alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1461

In Re: SHAKA AMIR FARRAKHAN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:08-cv-00438-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: June 8, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Amir Farrakhan, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Shaka Amir Farrakhan petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that on May 13, 2009, the district court transferred claims 13 through 30 of Farrakhan’s complaint to the Western District of Virginia, the court of proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) (2006), and dismissed claims 1, 3 through 9, 11, and 12 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) for failure to state a claim. Claims 2 and 10 remain pending in the Eastern District. Because the district court has recently acted in Farrakhan’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Farrakhan’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
D.S., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 289 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 289

 To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 with respect to the Acer access 
            and development program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

 Mr. Langworthy (for himself and Ms. Balint) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 with respect to the Acer access 
            and development program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting All Producers Act of 
2025'' or the ``SAP Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. ACER ACCESS AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 12306 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 1632c) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
        (f) and (g), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Consultations.--
            ``(1) In general.--Beginning with the first request for 
        applications under this section that occurs at least 1 year 
        after the date of the enactment of the SAP Act of 2025, not 
        later than 6 months before such a request for applications, the 
        Secretary shall solicit input from maple industry stakeholders 
        with respect to the research and education priorities of the 
        maple industry.
            ``(2) Consideration.--The Secretary shall consider the 
        information provided through the consultation required under 
        paragraph (1) when making grants under this section.''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``2023'' and inserting ``2030''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 
| /s/ Scott H. DeLong III                                  |   | Date: August 15, 2005 |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
| Scott H. DeLong III                                      |   |
| Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                            |   |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG AmericaCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
# C_2018341EN.01001003.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Limoges — France) — Banque Solfea SA v Jean-François Veitl

(Case C-63/17) (1)

(2018/C 341/14)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.

---
# C_2018408EN.01002801.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/28

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trento — Italy) — Chiara Motter v Provincia autonoma di Trento

(Case C-466/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Public sector - Secondary school teachers - Employment of fixed-term workers as career civil servants through recruitment based on qualification - Determination of the period of service deemed accrued - Account taken only in part of periods of service completed under fixed-term contracts))

(2018/C 408/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Chiara Motter

Defendant: Provincia autonoma di Trento

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as not precluding, in principle, national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which for the purpose of classifying a worker in a salary grade at the time of his recruitment on the basis of qualifications as a career civil servant, takes full account only of the first four years of service completed under fixed-term contracts, only two thirds of subsequent periods of service being taken into consideration.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
Mathew MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2803

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32





BELMOND LTD.





Section 1350 Certification





The undersigned hereby certify that this report of Belmond Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.





/s/ H. Roeland Vos/s/ Martin O’GradyH. Roeland VosMartin O’GradyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer





Dated: June 27, 2018





A signed original of this written certification has been provided to Belmond Ltd. and will be retained by Belmond Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Samuel JONES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Curon Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alistair F. McLaren, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: February 27, 2004 |  | By: | /s/ALISTAIR F. MCLARENAlistair F. McLaren
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Information Officer
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
# C_2017014EN.01004601.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/46

---

Action brought on 4 November 2016 — Isocell v EUIPO — iCell (iCell. Insulation Technology Made in Sweden)

(Case T-777/16)

(2017/C 014/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Isocell GmbH (Neumarkt am Wallersee, Germany) (represented by: C. Thiele, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: iCell AB (Älvdalen, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘iCell. Insulation Technology Made in Sweden’ — Application No 12 882 023

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2016 in Case R 181/2016-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | amend the contested decision by upholding the opposition in its entirety and refusing EU trade mark application No 12882023; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision by upholding the opposition in its entirety and refusing EU trade mark application No 12882023;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 18

- 00353

- CR

Jose Angel HERNANDEZ

- MENDOZA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 452nd District Court, Mason County, Texas

Trial Court No. 164728

Honorable Robert Rey Hofmann, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 31, 2018

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. “ At any time before the appellate

court’ s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal upon the appellant’ s motion. The

appellant and his or her attorney must sign the written motion

. . . .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). This

court has not yet decided this case, and appellant’s motion is signe d by both appellant and

appellant’s attorney. We therefore grant appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 906 of


the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H.
Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  June
24, 2010





/s/
      John H. HomierJohn
      H. HomierPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2016287EN.01002601.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/26

---

Action brought on 14 June 2016 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Primark Holdings (LOVE TO LOUNGE)

(Case T-305/16)

(2016/C 287/32)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz and A. Berger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Primark Holdings (Dublin, Ireland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘LOVE TO LOUNGE’ — EU trade mark No 8 500 548

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2016 in Case R 489/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and declare invalid EU trade mark No 8 500 548; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and declare invalid EU trade mark No 8 500 548;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 3:00-cv-01933-N Document 57 Filed 07/07/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID 209
Case 3:00-cv-01933-N Document 57 Filed 07/07/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID 210
#### James Hall, Joined by Eli Hall, His Uncle and Next Friend, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Sam Brooks, as Superintendent of Convicts in and for the County of Volusia and State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed July 20, 1927.

*Stewart &*Stewart, for Plaintiff in Error.

*Ered H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *H. E. Carter,*Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Petitioner, v. EDWARD MILLER AND SON, INC., Respondent.

No. 1D18-4110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 11, 2019

Eduardo S. Lombard of Radley Law Firm, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Daniel A. Bushell of Bushell Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. *Fla. Dep't of Health v. Tropiflora, LLC* , 265 So.3d 673, 2019 WL 323688 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 25, 2019).

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Larry WILLIAMS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ruby Jo Williams v. Shirley OTWELL SMITH

2160262

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193278) and Amendment No. 358 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
Kenneth D. ARY, Appellant, v. Sabrina D. ARY, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 917 

Recognizing November 2024 as ‘‘National Family Caregivers Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing November 2024 as ‘‘National Family Caregivers 

Month’’. 

Whereas, in 2020, 53,000,000 family caregivers in the United 

States provide essential care to millions of people each 

year, providing unpaid care worth an estimated 

$600,000,000,000 annually; 

Whereas family caregivers play a vital role in the healthcare 

system of the United States, supporting loved ones who 

have chronic illnesses, disabilities, and are aging; 

Whereas family caregivers, who are disproportionately 

women, often face significant challenges including financial strain, physical and emotional exhaustion, and social 

isolation; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 917 IS 

Whereas ‘‘National Family Caregivers Month’’ is an opportunity to recognize and appreciate the contributions of 

family caregivers of all ages and to advocate for policies 

that support family caregivers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes November 2024 as ‘‘National 

3 Family Caregivers Month’’; 

4 (2) commends the 53,000,000 family caregivers 

5 in the United States who provide essential care to 

6 their loved ones and chosen family each day; 

7 (3) recognizes the importance of the 2022 Na8 tional Strategy to Support Family Caregivers as a 

9 roadmap to better support caregivers in the United 

10 States; and 

11 (4) encourages all people of the United States 

12 to learn more about family caregiving and to support 

13 their loved ones and neighbors who are providing 

14 care. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN RE: The PEROXISOME TRUST

NO. 2019-CC-0327

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 42 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of 

Alaska Natives from being used to determine eligibility for certain programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska 

Natives or descendants of Alaska Natives from being 

used to determine eligibility for certain programs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Native Settle5 ment Trust Eligibility Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 42 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS. 

2 Section 29(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

3 Act (43 U.S.C. 1626(c)) is amended, in the undesignated 

4 matter following paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

5 (E) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) an interest in a Settlement Trust and, for 

7 the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enact8 ment of the Alaska Native Settlement Trust Eligi9 bility Act, an amount distributed from or benefit 

10 provided by a Settlement Trust to a Native or de11 scendant of a Native who is an aged, blind, or dis12 abled individual (as defined in section 1614(a) of the 

13 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a))).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB