alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Aamir Veljee, Aameerali Lakhani, CSI, LED, LLC, and CSI 

Factory, Inc.,

Appellate case number: 01-20-00116-CV

Trial court case number: 201922849

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order, signed 

January 9, 2020, compelling relators to obtain and produce bank records. Relators subsequently 

filed a motion for emergency relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.

The Court grants the motion for emergency relief and stays all proceedings in the trial 

court pending this Court’s disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus or further orders of this 

Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly___

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __February 11, 2020____
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 34

  To deposit portions of revenue generated from public lands into the 
                      Social Security Trust Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To deposit portions of revenue generated from public lands into the 
                      Social Security Trust Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Land And Social Security 
Optimization Act'' or ``LASSO Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC LAND REVENUE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other law, each fiscal year, 
10 percent of amounts collected by the Department of the Interior and 
the Department of Agriculture from the revenue generated by covered 
public lands during the preceding fiscal year shall be deposited into 
the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Trust Fund established under section 
201(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401(a)).
    (b) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
as--
            (1) authorizing the Secretary of the Interior or the 
        Secretary of Agriculture to raise the price of any of the 
        activities through which revenue is generated on covered public 
        lands; or
            (2) reducing amounts made available to States, Indian 
        Tribes, territories, or local governments from revenue 
        generated by covered public lands.
    (c) Covered Public Lands Defined.--In this Act, the term ``covered 
public lands'' means any land under the administrative jurisdiction--
            (1) of the Department of the Interior, including submerged 
        lands on the Outer Continental Shelf (as such term is defined 
        in section 2 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 
        U.S.C. 1331); or
            (2) the Forest Service.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m. on Friday, January 10, 2025.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: December 31, 2024.

Stephanie J. Fouse, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-31777 Filed 12-31-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1****NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan R. Spachman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Interstate Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.August 8, 2006     BY: /s/ Alan R. Spachman Alan R. Spachman    Chairman of the Board and President       (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

VS. ) CASE NO.: 3:05-CR-155-M

)

FARHAD HAIDER )

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a

Plea of Guilty, the consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed

within ten days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Concerning

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts

the plea of guilty, and also accepts the plea agreement, and the Defendant is hereby adjudged

guilty. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SIGNED this 27th day of April, 2009.

_________________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00155-M Document 23 Filed 04/27/09 Page 1 of 1 PageID 45
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1267 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1088, K2025-1087.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00910 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 3:04-cv-02745-P Document 23 Filed 10/11/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 155
Case 3:04-cv-02745-P Document 23 Filed 10/11/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 156
Case 3:04-cv-02745-P Document 23 Filed 10/11/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 157
Case 3:04-cv-02745-P Document 23 Filed 10/11/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 158
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Shahid S. Asghar,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: August 14, 2006
Case 4:03-cv-01003-A Document 29 Filed 05/20/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID 231
Glen Dale SPIVEY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017283EN.01001202.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/12

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2017 — Redpur GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Redwell Manufaktur GmbH

(Case C-86/17 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the word mark Redpur - Rejection of the application for registration))

(2017/C 283/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Redpur GmbH (represented by: S. Schiller, Agent)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Redwell Manufaktur GmbH

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Redpur GmbH is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Redpur GmbH is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.

1

---
#### Mollie Williams, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 14, 1927.

*V. 8. Broome,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Robert E. Davis*and *R. A. Bur ford,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the recofd having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:    03/14/08                    By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     ---------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
Adrian R. EDMONDS v. Markeisha THOMAS

2160888

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:04-cv-02648-D Document 12 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 27
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02648-D Document 12 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 28
# C_2017014EN.01004501.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/45

---

Action brought on 24 October 2016 — Toontrack Music v EUIPO (EZMIX)

(Case T-771/16)

(2017/C 014/53)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Toontrack Music AB (Umeå, Sweden) (represented by: L.-E. Ström, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘EZMIX’ — Application for registration No 13 945 423

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2016 in Case R 2436/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in accordance with Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), 7(2), 43 and 65 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in accordance with Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), 7(2), 43 and 65 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark; and

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs and to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs and to bear its own costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), 7(2) and 43 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), 7(2) and 43 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 2:04-cv-00054-J Document 18 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 88
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00054-J Document 18 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 89
# C_2017213EN.01001702.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma (Italy) lodged on 10 March 2017 — Luigi Bisignani v Agenzia delle Entrate -Direzione Provinciale 1 di Roma

(Case C-125/17)

(2017/C 213/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Luigi Bisignani

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate -Direzione Provinciale 1 di Roma

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In so far as they permit the retention in national law of restrictions, in force at 31 December 1993, of movements of capital from or to third countries, in order to prevent potential losses of revenue for the Member States and permit the gathering of evidence of the irregularity or illegality of transactions that appear to be incompatible with, or in breach of, tax legislation and, on the basis of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality under Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, distinguishing between taxpayers who do not find themselves in the same situation as regards their place of residence or as regards the place where their capital is invested, do Article 64 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in conjunction with the preceding Article 63 and subsequent Article 65 thereof, as well as Council Directive 2011/16/EU, (1) preclude national provisions that, in accordance with Article 9(1)(c) and (d) of Law No 97 of 6 August 2013 (European Law 2013), at least as interpreted by both parties, definitively abolished (rather than reframed) the tax offence established and penalised under Articles 4 and 5 of Decree-Law No 167 of 28 June 1990, converted, with amendments into Law No 227 of 4 August 1990, without, moreover, distinguishing the various cases of capital movement between Member States of the Union from those between the latter and States or territories with preferential tax regimes?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC (OJ 2011 L 64, p. 1).

1

---