alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021019EN.01001701.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 13 October 2020 — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v Termas Sulfurosas de Alcafache, S.A.

(Case C-513/20)

(2021/C 19/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Defendant: Termas Sulfurosas de Alcafache, S.A.

Question referred

May payments made in return for the service of opening, for each user, an individual file setting out the clinical history entitling the user to purchase ‘traditional thermal cure’ treatments be included within the concept of ‘closely related activities’, provided for in Article 132(1)(b) of the VAT Directive (1), and may they, as such, be regarded as being exempt from VAT?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2 p.m., Tuesday, January 28, 2025.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Morton Salt, Inc.,*                         Docket No. CENT 2022-0176. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that violations of 30 CFR 57.3200 and 57.11053(c) were not significant and substantial.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

*Phone Number for Listening to Meeting:*                         1-(866) 236-7472.                    

*Passcode:*                         678-100.                    

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 6, 2025.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2025-00360 Filed 1-6-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0578

CITY OF WHITEFISH,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDRU CURRY,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 21 2022

03/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0578
# C_2016410EN.01002901.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/29

---

Action brought on 22 September 2016 — Wirecard v EUIPO (mycard2go)

(Case T-676/16)

(2016/C 410/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘mycard2go’ — Application No 14 303 457

Mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2016 in Case R 280/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the defendant for continuation of the registration procedure concerning EU trade mark No 014303457; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the defendant for continuation of the registration procedure concerning EU trade mark No 014303457;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  |        |  |                        
|                  |  |       
|                  |  | By:    |  | /s/ William J. Zaiser  
|                  |  | Name:  |  | William J. Zaiser      
|                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



31
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-1121

JAMES LEWIS, AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

ROSEMARY LEWIS,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 2, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County,

Dennis Craig, Judge.

Troy A. Fuhrman and Marie A. Borland, of 

Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, and

Stephanie E. Parker, of Jones Day, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B. 

Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, and Joshua R. 

Gale, of Wiggins, Childs, Pantazis, Fisher, 

Goldfarb LLC, DeLand, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta, No. SC16-218, 2017 WL 

1282111 (Fla. April 6, 2017); Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 110 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 

2013). 

SAWAYA, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
# C_2019016EN.01001501.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Hellenische Republik v Leo Kuhn

(Case C-308/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Scope - Article 1(1) - Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ - Bonds issued by a Member State - Involvement of the private sector in the restructuring of public debt of that State - Unilateral and retroactive adjustment of the borrowing terms - Collective action clauses - Action brought against the State by private creditors who hold those bonds as natural persons - Liability of the State for acts and omissions in the exercise of State authority))

(2019/C 16/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant on a point of law: Hellenische Republik

Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Leo Kuhn

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters is to be interpreted as meaning that a dispute, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, relating to an action brought by a natural person having acquired bonds issued by a Member State, against that State and seeking to contest the exchange of those bonds with bonds of a lower value, imposed on that natural person by the effect of a law adopted in exceptional circumstances by the national legislator, according to which those terms were unilaterally and retroactively amended by the introduction of a CAC allowing a majority of holders of the relevant bonds to impose that exchange on the minority, does not fall within ‘civil and commercial matters’ within the meaning of that article.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 28.8.2017.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 93 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 93

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2023

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected members of the following joint committees of Congress:
    Joint Committee on Printing: Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Merkley, Mr. 
Padilla, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. Hagerty.
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
Warner, Mr. Ossoff, Mrs. Fischer, and Mrs. Hyde-Smith.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jane Shaw, the Chief Executive Officer of
Aerogen, Inc. (the "Company"), and Robert Breuil, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

This
Certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Dated:
March 27, 2003

|                                                    |  |                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/JANE E. SHAWJane E. Shaw Chief Executive
Officer |  | /s/ROBERT S. BREUILRobert S. Breuil Chief Financial
Officer

---

QuickLinks
# C_2017006EN.01004602.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/46

---

Action brought on 31 October 2016 — PY v EUCAP Sahel Niger

(Case T-763/16)

(2017/C 006/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PY (Souffelweyersheim, France) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: EUCAP Sahel Niger (Niamey, Niger)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare the present action to be admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action to be admissible and well founded;

and accordingly,

| — | declare the Mission to be liable within the meaning of Article 340 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the Mission to be liable within the meaning of Article 340 TFEU;

| — | order the payment of compensation for the material damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the payment of compensation for the material damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the payment of compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant, assessed at EUR 70 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the payment of compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant, assessed at EUR 70 000;

| — | order the defendant to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant invokes a single plea in law, alleging contractual breaches on the part of the Mission EUCAP Sahel Niger (‘the Mission’) which render it contractually liable within the meaning of Article 340 TFEU.

The applicant, a former member of staff of the Mission, alleges that the Mission committed contractual breaches in relation to internal investigation procedures and procedures for the protection of victims where a claim of harassment in the workplace has been made. Due to the Mission’s failure to act and its failure to open an internal investigation, the harassment reported by the applicant continued, intensified and resulted in substantial adverse effects on his health, leading to his emergency repatriation. It was not possible for the applicant to resume his duties before the expiry of his contract.

The applicant consequently seeks compensation for the non-material damage that he has suffered as a result of (i) being forced to endure harassment, despite having reported it, for many months, something that the Mission could have prevented, (ii) being laid off from work and (iii) the deterioration in his health and particularly the depression from which he has been suffering ever since. The applicant also seeks compensation for the financial damage resulting from the loss of his remuneration after 30 days on sick leave and from loss of the chance to have his contract of employment renewed.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DOUGLAS BARCLAY

, Appellant,

v.

DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 20 88

[ March 30, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Michael A. Robinson

, Judge; L.T. Case No. CA CE16

- 005080

.

Bernardo Protano of Bernardo Protano, Esq., P.A., Hollywood, for

appellant.

Robert Garven, Margate, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C ONNER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00604]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Obstetrics 
and Maternal-Fetal Biology Study Section.
    Date: March 21, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child, 
Health and Human Development, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Luis E. Dettin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, NIH 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2131B, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 827-8231, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 8, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00604 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
# C_2017382EN.01003301.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 22 August 2017 — Administrative penalty proceedings against Josef Baumgartner

(Case C-513/17)

(2017/C 382/40)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Josef Baumgartner

Other parties: Bundesamt für Güterverkehr, Staatsanwaltschaft Köln

Other parties:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the first sentence of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a penalty imposed on an undertaking or a manager of an undertaking pursuant to Paragraphs 30, 9 and 130 of the Gesetz über Ordnungswidrigkeiten (German Law on administrative offences, ‘OWiG’) for an administrative offence committed at the seat of the undertaking may be imposed only by the Member State in whose territory the undertaking has its seat? Or are other Member States also authorised to impose a penalty for the administrative offence when that offence has been detected on their territory?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Placido H. Canta, Chief Financial Officer of Lakeside Financial
Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   November 12, 2004                    __________/S/____________
                                              Placido H. Canta,
                                              Chief Financial Officer of Manager
                                              Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.