alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 29

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
provide that no person shall be elected to the office of the President 
                         more than three times.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2025

Mr. Ogles submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
provide that no person shall be elected to the office of the President 
                         more than three times.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``No person shall be elected to the office of the President more 
than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being 
elected to two consecutive terms, and no person who has held the office 
of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term 
to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to 
the office of the President more than twice.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31651]

[[Page 638]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. P-2299-082]

Turlock & Modesto Irrigation District; Notice of Reasonable 
Period of Time for Water Quality Certification Application

    On December 13, 2024, the Turlock & Modesto Irrigation District 
submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a 
copy of its application for Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water 
quality certification filed with the California State Water Resources 
Control Board (Water Board), in conjunction with the above captioned 
project. The submittal also included a response from the Water Board 
stating that it received the application on the same day. Pursuant to 
section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ we hereby notify 
the Water Board of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 5.23(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: December 13, 2024.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: 
December 13, 2025.
    If the Water Board fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying 
authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: December 30, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31651 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-K of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2005, I, John R. Maxwell, President and Chief Executive
Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


 /s/ John R. Maxwell
-------------------------------------
John R. Maxwell
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 16, 2004

/s/ Matthew S. Kerper
Matthew S. Kerper, President
(Principal executive officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2008 (the
"Report"), of Mac-Gray Corporation (the "Company") each of the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Dated: March 13, 2009

/s/ STEWART G. MACDONALD, JR.Name: Stewart G. MacDonald, Jr.
Title: Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 13, 2009

/s/ MICHAEL J. SHEAName: Michael J. Shea
Title: Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Kevin SYMONETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-788

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 4:04-cv-00738-Y Document 8 Filed 11/23/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 23
Case 4:04-cv-00738-Y Document 8 Filed 11/23/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 24
Ronald D. VETETO v. Jeff DUNN, DeWayne Estes, Cedric Specks, Anthony Brooks, Kevin White, Gary Malone, William Northcutt, Bruce Hodge, Jonathan Truitt, John Mason, Wendell Guthery, March Jones, Christopher McLaurin, Mark Michael, James Barton, Jasper Luitze, Cory Martin, Michael Williamson, and Dameta Baldwin.

2160668

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX PARTE Major ANDERSON

1160929 (CR-16-0467)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 231 

To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System conservation pilot program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Ms. HAGEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related 

Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the 

Colorado River System conservation pilot program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Colorado River Basin 

5 System Conservation Extension Act of 2025’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 231 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM 

2 CONSERVATION PILOT PROGRAM. 

3 Section 206 of the Energy and Water Development 

4 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (43 

5 U.S.C. 620 note; Public Law 113–235), is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘this Act’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘the Colorado River Basin System 

8 Conservation Extension Act of 2025’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘2024’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘2026’’; and 

11 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘2025’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘2027’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:04-CR-165-K

) (3:06-CV-0373-K)

JUSTIN LONGMIRE, #32546-177, ) ECF

Defendant/Movant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 7th day of April , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00165-K Document 56 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 121
# C_2018072EN.01002701.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/27

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam) — Netherlands) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Samet Ardic

(Case C-571/17 PPU) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Surrender procedures between Member States - Conditions for execution - Grounds for optional non-execution - Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA - Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence - ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ - Scope - Person sentenced to a custodial sentence in final proceedings conducted in his presence - Execution of sentence subsequently suspended in part subject to certain conditions - Subsequent proceedings leading to revocation of the suspension due to non-compliance with those conditions - Revocation proceedings conducted in the absence of the person concerned))

(2018/C 072/35)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Samet Ardic

Applicant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Where a party has appeared in person in criminal proceedings that result in a judicial decision which definitively finds him guilty of an offence and, as a consequence, imposes a custodial sentence the execution of which is subsequently suspended in part, subject to certain conditions, the concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’, as referred to in Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as not including subsequent proceedings in which that suspension is revoked on grounds of infringement of those conditions during the probationary period, provided that the revocation decision adopted at the end of those proceedings does not change the nature or the level of the sentence initially imposed.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

1

---
STATE of Louisiana v. James L. COLVIN

No. 2017-KP-1840

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

*421Granted. The district court conducted a hearing and properly concluded that the state was materially prejudiced in its ability to respond to, negate, and rebut the allegations of the petition as a result of events not under its control which have transpired since the date of original conviction. *See* La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(B). Therefore, respondent's application for post-conviction relief is dismissed.

Respondent has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Respondent's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, respondent has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer of**

**Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(Adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth E. Compton,President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|     |     | /s/ KENNETH E. COMPTON                   |
|----------|----------|------------------------------------------|
|     |     |                                     |
|     |     | Kenneth E. Compton                       |
| * * | * * | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

May 11, 2009

 

----
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 9 Filed 12/22/00 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12
SANTA FE LAKE DWELLERS ASSOC., INC. and Don Morgan, Petitioners, v. TOM'S HIGH ON THE HOG REAL PIT BARBECUE, INC., and the Board of County Commissioners of Bradford County, Respondents.

No. 1D18-542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jon A. Marshall, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GlobalSantaFe Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)] for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in the report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 10, 2004           /s/ Jon A. Marshall  Jon A. Marshall  President and Chief Executive Officer  
1
# C_2018032EN.01000801.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/8

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — VE v WD

(Case C-232/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Credit agreement denominated in a foreign currency - Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 032/11)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VE

Applicant:

Defendant: WD

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Central District Court, Buda, Hungary), by decision of 10 April 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1










CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Trøim, Director and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
March 19, 2010











Tor Olav
Trøim


Principal
Executive Officer





24
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Karl Brenkert III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kendle International Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     DATE SIGNED: March 16, 2007 /s/ Karl Brenkert III     Karl Brenkert III    Chief Financial Officer