alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Steven
      R. Delcarson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.





*Dated:
                June 19, 2008*
            *By:*
            */s/
                Steven R. Delcarson**Steven
                R. Delcarson**Chief
                Executive Officer*





I,
      Charles M. Caporale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.




*Dated:
                June 19, 2008*
            *By:*
            */s/
                Charles M. Caporale**Charles
                M. Caporale**Chief
                Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
                Officer*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided by Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:04-cv-02313-K Document 66 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 595
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02313-K Document 66 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 596
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02313-K Document 66 Filed 06/07/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 597
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Alan
      Finkelstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of Innovative Card Technologies,
      Inc.




Dated:
              August 14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Alan
              FinkelsteinAlan
                Finkelstein
              Chief
                Executive Officer,
              President
                and Secretary


I,
      Bennet
      Price-Lientz Tchaikovsky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc.




Dated:
              August 14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Bennet
              Price-Lientz TchaikovskyBennet
                  Price-Lientz Tchaikovsky
                Chief
                  Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Innovative Card
      Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of Hammonds Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report
of Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Hammonds Industries, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  February 23, 2010


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7722
MARC S. CASON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS MCINTYRE, Sergeant; H. B. MURPHY, Assistant Warden; MARK RALEY, Officer; OFFICER BRACHEMAN; DAVID LANCASTER, Officer; DOUGLAS FRAZEE, Officer; R. RALEY, Officer; STANLEY RALEY, Officer, Defendants - Appellees,
and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; P.H.S. MEDICAL SERVICE; MARYLAND DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA03-1139-1-CCB) Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marc S. Cason, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Marc S. Cason, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cason v. McIntyre , No. CA-03-1139-1-CCB (D. Md. Oct. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
David Lamar JOHNSON v. Jefferson S. DUNN et al.

2160870

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

Affirmed.
1.9330604
Lucas Energy, Inc. 8-K

 


Exhibit 10.2


 





SECOND AMENDMENT TO

STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


 


This Second Amendment
to Stock Purchase Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into on September 29, 2016 (“Amendment
Date”), by and between Lucas Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Company”), and the investor whose
name appears below (“Investor”).


 


1.


Reference
is made to the Stock Purchase Agreement made and entered into on April 6, 2016, by and between Lucas Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(“Company”), and Investor, and the First Amendment to the Agreement dated April 28, 2016 by and between the
Company and Investor (collectively, the “Agreement”), both of which are incorporated herein by reference.


 


2.


In
Section V.A.1 of the Agreement, the words “the Closing, and in any event within 30 days” are hereby deleted and replaced
with the words “the registration statement on Form S- 3/A (File No. 333-211066) is declared effective by the Commission,
and in any event within 5 business days thereafter.”


 


3.


Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.


 









 




    	 



    	 



    

 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized signatories on the Amendment Date.


 


 


Company:


 


LUCAS ENERGY, INC.


 







 


	By:		
	Name:	Anthony C. Schnur	
	Title:	CEO	


 


 


Investor:


 


 


	Discover Growth Fund 	 
	Investor Name	 
		 


 


	By:  	 	 
	Name:
    	David Sims		 	 
	Title:  	Director
H. Res. 43 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 15, 2025. 

Resolved, That at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, January 20, 

2025, the House shall proceed to the West Front of the Capitol for the purpose of attending the inaugural ceremonies of 

the President and Vice President of the United States; and 

that upon the conclusion of the ceremonies the House stands 

adjourned until noon on Tuesday, January 21, 2025 for 

morning-hour debate and 2 p.m. for legislative business. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 99-20085 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20085 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
GERARDO GUAPI LIZALDA,
Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-4

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Guapi Lizalda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lizalda has filed a response to counsel’s motion in which he argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. The record has not been adequately developed for us to consider Lizalda’s argument on direct appeal.

See United States v. Haese , 162 F.3d 359, 363-64 (5th Cir 1998),No. 99-20085 -2- cert. denied , ___ S. Ct. ___, 1999 WL 241837 (U.S., May 24, 1999). Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Lizalda’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
C.S.B., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 02, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Because C.S.B. has failed to serve an initial brief as provided by this court's order of February 1, 2019, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:04-cv-02721-M Document 7 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
Exhibit 10.02 








FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT 






        This
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT (This “Amendment”) is entered into as of June
20, 2003 by and between Ironwood Apartments, Inc., as successor to Metropolitan Federal
Savings and Loan Association (“Landlord”) and Targeted Genetics Corporation
(“Tenant”). 



        Landlord
and Tenant are parties to that certain Olive Way Building Lease dated November 20, 1992,
as modified by that certain First Amendment to Olive Way Building Lease dated December 10,
1994 and that certain Second Amendment to Lease Agreement executed on June 12, 1996 and
May 22 1996, and that certain Third Amendment to Lease Agreement dated October 30, 1998,
and that certain Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 5, 2001 (as modified,
the “Lease”). 



        Section
4.02 of the Lease grants to Tenant three (3) options to extend the Lease term for 5 years
each. Tenant exercised the first of these 3 options in that certain Third Amendment dated
October 30, 1998, leaving two options remaining. The purpose of this Amendment is to
exercise the second of these three options, leaving one remaining. 



        Landlord
and Tenant do hereby amend the Lease as follows: 



     	1. 	
          EXTENSION. The term of the Lease is hereby extended for an additional 60
          months to April 1, 2009. The rent for the extended term is set forth in
          Section 6.02 of the Lease. 



          



     	2. 	
          NO OTHER AMENDMENTS. Except as modified by this Amendment and by the
          Amendments referenced above, the Lease remains in full force and effect and has
          not been modified or amended. 



          




      DATED:
June 30, 2003. 






	  	
LANDLORD:





IRONWOOD APARTMENTS, INC.,

a Washington corporation









Signature:     /s/ John Stone

By:             John Stone

Its:             President






TENANT:





TARGETED GENETICS CORPORATION,

a Washington corporation







Signature:   /s/ Todd E. Simpson

By:             Todd E. Simpson

Its:             Vice President, Finance
Luciano DEL LUPO and Marie Luisa Del Lupo, Appellants, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, The Meadows Maintenance Association, Inc., The Town Foundation, Inc. and SunTrust Bank, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 26

      To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Mr. Pfluger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting American Energy 
Production Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTING AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that States 
should maintain primacy for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing for 
oil and natural gas production on State and private lands.
    (b) Prohibition on Declaration of a Moratorium on Hydraulic 
Fracturing.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President 
may not declare a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing unless 
such moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
A98A1986.

#### RICE v. HIGGINBOTHAM.

(521 SE2d 838)

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

In *Rice v. Higginbotham,*235 Ga. App. 378 (508 SE2d 736) (1998), we concluded that Rice’s caveat was timely and reversed the judgment of the probate court striking the caveat as untimely. In so ruling, we concluded it was unnecessary to address remaining enumerations of error raised by Rice. Id. at 381. In *Higginbotham v. Rice,*271 Ga. 262 (517 SE2d 784) (1999), the Supreme Court concluded the caveat was untimely and reversed the judgment of this Court.

On remittitur from the Supreme Court, we conclude that Rice’s remaining enumerations of error were either decided adversely to Rice by the decision of the Supreme Court or are without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the probate court’s judgment striking Rice’s caveat is affirmed.

*215Decided August 25, 1999

Reconsideration denied September 30, 1999

*Stephen F. Carley,*for appellant.

*Zweifel Law Firm, Gary D. Zweifel, Monica K. Gilroy, Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, Robert D. Ingram, Melissa W. Gilbert,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Ruffin and Ellington, JJ, concur.*
# C_2022207EN.01003601.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — KF v EIB

(Case T-299/20) (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Complaint of psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - Decision rejecting the complaint - Error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Liability)

(2022/C 207/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KF (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the EIB’s decision of 27 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of harassment and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 27 January 2020; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 27 January 2020;

| 2. | Orders the EIB to pay KF the amount of EUR 3 000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EIB to pay KF the amount of EUR 3 000;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the EIB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by KF. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the EIB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by KF.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 120 

To prohibit COVID–19 vaccination mandates, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committees on House Administration, and Energy and Commerce, for a 

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit COVID–19 vaccination mandates, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Mandates Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AGENCIES ISSUING VACCINE 

6 MANDATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—No agency may issue any rule, 

8 regulations, or guidance requiring any individual to receive 

9 a vaccination for COVID–19. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 120 IH

1 (b) AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

2 ‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given that term in section 551 

3 of title 5, United States Code. 

4 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING PROOF OF COVID–19 

5 VACCINATION FOR FEDERAL ACCESS. 

6 A vaccination for COVID–19 shall not be required 

7 for access to Federal property or Federal services, or for 

8 access to congressional grounds or services. 

9 SEC. 4. FEDERAL FUNDING RESTRICTIONS. 

10 (a) FUNDING RESTRICTION.—No entity that received 

11 Federal funds under a COVID–19 relief package or that 

12 receives any other Federal funds after the date of the en13 actment of this Act may require any individual to have 

14 received a vaccination for COVID–19 as a condition of 

15 such entity providing any service to such individual. 

16 (b) RETURN OF FUNDS.—Any entity that does not 

17 comply with subsection (a) shall be required to pay to the 

18 Government an amount equal to the sum of all funds such 

19 entity received. 

20 (c) COVID–19 RELIEF PACKAGE DEFINED.—In this 

21 section, the term ‘‘COVID–19 relief package’’ means any 

22 of the following: 

23 (1) CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.; Public 

24 Law 116–136; 134 Stat. 281). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 120 IH

1 (2) Coronavirus Preparedness and Response 

2 Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 

3 116–123; 134 Stat. 146). 

4 (3) Families First Coronavirus Response Act 

5 (Public Law 116–127; 134 Stat. 178). 

6 (4) Paycheck Protection Program and Health 

7 Care Enhancement Act (Public Law 116–139; 134 

8 Stat. 620). 

9 (5) Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 

10 (Public Law 116–260; 134 Stat. 1182). 

11 (6) American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public 

12 Law 117–2; 135 Stat. 41). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mark                Klein                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Name: Mark                KleinTitle:                 Chief Executive Officer, President and Date:                November 14, 2006Director                (Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal                Financial and Accounting Officer) August                18, 2006 |   |   |   |

----