alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 569 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-990, K2025-989.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00038 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 3:03-cv-02711-B Document 1 Filed 11/06/03 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02711-B Document 1 Filed 11/06/03 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02711-B Document 1 Filed 11/06/03 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02711-B Document 1 Filed 11/06/03 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-02711-B Document 1 Filed 11/06/03 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-02711-B Document 1 Filed 11/06/03 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
# C_2020433EN.01002301.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 21 September 2020 — Flightright GmbH v Ryanair Designated Activity Company

(Case C-444/20)

(2020/C 433/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Flightright GmbH

Defendant: Ryanair Designated Activity Company

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a trade union-organised strike by an operating air carrier’s own staff constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a trade union-organised strike by an operating air carrier’s own staff constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1)?

| 2. | Is it of any significance that the strike was held in connection with staff demands not previously agreed by contract between the staff and the operating air carrier? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it of any significance that the strike was held in connection with staff demands not previously agreed by contract between the staff and the operating air carrier?

| 3. | Is it of any significance that the strike in question was triggered by the operating air carrier’s conduct during negotiations with the trade union? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is it of any significance that the strike in question was triggered by the operating air carrier’s conduct during negotiations with the trade union?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong Yuk Ping, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong Yuk Ping



Eppie Wong Yuk Ping,

 CFO and a director

September 1, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 473 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 473

       Designating October 2023 as ``National Principals Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 27, 2023

Ms. Smith (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. King, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Hirono, 
   and Mr. Van Hollen) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating October 2023 as ``National Principals Month''.

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National 
        Association of Elementary School Principals, and the American Federation 
        of School Administrators have declared October 2023 to be ``National 
        Principals Month'';
Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional and assessment 
        leaders, community builders, budget analysts, facilities managers, and 
        administrators of legal and contractual obligations;
Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and parents to develop and 
        implement clear missions, high curriculum standards, and performance 
        goals;
Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate great teaching and 
        learning and continuous school improvement;
Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing 
        force behind any school improvement effort; and
Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would honor elementary 
        school, middle school, and high school principals and recognize the 
        importance of principals in ensuring that every child has access to a 
        high-quality education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 2023 as ``National Principals 
        Month'';
            (2) honors the contributions of principals in elementary 
        schools, middle schools, and high schools in the United States; 
        and
            (3) supports the goals and ideals of National Principals 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 15 PageID 1310
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 15 PageID 1311
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 3 of 15 PageID 1312
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 4 of 15 PageID 1313
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 5 of 15 PageID 1314
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 6 of 15 PageID 1315
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 7 of 15 PageID 1316
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 8 of 15 PageID 1317
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 9 of 15 PageID 1318
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 10 of 15 PageID 1319
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 11 of 15 PageID 1320
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 12 of 15 PageID 1321
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 13 of 15 PageID 1322
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 14 of 15 PageID 1323
Case 3:03-cv-01927-M-BD Document 149 Filed 05/24/06 Page 15 of 15 PageID 1324
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 13, 2011





/s/ Ming Fen LiuMing Fen Liu, Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.3


 


JOINT FILING AGREEMENT


 


The undersigned hereby agree, pursuant
to Rule 13d-1(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to file a joint statement on Schedule 13D (including amendments
thereto) pertaining to their beneficial ownership of Ordinary Shares of Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd.


 


This agreement may be terminated for any
reason by any party hereto immediately upon the personal delivery or facsimile transmission of notice to that effect to the other
parties hereto.


 


Date: September 26, 2016


 


	Billion Bright International Limited	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Changli Wang	 
	 	Changli Wang	 
	 	Director	 
	 	 	 
	Excellent Link Enterprises Limited	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	Changli Wang	 
	 	Changli Wang	 
	 	Director	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Changli Wang	 
	Changli Wang
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Paul Morrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify that to my knowledge:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: November
                19, 2008
            By:
            /s/*Paul
                Morrison*Paul
                MorrisonChief
                Executive Officer
Patrick WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2752

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

Patrick White, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40899

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO RAFAEL PUENTE-SOLIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:04-CR-880

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arturo Rafael

Puente-Solis raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
# C_2022311EN.01001002.xml

| 16.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Leonine Distribution v Commission

(Case T-641/20) (1)

(Culture - Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) - MEDIA sub-programme - Call for Proposals EACEA/05/2018 - Decision of the EACEA rejecting the applicant’s application on the ground of failure to comply with the eligibility conditions - Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal relating to the EACEA’s decision - Concept of ‘European company’ - Grant open only to applicants owned, directly or by majority participation, by nationals of EU Member States or by nationals of other European countries participating in the sub-programme - Errors of assessment - Failure to examine the documents annexed to the proposal - Proportionality)

(2022/C 311/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Leonine Distribution GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: J. Kreile, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: W. Farrell and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Education and Culture Executive Agency (represented by: H. Monet, N. Sbrilli and V. Kasparian, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2020) 5515 final of 10 August 2020 dismissing the administrative appeal brought under Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1) against the decision of the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) of 12 May 2020 rejecting its application for a grant in the context of the call for proposals ‘Support for the distribution of non-national films — Distribution Automatic Scheme’ (EACEA/05/2018).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Leonine Distribution GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Leonine Distribution GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
# C_2016175EN.01003201.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/32

---

Action brought on 29 March 2016 — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Charente-Maritime Deux-Sèvres v ECB

(Case T-135/16)

(2016/C 175/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Charente-Maritime Deux-Sèvres (Saintes, France) (represented by: H. Savoie, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/101) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français). |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Central Bank decision of 29 January 2016 (ECB/SSM/2016 — 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/101) adopted under Article 4(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank and under Articles L. 511-13, L. 511-52, L. 511-58, L. 612-23-1 and R. 612-29-3 of the French monetary and financial code (code monétaire et financier français).

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-133/16, Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence v ECB.

Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Alpes Provence

ECB

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 2022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00254]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Fourth Review)]

Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on non-malleable 
cast iron pipe fittings from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioners Jason E. Kearns and Rhonda K. Schmidtlein not 
participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on June 3, 2024 (89 FR 47610, 
June 3, 2024) and determined on September 6, 2024, that it would 
conduct an expedited review (89 FR 84932, October 24, 2024).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on January 3, 2025. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5576 (January 2025), 
entitled Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from China: 
Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 3, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-00254 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
J.D. v. P.M.

2160783

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 2 of 20 PageID 2
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 3 of 20 PageID 3
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 4 of 20 PageID 4
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 5 of 20 PageID 5
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 6 of 20 PageID 6
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 7 of 20 PageID 7
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 8 of 20 PageID 8
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 9 of 20 PageID 9
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 10 of 20 PageID 10
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 11 of 20 PageID 11
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 12 of 20 PageID 12
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 13 of 20 PageID 13
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 14 of 20 PageID 14
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 15 of 20 PageID 15
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 16 of 20 PageID 16
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 17 of 20 PageID 17
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 18 of 20 PageID 18
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 19 of 20 PageID 19
Case 3:00-cv-01252-G Document 1 Filed 06/09/00 Page 20 of 20 PageID 20
Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 12 Filed 06/23/04 Page 1 of 3 PageID 103
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 12 Filed 06/23/04 Page 2 of 3 PageID 104
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00677-B Document 12 Filed 06/23/04 Page 3 of 3 PageID 105
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1 
<CURRENCY>                                   USD
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                         6,371,704 
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    240,433 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                    2,495,227 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  78,578 
<PP&E>                                        32,430,427 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    80,028 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                45,302,703 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,151,484 
<BONDS>                                                0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0 
<COMMON>                                          73,515 
<OTHER-SE>                                    34,543,918 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  45,302,703 
<SALES>                                        2,009,165 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,009,165 
<CGS>                                          1,955,843 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,712,679 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               124,212 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,519,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,519,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,519,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.84)
                                               


</TABLE>
Garrett P. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Affirmed.