alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Steven G. Holder,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 14, 2006



/s/ Steven G. HolderSteven G. HolderCo-Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00089

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE

OF GRACE KIMBER LEE ADAMS

AND BOBBY REID ADAMS §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 354T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

RAINS COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORA NDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In her motion, Appellant states that

she no longer wishes to appeal the decision of the lower court or overturn it. Because Appellant

has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is

granted , and the appeal is dismissed

.

Opinion delivered July 31, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF A PPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 3 1 , 2014

NO. 12

- 14

- 00089

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

GRACE KIMBERLEE ADAM S AND BOBBY REID ADAMS

Appeal from the 354th District Court

of Rains County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 9555)

T HIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that th is appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the

cour t below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
# C_2019172EN.01002402.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Hussein Mohamad Hussein, other party: Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl

(Case C-657/17) (1)

(2019/C 172/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1619

___________________________

Justin Neill

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Dr. Roberto Saez; Nurse Shawna Stephens; Nurse Jessie Prince; Nurse Fran Infante

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

 ____________

 Submitted: October 5, 2020

Filed: October 8, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, inmate Justin Neill challenges the district

court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the summary judgment record

1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.
in a light most favorable to Neill, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor,

see Brewington v. Keener, 902 F.3d 796, 800 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review), we

agree that summary judgment was appropriate. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
EX PARTE STATE

(In re: State v. John Brown)

CR-15-1436

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Johnny Mack CARTER, IV, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NOS.: 2D18-1801 2D19-0763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 04, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 4:05-cv-00380-A Document 37 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 127
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00380-A Document 37 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 128
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

 

I, Shahid S. Asghar, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 17, 2005
**Exhibit
      31.1**





**SOUTHERN
      HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**


**FORM
      10-QSB**


**Quarter
      ended September 30, 2006**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





I,
      J. Lee
      Stewart, certify that:





1) I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Heritage Bancshares,
      Inc.





2) Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period by this quarterly report;





3) Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in the quarterly report;





4) The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as
      of September 30, 2006 (the “Evaluation Date”);





c) presented
      in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date; and





d) disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5) The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent
      function):





a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b) any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.








/s/
                J. Lee StewartJ.
                Lee StewartPresidentNovember
                15, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, created by**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companyat the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

Dated: May 16, 2005 

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40115

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO D. TILMAN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:94-CR-20-2

- - - - - - - - - -

November 24, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. He argues

that the factual basis to support his guilty plea was

insufficient and that his guilty plea was not knowing and

voluntary. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. The district court's finding that the factual basis was

sufficient to support the plea was not clearly erroneous, see
No. 95-40115

-2-

United States v. Adams, 961 F.2d 505, 508 (5th Cir. 1992), and a

review of the record reveals that the guilty plea was knowing and

voluntary and that the district court complied with Rule 11. 

AFFIRMED.
Lamarquis Dewayne POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1649

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Planning Grants (R34 Clinical Trial Not Allowed); NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         February 11, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maryam Feili-Hariri, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5026,                         *haririmf@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 8, 2025. 

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00601 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles CARTER

NO. 2018-K-1817

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
Oscar DOPICO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 09, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. C2024-13; Presiding Officer's Ruling No. 7]

# AGENCY:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Commission is providing notice that a prehearing videoconference is being rescheduled.

# DATES:

*Live WebEx Videoconference:*                         January 23, 2025, at 10 a.m., eastern daylight time, virtual.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Procedural Schedule

A prehearing videoconference is currently scheduled to be conducted before the Presiding Officer on January 16, 2025, at 10 a.m. Due to the inability of one of the participants to attend, the prehearing videoconference will be rescheduled to Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 10 a.m.

## II. Ruling

1. The prehearing videoconference, scheduled for Thursday, January 16, 2025, is hereby rescheduled to Thursday, January 23, 2025, at 10 a.m..

                    2. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this ruling (or abstract thereof) in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Erica A. Barker,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-01156 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
Loobens JOANEM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1229

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017221EN.01000801.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 April 2017 — flightright GmbH v Iberia Express SA

(Case C-186/17)

(2017/C 221/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: flightright GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Iberia Express SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) also exist in the case where a passenger does not catch a directly connecting flight as a result of a relatively minor delay in arrival, with the result that there is a delay in arrival at the final destination of three hours or more, but the two flights were operated by different air carriers and the booking was made through a tour operator who carried out the booking of the entire flight journey via another air carrier?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
Learonardo TRUSS v. STATE

CR-16-1142

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01159-L Document 6 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01159-L Document 6 Filed 07/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
STATE EX REL. Joseph LEMOINE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2212

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied.
Case 3:04-cv-00969-K Document 50 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 684
Case 3:04-cv-00969-K Document 50 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 685
Case 3:04-cv-00969-K Document 50 Filed 08/30/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 686
Case 3:04-cv-00969-K Document 50 Filed 08/30/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 687