alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; notice of cancellation of open hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence has been canceled: Evidence Rules Hearing on February 12, 2025.

# DATES:

February 12, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The announcement for this hearing was previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 31, 2024 at 89 FR 61498.                

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: January 13, 2025.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2025-01059 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Kendle International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Karl Brenkert III, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 16, 2006

/s/ Karl Brenkert III
------------------------------
Karl Brenkert III
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kendle International Inc. and will be retained by Kendle
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1309

LEBON BRUCE WALKER, a/k/a Larry Gene Platt; PATRICIA ANNETTE LEE-WALKER, a/k/a Angie Platt, Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, AND/OR ENTITY, et al.; DENNIS COX, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Agent and/or Repo Officer for Toyota Motor Credit Company, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, and/or Entity, et al., Defendants - Appellees, and
PERRY LONDON, Individually and Official Capacity as a Bail Bondsman; LONDON BAIL BONDING INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY COMPANY, London Bonding Agency, Inc., and/or Entity, et al; DENNIS COX, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Bailman and Bounty Hunter, an Agent of London Bail Bonding International Fidelity Company, London Bonding Agency, Inc., and/or Equity, et al.; DENNIS COX, Individually andin His official capacity as a Private Detective, Private Investigator, Agent and Owner of Harford Bureau of Investigation & Process, Ltd., and/or Entity, et al; HARFORD BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS COMPANY, Harford Bureau of Investigations & Process, Ltd., and/or Entity et al., Defendants.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-1629-DKC)
Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lebon Bruce Walker, Patricia Annette Lee-Walker, Appellants Pro Se. Michael N. Russo, Jr., FERGUSON, SCHETELICH, HEFFERNAN & MURDOCK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Francis Joseph Gorman, GORMAN & WILLIAMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court order denying their motions for entry of default, to lift stay, and for partial summary judgment; dismissing their claims for damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985(3) and 1986 (1988); granting Toyota Motor Credit Company's motion to dismiss; partly granting Dennis Cox's motion to dismiss; and staying other aspects of the case pending discovery. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
T.B. v. LEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160543

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017 Reh. denied November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1228 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1041, K2025-1040.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00787 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-10860 Summary Calendar

BARBARA SANDERSON, As Next Friend of Brandi Sanderson,

a Minor; SONIA JIMENEZ Plaintiffs - Appellants

VERSUS

ANSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; MIKE BROWN, Principal of Anson High School, Anson, Texas

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

(1:95-CV-086-C) April 10, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1 High school seniors who confessed to shoplifting whi le on a school-sponsored trip were disciplined by the principal. They were

not allowed to participate in graduation ceremonies (but did receive their diplomas), not allowed to participate in a senior awards ceremony and in another school-sponsored trip, and one was
removed from her posit ion as a class officer. The students sued2

the principal and the s chool district in state court alleging
violations of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of
the United States Constitution and resultant causes of action under
§ 1983, and a defamation claim un der Texas state law. After removal, the district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)6.
The students appeal and we affirm essentially for the reasons
stated by the district court. The students have failed to state
either a property or a liberty interest in mere participation in school ceremonies or extra-curricular activities or in holding a position as a class officer.
Before this Court, the students advance for the fir st time equal protection claims. We do not address claims such as these
raised for the first time on appeal. G off v. Taylor , 812 F.2d 931, 933 (5th Cir. 1987). The state law defamation claim against the principal and the
district were properly dismi ssed as they are immune under Texas
law. Jones v. Houston Ind. School Dist. , 979 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir.
1992).

AFFIRMED.
S.H. and C.H. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160975

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TROY ROBINSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 116 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SOUTHERNHERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

**FORM 10-QSB**

**Quarterended March 31, 2005**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, J. Lee Stewart, certifythat:

 

1)             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Heritage Bancshares, Inc.

 

2)             Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofmaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period by this quarterly report;

 

3)             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in the quarterly report;

 

4)             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31,2005 (the “Evaluation Date”);

 

c)             presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and

 

d)            disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5)             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing equivalent function):

 

a)             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 
| /s/ J. Lee Stewart |   |
|--------------------|--------|
| J. Lee Stewart     |
| President          |
| May 17, 2005  |

 

----
Charles David STODDARD v. Rita STODDARD

2160819

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 21, 2017

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00799]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 15, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1240 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1040, K2025-1039.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00799 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EX PARTE SEALED CASE

In re: Sealed Case

CR-15-0762

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

Mand. pet granted in part and denied in part.
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Derek Ward, the President, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the year ended December 31, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Derek WardName:Derek WardTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:February 13, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**SOUTHERN
      HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


***SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Heritage Bank (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Lee
      Stewart, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
                J. Lee StewartJ.
                Lee StewartPresidentNovember
                15, 2006
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 213 

To prohibit the use of Federal financial assistance for a certain high-speed 

rail development project in the State of California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2025 

Mr. KILEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal financial assistance for a 

certain high-speed rail development project in the State 

of California, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PROVISION OF FEDERAL FI4 NANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR CERTAIN HIGH5 SPEED RAIL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 

6 No Federal financial assistance may be provided to 

7 the State of California for a high-speed rail corridor devel8 opment project that is the same or substantially similar 

9 to the project that is the subject of Cooperative Agreement 

10 No. FR–HSR–0118–12–01–01 entered into between the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 213 IH

1 California High-Speed Rail Authority and the Federal 

2 Railroad Administration. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 12, 2005



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs IIChief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.



26
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 20879 and # 20880; MONTANA Disaster Number MT-20014]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Crow Nation (FEMA—4847-DR), dated November 14, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storm and Straight-line Winds.                    

# DATES:

Issued on January 8, 2025.

*Incident Period:*                         August 6, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         February 28, 2025.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         August 14, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street                               ( print page 6042)                            SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the Crow Nation, dated November 14, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to February 28, 2025.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2025-01071 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P