alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20414 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v. SHAMARION LYNETTE GRAVES , Defendant

– Appellant

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 354

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Shamarion Lynette Graves appeals from the revocation of her probation. The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent Graves has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) . Graves has not filed a response. In revoking Graves’s probation , the district court imposed a six

- month term of imprisonment and no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20414 Document: 00514435621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2018No. 17

- 20414

2 term of supervised release. Prior to the filing of the FPD’s motion to withdraw, Graves was released from prison. This appeal requires us to examine sua spo nte the basis of our jurisdiction. See Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987)

. Article III, S ection 2, of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). T he c ase - or controversy requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now

- ended incarceration or parole

— some ‘ collateral
consequence ’ of the conviction

— must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. Because Graves has completed t he entire sentence imposed for her probation revocation, there is no case or controversy for us to address. See id. at 8 ; United States v. Hines, 425 F. App’x 343 (5th Cir. 2011)

. For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and the FPD’s motion to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary. Case: 17-20414 Document: 00514435621 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2018
FINAL JUDGMENT - Page Solo

TRM/chr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JACK CLAUDE FRENCH §

§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-409-Y

§

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and §

TEXAS MOTORS FORD CO., INC. §

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order issued this same day and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 58,

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all claims are

hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their refiling. All costs of Court

under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 shall be borne, as agreed by the parties, by

the party incurring same.

SIGNED February 17, 2006.

Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 86 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 673
Case 2:04-cv-00301-J Document 15 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 132
Kahlil A. CRUDER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 225 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 225

To require the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban 
  Development to testify before the Congress annually, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

   Ms. De La Cruz (for herself, Mr. Emmer, Mr. Rose, Mr. Lawler, Mr. 
 Meuser, Mr. Crenshaw, and Ms. Hageman) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban 
  Development to testify before the Congress annually, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HUD Transparency Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY.

    Not later than October 1 of each year, the Inspector General of the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development shall appear before the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and 
present testimony on the Office of Inspector General's--
            (1) efforts to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse;
            (2) ability to conduct and supervise audits, 
        investigations, and reviews;
            (3) actions to identify opportunities for the programs of 
        the Department of Housing and Urban Development to progress and 
        succeed;
            (4) recommendations to improve overall efficiency and 
        public accountability;
            (5) assessment of the extent to which the Department of 
        Housing and Urban Development has resources sufficient to carry 
        out its statutory mission; and
            (6) ongoing activities regarding any such additional work, 
        as appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID 149
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID 150
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID 151
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID 152
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID 153
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID 154
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00229-M Document 47 Filed 11/22/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID 155
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 14, 2010





/s/ Ming Fen LiuMing Fen Liu, Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of InoLife Technologies, Inc. (Formerly NexxNow, Inc.) (the “Company”) certify that:




1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period  ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: February 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Gary BertholdGary Berthold (Chief Executive Officer)
  Date: February 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Gary BertholdGary Berthold (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Albert E.
Bergeron, Vice-PresidentChief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

| |                                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ Albert
  E. Bergeron                
| |                                         
| | Albert E.
  Bergeron                    
| | Vice-PresidentChief
  Financial Officer
| | August 11,
  2008                       

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping
Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. Dumencu,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











OCCULOGIX,
      INC.Date:
      May 12, 2008
            By:
            /s/ William G.
  Dumencu
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. ANTOINE M OUTON, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10255

D.C . No. 3:12-c r-00049-R C J M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da R obe rt C live Jone s, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 25, 2014 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C i rc u it Judge s. Antoine M outon a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha l le nge s a spe c ia l c ondition of supe

rvise d re le a se im

pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for fa ilure to re giste r a s a se x offe nde r, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 2250(a ). W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we va c at e in pa

rt a nd 

# FIL ED JUN 27 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re m and for furthe r proc e e dings.

M outon c ha lle n ge s the spe c ia l c ondition of supe rvise d re le a se tha

t prohibits him from a ssoc iating with a

ny m inors, inc luding his own da u ghte r, without supe rvision a

nd prior a p prova l from

the probation offic e r. The gove rnm e nt c onc e de s tha

t the portion of the

c ondition re lating to M outon’ s da u ghte r m ust be stric ke n a nd m ay not be re im

pose d upon re m and in light of our de c ision in Unite d State s v . W olf C hild, 699 F.3d 1082 (9th C ir. 2012). W e a gre e an d, a c c o rdingly , re m and for the distric t c ourt to strike the portion of the

c o ndition re s tric ting M outon’ s a ssoc iation with his da ughte r. M outon a lso c ha lle nge s the c ondition a s it re late s to his a ssoc iat ion with othe r m inors. Thegove rnm e nt c onc e de s tha t this portion of the

c ondition is ove rbroa d a

nd m ust be va c ate d. W e a gre e . Se e id . at 1101-02. W e va c ate and re m and for the distric t c ourt to de te rm ine whe t he r that portion of the

c ondition is warran te d a

nd, if so, to devise a

c ondition tha

t re stric ts M outon’ s libe rty no m ore tha n is re a sona

bly ne c e ssa ry to m e e t the sta

tutory purpose s of de te rre nc e , prote c tion of the public , a nd re ha bilita tion. Se e id. at 1102. V ACAT E D in par t and RE M ANDE D forfur the r pr oc e e dings c o nsiste nt w ith this disposition.

1 3 - 1 0 2 5 5 2
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

S T A T E O F A R

I Z O N A ; T E R R Y L

. G O D D AR

D , Attorney

General for the State of Ariz ona; A R

I Z ON A D E P AR T M E N T O F L AW , Civil Rig hts Division, Plaintiffs-Appellees , A N G E L A A G U I L A R , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v . ASARCO L L C, Defendant-Appellant

. N o. 11-17484 D.C. No. 4:08-cv-00441- MW B
ORDER

F iled F ebruary

28, 2014

ORDER KOZ I NSKI , Chief J udg e : Upon the vote of a majority o f nonrecused active judg es, it is ordered that th i s case b e reheard en banc pursuant to F ederal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35( a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judg e p anel opinion s h a l l not b e cited a s precedent by

or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                              |                                              |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                              |
|                                |                                                                         |                                         |
| Date: October              20, 2006 | By:                                                                     | /s/ Chi              Keung              Wong |
|                                     | Chi              Keung Wong,                                                      |
|                                     | Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |

***A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature      that      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement      required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained      by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or      its      staff upon request.***
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

          TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendement No. 1 to the Annual Report of TravelCenters of
America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James W. George, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the
                  exception that the audited financial statements of an equity
                  investee, Simons Petroleum., Inc., are not, and can not be,
                  included in this Report until such financial statements are
                  brought into compliance with Regulation S-X and audited; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ James W. George
--------------------------------------------------
James W. George
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 26, 2004
Jennifer WINGATE, as personal representative of the estate of Jimmy Isbell v. CEQUENT CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.

1140953

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 24, 2017 Reh. denied September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.*
----

----

|  (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 13, 2008 | /s/ Charles      Josenhans                           |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Charles      Josenhans                                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                       | Interim      Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|                       | (Principal      Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                                     |   |

----

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John M.Ballbach, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VWR International, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| /s/ JOHN M. BALLBACH |                                     |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Name:                | John M. Ballbach                         |   |
| Title:               | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* | * * |
| Dated:               | November 14, 2005                   | * * |

 

----
Elizabeth J. PALATINE and John G. Palatine, Appellants, v. REUNION GRANDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1677

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Sandy Michelle OGLESBY

1160967 (CR-16-0428)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.