alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00024]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1198 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-996, K2025-995.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00024 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,759-01

EX P ARTE KENNETH WAYNE ACY JR ., Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. A-14-1120- SA-W-1 IN THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TOM G REEN COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Applicant was convicted of two counts of ag g ravated assault and one count o f unlawful possession of a firea

rm by a felon and was sentenc ed to imprisonment. He filed this application for

a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to an appea l throug h no fault of his own. The trial court h as en t ere d finding s and rec ommends that a late appea l be g rante d. The trial court’s finding s and rec ommendation are supported by the habea s rec ord and applicable law. Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Relie f i s gra n t ed. Applicant may file an out-of-time appea l of his convictions in cause2

number A- 14-1120-SA fr om the 51st District Court of Tom Gree n County . Wit hin ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court s h al l d et er m i ne whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Appli ca n t is indige nt and wants to be represe nted by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him on direc t appea l. All deadlines shall be c alculate d as i f Appli cant was sentenc ed

on the date of this Court’s mandate. Should Applicant decide to appea l, he must file a written notice of appe al in the trial cour t within thi rty

day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Te xa s D e p a r tm e nt o f Crim in al J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 29, 2020 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  W.  Donald  Brunson,   Co-Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Coastal  Bancshares
Acquisition  Corp. (the  "Company"),  do hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     o  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
        June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
        "Report"),  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.


Date: July 25, 2005


/s/ W. Donald Brunson
-----------------------
W. Donald Brunson
Co-Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT NO. 1 


TO 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 to
the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated September 26, 2016, is by and between Drone Aviation Holding Corp.,
a Nevada corporation with an address 11651 Central Parkway #118, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (the “Company”), and
Jay H. Nussbaum (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered
into an Employment Agreement on April 27, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish
to further amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below, with the understanding that all other provisions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain unchanged;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


	1.	Section 3 of the Employment Agreement- Term of Employment- is hereby extended by from May
18, 2018 to December 31, 2018.




 


	2. 	The terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this agreement as of the date first stated above.


 





	 	DRONE
    AVIATION HOLDING CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:
     	/s/
    Kendall W. Carpenter
	 	Name:
    	Kendall
    W. Carpenter
	 	Title:
    	Chief
    Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Jay H. Nussbaum
	 	Name:
    	Jay
    H. Nussbaum
STATE of Louisiana v. Elbert BARNES

No. 2019-KH-0097

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

*1112Denied. The application is repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. In addition, applicant fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Applicant also fails to show the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Order entered February 3 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00144
- CV

IN RE: THE COMMITMEN T OF DAVID EDWARD JO INER

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV1870002



### O RDER Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Felicia Pitre to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the jury charge and verdict with respect to the trial of this matter held on November 5, 2018. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 34.5(c)(1). The supplemental
record shall be filed no later than February 13, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the parties.
/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4(q)

                                AMENDMENT NO. 14
                                       TO
                          THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY
                              EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN
                          (EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1994)

                  The Lincoln Electric Company, an Ohio corporation, hereby
adopts this Amendment No. 14 to The Lincoln Electric Company Employee Savings
Plan (Effective November 1, 1994) (the "Plan"), effective March 16, 2003.

                                       I.

                  Section 1.1(36) of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting the
following new sentence at the end thereof:

         "Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, on and
         after March 16, 2003, the Matching Employer Contribution Percentage to
         be applied against Before-Tax Contributions made on or after such date
         (other than Before-Tax Contributions attributable to Compensation
         earned prior to such date) shall be zero (0) percent."

                                       II.

                  The last sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan (as added by
Amendment No. 13) is hereby amended to read as follows:

         "Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, (i) no
         Matching Employer Contributions shall be made with respect to any
         Catch-Up Before-Tax Contributions (as defined in Section 3.12) and (ii)
         no Matching Employer Contributions shall be made with respect to any
         Before-Tax Contributions made on or after March 16, 2003 (other than
         Before-Tax Contributions attributable to Compensation earned prior to
         such date)."

                  EXECUTED at Cleveland, Ohio this 11th day of March, 2003.

                                      THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY

                                      By: __________________________________
                                          Title: Vice-President, Human Resources

                                   NO PAGE NO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

MARIA I. MARTINEZ, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 5:04-CV-293-C

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff is appealing an adverse decision of the Defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The United States Magistrate

Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on July 20, 2005. No written objections have been

filed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation are hereby

ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that the above-styled and numbered

cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated August 23, 2005.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:04-cv-00293-C Document 14 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 61
# C_2020297EN.01000202.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Milkiyas Addis v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-517/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Asylum policy - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Articles 14 and 34 - Obligation to give applicants for international protection the opportunity of a personal interview before the adoption of a decision declaring the application to be inadmissible - Failure to comply with that obligation in the procedure at first instance - Consequences)

(2020/C 297/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Milkiyas Addis

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 14 and 34 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which failure to comply with the obligation to give an applicant for international protection the opportunity of a personal interview before the adoption of a decision on the basis of Article 33(2)(a) of that directive declaring the application to be inadmissible does not lead to that decision being annulled and the case being remitted to the determining authority, unless that legislation allows the applicant, in the appeal procedure against that decision, to set out in person all of his or her arguments against the decision in a hearing which complies with the applicable conditions and fundamental guarantees set out in Article 15 of that directive, and those arguments are not capable of altering that decision.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 20.11.2017.

---
Exhibit 32.(2)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of International Isotopes, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Form 10-KSB), I, Laurie McKenzie-Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







March 28, 2008

/s/ Laurie McKenzie-Carter

Laurie McKenzie-Carter

Chief Financial Officer
Domenick GRASSO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Kara S. GRASSO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 1D18-1479

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 18, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 09, 2019

Domenick Grasso, Pro se, Appellant.

Ross A. Keene and Nicole Kessler Ferry, Pensacola, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1051Former husband appeals the amended final judgement of dissolution of marriage, raising issues related to: valuations of marital property for equitable distribution, imputation of income for calculating child support and retroactive child support, and the securing of child support via a life insurance policy. Former wife cross-appeals, claiming error in the denial of her request for attorney's fees. We affirm as to all issues on the appeal and cross-appeal except the life insurance issue, which we now discuss.

A trial court is authorized to order a party to purchase or maintain a life insurance policy "to the extent necessary to protect an award of child support." Fla. Stat. § 61.13(1)(c) (2017). A trial court, however, may not do so "without making factual findings regarding the necessity of such coverage." *Winney v. Winney* , 979 So.2d 396, 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) ; *Kotlarz v. Kotlarz* , 21 So.3d 892, 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ("In order to support the life insurance requirement, the trial court must make specific evidentiary findings as to the availability and cost of insurance, the obligor's ability to pay, and the special circumstances that warrant such security."). We agree with the former husband that the trial court did not make the requisite factual findings (a point the former wife does not address in her answer brief), and we are unable to determine whether this error was harmless. *Winney* , 979 So.2d at 401. We, therefore, reverse the amended final judgment as to the life insurance policy and remand for a determination supported by specific evidentiary findings in support of the life insurance requirement. *Therriault v. Therriault* , 102 So.3d 711, 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

Wolf, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
IIB 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 144 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2025 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To provide that the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset 

Act of 1995 does not apply to certain reports required 

to be submitted by the Tennessee Valley Authority, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 144 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tennessee Valley Au3 thority Salary Transparency Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SALARY DISCLOSURE; EXCEPTION TO REPORT 

5 ELIMINATION. 

6 Section 9 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 

7 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831h) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘a financial 

9 statement’’ and all that follows through ‘‘$1,500 a 

10 year’’ and inserting ‘‘a report of the total number of 

11 employees at the management level or above, to in12 clude all executives and board members, that shall 

13 include the names, salaries, and duties of such em14 ployees, that are receiving compensation at or great15 er than the maximum rate of basic pay for grade 

16 GS–15 of the General Schedule’’; 

17 (2) by striking all that precedes ‘‘The Board 

18 shall’’ and inserting the following: 

19 ‘‘SEC. 9. FINANCIAL REPORTING. 

20 ‘‘(a) REPORT ON COMPENSATION.— 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—’’; and 

22 (3) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

23 following: 

24 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION.—The information concerning 

25 salaries of employees of the Corporation contained 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 144 RFS

1 in, or filed with, the report described in paragraph 

2 (1) is exempt from— 

3 ‘‘(A) disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of 

4 title 5, United States Code; and 

5 ‘‘(B) the requirements of the Access to 

6 Congressionally Mandated Reports Act (Public 

7 Law 117–263).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 15, 

2025. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paula
      M. Lewis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeside Financial Group,
      Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
                20, 2008
            /s/
                Paula M. LewisPaula
                M. Lewis,President
                & CEO of ManagerLakeside
                Financial Group, Inc.
Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 19 PageID 200Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 2 of 19 PageID 201Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 3 of 19 PageID 202Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 4 of 19 PageID 203Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 5 of 19 PageID 204Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 6 of 19 PageID 205Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 7 of 19 PageID 206Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 8 of 19 PageID 207Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 9 of 19 PageID 208Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 10 of 19 PageID 209Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 11 of 19 PageID 210Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 12 of 19 PageID 211Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 13 of 19 PageID 212Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 14 of 19 PageID 213Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 15 of 19 PageID 214Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 16 of 19 PageID 215Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 17 of 19 PageID 216Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 18 of 19 PageID 217Case 7:03-cv-00205-R Document 43-2 Filed 01/13/06 Page 19 of 19 PageID 218
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21


Subsidiaries of Registrant


The following subsidiaries are direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Company:


VBI Inc., a Delaware corporation
Golf Card International Corp., a Delaware corporation
Camp Coast to Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Golf Card Resort Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
TL Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Golf Card Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation
GSS Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation
FEDCOR, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly National Association for Female
Executives, Inc.)
Woodall Publications Corporation, a Delaware corporation
AGI Properties of Colorado, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Affinity Bank, a California corporation 
Affinity Group Thrift Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Affinity Road and Travel Club, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Affinity Brokerage, Inc., a Delaware corporation
ART Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation
Camping Realty, Inc., a Kentucky corporation
Camping World, Inc., a Kentucky corporation
CWI, Inc., a Kentucky corporation
CW Michigan, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Ehlert Publishing Group, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
Exposition Group, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
AGI Real Estate Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation

                                         85
Misael PARES-VARGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3316

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Appellate case name: Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard

Appellate case number: 01-17-00918-CV

Trial court case number: CV-0077741

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Galveston County

The panel has voted to dismiss appellants’ pro se “Motion for Reconsideration and

Extension of Time to File Petition” as moot and to deny the “Motion to Correct Clerical 

Error in Judgment and Reconstruct Lost Document and Modify, Correct, or Reform 

Judgment.”

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Laura C. Higley______

x Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Higley.

Date: __November 29, 2018____