alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I,
Michael Marquez, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TearLab Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



Dated:
July 1, 2020



| | /s/
    Michael Marquez    
| | ---------------------------
| | Michael
    Marquez        
| | Chief
    Executive Officer
Marzuq AL HAKIM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, Secretary, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of International Isotopes, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Form 10-K), I, Laurie McKenzie-Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as such, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

To my knowledge, the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|               |                           
|-------------- | --------------------------
|March 31, 2011 | /s/ Laurie McKenzie-Carter
|               | Laurie McKenzie-Carter    
|               | Chief Financial Officer
BTXN 112 (rev. 10/02)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

MC2 Restoration, LLC Case No.: 23−10031−rlj7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER APPROVING TRUSTEE REPORT AND DISCHARGING TRUSTEE

 The Trustee appointed in the above listed case has filed the Trustee's Report. It is, therefore

 ORDERED that the trustee be discharged.

DATED: 5/31/23 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/S. Kerr, Deputy Clerk

Case 23-10031-rlj7 Doc 10 Filed 05/31/23 Entered 05/31/23 09:37:30 Desc Order

Approving Trustee Report Page 1 of 1
#### Elberton A. Pike, *Appellant,*v. H. P. Johnston and Dora Johnston, His Wife, and E. H. Morgan, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 12, 1927.

*J. H. Hanooclc,*for Appellant;

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order-herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer of**

**Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(Adopted by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash AdvanceCenters, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John I.Hill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/ JOHN I. HILL               |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | John I. Hill                   |
|   | *Executive Vice President and* |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*      |

 

May 10, 2006

58

----
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 102 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 102

    Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Homeland 
            Security in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2025

 Mr. Green of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. Thompson of Mississippi) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                        on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Homeland 
            Security in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Homeland Security (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $20,466,000 for the One Hundred 
Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $10,233,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $10,233,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023063EN.01003501.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Jinan Meide Casting and Others v Commission

(Case T-687/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Non-retroactivity - Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Proportionality - Registration of imports - Article 14(5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 14(5) of Regulation 2016/1036))

(2023/C 63/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd (Jinan, China), and the 10 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1210 of 19 August 2020 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron and spheroidal graphite cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide [Casting Co.] Ltd following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-650/17 (OJ 2020 L 274, p. 20).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
Myrick Brock HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1169

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.11


FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE 
This First Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of July 1, 2016 by and between SEARS OUTLET STORES, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Seller”), and LIT-ACQUISITIONS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Purchaser”).
RECITALS:
A.Purchaser and Seller entered into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated May 19, 2016 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell to Purchaser, and Purchaser agreed to purchase from Seller, the Property more particularly described in the Agreement, located in Alameda County, California.  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.
B.Seller and Purchaser now desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.
AGREEMENTS:
For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Purchaser and Seller agree as follows:
1.Inspection Period.  The Inspection Period is hereby extended and will expire on July 18, 2016. 
2.Closing Date. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary, the Closing Date shall be July 27, 2016.  
3.Ratification; Governing Law.  Seller and Purchaser hereby ratify the terms of the Agreement and acknowledge that, except as herein modified, the Agreement is in full force and effect.  If any inconsistency exists or arises between the terms of the Agreement and the terms of this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.  This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 
4.Counterparts; Delivery.  This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of such counterparts shall constitute one document.  To facilitate execution of this Amendment, the parties hereto may execute and exchange, by telephone facsimile or electronic mail PDF, counterparts of the signature pages.  Signature pages may be detached from the counterparts and attached to a single copy of this Amendment to physically form one document.
 [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]Signature Page
        
Executed as of the date first written above.
		
	SELLER:
	SEARS OUTLET STORES, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company


By:/s/ ROHIT JACOB
DVP, Real Estate













		
	PURCHASER:
	LIT-ACQUISITIONS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company


By:/s/ STACEY MAGEE
Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 293 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 293

 To expand the seniors farmers' market program to include maple syrup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

Mr. Langworthy (for himself and Mr. Courtney) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the seniors farmers' market program to include maple syrup.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Making Agricultural Products Locally 
Essential (MAPLE) Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE SENIORS FARMERS' MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

    Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``and herbs'' and 
inserting ``herbs, and maple syrup''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7252

DONALD EUGENE GRIFFIN, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

A. J. PADULA, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00874-PMD)

Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 1, 2008

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, and

denying his motion to alter or amend. The orders are not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Griffin has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
H. Res. 2 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2025. 

Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of 

the House of Representatives has assembled; that Mike Johnson, a Representative from the State of Louisiana, has been 

elected Speaker; and that Kevin McCumber, a citizen of the 

State of Illinois, has been elected Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Brian King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   November 15, 2004             By: /s/ Brian King
                                           -----------------------------
                                               Brian King
                                               Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SANDRA L. TRIMM §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-04-CV-2455-K

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of Social Security §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 10, 2005, the

Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are

accepted as the Findings and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SO ORDERED this 21st day of November , 2005.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

 ED KINKEADE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02455-K Document 18 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 93
## A'd. tr-frDbiiB^dL or-ts-ww ~£/l

I MTTD 

## 4^J«,, ^^ Fis-sqsiiv-s\ nz-s'znii-^ 

### Tie Jt»HU*dk Judces d li*. {J**/ 6t ^•M/^//^AfsrlLED INj QFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

## A^s art Ay AJa SL.J X. Al4,^i; Mj JiL 4hu MAR 27 23»5

. a, /) // A a J - ^oeiAcosta, Clerk LJliJcii -H> rib A tt-hft'M -he Di'saufiTvi/Huf Kwie-u;, Jd jULfpn t ! M 

### ~~fnz pjJ-;i,infjL ^6 ce^i//tfjuL--./A)-^n& T-LAls/iiJ t-*^ vf



### QftlfRj Ccu/\JifjTZas sf$4. fltkrtie,i #7../jjj/a.'ofuL.fosse**,'mi, at_ / 4e /W/ oP Appals S* b,sAiJ d*t/»s 1Z»j..It*.



### /he fiLescfif dr*J/;«M •TO./L ...h'J/n^ iif.t &&c>77 ita. Pxaa^-fy/ry^^
J,tt/> /$tptf4-S/>s Jo <?eii fi'J l/pe*3enf<:#i'iA //cL-Ao .Mmk4--->.M^-<QU4-_ L

Aj/Msh 

### jJkuuJ-tt*f /jJih'^^J^ pUlfi -HU'jj ColuJ <ML#a1 /J. : TiJtUJUteCZt .faJittfjJL, filfilfi. +ths UtUt ML*A-f Ate KouC**J& -$4»*V j^ /?7C75D

9 ^6/?/ m 20^



### 7-L*A^£±r^ C/^y /<£MS ftlSf b.&xie- -At\/-

.ptflag<~ ffr/)4j</ -h'/ts/ c/*-*S <Jc fi^it^/^ 4*fi~ "?/aA 

## n{j-J/JkA.,-rJ... M^ttys Met, mM. 1,'^uJL.^Mi/. ti-n JL^/t*l*dkSjLd3iuy^^ 1+sbtJ 4. foe ieA-Tg<T tti StLCtz^c***., J / . Of U 7 7 /j^ M/¥ {a/A,W /A/r fff ^>(M—^^fm^J—tLZiU^icAL-J.^£.c^^ /J_ £/^^Li>_i^/7^LA-/A^_^r 

### £^J}*J<j^jLdL^-Lg6isb_ jjUulaL ^^llALjzsS^L "JUtJ^tzSr*^ CLiSi l*-*** 7Sitj_
Chad Christopher RICHARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Silas KENDRICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1381

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 28, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021452EN.01003901.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/39

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2021 — MKB Multifunds v Commission

(Case T-277/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Private equity fund - Complaint - Measures allegedly constituting State aid related to Dutch Venture Initiative - Decision adopted at the end of the preliminary procedure for reviewing aid - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Status as an interested party - Safeguarding of procedural rights - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 452/48)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: MKB Multifunds BV (Zierikzee, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van de Hel and R. Rampersad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and C. Schillemans, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking, in essence, annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 1109 final of 27 February 2020 concerning State aid SA.55704 (2019/FC) — the Netherlands, relating to alleged State aid granted to Dutch Venture Initiative.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | MKB Multifunds BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

MKB Multifunds BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
Drapher Oneal BONMAN v. STATE

CR-16-0453

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017402EN.01002002.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 September 2017 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-130/17) (1)

1

(2017/C 402/26)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.

1

---