alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT

Revolving Operating Note

Increase in Principal Amount of Note

Principal
Amount: 50,000,000

This Change in Terms Agreement is entered into as of December 20, 2007, between Deere Credit, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Deere) and FC Stone L.L.C., West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, an Iowa corporation (the Borrower).

Whereas, Deere has provided a
Revolving Operating Loan facility (the Loan) in the amount of $30,000,000 governed by a Master Loan Agreement, dated February 15, 2001, as may be amended from time to time, and evidenced by a note (the Note) in the
Principal Amount of $36,750,000 dated May 19, 2006, a Change in Terms Agreement in the Principal Amount of $51,750,000 dated January 16, 2007, a Change in Terms Agreement in the Principal Amount of $48,750,000 dated February 26, 2007
and a Change in Terms Agreement in the Principal Amount of $30,000,000 dated August 15, 2007; and

Whereas, the Borrower has requested an
increase of $20,000,000 in the amount of the Revolving Operating Loan facility and Deere has approved the requested increase as stated herein; now

Therefore, the Revolving Operating Loan facility with a Final Due Date of March 1, 2008, will be increased by $20,000,000 making a total loan and commitment in the Principal Amount of $50,000,000 and the Note shall be amended to
reflect the terms and conditions agreed upon between Deere and Borrower:



| | 1. | The Principal Amount of the Note shall be increased from $30,000,000 to $50,000,000 until such time as the $20,000,000 shall become due and payable, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The Final Due Date of the $20,000,000 shall be March 1, 2008.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------

Except as expressly changed by this Agreement, the terms of the original obligation or obligations, including all agreements evidenced or securing the obligation(s), remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Change in Terms Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the date first shown above.



|                   |  |                        |  |                 |  |        |  |                      
|------------------ |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------
|Deere Credit, Inc. |  |                        |  | FC Stone L.L.C.
|                   |  |                        |  |                
|By:                |  | /s/ Sharon Luellen     |  |                 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Robert V. Johnson
|Title:             |  | Credit Account Manager |  |                 |  | Title: |  | Exec. V.P. & CFO
David RENCZKOWSKI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NOs.: 2D18-4705 2D18-5053

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                              |                              |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                     | CAPITAL              RESOURCE FUNDING, INC.       |
|                                |                                         |                         |
| Date: October              19, 2005 | By:                                     | /s/ Laura              Koran |
|                                     | Laura KoranChief                Financial Officer |
STATE of Louisiana v. Mark Edward COLBY

NO. 2018-K-1256

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Paul Morrison, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      OmniReliant Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by OmniReliant Holdings, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





September
      23, 2008





/s/
                Paul MorrisonChief
                Executive Officer,Chief
                Financial Officer
B. M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4948

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 230 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 230

To prohibit the implementation of the Approved Resource Management Plan 
 Amendment for the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau of Land 
                              Management.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

 Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the implementation of the Approved Resource Management Plan 
 Amendment for the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau of Land 
                              Management.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 
              FOR BUFFALO, WYOMING FIELD OFFICE OF BUREAU OF LAND 
              MANAGEMENT.

    The Secretary of the Interior may not implement, administer, or 
enforce the Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment for the 
Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management referred 
to in the notice of availability published by the Bureau of Land 
Management titled ``Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision 
and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment for the Buffalo Field 
Office, Wyoming'' (89 Fed. Reg. 93650; published November 27, 2024).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00652]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE571]

South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of the Ad Hoc For-Hire Reporting Advisory Panel in 
January.

DATES: The Ad Hoc For-Hire Reporting Advisory Panel meeting will be 
held via webinar on January 29, 2025. The meeting will be held from 1 
p.m. until 5 p.m., EST.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The meeting will be held via webinar. The webinar 
is open to members of the public. Registration is required. Webinar 
registration, an online public comment form, and briefing book 
materials will be available two weeks prior to the meeting at: https://safmc.net/advisory-panel-meetings/.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myra Brouwer, Deputy Director for 
Management, SAFMC; phone: (843) 571-4366 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ad Hoc For-Hire Reporting Advisory Panel 
will discuss potential actions to improve the Southeast For-Hire 
Integrated Electronic Reporting (SEFHIER) Program.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aid should be directed to the Council office 
(see ADDRESSES) 10 days prior to the meeting.
    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are subject 
to change.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 8, 2025.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-00652 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Jackie Lynn PRUITT aka Jackie L. Pruitt

NO. 2018-K-1399

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 18-PDB-053

No. 2018-OB-1900

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Reconsideration denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41253 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JAIRO RENATO MORALES

- CORTEZ, also known as Jairo Renato Morales , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 527

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jairo Renato Morales

- Cortez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th C ir. 2011). Morales

- Cortez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41253 Document: 00513558715 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 41253

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. A ccordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41253 Document: 00513558715 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
# C_2017030EN.01004902.xml

| 30.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/49

---

Action brought on 18 November 2016 — Di Bernardo v Commission

(Case T-811/16)

(2017/C 030/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Danilo Di Bernardo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 10 August 2016 by which the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 excluded the applicant from that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 10 August 2016 by which the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 excluded the applicant from that competition;

| — | order the Commission to pay all of the costs in any event. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all of the costs in any event.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a number of manifest errors of assessment on the part of the selection board when evaluating the applicant’s professional experience. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a number of manifest errors of assessment on the part of the selection board when evaluating the applicant’s professional experience.

| 2. | Second plea in law, raised in the alternative, alleging insufficient reasoning of the contested decision on the basis of the failure to inform the applicant of the selection criteria established by the selection board. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, raised in the alternative, alleging insufficient reasoning of the contested decision on the basis of the failure to inform the applicant of the selection criteria established by the selection board.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00842]

[[Page 3886]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Microphysiological Aging Systems.
    Date: February 24, 2025.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant proposals.
    Address: National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 
8B, Rockville, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., MPH, 
Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 
20892, (301) 594-7945, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00842 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30562

USDC No. 97-CV-1802

 

FRANK L. MCCALL, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

KELLY WARD, Warden, Wade Correctional Center,

Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

--------------------

November 9, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The notice of appeal filed by Frank McCall, Jr., Louisiana

prisoner #130746, is construed as a request for a certificate of

appealability (COA) to appeal from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). To

obtain a COA, a petitioner must make a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right. See § 2253(c)(2); Drinkard v.

Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 755 (5th Cir. 1996). In considering a

nonconstitutional question in a COA application, such as the

limitations issue presented here, the petitioner must first make 
O R D E R

No. 98-30562

- 2 -

a credible showing of error by the district court. See Sonnier

v. Johnson, 161 F.3d 941, 943-44 (5th Cir. 1998). Only if the

petitioner succeeds in doing so will the court consider whether

he has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right on his underlying claims. Id.

McCall has made a credible showing that the district court

erred in dismissing his § 2254 petition as untimely. Under

Villegas v. Johnson, 184 F.3d 467, 470-73 (5th Cir. 1999), the

filing of McCall’s application for state habeas corpus relief

served to toll the one-year limitations period under

§ 2244(d)(2), even though the application was rejected by the

state court as abusive. As McCall filed his § 2254 petition

while his state habeas application was pending on review in the

Louisiana Supreme Court, his federal habeas petition was timely. 

Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the district court’s judgment

dismissing McCall’s § 2254 petition as time-barred is VACATED,

and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. See Sonnier,

161 F.3d at 945-46. 

COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00937]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1288 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1112, K2025-1111.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00937 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Brent MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3773

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 3 

To elect Charles E. Grassley, a Senator from the State of Iowa, to be 

President pro tempore of the Senate of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. THUNE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To elect Charles E. Grassley, a Senator from the State 

of Iowa, to be President pro tempore of the Senate 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved, That Charles E. Grassley, a Senator from 

2 Iowa, be, and he is hereby, elected President of the Senate 

3 pro tempore. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 42 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 42

    Condemning the pardons for individuals who were found guilty of 
                  assaulting Capitol Police Officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2025

  Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Kim, Ms. Alsobrooks, Ms. 
 Baldwin, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Mr. Booker, 
 Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Coons, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Durbin, 
Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Gallego, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Heinrich, 
   Mr. Hickenlooper, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Kelly, Mr. King, Ms. 
Klobuchar, Mr. Lujan, Mr. Markey, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Ossoff, Mr. Padilla, 
 Mr. Peters, Mr. Reed, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Schiff, 
Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Slotkin, Ms. Smith, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
  Warner, Mr. Warnock, Ms. Warren, Mr. Welch, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. 
 Wyden) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Condemning the pardons for individuals who were found guilty of 
                  assaulting Capitol Police Officers.

    Resolved, That the Senate disapproves of any pardons for 
individuals who were found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police 
officers.
                                 <all>
```
Carlton Wayne HOLMAN v. STATE

CR-16-0656

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.