alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Cameron Robb, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of On4 Communications,
      Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of On4 Communications, Inc.                                                                

Dated: September 19, 2011

| | /s/ Cameron Robb                                                   
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Cameron Robb                                                       
| | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)                                      
| | On4 Communications, Inc.                                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to On4
Communications, Inc. and will be retained by On4 Communications, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

FREDERICK WEATHERSPOON, )

ID # 03059920, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-1958-D

)

DALLAS COUNTY JAIL, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of

the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED August 15, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01958-D Document 11 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 40
Sandra Efigenia NADAL HIDALGO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Carmine MARCENO, Sheriff of Lee County, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 96

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2025

    Mr. Babin (for himself and Ms. Lofgren) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $18,617,085 for the One 
Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $9,228,599 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $9,388,486 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 129

  To abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Ms. Boebert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abolish the ATF Act''.

SEC. 2. ABOLISHMENT OF THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND 
              EXPLOSIVES.

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is hereby 
abolished.
                                 <all>
```
Holly BRASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4171

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018301EN.01001101.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/11

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 June 2018 — Windrush Aka LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Jerry Dammers

(Case C-325/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Word mark The Specials - Genuine use - Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark))

(2018/C 301/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Windrush Aka LLP (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, instructed by S. Britton, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents), Jerry Dammers (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister, instructed by C. Fehler, Solicitor)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Windrush Aka LLP shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Windrush Aka LLP shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Sherry McKinzey, CFO of Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011. 
 
 The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Delta Seaboard International, Inc. and results of its operations.




Date:  May 13, 2011


Sherry McKinzey


CFO


/s/ Sherry McKinzey
# C_2018328EN.01001301.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Aviabaltika’ UAB v ‘Ūkio bankas’ AB, in liquidation

(Case C-107/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2002/47/EC - Enforcement of financial collateral arrangements - Commencement of insolvency proceedings against the collateral taker - Occurrence of the enforcement event - Inclusion of the financial collateral in the assets remaining after the insolvency - Obligation to satisfy the claims primarily from the financial collateral))

(2018/C 328/14)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant:‘Aviabaltika’ UAB

Respondent:‘Ūkio bankas’ AB, in liquidation

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 4(5) of Directive 2002/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral arrangements, as amended by Directive 2009/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009, must be interpreted as requiring Member States to adopt rules which enable a taker of collateral provided under a security financial collateral arrangement to recover its claim, arising from a failure to discharge the relevant financial obligations, from that collateral, where the enforcement event occurs after insolvency proceedings have been commenced against that taker. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 4(5) of Directive 2002/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral arrangements, as amended by Directive 2009/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009, must be interpreted as requiring Member States to adopt rules which enable a taker of collateral provided under a security financial collateral arrangement to recover its claim, arising from a failure to discharge the relevant financial obligations, from that collateral, where the enforcement event occurs after insolvency proceedings have been commenced against that taker.

| 2. | Article 4(1) and (5) of Directive 2002/47, as amended by Directive 2009/44, must be interpreted as not requiring the taker of collateral provided under a security financial collateral arrangement to recover its claim, arising from a failure to discharge the financial obligations covered by that arrangement, primarily from that collateral. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 4(1) and (5) of Directive 2002/47, as amended by Directive 2009/44, must be interpreted as not requiring the taker of collateral provided under a security financial collateral arrangement to recover its claim, arising from a failure to discharge the financial obligations covered by that arrangement, primarily from that collateral.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

---
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ming
Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.








Date:   October
      15,2009
            By:
            /s/ Ming
      Fen LiuMing
      Fen LiuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Thomas Brent STARKEY v. STATE

CR-16-0340

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 49 9

. SARKI S A GASARKI SI AN AND THE BEST J EW ELRY M ANUFACTURI N G COMPANY, I NC. v . KHADELA JAGD I S H K U M A R J IV A R

AV BHAI , D/ B/ A FI VE STAR DI A M OND, LL C

. , E T A L

. Up o n co n s i d erat i o n o f t h e Ap p el lan t s ’ Mo ti o n t o Rem an d t h e ab o v e s t y l ed

cas e, th e s am e i s h ereb y GRANTED. Cas e i s Rem an d ed to t h e t ri al co u rt u n t i l s u ch

t i m e as t h e reco rd i s p rep ared an d co m p l et e, at wh i ch t i m e t h e p art i es m ay refi l e

t h e No t i ce o f Ap p eal s u ch t h at t h e cas e can b e red o ck et ed i n t h is Co u rt

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/19/2016 January 19, 2016
#### Board of Public Instruction of Gilchrist County, Florida, *Appellant,*v. The State of Florida, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 5, 1928.

*L. P. Williams*and *W. 8. Broome,*for Appellant;

*J. C. Adkins,*State Attorney, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been .seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and.the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20697

Conference Calendar

 

ARTHUR E. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY THOMAS, Sheriff, Harris County; 

BILLY RAY KELLEY; DEPUTIES & 

JAILERS, SEVERAL; LAWARANCE HAYES; 

ROBERT M. FENLON,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. H-01-CV-129

--------------------

February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arthur E. Johnson, Texas prisoner #1047508, has filed an

appeal following the district court’s dismissal of his pro se 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to prosecute, the denial of

his FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) motion, and the denial of his motion to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the district court. 

Johnson’s notice of appeal is timely only as to the district

court’s denial of the motion to proceed IFP in the district
No. 01-20697

-2-

court. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A); United States v.

Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985). Johnson does not

argue that the district court erred in denying his motion to

proceed IFP, and he has therefore waived the only issue on

appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993).

This appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. See Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The dismissal of this appeal counts as one strike for purposes of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387

(5th Cir. 1996). Johnson is warned that if he accumulates three

strikes he will be barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action

or appeal brought in a United States court unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel is

DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED;

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 17, 2008



| |     |                                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID J. CURD                    
| |     | David J. Curd
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated: September 8, 2009   /s/ Tristan R. Pico Tristan R. Pico Chief Executive Officer Parks! America, Inc.    /s/ Jon Laria Jon Laria Chief Financial Officer Parks! America, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parks! America, Inc. and will be retained by Parks! America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. Brian Lowell FRAZIER

No. 2018-KP-1287

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 
| /s/ Kenneth U. Kuk                                                             | Date:  November 14, 2005 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |                     |

                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG America Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.