alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II             
|                        |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II                 
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 16 PageID 2
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 3 of 16 PageID 3
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 4 of 16 PageID 4
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 5 of 16 PageID 5
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 6 of 16 PageID 6
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 7 of 16 PageID 7
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 8 of 16 PageID 8
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 9 of 16 PageID 9
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 10 of 16 PageID 10
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 11 of 16 PageID 11
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 12 of 16 PageID 12
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 13 of 16 PageID 13
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 14 of 16 PageID 14
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 15 of 16 PageID 15
Case 3:05-cv-01558-L Document 1 Filed 08/05/05 Page 16 of 16 PageID 16
Exhibit 13.1





Certification of Periodic Financial Report



Pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the annual report of RBS Holdings N.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2015, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code.



Idzard van Eeghen, Chairman of the Managing
Board, and Cornelis Visscher, Chief Financial Officer of RBS Holdings N.V., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
                                         Act; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RBS Holdings N.V.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2016



|    |                      
|--- | ---------------------
|By: | /s/ Idzard van Eeghen
|    | Name:                
|    | Title:               



|    |                      
|--- | ---------------------
|By: | /s/ Cornelis Visscher
|    | Name:                
|    | Title:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Raul HERNANDEZ-RODRIQUEZ, Appellee.

No. 1D18-949

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S OF AL O MAT E S E B R OWN, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. J A M E S D . H A R T L E Y , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 17118 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 2 1 6 - F C DGG H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia F r a nk C . D a m r e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner S ofal o M at es e B row n app ea l s f rom the di stri ct court ’ s deni alof hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4 h abea s pet i t i on . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU N 6 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17118 2 B r o w n c o n te n d s th a t th e s ta te p r o s e c u to rin h is c r im in a l tr ia l d e n ie dh is co n st i tu t i o n al ri g h t s t o du e p ro cess an da fai r tri al b y i n t i m i d at i n g a d efen se w i tn ess w h o ch o se n o tt o t est i fy. T he C a l i f

orni aC ourtof

A ppe a l ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tthe r e w a s no prosec ut ori alm i sc on du ctw as no tcontraryt o, or an un re as on abl e app l i cat i on of, c l e a r l ye s t abl i s he d f

e de r a l l a w a s de t e rm i ne d bythe S upr e m e C ourt , a nd w a s not b a s e do n a n u n r e a s o n ab le d e te rm in a tio n o f th e f a c ts . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(d); P e nr yv . J ohns on , 5 3 2 U .S . 7 8 2 , 7 9 2 - 9 3 ( 2 0 0 1 ) . W e co n stru e th e i n cl u si o n o f an u n cert i fi edi ssu e i n th e o p en i n g b ri ef as a m o tio n to e x p a n dth e c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility . See 9 th Ci r . R. 2 2 - 1 ( e ) . So c o n s tru e d , th e m o tio n is d e n ie d . Se e Hi v ala v . W ood , 1 9 5 F .3 d1 0 9 8 , 1 1 0 4 - 0 5 ( 9 th C i r. 19 99 ) ( per c uri am ). K a th le e n C . P a g e ’s m o tio n to w ith d r aw a s B r o w n ’s c o u n s e l is g r an te d . W e c ons true B r ow n’ s l e tt e rda t e d D e c e m be r31, 2010, a s am ot i on f orappoi ntm e ntof ne w c ouns e l , a nd de nythe m ot i on. AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J Roland Vetter, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: May
14, 2010
 
 
 
 
 By:           /s/J
Roland Vetter
 J Roland
Vetter
 Chief
      Financial Officer/Principal Financial Officer, principal accounting
      officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DALE DEVON SCHEANETTE, 999440 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-1936-P

)

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF DISCIPLINARY )

COUNSEL and GARY NATION, )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 16 day of December 2005. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01936-P Document 8 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77
EX PARTE Tommy Lee PATE

CR-16-1337

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Jerome Paul SHERIDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2580

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Danielle Renee Rufai, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Jerome Paul Sheridan's post-sentencing motion to withdraw his plea. *See**Powell v. State* , 929 So.2d 54, 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, EDWARDS, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Vernon B. PORTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.1**

**SOUTHERNHERITAGE BANCSHARES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

***SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Southern Heritage Bank (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, J. Lee Stewart, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ J. Lee Stewart |   |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|
| J. Lee Stewart     |   |   |
| President          |   |   |
| May 15, 2007       |   |   |

 

----
Jana Marie Lindner MCCAFFERY v. Joe Ann Young LINDNER

NO. 2019-C-0140

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.
Tommy SPAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-161

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 02, 2019

Tommy Span, Miami, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion for postconviction relief in Lake County Circuit Court Case No. 1973-CF-122. We affirm the trial court's order and caution him that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE Kevin D. MILLER

(In re: Kevin D. Miller v. City of Dothan and City of Dothan Personnel Board)

2170182

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Eva Electris CANNIE aka Ava Electris Cannie aka Eve Helene Cannie, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 13, 2019

Eva Electris Cannie, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*452The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Jeffrey DOLAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-0151

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018042EN.01000202.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/2

---

Appeal brought on 3 August 2017 by Morton’s of Chicago Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 May 2017 in Case T-223/15: Morton’s of Chicago v EUIPO

(Case C-468/17 P)

(2018/C 042/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Morton’s of Chicago Inc. (represented by: J. Moss, Barrister, M. Krause, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Mortons the Restaurant Ltd

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 13 December 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Michael T. LIVORSI, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Peter M. BLAKELEY and Amy Blakeley, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0087

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Dismissed.
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 49 

Designating the week beginning February 3, 2025, as ‘‘National Tribal 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2025 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. DAINES, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

BENNET, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. 

HIRONO, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KELLY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. MORAN, Mr. ROUNDS, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. 

SCHATZ, Mr. SHEEHY, Ms. SMITH, and Ms. WARREN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning February 3, 2025, as 

‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 34 Tribal Colleges and Universities operating on more than 90 campuses in 16 States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are tribally chartered or federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the 

Federal Government; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities serve students from 

more than 230 federally recognized Indian Tribes; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities offer students access to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural tradiVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:37 Jan 30, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR49.ATS SR49

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 49 ATS 

tions and values, including indigenous languages, 

which— 

(1) enhances Indian communities; and 

(2) enriches the United States as a Nation; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities provide access to 

high-quality postsecondary educational opportunities 

for— 

(1) American Indians; 

(2) Alaska Natives; and 

(3) other individuals that live in some of the most 

isolated and economically depressed areas in the United 

States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are accredited institutions of higher education that prepare students to succeed in the global and highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities have open enrollment policies and enroll Native and non-Native students; 

and 

Whereas the collective mission and the considerable achievements of Tribal Colleges and Universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning February 3, 

3 2025, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities 

4 Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups to observe National Tribal Colleges 

7 and Universities Week with appropriate activities 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 49 ATS 

1 and programs to demonstrate support for Tribal 

2 Colleges and Universities. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

FORMS 2 AND 3 PREP SHEET

Below is a list of the questions and information needed to complete Forms Two and Three. Please use this 

sheet to help gather necessary Form Two and Three information before you sit down to file the forms. Forms 

Two and Three will become available at the time of the test. Only those filers who have previously submitted 

Form One for the current test cycle will be able to submit Forms Two and Three in ETRS.

Form Two

Did this facility receive the EAS test message?

• Yes

• No

Did this facility retransmit the EAS test message to the public?

• Yes

• No

Form Three

From which source(s) did this facility receive the EAS test message?

Identify the source from which this facility first received the EAS test message.

Date and Time of Receipt of First Message

Receipt Time Zone

Language(s) of EAS Message Receipt

Receipt Other Language

Received without complications 

• True 

• False

Receipt Equipment configuration issues

• True 

• False

Receipt Software out-of-date

• True 

• False

Receipt Equipment failure

• True 

• False

Receipt Audio quality issue

• True 

• False

Receipt User error

• True 
2

• False

Receipt Other

Receipt Explanation (open text field)

Date and Time of Retransmission of EAS Test Message

Retransmission Time Zone

Language(s) of EAS Message Retransmission

Retransmission Other Language

Retransmission without complication

• True 

• False

Retransmission Equipment configuration issues

• True 

• False

Retransmission Software-out-of-date

• True 

• False

Retransmission Equipment failure

• True 

• False

Retransmission User error

• True 

• False

Retransmission Other

Retransmission Explanation (open text field)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 21 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 21

   Establishing deadlines for the Joint Committee of Congress on the 
Library to approve or deny the statue of the Reverend William Franklin 
  ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., for placement in the National Statuary Hall.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2021

  Mr. Tillis submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Establishing deadlines for the Joint Committee of Congress on the 
Library to approve or deny the statue of the Reverend William Franklin 
  ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., for placement in the National Statuary Hall.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library shall approve or 
deny--
            (1) the full-sized clay model and pedestal design of a 
        statue of the Reverend William Franklin ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., 
        not later than 30 days after the State of North Carolina 
        submits to the Architect of the Capitol photographs of the 
        model from all 4 sides, the dimensions of the statue and 
        pedestal, engineering drawings of the pedestal, the anticipated 
        weight of the completed statue and pedestal, and the text of 
        any proposed inscriptions; and
            (2) the completed statue of the Reverend William Franklin 
        ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., not later than 30 days after the State 
        of North Carolina submits to the Architect of the Capitol 
        photographs of the completed statue and pedestal from all 4 
        sides, the dimensions of the statue and pedestal, the final 
        weight of the statue and pedestal, and the text of any 
        inscriptions.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Edward Dwight COLEMAN

1160789 (CR-16-0447)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NetSol Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Boo-Ali Siddiqui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: July 28, 2011





/s/ Boo-Ali Siddiqui


Boo-Ali Siddiqui,


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting Officer
S. Con. Res. 26 Agreed to January 10, 2022

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed 

to transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall 

of the Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the Capitol so 

that such catafalque may be used in connection with services to 

be conducted there for the Honorable Harry Mason Reid, Jr., a 

Senator from the State of Nevada. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.