alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Joseph Skeehan certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q /A of JMG Exploration, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report: 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 6, 2008 /s/   Joseph Skeehan Joseph Skeehan Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PAGE 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPCTY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC. 

 Debtor. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 22-31641-mv-7 

(Chapter 7) 

SCOTT M. SIEDEL, TRUSTEE; GNET 

ATC, LLC; MULTIBAND FIELD 

SERVICES, INC. 

 Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

JAMES FRINZI; FRINZI FAMILY TRUST, 

MULTIBAND GLOBAL RESOURCES, 

LLC, 

 Defendant(s). 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING 

NO: 23-03036-mvl 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby file this Notice of Appearance as 

counsel for Defendants James Frinzi, Frinzi Family Trust, and Multiband Global Resources, LLC 

and request that all notices given or required to be given in this case, and all papers served or 

required to be served in this case, be served upon the undersigned at the following address: 

Jason M. Rudd 

Paul Elkins 

Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP 

3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 500 

Dallas, Texas75204 

Telephone: (214) 692-6200 

Facsimile: (214) 692-6255 

jason.rudd@wickphillips.com 

paul.elkins@wickphillips.com 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 85 Filed 09/05/24 Entered 09/05/24 12:35:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PAGE 2 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the foregoing request includes notices and 

papers referred to in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and additionally includes, without 

limitation, notices of any application, complaint, demand, hearing, motion, petition, pleading or 

request, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, and whether transmitted or conveyed 

by mail, telephone or otherwise. 

Dated: September 5, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Paul T. Elkins 

Jason M. Rudd, Tex. Bar No. 24028786 

Paul T. Elkins, Tex. Bar No. 24092383 

Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP 

3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 500 

Dallas, TX 75204 

Phone: (214) 692-6200 

Fax: (214) 692-6255 

Email: jason.rudd@wickphillips.com 

 paul.elkins@wickphillips.com 

 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS JAMES 

FRINZI, FRINZI FAMILY TRUST, AND 

MULTIBAND GLOBAL RESOURCES, LLC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on September 5, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

clerk of the court using the CM/ECF system and have served a copy of the same to the following 

parties or their counsel via the method(s) indicated below: 

Davor Rukavina 

Thomas D. Berghman 

MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C. 

3800 Ross Tower 

500 N. Akard Street 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Counsel for the Scott Seidel, Chapter 7 Trustee 

 Hand Delivery 

 Regular Mail 

 Facsimile 

 E-mail 

 X CM/ECF 

/s/ Paul T. Elkins 

 Paul T. Elkins 

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 85 Filed 09/05/24 Entered 09/05/24 12:35:53 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Ronald D. PERRYMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 96 

To prevent agencies from using unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct 

surveillance of United States citizens, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prevent agencies from using unmanned aerial vehicles 

to conduct surveillance of United States citizens, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buzz Off Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHI6 CLES. 

7 (a) SURVEILLANCE.—A Federal law enforcement 

8 agency may not use an unmanned aerial vehicle to inten9 tionally conduct surveillance of, gather evidence or collect 

10 information about, or photographically or electronically 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 96 IH

1 record a specifically targeted United States citizen or the 

2 specifically targeted private property of a United States 

3 citizen. 

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), a 

5 Federal law enforcement agency may use an unmanned 

6 aerial vehicle to photograph, or otherwise record a United 

7 States citizen for the purposes of publishing or otherwise 

8 publicly disseminating such photograph or recording if the 

9 agency obtains the written consent of such United States 

10 citizen. 

11 (c) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

12 in the case that— 

13 (1) the President, acting through the Secretary 

14 of Homeland Security, authorizes use of an un15 manned aerial vehicle to conduct surveillance if the 

16 Secretary certifies in writing under oath that the 

17 surveillance is necessary to counter a high risk of a 

18 terrorist attack by a specific individual or organiza19 tion; or 

20 (2) the head of a Federal law enforcement 

21 agency first obtains a search warrant signed by a 

22 judge authorizing the use of an unmanned aerial ve23 hicle. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2022284EN.01002801.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Prigozhin v Council

(Case T-723/20) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - Freezing of funds - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Initial inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Errors of assessment - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Foreseeability of acts of the European Union)

(2022/C 284/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin (Saint-Petersburg, Russia) (represented by: M. Cessieux, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.C. Cadilhac and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Mr Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin, a Russian national, seeks the annulment, first, of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1483 of 14 October 2020 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2020 L 341, p. 16), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1481 of 14 October 2020 implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2020 L 341, p. 7), in so far his name was included in the lists of persons and entities set out in Annexes II and IV to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (OJ 2015 L 206, p. 34), and Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (OJ 2016 L 12, p. 1) (‘the lists in question’) and, secondly, after modification of the application, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1251 of 29 July 2021 amending Decision 2015/1333 (OJ 2021 L 272, p. 71), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1241 of 29 July 2021 implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation 2016/44 (OJ 2021 L 272, p. 1), in so far as his name was thereby maintained on the lists in question.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

---
BTXN 176 (rev. 12/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Frederic Bushe Fiege Case No.: 23−30707−swe7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO FILE A STATEMENT OF COMPLETION OF

COURSE IN PERSONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(Official Form 423)

Notice is hereby given that, subject to limited exceptions, a debtor must complete an instructional course in personal

financial management in order to receive a discharge under chapter 7 (11 U.S.C. § 727) . Pursuant to Rule 1007(b)(7)

of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the debtor(s) must complete and file Debtor's Certification of Completion of

Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management (Official Form 423)* as described in 11 U.S.C. §

111.

Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that Official Form 423 must be filed before a discharge can

be entered. Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that the debtor(s) must file Official Form 423

within 60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under § 341. Failure to file the certification will

result in the case being closed without an entry of discharge. If the debtor(s) subsequently file(s) a Motion to Reopen

the Case to allow for the filing of the Official Form 423, the debtor(s) must pay the full reopening fee due for filing

the motion.

DATED: 4/13/23 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

*NOTE: Official Form 423 (Debtor's Certification of Completion of Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management) must be

filed in all individual chapter 13 and chapter 7 cases even if the U.S. Trustee has not approved any credit counseling agency or financial

management course for the applicable district. See Rule 1007(b)(7).

Case 23-30707-swe7 Doc 9 Filed 04/13/23 Entered 04/13/23 18:00:12 Desc Ntc of

req to file FM cert Page 1 of 1
OVERSTREET WEALTH MANAGEMENT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ADVANCED HORIZONS VI, LLC INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2017063EN.01003301.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/33

---

Action brought on 21 December 2016 — Labiri v EESC and Committee of the Regions

(Case T-904/16)

(2017/C 063/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vassiliki Labiri (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. De Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), Committee of the Regions of the European Union (CoR)

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Secretary General of the Committee of the Regions of 11 May 2016 reassigning the applicant, as an administrator to the Translation Directorate pursuant to the settlement in Case F-33/15; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Secretary General of the Committee of the Regions of 11 May 2016 reassigning the applicant, as an administrator to the Translation Directorate pursuant to the settlement in Case F-33/15;

| — | hold that the EESC committed a misuse of power and infringed its obligation to act in good faith towards the applicant in knowingly misleading her as to the scope of the agreement concluded between the parties on 4 February 2016; |
| --- | --- |

—

hold that the EESC committed a misuse of power and infringed its obligation to act in good faith towards the applicant in knowingly misleading her as to the scope of the agreement concluded between the parties on 4 February 2016;

| — | order the EESC and the CoR jointly to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EESC and the CoR jointly to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging the infringement of Article 266 TFEU, since the contested decision was adopted in manifest breach of the amicable agreement reached in Case F-33/15 Labri v EESC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging the infringement of Article 266 TFEU, since the contested decision was adopted in manifest breach of the amicable agreement reached in Case F-33/15 Labri v EESC.

Labri

EESC

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a misuse of power, since the applicant was deliberately misled as to the scope of the agreement reached between the parties and more specifically as to the two committees’ interpretation of the terms of that agreement. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a misuse of power, since the applicant was deliberately misled as to the scope of the agreement reached between the parties and more specifically as to the two committees’ interpretation of the terms of that agreement.

---
IA 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service 

relating to ‘‘Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2025 

Mr. CAREY submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Internal Revenue Service relating to ‘‘Gross Proceeds 

Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services 

Effectuating Digital Asset Sales’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the In4 ternal Revenue Service relating to ‘‘Gross Proceeds Re5 porting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effec6 tuating Digital Asset Sales’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 106928 (DeVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:35 Jan 22, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ25.IH HJ25

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 25 IH 

1 cember 30, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or 

2 effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Donald P. BALDAUF v. Julia Helen BALDAUF

2160113

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 146
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 147
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 148
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 149
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 150
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 151
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 152
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 153
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00028-M Document 16 Filed 05/19/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 154
Lister H. REEVES, Jr. v. ENTERPRISE JOINT ALABAMA VENTURE, INC.

2160721

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Richard HERBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of PRB Energy, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2007
| /s/ Robert W. Wright                 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert W. Wright                     |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)        |
|                                 |
|                                 |
| /s/ Daniel D. Reichel                |   |
| Daniel D. Reichel                    |
| Vice President—Finance          |
| (Principal Financial Officer)        |

 

1

----
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 279 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a 

single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIP CODE FOR FAIRLAWN, VIRGINIA. 

4 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con5 gress that— 

6 (1) the Commonwealth of Virginia is the only 

7 State in the United States where all cities are inde8 pendent from their surrounding counties; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 279 IH

1 (2) these independent cities are not politically a 

2 part of the surrounding counties, even if they are lo3 cated within their borders; 

4 (3) in Virginia these independent cities are sub5 ject to separate revenue collection and distribution 

6 practices related to roads, resources, and sales tax 

7 than neighboring counties; 

8 (4) the sales tax collected from electronic com9 merce from the unincorporated community of 

10 Fairlawn, Virginia, located in Pulaski County, is 

11 often misallocated to the independent city of 

12 Radford, Virginia, because they share the same ZIP 

13 Codes; and 

14 (5) Fairlawn, Virginia, should be eligible to ob15 tain a separate and unique ZIP Code from the 

16 neighboring independent city of Radford, Virginia, 

17 for tax purposes. 

18 (b) ZIP CODE DESIGNATION.—Not later than 180 

19 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

20 United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 

21 unique ZIP Code applicable to Fairlawn, Virginia. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Steven CAMPBELL v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-0359

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.