alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3888-3889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00846]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration.

[[Page 3889]]

    Date: February 7, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 
8B, Rockville, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 496-9667, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00846 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-701V

Filed: May 13, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

MATTHEW FORREST KIERZEK, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Mark L. Krueger, Baraboo, WI, for petitioner.

Lara A. Englund, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On May 13, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During 

informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioner’s application. 

Based on these objections, petitioner amends his application for attorneys’ fees and costs to 

$11,181.43. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

be reasonable. In compliance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that he

advanced $19.99 in pursuit of his petition. Accordingly, the court awards:

a. $11,181.43, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The 

award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and 

Krueger & Hernandez, S.C. in the amount of $11,181.43.

b. $19.99, representing petitioner’s out-of-pocket costs. The award shall be in the 

form of a check made payable to petitioner in the amount of $19.99.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 306 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 7722
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 306 Filed 03/26/13 Page 2 of 6 PageID 7723
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 306 Filed 03/26/13 Page 3 of 6 PageID 7724
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 306 Filed 03/26/13 Page 4 of 6 PageID 7725
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 306 Filed 03/26/13 Page 5 of 6 PageID 7726
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 306 Filed 03/26/13 Page 6 of 6 PageID 7727
EXHIBIT
31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Dr.
Thomas E. Sawyer, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brazil Gold Corp. (the
“Registrant”):
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:
 
 a)
            designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
            evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and
 
 c)
            presented
      in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;
 
 5. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 
 a)
            all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
            any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
      controls; and
 
 6. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 Date: May
14, 2010
 
 
 By:           /s/Dr.
Thomas E. Sawyer
 
 Dr.
Thomas E. Sawyer
 Chairman
of the Board/Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and
Secretary
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a Spectrum, Appellant, v. Joseph NEWMAN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
L.S.G. v. STATE

CR-16-0171

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10433 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. G U AD AL U PE M AR TI N EZ , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 06- C R

- 29- 1
B ef ore G A R Z A , D E N N IS, an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to represent G u ad al u pe M art i n ez has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 738 (1967)
. M ar t i ne z ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 12, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-10433 Document: 00511027265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
Case 3:05-cv-00135-L Document 9 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00135-L Document 9 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 18
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00135-L Document 9 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,214
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,400
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,844
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,874
<LOANS>                                        239,797
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,013
<DEPOSITS>                                     287,206
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,925
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,760
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 318,013
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,057
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,119
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   840
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,406
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,406
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,610
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      755
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 30,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,393
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,807
<LOANS-PAST>                                       223
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,923
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      528
<RECOVERIES>                                       150
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,058
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            242
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                            Schedule of Omitted Notes

      The following documents have been omitted as Exhibits to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K because they are on substantially identical terms as Exhibit 10.16
in all material respects other than with respect to the numbers and purchase
prices of shares purchased by each of the executives under the agreements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Interest    
              Agreement                      Amount                 Rate      
-------------------------------------  -----------------    ------------------
<S>                                          <C>                    <C>       
1.    Note between the Company and           $77,260                4.76%     
      Edwin P. Kuhn                                                           
                                                                              
2.    Note between the Company and           $57,950                4.76%     
      James W. George                                                         
                                                                              
3.    Note between the Company and           $57,950                4.76%     
      Michael H. Hinderliter                                                  
                                                                              
4.    Note between the Company and           $57,950                6.01%     
      Timothy L. Doane                                                        
                                                                              
5.    Note between the Company and           $38,640                6.01%     
      Steven C. Lee                                                           
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

AGAPITO PETE MENDOZA §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-05-CV-0042-M 

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SO ORDERED this 26 day of June, 2008. th

_________________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
# C_2017269EN.01001301.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 June 2017 — ‘Varna Holideis’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

(Case C-364/17)

(2017/C 269/18)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Administrativen sad Varna

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Varna Holideis’ EOOD

Applicant:

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Articles 90(1) and 185(1) of Directive 2006/112 (1) to be interpreted as requiring the deduction claimed for input tax on a supply also to be adjusted in a case, such as that in the dispute in the main proceedings, where the legal transaction in respect of which the right to deduct input tax was exercised has been declared null and void by a judgment having legal force or should one, in light of the definition in Article 14(1) of Directive 2006/112, proceed on the basis that there is no supply and the tax claim did not arise in the first place? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Articles 90(1) and 185(1) of Directive 2006/112 (1) to be interpreted as requiring the deduction claimed for input tax on a supply also to be adjusted in a case, such as that in the dispute in the main proceedings, where the legal transaction in respect of which the right to deduct input tax was exercised has been declared null and void by a judgment having legal force or should one, in light of the definition in Article 14(1) of Directive 2006/112, proceed on the basis that there is no supply and the tax claim did not arise in the first place?

1

| 2. | Is Article 185(1) and (2) of Directive 2006/112 to be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of a national provision for the adjustment of deduction claimed in respect of input tax, and in the event of a court decision declaring a legal transaction null and void, the adjustment may be made by direct application of Article 90(1) of the directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 185(1) and (2) of Directive 2006/112 to be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of a national provision for the adjustment of deduction claimed in respect of input tax, and in the event of a court decision declaring a legal transaction null and void, the adjustment may be made by direct application of Article 90(1) of the directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Roque A. Santi,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 15, 2006



/s/ Roque A. SantiRoque A. SantiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Mark                Klein                                                                              |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Mark                Klein                                                                            |
| Title:   Chief                Executive Office, President and Director                           |
|                            (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                                                                                                            |
| Date:                November 19, 2008                                                                          |

----