alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 931 

Recognizing the exceptional service of Ambassador Michael Herzog during 

his tenure as Ambassador of Israel to the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the exceptional service of Ambassador Michael 

Herzog during his tenure as Ambassador of Israel to 

the United States. 

Whereas, since November 15, 2021, Ambassador Michael 

Herzog has served as Ambassador of Israel to the United 

States; 

Whereas, prior to serving as Ambassador of Israel to the 

United States, Ambassador Herzog served the State of 

Israel as— 

(1) the head of the Strategic Planning Division; 

(2) Military Secretary and Chief of Staff to four Defense Ministers; and 

(3) a special envoy for diplomatic negotiations for 

the Prime Minister; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 931 IS 

Whereas, during his entire tenure as Ambassador of Israel to 

the United States, Ambassador Herzog has worked in a 

bipartisan manner, stating, ‘‘Bipartisan support for 

Israel is a fundamental component of our relations with 

the United States’’; 

Whereas Ambassador Herzog has been one of the most effective voices for the State of Israel and has been instrumental in meeting Israel’s needs during this traumatic 

time in the history of the Jewish State; and 

Whereas Ambassador Herzog has worked tirelessly to build 

on the success of the Abraham Accords and advance normalization efforts between the State of Israel and the 

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the exceptional service of Ambas3 sador Michael Herzog during his tenure as Ambas4 sador of Israel to the United States; 

5 (2) commends Ambassador Herzog for his com6 mitment to building a more peaceful region through 

7 his work to further expand upon the Abraham Ac8 cords; and 

9 (3) encourages the United States and the State 

10 of Israel to continue to build off the work Ambas11 sador Herzog has done during his tenure to ensure 

12 the relationship between Israel and the United 

13 States continues to grow and prosper. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 11.11




POLICY REGARDING CONFLICT MINERALS


EXFO Inc. and its affiliates aim for the highest standards of ethical conduct and integrity in all areas of its activities.




Some product components used in our industry depend on certain minerals, such as gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten. Certain countries of the central African region, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (“DRC”) and several surrounding countries, are mining some of those minerals extensively. What makes these minerals particularly controversial is their prominence in eastern DRC, as well as their role in feeding ongoing hostilities in the region and the continuing instability, violence and human rights abuses that affect the region, hence the designation “Conflict Minerals”.




As gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten may be necessary to the functionality or production of our products, EXFO is committed to sourcing materials from environmentally and socially responsible suppliers. It is our policy not to purchase from known-conflict sources and we expect our suppliers to abide by the same standard. Since mineral mining and smelting are several steps away from our final product manufacturing, it is extremely difficult to trace the origin of minerals. Additionally, minerals may be smelted together with recycled materials, making it impossible to ascertain the true source.




Understanding the complexity of this challenge, EXFO has adopted the Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) Standard Conflict Minerals reporting format, and we request our suppliers to use the same format when reporting their supply chain status to us. As part of our review of the Conflict Minerals reports that we receive from our suppliers, named smelters are cross-checked against the list of known smelters as well as the Conflict-Free Smelter list published by EICC (www.conflictfreesmleter.org).




As a publicly traded company with shares listed on a US exchange, EXFO complies with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Section 1502 and the implementation guidelines published by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which require supply chain reporting and reasonable due diligence with respect to the sourcing of Conflict Minerals and their conflict-free status. EXFO supports its customers’ efforts to reach the common goal of ensuring a socially and environmentally responsible supply chain.






/s/ Luc Gagnon


Luc Gagnon


Vice-President, Manufacturing Operations and Customer Service


EXFO Inc.






January 9, 2013
Jermaine HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 3, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                                           |                                         |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | **OCCULOGIX,                  INC.**           |
|                                            |                                      |                                    |
| Date:   May                  10, 2006 | By:                                  | /s/ William                  G. Dumencu |
|                                                 |  Chief                  Financial Officer |
|                                                 |                                           |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Holding Company (‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the ‘‘Report’’) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2007, hereby certify as follows:

|  |          |                                                                                             |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                       |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations for Nalco. |

|        |  |  |                                                                                                |
|--------|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCE                                                                           |
|   |  |  | William H. JoyceChairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: May 8, 2007               |
|   |  |  | /s/ BRADLEY J. BELL                                                                            |
|   |  |  | Bradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 8, 2007 |
|        |

----
Case 3:04-cv-02454-M Document 18 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 78
John M. HOWELL, Appellant, v. MAGNIFY CREDIT UNION f/k/a Community First Credit Union; Peter Hanson, a/k/a Peter Hansen, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 16 PageID 257
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 16 PageID 258
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 3 of 16 PageID 259
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 4 of 16 PageID 260
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 5 of 16 PageID 261
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 6 of 16 PageID 262
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 7 of 16 PageID 263
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 8 of 16 PageID 264
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 9 of 16 PageID 265
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 10 of 16 PageID 266
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 11 of 16 PageID 267
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 12 of 16 PageID 268
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 13 of 16 PageID 269
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 14 of 16 PageID 270
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 15 of 16 PageID 271
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02183-BH Document 18 Filed 04/10/06 Page 16 of 16 PageID 272
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 131 

To make certain modifications to the repayment for the Arkansas Valley 

Conduit in the State of Colorado. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Ms. BOEBERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To make certain modifications to the repayment for the 

Arkansas Valley Conduit in the State of Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Finish the Arkansas 

5 Valley Conduit Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ARKANSAS VALLEY CONDUIT, COLORADO. 

7 Public Law 87–590 (76 Stat. 389) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (c) of the first section (76 

9 Stat. 390; 123 Stat. 1320), in the second sentence— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 131 IH

1 (A) by inserting ‘‘, without interest,’’ be2 fore ‘‘in an amount’’; 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘that is comprised of rev4 enue generated by payments’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

5 which payment shall only consist of funding 

6 provided during construction from any person 

7 other than the Secretary’’; 

8 (C) by inserting ‘‘of’’ before ‘‘revenue 

9 that’’; and 

10 (D) by inserting ‘‘over a period of 100 

11 years’’ after ‘‘project facilities’’; and 

12 (2) in section 2(b)(3)(A) (76 Stat. 390; 123 

13 Stat. 1321)— 

14 (A) by striking ‘‘plus interest’’; and 

15 (B) by striking ‘‘this section’’ and insert16 ing ‘‘subsection (c) of the first section’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2018112EN.01000501.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie — Poland) — Paweł Hofsoe v LVM Landwirtschaftlicher Versicherungsverein Münster AG

(Case C-106/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 11(1)(b) and Article 13(2) - Jurisdiction in insurance matters - Scope ratione personae - Concept of ‘injured party’ - Professional in the insurance sector - Not included))

(2018/C 112/07)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paweł Hofsoe

Applicant:

Defendant: LVM Landwirtschaftlicher Versicherungsverein Münster AG

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction with Article 11(1)(b) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that it may not be relied on by a natural person, whose professional activity consists, inter alia, in recovering claims for damages from insurers and who relies on a contract for the assignment of a claim concluded with the victim of a road accident, to bring a civil liability action against the insurer of the person responsible for that accident, which has its registered office in a Member State other than the Member State of the place of domicile of the injured party, before a court of the Member State in which the injured party is domiciled.

---

(1)  OJ C 202, 26.6.2017.

1

---
RIVER OAKS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. a/k/a River Oaks II Condo Assn., Inc. a Domestic Corporation, Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2540

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended  November 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Bin Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




January
      12,
      2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Bin
      WangBin
      WangPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                      (Principal
      Executive Officer)
# C_2021242EN.01004001.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Bibita Group v EUIPO — Benkomers (Beverage bottles)

(Case T-326/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle - Prior international design - Ground for invalidity - Conflict with a prior design - Individual character - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2021/C 242/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bibita Group (Tirana, Albania) (represented by: C. Seyfert, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Benkomers OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2020 (Case R 1070/2018 3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Bibita Group and Benkomers.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bibita Group to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bibita Group to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
C\C TIC O-f 4He 4uJ)g/4-4h COuH- ^ °$?e&\ 5 ^"^Appei^pjstrict 

### /5H Cjj^s\ ^onv s\ft^

Su*i^ ^sq 

### ^£". /l^y&rf^^br^ 6au£^rfe ^i!~ )^l5-/2> Ctear ^j r/madAm', aPh&te biY^ cc&£ *Mi^ m wwi bdhulr 

### CkG OcArliW m rVU**<*, \l fniiQnrri* g&A farthercdu'i'ScJi

xP rvUj c\$t\lo*e (Vcsftfl Of \0 a. \cu^u\\'ba>^^[

Coo?*'

### T^^UIC -focj Oor Y^o»r f np<;'te±Jtfr*XZ<*n* 

### $*£>fcci&Jltj.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31060]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 1:30 p.m. on Friday, December 20, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31060 Filed 12-20-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SCOTTY LAYNE HARRISON, §

 §

Petitioner, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-0314-D

VS. §

 §

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, § 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

 §

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the recommendation

of the magistrate judge is correct and is unopposed by either party. Accordingly, the

recommendation is adopted.

SO ORDERED.

February 26, 2008.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

CHIEF JUDGE
Exhibit 10.35

AVAYA INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

Effective
October 1, 2000,
Amended October 31, 2003

Preamble

The Avaya Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan is intended to constitute an unfunded, deferred compensation plan maintained primarily for a select group of
management or highly compensated employees and for members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company. The purpose of the Plan is to provide a means by which eligible employees and
non-employee Directors may defer the receipt of certain forms of compensation while at the same time giving the Company the present use of the compensation so deferred. The Plan is
intended to be an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Plan is not a qualified plan under
Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Benefits under the Plan are paid directly by the Company out of its general assets when due. The Plan is effective as of
October 1, 2000, and is a successor plan to the Lucent Technologies Inc. ("Lucent") Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefit of Eligible Members whose employment was transferred from
Lucent to the Company in connection with the spinoff of the Company from Lucent, and for non-employee Directors of the Company who were non-employee directors of Lucent prior
to the spinoff of the Company.

Section 1.    Definitions.

As
used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:



---



2

---





3

---



A
Potential Change in Control shall be deemed to be pending until the earliest of (i) the second anniversary thereof, (ii) the occurrence of a Change in Control and (iii) the
occurrence of a subsequent Potential Change in Control.



Section 2.    Deferral Elections.



4

---



Section 3.    Participant Accounts.



5

---



6

---



Section 4.    Deferred Cash Equivalent Account Interest Rate.



Section 5.    Payments Following Death.



Section 6.    Payments.



7

---



8

---



Section 7.    Change in Control.



Section 8.    Administration.



9

---



Section 9.    Miscellaneous.



10

---



11

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Plan, as amended, to be executed this 31st day of October, 2003.

|AVAYA INC. | 
|---------- | 
|By:        | 
|           | 
|Attest:    | 
|           | 

12

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Tucker I. Marr, Chief Financial Officer of Pruco Life Insurance
Company of New Jersey (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|Dated: March 14, 2008



/s/ Tucker I. MarrName:

Tucker I. MarrTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.