alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amy B. SCHWARTZ and Jay F. Schwartz, Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Briar Bay Community Association, Inc., and Waters Edge At Briar Bay Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D17-3457

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 6, 2019]

Bruce Jacobs of Jacobs Legal, PLLC, Miami, for appellants.

Adam J. Wick of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee Bank of America, N.A.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the final summary judgment of foreclosure. The appellants contend that discovery was outstanding and material issues of fact remained on their claim of fraud on behalf of the appellee's predecessor, Bank of America, in the fixation of an endorsement to the promissory note. They contended that the endorsement was added after the original holder of the note, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., was dissolved; thus, the appellee lacked standing to enforce the note. The appellee relied on section 673.3081, Florida Statutes (2012), to establish its standing, which provides for presumption of authenticity and authority of signatures on secured instruments, shifting to the party opposing the validity of the note the burden to offer some showing to negate the presumption. *See**Bennett v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co* ., 124 So.3d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). No affidavits or any other type of evidence was timely submitted to counter the appellee's motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the presumption was never rebutted, and summary judgment was properly entered.

Additionally, appellants also claim that the court erred in entering judgment when appellee had repeatedly violated discovery orders, and because discovery was not complete. First, the trial court made no findings that appellee violated any discovery orders. To the contrary, the court found that appellants had failed to comply with discovery. Secondly, the discovery about which appellants complained was still outstanding at the summary judgment hearing, but it had been propounded only days prior to the hearing. The hearing had been pending for several months in the case, which had been filed in 2012. The court determined that the appellants had not diligently conducted discovery, and it denied a motion for continuance. No abuse of discretion has been shown.

*Affirmed as to all issues raised.*

Warner, Damoorgian and Levine, JJ., concur.
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignm ent. TEX. GOV’T CODE

ANN. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002). 

NO. 07-01-0472-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

 DECEMBER 11, 2002

______________________________

LEONE PLUMMER,

Appellant

v.

CHARLENE J. REEVES, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 37,904-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, SJ.1

Appellant Leone Plummer filed a notice of appeal on November 27, 2001. The

clerk’s and reporter’s records were filed on September 18, 2002, and Plummer’s brief was

due to be filed on October 18, 2002. It was not filed but instead Plummer’s husband, who

is not a licensed attorney, purported to represent her by seeking an extension of time to

file the brief. On November 13, 2002, this court requested Plummer and her husband to
2

show proof he was a licensed attorney. In response, we received a document entitled

“Appeals Brief” signed by Plummer’s husband. 

By letter dated November 25, 2002, we notified Plummer that the brief had been

struck because her husband lacked the legal authority to act on her behalf. So too did we

order Plummer to file her brief on or before December 9, 2002, or the appeal would be

dismissed. No brief or other response has been received.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.8(a)(1) for want of prosecution.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Pepper Centers Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 18-19, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 496-2879,                         *sandhya.sanghi@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 10, 2025.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00841 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

JMG Exploration, Inc.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Herman S. Hartley, President and Chief Executive Officer of, JMG Exploration, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | 
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
| | 1. | This Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           
|
| | 2. | The information contained in this Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the periods presented therein. |  | 

Date: November 14, 2005

|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Herman S. Hartley                 |  | 
|                                      |  | 
|Herman S. Hartley                     |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |
Davel Mario ROSS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Mark INCH, Secretary D. O. C., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 9, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
---

Exhibit 10.2

ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT

This Addendum to the Lease Agreement dated May 14, 2004 is
  entered into as of May 1, 2005, by and between Sound Revolution Inc., a Delaware
  Corporation ("Tenant") and Ryan Tunnicliffe doing business as Spaceship Studios
  ("Landlord").

WHEREFORE the parties agree as follows:

|1. | Beginning on May 1, 2005, the new premises leased
        by the Tenant, and occupied by the Tenant and its subsidiary, Sound Revolution
        Recordings Inc., from the Landlord shall be a 200 square foot office located
        at 345 West 11thAvenue, Unit 4, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1T3.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | All other terms of the lease agreement dated May
        14, 2004 shall remain the same.                                                                                                                                                                                                     

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this
  Lease Agreement as of May 1, 2005.

|/s/ Penny Green               | /s/ Ryan Tunnicliffe                    
|----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                              |                                         
|Tenant: Sound Revolution Inc. | Landlord: R. Tunnicliffe d.b.a Spaceship
|                              | Studios                                 

---

Exhibit A

Description of Leasehold Premises and Equipment

Premises: Suite 205, a 380 square foot studio located on the
  2nd floor of Greenhouse Studios, located at 3995 Graveley Street,
  Burnaby, British Columbia

Equipment: Computer DAW Running Emagic Logic, Nuendo and Pro
  tools Computer Non-Linear Editing System, 210gb Adobe Premeire, After Effects
  Roland JV-30 midi controller Yamaha RM1x Midi Sequencer Emu Launch Pad Midi
  Controller Korg Electribe ES Groove Sampler Yamaha Ry-30 Rhythm Programmer Korg
  MicroKorg Synth
  Ensoiq DP4+
  Aphex Aural Exciter
  Emu ESI-4000 Sampler
  Lexocon Vortex Signal Processor
  DeltaLab Effectron Delay Line
  Symtrix SG-200 Dual Signal Gates (2)
  Spirirt Folio Mixer
  Videoonics Mx1. video mixer
  Yamaha cs-10 Vintage Analog Synth
  Yamaha cs-15
  Vestex Turntables and Mixer
  Sony TRV-900 3CCD DV
  Canon Vistua Digital Video Camera
  Audio Technica 291b Mic

---
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Richard W. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of Great American Family Parks, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Great American Family Parks, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's  disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: May 14, 2007   /s/ Richard W. Jackson Richard W. Jackson Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:05-cv-00104-N Document 9 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 65
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     7
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            585,271
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                             7,470
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                               6,938
<EQUITIES>                                            0
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  766,549
<CASH>                                              117
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   16
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          129,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,752,531
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 396,784
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              18,133
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  105,861
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      348,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,752,531
<PREMIUMS>                                        6,742
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              47,600
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (5,013)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   60,507
<BENEFITS>                                       45,083
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      12,859
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             32,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  19,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6,891
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12,797
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract                               ( print page 3978)                            1231 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1048, K2025-1047.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00790 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 26, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    M. MARK URBANIA

|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|M. Mark Urbania Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) July 28, 2005
Honorable Clifford 3. Roe

CountyAttorney Panola County Carthage,Texas L

.,, Dear Sir: ’ ”,. Opinion Nmber O-4078 Re: Use of oertaln funds derived from road bonds where speolficuse had been designated in the election.
We have your letter of September 26, setting out certain facts and propoundinga question for **our** opinion thereon. After.studying the facts outlined Fn **your** letter we reach,the conclusion that an election was held at which County-wide road bonds were voted’, and that the election proceedings spehlf’loally designated the purposes for which the proceeds thereof shouldbe used, amoixg which speolfiedpurposeswe find that oertain moneys were earmarked for use in. the construationof a road from the tWn of Clayton to the town of Longbranch,both of which are'lbcated in Panola couilty.A certainporti.on of the funds irere used in accokdante with that designat'ion and'that there is now a balance on hand whiah is proposed to be used in the constructioti of a road running from the town of Clayton and-connkctingwith thi Pinehlllroad which Is a point about one mile from the town of Longbranch. Your question Is:

"Can the above fund8be used on the ClaytbnPinehill-Longbranohroute or do they havestom be used orithe Clayton-Longbranchroute where few or no people live?" The purposes for whFoh the proaeeds of the bonds were to be used being a part of the election proceedings would require that the funds’ derived from’said- bonds beused only in accordance therewith.' In the case of Moore v. Coffman, 200 3. W. 374, the general rule is land downHonorable Clifford 3. Roe, page 2 (O-4078)

by the Supreme Court and is substantiallythat if the pur-,; pose for issuingbonds is specIfically stated in the petition, order and notice of eleatlon, the voters have the right to rely on such statementand the use of suahbond' funds otherwisewould be prohlbltedby law. Suoh a statement beaomes a part of an implied eontraatentered Into between the voters and the authorities entrustedwith the expenditure of suoh funds.

It is, therefore, our oplnlon that that portion of the funds earmarked for use Fn the construotion' of a road from Clayton to Longbranch aannot ,legally be used in the construction of a road beginning at Clayton and terminating at any plaae other than Longbraneh. We belleve this to be true without regard to the populationof the dlstrlct through which saidroad is to run.

TrustFng that the fore~golng fully answersyour 

### inquiry, we are Very trulyyours

CEC-a:mjs

,. ATTORREYf3BIWRALOFTEXAS

By /s/ ClarenceE.'Crowe

ClarenaeE. Crowe

Assistant

A~PPROVRD

OPIRIOIV

COMMITTBg By /s/BWB CBAIRI'lAR