alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 189 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the leasing authority 

of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the 

leasing authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securities and Ex5 change Commission Real Estate Leasing Authority Rev6 ocation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 189 IH

1 SEC. 2. LEASING OF SPACE FOR SECURITIES AND EX2 CHANGE COMMISSION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3304 of title 40, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(e) LEASING OF SPACE FOR SECURITIES AND EX7 CHANGE COMMISSION.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, on and after the date of enactment of this 

9 subsection, the Securities and Exchange Commission may 

10 not lease general purpose office space. The Administrator 

11 may lease such space for the Securities and Exchange 

12 Commission under section 585 and this chapter.’’. 

13 (b) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.— 

14 The amendment made by subsection (a) may not be con15 strued to invalidate or otherwise affect a lease entered into 

16 by the Securities and Exchange Commission before the 

17 date of enactment of this Act. 

18 SEC. 3. INDEPENDENT LEASING AUTHORITIES. 

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the 

20 United States shall submit to the Committee on Transpor21 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, 

22 the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 

23 Senate, and the Committee on Homeland Security and 

24 Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report on the review 

25 described in subsection (b). 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 189 IH

1 (b) REVIEW.—The Comptroller General shall com2 plete a review under which the Comptroller General shall 

3 update the 2016 report of the Comptroller General (GAO– 

4 16–648) with a specific focus on the following: 

5 (1) Updating the information included in Ap6 pendix II: Federal Entities That Reported Having 

7 Independent Leasing Authority for Domestic Offices 

8 and Warehouses of such report. 

9 (2) Determining to what extent Federal entities 

10 with independent leasing authorities have had such 

11 authorities rescinded or amended and the number 

12 and amount of office and warehouse space such enti13 ties lease. 

14 (3) Determining to what extent have agencies 

15 with independent leasing authority utilized the Gen16 eral Services Administration for leasing, including 

17 utilization of delegation of authority. 

18 (4) Identifying progress made on implementing 

19 the recommendations in such report. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Herbert Lee BUTLER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 5, 2019

Herbert Lee Butler, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Romerio Latee WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0660

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. Dumencu,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








OCCULOGIX,
      INC.Date
      : August  11,  2008
            By:
            /s/ William
      G. Dumencu
Case 2:04-cr-00071-J Document 116 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 372
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF K.D.L., et al.

No. 2018-CJ-1933

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, § 6.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TRACY DEAN DANIEL, ID # 61480-080, )

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-2047-P

) ECF

DAVID BERKEBILE, Warden, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 28 day of September 2007. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### James R. Reed, *Appellant,*v. Arthur Merrill, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 25, 1927.

*PL. Pierre Branning,*for Appellant;

*Godard & PPyzer,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bin
Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      October 15,2009
            By:
            /s/ Bin
      WangBin
      WangPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Jennifer Amanda TAYLOR v. Donald Brian MOTON

2160660

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1207-1208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00058]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

[[Page 1208]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1217 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1023, K2025-1022.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00058 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Christopher D. WARD, DOC #979923, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1778

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 12.1

GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION

STATEMENT SETTING FORTH DETAIL FOR COMPUTATION OF

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Millions
of dollars)



|                                              |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                              |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|                                              |  | 2006                    |         |   | 2005 |   |       | 2004 | 
|Fixed charges:                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Interest expense, gross                       |  | $                       | 37.0    |   |      | $ | 41.3  |      |  | $ | 55.5  |  
|Portion of rentals representative of interest |  |                         | 86.6    |   |      |   | 61.4  |      |  |   | 35.6  |  
|                                              |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Total fixed charges                           |  | $                       | 123.6   |   |      | $ | 102.7 |      |  | $ | 91.1  |  
|                                              |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Earnings before fixed charges:                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Income before income taxes                    |  | $                       | 1,117.9 |   |      | $ | 486.0 |      |  | $ | 98.0  |  
|Fixed charges                                 |  |                         | 123.6   |   |      |   | 102.7 |      |  |   | 91.1  |  
|Capitalized interest                          |  |                         | (20.5   | ) |      |   | (38.1 | )    |  |   | (41.0 | )
|Amortization of capitalized interest          |  |                         | 6.6     |   |      |   | 3.9   |      |  |   | 3.4   |  
|                                              |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Total earnings before fixed charges           |  | $                       | 1,227.6 |   |      | $ | 554.5 |      |  | $ | 151.5 |  
|                                              |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:           |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Earnings before fixed charges                 |  | $                       | 1,227.6 |   |      | $ | 554.5 |      |  | $ | 151.5 |  
|Fixed charges                                 |  | $                       | 123.6   |   |      | $ | 102.7 |      |  | $ | 91.1  |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            |  |                         | 9.93    |   |      |   | 5.40  |      |  |   | 1.66  |  
|                                              |  |                         |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |
# C_2016191EN.01003902.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/39

---

Action brought on 4 April 2016 — Intesa Sanpaolo v EUIPO — Intesia Group Holding (INTESA)

(Case T-143/16)

(2016/C 191/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Torino, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intesia Group Holding GmbH (Böblingen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘INTESA’ — EU trade mark No 3 105 277

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2016 in Case R 632/2015-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the other parties to pay the costs of the present proceeding, as well as those of the EUIPO application for revocation and appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other parties to pay the costs of the present proceeding, as well as those of the EUIPO application for revocation and appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and 51(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and 51(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, 

created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

 

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

Dated: November 17, 2005 

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                            SCHEDULE OF OMITTED NOTES

      The following documents have been omitted as Exhibits to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K because they are on substantially identical terms as Exhibit 10.25
in all material respects other than with respect to the principal amounts and
interest rates of each of the notes.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Interest
                       Agreement                           Amount     Rate
-------------------------------------------------------   -------   --------
<S>                                                       <C>       <C>
1.  Note between the company and Edwin P. Kuhn            $77,260     4.76%

2.  Note between the company and James W. George          $57,950     4.76%

3.  Note between the company and Michael H. Hinderliter   $57,950     4.76%

4.  Note between the company and Timothy L. Doane         $57,950     6.01%

5.  Note between the company and Joseph A. Szima          $38,640     6.01%
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 16, 2025.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 8, 2025.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-00587 Filed 1-8-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# Public Corruption

Public corruption is the FBI’s top criminal investigative priority, that includes border corruption, election crimes, international corruption and prison corruption.

- Election Crimes The FBI, through its Public Corruption Unit, has an important but limited role in ensuring fair and free elections.
- International Corruption The FBI’s International Corruption Unit is the leading investigative entity in combating foreign corruption and manages the Bureau's international corruption programs.
- Prison Corruption The FBI’s prison corruption initiative addresses contraband smuggling by local, state, and federal prison officials.
- Border Corruption The FBI recognizes and helps combat the very real threat public corruption at our nation’s borders and all other ports of entry pose.
- Major Cases Major FBI public corruption cases over the years.
- Regional Corruption Hotlines To report public corruption in your area, contact your local FBI public corruption hotline.
- News News and press releases relating to public corruption.
- Publications Public corruption publications.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q of PetroHunter Energy Corporation (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May 15, 2009
            /s/ Martin
      Oring


Martin Oring


Chief Executive Officer