alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 785 

Commending and congratulating the Florida Panthers on winning the 2024 

Stanley Cup Final. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending and congratulating the Florida Panthers on 

winning the 2024 Stanley Cup Final. 

Whereas, on June 24, 2024, the Florida Panthers (referred 

to in this preamble as the ‘‘Panthers’’) won the 2024 National Hockey League (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘NHL’’) Stanley Cup Final; 

Whereas the 2024 NHL Stanley Cup Final is the first Stanley Cup Final won by the Panthers in the 30-year history 

of the Panthers franchise; 

Whereas, on the way to winning the 2024 Stanley Cup Final, 

the Panthers defeated— 

(1) in the first round of the playoffs, the Tampa 

Bay Lightning; 

(2) in the second round of the playoffs, the Boston 

Bruins; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 785 ATS 

(3) in the Eastern Conference Finals to win the 

Prince of Wales Trophy, the New York Rangers; and 

(4) in the Stanley Cup Final, the Edmonton Oilers; 

Whereas, during the 2023–2024 NHL Season, the Panthers— 

(1) won 52 games during the regular season and 

scored 268 goals; and 

(2) had 2 players, Sam Reinhart (forward) and 

Sergei Bobrovsky (goaltender), represent the Panthers as 

All-Stars at the 2024 NHL All-Star Game in Toronto, 

Canada; 

Whereas Aleksander Barkov of the Panthers won the Selke 

Trophy and was recognized as the best defensive forward 

in the NHL for the second time in his career; 

Whereas the entire Panthers roster contributed to the 2024 

Stanley Cup Final victory; 

Whereas supporting the Panthers players was a team of 

coaches and support staff committed to enriching the 

South Florida community on and off the ice; and 

Whereas the Panthers represent their loyal fans, the South 

Florida community, and the entire State of Florida with 

a commitment to excellence: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates— 

3 (A) the Florida Panthers for winning the 

4 2024 National Hockey League Stanley Cup 

5 Final; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 785 ATS 

1 (B) the loyal fan base of the Florida Pan2 thers for their support throughout the 2023– 

3 2024 season; and 

4 (2) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

5 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu6 tion to members of the Florida Panthers ownership, 

7 management, and coaching staff, including— 

8 (A) the chairman, owner, and governor of 

9 the Florida Panthers, Vincent Viola, and his 

10 family; 

11 (B) the president and CEO of the Florida 

12 Panthers, Matthew Caldwell; and 

13 (C) the president of hockey operations and 

14 general manager of the Florida Panthers, Bill 

15 Zito, and the head coach of the Florida Pan16 thers, Paul Maurice. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2021009EN.01000402.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/4

---

Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-108/19, Kerry Luxembourg v EUIPO

(Case C-304/20 P)

(2021/C 9/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, H. Hartwig, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 29 October 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and that Kerry Luxembourg Sàrl shall bear its own costs.

---
Demond L. BOOKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3958

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Netco Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald Sharpe , the President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Donald Sharpe

/s/ Donald Sharpe

President 
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

June 30, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IVAN COLBERT FRAZIER, )

a.k.a. Ivan Colbert Frazier, Jr., )

ID # 889756, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CV-0864-D

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the objections, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and

Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED April 27, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 

 Case 3:03-cv-00864-D Document 13 Filed 04/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69
# C_2016462EN.01002902.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/29

---

Action brought on 10 October 2016 — Pfizer and Pfizer Santé Familiale v Commission

Pfizer and Pfizer Santé Familiale

Commission

(Case T-716/16)

(2016/C 462/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom), Pfizer Santé Familiale (Paris, France) (represented by: L. Catrain González, lawyer, and E. Wright, barrister-at-law)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 of 8 July 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 of 8 July 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 1);

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law and main arguments

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the European Commission infringed the Combined Nomenclature by failing to follow the precise order prescribed by the General Rules of interpretation in Chapter A of Part I of the Combined Nomenclature for the classification of goods.

| — | The Commission committed an error of law by applying General Rule 3 in the classification of a good which is not prima facie classifiable under two or more headings of the Combined Nomenclature; and |
| --- | --- |

—

The Commission committed an error of law by applying General Rule 3 in the classification of a good which is not prima facie classifiable under two or more headings of the Combined Nomenclature; and

| — | the Commission committed a second error of law by applying General Rule 3(b) without applying General Rule 3(a), which gives priority to the classification under the more specific headings. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Commission committed a second error of law by applying General Rule 3(b) without applying General Rule 3(a), which gives priority to the classification under the more specific headings.

---
Larry BARBER, Appellant, v. T.M. WINDOW & DOOR, LLC, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:03-cv-01324-M Document 5 Filed 06/30/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 35
Case 3:03-cv-01324-M Document 5 Filed 06/30/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 36
Case 3:03-cv-01324-M Document 5 Filed 06/30/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 37
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE





This Convertible Debenture Agreement is made and effective the 28th day of August, 2003 between Imperial Consolidated Capital (the "Company") and Donna Donaldson (the "Lender").



Whereas the Company desires to borrow money from the Lender upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Convertible Debenture Agreement;



This Agreement Witnesses that in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:



1)

The Lender agrees to advance tot he Company the principal sum of USD$12,500 ("Principal").

2)

The term of the loan is one year following the date of this Agreement set forth above.

3)

The Company agrees and promises to pay to the Lender the Principal, with interest thereon of ten percent (10%) per annum calculated annually, on or before the end of the term hereof and thereafter, on demand.

4)

The Company may pay the principal, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the end of the term without penalty.

5)

The Lender shall have the right to convert all or any portion of the Principal and interest earned thereon to common stock in the Company at a value of USD$0.10 per share, at any time prior to repayment of the loan, by providing the Company with written notice of conversion and an executed Subscription Agreement.  Upon receipt of notice and the Subscription Agreement, the Company shall forthwith issue to the Lender sufficient common shares to pay the amount that is subject to conversion.

6)

Notice of demand and presentment for payment are hereby waived.



Executed at Vancouver, British Columbia.







Imperial Consolidated Capital

Lender





Per:

/s/ "Kerry McCullagh"

/s/ "Donna Donaldson"

Kerry McCullagh, Director

Donna Donaldson

329 Brill Road

W. Bolton, PQ

Canada, J0E 1R0
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Accellent Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stewart A. Fisher,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

Date:  November 1, 2005

 
| /s/ Stewart A. Fisher   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Stewart  A. Fisher      |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of TearLab Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. Dumencu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 TEARLAB CORP.Date : August 12, 2010
By:
/s/ William G. DumencuChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Accellent Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ron Sparks, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 Date:  November 1, 2005

 
| /s/  Ron Sparks          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Ron  Sparks              |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

FRANK CHRISTIAN NICHOLS, )

ID # 18869-009, )

)

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-0059-N

)

D. JOSLIN, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED April 28, 2005.

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00059-N Document 21 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 102
#### James Edwin McCamy, Appellant, v. Lucius L. Payne, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed July 13, 1927.

*H. S. Glazier*and *Frank Biherd,*Attorneys for Appellant ;

*Massey, Warlow, Carpenter*and *Fishbaek,*Attorneys for Appellee.

Bupord, J.

In this ease bill of complaint was filed seeking to procure a decree to cancel a deed made by a guardian conveying the interest of a minor in real estate.

There was a general demurrer to the bill for want of equity.

The demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed. Prom this order appeal was taken.

The bill contains allegations constituting grounds for equitable relief and the demurrer should have been overruled on .authority of the opinion in the case of Wilkins et al. v. Dean Turpentine Company, 84 Fla. 457, 94 Sou. 508.

*210The decree sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill is reversed with directions for further proceedings in accordance with equity rules and practice.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
# C_2016078EN.01003401.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/34

---

Action brought on 4 January 2016 — Allstate Insurance v OHIM (DRIVEWISE)

(Case T-3/16)

(2016/C 078/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Allstate Insurance Company (Northfield, United States) (represented by: G. Würtenberger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘DRIVEWISE’ — Application for registration No 13 455 019

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2015 in Case R 956/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 8 October 2015 in Case R 956/2015-2 concerning Community Trademark Application No. 013 455 019 ‘DRIVEWISE’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 8 October 2015 in Case R 956/2015-2 concerning Community Trademark Application No. 013 455 019 ‘DRIVEWISE’;

| — | order the Defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation No. 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation No. 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No. 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No. 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Leader, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jacqueline Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 6, 2009



/s/    IAN MORRISIan MorrisChief Executive Officer and President/s/    JACQUELINE DAVIDSONJacqueline DavidsonChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
Melvin SMITH v. STATE

CR-16-0046

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021028EN.01005202.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/52

---

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — PL v Commission

(Case T-308/20) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Reassignment - Decision with retroactive effect adopted to comply with a judgment of the General Court - Article 266 TFEU - Article 22a of the Staff Regulations - Competent authority - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 28/81)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis and J. Van Rossum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff, I. Melo Sampaio and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 25 June 2019 concerning the reassignment of the applicant to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport with retroactive effect from 1 January 2013.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by PL. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by PL.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
----

| 1. | The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  12/15/2010 | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Ricker          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Jonathan Ricker              |   |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer,     |   |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer and  |   |
|                         |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |

----
Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 1 of 17 PageID 170
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 2 of 17 PageID 171
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 3 of 17 PageID 172
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 4 of 17 PageID 173
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 5 of 17 PageID 174
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 6 of 17 PageID 175
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 7 of 17 PageID 176
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 8 of 17 PageID 177
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 9 of 17 PageID 178
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 10 of 17 PageID 179
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 11 of 17 PageID 180
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 12 of 17 PageID 181
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 13 of 17 PageID 182
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 14 of 17 PageID 183
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 15 of 17 PageID 184
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 16 of 17 PageID 185
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 23 Filed 03/22/05 Page 17 of 17 PageID 186