alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER VALENCIA GUTIERREZ; et al.,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70615

Agency Nos. A202

- 159

- 863

A202

- 159

- 864

A202

- 159

- 865

A202

- 159

- 866

A202

- 159

- 867

A202

- 159

- 868

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 8, 2020 **

Before : CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Javier Valencia Gutierrez and his family , natives and citizens of Mexico,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision d eeming their applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70615

(“CAT”) abandoned . We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an

agency ’s decision to deem an application abandoned for abuse of disc retion.

Taggar v. Holder , 736 F.3d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 2013). We review de novo due

process claims. Jiang v. Holder , 754 F.3d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the

petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion by deeming petitioners’ applications

for relief abandoned where the IJ informed petitioners of the deadline for

biometrics and warned that failure to comply would result in their applications

being deemed abandoned, and petitioners did not show good cause for their failure

to comply with the biometrics requirement. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.47(c)

- (d) (failure

to provide biometrics as instructed by the IJ absent a showing of good cause

constitutes abandonment of the application relief)

. Petitioners’ due process

contention fails as well. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)

(requiring agency error for a petitioner to establish a violation of due process).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
STATE of Louisiana v. William BROWN, Jr.

NO. 2018-KH-0453

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.
Russell Leonard NEWBURN v. STATE

CR-16-1232

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Comstock
Homebuilding Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Christopher Clemente, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Jeffrey R. Dauer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to our best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher Clemente            
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Christopher Clemente                
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey R. Dauer                
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Jeffrey R. Dauer                    
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jakeel Adonis SHAGER v. STATE

CR-16-0733

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

PRB GAS TRANSPORTATION, INC.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2005, I, Robert W. Wright, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | This Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
  June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                  
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in this Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
  June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the periods presented therein.

Date:
August 15, 2005

|                                     |  | 
|------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Robert W. Wright                 |  | 
|                                     |  | 
|Robert W. Wright                     |  | 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)        |  |
Exhibit 10.62  MAC-GRAY CORPORATION NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY  The
following summarizes the compensation arrangements established between Mac-Gray
Corporation (the Company) and its directors to be effective as of May 1,
2009:  Directors
who are also employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their
services on the Board or any committee thereof. 
Each director who is not an employee of the Company receives:  ·An annual fee of $30,000, paid in quarterly
installments, 50% of which is paid in shares of common stock and the balance of
which, at the discretion of the director, is paid in cash, shares of common
stock or any combination thereof; and  ·An additional fee of $1,600 for each Board
meeting attended in person and $500 per meeting attended by teleconference.  Committee
members receive $1,600 per meeting of the Compensation Committee or the Audit
Committee, and $1,300 per meeting of the Governance and Nominating
Committee.  Committee members receive
$300 per meeting attended by teleconference. 
In addition, the Chairman of each of the Compensation Committee and the
Audit Committee is paid $8,000 per year, and the Chairman of the Governance and
Nominating Committee receives $5,500 per year.  Each
newly elected non-employee director receives an option to purchase 5,000 shares
of common stock on the fifth business day after his or her election to the
Board, and each non-employee director who is serving as a director on the fifth
business day after each annual meeting of stockholders automatically receives
an option to purchase shares of common stock valued at $60,000 based on the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  All
of such options granted to non-employee directors become fully exercisable as
of May 1 of the year following the date of grant, have an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant,
and terminate upon the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.  All directors are reimbursed for significant
travel expenses, if any, incurred in attending meetings of the Board and its
committees.
Hunter COAN v. STATE

CR-16-0899

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U** **.** **S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sayan Navaratnam,
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuan t to 18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




6.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




7.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*By**:/s/
                Sayan Navaratnam**Sayan
                Navaratnam**Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer*


March
      31,
      2008
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Joseph Skeehan certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of JMG Exploration, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report: 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 6, 2008 /s/   Joseph Skeehan Joseph Skeehan Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside  Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the  "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,  2006,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  William F.  Webster,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Lakeside
Financial  Group,  Inc.,  the Manager of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Dated:   August 11, 2006                /S/
                                        -----------------------------
                                        William F. Webster,
                                        President of Manager
                                        Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
##### 



COMSTOCK HOMEBUILDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
    /s/ Bruce J. LabovitzBruce J. Labovitz
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer)
# C_2017277EN.01002602.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 30 May 2017 — People Over Wind, Peter Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta

(Case C-323/17)

(2017/C 277/38)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: People Over Wind, Peter Sweetman

Applicants:

Defendant: Coillte Teoranta

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Whether, or in what circumstances, mitigation measures can be considered when carrying out screening for appropriate assessment under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive (1)?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992, L 206, p. 7).

1

---
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 2 of 8 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 3 of 8 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 4 of 8 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 5 of 8 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 6 of 8 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 7 of 8 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 1 Filed 09/22/03 Page 8 of 8 PageID 8
Robert L. GRAY and Zillah R. Jordan-Gray a/k/a Zillah Gray, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF the J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP. 2006-FRE2 ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-FRE2 ; United States of America; Unknown Tenant in Possession of the Subject Property, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4085

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 20 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating 

to ‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for 

Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2025 

Mr. PALMER (for himself, Mr. BURLISON, Ms. LETLOW, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mrs. BICE, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. OGLES, Ms. 

TENNEY, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. 

FISCHBACH, Mr. HURD of Colorado, and Mr. BAIRD) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Energy relating to ‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Energy relating to ‘‘Energy Conservation 

5 Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 20 IH 

1 Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 

2 105188 (December 26, 2024)), and such rule shall have 

3 no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
C.W. v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170165

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3992

_____________________________
J ACK D. B ERGSTRESSER , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. July 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and K ELSEY and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Jack D. Bergstresser, Jr., pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,295                  12,362
<SECURITIES>                                     6,195                   3,851
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,588                   2,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,980                  63,363
<PP&E>                                           5,011                   2,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,527                 119,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,649                  58,608
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            53                      50
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,325                  38,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,527                 119,331
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,541                  44,645
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,083                  30,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,954                   5,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,128                     729
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,764                   2,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,388)                   4,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (19,066)                   2,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,322)                   2,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,322)                   2,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.38)                     .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.38)                     .55
        

</TABLE>
Robert GEISSLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1064

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen P. LITZENBERGER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Paul Litzenberger, Deceased, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Steven BOWERS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4531

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Allen KENNEMER and Nina G. Kennemer v. SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

2160538

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

Affirmed.