alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jerome ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 5, 2019

Jerome Roberson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Steven Joseph HANDLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1306

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Craig CALHOUN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William G.
Dumencu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ William G. Dumencu
--------------------------------
Name:  William G. Dumencu
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 6, 2005


                                      -30-
D.J., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D18-3353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
STATE of Louisiana v. Thairie Xavier ROBINSON

NO. 2018-KO-1708

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

*597Denied.
EX PARTE Derrick Wayne MURRAY

1160785 (CR-15-0268)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00390]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Land Management Plan Direction for Old-Growth Forest Conditions 
Across the National Forest System; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Department of Agriculture is withdrawing its 
notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for 
the Land Management Plan Direction for Old-Growth Forest Conditions 
Across the National Forest System.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer McRae, Planning Team Leader, 
at 202-791-8488.
    Individuals who use telecommunications devices for the hearing 
impaired may call 711 to reach the Telecommunications Relay Service, 24 
hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays.

Christopher French,
Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2025-00390 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
```
Case 4:04-cr-00090-A Document 70 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID 231
Marcelo ESCOBAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Miikey Russell LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
WILLIAMS FRM-FAST RESPONSE MAINTENANCE LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. LEE COUNTY, VR Labs and VR Laboratories, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0436

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 10.14





[INTERNATIONAL ISOTOPES LETTERHEAD]





December 21, 2007



Firebird Global Master Fund II, Ltd.

c/o FG2 Advisors, LLC

152 West 57th Street, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10019



Re:

Exercise of Class D Warrant and Waiver of Certain Rights Therein



Ladies and gentlemen:



This letter is being sent to you in your capacity as holders (each a "Holder") of the Class D Warrants (the "Class D Warrants") dated March 20, 2007 issued by International Isotopes Inc. (the "Company").  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined have the meanings assigned to them in the Class D Warrants.



The Company hereby acknowledges that each of you has agreed to exercise your respective Class D Warrant pursuant to the terms contained therein.  With respect to such exercise, the Company hereby waives the following limitations contained in Section 11(a) of each of the Class D Warrants: (1) that the number of shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of a Holder's Class D Warrant shall be limited such that, following such exercise, the total number of shares of Common Stock then beneficially owned by such Holder and certain other persons, does not exceed the Maximum Percentage of the Companys issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (including for such purpose the shares of Common Stock issuable upon such exercise) (the "Beneficial Ownership Limitation"); and (2) that any waiver by the Holder of the Beneficial Ownership Limitation will not be effective until the 61st day after notice is delivered to the Company (the "Notice Requirement").



Each Holder hereby agrees to exercise such Holder's Class D Warrant and waives the Beneficial Ownership Limitation and the Notice Requirement contained in Section 11(a) of the Class D Warrant.



************



---



Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing and returning a copy of this letter to my attention.





Sincerely,





INTERNATIONAL ISOTOPES INC.



By:__________________________________

Name:  Steve Laflin

Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer





Acknowledged and Agreed:



|                                     |             
|------------------------------------ | ------------
|FIREBIRD GLOBAL MASTER FUND II, LTD.
|                                    
|By:                                  |             
|                                     | Name:
Title:









---



Schedule to Exhibit 10.14





The agreements listed below are substantially identical to this exhibit and are not being filed separately as an exhibit pursuant to Rule 12b-31 promulgated under the Exchange Act.



(1)

Letter Agreement dated December 21, 2007 between the Company and Dr. Ralph Richart



(2)

Letter Agreement dated December 21, 2007 between the Company and PowerOne Capital Markets Limited



(3)

Letter Agreement dated December 21, 2007 between the Company and Christopher Grosso



(4)

Letter Agreement dated December 21, 2007 between the Company and Francis Stobart
W.L., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1370

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0018

__________________________________________________________________ 

S.W., a minor, by and through her

Guardian, Jeffrey Ferguson,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

 -vsState of Montana, by and through the

Montana Department of Public Health and 

Human Services,

Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal for the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County

Cause No. DDV 13-813(b)

Honorable Elizabeth A. Best

__________________________________________________________________

Order Granting Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time

__________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the authority granted under Rule 26(2), M.R.App.P., Appellee’s 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Appellee has received an 

extension of sixty days, through and including September 6, 2022, within which to 

file Appellee’s Response Brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 23 2022

06/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0018
STATE of Louisiana v. Stephen Michael MCGILL

NO. 2018-KO-1552

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calamos Asset Management, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calamos Asset Management,
Inc. May 12, 2005 /S/ Patrick H. DudasikPatrick H. DudasikExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Calamos Asset Management, Inc. and
will be retained by Calamos Asset Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  May 16, 2005

/s/ Matthew S. Kerper
Matthew S. Kerper, President
(Principal executive officer)
Gabriel BOWEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daniel FULLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Bravo Resource Partners
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Tyrone R. Carter, the Chief Executive Officer and Tamela Miller-Carlson, the
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

Date:  September 15, 2005

                         By:  /s/ Tyrone R. Carter
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Tyrone R. Carter, Chief  Executive Officer


                              /s/ Tamela Miller-Carlson
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Tamela Miller-Carlson, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CallWave, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Stubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Mark Stubbs     
|                  |  |  |  | Mark Stubbs,           
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Gridley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of US Shipping General Partner LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        | /s/ Paul B.   Gridley                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                        |
|   | Paul B.   Gridley                      |
|   | Chairman and   Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 9,   2006                       |

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20697 Conference Calendar

ARTHUR E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TOMMY THOMAS, Sheriff, Harris County; BILLY RAY KELLEY; DEPUTIES & JAILERS, SEVERAL; LAWARANCE HAYES; ROBERT M. FENLON, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CV-129

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Arthur E. Johnson, Texas prisoner #1047508, has filed an appeal following the district court’s dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to prosecute, the denial of his F ED . R. C IV . P. 59(e) motion, and the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the district court. Johnson’s notice of appeal is timely only as to the district court’s denial of the motion to proceed IFP in the districtNo. 01-20697 -2- court. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a)(1)(A); United States v. Merrifield , 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985). Johnson does not argue that the district court erred in denying his motion to proceed IFP, and he has therefore waived the only issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). This appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal counts as one strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Johnson is warned that if he accumulates three strikes he will be barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal brought in a United States court unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
A.M., Father of N.M., a Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 26, 2019

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131272 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 131272 COA: 268886 Calhoun CC: 04-004320-FH JAMES MICHAEL BATEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the April 4, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
# C_2021028EN.01001501.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Snaitech SpA, formerly Cogetech SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Se. Ma. di Francesco Senese

(Case C-481/20)

(2021/C 28/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Snaitech SpA, formerly Cogetech SpA

Respondents: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Se. Ma. di Francesco Senese

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?

| 2. | Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?

---
Isaac BARROSO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 240 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 240

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for the 
 preemption of certain State overtime laws for agricultural employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2025

 Ms. Tenney (for herself, Mr. Langworthy, and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                             and Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for the 
 preemption of certain State overtime laws for agricultural employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Local Farms Act''.

SEC. 2. PREEMPTION OF CERTAIN STATE OVERTIME LAWS FOR AGRICULTURAL 
              EMPLOYEES.

    Section 18 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 218) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``No provision of this 
        Act or of any order thereunder'' and inserting ``Except as 
        provided in subsection (c), no provision of this Act or of any 
        order thereunder''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) The provisions of this Act shall preempt any State law that 
provides for a maximum workweek for employees employed in agriculture 
of less than 60 hours.''.
                                 <all>
```