alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 NO. 01

- 15

- 00017

- CV

In the Court of Appeals

First District of Texas at Houston

___________________________________

In re M.D. Mark, Inc.

__________________________________________________________________

____________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

190 th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 34393

__________________________________________________________________

REL ATOR’S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

__________________________________________________________________

T O THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS :

M.D. MARK, INC., Relator ask s the Court to dismiss this Relator’s Petition

for Writ of Mandamus.

1. On January 8, 2015, Relator filed its Petition for Writ of Mandamus

challenging the trial court’s order denying the motion to appear pro hac vice of

Dan Bonifazi.

2. On January 13, 2015, the trial court held a status conference and with

no objection from the real parties in interest signed an order granting the motion to

appear pro hac vice. ACCEPTED

01-15-00017-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

1/14/2015 12:52:49 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 3. Relator does not want to proceed with the Petition for Writ of

Mandamus and requests that the petition be dismissed with all costs assessed

against the party incurring the same.

Respectfully submitted,

DUNN, NEAL & GERGER, L.L.P.

By: __/s/ Ja mes A. Dunn

____________ James A. Dunn

Texas Bar No. 06244800

3006 Brazos Street

Houston, Texas 77006

Tel.: (713) 403

- 7405

Fax.: (713) 960

- 0204

Email: jdunn@dnglegal .com

Attorney for Relator

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that on January 13, 2015, the issue of the dismissal of the petition

for writ of mandamus was discussed with counsel for the real parties in interest,

Thomas Lillard, who indicated he was not opposed.

_ __/s/ James A. Dunn

_______________ James A . Dunn

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 14 , 2015, I served a copy of th is instrument to

Thomas F. Lillard, counsel for Defendants, via the electronic service manager in

accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

_ __/s/ James A. Dunn

____________ James A. Dunn
# C_2019065EN.01001501.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2018 — Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union

(Case C-530/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds and economic resources - List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the appellant’s name - Decision by an authority of a third State - Council’s obligation to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection))

(2019/C 65/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Mykola Yanovych Azarov (represented by: A. Egger and G. Lansky, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and F. Naert, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 July 2017, Azarov v Council (T-215/15, EU:T:2017:479); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 July 2017, Azarov v Council (T-215/15, EU:T:2017:479);

| 2. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/364 of 5 March 2015 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357 of 5 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as they concern Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/364 of 5 March 2015 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357 of 5 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as they concern Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs incurred both in the proceedings at first instance and in the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs incurred both in the proceedings at first instance and in the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
The LATHAN COMPANY, INC. v. The State of Louisiana, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, Office of Facility Planning and Control

NO. 2019-CC-0331

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

GUIDRY, J., would grant and docket.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and docket.
Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of MAX RESOURCE CORP. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Rogers, Principal Executive Officer and I, Christopher Cherry, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/Stuart RogersStuart Rogers, Principal Executive Officer September 14, 2011  /s/Christopher CherryChristopher Cherry, Principal Financial Officer September 14, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4209

JAMES CORNELL SWIFT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.

Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-99-13)

Submitted: August 10, 2000

Decided: September 20, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN,* NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL,

Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Robert B. Wilson, V, MCDERMOTT, ROE & JONES, Hampton,

Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, William D. Muhr, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

*Judge Murnaghan was assigned to the panel but did not participate

in the consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the

panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1994).
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

James Cornell Swift was convicted by a jury of being a felon in

possession of a firearm and ammunition and of possession of crack

cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal he alleges that the district

court erred by denying his: (1) motion to suppress evidence obtained

after the police executed a search warrant, without first knocking and

announcing themselves; (2) motion to suppress his alleged confession; and (3) motion for acquittal notwithstanding the verdict. For the

reasons that follow, we affirm.

First, police encountered the required exigent circumstances necessary to properly execute the search warrant without knocking and

announcing their presence; thus, the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. See Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385,

391 (1997); United States v. Kennedy, 32 F.3d 876, 882 (4th Cir.

1994). Second, the district court did not err by making the factual

finding that Swift voluntarily confessed to ownership of the gun and

admitted to distributing cocaine following the administration of the

warnings enumerated under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

See United States v. Allen, 159 F.3d 832, 838 (4th Cir. 1998) (stating

standard of review). Finally, both convictions were supported by sufficient evidence such that the district court properly denied his motion

for acquittal notwithstanding the verdict. See Glasser v. United States,

315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942); United States v. MacCloskey, 682 F.2d 468,

473 (4th Cir. 1982).

Accordingly, we affirm Swift's convictions. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
K.W.B., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-840

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofChristopher Clemente, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company andBruce Labovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to our bestknowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 16, 2005 | /s/ Christopher Clemente             |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Christopher Clemente                 |
|                    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |                                 |
| Date: May 16, 2005 | /s/ Bruce J. Labovitz                |   |
|                    | Bruce J. Labovitz                    |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer              |
|                    |                                 |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Kyle Chang CADEGIANI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5006

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 4.Y

PROMISSORY NOTE
  of
  Battle Mountain Gold Inc. ("BMG") FOR VALUE RECEIVED, BMG promises to pay to Chet Idziszek of 8000 Old Mine Road, Powell River BC  V8A 0E9 ("Lender") the amount of $50,000.00 (fifty thousand dollars) plus interest at the rate of 6% (six per cent) per annum calculated from September 22, 2014 until the date or dates of repayment on a non-compounding basis not in advance, on the demand of the Lender provided cash funds of $100,000.00 or more have been received by BMG from the proceeds of one or more equity issuances by BMG prior to the time of the demand by the Lender. Executed this 22nd day of September, 2014 on behalf of BMG by: /s/ "Ian Brown"Ian BrownChief Financial Officer (having the authority to bind BMG) E-676
Michael Shannon BOLDING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 19 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 19

  Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House 
  should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills within the 
       jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on 
    Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

    Mr. Ogles (for himself, Mr. Clyde, and Mrs. Luna) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House 
  should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills within the 
       jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on 
    Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the House should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills 
within the jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on 
Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
Anton JOSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2647

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 2772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00420]

[[Page 2772]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20703 and #20704; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
SC-20012]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of South Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 10.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4829-DR), dated 
September 29, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.

DATES: Issued on January 6, 2025.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024 through October 7, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: January 28, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of South Carolina, dated September 29, 2024, 
is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 28, 2025.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2025-00420 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

PRB GAS TRANSPORTATION, INC.  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005,
I, Robert W. Wright, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: November 14, 2005                                                                                |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ROBERT W. WRIGHTRobert W. Wright
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 

---



QuickLinks
# C_2018399EN.01003001.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/30

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 2 August 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Iberia Express SA

(Case C-186/17) (1)

(2018/C 399/37)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

---
<PAGE>
 

The Board of Directors
The WMF Group. Ltd. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.333-41613 and No.333-61653) on Form S-8 of The WMF Group, Ltd. of our report
dated March 5, 1999, except for note 20 which is as of March 19, 1999, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of The WMF Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 Form 10-K of The WMF Group,
Ltd.


KPMG LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 31, 1999
STATE of Louisiana v. Dwight BACON

NO. 2019-KH-0319

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing *1119that level of review, La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Nancy WILLIAMS, Wife of/and Franco Valobra v. Robert Allan NELSON and Jerome Garfield Smith, III as Co-Trustees of the Allan R. & Louise S. Nelson Revocable Trust & the Allan R. Nelson Marital Trust (Trusts)

NO. 2019-CC-0092

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.
Case 3:04-cr-00328-D Document 10 Filed 03/04/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
<PAGE>

                                                           Exhibit 21.1




                 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT, ANVIL HOLDINGS, INC.
                 ----------------------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     NAME OF CORPORATION                     JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
     -------------------                     -----------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
     Anvil Knitwear, Inc.                         Delaware


            Anvil (Czech), Inc.                   Delaware


                    Anvil s.r.o.                  Czech Republic


            Cottontops, Inc.                      North Carolina


            A.K.H., S.A.                          Honduras


            Livna, Limitada                       El Salvador
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer of**

**Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, J. Patrick O’Shaughnessy, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/   J. PATRICK O’SHAUGHNESSY                                |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                               |
|     | J.   Patrick O’Shaughnessy                                    |
| * * | *President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial   Officer* |
| * * | *(principal financial officer)*                                    |

 

May 5, 2011

 

----
SCWC-22-0000636

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

IN THE INTEREST OF THE P CHILDREN

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-22-0000636; FC-S NO. 19-1-0083 and FC-S NO. 19-1-0084)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Eddins, J.)

Upon consideration of the Motion to Correct December 7, 

2023 Order, filed on December 7, 2023,

It is ordered that the document filed at Docket 16, is 

corrected as follows:

On page 1, second paragraph, line 1, the name “Michael” is 

deleted and replaced with “Matthew.”

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 7, 2023.

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Associate Justice

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-22-0000636

07-DEC-2023

01:35 PM

Dkt. 21 OCOR
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                   1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

WHEREAS the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Santa Fe
International Corporation ("Board") having been expressly authorized by the
Board, has effective November 22, 1999, authorized and approved an amendment of
the definition of "Change of Control" contained within the Santa Fe
International Corporation 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan ("Plan") to address of a
"merger of equals" transaction; and

WHEREAS, Section 6.8 of the Plan authorizes the Board in this instance to amend
the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Santa Fe International Corporation 1997 Long-Term Incentive
Plan, which was adopted effective June 13, 1997, is hereby amended effective
November 22, 1999 as follows:

1.   A new Subparagraph (vi) of Section 5.7 "Change of Control" thereof is ADDED
     to the Plan to read as follows:

         (vi) there is consummated a `merger of equals' (which for purposes of
         this Subsection shall mean a merger with another company of relatively
         equal size) to which the Company is a party as a result of which the
         persons who were equityholders of the Company immediately prior to the
         effective date of such merger shall have beneficial ownership of less
         than 55% of the combined voting power for election of members of the
         Board (or equivalent) of the surviving entity or its parent following
         the effective date of such merger, provided that the Board shall have
         authority to increase said percentage as may in its sole discretion be
         deemed appropriate to cover a specific transaction.


Dated:  December 1, 1999



By: /s/ Cary A. Moomjian
    --------------------------------------------
    Santa Fe International Corporation