alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 2ndQuarter 2008 ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson         
|Paul G. Anderson             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|                             
|April 14, 2008               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Daryl Wade MAYATTE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great American Family Parks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard W. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Entertainment Is Us, Inc. and will be retained by Entertainment Is Us, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



May 22, 2006



/s/ Richard W. Jackson



Richard W. Jackson

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017022EN.01005702.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/57

---

Action brought on 2 December 2016 — Cyprus v EUIPO — POCF (COWBOYS HALLOUMI)

(Case T-847/16)

(2017/C 022/77)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pancyprian Organisation of Cattle Farmers (POCF) (Latsia, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colours containing the word elements ‘COWBOYS HALLOUMI’ — Application for registration No 11 281 375

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 2781/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
James Lee KEENE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4996

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Alphonso PASSMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-82

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

Alphonso Passmore, Malone, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*732AFFIRMED. *See**Fitzpatrick v. State*, 868 So.2d 615, 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that for PRR purposes, "it is the fact of the defendant's *release* from custody, not his status of being *in custody*, that is relevant").

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
# C_2021490EN.01004301.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/43

---

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2021 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-633/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public health - Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 - Conduct of clinical trials with medicinal products for human use containing GMOs - Treatment or prevention of the coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) - Concept of legislative act - Concept of regulatory act - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Coordination nationale médicale santé — environnement (CNMSE) (Paris, France) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: G. Tumerelle, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne and W. Kuzmienko, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jaume and M. Moore, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 on the conduct of clinical trials with and supply of medicinal products for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms intended to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (OJ 2020 L 231, p. 12).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission and the non-profit-making association ‘Groupe de Réflexion et d’Action Pour une Politique Ecologique’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission and the non-profit-making association ‘Groupe de Réflexion et d’Action Pour une Politique Ecologique’.

| 3. | The Coordination nationale médicale santé — environnement (CNMSE) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Coordination nationale médicale santé — environnement (CNMSE) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

| 4. | The Commission and the non-profit-making association ‘Groupe de Réflexion et d’Action Pour une Politique Ecologique’ shall bear the costs relating to their respective applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Commission and the non-profit-making association ‘Groupe de Réflexion et d’Action Pour une Politique Ecologique’ shall bear the costs relating to their respective applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
# C_2019139EN.01005301.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/53

---

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 –Miserini Johansson v EIB

(Case T-870/16) (1)

(Civil service - Staff of the EIB - Prolonged or repeated absence on account of a non-occupational accident or disease - Remuneration reduced after 12 months of absence - Article 33 of the EIB Staff Regulations - Procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of the disease)

(2019/C 139/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Virna Miserini Johansson (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Senes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and seeking, primarily, annulment of a decision of the EIB dated 25 January 2016 and compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm associated with that decision and, in the alternative, solely compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm claimed in the main action and reimbursement of the costs incurred in connection with the health problems developed as a result of the severe stress suffered by the applicant and which are allegedly not reimbursed by the EIB’s health insurance scheme.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Virna Miserini Johansson shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Virna Miserini Johansson shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 341 

Recognizing September 19, 2023, as ‘‘National Voter Registration Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing September 19, 2023, as ‘‘National Voter 

Registration Day’’. 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes September 19, 2023, as ‘‘Na3 tional Voter Registration Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the 

5 United States— 

6 (A) to register to vote; 

7 (B) to verify with the appropriate State or 

8 local election official that the name, address, 

9 and other personal information on record is 

10 current; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 341 ATS 

1 (C) to go to the polls on election day and 

2 vote if the voting-eligible citizen would like to 

3 do so. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Vectrus Systems Corporation ) ASBCA Nos. 63472

- ADR, 63523

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. FA3002

- 17

- C

- 0001 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Joseph G. Martinez, Esq.

Mikaela R. Colvin, Esq.

Natalie M. Seelig, Esq.

Dentons US LLP

Denver, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Caryl A. Potter III, Esq.

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Christian Robertson II, Esq.

Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ARNETT

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board ’ s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) , and the

parties ’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $162,000

. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further interest shall be

paid.

Dated: February 21, 2024

(Signatures continued) L AURA J. ARNETT

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63472

- ADR, 63523

- ADR

, Appeals of Vectrus Systems Corporation , rendered in conformance with the Board ’ s

Charter.

Dated: Febr uary 22, 202 4

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Avaya Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Garry K. McGuire,Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ GARRY K. MCGUIRE                                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Garry K. McGuire                                                            |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice  President, Corporate Development* |
| December 8, 2006                                                       |   |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31712]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1149 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-934, K2025-935.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31712 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financial
officer and principal accounting officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|3. | This 10-Q report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                       
|4. | The information contained in this 10-Q report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of AlphaRx, Inc.

/s/ Michael
LeeMichael Lee  Interim Chief Financial Officer August 19,
2010

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-15311

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-01406-RWS

DEANGELO COOK, 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, MACON SP, 

 Respondent - Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(April 28, 2017)

Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-15311 Date Filed: 04/28/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

In 2009, De Angelo Cook, a Georgia prisoner, filed a federal habeas corpus 

petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That petition was dismissed with prejudice 

as untimely, and Mr. Cook did not appeal.

In 2016, Mr. Cook filed a second habeas corpus petition. The district court 

dismissed this petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Mr. Cook had 

not obtained circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition. Mr. Cook 

now appeals. 

We affirm. Because Mr. Cook did not obtain circuit authorization to file a 

second or successive habeas petition, the district court did not have jurisdiction. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), (b) (4); Tompkins v. Secretary, 557 F.3d 1257, 

1259 (11th Cir. 2009) .

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-15311 Date Filed: 04/28/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 17, 2010

p0915 

# Order

September 17, 2010

140384(34)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140384 COA: 287034 Ingham CC: 08-000412-AR SIRDAREAN ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2010 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated June 25, 2010. On reconsideration, the application for leav e to appeal the November 19, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals fo r a new appeal. The defendant requested the appointment of appellate counsel in the district c ourt while the prosecutor’s interlocutory appeal was pending in the Cour t of Appeals, but counsel was not appointed

until after the Court of A ppeals issued its judgment on November 19, 2009. Consequently, the defendant was not repres ented by counsel during the prosecutor’s interlocutory appeal. On remand, the defendant is entitled to appointed appellate counsel.

Davis, J., not participating. I recuse my self and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Randall Lamar THOMAS v. STATE

CR-16-0305

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 4.36**

 

*FederalSupervisory Service for Communications*

 

**AddendumNo. 2**

 

**toLicense No. 30260 (Account Series A 030162)**

**datedDecember 30, 2003**

 

The line “Start of services’ rendering (not later than)” of theLicensee title-page shall be revised to read as follows:

 

“December 30, 2005”

 

 
| **Deputy Manager,**                                 |       |               |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|
| **Federal Supervisory Service  for Communications** | ** ** | **S. A. Malyanov** |
|                                                |       |               |
|                                                |       |               |
|                                                |       | April 26, 2005     |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Keith Conrad, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

|                     |     |                                                                   
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
March 30, 2007 | By: | /s/ Keith ConradKeith Conrad
President and Chief Executive Officer