alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

Order 

March 22, 2017

155476 (18)

WALTER EDWARD HARRINGTON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 155476

COA: 335420

COOPER STREET CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY WARDEN, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff’s motion to waive fees is DENIED because 

MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. 

Ordinarily, MCL 600.2963(8) would preclude plaintiff from seeking leave to appeal in 

this Court because of an inability to provide the initial partial fee. However, applying 

that statutory section to bar plaintiff from initiating an application for leave to appeal 

from the original complaint for habeas corpus filed in the court of appeals would violate 

the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Smith v Bennett, 365 US 

708; 81 S Ct 895; 6 L Ed 2d 39 (1961). 

The Clerk shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff. Plaintiff has 21 days 

from the certification of this order to submit one of those copies to this Court. By doing 

that, plaintiff becomes responsible for paying the $375 filing fee. MCL 600.2963. 

Failure to timely submit the order will result in the appeal not being docketed in this 

Court. The Clerk shall retain plaintiff’s pleadings until he timely submits the order or the 

21-day period for doing so has expired.

Plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial fee at the time he submits the order 

to this Court. The Department of Corrections is directed to collect amounts equal to 50 

percent of the deposits made to plaintiff’s account each month and remit $375 to this 

Court when that full amount is collected. Plaintiff may not file further appeals in this 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 22, 2017

jam

2

Clerk

Court from civil cases initiated by him until the entry fee in this appeal is paid in full. 

MCL 600.2963(8).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned James Charles President and acting Treasurer of Christie Fun,
Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Christie Fun, Inc. for the period
ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Christie Fun,
Inc.

Dated: November 17, 2005

/s/ James Charles
-----------------
James Charles
President and acting Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial,
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
# C_2020297EN.01000301.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2020 — ADR Center SpA v European Commission

(Case C-584/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Specific Programme ‘Civil Justice’ for the period 2007-2013 - Audit reports questioning the eligibility of certain costs - European Commission decision to recover unduly paid sums - Article 299 TFEU - Power of the Commission to adopt an enforceable decision within contractual relationships - Jurisdiction of the EU judicature - Effective judicial protection)

(2020/C 297/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: ADR Center SpA (represented by: A. Guillerme and T. Bontinck, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders ADR Center SpA to bear, in addition to two thirds of its own costs, two thirds of the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ADR Center SpA to bear, in addition to two thirds of its own costs, two thirds of the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear, in addition to one third of its own costs, one third of the costs incurred by ADR Center SpA. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear, in addition to one third of its own costs, one third of the costs incurred by ADR Center SpA.

---

(1)  OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.

---
Charles Henry JACKSON v. Simona D. MORTON

No. 2019-C-0121

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Writ denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

The mortgage was recorded before the donation. Therefore the donated property was subject to the mortgage. While the donee cannot be held personally responsible for payment of the debt secured by the *284mortgage, or made to reimburse the donor for payments on the mortgage, when the property is sold the mortgage must be satisfied prior to the claim of the donee, as the mortgage primes the donation. Thus the donee is entitled to one-half of the net proceeds from the sale.

The post-sale distribution, after the mortgage is satisfied, is a claim different from the matters previously litigated between the parties, and is not subject to the exception of *res judicata.*
Kirk M. PICKARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

 Exhibit 10.2

 AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT

 This agreement dated November 30, 2004 amends the loan agreement  dated August 31, 2004, made by and between Sound Revolution Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"), Penny Green, Chairman and Chief Financial Officer  of the Company (“Green”), and Bacchus Entertainment Ltd. (the “Lender”).

 Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and  promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the Company  and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

|   | 1. | Interest shall accrue quarterly and shall be payable within 45 days after      the end of each quarter. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

In witness whereof this Agreement has been executed by or on behalf of the  parties hereto, as an instrument under seal as of the date first above written.

 

|   | ***Sound Revolution Inc.*** |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | By: /s/ Heather Remillard                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Title:    Chief Executive Officer  |
|   |                                                   |
|   | ***Bacchus Entertainment Ltd. ***                 |
|   |                                                   |
|   | By: /s/ Penny Green                               |
|   | Title:    President                |
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   |                                                   |
|   |  /s/ Penny Green                             |
|   | Penny Green                                            |

----
Ann Marie LIVERMAN, Appellant, v. David A. TYREE, AS TRUSTEE OF the 2148 LAND TRUST, Appellee.

No. 4D18-510

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Everly S. LIPPWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 5:03-cv-00124-C Document 1 Filed 05/30/03 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 5:03-cv-00124-C Document 1 Filed 05/30/03 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
Case 5:03-cv-00124-C Document 1 Filed 05/30/03 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
Case 5:03-cv-00124-C Document 1 Filed 05/30/03 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
Case 5:03-cv-00124-C Document 1 Filed 05/30/03 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
Case 5:03-cv-00124-C Document 1 Filed 05/30/03 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
Jo Ann W. VILLENEUVE, a/k/a Jo Ann Villeneuve, a/k/a Joanna Villeneuve v. Katie ODOM

NO. 2019-CC-0178

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1233 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1050, K2025-1049.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00792 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Louis Paul ARDOVINO v. Lisa ARDOVINO

2160566

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John C. ALLEN v. Patsy ALLEN, Jacob B. Webster, M.D., William Brantley, Carolyn M. Dohn, and Samuel N. Crosby

1160705

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report
of Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Delta Seaboard International, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  August 16, 2010


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
**EXHIBIT 16.1**

 

May 8, 2017

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C., USA

20549-7561

 

 

Dear Sirs/Madams:

 

We have read Item 16F of Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição’s Annual Report Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, dated May 8, 2017, and have the following comments:

 

1.       We agree with the statements made in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth paragraphs.

 

2.       We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in the sixth paragraph.

 

Yours truly,

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

 

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Auditores Independentes
<PAGE>

Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

  We, the undersigned Directors and Officers of Precision Auto Care, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), hereby constitute and appoint Louis M. Brown Jr. and/or Robert
R. Falconi, our true and lawful attorney-in-fact with full power to sign for us,
in our names and in the capacities indicated below, the Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2001, and any and all amendments
thereto.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                Title                              Date
<S>                            <C>                                  <C>
/s/ Louis M. Brown Jr.         Chief Executive Officer;             September 28, 2001
--------------------------     Director
Louis M. Brown Jr.

/s/ Robert R. Falconi          Chief Financial Officer;             September 28, 2001
--------------------------     (Principal Accounting Officer)
Robert R. Falconi              Director

/s/ Frederick F. Simmons       General Counsel; Director            September 28, 2001
--------------------------
Frederick F. Simmons

/s/ John Wiegand               Vice President Operations;           September 28, 2001
--------------------------     Director
John Wiegand

/s/ Woodley A. Allen           Chairman of the Board of             September 28, 2001
--------------------------     the Board of Directors;
Woodley A. Allen               Director

/s/ Arthur C. Kellar           Director                             September 28, 2001
--------------------------
Arthur C. Kellar

/s/ Bassam N. Ibrahim          Director                             September 28, 2001
--------------------------
Bassam N. Ibrahim

/s/ Bernard H. Clineburg       Director                             September 28, 2001
--------------------------
Bernard H. Clineburg

/s/ Lynn E. Caruthers          Director                             September 28, 2001
--------------------------
Lynn E. Caruthers

/s/ Mauricio Zambrano          Director                             September 28, 2001
--------------------------
Mauricio Zambrano
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

CEDRIC RAY TATUM, 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 3:00-CR-00008-G (06)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The court referred the request for revocation of the Defendant’s supervised 

release to United States Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver for consideration. The 

court has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to its order. See docket entry 303. The Defendant waived allocution 

before this court and waived his right to object to the Report and Recommendation.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is ADOPTED as 

the opinion and findings of the court. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant be 

committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of (51) 

fifty-one months, with no additional term of Supervised Release to follow. 

The court recommends that the Defendant be allowed to serve his sentence at 

Bureau of Prisons facility in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, or FCI Texarkana, Texarkana, 

Texas.

Case 3:00-cr-00008-G Document 304 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1323
SO ORDERED.

January 26, 2021.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 3:00-cr-00008-G Document 304 Filed 01/26/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1324
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 254 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 254

   To prohibit the Director of the National Science Foundation from 
  awarding grants and other forms of assistance to Chinese communist 
    military companies and their affiliates, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

  Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Director of the National Science Foundation from 
  awarding grants and other forms of assistance to Chinese communist 
    military companies and their affiliates, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Science First Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION GRANTS AND OTHER 
              FORMS OF ASSISTANCE TO CHINESE COMMUNIST MILITARY 
              COMPANIES AND THEIR AFFILIATES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Director of the National Science Foundation may not provide grants or 
other forms of assistance to any individual or entity that is 
affiliated or otherwise has a relationship, including but not limited 
to a research partnership, joint venture, or contract with--
            (1) an entity included on the list maintained and set forth 
        in Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the Export Administration 
        Regulations;
            (2) a company on the list required by section 1237 of the 
        Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
        Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note), or 
        required by section 1260H of the Mac Thornberry National 
        Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-
        283), or any successor list; or
            (3) any parent, subsidiary, affiliate of, or entity owned 
        by or controlled by, an entity described in paragraph (1) or 
        (2).
    (b) Export Administration Regulations Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``Export Administration Regulations'' means the regulations 
set forth in subchapter C of chapter VII of title 15, Code of Federal 
Regulations, or successor regulations.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  International  Isotopes,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form  10-KSB"),  I,
Steve T. Laflin,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-KSB fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained  in the  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 29, 2005                            /S/ Steve T. Laflin
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Steve T. Laflin
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00230

- CR

Jose Delores Buenrostro

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tar rant County (1362275D )

August 28, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appea l is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
---

Exhibit 12.1 I, Chet Idziszek, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Madison Minerals Inc. (the “Company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 11, 2012 Signed “Chet Idziszek” __________________________Chet Idziszek, President


---