alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eva H. CANNIE, Petitioner, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Respondent.

No. 1D18-611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Clint G. HORVATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3855

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE DEADLINES Page 1

David B. Miller

Texas Bar No. 00788057

david@schneidlaw.com

SCHNEIDER MILLER REYNOLDS, P.C.

300 N. Coit Road, Suite 1125

Richardson, Texas 75080

Telephone: (972) 479-1112

Facsimile: (972) 479-1113

T. Micah Dortch

Texas Bar No. 24044981

micah@dll-law.com

Dortch Lindstrom Livingston Law Group

2613 Dallas Parkway, Suite 220

Plano, Texas 75093

Telephone: 214-252-8258

Facsimile: 888-653-3299

Special Counsel for the Trustee Areya Holder Aurzada

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: § CASE NO. 22-30500-swe7

DENNIS JAMES ROGERS II, §

 Debtor. § CHAPTER 7 

_____________________________________________________________________________

AREYA HOLDER AURZADA, §

CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE §

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF §

DENNIS JAMES ROGERS II §

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Adversary No. 24-03028

§

FUNDERZ.NET, LLC, §

 Defendant. §

STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE DEADLINES

Areya Holder Aurzada, in her capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Dennis Rogers, 

(the “Trustee”) and Defendant Funderz.net, LLC (the “Defendant”) hereby stipulate to extend 

responsive deadlines relating to (1) the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) [Dkt. No. 5]

Case 24-03028-swe Doc 13 Filed 06/25/24 Entered 06/25/24 10:57:31 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE DEADLINES Page 2

filed by the Defendant and (2) amending the Complaint without leave of Court to July 22, 2024.

Dated: June 25, 2024

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ David B. Miller 

David B. Miller

Texas Bar No. 00788057

david@schneidlaw.com

SCHNEIDER MILLER REYNOLDS, P.C.

300 N. Coit Road, Suite 1125

Richardson, Texas 75080

Telephone:(972) 479-1112

Facsimile: (972) 479-1113

-andT. Micah Dortch

Texas Bar No. 24044981

micah@dll-law.com

Dortch Lindstrom Livingston Law Group

2613 Dallas Parkway, Suite 220

Plano, Texas 75093

Telephone: 214-252-8258

Facsimile: 888-653-3299

Special Counsel for the Trustee 

Stipulated by the above-named Counsel to the Trustee and by:

/s/Carmen Contreras-Martinez (w/permission) 

Carmen Contreras-Martinez (pro hac vice)

SAUL EWING LLP

701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1700

Miami, FL 33131

(305) 428-4500

carmen.contreras-martinez@saul.com

-andTurner N. Falk (pro hac vice)

Centre Square West

1500 Market Street, 38th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19102-2186

(215) 972-8415

turner.falk@saul.com

-andCase 24-03028-swe Doc 13 Filed 06/25/24 Entered 06/25/24 10:57:31 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE DEADLINES Page 3

GRAY REED

Micheal W. Bishop (TX Bar No. 02354860)

Amber M. Carson (TX Bar No. 24075610)

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 954-4135

mbishop@grayreed.com

acarson@grayreed.com

Counsel to Funderz.Net, LLC

Case 24-03028-swe Doc 13 Filed 06/25/24 Entered 06/25/24 10:57:31 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
BARNETT FAMILY PROPERTIES, LLC v. POUNDERS & ASSOCIATES, INC., and Gregg Pounders

1151327

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Reginald WILLIAMS

NO. 2018-K-0937

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### DEC 17 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. KENNY TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-6187 (D.C. No. CIV-97-1821-R) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , BRISCOE , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Th e case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Petitioner Kenny Taylor seeks to appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sen tence, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court denied the § 2255 motion as untimel y filed, applying United States v. Simmonds , 111 F.3d 737 (10th Cir. 1997). The district court also denied petitioner’s request for a certificate of ap pealability, required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253 before this court can consider his appeal. Petitioner reurges his request before this court. He also seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, and moves this court to appoint him counsel on appeal. After review of petitioner’s motion and supporting documents, we grant his request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Ho wever, after careful consideration of petitioner’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that he has not made a substantial showing that the district court’s decision denied him a constitutional right. See id. Accordingly, petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability is denied, and this appeal is dismiss ed. Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel is denied as moot. The mand ate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Wade Brorby Circuit Judge
# C_2019220EN.01002801.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — D. H. v Ministerstvo vnitra

(Case C-704/17) (1)

(2019/C 220/34)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 83, 5.3.2018.

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MARCELINO PENALOZA,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-1469

 LT Case No. 93-06738-CFA

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

/

Opinion filed July 25, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County,

Robert Segal, Judge.

Marcelino Penaloza, Bonifay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, 

for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
# C_2016364EN.01001602.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/16

---

Action brought on 25 July 2016 — Omnicom International Holdings v EUIPO –eBay (DATABAY)

(Case T-394/16)

(2016/C 364/13)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Omnicom International Holdings, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: eBay, Inc. (San Jose, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DATABAY’ — EU trade mark application No 12 353 975

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2016 in Case R 925/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own and pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own and pay the applicant’s costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2016175EN.01003001.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/30

---

Action brought on 24 March 2016 — Claranet Europe v EUIPO — Claro (claranet)

(Case T-129/16)

(2016/C 175/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Claranet Europe Ltd (St Helier, Jersey) (represented by: G. Crown and D. Farnsworth, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Claro SA (São Paulo, Brazil)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark in red ‘claranet’ — Application for registration No 11 265 113

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2016 in Case R 803/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO (and if applicable, any intervener) to bear its own and pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO (and if applicable, any intervener) to bear its own and pay the applicant’s costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1222 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1028, K2025-1027.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00063 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350), the undersigned, Joseph Skeehan, Chief Financial Officer of JMG Exploration, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 30th day of November 2007.   JMG EXPLORATION, INC.  /s/ Joseph Skeehan Name: Joseph Skeehan Title: Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 33 Filed 12/16/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 142
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 33 Filed 12/16/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 143
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MAX Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  June 29, 2005



/s/ Stuart Rogers

---------------------------------------

Stuart Rogers, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Holding Company (‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the ‘‘Report’’) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2007, hereby certify as follows:

| |    |                                                                                            
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | a. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

| |    |                                                                                                                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | b. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations for Nalco.

/s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCEWilliam H. Joyce
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 7, 2007/s/ BRADLEY J. BELLBradley J. Bell
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 7, 2007


---
# C_2019305EN.01001001.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Villach — Austria) — Norbert Reitbauer and Others v Enrico Casamassima

(Case C-722/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Exclusive jurisdiction - Article 24(1) and (5) - Actions concerning rights in rem in immovable property and enforcement of judgments - Judicially ordered auction of a property - Opposition proceedings regarding the distribution of the proceeds from that auction)

(2019/C 305/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bezirksgericht Villach

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Norbert Reitbauer, Dolinschek GmbH, B.T.S. Trendfloor Raumausstattungs-GmbH, Elektrounternehmen K. Maschke GmbH, Klaus Egger, Architekt DI Klaus Egger Ziviltechniker GmbH

Defendant: Enrico Casamassima

Operative part of the judgment

Article 24(1) and (5) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an action brought by a pledgee challenging the distribution of the proceeds from a judicially ordered auction of a property and seeking, first, the finding that a competing debt has been extinguished by reason of a financial settlement and, second, that the pledge guaranteeing enforcement of that latter debt is unenforceable, does not come within the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State where the property is situated or of the courts of the place of enforcement.

---

(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.

---
Case 2:03-cv-00440-J Document 46 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 196
 

 Case 2:03-cv-00440-J Document 46 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 197
D.D., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ricky Bernard TAYLOR, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Brandon Nycole ROBINSON

NO. 2018-KO-1951

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned John M. Ballbach, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Jack L. Wyszomierski, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to the § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: November 14, 2005 |                                                    |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ JOHN  M. BALLBACH         |                                                    |
| Name:                         | John M. Ballbach                                        |   |
| Title:                        | *President and Chief Executive Officer*                 | * * |
| /s/ JACK  L. WYSZOMIERSKI     |                                                    |
| Name:                         | Jack L. Wyszomierski                                    |   |
| Title:                        | *Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer* | * * |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to VWR International, Inc. and will be retained by VWRInternational, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

----
Exhibit 12.2
------------

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
------------------------------------------------

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Golden State Petro (IOM
     1-A) PLC;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;
b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
     the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date: June 27, 2006

/s/ Kate Blankenship
-------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Director