alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

  We, the undersigned Directors and Officers of Precision Auto Care, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), hereby constitute and appoint Everett F. Casey and/or Robert R.
Falconi, our true and lawful attorney-in-fact with full power to sign for us, in
our names and in the capacities indicated below, the Corporation's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000, and any and all amendments
thereto.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name                                Title                              Date
<S>                          <C>                                <C>

/s/ Louis M. Brown, Jr.
---------------------------   Officer; Director                     October 13, 2000
Louis M. Brown, Jr.,          (Principal, Executive Officer)


/s/ Robert R. Falconi         Vice President and Chief              October 13, 2000
---------------------------   Principal Financial and
Robert R. Falconi,            Accounting Officer)

/s/ Woodley A. Allen          Chairman of the Board of Directors;
---------------------------   Director
Woodley A. Allen

/s/ George Bavelis            Director                              October 13, 2000
---------------------------
George Bavelis

/s/ Lynn E. Caruthers         Director                              October 13, 2000
---------------------------
Lynn E. Caruthers

/s/ Bernard H. Clineburg      Director                              October 13, 2000
---------------------------
Bernard H. Clineburg

/s/ Bassam N. Ibrahim         Director                              October 13, 2000
---------------------------
Bassam N. Ibrahim

---------------------------   Director
Arthur C. Kellar

/s/ William R. Klumb          Director                              October 13, 2000
---------------------------
William R. Klumb

/s/ Ernest S. Malas           Director                              October 13, 2000
---------------------------
Ernest S. Malas


---------------------------   Director
Mauricio Zambrano

</TABLE>
# C_2017022EN.01004901.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/49

---

Action brought on 21 November 2016 — Barmenia Krankenversicherung v EUIPO (Mediline)

(Case T-810/16)

(2017/C 022/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Barmenia Krankenversicherung a.G. (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Mediline’ — EU trade mark No 14 655 385

Mark at issue:

Contested decision: decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 September 2016 in Case R 2437/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
B.M., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D18-3349

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
3rd Quarter 2007 ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert V. Johnson                                
|Robert V. Johnson                                    
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

July 13, 2007

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



49.
# C_2017070EN.01002102.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/21

---

Action brought on 22 December 2016 — Ms v Commission

(Case T-435/16)

(2017/C 070/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ms (Castries, France) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

as a result,

| — | annul the Commission’s decision refusing to communicate personal data concerning the applicant, taken on 16 June 2016; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision refusing to communicate personal data concerning the applicant, taken on 16 June 2016;

| — | order payment of compensation for the non-material harm resulting from the European Commission’s misconduct, assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 20 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order payment of compensation for the non-material harm resulting from the European Commission’s misconduct, assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 20 000;

ex aequo et bono

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ 2001 L 8, p. 1) and, in particular, of Articles 8, 13 and 20 thereof. The applicant also alleges infringement of the fundamental right of access to personal data and of the right to respect for private life, as well as infringement of the principles of the rights of the defence, equality of arms and the right to good administration. In addition, it argues that the contested decision is vitiated by an unlawful and unfounded statement of reasons. All those illegalities constitute as many instances of misconduct which have caused the applicant real and certain harm.

---
Exhibit 12.2

              CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED


I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Golden State Petro (IOM
I-A) PLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: June 24, 2007


/s/ Kate Blankenship
----------------------------
    Kate Blankenship
    Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 10.26**

June 30, 2008 

ComVest Capital, LLC (“ComVest”) 

One North Clematis, Suite 300 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. (“ClearPoint”) 

1600 ManorDrive, Suite 110 

Chalfont, PA 18914 

 

Dear Sirs: 

Reference is made to (a) the Promissory Note dated as of August 14, 2006 in the original principal amount of $450,000 issued by ClearPoint toShareholders of Staffbridge, Inc. (“Lender”), as amended by that certain Amendment to Note dated December 31, 2007, which increased the original principal amount to $486,690 (the “Note”), and (b) the Revolving Creditand Term Loan Agreement to be entered into on or about the date hereof between ComVest and ClearPoint (the “Loan Agreement”). 

OnJune 20, 2008, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, ComVest made certain loans to ClearPoint, the proceeds of which will be used in substantial part to repay certain existing indebtedness; and from time to time thereafter, ComVest may make certainadditional loans to ClearPoint for the purpose of providing working capital to ClearPoint, which is expected to enhance ClearPoint’s financial capability and its ability to repay the Note. 

In order to induce ComVest to make loans and other financial accommodations to ClearPoint thereunder, Lender hereby agrees, for the benefit of ComVest,ClearPoint and its subsidiaries, that, immediately upon receipt of $150,000 and any amounts due and payable for work performed as a contractor to ClearPoint by Lender on, or about June 30, 2008, the Note is hereby amended such that the due datethereunder for the payment of the entire principal balance of the Note (currently in the amount of $336,690) is extended to December 31, 2008. 

Additionally, at such time that ClearPoint pays an additional sum of $150,000 and pays all then current obligations for work performed as a contractor to ClearPoint, Lender agrees to amend the Note such that the due date thereunder for thepayment of the entire remaining principal balance of the Note will be June 30, 2009. 

This agreement shall be binding upon and inureto the benefit of the successors and permitted assigns of the Lender and the addressees hereof. This agreement may not be amended or modified, nor may any provision hereof be waived, without the prior written consent of the party to be chargedtherewith. This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 

Very truly yours,SHAREHOLDER OF STAFFBRIDGE, INC.By:   Name:  Title: SHAREHOLDER OF STAFFBRIDGE, INC.By:   Name:  Title: 
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO DEBT EXTENSION AGREEMENT]
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 108 

To allow the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to establish a research center for deep space and interplanetary 

research, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To allow the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration to establish a research center for 

deep space and interplanetary research, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Space Research Inno5 vation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 108 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESEARCH CENTER FOR DEEP-SPACE AND INTER2 PLANETARY RESEARCH. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Na4 tional Aeronautics and Space Administration, using the 

5 authority under section 3204(a)(3)(B) of title 10, United 

6 States Code, shall— 

7 (1) establish a university-affiliated research 

8 center to facilitate capabilities in support of the Na9 tional Aeronautics and Space Administration; 

10 (2) use such a university-affiliated research cen11 ter to fund analyses and engineering support related 

12 to cis-lunar and deep-space missions and interplan13 etary research; and 

14 (3) ensure such a university-affiliated research 

15 center— 

16 (A) is held accountable for the technical 

17 quality of the work product developed under 

18 this section; and 

19 (B) has established expertise in convening 

20 academic and private sector groups to facilitate 

21 research and private-public partnerships. 

22 (b) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.—The Adminis23 trator shall develop and implement policies and procedures 

24 to govern, with respect to the establishment of the univer25 sity-affiliated research center under subsection (a)— 

26 (1) the selection of participants; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 108 IH

1 (2) the award of cooperative agreements or 

2 other contracts; 

3 (3) the appropriate use of competitive awards 

4 and sole source awards; and 

5 (4) the technical capabilities required. 

6 (c) ELIGIBILITY.—The following entities shall be eli7 gible to participate in a university-affiliated research cen8 ter established under subsection (a): 

9 (1) An institution of higher education (as such 

10 term is defined in section 102 of the Higher Edu11 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)). 

12 (2) An operator of a federally funded research 

13 and development center. 

14 (3) A nonprofit or not-for-profit research insti15 tution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 47
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 48
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 49
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 50
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 51
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 52
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 53
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 54
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00242-C Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 55
Case 3:03-cr-00268-L Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 68
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00268-L Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 69
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00268-L Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 70
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00268-L Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 71
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00268-L Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 72
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00268-L Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 73
# C_2019255EN.01000401.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Christa Plessers v PREFACO NV, Belgische Staat

(Case C-509/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Transfers of undertakings - Directive 2001/23/EC - Articles 3 to 5 - Safeguarding of employees’ rights - Exceptions - Insolvency proceedings - Proceedings for judicial restructuring by transfer under judicial supervision - Total or partial safeguard of the undertaking - National legislation authorising the transferee, after the transfer, to choose which employees to keep on)

(2019/C 255/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Christa Plessers

Defendants: PREFACO NV, Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, in particular Articles 3 to 5 thereof, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in the event of the transfer of an undertaking which has taken place in the context of proceedings for judicial restructuring by transfer under judicial supervision applied with a view to maintaining all or part of the transferor or its activity, entitles the transferee to choose the employees which it wishes to keep on

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Carey Deshawn Forris

- Clemons v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00437

- CR

Trial court case number: 1398951

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

We abated this appeal and remanded this cause to the trial court for a hearing concerning

appellant’s certification of the right to appeal. On February 28, 2017, a supplemental clerk’s

record was filed containing a certification indicating that appellant has the right to appeal. The

trial court also appointed counsel, Randy Martin.

Accordingly, we reinstate this appeal on the active docket. The reporter’s record is due

to be filed 30 days from the date of this order. Appellant’s brief wil l be due 30 days after the

reporter’s record is filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_

/s/ Harvey Brown

_  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 9, 2017
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193272) and Amendment No. 510 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R IC HARD H. B LAISDELL, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. HAWAII DEPAR TM ENT OF PUB LIC SAFETY, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-17793 D.C . No. 1:12-c v-00554-LEKB M K M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii Le slie E . Koba

y a shi, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2015 * * B e fore : SILVERM AN, B ER ZON, a nd WA TFORD, C i rc uit Judge s . Hawa ii sta

te prisone r R ic ha

rd H. B la isde ll a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing c onstitutiona l viola tions in c onne c tion with the tre at m e nt of his prison trust a

c c o unt. W e have 

# FIL ED OCT 23 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo. Hamilton v . Brow n ,

630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th C ir. 2011) (dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A); Barre n v . Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th C ir. 1998) (orde r) (dism issa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e )(2)). W e va c ate and re m and. The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d B la i sde ll’ s a c t ion a ga inst theHa wa ii De pa rtm e nt of Public Sa fe ty

be c a use it is ba

rre d by the Ele ve nth Am e ndm e nt. Se e Pe nnhurst State

Sc h. & Hosp. v . Halde rman , 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1984) (“ [I] n the a bse nc e of c o nse nt a

suit in which the State or one of its a ge nc ie s or de pa rtm e nts is nam e d a s the de fe nda

nt is prosc ribe d by

the Ele ve nth Am e ndm e nt.” ). Howe ve r, the d istric t c o urt pre m ature ly dism isse d the a c t ion with pre judic e . Ac c ordingly , we va c ate the judgm e nt a

nd re m and to pe rm it B l a isde ll to volunta rily dism iss his a c tion if heso c h o ose s. B e c a use this a ppe a l doe s not c onc e rn B l a isde ll’ s a bility to proc e e d in form a pa upe ris, we do not c onside r B la isde ll’ s c onte ntions c onc e rning whe the r a prior a c tion c ounts a s a

strike unde r the Prison Litiga tion R e form

Ac t. V ACAT E D and RE M ANDE D .

1 2 - 1 7 7 9 3 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong Yuk Ping, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong Yuk Ping



Eppie Wong Yuk Ping,

 CFO and a director

December 28, 2006