alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |     |  |                                      
|----------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|May 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ JOHN H. HOMIER                   
|            |  |     |  | John H. Homier                       
|            |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP
Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 213 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 213

To prohibit the use of Federal financial assistance for a certain high-
  speed rail development project in the State of California, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2025

   Mr. Kiley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal financial assistance for a certain high-
  speed rail development project in the State of California, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PROVISION OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR 
              CERTAIN HIGH-SPEED RAIL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.

    No Federal financial assistance may be provided to the State of 
California for a high-speed rail corridor development project that is 
the same or substantially similar to the project that is the subject of 
Cooperative Agreement No. FR-HSR-0118-12-01-01 entered into between the 
California High-Speed Rail Authority and the Federal Railroad 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Romi DIROBERTO and John Diroberto, Appellants, v. WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Not in Its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee of MFRA Trust 2015-1, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1893

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2016364EN.01001401.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/14

---

Action brought on 13 July 2016 — Düll v EUIPO — Cognitect (DaToMo)

(Case T-381/16)

(2016/C 364/10)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Klaus Düll (Südergellersen, Germany) (represented by: S. Wolff-Marting, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cognitect, Inc. (Durham, North Carolina, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DaToMo’ — EU trade mark No 6 715 627

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 April 2016 in Joined Cases R 1383/2015-2 and R 1481/2015-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision to the effect that the restriction ‘all the aforementioned for the enterprise mobility management (EMM)’ is not added to the services which, following the abovementioned decision, remain listed in the class specification for Class 42 in the list of goods and services covered by trade mark No 6715627 DaToMo; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to the effect that the restriction ‘all the aforementioned for the enterprise mobility management (EMM)’ is not added to the services which, following the abovementioned decision, remain listed in the class specification for Class 42 in the list of goods and services covered by trade mark No 6715627 DaToMo;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 50 of Regulation No 40/94. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 50 of Regulation No 40/94.

---
# C_2019155EN.01000501.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 March 2019 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-399/17) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 - Shipment of waste - Refusal of the Czech Republic to ensure the take-back of the mixture TPS-NOLO (Geobal) shipped from that Member State to Poland - Existence of waste - Burden of proof - Proof)

(2019/C 155/05)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, E. Sanfrutos Cano and L. Haasbeek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, T. Müller and L. Dvořáková, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.

---
# C_2018032EN.01000802.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/8

---

Order of the Court of 16 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP v António da Silva Rodrigues

(Case C-243/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Article 3(1) - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Concept of ‘multiannual programme’ - Scope of application))

(2018/C 032/12)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP

Applicant:

Defendant: António da Silva Rodrigues

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of an irregularity which is neither continuous nor repeated, the limitation period of four years provided for in that provision runs from the date the irregularity was committed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of an irregularity which is neither continuous nor repeated, the limitation period of four years provided for in that provision runs from the date the irregularity was committed.

| 2. | The second, third and fourth questions referred by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme Administrative Court, Portugal) are manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The second, third and fourth questions referred by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme Administrative Court, Portugal) are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

1

---
Amanda BERTRAND v. PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 2018-C-2011

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

*1130Reconsideration denied.
Jeremy BENFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1418

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony J. Massetti, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|/S/    ANTHONY J.
MASSETTI                                                                         
|Anthony J. Massetti Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

August 11, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 30 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 30

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
   Protection Agency relating to ``Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: 
  Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the 
          American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2025

    Mr. Dunn of Florida (for himself, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Rulli, and Mr. 
 Messmer) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
   Protection Agency relating to ``Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: 
  Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the 
          American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain 
Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and 
Manufacturing Act of 2020'' (89 Fed. Reg. 82682 (October 11, 2024)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,  David S. Kalt, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of optionsXpressHoldings, Inc.; 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)[Reserved]

 

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 

Date: May 3, 2005 

 
|   |   | /s/ DAVID  S. KALT |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                   | David  S. Kalt |
|   |   | Title:                  | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 182 Filed 09/12/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 481
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 63 Filed 04/01/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 882
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 63 Filed 04/01/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 883
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 190 

To provide for expedited removal of certain illegal aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. OGLES (for himself, Mr. BIGGS of Arizona, Mr. CLYDE, Mr. BRECHEEN, 

Ms. MACE, and Mr. MOORE of Alabama) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for expedited removal of certain illegal aliens. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sending Evading Non5 Documented Threats Home Especially Migrants Biden 

6 Accepted Carelessly and Knowingly Act of 2025’’ or the 

7 ‘‘SEND THEM BACK Act of 2025’’. 

8 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REMOVAL OF CERTAIN ILLEGAL 

9 ALIENS. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi11 sion of law, an alien who entered the United States illeVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:34 Jan 30, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H190.IH H190

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 190 IH

1 gally on or since January 20, 2021, shall be subject to 

2 expedited removal, even if such alien indicated an inten3 tion to apply for asylum or a fear of persecution. 

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

5 any alien who is currently a member of the Armed Forces 

6 of the United States as of January 1, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

WILFRIDO I. ASCENCIO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-236-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

September 1, 2006 (Doc. 21). Neither party has filed objections within the period specified in 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

WHEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

Dated September 22, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:04-cv-00236-C Document 22 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 72
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 246

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on the amount individuals can deduct for certain State and local taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

  Ms. Underwood (for herself and Mr. Casten) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on the amount individuals can deduct for certain State and local taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SALT Fairness for Working Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL 
              TAXES OF INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 164(b)(6)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$10,000 ($5,000 in the case of a 
married individual filing a separate return)'' and inserting ``$15,000 
(twice such amount in the case of a joint return)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
curm_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
 
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
CÜR MEDIA, INC.
2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 
Pursuant to Section 4(a) of the CÜR Media, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), this first amendment to the Plan (“First Amendment”) is made as of September 23, 2016. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this First Amendment shall have the meaning given to them in the Plan.
 
	 
	1.	Section 2 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 
“2. EFFECTIVE DATE. The Plan shall become effective and Awards may be granted on and after September 25, 2015 (the “Effective Date”). Any Awards of incentive stock options granted under the Plan are granted subject to approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months after the Effective Date. If such approval has not been obtained within such twelve (12) month period, grants of incentive stock options shall be deemed to have been grants of non-qualified stock options.”
 
	 
	2.	All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
	 
	 
	 

	 
	3.	This First Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, as of September 23, 2016, in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”).


 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed by order of the Board of Directors of CÜR Media, Inc.
 
	 	CÜR MEDIA, INC.	
	 	 	 	 
		By:	/s/ Kelly Sardo 	
	 
	 
	Kelly Sardo	 
	 	 	Secretary