alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 7 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to lie 

over, under the rule 

RESOLUTION 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 

2 12:01 p.m. unless otherwise ordered. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2019139EN.01001501.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien — Austria) — BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse v Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o.

(Case C-579/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 1(1) - Scope - Civil and commercial matters - Article 1(2) - Matters excluded - Social security - Article 53 - Application for the issue of the certificate certifying that the judgment delivered by the court of origin is enforceable - Judgment relating to a claim for wage supplements regarding annual leave pay that a social security body has against an employer with respect to the posting of workers - Exercise of a judicial function by the court ruling in the case)

(2019/C 139/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse

Defendant: Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an action for payment of wage supplements in respect of annual leave pay brought by a body governed by public law against an employer, in connection with the posting of workers to a Member State where they do not have their habitual place of work, or in the context of the provision of labour in that Member State, or against an employer established outside of the territory of that Member State in connection with the employment of workers who have their habitual place of work in that Member State, falls within the scope of application of that regulation, in so far as the modalities for bringing such an action do not infringe the rules of general law and, in particular, do not exclude the possibility for the court ruling on the case to verify the merits of the information on which the establishment of that claim is based, which is a matter to be determined by the referring court.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
# C_2017293EN.01003402.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/34

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 July 2017 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-883/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Application by the Bundesnetzagentur for review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the EU requirements for its operation - Commission decision amending the exemption from the EU requirements - Application for a stay of execution of a measure - Lack of any urgency))

(2017/C 293/41)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Kawnik and K. Rudzińska, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and R. Krasuckaitė, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the requirements on third party access and tariff regulation granted under Directive 2003/55/EC.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The order of 23 December 2016 is revoked insofar as it relates to Case T-883/16 R. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The order of 23 December 2016 is revoked insofar as it relates to Case T-883/16 R.

| 3. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00353]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1403-068]

Yuba County Water Agency; Notice of Reasonable Period of Time for 
Water Quality Certification Application

    On December 30, 2024, Yuba County Water Agency submitted to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its 
application for Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality 
certification filed with the California State Water Resources Control 
Board (Water Board), in conjunction with the above captioned project. 
The submittal also included a response from the Water Board stating 
that it received the application on the same day. Pursuant to section 
4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ we hereby notify the 
Water Board of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).

Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: December 30, 2024
Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: December 
30, 2025

    If the Water Board fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying 
authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Debbie-Anne Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00353 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
A.D. v. CULLMAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160633

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 12, 2020

NO. 03-19-00366-CV

Rhonda Yvonne Davila, Appellant

v.

Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 13, 2019. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

PRBGAS TRANSPORTATION, INC.

SARBANES-OXLEYACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

In connection with thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the fiscalquarter ended June 30, 2005, I, William P. Brand, Jr., Vice President –Finance of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     This Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter endedJune 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in this Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PRB GasTransportation, Inc. for the periods presented therein.

 
| Date: March 22, 2006           |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ William P. Brand, Jr.      |   |
|                           |
| William P. Brand, Jr.          |
| Vice President – Finance  |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

1

----
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 6 

Providing for certain procedures for bringing debate to a close on any question 

in the House of Representatives and Senate, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2025 

Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Rules 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for certain procedures for bringing debate to a 

close on any question in the House of Representatives 

and Senate, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Majority Rule 

5 Resolution’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROCEDURES FOR CONSIDERATION OF BILLS AND 

7 RESOLUTIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of 

9 the Rules of the House of Representatives or the Standing 

10 Rules of the Senate, the House of Representatives and the 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 6 IH 

1 Senate may not require that more than a majority of the 

2 Members of either House of Congress voting, a quorum 

3 being present, is required to bring debate to a close on 

4 any question in such House. 

5 (b) RULES OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND

6 SENATE.—This section is enacted by Congress— 

7 (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of 

8 the Senate and House of Representatives, respec9 tively, and as such is deemed a part of the rules of 

10 each House, respectively, but applicable only with re11 spect to the procedure to be followed in that House 

12 in the case of the bill or joint resolution involved, 

13 and supersede other rules only to the extent that it 

14 is inconsistent with such rules; and 

15 (2) with full recognition of the constitutional 

16 right of either House to change the rules (so far as 

17 relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, 

18 in the same manner, and to the same extent as in 

19 the case of any other rule of that House. 

Æ 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MAX Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 29, 2005





/s/ David Pearce

------------------------------------

David Pearce, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
Case 3:04-cv-00816-G Document 86 Filed 07/22/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1307
Case 3:04-cv-00816-G Document 86 Filed 07/22/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 1308
Case 3:04-cv-00816-G Document 86 Filed 07/22/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 1309
Case 3:04-cv-00816-G Document 86 Filed 07/22/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 1310
Exhibit
13.1
   Certification
of Periodic Financial Report
 Pursuant
to 18 USC. Section 1350
  The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual
report of ABN AMRO Holding N.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December
2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
  Gerrit
Zalm, the Chairman of the Managing Board and David Cole, the Chief Financial
Officer of ABN AMRO Holding N.V., each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:
  1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and
  2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ABN AMRO
      Holding N.V.
  Date:  27
March 2009
 
 By:
              /s/
      Gerrit ZalmName:
              Gerrit
      ZalmTitle:
              Chairman
      of the Managing Board
 
 By:
              /s/
      David ColeName:
              David
      ColeTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer
BTXN 027 (rev. 06/13)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Highland Select Equity Master Fund, L.P. Case No.: 23−31037−swe7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

Dear Mr. Seidel:

 The above referenced case has been reviewed as part of the Clerk's Office continuing effort to identify cases that

are deficient for specific documents. Our review indicates that this case requires:

Interim Report

Trustee's Final Account

Trustee's Final Report

341 Meeting Minute Sheet and Exempt Property Report

Report of Trustee in No−Asset Case and Application for Closing

Motion to Dismiss debtor's Failure to Attend 341 Meeting

Other: The notice of meeting of creditors (rescheduled) to be re−docketed using the "Meeting of

creditors continued/adjourned" event found under the Trustee/US Trustee category.

Please electronically file the requested documents, provide a specific date for which this information will be provided

to the Court, or provide information as to why this case should remain open. Failure to respond within 2 days from

the date of this letter may result in the Court setting a status conference to determine why the document(s) has not

been filed or the matter may be denied for want of prosecution.

DATED: 7/11/23 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/Tracy Nunns, Deputy Clerk

tracy_nunns@txnb.uscourts.gov

Case 23-31037-swe7 Doc 22 Filed 07/11/23 Entered 07/11/23 09:00:57 Desc

Letter RE deficiency (BK) Page 1 of 1
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 13 Filed 04/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 34
# C_2016243EN.01004701.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/47

---

Action brought on 12 May 2016 — Polskie Zdroje v EUIPO (perlage)

(Case T-239/16)

(2016/C 243/53)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Polskie Zdroje sp. z o.o. sp. k. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: T. Gawrylczyk, legal adviser)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘perlage’ — application for registration no 13 472 899

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2016 in Case R 1129/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KEITHIAN DANIELS, ID # 33157-077, )

)

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-0822-N

)

K.J. WENDT, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED November 4, 2005.

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00822-N Document 12 Filed 11/04/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2022

No. 04-21-00565-CR

John Anthony SCHARRINGHAUSEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR2612

Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After receiving an initial sixty day extension, appellant’s brief was due on October 10, 

2022. On October 11, 2022, appellant filed a motion requesting an additional sixty-day extension 

of time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. Appellant’s brief is 

due no later than November 9, 2022. Further requests for extension of time will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Advanced Power Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg Haugen, VicePresident, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.CSection 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Advanced  Power Technology, Inc.                                                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                               |
|   |                                                                                                               |
|   | By: /s/ GREG  HAUGEN                                                                                               |   |
|   | Vice  President, Finance and Administration,  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|   | November 13,  2002                                                                                                 |

 

----
# C_2018142EN.01001802.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/18

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2018 — GX v European Commission

(Case C-233/17 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Civil service - Open Competition EPSO/AD/248/13 - Decision not to include the appellant on the reserve list))

(2018/C 142/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: GX (represented by: G.-M. Enache, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and P. Mihaylova, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | GX shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

GX shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

1

---
John MONFEE v. Grady HICKS and Hicks Equipment Sales, LLC

1160238

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 01/01-0416]

Brookside Mezzanine Fund II, L.P.; Surrender of License of Small 
Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under section 309 of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company 
under the Small Business Investment Company license number 01/01-0416 
issued to Brookside Mezzanine Fund II, L.P., said license is hereby 
declared null and void.

Thomas Morris,
Director, Patient Capital Investments, Office of Investment and 
Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2025-00131 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, S.
Gregory Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ S.Gregory Clevenger

S. Gregory Clevenger
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
Mario PRATT, Appellant, v. Deryl LOAR, in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Indian River County, Appellee.

No. 4D18-340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 2:03-cv-00281-J Document 8 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
Case 4:03-cv-00422-A Document 51 Filed 03/25/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 291
Case 4:03-cv-00422-A Document 51 Filed 03/25/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 292
Case 4:03-cv-00422-A Document 51 Filed 03/25/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 293
TC 09, LLC, John and Jane Doe, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ROSEWOOD GARDENS OF TAMPA BAY, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 5:04-cv-00205-C Document 18 Filed 05/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 75