alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31688]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1106 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-881, K2025-882.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31688 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Ivan MCCOLLUM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3443

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Order entered November ,2012 904737

In The

.ffiftl) istritt of txas at allas

No. 05-12-00926-CR

HERNAN FRAIRE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-23600-T

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 11, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On October 29, 2012, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, we conclude findings are no longer necessary and VACATE the October 11, 2012

order.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

DAVID L.

JUSTICE
Case 3:03-cv-02318-K Document 22 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 81
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02318-K Document 22 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 82
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02318-K Document 22 Filed 04/26/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 83
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02318-K Document 22 Filed 04/26/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 84
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02318-K Document 22 Filed 04/26/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 85
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02318-K Document 22 Filed 04/26/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 86
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2710-2711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00456]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS-2023-1 Phase 
II: Adaptation of CRISPR-Based In Vitro Diagnostics for Rapid 
Detection of Select Eukaryotic Pathogens (Topic 119).
    Date: February 4, 2025.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Contact Person: Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious

[[Page 2711]]

Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC-
9823, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5199, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00456 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Thaddeus R. MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

Thaddeus R. McKenzie, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Martinez v. State*, 114 So.3d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; *Antoine v. State*, 138 So.3d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; McLeod v. State, 52 So.3d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) ; *Wooden v. State*, 42 So.3d 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) ; *Yasin v. State*, 896 So.2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form 10-K of our report (and to all references to our Firm)
dated February 2, 1999 (except with respect to the matter  discussed in Note 14,
as to which the date is March 26,  1999)  into the  Company's  previously  filed
Registration Statements (File No. 333-92290-99, 333-36361, 333-36427, 333-47401,
333-47267, 333-47849, 333-52585, 333-34883,  333-43399). It should be noted that
we have not audited  any  financial  statements  of the  Company  subsequent  to
December 31, 1998, nor performed any audit procedures  subsequent to the date of
our reports.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1999
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer of**

**Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(Adopted by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash AdvanceCenters, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, KennethE. Compton, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/ KENNETH E. COMPTON                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Kenneth E. Compton                      |
|   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

May 10, 2006

57

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IVAN COLBERT FRAZIER, )

a.k.a. Ivan Colbert Frazier, Jr., )

ID # 889756, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CV-1546-N

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED April 28, 2005.

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:03-cv-01546-N Document 13 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 242
# C_2019093EN.01001501.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘KPMG Baltics’, acting as insolvency administrator of AS ‘Latvijas Krājbanka’ v SIA ‘Ķipars AI’

(Case C-639/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems - Directive 98/26/EC - Scope - Concept of ‘transfer order’ - Payment order sent by the holder of an ordinary current account to a credit institution subsequently declared insolvent))

(2019/C 93/19)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SIA ‘KPMG Baltics’, acting as insolvency administrator of AS ‘Latvijas Krājbanka’

Respondent: SIA ‘Ķipars AI’

Operative part of the judgment

A payment order, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, given by the holder of an ordinary current account to a credit institution for a transfer of funds to another credit institution is not covered by the concept of ‘transfer order’, within the meaning of Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems, as amended by Directive 2009/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009, and does not, therefore, come within the scope of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

---
CHELSEA OAKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., and Chelsea Oaks Leasing, LLC, Appellants, v. CHELSEA OAKS TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Charles Berliner, Jeff Keith, Robert Paz, April Williams, and Mark Winchester. Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-3318

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ronald L.
OKelley, President and Chief Executive Officer of US Shipping General Partner
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

| |                                       
| | --------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ronald
 L. OKelley               
| |                                       
| | Ronald L.
 OKelley                   
| | President
 and Chief Executive Officer
| | September
 30, 2009                   

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping
Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 138

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses for 
  parents to be taken into account as medical expenses, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Mr. Buchanan (for himself and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses for 
  parents to be taken into account as medical expenses, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lowering Costs for Caregivers Act of 
2025''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 223(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``, any parent of 
either such individual or such spouse'' after ``the spouse of such 
individual''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid after December 31, 2024.

SEC. 3. FLEXIBLE SPENDING AND HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 105 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: ``A 
health flexible spending arrangement or health reimbursement 
arrangement shall not fail to be treated as meeting the requirements of 
this subsection or section 106, and no amount shall be included in 
gross income of the taxpayer, solely because, under the arrangement, 
the taxpayer may use amounts contributed to such arrangement for 
medical care (as defined in section 213(d), without regard to paragraph 
(1)(D) thereof) for a parent of the taxpayer or of the spouse of the 
taxpayer.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to expenses incurred after December 31, 2024.

SEC. 4. ARCHER MSAS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 220(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``, any parent of 
either such individual or such spouse'' after ``the spouse of such 
individual''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid after December 31, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018436EN.01001401.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — IQ v JP

(Case C-478/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 15 - Transfer to a court better placed to hear the case - Scope - Article 19 - Lis pendens))

(2018/C 436/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: IQ

Respondent: JP

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as not applying in circumstances, such as those in the main proceedings, in which both courts seised have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter under Articles 12 and 8, respectively, of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  International  Isotopes  Inc on Form
10-KQSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operation of the Company.



 /S/ Steve T. Laflin
 -------------------------
 Steve T. Laflin
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 March 7, 2003


 /S/ Steve T. Laflin
 -------------------------
 Steve T. Laflin
 Chief Financial Officer
 March 7, 2003
# C_2017022EN.01004102.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/41

---

Action brought on 11 November 2016 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (Boxes)

(Case T-793/16)

(2017/C 022/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Şehitkamil Gaziantep, Turkey) (represented by: T. Tsenova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elka Zaharieva (Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the design at issue:

Design at issue: Community design ‘Boxes’ — Community design No 002 343 244-0002

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2016 in Case R 1143/2015-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare invalid RCD No. 002343244-0002 ‘Bobo Cornet’; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare invalid RCD No. 002343244-0002 ‘Bobo Cornet’; and

| — | order EUIPO and Elka Zaharieva to bear the costs of Solen in relation to the proceedings before the General Court and in relation to the administrative phase of the proceedings, in particular the invalidity and appeal proceedings before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Elka Zaharieva to bear the costs of Solen in relation to the proceedings before the General Court and in relation to the administrative phase of the proceedings, in particular the invalidity and appeal proceedings before the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Articles 62 and 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 62 and 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

) Civil Action No.

MUTUALS.COM, INC., ) 3:03-CV-2912-D

CONNELY DOWD MANAGEMENT, INC., )

MTT FUNDCORP, INC., )

RICHARD SAPIO, )

ERIC MCDONALD and )

MICHELE LEFTWICH, )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________________ )

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission has filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss its

pending claims against Defendants Mutuals.com, Inc., Connely Dowd Management, Inc., MTT

Fundcorp Inc., Richard Sapio, Eric McDonald and Michele Leftwich in the above-captioned

cause with prejudice. The Court, having considered the submission of counsel for the parties,

hereby GRANTS the motion and orders that all of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are

DISMISSED with prejudice to refiling same.

SO ORDERED.

October 29, 2007.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 43 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 220
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 607 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 607

     Condemning the Nicaraguan Government's unjust imprisonment of 
        individuals affiliated with Mountain Gateway Order, Inc.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2024

   Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. 
 Britt, and Mr. Cramer) submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Condemning the Nicaraguan Government's unjust imprisonment of 
        individuals affiliated with Mountain Gateway Order, Inc.

Whereas, in December, 2023, 11 individuals affiliated with Mountain Gateway 
        Order, Inc. were arrested by the Government of Nicaragua, namely: Marcos 
        Sergio Hernandez Jiron; Harry Lening Rios Bravo; Manuel de Jesus Rios 
        Flores; Jose Luis Orozco Urrutia; Alvaro Daniel Escobar Caldera; Juan 
        Carlos Chavarria Zapata; Juan Luis Moncada; Orvin Alexis Moncada 
        Castellano, Cesar Facundo Burgalin Miranda, Walner Omier Blandon Ochoa, 
        and Marisela de Fatima Mejia Ruiz;
Whereas there is concern that the Government of Nicaragua has charged each of 
        these individuals for crimes on baseless claims of money laundering and 
        organized crime;
Whereas the accused individuals do not have adequate access to legal counsel;
Whereas there is concern that United States citizens affiliated with Mountain 
        Gateway Order, Inc. are being targeted for arrest and extradition by the 
        Government of Nicaragua;
Whereas this follows a pattern by the Government of Nicaragua to quell the free 
        speech and religious rights of Christians and other nongovernmental 
        organizations in Nicaragua;
Whereas, on November 30, 2022, in accordance with the International Religious 
        Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6401 et seq.), the Secretary of State 
        designated Nicaragua as a ``Country of Particular Concern'' for having 
        engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations of religious 
        freedom;
Whereas the Government of Nicaragua's actions are another example of an extreme 
        intolerance of religious organizations; and
Whereas Congress has a vested interest in upholding international religious 
        freedom and human rights: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) condemns the targeting and imprisonment of individuals 
        affiliated with Mountain Gateway Order, Inc. without due 
        process of law; and
            (2) calls on the Government of Nicaragua to take prompt 
        action to address these violations of religious freedom and 
        international human rights.
                                 <all>
```