alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00227-CR

Pedro P. Morales, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C-14-1091-SA, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Pedro Perez Morales was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm

by a felon, a third degree felony. Tex. Penal Code § 46.04(a). A jury found Morales guilty and

assessed his punishment at five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice and a $2,000 fine.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 86–87 (1988).
Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine

the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at

766. We have not received a pro se brief from the appellant.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d

at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel

that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field 

Affirmed

Filed: October 7, 2015

Do Not Publish

2
# C_2021263EN.01002401.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/24

---

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2021 — Kerstens v Commission

(Case T-672/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Request for assistance - Rejection of the complaint - Time limit for bringing an action - Starting point - Date on which the person concerned could have known the content of the decision - Delay - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 263/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (La Forclaz, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decisions of the Commission of 20 and 31 January 2020 rejecting, respectively, the request for assistance D/517/19 and the request for assistance D/516/19 lodged by the applicant pursuant to Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Petrus Kerstens shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Petrus Kerstens shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
TRIHA HEALTH PARTNERS, LLC, et al. v. TRINA HEALTH, LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1901

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

 

I, Steven G. Holder, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 17, 2005
Louisiana Board of Ethics in the MATTER OF Clarence SAVOIE, II

Louisiana Board of Ethics in the Matter of C.J. Savoie Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Louisiana Board of Ethics in the Matter C.J. Savoie Consulting Engineers, Inc.

NO. 2019-C-0273

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

*610Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
# C_2017121EN.01001601.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (Spain) lodged on 3 February 2017 — Eva Soraya Checa Honrado v Fondo de Garantía Salarial

(Case C-57/17)

(2017/C 121/22)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Eva Soraya Checa Honrado

Appellant:

Respondent: Fondo de Garantía Salarial

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

May statutory severance pay payable by a company to a worker, on termination of the employment relationship as a consequence of a change to a fundamental element of the contract of employment, such as geographic mobility obliging the worker to change residence, be understood to constitute ‘severance pay on termination of employment relationships’, as referred to in the first paragraph of Article 3 of Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 283, p. 36.

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT W ILLIAM FOOTE a

nd ELIZAB ETH FOOTE, Pe titione rs - Appe lla nts, v. C OM M ISSIONER

OF INTER

NAL REVENUE, R

e sponde n t - Appe lle e . No. 14-70668

Ta x C t. No. 12271-12 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

a De c ision of the Ta x C ourt Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 12, 2016 * * Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : B ER

Z ON a nd OW ENS, C irc uit Judge s, a nd M ARB LEY, *** Distric t Judge .



# FIL ED FEB 23 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).

*** The Honora

ble Alge non L. M arble y , Distric t Judge for the U.S. Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of Ohio, sitting by de signa tion.Pe titione rs W illia m and Eliz a

be th Foote a

ppe a l from the tax c ourt’ s sum m ary judgm e nt in fa

vor of the C om

m issione r. The tax c ourt he ld tha t the Foote s we re not e ntitle d to a n a ward of a dm inistra

tive c o sts a

nd litiga tion e xpe nse s inc urre d during the ir a

u dit a nd de fic ie nc y

proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 26 U.S.C . § 7482(a )(1). W e a ffirm . The Foote s we re subje c t to a uditing a nd de fic ie nc y

proc e e dings from

1996 to 2011. The

five a c tions a ga inst the m we re ultim ate ly

re solve d through stipula tions e nte re d by the tax c ourt, none of whic h re fe re nc e d a dm i nistra tive or litiga tion c osts. TheFoote s did not file a m o tion se e king a

n a w ard of c osts unde r 26 U.S.C . § 7430, nor did the y m ove to va c ate the de c isions. S e e 26 C .F.R . § 301.7430-2(b)(2); Ta

x C ourt R ule s 230-33. As the Foote s did not properly pe tition the

tax c o urt for a dm inistra

tive and litiga tion c osts be fore the stipula te d de c i sions be c am e fina l, the ir c urre nt a c tion for c osts is ba

rre d by re s judic ata . Se e Gustafson v. C omm’r , 97 T.C . 85, 93 (1991); se e a lso W

. Radio Se rv

s. C o. v . Glic k

m a n , 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th C ir. 1997) (listing the

re quire m e nts for re s judic ata to a pply ). The Foote s ’ re que st to the Inte rna l R e ve nue Se rvic e for a d m inistra tive c osts is im

m ate ria l, be c a

use a pre v a i ling ta

xpa y e r m ay only

re c ove r c osts from

the IR S if “ [t] h e unde rly i ng substa ntive issue s . . . a

re not, a nd ha ve ne v e r be e n , be fore any c ourt of the Unite d 2Stat e s.” § 301.7430-2(b)(1)(i). Here , the Foote s’ lia bility wa s de te rm ine d by

the tax c ourt by

wa y of stipula tion. As suc h, a

ny re que st for c o s ts m a de to the IR S wa s proc e dura lly

im prope r. AFFIRM E D.

3
Latedra BINGHAM v. Sandra BELL

2160622

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
EX PARTE A.M.

1160918 (2160001)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 258 

To cancel certain proposed changes to loan level price adjustments by the 

Federal National Mortgage Association and credit fees charged by the 

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mrs. BICE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To cancel certain proposed changes to loan level price adjustments by the Federal National Mortgage Association and 

credit fees charged by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage 

Corporation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CANCELLATION OF CHANGES. 

4 The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the enter5 prises, as defined in section 1303 of the Federal Housing 

6 Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 

7 (12 U.S.C. 4502), may not implement the changes to the 

8 single-family pricing framework announced by the Federal 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 258 IH

1 Housing Finance Agency on January 19, 2023, in an an2 nouncement entitled ‘‘FHFA Announces Updates to the 

3 Enterprises’ Single-Family Pricing Framework’’, and set 

4 forth in Federal National Mortgage Association Lender 

5 Letter LL–2023–01 and Federal Home Loan Mortgage 

6 Corporation Bulletin 2023–1, and the changes, Lender 

7 Letter, and Bulletin shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
STATE of Louisiana v. John T. FITCH, Sr.

NO. 2018-KH-0307

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Placido H. Canta, Chief Financial Officer of Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.,
      the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                November 14, 2007
            /S/Placido
                H. Canta,Chief
                Financial Officer of ManagerLakeside
                Financial Group, Inc.
# C_2016243EN.01003701.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/37

---

Action brought on 22 April 2016 – Anton Riemerschmid Weinbrennerei und Likörfabrik v EUIPO – Viña y Bodega Botalcura (LITU)

(Case T-187/16)

(2016/C 243/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Anton Riemerschmid Weinbrennerei und Likörfabrik GmbH & Co. KG (Erding, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Viña y Bodega Botalcura SA (Las Condes, Chile)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘LITU’ – Application for registration No 12 684 833

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 February 2016 in Case R 719/2015-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | deliver a judgment accepting the action, fully annulling the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

deliver a judgment accepting the action, fully annulling the contested decision;

| — | order to dismiss the European Union Trademark Application for the word mark LITU in relation to all the goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

order to dismiss the European Union Trademark Application for the word mark LITU in relation to all the goods;

| — | order that the Defendant and/or the other party to the proceedings should bear the fees and costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Defendant and/or the other party to the proceedings should bear the fees and costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
John RICE v. Richelle Webster RICE

2160574

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 09, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 09, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0002. KENNETH BELL v. GILDER TIMBER COMPANY et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CG0265
EXHIBIT 32.1

JMG Exploration, Inc.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, I, Joseph W. Skeehan, President and Chief Executive Officer of, JMG Exploration, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | 
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| | 1. | This Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           
|
| | 2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the periods presented therein. |  | 

Date: November 20, 2006

|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Joseph W. Skeehan                 |  | 
|                                      |  | 
|Joseph W. Skeehan                     |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |
Scott DUGAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jekaterina FEDOSEJEVA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1120

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of  Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kenneth E. Compton, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/KENNETH E. COMPTONKenneth E. Compton President and Chief Executive Officer


August 8,
2008

---



QuickLinks
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency [EPA-HQ-OW-2024-0454; FRL 12023-03-OW]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Notice of availability; correction.
 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making a correction to a notice that appeared in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on December 26, 2024. The notice of availability contained an incorrect value in Table 1, which is corrected below.
 DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 24, 2025.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandi Echols, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Water (4304T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 566-2717; email address: 
                        *Echols.Brandi@epa.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published a notice of availability in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     at 89 FR 105041, December 26, 2024. This document corrects an error in Table 1, third column, second row, by correcting the PFOA Organism Only HHC value of 0.00036 ng/L to 0.0036 ng/L. This notice for correction corrects that error. Correction In the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of December 26, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-30637, on page 105042, correct “Table 1” to read: Table 1—Draft Human Health Criteria (HHC) for PFOA, PFOS, and PFBS
PFAS
Water + organism HHC 
                             (ng/L)
Organism only HHC 
                             (ng/L)PFOA
0.0009
0.0036PFOS
0.06
0.07PFBS
400
500
 Tanya Hodge Mottley, Acting Director, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water.


[FR Doc. 2025-00710 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P