alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40172 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MICHAEL V. NEFF, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-94-CR-13-1
- - - - - - - - - - December 19, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Michael V. Neff challenges the district court's restitution order in the amount of $140,000. Inasmuch as Neff does not challenge the terms of his plea agreement regarding the waiver of appeal, and because Neff's sentence was neither above the statutory maximum nor the result of an upward departure by the court, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Transfer
Agreement


 


Transferor:
Ningsheng Financial Information Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.


 


Transferee:
Liu Bodang 


 


1.
The Transferor agrees to transfer the shares which corresponds to RMB 49.50 million from Benefactum Alliance Business
Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. to the Transferee;


 


2.
The Transferee agrees to accept the shares which corresponds to RMB 49.50 million from Benefactum Alliance Business
Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd:


 


3.
This share equity is formally transferred on Jan. 09, 2016, and as of the date of transfer the Transferor shall neither be entitled
to any rights nor undertake any obligations as a contributor and according to the contribution amount the Transferee shall either
be entitled to rights or undertake obligations as a contributor.


 


This
Agreement shall take effect as soon as it is signed by both parties.


 


Transferor:
Ningsheng Financial Information Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.


 


Transferee:
Liu Bodang (Signature)


 


 


 


Seal:
Ningsheng Financial Information Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.


Jan.
9, 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **LAS VEGAS    SANDS CORP.** **CERTIFICATION    UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed by Las Vegas    Sands Corp. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the    date hereof (the “Report”), I certify pursuant to    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of Las Vegas Sands Corp.      By: /s/  Robert    P. Rozek    Robert P. Rozek    Chief Financial Officer     Date: May 9, 2008
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeside Financial
      Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:May
              15, 2007
            
            /S/William
                F. Webster,
              President
                of Manager
              Lakeside
                Financial Group, Inc.
# United States Court **of Appeals** 
**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________**

No. 22

- 60658 Summary Calendar

**____________ Marcus Quin Butler,** 

Petitioner

— Appellant **,**

versus

**Commissioner of Internal Revenue,**

Respondent

— Appellee

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court Tax Court No. 16660

- 22

**______________________________**
Before **Duncan, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****

Marcus Quin Butler, Texas prisoner # 2353422, moves for le a ve to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP ) on appeal from the Tax Court’s dismissal of his petition for lack of jurisdiction and its denial of his motion to vacate. To proceed IFP on appeal, Butler must demonstrate that he is a pauper and that

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 28, 2023
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-60658 Document: 00516731229 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2023No. 22

- 60658

2 he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982).
Butler’s brief identifies no error in the Tax Court’s rulings and contains no substantive arguments as to why his appeal is not frivolous. He has therefore abandoned any such arguments. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v . Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because he has failed to identify any issue of arguable merit, Butler’s motion to proceed IFP is **DENIED** , and his appeal
is **DISMISSED** as frivolous. See Carson , 689 F.2d at 586; see al so **5th Cir.**

**R.** 42.2. Case: 22-60658 Document: 00516731229 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2023
# C_2016232EN.01003002.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/30

---

Action brought on 3 May 2016 – Apax Partners UK v EUIPO – Apax Partners Midmarket (APAX PARTNERS)

(Case T-209/16)

(2016/C 232/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Apax Partners UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Rose and J. Warner, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apax Partners Midmarket (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘APAX PARTNERS’ – EU trade mark No 1 805 282

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2016 in Case R 1611/2014-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety and order the registration to be reinstated in its entirety by the EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety and order the registration to be reinstated in its entirety by the EUIPO;

| — | order the EUIPO and any party involved in these proceedings before the Board to pay the costs of these proceedings and those of the Appeal before the Board and the Cancellation n. 779 C before the Cancellation Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EUIPO and any party involved in these proceedings before the Board to pay the costs of these proceedings and those of the Appeal before the Board and the Cancellation n. 779 C before the Cancellation Division.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(a), 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(a), 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2021079EN.01002401.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 30 December 2020 — Comune di Lerici v Provincia di La Spezia

(Case C-719/20)

(2021/C 79/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Comune di Lerici

Respondents: Provincia di La Spezia

Questions referred

Does Article 12 of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) of 26 February 2014 preclude national legislation which imposes a concentration of companies providing local public services of economic interest, as a result of which the economic operator succeeding the initial concession holder following transparent corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, continues to operate the services until the agreed date, if:

| (a) | the initial concession holder is a company awarded the contract in-house on the basis of similar control where several other public authorities are shareholders in that company; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the initial concession holder is a company awarded the contract in-house on the basis of similar control where several other public authorities are shareholders in that company;

| (b) | the new economic operator has been selected by means of a public call for tenders; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the new economic operator has been selected by means of a public call for tenders;

| (c) | as a result of the concentration, the requirements for similar control where several other public authorities are shareholders in that company no longer apply in relation to some of the local authorities which originally awarded the service in question. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

as a result of the concentration, the requirements for similar control where several other public authorities are shareholders in that company no longer apply in relation to some of the local authorities which originally awarded the service in question.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 88

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt from 
 regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt from 
 regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Innovation Acceleration Act 
of 2025''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES FROM REGULATION AS 
              DEVICES.

    Section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 321(h)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``section 520(o)'' and inserting the 
        following: ``section 520(o) or any non-invasive diagnostic 
        device''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``For purposes of 
        the preceding sentence, the term `non-invasive' means, with 
        respect to a diagnostic device, that the device does not 
        penetrate the skin or any other membrane of the body, is not 
        inserted or implanted into the body, causes no more than 
        ephemeral compression or temperature changes to in situ bodily 
        tissues, and does not subject bodily tissues to ionizing 
        radiation.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 104 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or establishment of national monuments in Arizona except by express authorization 

of Congress, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or establishment of national monuments in Arizona 

except by express authorization of Congress, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Arizona 

5 from Federal Land Grabs Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 104 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT 

2 OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN ARIZONA. 

3 Subsection (d) of section 320301 of title 54, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘OR ARIZONA’’ after ‘‘WYO6 MING’’; and 

7 (2) by inserting ‘‘or Arizona’’ after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EX PARTE Terry WYNN

CR-16-0715

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 11 PageID 60
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 11 PageID 61
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 3 of 11 PageID 62
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 4 of 11 PageID 63
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 5 of 11 PageID 64
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 6 of 11 PageID 65
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 7 of 11 PageID 66
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 8 of 11 PageID 67
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 9 of 11 PageID 68
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 10 of 11 PageID 69
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00298-C Document 13 Filed 07/25/05 Page 11 of 11 PageID 70
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 85 Filed 01/07/04 Page 1 of 3 PageID 262
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 85 Filed 01/07/04 Page 2 of 3 PageID 263
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 85 Filed 01/07/04 Page 3 of 3 PageID 264
# C_2018190EN.01000201.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/2

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Cádiz — Spain) — Moisés Vadillo González v Alestis Aerospace SL

(Case C-252/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficient information regarding the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying why an answer to the questions referred is necessary - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 190/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Cádiz

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Moisés Vadillo González

Applicant:

Defendant: Alestis Aerospace SL

Defendant:

Intervener: Ministerio Fiscal

Intervener:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Cádiz (Social Court No 2, Cádiz, Spain), by decision of 8 May 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

1

---
31079336.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

MATT BRODY, on behalf of himself § 

and all others similarly situated, § 

 § 

 Plaintiffs, § Civil Action No. 3-04-CV-1931-K 

 § ECF 

v. § 

 § 

ZIX CORPORATION, RONALD A., § 

WOESSNER, JOHN A. RYAN, § 

DANIEL S. NUTKIS, STEVE M. YORK, § 

and DENNIS F. HEATHCOTE, § 

 § 

 Defendants. § 

APPENDIX TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

Respectfully submitted, 

FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 

By: s/ Gerard G. Pecht 

 Gerard G. Pecht 

 State Bar No. 15701800 

 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 855-8000 

Telecopier: (214) 855-8200 

Anne M. Rodgers 

State Bar No. 17133025 

1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 

Houston, Texas 77010-3095 

Telephone: (713) 651-5151 

Telecopier: (713) 651-5246 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01931-K Document 54 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 4 PageID 861
31079336.1 2 

Of Counsel:

Karl G. Dial 

State Bar No. 05800400 

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 

Dallas, Texas 75201-2784 

Telephone: (214) 855-8050 

Peter Stokes 

State Bar No. 24028017 

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. 

600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2400 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Telephone: (512) 474-5201 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01931-K Document 54 Filed 02/17/06 Page 2 of 4 PageID 862
31079336.1 - 3 - 

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit Description Page Nos.

A October 30, 2003 Zix Press Release 1-8 

B October 30, 2003 Conference Call Transcript 9-22 

C October 31, 2003 Zix Form 10-Q 23-61 

D November 17, 2003 Zix Press Release 62-65 

E January 12, 2004 Zix Press Release 66-68 

F February 3, 2004 Zix Press Release 69-76 

G February 3, 2004 Conference Call Transcript 77-94 

H April 4, 2004 Zix Press Release 95-97 

I May 4, 2004 Zix Press Release 98-105 

J May 4, 2004 Conference Call Transcript 106-125 

K May 5, 2004 Zix Press Release 126-127 

L Yahoo! Stock Chart 128-133 

M Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary definition of 

“deploy” 

134-135 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01931-K Document 54 Filed 02/17/06 Page 3 of 4 PageID 863
31079336.1 - 4 - 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This document was served in compliance with Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

on the following counsel on February 17, 2006 via electronic service. 

Roger F. Claxton 

State Bar No. 04329000 

Robert J. Hill 

State Bar No. 09652100 

3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700 

Dallas, Texas 75204 

Telephone: (214) 969-9029 

Facsimile: (214) 953-0583 

Eric Lechtzin 

Heather Tashman 

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

Marvin L. Frank. 

MURRAY, FRANK & SAILER LLP 

275 Madison Avenue, Suite 801 

New York, NY 10016 

Telephone: (212) 682-1818 

Facsimile: (212) 682-1892

 s/ Anne M. Rodgers 

Counsel for Defendants 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01931-K Document 54 Filed 02/17/06 Page 4 of 4 PageID 864
STATE of Louisiana v. Kelvin Demarcus BROWN, II

NO. 2018-KO-1797

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

*598Denied.
AMENDMENT NO. 1
                           TO THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT
                         BETWEEN MANGOSOFT, INC. AND
                INTERWEST TRANSFER CO., INC., AS RIGHTS AGENT


      Reference is made to the Rights Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2003,
between MangoSoft, Inc. and Interwest Transfer Co., Inc., as Rights Agent
(the "Rights Agreement").  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Rights Agreement.

1.    Section 7(b) of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended and restated in
      its entirety to read as follows:

            "(b)     The purchase price (the "PURCHASE PRICE") per whole
Common Share at which a holder of Rights may purchase Common Shares or
(subject to SECTION 14 hereof) fractions thereof upon exercise of such Rights
shall initially be $250.00, shall be subject to adjustment from time to time
as provided in SECTIONS 11 AND 13(a) hereof, and shall be payable in
accordance with paragraph (c) below."

2.    Except as amended hereby, the Rights Agreement shall continue in full
      force and effect.



                  [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]


<PAGE>


            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
No. 1 to the Rights Agreement to be duly executed as of July 14, 2003.

                                    MANGOSOFT, INC.



                                    By:--------------------------------------
                                       Dale Vincent
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer



                                    INTERWEST TRANSFER CO., INC.



                                    By:--------------------------------------
                                       Print name:
                                       Title:



                                       2
IA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 23 

Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security 

relating to ‘‘Increase of the Automatic Extension Period of Employment 

Authorization and Documentation for Certain Employment Authorization 

Document Renewal Applicants’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2025 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. SELF, and Mr. MOORE of West Virginia) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of 

Homeland Security relating to ‘‘Increase of the Automatic Extension Period of Employment Authorization 

and Documentation for Certain Employment Authorization Document Renewal Applicants’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Homeland Security relating to ‘‘Increase of 

5 the Automatic Extension Period of Employment Author6 ization and Documentation for Certain Employment AuVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:44 Jan 17, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ23.IH HJ23

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 23 IH 

1 thorization Document Renewal Applicants’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 

2 101208), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  February 14, 2011 |   | /s/ Martin B. Oring                            |   |
|                          |   | Martin B. Oring                                     |   |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                                |   |

----

----