IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( NUMBER 3: 04-240-G 

(

(

VERSUS ( 

(

(

HOLY LAND FOUNDATION, ET AL. ( October 17, 2007

__________________________________________________________

CONFERENCE REGARDING JUROR WILLIAM NEAL

BEFORE THE HONORABLE A. JOE FISH

__________________________________________________________

A P P E A R A N C E S:

For the Government: MR. JIM JACKS

MR. BARRY JONAS

MS. ELIZABETH SHAPIRO

MR. NATHAN GARRETT

Assistant United States Attorney

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

U.S. Courthouse 

1100 Commerce Street

Dallas, Texas 75242

214/659-8600

For the Defendant Shukri Baker:

MS. NANCY HOLLANDER 

MS. TERESA DUNCAN

FREEDMAN BOYD DANIELS 

HOLLANDER 

20 First Plaza, Suite 700 

Albuquerque, NM 87102

505/842-9960 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
For the Defendant El-Mezain:

MR. JOSHUA DRATEL

MR. AARON J. MYSLIWIEC

LAW OFFICE OF JOSHUA L. DRATEL

14 Wall Street, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10005

212/732-0707 

For the Defendant Mufid Abdulqader:

MS. MARLO CADEDDU

LAW OFFICE OF MARLO P. CADEDDU

3232 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75204

214/744-3015 

For the Defendant Elashi:

MS. LINDA MORENO

LAW OFFICE OF LINDA MORENO

PO BOX 10985 

Tampa, Florida 33679

813-247-4500 

MR. JOHN D. CLINE 

Jones Day 

555 California St 

26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1500 

415/875-5812 

For the Defendant Odeh:

MR. GREG WESTFALL

WESTFALL PLATT CUTRER

Mallick Tower

One Summit Avenue, Suite 910

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

817/877-1700

Court Reporter: Cassidi L. Casey, CSR No. 1703

1100 Commerce Street, Rm 15D6L

Dallas, Texas 75242

214-254-3139

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
P R O C E E D I N G S:

THE COURT: Good afternoon, Ladies and 

Gentlemen. I asked Ms. Piwoni to contact you and set up 

this conference because she said that she had received a 

request from Mr. Jacks for such a conference. 

Mr. Jacks. 

MR. JACKS: Judge, over the weekend Agent 

Burns -- She informed us this morning that she was at a 

sports bar watching the Texas-Oklahoma football game with 

lots of other people, and a lawyer that is an acquaintance 

of hers came up to her and said "I know one of the jurors 

on your case," and she asked, you know, who was it, and it 

was Mr. Neal according to this lawyer. And they were 

friends, and she indicated that she had told him back I 

guess after he received his questionnaire something to the 

effect that, you know, when you fill out the questionnaire 

if you have any bias, make sure that you list those so 

that you don't have to serve on this long trial. There 

was other conversation. She indicated that she had talked 

to him I guess a couple of times after the trial had 

started. One time he made the comment about the lawyers 

were good, and he also made the comment one time that the 

evidence was boring. But I also believe that this 

lawyer -- this woman lawyer had told Ms. Burns that she 

had told him that the agent on that case is a friend of 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
mine, and I think she was complimentary of Ms. Burns. 

Mr. Garrett. 

MR. GARRETT: I took notes. Lara is outside I 

think if you want to talk to her, but I thought we would 

talk among us first, but I had her tell me the sequence of 

events, and I think Jim is right that during this even 

encounter at this sports bar she said "I know one of your 

jurors. His name is William." Went on to physically 

describe him, being Mr. Neal. And she stated, like Jim 

said, told him to express any bias he had to keep him off 

the jury, and she then told him she had a friend who was 

the FBI agent on the case, Ms. Burns, and then Lara asked, 

"Have you talked to him since?" And she said, "Yes, I 

have," and he said that the prosecution and the defense 

were both good and the evidence was boring, something to 

the effect of evidence being boring. Couldn't have been 

this case. But anyway, at that point Lara stopped asking, 

didn't ask anymore of her. We wanted to bring it to your 

attention, clearly, to the Court's attention. We don't 

know -- Again, Lara did not probe any further of this 

person in terms of how many times have you talked to him 

or is there anything else said, those sorts of follow-up 

conversations were not made. 

MR. JACKS: I think she did have conversation 

about what kind of a guy is he, and this woman said, you 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
know, he's quiet. 

MR. GARRETT: Yeah, I think the lady when she 

was saying I know one of your jurors, William the, lady 

went on sui sponti to say -- Lara said that you can ask if 

you want to -- he was an intelligent, quiet guy, but not a 

leader. 

MS. HOLLANDER: I've lost track who said what. 

MR. JACKS: Anything about the juror came from 

the woman lawyer that.

MR. DRATEL: I understand, a conversation with 

Lara Burns. 

MS. HOLLANDER: But Lara asked her what kind of 

a guy is he. 

MR. GARRETT: I'm not sure if she asked that or 

if the lady volunteered that. I don't know the answer to 

that.

MR. JONAS: Your Honor, the timing is this woman 

lawyer informed Mr. Neal about her friendship with Agent 

Burns at the time the juror received the questionnaire, 

and if the Court recalls, the jurors during the voir dire 

were asked if they knew any of the agents or attorneys. 

MR. DRATEL: He was being truthful. First of 

all, I'm concerned about someone involved in the case who 

happens to be an agent running into someone in a bar and 

asked what you know. If someone asks me do you know a 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
juror, I wouldn't want to know anything more. 

MR. GARRETT: Why is that improper? 

MR. DRATEL: She said I know a juror, and she 

said which one. I'm concerned about that. 

THE COURT: I listen to this and certainly 

appreciate you all wanting to bring it to my attention or 

our attention because that's something that I think it's 

proper to do. I personally don't see any issue here.

MR. DRATEL: I don't either in terms of what was 

said. 

MR. JACKS: Well, they were all asked have you 

heard anything about this case or do you know anything 

about this case. So if a friend had said I know an agent 

on the case. 

MR. DRATEL: Doesn't mean you know anything 

about the case. 

MS. MORENO: I don't see that as untruthful. It 

seems like he knew someone who knew someone on the case 

and still didn't know anything about the case. So I don't 

see that as an untruthful answer. I guess my question is, 

are you asking for a remedy or is this just informational? 

THE COURT: Well, you anticipated my question. 

I'm not sure whether you are asking me to do anything or 

not. 

MR. JACKS: Well, our first priority was to make 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
it known to the parties and the Court. I think we're 

still trying to determine, you know, what, if anything -- 

if we have any need for a remedy, right to a remedy or 

anything like that. I think if circumstances were 

different, if this were during the trial, I'm not sure 

that opposing counsel would feel the same way, that it's 

not a problem, that this person either failed to disclose 

a relationship with somebody that knew the case agent or 

the fact that somebody talked to him about the case and 

the fact that I do know this person that's the case agent. 

But I think our first interest was to find out, you know, 

if opposing counsel thought there was an issue or a 

problem, and then we were going from there, and so I guess 

now if they are of the opinion that it's not a problem -- 

First of all, I think I would want something on the record 

that they don't seek any kind of a remedy and not from 

just the lawyers, by the defendants themselves, that this 

would not be something that would later come up as a claim 

of ineffective assistance of counsel for not seeking some 

kind of a remedy because I think obviously the defendants 

would be the one that could appeal anything, not the 

government, if that you know were to happen in this case. 

And then I think we would want to consider what 

options, if any, the government has and what right to any 

remedy the government would have, but I think the defense 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
is the one that is kind of in the first position to make a 

decision as to whether or not they think it's something 

that requires a remedy or action by the Court. 

MR. WESTFALL: Your Honor, there wasn't a 

question on the questionnaire "Do you know somebody who 

knows somebody whose involved with this case." And then 

the stuff that Agent Burns learned was that the lawyers 

were good but the evidence is boring. This is obviously 

not at the time the questionnaire is being filled out, 

number one. 

And Number 2, that doesn't come in the same as 

juror tampering or misconduct. This is a nonissue. Mr. 

Jacks is wanting to have a nonissue become something that 

we can to drag these clients up here to say we're okay 

with Mr. Neal being on this jury. The case law is just 

manifest that something like this wouldn't get somebody 

kicked off the jury. It's totally up to the Court's 

discretion of course, but it's not misconduct. 

MR. JONAS: Your Honor. Mr. Westfall is it your 

position at the time of voir dire you would not have any 

interest in knowing whether a juror has a mutual friend 

with a case agent and whether that mutual friend discussed 

the case with the potential juror? Is that your position? 

MS. HOLLANDER: That's not what we heard.

MR. JONAS: I'm not asking what you heard. I'm 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
asking if that's your position. We want to make sure that 

we're covered. 

MR. DRATEL: You are covered. You are covered. 

You are covered.

MR. JONAS: We're making sure everything is 

protected because the way we played out the scenario in 

our head -- And certainly if Mr. Neal said a friend of 

mine came to me and after I got the questionnaire and said 

I'm friends with the case agent and talked about ways of 

getting off the case, I imagine you all would want to know 

that to explore whether Mr. Neal had a bias in favor of 

the case agent and so forth, follow-up questions. The way 

we perceive it is you are downplaying the situation 

totally, but that's not the way we envisioned you would 

have reacted had you had this information at the time of 

voir dire. 

MR. WESTFALL: I would never thought to have 

asked after I asked do you know anyone that is involved in 

the case. "Do you know anybody who knows anybody who's 

involved in this case?" I would never have asked that 

question. It would never enter my mind to ask this 

question. The guy was obviously honest on his 

questionnaire. So whatever advice he got about how to 

throw the questionnaire was irrelevant at this point if 

indeed that advice was given. We're assuming at this 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
point that every statement that's been stated is true. 

MS. HOLLANDER: It's triple hearsay. 

MR. JONAS: Certainly that would require the 

Court to make certain inquiries. 

MS. HOLLANDER: I'll state on the record that on 

behalf of my client that I think there is no issue here. 

MR. DRATEL: I would state the same for Mr. El 

Mezain. 

MS. MORENO: I would join on behalf of Mr. 

Elashi. 

MR. WESTFALL: On behalf of Odeh, no objection 

to the continued service of Mr. Neal, nor do I think there 

would be an issue if we had one. 

MS. MORENO: I think I expressed that already, 

but I will second it. 

THE COURT: I'm of the opinion from what I have 

heard that there is no issue either. But I say that 

without prejudice to the government's right to seek a 

remedy if they determine that's the appropriate course, 

and if they do, I'll hear their position at the time. 

MR. JACKS: Okay. 

THE COURT: Thank you. 

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

18:00

18:00
C E R T I F I C A T I O N

I, Cassidi L. Casey, certify that during the 

proceedings of the foregoing-styled and -numbered cause, I 

was the official reporter and took in stenotypy such 

proceedings and have transcribed the same as shown by the 

above and foregoing Pages 1 through 11 that said 

transcript is true and correct.

I further certify that the transcript fees and format 

comply with those prescribed by the court and the Judicial 

Conference of the United States.

S/Cassidi L. Casey

_______________________________

CASSIDI L. CASEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT REPORTER

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CSR NUMBER 1703

CASSIDI L. CASEY, CSR, 214-354-3139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
< Dates >

October 17, 2007 1:11

-numbered 11:4

< 0 >

04-240-G 1:5

05/842-9960505/842-9960

1:46

< 1 >

1 11:7

10005 2:7

10985 2:25

11 11:7

1100 1:32, 2:47

12/732-0707212/732-0707

2:8

13-247-4500813-247-4500

2:27

14 2:6

14-254-3139214-254-3139

2:49

14/659-8600214/659-8600

1:34

14/744-3015214/744-3015

2:18

15/875-5812415/875-5812

2:34

15D6L 2:47

17/877-1700817/877-1700

2:43

1703 2:46, 11:21

< 2 >

2 8:11

20 1:44

26th 2:32

28th 2:6

< 3 >

3 1:5

3232 2:16

33679 2:26

< 5 >

555 2:31

< 7 >

700 1:44, 2:16

75204 2:17

75242 1:33, 2:48

76102 2:42

< 8 >

87102 1:45

< 9 >

910 2:41

94104-1500 2:33

< A >

A 1:17, 1:21, 3:4, 3:5, 3:8, 

3:10, 3:20, 3:25, 4:11, 4:25, 

5:5, 5:10, 5:13, 5:24, 5:25, 

6:3, 6:13, 6:21, 7:3, 7:7, 7:8, 

7:12, 7:14, 7:16, 7:18, 7:20, 

8:1, 8:3, 8:4, 8:12, 8:13, 8:21, 

8:22, 9:7, 9:11, 10:18, 11:1

AARON 2:4

Abdulqader 2:11

about 3:21, 4:25, 5:8, 5:18, 

5:23, 6:4, 6:12, 6:13, 6:16, 

6:19, 7:9, 9:9, 9:23

above 11:7

according 3:13

acquaintance 3:10

action 8:3

advice 9:23, 9:25

after 3:15, 3:20, 9:8, 9:18

afternoon 3:2

Again 4:20

Agent 3:7, 3:25, 4:12, 5:18, 

5:24, 6:13, 7:8, 7:10, 8:7, 

8:22, 9:9, 9:12

agents 5:21

AL 1:11

Albuquerque 1:45

all 5:23, 6:6, 6:11, 7:15, 9:10

already 10:14

also 3:22, 3:23

AMERICA 1:5

among 4:5

an 3:10, 5:5, 5:24, 6:13, 6:20, 

7:12, 10:13

answer 5:15, 6:20

anticipated 6:22

any 3:17, 4:10, 4:20, 5:21, 

6:8, 7:3, 7:16, 7:24, 8:20

anybody 9:19

anymore 4:18

anyone 9:18

Anything 4:22, 5:8, 6:1, 6:12, 

6:15, 6:19, 6:23, 7:2, 7:4, 

7:21

anyway 4:17

appeal 7:21

appreciate 6:6

appropriate 10:19

are 6:21, 6:23, 7:14, 9:3, 9:4, 

9:13

as 6:17, 6:20, 7:18, 8:2, 8:11, 

11:6

ask 4:18, 5:4, 9:21

asked 3:3, 3:12, 4:12, 5:12, 

5:14, 5:21, 5:25, 6:11, 9:18, 

9:20

asking 4:17, 6:21, 6:23, 

8:25, 9:1

asks 5:25

assistance 7:19

Assistant 1:28

assuming 9:25

attention 4:19, 6:6, 6:7

Attorney 1:28

attorneys 5:21

Avenue 2:16, 2:41

< B >

back 3:14

Baker 1:37

bar 3:9, 4:7, 5:24

BARRY 1:25

become 8:13

behalf 10:6, 10:9, 10:11

believe 3:23

bias 3:17, 4:10, 9:11

boring 3:23, 4:15, 4:16, 8:8

BOX 2:25

BOYD 1:42

bring 4:18, 6:6
Burns 3:8, 3:24, 4:1, 4:12, 

5:11, 5:19, 8:7

< C >

CA 2:33

CADEDDU 2:14, 2:15

California 2:31

case 3:12, 3:25, 4:12, 4:17, 

5:23, 6:12, 6:13, 6:14, 6:16, 

6:18, 6:19, 7:8, 7:9, 7:10, 

7:22, 8:15, 8:22, 8:23, 9:9, 

9:10, 9:12, 9:19, 9:20

case. 8:6

CASEY 2:46, 11:3, 11:15, 

11:17

CASSIDI 2:46, 11:3, 11:17

cause 11:4

certain 10:4

Certainly 6:5, 9:7, 10:3

certify 11:3, 11:10

circumstances 7:4

claim 7:18

clearly 4:19

client 10:6

clients 8:14

CLINE 2:29

comment 3:21, 3:22

Commerce 1:32, 2:47

complimentary 4:1

comply 11:11

concerned 5:23, 6:4

Conference 1:16, 3:4, 3:5, 

11:12

consider 7:23

contact 3:3

continued 10:12

conversation 3:19, 4:24, 

5:10

conversations 4:23

correct 11:8

counsel 7:6, 7:12, 7:19

couple 3:20

course 8:18, 10:19

COURT 1:1, 2:46, 3:2, 4:19, 

5:20, 6:5, 6:22, 7:1, 8:3, 8:17, 

10:4, 10:16, 10:22, 11:11

Courthouse 1:31

covered 9:2, 9:3, 9:4

CSR 2:46, 11:21

CUTRER 2:39

< D >

D. 2:29

DALLAS 1:3, 1:33, 2:17, 

2:48, 11:20

DANIELS 1:42

Day 2:30

decision 8:2

Defendant 1:37, 2:1, 2:11, 

2:20, 2:36

defendants 7:17, 7:20

defense 4:14, 7:25

DEPARTMENT 1:29

describe 4:9

determine 7:2, 10:19

different 7:5

dire 5:20, 8:20, 9:16

disclose 7:7

discretion 8:18

discussed 8:22

DISTRICT 1:1, 1:2, 1:30, 

11:18, 11:19

DIVISION 1:3, 11:20

downplaying 9:13

drag 8:14

DRATEL 2:3, 2:5, 5:10, 5:22, 

6:3, 6:9, 6:15, 9:3, 10:7

DUNCAN 1:41

during 4:6, 5:20, 7:5, 11:3

< E >

effect 3:16, 4:16

either 6:9, 7:7, 10:17

El 10:7

El-mezain 2:1

Elashi 2:20, 10:10

ELIZABETH 1:26

encounter 4:7

enter 9:21

envisioned 9:14

ET 1:11

events 4:6

everything 9:5

evidence 3:23, 4:15, 4:16, 

8:8

explore 9:11

express 4:10

expressed 10:14

< F >

fact 7:9, 7:10

failed 7:7

favor 9:11

FBI 4:12

feel 7:6

fees 11:10

fill 3:16

filled 8:9

find 7:11

First 1:44, 4:5, 5:22, 6:25, 

7:11, 7:15, 8:1

FISH 1:17

Floor 2:6, 2:32

Florida 2:26

follow-up 4:22, 9:12

football 3:9

foregoing 11:7

foregoing-styled 11:4

format 11:10

Fort 2:42

forth 9:12

FOUNDATION 1:11

Francisco 2:33

FREEDMAN 1:42

friend 3:25, 4:11, 6:13, 8:21, 

8:22, 9:7

friends 3:14, 9:9

friendship 5:18

< G >

game 3:9

Garrett 1:27, 4:2

Gentlemen 3:3

getting 9:10

given 9:25

Government 1:24, 7:22, 

7:24, 7:25, 10:18

GREG 2:38

guess 3:15, 3:20, 6:20, 7:13

guy 4:25, 5:5, 5:13, 9:22

< H >

happen 7:22

happens 5:24
head 9:7

hear 10:20

heard 6:12, 8:24, 8:25, 10:17

hearsay 10:2

HOLLANDER 1:40, 1:43

HOLY 1:11

honest 9:22

Honor 5:17, 8:4, 8:19

HONORABLE 1:17

< I >

imagine 9:10

improper 6:2

indicated 3:14, 3:19

ineffective 7:19

information 9:15

informational 6:21

informed 3:8, 5:18

inquiries 10:4

intelligent 5:5

interest 7:11, 8:21

involved 5:23, 8:6, 9:18, 

9:20

irrelevant 9:24

issue 6:8, 7:12, 10:6, 10:13, 

10:17

< J >

J. 2:4

Jacks 1:24, 3:5, 3:6, 8:13

Jim 1:24, 4:6, 4:9

JOE 1:17

JOHN 2:29

join 10:9

JONAS 1:25

Jones 2:30

JOSHUA 2:3, 2:5

Judge 3:7

Judicial 11:11

JUROR 1:16, 5:8, 5:19, 6:1, 

6:3, 8:12, 8:21, 8:23

jurors 3:11, 4:8, 5:3, 5:20

jury 4:11, 8:15, 8:17

JUSTICE 1:29

< K >

keep 4:10

kicked 8:17

kind 4:25, 5:12, 7:16, 7:20, 

8:1

knowing 8:21

known 7:1

knows 8:6, 9:19

< L >

L. 2:5, 2:46, 11:3, 11:15, 

11:17

Ladies 3:2

lady 5:2, 5:3, 5:15

LAND 1:11

Lara 4:3, 4:12, 4:17, 4:20, 

5:4, 5:11, 5:12

later 7:18

LAW 2:5, 2:15, 2:24, 8:15

lawyer 3:10, 3:13, 3:24, 5:9, 

5:18

lawyers 3:21, 7:17, 8:7

leader 5:6

learned 8:7

LINDA 2:23, 2:24

list 3:17

listen 6:5

long 3:18

lost 5:7

lots 3:10

< M >

Mallick 2:40

manifest 8:16

MARLO 2:14, 2:15

Mckinney 2:16

mean 6:15

Mezain 10:8

mind 9:21

mine 4:1, 9:8

misconduct 8:12, 8:18

MORENO 2:23, 2:24, 10:14

morning 3:8

MR. GARRETT 4:3, 5:2, 

5:14, 6:2

MR. JACKS 3:7, 4:24, 5:8, 

6:11, 6:25, 10:21

MR. JONAS 5:17, 8:19, 8:25, 

9:5, 10:3

MS. 1:26, 1:40, 1:41, 2:14, 

2:23, 3:3, 3:24, 4:1, 4:12, 

10:14

MS. HOLLANDER 5:7, 5:12, 

8:24, 10:2, 10:5

MS. MORENO 6:17, 10:9

Mufid 2:11

mutual 8:21, 8:22

MYSLIWIEC 2:4

< N >

name 4:8

NANCY 1:40

NATHAN 1:27

Neal 1:16, 3:13, 4:9, 5:18, 

8:15, 9:7, 9:11, 10:12

need 7:3

New 2:7

NM 1:45

nonissue 8:12, 8:13

nor 10:12

NORTHERN 1:2, 1:30, 11:19

notes 4:3

NUMBER 1:5, 8:10, 8:11, 

11:21

NY 2:7

< O >

objection 10:11

obviously 7:20, 8:8, 9:22

Odeh 2:36, 10:11

OFFICE 2:5, 2:15, 2:24

official 11:5

Okay 8:14, 10:21

One 2:41, 3:11, 3:21, 3:22, 

4:7, 5:3, 7:21, 8:1

one. 6:4, 8:10, 10:13

opinion 7:14, 10:16

opposing 7:6, 7:12

options 7:24

outside 4:3

< P >

P. 2:15

Pages 11:7

parties 7:1

people 3:10

perceive 9:13
person 4:21, 7:7, 7:10

personally 6:8

physically 4:8

Piwoni 3:3

PLATT 2:39

played 9:6

Plaza 1:44

PO 2:25

point 4:17, 9:24, 10:1

position 8:1, 8:20, 8:23, 9:1, 

10:20

potential 8:23

prejudice 10:18

prescribed 11:11

priority 6:25

probe 4:20

problem 7:7, 7:13, 7:14

proceedings 11:4, 11:6

proper 6:8

prosecution 4:14

protected 9:6

< Q >

question 6:20, 6:22, 8:5, 

9:21, 9:22

questionnaire 3:15, 3:16, 

5:19, 8:5, 8:9, 9:8, 9:23, 9:24

questions 9:12

quiet 5:1, 5:5

< R >

reacted 9:15

recalls 5:20

received 3:4, 3:15, 5:19

record 7:15, 10:5

REGARDING 1:16

relationship 7:8

remedy 6:21, 7:3, 7:16, 7:20, 

7:25, 8:3, 10:19

REPORTER 2:46, 11:5, 

11:18

request 3:5

require 10:3

requires 8:3

Rm 2:47

running 5:24

< S >

S/cassidi 11:15

San 2:33

saying 5:3

scenario 9:6

second 10:15

seek 7:16, 10:18

seeking 7:19

seems 6:18

sequence 4:5

serve 3:18

service 10:12

set 3:3

SHAPIRO 1:26

shown 11:6

Shukri 1:37

situation 9:13

somebody 7:8, 7:9, 8:5, 8:6, 

8:16

someone 5:23, 5:24, 5:25, 

6:18

sorts 4:22

sponti 5:4

sports 3:9, 4:7

St 2:31

started 3:21

state 10:5, 10:7

stated 4:9, 10:1

statement 10:1

STATES 1:1, 1:5, 1:28, 1:29, 

11:12, 11:18

stenotypy 11:5

stopped 4:17

Street 1:32, 2:6, 2:47

stuff 8:7

sui 5:4

Suite 1:44, 2:16, 2:41

Summit 2:41

< T >

talked 3:19, 4:13, 4:21, 7:9, 

9:9

Tampa 2:26

tampering 8:12

TERESA 1:41

terms 4:21, 6:9

TEXAS 1:2, 1:30, 1:33, 2:17, 

2:42, 2:48, 11:19

Texas-oklahoma 3:9

themselves 7:17

throw 9:24

timing 5:17

took 4:3, 11:5

totally 8:17, 9:14

Tower 2:40

track 5:7

transcribed 11:6

transcript 11:8, 11:10

trial 3:18, 3:20, 7:5

triple 10:2

true 10:1, 11:8

truthful 5:22

trying 7:2

< U >

understand 5:10

UNITED 1:1, 1:5, 1:28, 1:29, 

11:12, 11:18

untruthful 6:17, 6:20

< V >

VERSUS 1:8

voir 5:20, 8:20, 9:16

volunteered 5:15

< W >

Wall 2:6

wanted 4:18

wanting 6:6, 8:13

watching 3:9

ways 9:9

weekend 3:7

WESTFALL 2:38, 2:39, 8:4, 

8:19, 9:17, 10:11

whatever 9:23

whether 6:23, 8:2, 8:21, 

8:22, 9:11

will 10:15

William 1:16, 5:3

William. 4:8

without 10:18

woman 3:24, 4:25, 5:9, 5:17

Worth 2:42

< Y >
York 2:7