alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EDGAR EUGENE SMALL, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:04-CV-0464-K

)

KEITH HOTTLE, Administrator, Texas )

Board of Pardons and Paroles, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making the independent review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that

the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they

are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

Signed this 12th day of December , 2005.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00464-K Document 19 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 95
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PRB GAS TRANSPORTATION, INC.**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connectionwith this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB GasTransportation, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, I,Robert W. Wright, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PRB GasTransportation, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       ThisForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in this Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006,fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the periods presentedtherein.

 
| Date: May 15, 2006                   |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| /s/  ROBERT W. WRIGHT      |   |
|                                 |
|                                 |
| Robert W. Wright                     |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)        |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**PRB GAS TRANSPORTATION, INC.**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB GasTransportation, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, I,William P. Brand, Jr, Vice President of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc.,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       This Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in thisForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofPRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the periods presented therein.

 

Date:March 22, 2006

 
| /s/  WILLIAM P.  BRAND, JR.                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William P. Brand, Jr.Vice President-Finance  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. R AFAEL RIOS-B ARR

AZA, a .k.a . R a fa , De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 15-10200

D.C . No. 2:13-c r-00066-NVW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Ne il V. W ake , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 26, 2016 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , C ANB Y, a n d C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. R a fa e l R ios-B arra z a a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 78-m onth se nte nc e for posse ssion with inte nt to distribute

m e tha m phe t am ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a )(1), (b)(1)(A). Pursuant to Ande rs v . C a lifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), R ios-B arra z a ’ s 

# FIL ED AUG 01 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d R ios-B arra z a the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. R ios-B arra z a

wa ive d his right to a

ppe a l his c o nvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to P e n son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se eid. at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 5 - 1 0 2 0 0 2
ELECTRONIC RECORD

11 HO -/g

COA # 14-14-00702-CR OFFENSE: Indecency with a Child

STYLE: Patrick Dale Earvin v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed -th TRIAL COURT: 177in District Court

DATE: July 7, 2015 Publish: No TC CASE #:1357121

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Patrick Dale Earvin vThe State of Texas

CCA#

APPBLLAHT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

CCA Disposition: lfl/Omf£_ tl¥fmt

DATE:

JUDGE:

DATE: lljtVfas SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: hP. OUAssd^- PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
EX PARTE Jimmie Edward PARKER

1160855 (CR-15-0871)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Nicole FRISARD, Appellant, v. Bruce Leon BROWN, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2481

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

Michael R. Yokan, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Garry W. Crews of The Law Offices of Ronald E. Sholes, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED. *See**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee* , 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

Roberts, Ray, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard W. Jackson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Great American Family Parks, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



May 22, 2006



/s/ Richard W. Jackson



Richard W. Jackson

Chief Financial Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.2  


 
 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    
    





        In connection with the amended Annual Report of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian Louis Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







	(1)
	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	(2)
	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 










	 	 	/s/  IAN LOUIS MURRAY      
 Ian Louis Murray

Chief Financial Officer

July 23, 2003













QuickLinks


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
# C_2019044EN.01000501.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Tratave — Tratamento de Águas Residuais do Ave SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-672/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Taxable amount - Reduction - Principle of fiscal neutrality))

(2019/C 44/06)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tratave — Tratamento de Águas Residuais do Ave SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of neutrality as well as Articles 90 and 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that the reduction of the taxable amount for value added tax (VAT), in the event of non-payment, cannot be made by the taxable person until it has given prior notice of its intention to cancel all or part of the VAT to the purchaser of goods or services, if that purchaser is a taxable person, for the purposes of correcting the deduction of VAT that the latter has made.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
EX PARTE Mitchell Bernard JOHNSON

1160790 (CR-15-1442)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      John
      A. Ward, III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of Innovative Card Technologies,
      Inc.




Dated:
                August 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ John
                A. Ward, IIIJohn
                A. Ward, IIIChairman
                and CEO




I,
      Bennet
      P. Tchaikovsky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Innovative Card Technologies,
      Inc.




Dated:August
                14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Bennet
                P. TchaikovskyBennet
                P. TchaikovskyChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Innovative Card
      Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1


 





AGREEMENT OF EXCHANGE


 





This Agreement for Exchange
(the "Agreement") is entered into effective September 19, 2016 by and between Xenetic Biosciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation
("XBIO") and SynBio, LLC ("SBL").


 


WHEREAS, SBL is the holder of in excess of
nine hundred seventy thousand shares of XBIO common stock;


 


WHEREAS, for reasons related to the proposed
up listing of XBIO onto the NASDAQ Markets Exchange, XBIO wishes to exchange nine hundred seventy thousand shares of its newly
created Series A Preferred Stock as defined in the attached certificate of designation (the "SOS Certificate") for the
return and cancellation of nine hundred seventy thousand shares of SBL's XBIO common stock;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.                 
SBL agrees to exchange nine hundred seventy thousand shares of its XBIO common stock for nine hundred seventy thousand shares
of XBIO's Series A Preferred Stock on a one for one basis (the "Conversion Amount") and XBIO agrees to issue to SBL nine
hundred seventy thousand shares of its newly created Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for nine hundred seventy thousand shares
of XBIO common stock held by SBC.


 


Upon receipt of SBL's share certificate
for nine hundred seventy thousand shares of XBIO common stock (or more) along with instructions to the Company's transfer agent
to cancel those shares, XBIO shall file the SOS Certificate with the Secretary of State of Nevada creating the Series A


 


Preferred Stock, and instruct its transfer
agent to issue to SBL a certificate for nine hundred seventy thousand shares of that Preferred Stock.


 


	Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.	SynBio, LLC
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:/s/ M. Scott Maguire	By: /s/ Sergey Avtushenko
**EXHIBIT 18.1**

November 17, 2005 

Board of Directors 

ECCCapital Corporation 

As stated in note M to the condensed consolidated financial statements of ECC Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries (the“Company”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for amortization of deferred loan fees and costs. Specifically, the Company amortized deferred loans fees and costs related to itsheld-for-investment loan portfolio over the contractual life of the individual loans using the effective yield method through the period ended June 30, 2005. Upon prepayment of any loan, the unamortized fees and costs were charged againstinterest income. The Company’s held-for-investment loan portfolio comprises a large number of similar loans for which prepayments are probable and can be estimated. Due to the anticipated prepayment patterns of its loan portfolio, managementbelieves it preferable to amortize deferred fees and costs over the life of the held-for-investment loan portfolio using the effective yield method in a manner that anticipates prepayments as permitted by paragraph 19 of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 91,*Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases*. Amortizing fees and costs in a manner that anticipates prepayments will result ina more ratable allocation of interest income over the life of the components of the Company’s held-for-investment loan portfolio. 

Management believesthe newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it better matches the loan fees and costs with the expected life and benefit periods of the loans. At your request, we have reviewed and discussed with management thecircumstances, business judgment, and planning that formed the basis for making this change in accounting principle. 

It should be recognized thatprofessional standards have not been established for selecting among alternative principles that exist in this area or for evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting principles. Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely forpurposes of the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose. 

Based on our review and discussion, we concur with management’s judgment that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances. In formulating this position, we are relying onmanagement’s business planning and judgment, which we do not find unreasonable. 

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of ECCCapital Corporation and Subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2004. Accordingly, we are unable to express an opinion on whether the method of accounting for the effect of the change is in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or if the financial information included in Part I of this Form 10-Q is fairly presented. 

Very truly yours, 

/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
In the MATTER OF BCL INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.

NO. 2019-C-0276

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Case 5:03-cv-00284-C Document 40 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 343
STATE of Louisiana v. Roderick Jermaine CAWTHORNE, Jr.

NO. 2018-KO-1899

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.
# C_2023015EN.01003202.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 August 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — JV (C-215/20), OC (C-222/20) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Joined Cases C-215/20 and C-222/20) (1)

(2023/C 15/36)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 854 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 854

 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Kelley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2024

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Kelley.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Kelley, Cr. No. 22-408, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of United States v. Kelley, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager, and any current or former officer or employee of the 
Secretary's office, in connection with the production of evidence 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.20
 
 Purpose of the Plan
    Definitions




---



##### 



2








Awards














---



##### 



3




Shares of Common Stock Subject to the Plan








Administration of the Plan










---



##### 



4




Eligibility




Limitations and Conditions












---



##### 



5








Adjustments


















---



##### 



6










Change in Control










---



##### 



7


Amendment and Termination






Purchase or Exercise Price; Withholding




Effective Date; Duration




Governing Law






---



##### 



8


Severability




Section 409A




Option Holding Period




Compliance with Laws; Exculpation and Indemnity






---



##### 



9




Non Exclusivity of Plan
E.B. INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. v. PAVILION DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and Madison County Tax Collector

1160637

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-00202-M Document 36 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 132