alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 11
I'orm 240A - Reaffirmatiou Agreemerr (Cont ) 6

PART B: REAI!'IRIuATION AGREEMENT.

I (we) agree to reaffirm the debts arising under &e credit agreement described below,

l. brief description of credit agreement:

ArLod"l^L{L S.-'dg \tetwat

2' Description of any cherrges to ttre credit agreeeent xgade ,15 part of rhis reaffirmation agree'ment:

SIGN,{TURE{S);

BorroweE

Christopher Collins

AcceBted by creditor:

(Signsture)

Dare: 1125/2024

Co-bonower, if also reaffirming these debr:

CIrintNane; 4

C,fi,

(Printed Name of Creditor) L75Wa

o,{1;r"'

(Print Name)

(Printed Name aad Title of Individual

Signing for Creditor)

(Sienature)

Date:

Date of creditor accepl

Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 11
1/25/2024

Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 11
Case 23-43861-mxm7 Doc 31 Filed 02/14/24 Entered 02/14/24 09:54:25 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 11
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Illustrations        January 26, 2015        USGS SIM 3250: Geologic Map of the Agnesi Quadrangle (V–45), Venus

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, G. Leigh Lyons, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Digital Ecosystems Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | */s/
      G. Leigh Lyons*       
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| | Name:  | G. LEIGH LYONS                   
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| | Date:  | February 16, 2006                

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 19 Filed 06/02/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 125
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 19 Filed 06/02/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 126
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 19 Filed 06/02/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 127
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1229. GWENDOLYN MCINTYRE v. BAKER COUNTY BOARD OF

EDUCATION.

Gwendolyn McIntyre filed this direct appeal seeking review of the superior

court’s order affirming a decision of the State Board of Education. An appeal from

a decision of the superior court reviewing a decision of a lower tribunal, however,

must be taken by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); see

also Hogan v. Taylor County Bd. of Ed., 157 Ga. App. 680 (278 SE2d 106) (1981). 

Because McIntyre failed to follow the discretionary appeal procedure asrequired, this

appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 13, 2017

03/13/2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

KEITH ROSARIO,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 298 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

KEITH ROSARIO,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 299 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

KEITH ROSARIO, RESONDENT

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 300 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
[298 WAL 2021, 299 WAL 2021 and 300 WAL 2021] - 2

(1) Did the Superior Court err and abuse its discretion and misapprehend and ignore 

or misapply the doctrine of stare decisis in its Simmons decision by overturning 

over 40 years of case law permitting the revocation of consecutive probation 

sentences not yet commenced where there has been a substantive violation and 

conviction in a new case?

(2) Did the Superior Court abuse its discretion and misapprehend and misapply the 

statutory authority it cited in Simmons, which statutes do not clearly and 

unambiguously speak to or demand the result of prohibiting violation of probation 

sentences that have not yet commenced when a substantive violation has 

occurred?
# C_2021278EN.01004301.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Himmel v EUIPO — Ramirez Monfort (Hispano Suiza)

(Case T-177/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Hispano Suiza - Earlier EU word mark HISPANO SUIZA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 278/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Erwin Leo Himmel (Walchwil, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Gomoll, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gonzalo Andres Ramirez Monfort (Barcelona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2020 (Case R 67/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Himmel and Mr Ramirez Monfort.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 January 2020 (Case R 67/2019-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 January 2020 (Case R 67/2019-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
C.M. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160423

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Faye S. GRAY a/k/a Faye Stanley Gray and James Gray, Jr., Appellants, v. YOUDALI INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company f/k/a Ford Motor Credit Company, a Corporation; United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Copper Ridge Point Homeowners Association, Inc., a Florida Not-for-Profit Corporation; James Gray, III; and Jason Gray, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Giovanni VELEZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0928

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 16, 2019

Giovanni Velez, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 829 

Designating October 8, 2024, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. COONS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 8, 2024, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and 

Fuel Cell Day’’. 

Whereas hydrogen, which has an atomic mass of 1.008, is the 

most abundant element in the universe; 

Whereas the United States is a world leader in the development and deployment of fuel cell and hydrogen technologies; 

Whereas hydrogen fuel cells played an instrumental role in 

the United States space program, helping the United 

States achieve the mission of landing a man on the 

Moon; 

Whereas private industry, Federal and State governments, 

national laboratories, and institutions of higher education 

continue to improve fuel cell and hydrogen technologies 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 829 ATS 

to address the most pressing energy, environmental, and 

economic issues of the United States; 

Whereas fuel cells utilizing hydrogen and hydrogen-rich fuels 

to generate electricity are clean, efficient, safe, and resilient technologies being used for— 

(1) stationary and backup power generation; and 

(2) zero-emission transportation for light-duty vehicles, industrial vehicles, delivery vans, buses, trucks, 

trains, military vehicles, marine applications, and aerial 

vehicles; 

Whereas stationary fuel cells are being placed in service for 

continuous and backup power to provide businesses and 

other energy consumers with reliable power in the event 

of grid outages; 

Whereas stationary fuel cells can help reduce water use, as 

compared to traditional power generation technologies; 

Whereas fuel cell electric vehicles that utilize hydrogen can 

mimic the experience of internal combustion vehicles, including comparable range and refueling times; 

Whereas hydrogen fuel cell industrial vehicles are deployed at 

logistical hubs and warehouses across the United States 

and exported to facilities in Europe and Asia; 

Whereas hydrogen is a nontoxic gas that can be derived from 

a variety of domestically available traditional and renewable resources, including solar, wind, biogas, and the 

abundant supply of natural gas in the United States; 

Whereas hydrogen and fuel cells can store energy to help enhance the grid and maximize opportunities to deploy renewable energy; 

Whereas the United States produces and uses approximately 

10,000,000 metric tons of hydrogen per year; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 829 ATS 

Whereas engineers and safety code and standard professionals have developed consensus-based protocols for safe 

delivery, handling, and use of hydrogen; and 

Whereas the ingenuity of the people of the United States is 

essential to paving the way for the future use of hydrogen technologies: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 8, 

2 2024, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
gmgi_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2
 
GOLDEN MATRIX GROUP, INC. & N600PG,
LLC. CANCELLATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
 
THIS CANCELLATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), isentered into this 20th day of September 2016, by and between Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (formerly known as Source Gold Corp.), (“GMGI”, “Company”), and N600PG, LLC. (“N600PG”).
 
WHEREAS, GMGI currently owes One Hundred and Two Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Four Dollars ($102,794) to N600PG pursuant to numerous Convertible Notes, as described in attached Table as Schedule One. The Convertible Notes have conversion features and carry interest rates from 8% per year.
 
WHEREAS, on or around February 22, 2016, GMGI entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement and a subsequent change of management took place.
 
WHEREAS, the Company is in the early stages of restructuring, changing the direction of the business the Company is engaged in, and moving the Company forward in a positive manner.
 
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company feels it to be in the best interest of the Company and the Shareholders to reduce the outstanding debt of the Company incurred by the previous management.
 
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2016, N600PG agreed to cancel all of the Convertible Notes listed on Schedule One and to release any remaining obligation the Company may have to N600PG pursuant to those Convertible Notes in Schedule One. 
 
WHEREAS, in exchange for the cancellation of the Debt listed on Schedule One, Golden Matrix Group, Inc, will return ownership of the Company’s mining claims held in the Company’s name.
 
THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by both the Company, and N600PG, that the outstanding Notes, principal and interest totaling $102,794, and owed to N600PG pursuant to the Convertible Notes listed in Schedule One and attached to this Agreement, by the Company, shall be cancelled, and no further obligations of the Company, under the Notes listed in Schedule One, are contemplated.
 
FURTHER, it is agreed by both the Company and N600PG that N600PG shall release all future claims to subsequent conversions of the Notes listed on Schedule One, the Company will have no further obligation to N600PG under those Convertible Notes and N600PG shall be forever barred from seeking further conversions or claiming obligations of the Company under the Convertible Notes.
   
 
	 
	1


	

	 


 
The undersigned do hereby acknowledge receipt, review, understanding and agreement with this Cancellation and Release Agreement.
 
	 
	  
	 
	 
	Anthony Goodman, President 
Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
	  
	Date 
	
	 
	 
	 
	
	 
	  
	 
	 
	Amy Munroe Swanson Chaffe, Managing Member   
N600PG, LLC.
	  
	Date
	


   
 
	 
	2

	

	 


 
SCHEDULE ONE
TABLE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES 
BETWEEN GMGI & N600PG, LLC.
 
	Note Holder
	 
	#
	 
	 
	Amount
($)
	 
	 
	Origination 
Date
	 
	Interest
 Rate (%)
	 
	 
	($) Total Principal
& Interest
	 

	DIRECT CAPITAL
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	N600PG, LLC
	 
	50
	 
	 
	 
	99,250	 
	 
	04/27/16
	 
	 
	8.00	%	 
	 
	102,794	 

	TOTAL
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	102,794	 


 
 
	3
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MAX Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  October 6, 2005



/s/ Stuart Rogers

---------------------------------------

Stuart Rogers, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
1The fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) states that the “court shall have

power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment

affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without

remanding the cause for a rehearing.” See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89

(1991). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

PAULA BROOKMAN §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-165-Y

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS,

 CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION 

On March 22, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings

and conclusions”) in the above-styled and numbered cause. An order

issued that same day gave all parties until April 12 to serve and

file with the Court written objections to the proposed findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge. The Court has not received

any written objections. As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the

Court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions

for plain error and has found none. 

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court finds that

the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the

Commissioner is REVERSED and the action REMANDED, pursuant to the

fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),1 for further administrative

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 25 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 189
2

proceedings for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s

findings and conclusions.

SIGNED April 21, 2005.

TRM/knV

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00165-Y Document 25 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 190
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 855 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Cudo. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Cudo. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Cudo, Cr. No. 24– 

007, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the 

production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a former 

employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:06 Sep 25, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR855.ATS SR855

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 855 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized 

3 to provide relevant testimony in the case of United States 

4 v. Cudo, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

5 should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Schwager, and any current or former officer 

8 or employee of the Secretary’s office, in connection with 

9 the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 

10 resolution. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS