alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 750 

Commending the Professional Women’s Hockey League Minnesota for winning 

the inaugural Professional Women’s Hockey League title on May 29, 2024. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Professional Women’s Hockey League Minnesota for winning the inaugural Professional Women’s 

Hockey League title on May 29, 2024. 

Whereas the inaugural season of the Professional Women’s 

Hockey League (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘PWHL’’) began on January 1, 2024; 

Whereas 6 teams, located in Montre ́al, Toronto, New York, 

Boston, Ottawa, and Minneapolis–Saint Paul, competed 

in the PWHL inaugural season; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota won the 2024 Walter Cup, defeating PWHL Boston 3–0 in game 5 of the PWHL 

Finals; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota is the first ever PWHL champion; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 750 IS 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota captain Kendall Coyne Schofield 

enters history as the first player ever to lift the Walter 

Cup; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota forward Taylor Heise was voted 

the Ilana Kloss Playoff Most Valuable Player after leading the PWHL Playoffs in goals by scoring 5 goals and 

finishing tied for first in points by scoring 8 points; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota goalie Nicole Hensley made 17 

saves in game 5 of the PWHL Finals, marking the second time in the PWHL Finals that she prevented an opposing team from scoring any goals; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota recorded 4 playoff wins in which 

the opposing team failed to score any goals; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota forward Grace Zumwinkle won 

the inaugural Rookie of the Year Award after scoring 11 

goals and 19 points in 24 games and tying for the lead 

in points among first-year professionals in the PWHL; 

and 

Whereas the innovative and competitive play of the entire 

PWHL inspired the people of the United States and Canada and led the PWHL to set multiple attendance 

records throughout the 2024 season: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Professional Women’s Hock3 ey League (referred to in this resolution as the 

4 ‘‘PWHL’’) Minnesota for winning the inaugural 

5 PWHL title; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 750 IS 

1 (2) recognizes the dedication, perseverance, 

2 hard work, and togetherness of the players, coaches, 

3 and staff in winning a championship; 

4 (3) congratulates the fans, players, coaches, 

5 and staff of PWHL Minnesota for a great season; 

6 (4) recognizes the dedication, perseverance, and 

7 hard work of the players, coaches, staff, and league 

8 administration in creating and operating a profes9 sional sports league; and 

10 (5) congratulates the fans, players, coaches, 

11 and staff of the entire PWHL for a great first sea12 son. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 900 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Baez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Baez. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Baez, Cr. No. 21- 

507, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the 

production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a former 

employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:03 Nov 20, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR900.ATS SR900

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 900 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That, Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized 

3 to provide relevant testimony in the case of United States 

4 v. Baez, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

5 should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Schwager, and any current or former officer 

8 or employee of the Secretary’s office, in connection with 

9 the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 

10 resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 215 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 215

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2025

Mr. Wittman (for himself, Mr. Grothman, Mr. LaMalfa, and Mr. Higgins of 
  Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Information Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION IN FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OF PAMPHLETS CONTAINING 
              ADOPTION CENTER CONTACT INFORMATION.

    Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 514. LIMITATION.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, a grant may be made or contract entered into under section 501 
for a family planning service project or program only upon assurances 
satisfactory to the Secretary that the project or program will--
            ``(1) provide to each person to whom the medical 
        professional provides family planning medical services, at the 
        time the person inquires about medical or abortion services, a 
        pamphlet that contains--
                    ``(A) a comprehensive list of the adoption centers 
                located in the region (as determined by the Secretary) 
                where the adoption services are provided; and
                    ``(B) the address and telephone number of each such 
                center; and
            ``(2) provide each such person an opportunity to read the 
        pamphlet.
    ``(b) Pamphlets.--The Secretary shall prepare, annually update, and 
distribute to each project or program referred to in subsection (a) 
pamphlets described in such subsection.
    ``(c) No Additional Funds.--No funds may be used to carry out this 
section, except funds that are appropriated to carry out this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,030-01

EX PARTE LOUIS ANGELO DAVILA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 08-01-0031-CRA-A IN THE 81ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM ATASCOSA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant originally pleaded guilty to

aggravated assault in exchange for deferred adjudication communitysupervision. His guilt was later

adjudicated and he was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal after adjudication because

adjudication counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the

trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
2

The trial court finds that adjudication counsel file a motion to withdraw from the

representation so that appellate counsel could be appointed, but that the motion was never brought

to the attention of the trial court. The trial court finds that Applicant was denied his right to appeal

due to a failure of the system. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-oftime appeal of the judgment adjudicating guilt in Cause No. 08-01-0031-CRA from the 81st District

Court of Atascosa County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written

notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within

ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if

the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: September 14, 2016

Do not publish
EX PARTE Sarah E. JUNGWIRTH

1160842

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Marcia HENRY v. Troy HENRY

NO. 2019-C-0134

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

Not Considered, not timely filed. See La. S.Ct. Rule X, § 5 (a).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Christopher Clemente, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bruce Labovitz, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, to our best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher Clemente            
|                       |  |  |  | Christopher Clemente                
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Bruce Labovitz                  
|                       |  |  |  | Bruce Labovitz                      
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 79

To nullify certain Executive orders regarding COVID-19 vaccine mandates 
 and to prohibit the Secretary of Labor from issuing a rule mandating 
         vaccination against COVID-19, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

    Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Cloud) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
 Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Education and 
Workforce, Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To nullify certain Executive orders regarding COVID-19 vaccine mandates 
 and to prohibit the Secretary of Labor from issuing a rule mandating 
         vaccination against COVID-19, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Mandates Act''.

SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF CERTAIN EXECUTIVE ORDERS.

    (a) Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors.--Executive Order 
14042 (86 Fed. Reg. 50985, relating to ensuring adequate COVID-19 
safety protocols for Federal contractors) shall have no force or 
effect.
    (b) COVID-19 Vaccine Requirement.--Executive Order 14043 (86 Fed. 
Reg. 50989, relating to requiring COVID-19 vaccination for Federal 
employees) shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF RULES MANDATING VACCINATION.

    The Secretary of Labor may not issue any rule requiring employers 
to mandate vaccination of employees against COVID-19 or requiring 
testing of employees who are unvaccinated against COVID-19.

SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COVID-19 VACCINATION 
              MANDATES.

    Notwithstanding any provision of title XI, XVIII, or XIX of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq., 1395 et seq., 1396 et 
seq.), the Secretary of Health and Human Services may not require a 
health care provider, as a condition of participation in the Medicare 
or Medicaid program, to mandate vaccination of employees against COVID-
19 or require testing of employees who are unvaccinated against COVID-
19, and may not otherwise penalize such a provider for such provider's 
failure to so mandate such vaccination or so require such testing.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|/s/    M. MARK
URBANIA                                                                         
|M. Mark Urbania Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

October 30, 2006
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoPetro Resources Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Stuart J. Doshi , Chief Executive Officer, and J. ChrisSteinhauser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2007 |   | /s/ Stuart J. Doshi                                           |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Stuart J. Doshi                                               |
|                     |   | President, Chief Executive Officer  and Chairman of the Board |

 
| Dated: November 14, 2007 |   | /s/ J. Chris Steinhauser |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                     |   | J. Chris Steinhauser     |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to GeoPetro Resources Company and will beretained by GeoPetro Resources Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----

*                 This certification is being furnished solely toaccompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

 

 

 

----
EX PARTE Jack Harold WILSON

CR-16-1016

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

Reh. denied.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2008 (the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 20, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael D. Traina
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Michael D. Traina                                    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Executive Officer                              
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | (principal executive officer)                        
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 20, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Kurt A. Braun    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Kurt A. Braun                                        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

VICTOR TACHTAUL, §

Petitioner, §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-030-Y

 §

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, §

T.D.C.J., Correctional § 

Institutions Division, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 of petitioner Victor Tachtaul, along with

the April 29, 2005, findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge gave the

parties until May 20, 2005, to file written objections to the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this

order, no written objections have been filed. 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this

case and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge filed on April 29, 2005. The Court concludes that the

petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with

prejudice for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings

and conclusions.

 It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions and

recommendation of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby,

ADOPTED.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00030-Y Document 15 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 83
2

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus be, and is hereby, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

SIGNED May 26, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00030-Y Document 15 Filed 05/26/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 84