alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3035-3036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00617]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

33 CFR Part 234

[Docket ID: COE-2023-0005]
RIN 0710-AB41

Corps of Engineers Agency Specific Procedures To Implement the 
Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines for Federal Investments in 
Water Resources; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Army, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) ACF is correcting a 
final rule (FR) that was published in the Federal Register on December 
19, 2024, with an effective date of January 17, 2025. This rule 
establishes Agency Specific Procedures (ASPs) for the Corps to 
implement the Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines (PR&G) for 
Federal water resources investments. It provides a framework to govern 
how the Corps would evaluate proposed water resources investments, 
subject to the PR&G. The rule incorporates recommendations from 
interested parties. This correction ensures that this final rule will 
be effective 30 days after

[[Page 3036]]

its publication on December 19, 2024, which is January 18, 2025.

DATES: This correction is effective January 17, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Milton Boyd, Acting Director for 
Policy and Legislation, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army 
(Civil Works), 108 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-0108, at (202) 
761-8546 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rule published December 19, 
2024, there was one technical error that is now identified and 
corrected in this document. The provisions in this correction document 
are effective as if they had been included in the document published 
December 19, 2024. Accordingly, the following corrections are effective 
January 18, 2025.

Corrections to Regulations

    In FR Doc. 2024-29652, appearing on page 103992 in the Federal 
Register of Thursday, December 19, 2024, the following correction is 
made:
    1. On page 103992, in the first column, correct the DATES section 
to read as follows:

DATES: This rule is effective on January 18, 2025.

Jaime A. Pinkham,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2025-00617 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sound Revolution Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
  the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|Dated: July 18, 2006 | /s/ Penny Green                                            
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Penny Green                                                
|                     | President, Chief Executive Officer,                        
|                     | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
      Officer

---
Kenny MORENO MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.       The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.       The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 25, 2015 “Ian Brown”Ian BrownChief Financial Officer E-13.2


---
Thomas Calvin VICKERY, Jr. v. ESTATE OF Jillian Cook VICKERY

2170006

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationAAC Consulting Group, Inc.
    
    MarylandACER/EXCEL INC.
    
    New JerseyBeijing KendleWits Medical Consulting Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaKendle Americas Holding Inc.
    
    OhioKendle Americas Investment Inc.
    
    OhioKendle Americas Management Inc.
    
    OhioKendle Argentina S.R.L.
    
    ArgentinaKendle Branches Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Brasil Servicios de Pesquisas Clinicas Ltda.
    
    BrazilKendle Canada Inc.
    
    CanadaKendle Chile Limitada
    
    ChileKendle Clinical Development Services Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Clinical Development Services, S.L.
    
    SpainKendle Colombia Ltda.
    
    ColombiaKendle CRO Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaKendle CRO Philippines, Inc.
    
    PhilippinesKendle CRO (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
    
    ThailandKendle CTA Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Data & Technologies (India) Private Ltd
    
    IndiaKendle Delaware Inc.
    
    DelawareKendle GmbH
    
    GermanyKendle India Private Limited
    
    IndiaKendle International B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsKendle International CPU LLC
    
    OhioKendle International Holdings Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle International Holdings Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaKendle International Israel Ltd.
    
    IsraelKendle International Limited
    
    United Kingdom




---



##### 



Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationKendle International Ltda.
    
    BrazilKendle International s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicKendle International SARL
    
    FranceKendle International Sp. z o.o.
    
    PolandKendle International SRL
    
    ItalyKendle International, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoKendle NC Inc.
    
    North CarolinaKendle Nova Scotia ULC
    
    CanadaKendle Peru S.R.L.
    
    PeruKendle Pte, Ltd
    
    SingaporeKendle Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaKendle R&D Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaKendle R&D Unit Trust
    
    AustraliaKendle Servicios, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoKendle South Africa (Proprietary) Limited
    
    South AfricaKendle Sweden AB
    
    SwedenKendle Toronto Inc.
    
    CanadaKendle U.K. Limited
    
    United KingdomKendle Unit Trust
    
    AustraliaU-Gene Clinical Research B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsU-Gene Research Biotechnology B.V.
    
    The Netherlands
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Lin Wen, being the Secretary and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Shineco, Inc., certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005.		    - Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made and is not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and		      - Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this quarterly report.		        - The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:		          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;			
- Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of his/her quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and			     Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;			
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):		
- All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and			                         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and			
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.		
			Dated: September 7, 2005			                                                                                                            /s/ Lin Wen                                                                                                             Lin Wen
II 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 27 

To prohibit certain telework employees from receiving certain annual 

adjustments to pay schedules, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain telework employees from receiving certain 

annual adjustments to pay schedules, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Re5 turn to Work Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) COVERED EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘covered 

9 employee’’— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 27 IS

1 (A) means an employee who teleworks not 

2 fewer than 1 day, or in the case of an alter3 native work schedule, not less than 20 percent, 

4 a week; and 

5 (B) does not include an employee who— 

6 (i) teleworks not fewer than 1 day a 

7 week; and 

8 (ii) is— 

9 (I) is disabled and receives rea10 sonable accommodations; 

11 (II) a member of the Foreign 

12 Service of the United States; 

13 (III) a Federal law enforcement 

14 officer; 

15 (IV) a member of the Armed 

16 Forces on active duty; or 

17 (V) any other employee, the offi18 cial worksite of whom is not described 

19 in section 531.605(a)(1) of title 5, 

20 Code of Federal Regulations (or any 

21 corresponding similar regulation or 

22 ruling). 

23 (2) EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘employee’’ has the 

24 meaning given the term in section 2105 of title 5, 

25 United States Code. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 27 IS

1 (3) TELEWORK.—The term ‘‘telework’’ has the 

2 meaning given the term in section 6501 of title 5, 

3 United States Code. 

4 SEC. 3. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO PAY SCHEDULES. 

5 No covered employee may receive an annual adjust6 ment under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code. 

7 SEC. 4. PAY LOCALITIES. 

8 Each covered employee shall be paid at the rate of 

9 basic pay under the applicable grade and step for that em10 ployee under the locality pay area designated as ‘‘Rest of 

11 U.S.’’— 

12 (1) as of the date on which the employee be13 comes a covered employee; and 

14 (2) which shall not be adjusted under section 

15 5304 of title 5, United States Code. 

16 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first 

18 full fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of 

19 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**PRBENERGY, INC.**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2006, I, Robert W. Wright, Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of PRB Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                            ThisForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

2.                           Theinformation contained in this Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of PRB Energy, Inc. for the periods presentedtherein.
| Date: November 13, 2006              |   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                 |   |   |
|  /s/ ROBERT W. WRIGHT           |   |   |
|                                 |   |   |
| Robert W. Wright                     |   |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
EX PARTE James BEAMON-BEY

CR-16-0634

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 4, 2017

Reh. denied.
# C_2022284EN.01002701.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission

(Case T-601/20) (1)

(State aid - Maritime transport - Service of general economic interest - Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection - Decision declaring the aid unlawful - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Interest accrued - Limitation period - New aid - Incompatibility with the internal market - Effects of a cartel on the market - Excessive duration of the procedure - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Principle of good administration)

(2022/C 284/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tirrenia di navigazione SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: B. Nascimbene and F. Rossi Dal Pozzo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1411 of 2 March 2022 on the State aid No C 64/99 (ex NN 8/99) implemented by Italy for the Adriatica, Caremar, Siremar, Saremar and Toremar shipping companies (Tirrenia Group) in so far as it concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tirrenia di navigazione SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tirrenia di navigazione SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30, 2015

p0622 

# Order

Clerk June 30, 2015

150344

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150344

COA: 322277

Clinton CC: 06

- 008035

- FH

JEFFREY LEE COCHRAN

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Aron LUNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
Nathan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





Date:
August 16, 2010





/s/ Richard
      NathanChief
      Executive Officer
              Innovative
      Card Technologies, Inc





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 23-30582-swe7 Doc 14 Filed 04/12/23 Entered 04/12/23 22:44:40 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### Lillie Sikes Worrell, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Mrs. A. W. Miller (Formerly Mrs. A. W. McGlashan) for the Use and Benefit of M. Ellen Ford, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed October 13, 1927.

Petition for Rehearing Denied October 31, 1927.

*J udson & Hopper,*and *Bently,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Howell & Phillips,*for Defendant in Error.

Pee Curiam.

This case is here on writ of error the second time.

The controlling law applicable to the case was embraced in the opinions delivered when the case was before this Court on a former writ of error where there was a judgment for plaintiff which was reversed by this Court. Worrell v. Ford, 91 Fla. 44, 109 Sou. 440.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 23-20084-rlj7 Doc 37 Filed 05/31/23 Entered 05/31/23 10:43:34 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case 23-20084-rlj7 Doc 37 Filed 05/31/23 Entered 05/31/23 10:43:34 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case 23-20084-rlj7 Doc 37 Filed 05/31/23 Entered 05/31/23 10:43:34 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 24 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 154
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 24 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 155
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 24 Filed 08/17/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 156
# C_2016475EN.01002301.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/23

---

Action brought on 31 October 2016 — Alessandro La Rocca v EUIPO (Take your time Pay After)

(Case T-755/16)

(2016/C 475/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alessandro La Rocca (Anzio, Italy) (represented by: A. Perani, J. Graffer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Take your time Pay After’ — Application for registration No 14 396 031

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2016 in Case R 406/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | rule that there has been an infringement and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that there has been an infringement and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | rule that there has been an infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and, accordingly; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that there has been an infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and, accordingly;

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO in Case R 406/2016-1, made on 4 August 2016 and notified on 31 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO in Case R 406/2016-1, made on 4 August 2016 and notified on 31 August 2016;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs and fees incurred in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs and fees incurred in the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Morris James PETTAWAY v. STATE

CR-15-1352

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

MARCH 30, 2015 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 

1. Case No. SD33196 

 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Plaintiff-Respondent, 

 v. 

 TINA M. LUNEY, 

 Defendant-Appellant.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jarrett ANDREWS

NO. 2019-KO-0354

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Denied.