alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the
?Report?), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Frank Bauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to the
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Frank Bauer
                                 ----------------------
                                 Frank Bauer
                                 Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006




                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the
?Report?), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Norman Becker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to the
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Norman Becker
                                 ----------------------
                                 Norman Becker
                                 Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2006
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 2, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00093

- CV

Wenkai Chen, Appellant

v.

Bank of America, N.A., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 29, 2018. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appe al, both in this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J Roland Vetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 23, 2011   By:/s/ J Roland VetterJ Roland VetterChief Financial Officer/Principal Financial Officer,
principal accounting officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>James Showell, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Joanne D. Quinones, J.), rendered July 30, 2012, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Joanne D. Quinones, J.), rendered July 30, 2012, affirmed.</p><p>The record as a whole establishes that defendant's guilty plea to third-degree assault was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered in the presence of and with the aid of counsel, and after the court had fully apprised defendant of the constitutional rights he would be giving up by pleading guilty (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375 [2015]; <i>People v Sougou</i>, 26 NY3d 1052 [2015]). Inasmuch as the record also demonstrates that defendant, who pleaded guilty to third-degree assault on several prior occasions, was rational and coherent throughout the plea, freely admitted his guilt and demonstrated his understanding of the terms and consequences of the plea, the court did not err in failing to make further inquiry regarding defendant's mental condition (<i>see People v Ames</i>, 184 AD2d 1083 [1992], <i>lv denied </i>80 NY2d 1025 [1992]; <i>see also People v Alexander</i>, 97 NY2d 482 [2002]; <i>People v Beals</i>,2 AD3d 3 29 [2003], <i>lv denied </i>2 NY3d 761 [2004]). Unlike the situation in <a href="../2012/2012_08441.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Mox</i>, 20 NY3d 936</a> [2012], defendant's statements did not cast significant doubt upon his guilt or otherwise called into question the voluntariness of the plea.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: June 29, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 20, 2010








/s/ Bryan Kenyon


Bryan Kenyon, CFO


(Principal Financial Officer)
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

LOUISIANA CONVENIENCE AND 

VAPE STORE ASSOCIATION, INC. 

VERSUS 

ERNEST P. LEGIER, JR. 

COMMISSIONER, LOUISIANA 

ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO CONTROL, 

AND KEVIN RICHARD, SECRETARY 

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF 

REVENUE 

NO. 2024 CW 0237 

APRIL 2, 2024 

In Re: Ernest P. Legier, Jr., Commissioner of the Louisiana 

Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control and Richard 

Nelson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District 

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 740120. 

BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, J J. 

STAY DENIED; WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The district court's 

February 21, 2024 order denying as moot the motion for 

suspensive appeal filed by defendants, Ernest P. Legier, Jr., in 

his official capacity as Commissioner, Louisiana Alcohol and 

Tobacco Control, and Kevin Richard, in his official capacity as 

Secretary, Louisiana Department of Revenue, is reversed. The 

district court has granted a preliminary injunction "which may 

restrain the execution or enforcement" of enacted laws of the 

legislature of Louisiana, and "the defendant or defendants or 

any person or persons affected thereby, may suspensively appeal 

the order or judgment" pursuant to La. R.S. 13:4431. 

Accordingly, the district court is ordered to grant defendants' 

motion for suspensive appeal pursuant to La. R.S. 13:4431 on or 

before April 9, 2024. See Womack v. Louisiana Commission on 

Governmental Ethics, 193 So.2d 777 (La. 1967); See also Manuel 

v. State, 95-2189 (La. 3/8/96), 692 So.2d 320. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

a.,.o 

DEPUT~ERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

JEW 

EW 

TPS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2592

MCC SPECIAL PURPOSE CORPORATION I,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEBORAH S. KOLODNER,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

MAURICE C. WILSON; CARTER MEDICAL SERVICES OF

MARYLAND, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Plaza Therapy;

PLAZA APPLIANCES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-

1201)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Deborah S. Kolodner, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Francis O’Hagan Murphy,

MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Deborah S. Kolodner appeals the district court’s order granting a monetary judgment against her in favor of the Appellee. The

judgment was based on a settlement agreement, to which Kolodner was

a party. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, 

created Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Dated: April 14, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Gary Musil, President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of Logicom Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Logicom Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Logicom Inc.

 
| Dated: August 19, 2005 |   |                                         |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                         |
|                   |   |                                         |
|                   |   | /s/ Gary Musil                               |   |
|                   |   | Gary Musil                                   |
|                   |   | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
|                   |   | Logicom Inc.                                 |
|                   |   |                                         |
|                   |   |                                         |
|                   |   |                                         |   |
|                   |   |                                         |
|                   |   |                                         |
|                   |   |                                         |
|                        |        |                                              |  |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Logicom Inc. and will be retained by Logicom Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Audrey Reich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2007

By: ***/s/ Audrey Reich***

Audrey Reich

President/Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer

----
Raney SIMMONS v. STATE

CR-16-0507

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 23-03036-mvl    Doc 6    Filed 05/11/23    Entered 05/11/23 14:21:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 2

Case 23-03036-mvl    Doc 6    Filed 05/11/23    Entered 05/11/23 14:21:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Joseph Skeehan certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JMG Exploration, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report: 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 26, 2007 /s/   Joseph Skeehan Joseph Skeehan Chief Executive Officer
K.C.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John Wayne FULLER, Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-1030

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service.TM

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 8, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 2, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1227 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1037, K2025-1036.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00136 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2019305EN.01000901.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2019 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Telecom Italia SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Infrastrutture e telecomunicazioni per l’Italia SpA (Infratel Italia SpA)

(Case C-697/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Award of public supply and public works contracts - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 28(2) - Restricted procedure - Economic operators admitted to submit a tender - Need for the pre-selected candidate and the candidate submitting the tender to be legally and factually identical - Principle of equal treatment of tenderers)

(2019/C 305/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Telecom Italia SpA

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Infrastrutture e telecomunicazioni per l’Italia SpA (Infratel Italia SpA)

Intervener: OpEn Fiber SpA

Operative part of the judgment

The first sentence of Article 28(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted, with regard to the requirement that the pre-selected operators and the operators submitting tenders be legally and factually identical, as not precluding, in the context of a restricted procedure for the award of a public procurement contract, a pre-selected candidate who agrees to merge with another pre-selected candidate under a merger agreement concluded between the pre-selection stage and the stage when tenders are submitted and performed after that submission stage from submitting a tender.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
BRETON SOUND OYSTER COMPANY, LLC v. STIEL INSURANCE CO. OF NEW ORLEANS INC., et al.

NO. 2019-C-0251

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 92

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2025

   Mr. Crawford (for himself and Mr. Himes) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $19,240,928 for the One 
Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $9,538,983 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $9,701,945 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```