alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of Louisiana v. Grover CANNON

No. 2019-KD-590

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM

**Stay lifted. Writ granted.** Defendant has shown that, under the system employed in East Baton Rouge Parish, persons born after June 2, 1993, otherwise *586qualified to serve on the jury, were never given an opportunity to serve, because their names were excluded from the general venire as a result of a significant error in the process by which the general venire was composed. That exclusion resulted in a general venire that was improperly constituted under Code of Criminal Procedure articles 401 *etseq*. and Louisiana Constitutional Articles I, § 3 ("No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.") and V, § 33 ("A citizen of the state who has reached the age of majority is eligible to serve as a juror within the parish in which he is domiciled."). Accordingly, we grant defendant's application to reverse the rulings of the courts below, grant defendant's motion to quash the general venire, and remand to the district court for further proceedings so that a petit jury can be chosen from a general venire that is selected according to law. *See**State v. Jacko* , 444 So.2d 1185 (La. 1984) ; *State v. Procell* , 332 So.2d 814 (La. 1976).

Guidry, J., concurs in the result and assigns reasons.

Given the unique posture and circumstances of this case, I agree that commencing jury selection from a newly-constituted venire is prudent, both out of an abundance of caution and to prevent a possible waste of judicial resources. Notwithstanding, this court, in my view, has not been directed to any constitutional provision or jurisprudence, whether federal or state, that would mandate quashing the general jury venire because of a software glitch that unintentionally excluded potential jurors born after June 2, 1993, and I withhold my judgment on that issue.
Order entered November 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00524-CV

COLLIN CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

COLLIN CREEK MALL, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-03582-2011

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s November 4, 2014 unopposed motion to substitute lead counsel. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to substitute Jason C. Marshall with The Marshall Firm, PC 

as lead counsel for appellee in the place of Melinda D. Blackwell with Blackwell & Duncan, 

PLLC.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00290]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2024-OS-0104]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness (OUSD(P&R)), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
10, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Problematic Sexual Behavior 
in Children and Youth Information System; OMB Control Number 0704-0620.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Number of Respondents: 2,500.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 2,500.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 2,500.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection provides incident and 
case management data on problematic sexual behavior between children 
and youth as required by the John S. McCain National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232), Section 1089, 
Policy on Response to Juvenile-on-Juvenile Problematic Sexual Behavior 
Committed on Military Installations. This statute requires policy 
development, data collection, and Family Advocacy Program (FAP) 
involvement through a multidisciplinary response to problematic sexual 
behavior in children and youth (PSB-CY) occurring on military 
installations. The purpose of the collection is to determine 
eligibility for FAP services and to initiate a case record that will 
inform and support the development and implementation of well-
coordinated safety plans, evidence informed support and intervention 
services, and referrals to specialized care when needed that meet the 
complex needs of children, youth, and their families involved in 
incidents of PSB-CY.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2025-00290 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In  connection  with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-A) PLC
(the  "Company")  on Form 20-F for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kate  Blankenship,  Chief Financial  Officer and
Secretary  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 28, 2004


/s/ Kate Blankenship
-------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Principal Financial Officer

02089.0007 #495979
Exhibit 32.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In  connection  with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-B) PLC
(the  "Company")  on Form 20-F for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC") on or about the
date  hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Tor Olav Troim,  Chief  Executive  Officer and
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 28, 2004

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
-------------------------
Tor Olav Troim
Principal Executive Officer
# C_2019139EN.01010901.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/109 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/109

---

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — Government of Gibraltar v Commission

(Case T-783/16) (1)

(2019/C 139/112)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

---
Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 15 PageID 143
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 2 of 15 PageID 144
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 3 of 15 PageID 145
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 4 of 15 PageID 146
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 5 of 15 PageID 147
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 6 of 15 PageID 148
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 7 of 15 PageID 149
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 8 of 15 PageID 150
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 9 of 15 PageID 151
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 10 of 15 PageID 152
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 11 of 15 PageID 153
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 12 of 15 PageID 154
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 13 of 15 PageID 155
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 14 of 15 PageID 156
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00245-C Document 27 Filed 09/30/05 Page 15 of 15 PageID 157
# C_2018408EN.01002501.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Fremoluc NV v Agentschap voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant (Vlabinvest APB) and Others

(Case C-343/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Fundamental freedoms - Articles 21, 45, 49 and 63 TFEU - Directive 2004/38/EC - Articles 22 and 24 - Right of pre-emption of a government body on land located in its operating area with a view to developing social housing - Housing allocated on a priority basis to private individuals who ‘have strong social, economic or socio-cultural ties’ with the area in which that body operates - Situation which is confined in all respects within a single Member State - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling))

(2018/C 408/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fremoluc NV

Defendants: Agentschap voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant (Vlabinvest APB), Vlaams Financieringsfonds voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant, Vlaamse Maatschappij voor Sociaal Wonen NV (VMSW), Christof De Knop and Others

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel (Dutch-language Court of First Instance, Brussels, Belgium), made by decision of 19 May 2017, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 

31, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00866-CV

SHO MUHAMMAD, Appellant

V.

GEORGE GILLUM, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1142083

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 21, 2019. On December 16, 

2019, the parties filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal “without prejudice.” 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure speak only of a dismissal of an appeal; 

neither “with prejudice” nor “without prejudice” is appended to the word 

“dismissal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We construe the motion as one for voluntary 
2

dismissal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). So construed, the 

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
Charles Edward PITTS, DOC #C09062, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-251

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

          TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of TravelCenters of
America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James W. George, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ James W. George
-------------------------------------------------------
James W. George
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 9, 2004
Robert Donald MCCOLLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3806

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2016441EN.01003101.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/31

---

Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Pebagua v Commission

(Case T-715/16)

(2016/C 441/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) (Isla Mayor, Spain) (represented by: A. J. Uceda Sosa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested implementing regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested implementing regulation;

| — | in the alternative, annul the inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii in the list adopted by that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii in the list adopted by that regulation;

| — | order the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the applicant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action is brought against Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 of 13 July 2016 adopting a list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 4).

In support of its action, the applicant submits that, as regards the species Procambarus clarkii, the requirements laid down in Article 4 of Regulation 1143/2014 were not met and a risk assessment under the terms set out in Article 5(1) of that regulation was not carried out.

---
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-534568

NO. 2019-BA-0291

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 22, 2019

Petition to transfer bar exam fees denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Joseph HALLIDAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 13 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 14 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 15 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 16 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 17 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 18 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 19 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 20 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 21 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 22 of 23

Case 24-43354-elm11    Doc 4    Filed 09/19/24    Entered 09/19/24 15:03:16    Desc MainDocument      Page 23 of 23
Michael BREGMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3005

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1403-068]

                    On December 30, 2024, Yuba County Water Agency submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the California State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board), in conjunction with the above captioned project. The submittal also included a response from the Water Board stating that it received the application on the same day. Pursuant to section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify the Water Board of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     December 30, 2024                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     December 30, 2025                

If the Water Board fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: January 3, 2025.

Debbie-Anne Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-00353 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
International Isotopes Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-31538) on Form S-3 of International Isotopes Inc. of our report dated March
17, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of International Isotopes
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report
appears in the 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of International Isotopes Inc.


                                            KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CR-0078-N (01)

) No. 3:05-CV-0403-N

ANDRE LYNN FORD, ID # 29802-177, ) ECF

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED November 15, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Ryan William COVEMAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3607

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cleturs SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-882

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.