alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019035EN.01000602.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 November 2018 — European Commission v Slovenian Republic

(Case C-506/17) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Landfilling of waste - Directive 1999/31/EC - Article 14(b) and (c) - Operation permit - Closure of unauthorised sites - Authorisation of necessary work on the basis of the approved site-conditioning plan - Laying down transitional period for completion of the plan))

(2019/C 35/08)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented initially by E. Sanfrutos Cano and M. M. Žebre, and subsequently by E. Sanfrutos Cano, B. Rous Demiri and F. Thiran and, finally, by E. Sanfrutos Cano and B. Rous Demiri, F. Thiran and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: J. Morela and N. Pintar Gosenca, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By failing to adopt the measures necessary:






  — | to close, by 16 July 2009 at the latest, in accordance with Article 7(g) and Article 13 of Council Directive 1999/31/EC or 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the landfill sites of Dragonja, Dvori, Rakek-Pretržje, Bukovžlak-Cinkarna, Suhadole, Lokovica, Mislinjska Dobrava, Izola, Mozelj, Dolga Poljana, Dolga vas, Jelšane, Volče, Stara gora, Stara vas, Dogoše, Mala gora, Tuncovec-Steklarna, Tuncovec-OKP and Bočna-Podhom, which have not obtained operation permits in accordance with Article 8 of that directive, and |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

By failing to adopt the measures necessary:

—

to close, by 16 July 2009 at the latest, in accordance with Article 7(g) and Article 13 of Council Directive 1999/31/EC or 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the landfill sites of Dragonja, Dvori, Rakek-Pretržje, Bukovžlak-Cinkarna, Suhadole, Lokovica, Mislinjska Dobrava, Izola, Mozelj, Dolga Poljana, Dolga vas, Jelšane, Volče, Stara gora, Stara vas, Dogoše, Mala gora, Tuncovec-Steklarna, Tuncovec-OKP and Bočna-Podhom, which have not obtained operation permits in accordance with Article 8 of that directive, and

| — | to ensure, by 16 July 2009 at the latest, that the Ostri vrh landfill site complies with the requirements of Directive 1999/31, with the exception of those set out in point 1 of Annex I thereto,
  the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(b) and Article 14(c) of Directive 1999/31. |
| --- | --- |

—

to ensure, by 16 July 2009 at the latest, that the Ostri vrh landfill site complies with the requirements of Directive 1999/31, with the exception of those set out in point 1 of Annex I thereto,

the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14(b) and Article 14(c) of Directive 1999/31.

| 2. | The Republic of Slovenia is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Republic of Slovenia is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 900 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 900

  To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Baez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2024

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Baez.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Baez, Cr. No. 21-507, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That, Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of United States v. Baez, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager, and any current or former officer or employee of the 
Secretary's office, in connection with the production of evidence 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32








WRITTEN
STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


FURNISHED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


AND
FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.





In
connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund III
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/Kimberly A.
      SpringsteenKimberly
      A. SpringsteenChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      20, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7014

BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; MANAGER, COURT AND LEGAL SERVICES; DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; T.ESTEP, Assistant Warden; E. B. WALKER, Assistant Warden; B. JOHNSON, Treatment Program Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-97-239-3) Submitted: October 9, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se. Vaughan Christopher Jones, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Downey v. Angelone , No. CA-97-239-3 (E.D. Va. June 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 21.1

METALS USA HOLDINGS CORP.

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                       |  |             
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Entity Name                            |  | Juris of Org
|Flag Intermediate Holdings Corporation |  | Delaware    

FLAG INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS CORPORATION

SUBSIDIARIES



|                 |  |             
|---------------- |  | ------------
|Entity Name      |  | Juris of Org
|Metals USA, Inc. |  | Delaware    

METALS USA, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                |  |             
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Entity Name                                     |  | Juris of Org
|Allmet GP, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware    
|Allmet LP, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware    
|Interstate Steel Supply Co. of Maryland, Inc.   |  | Maryland    
|Intsel GP, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware    
|Intsel LP, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware    
|i-Solutions Direct, Inc.                        |  | Delaware    
|Jeffreys Real Estate Corporation                |  | Delaware    
|Jeffreys Steel Holdings, L.L.C.                 |  | Alabama     
|Levinson Steel GP, Inc.                         |  | Delaware    
|Levinson Steel LP, Inc.                         |  | Delaware    
|Metals Receivable Corporation                   |  | Delaware    
|Metals USA Building Products, L.P.              |  | Texas       
|Metals USA Building Products, Canada Inc.       |  | Ontario     
|Metals USA International Holdings, Inc.         |  | Delaware    
|Metals USA Carbon Flat Rolled, Inc.             |  | Ohio        
|Metals USA Contract Manufacturing, Inc.         |  | Delaware    
|Metals USA Finance Corp.                        |  | Delaware    
|Metals USA Flat Rolled Central, Inc.            |  | Missouri    
|Metals USA Management Co., L.P.                 |  | Delaware    
|Metals USA Plates and Shapes, Northeast, L.P.   |  | Delaware    
|Metals USA Plates and Shapes Southcentral, Inc. |  | Oklahoma    



---

|                                                            |  |               
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Metals USA Plates and Shapes Southeast, Inc.                |  | Alabama       
|Metals USA Plates and Shapes Southwest, Limited Partnership |  | Connecticut   
|Metals USA Realty Company                                   |  | Delaware      
|Metals USA Specialty Metals Northcentral, Inc.              |  | Delaware      
|MUSA Newark, L.L.C.                                         |  | Delaware      
|MUSA GP, Inc.                                               |  | Delaware      
|MUSA LP, Inc.                                               |  | Delaware      
|Queensboro, L.L.C.                                          |  | North Carolina
|Wilkof-Morris                                               |  | Ohio          



-2-
B.L.V. v. K.H. and J.H.

2160523

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Mark                Klein                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Mark                KleinTitle:   Chief                Executive Office, President and Director(Principal                Executive Officer) Date:                May 20, 2008        |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
| /s/ Deborah                A. Gargiulo                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
|  Name: Deborah                A. GargiuloTitle:   Chief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) Date:                May 20, 2008 |

----
Anthony V. PUGLIESE, III, Anthony V. Pugliese, Inc. d/b/a The Pugliese Company, and Joseph Reamer, Appellants, v. FD DESTINY, LLC, Land Company of Osceola County, LLC, Elisabeth and Jonathan Deluca as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Frederick A. Deluca, FD Destiny Credit, LLC, and Doctor's Associates, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-0403

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (Credit Facility Agreement) Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Debtor) and Shenzhen Branch, China Citic Bank (the
Creditor) Dated May 6th, 2011

Main articles:

- Contract number: (2011) Shenyinsun Zongzi 003;
- Maximum amount of credit facilities to be provided: RMB 105 million;
- Term: from May 6th, 2011 to May 6th, 2012.
- Remedies in the event of breach of contract include adjustment of the credit amount, suspension of credit, imposition of punitive interest and overdue interest, an increase of guarantee deposit and the call back of loan principal and interest before
maturity.

Headlines of the articles omitted

- Termination and explanation
- Procedure on using the comprehensive credit facility
- Declaration and promise of the Debtor
- Rights and Obligations of the Debtor
- Rights and Obligations of the Creditor
- Guaranty
- Effectiveness, modification and termination of Contract
- Disputation settlement
- Validity

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 275 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish on a monthly 

basis the number of special interest aliens encountered attempting to 

unlawfully enter the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Ms. GREENE of Georgia (for herself, Mr. GREEN of Tennessee, Mr. HIGGINS

of Louisiana, Mr. CRANE, Mr. GUEST, and Mr. BRECHEEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish 

on a monthly basis the number of special interest aliens 

encountered attempting to unlawfully enter the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Interest Alien 

5 Reporting Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 275 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

2 SECURITY OF THE NUMBER OF SPECIAL IN3 TEREST ALIENS ENCOUNTERED ATTEMPTING 

4 TO UNLAWFULLY ENTER THE UNITED 

5 STATES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the seventh day of 

7 each month, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 

8 publish on a publicly available webpage of the Department 

9 of Homeland Security and submit to the Committee on 

10 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 

11 the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

12 Affairs of the Senate a report on the total number, and 

13 an identification of the nationalities or countries of last 

14 habitual residence, of special interest aliens encountered 

15 by the Department attempting to unlawfully enter the 

16 United States during the immediately preceding month. 

17 Each such report shall also include the following: 

18 (1) Such number disaggregated by geographic 

19 regions of such encounters. 

20 (2) Specifications relating to whether such en21 counters were made at land, air, or sea ports of 

22 entry, between ports of entry, or in the interior of 

23 the United States. 

24 (3) Identification of any such nationalities or 

25 countries of last habitual residence that are covered 

26 nations. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 275 IH

1 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

2 (1) ALIEN.—The term ‘‘alien’’ has the meaning 

3 given such term in section 101 of the Immigration 

4 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101). 

5 (2) COVERED NATION.—The term ‘‘covered na6 tion’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

7 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code. 

8 (3) SPECIAL INTEREST ALIEN.—The term ‘‘spe9 cial interest alien’’ means an alien who, based on an 

10 analysis of travel patterns, potentially poses a na11 tional security risk to the United States or its inter12 ests. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Second Amendment to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated: March 1, 2010   /s/ Tristan R. Pico Tristan R. Pico Chief Executive Officer Parks! America, Inc.    /s/ Jon Laria Jon Laria Chief Financial Officer Parks! America, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parks! America, Inc. and will be retained by Parks! America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Zachary LAMBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-405

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20074

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL ANTONIO RUIZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-565-1

--------------------

September 5, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel

Antonio Ruiz-Lopez (Ruiz) has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Ruiz has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief.

Ruiz, who pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, has

responded to counsel’s motion challenging his conviction and

sentence on several grounds. 

Our independent review of the brief, Ruiz’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
No. 01-20074

-2-

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE 

BLACKLINE, INC. 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment”) to the BlackLine, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (f/k/a the SLS Breeze Holdings,
Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan) (the “Plan”) is made by BlackLine, Inc. (“BlackLine”) on 12-14, 2015 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). 

WHEREAS, the BlackLine Board of Directors and Shareholders adopted the Plan on March 3, 2014; 

WHEREAS, the BlackLine Board of Directors and a majority of its Shareholders approved an amendment to the Plan on
February 25, 2015 authorizing an increased number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued as Stock Awards; 

WHEREAS, BlackLine adopted Amendment No. 1 to the Plan on July 28, 2015 authorizing an increased number of shares of
Common Stock that may be issued as Stock Awards; 
 WHEREAS, the BlackLine Board of Directors and a majority of its
Shareholders approved an amendment to the Plan on August 5, 2015 and August 24, 2015, respectively, authorizing an increased number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued as Stock Awards; and 

WHEREAS, BlackLine adopted Amendment No. 2 to the Plan on August 26, 2015 authorizing an increased number of shares of Common
Stock that may be issued as Stock Awards. 
 WHEREAS, BlackLine desires to amend the Plan in a manner consistent with the
foregoing amendments. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is modified as follows. 

1. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 

2. Section 3(a) of the Plan, shall be replaced in its entire with the following: 

“Share Reserve. Subject to the provisions of Section 9(a) relating to Capitalization Adjustments, the aggregate number of
shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards beginning on the Effective Date shall not exceed 32,007,310 shares (the “Share Reserve”). Furthermore, if a Stock Award (i) expires or otherwise terminates
without having been executed in full or (ii) is settled in cash (i.e., the holder of the Stock Award receives cash rather than stock), such expiration, termination or settlement shall not reduce (or otherwise offset) the number of shares of Common
Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan. For clarity, the limitation set forth in this Section 3(a) is a limitation in the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan. Accordingly, this Section 3(a) does
not limit the granting of Stock Awards except as provided in Section 7(a).” 
 3. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all of the terms
and provisions of the Plan are and will remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
BlackLine has caused the officer set forth below to execute this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date. 
  

			
	BLACKLINE, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Karole Morgan-Prager
		
	Name:	 	Karole Morgan-Prager
		
	Title:	 	Chief Legal Officer
		
	Date:	 	 DECEMBER 14, 2015