alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017151EN.01001901.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 13 February 2017 — SC Petrotel Lukoil SA, Maria Magdalena Georgescu v Ministerul Economiei, Ministerul Energiei, Ministerul Finanțelor Publice

(Case C-76/17)

(2017/C 151/24)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SC Petrotel Lukoil SA, Maria Magdalena Georgescu

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministerul Economiei, Ministerul Energiei, Ministerul Finanțelor Publice

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the provisions of Article 30 of TFEU preclude an interpretation to the effect that, when a taxpayer has in fact paid a charge having equivalent effect, he may request the recovery of the sums paid by way of that charge even though national legislation has designed a payment mechanism for that charge in such a way as to pass it on to the European consumer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the provisions of Article 30 of TFEU preclude an interpretation to the effect that, when a taxpayer has in fact paid a charge having equivalent effect, he may request the recovery of the sums paid by way of that charge even though national legislation has designed a payment mechanism for that charge in such a way as to pass it on to the European consumer?

| 2. | Is the recovery of sums collected in respect of a charge having equivalent effect, when those sums were in fact paid by the taxpayer (but not passed on to the consumer), compatible with EU law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the recovery of sums collected in respect of a charge having equivalent effect, when those sums were in fact paid by the taxpayer (but not passed on to the consumer), compatible with EU law?

---
J.W.S. v. STATE

CR-16-0101

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1970

In Re: RANDY LEE HAMMITT; SANDRA MARIE HAMMITT, Petitioners.

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

(CA-03-278-3) Submitted: September 14, 2005 Decided: September 19, 2005 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Lee Hammitt and Sandra Marie Hammitt, Petitioners Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Randy Lee Hammitt and Sandra Marie Hammitt petition for a writ of prohibition, seeking an order preventing the district court from enforcing a civil forfeiture order.

A writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re Vargas , 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983). A writ of prohibition may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Missouri , 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981).

Because the Hammitts do not have a clear right to the relief they seek, and because they may appeal any final adverse judgment in the district court proceeding, the relief sought is not availabl e by way of a writ of prohibition. Accordingly, we deny the petition. We also deny the motion to stay proceedings in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer ofAdvance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash AdvanceCenters, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John I.Hill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                     | /s/ JOHN  I. HILL              |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|
|                | John I. Hill                   |
| * *            | *Executive Vice President and* |
| * *            | *Chief Financial Officer*      |
| August 8, 2007 |                           |

 

----
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00110-CR

ARMANDO BROOKS, Appellant

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

On Appeal from the 362nd District Court

of Denton County (F21-833-362) 

November 10, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by 

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr

 Justice Kerr
Cardell ELLIS v. Heath C. MCDONALD, Waterworks Industrial Services, LLC and State National Insurance Company

Tramissiam Davis v. Heath C. McDonald, Water Works Industrial Services, LLC, State National Insurance Company, Inc., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

NO. 2019-C-0380

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
Brady BASS v. DISA GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC., Convenient Care, LLC d/b/a Total Occupational Medicine, Randy B. Barnett, D.O., and Psychemedics Corporation

NO. 2019-CC-0377

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 31 Filed 08/21/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
STATE of Louisiana v. Dwayne WILLIAMS

NO. 2018-KO-2038

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Larry Feldman, Chief Executive Officer of Feldman Mall Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                            |   | By:  | /s/ Larry Feldman                           |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------|
|                       |   |      |                                             |   |
|                       |   | Name:     | Larry        Feldman                        |
| Dated:        May 10, 2006 |   | Title:    | Chairman        and Chief Executive Officer |

I, Thomas Wirth, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|        |   | By:  | /s/ Thomas Wirth                                                                                                               |
|--------|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |      |  

 

Name:

Thomas Wirth

Dated: May 10, 2006

 

Title:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit      32.1

***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mark                Klein                                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
| Name: Mark                KleinTitle:   Chief                Executive Office, President and Director(Principal                Executive Officer) Date:                November 19, 2007 |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
| /s/ Deborah                A. Gargiulo                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Name: Deborah                A. GargiuloTitle:   Chief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) Date:                November 19 2007 |   |   |   |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Albert E.
Bergeron, Vice-PresidentChief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| | /s/ Albert
 E. Bergeron                
| |                                        
| | Albert E.
 Bergeron                    
| | Vice-PresidentChief
 Financial Officer
| | November 14,
 2008                     

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

- 73 -

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 22, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 22, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0029. JOSEPH B. MCCARTHY v. ANNIE J. ASHMENT.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 1619036
# Fugitives

Select the images to display more information.
# C_2018319EN.01001102.xml

| 10.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat

(Joined Cases C-397/17 and C-398/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 7307 11 10, 7307 19 10 and 7307 19 90 - Cast tube or pipe fittings, of spheroidal graphite cast iron))

(2018/C 319/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Profit Europe NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013, must be interpreted as meaning that the cast tube or pipe fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron must be classified under subheading 7307 19 90 thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1239 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1039, K2025-1038.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00798 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2017086EN.01001701.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 9 January 2017 — Maria Tirkkonen

(Case C-9/17)

(2017/C 086/21)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Maria Tirkkonen

Appellant:

Other party: Maaseutuvirasto

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 1(2)(a) of Procurement Directive 2004/18/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the definition of ‘public contract’ within the meaning of that directive encompasses a scheme

1

| — | by which a public body seeks to obtain services in the market for a contractual period limited in advance by entering into contracts, subject to the conditions of a draft framework agreement annexed to the invitation to tender, with all economic operators who meet the individual requirements laid down in the tender documents in regard to the suitability of the offeror and to the service offered, and pass an examination more particularly described in the invitation to tender, and |
| --- | --- |

—

by which a public body seeks to obtain services in the market for a contractual period limited in advance by entering into contracts, subject to the conditions of a draft framework agreement annexed to the invitation to tender, with all economic operators who meet the individual requirements laid down in the tender documents in regard to the suitability of the offeror and to the service offered, and pass an examination more particularly described in the invitation to tender, and

| — | which can no longer be joined during the currency of the contract? |
| --- | --- |

—

which can no longer be joined during the currency of the contract?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-15 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Feldman Mall Properties, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
     5)
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
    By:
    /s/ Thomas WirthName:
    Thomas WirthTitle:
    President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:04-cv-00493-N Document 23 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 165
Jasper ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2530

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer ofAdvance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash AdvanceCenters, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,John I. Hill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        |   | /s/ JOHN I.  HILL                                                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | John I. Hill*Executive Vice President and**Chief Financial Officer* |

 

November 9, 2006

62

----
HEALTH OPTIONS PLUS, INC. v. Winfred PETREY

1160359

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG America Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2007 | /s/ Scott H. DeLong III                                                                                       |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Scott H. DeLong III

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

  |