alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 10/ 20 / 15 P. v. Powell CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115( b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respo ndent,

v.

COLLIN RONALD POWELL,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B263323

(Super. Ct. No. 2013028454)

(Ventura County)

Collin Ronald Powell appeals from the judgment entered after pleading guilty

to two counts of gross ve hicular manslaughter while intoxicated (Pen. Code, § 191.5, subd.

(a)) 1 and one count of driving with a .08 percent or higher blood alcohol level causing

injuries to multiple victims , while driving with a blood alcohol content exceeding 0.15

percent. (Veh . Code, §§ 23153, subds. (a)

- (b); 23558; 23578). The trial court sentenced

appellant to eight years state prison and ordered appellant to pay victim restitution (§

1202.4, subd. (f)), a $5,000 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $5,000 parole revoca tion

fine (§ 1202.45), a $2,377 fine (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (a), a $90 court security fee (§

1465.8), a $443.34 criminal justice fee, and a $120 criminal conviction assessment (Gov.

Code, § 70373).

1 Unless otherwise stated, all statutory references are to the Penal Code.2 We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s

examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

On September 1, 2015, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which

to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to cons ider. No response has

been received. The record reflects that appellant was driving while intoxicated when his

vehicle left the roadway and hit two utility trailers and a large construction backhoe. Two

passengers in the vehicle died and a third passeng er suffered major injuries.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney

has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. ( People v.

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006 ) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J.3 David Hirsch, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

California Appellate Project, u nder appointment by the Court of Appeal,

Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.
# C_2019035EN.01000301.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 November 2018 — Bank Tejarat v Council of the European Union

(Case C-248/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Annulment of a listing by the General Court - Re-listing - Reasons for the listing relating to financial support to the Government of Iran and the procurement of prohibited goods and technologies - Scope - Financing of oil and gas projects - Evidence dating from before the first listing - Facts known before the first listing - Article 266 TFEU - Res judicata - Scope - Effective judicial protection))

(2019/C 35/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Bank Tejarat (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy and A. Meskarian, Solicitors, M. Brindle QC, T. Otty QC and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Kneale and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Bank Tejarat to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bank Tejarat to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DAVID E. JONES d/b/a CROOKED

STIRRUPS.COM,

Plaintiff,

VS.

RICHARD TRENT CARRILLO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:04-CV-2438-G

)

)

)

)

OPINION AND ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this

case, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the

Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of

the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED as the

findings and conclusions of the court.

November 15, 2005.

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02438-G Document 25 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 134
IN RE: Cherie Elizabeth TEAMER

NO. 2019-B-0353

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized signatures *287to a quitclaim deed, which signatures were made outside of her witness, and then filed the deed, which contained false information, into a succession proceeding. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that her conduct violated Rules 8.4(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Cherie Elizabeth Teamer, Louisiana Bar Roll number 36286, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent's successful completion of a one-year period of supervised probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the probation monitor, and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
# C_2017053EN.01003101.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/31

---

Action brought on 30 November 2016 — QF v Commission

(Case T-846/16)

(2017/C 053/38)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: QF (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: L. Ruiz Ezquerra, R. Oncina Borrego, I. Sobrepera Millet and A. Hernández Pardo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should;

| — | declare that the Commission Decision of 4 July 2016 on State aid SA.29769 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN), granted by Spain to certain football clubs, infringes Articles 107(1) and 108(3) of the TFEU, since the possibility of consolidating accounts brought about by the authorisation of four clubs to participate in different sports under Law 10/1990, as well as the application of the reduced tax rate under the same corporate tax, also constitute State aid incompatible with the internal market and, therefore, should be declared to be such by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commission Decision of 4 July 2016 on State aid SA.29769 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN), granted by Spain to certain football clubs, infringes Articles 107(1) and 108(3) of the TFEU, since the possibility of consolidating accounts brought about by the authorisation of four clubs to participate in different sports under Law 10/1990, as well as the application of the reduced tax rate under the same corporate tax, also constitute State aid incompatible with the internal market and, therefore, should be declared to be such by the European Commission.

| — | consequently, provide for the withdrawal/annulment of the measure and require the Kingdom of Spain to recover from the beneficiaries the aid that is incompatible with the internal market, and order it to pay the costs in that regard. |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, provide for the withdrawal/annulment of the measure and require the Kingdom of Spain to recover from the beneficiaries the aid that is incompatible with the internal market, and order it to pay the costs in that regard.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those put forward in Case T-845/16 QG v Commission.

QG

Commission

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 296 

To address the plea agreements for certain individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. LAWLER (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. FITZPATRICK, 

Mr. GARBARINO, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mr. ELLZEY, and 

Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To address the plea agreements for certain individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for 9/11 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 296 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRIAL AND POST-TRIAL MATTERS RELATING TO 

2 CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 

3 STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, 

4 CUBA. 

5 (a) PLEA AGREEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS.—Notwith6 standing the provisions of section 949h of title 10, United 

7 States Code, any plea agreement entered into by Khalid 

8 Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak 

9 Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi for ac10 tions involving the terrorist attack on September 11, 

11 2001, and its related judgment, shall not preclude the trial 

12 of such individual under chapter 47A of such title or any 

13 other provision of law for that terrorist attack. 

14 (b) SENTENCING.—Notwithstanding any other provi15 sion of law, in any trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, 

16 Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa 

17 Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi under chapter 47A of title 10, 

18 United States Code, or any other provision of law for the 

19 terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, a sentence of 

20 death shall be available. 

21 (c) CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT; TRANSFER.— 

22 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case 

23 of any sentence imposed on Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, 

24 Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, or Mustafa 

25 Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi, such individual— 

26 (1) shall be— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 296 IH

1 (A) held at United States Naval Station, 

2 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in solitary confine3 ment; 

4 (B) provided no contact with foreign na5 tionals; and 

6 (C) provided no psychological treatment 

7 except that specifically authorized by medical 

8 authorities at United States Naval Station, 

9 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and 

10 (2) shall not be transferred to the continental 

11 United States or any other country. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
H. Res. 40 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 14, 2025. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

(1) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—Mr. Courtney, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Moulton, Mr. 

Carbajal, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Keating, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. 

Crow, Ms. Sherrill, Mr. Golden of Maine, Ms. Jacobs, 

Ms. Strickland, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Vasquez, Mr. Deluzio, 

Ms. Tokuda, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, Mr. Cisneros, 

Mr. Sorensen, Ms. Goodlander, Ms. Elfreth, Mr. 

Whitesides, Mr. Tran, Mr. Vindman, Mr. Bell. 

(2) COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE.—Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Courtney, Ms. Wilson of 

Florida, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Takano, Ms. Adams, Mr. 

DeSaulnier, Mr. Norcross, Mrs. McBath, Mrs. Hayes, 

Ms. Omar, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Casar, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Mannion. 
2 

•HRES 40 EH 

(3) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE.—Mr. 

Menendez, to rank immediately after Mr. Carter of Louisiana. 

(4) COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY.—Mr. 

Swalwell, Mr. Correa, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Magaziner, 

Mr. Goldman of New York, Mrs. Ramirez, Mr. Kennedy 

of New York, Mrs. McIver, Ms. Johnson of Texas, Mr. 

Herna ́ndez, Ms. Pou, Mr. Turner of Texas. 

(5) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY.—Mr. Nadler, 

Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. 

Swalwell, Mr. Lieu, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Correa, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. Neguse, Mrs. McBath, Ms. Ross, Ms. Balint, 

Mr. Garcı ́a of Illinois, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Mr. 

Moskowitz, Mr. Goldman of New York, Ms. Crockett. 

(6) COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT

REFORM.—Ms. Norton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, 

Mr. Khanna, Mr. Mfume, Ms. Brown, Ms. Stansbury, 

Mr. Garcia of California, Mr. Frost, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Casar, Ms. Crockett, Ms. Randall, Mr. 

Subramanyam, Ms. Ansari, Mr. Bell, Ms. Simon, Mr. 

Min. 

(7) COMMITTEE ON RULES.—Mr. McGovern, Ms. 

Scanlon, Mr. Neguse, Ms. Leger Fernandez. 

(8) COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS.—Mr. 

McGarvey, Ms. Scholten, Mrs. McIver, Mr. Cisneros, Ms. 
3 

•HRES 40 EH 

Morrison, Mr. Latimer, Mr. Tran, Ms. Simon, Mr. 

Olszewski, Mr. Conaway, Ms. Goodlander. 

(9) COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE.—Ms. Norton, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Cohen, Mr. 

Garamendi, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Carson, Ms. 

Titus, Mr. Huffman, Ms. Brownley, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Stanton, Ms. 

Davids of Kansas, Mr. Garcı ́a of Illinois, Mr. Pappas, 

Mr. Moulton, Ms. Strickland, Mr. Ryan, Ms. Hoyle of 

Oregon, Mrs. Sykes, Ms. Scholten, Mrs. Foushee, Mr. 

Deluzio, Mr. Garcia of California, Ms. Pou, Ms. McDonald Rivet, Ms. Friedman, Ms. Gillen, Mr. Figures. 

(10) COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS.—Ms. 

Brownley, Mr. Pappas, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, Mr. 

McGarvey, Mrs. Ramirez, Ms. Budzinski, Mr. Kennedy 

of New York, Ms. Dexter, Mr. Conaway, Ms. Morrison. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Christopher Jonathan TORO, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1138

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 16, 2019

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. McCartney*, 1 So.3d 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

BERGER, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned James Charles President and acting Treasurer of Christie Fun,
Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Christie Fun, Inc. for the period
ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Christie Fun,
Inc.

Dated: May 18, 2005

/s/ James Charles
-----------------
James Charles
President and acting Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial,
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Purchases
and Sales Contract


 


Party
A: Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 


Party
B: Shanghai Nami Financial Consulting Co., Ltd. 


 


Location
when signing: Changning District, Shanghai


 


According
to related provisions of Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, in order to define the rights and obligations of
contracting parties, the following terms are agreed after friendly negotiation by two parties:


 


1.
Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as Party A) transfers a number of fixed assets
(see the attachment for detailed account) to Shanghai Nami Financial Consulting Co., Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as Party B).


 


2.
Price


 


According
to full negotiation by two parties, the price of the fixed assets is RMB 1,716, 747. 38 Yuan (in words: one million seven hundred
and sixteen thousand seven hundred and forty-seven point three eight Yuan).


 


3.
Delivery date and delivery place


 


(1)Delivery
date: Party A deliveries all fixed assets of Party B within one week after the contract takes effect.


(2)Delivery
place: as designated by Party B.


 


4.Payment
methods


 


The
full payments of this contract 1,716,747.38 Yuan(in words: one million seven hundred and sixteen thousand seven hundred and forty-seven
point three eight Yuan) which is paid to Party A by Party B will be deducted from the payable service charge to Party B.


 


5.Liability
for Breach of Contract


 


If
the delivery date is delayed, Party A shall pay liquidated damages as per 0.5% of total contract amount to Party B for every delayed
day; If Party B fails to pay on schedule, Party B shall pay liquidated damages as per 0.5% of total contract amount to Party A
for every delayed day. The amount of liquidated damages shall not exceed 10% of the total contract amount.


 




    	 	 	 



     

    






 


6.Settlement
of disputes


 


All
disputes occurred in the execution of this contract or concerned with this contract shall be settled through friendly negotiation
by both parties. In case friendly negotiation is failed, the two parties can file a lawsuit in People’s Court where the
signing place is according to the “Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China”.


 


7.The
contract is made out in two copies, with each party holding one copy, it will take effect from signing and seal of two parties.


 


(No
text below)


  


Party
A: Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (seal)


Authorized
representative:


 


 


 


Party
B: Shanghai Nami Financial Consulting Co., Ltd. (seal)


Authorized
representative:


  


 


 


Signed
on: April 30, 2016
Page | 1

Hudson M. Jobe

Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C.

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 871-2100 (Telephone)

(214) 871-2111 (Telefax)

PROPOSED ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEBTOR

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: §

§

HIGHLAND SELECT EQUITY §

FUND GP, L.P. § CASE NO: 23-31039-mvl7

§ (Chapter 11)

DEBTOR. §

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Debtor’s Motion to Transfer/Reassign Case (the 

“Motion”) [Docket No. 9], filed on June 12, 2023, is scheduled to be heard on July 19, 2023, at 

1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Michelle V. Larson, 1100 Commerce Street, 14th Floor, 

Courtroom #2, Dallas, Texas. Parties may appear in person or by WebEx video conferencing as 

follows:

For WebEx Video Participation/Attendance:

Link: https://us-courts.webex.com/meet/larson

For WebEx Telephonic Only Participation/Attendance:

Dial-In: 1-650-479-3207

Access Code: 160 135 6015

A copy of Judge Larson’s WebEx Hearing Instructions is attached hereto.

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 15 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 16:00:40 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Page | 2

Respectfully submitted,

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT 

& MOSER, P.C.

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 871-2100 (Telephone)

(214) 871-2111 (Facsimile)

By: /s/ Hudson M. Jobe 

 Hudson M. Jobe 

 State Bar No. 24041189

PROPOSED ATTORNEYS FOR DEBTOR

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 30, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice has 

been served by electronic transmission via the Court’s CM/ECF system upon all parties 

registered to receive electronic notice in this bankruptcy case and via first-class mail on the 

parties listed on the mailing matrix attached hereto. 

 /s/ Hudson M. Jobe

Hudson M. Jobe

Case 23-31039-mvl7 Doc 15 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 16:00:40 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
STATE of Louisiana v. Gary Thomas GORMAN

No. 2018-KP-0647

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LIVINGSTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's claim for relief has been fully litigated in an appeal from the proceedings leading to judgement of conviction and sentence and shall not considered. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.