alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016243EN.01003302.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/33

---

Action brought on 4 January 2016 — Gregis v EUIPO — DM9 Automobili (ATS)

(Case T-5/16)

(2016/C 243/36)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gian Luca Gregis (Adeje, Spain) (represented by: M. Bartolucci, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DM9 Automobili Srl (Borgomanero, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘ATS’ — Community trade mark No 9 799 719

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings relating to the registration of a transfer

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 October 2015 in Case R 588/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | cancel Transfer T8391925 of 14 April 2014. |
| --- | --- |

—

cancel Transfer T8391925 of 14 April 2014.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 17 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 17 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 31 of Regulation No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 31 of Regulation No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of Rule 84(3)(b) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 84(3)(b) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31684]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service TM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1102 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-877, K2025-878.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31684 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Trellis L. LANIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 33 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E– 

Rate Program’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 

Mr. FULCHER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Communications Commission relating to 

‘‘Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E–Rate 

Program’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Addressing 

5 the Homework Gap Through the E–Rate Program’’ (89 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 33 IH 

1 Fed. Reg. 67303 (August 20, 2024)), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 4 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 4

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
provide that debate upon legislation pending before the Senate may not 
  be brought to a close without the concurrence of a minimum of three-
                        fifths of the Senators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

  Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Golden of Maine) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
provide that debate upon legislation pending before the Senate may not 
  be brought to a close without the concurrence of a minimum of three-
                        fifths of the Senators.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``The debate on any measure or motion pending before the Senate, 
excluding Presidential nominations, shall not be brought to a close 
except as provided under laws as in effect on January 3, 2025, 
unanimous consent, or the concurrence of a minimum of three-fifths of 
the Senators duly chosen and sworn.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Arthur Lee GRIGGS

1160685 (CR-15-1445)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board of Directors


SmartFinancial, Inc.:








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-219159, 333-203449, 333-208819, 333-131006, and 333-113314) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-214802, 333-208700) of SmartFinancial, Inc., of our reports dated March 18, 2019, with respect to the 2018 consolidated financial statements of SmartFinancial, Inc. and Subsidiary and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in SmartFinancial, Inc.’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP





Atlanta, Georgia


March 18, 2019
Exhibit 10



SECOND EXTENSION OF LEASE AGREEMENT



This Agreement is made this 28th day of December, 2006 by and between Bannockburn Executive Plaza L.L.C. (Landlord), and Agility Centralized Research Services, Inc. (Tenant);



Whereas, on the 19th day of January, 2004 the parties hereto entered into a written lease (Lease) for the Premises commonly known as Suite 133 in Bannockburn Executive Plaza, 2275 Half Day Road, in Bannockburn, Illinois, which Lease was extended by Agreement on January 5, 2006, and terminates on the 31stday of January, 2007.



And whereas, the parties wish to continue the said Lease on the terms herein stated;



Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein, and in the stated Lease contained, the parties hereby agree that the term of the said Lease is extended for a period of two (2) years to expire on the 31stday of January, 2009 and that the said extended term is under the same terms, provisions, and conditions as in the said Lease now contained except that the Base Rent in the first year of this extension shall be increased by Fifty Three Dollars ($53.00) monthly to become Eighteen Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($1,813.00).







LANDLORD:
        
        TENANT:Bannockburn Executive Plaza, L.L.C.
        
        Agility Centralized Research Services, Inc.By Dolan Assoc., Ltd., as AgentBy:
        
        
        By:




Its President
        
        Its






---
Case 3:03-cv-02982-H Document 1 Filed 12/15/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02982-H Document 1 Filed 12/15/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02982-H Document 1 Filed 12/15/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02982-H Document 1 Filed 12/15/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 4
# C_2019230EN.01000401.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Monachos Eirinaios, kata kosmon Antonios Giakoumakis tou Emmanouil v Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon

(Case C-431/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 98/5/EC - Access to the profession of lawyer - Monk who has obtained the professional qualification of lawyer in a Member State other than the host Member State - Article 3(2) - Condition requiring registration with the competent authority of the host Member State - Certificate attesting to registration with the competent authority of the home Member State - Refusal to register - Rules of professional conduct - Incompatibility of the status of monk with practice of the profession of lawyer)

(2019/C 230/04)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Monachos Eirinaios, kata kosmon Antonios Giakoumakis tou Emmanouil

Defendant: Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2) of Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, on account of the incompatibility under that legislation between the status of monk and practice of the profession of lawyer, prohibits a lawyer who has the status of monk, and who is registered as a lawyer with the competent authority of the home Member State, from registering with the competent authority of the host Member State in order to practise there under his home-country professional title.

---

(1)  OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.

---
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**PRBENERGY, INC.**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2006, I, Daniel  D.Reichel Chief Financial Officer of PRB Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               This Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.               The informationcontained in this Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006,fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of PRB Energy, Inc. for the periods presented therein.
| Date: November 13, 2006                   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                      |   |   |
|  /s/ DANIEL D. REICHEL               |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
| Daniel  D.  Reichel                  |   |   |
| Vice President—Finance and Treasurer |   |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)             |   |   |

 

----
Case 24-30068-sgj11 Doc 15 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 09:20:39 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 24-30068-sgj11 Doc 15 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 09:20:39 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 24-30068-sgj11 Doc 15 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 09:20:39 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 24-30068-sgj11 Doc 15 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 09:20:39 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
# C_2018013EN.01001801.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/18

---

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2017 — Pilla v Commission and EACEA

(Case T-784/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment and damages - Provisional measures - Application for legal aid submitted after an action had been brought - Creative Europe Programme (2014-2020) - Call for proposals on support for a preparatory action - Decision rejecting candidature due to failure to respect an eligibility criterion - Grants available only to legal persons - Disregard of the formal requirements - Acts not attributable to EACEA - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 013/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rinaldo Pilla (Venafro, Italy) (represented by: A. Silvestri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and C. Gheorghiu, acting as Agents) and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet and V. Sansonetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision of 2 September 2016 rejecting the candidature submitted by the applicant in the call for proposals ‘EAC/S05/2016 — Support for a preparatory action to create an EU Festival Award and an EU Festival Label in the field of Culture: EFFE (Europe for Festivals — Festivals for Europe)’ of 26 April 2016, secondly, application seeking, principally, a declaration by the Court that the applicant’s candidature is admissible or, in the alternative, annulment of the ‘selection procedure itself’, thirdly, application seeking suspension of the selection procedure and, fourthly, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the rejection of his candidature.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA).

| 2. | The action is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law in so far as it is directed against the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law in so far as it is directed against the European Commission.

| 3. | The application for legal aid is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The application for legal aid is rejected.

| 4. | Mr Rinaldo Pilla la shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Mr Rinaldo Pilla la shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7718

JAMES W. TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-04-678-5) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James W. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James W. Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Stansberry , No. CA-04-678-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Rolla P. Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and S.
Gregory Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Rolla P. Huff

Rolla P. Huff
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003

/s/ S. Gregory Clevenger

S. Gregory Clevenger
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003

29
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID 229
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID 230
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID 231
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID 232
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID 233
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID 234
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 28 Filed 10/31/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID 235
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DUKE LEVY, §

§

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, §

§

V. §

§

CITY OF RIO GRANDE CITY, a Texas §

Municipal Corporation, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 04-CV-0381-B

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ §

Cross-Plaintiff, §

§

V. §

§

DUKE LEVY, L.L.C. and DLA §

ENGINEERING GROUP, LTD. §

§

Cross-Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court are the Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Jeff Kaplan that were read into the record on September 15, 2006 and the objections filed by Plaintiff

Duke Levy and Defendant City of Rio Grande City. Having conducted a de novo review of the

findings and conclusions to which objection has been made, I am of the opinion that the findings and

conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the findings and

conclusions of this Court. 

B

BD

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00381-B Document 154 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2788
SO ORDERED.

SIGNED September 29, 2006

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00381-B Document 154 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2789
# C_2016462EN.01002602.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/26

---

Action brought on 6 October 2016 — La Patrouille v EUIPO — Alpha Industries (Representation of an angular figure)

(Case T-709/16)

(2016/C 462/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: La Patrouille (Pantin, France) (represented by: A. Lakits-Josse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alpha Industries, Inc. (Chantilly, Virginia, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark — Application for registration No 11 778 727

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 July 2016 in Case R 2332/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision inasmuch as it ‘[annulled] the contested decision and [rejected] the opposition insofar as it concerns registration of the mark at issue for the following goods: ‘school bags; briefcases; school satchels’ in Class 18 and ‘[rejected] the remainder of the appeal’ and authorise registration of the mark applied for in respect of all the goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision inasmuch as it ‘[annulled] the contested decision and [rejected] the opposition insofar as it concerns registration of the mark at issue for the following goods: ‘school bags; briefcases; school satchels’ in Class 18 and ‘[rejected] the remainder of the appeal’ and authorise registration of the mark applied for in respect of all the goods;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Lack of likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue; |
| --- | --- |

—

Lack of likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue;

| — | The Board of Appeal based its finding of a likelihood of confusion on the alleged intellectual resemblances, yet they do not immediately strike the consumer. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal based its finding of a likelihood of confusion on the alleged intellectual resemblances, yet they do not immediately strike the consumer.

---
BTXN 112 (rev. 10/02)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Joseph Serdy Case No.: 3−02−35004−hca

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER APPROVING TRUSTEE REPORT AND DISCHARGING TRUSTEE

 The Trustee appointed in the above listed case has filed the Trustee's Report. It is, therefore

 ORDERED that the trustee be discharged.

DATED: 6/3/03 FOR THE COURT:

Tawana C. Marshall, Clerk of Court

by: /s/M. Mathews, Deputy Clerk
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 87 Filed 10/03/24 Entered 10/03/24 12:08:06 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 87 Filed 10/03/24 Entered 10/03/24 12:08:06 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 87 Filed 10/03/24 Entered 10/03/24 12:08:06 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 87 Filed 10/03/24 Entered 10/03/24 12:08:06 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
Case 2:04-cv-00323-J Document 27 Filed 04/06/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 104
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00323-J Document 27 Filed 04/06/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 105
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00323-J Document 27 Filed 04/06/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 106