alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 21

                            Kendle International Inc.
                                 Subsidiary List

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                                     Jurisdiction of Organization
----------                                                     ----------------------------

<S>                                                            <C>
Kendle U.K. Inc.                                                            Ohio

Kendle GmbH                                                               Germany

Kendle Vermogensverwaltungs GmbH                                          Germany

Kendle International B.V.                                             The Netherlands

U-Gene Clinical Research B.V.                                         The Netherlands

U-Gene Research Biotechnology B.V.                                    The Netherlands

Kendle International Holdings Limited                                 United Kingdom

Kendle Branches Limited                                               United Kingdom

Kendle International Limited                                          United Kingdom

Kendle U.K. Limited                                                   United Kingdom

Kendle International SARL                                                  France

Kendle R&D Pty Limited                                                   Australia

Synermedica R&D Unit Trust                                               Australia

ACER/EXCEL INC.                                                          New Jersey

Health Care Communications Inc.                                             Ohio

Kendle Delaware Inc.                                                      Delaware

AAC Consulting Group, Inc.                                                Maryland

Kendle Canada Inc.                                                         Canada
</TABLE>
EX PARTE J.M.D.

(In re J.M.D. v. E.F.)

2170263

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
EX PARTE D.E.

(In re: D.E. v. Russell County Department of Human Resources)

2170104

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 31, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit  99.1


                     BANC OF AMERICA SPECIALTY FINANCE, INC.
                           ANNUAL OFFICER CERTIFICATE

                       NationsCredit Grantor Trust 1997-1



The  undersigned certifies that he is a Senior Vice President of Banc of America
Specialty  Finance,  Inc  formerly  NationsCredit  Distribution Finance, Inc., a
Georgia  corporation (the "Servicer"), and that as such he is duly authorized to
execute  and  deliver  this  certificate  on  behalf of the Servicer pursuant to
Section  13.10 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997
among  NationsCredit  Securitization  Corporation,  NationsCredit  Commercial
Corporation  and  Bankers  Trust Company (the 'Agreement') and further certifies
that  ( i ) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period January
1,  2000  up to and including December 31, 2000 and of its performance under the
Agreement  has  been  made  and  (ii)  based  on  such  review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the past year up
to  and  including  December  31,  2000.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  have affixed hereto my signature this the 27th day of
                                                                    ----
March,  2001.

                                   Banc  of  America  Specialty  Finance,  Inc.


                                   By: /s/  CHRISTOPHER  SPOENEMAN
                                       ---------------------------
                                            Christopher  Spoeneman
                                            Senior Vice President


                                   Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Steven Lewis COTTON

1160954 (CR-15-1496)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles R.J. LANE

NO. 2019-KK-0280

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              |                                         |                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                              | **OCCULOGIX,                INC.**           |
|                                         |                                    |                              |
| Date:   May                9, 2007 | By:                                | /s/ Elias                Vamvakas |
|                                              |  Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                              |                                         |
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-57577, 333-61780,333-34261, 333-108163 and 333-120906 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2007, relating tothe financial statements of Kendle International, Inc. (which expresses an unqualified opinion onthe Company’s consolidated financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph referring tothe Company’s change effective January 1, 2006 in its accounting for stock based compensation), andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kendle International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPCincinnati, Ohio
Case 3:04-cv-01859-AH Document 4 Filed 09/01/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 105

  To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 
                  recreational areas on Federal land.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 54, United States Code, to increase public access to 
                  recreational areas on Federal land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Public Access to 
Recreation Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE FOR RECREATIONAL PUBLIC ACCESS.

    Subsection (c) of section 200306 of title 54, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``3 percent'' and inserting ``10 percent''; 
        and
            (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$50,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022084EN.01001901.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze — Czech Republic) — Vítkovice Steel a.s. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí

(Case C-524/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 11(3) - Decision 2011/278/EU - Article 3(b) and Article 10(2)(a) - Product benchmark sub-installation - Decision 2013/448/EU - Validity - Installation using a basic oxygen furnace - Hot metal - Input from a third-party installation - Refusal to allocate emission allowances - Admissibility - Failure by the applicant in the main proceedings to bring an action for annulment)

(2022/C 84/22)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Městský soud v Praze

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vítkovice Steel a.s.

Defendant: Ministerstvo životního prostředí

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) and the third subparagraph of Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2013/448/EU of 5 September 2013 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as not permitting the free allocation to the installation at issue in the main proceedings of allowances based on the ‘hot metal’ product benchmark, on the basis of a new application from the Czech Republic, even if double counting of emissions and double allocation of allowances are excluded.

---

(1)  OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J Roland Vetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2010
 
 
 By:           /s/J Roland Vetter
 J Roland Vetter
 Chief Financial Officer/Principal Financial Officer, principal accounting officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RONALD L. WEBB, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2487-P

§ ECF

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of Social Security §

Administration, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the

Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge are adopted and they are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly,

the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 

Signed this 13 day of November 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02487-P Document 16 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 105
HOWELL LUMBER CO. v. Larry Michael JONES

2160738

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 22, 2017

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SEC. 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

    Effective from January 3, 2025, the joint committee created by 
Senate Concurrent Resolution 34 (118th Congress), to make the necessary 
arrangements for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice 
President-elect of the United States, is continued with the same power 
and authority provided for in that resolution.

SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL.

    Effective from January 3, 2025, the provisions of Senate Concurrent 
Resolution 35 (118th Congress), to authorize the use of the rotunda and 
Emancipation Hall of the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee 
on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and 
ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and 
the Vice President-elect of the United States are continued with the 
same power and authority provided for in that resolution.

            Passed the Senate January 3, 2025.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
                              Ceremonies.
```
EX PARTE Lee EAKINS

1160986 (2160330)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 234

    To allow certain veterans to use high occupancy vehicle lanes, 
                         including toll lanes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

 Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To allow certain veterans to use high occupancy vehicle lanes, 
                         including toll lanes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HOV Lanes for Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. HOV FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 166(b) of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end the following:
            ``(7) Disabled veterans.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The public authority may allow a 
                disabled veteran to use the HOV facility if such 
                veteran has a license plate that clearly identifies the 
                vehicle, a registered transponder, or other method of 
                identification the public authority considers necessary 
                for qualification.
                    ``(B) Definition of disabled veteran.--For purposes 
                of this paragraph, the term `disabled veteran' means a 
                veteran (as such term is defined in section 101 of 
                title 38) who the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has 
                determined has a service-connected (as such term is 
                defined in such section) disability rated at or above a 
                percentage determined to be qualifying by the public 
                authority.
                    ``(C) Occupancy exception.--Notwithstanding the 
                occupancy requirement of subsection (a)(2), 1 occupant 
                described in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph may be 
                permitted to use a HOV facility.
                    ``(D) No charge for tolls.--Under this paragraph, a 
                public authority may charge no toll.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 166 of such title is further 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``through (5)'' and 
        inserting ``through (7)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)(1) by striking ``paragraph (4) or 
        (5)'' and inserting ``paragraph (4), (5), (6), or (7)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 241 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 241

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for access standards 
with respect to the provision by the Department of Veterans Affairs of 
  hospital care, medical services, or extended care services that are 
         applicable to certain veterans with mental disorders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

  Mr. Yakym introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for access standards 
with respect to the provision by the Department of Veterans Affairs of 
  hospital care, medical services, or extended care services that are 
         applicable to certain veterans with mental disorders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sergeant Ted Grubbs Mental 
Healthcare for Disabled Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITY CARE ACCESS STANDARDS 
              FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS.

    Section 1703B(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The access standards required under this subsection shall 
provide that in the case of a covered veteran with a service-connected 
mental disorder rated at 50 percent or more, the Department shall 
furnish hospital care, medical services, or extended care services for 
such mental disorder by not later than five days after the date on 
which the covered veteran requests such care or services.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1286 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1110, K2025-1109.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00935 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2018352EN.01000802.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 August 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — David Smith v Patrick Meade, Philip Meade, FBD Insurance plc, Ireland, Attorney General

(Case C-122/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Third Directive 90/232/EEC - Article 1 - Liability for personal injury caused to all passengers other than the driver - Compulsory insurance - Direct effect of directives - Obligation to disapply national legislation contrary to a directive - Non-application of a contractual clause contrary to a directive))

(2018/C 352/11)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: David Smith

Defendants: Patrick Meade, Philip Meade, FBD Insurance plc, Ireland, Attorney General

Operative part of the judgment

EU law, in particular Article 288 TFEU, must be interpreted as meaning that a national court, hearing a dispute between private persons, which finds that it is unable to interpret the provisions of its national law that are contrary to a provision of a directive that satisfies all the conditions required for it to produce direct effect in a manner that is compatible with that provision, is not obliged, solely on the basis of EU law, to disapply those provisions of national law and a clause to be found, as a consequence of those provisions of national law, in an insurance contract.

In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, a party adversely affected by the incompatibility of national law with EU law or a person subrogated to the rights of that party could however rely on the case-law arising from the judgment of 19 November 1991, Francovich and Others (C 6/90 and C 9/90, EU:C:1991:428), in order to obtain from the Member State, if justified, compensation for any loss sustained.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---