[Cite as State v. Cox , 2023

- Ohio

- 377.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
STATE OF OHIO , :

Plaintiff

- Appell ee , : No s . 111636 , 111640, v. : and 111651 BRIAN L. COX, JR ., :

Defendant

- Appel l ant

. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: February 9, 2023

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No s . CR

- 21
- 660012

- A, CR

- 21
- 660090

- A, CR

- 22
- 669956

- A , DL

- 21
- 100138, DL

- 21
- 100881, and DL

- 21
- 111153

Appearances:
Michael C. O ’ Malley , Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sean Kilbane , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for a

ppellee

. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Lauren Hammersmith , Assistant State Public Defender , for a ppellant

.ANITA LASTER MAYS , A. J.:
Defendant

- appellant Brian L. Cox , Jr. (“Cox”) appeals the trial court ’ s judgment sentencing him to an indefinite prison term pursuant to the Reagan Tokes
Law. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.

Cox was charged in three complaints in Cuyahoga County Juvenile
C ourt. 1 After the court found probable cause in relation to all counts in each

comp laint, Cox ’ s cases were transferred to the general division of the common pleas

court. Cox entered guilty pleas to one count of aggregated robbery in Cuyahoga C.P.
No. CR

- 21
- 660012; two count s of aggravated robbery (with three

- year firearm specifications), one count of robbery, and one count of aggravate burglary (with a
three

- year firearm specification) in Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR

- 21
- 660090; and one count of robbery in Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR

- 22
- 669956

. Cox agreed to a recommended sentence with a range of 14 to 18 years. The trial court sentenced Cox
to an agg r egate prison sentence of 14 to 16.5 years, subject to the Reagan Tokes Law indefinite sentencing scheme.

Cox ’ s trial counsel objected to the imposition of the Reagan Tokes Law citing that it was unconstitutional. Cox filed this appeal and assigned one error
for our review: The Reagan Tokes Law violates the Ohio and U.S. Con stitutions, Cox ’ s sentence is contrary to law. R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution; Articles I, II, and II I of the U.S.

1 Cox ’ s three juvenile cases were DL

- 21
- 100138, DL

- 21
- 100881, and DL

- 21
- 1 1 1153.Constitution; and Article I, Sections 5, 10, and 16 of the Ohio

Constitution.
I. Law and Anal ysis

In Cox ’ s sole assign ed error, he argues that his sentence violates the separation

- of

- powers doctrine and does not satisfy the requirements of due process, and thereby violates his constitutional rights.

Cox ’ s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court ’ s en banc
decision in State v. Delvallie , 2022
- Ohio

- 470, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist.).

Judgment affirmed. It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to

Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Proce dure.

______________________________________ ANITA LASTER MAYS, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
FRANK D ANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J. , CONCUR

N.B. Administrative Judge Anita Laster Mays is constrained to apply Delvallie ’ s en banc decision

. For a full explanation of her analysis, see State v. Delvallie , 2022
- Ohio

- 470, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist.) (Laster Mays, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Judge Mary Eileen Kilbane joined the dissenting opinion by Judge Lisa B. Forbes and the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by Administrative Judge Anita Laster Mays in Delvallie and would have found the Reagan Tokes Law unconstitutional.