alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00135]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 8, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 2, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
582 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1038, K2025-1037.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00135 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 129 

To abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Ms. BOEBERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 

Explosives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abolish the ATF Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ABOLISHMENT OF THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TO6 BACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES. 

7 The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Ex8 plosives is hereby abolished. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                           5 
        
<S>                                 <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998   
<CASH>                                  271,665   
<SECURITIES>                                  0   
<RECEIVABLES>                            46,737   
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0   
<INVENTORY>                                   0      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        318,402   
<PP&E>                                  244,925   
<DEPRECIATION>                         (165,070)      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          600,552   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,214,349   
<BONDS>                                       0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0   
<PREFERRED>                             100,000   
<COMMON>                                199,513   
<OTHER-SE>                             (913,310)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            600,552   
<SALES>                                 512,217   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        512,217   
<CGS>                                   390,555   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,731,859   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          7,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     (1,662,270)  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (59,459)  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               0   
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0   
<DISCONTINUED>                                0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0   
<CHANGES>                                     0   
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,664,670)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.09)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.06)  
         

</TABLE>
# C_2021289EN.01001501.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — BY, CX, FU, DW, EV v Stadt Duisburg

(Case C-194/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 - Articles 6 and 7 - Legal employment - Article 9 - Access to education for children of a Turkish worker - Right of residence - Refusal)

(2021/C 289/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: BY, CX, FU, DW, EV

Defendant: Stadt Duisburg

Operative part of the judgment

The first sentence of Article 9 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey must be interpreted as meaning that it cannot be relied on by Turkish children whose parents do not satisfy the conditions laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of that decision.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. David MARX

NO. 2018-KP-0585

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a) and Rule XLII, § 6(e).

WEIMER, J., would consider the merits.

HUGHES, J., would consider the merits.
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Juen 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Equity Ventures Group Inc. |

| By:                | /s/ Colette Kim                                    |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|     | Colette KimPresident, Secretary and Director  |
# C_2021110EN.01002301.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 31 December 2020 — RTL Television GmbH v Grupo Pestana S.G.P.S., S.A., SALVOR — Sociedade de Investimento Hoteleiro, S.A.

(Case C-716/20)

(2021/C 110/24)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal de Justiça

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RTL Television GmbH

Defendants: Grupo Pestana S.G.P.S., S.A., SALVOR — Sociedade de Investimento Hoteleiro, S.A.

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the concept of ‘cable retransmission’, as provided for in Article 1(3) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993, (1) be interpreted as meaning that it covers, in addition to the simultaneous transmission by one broadcasting organisation of a broadcast by another broadcasting organisation, the distribution to the public, on a simultaneous basis and entirely by cable, of a primary broadcast of television or radio programmes intended for reception by the public (whether or not the person performing that distribution to the public is a broadcasting organisation)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the concept of ‘cable retransmission’, as provided for in Article 1(3) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993, (1) be interpreted as meaning that it covers, in addition to the simultaneous transmission by one broadcasting organisation of a broadcast by another broadcasting organisation, the distribution to the public, on a simultaneous basis and entirely by cable, of a primary broadcast of television or radio programmes intended for reception by the public (whether or not the person performing that distribution to the public is a broadcasting organisation)?

| 2. | Does the simultaneous distribution of the satellite broadcasts of a television channel, through television sets installed in hotel rooms, and by means of coaxial cable, constitute a retransmission of such broadcasts within the meaning of the concept provided for in Article 1(3) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the simultaneous distribution of the satellite broadcasts of a television channel, through television sets installed in hotel rooms, and by means of coaxial cable, constitute a retransmission of such broadcasts within the meaning of the concept provided for in Article 1(3) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission (OJ 1993 L 248, p. 15).

---
Burke SILAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Zachary MOSLEY v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-0934

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

*1116WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-303-CR

RACHEL N. DAY	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 3 OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Rachel N. Day appeals from the trial court’s revocation of her community supervision for driving while intoxicated.  At an abatement hearing in the trial court on June 23, 2009, Day orally and in writing expressed her desire that we dismiss the appeal.  Accordingly, on our own initiative, we suspend the requirements of rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, and we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

							TERRIE LIVINGSTON

							JUSTICE

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  July 16, 2009
Exhibit 31.1

HORIZON LINES HOLDING CORP

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 28, 2006



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|/s/    CHARLES G.
RAYMOND                                                             
|Charles G. Raymond President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Great American Family Parks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard W. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great American Family Parks, Inc. and will be retained by Great American Family Parks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Dated:  May 14, 2007 /s/ Richard W. Jackson Name: Richard W. Jackson Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. Dumencu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








OCCULOGIX, INC.Date : May 13,  2010
By:
/s/ William G. Dumencu
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Initial Review Group; Neurological Sciences and Disorders C Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 3-4, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ana Olariu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-9223,                         *Ana.Olariu@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 6, 2025.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00470 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                | 1.     The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |
|                                | 2.     The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|                                |
| Date:                March 14, 2006 |
|                                |

|                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Steven              J. Haack                                   |   |   |   |
| Name: Treasurer                                                                   |   |   |        |
| Title:                  (Principal              Financial Officer) |   |   |   |

----
# C_2017249EN.01002901.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/29

---

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Verschuur v Commission

(Case T-877/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Document concerning the administrative procedure relating to State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) granted by the Netherlands to Starbucks - Refusal to grant access - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 249/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Steven Verschuur (Baarn, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Kreijger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, A. Buchet and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6455 final of 3 October 2016, rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Steven Verschuur shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Steven Verschuur shall bear his own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017

---