alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

BETTY J. MURPHY §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:05-CV-020-Y

 §

JO ANNE B. BARNHART §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 27, 2005, the United States magistrate judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings”) in

the above-styled and -numbered cause. In his findings, the magistrate

judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration of the United States (“the Commissioner”)

denying plaintiff Betty J. Murphy’s claim for disability insurance and

supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. The magistrate

judge’s order gave all parties until October 18 to serve and file with

the Court written objections to his proposed findings. 

Subsequently, the plaintiff filed her objections, asking this

Court to reject the findings of the magistrate judge. The defendant

did not file a response.

After carefully reviewing the findings, record, case law, and

Plaintiff’s objections, the Court concludes that the findings should

be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this

Court for the reasons stated therein.

Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED October 27, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00020-Y Document 22 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24I0235. ALESIA R. WATSON, et al. v. NIGEL NEMBHARD, et al.

Inthis civil action, plaintiffs filed an application for interlocutory review seeking

to challenge the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint and compelling

arbitration. We denied the application. The plaintiffs, however, have moved this

Court to reconsider, arguing that the trial court dismissed the entire action belowand

they are entitled to a direct appeal.

Orders completely dismissing actions are final orders within the meaning of

OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) and may be appealed directly. See Buckner-Webb v. State, 314

Ga. 823, 827 (2) (a) (878 SE2d 481) (2022). It appears from the application materials

that the trial court’s order is a final order disposing of all parties and claims in this

case. We will grant an otherwise timely interlocutory application if the lower court’s

order is subject to direct appeal and the applicant has not otherwise filed a notice of

appeal. See Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n.1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004).

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion for reconsideration and VACATE our

July 9, 2024 order. The plaintiffs’ application is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs may

file a notice of appeal within 10 days of the date of this order if they have not already

done so. If Plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal in the state court, they need not file

a second notice. The clerk of the state court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this

order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

August 02, 2024
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/02/2024
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and

c) disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 17, 2006



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Robert V. Johnson        
|Robert V. Johnson            
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)



36
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 13 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 13

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2025.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Chair.
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Cole, Chair.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Chair.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Arrington, Chair.
    Committee on Education and Workforce: Mr. Walberg, Chair.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Guthrie, Chair.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Hill of Arkansas, Chair.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Mr. Mast, Chair.
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. Green of Tennessee, Chair.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Jordan, Chair.
    Committee on Natural Resources: Mr. Westerman, Chair.
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mr. Comer, Chair.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Babin, Chair.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Williams of Texas, Chair.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Graves, Chair.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Bost, Chair.
    Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. Smith of Missouri, Chair.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0336 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSEPH DEAN PAULEY,

Defendant and Appellant

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 24 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 18 2023

10/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0336
Willie COX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4830

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350), the undersigned, Joseph Skeehan, Chief Executive Officer of JMG Exploration, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 6th day of August 2008.   JMG EXPLORATION, INC.  /s/   Joseph Skeehan Name: Joseph Skeehan Title: Chief Executive Officer
Maria COLEGAS, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.


Date:   October
      16, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Ming
      Fen LiuMing
      Fen LiuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Case 3:04-md-01627-D Document 5 Filed 03/24/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:04-md-01627-D Document 5 Filed 03/24/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:04-md-01627-D Document 5 Filed 03/24/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:04-md-01627-D Document 5 Filed 03/24/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:04-md-01627-D Document 5 Filed 03/24/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 18
# C_2022340EN.01002901.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — Tartu Agro v Commission

(Case T-150/20) (1)

(State aid - Agriculture - Lease contract for agricultural land in Estonia - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Determination of the market price - Private operator principle - Complex economic assessments - Judicial review - Taking into account of all relevant factors - Duty of care)

(2022/C 340/37)

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Applicant: Tartu Agro AS (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: T. Järviste, T. Kaurov, M. Valberg and M. Peetsalu, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and E. Randvere, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 252 final of 24 January 2020 on State aid SA.39182 (2017/C) (ex 2017/NN) (ex 2014/CP) — Alleged illegal aid to AS Tartu Agro.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 252 final of 24 January 2020 on State aid SA.39182 (2017/C) (ex 2017/NN) (ex 2014/CP) — Alleged illegal aid to AS Tartu Agro; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 252 final of 24 January 2020 on State aid SA.39182 (2017/C) (ex 2017/NN) (ex 2014/CP) — Alleged illegal aid to AS Tartu Agro;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Tartu Agro, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Tartu Agro, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 25.5.2020.

---
# C_2016350EN.01002401.xml

| 26.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/24

---

Action brought on 29 July 2016 — Sensi Vigne & Vini v EUIPO — El Grifo (CONTADO DEL GRIFO)

(Case T-434/16)

(2016/C 350/30)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sensi Vigne & Vini Srl (Lamporecchio, Italy) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: El Grifo, SA (San Bartolomé de Lanzarote, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘CONTADO DEL GRIFO’ — Application for registration No 12 097 416

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2016 in Case R 2218/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside EUIPO’s decision of 25 May 2016 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside EUIPO’s decision of 25 May 2016 in its entirety;

| — | uphold the present action, ruling on the substance of the case in favour of registration of EU Trade Mark No 12 097 416, filed on 28 August 2013 in Class 33; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present action, ruling on the substance of the case in favour of registration of EU Trade Mark No 12 097 416, filed on 28 August 2013 in Class 33;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of those before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of those before EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, C. Lourenço Gonçalves, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Flag Intermediate Holdings Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ C. LOURENÇO GONÇALVES                                  
|                     |  |     |  | C. Lourenço Gonçalves President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

ORIENT-EXPRESSHOTELS LTD.

 

Section 1350Certification

 

The undersigned herebycertify that this report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periodspresented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in thereport.

 
| /s/  Paul M. White        |   | /s/  Martin O’Grady         |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| Paul  M. White            |   | Martin  O’Grady             |
| President  and            |   | Vice  President—Finance and |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |   | Chief  Financial Officer         |
|                      |   |                             |
|                      |   |                             |
| Dated: June 18, 2010 |   |                             |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten certification has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and willbe retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Fourth Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2] 

## Background

The Commission instituted this review on June 3, 2024 (89 FR 47610, June 3, 2024) and determined on September 6, 2024, that it would conduct an expedited review (89 FR 84932, October 24, 2024).

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on January 3, 2025. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5576 (January 2025), entitled                     *Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 3, 2025.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioners Jason E. Kearns and Rhonda K. Schmidtlein not participating.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-00254 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P