alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017038EN.01004101.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/41

---

Action brought on 29 November 2016 — Alpirsbacher Klosterbräu Glauner v EUIPO (Klosterstoff)

(Case T-844/16)

(2017/C 038/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alpirsbacher Klosterbräu Glauner GmbH & Co. KG (Alpirsbach, Germany) (represented by: W. Göpfert, lawyer and S. Hofmann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Klosterstoff’– Application for registration No 13 945 944

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2016 in Case R 2064/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b),(c) and (g) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b),(c) and (g) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 158 

To require the use of independent nonpartisan commissions to carry out 

congressional redistricting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. FITZPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the use of independent nonpartisan commissions 

to carry out congressional redistricting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizen Legislature 

5 Anti-Corruption Reform of Elections Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘CLEAN Elections Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REQUIRING USE OF INDEPENDENT NONPARTISAN 

8 COMMISSIONS TO CARRY OUT REDIS9 TRICTING. 

10 (a) REQUIREMENT.— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 158 IH

1 (1) CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING.—Each 

2 State shall conduct Congressional redistricting (be3 ginning with the redistricting carried out pursuant 

4 to the decennial census conducted during 2020) in 

5 accordance with a redistricting plan developed by a 

6 nonpartisan independent redistricting commission. 

7 (2) REDISTRICTING FOR STATE LEGISLATIVE

8 DISTRICTS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

9 law, a State may not use any funds provided by the 

10 Federal Government directly for election administra11 tion purposes unless the State certifies to the Elec12 tion Assistance Commission that the State conducts 

13 redistricting for State legislative districts in the 

14 State (beginning with the first such redistricting 

15 carried out after the date of the enactment of this 

16 Act) in accordance with a redistricting plan devel17 oped by a nonpartisan independent redistricting 

18 commission. 

19 (b) NONPARTISAN INDEPENDENT STATUS.—For 

20 purposes of this section, a commission shall be considered 

21 to be a nonpartisan independent commission if— 

22 (1) the number of its members who are affili23 ated with the political party with the largest percent24 age of the registered voters in the State who are af25 filiated with a political party (as determined with reVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:04 Jan 29, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H158.IH H158

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 158 IH

1 spect to the most recent statewide election for Fed2 eral office held in the State for which such informa3 tion is available) is equal to the number of its mem4 bers who are affiliated with the political party with 

5 the second largest percentage of the registered vot6 ers in the State who are affiliated with a political 

7 party (as so determined); and 

8 (2) none of its members is an elected public of9 ficial. 

10 (c) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

11 ‘‘State’’ means each of the several States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 762 

Designating July 27, 2024, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2024 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. RISCH, Mr. RICKETTS, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. HOEVEN, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. ROUNDS, and Mr. CRUZ) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 27, 2024, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 762 ATS 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 27, 2024, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.16

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 to
Employment Agreement entered into as of December 15, 2010 (this Amendment), between Mark L. Kuna (Employee) and OraSure Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company).

WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2006, as amended (the
Original Agreement); and

WHEREAS, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code)
and the guidance issued thereunder imposes certain rules and regulations on arrangements that provide for the payment of non-qualified deferred compensation; and

WHEREAS, the Original Agreement provides for the payment of non-qualified deferred compensation and therefore must comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A as revised from time to time; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Original Agreement as more fully set forth herein to ensure compliance with
Section 409A of the Code and the rules and regulations thereunder.

NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, the
parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Expenses. Section 6.8.2 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to restate the last
sentence of the first paragraph of such Section as follows:

Subject to Section 6.10, all payments will be made (or
commenced) under this Section 6.8 on the 90th day after termination of employment hereunder.

2. Effect of Amendment. Except
as amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. All references to the Agreement shall hereafter be deemed to mean the Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

3. Counterparts and Facsimiles. This Amendment may be executed, including execution by facsimile signature, in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.

4. Governing Law. This
Amendment shall be governed by, and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without regards to the application of the principles of conflicts of laws.



---

The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date indicated above.



|                 |  |  |  |                            |  |                       
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                 |  |  |  | ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                 |  |  | 
|/s/ Mark L. Kuna |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Douglas A. Michels
|Mark L. Kuna     |  |  |  |                            |  |                       
|                 |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | President & CEO       
|                 |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Douglas A. Michels
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") of COL
China Online International, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30,
2004, C.K. Wong, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  October 12, 2004                  /s/ Chi Keung Wong
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Chi Keung Wong
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Sheiia GUIDRY v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-2116

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., recused.
# C_2016175EN.01003202.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/32

---

Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Brie Picardie v ECB

(Case T-136/16)

(2016/C 175/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Brie Picardie (Amiens, France) (represented by: H. Savoie, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/99) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français). |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/99) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français).

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-133/16, Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence v ECB.

Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence

ECB

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John Zdanowski, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HouseValues, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 5, 2005
SUCCESSION OF Bernadette Gaines GILBERT

NO. 2019-CC-0050

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Not considered; not timely filed. See State v. Crandell, 05-1060 (La. 3/10/06), 924 So.2d 122 ; Morris v. Stueben, 01-0137 (La. 3/16/01), 781 So. 2d 1220.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

V. § No. 3:04-cr-205-O (10)

 § 

WILLIAM GALLO, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding 

none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the

United States Magistrate Judge.

On the basis of Defendant’s Petition for Second Chanse [sic] Consideration 

[Dkt. No. 865], which seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Clerk of Court is 

DIRECTED to open a new civil action (NOS: 530), TERM the motion in the criminal 

action, and TRANSFER the new civil action to the Beaumont Division of the Eastern 

District of Texas for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2015.

____________________________________

REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00205-O Document 869 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2350
1

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3937

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JESSIE M. SNYDER and

ROBERT L. SNYDER, DECEASED

Jessie M. Snyder,

 Appellant

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 86-0466)

District Judge: Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

May 27, 2011

Before: BARRY, JORDAN and GARTH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed June 1, 2011)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM
2

Pro se appellant Jessie Snyder appeals the District Court’s order renewing the 

government’s judgment lien pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3201(c)(2). We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and will affirm the District Court’s judgment. 

In 1991, a consent judgment was entered in favor of the government and against 

Snyder and her husband concerning the couple’s federal tax liabilities. The government 

then filed an abstract of the judgment in Butler County, Pennsylvania. However, despite 

its continuing efforts, the government has been unable to collect the judgment in full. In 

2007, the government obtained an order of foreclosure and sale of properties belonging to 

Snyder. The order has not been executed because the occupants of the properties have 

refused to vacate the premises. 

Under federal law, the initial 1991 judgment lien was scheduled to expire after 20 

years. See 28 U.S.C. § 3201(c)(1). However, § 3201(c)(2) authorizes a party to renew 

the lien for an additional 20 years by filing notice with the court. The government here 

did so, and on August 19, 2010, the District Court approved the renewal of the judgment 

lien. Snyder then filed a timely notice of appeal. 

In her brief, Snyder does not challenge the District Court’s order renewing the 

lien. Instead, she argues that, because she has provided the government with, in her 

words, a “public money certificate,”1she has fully discharged her debt. See generally

Trohimovich v. Dir. of Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 584 P.2d 467, 469-70 (Wash. Ct. App. 
3

1978) (explaining the basis for and the legal frivolity of this argument). In her previous

appeals, Snyder has repeatedly raised this argument, and we have rejected it each time. 

See United States v. Snyder, 365 F. App’x 407 (3d Cir. 2010); United States v. Snyder, 

308 F. App’x 651 (3rd Cir. 2009); Snyder v. Everson, 237 F. App’x 734 (3d Cir. 2007). 

We will not entertain it again. Accordingly, we will affirm the District Court’s order 

renewing the government’s judgment lien. 

 

1

 This “public money certificate” was a personal note by Snyder promising to pay the 

government $1.3 million.
STATE of Louisiana v. William SERIGNE, Sr. and Lionel Serigne, Jr.

NO. 2018-KK-1983

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.
STATE of Louisiana v. Michael Joseph BROOKS, Jr.

NO. 2018-KO-1718

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Francesca M. LAPUYADE v. RAWBAR, INC. d/b/a Acme Oyster House

NO. 2019-C-0315

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Denied.
Case 2:03-cv-00180-J Document 7 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 38
 

 Case 2:03-cv-00180-J Document 7 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 39
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MAX Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 6, 2005





/s/ David Pearce

------------------------------------

David Pearce, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROLANDO DIAZ MOTA, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-0874-P

) ECF

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 13 day of January 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00874-P Document 5 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
Edward W. KYTTLE v. WMW LAND, LLC

2160621

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
L.K. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160251

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40724 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LUIS ALBERTO JASSO

- BOTELLO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 710

- 1

Before DAVIS , ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Alberto Jasso

Botello has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jasso

- Botello h a s not fil ed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 24 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40724 Document: 00512946293 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015No. 14

- 40724

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-40724 Document: 00512946293 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015