alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of MAX Resource Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Cherry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Christopher Cherry


__________________________________


Christopher Cherry


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting and Financial Officer


April 29, 2013








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As  independent  public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by  reference  in  this  Form 10-K/A of our report (and to all references to our
Firm)  dated  June  9,  1999  into  the  Company's previously filed Registration
Statements  (File  No. 333-92290-99, 333-36361, 333-36427, 333-47401, 333-47267,
333-47849,  333-52585,  333-34883,  333-43399).  It should be noted that we have
not  audited  any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31,
1998,  nor performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our reports.




/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
July 9, 1999
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David F. Hofstatter, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CallWave Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31735]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1176 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-964, K2025-963.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31735 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

 §

VS. § CRIMINAL NO.4:03-CR-055-Y

 § (CIVIL NO.4:03-CV-1434-Y)

PETER C. ADIEME §

 FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to an Opinion and Order Dismissing, In Part, and

Denying Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 issued this same day, and

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58:

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all claims

for relief in Peter C. Adieme’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, except for the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel

relating to the voluntariness of his plea, be, and they are hereby,

DISMISSED with prejudice. 

It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Adieme’s

claims of ineffective assistance of counsel relating to the

voluntariness of his plea be, and they are hereby, DENIED.

SIGNED May 24, 2005.

 

 Case 4:03-cv-01434-Y Document 2 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 7
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARTIN YANEZ VERDUGO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50545

D.C. No. 3:12-cr-01433-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2013** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Martin Yanez Verdugo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 68-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

DEC 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Yanez Verdugo contends that the district court erred by denying his request

for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b), because it presumed drug

couriers are ineligible for a minor role adjustment, improperly considered

government evidence in other cases, and improperly considered premeditation. 

We review de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines, for abuse of

discretion the district court’s application of the Guidelines to the facts of the case,

and for clear error its factual determination that a defendant is not a minor

participant. United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.

2011). We need not decide whether the district court erred because any error was

harmless in light of the district court’s determination, supported by the record, that

Yanez Verdugo failed to prove he was substantially less culpable than the average

participant in the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) & cmt. n.3(A); see also

Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d at 1193 (district court did not err in declining to apply

minor role adjustment where defendant, a courier, registered car in his name,

created a “crossing record,” and transported a substantial amount of narcotics). 

AFFIRMED.

2 12-50545
STATE of Louisiana v. Tara HUNTER

No. 2018-KH-0566

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LIVINGSTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant shows no lower court error.

Applicant has now fully litigated her application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless she can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted her right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 09

- 1921, 09

- 2989 & 09

- 2991

_________________

JOEL S. ARIO,

Insurance Commissioner of the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,

in his official capacity as the statutory liqui dator

of Legion Insurance Company (in liquidation);

*PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP,

Appellant (09

- 1921)

v.

THE UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF SYNDICATE

53 AT LLOYDS FOR THE 1998 YEAR OF ACCOUNT

Cross

- Appellants (09

- 2991)

*(Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 12(a) (09

- 2989 only))

_________________

No. 09

- 1922, 09

- 2990 & 09

- 2992

_________________

JOEL S. ARIO,

Insurance Commissioner of th e

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,

in his official capacity as the statutory liquidator

of Vil lanova Insurance Company (in liquidation);

*PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP,

Appellant (09

- 1922)

v.2 THE UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF SYNDICATE

53 AT LLOYDS FOR THE 1998 YEAR OF ACCOUNT

Cross

- Appellants (09

- 2992)

*(Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 12(a) (09

- 2990 only))

_________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 1

B 08

- cv

- 01619/20)

District Judge: Honorable William W. Caldwell

_________________

Arg ued March 10, 2010

_________________

Before: AMBRO, SMITH and ALDISERT , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed August 18 , 2010 )

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed August

18, 2010, be amended as follows:

One page 1 3, first partial paragraph, line 2 , insert “ the ” before the word

“Convention’s”

.

One page 13, first partial paragraph, line 3

, change “applies” to “apply”

.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: December 7, 2010
R.A.G. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160945

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Etowah Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                              
|                   |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady                                  
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                   |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 2, 2018

NO. 03-18-00093-CV

Wenkai Chen, Appellant

v.

Bank of America, N.A., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 29, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Case 3:04-cv-00521-P Document 9 Filed 09/21/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 28
Case 3:04-cv-00521-P Document 9 Filed 09/21/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 29
*       *       *       *       *
 
 EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Centale, Inc. (the
“Company”) certifies that:
  1.       The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
  2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 February
      13, 2008
              /s/ Thaddeus A. Wier,
      Jr.Thaddeus
      A. Wier, Jr.(Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer)
ROSE FIELD, LLC, Appellant, v. OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D18-117

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021431EN.01003202.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — SBG v EUIPO — VF International (GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION)

(Case T-459/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION - Absolute ground for refusal - Absolute ground for invalidity - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Bad faith - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 431/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Super Brand Licencing (SBG) (Villeurbanne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and A. Sion, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland) (represented by: T. van Innis and A. Van der Planken, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 (Case R 664/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between VF International and SBG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 April 2020 (Case R 664/2019-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 April 2020 (Case R 664/2019-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO and VF International Sagl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO and VF International Sagl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.

---
BTXN 189 (rev. 08/06)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Constantine Angus Case No.: 24−40432−elm13

 Chapter No.: 13

Debtor(s)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THIRTY−DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RECEIVE CREDIT

COUNSELING AND FILE CERTIFICATE OF SAME

 The Court, after consideration of the Debtor's Request For Thirty−Day Extension of Time to receive Credit

Counseling and file certificate of same, and noting that no explanation is provided within the Request of the 

exigent circumstances that would merit an extension, finds that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(3)(A), 

circumstances do not exist that merit an extension of time to obtain the credit counseling as set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 

109(h)(1).

IT IS ORDERED that the Request is DENIED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed February 7, 2024

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-40432-elm13 Doc 7 Filed 02/08/24 Entered 02/08/24 09:51:23 Desc

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) that:









| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | 
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 









| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | 
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 









|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                           |  |                      
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                           |  | /s/ Michael D. Traina
|Date: May 21, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | Michael D. Traina Chief Executive
Officer









|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                       |  |                  
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                       |  | /s/ Kurt A. Braun
|Date: May 21, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | Kurt A. Braun Chief Financial
Officer







The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
       MPOWER HOLDING CORPORATION CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
       SARBANES/OXLEY ACT - FILED AS AN EXHIBIT TO 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED
                                 JUNE 30, 2002

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rolla
P. Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
[sec]. 1350, as adopted pursuant to [sec]. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Rolla P. Huff

Rolla P. Huff
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Robert W. Piper, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Piper                  
|                                     
|Robert W. Piper                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 27, 2004