alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of Hammonds Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report
of Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of Hammonds Industries, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  February 23, 2010


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

LAWRENCE WILLIAMS, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-282-Y

 §

COLE JETER, Warden, §

FMC-Fort Worth, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Lawrence Williams under

28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

August 18, 2005; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on September 22, 2005.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Williams’s

objections must be overruled, that the motion to dismiss should be

granted, and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the

reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Respondent Jeter’s July 5, 2005, motion to dismiss [docket no.

8] is GRANTED.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00282-Y Document 14 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 81
2

Lawrence Williams’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

SIGNED September 26, 2005.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00282-Y Document 14 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 82
3

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00282-Y Document 14 Filed 09/26/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 83
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Albert E. Bergeron, Vice President—Chief Financial Officer of US ShippingGeneral Partner LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Albert E. Bergeron                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Albert E. Bergeron                          |
|   | Vice President—Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 5, 2005                            |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. ShippingPartners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Case 2:04-cv-00313-J Document 12 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

 

I, Roque A. Santi, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 26, 2006
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE OF STUDENT LOAN FINANCE CORPORATION, AS SERVICER



| | Re: | Education Loans Incorporated
| | --- | ----------------------------

Student Loan Asset-Backed
Notes, 2005-1 Indenture (Note Series 2005-1A and Series 2005-1B)

I, Norg Sanderson, President of Student Loan Finance Corporation, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report (the Exchange Act Periodic Reports), of Education Loans Incorporated (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided by the Trustee and the servicing information required to be provided to
the Trustee by the Servicer under the Indenture and the Servicing Agreement for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer and, based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the annual servicer compliance statement included in this report,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Indenture and the Servicing Agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in accordance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Servicing Agreement, that is included in these reports.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them (i) in the Indenture, dated June 1, 2005 (the Base
Indenture), between the Registrant and U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the Trustee), and the First Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2005 (the First Supplement and, together with the
Base Indenture, as supplemented, the Indenture), between the Registrant and the Trustee and (ii) in the Servicing and Administration Agreement, as amended, dated as of June 1, 2005 (the Servicing Agreement), among
the Registrant, the Servicer and the Trustee.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of March, 2006.



|       |  |                   
|------ |  | ------------------
|Name:  |  | /s/ Norg Sanderson
|Title: |  | President
Case 3:04-cv-02758-B Document 9 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 50
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-7070,333-62708 and 333-73878) of
GlobalSantaFe Corporation and (ii) the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form
S-8 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-70268) of
GlobalSantaFe Corporation of our report dated March 21, 2003, relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 21, 2003, relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

Houston, Texas
March 24, 2003
James Michael FORBUS v. Jean Carlton FORBUS

2160615

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 57 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 334
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 57 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 335
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 57 Filed 05/05/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 336
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


WHEREAS Santa Fe International Corporation has established a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (hereafter "SERP") for the benefit of selected
Executive employees of SFIC and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.1 of the SERP, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors may at any time or from time to time determine if any
employee shall become a Participant in the Plan and

WHEREAS the Compensation Committee has determined that it is appropriate for
Roger B. Hunt to become a Participant in the Plan, effective November 17, 1998.

NOW THEREFORE, effective this the 17th day of November 1998 the Santa Fe
International Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is amended as
follows:

Appendix A is hereby modified to ADD to the list of Class A Participants the
following Participant:

                            Roger B. Hunt



Dated: November 17, 1998



                                    SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION




                                    By:  /s/ JOE BOYD
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                          Santa Fe International Corporation
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0336

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH DEAN PAULEY,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 24, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 18 2023

10/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0336
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Gary Musil, President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of Logicom Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Logicom Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Logicom Inc.

 
| Dated: November 2, 2005 |   |                                         |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |                                         |
|                    |   |                                         |
|                    |   | /s/ Gary Musil                               |   |
|                    |   | Gary Musil                                   |
|                    |   | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
|                    |   | Logicom Inc.                                 |
|                    |   |                                         |
|                    |   |                                         |
|                    |   |                                         |   |
|                    |   |                                         |
|                    |   |                                         |
|                    |   |                                         |
|                         |        |                                              |  |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Logicom Inc. and will be retained by Logicom Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lake Dorr Land Company, a Florida Corporation, *Ap*pellant, v. E. L. Parker and Lenora Parker, His Wife, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 30, 1927.

*George P.*Garrett, for Appellant;

*Duncan & Haimlin,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
# C_2017144EN.01003201.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/32

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 February 2017 — Komisia za zashtita na potrebitelite v Evelina Kamenova

(Case C-105/17)

(2017/C 144/41)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Komisia za zashtita na potrebitelite

Appellant:

Respondent: Evelina Kamenova

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

| 1. | Must Article 2(b) and (d) of Directive 2005/29/ЕC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair commercial practices be interpreted as meaning that the action of a natural person who is registered on a website for the sale of goods, and who published a total of eight advertisements at the same time for the sale of different items via the website, is the action of a trader within the meaning of the legal definition in Article 2(b), represents a business-to-consumer commercial practice within the meaning of Article 2(d) and comes within the scope of the directive pursuant to Article 3(1) thereof? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 2(b) and (d) of Directive 2005/29/ЕC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair commercial practices be interpreted as meaning that the action of a natural person who is registered on a website for the sale of goods, and who published a total of eight advertisements at the same time for the sale of different items via the website, is the action of a trader within the meaning of the legal definition in Article 2(b), represents a business-to-consumer commercial practice within the meaning of Article 2(d) and comes within the scope of the directive pursuant to Article 3(1) thereof?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (Text with EEA relevance).

1

OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad Huss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 11, 2013By:/s/Conrad HussName:Conrad HussTitle:Director, Chief Executive Officer,
Secretary, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

Required by Rule 13a-14(a), created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 

 

I, Steven G. Holder, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ECC Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 26, 2006