alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016371EN.01000901.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/9

---

Action brought on 27 June 2016 — Dimos Athinaion v Commission

(Case T-360/16)

(2016/C 371/10)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dimos Athinaion (Athens, Greece) (represented by: G. Georgakarakos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Regulation (ΕU) 2016/646 of 20 April 2016, amending Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6), (1) and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Regulation (ΕU) 2016/646 of 20 April 2016, amending Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6), (1) and

1

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action the applicant relies on three pleas in law:

| 1. | The first plea in law claims an infringement of Article 191 TFEU, which sets out the objectives of the European Union policy on the environment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The first plea in law claims an infringement of Article 191 TFEU, which sets out the objectives of the European Union policy on the environment.

| 2. | The second plea in law claims an infringement of Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which affirms the right to a high level of environmental protection. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The second plea in law claims an infringement of Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which affirms the right to a high level of environmental protection.

| 3. | The third plea in law claims an infringement of Article 15 of Regulation (ΕC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information. (2) |
| --- | --- |

3.

The third plea in law claims an infringement of Article 15 of Regulation (ΕC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information. (2)

2

---

(1)  OJ L 109, 2016, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 171, 2007, p. 1.

2

---
No. 14-14-00862-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals 

For the 

Fourteenth District of Texas 

At Houston 



No. 876249-F 

In the 185th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 



WOODROW MILLER 

Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee 



STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

 COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1) and 

38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for extension of 

time in which to file the State’s brief in this case, and, in support thereof, presents the 

following: 

ACCEPTED

14-14-00862-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/2/2015 4:28:50 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/2/2015 4:28:50 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
1. In the 185th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 876249-F,

the trial court denied relief to the Appellant on October 9, 2014, in Ex parte Woodrow 

Miller.

2. A written notice of appeal was timely filed on October 15, 2014.

3. Appellant’s brief was filed with this Court on January 9, 2015.

4. The State’s brief was due to be filed with this Court on February 9, 2015.

5. An extension of time in which to file the State’s brief is requested until April 6, 

2015.

6. No previous extensions have been granted to the State.

7. The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are:

The State’s brief in this case is being prepared by the Chief of the Appellate 

Division. He has numerous other duties in that position. Therefore, additional 

time has been necessary in order to prepare the State’s brief.
WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an extension of time until 

April 6, 2015, in which to file the State’s brief in these cases.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 05263700

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been mailed to the 

appellant at the following addresses on April 2, 2015:

Woodrow Miller

12929 Main Street

Houston, Texas 77035-56-3

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 05263700

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

Date: April 2, 2015
Case 6:05-cv-00003-C Document 28 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 160
 

 Case 6:05-cv-00003-C Document 28 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 161
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Aampro Group, Inc., (the "Registrant")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
      Farkas, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:








|(1) | The
              Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
              fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Registrant
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: April
                16, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Stephen
                FarkasStephen
                  Farkas
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not
      deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
      Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or
      after
      the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
# C_2018301EN.01000801.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2018 — Mast-Jägermeister SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-217/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community design - Application for registration of designs representing beakers - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Article 36(1)(c) - Graphic representation - Articles 45 and 46 - Attribution of a date of filing - Conditions - Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 - Article 4(1)(e) and Article 10(1) and (2)))

(2018/C 301/09)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Mast-Jägermeister SE (represented by: C. Drzymalla, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mast-Jägermeister SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mast-Jägermeister SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
Exhibit 10.4
 *
    
    Confidential Treatment has
been requested for the marked
portions of this exhibit
pursuant to Rule 24B-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
 AMENDMENT
 between
 TRUBION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 and
 LONZA SALES AG
(successor in interest to Lonza Biologics, Inc. by way of novation)
 to
 MANUFACTURING SERVICES AGREEMENT
Dated November 21, 2005
 Page 1 of 6




---



##### 



Confidential
 AMENDMENT TO MANUFACTURING SERVICES AGREEMENT
  (1)
    
    Trubion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Trubion) and(2)
    
    Lonza Sales AG (Lonza Sales)
    Manufacture of TRU-016
 Amendments to MSA
 Technology Transfer and cGMP Manufacturing Schedule 2-016
 Section 1, Definitions
 Section 1.41, Master Cell Bank and Initial Master Cell Bank
   *Confidential Treatment Requested.
 Page 2 of 6




---



##### 



Confidential
 Section 1.48, Product TRU-016.
 Section 1.50, Quality Agreement Exhibit A-016
 Section 3.1(b) Subcontractors Subcontractors
 Section 3.2, Raw Materials
 Section 3.3, [*]
 Section 5.1(c)(1), Price Adjustment
 Section 6.2(b)(2), Critical Raw Materials Exhibit D-016
 Section 12.1, Control of Cell Lines and Cell Banks
 Section 23.1, Notices
 *Confidential Treatment Requested.
 Page 3 of 6




---



##### 



Confidential
 
 Exhibit A, Quality Agreement Exhibit A-016
 Exhibit B, Coordinators Exhibit B
 Exhibit D, Initial List of Critical Raw Materials Exhibit D-016
 Exhibit E, Copy of Bulk Drug Specifications Exhibit E-016 Exhibit E-016
 Schedule 1, Description of Product Schedule 1-016
 Schedule 2, Description of Services Schedule 2-016
 Schedule 3, Prices and Schedule of Payments Schedule 3-016 Schedule 2-016
 Exhibits and Schedules
 All Other Terms of MSA
 Headings; Capitalized Terms
 Counterparts; Electronic Signatures
 *Confidential Treatment Requested.
 Page 4 of 6




---



##### 



Confidential
  Integration; Applicable Law
  TRUBION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    
    LONZA SALES AGBy:
    
    /s/ PETER A. THOMPSON
    
    By:
    
    /s/ GERRY KENNEDY       /s/ KAREN FALLONName:
    
    Peter Thompson, MD, FACP
    
    Name:
    
    Gerry Kennedy      Karen FallonTitle:
    
    Chairman, President & CEO
    
    Title:
    
    Authorized Signatory      Authorized signatoryDate:
    
    12/5/08
    
    Date:
    
    27 Nov 08      27 Nov 08
 Page 5 of 6




---



##### 



Confidential
 Exhibit A-016
Quality Agreement
 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

          TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TravelCenters of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James W. George, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ James W. George
----------------------------------------------------
James W. George
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
Walter PENDARVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3048

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Albert M. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. SECTION 23 PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. ; Nancy Peraine; Joseph Wilfred Harris; Nicholas Theiss; Victoria Craig ; Charles Donald Peters; Ronald Daugherty; Kathleen Gill ; Harvey Goldstein; Peer Builders ; Carlson & Soforth ; Earle Jay Carlson; Ronald E. Woods ; Karen Lynne Perry; and Teresa Lynn Boucher, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cr-00240-P Document 1154 Filed 08/29/08 Page 1 of 4 PageID 15467
Case 3:04-cr-00240-P Document 1154 Filed 08/29/08 Page 2 of 4 PageID 15468
Case 3:04-cr-00240-P Document 1154 Filed 08/29/08 Page 3 of 4 PageID 15469
Case 3:04-cr-00240-P Document 1154 Filed 08/29/08 Page 4 of 4 PageID 15470
Kimberly JOHNSON, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:04-cv-02001-M Document 25 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 98
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7252

DONALD EUGENE GRIFFIN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,

v. A. J. PADULA, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00874-PMD) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 1, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, and denying his motion to alter or amend. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Griffin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 272 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 272

    To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the 
 entities will not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity 
                      that performs, an abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

 Mrs. Fischbach (for herself, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. Crenshaw, 
Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Ezell, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Jackson 
 of Texas, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. 
Aderholt, Mr. Williams of Texas, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Webster 
   of Florida, Mr. Kustoff, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. Bost, Mr. 
 Sessions, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Collins, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Mann, Mr. Taylor, 
 Mrs. Bice, Mr. Moran, Mr. Guest, Mr. Onder, Mr. Babin, and Mr. Latta) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the 
 entities will not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity 
                      that performs, an abortion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 
2025''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ABORTION.

    (a) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be provided (directly or 
indirectly, including through contract or subcontract) to an entity 
unless the entity certifies that, during the period for which such 
funds are provided, the entity will not perform, and will not provide 
any funds to any other entity that performs, an abortion.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to an 
abortion where--
            (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or
            (2) a physician certifies that the woman suffers from a 
        physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that 
        would place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is 
        performed, including a life-threatening physical condition 
        caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section, the term ``entity'' means the 
entire legal entity, including any entity that controls, is controlled 
by, or is under common control with such entity.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit  32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Bernard J. Jacob, Chief  Executive Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (the  Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for  the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.





Dated: February 9, 2006





| |        | /s/ Bernard J. Jacob   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Bernard J. Jacob       
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a  separate disclosure document.





---
Neil S. KAVANAGH v. Roe Eugene HEBRON

NO. 2019-C-0219

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
# C_2023063EN.01003401.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Green Power Technologies v Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking

(Case T-533/20) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Grant agreements - Eligible costs - OLAF report finding certain expenditure incurred to be ineligible - Recovery of sums paid - Burden of proof - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 - Counterclaim)

(2023/C 63/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Green Power Technologies (Bollullos de la Mitación, Spain) (represented by: A. León González and A. Martínez Solís, lawyers)

Defendant: Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking, formerly ECSEL Joint Undertaking (represented by: O. Lambinet and A. Salaun, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 272 TFEU, the applicant seeks a declaration that the amounts advanced by the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking in performance of the contracts Pollux (No 100205), IoE (No 269374), Motorbrain (No 270693) and AGATE (No 325630), concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) in order to finance the corresponding projects, which that joint undertaking sought to recover through the issuance of debit note No 4440200016, were eligible costs.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Allows the counterclaim brought by the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Allows the counterclaim brought by the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking;

| 3. | Orders Green Power Technologies, SL to pay the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking the sum of EUR 204 302,13 claimed by the latter in its counterclaim; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Green Power Technologies, SL to pay the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking the sum of EUR 204 302,13 claimed by the latter in its counterclaim;

| 4. | Orders Green Power Technologies to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Green Power Technologies to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, Director, Secretary, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Date: March 23, 2011
 
 
 /s/ Kate Blankenship
 Kate Blankenship
 Principal Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00789-CR

John Christopher DOMINGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3592

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED March 25, 2015.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice