alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 23 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 23 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 23 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 23 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 23 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 23 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

IN RE:

TOMMY’S FORT WORTH, LLC, et al.,

1

Debtors. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

Case No. 24-90000-elm11 

(Jointly Administered) 

DECLARATION OF IAN R. SHAPIRO IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO DEBTORS’ 

EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENFORCE AUTOMATIC STAY AND PUNITIVE 

DAMAGES FOR WILLFUL VIOLATIONS OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY 

I, Ian R. Shapiro, make this declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and state: 

1. I am a partner at the law firm Cooley LLP, counsel for Malibu Boats, Inc. and Malibu Boats, 

LLC (jointly, “Malibu”) in the above-captioned bankruptcy proceedings. 

2. This Declaration is submitted in support of the response by Malibu Boats, Inc. and Malibu 

Boats, LLC (“Malibu Boats”) to Debtor’s Emergency Motion to Enforce Automatic Stay and 

Punitive Damages for Willful Violations of the Automatic Stay against Malibu Boats, Inc. 

and Malibu Boats, LLC [ECF 107] (the “Motion”). 

3. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a November 9, 2023 letter (sent via email) from Malibu’s General Counsel, Matthew Googe, to Tommy’s Boats. 

 

1 The Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Tommy’s Fort 

Worth, LLC (3473); Tommy’s Holding Company, LLC (2662); Tommy’s Grand Rapids, LLC (9224); Tommy’s Castaic, LLC (7501); Tommy’s 

Lewisville, LLC (4750); High Country Watersports, LLC (6160); Walloon Lake Village Marina, LLC (0277); MKB Florida Holdings, LLC (5698); 

Tommy’s Detroit, LLC (5242); Tommy’s California Fresno, LLC (8597); Tommy’s Phoenix, LLC (3036); Tommy’s Las Vegas, LLC (7721); 

Tommy’s Chattanooga, LLC (0839); Tommy’s California Ventura, LLC (5149); Tommy’s Rancho Cordova, LLC (1070); Tommy’s Stockton, 

LLC (1338); and Tommy’s Knoxville, LLC (8052).

Case 24-90000-elm11 Doc 127 Filed 06/06/24 Entered 06/06/24 12:25:09 Desc

Main Document Page 1 of 2
 - 2 - 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct according to the best 

of my knowledge, information, and belief. 

Dated: June 6, 2024 

 /s/ Ian R. Shapiro 

 Ian R. Shapiro 

Case 24-90000-elm11 Doc 127 Filed 06/06/24 Entered 06/06/24 12:25:09 Desc

Main Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, 

created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Dated: April 14, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:04-cv-02309-M-BF Document 51 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 195
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Lee HEARD, Jr.

NÒ. 2018-KO-2022

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 3 Filed 04/07/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1208

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,416.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH GEORGE, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein 

LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK BERKOWITZ, BRIAN A. COMACK. 

 RICHARD LOUIS BRIDGE, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. 

Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

PATRICK E. BRENNAN. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Steven
      R. Delcarson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.





*Dated:
                May 12, 2008*
            *By:*
            */s/
                Steven R. Delcarson**Steven
                R. Delcarson**Chief
                Executive Officer*





I,
      Charles M. Caporale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.




*Dated:
                May 12, 2008*
            *By:*
            */s/
                Charles M. Caporale**Charles
                M. Caporale**Chief
                Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
                Officer*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Anthony Eugene ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3844

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Bennet P. Lientz, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Innovative Card
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005            By  /s/ Bennet P. Lientz, Jr.
                              Bennet P. Lientz, Jr.
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                                      |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                      |   |
| Date:       January 23, 2009 |   | /s/      Charles A. Josenhans             |   |
|                              |   | Charles      A. Josenhans                 |   |
|                              |   | Interim      Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                              |   | (Principal Financial      Officer)   |   |

----

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1211-1212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

[[Page 1212]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 571 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1029, K2025-1028.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00064 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2017112EN.01001902.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 18 January 2017 — Catlin Europe SE v O.K. Trans Praha spol. s.r.o.

(Case C-21/17)

(2017/C 112/28)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Catlin Europe SE

Appellant:

Applicant in the original proceedings: O.K. Trans Praha spol. s.r.o.

Applicant in the original proceedings:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure to be interpreted to the effect that a failure to notify the addressee of the possibility of refusing to accept the documents to be served, as provided for under Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (3) (‘the Service of documents Regulation’), gives grounds for a right on the part of the defendant (the addressee) to apply for review of the European order for payment under Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (‘the European order for payment Regulation’)?

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 399, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2007 L 324, p. 79.

2

(3)  OJ 2000 L 160, p. 37.

3

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00792]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 15, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1233 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1050, K2025-1049.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00792 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2018104EN.01004101.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/41

---

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — QG v Commission

(Case T-845/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain professional football clubs - Preferential tax rate applied in connection with corporate tax - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market - No interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 104/53)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: QG (represented by: L. Ruiz Ezquerra, R. Oncina Borrego, I. Sobrepera Millet and A. Hernández Pardo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 4046 final of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.29769 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Spain for certain football clubs.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate is dismissed.

| 2. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 3. | There is no longer any need to rule on the applications to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no longer any need to rule on the applications to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona.

| 4. | QG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

QG shall pay the costs.

| 5. | QG, the European Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

5.

QG, the European Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

1

---
# C_2021490EN.01003901.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Setarcos Consulting v EUIPO (Blockchain Island)

(Case T-523/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Blockchain Island - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 490/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Setarcos Consulting ltd. (Sliema, Malta) (represented by: S. Stafylakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2020 (Case R 2806/2019-5), regarding an application for registration of the word sign Blockchain Island as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Setarcos Consulting ltd. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Setarcos Consulting ltd. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.

---
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

LSC Communications, Inc. 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan 

Each director shall receive (A) an annual cash retainer (a “Cash Retainer”) and (B) an annual equity retainer (an “Equity
Retainer”) to be paid in the form of a grant of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) each on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as described further below and pursuant to the Company’s Performance Incentive
Plan in effect on such date (the “Plan”). 
  

	1)	Cash Retainer. 

  

	 	a)	Each director shall be entitled to a Cash Retainer equal to $90,000. 

  

	 	b)	Any director in a leadership role shall be entitled to an additional Cash Retainer in the applicable amount described in the table below: 


 

					
	 Lead Director
	  	$	62,500	  
	 Chairman of the Audit Committee
	  	$	25,000	  
	 Chairman of the Human Resources Committee
	  	$	25,000	  
	 Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee
	  	$	20,000	  

  

	2)	Equity Retainer. 

  

	 	a)	Each director shall be entitled to an Equity Retainer equal to $135,000. 

  

	 	b)	The Lead Director shall be entitled to an additional Equity Retainer equal to $62,500. 

  

	 	c)	The number of shares granted shall be calculated pursuant to the terms of the Plan and shall be rounded down to the nearest share. 

  

	 	d)	RSUs will vest and be payable on the first anniversary of the grant date, but will be payable in full on the earlier of (i) the date the director ceases to be a Director of the Company and (ii) a Change in
Control (as defined in the Plan). 

  

	 	e)	Dividend equivalents on the RSUs issued hereunder are deferred, credited with interest quarterly at the same rate as five-year U.S. government bonds and paid out in cash at the same time the corresponding portion of the
award becomes payable. 

  

	 	f)	The Company shall make payment of the RSUs in Company common stock. 

  

	3)	General. 

  

	 	a)	If any director joins the Board on a date other than the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting, then a pro-rata portion of each of the applicable Cash Retainer and Equity Retainer from the date joined to the next
Annual Meeting date shall be granted; provided, however, that any director of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (“RRD”) who joins the Board in connection with the spin-off of the Company from RRD shall not be entitled to such pro-rata
portion of the Cash Retainer or Equity Retainer. 

  

	 	b)	Each director is expected to comply with the terms of any stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors that are established by the Company, as in effect from time to time. 


  
 Effective as of
October 1, 2016