alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.15

             Schedule of Omitted Management Subscription Agreements

      The following documents have been omitted as Exhibits to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K because they are on substantially identical terms as Exhibit 10.14
in all material respects other than with respect to the numbers and purchase
prices of shares purchased by each of the executives under the agreements.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 Agreement                                 # of Shares 
-----------------------------------------------           ------------- 
<S>                                                          <C>    
1.  Management Subscription Agreement                               
      between the Company and Edwin P. Kuhn                  15,452 
                                                                    
2.  Management Subscription Agreement                               
      between the Company and James W. George                11,590 
                                                                    
3.  Management Subscription Agreement                               
      between the Company and Michael H.                            
      Hinderliter                                            11,590 
                                                                    
4.  Management Subscription Agreement                               
      between the Company and Timothy L.                      7,727 
      Doane                                                         
                                                                    
5.  Management Subscription Agreement                               
      between the Company and Steven C. Lee                   3,864 
</TABLE>
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Allied Security Holdings LLC (the‘‘Company’’) for the quarter endedMarch  31,  2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), William C. Whitmore, Jr., asChief Executive Officer of the Company, and William A. Torzolini, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ William C. Whitmore, Jr.Name:William C. Whitmore, Jr.Title: President, Chief Executive Officerand            Chairman of the Board of ManagersDate:May 15, 2006

/s/ William A. TorzoliniName:William A. TorzoliniTitle: Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate: May 15,2006

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 19, 2006



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs II Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

***SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

*** ***

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Heritage Bancshares, Inc.(the «Company») on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the «Report»), I, Steven W. Ledbetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Steven  W. Ledbetter |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Steven W.  Ledbetter     |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2005   |

 

----
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 114 Filed 06/28/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 375
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 114 Filed 06/28/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 376
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices 

# Order

October 26, 2010

139101

JAMES PLAGGEMEYER and RUTH PLAGGEMEYER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 139101 COA: 284016 Muskegon CC: 07-045215-NI THOMAS LEE, SUSAN LEE, and RYAN E. LEE, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 26, 2009, the appli cation for leave to appeal the May 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pending the decision in
McCormick v Carrier (Docket No. 136738). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 31, 20 10, 487 Mich ___ (2010 ), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the Muskegon Circuit Court and REMAND

this case to the Musk egon Circuit Court for reconsiderat ion of the defendants’ motion for summary disposition regarding whether plain tiff James Plaggemeyer sustained a serious impairment of body function in light of McCormick . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remainin g question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

C ORRIGAN

, J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the order remanding for reconsideration under McCormick v Carrier, 487 Mich ___ (2010), because the majority opinion in McCormick altered the criteria for determining whether an injured plaintiff meet s the serious impairment threshold in MCL 500.3135(7). But I reiterate my disagreement with the McCormick majority’s analysis for the reasons expressed in Justice M ARKMAN ’s dissent in that case, which I joined. I

continue to conclude that the McCormick majority misinterpreted MCL 500.3135(7), thusI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

1018 2

encouraging litigation that is expressly prohibited by the mo tor vehicle no-fault insurance act and upsetting the Legislature’ s clear intent to provide Mi chigan citizens with timely, automatic benefits for injuries sustained in auto accidents while avoiding costly, unnecessary litigation.

Y OUNG , J. ( concurring ).

Although I recognize that this Court’s decision in McCormick v Carrier , 487 Mich ___ (2010), now controls when a person may recover in tort for non-economic loss under the no-fault act, I continue to adhere to the position stated in Justice M ARKMAN ’ S dissenting opinion in that case, which I joined.
Exhibit 10.45





August 26, 2010


EXTENSION N3 TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF AUGUST 1, 2004





By and between Siberian Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and David Zaikin (“Employee”) entered into this 26th day of August, 2010, and made effective as of July 1, 2010.





WHEREASthe Company and the Employee previously signed the Employment Agreement, which stated the term of employment to start on August 1, 2004 and to end on December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), and subsequent extensions for the year 2009 and for six months of 2010 till June 30, 2010;





AND WHEREAS the Company and the Employee wish to further extend the term of the employment agreement;





NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the Company and the Employee agree as follows:





Point 4 “Term” of the employment Agreement to be revised and the term of the Agreement to be extended until December 31, 2010 (the “Extended Term”).





Point 5.1 “Compensation” of the employment Agreement to be revised and annual salary of the Employee to be stated as US$180,000.





Point 6 “Stock Option” of the employment Agreement is to be removed. A new Stock Option agreement will be entered into between the Company and the Employee upon the resolution of the Board of directors of the Company.





All other provisions of the Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2004 shall remain in full force and effect until the expiration of the Extended Term.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.




EMPLOYEE
COMPANY/s/ David Zaikin
/s/ Elena PochapskiDavid Zaikin,
Elena Pochapski71 Woodchester Crt,
CFOThornhill, ON, L4J 7V6
Siberian Energy Group Inc.Canada
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 Equity Office Properties Trust
Statement of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands) For the years ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Income before income taxes, allocation to minority interests, income from
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and gain on sale of real
estate
    
    $
    108,243
    
    
    $
    429,493
    
    
    $
    632,032
    
    
    $
    482,547
    
    
    $
    419,821Plus Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    835,385
    
    
    
    819,730
    
    
    
    809,033
    
    
    
    727,253
    
    
    
    521,746Capitalized interest
    
    
    4,648
    
    
    
    10,089
    
    
    
    20,466
    
    
    
    23,537
    
    
    
    14,277Loan amortization cost
    
    
    15,337
    
    
    
    6,976
    
    
    
    4,964
    
    
    
    15,170
    
    
    
    11,344Fixed charges
    
    
    855,370
    
    
    
    836,795
    
    
    
    834,463
    
    
    
    765,960
    
    
    
    547,367Plus amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    2,708
    
    
    
    2,043
    
    
    
    1,636
    
    
    
    1,226
    
    
    
    1,026Plus distributed income of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    
    66,829
    
    
    
    87,624
    
    
    
    149,224
    
    
    
    82,409
    
    
    
    63,942Less capitalized interest
    
    
    (4,648
    )
    
    
    (10,089
    )
    
    
    (20,466
    )
    
    
    (23,537
    )
    
    
    (14,277
    )Less minority interest in pretax income of subsidiaries that have not
incurred fixed charges
    
    
    (3,954
    )
    
    
    (2,193
    )
    
    
    (2,345
    )
    
    
    (2,333
    )
    
    
    (768
    )Total
    
    
    60,935
    
    
    
    77,385
    
    
    
    128,049
    
    
    
    57,765
    
    
    
    49,923Earnings
    
    $
    1,024,548
    
    
    $
    1,343,673
    
    
    $
    1,594,544
    
    
    $
    1,306,272
    
    
    $
    1,017,111Fixed charges
    
    $
    855,370
    
    
    $
    836,795
    
    
    $
    834,463
    
    
    $
    765,960
    
    
    $
    547,367Earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.9
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No.'s
333-59281 and 333-64389) of our report dated February 19, 1999 on our audits of
(i) the consolidated financial statements of L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and for the nine months ended December 31, 1997, and (ii) the
combined financial statements of the Predecessor Company for the three months
ended March 31, 1997, and for the year ended December 31, 1996, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As indicated in our report, our
opinion insofar as it relates to the financial statements of Communications
Systems Division included in the combined financial statements of the
Predecessor Company for the year ended December 31, 1996 is based solely on the
report of other auditors.




                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




New York, New York
March 25, 1999
# C_2018408EN.01003101.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/31

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Dirk Harms and Others v Vueling Airlines SA

(Case C-601/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 8(1) - Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight - Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought - Included))

(2018/C 408/40)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Dirk Harms, Ann-Kathrin Harms, Nick-Julius Harms, Tom-Lukas Harms, Lilly-Karlotta Harms, Emma-Matilda Harms

Defendant: Vueling Airlines SA

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, and in particular Article 8(1)(a) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that the price of the ticket to be taken into consideration for the purposes of determining the reimbursement owed by the air carrier to a passenger in the event of cancellation of a flight includes the difference between the amount paid by that passenger and the amount received by the air carrier, which corresponds to a commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between those two parties, unless that commission was set without the knowledge of the air carrier, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

---
C.L. v. D.B. and S.F.

2160661

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017347EN.01000701.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 10 July 2017 — Andreas Fabri, Elisabeth Mathes v Sun Express Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-418/17)

(2017/C 347/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Andreas Fabri, Elisabeth Mathes

Applicants:

Defendant: Sun Express Deutschland GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a change in reservation to another flight constitute a situation covered by Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

  If the first question is to be answered in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a change in reservation to another flight constitute a situation covered by Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

1

If the first question is to be answered in the affirmative:

| 2. | Must that provision also be applied to a change in reservation which was not instigated by the air carrier, but by the tour operator alone? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must that provision also be applied to a change in reservation which was not instigated by the air carrier, but by the tour operator alone?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91; OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
David I. EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2991

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**McDonald v. State*, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; *Epps v. State*, 100 So. 3d 689 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (table decision); *Epps v. State*, 75 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); *Doby v. State*, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Epps v. State*, 976 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (table decision); *Valdez-Garcia v. State*, 965 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Brown v. State*, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; *Pleas v. State*, 41 So. 3d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ; *Lykins v. State*, 894 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ; *Harris v. State*, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ; *Thomas v. State*, 778 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; *Bloodworth v. State*, 504 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Case 4:05-cv-00444-A Document 20 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 97
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00444-A Document 20 Filed 12/29/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 98
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00444-A Document 20 Filed 12/29/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 99
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00444-A Document 20 Filed 12/29/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 100
AGREEMENT



AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into this 24th day of June, 2003 by and between International Equity Partners, and On Guard Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation. 

RECITALS

1.Whereas, International Equity Partners has entered into a Sales Representative Agreement with ECSI International, Inc., and; 

Whereas On Guard Systems, Inc. wishes to acquire the rights of International Equity Partners in the ESCI International, Inc. Agreement and; 

Whereas International Equity Partners is willing to assign their position in the contract with ECSI International, Inc.,

Now therefore it is hereby agreed as follows;

a.International Equity Partners hereby assigns all of their right, title and interest in the Agreement of December 5, 2002 between International Equity Partners and ECSI International, Inc., to On Guard Systems, Inc.

b.In consideration, thereof, On Guard Systems, Inc. agrees to pay International Equity Partners the sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) USD, within thirty (30) days of On Guard Systems, Inc.'s merger or acquisition by Guideline Capital, Inc. and to issue one million (1,000,000) shares of On Guard Systems, Inc.'s common stock to International Equity Partners simultaneous with the payment of the above sum.

 

By:/s/ Ernest J. Wesson

        Ernie Wesson, President

        On Guard Systems, Inc.

By:/s/ Samuel Higgins

        Samuel Higgins, Managing Director

        International Equity Partners
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth C.
Donahey, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To the best of my knowledge information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: October 27, 2005

                               /s/ Kenneth C. Donahey
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Kenneth C. Donahey
                               Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Case 3:05-cv-01088-L Document 11 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 61
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01088-L Document 11 Filed 08/24/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 62
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6447
STANLEY GORDON GOODE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusRONALD JONES, Superintendent, Piedmont Correctional Institute; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-412-3-MU) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Gordon Goode, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Goode v. Jones , No. CA-96-412-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED