alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 249 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 249

  To redesignate certain facilities at Paterson Great Falls National 
       Historical Park in honor of Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

  Mr. Pallone (for himself, Ms. Pou, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. 
    Conaway, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Kean, Mr. 
     Menendez, Mrs. McIver, Ms. Sherrill, and Mrs. Watson Coleman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To redesignate certain facilities at Paterson Great Falls National 
       Historical Park in honor of Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF PATERSON GREAT FALLS NHP FACILITIES.

    (a) Great Falls Scenic Overlook Trail Bridge.--Great Falls Scenic 
Overlook Trail Bridge at Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park 
shall hereafter be known and designated as ``Bill Pascrell, Jr. Scenic 
Overlook Trail Bridge''.
    (b) Overlook Park.--Overlook Park at Paterson Great Falls National 
Historical Park shall hereafter be known and designated as ``Bill 
Pascrell, Jr. Overlook Park''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to--
            (1) Great Falls Scenic Overlook Trail Bridge shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to Bill Pascrell, Jr. Scenic Overlook 
        Trail Bridge; and
            (2) Overlook Park shall be deemed to be a reference to Bill 
        Pascrell, Jr. Overlook Park.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Adam Justin STOVALL

1160808 (CR-15-0848)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Felix GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1054

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018.

Felix Garcia, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Whren v. United States*, 517 U.S. 806, 819, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) ("For the run-of-the-mine case, which this surely is, we think there is no realistic alternative to the traditional *413common-law rule that probable cause justifies a search and seizure.").
# C_2018399EN.01000901.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2018 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-244/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Decision (EU) 2017/477 - Position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part, as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies - Article 218(9) TFEU - Decision establishing the positions to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in a body set up by an international agreement - Agreement some of whose provisions may be linked with the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Voting rule))

(2018/C 399/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Havas, L. Gussetti and P. Aalto, acting as Agents, subsequently by L. Havas and L. Gussetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (EU) 2017/477 of 3 March 2017 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (EU) 2017/477 of 3 March 2017 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies;

| 2. | Orders that the effects of Decision 2017/477 be maintained in force; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders that the effects of Decision 2017/477 be maintained in force;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

---
Claude Mitchell KERRIGAN O/B/O Blake Mitchell KERRIGAN v. Jason E. HOLLOWAY

NO. 2019-CJ-0428

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 26, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Case 3:05-cv-00100-D Document 75 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:05-cv-00100-D Document 75 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:05-cv-00100-D Document 75 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KIMYEN T. NGUYEN, §

§

Plaintiff §

§ Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-0914-K

v. §

§

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of

the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct

and are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

DENIED, Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the decision of the

Commissioner is wholly AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 25, 2005.

s/ Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cv-00914-K Document 26 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 105
Thomas JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-439

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0134

IN THE MATTER OF:

O.L.K.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 1, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 23 2023

01/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0134
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Gridley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of US Shipping General Partner LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

|   | /s/ Paul B. Gridley                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                        |
|   | Paul B. Gridley                        |
|   | Chairman and Chief   Executive Officer |
|   | May 10, 2007                           |

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
D.M. v. MORGAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160247

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1870        Hayden Survey 1870 Wyoming in camp at Red Buttes

Historical        December 31, 1964        Two buildings on hillside

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
# C_2022119EN.01005801.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/58

---

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Europull (GREEN COAST)

(Case T-361/20) (1)

(2022/C 119/82)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
Case 3:00-cv-02416-M Document 4 Filed 05/29/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID 9
Lemarr PIERITE v. DG LOUISIANA, LLC

NO. 2019-C-0127

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.
Case 3:03-cv-02167-K Document 14 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
FILED

March 11, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

FEBRUARY 1998 SESSION

GREGORY EARL JACKSON, )

)

APPELLANT, )

) No. 02-C-01-9706-CR-00206

)

) Shelby County

v. )

) W. Fred Axley, Judge

)

) (Post-Conviction Relief)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

 APPELLEE. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

William W. Nowlin John Knox Walkup

Attorney at Law Attorney General & Reporter

100 North Main Bldg., Suite 3201 425 Fifth Avenue, North

Memphis, TN 38103 Nashville, TN 37243-0493

Deborah A. Tullis

Assistant Attorney General

425 Fifth Avenue, North

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

William L. Gibbons

District Attorney General

201 Poplar Avenue, Suite 3-01

Nashville, TN 38103

Rhea Clift

Assistant District Attorney General

201 Poplar Avenue, Suite 3-01

Memphis, TN 38103

OPINION FILED:___________________________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

Joe B. Jones, Presiding Judge
O P I N I O N

The appellant, Gregory Earl Jackson (petitioner), appeals as of right from a

judgment of the trial court dismissing his action for post-conviction relief. In this court, the

petitioner contends the evidence contained in the record establishes he was denied his

constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel prior to and during his guilty plea.

The evidence consisted of the testimony of the petitioner and the attorney who

represented him. The testimony of these two witnesses conflicts as to every material

issue, and the conflicts cannot be reconciled.

After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the

law which governs the issue presented for review, it is the opinion of this court that the

judgment should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

The evidence contained in the record does not preponderate against the findings of fact

made by the trial court. Butler v. State, 789 S.W.2d 898, 899 (Tenn. 1990).

_______________________________________

 JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

CONCUR:

______________________________________

 JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

______________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
#### H. A. Moring, *Appellant,*v. G. S. Young, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 20, 1927.

*John B. Willis*and *W. S. Broome,*for Appellant;

*J. C. Aclkins*and *Thomas W. Fielding,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted *to the*Court upon the transcript of *the*record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that *1173there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 2:04-cv-00240-J Document 10 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 62
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steve T. Laflin, certify that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed this this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of International Isotopes Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |     |                     |                              
|------------------- | --- | ------------------- | -----------------------------
|Dated:  May 3, 2023 | By: | /s/ Steve T. Laflin
|                    |     | Name:               | Steve T. Laflin              
|                    |     | Title:              | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |     |                     | (Principal Executive Officer)
Justo E. ROQUE, Jr. v. Douglas CROSS, D.D.S

NO. 2018-C-1254

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule DC, § 6. No further filings shall be accepted in this matter.
# C_2021242EN.01003801.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Comercializadora Eloro v EUIPO — Zumex Group (JUMEX)

(Case T-310/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark JUMEX - Earlier EU figurative mark zumex - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 242/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Comercializadora Eloro, SA (Ecatepec, Mexico) (represented by: J. L. Gracia Albero, P. Merino Baylos and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zumex Group, SA (Moncada, Spain) (represented by: M. C. March Cabrelles, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2020 (Case R 534/2019-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Zumex Group and Comercializadora Eloro.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Comercializadora Eloro, SA to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Zumex Group, SA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Comercializadora Eloro, SA to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Zumex Group, SA.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
# C_2019093EN.01001001.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu

(Case C-386/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments on maintenance obligations - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 5(2) - Article 27 - Article 35(3) - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 19 - Lis pendens - Article 22(a) - Article 23(a) - Non-recognition where the decisions are manifestly contrary to public policy - Article 24 - Prohibition of review of jurisdiction of the court of origin - Ground for the non-recognition based on a breach of the rules of lis pendens - Absence))

(2019/C 93/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Stefano Liberato

Respondent: Luminita Luisa Grigorescu

Operative part of the judgment

The rules of lis pendens in Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 must be interpreted as meaning that where, in a dispute in matrimonial matters, parental responsibility or maintenance obligations, the court second seised, in breach of those rules, delivers a judgment which becomes final, those articles preclude the courts of the Member State in which the court first seised is situated from refusing to recognise that judgment solely for that reason. In particular, that breach cannot, in itself, justify non-recognition of a judgment on the ground that it is manifestly contrary to public policy in that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 338, 9.10.2017.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Preparation and Distribution of Research Drug Products.                    

*Date:*                         February 5, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gagan Deep Bajaj, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Scientific Review Branch, 11601 Landsdown Street, 3WF Room 09A01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-6965,                         *gagan.bajaj@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 2, 2025.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00108 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P