alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, S.
Gregory Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. [sec]. 1350, as adopted pursuant to [sec]. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ S. Gregory Clevenger

S. Gregory Clevenger
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
# C_2018142EN.01001302.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Romania) — SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA, Maria Magdalena Georgescu v Ministerul Economiei, Ministerul Energiei, Ministerul Finanţelor Publice

(Case C-76/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charges having an effect equivalent to customs duties - Article 30 TFEU - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Charge applied to exported petroleum products - Charge not passed on to the consumer - Tax burden for the taxpayer - Reimbursement of the sums paid by the taxpayer))

(2018/C 142/18)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA, Maria Magdalena Georgescu

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministerul Economiei, Ministerul Energiei, Ministerul Finanţelor Publice

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law, in particular Article 30 TFEU, must be interpreted as meaning that the taxpayer, who in fact pays the charge having an equivalent effect contrary to that article, must be able to obtain reimbursement of the sums which it has paid by way of that charge, even in a situation where the payment mechanism for the charge has been designed in national legislation so that the charge is passed on to the consumer.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

1

---
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 24
- 00169
- CR EX PARTE ISIAH SCOTT

O riginal Proceeding

From the 87th District Court Leon County, Texas Trial Court No. 22
- 0120CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Isiah Scott has filed a document that we have construed as an original application for a writ of habeas corpus. The courts of appeals, however, have no original habeas

corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. Ex parte Braswell , 630 S.W.3d 600, 601 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2021, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Martinez , 175 S.W.3d 510, 512

– 13 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding) (“Our law requires post

- conviction applications for writs of habeas corpus, for felony cases in which the death penalty was
not assess ed, to be filed in the court of original conviction, made returnable to the TexasEx parte Isiah Scott Page 2 Court of Criminal Appeals.”) (citing T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.07, § 3(a)

– (b)). Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

MATT JOHNSON Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 20, 2024 Do not publish [OT06]
EXHIBIT
31.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
Robinson, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dynamic Alert Limited (the
“Registrant”):





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:





a)
            designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;





b)
            evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and





c)
            presented
      in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):





a)
            all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and





b)
            any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
      controls; and





6. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.








Date:
November 12, 2009








By:           /s/
David Robinson





David
Robinson


Chairman
of the Board/Chief Executive Officer, principal executive
officer
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christophe Hidalgo,certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F ofCOMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO; 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.[OMITTED];

4.The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company andhave: 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financialreporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c)evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on evaluation; and 

d)disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and to the audit committee of the company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: April 15,2015

By: /s/Christophe HidalgoName: Christophe HidalgoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 192 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require Amtrak to include information on base pay and bonus compensation of certain Amtrak executives, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. ROUZER (for himself and Mr. GRAVES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require Amtrak 

to include information on base pay and bonus compensation of certain Amtrak executives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amtrak Executive 

5 Bonus Disclosure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMTRAK REPORTS AND AUDITS. 

7 Section 24315(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 192 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘, and make available to the 

2 public on the website of Amtrak,’’ after ‘‘submit to 

3 Congress’’; and 

4 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(2) provide the annual base pay and any 

7 bonus compensation paid to a member of the execu8 tive leadership team (including the chief executive 

9 officer, president, and officers) of Amtrak, including 

10 the criteria and metrics used to determine any such 

11 bonus compensation; and’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3



FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to Purchase Agreement (the "Amendment"), dated as of July 15, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), is made by and between ACQUIPORT MILFORD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), and VEREIT ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Buyer”).


RECITALS


A.    Buyer and Seller have entered into that certain Purchase Agreement dated as of June 27, 2016 (the “Agreement”), for the purchase and sale of the improved property described and defined therein as the “Property.”  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


B.    Buyer and Seller desire to amend the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.


AGREEMENT


NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1.    Contingency Period.  Section 2.2 of the Agreement shall be and hereby is amended by omitting such section in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:
“Contingency Period.  The period of time commencing on the Effective Date and ending at 5:00 p.m. New York time on July 19, 2016.”    
2.    Ratification.  The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, and shall be binding on the parties’ respective successors and/or assigns.
3.    Counterpart Signatures.  This Amendment may be executed by the parties in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.






[signatures appear on the following page]




    1







The parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


	
		
	SELLER:
	ACQUIPORT MILFORD LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 

	By:
	LXP Manager Corp., a Delaware corporation,
its manager

	 
	 

	 
	By:      /s/Lara S. Johnson       
Name: Lara S. Johnson
Title: Vice President

	 
	 

	BUYER:
	VEREIT ACQUISITIONS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 

	 
	By:      /s/ Daniel T. Hang     
Name: Daniel T Hang
Title: Authorized Officer








    2
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard Nathan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





Date:
November 19, 2010


/s/ Richard
      Nathan(Principal
      Financial Officer)
                Richard
      Nathan, Inc.





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

 

 

I, Mark J. Boggess, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Affinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the“Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 

Date: March 21, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  Mark J. Boggess                        |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Mark J. Boggess                             |   |
|   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

131

----
Order entered June 28, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00990-CR

No. 05-17-00991-CR

No. 05-17-00992-CR

GERARD MONTRELL PERRY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-11984-K, F16-11985-K, F16-11986-K

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the December 24, 2017 motion of 

Valencia Bush for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of 

the Court to remove Valencia Bush as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk 

of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Gerard Montrell Perry, 

TDCJ No. 02153962, Denton County Jail, 127 N. Woodrow Lane, No. 300, Denton, Texas, 

76205.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PRB GAS TRANSPORTATION, INC.**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRB GasTransportation, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005,I, Robert W. Wright, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PRB GasTransportation, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       This Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in thisForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofPRB Gas Transportation, Inc. for the periods presented therein.

 

Date:March 22, 2006

 
| /s/  ROBERT W.  WRIGHT                                                            |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert W. Wright  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 97 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the issuance of national 

injunctions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the 

issuance of national injunctions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Injunctive Authority 

5 Clarification Act of 2025’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ORDERS PURPORTING TO RESTRAIN ENFORCE7 MENT AGAINST NON-PARTIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 155 of title 28, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 97 IH

1 ‘‘§ 2285. Orders purporting to restrain enforcement 

2 against non-parties 

3 ‘‘No court of the United States (and no district court 

4 of the Virgin Islands, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Is5 lands) shall issue an order that purports to restrain the 

6 enforcement against a non-party of any statute, regula7 tion, order, or similar authority, unless the non-party is 

8 represented by a party acting in a representative capacity 

9 pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.’’. 

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

11 for chapter 155 of title 28, United States Code, is amend12 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 2285 the 

13 following: 

‘‘2285. Orders purporting to restrain enforcement against non-parties.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 86 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 

the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2025 

Mr. JORDAN (for himself and Mr. RASKIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

the Judiciary in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $31,714,000 for the One Hundred Nine9 teenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 86 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $15,857,000 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2025, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $15,857,000 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2026, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LARRY KEENE KEETON, ID # 1085942, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CV-2914-P

 )

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 23 day of January 2006. rd

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cv-02914-P Document 16 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69