alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit 12.1**

I, Chet Idziszek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Madison Minerals Inc. (the “Company”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 25, 2014

***Signed “Chet Idziszek”***
H.B. v. STATE

CR-16-1011

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

With reference to the Quarterly Report of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Black, Vice-President Finance of the Company, certify,
for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL BLACK      
|MICHAEL BLACK          
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 14, 2007
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Allerton Towne, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Allerton Towne
-----------------------------
Allerton Towne
Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2008


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Norman Becker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Norman Becker
-----------------------------
Norman Becker
Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2008
Case 3:04-cv-02493-N Document 13 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 40
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02493-N Document 13 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 41
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02493-N Document 13 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 42
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 21 PageID 275
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 21 PageID 276
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 3 of 21 PageID 277
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 4 of 21 PageID 278
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 5 of 21 PageID 279
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 6 of 21 PageID 280
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 7 of 21 PageID 281
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 8 of 21 PageID 282
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 9 of 21 PageID 283
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 10 of 21 PageID 284
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 11 of 21 PageID 285
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 12 of 21 PageID 286
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 13 of 21 PageID 287
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 14 of 21 PageID 288
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 15 of 21 PageID 289
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 16 of 21 PageID 290
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 17 of 21 PageID 291
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 18 of 21 PageID 292
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 19 of 21 PageID 293
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 20 of 21 PageID 294
Case 3:04-cv-00226-D Document 64 Filed 08/01/07 Page 21 of 21 PageID 295
Bruce Reid JOHNSON v. NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Skid Marks Tires & Auto

NO. 2019-CC-0379

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J Roland Vetter,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
February 16,
2010














By:           /s/J
Roland Vetter


J Roland
Vetter


Chief
      Financial Officer/Principal Financial Officer, principal accounting
      officer
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

§

Respondent/Plaintiff, §

 § Criminal Action No. 3:04-CR-376-L

v. § (Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1568-L)

§

CRISTELLA MEDRANO, §

§

Defendant/Movant. §

ORDER

Defendant/movant Cristella Medrano (“Movant”) seeks to vacate, set aside or correct her

sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the court in

implementation thereof, this action was referred to the United States magistrate judge for proposed

findings and recommendation. On June 22, 2007, the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation

of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, to which no objections were filed. 

The magistrate judge found that Movant, in her § 2255 motion, was seeking to collaterally

attack her sentence, alleging that her counsel was ineffective. The magistrate judge recommended

that Movant’s § 2255 motion be denied, as her claims were without merit. See Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation at 5 (Movant failed to show “deficient conduct and resulting

prejudice.”). See also id. at 2 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688 (1984)).

Having reviewed the pleadings, file and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions

of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct, and

accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, Cristella Medrano’s motion to vacate, set aside
Order – Page 2

or correct her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied, and this action is dismissed with

prejudice. Final judgment will be issued by separate document.

It is so ordered this 31st day of July, 2007.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 96

  To prevent agencies from using unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct 
    surveillance of United States citizens, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent agencies from using unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct 
    surveillance of United States citizens, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Buzz Off Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES.

    (a) Surveillance.--A Federal law enforcement agency may not use an 
unmanned aerial vehicle to intentionally conduct surveillance of, 
gather evidence or collect information about, or photographically or 
electronically record a specifically targeted United States citizen or 
the specifically targeted private property of a United States citizen.
    (b) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), a Federal law 
enforcement agency may use an unmanned aerial vehicle to photograph, or 
otherwise record a United States citizen for the purposes of publishing 
or otherwise publicly disseminating such photograph or recording if the 
agency obtains the written consent of such United States citizen.
    (c) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not apply in the case 
that--
            (1) the President, acting through the Secretary of Homeland 
        Security, authorizes use of an unmanned aerial vehicle to 
        conduct surveillance if the Secretary certifies in writing 
        under oath that the surveillance is necessary to counter a high 
        risk of a terrorist attack by a specific individual or 
        organization; or
            (2) the head of a Federal law enforcement agency first 
        obtains a search warrant signed by a judge authorizing the use 
        of an unmanned aerial vehicle.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Albert E. Bergeron, Vice President—Chief Financial Officer of US ShippingGeneral Partner LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Albert E. Bergeron                          |
|   | Vice President—Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 5, 2005                            |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. ShippingPartners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

JMG Exploration Inc.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Joanne R. Finnerty, Chief Financial Officer of JMG Exploration, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | 
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
| | 1. | This Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           
|
| | 2. | The information contained in this Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the periods presented therein. |  | 

Date: November 14, 2005

|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|                              |  | 
|/s/ Joanne R, Finnerty        |  | 
|                              |  | 
|Joanne R. Finnerty            |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer       |  | 
|(Principal Financial Officer) |  |
H. Res. 38 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 14, 2025. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Ms. Maloy (to rank 

immediately after Mr. Strong). 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE: Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Grothman, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Allen, Mr. Comer, 

Mr. Owens, Mrs. McClain, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Ms. Letlow, 

Mr. Kiley of California, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Rulli, Mr. Onder, 

Mr. Mackenzie, Mr. Baumgartner, Mr. Harris of North Carolina, Mr. Messmer. 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. McCaul, 

Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Guest, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. 

Pfluger, Mr. Garbarino, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Tony 

Gonzales of Texas, Mr. Luttrell, Mr. Strong, Mr. Brecheen, 

Mr. Crane, Mr. Ogles, Mrs. Biggs of South Carolina, Mr. 

Evans of Colorado, Mr. Mackenzie, Mr. Knott. 
2 

•HRES 38 EH 

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Ms. Foxx, Chair, Mrs. 

Fischbach, Mr. Norman, Mr. Roy, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. 

Langworthy, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Griffith, Mr. 

Jack. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Stauber, Mr. 

Meuser, Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Alford, Mr. LaLota, 

Mr. Finstad, Mr. Wied, Mr. Bresnahan, Mr. Jack, Mr. 

Downing, Mrs. King-Hinds, Mr. Schmidt. 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Crawford, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Massie, 

Mr. Perry, Mr. Babin, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Bost, Mr. LaMalfa, 

Mr. Westerman, Mr. Mast, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Burchett, Mr. 

Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Nehls, Mr. 

Mann, Mr. Owens, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Collins, Mr. Ezell, Mr. 

Kiley of California, Mr. Fong, Mr. Wied, Mr. Barrett, Mr. 

Begich, Mr. Bresnahan, Mr. Hurd of Colorado, Mr. Shreve, 

Mr. McDowell, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Knott, Mrs. King-Hinds, Mr. 

Kennedy of Utah, Mr. Onder. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
STATE of Louisiana v. Leroyal DUNBAR

NO. 2019-KK-0156

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20461

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PAULA JEAN FIELDS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-458-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paula Jean Fields appeals following her guilty-plea

convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm (Count

One) and for being a felon in possession of ammunition (Count Two),

in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). 

Fields argues that her convictions on the above counts are

multiplicitous and that they violate the constitutional guarantee

against double jeopardy. She contends that her conviction for

Count Two should be vacated and the case remanded to the district

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-20461

-2-

court with instructions to dismiss that count. The Government

concedes the error and agrees that the conviction on Count Two

should be vacated.

Simultaneous convictions and sentences for the same criminal

act involving possession of a firearm and possession of ammunition

violate double jeopardy. See United States v. Berry, 977 F.2d 915,

919 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we vacate Fields’s conviction on

Count Two and remand to the district court with instructions to

dismiss that count. See Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856, 864-

65 (1985). Fields’s conviction on Count One is affirmed.

Fields argues that § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional

because it does not require a substantial affect on interstate

commerce. She also contends that the mere fact that a firearm or

ammunition traveled across state lines in the past is legally

insufficient to satisfy § 922(g)(1)’s interstate commerce

requirement. Fields acknowledges that these arguments are

foreclosed by circuit precedent, but she raises them to preserve

them for further review. 

This court has repeatedly held that “‘the constitutionality of

§ 922(g) is not open to question.’” United States v. Daugherty,

264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001)(quoting United States v. DeLeon,

170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999)). This court has also held that

evidence that a weapon was manufactured in one state and possessed

in another is sufficient to sustain a conviction under § 922(g).

United States v. Pierson, 139 F.3d 501, 504 (5th Cir. 1998); United
No. 06-20461

-3-

States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly,

Fields’s arguments are foreclosed. 

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
Martin MCCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 07, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.