alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 603 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 603

       Designating April 2024 as ``National Native Plant Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2024

    Mr. Braun (for himself and Ms. Hirono) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating April 2024 as ``National Native Plant Month''.

Whereas native plants are indigenous species that have evolved and occur 
        naturally in a particular region, ecosystem, and habitat;
Whereas there are more than 17,000 native plant species in the United States, 
        which include trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and wildflowers;
Whereas native plants help prevent flooding, drought, and erosion and can help 
        restore damaged ecosystems;
Whereas native plants provide shelter as well as nectar, pollen, and seeds that 
        serve as food for native butterflies, insects, birds, and other wildlife 
        in ways that non-native plants cannot;
Whereas more than 200 of the native plant species in the United States are 
        estimated to have been lost since the early 19th century;
Whereas habitat loss and degradation, extreme weather events, and invasive 
        species have contributed to the decline of native plants in the United 
        States; and
Whereas native plants are essential components of resilient ecosystems and the 
        natural heritage of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates April 2024 as ``National Native Plant 
        Month''; and
            (2) recognizes the benefits of native plants to the 
        environment and economy of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Marquies Allen BRISBANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2017014EN.01004101.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/41

---

Action brought on 31 October 2016 — ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe v ECHA

(Case T-762/16)

(2017/C 014/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg) and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Scheidmann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the ECHA’s decision of 26 September 2016 (reference ATD/52/2016); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the ECHA’s decision of 26 September 2016 (reference ATD/52/2016);

| — | alternatively, annul the ECHA's decision of 19 August 2016 (reference ATD/52/2016) to the extent that it rejects the applicants’ request for access to their file; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, annul the ECHA's decision of 19 August 2016 (reference ATD/52/2016) to the extent that it rejects the applicants’ request for access to their file;

| — | order the ECHA to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECHA to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), first indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001






  — | The applicants claim that the contested decision misapplies the abovementioned provision by erroneously finding that commercial interests would be undermined by disclosure and they further argue that the decision disregards overriding public interests. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), first indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001

—

The applicants claim that the contested decision misapplies the abovementioned provision by erroneously finding that commercial interests would be undermined by disclosure and they further argue that the decision disregards overriding public interests.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41(2), second indent, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union






  — | The applicants assert that the contested decision violates the abovementioned provision and that, contrary to that decision, the documents to which access is requested do pertain to the applicants’ file and are not, therefore, excluded from the scope of that provision. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41(2), second indent, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

—

The applicants assert that the contested decision violates the abovementioned provision and that, contrary to that decision, the documents to which access is requested do pertain to the applicants’ file and are not, therefore, excluded from the scope of that provision.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Lawrence NIXON

NO. 2018-KH-0591

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS GOMEZ

- CARDENAS,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 14

- 71960 Agency No. A087

- 744

- 568

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 11 , 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS , Circuit Judges.
Luis Gomez

- Cardenas , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigratio n Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal fr om an immigration judge’s decision den ying his application for withholding of removal

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 16 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71960

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo que stions of law, Cerezo v.
Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent th at deference

is owed to the BIA’ s interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations,
Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review fo r

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d
1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008)

. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for

review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Gomez

- Cardenas’ unexhausted contention

as to his opinion about government corruption because he failed to raise it to the

agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks
jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency).
The agency did not err in finding that G omez
- Cardenas failed to establish
membership in a cognizable social group. See Ramirez

- Munoz v. Lynch , 816 F.3d
1226, 1229 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding that “imputed wealthy Americans”
returning to Mexico does not constitute a particular social group)

. Su bstanti al
evidence supports the agency’ s determination that Gomez

- Cardenas otherwise
failed to establish that any harm he fears in Mexico will be on account of a
protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) ( an3 14

- 71960

applicant’s “ desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or
random violence by gang members has no nexus to a protected ground ” ). Thus,

Gomez

- Cardenas ’ withholding of removal claim fail s

. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Gomez

- Cardenas failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured
by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See

Ramirez

- Munoz , 816 F.3d at 1230

. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Tomas Wayne ALTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-648

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
C.B., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3115

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C.Bierman, certify that:

 

1.                                                                                       Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Kof CNH Equipment Trust 2008-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                                                                       Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                                                                                       Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                                                                       Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and basedon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicercompliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all materialrespects; and

 

5.                                                                                       Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,N.A.

 

----

 
| March 30,  2009 |   |                                                            |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                                            |
|                 |   |                                                            |
|                 | By:    | /s/ Steven  C. Bierman                                          |
|                 | Name:  | Steven C.  Bierman                                              |
|                 | Title: | President  (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C.Bierman, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2008-B (the “ExchangeAct periodic reports”);

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, theExchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, all ofthe distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in theExchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewingthe activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and thecompliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statementrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.               All of the reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,N.A.

 

----

 
| March 30,  2009 |   |                                                              |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                                              |
|                 |   |                                                              |
|                 | By:    | /s/ Steven  C. Bierman                                            |
|                 | Name:  | Steven C.  Bierman                                                |
|                 | Title: | President  (senior officer in charge of the   servicing function) |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EARNEST RAY WILLIS, §

 §

Petitioner, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2020-D

VS. §

 §

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas § 

Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

 §

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

March 24, 2005 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court

concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted, and petitioner’s December

17, 2004 motion to file late objections to findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge is denied.

SO ORDERED.

April 26, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02020-D Document 16 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
William Derek TOUCHSTONE v. STATE

CR-16-0720

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2016106EN.01003902.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/39

---

Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Caffè Nero Group v OHIM (CAFFÈ NERO)

(Case T-29/16)

(2016/C 106/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caffè Nero Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Cassidy, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘CAFFÈ NERO’ — Application for registration No 13 238 019

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2015 in Case R 410/2015-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow Community trade mark application No. 13238019 to proceed to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow Community trade mark application No. 13238019 to proceed to registration;

| — | waive the objections to the CTM Application under Articles 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) and Article 7(2); |
| --- | --- |

—

waive the objections to the CTM Application under Articles 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) and Article 7(2);

| — | allows the CTM Application to proceed to acceptance and advertisement for all covered goods and services; |
| --- | --- |

—

allows the CTM Application to proceed to acceptance and advertisement for all covered goods and services;

| — | order OHIM to pay the Applicant’s costs in this matter. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the Applicant’s costs in this matter.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Other

1316.16
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00044]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 577 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1018, K2025-1017.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00044 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Preparation and Distribution of Research Drug 
Products.
    Date: February 5, 2025.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Address: National Institute of Health, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Gagan Deep Bajaj, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Scientific Review Branch, 
11601 Landsdown Street, 3WF Room 09A01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
402-6965, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 2, 2025.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00108 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
D.R. HORTON, INC. - Jacksonville, Appellant, v. HERON'S LANDING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., Appellee.

No. 1D17-5014

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 573 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1014, K2025-1013.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00040 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P