alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 30 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 30

              Honoring Mississippi's Gestational Age Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2025

Mrs. Hyde-Smith (for herself, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Marshall, Mr. 
 Ricketts, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Banks) submitted the following resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Honoring Mississippi's Gestational Age Act.

Whereas, on January 15, 2018, Mississippi State Representative Becky Currie of 
        Brookhaven, Mississippi introduced the Gestational Age Act to protect 
        unborn children from elective abortion after 15 weeks gestation;
Whereas, on March 19, 2018, the Gestational Age Act was passed by the 
        Mississippi State Legislature, approved by Mississippi Governor Phil 
        Bryant, and enacted into law;
Whereas, in May 2021, the United States Supreme Court agreed to review Dobbs v. 
        Jackson Women's Health, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), a challenge to the 
        constitutionality of the Gestational Age Act, where the question before 
        the Court was whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective 
        abortion are unconstitutional; and
Whereas, on June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its historical 
        decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, holding that ``the 
        Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe and Casey must be 
        overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to 
        the people and their elected representatives.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) expresses profound gratitude to Mississippi State 
        Representative Becky Currie for introducing the catalyst that 
        ultimately brought about the historical victory of overturning 
        Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. 
        Casey, 503 U.S. 833 (1992); and
            (2) honors life-affirming States across the country that 
        have enacted laws aimed to value and protect the inherent 
        dignity of every mother and unborn child.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018022EN.01001701.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Teresa Coria Garcia and Others v Austrian Airlines AG

(Case C-470/17)

(2018/C 022/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Handelsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Teresa Coria Garcia, Marina Velasco Coria, Miriam Coria Garcia

Applicants:

Defendant: Austrian Airlines AG

Defendant:

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 25 October 2017.

---
Exhibit 32

# Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                     |                                                                                         |             |  |                            | 
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- |  | -------------------------- | 
|                     |                                                                                         | Biotel Inc.
|Date:   May 13, 2005 |                                                                                         | By:         |  | /s/   B. Steven Springrose | 
|                     |                                                                                        
|                     | B. Steven SpringroseChief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) |            
|Date:   May 13, 2005 |                                                                                         | By:         |  | /s/   Judy E. Naus         | 
|                     |                                                                                        
|                     | Judy E. Naus Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)                      |            

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmasset, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  | /S/ P. SCHAEFER PRICE        
|                      |  | P. Schaefer Price            
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (principal executive officer)
|                      | 
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  | /S/ KURT LEUTZINGER          
|                      |  | Kurt Leutzinger              
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |  | (principal financial officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00049]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1223 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1032, K2025-1031.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00049 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Allerton Towne, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Allerton Towne
-----------------------------
Allerton Towne
Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2010


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Norman Becker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Norman Becker
-----------------------------
Norman Becker
Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2010
Harold HOLT v. LIMESTONE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160548

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20074 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL ANTONIO RUIZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-565-1

-------------------- September 5, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Publi c Defender appointed to represent Miguel Antonio Ruiz-Lopez (Ruiz) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 3 86 U.S. 738 (1967). Ruiz has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief. Ruiz, who pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, has responded to counsel’s motion challenging h is conviction and sentence on several grounds.
Our independent review of the brief, Ruiz’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,No. 01-20074 -2- counsel’s motion for le ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities he rein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Valentina Tuss, Chief Executive Officer of Digital Ecosystems
  Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Valentina Tuss     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | VALENTINA TUSS         
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 7, 2005          

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 8 -00 010 -CV The Tap estr y Gr oup, I nc. and T apestry G roup Par kview , L.L.C. , Appellan ts
v . P arkview Place , Ltd. , Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 05- 394- C368 , HO NORAB LE B URT CARNES , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellants the Tape stry Group, Inc. and Tape stry Group Parkvie w, L .L .C. have filed a motion t o d i s m i s s t h eir appeal be cause the par ties have se ttled the case
. SeeTe x. R. A pp . P. 42.1(a) . We gr ant the motion and dismiss t he appe al. See id.

W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: Apr il 4, 2008
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Mercator Software Australia Pty Ltd |  | Australia                   
|Mercator Software France, s.a.r.l.  |  | France                      
|Mercator International GmbH         |  | Germany                     
|Mercator Software PTE Ltd           |  | Hong Kong                   
|Mercator Japan K.K.                 |  | Japan                       
|MCTR Software B.V.                  |  | Netherlands                 
|Mercator Software PTE Ltd           |  | Singapore                   
|Mercator Software SL                |  | Spain                       
|MCTR Software AB                    |  | Sweden                      
|Mercator Software GmbH              |  | Switzerland                 
|Mercator Software Limited           |  | U.K.
Kendrell Bernard JOHNSON v. Shatia Chantel HINTON

2160739

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
No. 07-15-00155-CV

Diane V. Wade

 Appellant

v.

David's Landscaping and David's

Landscaping, Inc.

 Appellees

§

§

§

§

From the 419th District Court

 of Travis County

August 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Campbell

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 11, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
Cedric Dale JOHNSON v. STATE

CR-15-1372

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 2 of 8 PageID 2
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 3 of 8 PageID 3
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 4 of 8 PageID 4
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 5 of 8 PageID 5
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 6 of 8 PageID 6
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 7 of 8 PageID 7
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 1 Filed 09/04/02 Page 8 of 8 PageID 8
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 3 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 3

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING JAMES EARL CARTER, JR.

    (a) Lying in State in Rotunda.--In recognition of the long and 
distinguished service rendered to the Nation and to the world by the 
late James Earl Carter, Jr., the 39th President of the United States, 
his remains shall be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the 
Capitol from January 7, 2025 until January 9, 2025. The Architect of 
the Capitol, under the direction of the Majority Leader of the Senate 
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take all 
necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose.
    (b) Use of Catafalque.--The Architect of the Capitol is authorized 
and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situated in the 
Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the 
Capitol so that such catafalque may be used in connection with services 
to be conducted there for the late James Earl Carter, Jr., 39th 
President of the United States.

            Passed the Senate January 3, 2025.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 3

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the late James Earl Carter, Jr., 39th President 
                         of the United States.
```
Anthony Glenn POE v. STATE

CR-16-0788

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-00217-P Document 13 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

REGINALD DWAYNE SHEPPARD, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-079-Y

 §

COLE JETER, Warden, §

FMC-Fort Worth, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Reginald Dwayne Sheppard

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of

the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

June 1, 2005; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on June 27, 2005.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Sheppard’s

objections must be overruled, that the motion to dismiss should be

granted, and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the

reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

 It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby,

ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that respondent Jeter’s May 3, 2005,

motion to dismiss [docket no. 6] be, and is hereby, GRANTED.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00079-Y Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 99
1As noted in the magistrate judge’s report, Sheppard was convicted and

sentenced in this Court in United States v. Sheppard, 4:96-CR-153-Y(1). His

conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, and a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 was denied. Although this Court could thus preside over a motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255, because Sheppard has not received prior authorization from the

court of appeals to file a successive § 2255 motion, this Court lacks

jurisdiction to so construe this action. See Hooker v. Sivley, 187 F.3d 680, 682

(“Although 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the validity of a

conviction and sentence . . . the district court [of conviction] lacked

jurisdiction to construe Hooker’s [§ 2241] petition as a § 2255 motion because

he had not received prior authorization from us to file a successive § 2255

motion”), citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2255; United States v. Rich, 141 F.3d 550,

551 (5th Cir. 1998),cert. den’d, 526 U.S. 1011 (1999). 

2

 It is further ORDERED that Reginald Dwayne Sheppard’s

petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be, and

is hereby, DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.1

SIGNED June 28, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00079-Y Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 100
3

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00079-Y Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 101
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MARIA PRIOR PEREIRA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-5149

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:13-CV-00176-EJD, Judge Edward J. 

Damich.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MARIA PRIOR PEREIRA, of Washington, DC, pro se. 

JESSICA R. TOPLIN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC for defendant-appellee. With 

her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, BRYANT G. SNEE, Acting Director, and 

STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM, Assistant Director.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 10, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court