alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006
(the ?Report?), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Frank Bauer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to the Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Frank Bauer
                                 ----------------------
                                 Frank Bauer
                                 Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2006




                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006
(the ?Report?), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Norman Becker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to the Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Norman Becker
                                 ----------------------
                                 Norman Becker
                                 Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006
Justin FORD, DOC #D51823, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cv-02159-K Document 12 Filed 03/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 33
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1240 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1040, K2025-1039.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00799 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Taisha NEALY and Cassie Stahl v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

1160624

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.6
 *
    
    Confidential Treatment has
been requested for the marked
portions of this exhibit
pursuant to Rule 24B-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
 SECOND AMENDMENT
 between
 TRUBION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 and
 LONZA SALES AG
(successor in interest to Lonza Biologics, Inc. by way of novation)
 to
 MANUFACTURING SERVICES AGREEMENT
dated November 21, 2005




---



##### 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO MANUFACTURING SERVICES AGREEMENT
  (1)
    
    Trubion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Trubion) and(2)
    
    Lonza Sales AG (Lonza Sales)
   Exhibit 1 Schedule
2-016
 Schedule 3-016
 2.1.
    
    A row containing the following text and format shall be inserted at the bottom of the
table that appears under the sentence In consideration for Lonza carrying out the Services
as detailed in Schedule 2-016, Trubion shall pay Lonza as follows::
 Stage 10
    
    
    [*]
    
    
    [*]
 2.2.
    
    Under the heading Notes:, the following text shall be inserted following the last
sentence of Note 5:6. Invoices for these Services shall be issued, and payments shall be made, in U.S.
dollars.
 2.3.
    
    Following the final line of text that appears under the heading Payment by Trubion of
the Price for each Stage shall be made against Lonzas invoices as follows: the following
text shall be inserted:For Stage 10
 [*] per each lot subsequent to the first TRU-016 Drug product lot, payable against
Lonzas invoice upon [*]
 Exhibit 1
  *Confidential Treatment Requested.




---



##### 



TRUBION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    
    
    
    LONZA SALES AGBy:
    
    /s/ KENDALL MOHLER
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ GERRY KENNEDYName:
    
    Kendall Mohler
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Gerry KennedyTitle:
    
    SVP, R&D
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Authorized SignatoryDate:
    
    April 2, 2009
    
    
    
    Date:LONZA SALES AG
/s/ K.B. FALLON
Authorized Signatory
Karen Fallon




---



##### 



Exhibit 1
              *Confidential Treatment Requested.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 17

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2025

   Mr. Obernolte (for himself and Mr. Weber of Texas) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed 
total receipts for that fiscal year, unless two-thirds of the whole 
number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific 
excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.
    ``Section 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall 
transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States 
Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed 
total receipts.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall enforce and implement this article 
by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays and 
receipts.
    ``Section 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the 
United States Government except those derived from borrowing. Total 
outlays shall include all outlays of the United States Government 
except for those for repayment of debt principal.
    ``Section 5. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 35 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural 

Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting 

and Exemptions’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 

Mr. PFLUGER (for himself, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. EVANS of 

Colorado, Mr. CAREY, Mr. RULLI, Mr. PALMER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. 

JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

LANGWORTHY, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, and Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Waste 

Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including 

Netting and Exemptions’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Waste EmisVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:03 Feb 05, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ35.IH HJ35

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 35 IH 

1 sions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: 

2 Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting 

3 and Exemptions’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 91094 (November 18, 

4 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Robert T. COLES, Appellant, v. Michelle Apple COLES, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY

(In re Demetrius Yvonne Parks et al. v. Alabama State Board of Pharmacy)

2160988

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 27, 2017

Mand. pet. granted.
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Dated: October 26, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Kendle International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Karl
Brenkert III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 21, 2007 |  | /s/ Karl Brenkert III  
|                      |  | Karl Brenkert III      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kendle International
Inc. and will be retained by Kendle International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. Patricia HAMPTON

NO. 2019-K-0287

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

*1030Denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 1121

JAMES LEWIS, AS PERSONAL

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

ROSEMARY LEWIS

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed May 2, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County

, Dennis Craig , Judge.

Troy A. Fuhrman and Marie A. Borland, of

Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, and

Stephanie E. Parker, of Jones Day,

Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B.

Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, and Joshua R.

Gale, of Wiggins, Childs, Pantazis, Fisher,

Goldfarb LLC, DeLand, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta , No. SC16

- 218, 2017 WL

1282111 (Fla. April 6, 2017); Phi lip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas , 110 So. 3d 419 (Fla.

2013).

SAWAYA

, PALMER and EVANDER , JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 288 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 288

   To reauthorize Long Island Sound programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

  Mr. LaLota (for himself and Mr. Courtney) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reauthorize Long Island Sound programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Island Sound Restoration and 
Stewardship Reauthorization Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF LONG ISLAND SOUND PROGRAMS.

    (a) Long Island Sound Grants.--Section 119(h) of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1269(h)) is amended by striking ``2019 
through 2023'' and inserting ``2025 through 2029''.
    (b) Long Island Sound Stewardship Grants.--Section 11(a) of the 
Long Island Sound Stewardship Act of 2006 (33 U.S.C. 1269 note; Public 
Law 109-359) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking ``2019 through 2023'' and inserting ``2025 through 2029''.
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 119(g) of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1269(g)) is amended by redesignating 
paragraph (4) as paragraph (3).
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00179

- CR

EX PARTE PEDRO PENA
On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 01

- CR

- 0765

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, conclud es that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 13, 2015
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24-0220 WILLIAM L. HESSE,

Petitioner, v. GRANT OF MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE JIM SALMONSEN, WARDEN, MONTANA STATE PRISON,

Respondent. 

### Motionto proceed without payment ofthe filing fee in thismatter is GRANTED. DATED: April 5, 2024.
BOWEN GREENWOOD Clerk ofthe Supreme Court 04/05/2024
Case Number: OP 24-0220
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, W. Matt Ralls, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company. /s/ W. Matt RallsW. Matt RallsChief Financial OfficerMarch 11, 2004
Eric Lee BROWN v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-1006

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 9 Filed 04/22/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 63
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 9 Filed 04/22/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 64
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 9 Filed 04/22/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 65
# C_2019263EN.01000901.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Mohammed Bilali v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl

(Case C-720/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Asylum policy - Subsidiary protection - Directive 2011/95/EU - Article 19 - Revocation of subsidiary protection status - Error on the part of the administrative authorities with respect to the facts)

(2019/C 263/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mohammed Bilali

Defendant: Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl

Operative part of the judgment

Article 19(1) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, read in conjunction with Article 16 thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State must revoke subsidiary protection status if it granted that status when the conditions for granting it were not met, in reliance on facts which have subsequently been revealed to be incorrect, and notwithstanding the fact that the person concerned cannot be accused of having misled the Member State on that occasion.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-85,030-01

EX P ARTE LOUIS ANG ELO DAVILA, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 08-01-0031-C RA-AIN THE 81S T DIST RICT COURT

F ROM ATASCOSA COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim

. Ap p . 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant orig inally pleade d guilty to ag g rava ted assault in exchang e for defe rre d adjudication community supervision. His guilt was later adjudicate d and he w as sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appea l afte r adjudication beca use adjudication counsel failed to timely file a noti ce of appea l. We rema nded this application to the trial court f

or finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law.2

The trial court finds that adjudicatio n co u n s el file a motion to withdraw from the repr esentation so that appellate counsel could be appointed, but tha t the motion wa s never broug ht to the attention of the trial court. The trial court finds that Applicant was denied his right to appea l due to a failure of the sy stem. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-oftime appea l of the judgme nt adjudicating guilt in Cause No. 08-01-0031- CRA from the 81st District Court of Atascosa County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, wit h the aid of counse l, obtain a meaningf ul appea l. Wit hin ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Appli cant is indige nt and wishes t o b e re prese nted by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appe al in the trial cour t within 30 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant' s rema ining cl ai m s are dismiss ed. See Ex parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Copies of this opinion shall be s e nt to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

14, 2016 Do not publish
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF K.L.

NO. 2019-CK-0549

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 2019

Denied.