Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Notices 2741 

per night per site for large groups (15 to 

25 participants). Participants includes 

non-human participants (e.g., dogs, 

horses, alpacas, etc.). 

To stay current with rising 

management and maintenance costs, the 

BLM will utilize the Western U.S. 

Consumer Price Index (CPI) to 

determine future fee adjustments. The 

Western U.S. CPI is published online 

monthly at: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/ 

regional-resources.htm. A yearly 

average of the CPI is published every 

January. Every year after fee 

implementation begins, the BLM will 

use the yearly CPI to determine if fees 

need to be increased. When the CPI rises 

by 20 percent, the fees may be increased 

the corresponding amount, rounded up 

to the nearest whole dollar. This 

measure will result in a sustainable and 

consistent funding source that will 

increase assurances for users that the 

program could continue to provide 

regular maintenance and necessary 

capital improvements into the future. 

The BLM will update the BLM 

Northwest and Southwest Resource 

Advisory Councils (RACs) after each fee 

increase (approximately every 4 to 5 

years) on successes and challenges in 

using the Western U.S. CPI. 

People holding an America the 

Beautiful Pass—The National Parks and 

Federal Recreational Lands Senior Pass 

or Access Pass, or a Golden Age or 

Golden Access Passport, will be entitled 

to a 50 percent fee reduction on 

expanded amenity fees. Discounts and 

fee-free days do not apply to ISRP fees. 

The BLM is establishing these 

recreation fees in response to increasing 

recreation demands and resource 

protection requirements in the D–E 

NCA. Recreation fees are needed to: 

maintain visitor facilities and visitor 

services; replace aging infrastructure; 

reduce impacts to resources; improve 

visitor health and safety; and provide 

sustainable recreational opportunities. 

The business plan explains: (1) 

consistency with the BLM recreation fee 

program policy; (2) the recreation 

management direction for the D–E NCA; 

(3) the need for fee collection; (4) how 

the fees will be used in the area; (5) 

coordination with RACs; and (6) 

guidance on future fee increases. As 

analyzed in the business plan, the 

recreation use fees are consistent with 

other nearby Federal land management 

agency fees and are lower than the fees 

charged at privately owned 

campgrounds. The business plan is 

available at https://www.blm.gov/ 

programs/recreation/permits-and-fees/ 

business-plans. 

A public comment period on the draft 

business plan, announced by a news 

release, ran from August 26, 2024, to 

September 25, 2024. BLM Northwest 

and Southwest RACs met March 30, 

2023, at a combined RAC meeting where 

they discussed fee proposals. The RACs 

recommended the fee proposal for 

approval in a joint meeting on May 2, 

2024, using the Western U.S. CPI to 

determine future fee increases. 

(Authority: 16 U.S.C. 6803(b) and 43 CFR 

2933) 

Douglas Vilsack, 

BLM Colorado State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2025–00507 Filed 1–10–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4331–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[PO4820000251] 

Notice of Availability of the Record of 

Decision and Approved Resource 

Management Plan for the Grand 

Staircase-Escalante National 

Monument in Utah 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) announces the 

availability of the Record of Decision 

(ROD) for the Approved Resource 

Management Plan (RMP) for the Grand 

Staircase-Escalante National Monument 

(GSENM) in Utah. The Department of 

the Interior Principal Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Land and Minerals 

Management signed the ROD on Jan. 6, 

2025, which constitutes the decision of 

the BLM, makes the Approved RMP 

effective immediately, and replaces the 

2020 GSENM and Kanab Escalante 

Planning Area RMPs. 

DATES: The Department of the Interior 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Land and Minerals Management signed 

the ROD on Jan. 6, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: The ROD/Approved RMP is 

available online at https://

eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/ 

project/2020343/510 and will also be 

available for public inspection at the 

BLM Paria River District Office, 669 

US–89A, Kanab, Utah 84741, and BLM 

Utah Public Room, 440 West 200 South, 

Ste. 500 Salt Lake City, UT 84101. 

A copy of the Protest Resolution 

Report is available at: https://

www.blm.gov/programs/planning-andnepa/public-participation/protestresolution-reports. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bryce Franklin, Project Manger, by 

phone: 435–644–1288; by mail: 669 US– 

89A, Kanab, Utah 84741; by email: 

bfranklin@blm.gov. Individuals in the 

United States who are deaf, deafblind, 

hard of hearing, or have a speech 

disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or 

TeleBraille) to access 

telecommunications relay services for 

contacting Mr. Franklin. Individuals 

outside the United States should use the 

relay services offered within their 

country to make international calls to 

the point-of-contact in the United 

States. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM 

prepared the ROD and Approved RMP 

in response to Presidential Proclamation 

10286, which restored the boundaries 

and management direction for GSENM 

that existed prior to Dec. 4, 2017, and 

mandated that the BLM prepare and 

maintain a new management plan for 

the BLM-managed lands within the 

entirety of the restored monument 

boundaries for the specific purposes of 

‘‘protecting and restoring the objects 

identified [in Proclamation 10286] and 

in Proclamation 6920.’’ The RMP’s 

purpose is to provide a management 

framework, including goals, objectives, 

and management direction, to guide 

GSENM resource management 

consistent with the protection and 

restoration of GSENM objects and the 

management direction provided in 

Presidential Proclamations 10286 and 

6920. 

The Approved RMP is based on the 

Proposed RMP (Alternative E) from the 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

(EIS), with minor changes to 

management actions, goals and best 

practices for forestry, grazing, 

recreation, vegetation, and wildlife. A 

full description of modifications and 

clarifications can be found in section 

1.2.2 of the ROD. 

The BLM provided the Proposed 

RMP/Final EIS for public protest on 

Aug. 30, 2024, for a 30-day protest 

period and received 19 protest letters. 

The BLM Assistant Director for 

Resources and Planning resolved all 

protests. Responses to protest issues are 

compiled and documented in a Protest 

Resolution Report (see ADDRESSES). 

While no protests were granted, the 

BLM made several edits to the 

Approved RMP text to improve clarity 

based on input received during the 

protest period . 

The BLM provided the Proposed 

RMP/Final EIS to the Governor of Utah 

for a 60-day Governor’s consistency 

review on Aug. 30, 2024. The 

Governor’s Office identified concerns 

and inconsistencies between the 

Proposed RMP/FEIS and State and local 

plans, policies, and programs. The BLM 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
2742 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Notices 

considered the concerns, and where not 

in conflict with the purposes, policies, 

and programs of Federal laws and 

regulations applicable to public lands, 

accepted several recommendations, 

which are described in sections 1.2.2 

and 1.7.4 of the ROD. As the changes 

were within the range of alternatives 

considered in the Draft RMP/EIS, the 

BLM did not seek public comments on 

the recommendations that were 

accepted. 

On Dec. 20, 2024, the Governor 

appealed the State Director’s decision 

not to accept all of the State’s 

recommendations, consistent with 43 

CFR 1610.3–2. On Jan. 6, 2025, after 

careful review and consideration of the 

Governor’s points, the Department of 

the Interior Principal Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Land and Minerals 

Management determined the planning 

effort properly considered all applicable 

State and local plans, policies, and 

programs, and no further changes are 

necessary to provide for a reasonable 

balance between the national interest 

and the State’s interest. 

(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.9, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 

CFR 1610.5–1) 

Matthew A. Preston, 

BLM Utah State Director, Acting. 

[FR Doc. 2025–00428 Filed 1–10–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4331–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–39332; 

PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] 

National Register of Historic Places; 

Notification of Pending Nominations 

and Related Actions 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is 

soliciting electronic comments on the 

significance of properties nominated 

before January 4, 2025, for listing or 

related actions in the National Register 

of Historic Places. 

DATES: Comments should be submitted 

electronically by January 28, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Comments are encouraged 

to be submitted electronically to 

National_Register_Submissions@

nps.gov with the subject line ‘‘Public 

Comment on <property or proposed 

district name, (County) State>.’’ If you 

have no access to email, you may send 

them via U.S. Postal Service and all 

other carriers to the National Register of 

Historic Places, National Park Service, 

1849 C Street NW, MS 7228, 

Washington, DC 20240. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register 

of Historic Places/National Historic 

Landmarks Program, 1849 C Street NW, 

MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240, 

sherry_frear@nps.gov, 202–913–3763. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

properties listed in this notice are being 

considered for listing or related actions 

in the National Register of Historic 

Places. Nominations for their 

consideration were received by the 

National Park Service before January 4, 

2025. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 

CFR part 60, comments are being 

accepted concerning the significance of 

the nominated properties under the 

National Register criteria for evaluation. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Nominations Submitted by State or 

Tribal Historic Preservation Officers 

Key: State, County, Property Name, 

Multiple Name (if applicable), Address/ 

Boundary, City, Vicinity, Reference Number. 

ARIZONA 

Maricopa County 

Camelback 32, 3241 East Camelback Road, 

Phoenix, SG100011361 

CALIFORNIA 

Marin County 

Marconi Wireless-Synanon Tomales Bay 

Headquarters Historic District (Boundary 

Increase), 18500 CA 1, Marshall vicinity, 

BC100011433 

GEORGIA 

Chatham County 

Savannah Powder Magazine, Ogeechee Road, 

Savannah vicinity, SG100011426 

Effingham County 

Ash Farmhouse, 8603 Old Louisville Road, 

Newington vicinity, SG100011427 

IOWA 

Linn County 

Klinsky Farmstead Historic District, 1534 

Ivanhoe Road, Ely, SG100011413 

Mahaska County 

Russell, Chuck and Emily, House, 211 

Hillcrest Drive, Oskaloosa, SG100011414 

Polk County 

Financial Center Office Building, 207 

Seventh Street, Des Moines, SG100011415 

Ruan Center & Carriers Building, 666 Grand 

Avenue & 601 Locust Street, Des Moines, 

SG100011416 

MARYLAND 

Baltimore Independent City 

Arch Social Club, (Civil Rights in Baltimore, 

Maryland, 1831–1976 MPS), 2426 

Pennsylvania Avenue, Baltimore, 

MP100011434 

Cecil County 

West Nottingham Presbyterian Church 

Complex, 1195 Firetower Road, Colora, 

SG100011349 

Charles County 

Bel Alton High School, 9501 Crain Highway, 

Bel Alton, SG100011395 

Frederick County 

Frederick Historic District (Boundary 

Increase), Roughly bounded by Bentz, 

Seventh, East, and South Streets, 

Frederick, BC100011393 

Prince George’s County 

Bladensburg Battlefield, Address Restricted, 

Bladensburg vicinity, SG100011428 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Barnstable County 

Travelers Club, 314 Barlows Landing Road, 

Bourne, SG100011423 

Bristol County 

Monsignor James Coyle High School, 61 

Summer Street, Taunton, SG100011424 

Norfolk County 

George E. Keith Company Factory No. 8, 44 

Wharf Street, Weymouth, SG100011425 

MINNESOTA 

Hennepin County 

Oskam, Hendrik and Marrigje (Marri), House, 

6901 Dakota Trail, Edina, SG100011339 

Otter Tail County 

Foss, Ole and Anne, House, 301 Foss Street 

North, Underwood, SG100011340 

MISSISSIPPI 

Hancock County 

Holly Bluff on-the-Jordan, 6670 Crump Road, 

Kiln vicinity, SG100011347 

Lee County 

Downtown Tupelo Historic District 

(Boundary Increase), Roughly bounded by 

Clark Street, Kansas City Railroad line, 

North Santa Fe Railroad line, and South 

Church St., Tupelo, BC100011392 

MISSOURI 

Gasconade County 

Hermann High School, 808 Washington 

Street, Hermann, SG100011397 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1