alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 38 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) and Amendment No. 507 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50660 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NICHOLAS HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-98-CR-276-1

-------------------- September 1, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Nicholas Hernandez Martinez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Martinez argues that his warrantless arrest was not supported by probable cause. He contends that, as a result, any and all evidence seized from and derived from that arrest, interrogation, the subsequent search of his person and vehicle, and his post-arrest confession should have been suppressed as the fruit of an illegal arrest. Martinez reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress by entering a conditional guilty plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.No. 99-50660 -2- P. 11(a)(2). Based upon the testimony presented at the hearing on Martinez’s motion to suppress, we conclude that the officers had probable cause to arrest Martinez. See Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213, 237 (1983); United States v. Delario , 912 F.2d 766, 768 (5th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Finance Holdings LLC(‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunctionwith the filing of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the‘‘Report’’) with the Securities andExchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending June30,  2006, hereby certify asfollows:

|          |                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|          |                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations forNalco. |

|        |  |  |                                                                                       |
|--------|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/ WILLIAM H.JOYCE                                                                   |
|   |  |  | William H.JoyceChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August9,2006                 |
|   |  |  | /s/BRADLEY J. BELL                                                                    |
|   |  |  | Bradley J.BellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:August  9,2006 |
|        |

----
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 1 of 20 PageID 39
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 2 of 20 PageID 40
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 3 of 20 PageID 41
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 4 of 20 PageID 42
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 5 of 20 PageID 43
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 6 of 20 PageID 44
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 7 of 20 PageID 45
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 8 of 20 PageID 46
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 9 of 20 PageID 47
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 10 of 20 PageID 48
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 11 of 20 PageID 49
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 12 of 20 PageID 50
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 13 of 20 PageID 51
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 14 of 20 PageID 52
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 15 of 20 PageID 53
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 16 of 20 PageID 54
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 17 of 20 PageID 55
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 18 of 20 PageID 56
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 19 of 20 PageID 57
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 6 Filed 04/18/03 Page 20 of 20 PageID 58
Gregory MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 15, 2019

Affirmed.
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 1 of 19 PageID 104
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 2 of 19 PageID 105
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 3 of 19 PageID 106
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 4 of 19 PageID 107
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 5 of 19 PageID 108
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 6 of 19 PageID 109
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 7 of 19 PageID 110
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 8 of 19 PageID 111
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 9 of 19 PageID 112
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 10 of 19 PageID 113
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 11 of 19 PageID 114
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 12 of 19 PageID 115
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 13 of 19 PageID 116
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 14 of 19 PageID 117
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 15 of 19 PageID 118
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 16 of 19 PageID 119
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 17 of 19 PageID 120
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 18 of 19 PageID 121
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 17 Filed 05/27/03 Page 19 of 19 PageID 122
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 911 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 911

        Designating December 1, 2024, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2024

   Mr. Warnock (for himself and Mrs. Capito) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Designating December 1, 2024, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the 
        United States;
Whereas every individual traveling on roads and highways needs to drive in a 
        safer manner in order to reduce deaths and injuries that result from 
        motor vehicle crashes;
Whereas, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 
        wearing a seat belt saves more than 15,000 lives each year;
Whereas the Senate wants all people of the United States to understand the life-
        saving importance of wearing a seat belt and encourages motorists to 
        drive safely, not just during the holiday season, but every time they 
        get behind the wheel; and
Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is 1 of the busiest highway traffic days 
        of the year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) encourages--
                    (A) high schools, colleges, universities, 
                administrators, teachers, primary schools, and 
                secondary schools to launch campus-wide educational 
                campaigns to urge students to focus on safety when 
                driving;
                    (B) national trucking firms--
                            (i) to alert employee drivers to be 
                        especially focused on driving safely on the 
                        Sunday after Thanksgiving; and
                            (ii) to publicize the importance of the day 
                        through use of Citizens Band (commonly known as 
                        ``CB'') radios and truck stops across the 
                        United States;
                    (C) clergies to remind their members to travel 
                safely when attending services and gatherings;
                    (D) law enforcement personnel to remind drivers and 
                passengers to drive safely, particularly on the Sunday 
                after Thanksgiving; and
                    (E) all people of the United States to use the 
                Sunday after Thanksgiving as an opportunity to educate 
                themselves about highway safety; and
            (2) designates December 1, 2024, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.
                                 <all>
```
Ian DREWE, Appellant, v. Simon REYNOLDS, Brack Jaskey, and Applied Efforts, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-1845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Daniel Eugene GIBBS, Sr., Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, and Florida Commission on Offender Review, Respondents.

No. 1D17-5324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 26, 2019

Daniel Eugene Gibbs, Sr., pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee; Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

*865The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Steve T. Laflin, certify that:

I have  reviewed this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of  International  Isotopes,
Inc.;

Based on my  knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report,  fairly present in all material  respects the financial
condition,  results of  operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The  registrant's  other  certifying   officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


 Date: March 29, 2005


 /S/ Steve T. Laflin
 -----------------------
 Steve T. Laflin
 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2018123EN.01000602.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 February 2018 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-181/17) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport policy - Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 - Road transport operator - Licence for public transport - Conditions for grant - Article 3(1) and (2) - Article 5(b) - Number of vehicles required - National legislation - Stricter conditions for grant - Higher minimum number of vehicles))

(2018/C 123/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Rius, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: V. Ester Casas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by requiring undertakings to have at least three vehicles in order to obtain a public transport licence, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) and (2) and Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by requiring undertakings to have at least three vehicles in order to obtain a public transport licence, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) and (2) and Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

1

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A1 7 A1 22 9

. G W E N D O LYN MCI NTYRE v. BAKER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATI ON.

Gwen d o l y n M cIn t y re fi l ed t h i s d irect ap p eal seek i n g rev i ew o f t h e s u p eri o r

co u rt ’ s o rd er affi rm i n g a d eci s i o n o f t h e St at e Bo ard o f Ed u cat io n

. A n ap p eal fro m

a d e ci s i o n o f t he su p eri or co u rt rev i ewi ng a d eci si o n o f a l o w er t ri b u n al , h o we v e r , m u st be t ak en by ap pl icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o nary ap p e a l

. O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ); s ee al s o Ho g a n v. Ta

yl o r Co u n ty Bd . o

f Ed

. , 1 5 7 Ga. Ap p

. 6 8 0 (2 7 8 SE2 d 1 0 6 ) (1 9 8 1 ). Becau s e M cIn t y re fai l ed t o fo l l o w t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap peal p ro ced ur e a s req u i red , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s di ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 13, 2017

03/13/2017
# C_2016175EN.01002701.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/27

---

Action brought on 22 March 2016 — Tulliallan Burlington v EUIPO — Burlington Fashion (BURLINGTON)

(Case T-123/16)

(2016/C 175/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Tulliallan Burlington Ltd (St Helier, Jersey) (represented by: A. Norris, Barrister)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Burlington Fashion GmbH (Schmallenberg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark word mark ‘Burlington’ — International registration designating the European Union No 982 020

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2016 in Case R 1635/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the contested mark in respect of all of the contested goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the contested mark in respect of all of the contested goods;

| — | order the payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with this appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(5), 8(4) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(5), 8(4) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
NO. 06-14-00216-CR 

TRIAL NO. 43975-B 

PHYLLIS GWEN PRUITT § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

VS. § 6TH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

STATE OF TEXAS § STATE OF TEXAS 

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT 

Now comes Kyle Dansby, attorney for Appellant Phyllis Gwen Pruitt and files this 

Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief of this cause in the filing of the appeal due February 

23,2-15 and shows the following: 

I. This motion is filed in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

2. Attorney Kyle Dansby files this motion for request of a one day extension to file 

Appellant's brief. 

3. Major inclement weather all over the Northeast Texas area forced the closing of 

Appellant's attorney's office early. At the time of the closing of the office attorney 

was in the process of completing the Anders brief for Appellant, along with the 

requisite Motion to Withdraw as Appellate Counsel and letter to Appellant, along 

with copies of the entire appellate record. Attorney attempted to file the brieffrom 

home before 5PM yesterday, but attorney does not have conversion software on his 

home computer, and could not efile a Word document. 

4. Attorney requests a one-time one day extension so that attorney's Anders brief 

will be properly filed, and that Appellant is not harmed due to major inclement 

weather. 

S. This is attorney's first, and only, request for an extension. 

6. This motion is not made for purposes of delay but so that justice may be done. 

WHEREFORE premises considered, the Defendant respectfully requests that this, the Motion 

for Extension of Time to File Brief, be granted. 

Respectfully Submitted 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00216-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

2/24/2015 2:51:42 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 2/24/2015 2:51:42 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
BY: ~~~~~~~~~~-

Kyle D sby 

Attorney at Law 

P.O. Box 1914 

Marshall, TX 75671 

(903) 738-6162 

(888) 410-1583 (fax) 

kdansbylaw@gmail.com 

SBN: 24059180 

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Kyle Dansby, 

who, being duly sworn, upon his oath stated that he is the person who subscribed his name to the 

above and foregoing instrument, and that the matters stated herein are, to the best of his 

information and belief, true and correct. 

2014. 

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME on this the~ day Of'1-doYU¥J 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Kyle Dansby, attorney for Appellant, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this 

motion was delivered to the Gregg County Criminal District Attorney's Office, via email to Zan 

Brown, appellate counsel for Appellee. 

Kyl ansby 

Attorney for Appell
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Justin Yorke, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 3, 2011  /s/ Justin YorkeName:Justin YorkeTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.