alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Tuesday, January 28, 2025.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Morton Salt, Inc.,*                         Docket No. CENT 2022-0176. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that violations of 30 CFR 57.3200 and 57.11053(c) were not significant and substantial.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

*Phone Number for Listening to Meeting:*                         1-(866) 236-7472.                    

*Passcode:*                         678-100.                    

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 6, 2025.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2025-00365 Filed 1-6-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
Michael Alan MCCALLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 26, 2019

Affirmed.
#### Albert Davis, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed August 1, 1927.

*S. K. Gillis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*J. B. Johnson,*Attorney General, and *H. E. Carter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

In this case the judgment is affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Annie Fields v. State of Florida, filed at this term of the Court.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 91 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 91

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2025

Mr. Arrington submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Budget (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $11,990,000 for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,995,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2025, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2026; and
            (2) not more than $5,995,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2026, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2027.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley Hawkings, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2007

By: ***/s/ Bradley Hawkings***

Bradley Hawkings

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

AMBER MENENDEZ ISAAC and AMANDA M. MENENDEZ, 

as co-personal representatives of the Estate of Mary E. Menendez,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants,

DOUGLAS MENENDEZ; SHAWN KALETA; HEMINGWAY'S 

HIDEAWAY, LLC; LOUIS NAJMY; and NAJMY THOMPSON, P.L.,

Appellees.

No. 2D2021-3589

May 10, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, 

Judge.

Andres Cordova, Sina Bahadoran, Daniel R. Lever, and Michele A. Vargas

of Clyde & Co US LLP, Miami, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Debbie Sines Crockett, Edward K. Cheffy, David A. Zulian, and Sarah L. 

Baulac of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., Naples; James E. Aker; and E. Dusty 

Aker of Aker Law Firm, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants 

Amber Menendez Isaac and Amanda M. Menendez.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 2 Filed 04/01/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 2 Filed 04/01/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 15
EX PARTE Mary EMERY

(In re: Clark Corbett Dickerson III and Joyce Dickerson, as his guardian v. Mary Emery)

2160923

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                  |                                         |                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                                  | **OCCULOGIX,                INC.**           |
|                                                             |                                    |                              |
| Date:   November                9,                2007 | By:                                | /s/ Elias                Vamvakas |
|                                                                  |  Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                                  |                                         |

----
# Chart13

&"Arial,Regular"&10 Page 5 - &P	

Chart 13

2019 Cumulative Percentage of Fuel Consumption by Fuel Type and Aircraft Type

# 5.1

Page 5 - &P
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 223 

To prohibit funding for the implementation and enforcement of Federal red 

flag orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Mr. CRENSHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding for the implementation and enforcement 

of Federal red flag orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Unjust Red 

5 Flag Laws Act of 2025’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 223 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION 

2 AND ENFORCEMENT OF RED FLAG LAWS OR 

3 RULES. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION ON FUNDING.—None of the funds 

5 made available for any Federal department or agency may 

6 be used to— 

7 (1) implement or enforce Federal red flag laws; 

8 or 

9 (2) provide assistance to States, local, tribal, or 

10 territorial government departments or agencies for 

11 the implementation or enforcement of red flag laws. 

12 (b) RED FLAG LAW DEFINED.—In this section, the 

13 term ‘‘red flag law’’ means a risk-based, temporary, and 

14 preemptive protective order that authorizes the removal of 

15 a firearm without due process. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.3 

**DEGOLYERAND MACNAUGHTON**

5001 Spring Valley Road 

Suite 800 East 

Dallas, Texas 75244 

www.demac.com 

March 2, 2006 

We hereby consent to references to our firm and the inclusion andincorporation by reference of information from our report entitled “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2004 on Reserves owned by Challenger Minerals, Inc. in the West Heather Area of the Broom Field offshore United Kingdom” signedFebruary 28, 2005, relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenue of certain interests of Challenger Minerals, Inc., a subsidiary of the GlobalSantaFe Corporation (the “Company”) in (i) Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for 2005, (ii) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005, and the Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosure (unaudited) therein, (iii) the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.333-7070, 333-62708, 333-73878, 333-112670, 333-105015 and 333-111448), (iv) the Company’s Post Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-70268), and (v) theCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-127168).
Robert Lee COON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1749

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.
<PAGE>



Exhibit 21

                            Kendle International Inc.
                                 Subsidiary List

Subsidiary                                   Jurisdiction of Organization
----------                                   ----------------------------
Kendle U.K. Inc.                                       Ohio

Kendle GmbH                                          Germany

Kendle Vermogensverwaltungs GmbH                     Germany

Kendle International B.V.                        The Netherlands

U-Gene Clinical Research B.V.                    The Netherlands

U-Gene Research Biotechnology B.V.               The Netherlands

Kendle International Holdings Limited            United Kingdom

Kendle Branches Limited                          United Kingdom

Kendle International Limited                     United Kingdom

Kendle U.K. Limited                              United Kingdom

Kendle International SARL                             France

Kendle R&D Pty Limited                              Australia

Kendle R&D Unit Trust                               Australia

ACER/EXCEL INC.                                     New Jersey

Kendle Delaware Inc.                                 Delaware

AAC Consulting Group, Inc.                           Maryland

Kendle Canada Inc.                                    Canada

CPR Acquisition LLC                                    Ohio

Kendle International Holdings Pty Limited           Australia

Kendle Pty Limited                                  Australia

Kendle Unit Trust                                   Australia
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 108 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 108

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 5, 2025.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Ms. Chu to rank immediately after Ms. Jayapal.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended July 31, 2007  as  filed  with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:    9/19/07                      By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     ---------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
Lamont James WILLIAMS v. STATE

CR-16-0287

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





Date: May 21, 2010





By: /s/ David Zaikin


David Zaikin


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2018436EN.01001402.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2018 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-599/17) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Implementing Directive (EU) 2015/2392 - Reporting to competent authorities of actual or potential infringements of the market abuse regulation - Failure to communicate or failure to transpose within the prescribed period))

(2018/C 436/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Rius and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Jiménez García, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2015/2392 of 17 December 2015 on Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards reporting to competent authorities of actual or potential infringements of that regulation, and by failing to communicate to the European Commission the text of the provisions adopted to transpose that implementing directive, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that implementing directive, in particular under the first paragraph of Article 13 thereof; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2015/2392 of 17 December 2015 on Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards reporting to competent authorities of actual or potential infringements of that regulation, and by failing to communicate to the European Commission the text of the provisions adopted to transpose that implementing directive, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that implementing directive, in particular under the first paragraph of Article 13 thereof;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6267

JAKIE HAMMONDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE KENWORTHY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-hc-02033-H)

Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 24, 2007

Before MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jakie Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Appleton Reeves, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jakie Hammonds seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hammonds has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: UICI "ASSOCIATION-GROUP" INSURANCE

LITIGATION

Kathleen Ansley, et al. v. HealthMarkets, Inc., et al., ) 

E.D. North Carolina, C.A. No. 5:08-88 ) MDL No. 1578

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the entire Panel: Plaintiffs move, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425,

435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring their action to the Northern District of

Texas for inclusion in MDLNo. 1578. Defendants Mid-West National Life Insurance Co. of Tennessee

and the Alliance for Affordable Services oppose the motion to vacate. 

After considering all argument of counsel, we find that this action involves common questions

of fact with the actions in this litigation previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas, and

that transfer of this action to the Northern District of Texas for inclusion in MDL No. 1578 will serve

the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.

We further find that transfer of this action is appropriate for reasons that we set out in our original order

directing centralization in this docket. In that order, we held that the Northern District of Texas was

a proper Section 1407 forum for actions involving allegations that the defendants engaged in a scheme

to sell so-called association-group insurance by, inter alia, fraudulently concealing relationships

between certain insurance companies and two purported not-for-profit associations and making

fraudulent misrepresentations in connection with the marketing of memberships in the associations.

See In re UICI "Association-Group" Insurance Litigation, 305 F.Supp.2d 1360 (J.P.M.L. 2004). 

Plaintiffs can present their motion to remand to state court to the transferee court. See, e.g., In

re Ivy, 901 F.2d 7 (2nd Cir. 1990); In re Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practices

Litigation, 170 F.Supp.2d 1346, 1347-48 (J.P.M.L. 2001). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, this action is transferred

to the Northern District of Texas and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable A. Joe

Fish for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in this docket.

 

 Case 3:04-md-01578-G Document 178 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 2 PageID 3998
 - 2 -

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

_________________________________________

 John G. Heyburn II 

 Chairman

J. Frederick Motz Robert L. Miller, Jr.

Kathryn H. Vratil David R. Hansen

 

 Case 3:04-md-01578-G Document 178 Filed 08/12/08 Page 2 of 2 PageID 3999