alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Cyber Crime

The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating cyber attacks by criminals, overseas adversaries, and terrorists. The threat is incredibly serious—and growing.

- Business and Industry Partners
- FBI Guidance to Victims of Cyber Incidents on SEC Reporting Requirements: FBI Policy Notice Summary This page contains a summary of the FBI’s Policy Notice regarding cyber victim requests to delay SEC-mandated public disclosures.
- FBI Guidance to Victims of Cyber Incidents on SEC Reporting Requirements: Request a Delay The SEC’s new requirements for companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents go into effect on December 18, 2023. The FBI, in coordination with the Department of Justice, is providing guidance on how victims can request disclosure delays for reasons of national security or public safety.
- FBI Guidance to Victims of Cyber Incidents on SEC Reporting Requirements The Securities and Exchange Commission's new requirements for companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents go into effect on December 18, 2023. The FBI, in coordination with the Department of Justice, is providing guidance on how victims can request disclosure delays for reasons of national security or public safety.
- CyWatch Marks 10 Years In 2012, the FBI created a new cyber center called CyWatch to be the first point of contact in the event of a computer intrusion, ransomware attack, or financial crime.
- Get to Know FBI Cyber: Ryan Frampton Ryan Frampton is a computer scientist with the FBI’s Tampa office.
- Get to Know FBI Cyber: Bryan Vorndran Bryan A. Vorndran is the assistant director of the FBI Cyber Division.
- Get to Know FBI Cyber: Tonya Ugoretz Tonya Ugoretz is the assistant director of the FBI’s Directorate of Intelligence and the former deputy assistant director of the Cyber Division.
- Get to Know FBI Cyber: David Ring David Ring leads the FBI Cyber Division’s private sector engagement and cyber-criminal intelligence missions.
- Get to Know FBI Cyber: Elvis Chan Elvis Chan is an assistant special agent in charge assigned to FBI San Francisco.
- National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force As a unique multi-agency cyber center, the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force (NCIJTF) has the primary responsibility to coordinate, integrate, and share information to support cyber threat investigations, supply and support intelligence analysis for community decision-makers, and provide value to other ongoing efforts in the fight against the cyber threat to the nation.
- Major Cases Major cyber crime cases over the years.
- Most Wanted Cyber Crimes Most Wanted.
- Publications A listing of FBI publications pertaining to cyber crime and cybersecurity.
- News Cyber Crime news and press releases.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 2, 2021

b0526

Order 

Clerk

June 2, 2021

161899

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161899

COA: 353209

Genesee CC: 19-045059-FH

JOSEPH LEE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of February 12, 2021, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of 

the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00806]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 15, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
586 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1046, K2025-1045.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00806 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreement to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of the agreement are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting                           ( print page 1482)                        the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201347-001.                

*Agreement Name:*                     Sallaum/Hyundai Glovis Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hyundai Glovis Co. Ltd.; Sallaum Lines SA.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne Rohde, Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment expands the geographic scope of the Agreement, clarifies language in light of the expansion of the scope, and adds new Articles 5.1(b) and 5.1(c).                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     1/3/2025.                

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​33505.*

Dated: January 3, 2025.

Alanna Beck,

Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2025-00229 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
Laurie Elizabeth BRETON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Danny J. LAROCCO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11470

Summary Calendar

ELBERT M. MADERA, also known as Jack Madera; SUE MADERA

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, INC.

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 3:03-cv-1305)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*1

Reviewing the grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee de novo, we 

affirm for the following reasons:
1. “ERISA does not preempt state law claims when the claims ‘affect only [an 

employee’s] employer/employee relationship with [an employer] and not her 

administrator/beneficiary relationship with the company.” Rokohl v. Texaco, Inc., 

77 F.3d 126, 129 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing cases) (emphasis in original). The 

distinction appellants seek to draw between 1) the unpaid ERISA benefits and 2) 

medical expenses which arose after the discovery of the alleged negligent 

procurement does not help appellant. Some, if not all, of the damages arising 

under the former are necessarily encompassed by the latter. The district court 

properly concluded that the negligence claim was conflict preempted under ERISA

§ 514.

2. ERISA § 502 (a)(2) allows a beneficiary to sue for breach of fiduciary duty.

ERISA also requires fiduciaries to discharge their duties “solely in the interest of 

the participants and beneficiaries[,]” using “care, skill, prudence, and diligence.” 

29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1). The appellants’ negligent procurement of the failed 

insurer allegation is covered by this language. 

3. For the reasons stated by the district court, summary judgment was properly 

granted in favor of the appellee.

Affirmed.
Devon Oshea TAYLOR-CRAWFORD, DOC #F20088, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1809

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00011]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
NC-20007]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of North Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4827-DR), dated 
September 28, 2024.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Helene.

DATES: Issued on December 31, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024 through December 18, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: February 6, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated September 28, 2024, 
is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to February 6, 2025.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2025-00011 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |                                                |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August 23, 2010 | /s/ Martin B. Oring                            |   |
|                        | Martin B. Oring                                     |   |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----

----
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bin Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Date: April 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Bin WangBin WangPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2021502EN.01001101.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2021 — KF v European Union Satellite Centre

(Case C-464/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Institutional law - Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) - Members of the contract staff - Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out in respect of the applicant - Reopening of the investigation - Compliance with the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 25 October 2018, KF v SatCen (T 286/15, EU:T:2018:718) - Action for annulment and for damages)

(2021/C 502/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KF (represented by: A. Kunst, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Satellite Centre (represented by: A. Guillerme and T. Payan, avocates)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders KF to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KF to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. James SKINNER

NO. 2018-KP-1420

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.
EX PARTE NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE CO. et al.

1160606

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
ACCEPTED 01-14-00888-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 9:39:27 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DEVODERICK RAYSHON JONES, )

ID # 1035138, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-1596-D

 ) 

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED June 21, 2007.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01596-D Document 15 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 114
# C_2019220EN.01000201.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/2

---

Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 30 April 2019 — Kingdom of Belgium

(Opinion 1/17) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.

(Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU - Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (CETA) - Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) - Establishment of a Tribunal and an Appellate Tribunal - Compatibility with primary EU law - Requirement to respect the autonomy of the EU legal order - Level of protection of public interests determined, in accordance with the EU constitutional framework, by the EU institutions - Equal treatment of Canadian investors and EU investors - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 20 - Access to the above Tribunals and their independence - Article 47 of the Charter - Financial accessibility - Commitment to guarantee that accessibility for natural persons and small and medium-sized enterprises - External and internal aspects of the requirement of independence - Appointment, remuneration and ethics of the Members - Role of the CETA Joint Committee - Binding interpretations of the CETA determined by that Committee)

(2019/C 220/02)

Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, L. Van den Broeck, M. Jacobs and J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the Opinion

Section F of Chapter Eight of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 30 October 2016, is compatible with EU primary law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of Delta Seaboard International, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Delta Seaboard International, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  November 15, 2010


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
Cameron Dwayne MAY v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00884-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 13, 2019 Closed: April 18, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
# C_2018161EN.01001102.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Cristal Union, the legal successor to Sucrerie de Toury SA v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

(Case C-31/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Article 14(1)(a) - Energy products used for the generation of electricity - Obligation to exempt - Article 15(1)(c) - Energy products used for combined heat and power generation - Option to exempt or reduce the level of taxation - Natural gas intended for use in the cogeneration of heat and electricity))

(2018/C 161/13)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cristal Union, the legal successor to Sucrerie de Toury SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(1)(a) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity must be interpreted as meaning that the compulsory exemption provided for in that provision applies to energy products used for electricity generation, when such products are used for the combined generation of electricity and heat within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.

1

---