alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John W. Pelot, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. C. M. Long, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Decision Filed August 1, 1927.

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Plaintiff in Error;

TF. *D. Bell,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transeipt of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the *614said judgment of tbe Circuit Court be, and tbe same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2005


/s/ Bryan Kenyon
-------------------------------
Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1461

In Re: SHAKA AMIR FARRAKHAN, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:08-cv-00438-TSE-JFA) 

Submitted: June 8, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009 

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Shaka Amir Farrakhan, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Shaka Amir Farrakhan petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to 

act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that on May 13, 

2009, the district court transferred claims 13 through 30 of 

Farrakhan’s complaint to the Western District of Virginia, the 

court of proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) (2006), 

and dismissed claims 1, 3 through 9, 11, and 12 pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) for failure to state a claim. 

Claims 2 and 10 remain pending in the Eastern District. 

Because the district court has recently acted in 

Farrakhan’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We 

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Farrakhan’s 

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 13.2


                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-A) PLC (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: June 24, 2007





/s/ Kate Blankenship
----------------------------
    Kate Blankenship
    Principal Financial Officer
Timothy Leon ODOM v. STATE

CR-16-0319

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BASS GLOVE, LLC v. Jeff HALL

2160634

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2019263EN.01000601.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Brindisi — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Gianluca Moro

(Case C-646/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive 2012/13/EU - Right to information in criminal proceedings - Article 6(4) - Right of a person to be informed about the accusation against him - Being informed about any change in the information provided when that is necessary to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings - Change in the legal classification of the acts upon which the accusation is based - The accused person being unable to request, during the trial proceedings, the imposition of a negotiated penalty provided for under national law - Difference in the event of a change in the facts on which the accusation is based)

(2019/C 263/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Brindisi

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

Gianluca Moro

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(4) of Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings, and Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which the accused person may request, during the trial proceedings, the imposition of a negotiated penalty in the event of a change in the facts on which the accusation is based, and not in the event of a change in the legal classification of the acts on which the accusation is based.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
Edward Alexander LOBATTO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is granted.
EX PARTE Nicholas Robert DUNLAP

1160667 (CR-15-0439)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 13.2








PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-A) PLC (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: June 14, 2011





/s/ Kate Blankenship


Kate Blankenship


Principal Financial Officer
Trevontae J. SHULER, DOC #H37202, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael D. NORTHCUTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2487

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1979-1980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00277]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID: USAF-2024-HQ-0010]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
10, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Web-based Legal Information 
Online System (WebLIONS); OMB Control Number 0701-0161.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Number of Respondents: 194,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 194,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 3 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 9,700.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain personal identifiable information to provide efficient and 
competent legal assistance to individuals with personal civil legal 
issues. Legal assistance records assist Air Force attorneys with 
tracking and managing cases, performing conflict checks, and generating 
legal documents for clients.

[[Page 1980]]

The system optimizes the use of information technology and streamlines 
the legal assistance process by eliminating manual case tracking 
requirements and physical storage requirements, as well as assisting 
the Air Force in compiling and analyzing statistical data related to 
providing legal assistance to clients.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2025-00277 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3911-44-P
```
James D. SAFFORE, DOC #488495, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1717

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John Jerome SPEIGHTS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3116

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. Drawdy*, 136 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. 2014) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Carlyle v. State*, 945 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; *Coughlin v. State*, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; *Brown v. State*, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; *Schwenn v. State*, 898 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 13 Filed 04/24/03 Page 1 of 6 PageID 76
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 13 Filed 04/24/03 Page 2 of 6 PageID 77
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 13 Filed 04/24/03 Page 3 of 6 PageID 78
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 13 Filed 04/24/03 Page 4 of 6 PageID 79
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 13 Filed 04/24/03 Page 5 of 6 PageID 80
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 13 Filed 04/24/03 Page 6 of 6 PageID 81
Christopher O. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5333

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract                               ( print page 1205)                            1207 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1005, K2025-1004.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00033 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Thomas Noble Brown, *Appellant,*v. Louise Phelps Brown, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed October 27, 1927.

*McCollum & Howell,*of Bushnell, for Appellants;

*B. B. Sturkie,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Kenneth K. SEXTON v. Christine SEXTON

2160896

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of Patrick K. Gill, Chief Executive Officer, and James A. Luyk, Chief Financial Officer, of O.A.K. Financial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                 the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)                 the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of O.A.K. Financial Corporation.

 

Dated:    April 1, 2010

 

/s/ Patrick K. Gill                                                                  

Patrick K. Gill

Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ James A. Luyk                                                                

James A. Luyk

Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to O.A.K. Financial Corporation and will be retained by OAK Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

----
Luis THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and James A. Odell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Grady v. State* 753 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (Factors to be considered in determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia include "the proximity of the object to controlled substances" and "expert testimony concerning its use.").
N.A.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                |                                         |                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                                                | **OCCULOGIX,                INC.**           |
|                                                           |                                    |                                  |
| Date:   August                8,                2007 | By:                                | /s/ William                G. Dumencu |
|                                                                |  Chief                Financial Officer |
|                                                                |                                         |

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin PITTS

NO. 2018-KH-0415

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review and fails to show that any exception permits his successive filing. See State ex rel. Pitts v. State, 15-0329 (La. 11/20/15), 178 So.3d 984.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20703 and #20704; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number SC-20012]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 10.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4829-DR), dated September 29, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Helene.                    

# DATES:

Issued on January 6, 2025.

*Incident Period:*                         September 25, 2024 through October 7, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         January 28, 2025.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at                         *https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of South Carolina, dated September 29, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 28, 2025.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2025-00420 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P