alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023127EN.01003102.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission

(Case T-742/20) (1)

(Plant protection products - Active substance mancozeb - Non-renewal of approval - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 - Procedure for assessing the application for renewal of approval of an active substance - Designation of a new rapporteur Member State due to the withdrawal of the previous rapporteur Member State from the European Union - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration - Manifest error of assessment - Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 - Legitimate expectations)

(2023/C 127/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: UPL Europe Ltd (Warrington, United Kingdom), Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, G. Koleva and F. Castilla Contreras, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 of 14 December 2020 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2020 L 423, p. 50).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present action;

| 3. | Orders Indofil Industries (Netherlands) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Indofil Industries (Netherlands) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 10 PageID 94
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 10 PageID 95
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 3 of 10 PageID 96
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 4 of 10 PageID 97
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 5 of 10 PageID 98
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 6 of 10 PageID 99
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 7 of 10 PageID 100
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 8 of 10 PageID 101
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 9 of 10 PageID 102
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00225-C Document 21 Filed 01/23/06 Page 10 of 10 PageID 103
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 9 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 9

 Reaffirming that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute 
 and does not recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal 
                                 Court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

  Mr. Biggs of Arizona submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Reaffirming that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute 
 and does not recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal 
                                 Court.

Whereas the Constitution requires approval from two-thirds of the Senators 
        present for ratification and confirmation of international treaties;
Whereas President Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute on December 31, 2000, but 
        did not submit the treaty to the Senate for ratification;
Whereas, on May 6, 2002, the Bush administration announced that the United 
        States does not intend to become a party to the Rome Statute of the 
        International Criminal Court;
Whereas Article 125 of the Rome Statute states that it is ``subject to 
        ratification, acceptance, or approval by signatory States'';
Whereas, on May 20, 2024, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, 
        Karim Khan, took unprecedented measures announcing arrest warrant 
        applications for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister 
        of Defense Yoav Gallant;
Whereas the United States and Israel are not parties to the Rome Statute or 
        members of the International Criminal Court; and
Whereas the United States does not recognize the legitimacy or jurisdiction of 
        the International Criminal Court: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) reaffirms that the United States is not a party to the 
        Rome Statute and does not recognize the jurisdiction of the 
        International Criminal Court;
            (2) condemns the International Criminal Court's issuance of 
        arrest warrant applications for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin 
        Netanyahu and Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant; and
            (3) reiterates its unwavering support for the State of 
        Israel and its right to defend itself and its leaders from 
        unwarranted international legal actions.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to					18U.S.C. Section 1350,						as Adopted Pursuant to						Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Shineco, Inc., (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2005, the undersigned, Yuying Zhang, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and		    - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		  			Dated: August 24, 2005			                                                                                    /s/ Yuying Zhang			                                                                                    ________________________			                                                                                    Yuying Zhang
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: June 21, 2007



/s/ Steven G. HolderSteven G. HolderChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Rita K. URQUIZA v. Cesar URQUIZA

2160187

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Amer-Consolidated Roofing, Inc. * From the County Court at Law

d/b/a Top Wall Construction, of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 22,909.

Vs. No. 11-17-00255-CV * August 30, 2019

Key City Veterinary Clinic, Inc., * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Amer-Consolidated 

Roofing, Inc. d/b/a Top Wall Construction.
# C_2016175EN.01002901.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/29

---

Action brought on 24 March 2016 — SureID v EUIPO (SUREID)

(Case T-128/16)

(2016/C 175/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SureID, Inc. (Hillsboro, Oregon, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SUREID’ — Application for registration No 13 698 675

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2016 in Case R 1478/2015-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Plea in law

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2022257EN.01000901.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 May 2022 — Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-718/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People’s Republic of China - Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty)

(2022/C 257/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd (represented by: K. Adamantopoulos and P. Billiet, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Gustafsson, P. Němečková and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 14 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 14

 Electing Robert M. Duncan, of the District of Columbia, as Secretary 
                    for the Majority of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Thune submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Electing Robert M. Duncan, of the District of Columbia, as Secretary 
                    for the Majority of the Senate.

    Resolved, That Robert M. Duncan of the District of Columbia be, and 
he is hereby, elected Secretary for the Majority of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Gary Musil, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Logicom Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 17, 2006

 

/s/ Gary Musil

Gary Musil, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the annual  report of  International  Isotopes  Inc.,  (the
"Company")  on form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Steve T. Laflin
President,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


March 24, 2004                                /s/ Steve T. Laflin
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                                 Steve T. Laflin
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                                Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 231

    To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
  Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System 
                      conservation pilot program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

 Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
  Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System 
                      conservation pilot program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Colorado River Basin System 
Conservation Extension Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM CONSERVATION PILOT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 206 of the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (43 U.S.C. 620 note; Public Law 113-
235), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``this Act'' and 
        inserting ``the Colorado River Basin System Conservation 
        Extension Act of 2025'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``2024'' and 
        inserting ``2026''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), by striking ``2025'' and inserting 
        ``2027''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 2 of 9 PageID 2
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 3 of 9 PageID 3
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 4 of 9 PageID 4
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 5 of 9 PageID 5
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 6 of 9 PageID 6
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 7 of 9 PageID 7
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 8 of 9 PageID 8
 

 Case 3:00-cv-01806-D Document 1 Filed 08/16/00 Page 9 of 9 PageID 9
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




January
      12,  2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Ming
      Fen LiuMing
      Fen LiuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Timothy KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gigada Antoine PEARSON v. STATE

CR-15-1030

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 11 PageID 141
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 11 PageID 142
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 3 of 11 PageID 143
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 4 of 11 PageID 144
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 5 of 11 PageID 145
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 6 of 11 PageID 146
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 7 of 11 PageID 147
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 8 of 11 PageID 148
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 9 of 11 PageID 149
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 10 of 11 PageID 150
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01433-M Document 20 Filed 01/26/06 Page 11 of 11 PageID 151