alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21


                    PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES


Subsidiary                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-----------                                        -----------------------------
WE JAC Corporation                                      Delaware
Worldwide Drying Systems, Inc.                          Colorado
Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc.                          Virginia
PTW, Inc.                                               Washington
Precision Building Solutions Incorporated               Delaware
Rocky Mountain Ventures, Inc.                           Colorado
Ralston Car Wash, Ltd.                                  Colorado
Rocky Mountain Ventures II, Inc.                        Colorado
Miracle Partners, Inc.                                  Delaware
Miracle Industries, Inc.                                Ohio
Hydro Spray Car Wash Equipment Co., LLC                 Iowa
Indy Ventures, LLC                                      Indiana
Prema Properties, LLC                                   Ohio
PAC Mexican Delaware Holding Company, Inc.              Delaware
PAC Mexican Holding Co., LLC                            Virginia
Precision Auto Care Mexico I S.de R.L. de C.V.          Mexico
Promotora de Franquicias Praxis S.A. de C.V.            Mexico
Praxis Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
Praxis Auto Parts, S.A. de C.V.                         Mexico
Praxis Afinaciones, Puerto Rico, Inc.                   Puerto Rico
PTAC Franchise Corp                                     Delaware
Precision Franchising, LLC                              Virginia
Acc-u-tune, Inc.                                        California
Bay Area Precision, Inc.                                California
National 60 Minute Tune, Inc.                           Washington
Sixar Occidente, S.A. de C.V                            Mexico
Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                          Mexico
Premier Accesorios, S.A. de C.V                         Mexico
Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                          Puerto Rico
Sixar Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V                          Mexico

                                       50
C.J.S., Father of C.J.M, a Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-4842 MICHAEL RAY SMITH, a/k/a Black Mike, a/k/a Red, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-30006) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 19, 1998 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL John S. Hart, Jr., Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM:Michael Ray Smith appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Smith argues that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level by four points under U.S. Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(a) (1995), for his leadership role in the offense. We review this claim for clear error. See United States v. Hyppolite , 65 F.3d 1151, 1159 (4th Cir. 1995). Finding none, we affirm. Section 3B1.1(a) provides for a four-point enhancement if the defendant is an organizer or leader of criminal activity that involved five or more participants. Smith does not dispute that the organization involved five or more participants, and we find sufficient evidence supporting the court's conclusion that he played a leadership role in the offense. First, Smith recruited individuals into the organization. Second, one of these individuals stated that he served as Smith's "enforcer,"suggesting that Smith exercised some degree of control over his fellow conspirators. Third, Smith was instrumental in an arranged attack on one of his co-conspirators who owed him money. Finally, Smith received a larger share of the profits from the organization's dealings. Though Smith claims that he took a larger share b ecause, in his opinion, the risk associated with his acquisition of the drugs entitled him to it, we note that his ability to make this profit sharing decision denotes a degree of control within the organization. Based on these facts, we find no clear error in the court's assessment of the four-point enhancement under § 3B1.1(a). Accordingly, we affirm.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and
2argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3
Lorraine E. SMITH f/k/a Lorraine S. Carter, Appellant, v. EAYC INVESTMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellee.

No. 4D18-896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cr-00193-M Document 86 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 264
EX PARTE J.S.

1160878 (2160345)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6346

ROBERT STERLING DORSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS; JACQUELINE R. 

BROWN, case management coordinator; HECTOR JOYNER, Warden; D.L. 

SMITH, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00050-RMG)

Submitted: August 20, 2020 Decided: August 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Sterling Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Sterling Dorsey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 

complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-

2680, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JAMES DEREK JUAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10050

D.C. No. 

4:16-cr-01347-CKJ-DTF-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2018

San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and OLIVER,** District

Judge. 

James Derek Juan appeals the imposition of a sex offender evaluation

condition of supervised release. We review for abuse of discretion, United States

v. Gnirke, 775 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th Cir. 2015), and we vacate the condition.

FILED

MAY 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Solomon Oliver, Jr., United States District Judge for

the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
The sex offender evaluation condition is substantively unreasonable. See

United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Juan’s only

sexual offense occurred nearly three decades ago, when Juan was twelve. In the

intervening years, despite Juan’s frequent contact with and monitoring by law

enforcement, there is no evidence of any other history or characteristic of

inappropriate sexual conduct. Furthermore, Juan’s offense of conviction is entirely

unrelated to the facts and circumstances of his conduct as a child. Cf. United

States v. Johnson, 697 F.3d 1249, 1251 (9th Cir. 2012) (“Johnson’s current offense

involved possession of a gun, the same sort of weapon he used as a sexual

offender.”). Thus, there is no substantial nexus between the conduct underlying

Juan’s twenty-seven-year-old juvenile adjudication and any public safety rationale

that justifies the imposition of the sex offender evaluation condition today.1 See

United States v. Wise, 391 F.3d 1027, 1032 (9th Cir. 2004); United States v. T.M.,

330 F.3d 1235, 1240 (9th Cir. 2003) (“Supervised release conditions predicated

upon twenty-year-old incidents, without more, do not promote the goals of public

protection and deterrence.”). While it is rare that we would find that an imposition

of a condition of supervised release was an abuse of discretion, where, as here,

1

 We also note that neither the Probation Officer nor the government sought

such a condition.

2
there is insufficient basis in the record for its imposition, we must surely vacate the

condition.2

REVERSED; SUPERVISED RELEASE CONDITION VACATED.

2

 We need not reach Juan’s remaining arguments challenging the imposition

of the sex offender evaluation condition of supervised release.

3
Order entered August 31, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00717-CV

STEVE HUFFMAN AND PRESTON THOMPSON, Appellants

V.

LONESTAR TRANSFER, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-19-0074

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ August 27, 2020 unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the 

brief be filed no later than September 22, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NICOLE L. JOHNSON )

)

v. ) 3-06-CV-956-N

) (3-04-CR-301-N)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the

proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court

accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SIGNED February 2, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00301-N Document 91 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 371
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NICOLE L. JOHNSON )

)

v. ) 3-06-CV-956-N

) (3-04-CR-301-N)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _________, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00301-N Document 91 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 372
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nova Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Vahan Kololian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Vahan Kololian                                       Dated: May 15, 2006
    ----------------------------------------
    Vahan Kololian
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 2 

To provide for the counting on January 6, 2025, of the electoral votes 

for President and Vice President of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. THUNE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To provide for the counting on January 6, 2025, of the 

electoral votes for President and Vice President of the 

United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the two Houses of Congress shall meet 

3 in the Hall of the House of Represenatives on Monday, 

4 the 6th day of January 2025, at 1 o’clock post meridian, 

5 pursuant to the requirements of the Constitution and laws 

6 relating to the election of President and Vice President 

7 of the United States, and the President of the Senate shall 

8 be their Presiding Officer; that two tellers shall be pre9 viously appointed by the President of the Senate on the 

10 part of the Senate and two by the Speaker on the part 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 2 ATS 

1 of the House of Represenatatives, to whom shall be hand2 ed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, 

3 all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates 

4 of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall 

5 be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical 

6 order of the States, beginning with the letter ‘‘A’’; and 

7 said tellers, having then read the same in the presence 

8 and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the 

9 votes as they shall appear from said certificates; and the 

10 votes having been ascertained and counted in the manner 

11 and according to the rules by law provided, the result of 

12 the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, 

13 who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which 

14 announcement shall be deemed a suffucient declaration of 

15 the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President 

16 of the United States, and together with a list of the votes, 

17 be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 32 Filed 09/30/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID 206
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 32 Filed 09/30/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID 207
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 293 

To expand the seniors farmers’ market program to include maple syrup. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself and Mr. COURTNEY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To expand the seniors farmers’ market program to include 

maple syrup. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Agricultural 

5 Products Locally Essential (MAPLE) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE SENIORS FARMERS’ MARKET 

7 NUTRITION PROGRAM. 

8 Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural 

9 Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 293 IH

1 by striking ‘‘and herbs’’ and inserting ‘‘herbs, and maple 

2 syrup’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2018455EN.01000901.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 October 2018 — Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-100/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 - Imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan - Continuing interest in bringing proceedings))

(2018/C 455/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, and by R. Bierwagen and C. Hipp, Rechtsanwälte), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and N. Kuplewatzky, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 5, 2019        New U.S. Geological Survey Report Assesses Risk of Once-Per-Century Geomagnetic Superstorm to the Northeastern United States
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alistair F. McLaren, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Curon Medical, Inc., on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Curon Medical, Inc.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                          
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 29, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    ALISTAIR F.
MCLAREN                                               
|                      |  |     |  | Alistair F. McLaren Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2020390EN.01001702.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/17

---

Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-653/18, Armani v EUIPO

(Case C-239/20 P)

(2020/C 390/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Giorgio Armani SpA (represented by: S. Martínez-Almeida y Alejos-Pita, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 30 September 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Judy E. Naus, certify that:




1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Biotel Inc.;




2
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely, to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  May 14, 2008
        
        By:
        /s/ Judy E. NausChief Financial Officer






---