alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 30 

Honoring Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2025 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. MARSHALL, 

Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. LEE, and Mr. BANKS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act. 

Whereas, on January 15, 2018, Mississippi State Representative Becky Currie of Brookhaven, Mississippi introduced 

the Gestational Age Act to protect unborn children from 

elective abortion after 15 weeks gestation; 

Whereas, on March 19, 2018, the Gestational Age Act was 

passed by the Mississippi State Legislature, approved by 

Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant, and enacted into law; 

Whereas, in May 2021, the United States Supreme Court 

agreed to review Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, 597 

U.S. 215 (2022), a challenge to the constitutionality of 

the Gestational Age Act, where the question before the 

Court was whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortion are unconstitutional; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 30 IS 

Whereas, on June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme 

Court issued its historical decision in Dobbs v. Jackson 

Women’s Health, holding that ‘‘the Constitution does not 

confer a right to abortion. Roe and Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses profound gratitude to Mississippi 

3 State Representative Becky Currie for introducing 

4 the catalyst that ultimately brought about the his5 torical victory of overturning Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 

6 113 (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 503 

7 U.S. 833 (1992); and 

8 (2) honors life-affirming States across the coun9 try that have enacted laws aimed to value and pro10 tect the inherent dignity of every mother and unborn 

11 child. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 19, 2006

|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II             
|    |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II                 
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,Rick H. Lawler, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of PRB Energy, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a.             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b.            Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.             All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2007       |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| /s/ Rick H. Lawler            |   |
| Rick H. Lawler                |
| Vice President – Finance |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION S

Appellate case name: Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 9 18

- CV

Trial court case number: CV

- 0 077741

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Galveston County

The panel has voted to d ismiss appellant s ’ pro se “Motion for Reconsideration and

Extension of Time to File Petition” as moot and to deny the “Motion to Correct Clerical

Error in Judgment and Reconstruct Lost Document and Modify, Correct, or Reform

Judgment

. ”

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Laura C. Higley

____

__

x Acting for the Court

Panel consists of J ustices Jennings, Keyes, and Higley

.

Date: __ November 29, 2018

____
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEVI WOODERTS, JR. )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0188-D

)

WARDEN OF FCI SEAGOVILLE )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the court concludes that the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted

as the findings and conclusions of the court.

Signed June 22, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00188-D Document 14 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 99
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2047

JOHN BOWEN, II, d/b/a Marbo Limited; EARL

WAYNE BURNETTE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, A stock

company in Bloomington, Illinois,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-94-170-4)

Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: August 2, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Bowen, II, Earl Wayne Burnette, Appellants Pro Se. Andrew

Albert Vanore, III, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying a

motion for the district court judge to recuse himself and from the

order dismissing this diversity action as a sanction for Appellants' repeated failure to comply with discovery requests and failure to comply with the court's orders. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Bowen v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. CA-94-170-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar.

30 & 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 237 LT Case No. 2022 - CF - 292

_____________________________ DAVIS SOTO - MARTINEZ , Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. Don H. Lester , Judge . J ennifer Cogdill, of Law Office of Jennifer Cogdill , Fleming Island, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. August 1 5, 2023 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . LAMBERT , HARRIS , and MAC IVER , J J ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
STATE of Louisiana v. Brittany D. MONK

NO. 2018-K-1997

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
EX PARTE Kelvin PEACOCK

CR-17-0049

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
# C_2017112EN.01002201.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 25 January 2017 — Lubrizol France SAS v Caisse nationale du Régime social des indépendants (RSI) participations extérieures

(Case C-39/17)

(2017/C 112/31)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lubrizol France SAS

Applicant:

Defendant: Caisse nationale du Régime social des indépendants (RSI) participations extérieures

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it contrary to Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for the value of goods transferred from France to another Member State of the European Union by or on behalf of an entity subject to the social solidarity contribution payable by companies and to the contribution additional to the latter or on that account, for the purposes of its business, to be taken into account for determining the overall turnover that constitutes the basis of assessment to those contributions?

---
Andrelle Dion TILLMAN v. STATE

CR-15-1293

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
David Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date:
November 19, 2008





By: /s/ David
Zaikin


David
Zaikin


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
M.S.C. v. STATE

CR-16-0611

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-98-234)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

McKinley David Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

McKinley David Littlejohn seeks to appeal the district

court’s order construing his motion noting an alleged defect in the

indictment as an unauthorized second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Littlejohn has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX PARTE Woodburck NOE

1161046 (CR-16-0967)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael Schmidt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2008



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|   
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Schmidt                  
|    |  | Michael Schmidt                      
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 15, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 583 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1043, K2025-1042.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00803 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/    Michael F. Schmidt            
| |  | Michael F. Schmidt                   
| |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of this Report.