alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2  I, Alexey V. Kornya, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 20,   2016By:
/s/Alexey V. KornyaAlexey V. KornyaChief Financial   Officer
**Exhibit 10.1**

**HouseValues Inc.**

**2007 MANAGEMENT BONUS INCENTIVE PLAN SUMMARY**

The 2007 Management Bonus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is an annual cash bonus plan in which executive officers and certain other employees of HouseValues (the“Company”) are eligible to participate. The Plan provides cash bonuses based on the achievement of quarterly, semi-annual and/or annual key objectives related to the Company’s and individual’s performance during fiscal year 2007.

The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) administers the Plan. The target annualincentive is set as a percentage of each job level’s base salary. 

There are two components to the 2007 Plan. The first component of the Plan setsearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) targets for company performance. The second component of the Plan sets individual quarterly, semi-annual and/or annual key objectives. Funding for executive officermanagement bonuses under this Plan is largely weighted to company performance. No executive officer will receive a cash bonus under the Plan if less than 100% of the EBITDA target is met. Other job levels may be eligible to receive a cash bonus if athreshold EBITDA target is met. Participants may receive greater than 100% of their target annual incentive if EBITDA achieved is significantly greater than plan. 

The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may (a) eliminate, increase or reduce the bonus payable to any participant above or below that would otherwise be payable, including the reduction or elimination of payouts based onthe achievement of quarterly performance goals if the annual performance goals are not met, and (b) modify or terminate the Plan at any time. 

Paymentof bonuses, if any, under the Plan shall be made as soon as practicable after December 31, 2007, but shall be paid no later than March 31, 2008. Each bonus shall be paid in cash in a single lump sum, subject to applicable withholding.
# Exhibit 21 
Subsidiaries of Registrant  100 percent Owned

| | Byron Bank
2445 84th Street, S.W.Byron Center, MI 49315
| | -------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Byron Investment Services, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Bank)
2445  84th Street, S.W. Byron Center, MI 49315
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Byron Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)
5445  32nd AvenueHudsonville, MI  49426
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | OAK Title Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)
2445  84th Street, S.W.Byron Center, MI  49315
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Paul
      Morrison, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      OmniReliant Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by OmniReliant Holdings, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





October
      1, 2008




/s/
                Paul
                MorrisonPaul
                    MorrisonChief
                  Executive Officer,Chief
                  Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-B)
PLC (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

        A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 28, 2004

/s/ Kate Blankenship
-------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Principal Financial Officer

02089.0007 #495979
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 131 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 131

To make certain modifications to the repayment for the Arkansas Valley 
                   Conduit in the State of Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Ms. Boebert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make certain modifications to the repayment for the Arkansas Valley 
                   Conduit in the State of Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ARKANSAS VALLEY CONDUIT, COLORADO.

    Public Law 87-590 (76 Stat. 389) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) of the first section (76 Stat. 390; 
        123 Stat. 1320), in the second sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``, without interest,'' before 
                ``in an amount'';
                    (B) by striking ``that is comprised of revenue 
                generated by payments'' and inserting ``, which payment 
                shall only consist of funding provided during 
                construction from any person other than the 
                Secretary'';
                    (C) by inserting ``of'' before ``revenue that''; 
                and
                    (D) by inserting ``over a period of 100 years'' 
                after ``project facilities''; and
            (2) in section 2(b)(3)(A) (76 Stat. 390; 123 Stat. 1321)--
                    (A) by striking ``plus interest''; and
                    (B) by striking ``this section'' and inserting 
                ``subsection (c) of the first section''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020297EN.01003701.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/37

---

Appeal brought on 22 July 2020 by Volotea, SA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 13 May 2020 in Case T-607/17, Volotea v Commission

(Case C-331/20 P)

(2020/C 297/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Volotea, SA (represented by: M. Carpagnano, avvocato, M. Nordmann, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside points 1 and 2 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside points 1 and 2 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal;

| — | annul in part Article 1 (2), (3) (4) and the recovery of the decision by the Commission (1) of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA.33983 implemented by Italy for compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations insofar as it concerns the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in part Article 1 (2), (3) (4) and the recovery of the decision by the Commission (1) of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA.33983 implemented by Italy for compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations insofar as it concerns the appellant.

In the alternative:

| — | set aside points 1 and 2 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside points 1 and 2 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court.

Furthermore, the appellant claims that the Court should order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court erred in the application of the notion of State aid under 107(1) TFEU. More specifically, the Court misapplied the notion of economic advantage, exceeded its jurisdiction by replacing the European Commission’s reasoning, and misjudged the criteria of selectivity, State resources and distortion of competition.

The General Court erred in justification of State aid under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU and Community Guidelines on Financing of Airports and Start-Up Aid to Airlines Departing From Regional Airports.

The General Court failed to take into account the principle of legitimate expectations in its recovery order; erred in acknowledging a violation of Article 296 (2) TFEU due to lack of adequate reasoning of the European Commission and violated the appellant`s right to effective remedy.

---

(1)  Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations (SGEI) (OJ 2017, L 268, p. 1).

---
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                              
|                  |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady                                  
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                  |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
Leonard LUCKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-118

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 31 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 31

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 prohibit persons who are not citizens, nationals, or lawful permanent 
        residents of the United States from voting in elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2025

 Mr. Pfluger (for himself, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Hamadeh of Arizona, Mr. 
  Timmons, and Ms. Boebert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 prohibit persons who are not citizens, nationals, or lawful permanent 
        residents of the United States from voting in elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. A person who is not a person lawfully accorded the 
privilege of residing permanently in the United States, a person owing 
permanent allegiance to the United States, or a citizen of the United 
States may not vote in any election for Federal, State, Tribal, or 
local office, including offices in the District of Columbia or in any 
of the territories or possessions of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
bmc_ex41.htm

EXHIBIT 4.1
 
 
   	 
	1

	

	 


 
   	 
	2

	

	 


 
   	 
	3

	

	 


 
 
 
	4
Angelica JONES v. Jonathan Scott JONES

2160153

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 5, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-212830) of Smart Trust 268,
comprising Smart Trust, Argus Dividend Growers Total Return Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 5, 2016
Kenneth RUDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 1.2  APPROVEDBY GENERAL   MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSOF MOBILE   TELESYSTEMSOPEN JOINT STOCK   COMPANY23 JUNE 2016,   MINUTES NO.39  ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF MOBILE TELESYSTEMS PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY  To state point 12.2 of the Charter of Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company in the following edition:  The Companys authorized capital amounts to 199,838,157 rubles 50 kopecks (one hundred ninety nine million eight hundred thirty eight thousand one hundred fifty seven rubles fifty kopecks), divided into 1,998,381,575 (one billion nine hundred ninety eight million three hundred eighty one thousand five hundred seventy five) placed registered ordinary shares with a par value of 0.1 (one-tenth) ruble (or 10 (ten) kopecks) each. The Companys authorized capital has been fully paid.   Mobile   TeleSystemsPublic Joint   Stock CompanyPresident
A. Dubovskov
EXHIBIT 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report
The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust V, Series 2000-2 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 2000 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 2000, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust V, Series 2000-2 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Financial Services, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 2000, as supplemented.

 

		

_/s/ Steve Smith______________

Steve Smith 

Servicing Officer 

HSBC Finance Corporation 

 

March 1, 2005                                 	  	

Date	  

 

 

   /s/ Joan Coppenrath  ______   	 	  	          /s/ Craig Peters _____________ 	

Joan Coppenrath				       Craig Peters

Controller					       Group Director- Asset Management-

HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto Finance	       HSBC Finance Corporation - Auto Finance	

 

March 1, 2005                                 		       March 1, 2005                               	

Date						       Date
Kevin Jerome PARKER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2893

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NOS. 2-04-136-CR

						2-04-137-CR

BRANDY CHERRIEE SPOON                					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal And Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 					 												

										PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 30, 2004