alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registered fourth quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 3, 2009
    By:
    /s/  Anthony P. Bihl, IIIAnthony P. Bihl, IIITitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2018328EN.01001401.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd, Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe BV v Duma Forklifts NV, G.S. International BVBA

(Case C-129/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU trade mark - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 5 - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 9 - Trade mark proprietor entitled to oppose removal by a third party of all the signs identical to that trade mark and the affixing of new signs on goods identical to those for which the trade mark has been registered with a view to importing or placing them on the market in the European Economic Area (EEA)))

(2018/C 328/16)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd, Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe BV

Respondents: Duma Forklifts NV, G.S. International BVBA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a mark is entitled to oppose a third party, without its consent, removing all the signs identical to that mark and affixing other signs on products placed in the customs warehouse, as in the main proceedings, with a view to importing them or trading them in the EEA where they have never yet been marketed.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

---
# C_2021310EN.01002502.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — KT v EIB

(Case T-415/20) (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Summary dismissal for grave misconduct - Rights of the defence - Hearing of witnesses - Delegation of power - Preparation of the contested decision - Reasonable period of time - Impartiality - Protection of personal data - Proportionality)

(2021/C 310/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KT (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking the annulment of the decision of the EIB of 24 March 2020 imposing on the applicant, as a disciplinary penalty, summary dismissal for grave misconduct, without notice and with a severance grant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KT to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KT to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB).

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
Jacob BUCKIUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-196

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Market Leader, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ian
Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jacqueline Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9, 2010



/s/ IAN MORRISIan MorrisChief Executive Officer and President/s/ JACQUELINE DAVIDSONJacqueline DavidsonChief Financial Officer


This certification
accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EX PARTE Melton CROSBY III

1160976 (CR-15-0710)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 67

   Recognizing the roles and the contributions of Americas Certified 
   Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their critical role in 
  providing quality health care for the public and the Nation's Armed 
   Forces for more than 150 years and through multiple public health 
                        emergencies and beyond.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2025

    Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Tonko, Ms. 
Bonamici, and Ms. Norton) submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the roles and the contributions of Americas Certified 
   Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their critical role in 
  providing quality health care for the public and the Nation's Armed 
   Forces for more than 150 years and through multiple public health 
                        emergencies and beyond.

Whereas Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) are essential to 
        America's health care system, providing high-quality, cost-effective 
        anesthesia and pain management care for more than 150 years as the first 
        anesthesia providers;
Whereas CRNAs safely administer more than 58,000,000 anesthetics to patients 
        each year;
Whereas CRNAs are the primary providers of anesthesia care in rural America, 
        enabling health care facilities in these medically underserved areas to 
        offer obstetrical, surgical, trauma stabilization, and pain management 
        services for millions of underserved and at-risk people;
Whereas CRNAs practice in every setting in which anesthesia is delivered, 
        including traditional hospital surgical suites and obstetrical delivery 
        rooms, the offices of dentists, podiatrists, ophthalmologists, and 
        plastic surgeons, ambulatory surgical centers, and United States 
        Military and Public Health Services and Department of Veterans Affairs 
        medical facilities; and
Whereas the purpose of National CRNA Week, held January 19, 2025, through 
        January 25, 2025, is to raise public awareness of and celebrate the 
        Nation's 65,000 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and student 
        registered nurse anesthetists: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks and promotes the 
profession of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their 
incredible, selfless, and dedicated service for over 150 years, by 
encouraging patients, hospital administrators, health care 
professionals, policymakers, and others to utilize CRNAs to their full 
potential and to recognize the work of CRNAs by participating in 
National CRNA Week.
                                 <all>
```
Jose Maria RIVERA ROSALES v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al.

NO. 2019-C-0145

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.
S.T. and R.F. v. CHAMBERS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160349

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT21**

 

**ANVIL HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

| **NAME OF CORPORATION**   | ** ** | **JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION** |
|---------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|                      |       |                              |
| Anvil Knitwear,  Inc.     |       | Delaware                          |
|                      |       |                              |
| Spectratex, Inc.          |       | Delaware                          |
|                      |       |                              |
| A.K.H., S.A.              |       | Honduras                          |
|                      |       |                              |
| Estrella Mfg. Ltda., S.A. |       | Honduras                          |
|                      |       |                              |
| Star, S.A.                |       | Honduras                          |
|                      |       |                              |
| Annic, LLC, S.A.          |       | Nicaragua                         |
|                      |       |                              |
| Livna, Limitada           |       | El Salvador                       |
|                      |       |                              |
| Anvil GmbH                |       | Germany                           |

 

----
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 15 Filed 05/02/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 37
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 15 Filed 05/02/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 38
EX PARTE Ledon HALL

1160805

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Case 3:04-cv-02493-N Document 16 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
Kaleb Javon LAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNSOLICITED IDEAS DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 

I intend to disclose to Fannie Mae certain ideas for consideration pertaining to: 

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

[Please summarize object of the ideas] 

In connection with such disclosure, I agree and acknowledge that: 

1. Fannie Mae expects that anyone submitting ideas to Fannie Mae will rely solely upon

his or her patent rights and that, if I want to protect my ideas, I would file a patent 

application prior to the submission of such ideas to Fannie Mae. Notwithstanding the 

foregoing, nothing herein shall be interpreted or construed as a license to

Fannie Mae under any of my patent rights. 

2. Fannie Mae shall be in no way obligated to me, nor shall Fannie Mae's legal rights 

be prejudiced, by considering my ideas. This document does not create any 

obligation on Fannie Mae's part concerning my ideas. A specific agreement with 

Fannie Mae in writing would be necessary to create any obligation by Fannie Mae. 

3. Any disclosure of my ideas to Fannie Mae is unsolicited and gratuitous and cannot 

be considered confidential or secret disclosure. Notwithstanding the foregoing, I 

agree that I will not disclose this agreement to any third party or the fact that I will 

submit, or have submitted, my ideas to Fannie Mae. 

4. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the District of Columbia. 

I further represent that I have the full authority to make the disclosure and that such 

disclosure will not violate any agreement or infringe upon the rights of third parties. 

By signing below, I acknowledge and agree to the foregoing terms. 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED: 

Company Name (if any):

___________________ 

By: 

Name: ____ 

Title: 

Date:
# C_2018052EN.01001201.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against M.A.S., M.B.

(Case C-42/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 325 TFEU - Judgment of 8 September 2015, Taricco and Others (C-105/14, EU:C:2015:555) - Criminal proceedings for infringements relating to value added tax (VAT) - National legislation laying down limitation periods liable to prevent the prosecution of infringements - Activities affecting the financial interests of the EU - Obligation to disapply any provisions of national law liable to have an adverse effect on the fulfilment of the Member States’ obligations under EU law - Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law))

(2018/C 052/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte costituzionale

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

M.A.S., M.B.

Intervener: Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 325(1) and (2) TFEU must be interpreted as requiring the national court, in criminal proceedings for infringements relating to value added tax, to disapply national provisions on limitation, forming part of national substantive law, which prevent the application of effective and deterrent criminal penalties in a significant number of cases of serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union, or which lay down shorter limitation periods for cases of serious fraud affecting those interests than for those affecting the financial interests of the Member State concerned, unless that disapplication entails a breach of the principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law because of the lack of precision of the applicable law or because of the retroactive application of legislation imposing conditions of criminal liability stricter than those in force at the time the infringement was committed.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                  
|                   |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady                      
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                   |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony FARRIER

NO. 2018-KH-1944

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Reconsideration denied.
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 1 of 18 PageID 186
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 2 of 18 PageID 187
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 3 of 18 PageID 188
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 4 of 18 PageID 189
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 5 of 18 PageID 190
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 6 of 18 PageID 191
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 7 of 18 PageID 192
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 8 of 18 PageID 193
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 9 of 18 PageID 194
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 10 of 18 PageID 195
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 11 of 18 PageID 196
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 12 of 18 PageID 197
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 13 of 18 PageID 198
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 14 of 18 PageID 199
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 15 of 18 PageID 200
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 16 of 18 PageID 201
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 17 of 18 PageID 202
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 30 Filed 09/11/03 Page 18 of 18 PageID 203
Case 2:99-cv-00045-J Document 188 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1969
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40895

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MANUEL GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ

and NESTOR IBARRA-OSUNA,

 Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-B-95-125

- - - - - - - - - -

October 14, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Martinez appeals his convictions and

sentences for conspiracy to bring into and land, harbor, and

transport a certain alien within the United States, and

transporting a certain alien within the U.S., in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 371 & 2 and 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B). His codefendant,

Nestor Ibarra-Osuna, appeals his convictions for conspiracy to

bring into and land, harbor, and transport certain aliens within

the U.S., harboring certain aliens within the U.S., and
No. 95-40895

-2-

transporting certain aliens within the U.S. We have reviewed the

arguments and the record and find no reversible error as to the

defendants’ insufficient-evidence claims. See United States v.

Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1551 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S.

Ct. 1113 (1995). The district court did not clearly err in

finding that Gonzalez-Martinez was responsible for 100 or more

aliens for the purpose of determining his offense level under the

Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(2)(C); United

States v. Wimbish, 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1992), cert.

denied, 508 U.S. 919 (1993); United States v. Maseratti, 1 F.3d

330, 340 (5th Cir. 193), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1096 (1994). 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

HUBERT WARREN §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-04-CV-0496-D

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and

conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted.

SO ORDERED.

November 29, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00496-D Document 64 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 589