alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Executive Order 14136

# Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice

                    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq*. (the “Act”), it is hereby ordered that:                 

**Section 1**                    .                     *Order of Succession*. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, and to the limitations set forth in the Act, the following officials of the Department of Justice, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:                 

(a) United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; 

(b) United States Attorney for the District of Arizona; 

(c) United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; and

(d) United States Attorney for the District of Hawaii. 

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Exceptions*. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1(a)-(d) of this order in an acting capacity shall, by virtue of so serving, act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.                 

(b) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1(a)-(d) of this order shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Act. 

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General. 

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *Revocation*. Executive Order 13787 of March 31, 2017 (Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice), is hereby revoked.                 

**Sec. 4**                    .                     *General Provisions*. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2025-00611

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 52 Filed 12/15/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 280
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 52 Filed 12/15/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 281
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 52 Filed 12/15/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 282
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles CARTER

NO. 2018-K-1836

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
# C_2016441EN.01002601.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/26

---

Action brought on 26 September 2016 — Elevolution-Engenharia v Commission

(Case T-691/16)

(2016/C 441/30)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Elevolution-Engenharia SA (Amadora, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pinto Cardoso and L. Fuzeta da Ponte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | grant the application in its entirety and thereby annul the Commission’s decisions containing the debit notes received by the applicant by letter on 3 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the application in its entirety and thereby annul the Commission’s decisions containing the debit notes received by the applicant by letter on 3 August 2016;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs, to be assessed. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs, to be assessed.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging lack of competence. It is submitted that the Commission lacks the competence and powers to adopt the acts which are to be annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging lack of competence. It is submitted that the Commission lacks the competence and powers to adopt the acts which are to be annulled.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements. The reasoning of the disputed notes is implied or tacit, or clothed in obscurity, and the notes are not consistent with EU law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements. The reasoning of the disputed notes is implied or tacit, or clothed in obscurity, and the notes are not consistent with EU law.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringements of the Treaty and rules for its implementation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringements of the Treaty and rules for its implementation.

---
Order entered October 18, 2017

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00182

- CR

CHRISTOPHER LOWELL E MERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from t he County Criminal Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB1449199

- G



### O RDER

We GRANT the State’s October 17, 2017 “Second Motion for Extension of Time to File

State’s Brief” and ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court contempor aneously with

the motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

PRESIDING JUSTICE
# C_2017038EN.01004801.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/48

---

Action brought on 7 December 2016 — fritz-kulturgüter v EUIPO — Sumol + Compal Marcas (fritz-wasser)

(Case T-862/16)

(2017/C 038/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: fritz-kulturgüter GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: G. Schindler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA (Oeiras Carnaxide, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘fritz-wasser’ — Application No 12 314 753

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 October 2016 in Case R 1510/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision to the effect that the appeal is dismissed in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to the effect that the appeal is dismissed in its entirety;

| — | allow application No 012 314 753 to proceeding to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow application No 012 314 753 to proceeding to registration;

| — | order the opponent to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and order the defendant to pay the remainder of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opponent to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and order the defendant to pay the remainder of the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2018341EN.01001103.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/11

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Limoges — France) — BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v Roger Ducloux, Marie Josée Ducloux

(Case C-618/17) (1)

(2018/C 341/17)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

---
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 38 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2025 

Mr. THUNE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following committees for 

3 the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress, or until their suc4 cessors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC

6 WORKS: Mrs. Capito (Chair), Mr. Cramer, Ms. Lummis, 

7 Mr. Curtis, Mr. Graham, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. 

8 Wicker, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Husted. 

9 COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND

10 PENSIONS: Mr. Cassidy (Chair), Mr. Paul, Ms. Collins, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 38 ATS 

1 Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Scott (SC), 

2 Mr. Hawley, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Banks, Mr. Husted, Mrs. 

3 Moody. 

4 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOV5 ERNMENTAL AFFAIRS: Mr. Paul (Chair), Mr. Johnson, 

6 Mr. Lankford, Mr. Scott (FL), Mr. Hawley, Mr. Moreno, 

7 Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Moody. 

8 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Grassley 

9 (Chair), Mr. Graham, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Lee, Mr. Cruz, Mr. 

10 Hawley, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 

11 Schmitt, Mrs. Britt, Mrs. Moody. 

12 SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE: Mr. Cotton 

13 (Chair), Mr. Risch, Ms. Collins, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Moran, 

14 Mr. Lankford, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Young, Mr. Budd. 

15 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING: Mr. Scott (FL) 

16 (Chair), Mr. McCormick, Mr. Justice, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. 

17 Johnson, Mrs. Moody, Mr. Husted. 

18 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE: Mr. Schmitt (Chair), 

19 Mr. Cotton, Mr. Budd, Mr. McCormick, Mrs. Blackburn, 

20 Mrs. Moody. 

21 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRE22 NEURSHIP: Ms. Ernst (Chair), Mr. Risch, Mr. Paul, Mr. 

23 Scott (SC), Mr. Young, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Budd, Mr. Cur24 tis, Mr. Justice, Mr. Husted. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Dennis Allen LITTLE v. STATE

CR-16-0119

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017 Reh. denied October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350), the undersigned, Joseph Skeehan, Chief Executive Officer of JMG Exploration, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the  filing  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report").  The undersigned certifies that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 6th day of August 2008.   JMG EXPLORATION, INC.  /s/   Joseph Skeehan Name: Joseph Skeehan Title: Chief Executive Officer
John E. NOBLE and Holly Harger, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00904]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1261 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1080, K2025-1079.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00904 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 375 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 375

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require the Secretary of the Interior to partner and collaborate 
 with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address 
               Rapid Ohia Death, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response 
Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Rapid ohia death.--The term ``Rapid Ohia Death'' means 
        the disease caused by the fungal pathogen known as Ceratocystis 
        fimbriata that affects the tree of the species Metrosideros 
        polymorpha.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of Hawaii.

SEC. 3. COLLABORATION.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall partner and collaborate with 
the Secretary of Agriculture and the State to address Rapid Ohia Death.

SEC. 4. SUSTAINED EFFORTS.

    (a) Transmission.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
the Director of the United States Geological Survey, and the Chief of 
the Forest Service, acting through the Forest Service Institute of 
Pacific Islands Forestry, shall continue to conduct research on Rapid 
Ohia Death vectors and transmission.
    (b) Ungulate Management.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
shall continue to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture, the State, 
and with local stakeholders to manage ungulates in Rapid Ohia Death 
control areas on Federal, State, and private land, with the consent of 
private landowners.
    (c) Restoration and Research.--The Secretary of Agriculture, acting 
through the Chief of the Forest Service, shall continue to provide--
            (1) financial assistance, including through agreements with 
        the Secretary of the Interior--
                    (A) to prevent the spread of Rapid Ohia Death; and
                    (B) to restore the native forests of the State; and
            (2) staff and necessary infrastructure funding to the 
        Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry to conduct research on 
        Rapid Ohia Death.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 23, 2025.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 375

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require the Secretary of the Interior to partner and collaborate 
 with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address 
               Rapid Ohia Death, and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT "50"
Amanda Granier STEIB, Dwane J. Steib, Donavon J. Steib, and Israel J. Steib v. LAMORAK INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2019-CC-0159

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**SOUTHERN HERITAGEBANCSHARES, INC.FORM 10-QSBQuarter ended June 30, 2006**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven W. Ledbetter, certify that:

1)             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern HeritageBancshares, Inc.

2)             Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofmaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period by this quarterly report;

3)             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report;

4)             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)           designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

b)           evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2006 (the “EvaluationDate”);

c)           presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and

d)           disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

5)             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent function):

a)           all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)           any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| /s/ Steven W.  Ledbetter |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Steven W.  Ledbetter     |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
| Aug 14,  2006       |

 

----
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 31 Filed 06/09/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID 111
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 261 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 261

 To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prohibit requiring an 
  authorization for the installation, continued presence, operation, 
 maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in a 
   national marine sanctuary if such activities have previously been 
                authorized by a Federal or State agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

Mr. Carter of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mrs. Cammack, 
  Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia, Mr. Fry, and Mr. Pfluger) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prohibit requiring an 
  authorization for the installation, continued presence, operation, 
 maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in a 
   national marine sanctuary if such activities have previously been 
                authorized by a Federal or State agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Undersea Cable Protection Act of 
2025''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING AUTHORIZATIONS FOR UNDERSEA FIBER 
              OPTIC CABLES PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY FEDERAL OR STATE 
              AGENCIES.

    The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.) is 
amended by inserting after section 310 the following:

``SEC. 310A. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING AUTHORIZATIONS FOR UNDERSEA FIBER 
              OPTIC CABLES PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY FEDERAL OR STATE 
              AGENCIES.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, 
the Secretary may not prohibit or require any authorization for the 
installation, continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or 
recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary 
if a license, lease, or permit has been issued by a Federal or State 
agency authorizing such installation, continued presence, operation, 
maintenance, repair, or recovery.
    ``(b) Interagency Cooperation.--The Secretary may direct the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to engage in 
interagency cooperation under section 304(d) in any Federal agency 
action described in that section and involving the installation, 
continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of 
undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary.''.
                                 <all>
```