alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SEC. 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

4 Effective from January 3, 2025, the joint committee 

5 created by Senate Concurrent Resolution 34 (118th Con6 gress), to make the necessary arrangements for the inau7 guration of the President-elect and the Vice President8 elect of the United States, is continued with the same 

9 power and authority provided for in that resolution. 

10 SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL. 

11 Effective from January 3, 2025, the provisions of 

12 Senate Concurrent Resolution 35 (118th Congress), to au13 thorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of 

14 the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee on In15 augural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings 

16 and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the 

17 President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United 
2 

†SCON 1 ES 

1 States are continued with the same power and authority 

2 provided for in that resolution. 

Passed the Senate January 3, 2025. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Extending the life of the Joint Congressional 

Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies.
In the INTEREST OF V.A. and J.G., Children.

S.H., Petitioner, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-4386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019

Denied.
J.D. v. Cullman County DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160583

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tracy D. NEWTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 25, 2019

AFFIRMED.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-50888 Summary Calendar

RUBEN OLIVARES GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU O F P R I SONS; GEO GROUP; WARDEN, R EEVES COUNTY DETENTION C ENTER III; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents-Appellees

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CV-83
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ruben O livares G onzalez, federal prisoner # 15987-078, an a lien against whom the Bureau o f I m m i g r ation and Customs Enforcement has issued a detainer subjecting him to immediat e r e m oval from the United States upon release from Bureau o f Prisons (BOP) custody, moves this court to proceed in forma pauperis ( IFP) to appeal the denial of his 2 8 U

. S.C. § 2241 petition U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D May1, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-50888 Document: 00512226464 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/01/2013No. 12-50888

challenging the BOP’s exc l u s i on of him f rom rehabilitation p r ograms and halfway houses. His arguments are f orec l o s ed by this court’s decision in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States , 688 F.3d 190 , 1 9 2

- 9 3 ( 5th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 561 ( 2012). Accordingly, Olivares Gonzalez’s m otion t o proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 T H C I R . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-50888 Document: 00512226464 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/01/2013
Case 3:04-cr-00328-D Document 11 Filed 03/08/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 19
Case 3:04-cr-00328-D Document 11 Filed 03/08/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 20
Case 3:04-cr-00328-D Document 11 Filed 03/08/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 21
Case 3:04-cr-00328-D Document 11 Filed 03/08/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 22
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley Hawkings, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 8, 2009
|-----------------

|By: | /s/Bradley Hawkings                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Bradley Hawkings                                                                     
|    | Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

---
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Patrick H. Dudasik, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.November 10, 2005        /S/ Patrick H. Dudasik  Patrick H. Dudasik  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March  31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |     |                                
|------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------
|Date:  February 17, 2009 | By: | /s/ DAVID J. CURD              
|                         |     | David J. Curd                  
|                         |     | Interim Chief Financial Officer
Andre AARON, et al. v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, f/k/a Exxon Company U.S.A., Exxon Corporation

No. 2019-CC-0161

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons:

I would grant and docket the writ application by Exxon Mobil Corporation f/k/a Exxon Company U.S.A. *See**Howard v. Union Carbide Corporation* , 09-2750, pp. 1-3 (La. 10/19/10), 50 So.3d 1251.
# C_2018352EN.01000402.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 August 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — TGE Gas Engineering GmbH — Sucursal em Portugal v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-16/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Deduction of input tax - Origin and scope of the right to deduct))

(2018/C 352/05)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TGE Gas Engineering GmbH — Sucursal em Portugal

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 167 and 168 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, and the principle of neutrality must be interpreted as precluding the tax authority of a Member State from regarding a company which has its headquarters in another Member State and the branch which it has in the first of those States as constituting two separate taxable entities on the ground that each of those entities has a tax identification number, and, for that reason, from refusing that branch the right to deduct value added tax (VAT) on the debit notes issued by an economic interest group of which that company, and not its branch, is a member.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.

---
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mark              Klein                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
| Name: Mark                KleinTitle:                 Chief                Executive Officer, President and Director                (Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial                and Accounting Officer) May                31, 2006 |   |   |        |

----
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I,Robert W. Wright, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of PRB Energy, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a.             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b.            Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.             All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2007              |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| /s/ Robert W. Wright                 |   |
| Robert W. Wright                     |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)        |

 

----
# C_2016419EN.01005501.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/55

---

Appeal brought on 23 September 2016 by Sergio Siragusa against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 July 2016 in Case F-124/15, Siragusa v Council

(Case T-678/16 P)

(2016/C 419/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Sergio Siragusa (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 July 2016, served on 14 July 2016, Siragusa v Council of the European Union (F-124/15); |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 July 2016, served on 14 July 2016, Siragusa v Council of the European Union (F-124/15);

| — | Refer to the substance of the action and set aside the order under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer to the substance of the action and set aside the order under appeal;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of both instances. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on a single ground of appeal, alleging an error of law.

He is of the opinion that the Civil Service Tribunal erred in law in the classification in law of the Council’s decision validating his early retirement of 11 July 2013. In consequence, he submits that the decision of the Appointing Authority of 12 November 2014 refusing his early retirement must be regarded as an adverse measure withdrawing the earlier decision accepting his early retirement and not as a mere decision confirming an implied rejection decision.

The appellant submits, finally, that since the decision of 12 November 2014 was contested within the period prescribed for that purpose, the action brought at first instance is admissible and its merits must be examined.

---
EXHIBIT 21

PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

|Subsidiary                                       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|WE JAC Corporation                               |  | Delaware                     
|Worldwide Drying Systems, Inc.                   |  | Colorado                     
|Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc.                   |  | Virginia                     
|PTW, Inc.                                        |  | Washington                   
|Precision Building Solutions Inc.                |  | Delaware                     
|Miracle Partners, Inc.                           |  | Delaware                     
|Miracle Industries, Inc.                         |  | Ohio                         
|Indy Ventures, LLC                               |  | Indiana                      
|Prema Properties, LLC                            |  | Ohio                         
|Precision Auto Care Mexico I, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       
|Promotora de Franquicias Praxis S.A. de C.V.     |  | Mexico                       
|Praxis Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                 |  | Mexico                       
|Praxis Auto Partes, S.A. de C.V.                 |  | Mexico                       
|Praxis Afinaciones Puerto Rico, Inc.             |  | Puerto Rico                  
|Precision Franchising, LLC                       |  | Virginia                     
|Precision Printing, Inc.                         |  | Virginia                     
|Acc-u-tune                                       |  | California                   
|National 60 Minute Tune, Inc.                    |  | Washington                   
|Sixar Occidente, S.A. de C.V                     |  | Mexico                       
|Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                   |  | Mexico                       
|Premier Accesorios, S.A. de C.V                  |  | Mexico                       
|Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                   |  | Puerto Rico                  
|Sixar Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V                   |  | Mexico                       
|Precision Tune Auto Care (Canada) Inc.           |  | Ontario                      

---

QuickLinks
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 1 

Extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 

Ceremonies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. THUNE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee 

on Inaugural Ceremonies. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

4 Effective from January 3, 2025, the joint committee 

5 created by Senate Concurrent Resolution 34 (118th Con6 gress), to make the necessary arrangements for the inau7 guration of the President-elect and the Vice President8 elect of the United States, is continued with the same 

9 power and authority provided for in that resolution. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SCON 1 ATS 

1 SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL. 

2 Effective from January 3, 2025, the provisions of 

3 Senate Concurrent Resolution 35 (118th Congress), to au4 thorize the use of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of 

5 the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee on In6 augural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings 

7 and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the 

8 President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United 

9 States are continued with the same power and authority 

10 provided for in that resolution. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EX PARTE Jonathan Mikeal RAYNES

1160632 (CR-15-0767)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.