alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021471EN.01004801.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)

(Case T-685/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered community design representing a scooter - Earlier design - Ground for invalidity - Disclosure of the earlier design - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2021/C 471/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Asian Gear BV (Pijnacker, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Gravendeel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Multimox Holding BV (Rijen, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 (Case R 1042/2018-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Asian Gear and Multimox Holding.

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Asian Gear BV to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Multimox Holding BV for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Asian Gear BV to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Multimox Holding BV for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Dino YONKO

NO. 2019-KK-0332

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

*1128Denied.
Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Stuart Rogers, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MAX Resource Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 21, 2009  / s / Stuart RogersStuart Rogers, President and CEO (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 7:04-cv-00133-O Document 1 Filed 07/06/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1
Case 7:04-cv-00133-O Document 1 Filed 07/06/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID 2
Case 7:04-cv-00133-O Document 1 Filed 07/06/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID 3
Case 7:04-cv-00133-O Document 1 Filed 07/06/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID 4
D.F.S. v. B.L.

2160605

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Capital
Growth Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick C.
Shutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jim McDevitt, the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 20, 2009



By:

/s/ Patrick C. ShuttPatrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Jim McDevittJim McDevitt, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
Case 2:04-cv-00231-J Document 13 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 90
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00231-J Document 13 Filed 11/03/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 91
# C_2016335EN.01005001.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/50

---

Action brought on 26 July 2016 — Starbucks v EUIPO — Nersesyan (COFFEE ROCKS)

(Case T-398/16)

(2016/C 335/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Starbucks Corp. (Seattle, Washington, United States) (represented by: I. Fowler, Solicitor and J. Schmitt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hasmik Nersesyan (Borgloon, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘COFFEE ROCKS’ — Application for registration No 11 881 943

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2016 in Case R 559/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision given by the Office on 24 May 2016 in Case R 559/2015-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision given by the Office on 24 May 2016 in Case R 559/2015-4; and

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, or — in the event that the other party intervenes — that they be borne jointly by the defendant and the intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant, or — in the event that the other party intervenes — that they be borne jointly by the defendant and the intervener.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 6:03-cv-00067-C Document 6 Filed 01/12/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 19
Case 6:03-cv-00067-C Document 6 Filed 01/12/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 20
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Resource Funding, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      David R. Koran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, based on my knowledge:







(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










January
      20,
      2006                                                    
/s/ Da vid
      R.
      Koran


David
      R.
      Koran


Chief Executive Officer
Jorge PIEKAREWICZ and J. D. Rayburn, Appellants, v. PALMETTO CLUB PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and United National Bank, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1223

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, andb.
    
    The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations for Nalco.
 /s/ J. ERIK FYRWALDJ. Erik FyrwaldChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 30, 2008/s/ BRADLEY J. BELLBradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Date: October 30, 2008
Exhibit 31.1


I, Steve T. Laflin, certify that:


I have  reviewed this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of  International  Isotopes,
Inc.;

Based on my  knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report,  fairly present in all material  respects the financial
condition,  results of  operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The  registrant's  other  certifying   officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


 Date: March 29, 2005


 /S/  Steve T. Laflin
 -----------------------
 Steve T. Laflin
 Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
Shakia S. RAWLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4612

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Charles Ray GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald K. Peterson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/DONALD K. PETERSONDonald K. Peterson
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

August 12,
2003

---

QuickLinks
## **EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Annual Report”), I, Terry L. Freeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     TheAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theCompany.

 
| Dated:  May 26,  2005 |   | /S/ TERRY L FREEMAN      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Terry L. Freeman         |
|                       |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure statement.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
# C_2016287EN.01003101.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/31

---

Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-888TII RU)

(Case T-317/16)

(2016/C 287/37)

Language in which the application was lodged: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Moravia Consulting spol. s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Citizen Systems Europe GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SDC-888TII RU’– Application for registration No 12 781 225

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2016 in Case R 1566/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
# C_2021278EN.01004601.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/46

---

Order of the General Court of 25 May 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services)

(Case T-263/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 278/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: R. Gioia and L. Mansi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2020 (Case R 1545/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Rochem Marine and Rochem Group.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Rochem Group AG and Rochem Marine Srl. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Rochem Group AG and Rochem Marine Srl.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.

---
# C_2019016EN.01001401.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Wiemer & Trachte GmbH, in liquidation v Zhan Oved Tadzher

(Case C-296/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Insolvency proceedings - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Article 3(1) - International jurisdiction - Action to set a transaction aside - Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State within the territory of which insolvency proceedings have been opened))

(2019/C 16/16)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Wiemer & Trachte GmbH, in liquidation

Respondent in cassation: Zhan Oved Tadzher

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State within the territory of which insolvency proceedings have been opened to hear and determine an action to set a transaction aside by virtue of the debtor’s insolvency which has been brought against a defendant whose registered office or habitual residence is in another Member State is exclusive.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

---