# C_2016305EN.01004501.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/45

---

Appeal brought on 20 June 2016 by FN, FP, and FQ against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 April 2016 in Case F-41/15 DISS II FN and Others v CEPOL

(Case T-334/16 P)

(2016/C 305/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: FN (Budapest, Hungary), FP (Bratislava, Slovakia), FQ (Les Fonts Benitachell, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Police College (CEPOL)

Other party to the proceedings

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 April [2016] in Case F-41/15 DISS II, FN e.a. v CEPOL, and as a consequence, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 April [2016] in Case F-41/15 DISS II, FN e.a. v CEPOL, and as a consequence,

| — | annul the CEPOL decision no 17/2014/DIR dated 23 May 2014, providing for the relocation of CEPOL in Budapest, Hungary, as from 1st October 2014 and informing the appellants that ‘Non compliance with this instruction will be considered as resignation with the effect of 30 September 2014’, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the CEPOL decision no 17/2014/DIR dated 23 May 2014, providing for the relocation of CEPOL in Budapest, Hungary, as from 1st October 2014 and informing the appellants that ‘Non compliance with this instruction will be considered as resignation with the effect of 30 September 2014’,

o

st

| — | annul the CEPOL decisions dated 28 November 2014, rejecting the appellants’ complaints lodged between 8 and 21 August 2014, against the decision of 23 May 2014, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the CEPOL decisions dated 28 November 2014, rejecting the appellants’ complaints lodged between 8 and 21 August 2014, against the decision of 23 May 2014,

| — | order CEPOL to compensate the material and moral prejudices suffered by the appellants, |
| --- | --- |

—

order CEPOL to compensate the material and moral prejudices suffered by the appellants,

| — | order CEPOL to bear the costs of the appellants related to the present appeal and in case F-41/15 DISS II. |
| --- | --- |

—

order CEPOL to bear the costs of the appellants related to the present appeal and in case F-41/15 DISS II.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging an error in law in the application of article 47 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’). |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging an error in law in the application of article 47 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’).

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging an error in law in the interpretation of the contractual provisions binding the appellants and CEPOL and of the appellants’ acquired rights, a distortion of the facts, a violation of the duty duty to state reasons, a violation of the principle of equal treatment, and an error in law in the application of the principle of good administration and due care. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging an error in law in the interpretation of the contractual provisions binding the appellants and CEPOL and of the appellants’ acquired rights, a distortion of the facts, a violation of the duty duty to state reasons, a violation of the principle of equal treatment, and an error in law in the application of the principle of good administration and due care.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging an error in law in the appreciation of the appellants’ claims for damages. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging an error in law in the appreciation of the appellants’ claims for damages.

---