alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr., certify that:

1. 

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of EP Global Communications Inc.;

  

 

2. 

Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3. 

Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4. 

Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and have:

 

a) 

designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) 

evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) 

disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. 

Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors andthe audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) 

allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b) 

anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: September 22, 2005 

 

  

 

  

/s/ Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.

  

———————————————

  

Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.

  

Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 4 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 4

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2025.
    Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the President of the United 
States that the House of Representatives has elected Mike Johnson, a 
Representative from the State of Louisiana as Speaker, and Kevin McCumber, a 
citizen of the State of Illinois as Clerk, of the House of Representatives of 
the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong



Eppie Wong,

 CFO and a director

November 14, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John Zdanowski, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HouseValues, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 8, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 2060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 28)]

Railroad Cost of Capital--2024

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 2024. The decision solicits 
comments on the following issues: the railroads' 2024 current cost of 
debt capital, the railroads' 2024 current cost of preferred equity 
capital (if any), the railroads' 2024 cost of common equity capital, 
and the 2024 capital structure mix of the railroad industry on a market 
value basis.

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due by February 21, 2025. 
Statements of the railroads are due by March 14, 2025. Statements of 
other interested persons are due by April 4, 2025. Rebuttal statements 
by the railroads are due by April 25, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed with the Board via e-filing on the 
Board's website.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. If 
you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 
please call (202) 245-0245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The decision in this proceeding is posted at 
www.stb.gov.
    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).

    Decided: January 6, 2025.

    By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2025-00394 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50129 Summary Calendar

TERRENCE M. BROWN, and on behalf of All Federal Inmates Similarly Situated,
Petitioner - Appellant

v. CHERON NASH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Bastrop; JEFF ERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondents - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15 -CV- 689

Before BARKSDALE, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Proceeding pro se on appeal, Terrence M. Brown, federal prisoner
# 08524

- 031, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition on behalf of himself and
simila rly

- situated federal prisoners challenging the method adopted by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) f or calculating good

- time credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). Brown does not claim he is eligible for immediate release.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED March 3, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50129 Document: 00513896290 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2017No. 16

- 50129

2 W here the prisoner does not make that claim , we lack subject-matter jur isdiction over the appeal of § 2241 petition s challengin g the BOP’s calculation of good

- time credit under § 3624(b). Sample v. Morrison , 406 F.3d 310, 3 11

– 12 (5th Cir. 2005). In Sample , our court ruled the petition was no t ripe because the prisoner had not established he would sustain immediate injury that could be redressed by the relief requested. Id

. at 312. Brown requests the same relief as the petitioner in Sample

. Whether Brown’s projected release date is computed by the BOP’s interpretation or his own, he is not yet entitled to release. Thus, like the petitioner in Sample , Brown’s petition is not ripe for review and the instant appeal is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Se e id. DISMISSED. Case: 16-50129 Document: 00513896290 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2017
David ROLON, DOC #T64080, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.
James A. SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-2260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019.

Denied.
# C_2017151EN.01002102.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 8 March 2017 — Teva UK Ltd, Accord Healthcare Ltd, Lupin Ltd, Lupin (Europe) Ltd, Generics (UK) trading as ‘Mylan’ v Gilead Sciences Inc.

(Case C-121/17)

(2017/C 151/28)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Teva UK Ltd, Accord Healthcare Ltd, Lupin Ltd, Lupin (Europe) Ltd, Generics (UK) trading as ‘Mylan’

Applicants:

Defendant: Gilead Sciences Inc.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

What are the criteria for deciding whether ‘the product is protected by a basic patent in force’ in Article 3(a) of Regulation No. 469/2009 (1)?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 2009, L 152, p. 1).

1

---
Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 10 PageID 511
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 10 PageID 512
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 10 PageID 513
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 4 of 10 PageID 514
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 5 of 10 PageID 515
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 6 of 10 PageID 516
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 7 of 10 PageID 517
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 8 of 10 PageID 518
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 9 of 10 PageID 519
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01260-AH Document 52 Filed 04/20/05 Page 10 of 10 PageID 520
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT US" DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEKASORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION FILED
| SEP 2 6 2007
JIM DWIGHT SHIELDS, § i
§ ;  CLERK,US. DISTRICT COURT
Petitioner, § : by D
§ eputy
v. § 2:04-CV-0153
§
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, §
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §
Correctional Institutions Division, §
§
Respondent. §

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS,
ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.
and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner has filed with this Court an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in
state custody. On September 13, 2007, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation in this cause, recommending therein that habeas relief be denied. On September
23, 2007, petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the
record in this case. The objections filed by petitioner are without merit and are hereby
OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.

Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Z Yr 4
ENTERED this day of 2007.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6346

ROBERT STERLING DORSEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS; JACQUELINE R. BROWN, case management coordinator; HECTOR JOYNER, Warden; D.L. SMITH, Correctional Officer , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 5:19

- cv
- 00050

- RMG )

Submitted : August 20, 2020 Decided: August 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Sterling Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Sterling Dorsey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671

- 2680, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Age nts of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befor e this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRME D
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Judy E. Naus, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Biotel Inc.;

2    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely, to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (d)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date:  May 14, 2007                          By: /s/ Judy E. Naus
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
Marsha A. WILLIS v. EAN HOLDINGS d/b/a Enterprise Rent A Car, Elco Insurance Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and Troy David Thibodeaux

No. 2019-C-0139

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

I agree with the denial of plaintiff's writ application. I write separately to reiterate my view that plaintiff's arguments, which have previously been denied but are nonetheless repeated here, "lack any iota of legal merit" and are a troubling cause of unnecessary litigation. *See**Willis v. EAN Holdings* , 17-0789 (La. 9/22/17), 226 So.3d 438 (J. Crichton additionally concurring). Plaintiff's application is once again an egregious waste of judicial resources, and I find that her frivolous appeal warranted the damages imposed upon plaintiff therefor.
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathan
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Company.


Dated:     9/20/05                      By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     --------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 41 Filed 10/16/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 244
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 41 Filed 10/16/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 245
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 41 Filed 10/16/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 246
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 41 Filed 10/16/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 247