alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 25, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00016-CR

WARREN L. HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1386667

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly 

weapon. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. 

See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
2

On January 7, 2016, this court issued an opinion affirming appellant’s 

conviction. Appellant subsequently notified this court that he had changed his 

address and requested an extension of time to file a pro se response. On February 

2, 2016, this court granted appellant’s motion, reinstated the appeal, and directed 

the trial court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in 

accordance with local procedure. On March 16, 2016, this court received 

confirmation that appellant received the trial record. 

Appellant received two additional extensions of time to file his pro se 

response until May 16, 2016. On June 2, 2016, this court received correspondence 

from appellant informing the court that he had not received a copy of counsel’s 

Anders brief. On June 20, 2016, this court provided appellant a copy of counsel’s 

brief. As of this date, more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has 

been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 1 Filed 05/28/04 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1
Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 1 Filed 05/28/04 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 1 Filed 05/28/04 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 1 Filed 05/28/04 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
Case 4:04-cv-00409-Y Document 1 Filed 05/28/04 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
Case 3:04-cv-00575-M Document 65 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 700
Case 3:04-cv-00575-M Document 65 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 701
Case 3:04-cv-00575-M Document 65 Filed 06/14/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 702
Case 3:04-cv-00575-M Document 65 Filed 06/14/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 703
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 3202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00578]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP25-344-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Probability of Default to be 
effective 2/6/2025.
    Filed Date: 1/6/25.
    Accession Number: 20250106-5185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/21/25.

    Docket Numbers: RP25-345-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: REX 2025-01-06 Negotiated Rate 
Agreement Amendment to be effective 1/4/2025.
    Filed Date: 1/6/25.
    Accession Number: 20250106-5217.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/21/25.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

    Dated: January 7, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00578 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 836 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 836

Recognizing Hispanic Restaurant Week and the contributions of Hispanic 
      restaurant owners and employees to the restaurant industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2024

     Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Cruz) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing Hispanic Restaurant Week and the contributions of Hispanic 
      restaurant owners and employees to the restaurant industry.

Whereas Hispanic Restaurant Week is celebrated from September 22, 2024, through 
        October 3, 2024, during the national celebration of Hispanic Heritage 
        Month from September 15, 2024, through October 15, 2024;
Whereas, in 2020, the Bureau of the Census estimated that 41,817 owners of 
        accommodation and food service businesses were Hispanic;
Whereas the restaurant industry plays a significant role in the economy of the 
        United States as the second-largest private sector employer in the 
        United States;
Whereas 25.9 percent of workers in the restaurant industry are Hispanic;
Whereas, according to a 2023 State of Latino Entrepreneurship report, published 
        by the Stanford Graduate School of Business, during the last decade, 
        Hispanic entrepreneurs have started small businesses, including 
        restaurants, at a higher rate than any other demographic;
Whereas, of the nearly 5,000,000 Hispanic-owned businesses in the United States, 
        the restaurant industry has the second highest number of Hispanic 
        owners;
Whereas 8 in 10 restaurant owners started their restaurant industry careers in 
        entry-level positions;
Whereas 63 percent of adults in the United States have worked in the restaurant 
        industry, making it ``the Nation's training ground''; and
Whereas the restaurant industry employs more minority managers than any other 
        industry: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) celebrates Hispanic Restaurant Week; and
            (2) acknowledges--
                    (A) the contributions of Hispanic owners and staff 
                of the restaurant industry to the United States 
                economy; and
                    (B) the fact that the restaurant industry provides 
                restaurant owners, chefs, dishwashers, and other staff 
                the opportunity to work hard, persevere, support their 
                families, and live the American Dream.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 14.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Numbers: 333-74703, 333-81400, 333-84044, 333-127660, 333-128619, 333-128621, 333-140798, 333-145751, and 333-149577 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Numbers: 333-162193 and 333-104778-01 on Form F-3 of our reports dated March 26, 2010, relating to (1) the 2009 and the 2008  financial statements and the retrospective adjustments to the 2007 financial statements of ABN AMRO Holding N.V., The Netherlands and subsidiaries, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the retrospective adjustments to the segment disclosures, consolidated  statement of comprehensive income and the 2007 financial statements for discontinued operations, and (2) the effectiveness of ABN AMRO Holding N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting as at  December 31, 2009, appearing in this annual report on Form 20-F of ABN AMRO Holding N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2009.








March 26, 2010


Deloitte Accountants B.V.

/s/ J.G.C.M. Buné
James Christopher COLE, Doc #S06972, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

James Christopher Cole, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EX PARTE Anthony Tyrone GURLEY

1160809 (CR-16-0177)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                |                                         |                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                                | **OCCULOGIX,                INC.**           |
|                                                           |                                    |                              |
| Date:   August                8,                2007 | By:                                | /s/ Elias                Vamvakas |
|                                                                |  Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                                |                                         |

----
# C_2016251EN.01004501.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/45

---

Action brought on 23 May 2016 — Trost Auto Service Technik v EUIPO (AUTOSERVICE.COM)

Trost Auto Service Technik

EUIPO (AUTOSERVICE.COM)

(Case T-259/16)

(2016/C 251/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trost Auto Service Technik SE (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘AUTOSERVICE.COM’ — Application for registration No 13 593 678

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2016 in Case R 1770/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019305EN.01000701.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Amazon EU Sàrl

(Case C-649/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2011/83/EU - Article 6(1)(c) - Information requirements for distance and off-premises contracts - Obligation, for a trader, to indicate its telephone number and its fax number ‘where they are available’ - Scope)

(2019/C 305/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV

Respondent: Amazon EU Sàrl

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1)(c) of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as, firstly, precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which imposes on traders, before concluding a distance or off-premises contract referred to in Article 2(7) and (8) of that directive, to provide, in all circumstances, their telephone number. Secondly, that provision does not imply an obligation for traders to establish a telephone or fax line, or to create a new email address to allow consumers to contact them and requires that number, the fax number or their email address to be communicated only where those traders already have those means of communication with consumers;

Article 6(1)(c) of Directive 2011/83 must be interpreted as meaning that, although that provision requires traders to make available to consumers a means of communication capable of satisfying the criteria of direct and effective communication, it does not preclude those traders from providing other means of communication than those listed in that provision in order to satisfy those criteria.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
Exhibit



Exhibit  10.27





October 17, 2014






Harold Hughes




Re: Quantenna Communications, Inc. Board of Directors


Dear Harold:


Quantenna Communications, Inc. (the "Company") is delighted to offer you a position as a director on the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board"). What follows is information on some of the benefits available to you as a director of the Company (a "Director").


As compensation for your services to the Company, it has been recommended that the Board grant you an option to purchase 3,200,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price per share equal to the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the dale of grant, which has been determined by the Board to be $0.04 per share. The shares shall vest monthly over 48 months following October 16, 2014 in equal monthly amounts subject to your continuing service as a Director of the Company on each applicable vesting date. In the event of a Change in Control of the Company, as such term is defined in the 2006 Stock Plan, one hundred percent of the then unvested shares subject to the option shall vest and become exercisable immediately prior to the closing of such Change in Control transaction. This option grant shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Company's 2006 Stock Plan and Stock Option Agreement, including vesting requirements.


The Company will also reimburse you for all reasonable expenses incurred by you in connection with your services to the Company. All reimbursements are in accordance with established Company policies.


As a Director, you will be entitled to indemnification and will be asked to enter into the Company's standard form directors and officers indemnification agreement.


Nothing in this offer or the Stock Option Agreement should be construed to interfere with or restrict in any way the rights of the Company and the Company's stockholders to remove any individual from the Board at any time in accordance with the provisions of applicable law.


This letter sets forth the terms of your service as a Director with the Company and supersedes any prior representations or agreements, whether written or oral. This letter may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement, signed by an officer of the Company and by you.


We hope that you find the foregoing terms acceptable. You may indicate your agreement with these terms and accept this offer by signing and dating both copies and returning one original letter to me. Your effective date as a Director will be the date that you are elected to the position of Director by the stockholders of the Company.


We look forward to you joining the Board. I believe you will make significant contributions to the Company as a director.













	
	
	Sincerely,

	 

	/s/ Sam Heidari

	Sam Heidari

	Chief Executive Officer














Agreed:


Harold Hughes
	
		
	Signature:
	/s/ Harold Hughes

	Date:
	Nov. 1, 2014








- 2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 21

   Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland 
Security relating to ``Modernizing H-2 Program Requirements, Oversight, 
                       and Worker Protections''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2025

 Mr. Arrington (for himself, Mr. Self, and Mr. Moore of West Virginia) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland 
Security relating to ``Modernizing H-2 Program Requirements, Oversight, 
                       and Worker Protections''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security relating to 
``Modernizing H-2 Program Requirements, Oversight, and Worker 
Protections'' (89 Fed. Reg. 103202), and such rule shall have no force 
or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.2  


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TRUST

1996 NON-QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE MAY 14, 1998)  


        WHEREAS, Equity Residential Properties Trust ("Equity") adopted the Equity Residential Properties Trust 1996
Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan ("Plan"), reserved the right to amend the Plan and amended and restated the Plan; and 


        WHEREAS, Equity desires to amend the Plan to extend the Plan to employees of Merry Land Investment Company, Inc. and to increase
the opportunity for Participants to make additional contributions; 


        NOW, THEREFORE, Equity hereby amends the Plan as follows: 



	1.
	Section 2.11
is amended, effective October 19, 1998, to read as follows:



	

	"2.11
The term 'Participating Employer' shall mean Equity, Equity Residential Properties Management Limited Partnership, Equity Residential Properties
Management Corp., Equity Residential Properties Management Corp. II, Merry Land Investment Company, Inc. and any affiliated company which is designated as such by the Committee."



	2.
	The
second sentence of Section 5(b) is amended, effective for the Purchase Period ending November 14, 1998, to read as follows:



	

	"A
Participant also shall have the right (i) at any time on or before fifteen days prior to the last day of a Purchase Period, to withdraw (without
interest) all or any part of the contributions credited to his or her Account for such purchase; or (ii) at any time prior to the last day of a Purchase Period, to increase his or her cash
contributions for such purchase, by delivering an amended Election Form (and for purposes of clause (ii), a check for such contributions) to the Plan Administrator." 




        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed on behalf of Equity as of the 1st day of October, 1998. 













EQUITY
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TRUST
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 103 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 103

To provide Members of Congress lawful access to certain Indian land to 
 assess the security of the international boundary between the United 
 States and Mexico located on that Indian land, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide Members of Congress lawful access to certain Indian land to 
 assess the security of the international boundary between the United 
 States and Mexico located on that Indian land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Border Security 
Assessment Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO INDIAN RESERVATIONS FOR BORDER SECURITY ASSESSMENT.

    (a) In General.--A member of Congress and any Congressional staff 
accompanying that member shall have lawful access to any Indian 
reservation that includes 50 or more contiguous miles of the 
international boundary between the United States and Mexico for the 
purpose of obtaining information for assessing national security, 
public safety, and the security of the international boundary. Such 
lawful access shall extend to any roadways or easements on Indian 
country.
    (b) Definition of Indian Country.--For the purposes of this 
section, the term ``Indian country'' shall have the meaning given that 
term in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```