---

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) [   ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 or [ X ]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 or [   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 or [   ] SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report ________ For the transition period from ________ to ________ Commission file number: 0-29250 Battle Mountain Gold Inc.(Exact name of Company as specified in its charter) Not applicable(Translation of Company’s name into English) Province of British Columbia, Canada(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Suite 300, 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6E 2E9(Address of principal executive offices) Page 1 of 47 PagesThe Exhibit Index is located on Page 46


---

2 Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class

   Name of each exchange on which registeredNone

   ________
 Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. Common Shares Without Par Value(Title of Class) Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None(Title of Class) Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. 36,189,086 Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [   ] No [ X ] Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [   ] Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer [   ] Accelerated filer [   ] Non-accelerated filer [ X ] Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP [   ]

   International Financial Reporting Standards as issued

   Other [   ]by the International Accounting Standards Board[ X ]
 If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. [Not applicable] Item 17 [   ]Item 18 [   ]


---

3 If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [   ] No [ X ] (APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS) Indicate by check mark whether the Company has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [   ] No [   ] Not Applicable [ X ] The information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 20-F is as at October 31, 2015 unless an earlier or later date is indicated. Statements in this Annual Report regarding expected completion dates of feasibility studies, anticipated commencement dates of mining or metal production operations, projected quantities of future metal production and anticipated production rates, operating efficiencies, costs and expenditures are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially depending upon the availability of materials, equipment, required permits or approvals and financing, the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions, the accuracy of reserve estimates, lower than expected ore grades or the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications. See “Risk Factors” for other factors that may affect the Company’s future financial performance.


---

4 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 20-F TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No.GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS

   6PART I

   

   9ITEM 1.

   IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

   9ITEM 2.

   OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

   9ITEM 3.

   KEY INFORMATION

   9A.

   Selected Financial Data

   9B.

   Capitalization and Indebtedness

   10C.

   Reasons For The Offer and Use of Proceeds

   10D.

   Risk Factors

   10ITEM 4.

   INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

   15A.

   History and Development of the Company

   15B.

   Business Overview

   16C.

   Organizational Structure

   17D.

   Property Plants and Equipment

   17ITEM 5.

   OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

   21A.

   Operating Results

   21Overview

   21Comment on Capital Markets

   23Liquidity

   23B.

   Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

   24C.

   Trend Information

   24D.

   Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

   24ITEM 6.

   DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

   24A.

   Directors and Senior Management

   24B.

   Compensation

   25C.

   Board Practices

   25D.

   Employees

   26E.

   Share Ownership

   26ITEM 7.

   MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

   26A.

   Major Shareholders

   26B.

   Related Party Transactions

   27


---

5 ITEM 8.

   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

   27A.

   Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

   27B.

   Significant Changes

   28ITEM 9.

   THE OFFER AND LISTING

   28A.

   Offer and Listing Details

   28ITEM 10.

   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   29A.

   Share Capital

   29B.

   Memorandum and Articles of Association

   29C.

   Material Contracts

   32D.

   Exchange Controls

   33E.

   Taxation

   33Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences

   33Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

   34F.

   Dividends and Paying Agents

   39G.

   Statements by Experts

   39H.

   Documents on Display

   39I.

   Subsidiary Information

   39ITEM 11.

   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

   39PART II

   

   39ITEM 12.

   DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

   39ITEM 13.

   DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARS AND DELINQUENCIES

   39ITEM 14.

   MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDSITEM 15.

   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

   40ITEM 16A.

   AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

   41ITEM 16B.

   CODE OF ETHICS

   42ITEM 16C.

   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

   42ITEM 16D.

   EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

   42ITEM 16E.

   PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS43PART III

   

   43ITEM 17.

   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   43ITEM 18.

   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   43ITEM 19.

   EXHIBITS

   43SIGNATURES

   45EXHIBIT INDEX

  46


---

6 GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS This glossary comprises a list of common technical terms that are typically used by exploration geologists, edited to conform where possible to actual usage in the body of this 20-F report. Users are advised to refer to more comprehensive dictionaries of geology in printed form or available on the internet for a complete glossary. Allochthonous

   Rocks or materials which have formed at a different place than where they are currently found; having a foreign origin.Alluvial

   A general term for clay, silt, sand, gravel or similar unconsolidated detrital material deposited during comparatively recent geological time by a stream or other body of running water.Argillite

   A compact rock derived from mudstone or shale that is more highly indurated than either of these rocks. Argillite also lacks the fissility of shale or the cleavage of slate.Autochthonous

   Rocks or materials which are presently located in their place of origin.Basinal(of sediments)

   Describing a natural depression of strata containing a stratified deposit.Calcareous

   The term calcareous, when applied to a rock name, implies that as much as 50% of the rock is comprised of calcium carbonate (Ca CO3).Cambrian

   A geologic time span from 485 to 541 Ma.Chert

   A hard, dense, compact crytocrystalline sedimentary rock comprised chiefly of extremely fine grained interlocking crystals of quartz. It displays a distinctive conchoidal fracture and occurs in a variety of colors. The term flint is synonymous.Clastic

   A rock composed principally of fragments derived from pre-existing rock.Coeval

   A term applying to items having the same age or date of origin.Comagmatic

   Igneous rocks displaying a common set of chemical and mineralogical features. As such, they are regarded as having derived from the same parent magma.Cordilleran

   Referring to the great mountainous region of western North America, lying between the Great Plains and the Pacific Ocean.Core drilling

   A form of drilling which recovers cylindrical samples of the target rock through the use of a hollow drilling bit, which cuts and retains a section of the rock penetrated.Cretaceous

   A geologic time span from 66 to 145 Ma.Devonian

   A geologic time span from 359 to 419 Ma.Diorite

   A group of plutonic rocks intermediate in composition between acidic and basic.Dike

   A tabular body of igneous rock that cuts across the structure of adjacent rocks or cuts across massive rocks. Due to its cross-cutting nature, it has clear implications regarding the timing of geologic events.Eocene

   A geologic time span from 34 to 56 Ma.Facies

   A lateral subdivision of a stratigraphic unit.Fault

   A planar fracture or discontinuity in a volume of rock, across which there has been significant displacement along the fractures as a result of movement.Fault vein

   A mineral vein deposited in a fault fissure.Footwall

   The wall or rock under a vein; or, the wall on the lower side of a reef, lode or fault.Fold

   When originally flat and level surfaces, such as in sedimentary rocks, are bent or curved as a result of pressure and high temperature.Fracture

   A planar separation in a rock that divides the rock into two or more pieces.Gangue

   The valueless rock or mineral aggregates within an ore body that cannot be avoided during the mining process. Gangue is not economically desirable material that is separated from the ore during the mine concentration process.g/t

   Grams per metric tonne.Granodiorite

   A coarse-grained granitic rock containing quartz, feldspar and biotite.Hanging wall

   The wall or rock on the upper side of an inclined vein.Hydrothermal

   Of or pertaining to hot water, the action of hot water, or the products of such action including mineral deposition precipitated from a hot aqueous solution.


---

7 Imbricate

   Describing the shingle structure displayed by a series of rock slices, either thick or thin, separated by high-angle reverse faults or thrust faults.Induced Polarization orIP

   A geophysical survey technique that measured various electrical properties. This system introduces a strong electrical charge into the sub-surface and then measures its charging intensity and strength at various controlled stations over distance distribution. Often used to identify dissemingated massive sulphide deposits.Indurated

   Hardened; applied to rocks hardened by heat, pressure or the addition of a cementing ingredient; or, applied to consolidated sediments, or to incoherent sediments that have been cemented or lithified or otherwise changed into sedimentary rock.Intrusive

   In petrology, having, while molten, penetrated into or between other rocks, but solidifying before reaching the surface; said of certain igneous rocks; similar to plutonic.Ma

   Million years before the present.Magma

   Naturally occurring molten rock, generated within the earth.Magnetic geophysics

   A form of geophysical measurement which seeks to identify and interpret a measured magnetic pattern from a theoretical or empirically smoothed magnetic field on the earth’s surface.Mesozoic

   A geologic time span from 66 to 252 Ma.Mineral Deposit orMineralised Material

   A mineralised body which has been delineated by appropriately spaced drilling and/or underground sampling to support a sufficient tonnage and average grade of metal(s). Such a deposit does not qualify as a reserve until a comprehensive evaluation based upon unit cost, grade, recoveries and other material factors conclude legal and economic feasibility.Mineralization

   A natural aggregate of one or more metallic minerals.Oligocene

   A geologic time span from 23 to 34 Ma.Ordovician

   A geologic time span from 419 to 485 Ma.Orogeny

   The process of mountain making, especially by the folding of the earth’s crust. The Antler Orogenyis held to have occurred over a very long period extending from approximately 380 Ma to as late as approximately 300 Ma; theories about this process are unresolved. The Sonoma Orogenywas a period of mountain building in western North America, generally thought to have occurred during the Permian /Triassic transition, around 250 million years ago, following the Antler Orogeny.Ounces

   Troy ounces.Paleozoic

   A geologic time span from 252 to 541 Ma.Pennsylvanian

   A geologic time span from 299 to 323 Ma.Permian

   A geologic time span from 252 to 299 Ma.Pliocene

   A geologic time span from 2.6 to 5.3 Ma.Plutonic

   Of igneous origin. A general name for those rocks which have crystallized in the depths of the earth, and have therefore assumed, as a rule, a granitoid texture.Quaternary

   A geologic time span less than 2.6 Ma.RC/Reverse CirculationDrilling

   A rapid type of drilling using a fluid/air to recover the drill cuttings from the rotary down-hole hammer bit.Siliceous

   Of, relating to, or derived from silica.Splays

   Divergent small faults at the extremities of large, normal faults.


---

8 Stratigraphy

   The science of studying rock strata, concerning the characteristics and attributes of rock strata formation. This includes interpretation in terms of origin and geologic history. All classes of rocks, consolidated or unconsolidated, fall within the general scope of stratigraphy. It is also the arrangement of strata (layered rocks) relative to geographic position and chronological order of sequence.Structure

   General description of geological elements that include faults, fractures and foldscreated by tectonic forces that occur within the earth.Tectonics

   The processes which create the broad architecture of the surface of the earth.Tertiary

   A geologic time span from 2.6 to 66 Ma.Thrust Faults

   A structural displacement (fault) displaying a dip angle of 45 degrees or less over much of its extent, on which the hanging wall appears to have moved upwards relative to the foot wall. Horizontal compression rather than vertical displacement is the characteristic feature.Tonne

   A metric ton (1,000 kilograms or 2,204 pounds).Triassic

   A geologic time span from 201 to 252 Ma.Tuff

   A general term for all consolidated volcanic rocks derived from volcanic explosions into the air.Uncomformable, -ly

   Not succeeding the underlying strata in immediate order of age.Wallrock

   The country rock immediately adjacent to a vein or lode.


---

9 PART I ITEM 1.

   IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item. ITEM 2.

   OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item. ITEM 3.

   KEY INFORMATION
  A.

   Selected Financial Data
 As set out in Item 4.A of this annual report, the registrant in this document is the accounting acquirer in a “reverse acquisition” transaction. The Company was incorporated in April 2012 and its first fiscal year was an abbreviated period from inception to October 31, 2012. The selected financial data below cover only two fiscal years, those ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 pursuant to section 3-05 of Regulation S-X in that revenues in the most recent fiscal year are less than $50 million. The following tables summarize selected financial data for the Company (stated in Canadian dollars) prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) (“IFRS-IASB”). The information in the table was extracted from the more detailed financial statements and related notes included herein and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and with the information appearing under the heading “Item 5 – Operating And Financial Review And Prospects”. Results for the period ended October 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods. INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH IFRS Year ended October 312015

   2014(a)

   Total revenue

   

   $0

   

   

   $0(b)

   Earnings (loss) before extraordinary itemsTotal

   

   ($549,252

   )

   

   ($626,663

   )Per Share1

   

   ($0.02

   )

   

   ($0.03

   )(c)

   Total assets

   

   $3,463,097

   

   

   $2,912,643(d)

   Total long-term debt

   

   $0

   

   

   $0(e)

   Capital stock

   

   $4,400,474

   

   

   $3,262,874(f)

   Total shareholder equity

   

   $3,361,412

   

   

   $2,671,446(g)

   Cash dividends declared per share

   

   none

   

   

   none(h)

   Net earnings (loss) for the yearTotal

   

   ($549,252

   )

   

   ($626,663

   )Per Share1

   

   ($0.02

   )


   

   ($0.03

   )
 Note 1: Per share amounts are not presented on a fully-diluted basis as the inclusion of dilutive securities is anti-dilutive. In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, unless otherwise specified, all monetary amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars. On February 23, 2016, the exchange rate, based on the noon buying rate published by the Bank


---

10 of Canada, for the conversion of United States dollars into Canadian dollars (the “Noon Rate of Exchange”) was $1.3792. The following table sets out the high and low exchange rates for each of the last six months. 2016

   2015January

   December

   November

   October

   September

   AugustHigh for period

   1.4661

   1.4003

   1.3390

   1.3280

   1.3457

   1.3346Low for period

   1.3983

   1.3398

   1.3112

   1.2940

   1.3205

   1.3024
 The following table sets out the average exchange rates for the five most recent financial years calculated by using the average of the Noon Rate of Exchange on the last day of each month during the period. Year Ended October 312015

   2014

   2013

   2012

   2011Average for the period

   1.2497

   1.0906

   1.0301

   1.0046

   0.9868
  B.

   Capitalization and Indebtedness
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item. C.

   Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item. D.

   Risk Factors
 The following is a brief discussion of those distinctive or special characteristics of the Company’s operations and industry that may have a material impact on, or constitute risk factors in respect of, the Company’s future financial performance. Risks suggested by the fact that the Company has a history of net losses, a large accumulated deficit, and a persistent lack of revenue from operations The Company has incurred significant net losses to date. Its deficit as of October 31, 2015 under IFRS was $1,458,526. The Company has not yet had any revenue from the exploration activities on its properties, nor has the Company yet found that development activity is warranted on any of its properties. Even if the Company does undertake development activity on any of its properties, the Company may continue to incur losses beyond the period of commencement of such activity. There is no certainty that the Company will produce revenue, operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the future. Risks to investors of significant fluctuations in share prices and share price volatility In recent years, the securities markets in Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of securities of many companies, particularly junior mineral exploration companies like the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. In particular, the per share price of the Company's common stock fluctuated from a high of $0.355 to a low of $0.07 in the period beginning May 14, 2014 – the date its securities commenced trading on the TSX Venture Exchange – and ending on the date of this Annual Report. It is probable that such price fluctuations will continue to occur, and there can be no assurance that the market price for the Company’s shares will recover significantly from current low valuations.


---

11 Risks of the Company’s exploration efforts failing to establish a viable mining project The Company is engaged in the business of acquiring interests in mineral properties in the hope of locating mineral reserves. The Company's property interests are in the exploration stage only and are without a known body of commercial ore. Accordingly, there is little likelihood that the Company will realise any profits in the short to medium term. Any profitability in the future from the Company's business will be dependent upon locating mineral reserves, which itself is subject to numerous risk factors. The business of exploring for minerals involves a high degree of risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. In exploring its mineral deposits, the Company will be subjected to an array of complex economic factors and accordingly there is no assurance that a positive feasibility study or any projected results contained in a feasibility study of a mineral deposit will be attained. Technical considerations, delays in obtaining governmental approvals, inability to obtain financing or other factors could cause delays in exploring properties. Such delays could materially adversely affect the financial performance of the Company. Risks of failing to meet additional substantial funding requirements The Company has not received cash flow from operations in the past and cash flow is not expected in the next few years to satisfy the Company’s operational requirements and cash commitments. In the past, the Company has relied on sales of equity securities to meet most of its cash requirements, together with management fees, property payments and sales or joint ventures of properties. There can be no assurance that funding from these sources will be sufficient in the future to satisfy operational requirements and cash commitments, and this risk appears more likely in the current economic and financial environment. The Company presently has insufficient cash resources to meet the costs it would wish to incur on exploration programs and mineral tenure maintenance costs in 2016 on its Lewis Property, nor to sustain its general and administrative costs beyond April 2016. Any such costs will require additional financing in order to proceed. The exploration of the Company’s properties depends upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through any or all of the joint venturing of projects, equity financing, debt financing or other means. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining the required financing. Failure to obtain additional financing on a timely basis could cause the Company to forfeit all or a portion of its interest in its properties or reduce or terminate its operations on such properties. Risk of adverse currency fluctuations The Company maintains its accounts in Canadian dollars. The Company’s operations in Nevada expose it to the impact of fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar. In the most recent 18 months the cost to the Company of purchasing U.S. dollars has fluctuated significantly reflecting volatility in the USD/CAD foreign exchange rate. The Company does not at the present nor does it currently plan in the future to engage in foreign currency transactions to hedge any exchange rate risks. Risks of being required to find substantial funding for development of mineral projects Should the Company ultimately find itself with a funding interest in a joint venture to develop the Lewis Project, located in Nevada, its contribution to the costs necessary to build the necessary mining and processing infrastructure facilities, including electricity, transportation, etc., would be substantial. A similar risk applies to the cost of developing any other mining project.


---

12 Risks arising from the Company’s limited experience with development-stage mining operations The Company has limited experience in placing resource properties into production, and its ability to do so will be dependent upon using the services of appropriately experienced personnel or entering into agreements with other major resource companies that can provide such expertise. There can be no assurance that the Company will have available to it the necessary expertise when and if the Company places its resource properties into production. Risks of experiencing hazards associated with mining, if mining is attained The business of mining is subject to a variety of risks such as cave-ins and other accidents, flooding, environmental hazards, the discharge of toxic chemicals and other hazards. Such occurrences may delay production, increase production costs or result in liability. The Company will have insurance in amounts that it considers to be adequate to protect itself against certain risks of mining and processing. However, the Company may become subject to liability for hazards against which it cannot insure itself or which it may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. In particular, the Company is not insured for environmental liability or earthquake damage. Risks arising from the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in mineral prices The mining industry in general is intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, even if commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, a profitable market will exist for the sale of same. Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of any substances discovered. The prices of gold and silver have experienced volatile and significant price movements over short periods of time, and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company, including international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations (specifically, the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies), interest rates and global or regional consumption patterns (such as the development of gold coin programs), speculative activities and increased production due to improved mining and production methods. The supply of and demand for gold is affected by many varied factors, including political events, economic conditions and production costs in major producing regions and governmental policies with respect to holdings by a nation or its citizens. There can be no assurance that the price of gold will be such that the Company’s properties can be mined at a profit. Risk of adverse claims against title to the Company’s mineral interests While the Company has diligently investigated title to all exploration concessions and, to the best of its knowledge, title to all properties is in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the exploration properties in which the Company has an interest or the right to acquire an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers or aboriginal land claims and title may be affected by undetected defects. Risks arising from the Company’s limited capacities in the face of extensive industry competition Significant competition exists for the limited number of mineral property acquisition opportunities available, certainly including in the State of Nevada. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than the Company, the Company may be unable to acquire additional attractive mineral properties on terms it considers acceptable. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company’s exploration and acquisition programs will yield any new reserves or result in any commercial mining operation. Risks arising from the potential for conflicts of interest of the Company’s directors Certain of the directors of the Company are directors of other reporting companies or have significant shareholdings in other mineral resource companies and, to the extent that such other companies may participate in


---

13 ventures in which the Company may participate, the directors of the Company may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation. In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the directors of the Company, a director who has such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such participation or such terms. In appropriate cases the Company will establish a special committee of independent directors to review a matter in which several directors, or management, may have a conflict. In accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the directors of the Company are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company. In determining whether or not the Company will participate in a particular program and the interest therein to be acquired by it, the directors will primarily consider the potential benefits to the Company, the degree of risk to which the Company may be exposed and its financial position at that time. Other than as indicated, the Company has no other procedures or mechanisms to deal with conflicts of interest. Risks arising from environmental and other regulatory requirements The current or future operations of the Company, including development activities and commencement of production on its properties, require permits from various governmental authorities and such operations are and will be subject to laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Companies engaged in the development and operation of mines and related facilities generally experience increased costs, and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. There can be no assurance that approvals and permits required to commence production on its various properties will be obtained. Additional permits and studies, which may include environmental impact studies conducted before permits can be obtained, may be necessary prior to operation of the properties in which the Company has interests and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary permits that may be required to commence construction, development or operation of mining facilities at these properties on terms which enable operations to be conducted at economically justifiable costs. The Company’s potential mining and processing operations and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state or provincial and municipal laws and by-laws governing land use, the protection of the environment, prospecting, development, production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, mine safety and other matters. Such operations and exploration activities are also subject to substantial regulation under these laws by governmental agencies and may require that the Company obtain permits from various governmental agencies. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations that currently apply to its activities. There can be no assurance, however, that all permits the Company may require for construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations will be obtainable on reasonable terms or that such laws and regulations would not have a material adverse effect on any mining project the Company might undertake. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production at producing properties or abandonment or delays in advancement of new exploration properties. To the best of the Company's knowledge, it is currently operating in compliance with all applicable environmental regulations.


---

14 Lack of a history of, or intention to make, dividend payments All of the Company's available funds will be invested to finance the growth of the Company's business and therefore investors cannot expect and should not anticipate receiving a dividend on the Company's common shares in the foreseeable future. Risks to U.S. investors arising from the fact that a majority of the Company's officers and directors reside outside the U.S., raising the risk of potential unenforceability of civil liabilities and judgments The Company and its officers and two out of three of its directors are residents of countries other than the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or enforce in the United States against such persons judgements obtained in United States courts, including judgements predicated upon the civil liability provisions of United States federal securities laws or state securities laws. The Company believes that a judgement of a United States court predicated solely upon civil liability under United States securities laws would probably be enforceable in Canada if the United States court in which the judgement was obtained has a basis for jurisdiction in the matter that was recognised by a Canadian court for such purposes. However, there is doubt whether an action could be brought in Canada in the first instance on the basis of liability predicated solely upon such laws. Risks inherent in the fact that the Company’s stock is subject to penny stock rules The capital stock of the Company would be classified as “penny stock” as defined in Reg. § 240.3a51-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”). In response to perceived abuse in the penny stock market generally, the 1934 Act was amended in 1990 to add new requirements in connection with penny stocks. In connection with effecting any transaction in a penny stock, a broker or dealer must give the customer a written risk disclosure document that (a) describes the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading, (b) describes the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and the rights and remedies available to such customer with respect to violations of such duties, (c) describes the dealer market, including “bid” and “ask” prices for penny stock and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask prices, (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary histories of brokers and dealers, and (e) defines significant terms used in the disclosure document or the conduct of trading in penny stocks. In addition, the broker-dealer must provide to a penny stock customer a written monthly account statement that discloses the identity and number of shares of each penny stock held in the customer’s account, and the estimated market value of such shares. The extensive disclosure and other broker-dealer compliance related to penny stocks may result in reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for such stocks, thus limiting the ability of the holder to sell such stock. Risks to U.S. investors should the Company not successfully develop and subsequently generate sufficient cash flow from its properties, such that the Company be classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company for U.S. tax purposes, possibly resulting in additional taxes to its U.S. stockholders, and reduced liquidity for the stock The Company, as a foreign corporation with U.S. stockholders, could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. tax purposes. U.S. stockholders owning shares of a PFIC can be subject to adverse tax consequences. In general, the Company would be considered a PFIC if: 75% or more of its gross income in a taxable year is passive income such as dividends and interest; or, the average percentage of the Company’s assets (by value) during the taxable year which produce passive income or which are held for production of same is at least 50%. A U.S. stockholder owing shares of a PFIC, who does not make certain elections for tax purposes, is subject to an additional tax and to an interest charge based on the value of deferral of tax for the period during which the common shares of the PFIC are owned. Also, gain realised on the disposition of common shares of the PFIC would be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gains. If U.S. stockholders are subject to adverse tax consequences related to their ownership of the Company’s stock, they might be less willing to acquire the stock, which could result in reduced market activity and liquidity for the stock.


---

15 ITEM 4.

   INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
  A.

   History and Development of the Company
 Name and Incorporation The Company’s full corporate name is “Battle Mountain Gold Inc.” (“BMG”). The Company was incorporated under the British Columbia Business Corporations Act on April 2, 2012. BMG’s registered office is at 20th Floor, 250 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3R8. The head office and principal business office of the Company is located at Suite 300, 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2E9. Its telephone number is 604-331-8772. General Development of Business History BMG was incorporated in British Columbia on April 2, 2012 and, prior to the acquisition of Madison Minerals Inc. in May 2014 as set out below under Acquisition of Madison Minerals Inc.(the “Reverse Takeover” or “RTO”), its only asset was the option, through its wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in Nevada, USA, Battle Mountain Gold (USA) Inc. (“BMG US”), to acquire a 40% participation interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture and thereby a 40% interest in the Lewis Property. For more information on the Lewis Property, see Item 4.D below, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. Narrative Description of the Business BMG is a junior mineral exploration and development company currently engaged in the acquisition and eventual exploration and development of mineral resource properties. On March 13, 2013, BMG and BMG US entered into an option agreement (the “Phoenix Option Agreement”) with Nevada Royalty Corp. (“NRC”) (formerly Great American Minerals Inc.) for the option to acquire a 40% participation interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture and thereby a 40% interest in the Lewis Property. This agreement has subsequently been amended to provide for extensions of the due date for the final option payment due to NRC. As amended, the Phoenix Option Agreement provides that to exercise the BMG Option, BMG or BMG US must: (a)

   pay NRC $50,000 in cash immediately upon execution of the agreement (paid);(b)

   issue 2,000,000 common shares at a deemed value of $0.15 per share to NRC immediately upon execution of the agreement (issued);(c)

   pay $50,000 in cash to NRC six months after the date of the agreement (paid);(d)

   issue 500,000 common shares on or before March 31, 2015 (issued);(e)

   issue 500,000 common shares on or before October 31, 2015 (issued); and,(f)

   at the sole discretion and option of BMG, pay NRC $1,550,000 either in cash or in common shares of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. at a share price equal to the lesser of the market price and $0.40 per share on or before April 13,2017. The Phoenix Option Agreement was BMG’s only asset prior to the RTO. As of the date of this Form 20-F, only the payment of $1,550,000 to NRC remains outstanding and it has been extended such that the payment is not due until April 13, 2017 except that the due date will be accelerated to that date which occurs 10 days following the closing of any financing or financings that result in BMG or BMG US having raised an aggregate total of more than $10,000,000. Also see Interest of Madison in Lewis Propertybelow in this section A. Acquisition of Madison Minerals Inc. Pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement under the laws of British Columbia and Canada dated March 13, 2014 (the “SEA”) between BMG and the then security-holders of BMG on the one hand, and Madison Minerals Inc. (“MMR”) on the other hand, on May 14, 2014 MMR acquired all the shares and other securities of BMG and its security-holders by issuing 15,420,000 shares of MMR on a one for one basis for shares of BMG and 2,000,000 warrants of MMR on a one for one basis for warrants of BMG. At the same time MMR consolidated its pre-existing share capital on a one new for four old share basis such that the


---

16 previous shareholders of MMR held 11,041,386 post-consolidation shares of MMR. A total of 26,461,396 shares of MMR were issued and outstanding at the conclusion of the acquisition of BMG. Because the former shareholders of BMG held 58.3% of MMR following the acquisition and the former shareholders of MMR held 41.7% of MMR, this transaction resulted in the treatment of the acquisition as a “Reverse Takeover” under IFRS accounting standards (sometimes referred to under Rules of the Securities Exchange Commission as a “reverse acquisition”), such that BMG (the acquired company in legal terms) is regarded as the acquiring company in accounting terms, and MMR (the acquiring company in legal terms) is regarded as the acquired company in accounting terms. Coincident with the RTO, the former BMG changed its legal name to “BMG Mining Inc.” (“BMGMI”) and MMR changed its legal name to “Battle Mountain Gold Inc.” Following the RTO, the newly named Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (the former Madison Minerals Inc.) continued as the registrant with the SEC in accordance with SEC rules in respect of reverse acquisition transactions. The financial statements presented with and accompanying this Form 20-F are those of the accounting acquirer, including the consolidation of the former MMR into BMG subsequent to the RTO. Interest of Madison in Lewis Property By a series of agreements from 2002 to 2007 Madison acquired a vested 60% interest in the Lewis Property, a contiguous block of 360 unpatented and seven patented claims located in Lander County covering some 20 square miles in the Battle Mountain District of central Nevada. The remaining 40% interest is held by Nevada Royalty Corp. (“NRC”) which has entered into an option agreement to sell its 40% joint venture interest in the Lewis Property to BMG Mining Inc. (formerly Battle Mountain Gold Inc.), a subsidiary of BMG. The Lewis Property is subject to an advance minimum royalty of US$60,000 per year commencing in December 2007 (subject to annual escalation based upon the consumer price index), a 5% gross royalty on gold or silver and a 4% net smelter returns royalty on all other metals in favour of a predecessor owner. These royalties are subject to a purchase provision, initially US$4,000,000 in the year following the exercise of the purchase option in 2007. The purchase price for the royalties increases by US$500,000 per annum on each anniversary of the date of exercise of the purchase option for a period of 35 years. Accordingly, as at the date of this report the purchase price for these royalties is US$8,000,000. The advance royalty for the first nine years has been paid by the Joint Venture in December 2007 through 2015. The amount of the payments in the three most recent calendar years as determined pursuant to the escalation clause was US$81,146 in December 2015, US$79,120 in December 2014 and US$76,499 in December 2013. B.

   Business Overview
 Since its incorporation, the Company has been in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, with the primary aim of advancing them to a stage where they can be exploited at a profit. At that stage, the Company’s operations would, to some extent, be dependent on the prevailing market prices for any of the minerals produced by such operations. At present, however, the Company’s sole mineral property is in the exploration stage; the Company’s property does not have a known body of commercial ore; and this property is not yet at the commercial development or production stage. Since 2013 the Company has been focused primarily on the acquisition of various interests in the Lewis Property in Nevada as set out in Part 4.A preceding, including the business combination with MMR. See “Item 4 -Information on the Company - D. Property, Plants and Equipment” below. This is the only project which the company regards as significant.


---

17 C.

   Organizational Structure
 The following chart sets out the Company’s corporate structure, from a legal standpoint, and the mineral properties owned by each of the Company’s subsidiaries as at February 23, 2016:  While the Company, through Madison Enterprises (BVI) Inc., owns 100% of Madison Enterprises (PNG) Limited (“MPNG”), for a number of years MPNG has been in liquidation under the laws of Papua New Guinea and accordingly the court-appointed liquidator controls MPNG, and MPNG’s subsidiaries Frontier, Oakland and Matu. The Company accordingly does not consolidate MPNG. The Company expects no proceeds from the eventual completion of the liquidation process. The Panama subsidiary formerly held an interest in a Panama project which was sold by Madison in 2012. D.

   Property, Plants and Equipment
 The following description of the Lewis Property is predominantly extracted from a report compliant with National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Regulators (“NI 43-101”) dated March 13, 2014 (the “Lewis Report”). The author of the Lewis Report, B.R. Atkinson, B.Sc., P.Geol., MAusIMM, of Apex Geoscience Ltd., is a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101. The entire Lewis Report may be viewed on the Company’s website www.battlemtngold.com under the heading Investor Info / Articles, Agreements and Reports. Property Description, Location and Access The Lewis Property comprises a contiguous claim/group totaling 360 unpatented and seven patented lode mining claims and a fee parcel (2,225 hectares/5,500 acres) located in the Battle Mountain Mining District, Lander County, Nevada, USA. It is located approximately 20 km (12 mi) southwest of the town of Battle Mountain and Interstate I-80. The property lies immediately north and northwest of Newmont Mining’s producing open-pit Phoenix Mine.


---

18


---

19 The property is accessed by travelling south from Battle Mountain 15 km (9.5 mi) on State Highway 305, then 8 km (5 mi) west on the Galena Canyon unimproved dirt road. The nature of transport to the property is by four-wheel drive motor vehicle. Numerous drill roads provide local access to most parts of the property. Management believes that sufficient electrical power, water and personnel resources exist on or near the project location, and that the physiography of the property allows sufficient areas for tailings disposal, waste disposal, leach pad sites, and processing facilities. However, surfaces currently owned are not sufficient for mining. Additional surface rights would need to be negotiated with the Bureau of Land Management. The Phoenix Joint Venture currently owns a 100% interest in the Lewis Property, subject to a minimum advanced royalty in the amount of US$60,000 in cash, subject to an annual escalation based upon a defined consumer price index. The advance minimum royalty payments are to be credited against any production royalty in the same year. Production royalties include a 5% royalty on the value of gold and silver and a 4% royalty on the net smelter returns for other minerals such as lead, zinc, copper, etc. In recent years the escalated annual advance royalty payments have been in the order of US$76,000 to $81,000. BMG through its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Madison US, holds a 60% participating interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture and NRC, formerly GAM, holds a 40% participating interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture. On March 13, 2013, BMG through its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary BMG USA was granted the option to purchase NRC’s interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture on the terms set out in item 4A of this Form 20-F. The Phoenix Joint Venture operates under the terms of an exploration development and mine operating agreement between NRC (formerly GAM) and Madison dated March 29, 2006. Title and Tenure Maintenance A title opinion for the Lewis Property was prepared in February 2014 by a Nevada law firm for purposes of the RTO transaction. Obligations that must be met to retain the property are annual payment filing fees to the US Bureau of Land Management for the unpatented claims (US$155 per claim, totaling US$55,800 in calendar 2015) and payment of very minor taxes to Lander County for the patented claims. The claims are valid as long as the annual filings and assessment payments are made. Filing fees and taxes have been paid for 2015. History of Previous Operations Management is aware of exploration activity by several previous operators since 1986, including the following: American Barrick Resource Corp. 1986-1989; Homestake Mining 1988-1989; Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corp 1994-1995; Nighthawk North Exploration and United Tex-Sol Mines 1996-1997; Golden Phoenix Mines 1998-1999; and Newmont Mining Corp 2000-2001. These companies carried out mapping, soil and rock geochemistry, magnetic and induced polarization geophysics, and both diamond and reverse circulation drilling, sometimes extensive. In each case, however, the property was ultimately returned to the underlying owner. A more complete description of these programs may be found in the Lewis Report on the Company’s website. Work Conducted by Phoenix Joint Venture 2002 to 2014 The Phoenix Joint Venture acquired its interest in the property in 2002 and carried out exploration programs exceeding an aggregate $7.5 million between 2002 and 2008. From 2009 to mid-2014 the joint venture minimized its expenditures, due to financing conditions in the capital markets. Among other activities, the joint venture drilled 176 holes on the Lewis Property during the period 2002 to 2008 including both reverse circulation (RC) and core drilling. A total 6,812 metres of diamond drilling and 29,225 metres of RC drilling were carried out from 2002 to 2008. The bulk of the drilling targeted the Virgin Structural Zone (VSZ) located on the seven patented claims situated along the southeastern property boundary adjacent to the northern Phoenix Mine boundary. Dump material from the adjacent Phoenix Mine covers a portion of these claims. It is situated at the divide between Galena Canyon to the north and Copper Canyon to the south. Drilling has only been conducted on a small portion of the VSZ extending from near the southern boundary at 28,450N to 30,900N, approximately 750 m (2,450 ft.), and from the eastern Newmont boundary at 4,000E to 5,300E approximately 400 m (1,300 ft.). Drilling has predominantly been oriented to the east, perpendicular to the north-striking, west-dipping western splay of the VSZ. Later drilling in 2006 and 2007 saw eighteen holes oriented northeast to intersect northwest trending cross structures. Geological mapping and both RC and core drilling indicate that the Virgin area is divided into various structural blocks by at least three northerly trending splays/strands of the VSZ and at least two northwest trending cross structures which appear to step the westerly splay of the VSZ to the northwest along its northerly strike.


---

20 Present Status of Property and Recent and Proposed Work 2014 to 2016 Information in this section is based upon the Company’s programs under the supervision of Steven Garwin, PhD, FAIG, FAusIMM, a “qualified person” under NI 43-101 and a director of the Company. It is not based on the Lewis Report.
 In mid-2014 BMG commenced a renewed exploration program based on recommendations in the Lewis Report for a Phase 1 program of US$ 355,000. Principal components of this program have been field mapping, sampling and digitization; an airborne Hyperspectral geophysical survey; drill core and drill chip re-logging; geological modeling in three dimensions; and related support and supervision. Field expenditures for this program to the year-end date October 31, 2015 have totaled $558,407 ($266,553 in fiscal 2015 and $291,854 in fiscal 2014). Subsequent to the October 31, 2015 year-end date no significant field expenses have been incurred while the Company plans its next round of financing to fund a diamond-drilling program scheduled, subject to financing, for the second through the fourth calendar quarters of 2016. The Company has reported on exploration results from these programs in four detailed news releases dated September 2 and September 15, 2014 and February 17 and September 28, 2015 These announcements may be viewed on the Company’s website www.battlemtngold.comunder the heading Investor Info / Press Releases, and have been filed at the time of issue with the SEC via the registrant’s 6-K reports. The Company has set out its intention to carry out a diamond-core drill program of 4,100 meters in 11 diamond core-holes designed to extend known zones of mineralization and discover potential new gold- and silver-bearing bodies. Such a program would be of significant cost and would require additional financing in the capital markets. The capital markets for companies such as BMG are currently weak, and there can be no assurance that the Company will choose to or be able to complete the financing to support a drill program. The Lewis Property is without known reserves, and the proposed programs are exploratory in nature. Geology and Rock Formations Regional Geology Permian to Cambrian sediments are exposed in several imbricate thrust sheets throughout the region. Devonian to Cambrian rocks lie within the Roberts Mountain thrust sequence. These Lower Palaeozoic rocks are unconformably overlain by the Antler sequence comprised of Pennsylvanian to Permian near shore carbonates and clastics. During the Triassic, the Golconda Thrust moved Pennsylvanian to Permian siliceous basinal sediments of the Havallah Sequence from the west; these now lie unconformably over the Roberts Mountain sequence. Local Geology On the Lewis Property, the Devonian Scott Canyon Formation and the Early to Middle Ordovician Valmy Formation are exposed in the east below the Dewit Thrust, a major splay or imbricate thrust of the Roberts Mountain sole thrust. The Scott Canyon and Valmy Formations represent a western siliceous sediment and volcanic facies assemblage deposited in deep water adjacent to the Cordilleran platform. Structurally overlying this sequence is the Late Cambrian Harmony Formation, which crops out in the central portion of the property. It represents a transitional assemblage of quartzo-feldspathic sandstone with lesser shale, limestone and volcanic rocks, approximately 900 m (3,000 ft.) thick. These formations were transported eastward during the Antler Orogeny along the Roberts Mountain thrust fault that is not exposed and is postulated to occur at depth. The Dewit Thrust separates the Harmony Formation in its hanging wall from the foot wall Scott Canyon Formation. Unconformably overlying the allochthonous Lower Palaeozoic siliceous sediment, volcanic and transitional assemblages are autochthonous Upper Palaeozoic clastics and carbonates of the Antler Sequence encompassing three formations. The basal Battle Formation comprises 222 m (730 ft.) of conglomerate and sandstone with lesser interbedded shale and limestone of Pennsylvanian age. The middle Antler Peak Formation of Late Pennsylvanian to Early Permian age comprises 60-518 m (200-1,700 ft.) of fossiliferous limestone with subordinate sandy and shaley layers. The upper Edna Mountain Formation of Permian age comprises 30-60 m (100-200 ft.) of calcareous and carbonaceous shale, limestone, sandstone, and conglomerate. These rocks crop out in the central part of the property along the Virgin Fault and Golconda Thrust The allochthonous Havallah assemblage of Pennsylvanian to Permian age, the basinal equivalent of the Antler sequence, has been transported from the west along the Golconda sole thrust during the Sonoma Orogeny. The Havallah assemblage, which crops out in the western part of the property, has been divided into the Pumpernickel and Havallah Formations. The Pumpernickel Formation slope facies comprises over 1,500 m (5,000 ft.) of chert, argillite and minor volcanic separated from the Havallah Formation basinal turbidites by the Willow Creek imbricate thrust, a major splay of the Golconda Thrust.


---

21 Late Cretaceous to Pliocene magmatism affected large parts of the Battle Mountain mining district. The Late Cretaceous plutonic bodies at Trenton Canyon and in the Buckingham area produced porphyry molybdenum type mineralization. Most of the plutonic rocks in the area are Late Eocene to Early Oligocene in age. These include the granodiorites of Copper Canyon and intrusives at Copper Basin and Buffalo Valley, all of which were responsible for the formation of significant copper-gold-silver mineralization that has been mined since the 1870’s. Early Oligocene welded ash-flow tuffs of the Caetano Tuff cap some of the higher ridges. The Caetano Tuff is coeval and comagmatic with the granodiorite intrusions. Pliocene basalts locally cover some areas of lower elevation. Recent alluvium locally fills the valley bottoms. The complex Palaeozoic structural history, which has included several episodes of folding and thrusting, is further complicated by Mesozoic and Tertiary deformation, indicated by northwest, north, and northeast-trending structures. Northwest-trending structures are commonly granodiorite dikes and broad folds. North-trending normal faults are common throughout the district. Some are pre-Eocene in age, probably reflecting the onset of Basin and Range extensional tectonics. Locally they controlled the emplacement of intrusions and hydrothermal fluids, for example the Virgin Fault at Copper Canyon. Other north-trending faults, such as the range fronts, show Quaternary movement. Northeast-trending normal faults may represent the Midas trend in this part of north-central Nevada. Mineralization Sulphide minerals on the Lewis Property include pyrite, galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, bornite, stibnite, arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite, and tetrahedrite, which occur within a calcite-quartz gangue. Known mineralization is confined to the sedimentary wallrocks and structural conduits and is controlled by the reactive (calcareous) lithologies, unconformities, structures, and proximity to intrusions. Precious metal mineralization encountered in drilling at the southern Virgin area is classified as either bedding replacement or structurally controlled. Stratigraphically controlled refers to flat lying or gently dipping tabular shaped mineral zones that are dominantly controlled by carbonate-rich stratigraphy and formational contacts. Stratigraphically controlled mineralization is most commonly found adjacent to mineralized faults. In detail, the location of most precious metal mineralization indicates a strong structural control by the major and/or related secondary structures. Fault-vein mineralization has been found associated with major north-northwest trending west dipping structural zones that cross both the Phoenix Mine and the Lewis Property: far western Independence, west Copper Canyon, the central Virgin, and the eastern Plumas-Trinity structural zones. These structures each expose a different structural and/or stratigraphic level, with the youngest stratigraphy found to the west. Many of the mineralized areas on the Lewis Property are associated with these four structural zones. The Virgin-Hider-White and Shiloh, Buena Vista-Meagher, Southern-Filippini, Plumas-Trinity and Antler Peak areas have been the focus for most of the historic exploration and are still considered to have the greatest exploration potential. Precious metal mineralization has been traced by drilling for 750 m (about 2,450 ft.) to the north from near the southern claim boundary at 28,450N to 30,900N and 350 m (1,150 ft.) to the west from 5,200E to 4,000E and to a depth of 240 m (780 ft.) beneath surface. Precious metal (gold-silver) mineralization following structure crosscuts all stratigraphic units. Gold and silver mineralization is accompanied by a distinctive suite of the base metals lead, zinc, copper and molybdenum accompanied by geologically significant trace element signatures. ITEM 5.

   OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
  A.

   Operating Results
 Overview The nature of the Company and of its operations has changed significantly in the two financial years presented, such that management does not believe that readers of this document and of the financial statements included as exhibits can derive much meaningful information in comparing the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 to that ended October 31, 2014. Prior to the reverse takeover/RTO/reverse acquisition transaction which closed May 14, 2014 the Company had no permanent employees, maintained no operational office, had its administrative affairs principally conducted by a law firm acting under the direction of the Company’s two directors, conducted no mineral exploration activities, and was primarily focused on acquiring the option on a 40% interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture and then on carrying out the RTO transaction with Madison. Following


---

22 the RTO transaction described in “Acquisition of Madison Minerals Inc.” in Item 4.A above, the Company as its primary focus commenced an active exploration program, had three permanent employees working in an operational office, engaged numerous exploration personnel on a consulting basis, and assumed carrying out its own administration. That increased level of operations took place principally in the six month post-acquisition date period May to October 2014 in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2015, that level of operations was in place throughout the 12 month fiscal year. Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2015 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014 As set out in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss in the financial statements in Exhibit F, during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 the Company reported a loss of $549,252 versus $626,663 in fiscal 2014. As set out in the Overviewabove, there is little basis for comparability between the two fiscal years. In the 2014 fiscal year, the Company recorded “Expenses” of $621,413 arising from ten cost centres as it undertook a significant level of activities in support of the exploration programs commenced following the RTO transaction in May 2014. The category “Other income (expenses)” totaled a net expense of $5,250; however, this net amount included a $50,000 write-down in amending a mineral property agreement, a $33,367 gain on the forgiveness of an amount payable, and an $8,612 foreign exchange gain. In the 2015 fiscal year, the Company recorded “Expenses” of $550,992 arising from 11 cost centres as it continued a significant level of activities in support of the exploration programs. The category “Other income (expenses)” did not have a material total. Readers should note that a high proportion of the fiscal 2014 expenses were incurred in the post-RTO period May to October 2014. The most significant cost centres comprising the $621,413 of fiscal 2014 expenses were the share-based payments of $301,011 (48%), salaries and benefits $110,642 (18%), accounting and audit $66,903 (11%) and filing fees $63,444 (10%). The share-based payments are a non-cash item and arose on the grant of stock options following the RTO transaction. Accounting and audit costs, and filing fees, are strongly associated with the RTO transaction. The most significant cost centres comprising the $550,992 of fiscal 2015 expenses were salaries and benefits $175,463 (32%), share-based payments of $102,774 (19%), accounting and audit $82,147 (15%), consulting fees $46,963 (9%) and filing fees $35,980 (6%). Salaries and benefits costs in fiscal 2015 represent 12 months of costs; in fiscal 2014 they represented six months of costs subsequent to the RTO transaction. Share-based payments are a non-cash item and are based on the option pricing model inputs when stock options are granted. Accounting and audit costs in the 2015 fiscal year included significant tax return costs arising from the four taxation entities which combined in the RTO transaction. Consulting fees are a new cost centre in fiscal 2015 and represent the costs of a consulting contract which commenced in June 2015. Filing fees diminished in fiscal 2015 as significant costs in fiscal 2014 associated with the RTO transaction were not repeated. The losses per share in fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015 are not very comparable. In the 2014 fiscal year the issued share capital of the pre-RTO Company was modest, reflecting its status as a recently incorporated start-up. The 2014 share capital was materially increased as a result of the RTO transaction. Management believes that it is too early in the life of the post-RTO company to draw meaningful inferences about administrative cost patterns going forward. Management comment In management's view, given the nature of the Company's activities, which consist of the acquisition, exploration, exploration management and sale of mineral properties, the most meaningful and material financial information concerning the Company relates to its current liquidity and capital resources. The Company does not currently own or have an interest in any producing mineral properties.


---

23 Readers of this report are directed to the first risk factor presented under Item 3.D above. At the fiscal year-end the Company had limited working capital of $31,659 including cash of $96,529. Subsequently, working capital diminished through normal course operating expenses, and cash was increased by the proceeds of $110,000 from the December 2015 loans, as set out in Note 13 to the Financial Statements, which also sets out the December 2015cash outlay for the advance royalty payment Comment on Capital Markets The Company's mineral exploration activities have been funded through sales of common shares, and the Company expects that it will continue to be able to utilize this source of financing until it develops cash flow from its operations. Notwithstanding the successful financings in December 2014 and July 2015, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain required financing in the future on acceptable terms, or at all, and should a lack of success be the case, significant doubt could arise about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. Over the past three years the capital markets for the raising of equity for companies such as Madison have become difficult, with some observers holding the opinion that these capital markets are as unreceptive as at any time in the past 30 years or more. Liquidity In the near term, the Company plans to continue its mineral tenure and exploration programs on its Lewis Gold Project. See “Item 4 - Information on the Company - D. Property, Plants and Equipment” above. Subject to financing opportunities, which is a very significant caveat, the Company is planning to conduct a drill program on the Lewis project in the order of 4,100 metres of core drilling. The estimated budget for this program, including a provision for certain administrative overhead costs, is $2.2 million. The Company will remain watchful about market conditions, and is prepared to alter its plans if evidence so leads it. Based on the Company’s current cash position the Company faces a quite immediate necessity to find sources of additional financing for its operations. In addition, the Company’s annual tenure maintenance costs, expected to be due and payable in August 2016, is budgeted at approximately USD $60,000. The Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures at the end of its most recent fiscal year or at the date of this annual report. In December 2015, subsequent to the end of the most recent financial year and continuing in place to the date of this annual report, the Company had made short term loans from three shareholders, two of whom are senior officers, totaling $110,000. These loans bear interest at six percent and are due on demand, subject to the important proviso that no demand for repayment is binding unless and until the Company shall have raised $400,000 or more in cash by the issue of new equity capital. If the Company is to advance or develop its mineral properties further, or to maintain its general and administrative cost burdens, it will become necessary to obtain additional funding, and while the Company has been successful in the past, there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future. If such funds are not available or cannot be obtained or are insufficient to cover such costs, the Company will be forced to curtail its exploration activities to a level for which funding is available or can be obtained. Accordingly, substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern exists, and is set out in Note 1 to the Financial Statements. The Company has not carried out debt financing from institutional sources nor has it made use of any financial instruments for hedging purposes. Other than as discussed herein, the Company is not aware of any trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that may result in the Company's liquidity either materially increasing or decreasing at present or in the foreseeable future. Material increases or decreases in the Company's liquidity will be substantially determined by the success or failure of its endeavours to source additional equity capital and of its exploration programs on its mineral exploration properties.


---

24 Outlook For the remainder of the fiscal year currently in progress and ending October 31, 2015, the Company’s activities will be constrained by the funds available, including further funds to be raised if the markets permit. The technical focus will continue to be the Lewis Property. Based on existing cash the Company will require additional financing in the immediate short term during the current 2015 fiscal year. The Company has no material commitments for capital expenditures for the 2015 fiscal year. In December 2014 the joint venture made the advance royalty payment due at that time on the Lewis project in the amount of US$79,120. It is the current plan of the joint venture to make a similar advance royalty payment in December 2015; however, the Company’s current cash resources are not sufficient to make such a payment at that time. B.

   Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
 As the Company is an exploration company with no producing properties, the information required by this section is inapplicable. C.

   Trend Information
 Readers of this report are referred to the disclosure in Item 5.A above under “Comment on Capital Markets” for a discussion of current difficult conditions in the capital markets. D.

   Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements. E.

   Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
 The Company has no contractual obligations of the type required to be disclosed in this section. ITEM 6.

   DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
  A.

   Directors and Senior Management
 Chet Idziszek Mr. Idziszek is President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Mr. Idziszek holds a Master of Applied Sciences degree from McGill University and has worked as an exploration geologist and exploration executive with numerous international mining companies for over 40 years. He has been recognized by his industry peers for his central role in the discovery and development of the Eskay Creek gold deposit in Canada, being designated "Mining Man of the Year" in 1990 and the "Prospector of the Year" in 1994 for his leadership of Adrian Resources Ltd. during its exploration and development of the massive Petaquilla copper-gold-molybdenum deposits in Panama now under construction as First Quantum Minerals' Cobre Panama development project. He was a director of Arequipa Resources Ltd. which discovered the Pierina gold deposit subsequently acquired by Barrick Gold Corp. in 1996 for USD $790 million. Since 2005, his principal focus was Oromin Explorations Ltd. and the exploration and development of its joint venture on the OJVG Gold Project in eastern Sénégal. On October 4, 2013, Teranga Gold Corporation completed the acquisition of all the issued and outstanding shares of Oromin Explorations Ltd. by way of a takeover bid. Steven Garwin Mr. Garwin is a director of the Company. He obtained his B.S. from Stanford in 1984 and M.Sc. from the University of British Columbia in 1987, both degrees in geology. He was awarded a Ph.D. in geology (with distinction) in 2001 from the University of Western Australia. Dr. Garwin has more than 25 years of experience


---

25 as an exploration geologist with large and small mining companies working in SE Asia, SW Pacific, North America, South America, China and Russia. He was employed by Newmont Mining for ten years, including more than two years as Chief Geologist–Nevada (2000-2002), and by Geoinformatics Exploration for five years as a Principal Geologist and Consultant (2003-2007). Since 2008, Dr. Garwin has consulted to several junior and major mining companies. He is an adjunct research fellow at the Centre for Exploration Targeting at the University of Western Australia (since 2001) and has recently been appointed a visiting fellow at the Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University. Dr. Garwin became a fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists in 1996, a fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy in 2012 and a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists in 2013. He is the technical director for the Company and provides high-level technical support and guidance for the exploration program. Larry Kornze Mr. Kornze is a director of the Company. He retired from Barrick Gold Corporation as the General Manager of Exploration for Mexico and Central America, and International Evaluations. Prior to working internationally, Mr. Kornze was the US Exploration Manager for Barrick Gold Exploration Inc. and was responsible for the Goldstrike Mine exploration with discoveries at Betze, Meikle, Deepstar, Screamer and Rodeo. He also held various positions with Newmont and Getty Mining Co. in North America. Mr. Kornze obtained his professional engineer designation in 1977. He has acted as a consultant and director of several junior mining companies including Candente Gold Corp. (since April 2010), Goldex Resources Corporation (since June 2006), Dynasty Gold Corp. (May 2005), Mexivada Mining Corporation (October 2004) and Duncan Park Holdings Corporation (January 2003). Ian Brown Mr. Brown is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. He has been a Chartered Professional Accountant for over 40 years and has served as an executive of mineral exploration companies, including in numerous roles as CFO and/or as member of boards of directors and audit committees, for over 35 years. B.

   Compensation
 During the year ended October 31, 2015, Battle Mountain paid or accrued salaries and benefits of $30,000 to Chet Idziszek, the Chief Executive Officer, and $82,750 to Ian Brown, the Chief Financial Officer, for management services, AUD $64,940 recorded as CAD$62,682 to Steven Garwin for geological consulting, and diectors’ fees totaling $4,500 being $3,000 to Steven Garwin, $1,000 to independent director Larry Kornze and $500 to Chet Idziszek. The Company has no arrangements to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to its officers and directors. C.

   Board Practices
 The directors hold office for a term of one year or until the next annual general meeting of the Company, at which time all directors retire, and are eligible for re-election. Chet Idziszek has been a director of the Company since November 7, 1993, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company since April 23, 1997 and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since November 8, 1999 and the President of the Company since August 31, 2001. Steven Garwin has been a director of the Company since May 14, 2014. Larry Kornze has been a director of the Company since May 14, 2014. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries have any arrangement to provide benefits to directors upon termination of employment. The Company’s Audit Committee is comprised of Chet Idziszek, Steven Garwin and Larry Kornze, being all the directors of the Company. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and its members hold office until removed by the Board of Directors or until the next annual general meeting of the Company, at which time their appointments expire and they are then eligible for re-appointment. The Audit Committee reviews


---

26 the interim and audited financial statements of the Company and liaises with the Company’s auditors and recommends to the Board of Directors whether or not to approve such statements. At the request of the Company’s auditors, the Audit Committee shall convene a meeting to consider any matters which the auditor believes should be brought to the attention of the Committee, the Board of Directors or the shareholders of the Company. D.

   Employees
 During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had three permanent employees, all of whom worked at the Company’s head office. Of the three employees, two worked in management roles and one in an administrative role. Mineral exploration work was carried out by contract staff. E.

   Share Ownership
 The following table sets forth the share ownership of those persons listed in subsection 6.B above and includes the details of all options or warrants to purchase shares of the Company held by such persons: Number of

   Number of OptionsCommon Shares

   or Warrants

   BeneficialHeld at

   Outstanding at

   Percentage

   ExerciseName

   February 23, 2016

   February 23, 2016

   Ownership

   Price

   Expiry Date1Chet Idziszek

   1,453,397

   525,000

   5.47%

   $0.15-$0.25

   August 14, 2019Steven Garwin

   1,000,000

   550,000

   4.28%

   $0.15-$0.25

   August 14, 2019Larry Kornze

   50,000

   225,000

   0.76%

   $0.25

   August 14, 2019Ian Brown

   Nil

   200,000

   0.55%

   $0.25

   August 14, 2019Total:

   2,503,397

   1,500,000

   11.06%
 1. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In computing the number of shares owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, Common Shares subject to options and warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 23, 2016, are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. This table has been prepared based on 36,189,096 Common Shares outstanding as of February 23, 2016. The Company has a rolling stock option plan (the “Plan”) that authorizes the board of directors to grant incentive stock options to directors, officers, consultants and employees, whereby a maximum of 10% of the issued common shares are reserved for issuance under the plan. Under the Plan, the exercise price of each option may not be less than the market price of the Company’s shares at the date of grant. Options granted under the Plan will have a term not to exceed 5 years and be subject to vesting provisions as determined by the board of directors of the Company. As at the date hereof, there are 2,260,000 stock options outstanding and there are 1,358,910 shares reserved for issuance under the Plan. ITEM 7.

   MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
  A.

   Major Shareholders
 Based on the records of the Company’s registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services Inc., of 3rd Floor, 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (“Computershare”), as at January 31, 2016 or information provided by the shareholders, David Elliott, a resident of British Columbia, Canada, held or beneficially controlled 2,681,125 or 7.4% of the total 36,189,096 common shares of the Company issued and outstanding, and also held 900,000 share purchase warrants. Michael Philipps, a resident of New York State, held 2,000,000 shares or 5.5% and also held 1,000,000 share purchase warrants. Golden Predator US Holding Corp. (“GPUHC”), a Nevada corporation, held 3,000,000 common shares or 8.3%. Mr. Elliott obtained his shares and warrants for cash as an investor in private placement securities of the Company both prior to and subsequent to


---

27 the RTO transaction. Mr. Philipps obtained his shares by participating in private placement securities of the Company subsequent to the RTO transaction. GPUHC obtained its shares pursuant to an agreement dated March 13, 2013 and pursuant to various amendments thereto whereby the Company acquired an option on a 40% interest in the Lewis Gold Project, as set out in Item 4.A – “History and Development of the Company” Also based on the records of Computershare, as at February 23, 2016 there were 36,189,096 common shares of the Company issued and outstanding. As at January 31, 2016 Computershare’s records show there were 197 registered holders of the Company’s common shares resident in the United States, holding an aggregate 9,575,328 common shares, including 2,232,402 shares held by Cede & Co., a depository agent. This number represents 26.46 % of the total issued and outstanding common shares of the Company as at January 31, 2016 and the date of this report. B.

   Related Party Transactions
 There were no material transactions in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, or proposed material transactions between the Company or any of its subsidiaries and: (a)

   enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common control with, the Company;(b)

   associates;(c)

   individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of the Company that gives them significant influence over the Company, and close members of any such individual’s family;(d)

   key management personnel, that is, those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company, including directors and senior management of companies and close members of such individuals’ families;(e)

   enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting power is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person described in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence including enterprises owned by directors or major shareholders of the Company and enterprises that have a member of key management in common with the Company;
 WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT a senior officer and director received in July 2015 repayment of a loan made to the Company in September 2014 of $50,000 plus interest of $2,499. C.

   Interests of Experts and Counsel
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. ITEM 8.

   FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  A.

   Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
 This Annual Report contains the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Company for the Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2015 which contain an Independent Auditor’s Report dated February 24, 2016, Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at October 31, 2015 and 2014, Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss for the Fiscal Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company does not pay dividends and does not plan to do so in the foreseeable future.


---

28 B.

   Significant Changes
 No significant changes have occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F with the exception of 1) the matters set out in Note 13 Subsequent Eventsand 2) drawdowns of working capital in the ordinary course of the registrant’s business. ITEM 9.

   THE OFFER AND LISTING
  A.

   Offer and Listing Details
 The common shares of the Company on a post-RTO basis commenced trading on the TSX Venture Exchange (the “Exchange”) on May 14, 2014. The high and low sale prices for the common shares of the Company on the Exchange for each of the last six months and for each fiscal quarter since trading commenced in May 2014 are as follows. High

   LowFiscal Year 2015-2016February 2016

   $0.165

   $0.12January 2016

   $0.16

   $0.10December 2015

   $0.14

   $0.085November 2015

   $0.14

   $0.12First Quarter to January 31, 2016

   $0.16

   $0.085Fiscal Year 2014-2015October 2015

   $0.165

   $0.13September 2015

   $0.15

   $0.12Fourth Quarter to October 31, 2015

   $0.165

   $0.11Third Quarter to July 31, 2015

   $0.22

   $0.12Second Quarter to April 30, 2015

   $0.145

   $0.07First Quarter to January 31, 2015

   $0.18

   $0.07
 The most recent closing price of the Company's common shares on the TSX Venture Exchange as of February 23, 2016 was $0.16. The high and low sale prices for the common shares of the Company on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCQB”) for each of the last six months and for each fiscal quarter since trading commenced in May 2014 are as follows: High

   LowFiscal Year 2015-2016February 2016

   US$0.13

   US$0.11January 2016

   US$0.12

   US$0.08December 2015

   US$0.11

   US$0.06November 2015

   US$0.12

   US$0.09First Quarter to January 31, 2016

   US$0.12

   US$0.06Fiscal Year 2014-2015October 2015

   US$0.12

   US$0.09September 2015

   US$0.12

   US$0.09Fourth Quarter to October 31, 2015

   US$0.13

   US$0.09Third Quarter to July 31, 2015

   US$0.16

   US$0.11Second Quarter to April 30, 2015

   US$0.13

   US$0.06First Quarter to January 31, 2015

   US$0.13

   US$0.06
 The common shares of the Company ceased trading on the OTCQB on February 27, 2015 and commenced trading on the OTC Pink Sheet market on March 2, 2015.


---

29 The most recent closing price of the Company's common shares on the OTC-Pink Sheet market as of February 23, 2016 was US$0.12. B.

   Plan of Distribution
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. C.

   Markets
 The Company’s common shares have traded on the TSX Venture Exchange since May 14, 2014 and traded on the OTCQB from March 24, 2014 to February 27, 2015 and thereafter on the OTC Pink Sheet market. D.

   Selling Stockholders
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. E.

   Dilution
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. F.

   Expenses of the Issue
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. ITEM 10.

   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
  A.

   Share Capital
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. B.

   Memorandum and Articles of Association
 The Company, formerly Madison Minerals Inc., was incorporated on August 20, 1979 pursuant to the Company Act (British Columbia)(the “Act”) and is registered with the Registrar of Companies for British Columbia under incorporation number 195584. On March 29, 2004 the Company Act was replaced by the Business Corporations Act(British Columbia) (the “Act”), and the Company was transitioned from the Company Actto the Act on October 26, 2004. The Company is not limited in its objects and purposes. In legal terms the registrant Battle Mountain Gold Inc. is the successor to Madison Minerals Inc. the former name of the registrant pursuant to a change of name effective under the Act and dated May 14, 2014. With respect to directors, the Articles of the Company provide that a director who holds any office or possesses any property right or interest that could result, directly or indirectly, in the creation of a duty or interest that materially conflicts with his duty or interest as a director, must promptly disclose to the directors the nature and extent of his interest. The Articles also provide that:


---

30 (a)

   A director who holds a disclosable interest, as provided for in the Act, in a contract or transaction into which the Company has entered or proposes to enter is not entitled to vote on any directors' resolution to approve that contract or transaction, unless all the directors have a disclosable interest in that contract or transaction, in which case any or all of those directors may vote on such resolution; and(b)

   A director who holds a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction into which the Company has entered or proposes to enter is liable to account to the Company for any profit that accrues to the director under or as a result of the contract or transaction, only if and to the extent provided in the Act.
 The Act provides that a director holds a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction if it is material to the company, the company has entered or proposes to enter into it and the director has a material interest in the contract or transaction or is a director or senior officer of, or has a material interest in, a person who has a material interest in the contract or transaction. However, a director does not have a disclosable interest in a contact or transaction if: (a)

   The contract or transaction is an arrangement by way of security granted by the company for money loaned to, or obligations undertaken by, the director, or a person in whom the director has a material interest, for the benefit of the company or an affiliate of the company;(b)

   The contract or transaction relates to an indemnity or insurance;(c)

   The contract or transaction relates to the remuneration of the director in that person's capacity as director, officer, employee or agent of the company or of an affiliate of the company;(d)

   The contract or transaction relates to a loan to the company, and the director, or a person in whom the director has a material interest, is or is to be a guarantor of some or all of the loan; or(e)

   The contract or transaction has been or will be made with or for the benefit of a corporation that is affiliated with the company and the director is also a director of that corporation or an affiliate of that corporation.
 The Act provides that a director is not liable to account for and may retain any profit that accrues to the director under or as a result of the contract or transaction in any of the following circumstances: (a)

   the contract or transaction is approved by the directors, with the director having the disclosable interest not being entitled to vote on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction; or(b)

   the contract or transaction is approved by a special resolution of the shareholders.
 The Articles of the Company provide that the Company may, if authorized by the directors, borrow money in the manner and amount, on the security, from the sources and on the terms and conditions that they consider appropriate, issue bonds, debentures and other debt obligations, either outright or as security for any liability or obligation of the Company, or any other person and at such discounts or premiums and on such other terms as they consider appropriate; guarantee the repayment of money by any other person or the performance of any obligation of any other person; and mortgage, charge, whether by way of specific or floating charge, grant a security interest in or give other security on, the whole or any part of the present and future assets and undertaking of the Company. Variation of these borrowing powers would require an amendment to the Articles of the Company that would, in turn, require the approval of the shareholders of the Company by way of an ordinary resolution. An ordinary resolution means a resolution passed by a simple majority of the votes cast by shareholders of the Company voting shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings. There is no requirement in the Articles of the Company or in the Act requiring retirement or non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement, nor is there any minimum shareholding required for a director’s qualification.


---

31 Holders of common shares of the Company are entitled to vote at meetings of shareholders, and a resolution of the directors is required to effect a change in the rights of shareholders. Holders of common shares are not entitled to pre-emptive rights. Holders of common shares are entitled, rateably, to the remaining property of the Company upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and such holders receive dividends if, as, and when, declared by the directors of the Company. There are no restrictions on the purchase or redemption of common shares by the Company and no provisions for sinking funds. There is no liability on the part of any shareholder to further capital calls by the Company nor any provision discriminating against any existing or prospective holder of securities of the Company as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares. There are no limitations on the rights to own securities, including the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on the securities imposed by the Act or by the constating documents of the Company. The Company is required to give its registered shareholders, including registrants and intermediaries who hold shares on behalf of the ultimate beneficial owners, not less than 21 days notice of any general meeting of the Company unless all such shareholders consent to reduce or waive the period. In addition, the Company is obliged to give notice to registrants and intermediaries no fewer than 30 or more than 60 days prior to the date of the meeting. The Company then delivers, in bulk, proxy-related materials in amounts specified by the registrants and intermediaries. No shares of the Company owned by registrants or intermediaries may be voted at a general meeting of the Company unless all proxy-related materials are delivered to the ultimate beneficial owners of such shares. Such ultimate beneficial owner must then deliver voting instructions to the registrant or intermediary to enable the registrant or intermediary to deliver a proxy to the Company on the beneficial owner’s behalf within the time limited by the Company for the deposit of proxies in order for the beneficial owner’s shares to be voted at the meeting. There is no provision in the Company's constating documents that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company (or any of its subsidiaries) other than a shareholder rights plan adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company effective March 5, 2008. The plan authorized the issuance of one right in respect of each common share of the Company then outstanding and each common share issued subsequent to March 5, 2008. The rights remain attached to and trade with the common shares and are evidenced by a legend endorsed on the share certificates. The rights are not exercisable until the occurrence of certain designated events. Upon the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the common shares of the Company (other than through a Permitted Bid (as defined in the shareholder rights plan) or through a transaction which has been approved by the Board of Directors), the rights will separate from the common shares, share rights certificates will be issued, the rights will be transferable separately from the common shares, and will be exercisable, entitling the holders to acquire common shares of the Company at an effective 50% discount from the then prevailing market price for the Company’s common shares. A takeover bid made by way of "Permitted Bid" under the rights plan will not trigger the separation and exercise of the rights. A Permitted Bid is a bid made to all holders of common shares for all shares which are outstanding, and must be made by way of takeover bid circular. If at the end of 60 days after a takeover bid made by way of a Permitted Bid is announced at least 50% of the outstanding common shares (excluding the bidder's) have been tendered to the bid, the bidder may take up and pay for the shares, and must also extend the bid for an additional 10 days to allow other shareholders to tender their shares. Unless they are redeemed earlier, the rights will expire ten years from March 5, 2008. Securities legislation in the Company’s home jurisdiction of British Columbia requires that shareholder ownership must be disclosed once a person owns beneficially or has control or direction over greater than 10% of the issued shares of the Company. This threshold is higher than the 5% threshold under U.S. securities legislation at which shareholders must report their share ownership.


---

32 C.

   Material Contracts
 The following is a summary of each material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which the Company or any of its principal subsidiaries is a party, for the approximate two year period February 1, 2014 to the date of publication of this annual report. Contracts of the former Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (now BMG Mining Inc.) and its subsidiaries Extension Agreement dated March 10, 2014 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to NRC pursuant the Option Agreement above by a further six months, from April 13, 2015 to October 13, 2015. Share Exchange Agreement dated March 13, 2014 among Madison Minerals Inc., Battle Mountain Gold Inc. and certain securityholders of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. providing for (a) the Common Shares of the Company to be consolidated on a 4:1 ratio; (b) the transfer of all of the BMG Common Shares to the Company; (c) the issuance of Madison Common Shares to former holders of BMG Common Shares on a 1:1 ratio; (d) the cancellation of BMG Warrants and issuance of Resulting Issuer Warrants; (e) the name change of the Company from Madison Minerals Inc. to Battle Mountain Gold Inc.; and (f) a change in the Board of Directors of the Resulting Issuer. Extension Agreement dated March 23, 2015 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to NRC pursuant the Option Agreement above by a further 18 months, from October 13, 2015 to April 13, 2017. Contracts of the former Madison Minerals Inc. (now Battle Mountain Gold Inc.) and its subsidiaries Share Exchange Agreement dated March 13, 2014 as set out above under “Contracts of the former Battle Mountain Gold Inc.” Four (4) Forgiveness of Debt and Shares for Debt Agreements dated March 13, 2014 between the Company and Chet Idziszek in the first instance, Vivian Danielson in the second instance, Robert Sibthorpe in the third instance, and J. G. Stewart Holdings Ltd. in the fourth instance, providing for the settlement of a total indebtedness of $385,230 as follows: to be forgiven, $192,615; to be settled by the issue of pre-acquisition shares of the Company, $96,307; to be settled in cash $96,308. Loan Agreement dated September 22, 2014 between the Company and David Elliott for the advance of loan funds of $50,000 by Elliott to the Company bearing simple annual interest of six percent, unsecured, with no fixed repayment terms. Loan Agreement dated September 22, 2014 between the Company and Chet Idziszek, a director of the Company, for the advance of loan funds of $50,000 by Idziszek to the Company bearing simple annual interest of six percent, unsecured, with no fixed repayment terms. Loan Agreement dated December 8, 2015 between the Company and Chet Idziszek, who is a senior officer of the Company, for the advance of loan funds of $50,000 by Idziszek to the Company bearing simple annual interest of six percent, unsecured, repayable on demand provided that the Company shall have raised new equity of at least $400,000 before repayment shall be sought. Loan Agreement dated December 9, 2015 between the Company and David Elliott for the advance of loan funds of $50,000 by Elliott to the Company bearing simple annual interest of six percent, unsecured, repayable on demand provided that the Company shall have raised new equity of at least $400,000 before repayment shall be sought. Loan Agreement dated December 14, 2015 between the Company and Ian Brown, who is a senior officer of the Company, for the advance of loan funds of $10,000 by Brown to the Company bearing simple annual interest of


---

33 six percent, unsecured, repayable on demand provided that the Company shall have raised new equity of at least $400,000 before repayment shall be sought. D.

   Exchange Controls
 There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada relating to restrictions on the export or import of capital, or affecting the remittance of interest, dividends or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s common shares. Any remittances of dividends to United States residents are, however, subject to a 15% withholding tax (5% if the shareholder is a corporation owning at least 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company) pursuant to Article X of the reciprocal tax treaty between Canada and the United States. Taxation E.

   Taxation
 Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences Through consultation with counsel, management of the Company believes that the following general summary accurately describes all material Canadian federal income tax consequences applicable to a holder of common shares of the Company who is a resident of the United States and who is not a resident of Canada and who does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, his common shares of the Company in connection with carrying on a business in Canada (a “non-resident holder”). This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “ITA”), the regulations thereunder (the “Regulations”), the current publicly announced administrative and assessing policies of Revenue Canada, Taxation, and all specific proposals (the “Tax Proposals”) to amend the ITA and Regulations announced by the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof. This summary assumes that the Tax Proposals will be enacted in their form as of the date of this Annual Report. This description, except for the Tax Proposals, does not take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by legislative, government or judicial action, nor does it take into account provincial, territorial, or foreign tax considerations which may differ significantly from those discussed herein. Dividends Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company to a non-resident holder will be subject to withholding tax. The Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) (the “Treaty”) provides that the normal 25% withholding tax rate under the ITA is reduced to 15% on dividends paid on shares of a corporation resident in Canada (such as the Company) to beneficial owners of the dividends who are residents of the United States, and also provides for a further reduction of this rate to 5% where the beneficial owner of the dividends is a corporation that is a resident of the United States which owns at least 10% of the voting shares of the corporation paying the dividend. Capital Gains Under the ITA, a taxpayer’s capital gain or capital loss from a disposition of a share of the Company is the amount, if any, by which his proceeds of disposition exceed (or are exceeded by) the aggregate of his adjusted cost base of the share and reasonable expenses of disposition. One half of a capital gain (the “taxable capital gain”) is included in income, and one half of a capital loss in a year (the “allowable capital loss”) is deductible from taxable capital gains realised in the same year. The amount by which a shareholder’s allowable capital loss exceeds his taxable capital gains in a year may be deducted from a taxable capital gain realised by the shareholder in the three previous or any subsequent year, subject to certain restrictions in the case of a corporate shareholder. A non-resident holder is not subject to tax under the ITA in respect of a capital gain realised upon the disposition of a share of a public corporation unless the share represents “taxable Canadian property” to the holder thereof. The Company is a public corporation for purposes of the ITA and a common share of the Company will


---

34 be taxable Canadian property to a non-resident holder if, at any time during the period of five years immediately following the disposition, the non-resident holder, persons with whom the non-resident holder did not deal at arm’s length, or the non-resident holder and persons with whom he did not deal at arm’s length together owned not less than 25% of the issued shares of any class of shares of the Company. Where a non-resident holder who is an individual ceased to be resident in Canada, and at the time he ceased to be a Canadian resident elected to have his Company shares treated as taxable Canadian property, he will be subject to Canadian tax on any capital gain realised on disposition of the Company’s shares, subject to the relieving provisions of the Treaty described below. Shares of the Company may also be taxable Canadian property to a holder if the holder acquired them pursuant to certain tax-deferred “rollover” transactions whereby the holder exchanged property that was taxable Canadian property for shares of the Company. Where the non-resident holder realised a capital gain on a disposition of the Company shares that constitute taxable Canadian property, the Treaty relieves the non-resident shareholder from liability for Canadian tax on such capital gains unless: (a)

   the value of the shares is derived principally from “real property” in Canada, including the right to explore for or exploit natural resources and rights to amounts computed by reference to production from natural resources, which is the case for the Company,(b)

   the non-resident holder is an individual who was resident in Canada for not less than 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years preceding, and at any time during the 10 years immediately preceding, the disposition and the shares were owned by him when he ceased to be resident in Canada or are property substituted for property that was owned at that time, or(c)

   the shares formed part of the business property of a “permanent establishment” or pertained to a fixed base used for the purpose of performing independent personal services that the shareholder has or had in Canada within the 12 months preceding the disposition.
 Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences The following summary is a general discussion of the material United States Federal income tax considerations to U.S. holders of shares of the Company under current law. This discussion assumes that U.S. holders hold their shares of the Company’s common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). It does not discuss all the tax consequences that may be relevant to particular holders in light of their circumstances or to holders subject to special rules, such as tax-exempt organisations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals or foreign corporations whose ownership of shares of the Company is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, shareholders who acquired their stock through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, shareholders who hold their stock as ordinary assets and not capital assets and any other non-U.S. holders. In addition, U.S. holders may be subject to state, local or foreign tax consequences. No opinion or representation with respect to the United States Federal income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is being made by the Company herein. Holders and prospective holders should therefore consult with their own tax advisors with respect to their particular circumstances. This discussion covers all material tax consequences. The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Code, Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. This decision does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors


---

35 about the Federal, state, local, estate, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of shares of the Company. U.S. Holders As used herein, a “U.S. Holder” includes a holder of shares of the Company who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation created or organised in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, any entity that is taxable as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes and any other person or entity whose ownership of shares of the Company is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. A U.S. Holder does not include persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax exempt organisations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals or foreign corporations whose ownership of shares of the Company is not effectively connected with conduct of trade or business in the United States, shareholders who acquired their stock through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation and shareholders who hold their stock as ordinary assets and not as capital assets. Distributions on Common Shares of the Company U.S. Holders receiving dividend distribution (including constructive dividends) with respect to shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for United States Federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distribution to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits as defined under U.S. Federal tax law, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions. Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal taxable income by those who itemise deductions. (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” below). To the extent that distributions exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in the shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the shares. Preferential tax rates for long-term net capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long term capital gains for a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Dividends paid on the shares of the Company will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations. A U.S. Holder that is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from the Company (unless the Company qualifies as a “foreign personal holding company” or a “passive foreign investment company”, as defined below) if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of the Company. The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations that are beyond the scope of this discussion. In the case of foreign currency received as a dividend that is not converted by the recipient into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Generally, any gain or loss recognised upon a subsequent sale or other disposition of the foreign currency, including the exchange for U.S. dollars, will be ordinary income or loss. However, for tax years after 1997, an individual whose realised foreign exchange gain does not exceed U.S. $200 will not recognise that gain, to the extent that there are not expenses associated with the transaction that meet the requirement for deductibility as a trade or business expense other than travel expenses in connection with a business trip (or as an expense for the production of income). Foreign Tax Credit A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distribution) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because


---

36 a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer’s income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during the year. There are significant and complex limitations that apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder’s United States Federal income tax liability that the U.S. Holder’s foreign source income bears to this or its worldwide taxable income. In the determination of the application of this limitation, the various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules govern this classification process. There are further limitations on the foreign tax credit for certain types of income such as “passive income”, “high withholding tax interest”, “financial services income”, “shipping income”, and certain other classifications of income. The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and holders and prospective holders of shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding U.S information reporting requirements may apply with respect to the payment of dividends to U.S. Holders of the Company’s common shares. Under Treasury regulations currently in effect, non-corporate holders may be subject to backup withholding at a 31% rate with respect to dividends when such holder (1) fails to finish or certify a correct taxpayer identification number to the payor in the required manner, (2) is notified by the IRS that it has failed to report payments of interest or dividends properly or (3) fails, under certain circumstances, to certify that it has been notified by the IRS that it is subject to backup withholding for failure to report interest and dividend payments. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. Holder generally will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS. Certain U.S. Holders, including corporations, are not subject to backup withholding. Disposition of Common Shares of the Company A U.S. Holder will recognise a gain or loss upon the sale of shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between (i) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and (ii) the shareholder’s tax basis in the shares of the Company. This gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss if the shares are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. Holder, and will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder. Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year. Deductions for net capital loss are subject to significant limitations. Corporate capital losses (other than losses of corporations electing under Subchapter S of the Code) are deductible to the extent of capital gains. Non-corporate taxpayers may deduct net capital losses, whether short-term or long-germ, up to U.S. $3,000 a year (U.S. $1,500 in the case of a married individual filing separately). For U.S. Holders which are individuals, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted. For U.S. Holders which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted. Currency Exchange Gains or Losses U.S. holders generally are required to calculate their taxable incomes in United States dollars. Accordingly, a U.S. holder who purchases common shares of the Company with Canadian dollars will be required to determine the tax basis of such shares in United States dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing on the settlement date of the purchase (and may be required to recognise the unrealised gain or loss, if any, in the Canadian currency surrendered in the purchase transaction). Similarly, a U.S. holder receiving dividends or sales proceeds from common shares of the Company in Canadian dollars will be required to compute the dividend income or the amount realised on the sale, as the case may be, in United States dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing at the time of receipt in the case of dividends and on the settlement date in the case of sales on an


---

37 established securities exchange. Gain or loss, if any, recognised on a disposition of Canadian currency in connection with the described transactions generally will be treated as ordinary gain or loss. Other Considerations In the following circumstances, the above sections of this discussion may not describe the United States Federal income tax consequences resulting from the holding and disposition of common shares of the Company (the Company does not believe that it will qualify in the next year, or has qualified within the past three fiscal years, as a “foreign personal holding company”, “foreign investment company”, “passive foreign investment company” or “controlled foreign corporation” as discussed below): Foreign Personal Holding Company If at any time during a taxable year more than 50% of the total combined voting power or the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals who are citizens of the United States and 60% or more of the Company’s gross income for such year was derived from certain passive sources (e.g., from dividends received from its subsidiaries), the Company would be treated as a “foreign personal holding company”. In that event, U.S. Holders that hold common shares of the Company (on the earlier of the last day of the Company’s tax year or the last date in which the Company was a foreign personal holding company) would be required to include in gross income for such year their allocable portions of such passive income to the extent the Company does not actually distribute such income. Foreign Investment Company If 50% or more of the combined voting power or total value of the Company’s outstanding shares are held, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships or corporations, or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts (as defined by the Code Section 7701(a)(31)), and the Company is found to be engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, commodities, or any interest therein, it is possible that the Company might be treated as a “foreign investment company” as defined in Section 1246 of the Code, causing all or part of any gain realised by a U.S. Holder selling or exchanging common shares of the Company to be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gains. Passive Foreign Investment Company As a foreign corporation with U.S. Holders, the Company could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), as defined in Section 1297 of the Code, depending upon the percentage of the Company’s income which is passive, or the percentage of the Company’s assets which are producing passive income (generally 75% or more of its gross income in a taxable year is passive income, or the average percentage of the Company’s assets (by value) during the taxable year which produce passive income or which are held for production of same is at least 50%). Passive income is generally defined to include gross income in the nature of dividends, interest, royalties, rents and annuities; excess of gains over losses from certain transactions in any commodities not arising inter aliafrom a PFIC whose business is actively involved in such commodities; certain foreign currency gains; and other similar types of income. U.S. Holders owning shares of a PFIC are subject to an additional tax and to an interest charge based on the value of deferral of tax for the period during which the common shares of the PFIC are owned, in addition to treatment of gain realised on the disposition of common shares of the PFIC as ordinary income rather than capital gain. However, if the U.S. Holder makes a timely election to treat a PFIC as a qualified electing fund (“QEF”) with respect to such shareholder’s interest therein, the above-described rules generally will not apply. Instead, the electing U.S. Holder would include annually in his gross income his pro rata share of the PFIC’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain regardless of whether such income or gain was actually distributed. A U.S. Holder of a QEF can, however, elect to defer the payment of United States Federal income tax on such income inclusions. Special rules apply to U.S. Holders who own their interests in a PFIC through intermediate entities or person.


---

38 Effective for tax years of U.S. Holders beginning after December 31, 1997, U.S. Holders who hold, actually or constructively, marketable stock of a foreign corporation that qualifies as a PFIC may elect to mark such stock to the market (a “mark-to-market election”). If such an election is made, such U.S. Holder will not be subject to the special taxation rules of PFIC described above for the taxable year for which the mark-to-market election is made. A U.S. Holder who makes such an election will include in income for the taxable year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares of the Company as of the close of such tax year over such U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in such shares. In addition, the U.S. Holder is allowed a deduction for the lesser of (i) the excess, if any, of such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares over the fair market value of such shares as of the close of the tax year, or (ii) the excess, if any of (A) the mark-to-market gains for the shares in the Company included by such U.S. Holder for prior tax years, including any amount which would have been included for any prior year but for Section 1291 interest on tax deferral rules discussed above with respect to a U.S. Holder, who has not made a timely QEF election during the year in which he holds (or is deemed to have held) shares in the Company and the Company is a PFIC (“Non-Electing U.S. Holder”), over (B) the mark-to-market losses for shares that were allowed as deductions for prior tax years. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of the Company will be increased or decreased to reflect the amount included or deducted as a result of mark-to-market election. A mark-to-market election will apply to the tax year for which the election is made and to all later tax years, unless the PFIC stock ceases to be marketable or the IRS consents to the revocation of the election. The IRS has issued proposed regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would treat as taxable certain transfers of PFIC stock by a Non-Electing U.S. Holder that are generally not otherwise taxed, such as gifts, exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganisations, and transfers at death. Generally, in such cases, the basis of the Company’s shares in the hands of the transferee and the basis of any property received in the exchange for those shares would be increased by the amount of gain recognised. A U.S. Holder who has made a timely QEF election (as discussed below) will not be taxed on certain transfers of PFIC stock, such as gifts, exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganisation, and transfers at death. The transferee’s basis in this case will depend on the manner of transfer. The specific tax effect to the U.S. Holder and the transferee may vary based on the manner in which the shares of the Company are transferred. Each U.S. Holder should consult a tax advisor with respect to how the PFIC rules affect their tax situation. The PFIC and QEF election rules are complex. U.S. Holders should consult a tax advisor regarding the availability and procedure for making the QEF election as well as the applicable method for recognizing gains or earnings and profits under the foregoing rules. Controlled Foreign Corporation If more than 50% of the voting power of all classes of stock or total value of the stock of the Company is owned, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships and corporations or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts, each of whom owns 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (“United States shareholder”), the Company could be treated as a “controlled foreign corporation” under Subpart F of the Code. This classification would effect many complex results including the required inclusion by such United States shareholders in income of their pro rata shares of “Subpart F income” (as specifically defined by the Code) of the Company. Subpart F requires current inclusions in the income of United States shareholders to the extent of a controlled foreign corporation’s accumulated earnings invested in “excess passive” assets (as defined by the Code). In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, gain from sale or exchange of stock by a holder of common shares of the Company who is or was a United States shareholder at any time during the five year period ending with the sale or exchange is treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of earnings and profits of the Company attributable to the stock sold or exchanged. Because of the complexity of Subpart F, and because it is not clear that Subpart F would apply to the holders of common shares of the Company, a more detailed review of these rules is outside the scope of this discussion. If the Company is both a PFIC and controlled foreign corporation, the Company will generally not be treated as a PFIC with respect to United States shareholders of the controlled foreign corporation. This rule


---

39 generally will be effective for taxable years of the Company ending with or within such taxable years of United States shareholders. The foregoing summary is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. This discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors about the Federal, state, local, estate, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of shares of the Company. F.

   Dividends and Paying Agents
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. G.

   Statements by Experts
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section. H.

   Documents on Display
 Any documents referred to in this Annual Report may be inspected at the head office of the Company, Suite 300, 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 2E9, during normal business hours. I.

   Subsidiary Information
 There is no information relating to the Company’s subsidiaries which must be provided in Canada and which is not otherwise called for by the body of generally accepted accounting principles used in preparing the financial statements. ITEM 11.

   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
 The Company is a small business issuer as defined in Form 20-F and is not required to provide this disclosure. PART II ITEM 12.

   DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
 This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item. ITEM 13.

   DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARS AND DELINQUENCIES
 There has not been a material default in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund instalment, or any other material default not cured within thirty days, relating to indebtedness of the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries. There are no payments of dividends by the Company in arrears, nor has there been any other material delinquency relating to any class of preference shares of the Company.


---

40 ITEM 14.

   MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 Effective March 5, 2008 the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a shareholder rights plan and authorized the issuance of one right in respect of each common share of the Company then outstanding and each common share issued subsequent to March 5, 2008. The rights remain attached to and trade with the common shares and are evidenced by a legend endorsed on the share certificates. The rights are not exercisable until the occurrence of certain designated events. Upon the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the common shares of the Company (other than through a Permitted Bid (as defined in the shareholder rights plan) or through a transaction which has been approved by the Board of Directors), the rights will separate from the common shares, share rights certificates will be issued, the rights will be transferable separately from the common shares, and will be exercisable, entitling the holders to acquire common shares of the Company at an effective 50% discount from the then prevailing market price for the Company’s common shares. A takeover bid made by way of "Permitted Bid" under the rights plan will not trigger the separation and exercise of the rights. A Permitted Bid is a bid made to all holders of common shares for all shares that are outstanding, and must be made by way of takeover bid circular. If at the end of 60 days after a takeover bid made by way of a Permitted Bid is announced at least 50% of the outstanding common shares (excluding the bidder's) have been tendered to the bid, the bidder may take up and pay for the shares, and must also extend the bid for an additional 10 days to allow other shareholders to tender their shares. The rights plan was approved by the shareholders of the Company at the annual general meeting of the Company held on April 9, 2008. Unless they are redeemed earlier, the rights will expire ten years from March 5, 2008. ITEM 15.

   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 Disclosure Controls and Procedures Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company is collected and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. At the end of the period covered by this report, the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of, and with the participation of, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a – 15(e) and Rule 15d –15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed but were not effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. The deficiency of not being effective as set out above is based on an evaluation of the Company’s ability to meet the SEC filing deadline for this annual report, a deadline which was not met. Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (“ICFR”) Management is responsible to the Board of Directors for the preparation of financial statements of the Company. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IFRS-IASB), and necessarily include some amounts based on estimates and judgments.


---

41 The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s management has employed a framework consistent with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c), to evaluate the Company’s internal control over financial reporting described below. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. This evaluation included the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on this assessment, the CEO and CFO have determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as at October 31, 2015, at a reasonable assurance level, to ensure that material information regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In connection with this assessment, management identified the following material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting: 1.

   There is a very limited capacity for the division of accounting and accounting control duties in the registrant’s organizational structure, in that there are only three permanent employees, only one of whom is an accounting or finance professional, and in that the Company’s outsourced contract bookkeeping and statement compilation service is similarly limited, having only two permanent accounting employees.
 Our report herein was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report. The above described material weaknesses constitute changes in our ICFR during the period covered by this annual report that have materially affected our ICFR. In prior years’ filings, under the name Madison Minerals Inc., the Company had the benefits of 1) a larger internal accounting staff, and 2) the absence of complex accounting and related regulatory disclosure matters such as the reverse acquisition transaction. The above identified material weaknesses have been disclosed to the Company’s audit committee and to its auditors. ITEM 16.

   [RESERVED]
  ITEM 16A.

   AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
 The Company has determined that it does not have an audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. The Company is a very small entity with three directors, each of whom has a background as a professional geologist. Its audit committee comprises all three of the directors. It is not reasonable that the board of directors necessarily include a person with the expertise set out in Item 16A(b) of Form 20-F. The Company instead relies on the expertise in these matters possessed by its Chief Financial Officer, who is a Certified Professional Accountant.


---

42 ITEM 16B.

   CODE OF ETHICS
 The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics is available at the Company’s website at www.battlemtngold.com at the tab “Investor Info”. ITEM 16C.

   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 The aggregate fees billed in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 by Davidson & Company, the Company’s principal accountants are: Type of Fees

   Amount Paid

   Percentage of ServicesAudit fees

   $35,700

   68%Audit-related fees

   -

   -Tax fees

   $16,950

   32%All other fees

   -

   -Total fees

   $52,650

   100%
 The aggregate fees billed in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 by Davidson & Company, the Company’s principal accountants are: Type of Fees

   Amount Paid

   Percentage of ServicesAudit fees

   $51,050

   96%Audit-related fees

   -

   -Tax fees

   $2,000

   4%All other fees

   -

   -Total fees

   $53,050

   100%
 These amounts related to work done in two separate engagements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 for both the former Battle Mountain Gold Inc. and the former Madison Minerals Inc. For the purposes of this Item 16C, the following terms have the following meanings: Audit fees

   -

   Fees billed for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and for services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings in each fiscal year reported on.Audit-related fees

   -

   Fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements in each fiscal year reported on and that are not reported as audit fees.Tax fees

   -

   Fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning services in each fiscal year reported on.All other fees

   -

   Fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than services reported under the three categories above in each fiscal year reported on.
 As required by Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i) of Regulation S-X, before the accountant was engaged by the Company to render audit or non-audit services, the Company’s audit committee approved the engagement. ITEM 16D.

   EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
 The information referred to in this Item is not required for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014, which is the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F.


---

43 ITEM 16E.

   PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
 The information referred to in this Item is not required for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F. PART III ITEM 17.

   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 See the Financial Statements and Exhibits listed in Item 19 hereof and filed as part of this Annual Report. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB and are expressed in Canadian dollars. For a history of exchange rates in effect for Canadian dollars versus U.S. dollars, see Item 3A of this Annual Report. ITEM 18.

   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 Not applicable ITEM 19.

   EXHIBITS
  (a)

   Financial Statements
  Description of Document

   Page No.Cover Sheet

   F-1Auditors’ Report dated February 24, 2016

   F-2Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at October 31, 2015 and 2014

   F-4Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014

   F-5Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014

   F-6Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014

   F-7Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-8


---

44 (b)

   Exhibits
  Exhibit Number

   Description of Document

   Page No.*1.A.

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies as to the incorporation of Collingwood Energy Inc. dated August 20, 1979*1.B.

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies as to the change of name to Collins Resources Ltd., dated July 17, 1984*1.C.

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies at to the change of name to Madison Enterprises Corp., dated June 25, 1992*1.D.

   Articles of the Company*1.E

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies as to the change of name to Battle Mountain Gold Inc. dated May 14, 2014*2.A.

   Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated March 5, 2008, between Madison Minerals Inc. and Pacific Corporate Trust Company (now Computershare Investor Services Inc.)*4.H.

   Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2002 between the Company, F.W. Lewis, Inc. and Great American Minerals Exploration LLC*4.I.

   Joint Venture Letter Agreement dated May 23, 2002 between the Company and Great American Minerals Exploration LLC*4.L

   Joint Venture Agreement dated March 29, 2006 between the Company and Great American Minerals, Inc.*4.P

   Madison Minerals Inc. Stock Option Plan dated April 9, 2008*4.Q

   Madison Minerals Inc. Share Compensation Plan dated April 9, 2008*4.R.

   Madison Minerals Inc. Stock Option Plan dated April 9, 2008 (amended March 1, 2011)*4.S

   Option Agreement dated March 13, 2013 among Battle Mountain Gold Inc., Battle Mountain Gold (USA) Inc. (“BMG US”) and Great American Minerals Inc. (“GAM”) for the option for BMG US to acquire a 40% participation interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture.*4.T

   Extension Agreement dated October 23, 2013 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to Nevada Royalty Corp. (“NRC”) (formerly GAM) pursuant to item 4.S above by six months, from October 13, 2014 to April 13, 2015.*4.U

   Extension Agreement dated March 10, 2014 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to NRC pursuant to item 4.S above by a further six months, from April 13, 2015 to October 13, 2015.*4.V

   Share Exchange Agreement dated March 13, 2014 among Madison Minerals Inc., Battle Mountain Gold Inc. and certain securityholders of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. providing for (a) the Common Shares of the Company to be consolidated on a 4:1 ratio; (b) the transfer of all of the BMG Common Shares to the Company; (c) the issuance of Madison Common Shares to former holders of BMG Common Shares on a 1:1 ratio; (d) the cancellation of BMG Warrants and issuance of Resulting Issuer Warrants; (e) the name change of the Company from Madison Minerals Inc. to Battle Mountain Gold Inc.; and (f) a change in the Board of Directors of the Resulting Issuer.


---

45 *4.W (1-4)

   Four (4) Forgiveness of Debt and Shares for Debt Agreements dated March 13, 2014 between the Company and Chet Idziszek in the first instance, Vivian Danielson in the second instance, Robert Sibthorpe in the third instance, and J. G. Stewart Holdings Ltd. in the fourth instance, providing for the settlement of a total indebtedness of $385,230 as follows: to be forgiven, $192,615; to be settled by the issue of pre-acquisition shares of the Company, $96,307; to be settled in cash $96,308.*4.X

   Loan Agreement dated September 22, 2014 between the Company and David Elliott for the advance of $50,000 by Elliott to the Company.*4.Y

   Loan Agreement dated September 22, 2014 between the Company and Chet Idziszek, a director, for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.*4.Z

   Extension Agreement dated March 23, 2015 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to NRC pursuant to item 4.S above by a further 18 months, from October 13, 2015 to April 13, 2017.4.AA

   Loan Agreement dated December 8, 2015 between the Company and Chet Idziszek, a senior officer, for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.

   E-6794.BB

   Loan Agreement dated December 9, 2015 between the Company and David Elliott for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.

   E-6804.CC

   Loan Agreement dated December14, 2015 between the Company and Ian Brown, a senior officer, for the advance of $10,000 to the Company.

   E-68112.1

   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

   E-12.112.2

   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

   E-12.213.1

   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

   E-13.113.2

   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

   E-13.2*

   These exhibits were previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement or a previous Annual Report on Form 20-F (file no. 0-29250).
 SIGNATURES The Company hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf. Dated at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 24thday of February, 2016 BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC. “Chet Idziszek” Per: (signed) Chet IdziszekTitle: President


---

46 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Number

   Description of Document

   Page No.*1.A.

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies as to the incorporation of Collingwood Energy Inc. dated August 20, 1979*1.B.

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies as to the change of name to Collins Resources Ltd., dated July 17, 1984*1.C.

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies at to the change of name to Madison Enterprises Corp., dated June 25, 1992*1.D.

   Articles of the Company*1.E

   Certificate of British Columbia Registrar of Companies as to the change of name to Battle Mountain Gold Inc. dated May 14, 2014*2.A.

   Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated March 5, 2008, between Madison Minerals Inc. and Pacific Corporate Trust Company (now Computershare Investor Services Inc.)*4.H.

   Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2002 between the Company, F.W. Lewis, Inc. and Great American Minerals Exploration LLC*4.I.

   Joint Venture Letter Agreement dated May 23, 2002 between the Company and Great American Minerals Exploration LLC*4.L

   Joint Venture Agreement dated March 29, 2006 between the Company and Great American Minerals, Inc.*4.P

   Madison Minerals Inc. Stock Option Plan dated April 9, 2008*4.Q

   Madison Minerals Inc. Share Compensation Plan dated April 9, 2008*4.R.

   Madison Minerals Inc. Stock Option Plan dated April 9, 2008 (amended March 1, 2011)*4.S

   Option Agreement dated March 13, 2013 among Battle Mountain Gold Inc., Battle Mountain Gold (USA) Inc. (“BMG US”) and Great American Minerals Inc. (“GAM”) for the option for BMG US to acquire a 40% participation interest in the Phoenix Joint Venture.*4.T

   Extension Agreement dated October 13, 2013 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to Nevada Royalty Corp. (“NRC”) (formerly GAM) pursuant to item 4.S above by six months, from October 13, 2014 to April 13, 2015.*4.U

   Extension Agreement dated March 10, 2014 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to NRC pursuant to item 4.S above by a further six months, from April 13, 2015 to October 13, 2015.


---

47 *4.V

   Share Exchange Agreement dated March 13, 2014 among Madison Minerals Inc., Battle Mountain Gold Inc. and certain securityholders of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. providing for (a) the Common Shares of the Company to be consolidated on a 4:1 ratio; (b) the transfer of all of the BMG Common Shares to the Company; (c) the issuance of Madison Common Shares to former holders of BMG Common Shares on a 1:1 ratio; (d) the cancellation of BMG Warrants and issuance of Resulting Issuer Warrants; (e) the name change of the Company from Madison Minerals Inc. to Battle Mountain Gold Inc.; and (f) a change in the Board of Directors of the Resulting Issuer.*4.W (1-4)

   Four (4) Forgiveness of Debt and Shares for Debt Agreements dated March 13, 2014 between the Company and Chet Idziszek in the first instance, Vivian Danielson in the second instance, Robert Sibthorpe in the third instance, and J.G. Stewart Holdings Ltd. in the fourth instance, providing for the settlement of a total indebtedness of $385,230 as follows: to be forgiven, $192,615; to be settled by the issue of pre-acquisition shares of the Company, $96,307; to be settled in cash $96,308.*4.X

   Loan Agreement dated September 22, 2014 between the Company and David Elliott for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.*4.Y

   Loan Agreement dated September 22, 2014 between the Company and Chet Idziszek, a senior officer, for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.*4.Z

   Extension Agreement dated March 23, 2015 to extend the due date for the payment of $1,600,000 in cash or shares from, and at the sole option of, Battle Mountain Gold Inc. or BMG US to NRC pursuant to item 4.S above by a further 18 months, from October 13, 2015 to April 13, 2017.4.AA

   Loan Agreement dated December 8, 2015 between the Company and Chet Idziszek, a senior officer, for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.

   E-6794.BB

   Loan Agreement dated December 9, 2015 between the Company and David Elliott for the advance of $50,000 to the Company.

   E-6804.CC

   Loan Agreement dated December14, 2015 between the Company and Ian Brown, a senior officer, for the advance of $10,000 to the Company.

   E-68112.1

   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

   E-12.112.2

   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

   E-12.213.1

   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

   E-13.113.2

   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

   E-13.2*

   These exhibits were previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement or a previous Annual Report on Form 20-F (file no. 0-29250).


---

Battle Mountain Gold Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements October 31, 2015 Expressed in Canadian Dollars F-1


---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Shareholders and Directors of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Battle Mountain Gold Inc., which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as of October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management’s Responsibility for the consolidated Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors’ Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.


---

Opinion In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. as at October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014 and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Emphasis of Matter Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1 in the consolidated financial statements which indicate that Battle Mountain Gold Inc. has suffered recurring losses from operations. These matters, along with the other matters set forth in Note 1, indicate the existence of material uncertainties that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. “DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP” Vancouver, Canada

   Chartered Professional Accountants
 February 24, 2016 F-3


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION (Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated) As at October 31,

   

   

   October 31,2015

   

   

   2014ASSETSCurrent AssetsCash

   $

   96,529

   

   $

   85,303Marketable securities

   

   578

   

   

   1,734Prepaids

   

   24,017

   

   

   13,968Receivables (Note 3)

   

   12,220

   

   

   34,356Total current assets

   

   133,344

   

   

   135,361Non-Current AssetsAdvance to contractor

   

   -

   

   

   11,200Exploration and evaluation assets (Note 4)

   

   3,329,753

   

   

   2,766,082Total non-current assets

   

   3,329,753

   

   

   2,777,282Total Assets

   $

   3,463,097

   

   $

   2,912,643LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYCurrent LiabilitiesTrade and other payables (Note 5)

   $

   101,685

   

   $

   140,687Loans payable (Note 7)

   

   -

   

   

   100,510Total current liabilities

   

   101,685

   

   

   241,197Shareholders’ EquityShare capital (Note 6)

   

   4,400,474

   

   

   3,262,874Share-based payment reserves (Note 6)

   

   417,485

   

   

   301,011Warrants (Note 6)

   

   -

   

   

   13,700Accumulated other comprehensive income

   

   1,979

   

   

   3,135Deficit

   

   (1,458,526

   )

   

   (909,274

   )Total shareholders’ equity

   

   3,361,412

   

   

   2,671,446Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

   $

   3,463,097

   

   $

   2,912,643
 Nature of business and continuance of operations (Note 1) Subsequent events (Note 13) These consolidated financial statements are authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on February 24, 2016 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-4


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS For the years ended October 31, (Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated) 2015

   

   

   2014EXPENSESAccounting and audit

   $

   82,147

   

   $

   66,903Consulting

   

   46,963

   

   

   -Filing fees

   

   35,980

   

   

   63,444Insurance

   

   18,359

   

   

   7,533Interest

   

   4,488

   

   

   687Legal fees

   

   33,141

   

   

   34,664Office and rent

   

   20,427

   

   

   22,551Public relations

   

   16,684

   

   

   7,385Salaries and benefits

   

   175,463

   

   

   110,642Share-based payments (Note 6)

   

   102,774

   

   

   301,011Travel

   

   14,566

   

   

   6,593(550,992

   )

   

   (621,413

   )OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)Foreign exchange gain

   

   1,681

   

   

   8,612Gain on forgiveness of payable

   

   -

   

   

   33,367Interest earned

   

   59

   

   

   2,771Write-down exploration assets (Note 4)

   

   -

   

   

   (50,000

   )Loss for the year

   $

   (549,252

   )

   $

   (626,663

   )Other comprehensive lossUnrealized loss on marketable securities

   

   (1,156

   )

   

   (1,734

   )Total comprehensive loss

   $

   (550,408

   )

   $

   (628,397

   )Basic and diluted loss per common share

   $

   (0.02

   )

   $

   (0.03

   )**Weighted average number of common****shares outstanding**

   

   30,902,001

   

   

   18,681,467
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-5


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY For the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 (Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated) Share CapitalAccumulated otherNumber of

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   Share subscription

   

   

   Share-based

   

   comprehensive incomeShares

   

   Amount

   

   

   Warrants

   

   

   Advances

   

   

   payment reserves

   

   (loss)

   

   

   Deficit

   

   

   TotalBalance at October 31, 2013

   6,400,000

   $

   621,252

   

   $

   -

   

   $

   35,000

   

   $

   -

   $

   4,869

   

   $

   (282,611

   )

   $

   378,510Shares issued for exploration and evaluation assets

   500,000

   

   50,000

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   50,000Shares issued for cash

   8,250,000

   

   825,000

   

   

   -

   

   

   (35,000

   )

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   790,000Shares issued for finders fee

   270,000

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -Shares of Madision at the RTO date

   11,041,386

   

   1,766,622

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   1,766,622Warrants fair value

   -

   

   

   

   

   13,700

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   13,700Share-based payments

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   301,011

   

   -

   

   

   

   

   

   301,011Loss for the year

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   (626,663

   )

   

   (626,663

   )Other comprehensive loss for the year

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   (1,734

   )

   

   -

   

   

   (1,734

   )Balance at October 31, 2014

   26,461,386

   

   3,262,874

   

   

   13,700

   

   

   -

   

   

   301,011

   

   3,135

   

   

   (909,274

   )

   

   2,671,446Shares issued for exploration and evaluation assets

   1,000,000

   

   132,500

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   132,500Shares issued for cash

   8,575,000

   

   1,007,500

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   1,007,500Share issue costs

   -

   

   (2,400

   )

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   (2,400

   )Shares issued as finder's fee

   152,700

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -Fair value of warrants expired

   -

   

   -

   

   

   (13,700

   )

   

   -

   

   

   13,700

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -Share-based payments

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   102,774

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   102,774Loss for the year

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   -

   

   

   (549,252

   )

   

   (549,252

   )Other comprehensive loss for the year

   -

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   

   -

   

   (1,156

   )

   

   -

   

   

   (1,156

   )Balance at October 31, 2015

   36,189,086

   $

   4,400,474

   

   $

   -

   

   $

   -

   

   $

   417,485

   $

   1,979

   

   $

   (1,458,526

   )

   $

   3,361,412
 F-6


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the years ended October 31, (Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated) 2015

   

   

   2014CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESLoss for the year

   $

   (549,252

   )

   $

   (626,663

   )Items not affecting cash:Interest expense

   

   -

   

   

   510Gain on forgiveness of payable

   

   -

   

   

   (33,367

   )Share-based payments

   

   102,774

   

   

   301,011Write off exploration and evaluation assets

   

   -

   

   

   50,000Changes in non-cash working capital items:Prepaids and receivables

   

   12,087

   

   

   (40,080

   )Trade and other payables

   

   (29,771

   )

   

   (179,305

   )Net cash used in operating activities

   

   (464,162

   )

   

   (527,894

   )CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESExploration and evaluation assets

   

   (429,202

   )

   

   (471,319

   )Acquisition of subsidiary

   

   -

   

   

   (59,077

   )Advance to contractor

   

   -

   

   

   (11,200

   )Net cash used in investing activities

   

   (429,202

   )

   

   (541,596

   )CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESProceeds from share issuance

   

   1,007,500

   

   

   790,000Share issuance costs

   

   (2,400

   )

   

   (18,748

   )Repayments of loans payable

   

   (100,510

   )

   

   (22,744

   )Loan received

   

   -

   

   

   100,000Net cash from financing activities

   

   904,590

   

   

   848,508Change in cash

   

   11,226

   

   

   (220,982

   )Cash, beginning of year

   

   85,303

   

   

   306,285Cash, end of year

   $

   96,529

   

   $

   85,303Cash paid for interest

   $

   4,488

   

   $

   177Cash paid for tax

   $

   -

   

   $

   -Non-cash investing and financing activitiesExploration and evaluation assets incurred through accounts payable and accruals

   $

   31,114

   

   $

   40,345Shares issued as finder’s fees

   $

   16,350

   

   $

   27,000Shares issued for acquisition of exploration and evaluation assets

   $

   132,500

   

   $

   50,000Exploration advances reclassified as exploration and evaluation assets

   $

   11,200

   

   

   -Unrealized loss on marketable securities through AOCI

   $

   1,156

   

   $

   1,734
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-7


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 1.NATURE OF BUSINESS AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (the "Company" or “BMG”) was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada on April 2, 2012, and its principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties. The Company's corporate office is located at 300 – 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia. On May 14, 2014, the Company and its securityholders (the “BMG Securityholders”) completed a Share Exchange Agreement with Madison Minerals Inc. (“Madison”), a public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (the “Exchange”), pursuant to which the BMG Securityholders transferred all of their common shares of the Company in exchange for common shares of Madison on a 1:1 ratio. Warrants of BMG (“BMG Warrants”) were cancelled and each holder of BMG Warrants was issued Madison replacement warrants that entitle the holder to acquire that number of common shares of Madison that is equal to the number of common shares of BMG that such holder was entitled to acquire under the BMG Warrants previously held. The transaction resulted in the former BMG Securityholders owning approximately 58% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the resulting issuer, and therefor constituted a Reverse Takeover (the “RTO”) under the policies of Exchange. The ongoing entity has adopted the name Battle Mountain Gold Inc. The former Battle Mountain Gold Inc. has been identified for accounting purposes as the acquirer, and accordingly the entity is considered to be a continuation of BMG and the net assets of Madison at the date of the RTO are deemed to have been acquired by BMG (Note 12). These consolidated financial statements include the result of operations of Madison from May 14, 2014. The comparative figures are those of the former BMG. Prior to the completion of the RTO, Madison also was in the business of mineral exploration. Madison, through its wholly owned US subsidiary, Madison Enterprises (Nevada) Inc. (“Madison US”), held and continues to hold a 60% participating interest in the Lewis Gold Project, a joint venture under the laws of the State of Nevada consisting of Madison US and Nevada Royalty Corp. (“NRC”) (formerly Great American Minerals, Inc.) The joint venture to which Madison and NRC are parties currently holds a 100% interest in the Lewis Property. Prior to the completion of the RTO, BMG held, and continues to hold, an option to acquire the other 40% participating interest in the Lewis Gold Project, as set out in Note 4. Accordingly, the continuing entity has the potential to own 100% of the Lewis Property once the option set out in Note 4 is exercised. These consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis which assumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The continuing operations of the Company are dependent upon obtaining necessary financing to meet the Company’s commitments as they come due and to fund future exploration and development of economically recoverable reserves or potential business acquisitions, securing and maintaining title and beneficial interest in the properties and attaining future profitable production. At October 31, 2015 the Company had cash of $96,529 and a working capital of $31,659. Notwithstanding the financings completed in December 2014 and July 2015 set out in Note 6, management regards the Company’s working capital as insufficient to sustain the Company’s operations beyond the fiscal year-end October 31, 2015. This casts significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Failure to continue as a going concern would require that assets and liabilities be recorded at their liquidation values, which might differ significantly from their carrying values. Management is of the opinion that working capital can be obtained through the issuance of additional common shares, such as by way of the private placement financings described in Note 6, or by obtaining loans from certain shareholders, sufficient to meet the Company’s other liabilities and commitments as they come due, but this opinion is subject to considerable uncertainty. Although these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) applicable to a going concern, the above noted conditions raise significant doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in business. These adjustments could be material. F-8


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (a) Statement of Compliance The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") and interpretations of the IFRS Interpretations Committee ("IFRIC"). (b) Basis of Preparation These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for financial instruments classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, and available-for-sale shares or assets which are stated at their fair value. In addition, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting, except for cash flow information. The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements. (c) Basis of Consolidation These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Battle Mountain Gold (USA), Inc. and of the former Madison Minerals Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Madison Enterprises (Nevada) Inc., a U.S. corporation, and Madison Enterprises (BVI) Inc., an inactive British Virgin Islands corporation. (d) Non-monetary transactions All non-monetary transactions are measured at the fair value of the asset surrendered or the asset received, whichever is more reliable. When the fair value of a non-monetary transaction cannot be reliably measured, it is recorded at the carrying amount (after reduction, when appropriate, for impairment) of the asset given up adjusted by the fair value of any monetary consideration received or given. When the asset received or the consideration given up is shares in an actively traded market, the value of those shares will be considered fair value. (e) Foreign Currencies These consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars. The functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries is the Canadian dollar. During fiscal 2014, the functional currency of Battle Mountain Gold (USA), Inc. was changed from USD to CAD as a result of the RTO. The functional currency determinations were conducted through an analysis of the consideration factors identified in IAS 21, The Effect of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates. Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined. Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items or on settlement of monetary items are recognized in profit or loss in the period in which they arise. Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that gains and losses arising on those non-monetary items are also recognized in other comprehensive income. Where the non-monetary gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss, the exchange component is also recognized in profit or loss. F-9


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (f) Financial Instruments Non-derivative financial assets: Financial assets are classified into one of the following categories based on the purpose for which the asset was acquired. All transactions related to financial instruments are recorded on a trade date basis. The Company's accounting policy for each category is as follows: Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss ("FVTPL") Financial assets are designated as at FVTPL if the Company manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Company's documented risk management or investment strategy. Attributable transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss. The Company does not have any assets classified as FVTPL financial assets. Available-for-sale financial assets ("AFS") AFS financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated as AFS or are not classified as (i) loans and receivables, (ii) held-to-maturity investments or (iii) financial assets as at FVTPL. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign currency differences on AFS monetary items, are recognized in other comprehensive income or loss. When an investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in the investment revaluation reserve is transferred to profit or loss. The fair value of AFS monetary assets denominated in a foreign currency is determined in that foreign currency and translated at the spot rate at the end of the reporting period. The change in fair value attributable to translation differences that result from the amortized cost of the monetary asset is recognized in profit or loss. The change in fair value of AFS equity investments is recognized in other comprehensive income or loss. The Company classifies marketable securities as AFS financial assets. F-10


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (f) Financial Instruments (continued) Non-derivative financial assets (continued): Held to maturity (“HTM”) HTM assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity that the Company has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Such assets are initially recognized at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition HTM assets are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses. The Company does not have any assets classified as HTM. Loans and receivables Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are initially recognized at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses. Cash and receivables are classified as loans and receivables. Impairment of financial assets: When an AFS financial asset is considered to be impaired, cumulative gains or losses previously recognized in other comprehensive income or loss are reclassified to profit or loss in the period. Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Financial assets are impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial assets, the estimated future cash flows of the investments have been impacted. For marketable securities classified as AFS, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the securities below their cost is considered to be objective evidence of impairment. For all other financial assets objective evidence of impairment could include: significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; ordefault or delinquency in interest or principal payments; orit becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization. Non-derivative financial liabilities: The Company has the following non-derivative financial liabilities: trade and other payables, and loans payable. Such financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value net of any directly attributable transaction costs and are classified as other financial liabilities. Subsequent to initial recognition these financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. F-11


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (g) Mineral Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures Pre -acquisition Costs Pre-acquisition costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures Once the legal right to explore a property has been acquired, costs directly related to exploration and evaluation expenditures (“E&E”) are recognized and capitalized, in addition to the acquisition costs. These direct expenditures include such costs as materials used, surveying costs, drilling costs, payments made to contractors and depreciation on plant and equipment during the exploration phase. Costs not directly attributable to exploration and evaluation activities, including general administrative overhead costs, are expensed in the period in which they occur. The Company may occasionally enter into farm-out arrangements, whereby the Company will transfer part of a mineral interest, as consideration, for an agreement by the transferee to meet certain exploration and evaluation expenditures which would have otherwise been undertaken by the Company. The Company does not record any expenditures made by the transferee on its behalf. Any cash consideration received from the agreement is credited against the costs previously capitalized to the mineral interest given up by the Company, with any excess cash accounted for as a gain on disposal. When a project is deemed to no longer have commercially viable prospects to the Company, exploration and evaluation expenditures in respect of that project are deemed to be impaired. As a result, those exploration and evaluation expenditure costs in excess of estimated recoveries are written off to the statement of comprehensive loss. The Company assesses exploration and evaluation assets for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of an asset may exceed its recoverable amount. Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting the mineral resource has been determined, the property is considered to be a mine under development and is classified as ‘mines under construction’. Exploration and evaluation assets are also tested for impairment before the assets are transferred to development properties. As the Company currently has no operational income, any incidental revenues earned in connection with exploration activities are applied as a reduction to capitalized exploration costs. Mineral exploration and evaluation expenditures are classified as intangible assets. F-12


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (h) Impairment At the end of each reporting period the carrying amounts of the Company's assets are reviewed to determine whether there is any indication that those assets are impaired. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment, if any. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm's length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its recoverable amount and the impairment loss is recognized in the profit or loss for the period. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but to an amount that does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss. (i) Share Capital Financial instruments issued by the Company are classified as equity only to the extent that they do not meet the definition of a financial liability or financial asset. The Company’s common shares, share warrants, options and flow-through shares are classified as equity instruments. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. (j) Share-based Payment Transactions Where equity-settled share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is charged to the statement of comprehensive loss over the vesting period. Performance vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each reporting date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognized over the vesting period is based on the number of options that eventually vest. Non-vesting conditions and market vesting conditions are factored into the fair value of the options granted. As long as all other vesting conditions are satisfied, a charge is made irrespective of whether these vesting conditions are satisfied. The cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting condition or where a non-vesting condition is not satisfied. Where the terms and conditions of options are modified before they vest, the increase in the fair value of the options, measured immediately before and after the modification, is also charged to the statement of comprehensive loss over the remaining vesting period. Where equity instruments are granted to employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the equity instrument granted at the grant date. The grant date fair value is recognized in comprehensive loss over the vesting period, described as the period during which all the vesting conditions are to be satisfied. F-13


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (j) Share-based Payment Transactions (continued) Where equity instruments are granted to non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services received in the statement of comprehensive loss, unless they are related to the issuance of shares. Amounts related to the issuance of shares are recorded as a reduction of share capital. When the value of goods or services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a valuation model. All equity-settled share-based payments are reflected in reserves, until exercised. Upon exercise, shares are issued from treasury and the amount reflected in reserves is credited to share capital, adjusted for any consideration paid. (k) Valuation of warrants The Company has adopted the residual value method with respect to the valuation of warrants issued as part of a private placement unit. The residual value method allocates the net proceeds to the common shares up to their fair value, as determined by the current quoted trading price on the announcement date, and the balance, if any, to the attached warrants. The fair value attributed to the warrants, if any, is recorded as warrants in the equity section. Upon expiry, the fair value attributed to the warrants is reclassified to reserves. (l) Income Taxes Income tax on the profit or loss for the periods presented comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or loss or directly in equity, in which case it is recognized in other comprehensive income or loss or equity. Current tax expense is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at year end, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regards to previous years. Deferred tax is provided using the liability method, providing for unused tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for: goodwill not deductible for tax purposes; the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit; and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realization or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the end of the reporting period applicable to the period of expected realization or settlement. A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilized. Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends are recognized at the same time as the liability to pay the related dividend. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. F-14


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (m) Restoration, Rehabilitation, and Environmental Obligations An obligation to incur restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs arises when environmental disturbance is caused by the exploration or development of exploration and evaluation assets. Such costs arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work, discounted to their net present value, are provided for and capitalized to the carrying amount of the asset, along with a corresponding liability as soon as the obligation to incur such costs arises. The timing of the actual rehabilitation expenditure is dependent on a number of factors such as the life and nature of the asset, the operating license conditions and, when applicable, the environment in which the mine operates. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflects the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. These costs are charged against profit or loss over the economic life of the related asset, through amortization using either the unit-of-production or the straight line method. The corresponding liability is progressively increased as the effect of discounting unwinds creating an expense recognized in profit or loss. Decommissioning costs are also adjusted for changes in estimates. Those adjustments are accounted for as a change in the corresponding capitalized cost, except where a reduction in costs is greater than the unamortized capitalized cost of the related assets, in which case the capitalized cost is reduced to nil and the remaining adjustment is recognized in profit or loss. The operations of the Company have been, and may in the future be, affected from time to time in varying degree by changes in environmental regulations, including those for site restoration costs. Both the likelihood of new regulations and their overall effect upon the Company are not predictable. The Company has no material restoration, rehabilitation and environmental obligations as the disturbance to date is insignificant. (n) Loss per Share The Company presents basic and diluted loss per share data for its common shares, calculated by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share does not adjust the loss attributable to common shareholders or the weighted average number of common shares outstanding when the effect is anti-dilutive. F-15


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (o) Significant Accounting Estimates and Judgments The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual outcomes could differ from these estimates. These consolidated financial statements include estimates which, by their nature, are uncertain. The impacts of such estimates are pervasive throughout the consolidated financial statements, and may require accounting adjustments based on future occurrences. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. These estimates are based on historical experience, current and future economic conditions and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Critical accounting estimates Significant assumptions about the future and other sources of estimation uncertainty that management has made at the end of the reporting period, that could result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, in the event that actual results differ from assumptions made, relate to, but are not limited to, the following: i.

   The carrying value and the recoverability of exploration and evaluation assets, which are included in the statements of financial position. The cost model is utilized and the value of the exploration and evaluation assets is based on the expenditures incurred. At every reporting period, management assesses the potential impairment which involves assessing whether or not facts or circumstances exist that suggest the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.ii.

   The inputs used in calculating the fair value for share-based compensation expense included in profit or loss and share-based share issuance costs included in shareholders’ equity. The share- based compensation expense is estimated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model as measured on the grant date to estimate the fair value of stock options. This model involves the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility of the Company’s common shares, the expected life of the options, and the estimated forfeiture rate. Critical accounting judgments Critical accounting judgments are accounting policies that have been identified as being complex or involving subjective judgments or assessments. The Company’s principal critical accounting judgment is the determination of whether technical feasibility and commercial viability can be demonstrated for its exploration and evaluation assets. Once technical feasibility and commercial viability of a property can be demonstrated, it is reclassified from exploration and evaluation assets and subject to different accounting treatment. As at October 31, 2015, management determined that no reclassification of exploration and evaluation assets was required. (p) New Accounting Standards Adopted IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation: This amended standard provides clarification on the application of offsetting rules. This standard was adopted on November 1, 2014 and did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial reporting. IAS 36 Impairment of Assets: This amended standard requires disclosure, in certain instances, of the recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit, and the basis for the determination of fair value less costs of disposal, when an impairment loss is recognized or when an impairment loss is subsequently reversed. This standard was adopted on November 1, 2014 and did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial reporting. F-16


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) (q) New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted One new accounting standard has been published that is not mandatory for the reporting period ended January 31, 2015. Management has decided against early adoption of this standard. IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments This standard and its consequential amendments are to be adopted effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Among other matters, this standard will introduce new classification and measurement models for financial assets, using a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value. Management has not completed its assessment of the impact of adopting this new standard. 3. RECEIVABLES October 31, 2015

   

   October 31, 2014Goods and services tax recoverable

   $

   1,445

   $

   11,962Other receivables

   

   10,775

   

   22,394Receivables

   $

   12,220

   $

   34,356
 4. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (a) Lewis Gold Project (i) Interest of the Company The Company entered into an option agreement dated March 13, 2013, amended October 23, 2013, March 10, 2014 and March 23, 2015, with NRC for an exclusive option to acquire NRC’s 40% right, title and interest in a joint venture which holds mining claims located in Battle Mountain Mining District in Lander County, Nevada, USA (the "Lewis Gold Project"). On March 23, 2015 the Company amended the terms of exercising the option on a 40% interest in the Lewis Gold Project set out herein as follows: 1) by extending the due date of the final payment of $1,600,000 by 18 months to April 13, 2017; 2) by issuing 500,000 of the Company's common shares with a total fair value of $62,500 on or before March 31, 2015 (issued); and 3) issuing a further 500,000 of the Company's common shares on or before October 31, 2015 with a total fair value of $70,000 of which $50,000 has been credited to the payment due on or before April 13, 2017 per the amended terms. To exercise this option, the Company must make cash payments and issue Common Shares to NRC pursuant to the amended agreements as follows: Date

   Cash Payments

   Common Share IssuancesIssued on the date of Option Agreement

   $50,000 (paid)

   2,000,000 Common Shares (issued)September 13, 2013

   $50,000 (paid)March 31, 2015

   

   500,000 common shares (issued)October 31, 2015

   

   500,000 common shares (issued)April 13, 2017

   $1,550,000*
 * At the sole discretion and option of the Company, payment of $1,550,000 may be made in either cash or in common shares of the Company, or in the case of a reverse take-over, common shares of the resulting public company bearing any applicable legends and restrictions as required by applicable securities laws, at a share price equal to the lesser of: (1) in the case of an initial public offering, the initial public offering share price; (2) the market price; and (3) $0.40 per share. The April 13, 2017 due date will be accelerated to the date which occurs 10 days following the closing any financing or financings that result in BMG or its subsidiary having raised an aggregate total of more than $10,000,000. F-17


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 4. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (continued) (ii) Interest of Madison Pursuant to a series of agreements dating from 2002, Madison holds clear title, subject to the royalty agreement described below, to the other 60% interest in the joint venture, described above, which holds the Lewis Gold Project. All previous exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred by Madison have been charged to operations. As a result of the accounting for the RTO as set out in Note 12, an amount of $2,047,504 was determined in the fiscal year 2014 to be the fair value of the contribution by Madison of its interest in the joint venture which holds the Lewis Gold Project, and this amount was recorded as a carrying cost of the project in the Company’s accounting records. (iii) Royalty agreement The Lewis Gold Project property is subject to an advance minimum royalty payment of USD$60,000 per annum, payable each December, subject to annual price-index-based escalation, which may be credited against certain production royalties. During the first fiscal quarter the Company made its annual advance payment for the 2014-2015 royalty year of USD $79,120 translated as $90,513. As set out in Note 13, in December 2015 the Company made its annual advance payment for the 2015-2016 royalty year of USD $81,146 translated as $113,208. These royalties can be purchased for the price of USD $4,000,000 for a period of one year commencing December 27, 2007 and thereafter at a price which increases by USD $500,000 per annum each December 27 for a period of 35 years. (b) Plumas Pursuant to a February 2013 termination of a 2012 agreement in respect of a project referred to as “Plumas”, the Company issued 500,000 shares an arm’s length third party. As a result of the termination of this property agreement, $50,000 ascribed to the shares issued to the third party was written off in the year ended October 31, 2014. (c) Summary by Project

   

   Lewis Gold

   

   

   Plumas

   

   

   TotalBalance at October 31, 2013

   $

   356,464

   

   $

   -

   

   $

   356,464Acquisition costsShares issued

   

   -

   

   

   50,000

   

   

   50,000RTO purchase costs allocated to project (Note 12)

   

   2,047,504

   

   

   -

   

   

   2,047,504Exploration costsClaim maintenance

   

   70,260

   

   

   -

   

   

   70,260Field expenses

   

   291,854

   

   

   -

   

   

   291,854Write-off of exploration and evaluation assets

   

   -

   

   

   (50,000

   )

   

   (50,000

   )Balance at October 31, 2014

   $

   2,766,082

   

   $

   -

   

   $

   2,766,082Acquisition costsShares issued

   

   132,500

   

   

   -

   

   

   132,500Exploration costsClaim maintenance

   

   164,618

   

   

   -

   

   

   164,618Field expenses

   

   266,553

   

   

   -

   

   

   266,553Balance at October 31, 2015

   $

   3,329,753

   

   $

   -

   

   $

   3,329,753
 F-18


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 5. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES October 31,

   

   

   October 31,2015

   

   

   2014Trade accounts payable

   $

   62,966

   

   $

   87,166Accrued payables

   

   38,719

   

   

   53,521Trade and other payables

   $

   101,685

   

   $

   140,687
 6. SHARE CAPITAL (a) Share capital Authorized:an unlimited number of common shares with no par value. Issued:Recently issued shares comprise the following. On November 12, 2013, the Company issued 3,200,000 common shares at a cash price of $0.10 per share for gross proceeds of $320,000 of which $35,000 had been received during the year ended October 31, 2013. On February 28, 2014 the Company issued 5,050,000 common shares at a cash price of $0.10 per share for gross proceeds of $505,000. A further 270,000 shares with a fair value of $27,000 were issued as finders’ fees in relation to the issuance. On February 28, 2014 the Company issued 500,000 common shares at a fair value of $0.10 per share for the termination of the Plumas Mine Property Agreement (Note 4(b)). On May 14, 2014 the Company issued 11,041,386 common shares at a fair value of $0.16 per share in exchange for 44,165,547 shares of Madison Minerals Inc., consolidated on a one new share for four old shares basis, pursuant to the RTO. On December 17, 2014 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement. The private placement comprised of 2,000,000 units at a price of $0.10 per unit for gross proceeds of $200,000. Each unit comprises one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share at a price of $0.20 per common share until the expiry date December 17, 2016. The Company paid a finder’s fee by issuing 109,500 common shares in connection with this private placement recorded at a total fair value of $10,950. On December 23, 2014 the Company closed a further non-brokered private placement. The private placement comprised of 575,000 units at a price of $0.10 per unit for gross proceeds of $57,500. Each unit comprises one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share at a price of $0.20 per common share until the expiry date December 23, 2016. The Company paid a cash finder’s fee of $2,400 in connection with this private placement. On March 23, 2015 the Company issued 500,000 common shares at a total fair value of $62,500 pursuant to the extension of the exercise date of its option to acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Lewis Gold Project as set out in Note 4(a)(i). On July 17, 2015 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 6,000,000 units at the price of $0.125 per unit for gross cash proceeds of $750,000. Each unit comprised one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share at the price of $0.25 per share until the expiry date July 17, 2017. The Company also issued 43,200 units at a fair value of $5,400. These finder’s fee units have the same terms as private placement units. On October 7, 2015 the Company issued a further 500,000 common shares at a total fair value of $70,000 pursuant to the extension of the exercise date of its option to acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Lewis Gold Project as set out in Note 4(a)(i). Pursuant to the amendment terms, an amount of $50,000 was credited to the final option payment due, as extended, on or before April 13, 2017. F-19


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 6. SHARE CAPITAL (continued) (b) Warrants The Company has warrants outstanding for the purchase of common shares as follows: Number

   Exercise Price

   Remaining Life (Years)

   Expiry Date1,000,000

   $0.20

   1.10

   December 17, 2016287,500

   $0.20

   1.10

   December 23, 20163,021,600

   $0.25

   1.70

   July 17, 20172,000,000

   $0.15

   2.40

   March 21, 20186,309,100
 Pursuant to the RTO, 1,000,000 warrants of Madison exercisable at the price of $0.16 per share for a term expiring April 14, 2015 were exchanged on May 14, 2014 for 250,000 warrants of the Company exercisable at the price of $0.64 per share with the same term. As of October 31, 2014 this set of warrants had a remaining life of 0.45 years. The warrants had a fair value of $13,700 allocated to the RTO (Note 12). This fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following assumptions: risk free rate – 0.998%, expected life – 0.92 years, expected volatility - 182.50%, expected forfeiture – nil% and expected dividends – nil. Share purchase warrant transactions are summarized as follows: Number of Warrants

   

   

   Weighted AverageExercise PriceOutstanding at October 31, 2013

   

   2,000,000

   

   $

   0.15Issued

   

   250,000

   

   

   0.64Exercised

   

   -

   

   

   -Expired or cancelled

   

   -

   

   

   -Outstanding at October 31, 2014

   

   2,250,000

   

   

   0.20Issued

   

   4,309,100

   

   

   0.24Exercised

   

   -

   

   

   -Expired or cancelled

   

   (250,000

   )

   

   0.64Outstanding and exercisable at October 31, 2015

   

   6,309,100

   

   $

   0.21
 (c) Stock options The Company has a rolling stock options plan (the “Options Plan”) that authorizes the Board of Directors to grant incentive stock options to directors, officers, employees and consultants, whereby a maximum of 10% of the issued common shares may be reserved for issuance. The exercise price of each option may not be less than the market price of the Company’s shares at the date of grant. Options granted will have a term not to exceed five years and are subject to vesting provisions as determined by the Board. F-20


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 6. SHARE CAPITAL (continued) (c) Stock options (cont’d) At October 31, 2015 the Company had options for the acquisition of up to 2,260,000 common shares outstanding to directors, officers, employees and consultants as outlined below: Number

   Exercise Price

   Expiry Date1,550,000

   $0.25

   August 14, 2019590,000

   $0.16

   May 25, 2020120,000

   $0.125

   July 21, 20202,260,000
 Stock option transactions are summarized as follows: Number of Stock

   

   

   Weighted AverageOptions

   

   

   Exercise PriceOutstanding at October 31, 2013

   

   -

   

   $

   -Granted

   

   1,550,000

   

   

   0.25Exercised

   

   -

   

   

   -Expired or cancelled

   

   -

   

   

   -Outstanding at October 31, 2014

   

   1,550,000

   

   

   0.25Granted

   

   710,000

   

   

   0.15Exercised

   

   -

   

   

   -Expired or cancelled

   

   -

   

   

   -Outstanding and exercisable at October 31, 2015

   

   2,260,000

   

   $

   0.22
 On August 14, 2014, the Company, pursuant to its stock option plan, granted stock options to certain directors, officers, employees and consultants for the purchase of up to 1,550,000 shares exercisable at the price of $0.25 per share for a five year term ending August 14, 2019. As set out in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss the Company recognized a share-based payments expense of $301,011 upon the grant of these options, all of which fully vested at the date of grant. The fair value of the 1,550,000 stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate – 1.47%; expected life – 5 years; expected volatility –127.24%; expected forfeitures – nil%; and expected dividends – nil. The weighted average fair value per option is $0.19. On May 25, 2015, the Company, pursuant to its stock option plan, granted stock options to a certain consultant for the purchase of up to 590,000 shares exercisable at the price of $0.16 per share for a five year term ending May 25, 2020. As set out in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss the Company recognized a share-based payments expense of $87,016 upon the grant of these options, all of which fully vested at the date of grant. The fair value of the 590,000 stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate – 1.05%; expected life – 5 years; expected volatility – 131.93%; expected forfeitures – nil%; and expected dividends – nil. The weighted average fair value per option is $0.15. On July 21, 2015, the Company, pursuant to its stock option plan, granted stock options to a certain consultant for the purchase of up to 120,000 shares exercisable at the price of $0.125 per share for a five year term ending July 21, 2020. As set out in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss the Company recognized a share-based payments expense of $15,758 upon the grant of these options, all of which fully vested at the date of grant. The fair value of the 120,000 stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate – 0.70%; expected life – 5 years; expected volatility – 132.31%; expected forfeitures – nil%; and expected dividends – nil. The weighted average fair value per option is $0.13. F-21


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 6. SHARE CAPITAL (continued) (d) Escrow conditions As a component of the RTO transaction the Exchange imposed escrow restrictions on a total of 6,253,397 issued shares as follows: 1,753,397 shares to be released in various tranches over a 36-month period ending May 14, 2017 and 4,500,000 shares were released after a four-month period ending September 14, 2014. At October 31, 2015 escrow conditions continued in effect for a total of 1,262,040 issued shares. 7. RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS The key management personnel of the Company are the Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. (a) Compensation of Officers and Directors During the year ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company paid or accrued the following: October 31, 2015

   

   

   October 31, 2014Director fees 1

   $

   4,500

   

   $

   10,000Geological consulting 2

   

   62,682

   

   

   43,863Senior officers 1

   

   122,500

   

   

   44,700Share-based payments

   

   -

   

   

   247,606$

   189,682

   

   $

   346,169
 1 Charged to salaries and benefits2 Included in field expenses of $266,553 (2014-$291,854) set out in Note 4 (b) Transactions and Balances with Related Corporations Included in receivables is $10,775 (2014 – 22,394) due from a related party company with which is shared office premises. Included in trade and other payables is $24,279 (2014 – $21,505) due to the same party. (c) Loans from Related Parties On September 22, 2014 the Company borrowed for cash proceeds a total of $100,000 as to $50,000 each from two individuals, one a director and senior officer of the Company and the other an arm’s length party. The loans were unsecured, bore interest at 6% and were due on demand. In the period ended October 31, 2015 the Company re-paid the two loans with applicable interest, including $50,000 in principal and $2,499 in interest to both lenders. During the year ended October 31, 2013, the Company received unsecured loans from a then director, who has subsequently resigned. The loans bore interest at 6% per annum and were due on demand. The principal on the loans was repaid in full during the year ended October 31, 2014. The accrued interest was forgiven and the amount was reversed. During the year ended October 31, 2014, Madison received an unsecured loan of $20,000 from a director of Madison (Note 11), who has become a director of the Company following the RTO. The loan bore interest at 6% per annum and was due on demand. The principal on this loan was repaid in full in June 2014 together with interest earned of $296. (d) Private Placements Two directors of the Company participated in certain of this fiscal year’s private placements as follows. In the December 17, 2014 placement, one director subscribed for 100,000 units at a cost of $10,000 and one director for 175,000 units at a cost of $17,500. In the December 23, 2014 placement, the latter director subscribed for an additional 75,000 units at a cost of $7,500. In the July 17, 2015 placement one director subscribed for 100,000 units at a cost of $12,500. F-22


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 7. RELATED PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS (continued) (e) Debt Settlements Pursuant to the RTO transaction, the Company settled indebtedness of Madison to former Madison directors formerly classified by Madison as accrued liabilities totaling $385,230 as follows: 50% was forgiven by the former Madison directors totaling $192,615; 25% or $96,307was settled by the issue, immediately prior to the effectiveness of the RTO, of 1,926,150 common shares of Madison on a pre-consolidation basis at the fair value of $0.05 per share, which were then consolidated four old shares for one new share into 481,537 post-consolidation shares of the Company and included in the common shares issued by the Company to the former shareholders of Madison as set out in Note 6(a); and the balance, $96,308 was paid to the former Madison directors in cash. One former director of Madison has become a director of the Company pursuant to the RTO transaction. His holding in the above amounts was accrued liabilities of $258,130; amount forgiven $129,065; amount settled for shares $64,532 represented in due course by the issue of 322,660 shares of the Company; amount settled for cash $64,533. 8. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT The Company is exposed to a variety of risks related to financial instruments. The Board approves and monitors the risk management processes. The principal types of risk exposure and the way in which they are managed are as follows: Liquidity Risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations when they become due. As at October 31, 2015 the Company had working capital of $31,659 (October 31, 2014 – a working capital deficiency of $105,836) and management understands it will need to continue raising capital through equity markets or through loans to ensure the Company can meet its financial obligations as they become due. Note 12 sets out certain short term loans arranged in December 2015. Foreign exchange risk The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar. There is a foreign exchange risk to the Company as its exploration and evaluation property interests and resulting future commitments are located in the United States. The U.S. dollar translation rate has in recent periods experienced considerable volatility. Management monitors its foreign currency balances and makes adjustments based on anticipated need for currencies. The Company has a policy of not engaging in hedging activities to address this foreign currency risk. At October 31, 2015 the Company had net U.S. dollar denominated current assets of U.S. $55,000, translated as $72,000 at the year-end rate. Accordingly, a 10% change in the foreign exchange rate would result in a $7,200 credit or charge to operating results. Commodity price risk While the value of the Company's exploration and evaluation assets is related to the price of gold and other minerals, the Company currently does not have any operating mines and hence does not have any hedging or other commodity based risks with respect to its operational activities. Gold and other mineral prices have historically fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors outside of the Company's control, including, but not limited to, the perception of market participants about the price and future price prospects for gold, industrial and retail demand, levels of worldwide production, and forward sales by producers and speculators. Fair value Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are: Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; andLevel 3 - Inputs that are not based on observable market data. F-23


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 8. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) The fair value of marketable securities is measured using Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of cash, receivables, trade and other payables and the loan payable approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of the instruments. 9. SEGMENTED INFORMATION The Company’s activities are all in the one industry segment of acquiring and exploring mineral exploration and evaluation properties. Exploration and evaluation assets are located in the State of Nevada, USA. 10. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT The Company’s objective when managing capital is to safeguard the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company monitors its adjusted capital which comprises all components of equity. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in the light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue common shares through private placements. The Company is not exposed to any externally imposed capital requirements. No changes were made to the Company’s capital management practices during the year ended October 31, 2015. 11. INCOME TAXES A reconciliation of income taxes at statutory rates with reported taxes is as follows: For the period ended

   

   October 31, 2015

   

   

   October 31, 2014Loss before income taxes

   $

   (549,292

   )

   $

   (626,663

   )Statutory tax rate

   

   26

   %

   

   26

   %Income tax recovery

   

   (143,000

   )

   

   (163,000

   )Non-deductible items

   

   27,000

   

   

   76,000Effects of tax rate change and rate difference in other jurisdiction

   

   34,000

   

   

   (94,000

   )Impact of reverse takeover

   

   -

   

   

   669,000Change to prior years provision versus statutory return

   

   218,000

   

   

   759,000Change in unrecognized deductible temporary differences

   

   (136,000

   )

   

   (1,247,000

   )Total income tax expense

   $

   -

   

   $

   -
 The deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses that are not recognized as deferred tax assets are as follows: October 31, 2015

   

   Expiry dates

   

   October 31, 2014Exploration and evaluation assets

   $

   3,100,000

   

   No expiry date

   $

   2,786,000Non-capital losses available for future periods

   

   10,942,000

   

   2016 – 2036

   

   9,662,000Share-issuance costs

   

   42,000

   

   2036 – 2039

   

   55,000Property and equipment

   

   278,000

   

   No expiry date

   

   278,000Other

   

   57,000

   

   No expiry date

   

   56,000
 Tax attributes are subject to review, and potential adjustments, by tax authorities. F-24


---

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD INC.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) For the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 12. REVERSE TAKEOVER TRANSACTION On May 14, 2014, the Company completed a share exchange transaction (the “RTO”) whereby, among other matters, the security holders of the Company exchanged all of their securities of the Company for like securities of Madison on a one-for-one basis. Immediately prior to the share exchange, Madison completed a consolidation of its authorized and issued capital and its issued warrants pursuant to which each common share or warrant was consolidated on a four for one basis such that each four common shares or warrants were consolidated into one post-consolidation share or warrant. Madison issued 11,041,386 post-consolidation shares to the shareholders of the Company. As a result of this share issuance, the shareholders of the Company obtained control of the combined entity by obtaining approximately 58% of the common shares of the combined entity. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the Company was treated as the accounting parent company (legal subsidiary) and Madison has been treated as the accounting subsidiary (legal parent) in these consolidated financial statements. As the Company was deemed to be the acquirer for accounting purposes, its assets, liabilities and operations since incorporation are included in these consolidated financial statements at their historical carrying value. Madison’s results of operations have been included from May 14, 2014. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition. The purchase price was allocated to the net assets acquired as follows: $Cash

   7,923Marketable securities

   3,468Prepaid

   3,467Receivables

   4,777Exploration and evaluation assets

   2,047,504Loan payable

   (20,000

   )Trade and other payables

   (199,817

   )Net assets acquired

   1,847,32211,041,386 common shares

   1,766,622Fair value of warrants

   13,700Transaction costs

   67,000Total consideration

   1,847,322
 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In December 2015, the Company borrowed a total of $110,000 by way of short term loans from three lenders, two of whom were senior officers of the Company who lent $60,000. The loans are unsecured, bear simple interest at 6% per annum, and are due on demand provided that proceeds of future equity financings shall have reached the aggregate amount of $400,000 or greater. Also in December 2015 the Company made its annual advance payment in respect of the Lewis Gold Project for the 2015-2016 royalty year of USD $81,146 translated as $113,208. F-25


---