alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Darell ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4084

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, M.J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

B.L. Thomas, C.J.

Trusting in his cellmate to carry out the murder of a witness against him, Appellant was charged and convicted of Solicitation to Commit First-Degree Murder. At trial, defense counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal, and Appellant now asserts the motion should have been granted, because the evidence at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction. He relies primarily on the decision in *State v. Gaines* , 431 So.2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Our review of the trial court's ruling denying the motion for judgment of acquittal is *de novo* . *Pagan v. State* , 830 So.2d 792, 803 (Fla. 2002). All inferences are drawn in favor of the verdict and all evidence is reviewed in the light most favorable to the verdict: "If, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, sufficient evidence exists to sustain a conviction." *Id.*

In *Gaines* , the Fourth District held that because the defendant never expressed a present intent that the crime be carried out, but deferred her final decision to a later date, the trial court properly dismissed the charge. *Gaines* , 431 So.2d at 737. That decision is distinguishable, even were we to agree with its reasoning, because Appellant clearly and repeatedly stated that he intended that his cellmate carry out the murder. Appellant did not defer a final decision as to whether the murder should occur. In addition, Appellant attempted to obtain the funds to provide bail for his cellmate so the crime could be accomplished. He also discussed several methods by which the murder could be accomplished. After the cellmate informed law enforcement, and wore a recording device, Appellant continued to discuss the arrangement and stated his confidence that the cellmate would in fact be successful in the planned witness elimination. Thus, we reject Appellant's argument that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law.

AFFIRMED .

Kelsey and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Case 3:03-cv-01340-N Document 32 Filed 03/02/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 180
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31447]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Topics in Hepatobiliary Pathobiology.
    Date: January 22, 2025.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Atul Sahai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 2188, MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1198, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 26, 2024.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31447 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
# C_2019139EN.01001201.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles — France) — Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA) v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Bionoor, Ecocert France, Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)

(Case C-497/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 13 TFEU - Animal welfare - Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 - Protection of animals at the time of killing - Particular methods of slaughter prescribed by religious rites - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Articles 3 and 14(1)(b)(viii) - Compatibility with organic production - Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - First paragraph of Article 57 - Organic production logo of the European Union)

(2019/C 139/09)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA)

Defendants: Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Bionoor, Ecocert France, Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, in particular Article 3 and Article 14(1)(b)(viii) thereof, read in the light of Article 13 TFEU, must be interpreted as not authorising the placing of the organic production logo of the European Union, referred to in the first paragraph of Article 57 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation No 834/2007, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 271/2010 of 24 March 2010, on products derived from animals which have been slaughtered in accordance with religious rites without first being stunned, where such slaughter is conducted in accordance with the requirements laid down by Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, in particular Article 4(4) thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 141 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include education on trailer 

safety in State highway safety programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BURCHETT (for himself and Mr. BISHOP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include education 

on trailer safety in State highway safety programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trailer Safety Im5 provement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRAILER SAFETY PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 402(a)(2)(A)(xiv) of title 23, United States 

8 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘, prevent improper and 

9 unsafe use of light-duty and medium-duty trailers, and 

10 educate the public about required trailer safety equipment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 141 IH

1 and preventive maintenance’’ after ‘‘unsecured vehicle 

2 loads’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m. EST, Friday, January 10, 2025.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Matters relating to the CFTC's bargaining position and related issues concerning ongoing negotiations over CFTC employee compensation and benefits. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

Dated: January 3, 2025.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2025-00221 Filed 1-3-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
# C_2018123EN.01000601.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale Calabria — Italy) — Lloyd’s of London v Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente della Calabria

(Case C-144/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Directive 2004/18/EC - Reasons for exclusion from a tendering procedure - Insurance services - Participation of several Lloyd’s of London syndicates in the same tendering procedure - Signature of tenders by the Lloyd’s of London General Representative for the country concerned - Principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination - Proportionality))

(2018/C 123/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale Calabria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lloyd’s of London

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente della Calabria

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination which derive from Articles 49 and 56 TFEU and are referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2004/18/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not allow two syndicates of Lloyd’s of London to be excluded from participation in the same procedure for the award of a public service contract for insurance merely because their respective tenders were each signed by the General Representative of Lloyd’s of London for that Member State, but instead allows their exclusion if it appears, on the basis of unambiguous evidence, that their tenders were not drawn up independently.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.

1

---
Zeev VINIK and Jany Vinik, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D18-734

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marianne ALBERGO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Robert ALBERGO, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0840

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - (-)michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2785-2788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00478]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: This action was issued on January 7, 2025. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION for relevant dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, 202-622-2420; the Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance, 202-622-2490 or https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website: https://ofac.treasury.gov.

Notice of OFAC Action

    On January 7, 2025, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 2786]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JA25.036

[[Page 2787]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JA25.037

[[Page 2788]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JA25.038

Lisa M. Palluconi,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2025-00478 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
```
Terry GOTCH v. SCOOBY'S ASAP TOWING, LLC, et al.

No. 2019-C-0030

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

Granted. See Order Attached.

Attachment

**SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA**

**NO. 2019-C-0030**

**TERRY GOTCH**

**VS.**

**SCOOBY'S ASAP TOWING, LLC, ET AL.**

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review

Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette,

No. 2014-495, Division I;

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 18-355.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 6th day of March, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand-Nineteen.

John Tarlton Olivier

Clerk of Court

*/s/*

Deputy Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 9 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 9

     To make effective appointment of Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2023

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To make effective appointment of Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

    Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack Bryan of Virginia 
to be Deputy Senate Legal Counsel, made by the President pro tempore 
this day, is effective as of January 3, 2023, and the term of service 
of the appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hundred Nineteenth 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.2


Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EXFO Inc., hereby certifies, that:





1.
The Annual Report of Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2011 of EXFO fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EXFO.








Date:  November 23, 2011











/s/Pierre Plamondon


Pierre Plamondon, CA


Vice-President Finance


and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
Emily Lauren SMITH, DOC #Y48718, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Falone Robert KALMAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1636

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2019004EN.01000701.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Tänzer & Trasper GmbH v Altenweddinger Geflügelhof Kommanditgesellschaft

(Case C-462/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 - Spirit drinks - Definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications - Category 41 of Annex II - Egg liqueur - Definition - Exhaustive nature of the permissible components)

(2019/C 4/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tänzer & Trasper GmbH

Defendant: Altenweddinger Geflügelhof Kommanditgesellschaft

Operative part of the judgment

Category 41 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to be able to bear the sales denomination ‘egg liqueur’, a spirit drink cannot contain ingredients other than those mentioned in that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, its Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”).  Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(b) or 15d - 14(b) and to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Christophe Hidalgo, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:

 (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 30, 2015

By: /s/ Christophe Hidalgo