alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

IN RE: Retail Partners - FTW Ave, LLC CASE NO 

CHAPTER 11 

VE RI FICA TION OF CREDITOR MA TRIX 

03/04/2024 01 :44:24pm 

The above named Debtor hereby verifies that the attached list of creditors is true and correct to the best of his/her 

knowledge. 

Date ~ 's_/_1⁄2....._.{_2o_ 2._'-f ___ _ Signature 

Manager 

Date _ _ __________ _ Signature 

Case 24-40777-mxm11 Doc 2 Filed 03/04/24 Entered 03/04/24 15:34:02 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Bolton Glass, LLC 

120 Metrotex Drive 

Haslet, TX 76052 

Carillo Engineering, LLC 

9001 Airport Fwy, Suite 700 

North Richland Hills, TX 76180 

CBRE, Inc. 

P.O. Box 406588 

Atlanta, GA 30384-6588 

City of Dallas 

City Hall 

2D South 

Dallas, TX 75277 

Dallas County Tax Assessor 

500 Elm Street, Suite 3300 

Dallas, TX 75202 

Dallas Municipal Court 

Court and Detention Services 

2014 Main Street 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Equipment Depot 

15051 FAA Blvd 

Fort Worth, TX 76155 

Fahway 6 Trust 

c/o Rick Haskin 

1320 S. University Drive, Suite 701 

Fort Worth, TX 76107 

Franz Architects 

4055 lntemational Parkway, Suite 100 

Fort Worth, TX 76109-4874 

Case 24-40777-mxm11 Doc 2 Filed 03/04/24 Entered 03/04/24 15:34:02 Desc Main 03/04/2024 02:52:0Spm 

Document Page 2 of 4
GB Collects, LLC 

1253 Haddonfield Berlin Rd. 

Voorhees, NJ 08043-484 7 

Gray Reed 

Attn: J.P.B. Vogel 

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Internal Revenue Service 

Mail Code 5020 DAL 

1100 Commerce Street 

Dallas, TX 75242 

IPFS Corporation 

P.O. Box 412086 

Kansas City, MO 64141-2086 

JLB Enterprises, LLC 

25227 Grogans Mill Road, Suite 230 

The Woodlands, TX 77380 

John R. Ames, CT A 

P.O. Box 139066 

Dallas, TX 75313-9066 

LCP Real Estate Partners, LLC 

FTW Ave A Series 

P.O. Box 471819 

Fort Worth, TX 76147 

LCP Real Estate Partners, LLC 

FTW Ave B Series 

P.O. Box 471819 

Fort Worth, TX 76147 

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP 

900 Arion Parkway, Suite 104 

San Antonio, TX 78216 

Case 24-40777-mxm11 Doc 2 Filed 03/04/24 Entered 03/04/24 15:34:02 Desc Main 03/04/2024 02:52:0Spm 

Document Page 3 of 4
Lonestar Electric Supply 

1242 Regal Row 

Dallas, TX 75247 

Lynndom Enterprises, LLC 

d/b/a TriV AN Roofing 

1084 Texan Trail 

Grapevine, TX 76051 

Prosperity Bank 

11451 Broadway 

Pearland, TX 77584 

Retail Partners - FTW Ave, LLC 

P.O. Box 471819 

Fort Worth, Texas 76147 

Searcy Re Investments, LLC 

c/o J. Kirk Searcy 

1320 S. University Drive, Suite 701 

Fort Worth, TX 76107 

Service Steel Warehouse Co., L.P. 

P.O. Box 9607 

Houston, TX 77213 

The Retail Connection 

Attn: Tony Filley 

2525 McKinnon Ave, Suite 700 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Underwood 

600 Bailey Ave, Suite 200 

Fort Worth, TX 76107 

United Site Services 

P.O. Box 1870 

Ashland, VA 23005-4870 

Case 24-40777-mxm11 Doc 2 Filed 03/04/24 Entered 03/04/24 15:34:02 Desc Main 03/04/2024 02:52:0Spm 

Document Page 4 of 4
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1124-1125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2425-057]

PE Hydro Generation, LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an 
Environmental Assessment

    On January 3, 2022, the PE Hydro Generation, LLC filed a new major 
license application for the 1,600-kilowatt (kW) Luray and 1,400-kW 
Newport Hydroelectric Project No. 2425 (project). The two-development 
Luray and Newport Project is located on the South Fork of the 
Shenandoah River near the Towns of Luray (Luray Development) and 
Newport (Newport Development) in Page County, Virginia.
    In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on October 18, 
2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for 
environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the 
record, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would 
constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality 
of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to license the 
project.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's 
regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating 
to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1734604406. 40 CFR 
1501.5(c)(4) (2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested 
parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and 
considered in the Commission's final licensing decision.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members, and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

[[Page 1125]]

    The application will be processed according to the following 
schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission issues EA.................  December 31, 2025.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Kristine 
Sillett at (202) 502-6575 or [email protected].

    Dated: December 31, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00088 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
FINAL JUDGMENT - Page Solo

TRM/chr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MICHELLE LEE MULLINS §

§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-477-Y

§

JAMES R. CROUCH §

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order issued this same day and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 58,

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff’s

federal claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their refiling.

The Court DECLINES to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining

state claims, and those claims are therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE to their refiling. All costs of Court under 28 U.S.C. §

1920 shall be borne by Plaintiff. 

SIGNED April 28, 2005.

Case 4:04-cv-00477-Y Document 27 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 153
119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 192 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require Amtrak 

to include information on base pay and bonus compensation of certain Amtrak executives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 192 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amtrak Executive 

3 Bonus Disclosure Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMTRAK REPORTS AND AUDITS. 

5 Section 24315(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘, and make available to the 

8 public on the website of Amtrak,’’ after ‘‘submit to 

9 Congress’’; and 

10 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(2) provide the annual base pay and any 

13 bonus compensation paid to a member of the execu14 tive leadership team (including the chief executive 

15 officer, president, and officers) of Amtrak, including 

16 the criteria and metrics used to determine any such 

17 bonus compensation; and’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 

2025. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 192 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require 

tives, and for other purposes. bonus compensation of certain Amtrak execuAmtrak to include information on base pay and
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Videsh Sanchar Nigam
Limited, a limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of India (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers best knowledge, that:



1. the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



Date: September 29, 2004



/s/     Shailendra Kumar GuptaShailendra Kumar GuptaManaging Director




/s/    Amitabh A. KhannaAmitabh A. KhannaChief Financial Officer
Case 3:03-cv-00690-L Document 1 Filed 04/04/2003 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:03-cv-00690-L Document 1 Filed 04/04/2003 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:03-cv-00690-L Document 1 Filed 04/04/2003 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:03-cv-00690-L Document 1 Filed 04/04/2003 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:03-cv-00690-L Document 1 Filed 04/04/2003 Page 5 of 5
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

§

EARNEST CARL WILSON §

 §

Petitioner, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-0933-R

 §

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice §

Correctional Institutions Division. §

 §

Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez filed Findings, Conclusions and a

Recommendation in this case on November 30, 2005. Petitioner, Ernest Carl Wilson, filed

objections to the Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation on December 14, 2005.

 The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and has considered Petitioner’s objections. After

careful consideration, the Court concludes that Judge Ramirez’s Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation are correct and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings of this Court. Additionally,

for the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court DENIES

petitioner's motions for leave to file a motion for summary judgment (docs. 15 and 17) and DEEMS

MOOT the petition for stay (doc. 2). The Court will formally deny Wilson’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus by separate judgment.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

FILED

December 19, 2005

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00933-M Document 27 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 295
2

IT IS SO ORDERED

ENTERED: December 19, 2005

___________________________________

Hon. JERRY BUCHMEYER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00933-M Document 27 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 296
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 2 2 D0 4 4 5

. J OANA ESTRADA VELAZ QUEZ v . ALEJ ANDRO ROJ AS PEREZ

.

J o an a Es t rad a Vel azq u ez fi l ed t h i s ap p li cat i o n fo r di s cret i on ary ap p eal fro m a fi nal d i v o rce d ecr e e

. T h i s ap p l i cat i o n is h ereb y GRANTED. See Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 1 (b ) (4 ). Vel azq u ez m ay fi l e a n o t i ce of ap p eal wi th in 1 0 d ay s o f t hi s o rd er. Th e cl erk o f t h e s u peri o r co u rt i s DIRECTED t o i n c l u d e a co p y o f th i s o rd er i n t h e

reco rd t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s

. Re s p o n d en t Al ejan d ro Ro jas Perez fi l ed a m o t io n t o di s m i s s t h e ap p l i cat i o n b as ed u p on Vel azq u ez’ s fai l u re t o t ran s m i t a co m p l et e reco r d

. A l th o u g h fai l u re to

t ran s m i t s u ffi ci en t m at eri al m ay b e a b as i s fo r d en y i n g an ap pl i cat io n , s ee Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 1 (f), su ch i s n o t a b as i s f o r d i s m i s s al

. Acco rd in g ly
, t h e m o t i o n to
d i s m i s s i s DENIED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. July 22, 2022

07/22/2022
# C_2020433EN.01002001.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 16 September 2020 — flightright GmbH v SunExpress Günes Ekspres Havacilik A.S.

(Case C-434/20)

(2020/C 433/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: flightright GmbH

Defendant: SunExpress Günes Ekspres Havacilik A.S.

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 4 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a rebooking onto another, earlier flight by which the passenger reaches his final destination 10 hours and 1 minute before the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked constitutes a case of denied boarding triggering an obligation to pay compensation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 4 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a rebooking onto another, earlier flight by which the passenger reaches his final destination 10 hours and 1 minute before the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked constitutes a case of denied boarding triggering an obligation to pay compensation?

| 2. | In the event that the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, must the passenger, even in that event, have presented himself for check-in and boarding at the time indicated and no later than 45 minutes before the published departure time of the originally booked flight — as required in principle by Article 3(2) and Article 2(j) of Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2004) — in order for that regulation to be applicable and, more specifically, in order to give rise to a case of denied boarding triggering an obligation to pay compensation, even though this was in fact no longer possible because the passenger had taken the rebooked earlier replacement flight? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, must the passenger, even in that event, have presented himself for check-in and boarding at the time indicated and no later than 45 minutes before the published departure time of the originally booked flight — as required in principle by Article 3(2) and Article 2(j) of Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2004) — in order for that regulation to be applicable and, more specifically, in order to give rise to a case of denied boarding triggering an obligation to pay compensation, even though this was in fact no longer possible because the passenger had taken the rebooked earlier replacement flight?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
# C_2016402EN.01005601.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/56

---

Action brought on 13 September 2016 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (BOBO cornet)

(Case T-648/16)

(2016/C 402/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Şehitkamil Gaziantep, Turkey) (represented by: T. Tsenova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elka Zaharieva (Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BOBO cornet’– Application for registration No 12 299 343

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2016 in Case R 906/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Articles 75 and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 75 and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 31.1

HORIZON LINES HOLDING CORP.

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines Holding Corp.

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 30, 2006



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|/s/    CHARLES G.
RAYMOND                                                             
|Charles G. Raymond President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Lawrence BAKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

Lawrence Baker, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 332 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 332

    Prohibiting the imposition of vaccination, testing, and masking 
          requirements relating to COVID-19 for Senate Pages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2023

Mr. Paul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Prohibiting the imposition of vaccination, testing, and masking 
          requirements relating to COVID-19 for Senate Pages.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON COVID-19 VACCINATION, TESTING, AND MASKING 
              REQUIREMENTS FOR SENATE PAGES.

    A Senate Page or applicant to be a Senate Page may not be required 
to--
            (1) show proof of COVID-19 vaccination status;
            (2) receive a vaccination for COVID-19;
            (3) undergo testing for COVID-19 without cause; or
            (4) wear a mask.
                                 <all>
```