alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020378EN.01003401.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — IR v Commission

(Case T-131/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Rights and obligations of officials - Secondment in the interests of the service - Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations - Article 38 of the Staff Regulations - Refusal to extend a secondment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Rights of the defence)

(2020/C 378/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: IR (represented by: S. Pappas and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of the Commission of 2 July 2019 rejecting the request of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) that the applicant’s secondment within its services should be extended for an additional year and, second, of the decision of 23 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint brought against the decision of 2 July 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 2 July 2019 rejecting the request of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) that IR’s secondment within its services be extended for an additional year; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 2 July 2019 rejecting the request of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) that IR’s secondment within its services be extended for an additional year;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1101 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-876, K2025-877.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31683 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2785

TELEPAD CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus N. CALEB AVERY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1028-A) Submitted: July 15, 1997 Decided: August 19, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. N. Caleb Avery, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Taylor Cain, MAYS & VALENTINE, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:N. Caleb Avery appeals from the district court's orders denying his first, second, and third motions in limine, his motion to compel, and his motion to disqualify Telepad’s counsel, as well asthe orders entering judgment for Telepad Corporation in this contract and fraud action and denying his motions for reconsideration and for a new trial. The record does not contain transcripts of the hearings on the pre-trial motions, nor does it co ntain complete trial transcripts. Avery, as the Appellant, has the burden of including in the record on appeal transcripts of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App.P. 10(b); 4th Cir. Local R. 10(c). By failing to produce the transcripts or to qualify for the production of transcripts at government expense, Avery has waived review of the issues on appeal which depend upon the transcripts to show error. Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992); Keller v. Prince George's Co. , 827F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the record before the court and the district court's opinions and find no abuseof discretion and no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Page Solo

TRM/chr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JACK CLAUDE FRENCH, Individually § 

And as Representative of all other § 

Wrongful Death Claimants for the death §

Of Barbara Summers French, §

§

V. § Cause Number 4:04–CV–409-Y

§

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and § 

TEXAS MOTORS FORD CO., INC., §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On the date indicated below came on to be considered the Joint Stipulation of

Dismissal [document number 84] by and between plaintiff, Jack Claude French,

Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Barbara Summers French, Deceased,

and on behalf of all persons entitled to recover for the death of Barbara Summers French,

Deceased, under the Texas Wrongful Death/Survival Acts, Russell French, Jamie French,

and Jerry French, and Defendants, Ford Motor Company and Texas Motors Ford Co.,

Inc. 

It is, THEREFORE, ORDERED by the Court that in accordance with the joint

stipulation, Plaintiff’s claims against Ford Motor Company and Texas Motors Ford Co.,

Inc. are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1), with

costs taxed against the parties incurring same

SIGNED: February 17, 2006.

Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 85 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 671
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Page Solo

TRM/chr

APPROVED AND AGREED 

AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE:

LAW OFFICES OF B. THOMAS MCELROY

4809 Cole Avenue, Suite 212

Dallas, TX 75205

(214) 516300

(214) 521-6352 (fax)

By: _____/s/ B. Thomas McElroy__

B. Thomas McElroy

State Bar No. 13585000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

THOMPSON, COE, COUSINS & IRONS, L.L.P.

701 Brazos Avenue, Suite 1500

Austin, Texas 78701

512-708-8200

512-708-8777 TELECOPIER

By: /s/ Ronald D. Wamsted____

Ronald D. Wamsted

State Bar No. 20832000

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 85 Filed 02/17/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 672
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00225-CR 

Richard B. Reed 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 213th District Court 

of Tarrant County (1413225R) 

July 14, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

(p) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
# C_2016462EN.01002901.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/29

---

Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL)

(Case T-714/16)

(2016/C 462/37)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Asolo LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FLÜGEL’ — EU trade mark No 637 686

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2016 in Case R 282/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity;

| — | order EUIPO and Red Bull to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Red Bull to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HouseValues, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jacqueline Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 4, 2008



/s/ IAN MORRISIan MorrisChief Executive Officer and President/s/ JACQUELINE DAVIDSONJacqueline DavidsonChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) , or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 247 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand eligibility for the 

refundable credit for coverage under a qualified health plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Ms. UNDERWOOD (for herself, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. PETTERSEN, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. HOYER, Ms. NORTON, Ms. TITUS, Mr. MORELLE, Mr. 

TONKO, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. STEVENS, Ms. DELBENE, Ms. 

HOYLE of Oregon, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. BUDZINSKI, Mr. 

POCAN, Mr. BEYER, Mr. HORSFORD, and Mr. AMO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

eligibility for the refundable credit for coverage under 

a qualified health plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Afford5 ability Act of 2025’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 247 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN ELIGIBILITY FOR CREDIT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

3 36B(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend4 ed by striking ‘‘but does not exceed 400 percent’’. 

5 (b) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGES.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

7 36B(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(A) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—The ap10 plicable percentage for any taxable year shall be 

11 the percentage such that the applicable percent12 age for any taxpayer whose household income is 

13 within an income tier specified in the following 

14 table shall increase, on a sliding scale in a lin15 ear manner, from the initial premium percent16 age to the final premium percentage specified in 

17 such table for such income tier: 

‘‘In the case of household income 

(expressed as a percent of poverty line) 

within the following income tier: 

The initial 

premium 

percentage 

is— 

The final 

premium 

percentage 

is— 

Up to 150 percent .................................................. 0 0

150 percent up to 200 percent ............................... 0 2.0

200 percent up to 250 percent ............................... 2.0 4.0

250 percent up to 300 percent ............................... 4.0 6.0

300 percent up to 400 percent ............................... 6.0 8.5

400 percent and higher .......................................... 8.5 8.5.’’. 

18 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO

19 AFFORDABILITY OF COVERAGE.— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 247 IH

1 (A) Paragraph (1) of section 36B(c) of 

2 such Code is amended by striking subparagraph 

3 (E). 

4 (B) Subparagraph (C) of section 36B(c)(2) 

5 of such Code is amended by striking clause (iv). 

6 (C) Paragraph (4) of section 36B(c) of 

7 such Code is amended by striking subparagraph 

8 (F). 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Centale, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Centale, Inc. and will be retained by Centale,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date: November 11, 2004             /s/ Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr.
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr. (Chief executive
                                     officer, Chief financial officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 144 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 144

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2025

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide that the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 
   does not apply to certain reports required to be submitted by the 
          Tennessee Valley Authority, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tennessee Valley Authority Salary 
Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. SALARY DISCLOSURE; EXCEPTION TO REPORT ELIMINATION.

    Section 9 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 
831h) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``a financial 
        statement'' and all that follows through ``$1,500 a year'' and 
        inserting ``a report of the total number of employees at the 
        management level or above, to include all executives and board 
        members, that shall include the names, salaries, and duties of 
        such employees, that are receiving compensation at or greater 
        than the maximum rate of basic pay for grade GS-15 of the 
        General Schedule'';
            (2) by striking all that precedes ``The Board shall'' and 
        inserting the following:

``SEC. 9. FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    ``(a) Report on Compensation.--
            ``(1) In general.--''; and
            (3) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Exemption.--The information concerning salaries of 
        employees of the Corporation contained in, or filed with, the 
        report described in paragraph (1) is exempt from--
                    ``(A) disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of title 
                5, United States Code; and
                    ``(B) the requirements of the Access to 
                Congressionally Mandated Reports Act (Public Law 117-
                263).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 15, 2025.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 256 

To prohibit the sale of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum 

Reserve to certain entities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mrs. BICE (for herself, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. OWENS, Mr. MANN, Mr. RUTHERFORD, and Mr. DONALDS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the sale of petroleum products from the Strategic 

Petroleum Reserve to certain entities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save America’s Valu5 able Energy Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVE Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 256 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST SELLING SPR PETROLEUM 

2 PRODUCTS TO CERTAIN ENTITIES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Energy Policy and Con4 servation Act is amended by inserting after section 169 

5 (42 U.S.C. 6247b) the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 170. PROHIBITION ON SALES TO CERTAIN ENTITIES. 

7 ‘‘The Secretary shall prohibit the sale of petroleum 

8 products drawn down from the Strategic Petroleum Re9 serve, under any provision of law, to any entity 

10 headquartered in— 

11 ‘‘(1) a country listed in table 1 to paragraph 

12 (d)(1) under section 126.1 of title 22, Code of Fed13 eral Regulations, as in effect on the date of enact14 ment of this section; or 

15 ‘‘(2) Russia.’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

17 (1) DRAWDOWN AND SALE OF PETROLEUM

18 PRODUCTS.—Section 161(a) of the Energy Policy 

19 and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6241(a)) is 

20 amended by inserting ‘‘and section 170’’ before the 

21 period at the end. 

22 (2) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of con23 tents for the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 256 IH

1 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec2 tion 169 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 170. Prohibition on sales to certain entities.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2021028EN.01001702.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 14 October 2020 — JT, NQ v Ryanair DCA

(Case C-516/20)

(2021/C 28/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: JT, NQ

Defendant: Ryanair DCA

Question referred

Is a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
# C_2018341EN.01001102.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/11

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Oradea — Romania) — Sindicatul Energia Oradea v SC Termoelectrica SA

(Case C-392/17) (1)

(2018/C 341/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.

---