alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1223 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1032, K2025-1031.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00049 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX PARTE T.D.

CR-17-0152

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 13, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Janero L. MCBRIDE

No. 2018-KO-0580

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 1 of 33   PageID 4700

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 2 of 33   PageID 4701

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 3 of 33   PageID 4702

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 4 of 33   PageID 4703

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 5 of 33   PageID 4704

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 6 of 33   PageID 4705

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 7 of 33   PageID 4706

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 8 of 33   PageID 4707

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 9 of 33   PageID 4708

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 10 of 33   PageID 4709

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 11 of 33   PageID 4710

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 12 of 33   PageID 4711

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 13 of 33   PageID 4712

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 14 of 33   PageID 4713

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 15 of 33   PageID 4714

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 16 of 33   PageID 4715

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 17 of 33   PageID 4716

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 18 of 33   PageID 4717

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 19 of 33   PageID 4718

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 20 of 33   PageID 4719

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 21 of 33   PageID 4720

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 22 of 33   PageID 4721

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 23 of 33   PageID 4722

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 24 of 33   PageID 4723

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 25 of 33   PageID 4724

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 26 of 33   PageID 4725

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 27 of 33   PageID 4726

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 28 of 33   PageID 4727

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 29 of 33   PageID 4728

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 30 of 33   PageID 4729

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 31 of 33   PageID 4730

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 32 of 33   PageID 4731

Case 3:05-cv-00627-L   Document 282   Filed 09/10/10    Page 33 of 33   PageID 4732
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00738]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant and cooperative agreement applications 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant and 
cooperative agreement applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review 
Group; NST-4 Study Section.
    Date: February 6-7, 2025.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Steven G. Britt, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/
NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-
480-1953, [email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; HEAL--Pain Therapeutics 
Development Review.
    Date: March 6, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: W. Ernest Lyons, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-4056, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 8, 2025.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00738 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
John Clayton OWENS, Jr. v. STATE

CR-15-1034

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Lakeside Financial Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   December 20, 2004                     ____________/S/____________
                                               William F. Webster,
                                               President of Manager
                                               Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
#### The Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Anna B. McCullough, Administratrix of the Estate of Roy H. McCullough, Deceased, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed October 19, 1927.

*Wilson & Boswell,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Ira C. Hopper,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it .is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.98

        2006 BASE SALARIES AND 2005 BONUSES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     On March 9, 2006, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors
approved increases in the base salaries of certain of the named executives, to
be effective April 1, 2006 and bonuses for the named executives effective for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as set forth below. The base salary for
Robert Drewes was increased by the Compensation Committee on July 12, 2005.

NAME AND POSITION                         BASE SALARY                2005 BONUS
--------------------------------    ------------------------     ---------------------

Frank C. Lanza                                    $1,100,000                $1,200,000
Michael T. Strianese                                $550,000                  $630,000
Christopher C. Cambria                              $475,000                  $575,000
Charles J. Schafer                                  $450,000                  $525,000
Robert W. Drewes                                    $450,000                  $750,000

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```
Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 182 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1377
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 182 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1378
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 182 Filed 05/06/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1379
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 272 

To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the entities will 

not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity that performs, 

an abortion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. FEENSTRA, Mr. CRENSHAW, 

Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. EZELL, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. 

JACKSON of Texas, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. 

ELLZEY, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. BOST, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. 

THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. SMITH of 

New Jersey, Mr. MANN, Mr. TAYLOR, Mrs. BICE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

GUEST, Mr. ONDER, Mr. BABIN, and Mr. LATTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify 

the entities will not perform, or provide any funding 

to any other entity that performs, an abortion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Life and 

5 Taxpayers Act of 2025’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 272 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ABORTION. 

2 (a) PROHIBITION.—No Federal funds may be pro3 vided (directly or indirectly, including through contract or 

4 subcontract) to an entity unless the entity certifies that, 

5 during the period for which such funds are provided, the 

6 entity will not perform, and will not provide any funds 

7 to any other entity that performs, an abortion. 

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply with 

9 respect to an abortion where— 

10 (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or in11 cest; or 

12 (2) a physician certifies that the woman suffers 

13 from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical 

14 illness that would place the woman in danger of 

15 death unless an abortion is performed, including a 

16 life-threatening physical condition caused by or aris17 ing from the pregnancy itself. 

18 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the term ‘‘entity’’ 

19 means the entire legal entity, including any entity that 

20 controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with 

21 such entity. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30


                                February 15, 2002


Mr. C. Russell Luigs
GlobalSantaFe Corporation
777 N. Eldridge Parkway
Houston, Texas 77079-4493

Dear Mr. Luigs:

     You previously entered into a letter employment agreement dated May 6, 1999
(the "Agreement"), by and among Global Marine Inc. ("GMI"), Global Marine
Corporate Services Inc. (now, by change of name, GlobalSantaFe Corporate
Services Inc. ("GSFCSI")) as the employer, and you as the employee.
GlobalSantaFe Corporation ("GSF") has subsequently assumed all rights and
obligations of GMI under the Agreement. This letter will serve as evidence of an
amendment to the Agreement (the "First Amendment").

     GSF and GSFCSI agree to amend the Agreement by extending the expiration of
the term of your employment thereunder from (a) the earlier of the time of GSF's
annual meeting of shareholders in 2002 or May 31, 2002, to (b) August 31, 2002.
In the event your employment or the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment
is terminated without your consent for reasons other than Cause prior to August
31, 2002, GSF and GSFCSI will continue your salary until August 31, 2002. During
this period, your group insurance benefits will also be continued for you until
similar benefits are provided through other employment, and all stock options
granted to you by GMI will remain exercisable in accordance with their terms.

     The Agreement as amended by this First Amendment supersedes any and all
prior employment agreements, plans, policies and other arrangements between you
and GMI, GSFCSI or GSF regarding the terms and conditions of your employment
with GMI, GSFCSI or GSF and any salary, bonus or severance payments to which you
may be entitled in respect of such employment, but it shall not affect your
entitlement to any other compensation or benefits to which you may be entitled
in respect of such employment.

     Capitalized terms used in this First Amendment and not defined herein are
used as they are defined in the Agreement. Except as expressly amended by this
First Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is
hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

<TABLE>

<S>                                     <C>
GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION               GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATE
                                        SERVICES INC.

By:  /s/ C. Stedman Garber, Jr.         By: /s/ James L. McCulloch
     --------------------------         -----------------------------
     C. Stedman Garber, Jr.             James L. McCulloch
     President and CEO                  Vice President
</TABLE>

Accepted and Agreed:

/s/ C. Russell Luigs
C. Russell Luigs
Crystal MCCAFFREY, Appellant, v. Aaron ASHLEY, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2304

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Tania R. Schmidt-Alpers, of Tania R. Schmidt-Alpers, P.A., St. Augustine, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

WALLIS, J.,

Appellant, Crystal McCaffrey, appeals the trial court's summary denial of her petition for injunction against stalking from Appellee, Aaron Ashley. In her injunction petition, Appellant alleged that over the span of several days Appellee, a former co-worker, sent her over 160 unwanted photographs, videos, and messages, which she described as "graphic, obscene sexual statements." Appellant also alleged that she requested that Appellee stop communicating with her and that these communications "made [her] feel very uncomfortable and unsafe." The trial court summarily denied the petition without prejudice, finding that the Appellant failed to allege sufficient facts even after being afforded an opportunity to amend her petition. In its denial, the trial court failed to provide any explanation as to how Appellant's allegations were insufficient.

"In order to be entitled to an injunction for stalking, the petitioner must allege and prove two separate instances of stalking." *David v. Schack*, 192 So.3d 625, 627-28 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citing *Roach v. Brower*, 180 So.3d 1142, 1144 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ). "Each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support an injunction against stalking." *Packal v. Johnson*, 226 So.3d 337, 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (quoting *David*, 192 So.3d at 628 ). We note that the Fourth District Court has held that it is improper to summarily deny a petition for an injunction without providing an explanation "as to how the allegations are insufficient," or without a hearing. *Chizh v. Chizh*, 199 So.3d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citing *Sanchez v. State*, 785 So.2d 672, 677 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) ); *see**Vitale v. Holmes*, 229 So.3d 832, 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ("[O]ur case law requires the court to hold a hearing, or otherwise provide an explanation of those deficiencies, prior to summarily denying the petition.").

In this case, Appellant was entitled to either an order that specified the deficiencies in her allegations or an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case for the trial court either to hold an evidentiary hearing or to provide a specific explanation for its denial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED with Instructions.

EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2






Statement Pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
undersigned, Sherry Couturier, CFO of Hammonds Industries, Inc., Inc, a Nevada
corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section
906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this
report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008.
  The
undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all respects, the
financial condition of Hammonds Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.
   Date:  November
14, 2008
 Sherry
Couturier
 CFO
 /s/ Sherry
Couturier
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Delta Seaboard International, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  May 13, 2011


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
# C_2016462EN.01002801.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/28

---

Action brought on 5 October 2016 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

(Case T-712/16)

(2016/C 462/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: S. Völcker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul, in whole or in part, Commission Decision C(2016) 4964 final of 25 July 2016 in Case No M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss — Commission decision on Lufthansa’s request for a partial waiver of the commitments concerning the Zurich-Stockholm and Zurich-Warsaw routes; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, in whole or in part, Commission Decision C(2016) 4964 final of 25 July 2016 in Case No M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss — Commission decision on Lufthansa’s request for a partial waiver of the commitments concerning the Zurich-Stockholm and Zurich-Warsaw routes;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because it is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment and as a result breaches the principles of proportionality and protection of legitimate expectations by refusing to review and/or waive certain commitments imposed by Commission Decision of 4 July 2005 in Case No COMP/M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because it is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment and as a result breaches the principles of proportionality and protection of legitimate expectations by refusing to review and/or waive certain commitments imposed by Commission Decision of 4 July 2005 in Case No COMP/M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss.

Lufthansa/Swiss.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because the Commission has breached the principle of good administration in failing to assess carefully and impartially all the elements of the case. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because the Commission has breached the principle of good administration in failing to assess carefully and impartially all the elements of the case.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because the Commission has misused its powers in circumventing the administrative procedure under Regulation 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because the Commission has misused its powers in circumventing the administrative procedure under Regulation 1/2003.

---