UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 10-Q


(Mark One)





R
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009





Or





£
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the transition period from  _____  to _____





Commission file number: 000-51152





PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Maryland

98-0431245(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)

Identification No.)1600 Stout Street

80202Suite 2000, Denver, Colorado

(Zip Code)(Address of principal executive offices)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:


(303) 572-8900





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes R     No £





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files).    Yes o     No  o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and ”smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer £                                                                                     Accelerated
filer £


Non-accelerated filer £                                                                                     Smaller
reporting company R





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £     No R





As of August 7, the registrant had 375,468,544 shares of common stock outstanding.











FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS





Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report constitute “forward-looking statements”. These statements, identified by words such as “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “should”, “expect” and similar expressions include our expectations
and objectives regarding our future financial position, operating results and business strategy. These statements reflect the current views of management with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those set forth under the caption “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. We do not intend to update the forward-looking information to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting such forward-looking information. We advise you to carefully review the reports and documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).




CURRENCIES





All amounts expressed herein are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.








2


PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION





FORM 10-Q





FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED


JUNE 30, 2009





INDEX





PagePART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1.
Financial Statements
4Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
19Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
26Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
26PART II — OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.
Legal Proceedings
28Item 1A.
Risk Factors
28Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
28Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
28Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
28Item 5.
Other Information
28Item 6.
Exhibits
28SIGNATURES
29


3


PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(unaudited)





June 30,
2009


September 30,2008( $ in thousands)ASSETSCurrent AssetsCash and cash equivalents

$
58


$
967ReceivablesOil and gas receivables, net


—



193GST receivable


1



504Other receivables


—



12Due from related parties


—



1,840Marketable securities, available for sale


—



6,638Restricted marketable securities


9,893



7,495Assets held for sale


712



—Joint interest billings


11



—Prepaid expenses and other assets


319



273TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS


10,994



17,922Oil and Gas Properties, at cost under full cost methodUnevaluated properties


—



84,576Evaluated properties


150,150



69,704Accumulated depreciation, depletion amortization, and impairment


(150,150
)


(56,928
)Net Oil and Gas Properties


—



97,352Property and Equipment, at costFurniture and equipment, net


552



737Other AssetsRestricted cash


101



524Deposits and other assets


130



130Deferred financing costs


502



1,388Intangible asset


—



4,832TOTAL ASSETS

$
12,279


$
122,885LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)Current LiabilitiesAccounts payable and accrued expenses

$
2,938


$
11,981Notes payable — short-term


147



329Notes payable — related party — short term-net


42,983



3,572Accrued interest payable


1,224



166Accrued interest payable — related parties


3,476



969Contingent obligations


8,805



4,832TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES


59,573



21,849Long-Term LiabilitiesNotes payable – related parties — net of discount


106



38,035Convertible notes payable — net of discounts


765



325Asset retirement obligation


620



114Other


120



—TOTAL LIABILITIES


61,184



60,323Stockholders’ EquityPreferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; none issued


—



—Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 1,000,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding  375,468,544 and 373,343,54 at June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively


375



374Additional paid-in-capital


214,824



212,308Other comprehensive loss


(3,123
)


(632
)Accumulated deficit


(260,981
)


(149,488
)TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY (DEFICIT)


(48,905
)


62,562TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

$
12,279


$
122,885





See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.





4


PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 (unaudited)


Three Months Ended June 30, 2009


Three Months Ended June 30, 2008


Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009


Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008($ in thousands except per share amounts)RevenueOil and gas revenue

$
8


$
567


$
128


$
1,570Other revenue


-



6



1



156Total Revenue


8



573



129



1,726Costs and ExpensesLease operating expenses


2



164



588



404General and administrative


607



2,511



6,095



7,298Impairment of oil and gas properties


352



-



93,714



-Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion


63



337



194



820Impairment of intangible asset


-



-



6,092



-Total operating expenses


1,024



3,012



106,683



8,522(Loss) From Operations


(1,016
)


(2,439
)


(106,554
)


(6,796
)Other Income(Expense)Gain (Loss) on conveyance of property


3,410



(8,593
)


3,229



(20,468
)Gain on foreign exchange


-



-



-



11Interest income


1



6



13



33Interest expense


(2,438
)


(3,193
)


(7,276
)


(8,552
)Loss on sale of securities


(762
)


-



(762
)


(2,987
)Transaction  loss


(21
)


-



(143
)


-Total Other Income (Expense)


190



( 11,780
)


(4,939
)


(31,963
)Net (Loss)

$
(826
)

$
(14,219
)

$
(111,493
)

$
(38,579
)Net (loss) per common share — basic and diluted

$
(0.00
)

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.30
)

$
(0.12
)Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted


375,468



324,147



375,164



317,811







5


PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


(unaudited)





Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009


Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008($ in thousands)Cash flows from operating activitiesNet loss

$
(111,493
)

$
(38,759
)Adjustments used to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Stock based compensation


2,283



1,512Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion


194



820Impairment of oil and gas properties


93,714



-Amortization of deferred financing costs


912



1,340Impairment of contingent asset


6,092



-Amortization of debt discount and beneficial conversion feature


2,072



1,783Loss on marketable securities


762



2,987(Gain) Loss on conveyance of property


(3,229
)


20,468Warrants issued to settle interest costs


54



495Other adjustments to reconcile to net loss


-



45Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables


708



(381
)Prepaid expenses and other assets


46



(349
)Accounts payable and accrued expenses


(1,133
)


(11,210
)Due from related parties


1,840



(967
)Net cash used in operating activities


(7,178
)


(22,216
)Cash flows from investing activitiesAdditions to oil and gas properties


(1,988
)


(14,838
)Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties


2,320



26,922Proceeds from sale of marketable securities


713



2,541Additions to furniture and equipment


(6
)


(324
)Restricted cash


423



75Net cash provided by investing activities


1,462



14,376Cash flows from financing activitiesProceeds from the issuance of notes payable


-



8,250Borrowing on short-term notes payable


-



850Payments on short-term notes payable


(93
)


(6,088
)Proceeds from related party borrowings


5,210



1,170Payments on related party borrowing


(310
)


(2,097
)Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes


-



6,330Net cash provided by financing activities


4,807



8,415Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


(909
)


575Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period


967



120Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$
58


$
695Supplemental schedule of cash flow informationCash paid for interest

$
422


$
2,227




See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.


6


PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(unaudited)





Note 1 - Organization and Business Activities





The interim consolidated financial statements of PetroHunter Energy Corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) are unaudited and contain all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative
of results to be expected for a full year or for previously reported periods due in part, but not limited to, the volatility in crude oil and natural gas commodity prices, interest rates, estimates of reserves, drilling risks, geological risks, transportation restrictions, the timing of acquisitions, product demand, market competition, and our ability to obtain additional capital. You should read these consolidated interim financial statements in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008.





We are a global oil and gas exploration and production company committed to acquiring and developing primarily unconventional natural gas and oil prospects.  As of June 30, 2009, we owned properties in Rio Blanco, Garfield and Mesa Counties, Colorado, and in the Northern Territory, Australia.  We have drilled one test well on
our property in the Northern Territory. We have drilled five wells on our 20,000 acre Buckskin Mesa property located in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. All five wells are drilled and cased, and three of the five are completed and shut in. As of June 30, 2009, we owned 1,074 gross acres and 402 net acres in Garfield and Mesa Counties, Colorado.  Subsequent to June 30, 2009, we failed to meet certain drilling obligations, and as a result we lost our leases on this acreage (See Note 12).





In October 2008, we sold an undivided 50% interest in our four exploration permits comprising approximately seven million acres in the Beetaloo Basin of the Northern Territory, Australia to Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. (”Falcon”),  a related party.  In December 2008, we sold our working interests in eight wells
which were operated by EnCana Oil & Gas USA (“EnCana”).  In March 2009, we sold our land position in Montana which included 15,991 net undeveloped acres in the Bear Creek area.  In June 2009, we sold an additional undivided 25% working interest in our four exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin of the Northern Territory, Australia to Falcon (See Note 10).





Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies





Basis of Accounting and Estimates - The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of PetroHunter Energy Corporation, and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In preparing the accompanying financial statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved oil and natural gas reserves, which may affect the amount at which oil and natural gas properties are recorded. For the unevaluated properties, the Company evaluates
the possibility of potential impairment on a quarterly basis.  The computation of share based compensation expense requires assumptions such as volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest rate. Our estimates related to changes in the market value of securities held by us requires reliance on several input variables including fluctuations in value of the US dollar versus foreign currencies,  and  it is at least reasonably possible these estimates could be revised in the near
term, and these revisions could be material.





Going Concern -As of June 30, 2009, we have an accumulated deficit of $261.0 million and a working capital deficit of $48.6 million.  As of June 30, 2009, we had no revenue producing assets. As noted in the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on our
September 30, 2008 financial statements, these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.





Contingencies - In accounting for legal matters and other contingencies we follow the guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, under which loss contingencies
are accounted for based upon the likelihood of an impairment of an asset or the occurrence of a liability. If a loss contingency is “probable” and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, it is accrued.  If a loss contingency is “probable” but the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, disclosure is made. If a loss contingency is





7








“reasonably possible” disclosure is made, including a potential range of loss, if determinable. Loss contingencies that are “remote” are neither accounted for nor disclosed. Gain contingencies are given no accounting recognition until realized, but are disclosed if material.





Comprehensive Loss -Comprehensive loss consists of net losses on foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains or losses on restricted and unrestricted marketable securities held by us. Comprehensive loss is presented net of income taxes in the consolidated statements
of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss.





Fair Value Measurements -In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements in order to establish a single definition of fair value and a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP that is intended to result in increased consistency and comparability in fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 also expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other authoritative literature requires (or permits) certain assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, but does not expand the use of fair value. SFAS No. 157 was originally effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim
periods within those years with early adoption permitted.




In early 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) FAS-157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delays by one year, the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually). The delay pertains to items including, but not limited to, non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination, non-financial assets recorded at fair value at the time of donation, and long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.




The Company has adopted the portion of SFAS No. 157 that has not been delayed by FSP FAS-157-2 as of the beginning of its 2009 fiscal year, and plans to adopt the balance of its provisions as of the beginning of its 2010 fiscal year. Items carried at fair value on a recurring basis (to which SFAS No. 157 applies in fiscal 2009) consist
of restricted marketable securities based on quoted prices in active or brokered markets for identical as well as similar assets.




Fair values of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 included restricted marketable securities, recorded at a fair value of $9.9 million, which had quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (level 1) of $9.9 million.




Guarantees - As part of a gas gathering agreement we have with CCES Piceance Partners I, LLC (“CCES”), we had guaranteed that, should there be a mutual failure to execute a formal agreement for long-term gas gathering services in the future, we would repay CCES for certain
costs they had incurred in relation to the development of a gas gathering system and repurchase certain gas gathering assets we sold to CCES.  We have accounted for this guarantee using FASB Interpretation No. 45 as amended,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others  (“FIN 45”),  which
requires us to recognize a liability for the obligations undertaken upon issuing the guarantee in order to have a more representative and faithful depiction of the guarantor’s liabilities.  As of June 30, 2009, we have recognized a $6.8 million contingent purchase obligation related to this guarantee (See Note 11).





Impairment -SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,requires long-lived assets to be held and used to be reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas properties. Properties accounted for using the full cost method of accounting are excluded from the impairment testing requirements under SFAS No. 144. Properties accounted for under the full cost method of accounting are instead subject to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10, Financial Accounting
and Reporting for Oil and Gas Producing Activities Pursuant to the Federal Securities Laws and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975(“Rule 4-10”). Rule 4-10 requires that each regional cost center’s (by country) capitalized cost, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes not exceed a cost center “ceiling”. The ceiling is defined
as the sum of:




8





•
The present value of estimated future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil and gas reserves to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the balance sheet date less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing those proved reserves to be computed using a discount factor of 10%; plus





•       The cost of properties not being amortized; plus





•       The lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized; less





•       Income tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the properties.





If unamortized costs capitalized within a cost center, less related deferred income taxes, exceed the cost center ceiling, the excess is charged to expense. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $0.4 million and $93.7 million.  During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008,
we recorded no impairment charges.





Loss Per Common Share -Basic loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. Convertible equity instruments such as stock options and convertible debentures are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as the effect of the assumed exercises would be anti-dilutive. The diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excluded potential common shares from stock options and warrants of approximately 182 million shares and 175 million shares for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.





Liquidity -We hold working interests in undeveloped leases, and foreign exploration permits and we have participated in seismic surveys and the drilling of test wells on undeveloped properties. We plan to participate in exploration activities in our Beetaloo Basin project in Australia
during calendar year 2009. We may need to raise additional equity or enter into new borrowing arrangements to finance our continued participation in these planned activities. Further, we have farmed-out certain of our projects. If additional financing is not available, we may be compelled to reduce the scope of our business activities. If we are unable to fund planned expenditures, it may be necessary to forfeit our interest in proposed wells, farm-out our interest in proposed wells, sell a portion of our
interests in prospects and use the sale proceeds to fund participation for a lesser interest, reduce general and administrative expenses, or a combination of all of these factors.





Marketable Securities - We have received marketable equity securities as consideration from the sale of certain of interests in our oil and gas properties, and account for them in accordance with SFAS No. 115,Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.  As the shares we have received may be available for sale in the short term, or may be used as collateral for future borrowings, we have accounted for them by marking them to market with unrealized gains and losses reflected as a component of Other Comprehensive Income, until such gains or losses become realized, when they are then recognized in our consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, in circumstances where significant price declines are
experienced subsequent to the balance sheet date, we consider whether such declines are other than temporary, after considering our expected holding period, and may record a provision for impairment in the event we do not expect the value of the securities to recover from such a decline in market value. We consider our accounting for marketable securities to involve significant management judgment that is subject to estimation.





Reclassifications-Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in the consolidated financial statements to conform with current period presentation. Such reclassifications have had no effect on the net loss.





Restricted Cash - Consists of certificates of deposit, underlying letters of credit for exploration permits, state and local bonds and guarantees to vendors.




9





Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements





In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 - “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.  Adoption of this FSP has not had material impact on our financial statements.





In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4 - “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Adoption of this FSP has not had material impact on our financial statements.





On May 28, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. Under SFAS No. 165, companies are required to evaluate events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued in the case of
non-public entities. SFAS No. 165 requires entities to recognize in the financial statements the effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but arose after that date. SFAS No. 165 also requires entities to disclose
the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. SFAS No. 165 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 165 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as required, and adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements taken as a whole. We evaluated all events or transactions that occurred from June 30, 2009 to August 13, 2009, the date that we issued these financial statements. During this period
we did not have any material recognizable or non recognizable subsequent events.





On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R”), which change the way entities account for securitizations and
special-purpose entities as follows:





SFAS No. 166 is a revision to FASB SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing
exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures.





SFAS No. 167 is a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination
of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance.





Both SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The recognition and
measurement provisions of SFAS No. 166 shall be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. We will adopt both SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 on January 1, 2010, as required. We have not determined the impact adoption may have on our consolidated financial statements.




10





On June 29, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP. SFAS No. 168 will be effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards will be superseded. We will adopt SFAS No. 168 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as required, and adoption
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements taken as a whole.





Supplemental Cash Flow Information.Supplemental cash flow information for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, is as follows (unaudited,  $ in thousands):




Nine Months
Ended June 30,
2009


Nine Months
Ended June 30,
2008Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activitiesContracts for oil and gas properties

$
—


$
(1,500
)Shares issued for debt conversion

$
—


$
6,834Shares issued for commissions on offerings

$
—


$
56Shares issued in connection with investor relations

$
22


$
—Shares issued for property

$
—


$
9,000Shares returned on property conveyance

$
—


$
(1,408
)Warrants issued for debt

$
—


$
3,757Discount associated with beneficial conversion and detachable warrants

$
—


$
6,956Marketable securities received from sale of oil and gas properties

$
—


$
5,529Acquisition of oil and gas properties by exchange of joint
interest billings, oil and gas receivables and accounts payable

$
—


$
12,707Debt relief in connection with conveyance of properties to a related party

$
(5,000
)

$
—Accounts payable and other amounts relieved in connection with the sale of properties to a related party

$
(2,481
)

$
—




Note 3 - Restricted Cash and Marketable Securities





As of June 30, 2009, long term restricted cash consists of $0.1 million in certificates of deposit underlying letters of credit for exploration permits, state and local bonds and guarantees to vendors.





As of June 30, 2009, we have recorded $9.9 million in restricted marketable securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Included in this amount are 26 million shares of Falcon common stock received in connection with the sale of a 50% interest in our four exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin, Australia in October 2008. The Falcon
shares are restricted through an escrow agreement that restricts the timing of and quantity of the potential sale of the common stock (See Note 10).





11





Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties





Oil and gas properties consisted of the following ($ in thousands):





June 30,
2009


September 30,
2008Oil and gas properties, at cost, full cost method

(unaudited)Unproved United States

$
-


$
82,040Unproved Australia


-



2,536Proved, United States


150,150



69,704150,150



154,280Less accumulated  depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment


(150,150
)


(56,928
)Total

$
-


$
97,352





During the three-and nine-month fiscal periods ended June 30, 2009, we have reclassified approximately $0.4 million and $93.7 million in costs from unproved to proved properties within the US full cost pool.  The costs are associated with the Jolley and Buckskin Mesa prospects.  The Company’s partner in the five
Buckskin Mesa wells, Falcon, chose not to exercise its option to participate in an additional 50% interest in the play in February 2009. Without Falcon or another partner we were unable to meet the capital obligations necessary to develop this acreage.





Due to our lack of working capital our ability to extract minerals associated with the assets in the US full cost pool became non-feasible.  As of June 30, 2009, the US full cost pool was fully impaired; therefore, we did not record depletion expense during the nine months ended June 30, 2009.  We recorded impairment
expense of $ 0.4 million and $93.7 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009.  For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 there was no impairment expense recorded.





Included below is the description of significant oil and gas properties and their current status.





PICEANCE BASIN, COLORADO





Buckskin Mesa Project.  As of June 30, 2009, we have drilled five wells within our 20,000-acre Buckskin Mesa Project area.  All five wells are drilled and cased, and three of the five are completed and shut in. The first PetroHunter operated well, the Anderson
6-16, was drilled to a total depth of 10,785 feet through the Williams Fork, Cozzette, Corcoran, and Sego sands into the Cretaceous Mancos Shale. The initial well was followed in close succession with the drilling of the Anderson 13-10, the Lake 16-21, Anderson 4-21, and the Lake 6-22 wells. Completion operations have begun on the Lake 16-21, Lake 6-22, and the Anderson 6-16 wells.  Due to our financial position this play was deemed economically unfeasible as of June 30, 2009.





Piceance Project. As of June 30, 2009, we owned an additional 1,074 gross acres and 402 net acres in the Piceance Basin. During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we sold our 50% working interests in our 8 producing wells located in this area of Garfield and Mesa Counties, Colorado
for $2.3 million.  Related to this sale, we recorded a loss on the conveyance during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 of approximately $0.2 million. Subsequent to the end of the period we failed to meet our drilling obligations and lost the leases on this acreage (See Note 12).





AUSTRALIA





Northwest Shelf Project. In March 2007, our subsidiary, Sweetpea Petroleum Pty Ltd (“Sweetpea”), acquired Exploration Permit #WA-393-P in the Barrow Sub-Basin of the Carnavon Basin on the Northwest Shelf of Australia.  Subsequently, Sweetpea acquired the
available seismic on and adjacent to the permit and mapped four stratigraphic horizons. Initial seismic mapping of the permit area demonstrates three structures: one structure entirely on the block and two partially on the block in water depths of approximately 600 feet. These structures are within about 80 kilometers of the major discovery in the Triassic Mungaroo Formation at the Chevron Clio-1 well on the Northwest Shelf in this basin, which occur in deeper water depths of about 3,000 feet. As of June 30,
2009, our permit has expired. We are attempting to obtain an extension of this permit.






12


Beetaloo Basin Project. Sweetpea also has four exploration permits in the Northern Territory, comprising the Beetaloo Basin Project. In September 2007, Sweetpea drilled and cased one well the Shenandoah #1 to a total depth of 1,555 meters (4,740 feet) in the area covered by Exploration
Permit (“EP”) 98 in the Beetaloo Basin. The test was a twin (50 meter distance) from the Balmain #1 well and was designed to test the Bessie Creek Formation at a depth of approximately 3,000 meters. The well was completed to the drilled depth of 1,555 meters and cased, in anticipation of later completing the drilling of the well to the targeted total depth.





Effective October 1, 2008, we assigned 50% of our working interest in the four exploration permits covering the seven million acres in the Beetaloo Basin, to Falcon.





Effective June 11, 2009, we assigned an additional 25% of our working interest in these four exploration permits to Falcon.  With the assignment of this additional 25% working interest, Falcon’s Australian subsidiary has assumed the role as operator on this prospect.





We had been obligated to attempt to drill four wells in the Beetaloo prior to December 31, 2009, to fulfill our obligations under EP 98 and EP 117, with additional activity planned for EP 76 and EP 99.  Application to reduce these drilling commitments has been lodged with the Australian government. As of June 30, 2009 we have
not received confirmation that the obligations under these permits will be reduced.





In addition to the Beetaloo Basin and Northwest Shelf projects, we have also applied for two additional exploration permits in the Northern Territory in Australia covering an additional 1.5 million acres, which are adjacent to our Beetaloo Basin Project acreage. As of June 30, 2009, we have not received confirmation that these permits have
been granted to us.





Note 5 - Asset Retirement Obligation





The Company recognizes an estimated liability for future costs associated with the abandonment of its oil and gas properties. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation and a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset are recorded at the time a well is completed or acquired. The increase
in carrying value is included in proved oil and gas properties in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company depletes the amount added to proved oil and gas property costs and recognizes accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the remaining estimated economic lives of the respective oil and gas properties.





The Company’s estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on estimated economic lives, estimates as to the cost to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised.
The credit-adjusted risk-free rates used to discount the Company’s abandonment liabilities range from 8% to 22%. Revisions to the liability are due to increases in estimated abandonment costs and changes in well economic lives, or in changes to federal or state regulations regarding the abandonment of wells.





A reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligation liability is as follows, ($ in thousands):





June 30,
2009


September 30, 2008Beginning asset retirement obligation

$
114


$
136Liabilities settled


—



(16
)Revisions to estimates


499



(14
)Accretion expense


7



8Ending asset retirement obligation

$
620


$
114





The five Buckskin Mesa wells proved to be uneconomic and accordingly, a revised estimate has been calculated for plugging fees and the liability was updated as of June 30, 2009.








13




Note 6 - Notes Payable





Notes payable as of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 are summarized below ($ in thousands):




June 30, 2009


September 30, 2008Short-term notes payable

(unaudited)Installment loan

$
88


$
199Other


20



—Vendor


39



130Notes payable – short-term

$
147


$
329Note payable – related party – short termBruner Family Trust

$
2,722


$
2,722Global Project Finance


40,650



850Discount on notes payable


(389
)


—Notes payable – related party - short, term

$
42,983


$
3,572Long-term notes payable – related party - netBruner Family Trust

$
106


$
106Global Project Finance


—



39,800Other


—



146Discount on notes payable


—



(2,017
)Long-term notes payable – related party - net

$
106


$
38,035Convertible debt

$
6,956


$
6,956Discount on convertible debt


(6,191
)


(6,631
)Convertible debt - net

$
765


$
325OtherCapital lease

$
120


$
—





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued an 18% subordinated debenture in the amount of $0.03 million to a shareholder of the Company in exchange for the relief of amounts due the shareholder. The subordinated debenture is collateralized by an interest in .01 million shares of Falcon common stock held by us as unrestricted marketable securities. In connection
with the issuance the debenture we issued 0.07 million warrants to purchase our common stock at $0.15 per share, which expire in January 2010.  The debenture was due on April 15, 2009. We are currently in default under the terms of the debenture agreement.




During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued three subordinated convertible debentures totaling $0.2 million to two related parties. These debentures bore interest at 15% per annum and were due in May 2009. We issued 0.5 million warrants to purchase our common stock at $0.15 per share in connection with these debentures (See Note 9).   These debentures
along with all related accrued interest were repaid in January 2009.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued a promissory note in the amount of $0.1 million to a related party. This note bore interest at 15% per annum.  As of June 30, 2009 we have repaid this note and all accrued interest.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we entered into a secured loan agreement with Falcon (“Falcon Loan”). Under the terms of the loan agreement, Falcon agreed to advance to us $5.0 million.  This loan was secured by 14.5 million shares of Falcon common stock we had received as consideration in relation to the
sale of a 50% working interest in our four exploration permits in Australia to Falcon in October 2008.   The Falcon Loan was also secured by a first position security interest in our five well bores in our Buckskin Mesa project. In June 2009, we sold an additional 25% interest in our exploration permits to Falcon. As a component of our consideration, the $5.0 million note was relieved by Falcon (See Note 10).




14


As of June 30, 2009, we have received multiple waivers and releases of covenant violations and default and failure to make interest payments from the holders of our 8.5% convertible debentures. In connection with the receipt of these debentures we issued a total of 2.77 million warrants to purchase our common stock at prices ranging from
$0.12 to $ 0.28 (See Note 9).





As of June 30, 2009, we have received a waiver and release from the Bruner Family Trust related to our covenant violations and in relation to our default and failure to make scheduled interest payments.





Our largest creditor, Global Project Finance (“Global”), a related party, had previously granted us a waiver of covenant violations and default and failure to make interest payments related to the $39.8 million credit facility we have with them. This waiver remains in effect through January 1, 2010. An additional amount owed
to Global, $0.9 million was due to Global on July 31, 2009, and we are currently in default on that instrument (See Note 12).





Note 7 - Stockholders’ Equity





We have authorized 1 billion shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. No preferred stock was issued or is outstanding as of June 30, 2009.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued 1.9 million shares of our common stock at $0.22 per share in connection with the receipt of an amendment to a letter of understanding between CCES and us, related to our property interests. Under the terms of the agreement CCES agreed to allow Falcon to exercise an additional option
for and additional working interest in our Buckskin Mesa project, should Falcon choose to do so.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued 0.25 million shares of our common stock at $0.09 per share in connection with investor relation services.





Note 8 - Share-Based Compensation





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we granted an extension allowing for the continuation of the vesting of options related to a consultant of the Company whose tenure with the Company was terminated in December 2008.




During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we granted the acceleration of the vesting of 0.1 million unvested options granted to a consultant in August 2008.




During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we granted continuance of 8.4 million options for employees and consultants of the Company who were separated from the Company as of June 30, 2009.




The fair value of each share-based award under all plans is estimated on the date of grant or amendment using a Black-Scholes pricing model that incorporates the assumptions noted in the following table for the nine months ended June 30, 2009.




Expected option term – years
1.75-3.5Risk-free interest rate
1%-1.69%Expected dividend yield
0 %Weighted average volatility
98.84%





The following table sets forth stock options outstanding under our 2005 stock option plan as of June 30, 2009   (shares in thousands):




Number of
Shares


Weighted-Average
Exercise PriceOptions Outstanding – September 30, 2008


34,170


$
0.87Granted


1,095


$
0.11Forfeited


(520
)

$
1.87Expired


-



-Options outstanding  — June 30, 2009


34,745


$
0.88Options exercisable — June 30, 2009


23,169


$
0.89





15


Compensation Expense –Stock-based employee and non-employee compensation expense of $0.2 million and $2.3 million was charged to operations during the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2009.  Stock-based employee and non-employee compensation expense of
$ 0.4 million and $1.5 million was charged to operations during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. Stock-based compensation has been included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.





Note 9 - Common Stock Warrants





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued 0.5 million warrants to purchase our common stock at $0.15 per share to three related parties, in connection with sale of $0.2 million in convertible debentures (See Note 6). The warrants issued have a one-year term and the total value of $0.0 million as calculated under the Black-Scholes
method.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued a total of 2.77 million warrants to purchase our common stock at prices ranging $0.12 to $0.28 per share to the holders of our Series A 8.5% convertible debentures in connection with our default and failure to make scheduled interest payments. In addition these warrants were issued as
consideration for the receipt of waivers related to our violation of certain debt covenants. These warrants expire in November 2012, and had a total value of $0.05 million as calculated under the Black-Scholes method.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued .07 million warrants to purchase our common stock at $0.15 per share, which expire in January 2010 in connection with a convertible debenture issued to a shareholder of the Company these warrants expire in January 2010, and have a value of $.001 (See Note 6).





The following stock purchase warrants were outstanding at June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 (warrants in thousands):




June 30,
2009

September 30,
2008Number of warrants
139,127

135,754Exercise price
$0.12 - $2.10

$0.21 - $2.10Expiration date
2009 - 2012

2011 - 2012




Note 10 - Related Party Transactions





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued three subordinated debentures in the total amount of $0.2 million to related parties. These debentures bore interest at 15% per annum and were due in May 2009. We issued 0.5 million warrants to purchase our common stock at $0.15 per share in connection with these debentures, (See Notes
6 and 9).  These debentures and all related accrued interest have been repaid as of June 30, 2009.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we issued a promissory note in the amount of $0.1 million to a related party. This note bore interest at 15% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, the note and all accrued interest have been repaid.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we sold a 25% interest in five drilled but uncompleted wells in our Buckskin Mesa Project to Falcon. Under the terms of the agreement, Falcon deposited $7.0 million into escrow, of which $5.3 million was to be used for testing and completion costs on these wells.  In February 2009, Falcon
elected to not participate in an additional 50% of our Buckskin Mesa project (See Note 4).





During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we entered into a secured loan agreement with Falcon (“Falcon Loan”). Under the terms of the loan agreement, Falcon agreed to advance to us $5.0 million.  This loan was secured by 14.5 million shares of Falcon common stock we had received as consideration in relation to the
sale of a 50% working interest in our four exploration permits in Australia to Falcon in October 2008.   The Falcon Loan was also secured by a first position security interest in our five well bores in our Buckskin Mesa project.





In June 2009, we sold an additional 25% interest in our exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin, Australia to Falcon. As a result, Falcon now holds a 75% working interest in the Beetaloo Basin, while  we have retained a 25%








16





undivided interest. As a component of the transfer of the additional interest, Falcon became the operator of the property. As consideration, Falcon relieved the $5.0 million loan made to us in October 2008, and assumed our Australian projects accounts payable in the amount of approximately $1.3 million related to this prospect. In addition
Falcon re-assigned its working interest in five wellbores in the Buckskin Mesa acquired from us in October 2008, and released approximately $0.9 million in working capital related to the initial $7.0 million conveyed in connection with their purchase of a 25% interest in the Buckskin Mesa project to us.





As of June 30, 2009, we have recorded restricted marketable securities totaling $9.9 million in aggregate on our Consolidated Balance sheet. These securities were received from Falcon pursuant to the sale of a 50% interest in four exploration permits in Australia in October 2008.





Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies





CCES - On April 11, 2008, we closed the sale of certain natural gas gathering assets for $0.7 million in cash consideration, and simultaneously entered into a gas gathering agreement with CCES Piceance relating to the initial phase of our gas gathering system project.  These
agreements formalized and expanded upon a letter of understanding between the parties which contemplated a dedicated relationship with CCES in the development of a gas gathering system and the provision of gas gathering services within our Buckskin Mesa Project area (the “CCES Agreements”). In addition to customary terms and conditions, the CCES Agreements included a guarantee (the “Guarantee”) from us to CCES regarding their increasing financial commitments as they are incurred in relation
to the development of the gas gathering system, including our contingent repurchase of the gas gathering assets we sold to CCES.  The triggering event for the Guarantee is contingent upon our mutual failure to execute a formal agreement for long-term gas gathering services in the future.  The resolution of this contingency is dependent upon, among other things, gas production levels from the initial phase gas gathering system for our Buckskin Mesa Project. Per the agreement should we fail
to execute a mutually agreeable long-term contract, CCES had the right to invoice us for their incurred costs and demand repayment within 20 days of our receipt of the demand invoice.  To secure our Guarantee, we have executed a promissory note for an amount up to $11.5 million, secured by second deeds of trust on our Colorado properties.  The amount of the Guarantee is variable, based upon the underlying incurred costs by CCES as defined in the CCES Agreements.





As of June 30, 2009, the liabilities associated with the construction of this gathering system amounted to approximately $6.8 million. We have accounted for our Guarantee under the requirements of FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 45.  As of June 30, 2009, we have recorded all amounts due as current contingent liabilities
in our financial statements, to reflect our contingent purchase obligation relating to the Guarantee. In February 2009, completion of this gathering system became economically unfeasible for us. We are currently in negotiations with CCES and other third parties regarding this liability.





As we have deemed that the completion of this gathering system is economically unfeasible for us we have impaired approximately $6.1 million in value related to the asset component of the gathering system during the nine months ended June 30, 2009.  We have deemed there to be approximately $0.7 million in assets for which we may
recoup some value either through a sale to a third party or for which CCES may find an alternate use.  These costs been classified as assets held for sale in accordance with FASB No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.





In May 2009, we received a final invoice from CCES, indicating amounts recorded as a contingent liabilities as of June 30, 2009 were due within 20 days of the receipt of the demand. We have not resolved this issue, and are in default of our agreement with CCES. We continue negotiation with CCES and have received assertions from their management
that no further definitive action will be taken until the ongoing negotiations have been completed.




Daniels Petroleum –In September 2008, our August 2005 Exploration and Development “EDA” agreement with Daniels Petroleum was amended for the seventh time.  In accordance with the seventh amendment we committed to drill and/or commence drilling four wells
in the Buckskin Mesa no later than July 2009.  Per the seventh amendment, the penalty for failing to commence drilling by July 31, 2009 is $0.5 million per well, and if unpaid the EDA is no longer in effect. As a result of our current liquidity issues, we were unable to commence the drilling of the wells prior to July 31, 2009. We have recorded the maximum penalty of $2.0 million as a current liability as of June 30, 2009. We have additional potential obligations under the terms of this agreement which
may result in





17





additional penalties should we fail to commence drilling of 5 additional wells by December 31, 2009. We have not recorded amounts related to these additional potential penalties as we are currently exploring amendments to the EDA, and at this time cannot determine whether we will be successful in those amendments.





Note 12 - Subsequent Events




We have evaluated subsequent events through August 13, 2009, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.




In July 2009, we failed to meet drilling obligations related to our holdings of 1,074 gross acres and 402 net acres in Garfield and Mesa counties, Colorado.  As a result of our failure to meet these obligations we have lost our leases on this acreage.





In July 2009, we defaulted on our drilling commitments and obligations under our EDA with Daniels Petroleum, (See Note 11).





In July 2009, a director of the Company advanced to us the amount of $0.01 million to satisfy trade liabilities of the Company. The advance is non interest bearing and is payable upon demand.





In July 2009, we reached an agreement in principle with respect to our obligation under a long term lease related to our office in Denver, Colorado, and are scheduled to relocate to a more cost effective facility in late August 2009.





In July 2009, we appointed a new a new Chief Financial Officer as we continue to restructure the Company.




As of July 31, 2009, we defaulted on a repayment of $0.85 million due to Global, a related party. We have not received a waiver for this default.















































18





ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS





The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. It contains forward-looking statements that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected performance. The forward-looking statements are dependent upon events, risks
and uncertainties that may be outside our control. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.





Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, market prices for natural gas and oil, economic and competitive conditions, regulatory changes, estimates of proved reserves, potential failure to achieve production from exploratory and development drilling projects, capital expenditures and other
uncertainties, as well as those factors discussed below, all of which are difficult to predict and which expressly qualify all subsequent oral and written forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward looking events discussed may not occur. We do not have any intention or obligation to update forward-looking statements included in this report after the date of this report, except as required by law.





Executive Summary





We are a global oil and gas exploration and production company committed to acquiring and developing primarily unconventional natural gas and oil prospects.  As of June 30, 2009, we owned properties in Rio Blanco, Garfield and Mesa Counties Colorado, and in the Northern Territory, Australia.  We have drilled one test well on our
property in the Northern Territory.  We have drilled five wells on our 20,000-acre Buckskin Mesa property located in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. All five wells are drilled and cased, and three of the five are completed and shut in. As of June 30, 2009, we owned 1,074 gross acres and 402 net acres located in Garfield and Mesa Counties, Colorado.  Subsequent to June 30, 2009 we failed to meet certain drilling obligations on these holdings and as a result we lost our leases on the acreage.





In October 2008, we sold an undivided 50% interest in our four exploration permits comprising approximately seven million acres in the Beetaloo Basin of the Northern Territory, Australia to Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd. (“Falcon”), a related party.  In December 2008, we sold our working interests in eight wells which were
operated by EnCana Oil & Gas USA (“EnCana”).  In March 2009, we sold our land position in Montana which included 15,991 net undeveloped acres in the Bear Creek area.  In June 2009, we sold an additional undivided 25% working interest in our four exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin of the Northern Territory, Australia to Falcon. As a result of the sale we continue to hold a 25% working interest in these permits.





Results of Operations





The financial information with respect to the three months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 that is discussed below is unaudited. In the opinion of management, such information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods.  The results
of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full fiscal years.





Industry Overview for the three months ended June 30, 2009





The three months ended June 30, 2009 continued to see weaker natural gas prices.  Natural gas prices have been very volatile during 2009 year to date due to supply concerns earlier in the year, and more recently due to recession concerns arising from the current worldwide financial crisis.





We may need to raise capital, and due to the global credit crisis, funds may not be available, or if available, may be on unfavorable terms.  Based on our current financial position, our participation only in seismic and drilling activity that is necessary to maintain current licenses in Australia is planned for the remainder of 2009.
We may need to raise additional equity or enter into new borrowing arrangements to finance our continued participation in these planned activities. If additional financing is not available we may be compelled to reduce the scope of our business activities.  If we are unable to fund planned expenditures, it may be necessary to:





19


1.
forfeit our interest in wells that are proposed to be drilled;2.
farm-out our interest in proposed wells;3.
sell a portion of our interest in prospects and use the sale proceeds to fund our participation for a lesser interest; and4.
reduce general and administrative expenses.





Company Overview for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008





Our net loss for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.8 million and $111.5 million respectively. We received only nominal revenues from our oil and natural gas properties while incurring substantial impairment charges and overhead expenses which have resulted in an accumulated deficit through June 30, 2009 of $261.0
million. We sold our only revenue producing assets during the nine months ended June 30, 2009.





Comparison of the results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008





Oil and Gas Revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, oil and gas revenue was $0.0 million as compared to $0.6 million for the corresponding period in 2008. The decrease in revenue relates to the sale of our 8 producing wells effective December 1, 2008.





For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, our revenue was $0.1 million compared to approximately $1.6 million for the corresponding period in 2008.





Costs and Expenses





Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating expenses were $0.0 million and $0.6 million during the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the comparable 2008 periods.  The changes are primarily attributable to compressor
rentals and other charges in the Buckskin Mesa.





General and Administrative.During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, general and administrative expense was $0.6 million and $6.1 million, as compared to $2.5 million and $7.2 million in the comparable 2008 periods.





The following table highlights the areas with the most significant changes ($ in thousands):





Three Months ended June 30,


Nine Months ended June 30,2009


2008


2009


2008Personnel and contract services

$
306


$
1,118


$
3,302


$
2,911Legal


101



265



318



657Stock-based compensation


176



440



2,283



1,512Travel


22



91



38



164Other


2



597



154



2,054Total

$
607


$
2,511


$
6,095


$
7,298





For the nine months ended June 30, 2009 the decreases in general and administrative expenses in 2009 are the result of decreases in legal expense, travel expense as well as decreases in non-recurring one time other expenses incurred, in fiscal 2008.  In addition we experienced significant decreases in stock-based compensation
as well as salaries and contract services resulting from reduced staffing levels in the third quarter of fiscal 2009.





20


We anticipate that in future periods, general and administrative expenses will continue to be significantly less as we continue to implement significant reductions in expenses through reduced staffing, rent expenses, and other infrastructure related charges.





Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties. Costs capitalized for properties accounted for under the full cost method of accounting are subjected to a ceiling test limitation to the amount of costs included in the cost pool by geographic cost center. Costs of oil and gas properties may
not exceed the ceiling which is an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves plus the cost, or estimated fair market value, if lower, of unproved properties. Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, impairment is recognized.





During the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized impairment expense of $0.4 million and $93.7 million, respectively, as compared to Nil million and Nil during the corresponding 2008 periods. Impairment expense recorded in 2009 resulted from the fact that our lack or working capital and inhibited our ability to
extract minerals associated with the assets in the US full cost pool became non-feasible.





Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion“DD&A”. - During the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $0.1 million and $0.2 million of DD&A respectively as compared to $0.3 million and $0.8 million during the 2008 periods.




Interest Expense. During the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009, interest expense was $2.4 million and $7.3 million, as compared to $3.2 million and $8.6 million during the corresponding 2008 periods.





The following table highlights interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, ($ in thousands):





3 Months ended
June 30, 2009


3 months ended
June 30, 2008


9 Months ended
June 30, 2009


9 Months ended
June 30, 2008Interest expense related to credit facility, convertible notes and debt

$
1,428


$
1,623


$
4,256


$
4,393Amortization of debt discounts, deferred financing costs and accretion


995



923



2,984



3,123Interest on vendor obligations and other


15



647



36



1,036Total

$
2,438


$
3,193


$
7,276


$
8,552




We expect that our interest expense will remain constant for the remainder of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, due to the fact that interest rate indices underlying the rates attached to the majority of our debt portfolio have stabilized and that we anticipate no new borrowings.





Net Loss.For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred net losses of $0.8 million and $111.5 million as compared to a net losses of $14.2 million and $38.6 million during the corresponding 2008 periods.





Going Concern





The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2008, includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the substantial doubt of our ability to continue as a going concern. We have an accumulated deficit of $261.0 million and have a working capital deficit of
approximately $48.6 million as of June 30, 2009. We are not in compliance with the covenants of several loan agreements, and have significant capital expenditure commitments. We require significant additional funding to sustain our operations and satisfy our contractual obligations for our planned oil and gas exploration and development operations. We are in default on certain obligations. Our ability to establish the Company as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional funding in order
to finance our planned operations.





21


Liquidity and Capital Resources





On November 10, 2008, we closed the sale of an undivided 25% interest in five wells drilled in the Buckskin Mesa to Falcon in exchange for a $5.3 million cash work commitment to complete certain of these wells. In December 2008, we completed the sale of our working interests in our eight producing wells operated by EnCana Oil & Gas,
for net cash proceeds of $2.3 million.  As part of the purchase and sale agreement, Falcon obtained an option to acquire up to a 50% interest in our entire Buckskin Mesa Project, for total consideration of $28.5 million in cash or shares of Falcon common stock, and an $18.0 million work commitment. In February 2009, Falcon elected not to exercise its option.





In October 2008, we entered into a secured loan agreement with Falcon. Under the terms of the loan agreement, Falcon agreed to advance to us $5.0 million.  This loan was secured by 14.5 million shares of Falcon common stock we had received as consideration in relation to the sale of a 50% working interest in our four exploration
permits in Australia conveyed to Falcon in October 2008.





In June 2009, we sold an additional 25% interest in our four exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin to Falcon,  in exchange Falcon relieved the $5 million note payable and assumed trade accounts payable related to the Beetaloo prospect in the amount of approximately $1.3 million. The relief of this note allows us to access
the shares of Falcon that served as collateral on the $5 million note subject to restrictions set forth in an escrow agreement.







Working Capital.Working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities. Our working capital is impacted by changes in prices of oil and gas along with other business factors that affect our net income and cash flows. Our working capital is also affected
by the timing of operating cash receipts and disbursements, borrowings of and payments of debt, additions to oil and gas properties and increases and decreases in other non-current assets.





As of June 30, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $48.6 million and unrestricted cash of $0.06 million, while at September 30, 2008 we had a working capital deficit of $3.9 million and unrestricted cash of $1.0 million. The decreases in working capital are primarily attributable to the fact that we have disposed of our revenue producing
assets and continue to incur expenses related to operations.  In addition, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we had completed several significant property conveyances that temporarily reduced our working capital deficit.





Cash Flow.Net cash used in or provided by operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows ($ in thousands):





Nine Months Ended
June 30,2009


2008Net cash (used in) operating activities

$
(7,178
)

$
(22,216
)Net cash provided by investing activities

$
1,462


$
14,376Net cash provided by financing activities

$
4,807


$
8,415





Net Cash Used in Operating Activities.The changes in net cash used in operating activities are attributable to our net loss adjusted for non-cash charges as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows and changes in working capital as discussed above.





Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities.Net cash provided by investing activities of approximately $1.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily related to net proceeds of $2.3 million received from the sale of our 8 producing wells, as well as $0.8 million
in proceeds from the sale of marketable securities offset by additions to oil and gas properties of $2.0 million.  Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008  related to cash received from the sale of oil and gas properties of $26.9 million and proceeds from the sale of marketable securities of $2.5 million offset by cash used  for  oil and gas properties additions of $14.8 million.





22


Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities.Net cash provided by financing activities of $4.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 was comprised primarily of proceeds of a $5.0 million related party note payable and proceeds of additional related party notes
of $0.3 million net of repayments of related  party notes of  $0.4 million.  Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 of $8.4 million primarily consisted of proceeds $23.5 million net of repayments of short term debt.





Plan of Operation





Colorado


We will continue to seek opportunities related to our interests and or upon our acreage. We cannot say with any reasonable probability what the outcome of our ongoing efforts will be.





Australia


We plan to continue to fund exploration, seismic and drilling activity related to our undivided 25% working interest in four exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin project area located in the northern territory of Australia. Based on our current financial position only required funding that is necessary to maintain our interest
in these licenses is planned for the remainder of 2009.  We anticipate that these costs will aggregate approximately $1.8 million, including $0.3 million in refundable deposits.





Capital Requirements





As of June 30, 2009 and for the remainder of the calendar year 2009, we have obligations to drill and or commence drilling a total of 8 wells in Colorado for which our ownership interests and corresponding obligations vary from 37.5% to 100%. Due to liquidity concerns we do not anticipate having the cash to meet these obligations.





Negotiations with the Australian Land council to reduce the drilling commitments related to the Beetaloo project have commenced, the outcome of these negotiations are not yet known. We plan to participate in the deepening of our well in the Beetaloo Basin project in calendar 2009 and anticipate expenditures related to this will aggregate
approximately $1.5 million.





Financing.During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we entered into the following financing arrangements:





In October 2008, we entered into a secured loan agreement with Falcon, whereby Falcon agreed to advance us up to $5.0 million. During October and November 2008, we received advances aggregating $5.0 million. The loan was secured by 14.5 million shares of
Falcon common stock we received in consideration for our sale of a 50% working interest in four exploration permits in Australia. These shares were pledged to Falcon under a pledge and security agreement. The loan carried interest at 10% payable in monthly installments and was due in full on April 30, 2009. Funds were used to satisfy various vendor obligations.  In June 2009, we sold an additional 25% interest in our four exploration permits in the Beetaloo Basin to Falcon in exchange for the relief
of this loan.





In December 2008, we issued $0.2 million in convertible debentures to three related parties. The debentures bore interest at interest at 15%. The debenture holders were issued 0.5 million warrants to purchase our common stock. Funds borrowed were used to fund the operations.





In December 2008, we borrowed $0.1 million from Global, a related party, under short term promissory notes which were unsecured and bore interest at 15%. Funds borrowed were used to fund operations.





In January 2009, we converted $.025 million in trade accounts payable into a convertible promissory note. This note bore interest at 18%. The noteholder was issued 0.07 million warrants to purchase our common stock.





The continuation and future development of our business will require substantial additional capital expenditures. Meeting capital expenditure, operational, and administrative needs for the remainder of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 and for future fiscal periods will depend on our success in farming out or selling portions of
our remaining working interests in our properties for cash and/or funding of our share of development expenses, the availability of debt or equity financing, and the results of our activities. To limit capital expenditures, we may form








23





industry alliances and exchange an appropriate portion of our interest for cash and/or a carried interest in our exploration projects using farm-out arrangements. We may need to raise additional funds to cover capital expenditures. These funds may come from equity or debt financings, a credit facility, or sales of interests in our properties,
although there is no assurance additional funding will be available or that it will be available on satisfactory terms. The global credit crisis may impact our ability to raise additional funds. If we are unable to raise capital through the methods discussed above, our ability to execute our development plans will be greatly impaired. See the Going Concern section above.





Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements





We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements.





Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We refer you to the corresponding section in Part II Item 7 and the notes to the consolidated financial statements of our Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended September 30, 2008 for the description of critical accounting policies
and estimates





Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements





In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 - “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Management believes that this FSP, will not have material impact on our financial statements.





In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4 - “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Management believes that this FSP, will not have material impact on our financial statements.





On May 28, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. Under SFAS No. 165, companies are required to evaluate events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued in the case of
non-public entities. SFAS No. 165 requires entities to recognize in the financial statements the effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but arose after that date. SFAS No. 165 also requires entities to disclose
the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. SFAS No. 165 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 165 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as required, and adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements taken as a whole. We evaluated all events or transactions that occurred from June 30, 2009 to August 13, 2009, the date that we issued these financial statements. During this period
we did not have any material recognizable or non recognizable subsequent events.





On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), which change the way entities account for securitizations and special-purpose
entities as follows:





24


SFAS No. 166 is a revision to FASB SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing
exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures.





SFAS No. 167 is a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate
an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance.





Both SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The recognition and
measurement provisions of SFAS No. 166 shall be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. We adopt both SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 on January 1, 2010, as required. We have not determined the impact adoption may have on our consolidated financial statements.





On June 29, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP. SFAS No. 168 will be effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards will be superseded. We will adopt SFAS No. 168 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as required, and adoption
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements taken as a whole.


































25




ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Commodity Price Risk





Because of our lack of current lack of oil and gas production, we are not exposed to a great degree of market risk relating to the pricing applicable to our oil and natural gas production. However, our ability to raise additional capital at attractive pricing, or generate future revenues from oil and gas operations, our future profitability
and future rate of growth all depend substantially upon the market prices of oil and natural gas, which fluctuate considerably. We expect commodity price volatility to continue. We do not currently utilize hedging contracts to protect against commodity price risk. In the future, we may manage our exposure to oil and natural gas price declines by entering into oil and natural gas price hedging arrangements to secure a price for a portion of our expected future oil and natural gas production.





Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk





We conduct business in Australia and are subject to exchange rate risk on cash flows related to sales, expenses, financing and investment transactions. We do not currently utilize hedging contracts to protect against exchange rate risk. As our foreign oil and gas production grows, we may utilize currency exchange contracts, commodity forwards,
swaps or futures contracts to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risks.





Interest Rate Risk





Interest rates on future credit facility draws and debt offerings could be higher than current levels, causing our financing costs to increase accordingly. This could limit our ability to raise funds in debt capital markets.





ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





Based on their evaluation as of the end of the quarter ended June 30, 2009, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.





Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting





As previously disclosed in our past filings with the SEC, management identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting for the years ended September 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The weaknesses that the Company previously disclosed related to (a) our lack of adequate processes for monitoring our financial reporting
and accounting processes and our failure to conduct a comprehensive review of our account balances and transactions; (b) our lack of appropriate processes and procedures, including inadequate segregation of duties; and (c) our lack of appropriate processes and procedures in relation to the timely review of material documents and transactions for accounting and disclosure purposes. In order to remediate these material weaknesses management retained additional senior accounting staff and financial consultants
and, during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2008, and into the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company designed and implemented improved processes and controls to ensure that (a) all material transactions are properly recorded, reviewed and approved; (b) all significant accounts are reconciled on a timely basis; (c) duties are properly segregated; and, (d) complex accounting issues are properly evaluated and accounted for in accordance with GAAP.





Management believes we now have sufficient individuals that collectively possess a strong background, experience and expertise related to accounting, SEC reporting and other finance functions. We now believe that the remediation steps taken in previous periods and through the quarter ended June 30, 2009, permitted observation over an





26





appropriate period of time for us to conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of June 30, 2009 to assure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified
in the SEC's rules.





Notwithstanding the existence of these past material weaknesses in internal control, we believe that the consolidated financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, our consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, and cash flows for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are in conformity with GAAP.





Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting





There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.








27


PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





As of June 30, 2009, the Company is not a party to any legal or administrative actions or proceedings.





ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS





Our viability will depend upon our ability to negotiate satisfactory arrangements with our creditors and vendors.





As of June 30, 2009, we have no revenue-producing assets and a working capital deficit of approximately $48.6 million.  During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we received debt covenant waivers from several of our lenders allowing us to extend the due dates on scheduled maturities, and or to extend due dates on scheduled interest
payments.   We will need to negotiate with other lenders for similar extensions and with vendors for extended and/or reduced payment terms in order to survive our existing cash shortage.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so.  If we are unsuccessful in these negotiation efforts, we may be unable to continue in existence.





ITEM 2.   UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS





During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we issued 1.85 million warrants to purchase our common stock at prices ranging $0.12 to $0.14 per share to the holders of our Series A 8.5% convertible debentures in connection with the receipt of waivers related to our violation of certain debt covenants.





No underwriters were used in the above stock transactions.  The Company relied upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as to these transactions, as the investors were either deemed to be sophisticated with respect to the investment in the securities due to their financial condition
and involvement in the Company’s business or accredited investors.  Restrictive legends were placed on the certificates evidencing the securities issued in both of the above transactions.





ITEM 3.   DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES





None.





ITEM 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS





Our annual meeting was held on April 20, 2009. Stockholders were invited to vote, by proxy or in person, in the election of five directors to our Board of Directors and to approve our 2009 Performance Incentive Plan. The results of the vote were as follows:





Charles D. Crowell
Carmen J. Lotito
Martin B. Oring
Matthew R. Silverman
Performance Incentive PlanFor
187,656,179
187,681,165
187,664,890
187,665,290
50,693,178Withheld
1,918,163
1,893,177
1,909,452
1,909,052
—Against
—
—
—
—
93,871,286Abstain
—
—
—
—
934,69778.39%
75.39%
75.39%
75.39%
20.36%





None.





ITEM 5.   OTHER INFORMATION





None.





ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS





See Exhibit Index


28


SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.








PETROHUNTER ENERGY CORPORATION





By:  /s/ Martin Oring


Martin Oring


Chief Executive Officer





Date: August 13, 2009





By:  /s/Paul D. Maniscalco


Paul D. Maniscalco


Principal Accounting Officer





Date: August 13, 2009


29





EXHIBIT INDEX





Regulation
S-K Number
Exhibit10.1
Purchase and Sale Agreement between PetroHunter Energy Corporation, PetroHunter Operating Company and Sweetpea Petroleum Pty Ltd. and Falcon Oil & Gas Ltd., Falcon Oil & Gas USA, Inc. and Falcon Oil & Gas Australia Pty Ltd. Dated May 26, 2009*31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Martin Oring31.2
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Paul D. Maniscalco32.1
Certification of Martin Oring Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 200232.2
Certification of Paul D. Maniscalco to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





*Incorporated by reference to the exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K, filed May 27, 2009