alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 1 of 27 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 2 of 27 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 3 of 27 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 4 of 27 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 5 of 27 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 6 of 27 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 7 of 27 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 8 of 27 PageID 8
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 9 of 27 PageID 9
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 10 of 27 PageID 10
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 11 of 27 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 12 of 27 PageID 12
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 13 of 27 PageID 13
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 14 of 27 PageID 14
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 15 of 27 PageID 15
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 16 of 27 PageID 16
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 17 of 27 PageID 17
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 18 of 27 PageID 18
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 19 of 27 PageID 19
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 20 of 27 PageID 20
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 21 of 27 PageID 21
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 22 of 27 PageID 22
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 23 of 27 PageID 23
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 24 of 27 PageID 24
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 25 of 27 PageID 25
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 26 of 27 PageID 26
Case 3:03-cv-02671-H Document 1 Filed 10/31/03 Page 27 of 27 PageID 27
#### Aileen Mikesell and Her Husband, Bert Mikesell, *Appellants,*v. I. E. Morley and Alice K. Morley, His Wife, *Appellees.*

Division A.

Decision Filed July 8, 1927.

Petition for Rehearing Denied October 14, 1927.

*H. D. Wentworth,*for Appellants;

*S. S. Sandford,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised if its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
# C_2018328EN.01002101.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 July 2018 — European Commission v Combaro SA

(Case C-574/17) (1)

((Appeal - Customs union - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Article 239 - Remission of import duties - Import of linen fabrics from Latvia between 1999 and 2002 - Special situation - Supervision and monitoring obligations - Corruption alleged of the customs authorities - Inauthentic movement certificate - Mutual trust))

(2018/C 328/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: European Commission (represented by A. Caeiros and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Combaro SA (represented by: D. Ehle, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 19 July 2017, Combaro v Commission (T-752/14, EU:T:2017:529); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 19 July 2017, Combaro v Commission (T-752/14, EU:T:2017:529);

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by Combaro SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by Combaro SA;

| 3. | Orders Combaro SA to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Combaro SA to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.

---
Case 3:05-cv-00215-L Document 15 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 91
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00215-L Document 15 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 92
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00215-L Document 15 Filed 05/30/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 93
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4(e)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                          THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY
                              EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN
                          (EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1994)

                  The Lincoln Electric Company, an Ohio corporation, hereby
adopts this Amendment No. 2 to The Lincoln Electric Company Employee Savings
Plan (Effective November 1, 1994).

                                       I.

                  Effective as of July 1, 1995, Section 1.1(17) of the Plan is
hereby amended by (i) deleting the words "or provisional" and (ii) restating
clause (b) thereof to read as follows:

         "(b) prior to July 1, 1995, any Employees of the Harris Calorific
         Division of the Company."

                                       II.

                  Effective as of November 1, 1994, Section 12.2 of the Plan is
hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

         "12.2 Costs and Expenses. The costs and expenses incurred in connection
         with the administration of the Plan and Trust Fund shall be paid from
         the Trust Fund; provided, however, that the Company, in its absolute
         discretion, may elect at any time to pay part or all thereof directly,
         but any such election shall not bind the Company as to its right to
         elect with respect to the same or other expenses at any other time to
         have such expenses reimbursed or paid from the Trust Fund."

                  EXECUTED at Cleveland, Ohio, this 19th day of June, 1995.

                                     THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY

                                      By: /s/ Harry Carlson
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Title: Vice Chairman

                                      And /s/ Frederick G. Stueber
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Title: Secretary
Isaac E. ABRAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3028

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 259 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 259

    To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit certain 
 advertising with respect to the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

    Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Ogles, and Mr. Harris of 
  Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit certain 
 advertising with respect to the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Funding for Illegal Migrant 
Billboards Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ADVERTISING WITH RESPECT TO THE 
              IMMIGRATION DETENTION OMBUDSMAN.

    Section 405 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 205) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Advertisement.--The Secretary may not obligate or expend any 
funds to advertise to the general public, by billboard or otherwise, 
the office or functions of the Ombudsman.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2006


/S/ Bryan Kenyon
--------------------------------------
Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.25

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                   1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

The Santa Fe International Corporation 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was
adopted effective June 1, 1997, is hereby amended effective November 17, 1998 as
follows:

1.   The current Section 1.3 Administration is hereby AMENDED by ADDING to the
     end of the section the following sentence:

     "Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may delegate to any agent
     such duties or powers, both ministerial and discretionary with respect to
     the interpretation or administration of the Plan as it deems appropriate,
     except that the Committee shall retain exclusive authority to determine
     both the grant of awards under the Plan and the terms and conditions of
     such awards, and excepting further that any dispute arising from any such
     interpretation or administration shall be determined by the Committee in
     its sole and absolute discretion."


Dated:  November 17, 1998




By:     /s/ JOE BOYD
   --------------------------------------------
        Santa Fe International Corporation
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELSON ARMANDO FOLGAR,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 72794

Agency No. A094

- 290

- 134

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Immigration Judge

Submitted July 14, 2020 * *

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Nelson Armando Folgar , a native and citizen of Honduras

, petitions for

review of an immigration judge’s (“I J”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen. Perez v. Mukasey , 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2008).

We dismiss in part and deny in part the pe tition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 23 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 72794

We lack jurisdiction to consider Folgar’s contention that his proposed

particular social group is based on a familial relationship because he failed to raise

the issue before the IJ

. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir.

2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not prese nted to the agency).

Assuming the IJ had the authority to reopen proceedings

, she did not abuse

her discretion in denying Folgar ’s untimely motion to reopen where h e failed to

establish prima facie eligibility for relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 3(b)(2); Ramirez

Munoz v. Lynch , 816 F.3d 1226, 1228

- 29 (9th Cir. 2016) ( denying motion to

reopen for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought).

Folgar does not challenge the IJ’s determination that there was no

jurisdiction to reopen his initial removal proceedings or the IJ’s denial of sua

sponte reopening

. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir.

1996) (issues not specifically rai sed and argued in a party’s opening brief are

waived).

Folgar ’s motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 1) is denied as

moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

.
# C_2018328EN.01001001.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 July 2018 — Société des produits Nestlé SA v Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-84/17 P), Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Société des produits Nestlé SA (C-85/17 P), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd, Société des produits Nestlé SA (C-95/17 P)

(Joined Cases C-84/17 P, C-85/17 P and C-95/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Three-dimensional mark representing the shape of a four-fingered chocolate bar - Appeal directed against the grounds - Inadmissibility - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(3) - Evidence of distinctive character acquired through use))

(2018/C 328/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Société des produits Nestlé SA (represented by: G.S.P. Vos, advocaat, and S. Malynicz QC) (C-84/17 P), Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd (represented by: T. Mitcheson QC and J. Lane Heald, Barrister, instructed by P. Walsh, J. Blum and C. MacLeod, Solicitors) (C-85/17 P), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent) (C-95/17 P)

Other parties to the proceedings: Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd (represented by: T. Mitcheson QC and J. Lane Heald, Barrister, instructed by P. Walsh and J. Blum, Solicitors), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent) (C-84/17 P), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Société des produits Nestlé SA, (represented by: G.S.P. Vos, advocaat, and S. Malynicz QC) (C-85/17 P), Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd (represented by: T. Mitcheson QC and J. Lane Heald, Barrister, instructed by P. Walsh and J. Blum, Solicitors), Société des produits Nestlé SA (represented by: G.S.P. Vos, advocaat, and S. Malynicz QC) (C-95/17 P)

Interveners in support of the appelant in Case C-84/17 P: European Association of Trade Mark Owners (MARQUES) (represented by: M. Viefhues, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders Société des produits Nestlé SA, European Association of Trade Mark Owners (MARQUES), Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Société des produits Nestlé SA, European Association of Trade Mark Owners (MARQUES), Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 6.6.2017, p. 4.

OJ C 161, 22.5.2017, p. 9.

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Lin Wen, being the Secretary and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Shineco, Inc., certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005.		    - Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made and is not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and		      - Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this quarterly report.		        - The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:		          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;			
- Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of his/her quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and			     Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;			
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):		
- All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and			                     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and			
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.		
			Dated: August 24,2005			                                                                                                            /s/ Lin Wen                                                                                                             Lin Wen
# C_2017269EN.01003501.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/35

---

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — Fair deal for expats and Others v Commission

(Case T-713/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 269/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 428, 21.11.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric Donsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








OCCULOGIX, INC.Date:   May 14, 2009
By:
/s/ Eric DonskyChief Executive Officer
Freddie W. COGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 16, 2019

Freddie W. Coger, South Bay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*259AFFIRMED. *See**Nielson v. State* , 984 So.2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

EDWARDS, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF
CALAMOS HOLDINGS LLC
    1.
    
    Amendment. Section 2.06 of the Limited Liability Company Agreement is hereby
amended to remove Calamos Capital LLC.2.
    
    Reaffirmation. In all other respects the Limited Liability Company Agreement
remains the same and in full force and effect.3.
    
    Effective Date. This Amendment No. 2 shall become effective as of the date
first written above (the Effective Date). On and after the Effective Date of this
Amendment No. 2, each reference in the Limited Liability Company Agreement to this
Agreement, hereunder, hereof, or words of like import referring to the Limited
Liability Company Agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Limited Liability Company
Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2.4.
    
    Governing Law. The validity and construction of this Amendment No. 2 shall
be determined and governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Delaware without
regard to conflict of laws principles.
  CALAMOS ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
    
    CALAMOS FAMILY PARTNERS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ James S. Hamman, Jr.
    
    By:
    
    /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.James S. Hamman, Jr.
EVP, General Counsel & Secretary
    
    
    
    John P. Calamos, Sr./s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.John P. Calamos, Sr.