alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6
 AIRCRAFT COST ALLOCATION AGREEMENT  (Bermuda Registered Aircraft)
   Interface Operations Bermuda, LTD
   Las Vegas Sands Corporation




---



##### 



AIRCRAFT COST ALLOCATION AGREEMENT  (Bermuda Registered Aircraft)
 Aircraft Cost Allocation Agreement
  Sharing of the Aircraft
 Term
 Delivery to Recipient
 Fee
       -2-




---



##### 



Return to Base
 Use of Aircraft
     -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



Pilots
 Operation and Maintenance Responsibilities of Provider
 Liens
 -5-




---



##### 



Taxes
   Insurance
 -6-




---



##### 



Loss or Damage
     Cape Town Treaty Compliance
  -7-




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Agreements of Recipient
 Authorization
 Identification
 -8-




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Agreements of Provider
 Authorization
 FAA Registration
 Event of Default
    Providers Remedies
    -9-




---



##### 



General Provisions
 Headings
 Partial Invalidity
 Waiver
 Notices
 To Provider at:
    
    Interface Operations Bermuda, Ltd.c/o Interface Operations, LLC300 First AvenueNeedham, Massachusetts 02494Attn:  Stephen J. OConnorFax:    (781) 449-6616Tel.    (781) 449-6500To Recipient at:
    
    Las Vegas Sands Corp.3355 Las Vegas Blvd. SouthLas Vegas, Nevada 89109Attn:  General CounselFax:    (702) 733-5088Tel.:   (702) 733-5631
  -10-




---



##### 



Massachusetts Law
 Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 Binding Effect; Assignment
 Attorney Fees
 Remedies Not Exclusive
 No Third Party Rights
 Counterparts
 Expenses
 -11-




---



##### 



Broker/Finder Fees
 Relationship of the Parties
 Limitation of Damages
 Survival
  PROVIDER:
    
    
    
    RECIPIENT:INTERFACE OPERATIONS BERMUDA, LTD
    
    
    
    LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.By:
    
    /s/ Sheldon G. Adelson
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael A LevenPrint:
    
    Sheldon G. Adelson
    
    
    
    
    
    Print:
    
    Michael A. LevenTitle:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    President & Chief Operating Officer
 
 -12-




---



##### 



Schedule A
 (1)
    
    Boeing 747-SP aircraft bearing Bermuda registration number VQ-BMS and manufacturers serial
number 21649(2)
    
    Boeing 747-SP aircraft bearing Bermuda registration number VP-BLK and manufacturers serial
number 21961
 -13-
Anthony ROSS-SPAGONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2019187EN.01001502.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales v Abdelaziz Arib, Procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Montpellier, Procureur général près la cour d’appel de Montpellier

(Case C-444/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Border control, asylum and immigration - Regulation (EU) 2016/399 - Article 32 - Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders - Illegal entry of a third-country national - Equation of internal borders with external borders - Directive 2008/115/EC - Scope - Article 2(2)(a))

(2019/C 187/17)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Préfet des Pyrénées-Orientales

Defendants: Abdelaziz Arib, Procureur de la République près le tribunal de grande instance de Montpellier, Procureur général près la cour d’appel de Montpellier

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, read in conjunction with Article 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), must be interpreted as not applying to the situation of an illegally staying third-country national who was apprehended in the immediate vicinity of an internal border of a Member State, even where that Member State has reintroduced border control at that border, pursuant to Article 25 of the regulation, on account of a serious threat to public policy or internal security in that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.

---
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 5 Filed 12/12/03 Page 1 of 6 PageID 36
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 5 Filed 12/12/03 Page 2 of 6 PageID 37
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 5 Filed 12/12/03 Page 3 of 6 PageID 38
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 5 Filed 12/12/03 Page 4 of 6 PageID 39
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 5 Filed 12/12/03 Page 5 of 6 PageID 40
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 5 Filed 12/12/03 Page 6 of 6 PageID 41
Liston T. GUMBS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
1082.

#### Pearson *v.*Bass.

Complaint, from city court of Sylvester — Judge Park. February 17, 1908.

Submitted May 5, 1908. —

Decided June 15, 1909

*Perry & Williamson,*for plaintiff in error.

J. J. *Forehand, Claude Payton,*contra.

Russell, J.

It appears, ■ from the answers given by the Supreme Court to questions certified to it by this court (132 Ga. 117, 63 S. E. 798), that the trial judge should have sustained the third ground of the demurrer to the petition. The case is, therefore, sent back for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: TATYANA E. DREVALEVA,

Petitioner

______________________

2020-149

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 

3:20-cv-00642-JD, Judge James Donato.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Tatyana E. Drevaleva petitions for a writ of mandamus 

directing the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California to vacate the judgment in case No. 20-

CV-00642 or to rule on her motion to vacate that judgment.

After Ms. Drevaleva was unsuccessful in suing her former employer for unlawful termination, retaliation, and 

lost wages, she filed the instant suit against the magistrate 

judge who was assigned to her prior case and the United 

States, seeking damages under the Federal Tort Claims 

Act (“FTCA”) and California state law. The district court 

dismissed the claims as barred by judicial immunity. Ms. 

Case: 20-149 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 10/20/2020
2 IN RE: DREVALEVA

Drevaleva filed a motion to vacate the judgment, which remains pending. This petition followed.

The All Writs Act authorizes courts to issue writs “necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions.” 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). Because “[t]he All Writs Act is 

not an independent basis of jurisdiction, . . . the petitioner 

must initially show that the action sought to be corrected 

by mandamus is within this court’s statutorily defined subject matter jurisdiction.” Baker Perkins, Inc. v. Werner & 

Pfleiderer Corp., 710 F.2d 1561, 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

Here, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 

Circuit, not this court, would have jurisdiction over a 

proper appeal from a final judgment arising out of a civil 

action pursuant to the FTCA. Because this court would not 

have jurisdiction over an appeal from the underlying case, 

we lack jurisdiction to issue mandamus relief. While this 

court has authority to transfer matters to the appropriate 

regional circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, we cannot say it 

would be in the interest of justice to do so here. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is dismissed. All other pending motions 

are denied as moot.

October 20, 2020 

Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s28

Case: 20-149 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 10/20/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         392,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,709
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 392,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   392,709
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,164
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               126,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,120,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,120,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,120,433)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (10,545)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (10,545)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
on Supplemental Information


To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Precision Auto Care, Inc.


In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
Precision Auto Care, Inc. referred to in our report dated September 21, 2001
which is included in this Form 10-K, we have also audited Schedule II as of June
30, 2001 and for the year then ended. In our opinion, this schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be set forth
therein.



Grant Thornton LLP
Vienna, VA
September 21, 2001
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Roque A. Santi, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 16, 2005
[apr1907form40f002.gif]

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | [apr1907form40f004.gif]



Consent of McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of our reports entitled Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Forecast Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006" and "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Constant Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006", dated February 20, 2007, evaluating reserves of Enterra Energy Corp. of December 31, 2006, included in the 2006 Annual Information Form of Enterra Energy Trust (the AIF), and to the references to our firm in the AIF.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of references to our firm and of information derived from our reports entitled Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Forecast Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006" and "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Constant Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006", both dated February 20, 2007 evaluating reserves of Enterra Energy Corp. of December 31, 2006, appearing in the annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, into the registration statement on Form F-10 Registration Statement (No. 333-129601), the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120996) and the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-113609 and 333-115318).

Sincerely,

McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.

signed by B. J. Wurster

B. J. Wurster, P. Eng.

Calgary, Alberta Dated: April 19, 2007



2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255  5 Avenue SW, Calgary AB T2P 3G6 Tel: (403) 262-5506 Fax: (403) 233-2744

www.mcdan.com
# C_2016314EN.01002402.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/24

---

Action brought on 13 June 2016 — Jindal Saw et Jindal Saw Italia v Commission

(Case T-300/16)

(2016/C 314/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jindal Saw Ltd (New Delhi, India) and Jindal Saw Italia SpA (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: R. Antonini and E. Monard, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron), originating in India, in so far as it relates to the Applicants; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron), originating in India, in so far as it relates to the Applicants; and

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that by means of the determination of the export prices, the Commission infringed Articles 2(8), 2(9), 3(2), 3(3), 3(6) and 9(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that by means of the determination of the export prices, the Commission infringed Articles 2(8), 2(9), 3(2), 3(3), 3(6) and 9(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that by means of its price effects, injury and causation determinations, the Commission infringed Articles 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 3(7), 3(8), 4(1), 5(4) and 9(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that by means of its price effects, injury and causation determinations, the Commission infringed Articles 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 3(7), 3(8), 4(1), 5(4) and 9(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the failure to disclose essential facts and considerations and to grant sufficient time to submit comments infringed Articles 20(4) and 20(5) of Council Regulation No 1225/2009. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the failure to disclose essential facts and considerations and to grant sufficient time to submit comments infringed Articles 20(4) and 20(5) of Council Regulation No 1225/2009.

---
#### W. B. Tilton, ex rel. State of Florida, *Appellants,*v. City of Stuart, J. E. Taylor, Mayor Commissioner; C. Van Anglen, Commissioner; Theodore Dehon, Commissioner; Florida K. Speirs, City Clerk, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed October 14, 1927.

*T. E. Getzen,*for Appellant;

*Edwin Brobston,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is p.o error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.
119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 375 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to partner and 

collaborate with the Secretary of Agriculture and the 

State of Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 375 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continued Rapid Ohia 

3 Death Response Act of 2025’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) RAPID OHIA DEATH.—The term ‘‘Rapid 

7 Ohia Death’’ means the disease caused by the fungal 

8 pathogen known as Ceratocystis fimbriata that af9 fects the tree of the species Metrosideros 

10 polymorpha. 

11 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

12 of Hawaii. 

13 SEC. 3. COLLABORATION. 

14 The Secretary of the Interior shall partner and col15 laborate with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State 

16 to address Rapid Ohia Death. 

17 SEC. 4. SUSTAINED EFFORTS. 

18 (a) TRANSMISSION.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

19 acting through the Director of the United States Geologi20 cal Survey, and the Chief of the Forest Service, acting 

21 through the Forest Service Institute of Pacific Islands 

22 Forestry, shall continue to conduct research on Rapid 

23 Ohia Death vectors and transmission. 

24 (b) UNGULATE MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary of the 

25 Interior, acting through the Director of the United States 

26 Fish and Wildlife Service, shall continue to partner with 
3 

•HR 375 EH

1 the Secretary of Agriculture, the State, and with local 

2 stakeholders to manage ungulates in Rapid Ohia Death 

3 control areas on Federal, State, and private land, with the 

4 consent of private landowners. 

5 (c) RESTORATION AND RESEARCH.—The Secretary 

6 of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest 

7 Service, shall continue to provide— 

8 (1) financial assistance, including through 

9 agreements with the Secretary of the Interior— 

10 (A) to prevent the spread of Rapid Ohia 

11 Death; and 

12 (B) to restore the native forests of the 

13 State; and 

14 (2) staff and necessary infrastructure funding 

15 to the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry to con16 duct research on Rapid Ohia Death. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 23, 

2025. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 375 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to partner 

Death, and for other purposes. and the State of Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia and collaborate with the Secretary of Agriculture
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Silvergraph International, Inc. (the Registrant) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.   Date:  April 14, 2010 /s/ James R. Simpson James R. Simpson Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been furnished to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.