alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 104

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee on the 
    Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese 
        Communist Party in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2025

Mr. Moolenaar submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee on the 
    Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese 
        Communist Party in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Select Committee on the Strategic 
Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Select Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $10,740,218 for the One 
Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,366,830 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $5,373,388 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Select Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Select 
Committee, and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOUGLAS BARCLAY,

Appellant,

v.

DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-2088

[March 30, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16-

005080.

Bernardo Protano of Bernardo Protano, Esq., P.A., Hollywood, for 

appellant.

Robert Garven, Margate, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Ian Morris, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of HouseValues, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2005
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________
No. 23

- 30568 Summary Calendar

____________ Raymond H. Kimble, III,

Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus

Keith Cooley; Brent Thompson; J. Pelican; John Doe, Administrative Remedy Program Screening Officer ; James LeBlanc,

Defendants

— Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:23

- CV

- 921

______________________________
Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Raymond H. Kimble, III , Louisiana prisoner # 503830, filed a pro se
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In the instant appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion s for a temporary restraining order (TRO)

_____________________

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Ru le 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 28, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30568 Document: 00517015402 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/28/2023No. 23

- 30568

2 and the appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal f or lack of jurisdiction because Kimble’s appeal does not correspond to any appealable
decision in the district court

. The district court’s denial of a TRO is not an appealable decision. In re Lieb , 915 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1990). Further, we lack jur isdiction to hear an appeal directly from the magistrate judge’s order denying the appointment of counsel

. S ee Butler v. S. Porter , 999 F.3d 287, 297 (5th Cir. 2021)

. The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. In light of our lack of jurisdiction, Kimble ’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED

. To the extent that Kimble’s brief includes a motion for a restraining order, it is also DENIED

. Case: 23-30568 Document: 00517015402 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/28/2023
EX PARTE Bert BOWERS

CR-16-0808

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 55 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 55

         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

    Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Perry) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT OF 1993.

    The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20501 et 
seq.) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Cary M. Grossman, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Coastal Bancshares Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

|   | • |   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: November 10, 2005

 

|                                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Cary M. Grossman

Cary M. Grossman

Co-Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
A'd. tr-frDbiiB^dL or-ts-ww ~£/l

I MTTD 4^J«,, ^^

Fis-sqsiiv-s\ nz-s'znii-^

Tie Jt»HU*dk Judces d li*. {J**/ 6t ^•M/^//^AfsrlLED INj

QF CRIMINAL APPEALS

A^s art Ay AJa SL.J X. Al4,^i; Mj JiL 4hu MAR 27 23»5

. a, /) // A a J - ^oeiAcosta, Clerk LJliJcii -H> rib A tt-hft'M -he Di'saufiTvi/Huf Kwie-u;, Jd jULfpn t !

M

~~fnz pjJ-;i,infjL ^6 ce^i//tfjuL--./A)-^n& T-LAls/iiJ t-*^ vf

QftlfRj Ccu/\Jif jTZas sf $4. fltkrtie,i #7../jjj/a.'ofuL.fosse**,'mi, at_

/ 4e /W/ oP Appals S* b,sAiJ d*t/»s 1Z»j..It*.

/he fiLescfif dr*J/;«M •TO./L ...h'J/n^ iif.t &&c>77 it a. Pxaa^-fy/ry^^

J,tt/> /$tptf4-S/>s Jo <?eii fi'J l/pe*3enf<:#i'iA //cL-Ao .Mmk4--->.M^-
<QU4-_

LAj/Msh

: TiJtUJUteCZt jJkuuJ-tt* f .faJittfjJL, /jJih'^^J^ pUlfi filfilfi. +ths -HU'jj ColuJ UtUt <ML#a1ML*A-f /J.Ate

KouC**J& -$4»*V j^ /?7C75D 9

^6/?/ m 20^

7-L*A^£±r^ C/^y /<£MS ftlS f

b.&xie- -At\/-

.ptflag<~ ffr /)4j</ -h'/ts/ c/*-*S <Jc fi^it^/^ 4*fi~ "?/aA

n{j-J/ JkA.,-rJ... M^ttys Met, mM. 1,'^uJL.^Mi/. ti-n

JL^/t*l*dkSjLd3iuy^^

1+sbtJ 4.foe ieStLCtz^c***.,A-Tg<T tti

J / . Of U 7 7 /j^ M/¥ {a/A,W /A/r fff ^>(M—^^fm^J—tLZiU^icAL-J.^£.c^^ /J_

£/^^Li>_i^/7^LA-/A^_^r

£^J}*J<j^jLdL^-Lg6isb_

jjUulaL

^^llALjzsS^L

"JUtJ^tzSr*^ CLiSi l*-*** 7Sitj_
Case 3:04-cv-01861-B     Document 151-2      Filed 01/06/2006     Page 1 of 6

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B     Document 151-2      Filed 01/06/2006     Page 2 of 6

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B     Document 151-2      Filed 01/06/2006     Page 3 of 6

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B     Document 151-2      Filed 01/06/2006     Page 4 of 6

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B     Document 151-2      Filed 01/06/2006     Page 5 of 6

Case 3:04-cv-01861-B     Document 151-2      Filed 01/06/2006     Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Kendle International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Candace Kendle, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge,:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 16, 2005

/s/ Candace Kendle
-----------------------
Candace Kendle
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kendle International Inc. and will be retained by Kendle
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. John SMITH

NO. 2019-KK-0437

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 20, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

CLARK, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of ClearPoint
Business Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009
(the “Report”) that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




CLEARPOINT
      BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.Date: August
      19, 2009
            By:  /s/ John G.
      Phillips
              
              John
      G. Phillips
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (principal
      financial officer)


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Barbara Halpern ALTOMARE and Richard Altomare, Appellants, v. BOCAIRE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D18-1501

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Angie Avery COLLINS v. James Thomas COLLINS

2160795

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:03-cv-02282-M Document 14 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 246
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129478 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

KAREN F. RICHARDS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129478 

 COA: 261189 

WCAC: 04-000216 

ADAPT BRANCH, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 254 

To prohibit the Director of the National Science Foundation from awarding 

grants and other forms of assistance to Chinese communist military 

companies and their affiliates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Director of the National Science Foundation 

from awarding grants and other forms of assistance to 

Chinese communist military companies and their affiliates, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Science First 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 254 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

2 GRANTS AND OTHER FORMS OF ASSISTANCE 

3 TO CHINESE COMMUNIST MILITARY COMPA4 NIES AND THEIR AFFILIATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the Director of the National Science Founda7 tion may not provide grants or other forms of assistance 

8 to any individual or entity that is affiliated or otherwise 

9 has a relationship, including but not limited to a research 

10 partnership, joint venture, or contract with— 

11 (1) an entity included on the list maintained 

12 and set forth in Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of 

13 the Export Administration Regulations; 

14 (2) a company on the list required by section 

15 1237 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Au16 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 

17 105–261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note), or required by sec18 tion 1260H of the Mac Thornberry National De19 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub20 lic Law 116–283), or any successor list; or 

21 (3) any parent, subsidiary, affiliate of, or entity 

22 owned by or controlled by, an entity described in 

23 paragraph (1) or (2). 

24 (b) EXPORT ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS DE25 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Export Administration 

26 Regulations’’ means the regulations set forth in subVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:26 Jan 31, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H254.IH H254

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 254 IH

1 chapter C of chapter VII of title 15, Code of Federal Reg2 ulations, or successor regulations. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny Ray COLLINS

NO. 2018-KH-0801

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.
#### A. C. Blowers, *Appellant,*v. Annie Test Blowers et al., *Appellees.*

En Bane.

Decision Filed October 31, 1927.

*J. G. Davant,*for Appellant;

*McMullen, Worth & Draper,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of. the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby-affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 12.2


Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EXFO Inc., hereby certifies, that:




1.
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 of EXFO fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EXFO.




Date:           November 25, 2013










/s/Germain Lamonde


Germain Lamonde


Chairman of the Board,


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MALTIDE JEAN

- LOUIS , Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWALT, INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 205

- 33CB MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005

- 33CB , SILFA JEAN

LOUIS, LEONADE JEAN

- LOUIS and TATYANA JEAN

- LOUIS, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 21 37

[ April 4, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CA032738XXXXMB

. Philippe Symonovicz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Dariel Abrahamy of Greenspoon M arder, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellee Bank of New York Mellon.

P ER C URIAM

. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)

.

G ROSS , T AYLOR and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, 

created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

 

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

Dated: November 17, 2005 

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.