alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.02**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 
| /s/ Scott H. DeLong III                              |   | Date:  May 16, 2005 |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
| Scott H. DeLong III                                  |   |
| Senior Vice President  & Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal Financial  Officer)                       |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG AmericaCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

 

----
# C_2019054EN.01001601.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/16

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie v D, I v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-586/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.

---
# C_2022051EN.01002701.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2021 — JR v Commission

(Case T-265/20) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the oral test in a competition - Partial refusal of access - Method for rounding scores - Weightings assigned to the different parts and sub-parts of the oral test - Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - No need to adjudicate in part)

(2022/C 51/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: JR (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska, C. Ehrbar and H. Kranenborg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 28 February 2020 and 9 April 2020 refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) — 1 — Administrators.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the form of order sought by the applicant seeking annulment of the European Commission’s decisions of 28 February 2020 and 9 April 2020 in so far as they refused the applicant access to the method for rounding scores used by the selection board in the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) — 1 — Administrators; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the form of order sought by the applicant seeking annulment of the European Commission’s decisions of 28 February 2020 and 9 April 2020 in so far as they refused the applicant access to the method for rounding scores used by the selection board in the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) — 1 — Administrators;

| 2. | Annuls the Commission’s decision of 9 April 2020 in so far as it refuses access to a document containing the weightings assigned to the two parts of the oral test (interview and structured presentation) specified in the notice for the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) — 1 — Administrators, and the two sub-parts of the interview (professional experience and motivation) which were also specified in the notice for that competition; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the Commission’s decision of 9 April 2020 in so far as it refuses access to a document containing the weightings assigned to the two parts of the oral test (interview and structured presentation) specified in the notice for the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) — 1 — Administrators, and the two sub-parts of the interview (professional experience and motivation) which were also specified in the notice for that competition;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                  
|                        |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady                      
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                        |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
# C_2018399EN.01001102.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Basic Net SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-547/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Figurative trade mark representing three vertical stripes - Proof of distinctive character acquired through use))

(2018/C 399/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Basic Net SpA (represented by: D. Sindico, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Basic Net SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Basic Net SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00280]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[Docket ID: USA-2024-HQ-0015]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of the Army, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
10, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Application for Survivor 
Access Card; IMCOM Form 44; OMB Control Number 0702-0152.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 670.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 670.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 670.
    Needs and Uses: In accordance with AR 190-13, the Army Physical 
Security Program permits surviving family members to have unescorted 
access to Army installations via the Survivor Access Card, in order for 
them to receive services, attend events, view memorials, and similar 
activities. Eligible survivors are those who meet the eligibility 
criteria to receive the Gold Star Lapel Button or Next of Kin Lapel 
Button. Eligible survivors must first contact the installation level 
Survivor Outreach Services (SOS) support coordinator to verify 
eligibility and coordinate issuance of an installation access 
credential. The application for Survivor Access Card (IMCOM Form 44) is 
obtained by eligible surviving family members from SOS staff members. 
Eligible family members complete the form to obtain the Survivor Access 
Card which grants survivors ease of access to military installations.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2025-00280 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
Case 4:03-cv-01410-A Document 10 Filed 01/16/04 Page 1 of 3 PageID 43
 

 Case 4:03-cv-01410-A Document 10 Filed 01/16/04 Page 2 of 3 PageID 44
 

 Case 4:03-cv-01410-A Document 10 Filed 01/16/04 Page 3 of 3 PageID 45
Heeralall PURAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-38

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:00-cr-00478-L Document 142 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 113
 

 Case 3:00-cr-00478-L Document 142 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 114
 

 Case 3:00-cr-00478-L Document 142 Filed 09/20/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 115
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 230 

To prohibit the implementation of the Approved Resource Management Plan 

Amendment for the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office of the Bureau of 

Land Management. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Ms. HAGEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the implementation of the Approved Resource 

Management Plan Amendment for the Buffalo, Wyoming 

Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON APPROVED RESOURCE MAN4 AGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR BUFFALO, 

5 WYOMING FIELD OFFICE OF BUREAU OF 

6 LAND MANAGEMENT. 

7 The Secretary of the Interior may not implement, ad8 minister, or enforce the Approved Resource Management 

9 Plan Amendment for the Buffalo, Wyoming Field Office 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 230 IH

1 of the Bureau of Land Management referred to in the no2 tice of availability published by the Bureau of Land Man3 agement titled ‘‘Notice of Availability of the Record of De4 cision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amend5 ment for the Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming’’ (89 Fed. 

6 Reg. 93650; published November 27, 2024). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Cedrick A. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3231

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00004]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

Office of Refugee Resettlement

Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority; Delegation From Office of Refugee Resettlement Director to 
Unaccompanied Children Bureau Chief

    Notice is hereby given that I delegate to the Chief of the 
Unaccompanied Children Bureau the following authority delegated to the 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Humanitarian Services and Director of 
the Office of Refugee Resettlement by the Assistant Secretary for 
Children and Families and the Secretary under the William Wilberforce 
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 
110-457 sec. 235, amended).

(a) Authority Delegated

    Authority under the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims 
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 section 235(d)(1) to 
specifically consent to juvenile court jurisdiction for an 
unaccompanied alien child who is applying for special immigrant status 
pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 
(a)(27)(J)) and who is in the custody of the Secretary.

(b) Limitations

    1. This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's 
existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations.
    2. This delegation shall be exercised under financial and 
administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for 
Children and Families authorities.

(c) Effective Date

    This delegation of authority is effective on date of signature. In 
addition, I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Chief of 
the Unaccompanied Children Bureau, which, in effect, involved the 
exercise of these authorities prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.

Robin Dunn Marcos,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Humanitarian Services and Director, 
Office of Refugee Resettlement.
[FR Doc. 2025-00004 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-45-P
```
#### H. F. Kneeland, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Tampa Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Opinion Filed October 19, 1927.

*703*Dickenson & Diaz,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Knight, Thompson & Turner,*for Defendant in Error.

Chillingworth, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff in error sued the railroad company for injuries-which he alleged he had received while attempting to cross the railroad right-of-way at a grade crossing in Brooksville, Florida.

A demurrer was sustained to the declaration. Plaintiff declined to amend and a final judgment was entered against him.

We believe it would be of no assistance to copy the declaration in this opinion. When a declaration states a cause of action, surplus allegations not eliminated by appropriate motion may be disregarded. Stinson v. Prevatt, 84 Fla. 416, 94 So. 656. In actions where negligence is the basis of recovery, it is not necessary for the declaration to set out the facts constituting the negligence, but an allegation of sufficient acts causing the injury, coupled with an averment that they were negligently done, will be sufficient. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Rentz, 60 Fla. 429, 54 So. 13; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Good, 79 Fla. 589, 84 So. 733.

While the declaration contains surplusage, it does state a cause of action.

Reversed.

*704Per Curiam.- — Tlie record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown, and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 24-43456-elm7 Doc 4 Filed 09/26/24 Entered 09/26/24 13:12:29 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 24-43456-elm7 Doc 4 Filed 09/26/24 Entered 09/26/24 13:12:29 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 24-43456-elm7 Doc 4 Filed 09/26/24 Entered 09/26/24 13:12:29 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 24-43456-elm7 Doc 4 Filed 09/26/24 Entered 09/26/24 13:12:29 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20599 Summary Calendar

__________________ FIRST LAKE CORPORATION, substituted for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SALIH M. YILMAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-94-1523

- - - - - - - - - - May 14, 1996 Before KING, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Salih M. Yilmaz appeals the grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover on a promissory note. Yilmaz argues that his summary judgment evidence, the affidavit of his accountant/business adviser, was proper evidence which raised a question of material fact concerning whether the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation accelerated the promissory note,2

which had the legal effect of beginning the running of limitations. To establish his affirmative defense of the running of limitations, and thus to defeat the FDIC's summary judgment motion, Yilmaz had the burden to establish valid acceleration and its necessary precondition, default. Yilmaz relies on the affidavit of Jordan Fruehauf, his accountant/business adviser. Fruehauf attested that "Yilmaz made two or three payments on the note after the FDIC was appointed as the liquidator, but ceased payments thereafter and the note was in default. The fact was confirmed to [Fruehauf] by a representative of the FDIC." The affidavit fails to give the dates of the specific payments or the dates for which payments were not made and it has no supporting exhibits, such as business records or bank statements. The FDIC relies on the amended affidavit of Victor Black, the account officer assigned by the FDIC to monitor Yilmaz' case. Black's affidavit attests to the facts that the note matured on May 5, 1988; that the last payment received on the note was dated August 1, 1988; that Yilmaz defaulted on the note on May 5, 1988; that Yilmaz sent notification to the FDIC, through Fruehauf, on August 27, 1988 to the effect that no further payments would be made by Yilmaz until the FDIC renegotiated the loan; and that formal demand for the entire unpaid principal amount of the note and all accrued interest was made to Yilmaz by the FDIC by letter dated August 20, 1991. Fruehauf's vague affidavit is not enough to3

create a fact issue about the maturity date of the note and the date the statute of limitations commenced to run. Because Yilmaz failed to carry his summary judgment burden in demonstrating a genuine dispute of material fact on his affirmative defense of limitations, the district court's grant of summary judgment is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 875 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 875

 Designating September 21, 2024, through September 29, 2024, as ``Blue 
                          Star Welcome Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

   Mr. Kaine (for himself and Mr. Sullivan) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 19, 2024

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating September 21, 2024, through September 29, 2024, as ``Blue 
                          Star Welcome Week''.

Whereas Blue Star Families seeks to empower military families by connecting them 
        with their neighbors--individuals and organizations--to create vibrant 
        communities of mutual support;
Whereas Blue Star Families annually designates the week beginning the second to 
        last Saturday in September and concluding 8 days thereafter as ``Blue 
        Star Welcome Week'';
Whereas, during Blue Star Welcome Week, the Senate recognizes the 600,000 active 
        duty and transitioning military families who move to new communities 
        each year;
Whereas nearly half of these permanent change of station (PCS) moves occur 
        during the summer; and
Whereas a sense of belonging is essential to the well-being and readiness of 
        military families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 21, 2024, through September 29, 
        2024, as ``Blue Star Welcome Week'';
            (2) expresses gratitude for the sacrifices made by service 
        members, transitioning veterans, and their families;
            (3) commits to ensuring that military-connected families 
        feel a strong sense of belonging to their local civilian 
        communities; and
            (4) encourages civilians across the United States to 
        welcome military-connected families into their communities.
                                 <all>
```