alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 84 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Mr. GRAVES (for himself and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred 

Nineteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

4 and Infrastructure (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $23,290,035 for the One 

9 Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 84 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $11,102,513 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2025, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $12,187,522 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2026, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2017178EN.01000602.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 March 2017 — Reinhard Nagel v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-116/17)

(2017/C 178/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Reinhard Nagel

Applicant:

Defendant: Swiss International Air Lines AG

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can an air carrier make the deduction in all cases or is this dependent on the extent to which national law permits it or the court regards it as appropriate? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can an air carrier make the deduction in all cases or is this dependent on the extent to which national law permits it or the court regards it as appropriate?

| 2. | In so far as national law is applicable or the court is to exercise its discretion: is compensation under Article 7 of the regulation (1) intended to redress only the inconvenience and loss of time suffered by passengers as a result of the cancellation, or is it also intended to address material damage? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In so far as national law is applicable or the court is to exercise its discretion: is compensation under Article 7 of the regulation (1) intended to redress only the inconvenience and loss of time suffered by passengers as a result of the cancellation, or is it also intended to address material damage?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Barbara A. Ras, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Distributors
Holding Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.





        Date: August 11, 2006

                               /s/ Barbara A. Ras
                              -------------------------------------
                              Barbara A. Ras
                              Chief Financial Officer/Principal
                              Financial & Accounting Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 08, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 08, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A2173. DAN MIHAIL CUTZU v. THOMAS WITKOWSKI.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 10.2
 Las Vegas Sands Corp.
2004 EQUITY AWARD PLAN
 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 Agreement  Date of Grant Company    Participant
 RECITALS:
 Plan
 Committee
  Grant of Option
 Option  Option Shares
 Incorporation by Reference, Etc




---



##### 



Terms and Conditions
 Option Price
 Expiration Date Option Period
 Exercisability of the Option.
 
 Exhibit A provided
 Effect of Termination of Employment on the Option
 Death/Disability




---



##### 



Termination Other than due to Death/Disability or for Cause
 Termination for Cause
 Compliance with Legal Requirements
 Transferability
 Rights as Stockholder
 Tax Withholding. provided




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Notices
  
  
   Severability
 No Rights to Employment
 Bound by Plan




---



##### 



Beneficiary
 Successors
 Entire Agreement
 Governing Law
 Headings
 Signature in Counterparts
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow]




---



##### 



Exhibit A
  Las Vegas Sands Corp.By:Name:Title:[ Name of Participant]
 A-1
# C_2018005EN.01001602.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/16

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga — Portugal) — Caixa Económica Montepio Geral v Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho and Others

(Case C-333/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 21 and 38 - Non-discrimination - Consumer protection - Contract for a bank loan - Question which does not concern a rule of EU law other than those contained in the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2018/C 005/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Caixa Económica Montepio Geral

Applicant:

Defendants: Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho, Maria de Lurdes Coelho Pimenta Marinho, Daniel Pimenta Marinho, Vera da Conceição Pimenta Marinho

Defendants:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga (District Court, Braga, Portugal) by decision of 29 March 2017.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 07.08.2017

1

---
xonoublo 

FlWWU’8 

P. 0. B6x 

AUSTXX, TEXAS 

B. mpe sattelflelb 

Pee'" CoE8tuloner 
Him. 8. Beyna 8atterfXeld - Page 2 
xnwber shaU-f&elt85* ,Pi&t to partlU%gMte 

la sny of the b0nbtltS from sati FLr%wbncs Relief 8Ilj Retlrewat'Fund. If any 8uah amber 

shellele&w3ttopmtW5pste lamwahFuncl, 

he ahell not bet lleble fast any rule= de&mtion 

nor to py ea harmin pso$lded.' 

St ls qn?fme& frau 8 readbig of tht~ aaction 

of the Aat that pmtlul.pmnta who deatx-4 ehell~ e . . 

authoriw ~aldoltyartownorthegowrn.irrgbal~ 

themof to dedwt not lur then ow psr ceutw aor more 

tlum three (3) qer aentw . . . from hl8 roleq or a-- 

paaetton . . . 

Xn e.$eotiag to pnrtlalpete In the Vlrewn*e 

ttQa*hel'lberrdb.
# C_2017038EN.01004501.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/45

---

Action brought on 5 December 2016 — Erdinger Weißbräu Werner Brombach v EUIPO (Shape of a large glass)

(Case T-857/16)

(2017/C 038/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Erdinger Weißbräu Werner Brombach GmbH & Co. KG (Erding, Germany) (represented by: A. Hayn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the three-dimensional mark ‘Shape of a large glass’ — Application for registration No 1 242 704

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 September 2016 in Case R 659/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings;

| — | hold a hearing. |
| --- | --- |

—

hold a hearing.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 3:00-cr-00008-G Document 303 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1322
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3174

___________________________

Richard Bower

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: January 7, 2015

Filed: January 8, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Richard Bower appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his

pleading seeking to vacate two prior federal convictions. Because he sought to vacate

1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.
convictions for which he is no longer serving the sentences, we conclude his pleading

was a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See Kandiel v United States,

964 F.2d 794, 796 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (motion seeking to vacate conviction

where sentence was already expired should be treated as coram nobis petition). 

Because Bower must seek such relief in the district courts where he was sentenced on

the convictions he seeks to vacate, dismissal was appropriate. See Mustain v.

Pearson, 592 F.2d 1018, 1021 (8th Cir. 1979) (per curiam) (petition for writ of error

coram nobis may be filed only in court where alleged errors occurred).

Accordingly we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 19, 2018

No. 04-18-00812-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Appellant

v.

Naomi MARKHAM, et al.,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-01166

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Frist Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to January 22, 2019.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Candace Kendle, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kendle International Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     DATE SIGNED: March 16, 2007 /s/ Candace Kendle     Candace Kendle, PharmD    Chairman and CEO
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21



                     PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES


Subsidiary                                              Jurisdiction of
                                                        Incorporation

WE JAC Corporation                                      Delaware
Worldwide Drying Systems, Inc.                          Colorado
Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc.                          Virginia
PTW, Inc.                                               Washington
Hydro Spray Car Wash Equipment Co., Ltd.                Delaware
Miracle Partners, Inc.                                  Delaware
Miracle Industries, Inc.                                Ohio
Indy Ventures, LLC                                      Indiana
Prema Properties, LLC                                   Ohio
Precision Auto Care Mexico I, S. de R.L. de C.V.        Mexico
Promotora de Franquicias Praxis S.A. de C.V.            Mexico
Praxis Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
Praxis Auto Partes, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
Praxis Afinaciones Puerto Rico, Inc.                    Puerto Rico
PTAC Franchise Corp.                                    Delaware
Precision Franchising, LLC                              Virginia
Acc-u-tune                                              California
National 60 Minute Tune, Inc.                           Washington
Sixar Occidente, S.A. de C.V                            Mexico
Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                          Mexico
Premier Accesorios, S.A. de C.V                         Mexico
Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                          Puerto Rico
Sixar Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V                          Mexico
#### John S. Taylor, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Potomac Savings Bank, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed August 1, 1927.

*Kelly &*Cosier, for Plaintiff in Error;

*Zetrouer & Ware,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICARDO B. LEIVA-GARAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1670

[December 22, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab and

Robert E. Belanger, Judges; L.T. Case No. 562014CF001070A.

Ricardo B. Leiva-Garay, Bonifay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 576 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1017, K2025-1016.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00043 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex p arte Michael Joe Anderson

, * From the 2 20 th District Court

of Comanche County,

Trial Court No. CR 03521

- A

No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 213

- CR * November 12 , 20 2 1

* Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J., and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, t he appeal is dismissed.
Case 3:05-cv-00621-P Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 69
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00621-P Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 70
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00621-P Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 71
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00621-P Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 72
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00621-P Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 73
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00621-P Document 7 Filed 05/18/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 74
Daniel JOSEY v. STATE

CR-16-0536

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.