DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 11, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00430-CR 

No. 05-22-00431-CR 

No. 05-22-00432-CR 

No. 05-22-00433-CR 

JARRICK RYAN CROWE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. W15-34070-A, W15-34078-A, 

W15-34079-A & W15-76048-A 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Nowell 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

On April 26, 2022, Jarrick Ryan Crowe filed his notices of appeal in the Dallas 

County District Clerk’s office, seeking to challenge the trial court’s April 8, 2022 

findings of fact and conclusions of law on his applications for Article 11.07 writs of 

habeas corpus. The notices were forwarded to this Court. 

A court of appeals may review appeals only when authorized by law. Abbott 

v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). An applicant imprisoned 

after final conviction for a felony offense who desires to apply for habeas relief must 
 –2– 

do so under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07, §§ 1, 3; Bd. of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. The Eighth 

Court of Appeals, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding). 

This Court is not authorized by law to review the trial court’s determinations on an 

article 11.07 writ application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(b) 

(providing writ of habeas corpus filed after final conviction of felony for which death 

penalty is not imposed must be filed with trial court clerk and writ of habeas corpus 

is returnable to court of criminal appeals); Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483; see also Ex 

parte Wicker, No. 02-18-00318-CR, 2018 WL 4140642, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort 

Worth Aug. 30, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing 

appeal of trial court’s order recommending denial of article 11.07 writ application). 

Because we have no jurisdiction to review the trial court’s determinations on 

appellant’s article 11.07 applications for writ of habeas corpus, we dismiss these 

appeals. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

220430F.U05 

 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JARRICK RYAN CROWE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-22-00430-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. W15-34070-

A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Nowell participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. 

 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JARRICK RYAN CROWE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-22-00431-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. W15-34078-

A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Nowell participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. 

 
 –5– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JARRICK RYAN CROWE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-22-00432-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. W15-34079-

A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Nowell participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. 

 
 –6– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JARRICK RYAN CROWE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-22-00433-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. W15-76048-

A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Nowell participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022.