alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
David Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: May
19, 2009





By: /s/ David
Zaikin


David
Zaikin


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
William REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4809

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History

Posters        December 31, 2004        Oceanography Beyond the Golden Gate
Tara MISSEL, Petitioner, v. Iverson AIKEN, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0655

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 24, 2019

Christopher V. Carlyle, B.C.S. of the Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TEKNI-PLEX,
INC. STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND BALANCE SHEET AS
AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,642
<INVENTORY>                                     91,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,848
<PP&E>                                         185,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 574,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,969
<BONDS>                                        275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   574,789
<SALES>                                        506,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               506,828
<CGS>                                          376,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (35,374)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,968)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  |        |  |                        
|                     |  |       
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/ William J. Zaiser  
|                     |  | Name:  |  | William J. Zaiser      
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



39
Z.T.D. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160371

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
ALFA INSURANCE CORP. et al. v. R.G. "Bubba" HOWELL, Jr., and M. Stuart "Chip" Jones

1150151

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 16 Filed 04/26/01 Page 1 of 5 PageID 51
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 16 Filed 04/26/01 Page 2 of 5 PageID 52
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 16 Filed 04/26/01 Page 3 of 5 PageID 53
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 16 Filed 04/26/01 Page 4 of 5 PageID 54
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 16 Filed 04/26/01 Page 5 of 5 PageID 55
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6284

BUSTER A. YANCEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusBUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; TROY HOUSE; CAVALE COURT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-125-5-F(3)) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Buster A. Yancey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Larry D. Hall, Durham, North Carolina; Robert Daniel Boyce, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Buster A. Yancey, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Yancey v. Bureau of Prisons , No. CA-97-125-5-F(3) (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1998). We deny Yancey’s motion for a default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| a.   | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                          | **HemoBioTech,                  Inc.** |                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |                                   |                                                                           |   |
| Date:                    November                    13, 2007 | By:                                    | /s/                  Mark J.                  Rosenblum                        |   |
|                                                          |                                   | Mark                  J. Rosenblum                                             |   |
|                                                          |                                   | Chief                  Financial Officer                                       |   |
|                                                          |                                   | (Principal                  Financial and                  Accounting Officer) |   |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHARLES OLAWALE SIWOKU, A26-906-632 )

Petitioner, )

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-1296-N

)

BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, and )

DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, )

Respondents. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed December 29, 2005.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01296-N Document 15 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 108
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for theperiod ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Frank A.G.M. Verwiel,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     |   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Dr. Frank  A.G.M. Verwiel     |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Dr. Frank A.G.M.  Verwiel         |
|   |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   | December 28, 2007                 |

 

----
# C_2017309EN.01002901.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/29

---

Appeal brought on 04/07/2017 by JYSK sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 04/05/2017 in Case T-403/15: JYSK sp. z o.o. v European Commission

(Case C-402/17 P)

(2017/C 309/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: JYSK sp. z o.o. (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, advokat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant submits that the judgment of the General Court declaring its action inadmissible on the ground that it is not directly and individually concerned by Commission decision C (2015) 3228 final of 11 May 2015 should be set aside on the ground that it violates the principle of effective judicial protection.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant argues that indirect access to the Court of Justice via a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Polish courts does not provide the protection envisaged by article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The appellant maintains that it is directly and individually concerned by the aforementioned Commission decision.

---
EX PARTE Alex Demetrius MCMILLIAN

CR-17-0168

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 20, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 7 Filed 12/07/00 Page 1 of 2 PageID 8
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 7 Filed 12/07/00 Page 2 of 2 PageID 9
EX PARTE D.E.

(In re D.E. v. Russell County Department of Human Resources)

2170109

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 98 

Expressing support for the designation of February 4, 2025, as ‘‘National 

Cancer Prevention Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. JAMES) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of February 4, 2025, 

as ‘‘National Cancer Prevention Day’’. 

Whereas National Cancer Prevention Day is a day to remind 

us that, when looking at cancer, we need to look at prevention and reducing risks for human health and the environment; 

Whereas, when we work to prevent cancer risks, it impacts 

human health, the environment, and the economy; 

Whereas cancer is one of the leading causes of death around 

the world and has touched the lives of nearly everyone, 

either directly or indirectly; 

Whereas, in 2025, there will be an estimated 2,041,910 new 

cancer cases diagnosed and 618,120 cancer deaths in the 

United States; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 98 IH 

Whereas, in 2025, an estimated 9,550 children ages 0 to 14 

will be diagnosed with cancer, and 1,050 will die from it; 

Whereas the Cancer Moonshot has been reignited to encourage all Americans, companies, institutions, and organizations to work together to cut the death rate from cancer 

by 50 percent over the next 25 years; and 

Whereas February 4, 2025, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as ‘‘National Cancer Prevention Day’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Can3 cer Prevention Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes all efforts to raise the awareness 

5 for the reduction of cancer risks; and 

6 (3) recognizes the devastating effect cancer has 

7 on families and wishes to expand knowledge, encour8 age early detection, and work with friends in the 

9 medical and scientific fields to put an end to this 

10 deadly disease. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 2:04-cr-00039-Z-BR Document 180 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 436
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan Finkelstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.

Dated: November __, 2005           By: /s/ Alan Finkelstein
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Alan Finkelstein
                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                    President and Secretary

I, Bennet Price-Lientz Tchaikovsky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.

Dated: November __, 2005           By: /s/ Bennet Price-Lientz
                                              Tchaikovsky
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Bennet Price-Lientz Tchaikovsky
                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO OF ALLIED SECURITYHOLDINGS LLC PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allied SecurityHoldings LLC (the ‘‘Company’’) for the quarterended June  30,  2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), William C. Whitmore, Jr., as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and William A. Torzolini, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ William C. Whitmore,Jr.    Name: William C. Whitmore, Jr.Title:President, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board ofManagersDate: August  14,  2006

/s/William A.Torzolini                        Name:William A. TorzoliniTitle: Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate: August  14,2006

----
Mark MILLER v. Seth SMITH, et al.

No. 2018-KH-1053

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. JAMES**

PER CURIAM:

*697Denied. Applicant shows no lower court error.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.