alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |   |                                                |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March 07, 2014 |   | /s/ Martin B. Oring                            |   |
|                            |   | Martin B. Oring                                     |   |
|                            |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----

----
# C_2022418EN.01002101.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KL v EIB

(Case T-751/20) (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Sick leave - Rejection of medical certificates - Unjustified absences - Action for annulment and for damages)

(2022/C 418/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KL (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 18 May 2020 by which the European Investment Bank (EIB) rejected the medical certificates which he had produced to justify his absences from 18 March to 18 April and from 20 April to 20 May 2020 under Article 3.3 of Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations, and, secondly, compensation for the damage he claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 18 May 2020 by which the European Investment Bank (EIB) rejected the medical certificates produced by KL to justify his absences from 18 March to 18 April and from 20 April to 20 May 2020 under Article 3.3 of Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 18 May 2020 by which the European Investment Bank (EIB) rejected the medical certificates produced by KL to justify his absences from 18 March to 18 April and from 20 April to 20 May 2020 under Article 3.3 of Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the EIB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EIB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicerpursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2009 (asamended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and amongNHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2009-A, does herebycertify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuantto the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) ofthe Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the periodfrom the trust’s initial cutoff date, February 28, 2009, to and including December 31,2009 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, theServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the period from the trust’sinitial cutoff date, February 28, 2009, to and including December 31,2009.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executedthis Certificate this 29th day of March 2010.

 

----

 

March 29, 2010

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Bierman |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven C. Bierman     |
|   | Title: | President             |

 

----
# C_2017006EN.01004301.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/43

---

Action brought on 2 November 2016 — Euro Castor Green v EUIPO — Netlon France (Concealed trellis)

(Case T-756/16)

(2017/C 006/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euro Castor Green (Bagnolet, France) (represented by: B. Lafont, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Netlon France (Saint Saulve, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the design at issue:

Design at issue: European Union design No 001 197 966-0001

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11/08/2016 in Case R 754/2014-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the application, and its annexes, are admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the application, and its annexes, are admissible;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 5 of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 5 of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA SERRANO AND TLP

- EPL

ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA THE LENS

FACTORY; AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF

11450 JAMES WATT, SUITE C1 AND

C2 EL PASO, TEXAS 79936,

Appellants,

v.

FRANCIS PROPERTIES I, LTD.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00191

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Five

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011

- J00021)

O R D E R

The Court has considered the Appellant’s Plea to the Jurisdiction, and concludes that the

Court is without authority to grant the plea. Therefore, the Appellant’s Plea to the Jurisdiction is

denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
# C_2016232EN.01003201.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/32

---

Action brought on 9 May 2016 — Mühlbauer Technology v EUIPO (Magicrown)

(Case T-218/16)

(2016/C 232/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mühlbauer Technology GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Magicrown’ — Application No 13 627 641

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2016 in Case R 1213/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
Tavares Survell EVANS Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2622

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**
    **CERTIFICATIONS**
   I, Rolla P. Huff, certify that:
  (1)
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mpower Holding Corporation;(2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and(5)
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  
 
  Date:
November 10, 2004
By:
/s/ Rolla P. HuffRolla P. HuffPrincipal Executive Officer
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   May 6, 2010/s/ Cristina WasiakCristina WasiakChief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1148 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-933, K2025-934.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31711 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Order entered January 14, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00283 - CV ESTATE OF: LOLA CHEN OWITH, DECEASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. P R - 12 - 00202 - 2 

### O RDER T he supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the “Last Will & Testament of Lola B. Chenoweth” ordered to be filed by January 6, 2014 has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren to file, no later than January 21, 201 4, either a supplemental record containing the will or written verification that the will cannot be located.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Finance Holdings LLC("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2005, herebycertify as follows:

|  |          |                                                                                           |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                     |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | The information inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations for Nalco. |

|  | /s/  WILLIAM H.JOYCE                         William H.Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: May 12,2005 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/  BRADLEY J.BELL                              BradleyJ. Bell Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer Date: May 12, 2005 |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10994 Summary Calendar

MORGAN S. GILMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JACQUES I. KIERE, ET AL.,
Defendants, JACQUES I. KIERE; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-2710-G
- - - - - - - - - - May 1, 1997 Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Morgan S. Gilmer, Texas prisoner # 666666, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action against Jacques I. Kiere, the Sheriff of Rockwall County, and John Doe, the jail captain responsible for the health and safety of the prisoners, pursuantNo. 96-10994 - 2 - to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We liberally construe Gilmer’s pro
se brief as arguing that the district court erred in dismissing the case for failure to state an Eighth Amendment violation, requiring Gilmer to meet the heightened pleading requirements in responding to the defendants’ assertion of qualified immunity, denying his motion to amend his complaint, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal on grounds of frivolousness. We have reviewed Gilmer’s brief and the record and conclude that the judgment of the district court should be AFFIRMED. Gilmer v. Kiere , No. 3:94-CV-2710-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 1995). AFFIRMED.
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 2 of 7 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 3 of 7 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 4 of 7 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 5 of 7 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 6 of 7 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 1 Filed 12/23/03 Page 7 of 7 PageID 7
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1446

___________ Dawn R. Rolph, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Minnesota. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 22, 1999

Filed: October 28, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LAY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. DawnR. Rolph appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming theCommissioner's decision to deny Rolph disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. For reversal, Rolph contends the record supports a finding that there are no other jobs in the national and regional economy that Rolph could per form and the administrative law judge improperly discredited Rolph's limitations and subjective complaints of pain. Having reviewed the administrative record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that Rolph's arguments lack merit. We find substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision of the Commissioner that-2-

Rolph is not disabled for social security purposes. Because the controlling legal principles are well established and an extended discussion would serve no useful purpose in this fact-intensive case, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Juan J. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF the INDYMAC INDX MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2004-AR12, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-AR12 Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated November 1, 2004, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cv-01442-B Document 12 Filed 08/31/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID 55
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01442-B Document 12 Filed 08/31/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID 56
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01442-B Document 12 Filed 08/31/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID 57
 

 Case 3:04-cv-01442-B Document 12 Filed 08/31/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID 58
# C_2016165EN.01001901.xml

| 10.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/19

---

Action brought on 22 March 2016 — 1. FC Köln v EUIPO (SPÜRBAR ANDERS)

(Case T-126/16)

(2016/C 165/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: 1. FC Köln GmbH & Co. KGaA (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt, V. Töbelmann and S. Stier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SPÜRBAR ANDERS’ — Application No 13 468 103

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 January 2016 in Case R 718/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Conrad THITCHENER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-143

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mid-Am Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Cosmo Palmieri, President and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Cosmo Palmieri



Cosmo Palmieri,

 President and a director

April 14, 2004