```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3175-3179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00545]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-191]

Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People's 
Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Applicable January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suresh Maniam, Office I, AD/CVD 
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1603.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Petition

    On November 25, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of sol 
gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains (ceramic abrasive grains) 
from the People's Republic of China (China) filed in proper form on 
behalf of Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. (the petitioner), a 
U.S. producer of ceramic abrasive grains.\1\ The CVD Petition was 
accompanied by an antidumping duty (AD) petition concerning imports of 
ceramic abrasive grains from China.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated November 25, 2024 
(Petition).
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Between November 27, 2024, and December 17, 2024, Commerce 
requested supplemental information pertaining to certain aspects of the 
Petition in supplemental questionnaires.\3\ Between December 4 and 23, 
2024, the petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for 
additional information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated 
November 27, 2024 (General Issues Questionnaire); ``Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated November 27, 2024; and ``Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated December 17, 2024; see also Memorandum, ``Phone 
Call with Counsel to the Petitioner,'' dated December 6, 2024 
(December 6, 2024, Memorandum).
    \4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Antidumping and Countervailing 
Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 4, 2024 
(General Issues Supplement); ``Countervailing Supplemental 
Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 4, 2024; ``Antidumping and 
Countervailing General Issues Supplement Response,'' dated December 
9, 2024 (Scope Supplement); and ``Antidumping and Countervailing 
Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 23, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 6, 2024, Commerce extended the initiation deadline by 
20 days to poll the domestic industry in accordance with sections 
702(c)(1)(B) and 702(c)(4)(D) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), because the Petition ``{had{time}  not established that the 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
total production support the {Petition{time} . . . .'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the 
Adequacy of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions: Sol 
Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from the People's Republic 
of China, 89 FR 100465 (December 12, 2024) (Initiation Extension 
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Act, the petitioner 
alleges that the Government of China (GOC) is providing countervailable 
subsidies, within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to 
producers of ceramic abrasive grains in China, and that such imports 
are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, the 
domestic industry producing ceramic abrasive grains in the United 
States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are initiating a CVD 
investigation, the Petition was accompanied by information reasonably 
available to the petitioner supporting its allegations.
    Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of 
the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party, 
as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. Commerce also finds that 
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to 
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the 
Petition,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    Because the Petition was filed on November 25, 2024, the period of 
investigation for the CVD investigation is January 1, 2023, through 
December 31, 2023.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 3176]]

Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by this investigation are ceramic abrasive 
grains from China. For a full description of the scope of this 
investigation, see the appendix to this notice.

Comments on the Scope of the Investigation

    On November 27, 2024 and December 6, 2024, Commerce requested 
information and clarification from the petitioner regarding the 
proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petition is an 
accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is 
seeking relief.\8\ On December 4 and 9, 2024, the petitioner provided 
clarifications and revised the scope.\9\ The description of merchandise 
covered by this investigation, as described in the appendix to this 
notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See General Issues Questionnaire; see also December 6, 2024, 
Memorandum.
    \9\ See General Issues Supplement at 1-3; see also Scope 
Supplement at 4-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are 
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding 
product coverage (i.e., scope).\10\ Commerce will consider all comments 
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with 
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary 
determination. If scope comments include factual information, all such 
factual information should be limited to public information.\11\ To 
facilitate preparation of its questionnaire, Commerce requests that 
scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on January 
27, 2025, which is the next business day after 20 calendar days from 
the signature date of this notice.\12\ Any rebuttal comments, which may 
include factual information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on February 
6, 2025, which is 10 calendar days from the initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble).
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual 
information'').
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). The deadline for scope comments 
falls on January 26, 2025, which is a Sunday. In accordance with 19 
CFR 351.303(b)(1), Commerce will accept comments filed by 5:00 p.m. 
ET on January 27, 2025 (``For both electronically filed and manually 
filed documents, if the applicable due date falls on a non-business 
day, the Secretary will accept documents that are filed on the next 
business day.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce requests that any factual information that parties 
consider relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during 
that time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that 
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the 
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and 
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope 
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent 
AD and CVD investigations.

Filing Requirements

    All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception 
applies.\13\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and 
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing 
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS 
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook 
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce 
notified the GOC of the receipt of the Petition and provided an 
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\14\ The GOC 
did not request consultations.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultation to 
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated November 26, 2024.
    \15\ The GOC submitted comments on the CVD petition. See GOC's 
Letter, ``Comments on Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated December 
13, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Industry Support for the Petition

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i) 
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if 
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or 
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling 
method to poll the ``industry.''
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), 
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' 
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like 
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the 
ITC apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like 
product,\16\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a 
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination 
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may 
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences 
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
    \17\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. 
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United 
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not 
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope 
of the investigation.\18\ Based on our analysis of the information 
submitted on the record, we have determined that

[[Page 3177]]

ceramic abrasive grains, as defined in the scope, constitute a single 
domestic like product, and we have analyzed industry support in terms 
of that domestic like product.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as 
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see 
Checklist, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: 
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from the People's 
Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 
this notice (China CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, 
Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Petitions Covering Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive 
Grains from the People's Republic of China (Attachment II). This 
checklist is on file electronically via ACCESS.
    \19\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, on December 6, 2024, Commerce extended the 
initiation deadline by 20 days to poll the domestic industry in 
accordance with sections 702(c)(1)(B) and 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act 
because the Petition ``{had{time}  not established that the domestic 
producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of total 
production support the {Petition{time} . . . .'' \20\ On December 10, 
2024, we issued polling questionnaires to all known producers 
identified in the Petition.\21\ We requested that the companies 
complete the polling questionnaire and certify their responses by the 
due date specified in the cover letter to the questionnaire. We 
received timely responses to these questionnaires from domestic 
producers on December 17, 2024.\22\ No interested party submitted 
comments on the polling questionnaire responses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Initiation Extension Notice.
    \21\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Polling Questionnaire,'' dated 
December 10, 2024; see also Memorandum, ``Email to Counsel for 
Domestic Producers,'' dated December 23, 2024.
    \22\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Polling Questionnaire 
Response,'' dated December 17, 2024; see also 3M Company's Letter, 
``Industry Polling Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 17, 
2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our analysis of the data we received in the polling questionnaire 
responses indicates that the domestic producers and workers who support 
the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total production of 
the domestic like product and more than 50 percent of the production of 
the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry 
expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\23\ 
Accordingly, Commerce determines that the industry support requirements 
of section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act have been met and that the Petition 
was filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of 
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
    \24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Injury Test

    Because China is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the 
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act 
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine 
whether imports of the subject merchandise from China materially 
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner 
alleges that subject imports from China exceed the negligibility 
threshold provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ For further information regarding negligibility and the 
injury allegation, see China CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment 
III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and 
Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions 
Covering Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from the 
People's Republic of China (Attachment III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by the increasing volume of subject imports; reduced market 
share; underselling and price depression and/or suppression; lost sales 
and revenues; and declines in the domestic industry's production, 
capacity utilization, and financial performance.\26\ We assessed the 
allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat 
of material injury, causation, cumulation, as well as negligibility, 
and we have determined that these allegations are properly supported by 
adequate evidence and meet the statutory requirements for 
initiation.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Id.
    \27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation of CVD Investigation

    Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental 
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of 
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine 
whether imports of ceramic abrasive grains benefit from countervailable 
subsidies conferred by the GOC. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our 
preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the date of this 
initiation.
    Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 24 of the 29 
programs alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis 
for our decision to initiate on each program, see the China CVD 
Initiation Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for 
this investigation is available on ACCESS.

Respondent Selection

    In the Petition, the petitioner identified 11 companies in China as 
producers and/or exporters of ceramic abrasive grains.\28\ Commerce 
intends to follow its standard practice in CVD investigations and 
calculate company-specific subsidy rates in this investigation. In the 
event that Commerce determines that the number of companies is large 
and it cannot individually examine each company based on Commerce's 
resources, Commerce normally selects mandatory respondents in CVD 
investigations using U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry 
data for U.S. imports under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (HTSUS) subheading(s) listed in the ``Scope of the 
Investigation'' in the appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Petition at Volume I (Exhibit I-5); see also General 
Issues Supplement at 1 and Exhibit I-5-Revised.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 2, 2025 Commerce released CBP data on imports of ceramic 
abrasive grains from China under administrative protective order (APO) 
to all parties with access to information protected by APO and 
indicated that interested parties wishing to comment on CBP data and/or 
respondent selection must do so within three business days of the 
publication date of the notice of initiation of this investigation.\29\ 
Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically 
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety via ACCESS 
by 5:00 p.m. ET on the specified deadline. Commerce will not accept 
rebuttal comments regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection Entry Data,'' dated January 2, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective order (APO) in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may be found on 
Commerce's website at https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders.

Distribution of Copies of the Petition

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been 
provided to the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will 
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each 
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

[[Page 3178]]

ITC Notification

    Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by 
section 702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determination by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 25 days after the date 
on which the ITC receives notice from Commerce of initiation of the 
investigation, whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of 
ceramic abrasive grains from China are materially injuring, or 
threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\30\ A negative ITC 
determination will result in the investigation being terminated.\31\ 
Otherwise, this CVD investigation will proceed according to statutory 
and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See section 703(a) of the Act.
    \31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submission of Factual Information

    Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) 
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence 
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available 
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or 
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); 
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other 
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of 
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual 
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) 
the information is being submitted \32\ and, if the information is 
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on 
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information 
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, 
clarify, or correct.\33\ Time limits for the submission of factual 
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific 
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. 
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting 
factual information in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
    \33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extensions of Time Limits

    Parties may request an extension of time limits before the 
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as 
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will 
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time 
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by 
Commerce.\34\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties 
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it 
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain 
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by 
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions 
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we 
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline 
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed 
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a 
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will 
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where 
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances 
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the 
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to 
submitting factual information in this investigation.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
    \35\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits; 
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final 
Rule), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certification Requirements

    Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding 
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\36\ 
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 
351.303(g).\37\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the 
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \37\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also 
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate 
in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of 
19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of appearance). 
Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining 
to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other 
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and 
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).

    Dated: January 6, 2025.
Steven Presing,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is sol gel 
alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains which are comprised of minimum 
94% aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and may contain 
other compounds, including, but not limited to, titanium dioxide, 
silicon dioxide, calcium oxide, sodium superoxide, ferric oxide, 
magnesium oxide, di-aluminum magnesium tetroxide, lanthanum oxide, 
lanthanum magnesium oxide, zirconium dioxide, or zirconium 
carbonate. Grain sizes of sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive 
grains range from 0.85 mm to 0.0395 mm (which corresponds to 
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) grit sizes from 20 to 
280).
    Shapes include but are not limited to angular, sharp, extra 
sharp, blocky, splintery, round stripped, triangular or shaped like 
extruded rods or stars.
    Ceramic abrasive grains have unique crystalline structures that 
impart certain advanced properties, such as their extreme hardness 
and strength ranging between 16 and 22 gigapascals by the Vickers 
Diamond Indent Method, high melting point (2050 [deg]C), and a 
single- or multi-phase microstructure, which may contain multiple 
phases, having crystalline sizes ranging from 0.05 to 30[micro]m. 
These ceramic abrasive grains include but are not limited to blue, 
white, white-translucent, or off-white opaque colors.
    Sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains are covered by the 
scope of this investigation, whether or not incorporated into 
downstream articles, including but not limited to, abrasive papers, 
grinding wheels, grinding cylinders, and grinding discs. When 
incorporated into downstream articles, only the sol gel alumina-
based ceramic abrasive grains component of such articles is covered 
by the product scope, and not the downstream product as a whole.
    The merchandise subject to this investigation is properly 
classified under subheadings 2818.10.2020 and 2818.10.2090 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Other 
merchandise subject to the current scope, including when 
incorporated into the abovementioned downstream articles, may be 
classified under HTSUS subheadings 2818.10.1000, 2818.20.0000, 
2818.30.0000, 3824.99.1100, 3824.99.1900, 6805.10.0000, 
6805.20.0000, 6805.30.1000, 6805.30.5000, 6804.22.1000, 
6804.22.4000, 6804.22.6000, 8204.12.0000, 8474.90.0010, 
8474.90.0020, 8474.90.0050,

[[Page 3179]]

and 8474.90.0090. Although the HTSUS statistical reporting numbers 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
description of the merchandise is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2025-00545 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```