alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017269EN.01000302.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Czech Republic) lodged on 19 May 2017 — Česká pojišťovna a.s. v WCZ, spol. s r.o.

(Case C-287/17)

(2017/C 269/05)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Česká pojišťovna a.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: WCZ, spol. s r.o.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 6(1) and (3) of Directive 2011/7/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating late payment in commercial transactions be interpreted as requiring the court to award a successful applicant in a dispute concerning the recovery of a debt under a commercial transaction defined in Article 3 or 4 of that directive the sum of EUR 40 (or the equivalent in national currency) as well as compensation for costs of the court proceedings, including compensation for costs of a reminder to the defendant before the bringing of the action, in the amount laid down by the procedural provisions of the Member State?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 48, p. 1.

1

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
FIRST QUALITY BABY P RODUCTS, LLC, Appellant

v.

KIMBERLY

- CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC
., Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1208

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,416.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH G EORGE , Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also repr esented by M ARK B ERKOWITZ
, B RIAN A. C OMACK

.

R ICHARD L OUIS B RIDGE , Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also repr esented by
P ATRICK E. B RENNAN

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY
, R EYNA
, and C HEN
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Brian M. CASEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3552

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 09, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS COMMISSION ON

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND

THE CITY OF DRIPPING SPRINGS

,

Appellant s

,

v.

SAVE OUR SPRINGS ALLIANCE, INC.

,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 20

- 00 239

- C V

Appeal from the

345 th District Court

of Travis C ounty, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- GN

- 1 9

- 00 3030 )

O R D E R

The Court on its own motion, VACATES the October 21, 2021 submission and oral

argument setting. The above styled and numbered cause will be rescheduled at a later date

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19 th d ay of October

, 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C. J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
K.H., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2662

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 85 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Mr. GUTHRIE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce in the One Hundred Nineteenth 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

4 Commerce (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $32,293,696 for the One Hundred 

9 Nineteenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 85 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $15,774,974 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2025, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $16,518,722 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2026, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Cristian A. VERGARA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sisy Escobar VERGARA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
Jonathan FULLER v. ALABAMA SCHOOL OF FINE ARTS

2160201

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Henry Earl OLDS

(In re: Henry Earl Olds v. Sherri J. Smelley and Mary Becker

2170081

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KENT WILLIAMS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2696-K

v. §

§

WESTWAY FORD and §

GEORGE HERRON, §

§

Defendants. § Pretrial Management

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 23rd day of May , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02696-K Document 61 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 754
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Cary  M.  Grossman,   Co-Chief   Executive  Officer  of  Coastal  Bancshares
Acquisition  Corp. (the  "Company"),  do hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     o  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
        March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission
        (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.


Date: May 9, 2005


/s/ Cary M. Grossman
---------------------
Cary M. Grossman
Co-Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer)
# C_2019016EN.01001002.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘Renerga’ v AB ‘Energijos skirstymo operatorius’, AB ‘Lietuvos energijos gamyba’

(Case C-238/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2009/72/EC - Article 3(2), (6) and (15) and Article 36(f) - Internal market in electricity - Hypothetical nature of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling))

(2019/C 16/12)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UAB ‘Renerga’

Defendants: AB ‘Energijos skirstymo operatorius’, AB ‘Lietuvos energijos gamyba’

Third parties: UAB ‘BALTPOOL’, Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė, Achema AB, Achemos Grupė UAB

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas (District Court, City of Vilnius, Lithuania), made by decision of 11 April 2017, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TONY EDWARD POWELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. SMITH, Warden; McFADDEN,

Regional Director,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-17551

D.C. No. 1:08-cv-01443-SMM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Tony Edward Powell appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging that

FILED

MAY 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17551

defendants subjected him to inhumane living conditions during a prison lockdown. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and for clear error the district court’s

underlying factual determinations. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th

Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Powell’s action because Powell did not

timely exhaust prison grievance procedures concerning his claim. See Woodford v.

Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95 (2006) (exhaustion is mandatory and must be done in a

timely manner consistent with prison policies); McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198,

1199 (9th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (a prisoner must exhaust available administrative

remedies before filing a complaint; exhaustion during the course of litigation is not

sufficient). 

Powell’s motion for leave to file supplemental materials, filed on March 22,

2013, is denied. 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00880]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1254 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1072, K2025-1071.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00880 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2017121EN.01001702.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/17

---

Action brought on 24 February 2017 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-97/17)

(2017/C 121/25)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Mihaylova and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that, in failing to classify the entirety of the Rila important bird area as a special protection area, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to classify the most suitable territories in number and size as special protection areas for the conservation of the species of birds listed in Annex I to Directive 2009/147/EC (1) on the conservation of wild birds, and accordingly has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that, in failing to classify the entirety of the Rila important bird area as a special protection area, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to classify the most suitable territories in number and size as special protection areas for the conservation of the species of birds listed in Annex I to Directive 2009/147/EC (1) on the conservation of wild birds, and accordingly has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) of that directive;

1

| 2. | Order the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The case concerns the conservation of many endangered species of birds listed in Annex 1 to the Birds Directive and their habitats in the territory of the Rila mountain range in the south-west of Bulgaria. The Rila important bird area is one of the most significant places in both Bulgaria and the European Union for the conservation of over 130 species of nesting birds. 41 species are of European conservation concern, of which one is endangered worldwide.

Under Article 4(1) of the Birds Directive, the species listed in Annex I must be the subject of special conservation measures concerning their habitat in order to ensure their survival and reproduction in their area of distribution. Furthermore, Article 4(1) of the Birds Directive provides that the Member States must classify in particular the most suitable territories in number and size as special protection areas for the conservation of those species.

According to the Commission, the Republic of Bulgaria should have classified the Rila important bird area as a special protection area in its entirety, but, to date, has not done so. The Commission provides evidence of the ornithological importance of the unclassified territories in the Rila important bird area.

---

(1)  Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 2010 L 20, p. 7).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Proguard  Acquisition  Corp. (the
"Company"),  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005  (the
"Report"),  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, I, Frank Bauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.   Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  the  Sec.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. the Company's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended
September  30, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Frank Bauer
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Frank Bauer
                                                Chief Executive Officer

December 23, 2005
Donald Edward BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2911

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 103 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 103

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial 
            Services in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2025

  Mr. Hill of Arkansas submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial 
            Services in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Financial Services (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $22,407,000 for the One Hundred 
Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $11,203,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $11,203,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 55 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 55

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 22, 2025.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on the Budget: Mr. Doggett, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Peters of 
California, Mr. Panetta, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Plaskett, Ms. Escobar, Ms. 
Omar, Ms. Balint, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Tonko, Mr. McGarvey, Mr. Amo.
     Committee on House Administration: Mr. Morelle, Ms. Sewell, Mrs. Torres of 
California, Ms. Johnson of Texas.
     Committee on Natural Resources: Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Soto, Ms. 
Brownley.
     Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Ms. Pressley, Ms. Tlaib.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 5922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01078]

[[Page 5922]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis; Panel Review of Clinical Study 
Applications.
    Date: February 20, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, 
31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Yun Mei, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4639, email: [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Bruce A. George,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-01078 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00933]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1284 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1108, K2025-1107.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00933 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```