alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Supplemental
Agreement on the Cooperation Structure Agreement of Guarantee Company


 


Party
A: Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)


 


Party
B: Inner Mongolia Jinfengyuan Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”)


 


Unless
otherwise stated, the terms and expressions used herein shall have the same meaning as those defined in the Cooperation Structure
Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “the Original Agreement”) signed by Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant
(Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Inner Mongolia Jinfengyuan Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd. on October 30, 2015.


 


Whereas:


 


This
Cooperation Structure Agreement is entered by and between Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Inner
Mongolia JINFENGYUAN Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd. on October 30, 2015. Based on the principle of mutual benefits, both parties
have entered into the following supplementary agreement on the matters not mentioned in such Cooperation Structure Agreement through
friendly negotiation.


 


Supplemental
contents are as follows:


 


1.
Through negotiation, both parties will cooperate in credit loan services, specifically, the services of transferring of creditors’
rights. Party A shall be responsible for evaluating and reviewing the transfer projects of creditor’s rights in credit financing
which are submitted by Party B and control relevant risks.


 


2.
In order to guarantee the interests of both parties and normal business operations, through negotiation, both parties agree that
Party B opens a corporate account (account number: _____________________________________________) in ___________________________________________________
(Bank Name) as the account owner, pays a basic guarantee deposit of ___________ RMB into such account in advance and deposits
10%~20% of the amount for each financing operation to the guarantee deposit; as the administrator of such account, Party A manages
such account together with Party B.


 


3.
During the cooperation, Party B shall not create any third-party charge, pledge or encumbrance over funds in such account, and
both parties have no right to withdraw or transfer funds in the account managed by both parties and must jointly operate such
account.


 


After
taking effect, this agreement becomes an integral part of the Cooperation Structure Agreement between Benefactum Alliance Business
Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Inner Mongolia JINFENGYUAN Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd. and has the same legal force with
such Cooperation Structure Agreement.


 




    	 	 	 



    	 	 	 



    

 


5.
Except the terms supplemented herein, the remainder of the Original Agreement shall remain in full effect.


 


	 	Party
    A (official seal):	Party
    B (official seal):
	 	 	 
	 	Legal
representative/	Legal
    representative/
	 	 	 
	 	Authorized
person:	Authorized
    person:
	 	 	 
	 	Date:
February 23, 2016	Date:
    February 23, 2016
# C_2020320EN.01000502.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/5

---

Appeal brought on 8 April 2020 by WV against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) made on 29 January 2020 in Case T-388/18, WV v EEAS

(Case C-172/20 P)

(2020/C 320/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: WV (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the order of 29 January 2020 of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-388/18, in so far as it dismissed the present appellant’s initial action for annulment as inadmissible and ordered the appellant to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order of 29 January 2020 of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-388/18, in so far as it dismissed the present appellant’s initial action for annulment as inadmissible and ordered the appellant to pay the costs;

| — | Order the original defendant to pay all of the costs, including the costs incurred before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with Article 184 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the original defendant to pay all of the costs, including the costs incurred before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with Article 184 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union;

| — | Refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union in order for it to rule on the action. |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union in order for it to rule on the action.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appellant submits that, in issuing the order under appeal, the General Court failed to have regard to the principle of unfettered evaluation of evidence and the concept of a body of consistent evidence and, therefore, failed to have regard to the rules relating to the burden of proof, in particular as regards the arguments and evidence submitted concerning the calculation of the time available to the appellant for the purposes of contesting the decision of the EEAS.

The single ground of appeal raised by the appellant also alleges discrimination, distortion of the facts by the order under appeal and manifest errors of assessment made by the General Court resulting in imprecise legal reasoning.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - hawaii(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - montana(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea, showing generalized distribution of lava...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1972        Generalized geologic map of the Eocene Absaroka volcanic field

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea with generalized surface distribution of ...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2018        Nantucket and Marthas Vineyard geologic illustrations

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2013        Geology of the Anza-Terwilliger Area, California

Charts or Graphs        April 1, 2023        Geologic map of the Timber Hill basalt Sweetwater Hills, Montana

Charts or Graphs        July 11, 2021        Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        Map shows hill-shaded bathymetric, backscatter, and photographic data

Charts or Graphs        June 15, 2018        Kilauea Volcano -- Lower East Rift Zone lava flows and fissures

Charts or Graphs        June 10, 2016        Potential Marine Benthic Habitats of Monterey Canyon and Vicinity

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        IMMeRSS Cruise expedition area

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2012        Acoustic Backscatter Intensity
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9 - 0586 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GREGORY GEORGE DENNY ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 21 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

**J M** **K** Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2020

07/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0586
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31254]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12621]

Notice of Receipt of Request From the Government of the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice of receipt of request from Vietnam for cultural 
property protection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Compton, Cultural Heritage 
Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs: (202) 904-0878; 
[email protected]; include ``Vietnam'' in the subject line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Government of the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam made a request to the Government of the United States on 
November 13, 2024, under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the 
Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and 
Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Vietnam's request seeks 
U.S. import restrictions on archaeological and ethnological materials 
representing Vietnam's cultural patrimony. The Cultural Heritage Center 
website will provide instructions for public comment and additional 
information on the request, including categories of material that may 
be included in import restrictions: https://eca.state.gov/highlight/cultural-property-advisory-committee-meeting-february-4-6-2025. This 
notice is published pursuant to authority vested in the Principal 
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs and pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1).

Allison R. Davis Lehmann,
Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2024-31254 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC v. TEXAS BRINK COMPANY, L.L.C., et al.

NO. 2019-CD-0399

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 14, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.
Antonio M. NEAL, DOC #124111, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PetroHunter Energy Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carmen
      J. Lotito, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Carmen J.
      Lotito


Carmen
      J.
      Lotito, Chief Financial Officer








September
      6, 2007
1

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 115,132

STATE OF KANSAS,

Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY HEGWOOD,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Wyandotte District Court; MICHAEL A. RUSSELL, judge. Opinion filed December 1, 2017. 

Affirmed.

Gerald E. Wells, of Jerry Wells Attorney-at-Law, of Lawrence, was on the brief for appellant.

Jerome A. Gorman, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were on the brief for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM: Anthony Hegwood appeals the district court's summary denial of 

his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm. 

Hegwood asserted he was entitled to relief under State v. Murdock, 299 Kan. 312, 

323 P.3d 846 (2014), overruled by State v. Keel, 302 Kan. 560, 357 P.3d 251 (2015), 

cert. denied 136 S. Ct. 865 (2016). Murdock related to the calculation of a criminal 

defendant's criminal history score under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA) 

when a defendant's criminal history includes out-of-state robberies committed prior to the 

enactment of the KSGA. 299 Kan. at 314, 318-19. 
2

The district court summarily denied Hegwood's claims based on its conclusion that 

Murdock did not apply to Hegwood's sentences for aggravated robbery, which were 

imposed on May 13, 1993—before the July 1, 1993, effective date of the KSGA. See 

K.S.A. 21-4704(a) ("For purposes of sentencing, the following sentencing guidelines for 

nondrug crimes shall be applied in felony cases for crimes committed on or after July 1, 

1993."); see also K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-6802(c) (Revised Kansas Sentencing Guidelines 

Act "shall have no application to crimes committed prior to July 1, 1993"). Murdock, 

which limited its analysis to situations where the KSGA applied, would not have any 

effect on Hegwood's sentences.

The district court appointed counsel for Hegwood's appeal, and before us

Hegwood concedes he is not entitled to relief under Murdock because his sentences were

imposed prior to enactment of the KSGA. Therefore, Murdock would not impact his preKSGA sentences, even if it had not been overruled after Hegwood filed his motion to 

correct an illegal sentence. 

We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude the district court adequately 

addressed the issues. The district court's dismissal is affirmed under Kansas Supreme 

Court Rule 7.042(b)(2) (2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 48) (the appeal is without merit).

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 859 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 859

  Supporting the designation of September 2024 as ``National Recovery 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

    Mr. King (for himself and Mrs. Capito) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the designation of September 2024 as ``National Recovery 
                                Month''.

Whereas the theme for National Recovery Month is ``Every Person. Every Family. 
        Every Community.'';
Whereas nearly 108,000 individuals in the United States suffered a fatal drug 
        overdose during 2023, the first annual decrease in drug overdose deaths 
        since 2018;
Whereas overdose deaths involving opioids decreased from an estimated 84,181 in 
        2022 to 81,083 in 2023;
Whereas overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) decreased in 
        2023 compared to 2022, but overdose deaths from cocaine and 
        psychostimulants (like methamphetamine) increased;
Whereas, in 2023, there were approximately 22,219,000 adults in the United 
        States who considered themselves to be in recovery from substance use 
        disorder;
Whereas individuals with substance use disorder may face stigma from health 
        professionals as well as from friends and family;
Whereas it has been demonstrated that stigma can be a barrier to accessing 
        treatment and engaging in recovery for individuals with substance use 
        disorder; and
Whereas peer-supported communities offer individuals with substance use disorder 
        better success in recovery by addressing the personal and emotional 
        effects of addiction and easing reintegration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the importance of patient, provider, and 
        societal education for the prevention of substance use 
        disorder;
            (2) supports efforts to explore the means by which 
        integrated care, community, and helping individuals obtain a 
        sense of purpose can lead to effective and sustainable 
        treatment of substance use disorder;
            (3) shows appreciation and gratitude for family members, 
        friends, and other individuals who support individuals in 
        recovery from substance use disorder; and
            (4) supports the designation of September 2024 as 
        ``National Recovery Month''.
                                 <all>
```
# Mission and Priorities

The FBI has dual responsibilities as a law enforcement and intelligence agency. Learn about our vision, mission, priorities, core values, budget, and more.

- Lawful Access Because of warrant-proof encryption, the government often cannot obtain the electronic evidence necessary to investigate and prosecute threats to public and national safety, even with a warrant or court order.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of SYNAVANT Inc. (the "Company") on Forms S-8 (No. 33-46040 and 33-46038) of
our report dated February 26, 2001, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and
1999, the year ended November 30, 1998 and the month ended December 31, 1998,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BARRY GLEN THOMPSON, a/k/a Berry G. Thompson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-95-115, CA-97-429-6)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Graham James, Montgomery, Alabama, for Appellant. Monica

Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Thompson, Nos. CR-95-115; CA-97-429-6 (S.D.W. Va.

Feb. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 7

Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 7

Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 7

Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 7

Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 7

Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 7

Case 24-50120-rlj7    Doc 6    Filed 05/30/24    Entered 05/30/24 16:22:24    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 7
# C_2020209EN.01000501.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Procura della Repubblica di Trento (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2020 — Criminal proceedings against XK

(Case C-66/20)

(2020/C 209/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Procura della Repubblica di Trento

Party to the main proceedings

XK

Other Party

Finanzamt Münster

Question referred

In so far as it provides that ‘any other competent authority as defined by the issuing State which, in the specific case, is acting in its capacity as an investigating authority in criminal proceedings with competence to order the gathering of evidence in accordance with national law’, may also be regarded as an issuing authority, but also provides that, in that case, ‘before it is transmitted to the executing authority the EIO shall be validated, after examination of its conformity with the conditions for issuing an EIO under this Directive, in particular the conditions set out in Article 6.1, by a judge, court, investigating judge or a public prosecutor in the issuing State’, is Article 2(1)(c)(ii) of Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (1) to be interpreted as allowing a Member State to exempt an administrative authority from the obligation to have the EIO validated by defining it as a “judicial authority for the purposes of Article 2 of the Directive?

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 130, p. 1.

---