alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.1

                      RESOLUTION REGARDING AMENDMENT TO
                        EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF
                             LACLEDE GAS COMPANY

         Resolved, that effective beginning with the current Plan Year, as
defined in the Plan:

1.       Section 9.6 of the Employees' Retirement Plan of Laclede Gas Company
         ("Plan") is amended to read as follows:

                  Section 9.6 - Administrative Expenses.
                  --------------------------------------

                  No member of the Retirement Board shall receive any
         compensation from the Fund for his services as such member. All
         expenses of administering the Plan (as distinguished from expenses
         of administering the Trust Fund) and, in addition, the Trustee's
         compensation and Investment Manager's compensation, may be paid by
         the Company. The Company shall furnish the Retirement Board with
         such clerical and accounting assistance as it may request.

2.       Section 11.2 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

                  Section 11.2 - Trust Fund for Exclusive Benefit of Employees.
                  -------------------------------------------------------------

                  Subject to the express provision of Section 10.3 of this
         Plan, at no time prior to the satisfaction of all liabilities with
         respect to Employees and Retirees and their Designated Dependents
         and Designated Beneficiaries under the Plan shall any part of the
         corpus or income of the Trust Fund be used for or diverted to
         purposes other than (a) for the exclusive benefit of such Employees
         and Retirees and their Designated Dependents and Designated
         Beneficiaries under the Plan and (b) to defray reasonable expenses
         of administering the Plan.
# C_2018022EN.01002501.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Limoges (France) lodged on 30 October 2017 — BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v Roger Ducloux, Josée Ducloux, née Lecay

(Case C-618/17)

(2018/C 022/37)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal d’instance de Limoges

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, successor in title to Solfea

Applicant:

Defendants: Roger Ducloux, Josée Ducloux, née Lecay

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Where the annual percentage rate of credit is 5,97377 %, does the rule provided for in Directives 98/7/EC of 16 February 1998 (1) and 2008/48/EC of 23 April 2008, (2) according to which, in the French version, ‘Le résultat du calcul est exprimé avec une exactitude d’au moins une décimale. Si le chiffre de la décimale suivante est supérieur ou égal à 5, le chiffre de la première décimale sera augmenté de 1’ [translated in literal terms as ‘[t]he result of the calculation shall be expressed correct to at least one decimal place; if the figure at the following decimal place is greater than or equal to 5, the figure at [the first] decimal place shall be increased by one’] allow a stated annual percentage rate of charge of 5,95 % to be considered correct?

1

2

Le résultat du calcul est exprimé avec une exactitude d’au moins une décimale

Si le chiffre de la décimale suivante est supérieur ou égal à 5, le chiffre de la première décimale sera augmenté de 1

---

(1)  Directive 98/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 amending Directive 87/102/EEC for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit (OJ 1998 L 101, p. 17).

1

(2)  Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2007 |  |        |  |                                      
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/ Andrew M. Sims                   
|                     |  |        |  |                                      
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Andrew M. Sims                       
|                     |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00909]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1266 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1085, K2025-1084.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00909 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32.2


                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, Secretary, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.



Date: April 2, 2007

/s/ Kate Blankenship
----------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1237 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1054, K2025-1053.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00796 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Shantwaun TURNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 21 PageID 2
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 21 PageID 3
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 3 of 21 PageID 4
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 4 of 21 PageID 5
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 5 of 21 PageID 6
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 6 of 21 PageID 7
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 7 of 21 PageID 8
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 8 of 21 PageID 9
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 9 of 21 PageID 10
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 10 of 21 PageID 11
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 11 of 21 PageID 12
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 12 of 21 PageID 13
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 13 of 21 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 14 of 21 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 15 of 21 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 16 of 21 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 17 of 21 PageID 18
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 18 of 21 PageID 19
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 19 of 21 PageID 20
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 20 of 21 PageID 21
 

 Case 3:05-mc-00093-R Document 2 Filed 08/17/05 Page 21 of 21 PageID 22
Kevin Lynn LAMB v. STATE

CR-16-1264

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Robert W. Wright,certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofPRB Energy, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we:

a.      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee ofthe registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b*.**    *Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2007                 |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ Robert W.  Wright                 |   |
| Robert W. Wright                      |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)        |

 

----
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-6 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 169
Case 4:05-cv-00338-Y Document 25-6 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 170
# FCA

FCA FOIA Request FY 2022
Exhbit 10.1




                            Michael T. Williams, Esq.
                               2503 W. Gardner Ct.
                                 Tampa FL 33611
                               Phone: 813.831.9348
                                Fax: 813.832.5284
                         e-mail: wmslaw@tampabay.rr.com


                                  May 15, 2003


HydroFlo, Inc.
Raleigh NC

Via e-mail and fax

Re:  Engagement Agreement

Dear Sirs:

     This letter sets forth the terms by which I shall be engaged in connection
with matters described below. I agree that the terms and conditions of the
engagement shall be as set forth in this letter.

1.   Engagement. I have been engaged as special counsel for the HydroFlo, Inc.,
["Company"].

The engagement shall be limited to the assistance with following matters:

        o      The preparation of a Forms 10K-SB, 10Q-SB, and 8-K
        o      The preparation of Forms 3, 4, 5, and 13D/G
        o      The establishment of an insider stock trading monitoring program
        o      Availability to respond to general securities law questions

No other services, including but not limited to services in connection with the
offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and services that
directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for your securities, shall
be the subject of or provided under this Agreement.

The term of the engagement shall be for the first 24 months commencing May 15,
2003.

2.   Fees, Costs and Expenses.  My  fee shall be 125,000 shares of common stock,
to be registered on form S-8 as soon as the form is available and issued in 24
equal monthly installments the first day of each month of after services
commence under this agreement, with the final installment due upon the
expiration of this agreement. I shall prepare the S-8 and related legal opinion.
I shall be responsible for expenses of filing, such as edgar and the SEC filing
fee, and you shall be responsible for accounting fees.

                               Sincerely,

                              /s/  Michael T. Williams
                                   Michael T. Williams, Esq.

The above is understood and agreed to:

HydroFlo, Inc.

By: /s/ Dennis Mast, CEO
        Dennis Mast, CEO
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 2012 V

UNPUBLISHED

THOMAS JEFFREY MICKLES

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 6, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC , for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On December 31, 2019

, Thomas Jeffrey Mickles filed a petition for compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2

(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain

- Barré Syndrome (“GBS”)

caused by the influenza vaccine he received on Octo ber 16, 2018 . Petit ion at 1, ¶¶ 2, 20

. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 23, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1 , ECF No. 24 . Specifically, R espondent states “[i]t is [his] position that [P]etitioner has

satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications

and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”)

. ” Id. at 4

.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In ac cordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits wi thin this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
# C_2017300EN.01001702.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 19 June 2017 — Vision Research Europe BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

(Case C-372/17)

(2017/C 300/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Holland

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vision Research Europe BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2014 (1) of 4 February 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid if the Rechtbank is correct in its provisional view that subheading 8525 80 30 should be interpreted as meaning that the camera, as described in 2 and 12 above, which has a volatile memory whereby the images captured in the camera are lost when subsequent images are captured or when the camera is switched off, can be classified thereunder?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 38, p. 20.

1

---
# C_2019016EN.01001101.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus — Finland) — proceedings relating to the extradition of Denis Raugevicius

(Case C-247/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - European Union Citizenship - Articles 18 and 21 TFEU - Request to a Member State by a third country seeking extradition of an EU citizen who is a national of another Member State and who has exercised his right to free movement in the first Member State - Request made for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence and not for the purpose of prosecution - Prohibition on extradition applied only to own nationals - Restriction on free movement - Justification based on the prevention of impunity - Proportionality))

(2019/C 16/13)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

Denis Raugevicius

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 18 and 21 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that, where an extradition request has been made by a third country for an EU citizen who has exercised his right to free movement, not for the purpose of prosecution, but for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence, the requested Member State, whose national law prohibits the extradition of its own nationals out of the European Union for the purpose of enforcing a sentence and makes provision for the possibility that such a sentence pronounced abroad may be served on its territory, is required to ensure that that EU citizen, provided that he resides permanently in its territory, receives the same treatment as that accorded to its own nationals in relation to extradition.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---