alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016156EN.01005102.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/51

---

Action brought on 22 February 2016 — Murphy v EUIPO — Nike Innovate

(Measuring instruments, apparatus and devices)

(Case T-90/16)

(2016/C 156/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Murphy (Blackrock, Ireland) (represented by: N. Travers, SC, J. Gormley, Barrister, M. O’Connor, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nike Innovate CV (Beaverton, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the design at issue:

Design at issue: Community design ‘measuring instruments, apparatus and devices’ — Community design No 2 159 640-0002

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2015 in Case R 736/2014-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to give the Applicant a fair and adequate hearing; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to give the Applicant a fair and adequate hearing;

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to identify the actual degree of design freedom and the degree of design constraint, and, in so doing, failed properly to reason, or reason adequately, the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to identify the actual degree of design freedom and the degree of design constraint, and, in so doing, failed properly to reason, or reason adequately, the contested decision;

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to make a proper, close, factually correct and realistic assessment of the overall impression of the competing designs and then apply that assessment to those designs when considering the question of individual character. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to make a proper, close, factually correct and realistic assessment of the overall impression of the competing designs and then apply that assessment to those designs when considering the question of individual character.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 7 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 7

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
Commission relating to ``Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate 
                               Program''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 2025

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Thune, Mr. Wicker, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Moran, 
   Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Young, Mr. Budd, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. Curtis, Mr. 
  Sheehy, Mrs. Capito, and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
Commission relating to ``Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate 
                               Program''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
``Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program'' (89 Fed. 
Reg. 67303 (August 20, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
Case 19-34054-sgj11    Doc 3939-1    Filed 10/10/23    Entered 10/10/23 11:13:39    Desc Complete Application for admission Pro Hac Vice    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-34054-sgj11    Doc 3939-1    Filed 10/10/23    Entered 10/10/23 11:13:39    Desc Complete Application for admission Pro Hac Vice    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-34054-sgj11    Doc 3939-1    Filed 10/10/23    Entered 10/10/23 11:13:39    Desc Complete Application for admission Pro Hac Vice    Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 11, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Schmidt                  
|Michael Schmidt                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 118

To prohibit the use of forfeited funds made available to certain State 
  or local law enforcement agencies pursuant to equitable sharing for 
                           certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of forfeited funds made available to certain State 
  or local law enforcement agencies pursuant to equitable sharing for 
                           certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Federal Funds for Political 
Prosecutions Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FORFEITED FUNDS MADE AVAILABLE PURSUANT TO 
              EQUITABLE SHARING.

    (a) In General.--No funds or property received pursuant to section 
511(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811(e)), section 981 
of title 18, United States Code, or section 524 of title 28, United 
States Code, by a State or local law enforcement agency with the 
authority to prosecute a criminal case may be used to investigate or 
prosecute the President or Vice President, a former President or Vice 
President, or a candidate for the office of President.
    (b) Certification.--A State or local law enforcement agency 
referred to in subsection (a) shall certify to the Attorney General 
that the law enforcement agency will comply with subsection (a).
    (c) Disqualification.--In the case of a State or local law 
enforcement agency that the Attorney General determines has failed to 
comply with this section, the Attorney General may not transfer, under 
section 511(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811(e)), 
section 981 of title 18, United States Code, or section 524 of title 
28, United States Code, any property seized by the Attorney General and 
forfeited to the United States, or any of the proceeds from the sale of 
such property to such State or local law enforcement agency.
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``candidate'' has the 
meaning given such term in section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign 
Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101).
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE James Calvin FRAZIER

CR-17-0038

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 911 

To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing aircraft, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on 

existing aircraft, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saracini Enhanced 

5 Aviation Safety Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS 

7 ON EXISTING AIRCRAFT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

10 of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 911 IS

1 order requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier 

2 on each covered aircraft. 

3 (b) COVERED AIRCRAFT.—In this section, the term 

4 ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means a commercial passenger aircraft 

5 operating under the provisions of part 121 of title 14, 

6 Code of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017249EN.01001901.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 28 April 2017 — Medtronic GmbH v Finanzamt Neuss

(Case C-227/17)

(2017/C 249/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Medtronic GmbH

Defendant: Finanzamt Neuss

Question referred

Is the combined nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1754 (1) of 6 October 2015 to be interpreted as meaning that spinal fixation systems (2) as described in more detail in the order fall under subheading 9021 90 90?

---

(1)  
  OJ 2015 L 285, p. 1.

(2)  Wirbelsäulenfixationssysteme der Marke CD Horizon SOLERA Spinal System.

---
Freemel BEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Stacia CROMARTIE

(In re: Stacia Cromartie v. Alabama State University et al.)

2170093

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
EX PARTE Reuben I. PIERCE, Jr.

1160882 (2150870)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 4.3
                                                                     -----------

                          WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                                       TO
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                             1992 STOCK OPTION PLAN

         The Webster Financial Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended
and restated (the "Plan") is hereby amended as set forth below, subject to
approval of this Amendment Number 2 by the shareholders of Webster Financial
Corporation (the "Corporation"), as provided below:

         1.   The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is amended to read as
              follows:

              "The number of shares of Stock that may be issued pursuant to
              Incentive Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed in the
              aggregate 6,661,000 shares, which number of shares is subject to
              adjustment as hereinafter provided in Section 17 below."

         2.   Section 5(b) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

              "(b) Term. The Plan shall terminate on March 20, 2013."

         3.   The Plan shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment Number 2.

         4.   This Amendment Number 2 is adopted subject to approval within one
year of the date of adoption by the Board of Directors of the Corporation of
this Amendment Number 2 by a majority of the votes cast on the amendment at a
duly held meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation at which a quorum
representing a majority of all outstanding voting stock is, either in person or
by proxy, present and voting on the amendment; provided, however, that upon
approval of Amendment Number 2 by the shareholders of the Corporation as set
forth above, any Incentive Awards (as defined in the Plan) granted under the
Plan pursuant to Amendment Number 2 shall be fully effective as if the
shareholders of the Corporation had approved Amendment Number 2 on the date the
Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted this Amendment Number 2. If the
shareholders fail to timely approve Amendment Number, any options granted
covering shares of stock in excess of the number permitted under the Plan (as in
effect before adoption of this Amendment Number 2) shall be null and void and of
no effect.

                                    *  *  *



<PAGE>


         This Amendment Number 2 to the Plan was duly adopted by the
shareholders of the Corporation at a meeting held on April 24, 2003.

                                          /s/ Harriet Munrett Wolfe
                                          --------------------------
                                          Harriet Munrett Wolfe
                                          Corporate Secretary
Rita PFAFF v. Patrick LYMON

2160641

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 42

  To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain 
 payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of 
  Alaska Natives from being used to determine eligibility for certain 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

  Mr. Begich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain 
 payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of 
  Alaska Natives from being used to determine eligibility for certain 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Native Settlement Trust 
Eligibility Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS.

    Section 29(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1626(c)) is amended, in the undesignated matter following paragraph 
(3), by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:
            ``(E) an interest in a Settlement Trust and, for the 5-year 
        period beginning on the date of the enactment of the Alaska 
        Native Settlement Trust Eligibility Act, an amount distributed 
        from or benefit provided by a Settlement Trust to a Native or 
        descendant of a Native who is an aged, blind, or disabled 
        individual (as defined in section 1614(a) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a))).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey C. Grace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                          |  | 
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |                                          |  | 
|                   |  |                                         
|                   |  | /s/ Jeffrey C. Grace                     |  | 
|                   |  | Jeffrey C. Grace                         |  | 
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, |  | 
|                   |  | Secretary and Director                   |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Case 3:05-cv-01284-B Document 7 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 57
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01284-B Document 7 Filed 07/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 58
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 13 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 13

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at 
                   Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Thune submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at 
                   Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Jennifer A. Hemingway as Sergeant at Arms and 
Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HouseValues, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and R. Barry Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 7, 2007



/s/ IAN MORRISIan Morris Chief Executive Officer and
President/s/ R. BARRY ALLENR. Barry Allen Chief Financial Officer
andExecutive Vice President of Operations


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.