

held Jumry 19,l939. bad csrrlsd. Said bonds were Issued ln pursuance 

d a bead order parsed b7 the ComnXrrfeaerr’ Cew8 tm .Tebrouy 13, 

1939. 

fherebro, Z3001i00s l aildle Q to be ued for the par&are of 

riglrts-d-way for St& dee r lgha ided g h wNao yl pectfic s. hl&wey wee 

designated La the electha order fsf notice of electton. and ii tbe Cammlssloners’ Conrt did not paa8 an order demiqnrting s rpedflc highway 

prior te the decttee, t&en it te mew La their ~ecrettea to d8elgneted the 

rights-of-wry for which the btmd manay will ba uoed. Bluk va. .Stren&h, 

246 9. w . . t9j Tlstcher vs. Ely, 53 s. w. (ad) 617. 

Under ths orders d the Goamnieeleaers’ Ceart ef .Aprll If, 1939 

and Oateber 9,1939. sr;bmHted ~4th your oplaion reqaeot, wherein the 

Commlsdoaers* Gouti wUen$ hrta UI iyroqment w&b ULO Hilhwny L>apartment to purehue a rlqht-of-wry for a highway nady hat Xbsca 

ts Piles Valley. the $30,000 beard fmtd l8 avdlsbl8 md U musk d it al 

18 nece88uy may be ased to puchue thlb p4rtieulri ri&t-of-tiy. E%** 

ever, it in entirely I4 the diaorotl@m 68 ihe Commlu1ioaers* Court whether 

they pay for thf8 putttulu rlght?8brsy att of the bad fun&e or ent of 

the avnll8blr rod and bridp ha& 

Trustiug th8t this sumwerm ysur quutima, we rembln 

APPROVED 

NOV 7.1919 

ATTOXNHY OENERAL OT TEXAS 

(Sod.) Gerald C. Mum 

ATTORN&Y WCNXXAL 

OP TEXAS 

COB-8-81
Maurice T. HERRING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Zachery THIGPEN v. STATE

CR-16-0770

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51134

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDRES NARANJO-SANTOS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-133-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Andres Naranjo-Santos (Naranjo) appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that

the district court erred in increasing his sentence based on a prior drugtrafficking conviction which was neither pleaded nor proved and that it erred in

determining that his prior conviction for simple possession was an aggravated

felony.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-51134

2

Naranjo, however, has been released from federal custody and removed

from the United States, leaving him subject only to an undischarged term of

supervised release. Because Naranjo has requested relief in the form of

resentencing, relief we cannot grant, his appeal is moot. See United States v.

Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct.

1216 (2008). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GLENN BENTON FINCK, )

a.k.a. Beau Lee DuBois, ID # 02287-081, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-0718-D

)

DAN JOSLIN, )

Respondent )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions,

and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and petitioner’s objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned is of the opinion that the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are accepted as the findings and

conclusions of the court.

In addition to the cases on which the magistrate judge relies to reject petitioner’s challenge

to collection of restitution from non-institutional sources, the court notes that the Ninth Circuit has

also rejected petitioner’s argument. In Moreno v. Hood, 10 Fed. Appx. 600 (9th Cir. 2001) (per

curiam) (unpublished opinion), the panel held:

Moreno contends that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) is

violating his constitutional rights by deducting non-institutional funds

from his prison account towards the payment of his $3,500 fine

through the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”). This

contention lacks merit. The Judgment and Commitment order

requires Moreno to pay the fine out of funds earned during

incarceration and under the IFRP. Because the IFRP states that

“[p]ayments may be made from institution resources or

non-institution (community) resources,” the BOP is permitted to

collect payments from non-wage funds in Moreno's account. 28

C.F.R. § 545.11(b). 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00718-D Document 21 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 143
2

Id. at 601.

The court denies petitioner’s motions for injunction and other requests for injunction, grants

respondent’s motion to dismiss, and by separate judgment, dismisses the instant petition filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

SIGNED February 28, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00718-D Document 21 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 144
W.M. v. A.A.

2170119

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Morgan Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
Case 3:05-cv-00864-M Document 4 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12
STATE of Louisiana v. Harry PRYER

NO. 2019-KK-0316

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a).
A.N.S. v. P.C.N.

2160434

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Johnny Walter MCRAY v. STATE

CR-16-1155

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-00881-L Document 22 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 147
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00881-L Document 22 Filed 02/07/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 148
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Aging Research.                    

*Date:*                         February 21, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anita T. Tandle, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (240) 204-0329,                         *tandlea@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 10, 2025.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00849 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT      21**

**LIST      OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| 1.   | NetSol                Technologies Ltd. located in Lahore,                Pakistan. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2.   | NetSol                Connect (Pvt) Limited located in Karachi,                Pakistan. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 3.   | NetSol                Abraxas, Inc., located in Adelaide,                Australia. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 4.   | NetSol                USA, Inc., located in Calabasas,                California |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 5.   | NetSol                Technologies Ltd. located in London,                England. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 6.   | NetSol-CQ                Ltd., Located in Horsham, England |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 7.   | NetSol                Omni, located in Lahore, Pakistan. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 8.   | NetSol                McCue, Inc., Located in Burlingame,                California |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6931

RONNIE L. SIMMONS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY W. HUFFMAN; DAVID K. SMITH; BOBBY W. SOLES; BARBARA WHEELER; ICC COMMITTEE; S. RALLS; RUFUS FLEMING; STANLEY JONES; CAPTAIN SPEARS; CAPTAIN WOODSON; LIEUTENANT YATES; LIEUTENANT WILSON; LIEUTENANT ELDRIDGE; E. O.TRENT; SERGEANT TONEY; SERGEANT SMITH; SERGEANT PHILLIPS; SERGEANT TERRY; SERGEANT D. STITH, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-482-R) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie L. Simmons, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order entering judgment on the jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action.The record does not contain a transcript of the jury trial. Appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceed ings material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. Local R. 10(c). Appellants proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis are entitled to transcripts at government expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government expense, Appellant has waived review of the issues on appeal which depend upon the transcript to show error. Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 1025 (1992); Keller v. Prince George's County , 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the record before the court and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40115 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus RICARDO D. TILMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:94-CR-20-2
- - - - - - - - - - November 24, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. He argues that the factual basis to support his guilty plea was insufficient and that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court's finding that the factual basis was sufficient to support the plea was not clearly erroneous, seeNo. 95-40115 -2- United States v. Adams , 961 F.2d 505, 508 (5th Cir. 1992), and a review of the record reveals that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and that the district court complied with Rule 11. AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE T.G.

(In re: T.G. v. Russell County Department of Human Resources)

2170114

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 31, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Herbert Alexander WEGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-967

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 8, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED.
David N. ZADEN and Sylvia F. Zaden, Appellants, v. HMC ASSETS, LLC, Solely in its Capacity as Separate Trustee of Community Development Fund II Trust, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 18, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2018022EN.01001601.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/16

---

Appeal brought on 14 July 2017 by Vilislav Andreev Kaleychev against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 22 June 2017 in Case T-58/17: Kaleychev v European Court of Human Rights

(Case C-424/17 P)

(2018/C 022/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Vilislav Andreev Kaleychev (represented by: K. Mladenova, адвокат)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Court of Human Rights

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 22 November 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Donald BOSWELL

NO. 2018-KH-0350

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Boswell v. State, 16-0855 (La. 5/19/17), 219 So.3d 1077.
Roberto Jesus PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2304

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TONI LARRY,

Plaintiff,

VS.

COMCAST,

Defendant.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:04-CV-2384-G

)

)

)

ORDER

On February 1, 2005, the plaintiff was ordered to pay the $150.00 filing fee

within thirty days, or this case would be dismissed. The filing fee not having been

paid, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

March 3, 2005.

Case 3:04-cv-02384-G Document 10 Filed 03/03/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
Case 3:05-cv-01323-B Document 46 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 4 PageID 638
Case 3:05-cv-01323-B Document 46 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 4 PageID 639
Case 3:05-cv-01323-B Document 46 Filed 03/21/06 Page 3 of 4 PageID 640
Case 3:05-cv-01323-B Document 46 Filed 03/21/06 Page 4 of 4 PageID 641
EX PARTE Joshua ALLEN

CR-16-1054

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 25, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.