alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00479

- CV LIBERTY SPORT AVIATION, L.P. , Appellant

v. Barry PRUITT , Bristell USA L.P. and PRM Group, LLC, Appellees
From the 216th Judicial District Court , Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 14

- 314 Honorable N. Keith Williams , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 9, 2015
DIS MISSED The trial court granted an interlocutory summary judgment in trial court number 14

- 314. The trial court subsequently severed the summary judgment into a new cause, trial court number
14

- 314A, making the summary judgment final and appealable. Appellant filed notices of appeal in both trial court causes. Appellant has advised the court it wishes to proceed only in appeal number 04

- 15

- 00480

- CV, the appeal from the severed cause, trial court number 14

- 314A. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal from the original cause, trial court number 14

- 314.
PER CURIAM
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                PLANET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE


                                          FOR THE YEAR ENDED FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS:                 AUGUST 31, 1999    AUGUST 31, 1998
                                          ------------------ --------------------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>
Net income (Loss)                            $    278,462        $   (645,464)
Less: preferred stock dividends                  (353,199)            (87,500)
Less: preferred stock dividend
     return of capital                                 --          (3,620,690)
                                             ------------        ------------
Net loss attributed to common stockholders   $    (74,737)       $ (4,353,654)
                                             ============        ============

SHARES:
Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                        11,996,114          11,827,308
Conversion of convertible preferred
     stock                                             --                  --
Exercise of stock options                              --                  --

TOTAL:                                         11,996,114          11,827,308
                                             ============        ============


BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE             $       (.01)       $       (.37)
                                             ============        ============
</TABLE>
Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID 127
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID 128
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID 129
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID 130
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID 131
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID 132
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID 133
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02249-K Document 24 Filed 08/01/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID 134
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50308 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FRANCISCO JAVIER SAUCEDO

- VASQUEZ, also known as Raul Pena Banda, also known as Raul Pena

- Banda, also known as Francisco Javier Vasquez

- Saucedo, also known as Francisco Saucedo

- Vasquez, also known as Javier Francisco, also known as Javier Saucedo Vasuez, al so known as Francisco Javier Sauceda, also known as Javier V. Saucedo, also known as Francisco Javier Vasquez, also known as Francisco J. Saucedo, also known as Francisco Javier Saucedo , Defendant

- Appellant

_______________________ Consolidate d with No. 18

- 50314

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FRANCISCO SAUCEDO

- VASQUEZ, also known as Francisco Javier Saucedo

Vasquez,

Defendant

- Appellant United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 1, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50308 Document: 00514819348 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2019N o. 18

- 50308 c/w No. 18

- 50314

2 Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:18

- CR

- 27

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier Saucedo

- Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Saucedo

- Vasquez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief an d the relevant portions of the
record s reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal s present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fur ther responsibi lities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-50308 Document: 00514819348 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2019
Exhibit 32.2





Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of ABCO Energy, Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: August 14, 2014ABCO ENERGY, INC./s/ Charles O’DowdCharles O’DowdChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Audrey Reich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 29, 2007
|------------------



|By:/s/ Audrey Reich
|-------------------



| | Audrey ReichPresident/CEO, principal executive officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------

---
Notice: This opin ion is subject to form al revision before publication in the Atl antic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal

errors so that correc tions m ay be made before the boun d volum es go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF AP P EALS

No. 1 5- BG- 56 3

IN RE: ANTHONY MCDANIEL, Res po nd en t. Ba r Reg is tra tio n No. 9 76 58 3 BDN: 1 40 -1 5

BEFORE: Fi sh er, Ass oc ia te Ju dg e, an d Newm an an d F arre ll , Sen io r Ju dg es

.

ORDER (FILED - Aug us t 2 7, 2 01 5)

O n c o n s id erat io n of th e cert ifi ed or de r of th e Co ur t of App eal s of Mar y l a n d di sb arri ng res po nd en t fro m th e pr act ic e of la w in th at juri sd ic ti on , se e Att or ne y Gri eva nc e Co m’n of

Mar yl an d v. McDa ni el
, 11 4 A.3d 70 8 (Md

. 20 15 ), th is co ur t’s Ju ne 17
, 20 15
, or de r di rect in g res po nd en t to s h o w cau se why reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne sh ou ld no t be im

po se d, an d th e st at em en t o f B a r C o u ns el reg ard in g reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne , an d it ap pe ari ng th at res po nd en t ha s fai le d to fil e ei th er a res po ns e to th is

co ur t’s o rd er t o s ho w cau se or t he affi da vi t as req ui red by D.C. Bar R. XI, §1 4 (g ), it is

O R D ER ED th at Ant ho ny McDa ni el is he reb y di sb arre d fro m th e pr act i c e o f la w in th e Dis tri ct of Co lu m bi a. Se e In re Si bl ey , 99 0 A.2d 48 3 (D.C. 20 10 ), an d In

re Ful le r , 93 0 A.2d 19 4, 1 98 (D.C. 20 07 ) (reb ut ta bl e pr es um pt io n of id en ti cal reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne ap pl ie s to al l cas es in whi ch th e res po nd en t do es no t pa rti ci pa te ). It i s

FURTHER ORDERED th at fo r pu rp os es of rei ns ta te m en t res po nd en t’s pe rio d of di sb arm en t wil l no t be gi n to ru n un ti l su ch ti m e as he fil es an affi da vi t t ha t fu ll y

co m pl ie s wi th th e req ui rem en ts of D.C. Ba r R. XI, § 1 4 (g ).

PER CURI AM
J.P. v. R.B.

2160620

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017 Reh. denied December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationAAC Consulting Group, Inc.
    
    MarylandACER/EXCEL INC.
    
    New JerseyBeijing KendleWits Medical Consulting Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaKendle Americas Holding Inc.
    
    OhioKendle Americas Investment Inc.
    
    OhioKendle Americas Management Inc.
    
    OhioKendle Argentina S.R.L.
    
    ArgentinaKendle Branches Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Brasil Servicios de Pesquisas Clinicas Ltda.
    
    BrazilKendle Canada Inc.
    
    CanadaKendle Chile Limiteda
    
    ChileKendle Clinical Development Services GmbH
    
    GermanyKendle Clinical Development Services Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Colombia Ltda.
    
    ColombiaKendle CTA Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Czech Republic s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicKendle Delaware Inc.
    
    DelawareKendle GmbH
    
    GermanyKendle India Private Limited
    
    India




---



##### 



Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationKendle International B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsKendle International CPU LLC
    
    OhioKendle International Holdings Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle International Holdings Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaKendle International Israel Ltd.
    
    IsraelKendle International Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle International Ltda.
    
    BrazilKendle International Pty, Ltd.
    
    AustraliaKendle International s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicKendle International SARL
    
    FranceKendle International SL
    
    SpainKendle International Sp. z o.o.
    
    PolandKendle International SRL
    
    ItalyKendle International, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoKendle NC Inc.
    
    North CarolinaKendle Peru S.R.L.
    
    PeruKendle Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaKendle R&D Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaKendle R&D Unit Trust
    
    AustraliaKendle SARL
    
    FranceKendle Servicios, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoKendle South Africa (Proprietary) Limited
    
    South AfricaKendle Sweden AB
    
    SwedenKendle U.K. Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Unit Trust
    
    AustraliaPharma Clinical Research Limited
    
    United KingdomU-Gene Clinical Research B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsU-Gene Research Biotechnology B.V.
    
    The Netherlands
Kurt Henry Van ZEELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2553

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Roque A. Santi,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 14, 2006



/s/ Roque A. SantiRoque A. SantiChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12628]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(A) of Executive Order 13224, as amended (“E.O. 13224” or “Order”), the Secretary of State has determined that the person known as The Terrorgram Collective (also known as Terrorgram) is a foreign person that has committed or has attempted to commit, poses a significant risk of committing, or has participated in training to commit acts of terrorism that threaten the security of United States nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Additionally, acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(B)(2) of E.O. 13224, the Secretary of State has determined that the persons known as Ciro Daniel Amorim Ferreira (also known as Ciro Daniel Ferreira), Noah Licul (also known as Noah Lycul), and Hendrik-Wahl Muller, are foreign persons who are leaders of The Terrorgram Collective, an entity whose property and interests in property are concurrently blocked pursuant to a determination by the Secretary of State pursuant to E.O. 13224.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of E.O. 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, the Secretary of State determines that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Hillary Batjer Johnson,

Deputy Coordinator, Bureau of Counterterrorism, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2025-00756 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 50 

To prohibit grants provided under section 106 of the Housing and Community 

Development Act of 1974 from being used to assist persons who are 

neither a national of the United States nor lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona (for himself, Mr. OGLES, Mr. CRANE, and Mrs. LUNA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit grants provided under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 from being 

used to assist persons who are neither a national of 

the United States nor lawfully admitted for permanent 

residence, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Aid for Mu5 nicipalities And Localities Accountable Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘KAMALA Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 50 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE FOR PERSONS NOT 

2 LAWFULLY PRESENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105 of the Housing and 

4 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(i) PROHIBITION ON USE OF ASSISTANCE FOR PER7 SONS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT.—Notwithstanding any 

8 other provision of law, no amount from a grant under sec9 tion 106 made in fiscal year 2024 or any succeeding fiscal 

10 year may be used to assist persons who are neither a na11 tional of the United States nor lawfully admitted for per12 manent residence under section 101(a)(20) of the Immi13 gration and Nationality Act.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON GRANTS TO ENTITIES THAT PRO15 VIDE ASSISTANCE TO PERSONS NOT LAW16 FULLY PRESENT. 

17 Section 103 of the Housing and Community Develop18 ment Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5303) is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary is authorized to’’ 

20 and inserting: 

21 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to’’; 

22 and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The Secretary may not make a 

25 grant to any State, unit of general local government, or 

26 Indian tribe to carry out activities in accordance with the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 50 IH

1 provisions of this title if such State, unit of general local 

2 government, or Indian tribe carries out any housing or 

3 community development related program that provides as4 sistance to persons who are neither a national of the 

5 United States nor lawfully admitted for permanent resi6 dence under section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and 

7 Nationality Act.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Terrence Lamont GREEN v. STATE

CR-16-0922

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

Bar No.01344800

860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

Hurst, TX 76054

Phone: (817) 916-4710

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO.: 24-42998-ELM -13

TINA RENA DELEON

709 ATASCOSA AVE

FT WORTH, TX 76120

SSN/TIN: XXX-XX-1486

DEBTOR HEARING: NOVEMBER 7, 2024 AT 8:30 AM 

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

TO THE HONORABLE U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

NOW COMES Pam Bassel Standing Chapter 13 Trustee and files this Trustee 's Objection to Confirmation. 

Trustee would respectfully show the Court:

The Plan fails to meet the disposable income test of 11 U.S.C. Section 1325 (b) (1) (B) because the Plan does 

not propose to pay all of the Debtor's disposable income for the applicable commitment period to the Debtor's 

unsecured creditors. 

The Plan provides for an unsecured creditors' pool ("UCP") of $0.00. The Trustee has calculated a UCP of 

$48,724.80 based on a monthly disposable income of $812.08 over a 60 month applicable commitment period, with 

the following add-backs, if any: 

 

FORM 122C-2 LINE 16 TAX WITHHOLDING OVERSTATED PER 62.62

SCHEDULE I LINE 5A

FORM 122C-2 LINE 23 OPTIONAL TELEPHONE 40.00

SCH I LINE 4 GROSS INCOME UNDERSTATED PER PAYSTUBS 219.58

The Plan does not meet the requirements of the best interests of creditors test of 11 U.S.C. Section 1325(a)(4). 

Debtor has equity in non-exempt property as follows:

The total equity in non-exempt property is approximately $ 3220 but the Plan provides for equity in non -exempt 

property of only $0.00. 

The Debtor's Attorney's Fees exceed the court's guidelines for a "no-look" fee.

WHEREFORE, Trustee prays that confirmation be DENIED and for general relief.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright, Staff Attorney

 Bar No. 24068273

 PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

 Bar No. 01344800

 860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

 Hurst, TX 76054

 (817) 916-4710 Phone

 

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION 

Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on or before the date of filing. Service 

was accomplished electronically on Debtor's attorney and all parties entitled to electronic notice and by first class 

mail on the Debtor and the parties listed below, if any.

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright

TINA RENA DELEON

709 ATASCOSA AVE

FT WORTH, TX 76120

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION 

Page 2 of 2