alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1196 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-993, K2025-992.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00022 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
STATE of Louisiana v. Louis Edward BETHLEY, Jr.

NO. 2018-KO-0661

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
# C_2016279EN.01003701.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/37

---

Action brought on 7 June 2016 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT)

(Case T-293/16)

(2016/C 279/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd. (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez, I. Valdelomar, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘GOLD MONT’ – EU trade mark No 11 803 831

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 in Case R 2699/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | accept the present appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

accept the present appeal;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare the suspension of the Appeal R 2699/2014-4 until a decision on the parallel proceedings R 1857/2015-4 (which is currently appealed before the General Court) becomes definitive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the suspension of the Appeal R 2699/2014-4 until a decision on the parallel proceedings R 1857/2015-4 (which is currently appealed before the General Court) becomes definitive;

| — | condemn EUIPO (The Boards of Appeal) or subsidiary the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn EUIPO (The Boards of Appeal) or subsidiary the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees of the present proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of the principles of equality before the law and impartiality. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles of equality before the law and impartiality.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEVI WOODERTS, JR., ID # 29639-077, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-2253-D

)

DAN JOSLIN, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the court.

II

Petitioner complains in his objections that the magistrate judge did not resolve the question

whether his restitution requirement should be modified in some manner. He explains at length why,

in light of his monthly prison earnings of $16.00, the court should reduce the amount of restitution

he must pay each month, and he requests a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k). To the extent he

is asking that the court in its discretion reduce his restitution obligation, that question is not now

before the court. 

In the court’s December 23, 2004 order docketed in petitioner’s criminal case, Criminal No.

3:97-CR-054-D, the court noted that its September 23, 2004 order had denied petitioner’s earlier

motion requesting that restitution be waived, to the extent that defendant requested that the court

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02253-D Document 9 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 44
2

waive this component of his sentence. The court ordered that, to the extent petitioner sought any

other relief, it was denied without prejudice to his filing a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

In other words, the issues involved in the § 2241 petition do not relate to the discretionary question

whether the court should modify his restitution requirement under § 3644(e). The magistrate judge

was not therefore required to address whether the court, in its discretion, should grant petitioner

discretionary relief from the restitution requirement.

SIGNED June 9, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02253-D Document 9 Filed 06/09/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 45
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

Hurst, TX 76054

Phone: (817) 916-4710

IN RE: CASE NO.:23-42645-ELM-13

TAKEARA ANTRELLE BURTON

2400 STATE HIGHWAY 121 #104

EULESS, TX 76039

SSN/TIN: XXX-XX-2089

DEBTOR

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO 

CERTIFY CASE FOR DISMISSAL IN SEVEN DAYS FOR NO FIRST PLAN PAYMENT

After seven days from October 05, 2023, Trustee will certify this case for dismissal because Debtor did not timely pay the 

first Plan Payment to Trustee within thirty days of filing the Petition. To prevent dismissal, Debtor's first Plan Payment must be 

received by 4:00 PM on October 12, 2023. FAILURE TO TIMELY CURE THE DELINQUENCY SHALL RESULT IN DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE.

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright, Staff Attorney

 Bar No. 24068273

 PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

 Bar No. 01344800

 860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

 Hurst, TX 76054

 (817) 916-4710 Phone

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on or before the date of filing. Service was accomplished 

electronically on Debtor's attorney and all parties entitled to electronic notice and by first class mail on the Debtor and the 

parties listed below, if any. 

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright

TAKEARA ANTRELLE BURTON

2400 STATE HIGHWAY 121 #104

EULESS, TX 76039

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO CERTIFY CASE FOR DISMISSAL 

Page 1 of 1

Case 23-42645-elm13 Doc 22 Filed 10/05/23 Entered 10/05/23 13:06:31 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 1 of 15 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 2 of 15 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 3 of 15 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 4 of 15 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 5 of 15 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 6 of 15 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 7 of 15 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 8 of 15 PageID 8
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 9 of 15 PageID 9
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 10 of 15 PageID 10
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 11 of 15 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 12 of 15 PageID 12
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 13 of 15 PageID 13
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 14 of 15 PageID 14
Case 3:03-cv-02132-L Document 1 Filed 09/19/03 Page 15 of 15 PageID 15
John Kyle SAFRON, DOC #Y33072, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sean Patrick SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2782

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31741]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1186 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-981, K2025-980.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31741 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2016279EN.01003801.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/38

---

Action brought on 8 June 2016 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MOUNT)

(Case T-294/16)

(2016/C 279/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd. (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez, I. Valdelomar, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘GOLD MOUNT’ — EU trade mark No 7 157 233

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 in Case R 1857/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | accept the present appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

accept the present appeal;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare the registration of the EUTM No. 7.157.233 ‘GOLD MOUNT’ (figurative) valid for all the products covered; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the registration of the EUTM No. 7.157.233 ‘GOLD MOUNT’ (figurative) valid for all the products covered;

| — | condemn EUIPO (The Boards of Appeal) or subsidiary the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn EUIPO (The Boards of Appeal) or subsidiary the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees of the present proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Phillip NEWTON

No. 2017-KP-1997

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST FELICIANA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Exhibit 10.22


 


April 18, 2016


 


Menashe Shahar


 


Re:        First
Amendment to Letter Agreement between Full Spectrum Inc. (the “Company”) and Menashe Shahar (the “Executive”)
dated Sept. 24 2007 (the “Agreement”)


 


Dear Menashe,


 


Subject to and effective
upon the date (the “Effective Date”) that the Company becomes a reporting company under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, pursuant to the consummation of an underwritten initial public offering of its Common Stock (the “IPO”),
this letter agreement (this “Amendment”) hereby amends the Agreement.
This terms of this Amendment shall not take effect, and this Amendment shall be null and void, if the IPO does not occur prior
to Dec. 31, 2016.


 


Pursuant to this Amendment,
the following changes to the Agreement shall become effective on the Effective Date, as long as you remain employed by the Company
on such date and subject to any material changes in the scope of your services to the Company:


 


The term “Base Salary”
under section 2(a) of the Agreement shall refer to a base salary at the annual rate of $200,000.


 


Section 6 of the Agreement
shall be amended and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“Severance Compensation.
Notwithstanding the above, in the event that you are terminated by the Company without Cause or you terminate your employment due
to Constructive Termination, the Company will provide you the following compensation:


 


(a)          The
Company will pay you (i) your Accrued Obligations through the date of termination, and (ii) your continued Base Salary
for a period of twelve months following the date of termination.


 


(b)          For
the first six month period that you receive severance pay under this Section 6, your COBRA continuation coverage will be at the
same employee cost as such group health coverage is made available to covered active Company employees.


 


(c)          The
provision of the foregoing severance is conditioned upon receipt from you of a signed a general release and non-disparagement agreement
(the "Waiver and Release of Claims" in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A) and your continued
compliance with the terms of this Agreement.”


 




     


     


    

 


Subject to the recommendations
of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, and in accordance with any terms and conditions the said
committee deems appropriate, you shall be entitled to an annual bonus.


 


You confirm that as of
the date on which your signature is affixed to this Amendment, the Company has complied with all of its obligations under the Agreement.


 


Except for the forgoing,
you agree that all other terms of your Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


Your signature below confirms
your understanding of and agreement to all the statements contained in this Amendment.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	FULL SPECTRUM INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Stewart Kantor
	 	Stewart Kantor, CEO
	 	 
	 	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	/s/ Menashe
    Shahar
	 	Menashe Shahar, CTO
# C_2021028EN.01002602.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Portugal) lodged on 4 November 2020 — NM, NR, BA, XN, FA v Sata Air Açores — Sociedade Açoriana de Transportes Aéreos, SA

(Case C-578/20)

(2021/C 28/42)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: NM, NR, BA, XN, FA

Defendant: Sata Air Açores — Sociedade Açoriana de Transportes Aéreos, SA

Question referred

Must a strike by an airline’s aircraft maintenance staff be deemed to constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) when the airline has held meetings and negotiations in an unsuccessful attempt to avert the strike?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 — Commission Statement (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
Lee A. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2478

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018436EN.01001101.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie — Poland) — Feniks Sp. z o.o. v Azteca Products & Services SL

(Case C-337/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Special jurisdiction - Article 7(1)(a) - Concept of ‘matters relating to a contract’ - Actio pauliana))

(2018/C 436/12)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Feniks Sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Azteca Products & Services SL

Operative part of the judgment

In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, an actio pauliana, whereby the person entitled to a debt arising under a contract requests that an act by which his debtor has transferred an asset to a third party and which is allegedly detrimental to his rights be declared ineffective in relation to the creditor, is covered by the rule of international jurisdiction provided for in Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEANDRO ESCALANTE,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:03-CV-0941-G

)

) CONSOLIDATED WITH

)

) 3:03-CV-0942-G

) 3:03-CV-0944-G

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this consolidated action,

including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the court.

 

 Case 3:03-cv-00941-G Document 12 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 41
- 2 -

SO ORDERED.

April 29, 2005.

 

 Case 3:03-cv-00941-G Document 12 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 42
R.C. THOMAS a/k/a Robert Thomas, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3545

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

R.C. Thomas, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Damoorgian, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.