alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 10 PageID 54
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 10 PageID 55
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 3 of 10 PageID 56
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 4 of 10 PageID 57
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 5 of 10 PageID 58
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 6 of 10 PageID 59
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 7 of 10 PageID 60
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 8 of 10 PageID 61
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 9 of 10 PageID 62
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00277-C Document 13 Filed 06/22/05 Page 10 of 10 PageID 63
Chilita GRAY v. CRESTWOOD HEALTHCARE, LP

2160940

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 228 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 228

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and adjust for 
          inflation the above-the-line deduction for teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and adjust for 
          inflation the above-the-line deduction for teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 
              SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(a)(2)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$1000''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 62(d)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2025'',
            (2) by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$1000'', and
            (3) by striking ``calendar year 2014'' and inserting 
        ``calendar year 2024''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
Maryellen VERSCHLEISER, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-162

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Deonta LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-443

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Economic Forecast: January 2017

16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 2015 2016 2017 2018

National Income and Product Accounts (Chained 2009$)

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 0.8 1.4 3.5 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9

 Personal Consumption Expenditures 1.6 4.3 3.0 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.9 2.4 2.1

 Residential Fixed Investment 7.8 -7.7 -4.1 10.2 4.4 2.0 2.5 2.8 3.7 4.2 4.1 3.5 13.1 1.2 2.9 3.9

 Business Fixed Investment -3.4 1.0 1.4 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.6 0.8 0.4 2.7 2.7

 Government Consumption & Investment 1.6 -1.7 0.8 1.5 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.8 -0.5 1.1 1.2 1.2 2.2 0.5 0.6 0.7

Billions of Chained 2009$

 Net Exports -566 -559 -522 -570 -588 -608 -637 -655 -664 -673 -694 -710 -540 -554 -622 -685

 Change in Business Inventories 41 -10 7 22 31 44 54 51 48 47 50 51 84 15 45 49

Price Indices

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

GDP Price Index 0.5 2.3 1.4 1.6 1.4 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.5 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.4

Consumer Price Index -0.3 2.5 1.6 3.4 2.7 2.9 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.0 0.4 1.8 2.5 2.1

Consumer Price Index excl. Food & Energy 2.7 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.4 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0

Employment

Unemployment Rate (Percent) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.5

Employment, Total Nonfarm (% Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4) 1.9 1.3 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.1

Interest Rates (Percent)

Federal Funds Rate 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.3

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 0.3 0.6 1.3 1.8

10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.8 2.6 2.8

January 10, 2017

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from December 30, 2016.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic and Strategic Research

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating 

Fannie Mae's business prospects or expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend 

on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided 

in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. 

The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views 

of Fannie Mae or its management.

 --------------- 2016 --------------- --------------- 2017 --------------- --------------- 2018 ---------------
Gene Hinton FOLDS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-87

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JAMES A. PETTY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0120-D

v. §

§ 

SOCIAL SECURITY §

ADMINISTRATION, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the

opinion that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct and

are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. 

It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed

March 8, 2005, is denied. 

SO ORDERED.

May 17, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00120-D Document 27 Filed 05/17/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 2

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2025.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that Mike Johnson, a Representative from the 
State of Louisiana, has been elected Speaker; and that Kevin McCumber, a citizen 
of the State of Illinois, has been elected Clerk of the House of Representatives 
of the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      54,724,484              55,531,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,582,815               9,551,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,324,191               6,263,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            91,175,100              74,638,777
<PP&E>                                     442,180,977             446,028,178
<DEPRECIATION>                             (50,314,383)            (62,601,105)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             541,142,004             522,503,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       64,782,939              29,335,554
<BONDS>                                    344,740,630             338,195,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                      10
<OTHER-SE>                                (132,870,876)           (120,606,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               541,142,004             522,503,855
<SALES>                                     78,947,025              92,950,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,645,202             185,588,917
<CGS>                                       25,583,482              29,029,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,492,432              47,877,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,856,576              13,932,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          57,199,458              50,996,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (26,903,264)             72,781,926
<INCOME-TAX>                               (25,000,000)             38,000,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,903,264)             34,781,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,903,264)             34,781,926
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Amergent Hospitality Group, Inc. Case No.: 24−42483−mxm11

 Chapter No.: 11

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cody Hoesly, to represent Ore

3810 D Street LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, related to document 139, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Signed November 1, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

____________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 24-42483-mxm11 Doc 141 Filed 11/01/24 Entered 11/01/24 15:51:33 Desc

Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH
FLOWS AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY OF SCHEID VINEYARDS INC. FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
IN FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      761
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,159
<PP&E>                                          27,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,494
<BONDS>                                         17,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,869
<SALES>                                         18,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,870
<CGS>                                            6,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,733
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,277<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,456
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<FN>
<F1>INCOME TAX EXPENSE INCLUDES A ONE-TIME DEFERRED TAX CHARGE OF $1,390 FOR CHANGE
FROM S-CORPORATION TO C-CORPORATION STATUS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 46 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to prioritize the timely 

processing of certain long-form applications in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Phase II auction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BERGMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to 

prioritize the timely processing of certain long-form applications in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Phase 

II auction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Broadband Win5 dow of Opportunity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to level the playing field 

8 for service providers participating in the Rural Digital OpVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:48 Jan 28, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H46.IH H46

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 46 IH

1 portunity Fund that are disadvantaged by short construc2 tion seasons. 

3 SEC. 3. APPLICATION PROCESSING PRIORITIZATION. 

4 With respect to the long-form applicants of the Rural 

5 Digital Opportunity Fund Phase II auction provided for 

6 in the Report and Order in the matter of Rural Digital 

7 Opportunity Fund and Connect America Fund adopted by 

8 the Federal Communications Commission (in this section 

9 referred to as the ‘‘Commission’’) on January 30, 2020 

10 (FCC 20–5), the Commission shall prioritize the timely 

11 processing of long-form applications and any subsequent 

12 paperwork (in this section referred to as the ‘‘applica13 tions’’) submitted by the long-form applicants as follows: 

14 The Commission shall prioritize the timely processing of 

15 applications which are proposing to provide service in geo16 graphic areas which the Commission determines to have 

17 the shortest construction seasons (such as in areas charac18 terized by long winters with heavy snowfall). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
2nd Quarter 2007 ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Robert V. Johnson        
|Robert V. Johnson            
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)

April 16, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 8 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 8

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
       provide certain line item veto authority to the President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

   Mr. McClintock (for himself and Mr. Weber of Texas) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
       provide certain line item veto authority to the President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. In approving and signing a bill or joint resolution 
that is presented under section 7 of article I, the President may 
reduce an appropriation in such bill or joint resolution, and such bill 
or joint resolution shall become law with such reduction incorporated.
    ``Section 2. If the President reduces an appropriation under 
section 1 of this article--
            ``(1) not later than 10 days after the date of such 
        reduction, the President shall notify the House of 
        Representatives and the Senate of such reduction;
            ``(2) the House of Representatives and the Senate may 
        consider disapproval of such reduction; and
            ``(3) if two-thirds of each House votes to disapprove of 
        such reduction, the amount of the appropriation in law subject 
        to such reduction shall be treated as returned to the amount 
        originally presented to the President under section 1.''.
                                 <all>
```
B.T.S. v. STATE EX REL. P.L.S.

2170026

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

Dismissed.
Greg A. DEICHMANN, Sr. v. Mark A. MOELLER

NO. 2019-C-0162

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

*602Denied.
# C_2016251EN.01004601.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/46

---

Action brought on 30 May 2016 — Viridis Pharmaceutical v EUIPO — Hecht-Pharma (Boswelan)

(Case T-276/16)

(2016/C 251/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viridis Pharmaceutical (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hecht-Pharma GmbH (Hollnseth, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Boswelan’ — European Union trade mark No 3 381 563

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 February 2016 in Case R 2837/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it rejects the applicant’s appeal against the declaration of the revocation of European Union trade mark No 003381563 in relation to ‘medicinal products for the treatment of multiple sclerosis’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it rejects the applicant’s appeal against the declaration of the revocation of European Union trade mark No 003381563 in relation to ‘medicinal products for the treatment of multiple sclerosis’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the mark;

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Proper reasons for non-use of the mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Proper reasons for non-use of the mark;

| — | Infringement of Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009, in particular infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009, in particular infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

---