alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                              
|                        |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady                                  
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                        |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
Jean Marie DELVAR a/k/a Jean Delvar, Appellant, v. NEW PENN FINANCIAL LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Assignee of All Interests from Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Formerly GMAC Mortgage, LLC, and Marie Elie Delvar a/k/a Marie Delvar, Appellees.

No. 4D18-655

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Biotel Inc.Date:  February 11, 2008
        By:
        /s/ B. Steven SpringroseB. Steven Springrose
Chief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)Date:  February 11, 2008
        By:
        /s/ Judy E. NausJudy E. Naus
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

I, Steven G. Holder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

Dated: April 14, 2006
Michael Rayford SWEENEY v. STATE

CR-16-0562

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 138 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses for parents 

to be taken into account as medical expenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses for parents to be taken into account as medical 

expenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lowering Costs for 

5 Caregivers Act of 2025’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 223(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend9 ed by inserting ‘‘, any parent of either such individual or 

10 such spouse’’ after ‘‘the spouse of such individual’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 138 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid after December 

3 31, 2024. 

4 SEC. 3. FLEXIBLE SPENDING AND HEALTH REIMBURSE5 MENT ARRANGEMENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 105 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following: ‘‘A health flexible spending ar9 rangement or health reimbursement arrangement shall not 

10 fail to be treated as meeting the requirements of this sub11 section or section 106, and no amount shall be included 

12 in gross income of the taxpayer, solely because, under the 

13 arrangement, the taxpayer may use amounts contributed 

14 to such arrangement for medical care (as defined in sec15 tion 213(d), without regard to paragraph (1)(D) thereof) 

16 for a parent of the taxpayer or of the spouse of the tax17 payer.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to expenses incurred after Decem20 ber 31, 2024. 

21 SEC. 4. ARCHER MSAS. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

23 220(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend24 ed by inserting ‘‘, any parent of either such individual or 

25 such spouse’’ after ‘‘the spouse of such individual’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 138 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid after December 

3 31, 2024. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Melvin C. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Office of the State Attorney, Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Florida, Aramis D. Ayala, Oakland, Florida, Angela D. Campbell and Elias DeJesus, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-2730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6313
WILLIAM A. HARRIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PROBATION AND PAROLE, District 24; SALLIE OVERTON AMOS, Parole Officer; JAMES REYNOLDS, III, Chief Parole Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-1759-AM) Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William A. Harris, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Virginia , No. CA-02-1759-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTE:  RECEIVABLES are Net of allowance for doubtful amounts of $0.
NOTE:  PP&E is Net of accumulated depreciation of $3,068,329.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                  0001038599
<NAME>                             Thrucomm, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     178,365
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                204,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           720,396
<PP&E>                                   2,728,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,666,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    5,421,762
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                              (2,805,677)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             3,666,364
<SALES>                                  2,917,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,917,707
<CGS>                                    6,195,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            6,195,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           223,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         223,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,501,269)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,501,269)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,501,269)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (3,501,269)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Albert E. Bergeron, VicePresident—Chief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner LLC, thegeneral partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   | /s/ Albert E. Bergeron                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Albert E. Bergeron                          |
|   | Vice President—Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 12, 2005                        |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S.Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2017293EN.01001902.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 29 June 2017 — Konkurrensverket v SJ AB

(Case C-388/17)

(2017/C 293/23)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Konkurrensverket

Applicant:

Defendant: SJ AB

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Directive 2004/17 (1) be interpreted as meaning that there is a network in the field of transport services when transport services on a State-administered rail network for national and international rail traffic are provided in accordance with provisions in national legislation which implement Directive 2012/34 (2), which involve the allocation of rail infrastructure capacity on the basis of requests from railway companies and a requirement that all requests are to be met so far as possible? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Directive 2004/17 (1) be interpreted as meaning that there is a network in the field of transport services when transport services on a State-administered rail network for national and international rail traffic are provided in accordance with provisions in national legislation which implement Directive 2012/34 (2), which involve the allocation of rail infrastructure capacity on the basis of requests from railway companies and a requirement that all requests are to be met so far as possible?

1

2

| 2. | Must the first subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Directive 2004/17 be interpreted as meaning that an activity which is carried out by a railway company such as is referred to in Directive 2012/34 and which entails the provision of transport services to the public on a rail network constitutes the provision or operation of a network as referred to in that provision of the directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the first subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Directive 2004/17 be interpreted as meaning that an activity which is carried out by a railway company such as is referred to in Directive 2012/34 and which entails the provision of transport services to the public on a rail network constitutes the provision or operation of a network as referred to in that provision of the directive?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (Utilities Directive) (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 1).

1

(2)  Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 32).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Centale, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   August 20, 2007 /s/ Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr.  Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr. (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Daniel Vasquez Dominguez

, * From the 104th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 13674

- B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00349

- CR * February 27, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Finance Holdings LLC("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2004,hereby certify as follows:

|          |                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and |

|          |                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation for Nalco. |

|  | /s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCE  William H. Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November 15, 2004 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ BRADLEYJ. BELL   Bradley J. Bell Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer Date:  November15, 2004 |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Samuel LINE, DOC #C09033, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1068

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofScheid Vineyards Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-KSB for the period endingDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott D. Scheid, the Chief Executive Officer andPresident of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on myknowledge:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| * * | */s/ Scott D.  Scheid*                 | * * |
|----------|----------------------------------------|----------|
|     | Scott D. Scheid                        |
|     | Chief Executive Officer and  President |
|     | April 7, 2006                          |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

      Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 350), the undersigned, Joseph Skeehan, Chief Executive Officer of JMGExploration, Inc. (the “Company”) has executed this certification in connectionwith the  filing  with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2007 (the “Report”).

 

      The undersigned certifiesthat:  (1) the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 8th day of August 2007.

 

 
|        | JMG EXPLORATION, INC.          |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |                           |   |
|   | /s/  Joseph  Skeehan      |   |
|   | Name: Joseph Skeehan           |   |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----