alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22

- 0018

__________________________________________________________________

S.W. , a minor, by and through her

Guardian, Jeffrey Ferguson,

Plaintiff and Appellee

,

- vs

State of Montana, by and through the

Montana Department of Public Health and

Human Services,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________ _________

On Appeal for the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County

Cause No. DDV 13

- 813(b)

Honorable Elizabeth A. Best

__________________________________________________________________

Order Granting Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time

__________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the authority granted under Rule 26(2), M.R.App.P., Appellee’s

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Appellee has received an

extension of sixty days, through and including September 6, 2022, within which to

file Appellee’s Response Brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 23 2022

06/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0018
# Fourth Court **of Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 

August 24, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00110

- CV

IN RE GREAT PLAINS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CI19936 Honorable Donna S. Rayes , Jud ge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant

, American General Life Insurance Company 's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant's Reply Brief is due October 8 , 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a ffixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of August, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 12.2  I,
Alexey V. Kornya, certify that:  1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mobile TeleSystems OJSC;  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.The
companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the
companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.The
companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 26, 2009
  /s/ ALEXEY V. KORNYAAlexey V. KornyaActing Chief Financial Officer
EX PARTE Raymond Dennis EARL

CR-16-0856

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
_ US. DIST R'CT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FELED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF THXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION
CLERK, US. DISTRICT COURT

JANIE ROCHA, § Lr

Plaintiff, ;
v. ; 2:04-CV-0324
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ;
Commissioner of Social Security, §

Defendant. ;

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,
REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER,
and REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

Came for consideration plaintiff's appeal of the decision of the Commissioner of Social
Security denying plaintiff disability benefits. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a
Report and Recommendation on March 6, 2008, recommending therein that the decision of the
Commissioner be reversed and the case remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative
action. On March 13, 2008, defendant gave notice that he does not object to the decision made
in the Report and Recommendation.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of
the record in this case. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s administrative decision finding
plaintiff not disabled is REVERSED, and the decision is REMANDED to the Commissioner for

further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to all action specified and recommended to be taken



on remand.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

ENTERED this L/ 7 day of WH: MME 2008.

UNITED STA TES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 9 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 9

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   prohibiting the United States Government from increasing its debt 
 except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the 
                 membership of each House of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

   Mr. McClintock (for himself and Mr. Weber of Texas) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   prohibiting the United States Government from increasing its debt 
 except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the 
                 membership of each House of Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The United States Government may not increase its debt 
except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the 
membership of each House of Congress.
    ``Section 2. This article shall take effect beginning ten years 
after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Scott D. Kaplan,
Chief Executive Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 11, 2011



/s/ Scott D. KaplanName: Scott D. KaplanTitle: Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2018032EN.01001001.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/10

---

Order of the Court of 23 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Geocycle Bulgaria’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

(Case C-314/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Principles of fiscal neutrality and effectiveness - Reverse charge regime - Refusal to allow the recipient of an invoice to deduct input VAT - Decision of the tax authorities establishing a tax payable by the recipient of goods))

(2018/C 032/14)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Geocycle Bulgaria’ EOOD

Applicant:

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The principles of fiscal neutrality and effectiveness of the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing to allow the recipient of a supply to deduct input value added tax, where, with respect to the same transaction, value added tax is collected a first time from the provider of the goods or service, since he included it on the invoice he issued, then a second time from the purchaser, in situations in which national legislation does not provide for the possibility of adjusting the value added tax where there is a tax adjustment notice.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0618 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ANDREW DAVID LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 5 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 3 2024

03/04/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0618
D'Miya MADISON v. Gray C. BUCK III

1160035

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 94 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 94

 To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a 
              major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a 
              major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF 
              PAKISTAN AS A MAJOR NON-NATO ALLY.

    (a) In General.--Effective beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act--
            (1) the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as 
        a major non-NATO ally pursuant to section 517(a)(1) of the 
        Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321k(a)(1)) or any 
        other provision of law is hereby terminated; and
            (2) the President may not issue a separate designation of 
        the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally 
        pursuant to section 517(a)(1) of such Act or any other 
        provision of law unless the President submits to Congress a 
        certification described in subsection (b).
    (b) Certification.--A certification described in this subsection is 
a certification that contains a determination of the President that--
            (1) Pakistan continues to conduct military operations that 
        are contributing to significantly disrupting the safe haven and 
        freedom of movement of the Haqqani Network in Pakistan;
            (2) Pakistan has taken steps to demonstrate its commitment 
        to prevent the Haqqani Network from using any Pakistani 
        territory as a safe haven;
            (3) the Government of Pakistan actively coordinates with 
        the Government of Afghanistan to restrict the movement of 
        militants, such as the Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-
        Pakistan border; and
            (4) Pakistan has shown progress in arresting and 
        prosecuting Haqqani Network senior leaders and mid-level 
        operatives.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018083EN.01001001.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/10

---

Appeal brought on 11 September 2017 by Josel, SL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2017 in Case T-333/15: Josel v EUIPO — Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland

(Case C-536/17 P)

(2018/C 083/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Josel, SL (represented by: J. Güell Serra, abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland BV

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 17 January 2018 the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Fernando Sotelo Ruiz, Appellant

No. 06-19-00190-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11494-

CR). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Fernando Sotelo Ruiz, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 9, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Henry MURRY v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

2160681

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes these appeals are suitable for **

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOHAMMAD SALAMEH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

PETER CARLSON; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Nos. 08-56040 

 08-57068

D.C. No. 2:98-cv-08493-SVWMLG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Mohammad Salameh, a federal prisoner who is currently housed in

Colorado, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment following a bench trial

in his Bivens action alleging defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by

FILED

JUL 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-57068

using excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo the district court’s legal conclusions and review for clear error its findings

of fact. Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 793 (9th Cir. 2003). 

We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s award of costs to a

prevailing party. Save Our Valley v. Sound Transit, 335 F.3d 932, 944 n.12 (9th

Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err when it made credibility determinations

and concluded, based on those findings, that defendant Swanson did not use

excessive force when transferring Salameh. See Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1,

7 (1992) (the core judicial inquiry in an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim

is whether the “force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore

discipline, or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm”). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Salameh’s motion

to re-tax costs after considering Salameh’s financial situation and his ability to pay

awarded costs. See Save Our Valley, 335 F.3d at 944-45.

Salameh’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3228-3229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group, Population 
Sciences Study Section.
    Date: March 6, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child 
Health and Human Development, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Christiane M. Robbins, Scientific Review Branch, 
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, NIH, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Rm 2121B, Bethesda, MD 
20817, 301-451-4989, [email protected].

[[Page 3229]]

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 8, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00602 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**In connection withthe Annual Report of Scheid Vineyards, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Thomsen,the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:**

 

**(1)****                                 ****TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and**

 

**(2)****                                 ****Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.**

 
|   | */s/**Michael S. Thomsen* |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Michael S. Thomsen        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |
|   | March 29, 2004       |

 

 

***A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.***

** **

----