alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Howard SPARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3640

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

Howard Sparber, Zephyrhills, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

HARRIS, J.

Howard Sparber appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence *254filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm, without further discussion, the denial of Sparber's first two claims. However, we conclude that the trial court erred in summarily denying Sparber's remaining two claims and reverse.

Sparber was convicted of shooting at or within a dwelling, aggravated stalking, and criminal mischief. He was sentenced to five years in prison followed by five years of probation. Below, Sparber argued that his sentence was illegal because the special conditions of his probation were not related to the underlying charges. Specifically, Sparber's probation precludes him from consuming alcohol and patronizing bars and requires him to undergo evaluation and treatment for drug use and mental health issues.

"A defendant may not be sentenced to drug-offender probation unless he has been convicted of an enumerated offense under Chapter 893 or he has specifically agreed to such conditions as part of a plea agreement." *Ackermann v. State*, 962 So.2d 407, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (citing *Parker v. State*, 839 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ). Because Sparber was not charged with an offense under chapter 893, Florida Statutes (2017), and he argues neither his competency nor mental health was an issue in his case, it is not clear whether the trial court had the authority to impose these special conditions as a part of his probationary sentence. Further, Sparber alleged that when he entered his plea, he never agreed to the additional special conditions for either drug offender probation or mental health evaluation and treatment. The order denying these claims failed to attach any records that conclusively refute Sparber's allegations. Because the record on appeal does not include the plea form or a transcript of the plea hearing, this Court is unable to determine whether the special conditions were legally imposed. *See* *McLendon v. State*, 58 So.3d 387, 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

We reverse the summary denial of Claims 3 and 4 of Sparber's motion to correct illegal sentence and remand for the postconviction court to attach records conclusively refuting these claims or to resentence Sparber without the drug-offender and mental health conditions. *See* *Parker*, 839 So.2d at 737.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with instructions

EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Robert J. RECKLEIN and Curtis B. Recklin, Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FKA The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee for RAMP 2004RS2; Wachovia Bank, National Association; and The Orchards Community Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-947

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Centale, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Centale, Inc. and will be retained by Centale, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: February 14, 2005                   /s/ Patrick T. Parker
                                          --------------------------
                                          Patrick T. Parker
                                          (Chief Executive Officer)

Date: February 14, 2005                   /s/ Juan Ferreira
                                          --------------------------
                                          Juan Ferreira
                                          (Chief Financial Officer)
# C_2016111EN.01003402.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/34

---

Action brought on 5 February 2016 — Netguru v EUIPO (NETGURU)

(Case T-54/16)

(2016/C 111/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Netguru sp. z o.o. (Poznań, Poland) (represented by: K. Jarosiński, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘NETGURU’ — Application for registration No 12 994 166

Trade mark at issue

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 December 2015 in Case R 144/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside in its entirety the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 18 December 2015 in Case R 144/2015-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside in its entirety the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 18 December 2015 in Case R 144/2015-5;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Breach of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Breach of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 940 

Honoring the lives and service of Natalie and Davy Lloyd and expressing 

condolences to the family of Natalie and Davy Lloyd. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2024 

Mr. HAWLEY (for himself and Mr. SCHMITT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the lives and service of Natalie and Davy Lloyd 

and expressing condolences to the family of Natalie and 

Davy Lloyd. 

Whereas Natalie Elizabeth Lloyd— 

(1) was born on March 2, 2003, in Joplin, Missouri; 

(2) graduated from Ozark Christian Academy and 

Ozark Bible Institute and College; and 

(3) was known for her exceptionally kind heart and 

love for everyone she encountered and her dedication to 

caring for children; 

Whereas David (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘Davy’’) Joseph Lloyd, III— 

(1) was born on July 3, 2000, in Tulsa, Oklahoma; 

(2) grew up in Haiti, developing a heart for the Haitian community; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 940 IS 

(3) graduated from Ozark Bible Institute and College in Neosho in April 2022 and went on to become an 

effective preacher; 

Whereas Natalie and Davy Lloyd were married on June 18, 

2022, at the Bible Holiness Assembly of God in Neosho, 

Missouri; 

Whereas Natalie and Davy Lloyd began their married life together in Neosho, Missouri; 

Whereas Natalie and Davy Lloyd became full-time missionaries in Haiti in January 2023 with Missions in Haiti, 

serving the Haitian community and, in particular, Haitian children through a local orphanage; and 

Whereas Natalie and Davy Lloyd were tragically killed by unlawful Haitian gangs on May 23, 2024: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) extends heartfelt condolences to the family 

3 and friends of Natalie and David (referred to in this 

4 resolution as ‘‘Davy’’) Lloyd; 

5 (2) recognizes and honors Natalie and Davy 

6 Lloyd as extraordinarily faithful missionaries, excep7 tional Missourians, and great Americans who self8 lessly dedicated their entire lives to God and serving 

9 others; and 

10 (3) commemorates the amazing work Natalie 

11 and Davy Lloyd completed as missionaries in Haiti 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 940 IS 

1 and the powerful legacy that the young couple 

2 leaves. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Company.


Dated:   12/11/03                        /s/  Jonathan  Ricker
       ----------------                --------------------------------------
                                       Jonathan  Ricker
                                       Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer

This  certification accompanies the Report pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of 18 of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.


<PAGE>
Bryan Dean MCDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-559

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 1 of 14 PageID 39
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 2 of 14 PageID 40
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 3 of 14 PageID 41
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 4 of 14 PageID 42
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 5 of 14 PageID 43
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 6 of 14 PageID 44
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 7 of 14 PageID 45
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 8 of 14 PageID 46
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 9 of 14 PageID 47
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 10 of 14 PageID 48
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 11 of 14 PageID 49
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 12 of 14 PageID 50
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 13 of 14 PageID 51
Case 3:04-cv-00742-G Document 9 Filed 05/01/03 Page 14 of 14 PageID 52
Exhibit 23.1

HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.

A Professional Corporation

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

5 Triad Center, Suite 750

Salt Lake City, UT 84180-1128

Phone: (801) 532-2200

Fax: (801) 532-7944

www.hbmcpas.com







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors

International Isotopes, Inc.



We consent to the use of our report dated March 25, 2009 with respect to the financial statements of International Isotopes, Inc. included in this annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 26, 2009 with the Securities Exchange Commission, and incorporated by reference in the Registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-121335 and No. 333-108776), and Form S-3 (No. 333-106215 and No. 333-142674).









HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.



Salt Lake City, Utah
March 25, 2009
Felix MARTINEZ-CANDELARIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3114

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kenneth WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4782

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ryan M. ANDERSON, DOC #Y26220, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for 
                    Heavy-Duty Vehicles--Phase 3''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2025

    Mr. Fulcher submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for 
                    Heavy-Duty Vehicles--Phase 3''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles--Phase 3'' 
(89 Fed. Reg. 29440 (April 22, 2024)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MILDRED ROSENTHAL §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:03-CV-141-Y

 § 

CLIFTON H. MORRIS, et al. §

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the order issued this same day, and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 58, 

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all claims

in the above-styled and -numbered cause are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

All costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 shall be taxed against the plaintiff.

SIGNED August 21, 2006.

TRM/kat

 

 Case 4:03-cv-00141-Y Document 101 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 525
Cole William RUCKER, Appellant, v. Helena Raquel ROTH, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1656

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.
# C_2016454EN.01003101.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/31

---

Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Luxottica Group v EUIPO — Chen (BeyBeni)

(Case T-721/16)

(2016/C 454/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Milan, Italy) (represented by: E.M. Ochoa Santamaría and I. Aparicio Martínez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xian Chen (Wenzhou, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘BeyBeni’ — Application for registration No 12 511 317

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 in Case R 675/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the application by annulling the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 in Case R 675/2015-5 and by refusing registration of the EU trade mark No 12 511 317 ‘BeyBeni’ pursuant to the provisions of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the application by annulling the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 in Case R 675/2015-5 and by refusing registration of the EU trade mark No 12 511 317 ‘BeyBeni’ pursuant to the provisions of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in respect of the analysis of the conditions for its application. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in respect of the analysis of the conditions for its application.

| — | Infringement of Articles 63(2) and 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 in respect of a possible infringement of the right of the defence and the right to be heard at the appeal stage. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 63(2) and 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 in respect of a possible infringement of the right of the defence and the right to be heard at the appeal stage.

---
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Equity Ventures Group      Inc. |

| By:                | /s/      Colette Kim                                                     |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Colette      KimChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer |
Ibtisam OJAYMI, Appellant, v. ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, LLC and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0452

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

Date of Accident: March 11, 2017.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - (-)products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - (-)new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1951        Preliminary report on the geology and ground-water supply of the Newark, New Jersey, area

publication        January 1, 2013        Arsenic in New Jersey Coastal Plain streams, sediments, and shallow groundwater: effects from different geologic sources and anthropogenic inputs on biogeochemical and physical mobilization processes

publication        January 1, 1960        Factual data for public-supply wells and selected irrigation wells in Monmouth County, New Jersey

publication        January 1, 1973        Geology and water resources of the Wharton Tract and the Mullica River basin in southern New Jersey
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1090 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-858, K2025-859.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30839 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P