alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017195EN.01001501.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/15

---

Action brought on 7 April 2017 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-181/17)

(2017/C 195/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Rius, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare, in accordance with Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, that, by laying down a minimum number of vehicles for obtaining a public transport authorisation, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 concerning access to the occupation of road transport operator; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare, in accordance with Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, that, by laying down a minimum number of vehicles for obtaining a public transport authorisation, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 concerning access to the occupation of road transport operator;

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The action brought by the European Commission against the Kingdom of Spain concerns the application of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC. (1)

1

The Commission takes the view that, by imposing the requirement, for the purpose of obtaining a public transport authorisation, that undertakings should have at least three vehicles, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) and (2) and Article 5(b) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 300, p. 51.

1

---
George Locke GALBRAITH et al. v. REGIONS BANK

1160044

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Reginald J. BOUIE Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2282

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

Reginald J. Bouie Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE Roger Anthony DIXON

1160932 (CR-15-0152)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
# C_2018042EN.01000201.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/2

---

Appeal brought on 30 June 2017 by Double ‘W’ Enterprises Ltd against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 May 2017 in Case T-899/16: Double ‘W’ Enterprises Ltd v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-401/17 P)

(2018/C 042/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Double ‘W’ Enterprises Ltd (represented by: A. Rubio Crespo, abogado)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 14 December 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

KENNETH RAY BUMPASS, §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-068-Y

§

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, §

T.D.C.J., Correctional § 

Institutions Division, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Kenneth Ray Bumpass under

28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

August 16, 2005; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on September 2, 2005.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Bumpass’s

objections must be overruled, and that some of the claims in the

petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed, and the

remaining claims should be denied, for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. 

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Bumpass’s grounds for relief that: (1) he was denied timely

access to the courts; (4) he was denied release on parole; and (5)

he was denied release to mandatory supervision, are DENIED.

Bumpass’s grounds for relief number (3), denial of good time

credits, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust,

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00068-Y Document 23 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 128
1Petitioner is expressly warned of the time limitation for the filing of

federal habeas corpus petitions. As a result of amendments to the habeas corpus

statutes, a one-year statute of limitations is now applicable to the filing of

non-capital § 2254 habeas corpus petitions in federal court. See 28 U.S.C.A. §

2244(d)(West Supp. 2005). The statute of limitations is tolled, however, while

a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral review

is pending. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d)(2)(West Supp. 2005). 

2

except as to any application of the federal statute of limitations

or other federal procedural bar that may apply.1

Bumpass’s ground for relief number (2), his conviction and

sentence are illegal, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his right

to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) in the United

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for leave to file a

successive petition.

SIGNED September 9, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00068-Y Document 23 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 129
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 1 of 16 PageID 14
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 2 of 16 PageID 15
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 3 of 16 PageID 16
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 4 of 16 PageID 17
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 5 of 16 PageID 18
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 6 of 16 PageID 19
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 7 of 16 PageID 20
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 8 of 16 PageID 21
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 9 of 16 PageID 22
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 10 of 16 PageID 23
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 11 of 16 PageID 24
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 12 of 16 PageID 25
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 13 of 16 PageID 26
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 14 of 16 PageID 27
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 15 of 16 PageID 28
Case 3:00-cv-00933-P Document 26 Filed 09/28/01 Page 16 of 16 PageID 29
R.A.G. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160943

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Etowah Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
Case 3:04-cv-01167-H Document 17 Filed 10/25/2004 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:04-cv-01167-H Document 17 Filed 10/25/2004 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:04-cv-01167-H Document 17 Filed 10/25/2004 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 15.3






KPMG Al Fozan & Al Sadhan

KPMG Tower

Salahudeen Al Ayoubi Road

P O Box 92876

Riyadh 11663

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Telephone  +966 11 874 8500

Fax           +966 11 874 8600

Internet      www.kpmg.com.sa



License No. 46/11/323  issued 11/3/1992








KPMG Al Fozan & Al Sadhan

KPMG Tower

Salahudeen Al Ayoubi Road

P O Box 92876

Riyadh 11663

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia








Consent of Independent Accountants





We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements (333-74703, 333-81400, 333-84044, 333-127660, 333-128619, 333-128621, 333-140798, 333-145751, and 333-149577 on Form S-8, and 333-179685 and 333-179685-01 on Form F-3) of our report dated September 18, 2014, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial position of Saudi Hollandi Bank (a Saudi Joint Stock Company) as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated income statement, consolidated statements of comprehensive income and cash flows for the year then ended, which appears in  Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of RBS Holdings N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2013.











For KPMG Al Fozan & Al Sadhan








/s/Abdullah H. Al Fozan
Abdullah H. Al Fozan

Certified Public Accountant

License No. 348



Date: 30 December 2014














KPMG Al Fozan & Al Sadhan, a partnership registered in Saudi Arabia and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 1 of 25 PageID 18
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 2 of 25 PageID 19
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 3 of 25 PageID 20
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 4 of 25 PageID 21
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 5 of 25 PageID 22
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 6 of 25 PageID 23
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 7 of 25 PageID 24
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 8 of 25 PageID 25
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 9 of 25 PageID 26
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 10 of 25 PageID 27
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 11 of 25 PageID 28
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 12 of 25 PageID 29
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 13 of 25 PageID 30
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 14 of 25 PageID 31
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 15 of 25 PageID 32
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 16 of 25 PageID 33
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 17 of 25 PageID 34
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 18 of 25 PageID 35
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 19 of 25 PageID 36
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 20 of 25 PageID 37
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 21 of 25 PageID 38
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 22 of 25 PageID 39
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 23 of 25 PageID 40
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 24 of 25 PageID 41
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 16 Filed 04/04/01 Page 25 of 25 PageID 42
Beth DALTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
MONIQUE LAFAYE CLEMENTS
, Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0253

Opinion filed August 18, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Thomas M. Jaworski, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Brenda L. Roman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , fo r Appellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRM ED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and BILBREY, JJ.

, CONCUR.
Case 3:05-cv-00569-L Document 4 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 31
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00569-L Document 4 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 32
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Candace Kendle, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kendle International Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        DATE SIGNED: March 17, 2008 /s/ Candace Kendle   Candace Kendle, PharmD   Chairman and CEO
Year Ended December 31,2009
    
    2008 (1)
    
    2007 (1)
    
    2006
    
    2005Earnings (in thousands):Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    
    28,671
    
    
    
    39,652
    
    
    
    27,765
    
    
    
    13,373
    
    
    
    17,815Fixed charges
    
    
    20,589
    
    
    
    21,466
    
    
    
    26,548
    
    
    
    10,469
    
    
    
    3,009Total earnings
    
    
    49,260
    
    
    
    61,118
    
    
    
    54,313
    
    
    
    23,842
    
    
    
    20,824Fixed Charges (in thousands):Interest expense
    
    
    13,130
    
    
    
    13,417
    
    
    
    15,889
    
    
    
    6,781
    
    
    
    460Amortization of expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    1,273
    
    
    
    2,474
    
    
    
    5,810
    
    
    
    355
    
    
    
    41Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    6,186
    
    
    
    5,575
    
    
    
    4,849
    
    
    
    3,333
    
    
    
    2,508Total fixed charges
    
    
    20,589
    
    
    
    21,466
    
    
    
    26,548
    
    
    
    10,469
    
    
    
    3,009Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.39
    
    
    
    2.85
    
    
    
    2.05
    
    
    
    2.28
    
    
    
    6.92
 
 (1)
    
    As adjusted due to the implementation of accounting guidance related to convertible debt. See
Note 2: Accounting Changes
EX PARTE M.A.M.J.

(In re: M.W. v. M.J.)

2161067

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 10, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of On4 Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Cameron Robb, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:      September 29, 2010





By:        /s/ Cameron Robb


Cameron Robb


President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CR-0078-N (12)

) No. 3:04-CV-2647-N

GREGORY H. WASHINGTON, ) ECF

ID # 29805-177, )

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED July 19, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:03-cr-00078-N Document 640 Filed 07/19/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3790
Patrick Larrimore HALLQUIST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elena Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: June 22, 2011





By: /s/ Elena Pochapski


Elena Pochapski


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)
EX PARTE Woodburck NOE

1160847 (CR-16-0525)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
# C_2017046EN.01002701.xml

| 13.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/27

---

Action brought on 13 December 2016 — Toontrack Music AB v EUIPO (‘SUPERIOR DRUMMER’)

(Case T-895/16)

(2017/C 046/31)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Toontrack Music AB (Umeå, Sweden) (represented by: L.E. Ström, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SUPERIOR DRUMMER’ — Application for registration No 13 945 019

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 October 2016 in Case R 2438/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings and to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings and to bear its own costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 65 of No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 65 of No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of On4 Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Cameron Robb, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:     September 29, 2010





By:        /s/ Cameron Robb


Cameron Robb


President, Chief Executive Officer and


Interim Financial Officer