alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 1 of 15 PageID 1169
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 2 of 15 PageID 1170
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 3 of 15 PageID 1171
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 4 of 15 PageID 1172
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 5 of 15 PageID 1173
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 6 of 15 PageID 1174
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 7 of 15 PageID 1175
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 8 of 15 PageID 1176
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 9 of 15 PageID 1177
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 10 of 15 PageID 1178
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 11 of 15 PageID 1179
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 12 of 15 PageID 1180
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 13 of 15 PageID 1181
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 14 of 15 PageID 1182
 

 Case 3:04-cr-00289-O Document 130 Filed 03/04/05 Page 15 of 15 PageID 1183
Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID 431
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID 432
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID 433
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID 434
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID 435
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID 436
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02332-M Document 29 Filed 12/06/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID 437
Rosalie L. JENKINS, Appellant, v. PENNYMAC CORP. and Michael L. Bell, Appellees.

No. 4D18-2067

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 3, 2019

Rosalie L. Jenkins, West Park, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Eric M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee PennyMac Corp.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . *See* *Hunnewell v. Palm Beach Cty.* , 817 So.2d 847 (Fla. 2002) ; *Heilman v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue* , 727 So.2d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ; *but see* *Musa v. Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Co.* , 181 So.3d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Warner, Gross and Forst, JJ., concur.
Vitaly TSABAK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1868

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED.
# C_2019155EN.01000301.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2019 — Republic of Poland v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-128/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive (EU) 2016/2284 - Reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants - Adoption of EU legal acts - Functioning of the legislative procedure - Article 4(3) TEU - Principle of cooperation in good faith - Actual exercise of the EU legislature’s powers of discretion - Impact assessment - Sufficient assessment of the effects of the contested act - Article 5(4) TEU - Principle of proportionality - Article 4(2) TEU - Equality of Member States before the Treaties - Article 191(2) TFEU - EU policy on the environment - Account taken of the diversity of the EU regions - Judicial review)

(2019/C 155/03)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, Agent)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: A. Tamás and A. Pospíšilová Padowska, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm, A.-Z. Varfi, K. Adamczyk Delamarre and A. Sikora-Kalėda, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér, G. Koós and E. Tóth, Agents), Romania (represented by: C. Canțăr, R.H. Radu, A. Wellman and M. Chicu, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: European Commission (represented by: K. Petersen, K. Herrmann and G. Gattinara, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders Hungary, Romania and the European Commission to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Hungary, Romania and the European Commission to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

---
Larry SLADE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1447

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 1 Filed 02/27/03 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 1 Filed 02/27/03 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 1 Filed 02/27/03 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 1 Filed 02/27/03 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 1 Filed 02/27/03 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 1 Filed 02/27/03 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 908 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. BRAUN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is difficult to detect in the early stages of the disease due to 

the late onset of symptoms, which lowers survival rates; 

Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in 

the lining of the stomach; 

Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most commonly diagnosed type of cancer worldwide; 

Whereas, in 2024, an estimated— 

(1) 26,890 cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed 

in the United States; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 908 ATS 

(2) 10,880 individuals in the United States will die 

from stomach cancer; 

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 36.4 percent, and the 5-year survival rate is 

just 7 percent when diagnosed at a late, or distant, stage; 

Whereas early-onset gastric cancer, gastric cancer presenting 

at the age of 45 or younger, appears to be rising for reasons that are unclear; 

Whereas helicobacter pylori has been identified as a risk factor for stomach cancer that often goes undetected and 

untreated; 

Whereas, in the United States, there are disparities in stomach cancer incidence and mortality among racial and ethnic minorities; 

Whereas a diagnosis of stomach cancer is often delayed, because stomach cancer usually does not have symptoms 

early on, making it hard to detect; 

Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer, including risk factors and symptoms, among 

patients and health care providers could improve timely 

diagnosis of stomach cancer; 

Whereas more research into prevention, early detection, and 

treatment for stomach cancer is needed; and 

Whereas November 2024 is an appropriate month to observe 

Stomach Cancer Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer 

3 Awareness Month; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

SRES 908 ATS 

1 (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, 

2 and education about, stomach cancer among health 

3 care providers and the general public of the United 

4 States; 

5 (3) recognizes the need for additional research 

6 to understand stomach cancer risk factors, as well 

7 as prevention, early detection, and treatment for 

8 stomach cancer; and 

9 (4) encourages States, territories, and localities 

10 of the United States to support the goals of Stom11 ach Cancer Awareness Month. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Christopher Rudolph BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3714

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Carmen J. Lotito, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of PetroHunter EnergyCorporation, formerly known as Digital Ecosystems Corp.,(the “Registrant” or the “Company”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 21, 2006                     /s/ Carmen J. Lotito   Carmen J. Lotito   Chief Financial Officer
Demario GILMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |                   |  |     |                                                | 
|----- | ----------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: | February 26, 2009 |  | By: | /s/ DAVID J. CURD                              | 
|      |                   |  |     | David J. Curd,
Interim Chief Financial Officer |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 24, 2015

Order 

Clerk

February 24, 2015

149599(86)

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 149599

v COA: 307756

Oakland CC: 2010-112606-CK

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE

COMPANY, PATRIOT TITLE AGENCY, KIRK

D. SCHIEB, WESTMINSTER ABSTRACT

COMPANY, WESTMINSTER TITLE AGENCY,

INC., PRIME FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,

VALENTINO M. TRABUCCHI, PAMELA S.

NOTTURNO, f/k/a PAMELA S. SIIRA, 

DOUGLAS K. SMITH, JOSHUA J. GRIGGS,

STATE VALUE APPRAISALS, LLC, NATHAN

B. HOGAN, and CHRISTINE D. MAYS,

Defendants-Appellees, 

and

FRED MATSON, MICHAEL LYNETT, JO KAY

JAMES, and PAUL SMITH,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the defendants-appellees to extend the 

time for filing their brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before March 25, 2015.
Fabian JENNINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3873

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, a limited liability Company incorporated
in the Republic of India (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers best knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to
be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

Date: October 1, 2007



/s/     Narasimhan SrinathNarasimhan SrinathManaging Director & CEO/s/     Rajiv DharRajiv DharChief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31159]

[[Page 106620]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1170 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-956, K2025-956.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31159 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Juan SALINAS

NO. 2018-K-1301

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

CLARK, J., would grant.
#### Sam Lovitz, A. B. Gamse, W. F. Rouse and L. Frank, Appellants, v. Guaranty Title and Trust Company, a Corporation, a Trustee, and L. S. Johnson, M. W. Ulmer, John S. Taylor, Jr., L. T. Gregory, Jr., and Taver Bayly, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 5, 1928.

*Guss Wilder,*for Appellants;

*Kelly & Gasler,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

The appellees herein by counsel having in writing confessed error in the decree appealed from the decree is reversed without considering the extent of the error, and the cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings. See Gray v. First Nat. Bank of Pensacola, 31 Fla. 590, 12 South. Rep. 215.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 1176)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 5-6, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

**Address:**                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G74, Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hailey P. Weerts, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G74, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5931,                         *hailey.weerts@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 2, 2025.

Victoria E. Townsend,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00110 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2016111EN.01003902.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/39

---

Action brought on 15 February 2016 — fleur ami v EUIPO — 8 Seasons Design (Lamps)

(Case T-67/16)

(2016/C 111/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: fleur ami GmbH (Willich, Germany) (represented by: B. Potthoff, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: 8 Seasons Design GmbH (Eschweiler, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the design at issue:

Design at issue: Community design ‘Lamps’ — Application No 2 252 213-0002

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 December 2015 in Case R 2164/2014-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative arrange a hearing; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative arrange a hearing;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.

---