alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1995-1996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM01-5-000]

Electronic Tariff Filings; Notice of Inability To Add Service 
List Entries for eTariff Filings

    Take notice that filers making eTariff currently are not able to 
add additional names to the service list through FERC Online. The 
account manager in Company Registration is added

[[Page 1996]]

automatically. A solution for this problem is in progress. In the 
interim, if filers want to add additional names to the service list, 
they should file an Intervention through FERC Online.

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00352 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
# C_2018052EN.01002901.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/29

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — PGNiG Supply & Trading v Commission

(Case T-849/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Commission decision amending the conditions for exemption from the EU requirements of the rules governing operation of the OPAL pipeline in regard to third-party access and tariff regulation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 052/41)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Jeżewski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC, from the rules on third-party access and tariff regulation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene.

| 3. | PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

| 4. | The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

| 5. | PGNiG Supply & Trading, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, Naftogaz Ukrainy SA, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

5.

PGNiG Supply & Trading, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, Naftogaz Ukrainy SA, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

1

---
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 29 PageID 80
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 29 PageID 81
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 3 of 29 PageID 82
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 4 of 29 PageID 83
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 5 of 29 PageID 84
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 6 of 29 PageID 85
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 7 of 29 PageID 86
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 8 of 29 PageID 87
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 9 of 29 PageID 88
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 10 of 29 PageID 89
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 11 of 29 PageID 90
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 12 of 29 PageID 91
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 13 of 29 PageID 92
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 14 of 29 PageID 93
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 15 of 29 PageID 94
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 16 of 29 PageID 95
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 17 of 29 PageID 96
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 18 of 29 PageID 97
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 19 of 29 PageID 98
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 20 of 29 PageID 99
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 21 of 29 PageID 100
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 22 of 29 PageID 101
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 23 of 29 PageID 102
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 24 of 29 PageID 103
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 25 of 29 PageID 104
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 26 of 29 PageID 105
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 27 of 29 PageID 106
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 28 of 29 PageID 107
Case 3:04-cv-01174-D Document 20 Filed 10/04/05 Page 29 of 29 PageID 108
H. Res. 53 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 22, 2025. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 471) to expedite under the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities 

on National Forest System lands, on public lands under the 

jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, and on 

Tribal lands to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 

bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Natural Resources or their respective designees. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 
2 

•HRES 53 EH 

bill are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order 

except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (S. 5) to require the 

Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens 

who have been charged in the United States with theft, and 

for other purposes. All points of order against consideration 

of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
3 

•HRES 53 EH 

bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 

intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to commit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trycera Financial, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 23, 2010
/s/ Ray SmithChief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WC 4th AND RIO GRAND, LP,

 Appellant,

v.

LA ZONA RIO, LLC,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00073-CV

Appeal from the

345th District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# D-1-GN-20-007177)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until November 22, 2022. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. 

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Brent C. Perry, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 22, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
William POINTER v. Patrick CROWE

1151092

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 27 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 27

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
  Protection Agency relating to ``Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation 
            Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2025

  Mrs. Harshbarger (for herself and Mrs. Miller-Meeks) submitted the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
  Protection Agency relating to ``Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation 
            Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA)'' (89 Fed. Reg. 102568 (December 17, 2024)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
|                                          |                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|HAAS PETROLEUM ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC. | 2100 ROSS AVENUE
SUITE 1450
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
PHONE (214) 754-7090
FAX (214) 754-7092



March 29, 2007

The Board of Directors of Enterra Energy Corp.

as Administrator of Enterra Energy Trust ("Enterra")

RE: Consent of Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc.

Dear Sirs:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of our report "Appraisal of Oil and Gas Reserves Owned by Enterra Energy Trust in Various Counties, Oklahoma" as of December 31, 2006 dated March 2, 2007, included in the 2006 Annual Information Form of Enterra Energy Trust (the and to the references to our firm in the AIF.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of references to our firm and of information derived from our report entitled, "Appraisal of Oil and Gas Reserves Owned by Enterra Energy Trust in Various Counties, Oklahoma" as of December 31, 2006 dated March 2, 2007, appearing in the annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, into the registration statement on Form F-10 Registration Statement (No, 333-129601), the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120996) and the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-113609 and 333-115318).

Sincerely,

HAAS PETROLEUM ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

[haasconsentletter002.gif]

Rodger L. Walker, P.E.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TIMOTHY MARTIN CASAREZ,

Petitioner,

VS.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-1450-G

)

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 3:04-CR-018(02)-G

) ECF

)

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the court finds that

the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct,

and they are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.

June 7, 2006.

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00018-G Document 57 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 139
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth Ray DUNCAN

NO. 2019-KH-0240

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Supreme Court of Louisiana April 15, 2019

Denied. Premature.
# C_2017014EN.01005401.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/54

---

Action brought on 14 November 2016 — Jean Patou Worldwide v EUIPO — Emboga (HISPANITAS JOY IS A CHOICE)

(Case T-808/16)

(2017/C 014/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Jean Patou Worldwide Ltd (Watford, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Baran, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Emboga, SA (Petrel, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘HISPANITAS JOY IS A CHOICE’ — Application for registration No 12 789 971

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2016 in Case R 235/2016-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Black Raven Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), the undersigned,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company for the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date: January 20,  2010 | /s/ Thomas E.  Riley      |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                         | Thomas E. Riley                |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                         | (Principal Executive  Officer) |
|                         |                           |
|                         |                           |
|                         | /s/ Patrick A.  Quinn     |
|                         | Patrick A. Quinn               |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                         | (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

April 19, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00215

- CR

IN RE Edwin Abiel ESCOBAR AGUILAR

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On March 7 , 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay. Because relator has obtained the requested relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The stay imposed on March 8, 202 3 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on April 19, 2023

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of April, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This pr oceeding arises out of Cause No. 13321CR , styled State of Texas v. Edwin Abiel Escobar Aguilar , pending in the County Court
, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 101 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID 256
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 101 Filed 11/05/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID 257
# C_2019131EN.01001201.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato, Italy) — CCC — Consorzio Cooperative Costruzioni Soc. Cooperativa v Comune di Tarvisio

(Case C-710/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public works contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 48(3) - Assessment and verification of the technical capacities of economic operators - National provision which cannot be regarded as a transposition of Directive 2004/18 - No direct and unconditional reference to EU law - No request based on the existence of a certain cross-border interest - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

(2019/C 131/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato, Italy

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CCC — Consorzio Cooperative Costruzioni Soc. Cooperativa

Defendant: Comune di Tarvisio

Interveners: Incos Srl, RTI — Idrotermica F.lli Solera, Gabriele Indovina

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), by decision of 28 September 2017, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
Exhibit 10.01

                                                               August 16th, 2004


                        International Marketing Agreement

                           Official Termination Letter


     Between:     SOTA Instruments Inc. ("SOTA"), and
                  Essential Innovations Asia Limited ("EIAL"), and
                  Essential Innovations Technology Corp. ("EITC")


     To:          Russell Torlage
                  President, SOTA


     From:        Mr. Jason McDiarmid
                  President/CEO, EIAL and EITC


     Re:           Termination and Cancellation of the International Marketing
                   Agreement, (the "Agreement") originally dated April 9th, 2002


It is hereby agreed between SOTA Instruments Inc., Essential Innovations Asia
Limited and Essential Innovations Technology Corp. that as of the date of this
letter of August 16th, 2004, the International Marketing Agreement dated April
9th, 2002, shall officially be terminated.

In cancellation of the Agreement, all parties wish to sincerely express to each
other their gratitude in having worked together over the last couple of years,
and to be clear about the fact that the cancellation of this agreement is based
solely on the fact that each of the organizations is going in different
directions with their collective businesses.

By executing this document, SOTA, EIAL and EITC agree to waive any of the 30
and/or 60-day notice provisions required under Section 10 - Clause 10.01 - 10.03
of the Agreement and to thereby willingly terminate the Agreement immediately.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SOTA, EIAL and EITC have caused this Agreement to be
executed and delivered by the undersigned duly authorized officers as of the day
and year first above written.


Essential Innovations Asia Limited, and             SOTA Instruments Inc.
Essential Innovations Technology Corp.


By:  /s/ Jason McDiarmid                             /s/ Russell Torlage
   -------------------------------                   ---------------------------
   Jason McDiarmid, President/CEO                    Russell Torlage, President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeside
Financial Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   May 12, 2006                            /S/ William F. Webster
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 William F. Webster,
                                                 President of Manager
                                                 Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
ALPHA CAPITAL US BANK d/b/a Alpha Capital v. Zenobia A. WHITE

NO. 2019-C-0135

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.