alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00203

- CV

Michael S. GOODLETT , Jr., through his legal Guardian, Michael S. Goodlett, Sr.

, Appellant

v.

NORTHEAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 03596 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record h as

not been filed because appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant i s not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court with in ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of May, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
Case 3:04-cv-02440-O Document 22 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 393
Case 3:04-cv-02440-O Document 22 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 394
Christopher D. POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3615

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 9, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Long, Jr., Robert E., Associate Judge.

Christopher Powell appeals his convictions for the first-degree murder of one woman and the attempted first-degree murder of another woman, both committed on February 20, 2016. Because the evidentiary errors he asserts on appeal were unpreserved at trial, reversal is available only if Powell shows that the errors were fundamental. *Williams v. State* , 209 So.3d 543, 557 (Fla. 2017).

*1094Powell contends that the trial court committed fundamental error by allowing testimony from a co-defendant regarding the events leading up to the charged incidents - that a BOLO (be on lookout) had been issued for Powell, a warrant had been issued for Powell's arrest, and that Powell "beat [his wife] up."

However, our review of the trial transcript reveals that the co-defendant's comments were isolated, passing references to explain some of Powell's actions being related by the witness. The State never mentioned these portions of the co-defendant's testimony in any argument, and, taken in context of the entire trial, these references did not become a feature of the trial. The admission of these statements was not fundamental error. *See* *Calloway v. State* , 210 So.3d 1160, 1191 (Fla. 2017) (unpreserved error "so fundamental as to require reversal 'must reach down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.' ").

Powell also argues that the trial court fundamentally erred by allowing two sheriff's deputies to testify regarding out of court statements made by the surviving victim during the investigation of the case. The surviving victim testified at trial prior to the testimony of these officers. The record shows that even if contemporaneous objections had been raised, the testimony of these officers did not improperly bolster the witness' credibility in a simple swearing match between witnesses. The surviving victim was not the only witness to Appellant's acts and the record of the entire trial demonstrates overwhelming evidence to support the jury's verdict. Any error in admitting hearsay evidence from these witnesses was harmless and, in the context of the entire trial, certainly not fundamental error. *See* *Floyd v. State* , 850 So.2d 383, 400 (Fla. 2002).

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Jay, J., concur.
EX PARTE Ronnie Lenear COLVIN

1160829 (CR-15-1457)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pharmasset, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, P. Schaefer Price, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 9, 2011



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    P. SCHAEFER
PRICE P. Schaefer Price
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Lakeside Financial Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   November 12, 2004                     ____________/S/____________
                                               William F. Webster,
                                               President of Manager
                                               Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements on Form S-8

     No. 333-49097 pertaining to the Precision Auto Care, Inc. 1998 Employee
         Stock Purchase Plan
     No. 333-47165 pertaining to the Precision Tune Stock Option Plan
     No. 333-47169 pertaining to the Precision Auto Care Employee Stock Option
         Plan
     No. 333-47171 pertaining to the Precision Auto Care, Inc. Director Stock
         Option Plan
     No. 333-85877 pertaining to the Precision Auto Care, Inc. 1998 Outside
         Directors' Stock Option Plan
     No. 333-85879 pertaining to the Precision Auto Care, Inc. 1999 Employee
         Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
     No. 333-39226 pertaining to the Precision Auto Care, Inc. 2000 Outside
         Directors' Stock Plan

of our report dated September 8, 2000, except for Note 8, as to which the date
is October 11, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Precision Auto Care, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2000, included
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Precision Auto Care, Inc. for the year
ended June 30, 2002.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
October 8, 2002
McLean, Virginia
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 9 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 9

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Commodity Futures 
  Trading Commission relating to ``Commission Guidance Regarding the 
       Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2025

Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Sheehy) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Commodity Futures 
  Trading Commission relating to ``Commission Guidance Regarding the 
       Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final guidance submitted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
relating to ``Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Voluntary 
Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts'' (89 Fed. Reg. 83378 (October 15, 
2024)) and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE James WINSTON

1160872 (CR-15-0760)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 10, 2016

No. 04-16-00576-CR & 16-00577-CR & 16-00578-CR

Kathleen Darleen DANIEL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5924 & 5925 & 5926

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s records and reporter’s records were originally due on October 31, 2016. The 

district clerk has been granted one extension of time in which the file the clerk’s records on 

November 22, 2016. Ms. Dandy Middleton is the reporter responsible for preparing, certifying, 

and filing the reporter’s records in these appeals. On October 30, 2016, Ms. Middleton filed a 

Notification of Late Record indicating partial payment has been made, but arrangements need to 

be made for full payment of the record. 

 

On October 21, 2016, we granted appellant’s request to consolidate these three

companion cases for briefing and oral argument purposes (if oral argument is requested and 

granted). On November 2, 2016, appellant filed a motion requesting that the records in these 

cases be consolidated for purposes of briefing, oral argument, and decision. The motion is 

DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART.

The request to consolidate the clerk’s records is DENIED, and the district clerk is 

ORDERED to file a separate clerk’s record in each of these companion cases no later than 

November 22, 2016.

The request to consolidate the reporter’s records is GRANTED. Ms. Middleton is hereby 

ORDERED to file a single reporter’s record (1) that specifies all three trial court cause numbers 

(2) no later than November 22, 2016.
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID 55
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID 56
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID 57
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID 58
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID 59
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID 60
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID 61
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00255-C Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID 62
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theinterim  report of Ecotality, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thesixmonths ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan R. Read, acting inthe capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, BarryS.Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934;and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Jonathan R. Read    |
|-------------------------|
| Jonathan R. Read        |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2007       |
|                    |
| /s/ Barry S. Baer       |
| Barry S. Baer           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2007       |

 

----
# Fourth Court **of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 19, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00812

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRAN SPORTATION

, Appellant

v.

Naomi MARKHAM , et al.,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 01166

Honorabl e Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Frist Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. Time is

extended to January 22, 2019.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of December, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# C_2017330EN.01000301.xml

| 2.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 9 June 2017 — IJDF Italy Srl v Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando

(Case C-344/17)

(2017/C 330/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: IJDF Italy Srl

Applicant:

Defendants: Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) the second sentence of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding a national law that, when cases are related, in particular when there is a guarantee claim related to the original proceedings, provides that the cases are to be determined together before the same court, even though as a result of that provision jurisdiction in respect of the guarantee claim lies with a court other than that within whose jurisdiction the consumer resides or other than that of his address for service?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

1

---
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Boo-Ali Siddiqui,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 9, 2010





/s/
      Boo-Ali SiddiquiBoo-Ali
      Siddiqui, Chief Financial
Officer
Drew ARNOLD v. Warden Darrell VANNOY, Louisiana State Penitentiary

NO. 2019-KH-0366

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Mark MALLET v. Frederick Mark KEEL and Mark Keel Construction, LLC

2160425

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE STATE

(In re State v. J.A.T.)

CR-15-0614

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00080

- CV

Ex parte Earnest Lee Glover , Appellant

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 19

- 008912 , THE HONORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In December 2019, Ear nest Lee Glover filed a petition for o riginal ha beas corpus
with the trial court. Glover s tyled his petition as a civil lawsuit, naming Lorie Davis as
defendant , but he sought habeas rel ief , to have his judgment of conv iction set aside and to be
released from cus tod y. 1 Glover filed a notice of appeal f rom the trial court ’ s order granting
Dav is ’ s plea to the jurisdiction and dismissing his claims for l a ck of subject matter jurisdiction.
O n Jul y 1 5 , 2021 , this C ourt inform ed Glover that it a ppeared that this Court lacked jurisdiction over this appeal

. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 (setting forth procedure for writ of habeas corp us) ; In re Garcia , 363 S.W.3d 819, 822 n.4 (Tex. App.

— A ustin 2012, no pet.) (“Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over criminal

- law matters pertaining to proceedings under article 1 1.07.”) ; Ex parte Williams , 239 S.W.3d 859, 862 (Tex. App.

— Austin

1 According to offender information details attached to the plea to the jurisdiction b ef o re the trial court , Glover was sent enced in 2007 to two counts of a ggravated se xual assault and is servi ng se ntence s of confinement for ninety

- nine year s
.2 2007, no pet

. )

. 2 This Court also direct ed him to file a resp onse on or before July 26, 2021 ,
exp laining ho w this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal

. To date, appellant has not
file d a response
. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lac k of jurisdiction

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3( a ).

_______ _____ ______________________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisd iction
Filed: December 22, 2021

2 See also McClure v. State , No. 03

- 13

- 00226

- CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEX IS 7184, at *1

– 2 (Tex . App.

— Aust in June 13, 2013, no pet.) ( me m. op., not designated for publication) ( “ The intermedia te courts of appeal ha ve no role in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings initiated under article 11.07

. ” )
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date November 8, 2007 |  |        |  |                        
|                      |  |       
|                      |  | By:    |  | /s/ William J. Zaiser  
|                      |  | Name:  |  | William J. Zaiser      
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer