alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Sherry Couturier, CFO of Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly
Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010.


The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Delta Seaboard International, Inc. and results of its operations.




Date:  May 17, 2010


Sherry Couturier


CFO


/s/ Sherry Couturier
Sandy Michelle OGLESBY v. STATE

CR-16-0428

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied,
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 53 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 53

   To cancel certain proposed changes to credit fees charged by the 
    Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan 
             Mortgage Corporation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Weber 
of Texas, Mr. Cline, Mr. Bost, and Mr. Cloud) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To cancel certain proposed changes to credit fees charged by the 
    Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan 
             Mortgage Corporation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Borrower Protection Act 
of 2025''.

SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF CHANGES.

    The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the enterprises (as such 
term is defined in section 1303 of the Federal Housing Enterprises 
Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4502)) may not 
implement the changes to the single-family housing mortgage credit fee 
pricing framework of the enterprises announced by the Federal Housing 
Finance Agency on January 19, 2023 (``FHFA Announces Updates to the 
Enterprises' Single-Family Pricing Framework''), and set forth in 
Federal National Mortgage Association Lender Letter LL-2023-01 and 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Bulletin 2023-1, and such 
changes, Lender Letter, and Bulletin shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 3. CONTINUATION OF RISK-BASED PRICING.

    This Act may not be construed to prohibit the enterprises from 
applying risk-based pricing for credit fees for single-family housing 
mortgages.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:03-cv-00368-J-BB Document 1 Filed 10/29/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1
Case 2:03-cv-00368-J-BB Document 1 Filed 10/29/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 2
Case 2:03-cv-00368-J-BB Document 1 Filed 10/29/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 3
Case 2:03-cv-00368-J-BB Document 1 Filed 10/29/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 4
# C_2016371EN.01001602.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/16

---

Action brought on 1 August 2016 — VIMC v Commission

(Case T-431/16)

(2016/C 371/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: VIMC — Vienna International Medical Clinic GmbH (Kulmbach, Germany) (represented by: R. Bramerdorfer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s Decision of 27 May 2016 (Case AT.40231 — VIMC/WK&FGB); and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s Decision of 27 May 2016 (Case AT.40231 — VIMC/WK&FGB); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C (2016) 3351 final of 27 May 2016, by which the applicant’s complaint was rejected on the basis of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. (1)

1

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging an improper exercise of discretion.

In this connection, the applicant submits that the application or non-application of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 is not within the Commission’s power of discretion. On the contrary, it argues, the Commission must take into account the particular circumstances of each case and cannot, on the basis of that provision and without further clarification, reject a matter already under examination by a national authority.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

1

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles WILLIAMS

NO. 2018-K-0584

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

\March 18, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Case 4:03-cv-01466-A Document 2 Filed 12/19/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 6
Case 4:03-cv-01466-A Document 2 Filed 12/19/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 7
Case 4:03-cv-01466-A Document 2 Filed 12/19/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 8
Case 4:03-cv-01466-A Document 2 Filed 12/19/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 9
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hangman  Productions,  Inc. (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  we, James Doolin and Shane  Thueson,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Date:08/05/2009                  /S/ JAMES DOOLIN
                                --------------------------------------------
                                James Doolin, Principal Financial Officer
                                              President and Director

Date:08/05/2009                  /S/ SHANE THUESON
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Shane Thueson, Principal Executive Officer
                                                Vice President and Director
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 1 of 25 PageID 90
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 2 of 25 PageID 91
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 3 of 25 PageID 92
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 4 of 25 PageID 93
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 5 of 25 PageID 94
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 6 of 25 PageID 95
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 7 of 25 PageID 96
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 8 of 25 PageID 97
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 9 of 25 PageID 98
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 10 of 25 PageID 99
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 11 of 25 PageID 100
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 12 of 25 PageID 101
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 13 of 25 PageID 102
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 14 of 25 PageID 103
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 15 of 25 PageID 104
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 16 of 25 PageID 105
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 17 of 25 PageID 106
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 18 of 25 PageID 107
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 19 of 25 PageID 108
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 20 of 25 PageID 109
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 21 of 25 PageID 110
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 22 of 25 PageID 111
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 23 of 25 PageID 112
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 24 of 25 PageID 113
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 10 Filed 08/13/04 Page 25 of 25 PageID 114
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1147 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-932, K2025-933.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31710 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - (-)north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        December 31, 1947        Preliminary report on the general geology and engineering geology of Noonan quadrangle, North Dakota

publication        March 19, 2012        Watershed scale response to climate change--Starkweather Coulee Basin, North Dakota

publication        November 1, 1995        Aquatic communities and contaminants in fish from streams of the Red River of the North basin, Minnesota and North Dakota

publication        July 6, 2006        Summary of surface-water quality, ground-water quality, and water withdrawals for the Spirit Lake Reservation, North Dakota

publication        August 6, 2015        Regional regression equations to estimate peak-flow frequency at sites in North Dakota using data through 2009

publication        January 1, 1970        Geology and ground water resources, Williams County, North Dakota

publication        January 1, 1949        Progress report on the geology and ground-water hydrology of the Lower Missouri-Souris Unit; Part 1, Crosby-Mohall area, North Dakota
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136938 & (15)(16)(17)	 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136938 

 COA: 284117 
 Wayne CC: 06-006534-01

ANTHONY SHEPHERD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for release on 

bond, for discovery, and for remand are DENIED. 

p1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2017374EN.01001202.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/12

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski Sud u Vukovaru — Croatia) — Rafaela Alandžak, Ljubica Alandžak, Rafo Alandžak v EUROHERC osiguranje — dioničko društvo za osiguranje imovine i osoba i druge poslove osiguranja

(Case C-187/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice))

(2017/C 374/17)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Referring court

Općinski Sud u Vukovaru

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Rafaela Alandžak, Ljubica Alandžak, Rafo Alandžak

Applicants:

Defendant: EUROHERC osiguranje — dioničko društvo za osiguranje imovine i osoba i druge poslove osiguranja

Defendant:

Operative part

Operative part

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Općinski Sud u Vukovaru (Municipal Court of Vukovar, Croatia), by decision of 5 April 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.

1

---
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

2 Of the first pair of sentences, one was for Rowett's March 2, 1989 arrest for possession of a controlled substance, and the second was for his March 29, 1989 arrest for stealing an automobile and removing/defacing the manufacturer's serial number. Of the ___________ No. 95-2062

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Kevin Lee Rowett, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 5, 1996 Filed: January 16, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Kevin Lee Rowett appeals the 240-month sentence imposed by the district court 1 following his guilty plea to two counts of distributing cocaine base and three counts of distributing cocaine powder, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
Rowett argues first that, in calculating his criminal history category, the district court erred in finding that neither of two pairs of prior concurrent sentences, 2 were "related cases" undersecond pair of sentences, one was for his July 6, 1992 arrest for driving with a suspended license, and the second was for his August 31, 1992 arrest for driving with a revoked license.
-2- U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2). It is well-settled in this circuit that "two or more sentences imposed at the same time `are not related for purposes of § 4A1.2(a)(2) if the cases proceeded to sentencing under separate docket numbers and there was no formal order of consolidation.'" United States v. Klein , 13 F.3d 1182, 1185 (8th Cir.) (quoting United States v. McComber , 996 F.2d 946, 947 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam)), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 2722 (1994). Rowett has not shown either pair of cases proceeded to sentencing under the same docket number or that either pair was formally consolidated.
Rowett argues next that the district court erred by assessing one criminal history point for committing the instant offense less than two years after release from imprisonment. Section 4A1.1(e) states that one point should be added if "the defendant committed the instant offense less than two years after release from imprisonment." Application Note 5 for section 4A1.1 states this assessment can be based on a defendant's relevant conduct. Because Rowett's PSR indicated that he was paroled on January 21, 1991, for the 1989 drug and theft offenses and that his relevant conduct for the instant offense included distributing cocaine in 1991, we conclude the district court properly assessed one point under section 4A1.2(e).
The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32




          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 25, 2005                  By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Smuda
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Jeffrey M. Smuda
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
SECOND AMENDMENT TO





THIRD AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE BENEFITS AGREEMENT



 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE BENEFITS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of April 22, 2003, between CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), and THOMAS H. JOHNSON (the "Executive").



WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement dated as of July 17, 1997; which Agreement was amended by a First Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement on September 13, 1999, and by a Second Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement on August 28, 2001; and



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the Executive Compensation Committee ("Committee") of the Board of Directors desire to further amend the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended in the following respects:


Section 4(a) of the Agreement is amended to replace the first sentence thereof with the following:

(a)Pay the Executive as compensation for his services hereunder a cash amount on an annual base salary of not less than six hundred forty-two thousand, nine hundred dollars ($642,900) (which base salary shall be reviewed on an annual basis for possible increase in light of business conditions, competitive considerations, increases given to other employees of the Company and the Executive's performance, provided that such salary shall not be reduced below the salary in effect immediately prior to such review).






Except as provided above, the terms of the Agreement, dated July 17, 1997, and the terms of the First Amendment to Employment Severance Benefits Agreement, dated September 19, 1999, and the Second Amendment to Employment Severance Benefits Agreement, dated August 28, 2001, shall remain in effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has cause this Second Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf and the Executive has duly executed this Second Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement, all as of the date first written above.


EXECUTIVECHESAPEAKE CORPORATION


/s/ Thomas H. Johnson/s/ Richard G. Tilghman

Thomas H. JohnsonRichard G. Tilghman

Director


/s/ J.P. Causey Jr.

J.P. Causey Jr.

Executive Vice President, Secretary &

General Counsel
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 21 Filed 05/16/01 Page 1 of 2 PageID 59
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 21 Filed 05/16/01 Page 2 of 2 PageID 60