IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( NUMBER 3: 04-240-G 

(

(

VERSUS ( 

(

(

HOLY LAND FOUNDATION, ET AL. ( July 20, 2007

__________________________________________________________

VOLUME 5 

VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION

BEFORE THE HONORABLE A. JOE FISH

__________________________________________________________

A P P E A R A N C E S:

For the Government: MR. JIM JACKS

MR. BARRY JONAS

MS. ELIZABETH SHAPIRO

MR. NATHAN GARRETT

Assistant United States Attorney

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

U.S. Courthouse 

1100 Commerce Street

Dallas, Texas 75242

214/659-8600

For the Defendant Shukri Baker:

MS. NANCY HOLLANDER 

MS. TERESA DUNCAN

FREEDMAN BOYD DANIELS 

HOLLANDER 

20 First Plaza, Suite 700 

Albuquerque, NM 87102

505/842-9960 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
For the Defendant El-Mezain:

MR. JOSHUA DRATEL

MR. AARON J. MYSLIWIEC

LAW OFFICE OF JOSHUA L. DRATEL

14 Wall Street, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10005

212/732-0707 

For the Defendant Mufid Abdulqader:

MS. MARLO CADEDDU

LAW OFFICE OF MARLO P. CADEDDU

3232 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75204

214/744-3015 

For the Defendant Elashi:

MS. LINDA MORENO

LAW OFFICE OF LINDA MORENO

PO BOX 10985 

Tampa, Florida 33679

813-247-4500 

MR. JOHN D. CLINE 

Jones Day 

555 California St 

26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1500 

415/875-5812 

For the Defendant Odeh:

MR. GREG WESTFALL

WESTFALL PLATT CUTRER

Mallick Tower

One Summit Avenue, Suite 910

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

817/877-1700

Court Reporter: Cassidi L. Casey, CSR No. 1703

1100 Commerce Street, Rm 15D6L

Dallas, Texas 75242

214-254-3139

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
P R O C E E D I N G S:

THE COURT: Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen. 

I asked you to come this morning before ten o'clock 

because Ms. Hudson told me earlier this morning that she 

had received a phone call from Ms. Hollander to the effect 

that Ms. Hollander thought we needed to resolve the 

question of attorney representation for some of the 

defendants and their counsel before counsel were 

introduced to the jury panel, and I agree with that. I 

didn't want to keep the jury panel waiting to start this 

at ten o'clock, and that's why I asked you to be here at 

an earlier time. 

Ms. Hollander, do you have anything to say about 

that issue? 

MS. HOLLANDER: Your Honor, all I can say is 

that if there is no one here to represent Holy Land since 

we don't know exactly what its status is we can't 

represent Holy Land. 

THE COURT: We being you and who else? 

MS. HOLLANDER: We being my law firm, myself and 

Teresa Duncan and John Boyd, who's not in the courtroom -- 

the lawyers in my office. Since the government has raised 

this and is concerned that we need waivers on the record 

by your Honor asking questions, and there is no one to 

answer those questions on behalf of Holy Land. Since the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1013

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
government is concerned about it we're concerned about it. 

So we can't represent Holy Land under those circumstances. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jonas. 

MS. SHAPIRO: Honestly, I'm not sure how we 

proceed when it comes to Holy Land, but I think we would 

like to see because there was a joint representation up to 

this point with the defendant Shukri Abu Baker that at 

least he be questioned by the Court so that there is no 

issue with regard to his counsel. With regard to Holy 

Land Foundation, I don't know what we do. Maybe remain 

unrepresented for the trial. 

MS. HOLLANDER: Your Honor, I think in light of 

what the government has said, and we have no problem with 

your Honor questioning Mr. Baker although we do believe 

that should be ex parte in chambers if your Honor 

questions him, but based on what the government has said, 

we will simply withdraw from representing Holy Land and 

represent Mr. Baker, and your Honor can question him if 

you wish. I remind the Court he did sign a waiver. 

THE COURT: A waiver of what? 

MS. HOLLANDER: Of conflict. 

THE COURT: Well, if you propose to withdraw 

from representing the Holy Land Foundation at this point, 

I don't know that I really need to question him. The only 

questioning that I felt was necessary was that which I 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
typically do as required by Rule 44 when there is joint 

representation to be sure that each of the defendants 

who's jointly represented understands the hazards of that 

representation. But if there is to be no joint 

representation at trial, I'm not sure that I see the 

necessity for that, and if I do engage in such 

questioning, I don't see the necessity to do it ex parte. 

I typically do it in the courtroom during arraignment when 

it is necessary.

MS. HOLLANDER: That's fine with us, if you 

don't want to question him, your Honor, but we will 

withdraw from representing Holy Land at this time. Ms. 

Duncan and I will continue to represent Mr. Baker. 

THE COURT: Let me while we're on that subject 

be sure that I am correct later this morning in who I 

introduce as representing what defendants. Because as I 

said at an earlier conference, I'm not sure our docket 

sheet is completely up to date. In fact, I checked it 

again this morning, and that may be the clerk's office's 

fault. I'm not saying that counsel bear any 

responsibility for that. But the docket sheet I think as 

of this morning reflected that Holy Land was represented 

by John Boyd, Nancy Hollander and Josh Dratel and Mr. 

Baker was represented by Nancy Hollander and John Boyd. 

So I guess on Holy Land, I can simply say that it is 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1015

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
unrepresented. 

MS. HOLLANDER: Your Honor, I believe that's an 

error. I don't know where the error originated. But the 

lawyers who represent Holy Land are the same lawyers who 

represent Shukri Abu Baker, and it's my law firm. So it's 

myself, Teresa Duncan and John Boyd. I'm not sure how 

Joshua Dratel's name got in there. 

THE COURT: I don't know either.

MS. HOLLANDER: So as it would stand now, my law 

firm -- John Boyd who's not going to be in court or at 

counsel table. But John Boyd, Teresa Duncan and I 

represent Shukri Abu Baker, and in terms of introductions 

to the jury it will simply be Teresa Duncan and Nancy 

Hollander. 

THE COURT: So Mr. Boyd will not be 

participating? 

MS. HOLLANDER: At counsel table, that's 

correct. 

THE COURT: I guess I need not include his name. 

And then Mr. El Mezain, I have Joshua Dratel and Mr. 

Mysliwiec. Then I have Mr. Odeh represented by Mr. 

Westfall and Mr. Abdulqader represented by Ms. Cadeddu. 

And Ms. Moreno and Mr. Cline representing Mr. Elashi. 

MR. JACKS: Your Honor, I am going to want to 

address some of the issues with regard to the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1016

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
representation issue. I can wait. 

THE COURT: I think I am finished. I was told 

you had other issues, but I wasn't told what they were. 

MR. JACKS: Yes, your Honor. The reason it is 

being brought up now is simply that it is something that 

has only recently I guess -- the extent of this practice 

or whatever has come to light. I believe it was earlier 

this week that Ms. Duncan filed an entry of appearance in 

which she filed two forms, one indicating that she was 

appearing as a retained attorney for the Holy Land 

Foundation, and the second page of that indicated she was 

appearing as appointed attorney for Shukri Abu Baker. The 

government has never been served or seen any notice or 

paperwork from the Court showing that Ms. Duncan has been 

appointed by the Court to represent Shukri Abu Baker. Ms. 

Hollander has at various times claimed that her firm was 

appointed, and I don't believe that is the accurate 

statement. A law firm cannot be appointed. Only an 

attorney can be appointed. In addition, with regard to 

Mr. Mysliwiec -- I apologize for mispronouncing his name 

as well. Mr. Dratel's associate, Mr. Mysliwiec. He also 

entered last Thursday, and the Court raised the question 

of how many attorneys is an indigent entitled to, and it's 

the government's understanding only in a capital case is a 

defendant entitled to more than one attorney. The Court 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1017

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
asked Mr. Dratel about that, and he really didn't respond. 

THE COURT: Well, I have done some more research 

on that, and so I can bring you up to date on what I know 

about that. After I had that colloquy with counsel in the 

courtroom, I talked with Magistrate Judge Stickney, who as 

you know has had a large role in handling the pretrial 

part of this case, and Judge Stickney told me that in 

certain circumstances a second counsel can be appointed in 

a noncapital case, and in fact, I had signed an order 

approving the appointment of Mr. Mysliwiec in this case 

and that he was supposed to be -- as I understood Judge 

Stickney's phrase, that he was supposed to be sort of a 

swing attorney. There was so much work that maybe he was 

going to be assisting more than just Mr. Dratel in the 

case. I was afraid I had exceeded my authority or the 

Court had in appointing more than one attorney to 

represent Mr. El Mezain, but according to Judge Stickney, 

that's not true. 

MR. JACKS: That was my impression, that a lot 

of this was not something necessarily that your Honor had 

been involved with which leads me to my second point. 

Again, the government has received no indication, no 

pleadings from the clerk's office or the magistrate's 

office indicating that Mr. Mysliwiec had been appointed, 

and even if it was entirely proper and within the Court's 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1018

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
rules, it's difficult to see why that type of a pleading 

would have to be kept from the government and done through 

an ex parte procedure, and I don't know if the Court takes 

a step back and looks at the record -- and the government 

has made this point for quite some time in this case -- 

you have attorneys who have entered this case as retained 

attorneys from out of district and suddenly or quickly 

become appointed attorneys again without any participation 

or knowledge or notice to the government. And I think 

even Mr. Westfall entered the case as a retained attorney 

and was eventually appointed, and it could certainly lead 

one to the belief that the defendants or defense counsel 

is choosing counsel to represent certain defendants, and I 

don't believe other indigent defendants are afforded that 

opportunity. But be that as it may, I looked at the 

docket sheet, and the docket entries are in the low seven 

hundreds now, and probably a full one third of those 

entries are ex parte sealed matters that have not been 

disclosed to the government. The government raised that 

point more than once with the Court, and on in the case 

the government was advised that the CJA entries were 

merely bills that were being submitted for payment under 

the CJA act. 

THE COURT: I still believe that to be the case. 

I have not gone back and looked at those entries. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Everything you say is consistent with my knowledge of the 

case, but there have been a lot of bills, I can tell you, 

because I have to personally review them and sign off on 

them. 

MR. JACKS: I understand. Your Honor, there has 

been other ex parte pleadings filed by the defendant, and 

there has been some filed by the government. The only 

motion filed by the defense requesting permission to file 

an ex parte motion was one filed early on in 2004. It 

does not show that it was served on the government. It 

does not show that there was a certificate of conference. 

It does not state what the purpose of the motion is or 

even the subject matter of the motion. The government has 

made at least three ex parte motions with the Court. All 

of them have been pursuant to the CIPA statute which it 

was required to do. The motions were served upon the 

defendant. They knew the nature of what the government 

was asking to do, and they had an opportunity and in fact 

did file a responsive pleading. None of that has happened 

with regard to the ex parte material and contacts that the 

defense may have had with this Court or with the 

magistrate judge. 

About a week and a half ago, we were informed 

that Mr. Cline was going to be entering the case and that 

Mr. Cline had, in fact, signed a memorandum of 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1020

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
understanding some months ago, years ago in this case. 

That memorandum of understanding was nowhere to be found 

among the pleadings in this Court. The government 

obtained a copy of that memorandum of understanding 

showing that it was filed on August 30th of 2006. When 

you go back and look at the docket, the only thing filed 

on that date was something ex parte sealed, and it was 

referred to as a CJA filing. Well, a memorandum of 

understanding saying you have read the protective order 

and intend to abide by it is not a sealed filing. The 

government requires notification before anybody is given 

access to classified material. Clearly, that was not done 

in this case, and Mr. Cline's previous involvement in this 

case was totally unknown to the government, and we believe 

that's a violation of the protective order. 

Again, the government raised the issue with the 

Court last week in the course of the hearings. I believe 

it was in regard to the Kastigar or attorney-client 

situation. According to the record now, the Holy Land 

Foundation up until today had a retained attorney. Mr. 

Elashi had a retained attorney. First Mr. Evans and then 

Ms. Moreno, and then as recently as ten days or two weeks 

ago, Mr. Cline enters as an additional retained attorney 

for Mr. Elashi. And the government has reason to believe, 

as we stated, that Ms. Moreno and Mr. Cline are being paid 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1021

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
by this Muslim Legal Fund of America. Even if a person -- 

Even if the money to pay a retained lawyer comes from 

donors or friends, at some point in time the defendant 

would have to agree to accept that money, and it becomes 

discretionary with him. So I don't believe that a legal 

defense fund can determine who an attorney is going to 

represent. At some point in time the defendant would have 

to agree, and essentially that money would have to have 

been expended on behalf of the defendant. 

It appears, your Honor, that there has been a 

manipulation at least of the CJA system. If this legal 

defense fund wants to pay for a lawyer to represent some 

of these parties but not cut into the taxpayers paying for 

part of the attorneys, it seems like they have done a good 

job of that in the sense that they have -- rather than 

having Mr. Cline represent one of the appointed indigent 

defendants, he simply comes on as an additional lawyer for 

a client who already has a retained attorney. There is 

nothing the government can do about that, but I think 

that's something the Court clearly has the authority to 

look into and make inquiry about the circumstances 

surrounding whether or not there was manipulations of 

lawyers and manipulations where lawyers come into the case 

saying we have been retained and then automatically say a 

few weeks later, oh, my client is indigent now, will you 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1022

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
appoint me. I simply bring up all of these because I 

think when you step back and look at the totality of the 

circumstances, quite frankly, your Honor, the government 

is very concerned about the degree of ex parte filings, 

the fact that none of these filings have been pursuant to 

a motion. I understand that the local rules allow a court 

to seal anything that the parties request and show good 

cause for. It may require a motion or simply saying can 

this be filed under sealed. Sealing is one thing. Doing 

it in an ex parte fashion is an entirely different thing. 

I can imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and the 

government was having constant ex parte contact with 

either the magistrate court or this Court, the reaction of 

the defendants and rightfully so. The courts have said 

that ex parte contact with the Court should be something 

that is extremely rare, and I don't think you can say that 

in this case. I have come across an article that Mr. 

Dratel wrote for the New York Law School Review 2003/2004, 

entitled "Turning the Tables: Using the Government's 

Secrecy and Security Arsenal for the Benefit of the Client 

in Terrorism Prosecutions," and he talks about using this 

ex parte contact with the Court as a strategic device. 

Even to the point that if you can get the court to appoint 

an expert, it's unlikely the court is going to exclude 

that expert if the Court has already paid for that expert. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1023

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
So it appears this is not some impromptu strategic 

procedure. It's been planned. The government has been 

raising this question throughout this litigation. We have 

made the point over and over that the defendants have 

never filed a motion even giving the government notice 

that we're going to have an ex parte contact with the 

Court, we just want to let you know about it and this is 

the subject matter. So the government is completely in 

the dark regarding how many ex parte pleadings there has 

been with the Court or magistrate court or what the 

subject matter has been, whether or not the government had 

anything to add or contribute, and as I said, your Honor, 

I guess one of the things that really tipped the scale in 

this regard is finding out that Mr. Cline, even though he 

was not an attorney of record in this case was somehow -- 

he somehow signed a memorandum of understanding to view 

the classified material totally unknown to the government. 

Clearly, I would submit in violation of the protective 

order which says that anybody that is going to have access 

to that material the government has to be notified if they 

have to sign a memorandum of understanding. 

In terms of -- What does the government want the 

Court to do about it? Well, I don't know what you can do 

about it at this point in time. I simply want the Court 

to be made aware of it, and as far as a remedy, we would 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1024

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
ask the defense be required to file a motion specifying 

each and every ex parte contact with the Court, each ex 

parte submission, the grounds for that submission so that 

at least at this phase the government can be aware of the 

degree of ex parte contact between defense counsel and the 

Court. And we don't know if we have an objection or not. 

But you know, you can't even respond to that if you don't 

know what the contact was. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks, it's about four minutes 

to ten. I don't want to be late in starting this general 

voir dire session. I don't think this is something I need 

to resolve before the jury comes up. I don't want to cut 

you off. If you have more to say, I'll hear it at a later 

time. 

MR. JACKS: The last thing I have to say would 

be to -- There was a Supreme Court case that addressed 

this topic, and essentially the Supreme Court said the 

adversary process is not a poker game and not something 

where one side can hide their cards and hold back their 

strategy until they get to see what the other side is 

going to do, that there is a right on both sides for a 

free flow of discovery and exchange, and we believe that 

simply has not taken place in this case. That's all I 

have, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks, I have had a lot more 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1025

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
exposure to the Criminal Justice Act in this case than any 

other case assigned to me. Judge Stickney has had a very 

active role in managing this case for me, including for 

the most part the CJA matters. So if you want to pursue 

some relief on this, I am going to refer you to Judge 

Stickney because he really is more knowledgeable about 

this than I. And as you know, he was defense counsel 

before he came on the Bench. So I think he's more 

familiar with the CJA than I am. We can do that by having 

Ms. Casey preparing a transcript of your remarks, and I 

can refer it to him in a formal way or you can go over and 

tell him what you have told me, and I'm sure he would 

listen to you. I don't know in what respect he is aware 

of it. Certainly more than I because he sees the CJA's in 

the first instance. Like you, I was unaware that Mr. 

Cline had signed this memorandum of understanding a year 

ago, and I don't know anything about that. So if you 

think there is a violation of the protective order and you 

want to pursue that, I would refer that to Judge Stickney 

in the first instance for his recommendation to me. 

MR. JACKS: Yes, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Ladies and Gentlemen, let's take a 

brief recess while the jury panel is brought to the 

courtroom and then we will commence general voir dire.

(Recess)

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1026

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
THE COURT: Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen. 

We have already talked to all of you individually, but as 

a group you are now the panel from which the jury in this 

case will be selected. So let me first formally welcome 

you to the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Texas, Dallas Division. I don't think we took 

the time to do that when you were up here and we talked to 

you individually. 

As you heard, my name is Joe Fish, and I will be 

presiding over the trial, and in just a moment I will 

introduce to you the other people who will be 

participating in the trial so that I can ask you whether 

you are acquainted with any of us. 

Let me first outline what I hope to accomplish 

this morning. Now that you are all here as a group, I 

have some additional questions to ask you, and once I have 

asked all of my questions and you have responded to those 

questions where you have an answer, we will take a recess 

and the parties and counsel and I will go through the 

process of actually selecting the jury. So before you 

leave the courthouse today, you will know whether you are 

going to be on the jury that will hear this case or not. 

I hope to complete these proceedings by approximately the 

noon hour or shortly after noon so that everybody can have 

lunch at near your normal lunch hour. So please bear with 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1027

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
me if sometimes the proceedings seem to go slowly this 

morning. 

The concept of our jury system is that you as 

members of the community come into court when you are 

summoned to do so, and if you are selected as a juror, you 

will become a judge of the facts. That is to the extent 

that the parties to this dispute are in disagreement about 

what happened, it will be your responsibility as jurors to 

determine the facts from the evidence which is presented 

here in court. 

By contrast, I will be the judge of the law and 

will decide disputed questions of law, including what 

evidence is available for the jury's consideration. So 

that will be the division of responsibility that you and I 

will have during this trial. You will be the judges of 

the facts, and I will be the judge of the law. Because in 

a very real sense you will be judges in this case, I have 

some additional questions to ask you to determine whether 

this is a suitable case for you to sit in. We know, of 

course, from the previous questioning that we have done 

and from the questionnaires that you have filled out that 

you are qualified to sit as jurors in this court 

generally. But there might be something about your 

background or experience or your knowledge of one of the 

parties or one of the attorneys or one of the witnesses 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1028

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
that might disqualify you from serving in this particular 

case. So please listen closely to my questions, and if 

you have an answer to my question, indicate by raising 

your hand, and then when you are recognized, please stand 

and give us your name and then your answer as completely 

but concisely as possible. As you previously remember or 

remember from the previous visit to the courtroom where 

you were questioned individually, the acoustics in this 

room are not the best. So please speak out so that 

everyone involved in the trial can hear your answer. 

As I said, I want to introduce the various 

people participating in the trial so that I can ask 

whether you are acquainted with us. You met some of the 

them earlier in the individual questioning but not all of 

them. So I want to be sure that we cover all of that. In 

addition to myself, I have some other members of the 

Court's staff to introduce to you. Mr. Kiblinger is our 

court security officer who opened court a moment ago. Mr. 

Kiblinger will serve as the baliff of this jury once it is 

selected. The lady with the red hair seated immediately 

in front of me is Ms. Cass Casey. She's the court 

reporter and takes down what everyone says, and that 

becomes the official record of our proceedings. 

To her left, is Ms. Susan Hudson, who's our 

court coordinator and a deputy clerk of this Court. The 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1029

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Court's administrative assistant just came in the door 

behind me and to my right. She is Ms. Eleanore Piwoni. 

She will probably not be in the courtroom throughout the 

trial but in and out on occasion. So I wanted you to know 

who she is. 

Over here, I have more members of the Court's 

staff. The gentlemen next to the Bench is Mr. Ben 

Stewart. Next to him is Mr. Kyle Miller. And then Mr. 

Dennis Lester, who's a law student from Loyola in New 

Orleans who's with us for a few weeks this summer as an 

intern. I believe that completes the introduction of the 

Court and its staff. Let me pause to ask if there is 

anyone on the panel who knows me or any other member of 

the Court's staff just introduced. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, as you heard earlier, this 

is a criminal case, and I will have more to say about that 

later. But one significant fact about a criminal case is 

that it is brought in the name of the United States of 

America as the prosecuting authority, and the United 

States is represented by several lawyers, some of whom are 

with the Office of the United States Attorney for the 

Northern District of Texas, specifically Mr. Jim Jacks. 

Mr. Jacks, would you stand and I am going to ask you to 

introduce to the Ladies and Gentlemen of the panel your 

cocounsel and where they are from. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1030

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
MR. JACKS: Good morning again, Ladies and 

Gentlemen. As I told you before, my name is Jim Jacks. 

I'm an Assistant United States Attorney here in Dallas for 

the Northern District of Texas. To my left is Elizabeth 

Shapiro. Ms. Shapiro is an attorney from the Department 

of Justice, and she's also a special assistant to the 

United States Attorney. To my right is Nathan Garrett. 

Mr. Garrett is also an assistant United States Attorney. 

And to my far right is Mr. Barry Jonas. Mr. Jonas is also 

an attorney -- a trial attorney from the Department of 

Justice in Washington and a Special Assistant U.S. 

Attorney. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Jacks and Ladies and 

Gentlemen. Is there any member of the panel who knows Mr. 

Jacks, Ms. Shapiro, Mr. Garrett or Mr. Jonas? Is there 

any member of the panel who has ever had any dealings with 

the Department of Justice or the United States Attorney's 

office for the Northern District of Texas, if those 

dealings did not involve these particular lawyers? Yes, 

sir. 

VENIRE PERSON: Steven Saucier. We had a girl 

that worked for our firm. I work for an environmental 

consulting firm. She went on to get her law degree and 

worked for the Department of Justice. So I was 

interviewed by them for her. I don't know if that counts. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1031

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
But she's in Washington. 

THE COURT: Do you know the name of the lady you 

are referring to? 

VENIRE PERSON: Elizabeth Sanders. 

THE COURT: How long ago was this? 

VENIRE PERSON: About eight years ago. 

THE COURT: And do you think Ms. Sanders's 

connection with the Department of Justice would have any 

influence on you if you were selected to serve as a member 

of this jury? 

VENIRE PERSON: No. I just wanted to be 

forthright. 

THE COURT: Well, you did the right thing in 

bringing it to our attention. Thank you, sir. 

Anyone else? 

Now, let me turn to the other side of the case. 

I think, as you heard in the individual questioning, there 

are several defendants named in this case in addition to a 

corporate entity. The corporate entity is named the Holy 

Land Foundation for Relief and Development. However, that 

entity is unrepresented at this trial. And I don't think 

during the individual questioning you were introduced to 

all of the individual defendants. I'm just going to go in 

the order in which these names are mentioned in the 

indictment. The indictment is the document which is filed 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1032

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
with the court to commence a case like this. It is only a 

written accusation, nothing more, and I will have more to 

say about that later as well. But the first individual 

defendant named in the indictment is a man by the name of 

Shukri Abu Baker, and he is represented by Ms. Nancy 

Hollander and Ms. Teresa Duncan. 

Ms. Hollander, I'll ask you to introduce your 

client to the Ladies and Gentlemen of the panel, and also 

if you have anyone assisting you in the trial, introduce 

that person or those persons as well. 

MS. HOLLANDER: Thank you, your Honor. Good 

morning, Ladies and Gentlemen. I'm Nancy Hollander, and 

my cocounsel is Teresa Duncan. Our client is Mr. Shukri 

Abu Baker. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Ladies and Gentlemen. 

You may be seated. Is there any member of the panel who 

knows Ms. Hollander, Ms. Duncan or Mr. Baker?

The second individual. 

MS. HOLLANDER: Excuse me. Should I introduce 

my paralegal. 

THE COURT: Yes, ma'am, if that person is here. 

MS. HOLLANDER: I'm sorry. I didn't see her in 

the back. Martha Hardiman is a paralegal who will be 

assisting us. 

THE COURT: Thank you. Anyone who knows Ms. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1033

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Hardiman?

That reminds me. I have failed to make one 

other introduction from the Court's staff. He's not here 

today, but there is a man named Andrew Newman who will 

become a law clerk in this court in approximately mid to 

late August, and it's anticipated this trial will still be 

going at that point. His name is Andrew Newman, and he 

has just graduated from the University of Texas Law 

School, and I think he's currently studying for the bar 

exam. Is there anyone who knows Mr. Newman?

Now let me go back to the defendants who are 

named in the indictment. The second individual defendant 

named in the indictment is Mohamed El Mezain, and he is 

represented by Mr. Joshua Dratel and Mr. Mysliwiec. Let 

me ask you to introduce your client as well as anyone 

assisting you during the trial. 

MR. DRATEL: My client is Mohamed El Mezain, and 

I'm Josh Dratel, and this is my associate Mr. Mysliwiec. 

THE COURT: Anyone recognize Mr. Dratel, Mr. 

Mysliwiec or Mr. El Mezain?

I forgot to do this with Ms. Hollander so I need 

to back up. Mr. Dratel, are you with a law firm so that I 

can inquire if anyone has had any dealings with your law 

firm? 

MR. DRATEL: Yes, Joshua Dratel Law Offices. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1034

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
THE COURT: Anyone who has ever dealt with the 

law firm of Joshua Dratel? 

Ms. Hollander. 

MS. HOLLANDER: My law firm is Freedman, Boyd, 

Daniels, Hollander. 

THE COURT: That's a long list of names. Anyone 

on the panel who has ever had any dealings with that law 

firm?

The next defendant named in the defendant is 

named Ghassan Elashi, and Mr. Elashi is represented by Ms. 

Linda Moreno and Mr. John Cline. 

Ms. Moreno, let me ask you to introduce to the 

Ladies and Gentlemen of the panel your client as well as 

anyone assisting you during the trial. 

MS. MORENO: Thank you. Good morning, Ladies 

and Gentlemen. My name is Linda Moreno. I represent Mr. 

Ghassan Elashi. Cocounsel is Mr. John Cline. My law firm 

is the Law Services of Linda Moreno, and Mr. Cline is with 

Jones Day.

THE COURT: Thank you. Any members of the panel 

know Ms. Moreno, Mr. Cline, Mr. Elashi? Yes, sir, second 

row. 

VENIRE PERSON: Freeman Robinson. I don't know 

either lawyer, but I have done some work for Jones Day 

before with my firm. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1035

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
THE COURT: Refresh my memory, if you will, what 

kind of work you have done for that law firm. 

VENIRE PERSON: I work for a graphic media firm, 

and I think we have done some stuff for a client of Jones 

Day. 

THE COURT: Jones Day has several offices in 

several cities. Has your firm did work for the Jones Day 

firm here?

VENIRE PERSON: Yes. 

THE COURT: I think Mr. Cline is probably from a 

different office of Jones day. So as far as you know you 

haven't had any contact with him? 

VENIRE PERSON: No, sir, I haven't. 

THE COURT: Given the fact that Mr. Cline is 

involved in the case and with the firm of Jones Day, if 

you are selected to serve as a judge of the facts in this 

case, would you be inclined for or against Mr. Cline and 

his client by virtue of your having done work for that law 

firm? 

VENIRE PERSON: No, sir. 

THE COURT: Going down the indictment further. 

Ms. Cadeddu, let me ask you to introduce your client as 

well as anyone assisting you during the trial. 

MS. CADEDDU: My name is Marlo Cadeddu, and I'm 

with the Law Office of Marlo Cadeddu, and I represent Mr. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1036

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Mufid Abdulqader. 

THE COURT: Anyone who recognizes either of 

these people? 

VENIRE PERSON: My name is Baccus. My wife 

worked with one of the defendants in their home. It's 

called International Child Intervention. She went out to 

their house and worked with their son for a two or three 

day period, and there is things that she has told me that 

could definitely sway my judgment. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Baccus. I did 

receive information from the jury administrator about 

that, although not in as much detail as you have given us. 

I have related that information to counsel and the parties 

when I received it. I think we have determined that the 

defendant involved in the case -- that your wife visited 

with Mr. Elashi who was introduced not this last defendant 

but the one before that. And I appreciate your bringing 

that to our attention. 

The next defendant is Mr. Abdulrahmin Odeh. 

MR. WESTFALL: Thank you. Ladies and Gentlemen, 

I'm Greg Westfall. My law firm is Westfall, Platt, Cutrer 

and Foster. This is Mr. Foster who assists me. 

THE COURT: Thank you, gentlemen. Anyone who 

knows Mr. Westfall or Mr. Odeh or the other gentlemen 

introduced just now by Mr. Westfall as assisting him?

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1037

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Ladies and Gentlemen, I believe that completes 

the introduction of those of us who will be participating 

in the trial. However, I now need to give you the names 

of the persons who may be testifying as witnesses in this 

case so that I can make a similar inquiry if you know any 

of them. There is a long list of names here so I will 

possibly be pausing periodically to ask you if you know 

any of the persons that I have read the names of up to 

that point. 

(Witness list read)

VENIRE PERSON: I don't know. Jim Lewis is a 

pretty generic name but -- 

THE COURT: This Jim Lewis is a Special Agent 

for the FBI. 

VENIRE PERSON: Wouldn't be that one. 

THE COURT: Sir, the court reporter didn't hear 

your name, would you stand and give us your name.

VENIRE PERSON: Brice O'Dell. 

THE COURT: Let me pause and ask if any of you 

recognize that group of names. 

(Witness list read)

THE COURT: Let me pause and ask if anyone 

recognizes any of those names. 

VENIRE PERSON: Mollie Drake. I don't know if 

it's the same person, but I do know a Chris Jones. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1038

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
THE COURT: This Chris Jones lives in Dallas, 

Texas. Let me inquire of counsel for the defendants if 

anyone can give us more information about the age of Mr. 

Jones or anything about him that would help us identify 

whether this is the same person she knows. 

MS. SHAPIRO: He works for an engineering 

consulting firm, your Honor. He's in his late thirties or 

early forties. 

THE COURT: Thank you. 

(Witness list read)

THE COURT: I think that completes the list. 

Anyone recognize any of that group of names?

Now, Ladies and Gentlemen, I want to tell you a 

little bit about what this case involves. I think most of 

you at least were told a little bit about this during the 

individual questioning that went on earlier this week. 

But there are a number of charges in this case. Most of 

them however are -- revolve around the allegation that the 

Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, which as 

I told you, is named as a defendant in the indictment but 

which is not represented here at trial, was an American 

charitable organization that raised money for certain 

causes, and it's alleged in the indictment that the Holy 

Land Foundation and these individual defendants who have 

been introduced to you who worked with the Holy Land 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1039

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Foundation in various capacities sent money either 

directly to or affiliates of an organization named HAMAS 

which the United States Government has designated as a 

foreign terrorist organization. And under United States 

law, it is illegal for anyone to make -- to give material 

support to a foreign terrorist organization. So once the 

United States Government declared that HAMAS was a foreign 

terrorist organization, it thereafter became illegal under 

United States law for anyone to send money or anything of 

value to or for the benefit of HAMAS. So that's really 

what the case is about, although there are a number of 

specific charges related to that central theme. They are 

all revolve around that central allegation. I think you 

have all been asked about this in the individual 

questioning, but out of an abundance of caution, let me 

ask you again. Is there anyone who knows something about 

that other than what you have already told us about. I 

know a number of you said you had read or heard something 

in the news media particularly shortly before jury 

selection began this week. Beyond what you have told us 

in individual questioning, is there anyone who knows 

something about this case before coming in court today?

Ladies and Gentlemen, again, I think you were 

told a little bit about the rules that relate to criminal 

cases in the individual questioning, but I want to go over 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1040

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
the rules that apply to criminal cases with all of you to 

be sure there is no misunderstanding here. There are 

fundamental rules that apply to every criminal case, 

including this one. 

First, a defendant is presumed innocent until 

proven guilty. The indictment which I have referred to 

earlier, this is written accusation that commences the 

case. The indictment against the defendants brought by 

the government is only an accusation, nothing more. It is 

not proof of guilt or anything else. Each defendant in 

this case therefore starts out with a clean slate. 

Second, the burden of proof is on the government 

until the very end of this case. None of these defendants 

has any burden to prove his innocence or to present any 

evidence or to testify, although the defendants do have 

the right to present evidence or testify if they choose to 

do so. Since each defendant has the right to remain 

silent, if they elect to exercise that right, the law 

prohibits you in arriving at your verdict from considering 

that a defendant may not have testified. 

And third, the government must prove each 

defendant's guilt beyond a quantum of evidence, beyond a 

reasonable doubt. I will explain that to you later in the 

case. But keep in mind this is not a civil case. I know 

that some of you have served in civil cases, and there the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1041

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
standard is a preponderance of the evidence; that is, one 

thing is more likely than the other thing. But in a 

criminal case the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Is there any member of the panel who has any question 

about any of these rules that apply to a criminal case or 

doubts your ability to follow those standards? 

There is one other point that I wanted to cover 

with you for those of you who have indicated that you had 

previous service as a trial juror. I know some of you 

indicated that you had served as jurors in criminal cases 

in the State of Texas or in a county court in the State of 

Texas. And although I have never personally had any 

participation in the State of Texas Criminal Justice 

System, it is my understanding that in Texas the role of 

the juror is frequently two-fold in a criminal case. The 

first step is that the jury has to determine the guilt or 

innocence of the accused, and if the jury determines that 

the accused is guilty, they are often called upon to 

decide the punishment or the sentence of the defendant. 

In the federal system, it works a little bit 

differently. In this case, the jury will have the role 

only of deciding the guilt or innocence, although there 

will be multiple decisions to be made because there are a 

number of defendants and each defendant is charged in 

separate counts that charge a separate crime. Some of the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1042

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
defendants are named in all counts and some only in one. 

But with respect to each count of the indictment, the jury 

will have to reach a decision about the defendant named in 

that count. So there would be multiple determinations to 

be made by the jury in this case. If the defendants are 

found guilty, it will be my job as judge to decide what 

the punishment of defendant who's found guilty will be. 

Is there any member of the jury panel who feels 

that he or she cannot participate in such a system knowing 

that if the verdict of the charge is guilty that you would 

not have any say into what the punishment of the defendant 

would be?

Ladies and Gentlemen, I think I'm almost through 

with my questioning. You were asked in the individual 

sessions about any exposure to media counts that you may 

have had before coming to that session. Of course, I 

think media coverage of this case is probably ongoing, and 

there has been a lapse of time since we saw most of you. 

So let me ask if there is anyone on the panel who has read 

or heard anything in the media about this case that you 

haven't already told us about in the individual sessions. 

Let me caution you again if you are selected to 

serve on the jury in this case that it is very important 

to all of these parties that this case be determined on 

the evidence that is presented here in the courtroom and 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1043

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
on nothing else. 

That is why we have taken such care with the 

jury selection proceedings in this case, and I will be 

reminding you of the importance throughout the trial of 

avoiding any contact with media coverage of this case. 

May I see counsel at the Bench, please? 

Ladies and Gentlemen, I think I have covered 

what I usually cover in my voir dire, as supplemented what 

was done in the individual sessions. Is there anything 

else you feel I need to cover? I think I hit all the 

topics that Mr. Westfall had mentioned in his letter that 

you wanted me to cover. 

MR. WESTFALL: No, your Honor. 

MS. HOLLANDER: Nothing, your Honor.

MR. GARRETT: Not for the government. 

THE COURT: I guess we will excuse them to go 

back to the central jury room, and we will let the parties 

go through the struck procedure, and we'll bring the 

eighteen back up and give them instruction. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, on the issue of Mr. 

Baccus. 

THE COURT: You want to have him stay behind and 

question him further? 

MR. WESTFALL: Well, if anyone needs to question 

him. I don't know that -- I don't even know who he's bad 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1044

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
on. But certainly the record can't be fair and impartial, 

and we will submit him for challenge. 

MR. JACKS: Just question him I guess and see 

what he says. 

THE COURT: Ladies and Gentlemen, it is true 

that I have finished my questioning of the panel as a 

whole. Mr. Baccus, in light of the matter you brought to 

the attention of the panel today, I do need to ask you to 

remain behind so that I can ask you a few additional 

questions. Let me ask you when you leave the courtroom 

that you go back to the jury assembly room on the first 

floor. We do need you to stay at the courthouse because 

the parties and counsel and I will be working to decide 

which of you will actually be the jury in this case, and 

once we have made that determination which should occur 

within the next hour, we will let you know that, and those 

who have been selected will be brought up to the courtroom 

for further instructions. So it is important that you all 

remain present here at the courthouse so that we can 

access you quickly when a decision is made as to who's on 

the jury. 

Thank you for your attention, and all of you may 

be excused from the courtroom, except Mr. Baccus. 

VENIRE PERSON: May I speak with you a moment? 

THE COURT: Yes, sir. Just remain behind when 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1045

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
everybody else leaves. 

(Jury out)

THE COURT: Let's see, there was a few members 

of the panel who raised their hand and asked to see me. 

Let me be sure I know who they are. Mr. Saucier, Mr. 

Robinson and then Mr. O'Dell and Dr. Constantinescu. Let 

me ask all of you to go out in the hall until we call you 

in. Please remain near the double doors at the back of 

the courtroom. 

I think we're ready to see next Dr. 

Constantinescu. Did you need to see me for some reason? 

VENIRE PERSON: Yes. The only reason is the 

length of the trial, and if it is possible because I know 

it's a little late now to be excused as I am a cancer 

patient, and I have already cancelled some medical 

appointments. I would appreciate it. If not -- because I 

understand it would take probably three months every day. 

THE COURT: It's every day Monday through 

Thursday. 

VENIRE PERSON: Yes. 

THE COURT: But you are right; it would be a 

period of four months. 

VENIRE PERSON: I'm sorry. If you could 

consider feasible, let me appreciate it. 

THE COURT: Let me ask you a couple of follow-up 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1046

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
questions. You said you had had to cancel a couple of 

medical appointments. I don't know how difficult they are 

to obtain and how long you have to wait to see the 

provider that you have to see. Can you give me an idea of 

that? 

VENIRE PERSON: Two months. For example, last 

week I had MRI and surgery appointment. I had the surgery 

last year, and now I need to go to three doctors. 

THE COURT: How far in advance do you generally 

need to make these appointments? 

VENIRE PERSON: They can't see you on shorter 

notice than that. Only if I give them a day. Most of the 

doctors don't work on Friday. 

THE COURT: Counsel for the parties have any 

further questions for Dr. Constantinescu? 

MR. JACKS: No, your Honor. 

MR. WESTFALL: No, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Mr. Baccus, would you come to the 

lectern in the middle of the room and speak into the 

microphone so that we can all hear you clearly. You said 

this morning in your answer to one of my questions that 

your wife had visited in the home of one of the defendants 

and that you felt that could definitely have an influence 

on you if you were selected to serve in this case. Can 

you be more specific on what kind of influence you think 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1047

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
that might have on you? 

VENIRE PERSON: She had basically stated that 

there were some problems with the defendant and the 

family, and she really didn't elaborate. She kind of came 

in towards the end of helping the child and the girl that 

was there before her or oversaw my wife said that they had 

had some problems with the defendant and they were not 

allowed to see the child there at the house and they had 

to go next door to either the aunt or mother-in-law's 

house, and it came to the point after that that the police 

were called for some reason. But again, that was probably 

five years ago. 

THE COURT: Do you think that would influence 

you against the defendant involved if you were selected as 

a juror in this case? 

VENIRE PERSON: Yes, sir. 

THE COURT: Counsel for the parties have any 

further questions for Mr. Baccus? 

MS. CADEDDU: Not from the defendants, your 

Honor. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Baccus, you may 

rejoin the others in the hall. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, I'm not sure that the 

parties would know this, but Mr. Kiblinger told me as the 

panel was exiting the courtroom that Mr. Henson said he 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1048

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
had already cancelled two medical appointments, and he 

wanted to see me about that. 

He's Number 14. 

Mr. Henson, Mr. Kiblinger told me you needed to 

see me because of some medical appointments you have.

VENIRE PERSON: I have two doctors' 

appointments. One is the 6th of August which is a 

urologist. And I have my six months appointment which I 

wasn't aware of was this close. It's the 23rd which is 

next week. I'm a borderline diabetic. And I have to set 

an appointment which would be next month with the VA 

Medical Center. 

THE COURT: I anticipate the jury will not be in 

session with us next Monday so that should not be a 

problem if you were selected in this case. 

VENIRE PERSON: The first one is August 6th. I 

have to see the urologist. I have cysts on my kidneys. 

Every three to six months I go back to the VA. I have a 

letter. 

THE COURT: The 6th of August -- 

VENIRE PERSON: Should be a Monday. 

THE COURT: Yes, it is a Monday. Is there any 

possibility that you could move that appointment to a 

Friday? I anticipate that the jury will not be in session 

on Fridays. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1049

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
VENIRE PERSON: Well, dealing with the VA, your 

Honor, you know, moving an appointment is kind of -- It's 

tough. I have had to move some in the past, and that 

moves me down another six months possibly to get back in 

for another appointment. That's really my primary care, 

is through the VA. 

THE COURT: Counsel for the parties have any 

further questions for Mr. Henson? 

MR. JACKS: Your Honor, just the fact that he is 

going to the VA and that he's seeing a urologist, as far 

as who that doctor is. It might be relevant in this case. 

VENIRE PERSON: I haven't seen the same one in 

the last year. I haven't seen the same one. 

THE COURT: So you don't know which doctor you 

will see? 

VENIRE PERSON: I don't know who it's going to 

be now. My primary care which over sees my health 

condition, I just received a new one which was in March 

when I went. I have had three changes in primary care in 

the last two years over there. 

THE COURT: Anything further, Mr. Jacks? 

MR. JACKS: No, your Honor. 

MR. WESTFALL: No, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Henson. You may 

rejoin the others in the central room downstairs. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1050

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Mr. Kiblinger, I think we're ready to see next 

Mr. Saucier, Number 23. 

VENIRE PERSON: Just a couple of things. One 

was something that was asked in the questionnaire that I 

forgot to put down, and I guess because at the time I was 

a little nervous in here the last time. I am part of an 

organization that I signed up last year which is Minute 

Men. It's a voluntary organization that goes to the 

border, and they watch, and if someone crosses, they call 

the border patrol. I contribute, but it's not in the 

forefront of my mind. So I wanted to be sure that 

everyone knew I was part of that organization. My major 

concern -- I do have a concern about this going to a 

sequester. 

THE COURT: The jury I don't anticipate will be 

going to a sequester. 

VENIRE PERSON: I know you don't. But my only 

concern is the media attention that it may. I'm a key man 

in my company, and right now we're in two class action 

lawsuits. I'm the only one that can design, and if I'm 

not here, they cannot do anything in that regard. Not 

that I'm so special I'm irreplaceable, but under the time 

constraints where that judge requires whatever evidence, 

we wouldn't be able to function. If there is no 

sequester, I can still perform my duties at night. If 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1051

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
there is one, I don't know about my ability to do that or 

their ability to pay me. 

THE COURT: Counsel for the parties have any 

further questions for Mr. Saucier? 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, just one. Why did 

you join the Minute Men? 

VENIRE PERSON: I have a concern about the 

border security. 

MR. WESTFALL: Is that something that would 

affect you in this case? 

VENIRE PERSON: No. I just wanted to make sure 

you knew that if that was a concern for either of the 

government or you guys. 

MR. WESTFALL: Have you ever been inclined to go 

down and stand on the border? 

VENIRE PERSON: Not yet. No, I haven't done it 

yet. But I guess I could do that if I wanted to. 

MR. WESTFALL: Anything about that that would 

affect your ability to be fair and impartial in a case 

where we're talking about people who weren't born in the 

United States? 

VENIRE PERSON: I just wanted to make sure you 

guys knew that because it was asked and I didn't write it 

down.

MR. WESTFALL: Do you think you could be fair 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1052

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
and impartial? 

VENIRE PERSON: Yes. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Saucier. You may go 

back to the central jury room. 

Mr. Kiblinger, I think we're ready to see next 

Mr. Robinson, Number 26. 

I believe you indicated as the panel was leaving 

the courtroom that you needed to see me.

VENIRE PERSON: Yes. What's happening on my 

job, we got a secretary that embezzled some money, and so 

we're going through some changes with that, and we only 

have like seven people that's there. And myself and 

another guy, we pretty much do some of the work and then 

picking it up -- because we pick up and deliver -- because 

it's going to be real difficult with the whole situation 

to come here and be here that long. Within a week or so, 

I could probably handle that, but anything past that is 

going to be real difficult for the company. Like I said, 

it's small, and we're going through some legal stuff with 

the secretary, too. 

THE COURT: Counsel for the parties have further 

questions for Mr. Robinson? Thank you. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, I'm sorry. I do. 

You said that it's going to take about a week or so of 

adjustment to get everything back in control? 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1053

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
VENIRE PERSON: No, I'm saying it would be 

difficult for me to be gone beyond that amount of time. 

They might could probably cope of with that amount of 

time, but two weeks or three with the small amount of 

people we have is going to be very difficult. 

MR. WESTFALL: What would be the consequences of 

you being gone four days a week? 

VENIRE PERSON: The consequence is they will 

have to hire somebody else. More than likely they will 

have to hire somebody else. Like I said, over that period 

of time myself and another guy do pretty much most of the 

work going in and out of the company. 

MR. WESTFALL: How long have you been with the 

company? 

VENIRE PERSON: Since 1995. 

MR. WESTFALL: Do you think they could hire a 

temporary person to pick up the slack while you were doing 

it? 

VENIRE PERSON: Well, see, they could do the 

delivery part but not the work part. She wouldn't be able 

to just come in and do the work I do also. Like going out 

and picking it up is fine, but as it comes back in -- I do 

a lot of the work. I pick up and deliver also. 

MR. WESTFALL: How many hours a week do you 

think you spend doing the work? 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1054

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
VENIRE PERSON: You mean per week? 

MR. WESTFALL: In a given week, how many hours 

would you spend designing? 

VENIRE PERSON: Probably half of the day I'm 

doing the work, and the other half I'm picking it up. So 

about -- four hours a day that I'm pretty much doing the 

work, and the rest of it I'm picking it up and taking it 

back. 

MR. WESTFALL: And there is two of you? 

VENIRE PERSON: The other guy, he's on the one 

side. He's on the litigation side, and I do the board 

side. He's in the same thing. He works doing litigation 

and picks up and delivers. 

MR. JACKS: Mr. Robinson, is this something 

would you lose your job over this or is this -- it would 

just be a hardship for your employer? 

VENIRE PERSON: Well, it would be a hardship for 

the employer, you know, as being able to afford me being 

gone for that amount of time, period. 

MR. JACKS: Okay. Thank you. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Robinson, you may 

rejoin the others in the central jury room.

VENIRE PERSON: All right. Thank you. 

THE COURT: Mr. Kiblinger, I think we're ready 

to see next Mr. O'Dell, Number 41. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1055

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
VENIRE PERSON: I just had some things going on 

personally in my life that have come up this week since 

this all started I wanted the Court to be aware of. A 

lady that actually my wife and I take care of, we call her 

our grandmother. I have been with her since I was eight 

years, over thirty years, and she has broken her leg this 

week and is in the ICU. She's stable and doing well right 

now. They haven't been able to do any surgery on her leg 

yet because she is not strong enough. They are trying to 

get her blood count up and she's anemic right now. I 

don't know where that is going. I wanted the Court to be 

aware that was going on. 

THE COURT: Thank you for bringing that to my 

attention. Counsel for the parties have any further 

questions for Mr. O'Dell? 

MR. JACKS: No. 

MR. WESTFALL: No, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. O'Dell, you may 

rejoin the others in the central juryroom. Mr. Kiblinger, 

I think that completes the list of people who indicated 

they needed to see me, does it not? We have seen now 

since the panel left the courtroom six members of the 

panel I believe. Dr. Constantinescu, Mr. Baccus, Mr. 

Saucier, Mr. Robinson and Mr. O'Dell. I'm assuming the 

defense probably will want to submit Mr. Baccus for cause. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1056

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Am I right about that? 

MR. WESTFALL: Yes, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Does the government have any 

objection to excusing Mr. Baccus for cause? 

MR. JACKS: No, your Honor. 

THE COURT: I will excuse Mr. Baccus for cause. 

It was reported to me this morning before we began that 

there were two members on this panel who had not reported 

as of about 9:30 this morning. I don't know whether they 

ever showed up or not. 

One of those was Ms. Munoz, Number 39. Ms. 

Hudson reported to me that she was here. The other one I 

think was Ms. Hodge, Number 45, and I guess she never made 

it this morning. So we are down to forty-nine people for 

this general voir dire session, and with the excusal of 

Mr. Baccus, we're down to forty-eight. These others I 

would say are in the category of hardship excuses, and I 

don't know if counsel have any views on how I should use 

my discretion in exercising those excuses. 

MR. JACKS: I don't think Mr. Saucier was a 

hardship. He was making it known to us, first of all, 

about his contribution to that organization and if the 

jury was sequestered it would be a hardship. But the 

others -- I don't think Mr. O'Dell, was planning a 

hardship again. I think he was just making the Court 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1057

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
aware of that. But as far as the others, I guess just 

submit that to the Court as we have done with the others 

regarding making that decision. 

THE COURT: Thank you. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Dr. Constantinescu 

said that she's undergoing continuous cancer treatment. 

THE COURT: That was my understanding. 

MR. WESTFALL: And that that would be I believe 

a hardship, not being able to do cancer treatment. Mr. 

Henson has one doctor's appointment that he is liable to 

myself. At this point in time, your Honor, after you have 

had three chances to claim a hardship, one doctor's 

appointment, I don't know that's efficient. I agree Mr. 

Saucier didn't say anything. He just wanted us to know 

that he was a Minute Man. As for Robinson, there wasn't 

anything other than just kind of messing him around. 

Missing four days a week when he works four hours a day on 

something that somebody already does. And after three 

chances to claim a hardship. And with Mr. O'Dell, I don't 

think he claimed a hardship. 

THE COURT: Let me be sure I understand what you 

said. You think Dr. Constantinescu is a hardship, and did 

you think Mr. Henson is or not? 

MR. WESTFALL: I think he's not. One doctor's 

appointment he's going to miss. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1058

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
MR. JACKS: Your Honor, the reason I asked if he 

knew the doctor is because I know Mr. Cadeddu's husband 

practices at the VA, and I know he's a urologist, and if 

there is a possibility he's the doctor assigned to treat 

him, that would be problematic. He said it was a doctor 

he hadn't seen before. So there is that potential problem 

there. So there is a couple of reasons that he may be 

problematic. 

THE COURT: He being Mr. Henson? 

MS. CADEDDU: Your Honor, may I respond? There 

was an operating room nurse on the list, and so I asked my 

husband about the service he does there. He only operates 

if an attending needs a surgeon to be in there. They 

manage the patients, and he only sees in clinic. And he 

told me that he has not operated there in almost a year. 

He wouldn't see Jeff because he is seeing someone -- It 

doesn't sound to me like an operative thing. It sounds 

like a follow-up thing, and even if he had had surgery in 

the last year, Jeff would have not have been the one to do 

it. 

MR. WESTFALL: And he said he has seen a 

different doctor every time he goes there which is not 

surprising. 

THE COURT: I am going to excuse 

Dr. Constantinescu in the exercise of my discretion for 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1059

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
hardship. But as to the others that we saw 

individually -- Mr. Henson, Mr. Robinson, Mr. O'Dell and 

Mr. Saucier -- I'm not going to excuse them. So I think 

we still have this minimum of forty-five people that we 

need to come up with a jury of twelve and six alternates. 

I'll ask counsel to double-check me on that to 

be sure I have counted correctly. The way I get to that 

number is we started off with this list of fifty. Ms. 

Hodge, Number 45, did not appear so we're missing her, and 

I have excused Mr. Baccus for cause and Dr. Constantinescu 

for hardship, and so that brings us down to 47 I guess. 

If everyone is in agreement on those numbers, I guess I 

now need counsel for the defense who seem to have had some 

experience in this struck jury method refresh my memory as 

to what we're going to do now as to the procedure for 

exercising peremptory challenges.

MR. WESTFALL: I will do that. So I'm clear. 

It seems to me the strike zone initially goes to Mr. 

Boozer, Number 33. 

MR. JACKS: Your Honor, any possibility the 

Court would give us some time given these last minute 

changes to kind of re-examine our list? We weren't 

necessarily expecting some of these changes, and if the 

Court would consider either re-convening at noon or 

whenever, but just give us a little time to digest what we 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1060

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
have encountered this morning and make a little more 

educated decision about these strikes. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, I could address your 

question about what the procedure is. 

THE COURT: Let's do that. I guess I'm amenable 

to your request, Mr. Jacks, but I think we need to let the 

potential jurors go to lunch because it's 11:30 already. 

Otherwise, they will be thinking about their stomachs 

instead of my instructions. 

MR. JACKS: They are not the only one, your 

Honor. 

THE COURT: Mr. Westfall, would you outline the 

procedures again? 

MR. WESTFALL: I will, your Honor. When we have 

our thirty-one that we know about which we do, we have 

twelve strikes and the government seven. So it goes 

government one, defense two, government one defense two, 

government one and defense two. And we do six sets, 

twelve sets I guess -- six sets of two, and the government 

has the first and the very last. So one two, one two, one 

two, one. Does that make sense? 

THE COURT: Okay. 

MR. WESTFALL: There is two ways to approach the 

panel. The easiest way to wrap your mind around it is the 

entire thirty-one jurors are fair game for any strike. So 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1061

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
if somebody wanted to strike Number 31 first and Number 1 

second, then that would be fine until the strikes are used 

up. From just looking at it, that's the easiest way to 

conceptualize it. There is another way where the 

government would strike one and we would strike two, but 

you move in rows across, and as you move in rows -- Like 

for instance, if the government struck 1, we struck 5 and 

6 and then the government then struck 7. 2, 3, 4 are on 

the jury, and they can't be messed with anymore. You 

can't go back behind the strikes. That's another way. 

We're amenable to do it either way. I just think that all 

of the thirty-one sitting there and striking anywhere is 

probably conceptually the way to do it. 

THE COURT: I agree. Since I haven't done this 

before, I would like to do it the easiest way. Let me 

talk with Ms. Hudson about sending the panel to lunch, and 

I would say that we ought to give them -- it's 11:35 now. 

We probably ought to give them until 12:45 at least. But 

if we could I guess reconvene by -- How long do you think 

this is going to take, Mr. Westfall? You have been 

through it before. 

MR. WESTFALL: It should take I would think less 

than thirty minutes. 

THE COURT: If we could reconvene at 12:15, we 

could have this done by the time the jury panel gets back 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1062

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
from lunch and have the people selected brought up for 

further instruction. Ms. Hudson has gone to call the jury 

clerk to tell them to go to lunch, and hopefully, we will 

have time to get lunch, too. 

MR. CLINE: Your Honor, may I be excused from 

the afternoon session? I have an urgent unshakable 

commitment. 

THE COURT: If it's okay with your client. 

MR. ELASHI: I have no problem. 

THE COURT: We'll be in recess until 12:15. 

(Recess)

THE COURT: Are we ready to begin? 

MS. CADEDDU: Defense is ready. 

MR. JACKS: Ready, your Honor. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks, as I understand the 

process, the government is supposed to exercise the first 

peremptory challenge in this initial stage. So who would 

be your first challenge. 

MR. JACKS: Juror Number 32, Mr. Torrez. 

THE COURT: Mr. Westfall, who will be the first 

two for the defense? 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Juror Number 8, who I 

understand to be Bobbitt, and Number 28, Ms. Ritter. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: Number 14, your Honor, Juror Henson. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1063

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
THE COURT: Mr. Westfall. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Number 27, Wolverton, 

and Number 19, Drake. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: Number 17, your Honor, Cynthia 

Williams. 

THE COURT: Mr. Westfall. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Number 22, Shrum, and 

Number 20, Hill. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: Number 7, your Honor, Ms. Pena. 

MR. WESTFALL: Number 2, Gartman, and Number 1, 

Epperson. 

MR. JACKS: Number 11, Ms. Marshall. 

THE COURT: Mr. Westfall. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Number 33 Mr. Boozer; 

Number 23, Saucier. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. Number 24, your Honor, 

Ms. Tillis. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Number 30, Young; 

Number 6, Maddox. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: Number 29, your Honor, Ms. Moss. 

THE COURT: I believe that gives us our first 

twelve, does it not? 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1064

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
MR. WESTFALL: Yes, sir. 

THE COURT: Ms. Simental, Number 4; Shawn 

Lopez-Rogina, Number 9; Alvin Lovely, Number 10; Carter 

Arce; Number 12, Sylvester Holmes; Number 15, Tilmer 

Johnson Junior; Number 15, Lisette Lopez; Number 21, 

Leticia Morton, Number 21; Nanette Scroggins, Number 25; 

Freeman Robinson, your Honor, Number 26; and Rosie Suarez, 

Number 31. 

And now for the alternates, I'm assuming -- 

although I don't remember you discussed this in detail, 

Mr. Westfall -- that we simply alternate in this process. 

The government first and then the defense. 

MR. WESTFALL: Yes, sir. Mr. Jacks, striking 

for the alternates beginning at Number 34, is the 

government's first peremptory challenge. 

MR. JACKS: Number 40, Mr. Taylor. 

MR. WESTFALL: 44, your Honor, Mooney. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: 34, your Honor, Ms. Jensen. 

THE COURT: Mr. Westfall. 

MR. WESTFALL: Number 42, Carrillo. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: Number 37, your Honor, Ms. Overy. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Number 36, Jones. 

THE COURT: Mr. Jacks. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1065

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
MR. JACKS: Number 39, your Honor, Ms. Munoz. 

THE COURT: Mr. Westfall. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, Number 43, Ms. 

Buonasera. 

THE COURT: I believe that goes through the 

allotted number to each side. I show then that our 

alternates would be Mr. William Neal, Number 35; Gail 

Graham, 38; Brice O'Dell, Number 41; Patricia Sanders, 

Number 46; Gerry McGahan, Number 47; and Stephanie Moreno, 

Number 48. 

Anything else we need to accomplish before Ms. 

Hudson goes to the central room to bring those eighteen 

up? 

MS. CADEDDU: No, your Honor. 

THE COURT: We'll take another brief recess. 

While they are being brought to the courtroom. Let me 

just visit with you briefly about what should happen when 

they get here. I could go ahead and swear them in and 

give them the normal preliminary instructions that I give 

in a criminal case. I usually use the Fifth Circuit 

Pattern Instructions or we can defer those things until 

Tuesday morning when they actually come and we begin 

presentation of the indictment and opening statements. 

And then in any event whether we do that this morning or 

Tuesday morning, I need to enjoin them again about the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1066

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
importance of avoiding contact with media accounts and 

people who are involved in the trial. And then I 

anticipate turning them over to Ms. Piwoni, because we're 

going to be providing lunch for the jury so that they will 

not be hopefully out in the halls encountering potential 

witnesses or parties during lunch hour. And so she needs 

to get their lunch order and describe the procedures we 

will follow every day to order lunch, and then there is 

going to be a deputy marshal I think who's going to orient 

them about the reporting procedures to this remote 

location before the drive to the courthouse, and he's 

going to explain that to them, and I think we're going to 

collect cell phone information, if we can, so that if 

anyone doesn't show up, we will have a means of getting in 

touch with them. Do either side have a preference on 

whether I go ahead and give them the oath and preliminary 

instructions today or wait until Tuesday? 

MR. JACKS: Your Honor, the government would 

prefer to wait until Tuesday. Given the ramifications on 

that, just withhold on Tuesday. 

MR. WESTFALL: I don't understand the 

ramifications. 

THE COURT: Well, I think what is probably meant 

is in the case law I have looked at that is always the 

bright line as to when jeopardy attaches is when the jury 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1067

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
is sworn. 

MR. WESTFALL: I didn't realize the swearing in 

and instructions were the same thing. For that, whatever 

the Court decides. The only thing I was going to ask is 

as to the remote location. Can the Court give them an 

instruction basically that we're not doing this because we 

are scared for your safety but to help in something else 

other than that? 

THE COURT: Well, yeah, I want to give it to 

them in the context of avoiding contacts with the media. 

I didn't want them to run the gauntlet every day to get 

into the courthouse. 

MR. WESTFALL: I would like to get on the bus 

with them. That's very appropriate, your Honor. I was 

worried about them inferring there was some danger. 

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. WESTFALL: Josh was telling me basically 

what the Court intended to do anyway. He's worried the 

Court will say don't be scared because we're doing this. 

Just because of media and leave it that I way, I 

thought that. 

THE COURT: Just to be on the same page, we're 

going to shuffle the names so that when the jury is seated 

in the jury box it will not necessarily be in this order. 

We don't want the last six people to immediately infer 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1068

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
that they are alternates. In fact, I intend to tell them 

that we have shuffled the names and that the lawyers and 

the Court know who the alternates are and the jurors, but 

they will not. And that it's important for everyone to 

pay close attention throughout the trial because they may 

well wind up being a juror at the end of the case. 

Very well. We will take a recess while Ms. 

Hudson brings those eighteen to the courtroom. 

(Recess)

THE COURT: Good afternoon, Ladies and 

Gentlemen. Welcome back to the courtroom. Please make a 

mental note of where you are seated in the jury box 

because that's where you will sit throughout the trial, 

and it's important that you occupy the same seat during 

the court sessions. All of us are going to be together 

for quite a period of time it looks like it so it is 

important that we all be in place at the appropriate time. 

I have just a few remarks for you today, and I 

will be giving you some instructions at greater length 

when we reconvene next week. Today I want to emphasize to 

you, as I have already told you I think, the importance of 

deciding this case strictly on the basis of the evidence 

that is presented here in the courtroom. The parties have 

the right to expect nothing less. One aspect of that case 

is that you should not discuss the case with anyone or 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1069

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
allow anyone to discuss it with you, and that includes 

discussing it among yourselves during the case before you 

have heard the arguments of counsel and my instructions on 

the law. Otherwise, without realizing it, you might begin 

forming impressions or opinions about the case which are 

not based on what the evidence has been. 

I know when you leave the courthouse today 

people that you know or members of your family may 

understand that you are on jury service and naturally are 

curious about what you are doing and will be asking you 

about your service, and you may not be sure how far you 

can go in responding to any such questions. Let me be 

specific about that. When you leave here when someone 

asks you whether you are serve on a jury, you are 

authorized to tell them, yes, you are serving on a jury, 

and the name of the case is the Holy Land Foundation, and 

Judge Fish is the presiding judge, and he has told you, 

you cannot say anymore about the case until it is over. 

That's the first rule. Don't discuss the case or allow 

anyone to discuss it with you. 

Also, I have tried to introduce to you all the 

people that I know will be involved in the trial so that 

you would know who they are. It's important that you 

avoid contact with any of those people as well. I know 

there is a natural human tendency when you encounter 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1070

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
someone in the hall to be polite and say hello and maybe 

even start talking about the weather, something innocuous 

like that. But if someone on one side of the case sees 

you talking to the other side, they are naturally going to 

suspect the worst, even if you are talking about something 

entirely unrelated to the case. Please do nothing that 

would create the appearance of impropriety. We're going 

to try to make it as easy as possible for you to avoid 

contact with anyone who has anything to do with the trial 

or any media that are covering the trial. As I think you 

probably understand from the individual questioning that 

took place earlier this week, there has been some media 

coverage about this case to this point and all indications 

are that we will continue to have media coverage about the 

case throughout the trial and it may include efforts on 

the part of reporters or others to find out who the jury 

is and try to interview you all which is entirely 

inappropriate. And my guess is that probably you would 

not like that either. If I were in your place, I would 

not want my face and name and identity splashed over the 

front pages or over the television screen which is 

probably an invitation for other people then to try to 

contact you. So we are going to take some steps to try to 

avoid any of that happening. For one thing, as you will 

be instructed later today, we're going to have you report 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1071

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
to a remote location that's outside the courthouse every 

morning of the trial day, and when you are all there, 

someone from the United States Marshal's office will drive 

you in a van to the courthouse and probably bring you up a 

private elevator to this floor so you don't have to run 

the gauntlet of the media if they are gathered on the 

first floor. And then at the end of the day, you will be 

transported back to that remote location, and the Marshal 

will discuss that with you later today. 

Also to try to minimize your potential contact 

with the media or anyone involved in the trial, we're 

going to provide lunch for you every day here in the 

juryroom. So my assistant, Ms. Piwoni, will have menus to 

distribute to you each day where you make your choices of 

what you want and turn that in, and lunch will then be 

provided to you that following day, and then on the 

following day there will be a menu for the next day, and 

we will try to rotate places that we order lunch from so 

that you don't get burned out on what you eat every day. 

Going back to one thing about the way you are 

seated in the jury box. There are eighteen people in the 

jury. The law requires a jury of twelve and allows us to 

have as many as six alternates in a case. So some of you 

are regular jurors, and some of you are alternates, but 

you don't know which is which. We mixed up the order in 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1072

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
the jury box. So the parties and I and the lawyers know 

who the regular jurors and alternates are, but you do not, 

and there is a reason for that, and the reason is all of 

you need to pay strict attention to the evidence 

throughout the trial because you will not know and cannot 

know until the end of the case whether you will be a juror 

who will deliberate and reach a verdict with the other 

jurors or whether you are an alternate, and if you are not 

needed to substitute for one of the other jurors, you will 

be excused. So it's important that everyone pay close 

attention to the evidence as it comes in.

And along that line, because of the anticipated 

length of the trial, I am going to allow the jury to take 

notes, if you choose to do so. That's an individual 

decision for each of you. Some of you may decide to take 

notes; some of you may not. We will provide writing 

materials for you in the event that you do decide to take 

notes. There are sort of pros and cons on whether to take 

notes or not. The pro, of course, is that in a long trial 

such as this, it can assist you in recalling what happened 

sometime ago. The cons are that -- and I have found this 

myself so I can tell you this from personal experience. 

Sometimes in cases tried without a jury where I have to 

evaluate the evidence, as you will be doing at the end of 

the trial, and decide which witnesses to believe and which 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1073

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
witnesses not to believe, I have found that it's hard to 

take detailed notes and watch the demeanor of the witness 

as the witness is testifying. So there is sort of a trade 

off on whether you are taking detailed notes or watching 

the demeanor of the witness as the witness testifies. 

Another con is that inevitably in a group the size of 

yours there are some better note takers than others. So 

there is a temptation if some of you take notes and others 

do not for those who don't take notes to rely on the notes 

of the jurors who do. Each of you has to reach your own 

decision in this case, and I'll discuss that with you 

later in more detail, but it's important you reach your 

own decision without relying on the recollection or notes 

of other jurors. 

I intend that Court will be in session Monday 

through Thursday. I think you have been told that 

already. Our Court session starts at nine o'clock every 

day unless a different start time is announced the day 

before. We will take an hour and a half luncheon recess 

midday starting about 12:00 and ending at 1:30, and we 

will have mid-morning and mid-afternoon recesses of 

approximately fifteen or twenty minutes and we will try to 

recess by 4:45 every day. I don't know how far the remote 

location is from the courthouse, but hopefully you should 

be there to start your journey home by five o'clock. The 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1074

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
reason I told you about the notes is you may want to be 

thinking between now and the time you come back to the 

courthouse, which will be next Tuesday, July 24th -- you 

may be wanting to think about whether you want to take 

notes in this case or not. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, I think that's everything 

I wanted to cover with you today. I do want to emphasize 

the importance of being on time. In a jury trial like 

this, we cannot begin until all of you are here, and you 

can see, looking around the courtroom, how many people are 

involved in this trial. So if everybody but you is on 

time, that means the rest of us has to wait on that one 

person who's late. I know that emergencies come up, 

unforeseen circumstances, so probably in a trial that is 

going to last as long as everyone predicts this one is, it 

will happen that something will come up and you may be 

occasionally late. I understand that, but please don't 

let that be a routine occurrence because it really affects 

the way we can start the trial and ultimately will affect 

how long we're all here. A case that is supposed to last 

three months could take longer than that if we habitually 

have to start later than nine o'clock every day. 

One of the things I want to have collected when 

you see my assistant and the Marshal is cell phone 

information for all of you who have cell phones so that if 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1075

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
someone is running late and we haven't heard from you, we 

can hopefully get in touch with you and find out what the 

situation is. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, as I said, I think that 

completes my remarks for you today. Thank you for your 

attention. When we finish here, you will exit through 

this door behind me and to my right which is across the 

hall from the juryroom. The juryroom is where you will 

always go when we leave the courtroom and where you will 

always resemble before coming back to the courtroom. This 

orientation by my assistant, Ms. Piwoni and the Deputy 

Marshal will take place in the juryroom when we're 

finished here in the courtroom. It may be that Mr. 

Kiblinger will also have some orientation for you. So 

please give those people the same attention that you have 

given me. 

Also, you might want to sort of mentally figure 

out how you are going to come back in the courtroom when 

we come back in the courtroom, and we may need to practice 

a couple of times before we get it down. But the people 

at the far end of the jury box will be at the first of the 

line, and the people near this end will be at the end of 

the line. So Mr. Kiblinger may want to instruct you 

further. Let me excuse you to go to the juryroom now for 

that orientation and keep in mind whatever time the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1076

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
Marshal tells you to be at the remote location, please be 

there on Tuesday the 24th by that hour so that you can be 

transported to the courthouse, and we can begin promptly 

at nine o'clock that morning. I hope all of you have a 

pleasant weekend. 

(Jury out)

THE COURT: Ladies and Gentlemen, while we're 

still all together, I wanted to call the attention of the 

parties and counsel to something that I just did a short 

while ago, and that is to put out an amended order 

scheduling this Daubert hearing for Dr. Levitt on Monday. 

An order was issued yesterday setting that at 1:30, but 

that was due to a failure of communication between me and 

my staff, and I actually intended to start that hearing 

Monday morning at 9:30 because I wanted to be sure that we 

could get it done in that one day. So an amended order 

was issued a short while ago that resets that hearing from 

1:30 to 9:30 in the morning. I wanted everyone to be 

aware of that. 

We will have also the CIPA Section 2 pretrial 

conference that was requested by the government 

immediately following the conclusion of that hearing. 

Anything else we needed to take up? 

MS. CADEDDU: Your Honor, you may have said 

this. Did you admonish them not to research on the 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1077

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
internet? 

THE COURT: No, I didn't, but if you want me to, 

if you want to bring them back in the courtroom, I can do 

that. Certainly that's a part of my normal preliminary 

instructions, so I will be telling them that on Tuesday 

about not doing any investigation or research on their 

own. I really didn't think they would be that highly 

motivated this weekend. Maybe they are more excited about 

this than I know. 

MR. WESTFALL: Since I have been on this case, 

my whole definition of motivation has been changed. And 

the notes, are they going to be leaving them in the 

courthouse? 

THE COURT: That would be my instruction. 

MR. WESTFALL: Whatever the Court wants to do. 

THE COURT: We'll be in recess until 9:30 Monday 

morning. 

(Recess)

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1078

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
C E R T I F I C A T I O N

I, Cassidi L. Casey, certify that during the 

proceedings of the foregoing-styled and -numbered cause, I 

was the official reporter and took in stenotypy such 

proceedings and have transcribed the same as shown by the 

above and foregoing pages 1011 through 1079 and that said 

transcript is true and correct.

I further certify that the transcript fees and format 

comply with those prescribed by the court and the Judicial 

Conference of the United States.

s/Cassidi L. Casey

______________________________

CASSIDI L. CASEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT REPORTER

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1079

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
< A >

AARON 1012:4

Abdulqader 1012:11, 

1016:22, 1037:1

Abdulrahmin 1037:19

abide 1021:10

ability 1042:6, 1052:1, 

1052:2, 1052:19

able 1051:24, 1054:20, 

1055:18, 1056:8, 1058:9

above 1079:7

Abu 1014:7, 1016:5, 

1016:12, 1017:12, 1017:15, 

1033:5, 1033:14

abundance 1040:15

accept 1022:4

access 1021:12, 1024:19, 

1045:20

accomplish 1027:14, 

1066:11

According 1018:17, 1021:19

accounts 1067:1

accurate 1017:17

accusation 1033:2, 1041:7, 

1041:9

accused 1042:17, 1042:18

acoustics 1029:8

acquainted 1027:13, 

1029:13

across 1023:17, 1062:6, 

1076:7

Act 1019:23, 1026:1

action 1051:19

active 1026:3

actually 1027:20, 1045:14, 

1056:4, 1066:22, 1077:14

add 1024:12

addition 1017:19, 1029:16, 

1032:18

additional 1021:23, 1022:17, 

1027:16, 1028:18, 1045:9

address 1016:25, 1061:3

addressed 1025:16

adjustment 1053:25

administrative 1030:1

administrator 1037:11

admonish 1077:25

advance 1047:9

adversary 1025:18

advised 1019:21

affect 1052:10, 1052:19, 

1075:19

affects 1075:18

affiliates 1040:2

afford 1055:18

afforded 1019:14

afraid 1018:15

After 1018:4, 1027:24, 

1048:10, 1058:11, 1058:18

afternoon 1063:6, 1069:10

Again 1015:19, 1018:22, 

1019:8, 1021:16, 1031:1, 

1040:16, 1040:23, 1043:22, 

1048:11, 1057:25, 1061:13, 

1066:25

against 1036:17, 1041:8, 

1048:14

age 1039:3

Agent 1038:13

ago 1020:23, 1021:1, 

1021:23, 1026:17, 1029:18, 

1032:5, 1032:6, 1048:12, 

1073:21, 1077:10, 1077:17

agree 1013:9, 1022:4, 

1022:8, 1058:13, 1062:14

agreement 1060:12

ahead 1066:18, 1067:16

AL 1011:11

Albuquerque 1011:46

All 1013:15, 1020:14, 

1023:1, 1025:23, 1027:2, 

1027:15, 1027:17, 1029:14, 

1029:15, 1032:23, 1040:13, 

1040:14, 1041:1, 1043:1, 

1043:24, 1044:10, 1045:18, 

1045:22, 1046:7, 1047:20, 

1055:23, 1056:3, 1057:21, 

1062:11, 1069:15, 1069:17, 

1070:21, 1071:13, 1071:17, 

1072:2, 1073:3, 1075:9, 

1075:20, 1075:25, 1077:4, 

1077:8

allegation 1039:18, 1040:13

alleged 1039:23

allotted 1066:6

allow 1023:6, 1070:1, 

1070:19, 1073:13

allowed 1048:8

allows 1072:22

almost 1043:13, 1059:15

along 1073:12

already 1022:18, 1023:25, 

1027:2, 1040:17, 1043:21, 

1046:15, 1049:1, 1058:18, 

1061:7, 1069:21, 1074:17

Also 1017:21, 1031:6, 

1031:8, 1031:9, 1033:8, 

1054:21, 1054:23, 1070:21, 

1072:10, 1076:14, 1076:17, 

1077:20

alternate 1065:11, 1073:8

alternates 1060:5, 1065:9, 

1065:14, 1066:7, 1069:1, 

1069:3, 1072:23, 1072:24, 

1073:2

although 1014:14, 1037:12, 

1040:11, 1041:15, 1042:12, 

1042:22, 1065:10

Alvin 1065:3

always 1067:24, 1076:9, 

1076:10

Am 1015:15, 1016:24, 

1017:2, 1026:5, 1026:9, 

1030:23, 1046:14, 1051:6, 

1057:1, 1059:24, 1073:13

amenable 1061:5, 1062:11

amended 1077:10, 1077:16

America 1011:5, 1022:1, 

1030:19

American 1039:21

among 1021:3, 1070:2

amount 1054:2, 1054:3, 

1054:4, 1055:19

Andrew 1034:4, 1034:7

anemic 1056:10

announced 1074:18

Another 1050:4, 1050:5, 

1053:13, 1054:11, 1062:4, 

1062:10, 1066:15, 1074:6

answer 1013:25, 1027:18, 

1029:3, 1029:5, 1029:10, 

1047:21

anticipate 1049:13, 1049:24, 

1051:15, 1067:3

anticipated 1034:6, 1073:12

anybody 1021:11, 1024:19

anymore 1062:9, 1070:18

Anyone 1030:13, 1032:15, 

1033:9, 1033:25, 1034:10, 

1034:15, 1034:19, 1034:23, 
1035:1, 1035:6, 1035:14, 

1036:23, 1037:2, 1037:23, 

1038:22, 1039:3, 1039:12, 

1040:5, 1040:9, 1040:16, 

1040:21, 1043:19, 1044:24, 

1067:14, 1069:25, 1070:1, 

1070:20, 1071:9, 1072:11

Anything 1013:13, 1023:7, 

1024:12, 1026:17, 1039:4, 

1040:9, 1041:10, 1043:20, 

1044:9, 1050:21, 1051:21, 

1052:18, 1053:17, 1058:14, 

1058:16, 1066:11, 1071:9, 

1077:23

anyway 1068:18

anywhere 1062:12

apologize 1017:20

appear 1060:9

appearance 1017:8, 1071:7

appearing 1017:10, 1017:12

appears 1022:10, 1024:1

apply 1041:1, 1041:3, 1042:5

appoint 1023:1, 1023:23

appointed 1017:12, 1017:15, 

1017:17, 1017:18, 1017:19, 

1018:8, 1018:24, 1019:8, 

1019:11, 1022:16

appointing 1018:16

appointment 1018:10, 

1047:7, 1049:8, 1049:11, 

1049:23, 1050:2, 1050:5, 

1058:10, 1058:13, 1058:25

appointments 1046:16, 

1047:2, 1047:10, 1049:1, 

1049:5, 1049:7

appreciate 1037:17, 

1046:16, 1046:24

approach 1061:23

appropriate 1068:14, 

1069:17

approving 1018:10

approximately 1027:23, 

1034:5, 1074:22

Arce 1065:4

arguments 1070:3

around 1039:18, 1040:13, 

1058:16, 1061:24, 1075:10

arraignment 1015:8

arriving 1041:19

Arsenal 1023:20

article 1023:17

ask 1025:1, 1027:12, 

1027:16, 1028:18, 1029:12, 

1030:12, 1030:23, 1033:7, 

1034:15, 1035:12, 1036:22, 

1038:7, 1038:19, 1038:22, 

1040:16, 1043:19, 1045:8, 

1045:9, 1045:10, 1046:7, 

1046:25, 1060:6, 1068:4

asked 1013:3, 1013:11, 

1018:1, 1027:17, 1040:14, 

1043:14, 1046:4, 1051:4, 

1052:23, 1059:1, 1059:11

asking 1013:24, 1020:18, 

1070:10

asks 1070:14

aspect 1069:24

assembly 1045:11

assigned 1026:2, 1059:4

assist 1073:20

Assistant 1011:29, 1030:1, 

1031:3, 1031:6, 1031:8, 

1031:11, 1072:13, 1075:24, 

1076:11

assisting 1018:14, 1033:9, 

1033:24, 1034:16, 1035:14, 

1036:23, 1037:25

assists 1037:22

associate 1017:21, 1034:18

assuming 1056:24, 1065:9

attaches 1067:25

attending 1059:13

attention 1032:14, 1037:18, 

1045:8, 1045:22, 1051:18, 

1056:14, 1069:5, 1073:4, 

1073:11, 1076:6, 1076:15, 

1077:8

Attorney 1011:29, 1013:7, 

1017:10, 1017:12, 1017:19, 

1017:25, 1018:13, 1018:16, 

1019:10, 1021:20, 1021:21, 

1021:23, 1022:6, 1022:18, 

1024:15, 1030:21, 1031:3, 

1031:5, 1031:7, 1031:8, 

1031:10, 1031:12, 1031:17

attorney-client 1021:18

attorneys 1017:23, 1019:6, 

1019:7, 1019:8, 1022:14, 

1028:25

August 1021:5, 1034:6, 

1049:7, 1049:20

aunt 1048:9

authority 1018:15, 1022:20, 

1030:19

authorized 1070:15

automatically 1022:24

available 1028:13

Avenue 1012:16, 1012:41

avoid 1070:24, 1071:8, 

1071:24

avoiding 1044:5, 1067:1, 

1068:10

aware 1024:25, 1025:4, 

1026:13, 1049:9, 1056:3, 

1056:12, 1058:1, 1077:19

< B >

Baccus 1037:4, 1037:10, 

1044:21, 1045:7, 1045:23, 

1047:18, 1048:18, 1048:21, 

1056:23, 1056:25, 1057:4, 

1057:6, 1057:16, 1060:10

back 1019:4, 1019:25, 

1021:6, 1023:2, 1025:19, 

1033:23, 1034:11, 1034:22, 

1044:17, 1044:19, 1045:11, 

1046:8, 1049:18, 1050:4, 

1053:4, 1053:25, 1054:22, 

1055:8, 1062:10, 1062:25, 

1069:11, 1072:8, 1072:20, 

1075:2, 1076:10, 1076:18, 

1076:19, 1078:3

background 1028:24

bad 1044:25

Baker 1011:38, 1014:7, 

1014:14, 1014:18, 1015:13, 

1015:24, 1016:5, 1016:12, 

1017:12, 1017:15, 1033:5, 

1033:14, 1033:17

baliff 1029:19

bar 1034:9

Barry 1011:26, 1031:9

based 1014:16, 1070:6

basically 1048:2, 1068:6, 

1068:17

basis 1069:22

bear 1015:20, 1027:25

became 1040:8

become 1019:8, 1028:6, 
1034:5

becomes 1022:4, 1029:23

began 1040:20, 1057:7

begin 1063:12, 1066:22, 

1070:4, 1075:9, 1077:3

beginning 1065:14

behalf 1013:25, 1022:9

behind 1030:2, 1044:22, 

1045:9, 1045:25, 1062:10, 

1076:7

belief 1019:12

believe 1014:14, 1016:2, 

1017:7, 1017:17, 1019:14, 

1019:24, 1021:14, 1021:17, 

1021:24, 1022:5, 1025:22, 

1030:11, 1038:1, 1053:7, 

1056:23, 1058:8, 1064:24, 

1066:5, 1073:25, 1074:1

Ben 1030:7

Bench 1026:8, 1030:7, 

1044:6

Benefit 1023:20, 1040:10

best 1029:9

better 1074:7

Beyond 1040:20, 1041:22, 

1042:3, 1054:2

bills 1019:22, 1020:2

bit 1039:14, 1039:15, 

1040:24, 1042:20

blood 1056:10

board 1055:11

Bobbitt 1063:23

Boozer 1060:19, 1064:16

border 1051:9, 1051:10, 

1052:8, 1052:15

borderline 1049:10

born 1052:20

BOX 1012:25, 1068:24, 

1069:12, 1072:21, 1073:1, 

1076:21

Boyd 1011:43, 1013:21, 

1015:23, 1015:24, 1016:6, 

1016:10, 1016:11, 1016:15, 

1035:4

Brice 1038:18, 1066:8

brief 1026:23, 1066:15

briefly 1066:17

bright 1067:25

bring 1018:3, 1023:1, 

1044:18, 1066:12, 1072:4, 

1078:3

bringing 1032:14, 1037:17, 

1056:13

brings 1060:11, 1069:8

broken 1056:6

brought 1017:5, 1026:23, 

1030:18, 1041:8, 1045:7, 

1045:17, 1063:1, 1066:16

Buonasera 1066:4

burden 1041:12, 1041:14

burned 1072:19

bus 1068:13

< C >

CA 1012:33

CADEDDU 1012:14, 

1012:15, 1016:22, 1036:22, 

1036:24, 1036:25, 1059:2, 

1059:10

California 1012:31

call 1013:5, 1046:7, 1051:9, 

1056:4, 1063:2, 1077:8

called 1037:6, 1042:18, 

1048:11

cancel 1047:1

cancelled 1046:15, 1049:1

cancer 1046:14, 1058:6, 

1058:9

capacities 1040:1

capital 1017:24

cards 1025:19

care 1044:2, 1050:5, 

1050:17, 1050:19, 1056:4

Carrillo 1065:21

Carter 1065:3

cases 1040:25, 1041:1, 

1041:25, 1042:10, 1073:23

CASEY 1012:45, 1026:10, 

1029:21, 1079:3, 1079:15, 

1079:17

Cass 1029:21

CASSIDI 1012:45, 1079:3, 

1079:17

category 1057:17

cause 1023:8, 1056:25, 

1057:4, 1057:6, 1060:10, 

1079:4

causes 1039:23

caution 1040:15, 1043:22

cell 1067:13, 1075:24, 

1075:25

Center 1049:12

central 1040:12, 1040:13, 

1044:17, 1050:25, 1053:4, 

1055:22, 1056:19, 1066:12

certain 1018:8, 1019:13, 

1039:22

Certainly 1019:11, 1026:14, 

1045:1, 1078:4

certificate 1020:11

certify 1079:3, 1079:10

challenge 1045:2, 1063:17, 

1063:18, 1065:15

challenges 1060:16

chambers 1014:15

chances 1058:12, 1058:19

changed 1078:11

changes 1050:19, 1053:11, 

1060:22, 1060:23

charge 1042:25, 1043:10

charged 1042:24

charges 1039:17, 1040:12

charitable 1039:22

checked 1015:18

Child 1037:6, 1048:5, 1048:8

choices 1072:14

choose 1041:16, 1073:14

choosing 1019:13

Chris 1038:25, 1039:1

CIPA 1020:15, 1077:20

Circuit 1066:20

circumstances 1014:2, 

1018:8, 1022:21, 1023:3, 

1075:14

cities 1036:7

civil 1041:24, 1041:25

CJA 1019:21, 1019:23, 

1021:8, 1022:11, 1026:4, 

1026:9, 1026:14

claim 1058:12, 1058:19

claimed 1017:16, 1058:20

class 1051:19

classified 1021:12, 1024:17

clean 1041:11

clear 1060:17

Clearly 1021:12, 1022:20, 

1024:18, 1047:20

clerk 1015:19, 1018:23, 

1029:25, 1034:5, 1063:3
Client 1022:18, 1022:25, 

1023:20, 1033:8, 1033:13, 

1034:15, 1034:17, 1035:13, 

1036:4, 1036:18, 1036:22, 

1063:8

CLINE 1012:29, 1016:23, 

1020:24, 1020:25, 1021:13, 

1021:23, 1021:25, 1022:16, 

1024:14, 1026:16, 1035:11, 

1035:17, 1035:18, 1035:21, 

1036:10, 1036:14, 1036:17, 

1063:5

clinic 1059:14

close 1049:9, 1069:5, 

1073:10

closely 1029:2

Cocounsel 1030:25, 

1033:13, 1035:17

collect 1067:13

collected 1075:23

colloquy 1018:4

comes 1014:5, 1022:2, 

1022:17, 1025:12, 1054:22, 

1073:11

coming 1040:22, 1043:16, 

1076:10

commence 1026:24, 1033:1

commences 1041:7

Commerce 1011:33, 

1012:46

commitment 1063:7

communication 1077:13

community 1028:4

company 1051:19, 1053:18, 

1054:12, 1054:14

complete 1027:23

completely 1015:18, 1024:8, 

1029:5

completes 1030:11, 1038:1, 

1039:11, 1056:20, 1076:5

comply 1079:11

con 1074:6

concept 1028:3

conceptualize 1062:4

conceptually 1062:13

concern 1051:13, 1051:18, 

1052:7, 1052:12

concerned 1013:23, 1014:1, 

1023:4

concisely 1029:6

conclusion 1077:22

condition 1050:18

Conference 1015:17, 

1020:11, 1077:21, 1079:12

conflict 1014:21

connection 1032:8

cons 1073:18, 1073:21

consequence 1054:8

consequences 1054:6

consider 1046:24, 1060:24

consideration 1028:13

considering 1041:19

consistent 1020:1

constant 1023:12

Constantinescu 1046:6, 

1046:11, 1047:15, 1056:23, 

1058:5, 1058:22, 1059:25, 

1060:10

constraints 1051:23

consulting 1031:23, 1039:7

contact 1023:12, 1023:15, 

1023:22, 1024:6, 1025:2, 

1025:5, 1025:8, 1036:12, 

1044:5, 1067:1, 1070:24, 

1071:9, 1071:23, 1072:10

contacts 1020:20, 1068:10

context 1068:10

continue 1015:13, 1071:14

continuous 1058:6

contrast 1028:11

contribute 1024:12, 1051:10

contribution 1057:22

control 1053:25

coordinator 1029:25

cope 1054:3

copy 1021:4

corporate 1032:19

correct 1015:15, 1016:18, 

1079:8

correctly 1060:7

Counsel 1013:8, 1014:9, 

1015:20, 1016:11, 1016:17, 

1018:4, 1018:8, 1019:12, 

1019:13, 1025:5, 1026:7, 

1027:19, 1037:13, 1039:2, 

1044:6, 1045:13, 1047:14, 

1048:17, 1050:7, 1052:3, 

1053:21, 1056:14, 1057:18, 

1060:6, 1060:13, 1070:3, 

1077:9

count 1043:2, 1043:4, 

1056:10

counted 1060:7

counts 1031:25, 1042:25, 

1043:1, 1043:15

county 1042:11

couple 1046:25, 1047:1, 

1051:3, 1059:7, 1076:20

course 1021:17, 1028:20, 

1043:16, 1073:19

Courthouse 1011:32, 

1027:21, 1045:12, 1045:19, 

1067:11, 1068:12, 1070:7, 

1072:1, 1072:4, 1074:24, 

1075:3, 1077:3, 1078:13

courtroom 1013:21, 1015:8, 

1018:5, 1026:24, 1029:7, 

1030:3, 1043:25, 1045:10, 

1045:17, 1045:23, 1046:9, 

1048:25, 1053:8, 1056:22, 

1066:16, 1069:8, 1069:11, 

1069:23, 1075:10, 1076:9, 

1076:10, 1076:13, 1076:18, 

1076:19, 1078:3

courts 1023:14

cover 1029:15, 1042:7, 

1044:8, 1044:10, 1044:12, 

1075:7

coverage 1043:17, 1044:5, 

1071:13, 1071:14

covered 1044:7

covering 1071:10

create 1071:7

crime 1042:25

Criminal 1026:1, 1030:16, 

1030:17, 1040:24, 1041:1, 

1041:3, 1042:3, 1042:5, 

1042:10, 1042:13, 1042:15, 

1066:20

crosses 1051:9

CSR 1012:45

curious 1070:10

currently 1034:9

cut 1022:13, 1025:12

Cutrer 1012:39, 1037:21

Cynthia 1064:5

cysts 1049:17

< D >
D. 1012:29

DALLAS 1011:3, 1011:34, 

1012:17, 1012:47, 1027:6, 

1031:3, 1039:1, 1079:20

danger 1068:15

Daniels 1011:43, 1035:5

dark 1024:9

date 1015:18, 1018:3, 

1021:7

Daubert 1077:11

Day 1012:30, 1035:19, 

1035:24, 1036:5, 1036:6, 

1036:7, 1036:11, 1036:15, 

1037:8, 1046:17, 1046:18, 

1047:12, 1055:4, 1055:6, 

1058:17, 1067:8, 1068:11, 

1072:2, 1072:7, 1072:12, 

1072:14, 1072:16, 1072:17, 

1072:19, 1074:18, 1074:23, 

1075:22, 1077:16

days 1021:22, 1054:7, 

1058:17

dealing 1050:1

dealings 1031:16, 1031:19, 

1034:23, 1035:7

dealt 1035:1

decide 1028:12, 1042:19, 

1043:6, 1045:13, 1073:15, 

1073:17, 1073:25

decides 1068:4

deciding 1042:22, 1069:22

decision 1043:3, 1045:20, 

1058:3, 1061:2, 1073:15, 

1074:11, 1074:13

decisions 1042:23

declared 1040:7

Defendant 1011:38, 1012:1, 

1012:11, 1012:20, 1012:36, 

1014:7, 1017:25, 1020:6, 

1020:17, 1022:3, 1022:7, 

1022:9, 1033:4, 1034:12, 

1035:9, 1037:15, 1037:16, 

1037:19, 1039:20, 1041:5, 

1041:10, 1041:17, 1041:20, 

1041:22, 1042:19, 1042:24, 

1043:3, 1043:7, 1043:11, 

1048:3, 1048:7, 1048:14

defendants 1013:8, 1015:2, 

1015:16, 1019:12, 1019:13, 

1019:14, 1022:17, 1023:14, 

1024:4, 1032:18, 1032:23, 

1034:11, 1037:5, 1039:2, 

1039:24, 1041:8, 1041:13, 

1041:15, 1042:24, 1043:1, 

1043:5, 1047:22, 1048:19

Defense 1019:12, 1020:8, 

1020:21, 1022:6, 1022:12, 

1025:1, 1025:5, 1026:7, 

1056:25, 1060:13, 1061:17, 

1061:18, 1063:13, 1063:21, 

1065:12

defer 1066:21

definitely 1037:9, 1047:23

definition 1078:11

degree 1023:4, 1025:5, 

1031:23

deliberate 1073:7

deliver 1053:14, 1054:23

delivers 1055:13

delivery 1054:20

demeanor 1074:2, 1074:5

Dennis 1030:9

Department 1011:30, 

1031:5, 1031:10, 1031:17, 

1031:24, 1032:8

Deputy 1029:25, 1067:9, 

1076:11

describe 1067:7

design 1051:20

designated 1040:3

designing 1055:3

detail 1037:12, 1065:10, 

1074:12

detailed 1074:2, 1074:4

determination 1045:15

determinations 1043:4

determine 1022:6, 1028:9, 

1028:18, 1042:16

determined 1037:14, 

1043:24

determines 1042:17

Development 1032:20, 

1039:19

device 1023:22

diabetic 1049:10

different 1023:10, 1036:11, 

1059:22, 1074:18

differently 1042:21

difficult 1019:1, 1047:2, 

1053:15, 1053:18, 1054:2, 

1054:5

digest 1060:25

DIRE 1011:17, 1025:11, 

1026:24, 1044:8, 1057:15

directly 1040:2

disagreement 1028:7

disclosed 1019:19

discovery 1025:22

discretion 1057:19, 1059:25

discretionary 1022:5

discuss 1069:25, 1070:1, 

1070:19, 1070:20, 1072:9, 

1074:11

discussed 1065:10

discussing 1070:2

dispute 1028:7

disputed 1028:12

disqualify 1029:1

distribute 1072:14

DISTRICT 1011:1, 1011:2, 

1011:31, 1019:7, 1027:5, 

1027:6, 1030:22, 1031:4, 

1031:18, 1079:18, 1079:19

DIVISION 1011:3, 1027:6, 

1028:14, 1079:20

docket 1015:17, 1015:21, 

1019:16, 1021:6

doctor 1050:11, 1050:14, 

1058:10, 1058:12, 1058:24, 

1059:2, 1059:4, 1059:5, 

1059:22

doctors 1047:8, 1047:13, 

1049:6

document 1032:25

Doing 1023:9, 1054:17, 

1054:25, 1055:5, 1055:6, 

1055:12, 1056:7, 1068:6, 

1068:19, 1070:10, 1073:24, 

1078:6

done 1018:2, 1019:2, 

1021:12, 1022:14, 1028:20, 

1035:24, 1036:2, 1036:4, 

1036:18, 1044:9, 1052:16, 

1058:2, 1062:14, 1062:25, 

1077:16

donors 1022:3

door 1030:1, 1048:9, 1076:7

doors 1046:8

double 1046:8

double-check 1060:6
doubt 1041:23, 1042:3

doubts 1042:6

down 1029:22, 1036:21, 

1050:4, 1051:5, 1052:15, 

1052:24, 1057:14, 1057:16, 

1060:11, 1076:20

downstairs 1050:25

Drake 1038:24, 1064:3

Dratel 1012:3, 1012:5, 

1015:23, 1016:7, 1016:20, 

1017:21, 1018:1, 1018:14, 

1023:18, 1034:14, 1034:17, 

1034:18, 1034:19, 1034:22, 

1034:25, 1035:2

drive 1067:11, 1072:3

due 1077:13

Duncan 1011:42, 1013:21, 

1015:13, 1016:6, 1016:11, 

1016:13, 1017:8, 1017:14, 

1033:6, 1033:13, 1033:17

during 1015:8, 1028:15, 

1032:22, 1034:16, 1035:14, 

1036:23, 1039:15, 1067:6, 

1069:14, 1070:2, 1079:3

duties 1051:25

< E >

earlier 1013:4, 1013:12, 

1015:17, 1017:7, 1029:14, 

1030:15, 1039:16, 1041:7, 

1071:12

early 1020:9, 1039:8

easiest 1061:24, 1062:3, 

1062:15

easy 1071:8

eat 1072:19

educated 1061:2

effect 1013:5

efficient 1058:13

efforts 1071:15

eight 1032:6, 1056:5

eighteen 1044:19, 1066:12, 

1069:8, 1072:21

either 1016:8, 1023:13, 

1035:24, 1037:2, 1040:1, 

1048:9, 1052:12, 1060:24, 

1062:11, 1067:15, 1071:19

El 1016:20, 1018:17, 

1034:13, 1034:17, 1034:20

El-mezain 1012:1

elaborate 1048:4

ELASHI 1012:20, 1016:23, 

1021:21, 1021:24, 1035:10, 

1035:17, 1035:21, 1037:16, 

1063:9

Eleanore 1030:2

elect 1041:18

elevator 1072:5

Elizabeth 1011:27, 1031:4, 

1032:4

embezzled 1053:10

emergencies 1075:13

emphasize 1069:20, 1075:7

employer 1055:16, 1055:18

encounter 1070:25

encountered 1061:1

encountering 1067:5

end 1041:13, 1048:5, 

1069:6, 1072:7, 1073:6, 

1073:24, 1076:21, 1076:22

ending 1074:20

engage 1015:6

engineering 1039:6

enjoin 1066:25

enough 1056:9

entered 1017:22, 1019:6, 

1019:10

entering 1020:24

enters 1021:23

entire 1061:25

entirely 1018:25, 1023:10, 

1071:6, 1071:17

entitled 1017:23, 1017:25, 

1023:19

entity 1032:19, 1032:21

entries 1019:16, 1019:18, 

1019:21, 1019:25

entry 1017:8

environmental 1031:22

Epperson 1064:13

error 1016:3

essentially 1022:8, 1025:17

ET 1011:11

evaluate 1073:24

Evans 1021:21

event 1066:24, 1073:17

eventually 1019:11

everybody 1027:24, 1046:1, 

1075:11

everyone 1029:10, 1029:22, 

1051:12, 1060:12, 1069:4, 

1073:10, 1075:15, 1077:18

Everything 1020:1, 1053:25, 

1075:6

evidence 1028:9, 1028:13, 

1041:15, 1041:16, 1041:22, 

1042:1, 1043:25, 1051:23, 

1069:22, 1070:6, 1073:4, 

1073:11, 1073:24

ex 1014:15, 1015:7, 1019:3, 

1019:18, 1020:6, 1020:9, 

1020:14, 1020:20, 1021:7, 

1023:4, 1023:10, 1023:12, 

1023:15, 1023:22, 1024:6, 

1024:9, 1025:2, 1025:5

exactly 1013:17

exam 1034:10

EXAMINATION 1011:17

example 1047:6

exceeded 1018:15

except 1045:23

exchange 1025:22

excited 1078:8

exclude 1023:24

excusal 1057:15

Excuse 1033:19, 1044:16, 

1057:6, 1059:24, 1060:3, 

1076:24

excused 1045:23, 1046:14, 

1060:10, 1063:5, 1073:10

excuses 1057:17, 1057:19

excusing 1057:4

exercise 1041:18, 1059:25, 

1063:16

exercising 1057:19, 1060:16

exit 1076:6

exiting 1048:25

expect 1069:24

expecting 1060:23

expended 1022:9

experience 1028:24, 

1060:14, 1073:22

expert 1023:24, 1023:25

explain 1041:23, 1067:12

exposure 1026:1, 1043:15

extent 1017:6, 1028:6

extremely 1023:16
< F >

face 1071:20

fact 1015:18, 1018:9, 

1020:18, 1020:25, 1023:5, 

1030:17, 1036:14, 1050:9, 

1069:1

facts 1028:6, 1028:9, 

1028:16, 1036:16

failed 1034:2

failure 1077:13

fair 1045:1, 1052:19, 

1052:25, 1061:25

familiar 1026:9

family 1048:4, 1070:8

far 1024:25, 1031:9, 

1036:11, 1047:9, 1050:10, 

1058:1, 1070:11, 1074:23, 

1076:21

fashion 1023:10

fault 1015:20

FBI 1038:14

feasible 1046:24

federal 1042:20

feel 1044:10

feels 1043:8

fees 1079:10

felt 1014:25, 1047:23

few 1022:25, 1030:10, 

1045:9, 1046:3, 1069:18

fifteen 1074:22

Fifth 1066:20

fifty. 1060:8

figure 1076:17

file 1020:8, 1020:19, 1025:1

filed 1017:8, 1017:9, 1020:6, 

1020:7, 1020:8, 1020:9, 

1021:5, 1021:6, 1023:9, 

1024:5, 1032:25

filing 1021:8, 1021:10

filings 1023:4, 1023:5

filled 1028:21

find 1071:16, 1076:2

finding 1024:14

fine 1015:10, 1054:22, 

1062:2

finish 1076:6

finished 1017:2, 1045:6, 

1076:13

firm 1013:20, 1016:5, 

1016:10, 1017:16, 1017:18, 

1031:22, 1031:23, 1034:22, 

1034:24, 1035:2, 1035:4, 

1035:8, 1035:17, 1035:25, 

1036:2, 1036:3, 1036:7, 

1036:8, 1036:15, 1036:19, 

1037:21, 1039:7

First 1011:45, 1021:21, 

1026:15, 1026:20, 1027:4, 

1027:14, 1033:3, 1041:5, 

1042:16, 1045:11, 1049:16, 

1057:21, 1061:20, 1062:1, 

1063:16, 1063:18, 1063:20, 

1064:24, 1065:12, 1065:15, 

1070:19, 1072:7, 1076:21

Fish 1011:18, 1027:9, 

1070:17

five 1048:12, 1074:25

Floor 1012:6, 1012:32, 

1045:12, 1072:5, 1072:7

Florida 1012:26

flow 1025:22

follow 1042:6, 1067:8

follow-up 1046:25, 1059:18

following 1072:16, 1072:17, 

1077:22

foot 1023:11

forefront 1051:11

foregoing 1079:7

foregoing-styled 1079:4

foreign 1040:4, 1040:6, 

1040:7

forgot 1034:21, 1051:5

formal 1026:11

formally 1027:4

format 1079:10

forming 1070:5

forms 1017:9

Fort 1012:42

forthright 1032:12

forties 1039:8

forty-eight. 1057:16

forty-five 1060:4

forty-nine 1057:14

Foster 1037:22

found 1021:2, 1043:6, 

1043:7, 1073:21, 1074:1

Foundation 1011:11, 

1014:10, 1014:23, 1017:11, 

1021:20, 1032:20, 1039:19, 

1039:24, 1040:1, 1070:16

four 1025:9, 1046:22, 

1054:7, 1055:6, 1058:17

Francisco 1012:33

frankly 1023:3

free 1025:22

Freedman 1011:43, 1035:4

Freeman 1035:23, 1065:7

frequently 1042:15

Friday 1047:13, 1049:24

Fridays 1049:25

friends 1022:3

front 1029:21, 1071:21

full 1019:17

function 1051:24

Fund 1022:1, 1022:6, 

1022:12

fundamental 1041:3

< G >

Gail 1066:7

game 1025:18, 1061:25

Garrett 1011:28, 1031:7, 

1031:8, 1031:15

Gartman 1064:12

gathered 1072:6

gauntlet 1068:11, 1072:6

general 1025:10, 1026:24, 

1057:15

generally 1028:23, 1047:9

generic 1038:12

Gentlemen 1013:2, 1026:22, 

1027:1, 1030:7, 1030:15, 

1030:24, 1031:2, 1031:14, 

1033:8, 1033:12, 1033:15, 

1035:13, 1035:16, 1037:20, 

1037:23, 1037:24, 1038:1, 

1039:13, 1040:23, 1043:13, 

1044:7, 1045:5, 1048:23, 

1069:11, 1075:6, 1076:4, 

1077:7

Gerry 1066:9

gets 1062:25

getting 1067:14

Ghassan 1035:10, 1035:17

girl 1031:21, 1048:5

give 1029:5, 1038:3, 

1038:17, 1039:3, 1040:5, 

1044:19, 1047:4, 1047:12, 

1060:21, 1060:25, 1062:17, 
1062:18, 1066:19, 1067:16, 

1068:5, 1068:9, 1076:15

Given 1021:11, 1036:14, 

1037:12, 1055:2, 1060:21, 

1067:19, 1076:16

gives 1064:24

giving 1024:5, 1069:19

graduated 1034:8

Graham 1066:8

grandmother 1056:5

graphic 1036:3

greater 1069:19

Greg 1012:38, 1037:21

grounds 1025:3

group 1027:3, 1027:15, 

1038:20, 1039:12, 1074:6

guess 1015:25, 1016:19, 

1017:6, 1024:13, 1044:16, 

1045:3, 1051:5, 1052:17, 

1057:13, 1058:1, 1060:11, 

1060:12, 1061:5, 1061:19, 

1062:19, 1071:18

guilt 1041:10, 1041:22, 

1042:16, 1042:22

guilty 1041:6, 1042:18, 

1043:6, 1043:7, 1043:10

guy 1053:13, 1054:11, 

1055:10

guys 1052:13, 1052:23

< H >

habitually 1075:21

hair 1029:20

half 1020:23, 1055:4, 

1055:5, 1074:19

hall 1046:7, 1048:22, 1071:1, 

1076:8

halls 1067:5

HAMAS 1040:2, 1040:7, 

1040:10

hand 1029:4, 1046:4

handle 1053:17

handling 1018:6

happen 1066:17, 1075:16

happened 1020:19, 1028:8, 

1073:20

happening 1053:9, 1071:24

hard 1074:1

Hardiman 1033:23, 1034:1

hardship 1055:16, 1055:17, 

1057:17, 1057:21, 1057:23, 

1057:25, 1058:9, 1058:12, 

1058:19, 1058:20, 1058:22, 

1060:1, 1060:11

hazards 1015:3

health 1050:17

hear 1025:13, 1027:22, 

1029:10, 1038:16, 1047:20

heard 1027:9, 1030:15, 

1032:17, 1040:18, 1043:20, 

1070:3, 1076:1

hearing 1077:11, 1077:14, 

1077:17, 1077:22

hearings 1021:17

hello 1071:1

help 1039:4, 1068:7

helping 1048:5

Henson 1048:25, 1049:4, 

1050:8, 1050:24, 1058:10, 

1058:23, 1059:9, 1060:2, 

1063:25

hide 1025:19

highly 1078:7

Hill 1064:9

hire 1054:9, 1054:10, 

1054:16

hit 1044:10

Hodge 1057:13, 1060:9

hold 1025:19

Hollander 1011:41, 1011:44, 

1013:5, 1013:6, 1013:13, 

1015:23, 1015:24, 1016:14, 

1017:16, 1033:6, 1033:7, 

1033:12, 1033:17, 1034:21, 

1035:3, 1035:5

Holmes 1065:4

Holy 1011:11, 1013:16, 

1013:18, 1013:25, 1014:2, 

1014:5, 1014:9, 1014:17, 

1014:23, 1015:12, 1015:22, 

1015:25, 1016:4, 1017:10, 

1021:19, 1032:19, 1039:19, 

1039:23, 1039:25, 1070:16

home 1037:5, 1047:22, 

1074:25

Honestly 1014:4

HONORABLE 1011:18

hope 1027:14, 1027:23, 

1077:4

hopefully 1063:3, 1067:5, 

1074:24, 1076:2

hour 1027:24, 1027:25, 

1045:16, 1067:6, 1074:19, 

1077:2

hours 1054:24, 1055:2, 

1055:6, 1058:17

house 1037:7, 1048:8, 

1048:10

Hudson 1013:4, 1029:24, 

1057:12, 1062:16, 1063:2, 

1066:12, 1069:8

human 1070:25

hundreds 1019:17

husband 1059:2, 1059:12

< I >

ICU 1056:7

idea 1047:4

identify 1039:4

identity 1071:20

illegal 1040:5, 1040:8

imagine 1023:11

immediately 1029:20, 

1068:25, 1077:22

impartial 1045:1, 1052:19, 

1053:1

importance 1044:4, 1067:1, 

1069:21, 1075:8

important 1043:23, 1045:18, 

1069:4, 1069:14, 1069:17, 

1070:23, 1073:10, 1074:12

impression 1018:19

impressions 1070:5

impromptu 1024:1

impropriety 1071:7

in. 1028:19, 1046:8, 1073:11

inappropriate 1071:18

inclined 1036:17, 1052:14

include 1016:19, 1071:15

includes 1070:1

including 1026:3, 1028:12, 

1041:4

indicate 1029:3

indicated 1017:11, 1042:8, 

1042:10, 1053:7, 1056:20

indicating 1017:9, 1018:24

indication 1018:22

indications 1071:13
indictment 1032:25, 1033:4, 

1034:12, 1034:13, 1036:21, 

1039:20, 1039:23, 1041:6, 

1041:8, 1043:2, 1066:23

indigent 1017:23, 1019:14, 

1022:16, 1022:25

individual 1029:14, 1032:17, 

1032:22, 1032:23, 1033:3, 

1033:18, 1034:12, 1039:16, 

1039:24, 1040:14, 1040:21, 

1040:25, 1043:14, 1043:21, 

1044:9, 1071:11, 1073:14

individually 1027:2, 1027:8, 

1029:8, 1060:2

inevitably 1074:6

infer 1068:25

inferring 1068:15

influence 1032:9, 1047:23, 

1047:25, 1048:13

information 1037:11, 

1037:13, 1039:3, 1067:13, 

1075:25

informed 1020:23

initial 1063:17

initially 1060:18

innocence 1041:14, 

1042:17, 1042:22

innocent 1041:5

innocuous 1071:2

inquire 1034:23, 1039:2

inquiry 1022:21, 1038:5

instance 1026:15, 1026:20, 

1062:7

instead 1061:9

instruct 1076:23

instructed 1071:25

instruction 1044:19, 1063:2, 

1068:6, 1078:14

Instructions 1045:18, 

1061:9, 1066:19, 1066:21, 

1067:17, 1068:3, 1069:19, 

1070:3, 1078:5

intend 1021:10, 1069:1, 

1074:15

intended 1068:18, 1077:14

intern 1030:11

International 1037:6

internet 1078:1

Intervention 1037:6

interview 1071:17

interviewed 1031:25

introduce 1015:16, 1027:11, 

1029:11, 1029:17, 1030:24, 

1033:7, 1033:9, 1033:19, 

1034:15, 1035:12, 1036:22, 

1070:21

introduced 1013:9, 1030:14, 

1032:22, 1037:16, 1037:25, 

1039:25

introduction 1030:11, 

1034:3, 1038:2

introductions 1016:12

investigation 1078:6

invitation 1071:22

involve 1031:19

involved 1018:21, 1029:10, 

1036:15, 1037:15, 1048:14, 

1067:2, 1070:22, 1072:11, 

1075:11

involvement 1021:13

involves 1039:14

irreplaceable 1051:22

issue 1013:14, 1014:9, 

1017:1, 1021:16, 1044:20

issued 1077:12, 1077:17

issues 1016:25, 1017:3

< J >

J. 1012:4

Jacks 1011:25, 1025:9, 

1025:25, 1030:22, 1030:23, 

1031:2, 1031:13, 1031:15, 

1050:21, 1061:6, 1063:15, 

1063:24, 1064:4, 1064:10, 

1064:18, 1064:22, 1065:13, 

1065:18, 1065:22, 1065:25

Jeff 1059:16, 1059:19

Jensen 1065:19

jeopardy 1067:25

Jim 1011:25, 1030:22, 

1031:2, 1038:11, 1038:13

job 1022:15, 1043:6, 

1053:10, 1055:15

Joe 1011:18, 1027:9

John 1012:29, 1013:21, 

1015:23, 1015:24, 1016:6, 

1016:10, 1016:11, 1035:11, 

1035:17

Johnson 1065:5

join 1052:6

joint 1014:6, 1015:1, 1015:4

jointly 1015:3

Jonas 1011:26, 1014:3, 

1031:9, 1031:15

Jones 1012:30, 1035:19, 

1035:24, 1036:4, 1036:6, 

1036:7, 1036:11, 1036:15, 

1038:25, 1039:1, 1039:4, 

1065:24

Josh 1015:23, 1034:18, 

1068:17

Joshua 1012:3, 1012:5, 

1016:7, 1016:20, 1034:14, 

1034:25, 1035:2

journey 1074:25

Judge 1018:5, 1018:7, 

1018:11, 1018:17, 1020:22, 

1026:2, 1026:5, 1026:19, 

1028:6, 1028:11, 1028:16, 

1036:16, 1043:6, 1051:23, 

1070:17

judges 1028:15, 1028:17

judgment 1037:9

Judicial 1079:11

Junior 1065:5

Juror 1028:5, 1042:9, 

1042:15, 1048:15, 1063:19, 

1063:22, 1063:25, 1069:6, 

1073:6

jurors 1028:8, 1028:22, 

1042:10, 1061:7, 1061:25, 

1069:3, 1072:24, 1073:2, 

1073:8, 1073:9, 1074:10, 

1074:14

juryroom 1056:19, 1072:13, 

1076:8, 1076:12, 1076:24

Justice 1011:30, 1026:1, 

1031:6, 1031:11, 1031:17, 

1031:24, 1032:8, 1042:13

< K >

Kastigar 1021:18

keep 1013:10, 1041:24, 

1076:25

kept 1019:2

key 1051:18

Kiblinger 1029:17, 1029:19, 

1048:24, 1049:4, 1051:1, 
1053:5, 1055:24, 1056:19, 

1076:14, 1076:23

kidneys 1049:17

kind 1036:2, 1047:25, 

1048:4, 1050:2, 1058:16, 

1060:22

knowing 1043:9

knowledge 1019:9, 1020:1, 

1028:24

knowledgeable 1026:6

known 1057:21

knows 1030:13, 1031:14, 

1033:17, 1033:25, 1034:10, 

1037:24, 1039:5, 1040:16, 

1040:21

Kyle 1030:8

< L >

L. 1012:5, 1012:45, 1079:3, 

1079:15, 1079:17

Ladies 1013:2, 1026:22, 

1027:1, 1030:15, 1030:24, 

1031:1, 1031:13, 1033:8, 

1033:12, 1033:15, 1035:13, 

1035:15, 1037:20, 1038:1, 

1039:13, 1040:23, 1043:13, 

1044:7, 1045:5, 1048:23, 

1069:10, 1075:6, 1076:4, 

1077:7

lady 1029:20, 1032:2, 1056:4

Land 1011:11, 1013:16, 

1013:18, 1013:25, 1014:2, 

1014:5, 1014:10, 1014:17, 

1014:23, 1015:12, 1015:22, 

1015:25, 1016:4, 1017:10, 

1021:19, 1032:20, 1039:19, 

1039:24, 1039:25, 1070:16

lapse 1043:18

large 1018:6

last 1017:22, 1021:17, 

1025:15, 1037:16, 1047:6, 

1047:8, 1050:13, 1050:20, 

1051:6, 1051:7, 1059:19, 

1060:21, 1061:20, 1068:25, 

1075:15, 1075:20

late 1025:10, 1034:6, 1039:7, 

1046:14, 1075:13, 1075:17, 

1076:1

later 1015:15, 1022:25, 

1025:13, 1030:17, 1033:3, 

1041:23, 1071:25, 1072:9, 

1074:12, 1075:22

Law 1012:5, 1012:15, 

1012:24, 1013:20, 1016:5, 

1016:9, 1017:18, 1023:18, 

1028:11, 1028:12, 1028:16, 

1030:9, 1031:23, 1034:5, 

1034:8, 1034:22, 1034:23, 

1034:25, 1035:2, 1035:4, 

1035:7, 1035:17, 1035:18, 

1036:2, 1036:18, 1036:25, 

1037:21, 1040:5, 1040:9, 

1041:18, 1067:24, 1070:4, 

1072:22

lawsuits 1051:20

lawyer 1022:2, 1022:12, 

1022:17, 1035:24

lawyers 1013:22, 1016:4, 

1022:23, 1030:20, 1031:19, 

1069:2, 1073:1

lead 1019:11

leads 1018:21

least 1014:8, 1020:14, 

1022:11, 1025:4, 1039:15, 

1062:18

leave 1027:21, 1045:10, 

1068:20, 1070:7, 1070:13, 

1076:9

leaves 1046:1

leaving 1053:7, 1078:12

lectern 1047:19

left 1029:24, 1031:4, 

1056:22

leg 1056:6, 1056:8

Legal 1022:1, 1022:5, 

1022:11, 1053:19

length 1046:13, 1069:19, 

1073:13

less 1062:22, 1069:24

Lester 1030:9

Leticia 1065:6

letter 1044:11, 1049:19

Levitt 1077:11

Lewis 1038:11, 1038:13

liable 1058:10

life 1056:2

light 1014:12, 1017:7, 

1045:7

likely 1042:2, 1054:9

Linda 1012:23, 1012:24, 

1035:11, 1035:16, 1035:18

line 1067:25, 1073:12, 

1076:22, 1076:23

Lisette 1065:5

list 1035:6, 1038:6, 1038:10, 

1038:21, 1039:10, 1039:11, 

1056:20, 1059:11, 1060:8, 

1060:22

listen 1026:13, 1029:2

litigation 1024:3, 1055:11, 

1055:12

little 1039:14, 1039:15, 

1040:24, 1042:20, 1046:14, 

1051:6, 1060:25, 1061:1

lives 1039:1

local 1023:6

location 1067:11, 1068:5, 

1072:1, 1072:8, 1074:24, 

1077:1

long 1032:5, 1035:6, 1038:6, 

1047:3, 1053:16, 1054:13, 

1062:19, 1073:19, 1075:15, 

1075:20

longer 1075:21

look 1021:6, 1022:21, 

1023:2

looked 1019:15, 1019:25, 

1067:24

looking 1062:3, 1075:10

looks 1019:4, 1069:16

Lopez 1065:5

Lopez-rogina 1065:3

lose 1055:15

lot 1018:19, 1020:2, 

1025:25, 1054:23

Lovely 1065:3

low 1019:16

Loyola 1030:9

lunch 1027:25, 1061:7, 

1062:16, 1063:1, 1063:3, 

1063:4, 1067:4, 1067:6, 

1067:7, 1067:8, 1072:12, 

1072:15, 1072:18

luncheon 1074:19

< M >

ma'am 1033:21

Maddox 1064:21
Magistrate 1018:5, 1018:23, 

1020:22, 1023:13, 1024:10

major 1051:12

Mallick 1012:40

Man 1033:4, 1034:4, 

1051:18, 1058:15

manage 1059:14

managing 1026:3

manipulation 1022:11

manipulations 1022:22, 

1022:23

March 1050:18

Marlo 1012:14, 1012:15, 

1036:24, 1036:25

Marshal 1067:9, 1072:3, 

1072:8, 1075:24, 1076:12, 

1077:1

Marshall 1064:14

Martha 1033:23

material 1020:20, 1021:12, 

1024:17, 1024:20, 1040:5

materials 1073:17

matter 1020:13, 1024:8, 

1024:11, 1045:7

matters 1019:18, 1026:4

Mcgahan 1066:9

Mckinney 1012:16

mean 1055:1

means 1067:14, 1075:12

meant 1067:23

media 1036:3, 1040:19, 

1043:15, 1043:17, 1043:20, 

1044:5, 1051:18, 1067:1, 

1068:10, 1068:20, 1071:10, 

1071:12, 1071:14, 1072:6, 

1072:11

Medical 1046:15, 1047:2, 

1049:1, 1049:5, 1049:12

member 1030:13, 1031:14, 

1031:16, 1032:9, 1033:16, 

1042:4, 1043:8

members 1028:4, 1029:16, 

1030:6, 1035:20, 1046:3, 

1056:22, 1057:8, 1070:8

memorandum 1020:25, 

1021:2, 1021:4, 1021:8, 

1024:16, 1024:21, 1026:16

memory 1036:1, 1060:14

Men 1051:8, 1052:6

mental 1069:12

mentally 1076:17

mentioned 1032:24, 1044:11

menu 1072:17

menus 1072:13

merely 1019:22

messed 1062:9

messing 1058:16

met 1029:13

method 1060:14

Mezain 1016:20, 1018:17, 

1034:13, 1034:17, 1034:20

microphone 1047:20

mid 1034:5

mid-afternoon 1074:21

mid-morning 1074:21

midday 1074:20

middle 1047:19

Miller 1030:8

mind 1041:24, 1051:11, 

1061:24, 1076:25

minimize 1072:10

minimum 1060:4

Minute 1051:7, 1052:6, 

1058:15, 1060:21

minutes 1025:9, 1062:23, 

1074:22

mispronouncing 1017:20

Missing 1058:17, 1060:9

misunderstanding 1041:2

mixed 1072:25

Mohamed 1034:13, 1034:17

Mollie 1038:24

moment 1027:10, 1029:18, 

1045:24

Monday 1046:18, 1049:14, 

1049:21, 1049:22, 1074:15, 

1077:11, 1077:15, 1078:16

money 1022:2, 1022:4, 

1022:8, 1039:22, 1040:1, 

1040:9, 1053:10

month 1049:11

months 1021:1, 1046:17, 

1046:22, 1047:6, 1049:8, 

1049:18, 1050:4, 1075:21

Mooney 1065:17

Moreno 1012:23, 1012:24, 

1016:23, 1021:22, 1021:25, 

1035:11, 1035:12, 1035:16, 

1035:18, 1035:21, 1066:9

morning 1013:2, 1013:3, 

1013:4, 1015:15, 1015:19, 

1015:22, 1027:1, 1027:15, 

1028:2, 1031:1, 1033:12, 

1035:15, 1047:21, 1057:7, 

1057:9, 1057:14, 1061:1, 

1066:22, 1066:24, 1066:25, 

1072:2, 1077:4, 1077:15, 

1077:18, 1078:17

Morton 1065:6

Moss 1064:23

mother-in-law 1048:9

motion 1020:8, 1020:9, 

1020:12, 1020:13, 1023:6, 

1023:8, 1024:5, 1025:1

motions 1020:14, 1020:16

motivated 1078:8

motivation 1078:11

move 1049:23, 1050:3, 

1062:6

moves 1050:4

moving 1050:2

MR. GARRETT 1044:15

MR. JACKS 1016:24, 

1017:4, 1018:19, 1020:5, 

1025:15, 1026:21, 1031:1, 

1045:3, 1047:16, 1050:9, 

1050:22, 1055:14, 1055:20, 

1056:16, 1057:5, 1057:20, 

1059:1, 1060:20, 1061:10, 

1063:14, 1063:19, 1063:25, 

1064:5, 1064:11, 1064:14, 

1064:23, 1065:16, 1065:19, 

1065:23, 1066:1, 1067:18

MRI 1047:7

MS. CADEDDU 1048:19, 

1063:13, 1066:14, 1077:24

MS. HOLLANDER 1013:15, 

1013:20, 1014:12, 1014:21, 

1015:10, 1016:2, 1016:9, 

1016:17, 1033:11, 1033:19, 

1033:22, 1035:4, 1044:14

MS. MORENO 1035:15

MS. SHAPIRO 1014:4

Mufid 1012:11, 1037:1

multiple 1042:23, 1043:4

Munoz 1057:11, 1066:1

Muslim 1022:1

myself 1013:20, 1016:6, 

1029:16, 1053:12, 1054:11, 

1058:11, 1073:22
Mysliwiec 1012:4, 1016:21, 

1017:20, 1017:21, 1018:10, 

1018:24, 1034:14, 1034:18, 

1034:20

< N >

name 1016:7, 1016:19, 

1017:20, 1027:9, 1029:5, 

1030:18, 1031:2, 1032:2, 

1033:4, 1034:7, 1035:16, 

1036:24, 1037:4, 1038:12, 

1038:17, 1070:16, 1071:20

named 1032:18, 1032:19, 

1033:4, 1034:4, 1034:12, 

1034:13, 1035:9, 1035:10, 

1039:20, 1040:2, 1043:1, 

1043:3

names 1032:24, 1035:6, 

1038:3, 1038:6, 1038:8, 

1038:20, 1038:23, 1039:12, 

1068:23, 1069:2

Nancy 1011:41, 1015:23, 

1015:24, 1016:13, 1033:5, 

1033:12

Nanette 1065:6

Nathan 1011:28, 1031:7

natural 1070:25

naturally 1070:9, 1071:4

nature 1020:17

Neal 1066:7

near 1027:25, 1046:8, 

1076:22

necessarily 1018:20, 

1060:23, 1068:24

necessary 1014:25, 1015:9

necessity 1015:6, 1015:7

need 1013:23, 1014:24, 

1016:19, 1025:11, 1034:21, 

1038:3, 1044:10, 1045:8, 

1045:12, 1046:11, 1047:8, 

1047:10, 1060:5, 1060:13, 

1061:6, 1066:11, 1066:25, 

1073:4, 1076:19

needed 1013:6, 1049:4, 

1053:8, 1056:21, 1073:9, 

1077:23

needs 1044:24, 1059:13, 

1067:6

nervous 1051:6

New 1012:7, 1023:18, 

1030:9, 1050:18

Newman 1034:4, 1034:7, 

1034:10

news 1040:19

Next 1030:7, 1030:8, 1035:9, 

1037:19, 1045:16, 1046:10, 

1048:9, 1049:10, 1049:11, 

1049:14, 1051:1, 1053:5, 

1055:25, 1069:20, 1072:17, 

1075:3

night 1051:25

nine 1074:17, 1075:22, 

1077:4

NM 1011:46

noncapital 1018:9

None 1020:19, 1023:5, 

1041:13

noon 1027:24, 1060:24

normal 1027:25, 1066:19, 

1078:4

NORTHERN 1011:2, 

1011:31, 1027:5, 1030:22, 

1031:4, 1031:18, 1079:19

note 1069:12, 1074:7

notes 1073:14, 1073:16, 

1073:18, 1073:19, 1074:2, 

1074:4, 1074:8, 1074:9, 

1074:13, 1075:1, 1075:5, 

1078:12

Nothing 1022:19, 1033:2, 

1041:9, 1044:1, 1044:14, 

1069:24, 1071:6

notice 1017:13, 1019:9, 

1024:5, 1047:12

notification 1021:11

notified 1024:20

nowhere 1021:2

numbers 1060:12

nurse 1059:11

NY 1012:7

< O >

o'clock 1013:3, 1013:11, 

1074:17, 1074:25, 1075:22, 

1077:4

O'dell 1038:18, 1046:6, 

1055:25, 1056:15, 1056:18, 

1056:24, 1057:24, 1058:19, 

1060:2, 1066:8

oath 1067:16

objection 1025:6, 1057:4

obtain 1047:3

obtained 1021:4

occasion 1030:4

occasionally 1075:17

occupy 1069:14

occur 1045:15

occurrence 1075:18

Odeh 1012:36, 1016:21, 

1037:19, 1037:24

Office 1012:5, 1012:15, 

1012:24, 1013:22, 1015:19, 

1018:23, 1018:24, 1030:21, 

1031:18, 1036:11, 1036:25, 

1072:3

officer 1029:18

Offices 1034:25, 1036:6

official 1029:23, 1079:5

often 1042:18

Okay 1055:20, 1061:22, 

1063:8, 1068:16

once 1019:20, 1027:16, 

1029:19, 1040:6, 1045:15

one. 1038:15, 1041:4, 

1043:1, 1050:13, 1052:5, 

1061:21

ongoing 1043:17

opened 1029:18

opening 1066:23

operated 1059:15

operates 1059:12

operating 1059:11

operative 1059:17

opinions 1070:5

opportunity 1019:15, 

1020:18

order 1018:9, 1021:9, 

1021:15, 1024:19, 1026:18, 

1032:24, 1067:7, 1067:8, 

1068:24, 1072:18, 1072:25, 

1077:10, 1077:12, 1077:16

organization 1039:22, 

1040:2, 1040:4, 1040:6, 

1040:8, 1051:7, 1051:8, 

1051:12, 1057:22

orient 1067:9

orientation 1076:11, 

1076:14, 1076:25
originated 1016:3

Orleans 1030:10

others 1048:22, 1050:25, 

1055:22, 1056:19, 1057:16, 

1057:24, 1058:1, 1058:2, 

1060:1, 1071:16, 1074:7, 

1074:8

Otherwise 1061:8, 1070:4

ought 1062:17, 1062:18

outline 1027:14, 1061:12

outside 1072:1

oversaw 1048:6

Overy 1065:23

own 1074:10, 1074:13, 

1078:7

< P >

P. 1012:15

page 1017:11, 1068:22

pages 1071:21, 1079:7

paid 1021:25, 1023:25

panel 1013:9, 1013:10, 

1026:23, 1027:3, 1030:13, 

1030:24, 1031:14, 1031:16, 

1033:8, 1033:16, 1035:7, 

1035:13, 1035:20, 1042:4, 

1043:8, 1043:19, 1045:6, 

1045:8, 1046:4, 1048:25, 

1053:7, 1056:22, 1056:23, 

1057:8, 1061:24, 1062:16, 

1062:25

paperwork 1017:14

paralegal 1033:20, 1033:23

part 1018:7, 1022:14, 

1026:4, 1051:6, 1051:12, 

1054:20, 1071:16, 1078:4

parte 1014:15, 1015:7, 

1019:3, 1019:18, 1020:6, 

1020:9, 1020:14, 1020:20, 

1021:7, 1023:4, 1023:10, 

1023:12, 1023:15, 1023:22, 

1024:6, 1024:9, 1025:2, 

1025:3, 1025:5

participate 1043:9

participating 1016:16, 

1027:12, 1029:12, 1038:2

participation 1019:8, 

1042:13

particular 1029:1, 1031:19

particularly 1040:19

parties 1022:13, 1023:7, 

1027:19, 1028:7, 1028:25, 

1037:13, 1043:24, 1044:17, 

1045:13, 1047:14, 1048:17, 

1048:24, 1050:7, 1052:3, 

1053:21, 1056:14, 1067:6, 

1069:23, 1073:1, 1077:9

past 1050:3, 1053:17

patient 1046:15

patients 1059:14

Patricia 1066:8

patrol 1051:10

Pattern 1066:21

pause 1030:12, 1038:19, 

1038:22

pausing 1038:7

pay 1022:2, 1022:12, 1052:2, 

1069:5, 1073:4, 1073:10

paying 1022:13

payment 1019:22

Pena 1064:11

people 1027:11, 1029:12, 

1037:3, 1052:20, 1053:12, 

1054:5, 1056:20, 1057:14, 

1060:4, 1063:1, 1067:2, 

1068:25, 1070:8, 1070:22, 

1070:24, 1071:22, 1072:21, 

1075:10, 1076:15, 1076:20, 

1076:22

per 1055:1

peremptory 1060:16, 

1063:17, 1065:15

perform 1051:25

period 1037:8, 1046:22, 

1054:10, 1055:19, 1069:16

periodically 1038:7

permission 1020:8

personal 1073:22

personally 1020:3, 1042:12, 

1056:2

persons 1033:10, 1038:4, 

1038:8

phase 1025:4

phone 1013:5, 1067:13, 

1075:24

phones 1075:25

phrase 1018:12

pick 1053:14, 1054:17, 

1054:23

picking 1053:14, 1054:22, 

1055:5, 1055:7

picks 1055:13

Piwoni 1030:2, 1067:3, 

1072:13, 1076:11

place 1025:23, 1069:17, 

1071:12, 1071:19, 1076:12

places 1072:18

planned 1024:2

planning 1057:24

Platt 1012:39, 1037:21

Plaza 1011:45

pleading 1019:1, 1020:19

pleadings 1018:23, 1020:6, 

1021:3, 1024:9

pleasant 1077:5

Please 1027:25, 1029:2, 

1029:4, 1029:9, 1044:6, 

1046:8, 1069:11, 1071:6, 

1075:17, 1076:15, 1077:1

PO 1012:25

point 1014:7, 1014:23, 

1018:21, 1019:5, 1019:20, 

1022:3, 1022:7, 1023:23, 

1024:4, 1024:24, 1042:7, 

1048:10, 1058:11, 1071:13

point. 1034:7, 1038:9

poker 1025:18

police 1048:10

polite 1071:1

possibility 1049:23, 1059:4, 

1060:20

possible 1029:6, 1046:13, 

1071:8

possibly 1038:7, 1050:4

potential 1059:6, 1061:7, 

1067:5, 1072:10

practice 1017:6, 1076:19

practices 1059:3

predicts 1075:15

prefer 1067:19

preference 1067:15

preliminary 1066:19, 

1067:16, 1078:4

preparing 1026:10

preponderance 1042:1

prescribed 1079:11

present 1041:14, 1041:16, 

1045:19

presentation 1066:23
presented 1028:9, 1043:25, 

1069:23

presiding 1027:10, 1070:17

presumed 1041:5

pretrial 1018:6, 1077:20

pretty 1038:12, 1053:13, 

1054:11, 1055:6

previous 1021:13, 1028:20, 

1029:7, 1042:9

previously 1029:6

primary 1050:5, 1050:17, 

1050:19

private 1072:5

pro 1073:19

Probably 1019:17, 1030:3, 

1036:10, 1043:17, 1046:17, 

1048:11, 1053:17, 1054:3, 

1055:4, 1056:25, 1062:13, 

1062:18, 1067:23, 1071:11, 

1071:18, 1071:22, 1072:4, 

1075:14

problem 1014:13, 1049:15, 

1059:6, 1063:9

problematic 1059:5, 1059:8

problems 1048:3, 1048:7

procedure 1019:3, 1024:2, 

1044:18, 1060:15, 1061:4

procedures 1061:13, 

1067:7, 1067:10

proceed 1014:5

proceedings 1027:23, 

1028:1, 1029:23, 1044:3, 

1079:4, 1079:6

process 1025:18, 1027:20, 

1063:16, 1065:11

prohibits 1041:19

promptly 1077:3

proof 1041:10, 1041:12

proper 1018:25

propose 1014:22

pros 1073:18

prosecuting 1030:19

Prosecutions 1023:21

protective 1021:9, 1021:15, 

1024:18, 1026:18

prove 1041:14, 1041:21

proven 1041:6

provide 1072:12, 1073:16

provided 1072:16

provider 1047:4

providing 1067:4

punishment 1042:19, 

1043:7, 1043:11

purpose 1020:12

pursuant 1020:15, 1023:5

pursue 1026:4, 1026:19

put 1051:5, 1077:10

< Q >

qualified 1028:22

quantum 1041:22

question 1013:7, 1014:18, 

1014:24, 1015:11, 1017:22, 

1024:3, 1029:3, 1042:4, 

1044:23, 1044:24, 1045:3, 

1061:4

questioned 1014:8, 1029:8

questioning 1014:14, 

1014:25, 1015:7, 1028:20, 

1029:14, 1032:17, 1032:22, 

1039:16, 1040:15, 1040:21, 

1040:25, 1043:14, 1045:6, 

1071:11

questionnaire 1051:4

questionnaires 1028:21

questions 1013:24, 1013:25, 

1014:16, 1027:16, 1027:17, 

1027:18, 1028:12, 1028:18, 

1029:2, 1045:10, 1047:1, 

1047:15, 1047:21, 1048:18, 

1050:8, 1052:4, 1053:22, 

1056:15, 1070:12

quickly 1019:7, 1045:20

quite 1019:5, 1023:3, 

1069:16

< R >

raised 1013:22, 1017:22, 

1019:19, 1021:16, 1039:22, 

1046:4

raising 1024:3, 1029:3

ramifications 1067:19, 

1067:22

rare 1023:16

rather 1022:15

re-convening 1060:24

re-examine 1060:22

reach 1043:3, 1073:7, 

1074:10, 1074:12

reaction 1023:13

read 1021:9, 1038:8, 

1038:10, 1038:21, 1039:10, 

1040:18, 1043:19

Ready 1046:10, 1051:1, 

1053:5, 1055:24, 1063:12, 

1063:13, 1063:14

real 1028:17, 1053:15, 

1053:18

realize 1068:2

realizing 1070:4

really 1014:24, 1018:1, 

1024:13, 1026:6, 1040:10, 

1048:4, 1050:5, 1075:18, 

1078:7

reason 1017:4, 1021:24, 

1046:11, 1046:12, 1048:11, 

1059:1, 1073:3, 1075:1

reasonable 1041:23, 1042:3

reasons 1059:7

recalling 1073:20

receive 1037:11

received 1013:5, 1018:22, 

1037:14, 1050:18

recently 1017:6, 1021:22

Recess 1026:23, 1026:25, 

1027:18, 1063:10, 1063:11, 

1066:15, 1069:7, 1069:9, 

1074:19, 1074:23, 1078:16, 

1078:18

recesses 1074:21

recognize 1034:19, 1038:20, 

1039:12

recognized 1029:4

recognizes 1037:2, 1038:23

recollection 1074:13

recommendation 1026:20

reconvene 1062:19, 

1062:24, 1069:20

record 1013:23, 1019:4, 

1021:19, 1024:15, 1029:23, 

1045:1

red 1029:20

refer 1026:5, 1026:11, 

1026:19

referred 1021:8, 1041:6

referring 1032:3

reflected 1015:22

Refresh 1036:1, 1060:14
regard 1014:9, 1016:25, 

1017:19, 1020:20, 1021:18, 

1024:14, 1051:21

regarding 1024:9, 1058:3

regular 1072:24, 1073:2

rejoin 1048:22, 1050:25, 

1055:22, 1056:19

relate 1040:24

related 1037:13, 1040:12

relevant 1050:11

Relief 1026:5, 1032:20, 

1039:19

rely 1074:9

relying 1074:13

remain 1014:10, 1041:17, 

1045:9, 1045:19, 1045:25, 

1046:8

remarks 1026:10, 1069:18, 

1076:5

remedy 1024:25

remember 1029:6, 1029:7, 

1065:10

remind 1014:19

reminding 1044:4

reminds 1034:2

remote 1067:10, 1068:5, 

1072:1, 1072:8, 1074:23, 

1077:1

report 1071:25

reported 1057:7, 1057:8, 

1057:12

REPORTER 1012:45, 

1029:22, 1038:16, 1079:5, 

1079:18

reporters 1071:16

reporting 1067:10

represent 1013:16, 1013:18, 

1014:2, 1014:18, 1015:13, 

1016:4, 1016:5, 1016:12, 

1017:15, 1018:17, 1019:13, 

1022:7, 1022:12, 1022:16, 

1035:16, 1036:25

representation 1013:7, 

1014:6, 1015:2, 1015:4, 

1015:5, 1017:1

represented 1015:3, 

1015:22, 1015:24, 1016:21, 

1016:22, 1030:20, 1033:5, 

1034:14, 1035:10, 1039:21

representing 1014:17, 

1014:23, 1015:12, 1015:16, 

1016:23

request 1023:7, 1061:6

requested 1077:21

requesting 1020:8

require 1023:8

required 1015:1, 1020:16, 

1025:1

requires 1021:11, 1051:23, 

1072:22

research 1018:2, 1077:25, 

1078:6

resemble 1076:10

resets 1077:17

resolve 1013:6, 1025:12

respect 1026:13, 1043:2

respond 1018:1, 1025:7, 

1059:10

responded 1027:17

responding 1070:12

responsibility 1015:21, 

1028:8, 1028:14

responsive 1020:19

rest 1055:7, 1075:12

retained 1017:10, 1019:6, 

1019:10, 1021:20, 1021:21, 

1021:23, 1022:2, 1022:18, 

1022:24

Review 1020:3, 1023:18

revolve 1039:18, 1040:13

rightfully 1023:14

Ritter 1063:23

Rm 1012:46

Robinson 1035:23, 1046:6, 

1053:6, 1053:22, 1055:14, 

1055:21, 1056:24, 1058:15, 

1060:2, 1065:7

role 1018:6, 1026:3, 

1042:14, 1042:21

room 1029:9, 1044:17, 

1045:11, 1047:19, 1050:25, 

1053:4, 1055:22, 1059:11, 

1066:12

Rosie 1065:7

rotate 1072:18

routine 1075:18

row 1035:22

rows 1062:6

Rule 1015:1, 1070:19

rules 1019:1, 1023:6, 

1040:24, 1041:1, 1041:3, 

1042:5

run 1068:11, 1072:5

running 1076:1

< S >

s/cassidi 1079:15

safety 1068:7

San 1012:33

Sanders 1032:4, 1032:7, 

1066:8

Saucier 1031:21, 1046:5, 

1051:2, 1052:4, 1053:3, 

1056:24, 1057:20, 1058:14, 

1060:3, 1064:17

saw 1043:18, 1060:1

saying 1015:20, 1021:9, 

1022:24, 1023:8, 1054:1

says 1024:19, 1029:22, 

1045:4

scale 1024:13

scared 1068:7, 1068:19

scheduling 1077:11

School 1023:18, 1034:9

screen 1071:21

Scroggins 1065:6

seal 1023:7

sealed 1019:18, 1021:7, 

1021:10, 1023:9

Sealing 1023:9

seat 1069:14

seated 1029:20, 1033:16, 

1068:23, 1069:12, 1072:21

Second 1017:11, 1018:8, 

1018:21, 1033:18, 1034:12, 

1035:21, 1041:12, 1062:2

Secrecy 1023:20

secretary 1053:10, 1053:20

Section 1077:20

Security 1023:20, 1029:18, 

1052:8

seeing 1050:10, 1059:16

seem 1028:1, 1060:13

seems 1022:14, 1060:18

seen 1017:13, 1050:12, 

1050:13, 1056:21, 1059:6, 

1059:21

sees 1026:14, 1050:17, 

1059:14, 1071:3
selected 1027:4, 1028:5, 

1029:20, 1032:9, 1036:16, 

1043:22, 1045:17, 1047:24, 

1048:14, 1049:15, 1063:1

selecting 1027:20

selection 1040:20, 1044:3

send 1040:9

sending 1062:16

sense 1022:15, 1028:17, 

1061:21

sent 1040:1

sentence 1042:19

separate 1042:25

sequester 1051:14, 1051:16, 

1051:25

sequestered 1057:23

serve 1029:19, 1032:9, 

1036:16, 1043:23, 1047:24, 

1070:14

served 1017:13, 1020:10, 

1020:16, 1041:25, 1042:10

service 1042:9, 1059:12, 

1070:9, 1070:11

Services 1035:18

serving 1029:1, 1070:15

session 1025:11, 1043:16, 

1049:14, 1049:24, 1057:15, 

1063:6, 1074:15, 1074:17

sessions 1043:15, 1043:21, 

1044:9, 1069:15

set 1049:10

sets 1061:18, 1061:19

setting 1077:12

seven 1019:16, 1053:12

seven. 1061:16

several 1030:20, 1032:18, 

1036:6, 1036:7

SHAPIRO 1011:27, 1031:5, 

1031:15, 1039:6

Shawn 1065:2

sheet 1015:18, 1015:21, 

1019:16

shoe 1023:11

short 1077:9, 1077:17

shorter 1047:11

shortly 1027:24, 1040:19

show 1020:10, 1020:11, 

1023:7, 1066:6, 1067:14

showed 1057:10

showing 1017:14, 1021:5

shown 1079:6

Shrum 1064:8

shuffle 1068:23

shuffled 1069:2

Shukri 1011:38, 1014:7, 

1016:5, 1016:12, 1017:12, 

1017:15, 1033:5, 1033:13

side 1025:19, 1025:20, 

1032:16, 1055:11, 1055:12, 

1066:6, 1067:15, 1071:3, 

1071:4

sides 1025:21

sign 1014:19, 1020:3, 

1024:21

signed 1018:9, 1020:25, 

1024:16, 1026:16, 1051:7

significant 1030:17

silent 1041:18

Simental 1065:2

similar 1038:5

simply 1014:17, 1015:25, 

1016:13, 1017:5, 1022:17, 

1023:1, 1023:8, 1024:24, 

1025:23, 1065:11

Sir 1031:20, 1032:14, 

1035:21, 1036:13, 1036:20, 

1038:16, 1045:25, 1048:16, 

1065:1, 1065:13

sit 1028:19, 1028:22, 

1069:13

sitting 1062:12

situation 1021:19, 1053:15, 

1076:3

six 1049:8, 1049:18, 1050:4, 

1056:22, 1060:5, 1061:18, 

1061:19, 1068:25, 1072:23

size 1074:6

slack 1054:17

slate 1041:11

slowly 1028:1

small 1053:19, 1054:4

somebody 1054:9, 1054:10, 

1058:18, 1062:1

somehow 1024:15, 1024:16

someone 1051:9, 1059:16, 

1070:13, 1071:1, 1071:3, 

1072:3, 1076:1

sometime 1073:21

Sometimes 1028:1, 1073:23

son 1037:7

sorry 1033:22, 1046:23, 

1053:23

sort 1018:12, 1073:18, 

1074:3, 1076:17

sound 1059:17

sounds 1059:17

Special 1031:6, 1031:11, 

1038:13, 1051:22

specific 1040:12, 1047:25, 

1070:13

specifically 1030:22

specifying 1025:1

spend 1054:25, 1055:3

splashed 1071:20

St 1012:31

stable 1056:7

staff 1029:17, 1030:7, 

1030:12, 1030:14, 1034:3, 

1077:14

stage 1063:17

stand 1016:9, 1029:4, 

1030:23, 1038:17, 1052:15

standard 1042:1, 1042:3

standards 1042:6

start 1013:10, 1071:2, 

1074:18, 1074:25, 1075:19, 

1075:22, 1077:14

started 1056:3, 1060:8

starting 1025:10, 1074:20

starts 1041:11, 1074:17

State 1020:12, 1042:11, 

1042:13

stated 1021:25, 1048:2

statement 1017:18

statements 1066:23

STATES 1011:1, 1011:5, 

1011:29, 1011:30, 1027:5, 

1030:18, 1030:20, 1030:21, 

1031:3, 1031:7, 1031:8, 

1031:17, 1040:3, 1040:4, 

1040:7, 1040:9, 1052:21, 

1072:3, 1079:12, 1079:18

status 1013:17

statute 1020:15

stay 1044:22, 1045:12

stenotypy 1079:5

step 1019:4, 1023:2, 

1042:16

Stephanie 1066:9

steps 1071:23
Steven 1031:21

Stewart 1030:8

Stickney 1018:5, 1018:7, 

1018:12, 1018:17, 1026:2, 

1026:6, 1026:19

stomachs 1061:8

strategic 1023:22, 1024:1

strategy 1025:20

Street 1011:33, 1012:6, 

1012:46

strict 1073:4

strictly 1069:22

strike 1060:18, 1061:25, 

1062:1, 1062:5

strikes 1061:2, 1061:16, 

1062:2, 1062:10

striking 1062:12, 1065:13

strong 1056:9

struck 1044:18, 1060:14, 

1062:7, 1062:8

student 1030:9

studying 1034:9

stuff 1036:4, 1053:19

Suarez 1065:7

subject 1015:14, 1020:13, 

1024:8, 1024:11

submission 1025:3

submit 1024:18, 1045:2, 

1056:25, 1058:2

submitted 1019:22

substitute 1073:9

suddenly 1019:7

suitable 1028:19

Suite 1011:45, 1012:16, 

1012:41

summer 1030:10

Summit 1012:41

summoned 1028:5

supplemented 1044:8

support 1040:6

supposed 1018:11, 1018:12, 

1063:16, 1075:20

Supreme 1025:16, 1025:17

surgeon 1059:13

surgery 1047:7, 1056:8, 

1059:18

surprising 1059:23

surrounding 1022:22

Susan 1029:24

suspect 1071:5

sway 1037:9

swear 1066:18

swearing 1068:2

swing 1018:13

sworn 1068:1

Sylvester 1065:4

System 1022:11, 1028:3, 

1042:14, 1042:20, 1043:9

< T >

table 1016:11, 1016:17

Tables 1023:19

takers 1074:7

talked 1018:5, 1027:2, 

1027:7

talks 1023:21

Tampa 1012:26

taxpayers 1022:13

Taylor 1065:16

television 1071:21

tells 1077:1

temporary 1054:17

temptation 1074:8

ten 1013:3, 1013:11, 

1021:22

ten. 1025:10

tendency 1070:25

Teresa 1011:42, 1013:21, 

1016:6, 1016:11, 1016:13, 

1033:6, 1033:13

terms 1016:12, 1024:22

Terrorism 1023:21

terrorist 1040:4, 1040:6, 

1040:8

testified 1041:20

testifies 1074:5

testify 1041:15, 1041:16

testifying 1038:4, 1074:3

TEXAS 1011:2, 1011:31, 

1011:34, 1012:17, 1012:42, 

1012:47, 1027:6, 1030:22, 

1031:4, 1031:18, 1034:8, 

1039:2, 1042:11, 1042:12, 

1042:13, 1042:14, 1079:19

theme 1040:12

thereafter 1040:8

thinking 1061:8, 1075:2

third 1019:17, 1041:21

thirties 1039:7

thirty 1056:6, 1062:23

thirty-one 1061:15, 1061:25, 

1062:12

though 1024:14

three 1020:14, 1037:7, 

1046:17, 1047:8, 1049:18, 

1050:19, 1054:4, 1058:12, 

1058:18, 1075:21

throughout 1024:3, 1030:3, 

1044:4, 1069:5, 1069:13, 

1071:15, 1073:5

Thursday 1017:22, 1046:19, 

1074:16

Tillis 1064:19

Tilmer 1065:4

tipped 1024:13

Today 1021:20, 1027:21, 

1034:4, 1040:22, 1045:8, 

1067:17, 1069:18, 1069:20, 

1070:7, 1071:25, 1072:9, 

1075:7, 1076:5

together 1069:15, 1077:8

took 1027:6, 1071:12, 

1079:5

topic 1025:17

topics 1044:11

Torrez 1063:19

totality 1023:2

totally 1021:14, 1024:17

touch 1067:15, 1076:2

tough 1050:3

towards 1048:5

Tower 1012:40

trade 1074:3

transcribed 1079:6

transcript 1026:10, 1079:8, 

1079:10

transported 1072:8, 1077:3

treat 1059:4

treatment 1058:6, 1058:9

trial 1014:11, 1015:5, 

1027:10, 1027:12, 1028:15, 

1029:10, 1029:12, 1030:4, 

1031:10, 1032:21, 1033:9, 

1034:6, 1034:16, 1035:14, 

1036:23, 1038:3, 1039:21, 

1042:9, 1044:4, 1046:13, 

1067:2, 1069:5, 1069:13, 

1070:22, 1071:9, 1071:10, 

1071:15, 1072:2, 1072:11, 
1073:5, 1073:13, 1073:19, 

1073:25, 1075:8, 1075:11, 

1075:14, 1075:19

tried 1070:21, 1073:23

true 1018:18, 1045:5, 1079:8

try 1071:8, 1071:17, 

1071:22, 1071:23, 1072:10, 

1072:18, 1074:22

trying 1056:9

Tuesday 1066:22, 1066:25, 

1067:17, 1067:19, 1067:20, 

1075:3, 1077:2, 1078:5

turn 1032:16, 1072:15

Turning 1023:19, 1067:3

twelve 1060:5, 1061:16, 

1061:19, 1064:25, 1072:22

twenty 1074:22

Two 1017:9, 1021:22, 

1037:7, 1047:6, 1049:1, 

1049:6, 1050:20, 1051:19, 

1054:4, 1055:9, 1057:8, 

1061:17, 1061:19, 1061:20, 

1061:21, 1061:23, 1062:5, 

1063:21

two-fold 1042:15

two. 1061:18

type 1019:1

typically 1015:1, 1015:8

< U >

ultimately 1075:19

unaware 1026:15

undergoing 1058:6

understand 1020:5, 1023:6, 

1046:17, 1058:21, 1063:15, 

1063:23, 1067:21, 1070:9, 

1071:11, 1075:17

understanding 1017:24, 

1021:1, 1021:2, 1021:4, 

1021:9, 1024:16, 1024:21, 

1026:16, 1042:14, 1058:7

understands 1015:3

understood 1018:11

unforeseen 1075:14

UNITED 1011:1, 1011:5, 

1011:29, 1011:30, 1027:5, 

1030:18, 1030:19, 1030:21, 

1031:3, 1031:7, 1031:8, 

1031:17, 1040:3, 1040:4, 

1040:7, 1040:9, 1052:21, 

1072:3, 1079:12, 1079:18

University 1034:8

unknown 1021:14, 1024:17

unless 1074:18

unlikely 1023:24

unrelated 1071:6

unrepresented 1014:11, 

1016:1, 1032:21

unshakable 1063:6

until 1021:20, 1025:20, 

1041:5, 1041:13, 1046:7, 

1062:2, 1062:18, 1063:10, 

1066:21, 1067:17, 1067:19, 

1070:18, 1073:6, 1075:9, 

1078:16

urgent 1063:6

urologist 1049:8, 1049:17, 

1050:10, 1059:3

Using 1023:19, 1023:21

< V >

VA 1049:11, 1049:18, 

1050:1, 1050:6, 1050:10, 

1059:3

value 1040:10

van 1072:4

various 1017:16, 1029:11, 

1040:1

verdict 1041:19, 1043:10, 

1073:7

VERSUS 1011:8

view 1024:16

views 1057:18

violation 1021:15, 1024:18, 

1026:18

virtue 1036:18

visit 1029:7, 1066:17

visited 1037:15, 1047:22

VOIR 1011:17, 1025:11, 

1026:24, 1044:8, 1057:15

VOLUME 1011:16

voluntary 1051:8

< W >

wait 1017:1, 1047:3, 

1067:17, 1067:19, 1075:12

waiting 1013:10

waiver 1014:19, 1014:20

waivers 1013:23

Wall 1012:6

wanted 1030:4, 1032:11, 

1042:7, 1044:12, 1049:2, 

1051:11, 1052:11, 1052:17, 

1052:22, 1056:3, 1056:11, 

1058:14, 1062:1, 1075:7, 

1077:8, 1077:15, 1077:18

wanting 1075:4

wants 1022:12, 1078:15

Washington 1031:11, 

1032:1

watch 1051:9, 1074:2

watching 1074:4

ways 1061:23

weather 1071:2

week 1017:8, 1020:23, 

1021:17, 1039:16, 1040:20, 

1047:7, 1049:10, 1053:16, 

1053:24, 1054:7, 1054:24, 

1055:1, 1055:2, 1056:2, 

1056:7, 1058:17, 1069:20, 

1071:12

weekend 1077:5, 1078:8

weeks 1021:22, 1022:25, 

1030:10, 1054:4

Welcome 1027:4, 1069:11

Westfall 1012:38, 1012:39, 

1016:22, 1019:10, 1037:21, 

1037:24, 1037:25, 1044:11, 

1061:12, 1062:20, 1063:20, 

1064:1, 1064:7, 1064:15, 

1065:11, 1065:20, 1066:2

Whatever 1017:7, 1051:23, 

1068:3, 1076:25, 1078:15

whenever 1060:25

whether 1022:22, 1024:11, 

1027:12, 1027:21, 1028:18, 

1029:13, 1039:5, 1057:9, 

1066:24, 1067:16, 1070:14, 

1073:6, 1073:8, 1073:18, 

1074:4, 1075:4

whole 1045:7, 1053:15, 

1078:11

whom 1030:20

wife 1037:4, 1037:15, 

1047:22, 1048:6, 1056:4

William 1066:7

Williams 1064:6
wind 1069:6

wish 1014:19

withdraw 1014:17, 1014:22, 

1015:12

withhold 1067:20

Within 1018:25, 1045:16, 

1053:16

without 1019:8, 1070:4, 

1073:23, 1074:13

Witness 1038:10, 1038:21, 

1039:10, 1074:2, 1074:3, 

1074:5

witnesses 1028:25, 1038:4, 

1067:6, 1073:25, 1074:1

Wolverton 1064:2

work 1018:13, 1031:22, 

1035:24, 1036:2, 1036:3, 

1036:7, 1036:18, 1047:13, 

1053:13, 1054:12, 1054:20, 

1054:21, 1054:23, 1054:25, 

1055:5, 1055:7

worked 1031:22, 1031:24, 

1037:5, 1037:7, 1039:25

working 1045:13

works 1039:6, 1042:20, 

1055:12, 1058:17

worried 1068:15, 1068:18

worst 1071:5

Worth 1012:42

wrap 1061:24

write 1052:23

writing 1073:16

written 1033:2, 1041:7

wrote 1023:18

< Y >

year 1026:16, 1047:8, 

1050:13, 1051:7, 1059:15, 

1059:19

years 1021:1, 1032:6, 

1048:12, 1050:20, 1056:6

yesterday 1077:12

York 1012:7, 1023:18

Young 1064:20

yourselves 1070:2

< Z >

zone 1060:18