alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1176-1177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Research Education Program 
(R25 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: January 24, 2025.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 1177]]

    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21A, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Shiv A. Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21A, 
Rockville, MD 20892, [email protected], (240) 627-3219.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 2, 2025.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00104 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 2nd Quarter 2005 ending February 28, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert V. JohnsonRobert V. JohnsonChief Financial OfficerApril 14, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-15 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Feldman Mall Properties, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    By:
    /s/ Thomas WirthName:
    Thomas WirthTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
EX PARTE Alfred P. MONTGOMERY

CR-16-1035

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 94 Filed 05/17/10 Page 1 of 1 PageID 212
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 PIEDMONT
NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 As Amended and Restated Effective November 1, 2015 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, entered into as of the last date signed below, modifies the Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. Incentive Compensation
Plan as amended and restated effective November 1, 2015 (the “Plan”). 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.11 of the Plan,
the Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (“Piedmont”) may amend the Plan at any time, provided that an amendment is made with shareholder approval if
and to the extent such approval is required by applicable law; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
October 24, 2015, among Piedmont, Duke Energy Corporation (“Duke Energy”) and Forest Subsidiary, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy (“Merger Sub”), on October 3, 2016 (the “Effective Time”)
Piedmont merged into Merger Sub resulting in Piedmont becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy (the “Merger”); and 

WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger, on September 6, 2016 the Compensation Committee adopted resolutions amending the Plan, effective
as of the Effective Time, to provide that no new awards may be granted or awarded under the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Piedmont hereby amends
the Plan as follows: 
 New Section 12.23 shall be added immediately following Section 12.22 of the Plan: 

12.23 No New Awards. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Plan, effective as of the Effective Time (as such term is
defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 24, 2015, by and between the Company, Duke Energy Corporation and Forest Subsidiary, Inc.), no new Awards shall be granted or awarded to any Participants in the Plan. 

All other terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue to remain in full force and effect. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this
First Amendment and the terms of the Plan, the terms of this First Amendment shall control. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly
authorized officer to execute this First Amendment as of the 3rd day of October, 2016. 
  

			
	PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Karl W. Newlin
		 	Karl W. Newlin
		 	Senior Vice President & Chief Commercial Officer, Natural Gas Business
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 290 

To reauthorize the Distance Learning and Telemedicine Program of the 

Department of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself and Ms. PINGREE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Distance Learning and Telemedicine 

Program of the Department of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Telehealth and 

5 Education Enhancement Act of 2025’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 290 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE DISTANCE LEARNING 

2 AND TELEMEDICINE PROGRAM. 

3 Section 2335A of the Food, Agriculture, Conserva4 tion, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 950aaa–5) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
John Robert CLIFTON, DOC #761493, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1457

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great American Family Parks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Eastland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.   Date: May 15, 2008By:/s/ Larry EastlandLarry Eastland
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 12.2
 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EXFO Inc., hereby certifies, that:
 
 1.
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2012 of EXFO fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EXFO.
 
 
 Date:           December 10, 2012
 
 
 
 /s/Germain Lamonde
 Germain Lamonde
 Chairman of the Board,
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
# C_2022294EN.01002502.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — EMCS v EUAA

(Case T-621/20) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Equal treatment - Principle of transparency - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 294/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: EMCS ltd. (Msida, Malta) (represented by: P. Kuypers and N. Groot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) (represented by: P. Eyckmans and J. van Heel, acting as Agents, and by V. Ost and M. Umbach, lawyers)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of the decision of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) of 23 July 2020, entitled ‘Call for tenders EASO/2020/789 Provision of Temporary Agency Workers for EASO in Malta’, rejecting the bid submitted by the applicant in the call for tenders and awarding the contract to another tenderer and, second, under Article 268 TFEU, for compensation of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EMCS ltd. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EMCS ltd. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.

---
# C_2016270EN.01006101.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/61

---

Action brought on 23 May 2016 — Gulli v EUIPO — Laverana (Lybera)

(Case T-284/16)

(2016/C 270/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Diego Gulli (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: M. Andreolini and F. Andreolini, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laverana GmbH & Co.KG (Wennigsen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Lybera’ — Application for registration No 12 155 743

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fith Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2016 in Case R 3219/2014-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2021009EN.01002202.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/22

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2020 — KN v EESC

(Case T-377/20 R II)

(Application for interim measures - Civil Service - Member of the EESC - Harassment - OLAF investigation - EESC Bureau decision - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - New application - New facts - Lack of urgency)

(2021/C 9/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, I. Pouli and A. Carvajal García-Valdecasas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of the decision of the EESC of 9 June 2020 by which the applicant was, inter alia, discharged from all supervisory and personnel management activities.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

TAMBURELLO MARQUIS GRAHAM

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 870

[ July 12, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Charles E. Burton

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2009

- CF

- 014160

- AXXX

- MB

.

Tamburello Marquis Graham, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ERBER , C.J., C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2018328EN.01000902.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v DPAS Limited

(Case C-5/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemption - Article 135(1)(d) - Transactions concerning payments and transfers - Concept - Scope - Dental payment plan by direct debit))

(2018/C 328/10)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant: DPAS Limited

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(d) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from value added tax which is provided for therein for transactions concerning payments and transfers does not apply to a supply of services, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which consists for the taxable person in requesting from the relevant financial institutions, first, that a sum of money be transferred from a patient’s bank account to that of the taxable person pursuant to a direct debit mandate and, second, that that sum, after deduction of the remuneration due to that taxable person, be transferred from the latter’s bank account to the respective bank accounts of that patient’s dentist and insurer.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

---
Case 3:04-cv-02561-K Document 17 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
report dated February 12, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Utix Group, Inc. (formerly known as Corporate Sports Incentives,
Inc.) in this Form 10SB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. It should be noted that we
have not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to September
30, 2003 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



/s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, P.C.

VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, P.C.

June 15, 2004
Boston, Massachusetts
Exhibit 10.2


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO


ENER-CORE,
INC. 


2015
OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


 


In
accordance with those certain resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors and stockholders of Ener-Core, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of the Company is hereby amended
as follows:


 


1.           Section
4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the
Plan as follows:


 


“4.1.     Authorized
Number of Shares.


 


Subject
to adjustment under Section 15, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be initially issued pursuant to
the Plan is 600,000. In addition, Shares underlying any outstanding award granted under the Prior Plan that, following the Effective
Date, expires, or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited for any reason without issuance of Shares shall be available for the
grant of new Awards. As provided in Section 1, no new awards shall be granted under the Prior Plan following the Effective
Date. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued Shares, treasury Shares or Shares
purchased on the open market or otherwise, all as determined by the Board from time to time.”


 


2.          Unless
otherwise expressly provided for in this First Amendment to the Plan (the “First Amendment”), all capitalized
words, phrases, or defined terms used in this First Amendment will have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.


 


3.          Except
as expressly set forth in this First Amendment, there have been no other changes or modifications to the Plan, and the Plan remains
otherwise unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


4.         This
First Amendment shall be effective as of September 26, 2016.


 


I
hereby certify that the Plan was duly amended and such First Amendment has been duly approved by the Board of Directors of the
Company as of August 22, 2016 and such First Amendment has been duly approved by the stockholders of the Company as of September
26, 2016.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 






     

     


    







 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this First Amendment to be executed effective as of the date set forth above.


 


	 	ENER-CORE, INC.,



	 	A Delaware corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:
	 
	 	 	Domonic
J. Carney, Chief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ANTHONY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D17-969

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 12, 2017

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Anthony Williams, Crestview, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the December 6, 2016 

order denying Petitioner’s pro se amended motion for postconviction relief and the 

January 5, 2017 order denying Petitioner’s motion for rehearing, filed in Case No. 2005-

CF-31276-B, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.