SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Thomas R. Califano (24122825)

Rakhee V. Patel (00797213)

Jeri Leigh Miller (24102176)

Parker G. Embry (24126826)

2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 981-3300

Facsimile: (214) 981-3400

Email: tom.califano@sidley.com

rpatel@sidley.com

jeri.miller@sidley.com

parker.embry@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Andres Barajas (admitted pro hac vice)

Weiru Fang (admitted pro hac vice)

787 Seventh Avenue

New York, New York 10019

Telephone: (212) 839-5300

Facsimile: (212) 839-5599

Email: andres.barajas@sidley.com

weiru.fang@sidley.com

Attorneys for the Debtors

and Debtors in Possession

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

In re:

EBIX, INC., et al.1

 Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 23-80004 (SWE)

(Jointly Administered)

1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification 

number, as applicable, are: Ebix, Inc. (1975), Vertex, Incorporated (6295), P.B. Systems, Inc. (9074), Ebix 

Consulting, Inc. (6666), Ebix US, LLC (N/A), Facts Services, Inc. (1348), Doctors Exchange, Inc. (N/A), Ebix 

International LLC (N/A), Agency Solutions.com, LLC d/b/a Health Connect LLC (N/A), ConfirmNet 

Corporation (2737), A.D.A.M., Inc. (8070), and Ebix Latin America, LLC (N/A). The Debtors’ mailing address 

is 1 Ebix Way, Johns Creek, Georgia 30097.

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 1 of 18
2

DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER

(I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO USE NA L&A NET SALE PROCEEDS 

TO PAY PREPETITION SECURED CLAIMS, (II) MODIFYING THE AUTOMATIC 

STAY IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND (III) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

If you object to the relief requested, you must respond in writing. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, 

you must file your response electronically at https://ecf.txnb.uscourts.gov no more than twenty-four (24) days 

after the date this motion was filed. If you do not have electronic filing privileges, you must file a written 

objection that is actually received by the clerk and filed on the docket no more than twenty-four (24) days 

after the date this motion was filed. Otherwise, the Court may treat the pleading as unopposed and grant the 

relief requested. 

A hearing will be conducted on the matters set forth in this motion on April 22, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. (prevailing 

Central Time) in Courtroom #3, 14th Floor, Earle Cabell Federal Building, 1100 Commerce Street, Suite 

1254, Dallas, Texas 75242. 

Parties who will be offering evidence or participating in examination need to make in person appearances in 

the courtroom. All other interested parties may make their appearance via Cisco Webex. Audio 

communication will be by use of the Court’s dial-in facility. You may access the facility at 1.650.479.3207. 

The meeting code is 476 420 189. Video communication will be by the use of the Cisco WebEx platform. 

Connect via the Cisco WebEx application or click the link on Judge Everett’s home page. Click the settings 

icon in the upper right corner and enter your name under the personal information setting. WebEx hearing

instructions may be obtained from Judge Everett’s hearing/calendar site: 

https://www.txnb.uscourts.gov/judges-info/hearing-dates/judge-everetts-hearing-dates . 

Hearing appearances must be made electronically in advance of electronic hearings. To make your 

appearance, click the “Electronic Appearance” link on Judge Everett’s home page. Select the case name, 

complete the required fields and click “Submit” to complete your appearance.

Ebix, Inc. and its debtor affiliates as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, 

the “Debtors”) in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases submit this motion (this “Motion”) for an 

entry of an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, (the “Proposed Order”) 

authorizing (i) the Debtors to use the NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds to pay the Prepetition Lenders 

(each as defined below), (ii) modifying the automatic stay in connection therewith, and 

(iii) granting related relief. In support of this Motion, the Debtors submit the Declaration of 

Peter D. Fitzsimmons in Support of the Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing 

the Debtors to Use NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds to Pay Prepetition Secured Claims, 

(II) Modifying the Automatic Stay in Connection Therewith, and (III) Granting Related Relief, 

attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Fitzsimmons Declaration”). In further support of this Motion, 

the Debtors respectfully state as follows:

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 2 of 18
3

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. Immediately prior to the filing of these chapter 11 cases, the Debtors entered into 

a restructuring support agreement (the “RSA”) with their Prepetition Lenders, which is intended 

to form the basis for a consensual plan process. The Debtors expect the sale of the North 

American Life and Annuity assets (the “NA L&A Assets,” and such sale, the “NA L&A 

Sale”)—which was approved by this Court on February 16, 2024—to close on or about 

April 1, 2024. By this Motion, the Debtors agree to pay the net proceeds of the NA L&A Sale 

(the “NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds”) (less the amount of debtor in possession financing 

outstanding and the cash collateral reserve described herein) to the Prepetition Lenders on 

account of their secured claim in the assets sold. The Debtors believe the relief requested is 

warranted for the following reasons:

• the Creditors’ Committee (as defined below) has conducted its investigation of 

the Prepetition Lenders’ claims, the challenge period has run, and no challenge 

has been brought;

• the payment will be sufficient to pay off the outstanding DIP obligations 

(inclusive of the $70 million roll up) and will stop the accrual of interest thereon;

• the payment will allow for a significant paydown of the Prepetition Lenders’ 

secured prepetition claims, thus reducing the accrual of interest thereon; and

• the Debtors have negotiated a $25,000,000 cash collateral carve-out from the NA 

L&A Net Sale Proceeds to fund ongoing administrative expenses, should the 

remaining DIP availability prove insufficient.

2. On March 29, 2024, the Debtors and the Prepetition Agent agreed to the terms of 

the first amendment to the RSA (the “Amended RSA”), which, importantly, provides the 

Debtors, among other concessions, with (i) the ability to pursue multiple paths with the blessing 

of their Prepetition Lenders, including the ability to pursue a reorganization transaction that 

could include a debt or equity financing transaction, (ii) continued forbearance by the Prepetition 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 3 of 18
4

Lenders against certain of the Debtors’ non-Debtor foreign subsidiaries which are guarantors on 

the Prepetition Credit Agreement (as defined below) and whose equity were pledged to the 

Prepetition Lenders, and (iii) agreement by the Prepetition Lenders to consensually set aside 

$25 million from the NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds which may be subject to use as cash collateral

in these chapter 11 cases, subject to and in accordance with the Final DIP Order (as defined 

below) and/or Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, as applicable, on such terms and conditions 

to be agreed upon by the Debtors and the Prepetition Agent. In exchange for these and other 

significant concessions, the Debtors have agreed to seek approval for a partial paydown of the 

existing Prepetition Secured Claims from the NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds.

3. Given that partial paydown of the Prepetition Secured Claims is a matter of 

timing rather than right, and the benefits to the Debtors’ estates, the Debtors believe that the 

relief requested is in the best interest of stakeholders and should be approved.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

4. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the 

“Court”) has jurisdiction to consider the Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the 

Order of Reference of Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings Nunc Pro Tunc dated August 3, 1984, 

entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This is a core 

proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b). Venue of these cases and the Motion in this District is 

proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. 

5. The legal predicates for the relief requested herein are sections 105(a), 362, and 

363 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101–1532 (the “Bankruptcy Code”), and 

rules 6006 and 9014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”). 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 4 of 18
5

6. The Debtors confirm their consent to the entry of a final order by the Court in 

connection with the Motion in the event that it is later determined that the Court, absent consent 

of the parties, cannot enter final orders or judgments in connection herewith consistent with 

Article III of the United States Constitution.

BACKGROUND

I. General Background

7. Ebix, Inc., along with its affiliated debtors and debtors-in-possession, is a leading 

international provider of a variety of technology services, focusing on the insurance, financial 

services, travel, and healthcare industries. The Debtors’ main focus is to design and deploy a 

wide variety of insurance and reinsurance exchanges on an on-demand basis using software-as-aservice enterprise solutions in areas of customer relationship management, front-end and backend systems, and outsourced administrative and risk compliance. 

8. On December 17, 2023 (the “Petition Date”), each of the Debtors filed a 

voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in this Court. These 

chapter 11 cases have been consolidated for procedural purposes only and are being administered 

jointly. The Debtors are authorized to operate their businesses and manage their properties as 

debtors-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee 

or examiner has been appointed in these chapter 11 cases. On January 3, 2024, the Office of the 

United States Trustee established the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Creditors’ 

Committee”).

9. Additional information regarding the Debtors’ business, capital structure and the 

circumstances preceding the Petition Date may be found in the Declaration of Amit K. Garg, 

Chief Financial Officer of Ebix, Inc., in Support of the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Petitions and First 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 5 of 18
6

Day Motions [Docket No. 16] (the “First Day Declaration”), and incorporated herein by 

reference.

II. The RSA 

10. On the Petition Date, the Debtors and certain non-Debtor affiliates entered into 

the RSA with the Prepetition Lenders under the Prepetition Credit Agreement (collectively, the 

“Prepetition Lenders”) and the Prepetition Agent. Pursuant to the RSA, the Debtors agreed to

undertake certain “Restructuring Transactions,” which the RSA defines as: 

(a) a jointly administered plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) and (b) a sale or 

sales of the Debtors’ North American Life and Annuity assets (the “NA L&A 

Assets”) or, to the extent the proceeds of the sale of the NA L&A Assets are not 

sufficient to pay the Prepetition Lenders in full, the sale of such of the Debtors’ 

other assets as is necessary to fund the Restructuring Transactions contemplated 

herein and to pay all Prepetition Secured Claims2 in full (the “Sale 

Transaction(s)”) pursuant to a sale process or processes to be approved in the 

Chapter 11 Cases to be filed by the Debtors.”

See RSA, Recitals. 

11. Beginning in February 2024, the Debtors and the Prepetition Agent began 

discussing a path forward for the balance of the case. On March 29, 2024, the Debtors entered 

into the Amended RSA, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 to the Fitzsimmons Declaration.

12. The Prepetition Lenders have bargained for an interim distribution through a 

partial paydown of their Prepetition Secured Claims. The Debtors have agreed to the terms of 

the Amended RSA, including for the partial paydown of the Prepetition Secured Claims from the 

NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds, in light of the benefits derived therefrom.

2 As defined in the RSA, “Prepetition Secured Claims” means any claim arising under the Prepetition Credit

Agreement and all related security agreements, collateral agreements, pledge agreements, control agreements, 

guarantees and other documents (including, without limitation, any notes, guarantees, collateral documents, 

amendments, and fee letters entered into in connection therewith) (including the loans outstanding under the 

Prepetition Credit Agreement), which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall include any accrued and unpaid interest 

and fees, whether accrued prepetition or postpetition. 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 6 of 18
7

III. The NA L&A Sale

13. On December 18, 2023, the Debtors filed a bidding procedures motion 

[Docket No. 43] (the “L&A Bid Procedures Motion”) approving, among other things, the 

Debtors’ bid procedures and entry into the asset purchase agreement with Zinnia Distributor 

Solutions LLC (the “Stalking Horse Purchaser,” and such asset purchase agreement, the 

“Stalking Horse APA”). On January 18, 2024, the Court approved the L&A Bid Procedures 

Motion. See Docket No. 199.

14. On February 10, 2024, the Debtors filed a notice cancelling the auction for the 

Debtors’ NA L&A Assets and designating the Stalking Horse Purchaser as the successful bidder 

of the NA L&A Assets. See Docket No. 309.

15. On February 16, 2024, the Court entered an order approving the NA L&A Sale 

(the “Sale Order”) to the Stalking Horse Purchaser for a purchase price of approximately 

$386.5 million, subject to the terms and conditions in the Stalking Horse APA.3 The Sale Order 

provides: 

Upon the receipt of the proceeds of the Sale Transaction by the Debtors, but after 

such proceeds have been applied in accordance with the DIP Documents (as 

defined in the Final Order (I) Authorizing (A) Postpetition Financing, and 

(B) The Use of Cash Collateral; (II) Granting Liens and Providing Superpriority 

Administrative Expense Claims; (III) Granting Adequate Protection to Prepetition 

Lenders; (IV) Modifying the Automatic Stay; (V) Scheduling a Final Hearing; and 

(VI) Granting Related Relief [Docket No. 255] (“Final DIP Order”)) the Debtors 

shall immediately deposit the proceeds in a segregated account with, or subject to 

a control agreement in favor of, the Prepetition Agent (as defined in the Final DIP 

Order), or in such other account as the Prepetition Agent may agree. The net cash 

proceeds received by the Debtors on account of the NA L&A Assets constitute 

Prepetition Collateral (as defined in the Final DIP Order) subject in all respects to 

the terms of, the Final DIP Order and the DIP Documents (as defined in the Final 

DIP Order). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Order, all parties’ 

rights as to allocation of (i) the proceeds of the Sale Transaction and (ii) any 

amounts payable from the proceeds of the Sale Transaction and timing thereof are 

3 The Purchase Price is subject to further adjustments until the closing of the NA L&A Sale pursuant to terms of 

the Stalking Horse APA. 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 7 of 18
8

fully reserved in accordance with the APA, the DIP Documents (as defined in the 

Final DIP Order) and the Prepetition Credit Documents (as defined in the Final 

DIP Order).

See Sale Order, ¶ 10. 

16. The Debtors anticipate that the NA L&A Sale will close on or around April 1, 

2024.

IV. The Prepetition Credit Facility

17. The Debtors are party to that certain Prepetition Credit Agreement, dated as of 

August 5, 2014 (the “Prepetition Credit Agreement,” and such facility, the “Prepetition Credit 

Facility”) by and among (a) Ebix, Inc., as borrower, (b) Regions Bank, as administrative agent 

and collateral agent (the “Prepetition Agent”), (c) the other Debtors and certain non-Debtor 

affiliates, and (d) the lenders party thereto from time to time (the “Prepetition Lenders”), as 

amended, modified, and restated from time to time.

4

 As set forth in the First Day Declaration, 

as of the Petition Date, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Prepetition Credit 

Facility was approximately $617 million, which amount consisted of: (a) approximately 

$172 million of the outstanding principal amount of Term Loans (as defined in the Prepetition 

Credit Agreement); and (b) approximately $445 million of the outstanding principal amount of 

Revolving Loans (as defined in the Prepetition Credit Agreement). In addition, as of the Petition 

Date, interest and amendment fees had accrued in the aggregate amount of approximately 

$36 million. 

18. Under the Prepetition Credit Agreement, interest on the unpaid principal amounts 

of the Term Loans and Revolving Loans accrue at Base Rate or Term SOFR plus the Applicable 

4 As more fully described in the First Day Declaration, the Prepetition Credit Agreement has been amended 

multiple times since its inception.

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 8 of 18
9

Margin (each as defined in the Prepetition Credit Agreement).

5 Default interest accrues under 

the Prepetition Credit Agreement at an interest rate equal to (i) the Base Rate plus (ii) the 

Applicable Margin applicable to Base Rate Loans (as defined in the Prepetition Credit 

Agreement) plus (iii) 2% per annum.

6

19. Obligations under the Prepetition Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien 

on substantially all of the Debtors’ assets, subject to customary exceptions and exclusions set 

forth in the applicable credit documents, and are guaranteed by non-Debtor affiliates Ebix 

International Holdings Limited (Ebix, Inc.’s direct subsidiary) and Ebix Singapore Pte Ltd (Ebix 

International Holdings Limited’s direct subsidiary).

V. DIP Facility

20. Importantly, pursuant to the Final DIP Order, the Debtors have admitted, 

stipulated, and agreed to, among other things, the validity and amount of the Prepetition Secured 

Claims, as well as the validity, perfection, and priority of the Prepetition Lenders’ liens on 

substantially all of the Debtors' property. Final DIP Order ¶ E. The challenge period under the 

Final DIP Order expired on March 18, 2024, without any challenge being filed. See Final DIP 

Order ¶ 61. Accordingly, such stipulations, admissions, agreements, and releases contained in the 

Final DIP Order are now binding upon all parties in interest.

21. The Debtors entered into that certain Senior Secured Superpriority Debtor-inPossession Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated December 19, 2023 (the “DIP Credit 

Agreement,” and such facility, the “DIP Facility”), as amended on March 29, 2024 and as further

amended, modified, or restated from time to time, with the lenders party thereto (the “DIP 

5 The summary of the Prepetition Credit Agreement herein is qualified by the terms of the Prepetition Credit 

Agreement.

6 In connection with the forbearance agreement entered into on September 29, 2023, the Debtors agreed that pastdue obligations would accrue at the default rate provided for in the Prepetition Credit Agreement. 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 9 of 18
10

Lenders”) and Regions Bank, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “DIP Agent”). On 

January 26, 2024, the Court approved entry into the DIP Credit Agreement on a final basis, 

including the roll-up of $70 million of prepetition indebtedness into DIP obligations. As of the 

date hereof, the Debtors have borrowed, in addition to the roll-up, approximately $23 million in 

New Money DIP Loans (as defined in the Final DIP Order) under the DIP Facility. 

22. The DIP Credit Agreement contains a mandatory prepayment provision whereby 

the Debtors are obligated to prepay the obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement from the Net 

Cash Proceeds of any Sale Transaction on the Business Day following receipt thereof (each as 

defined in the DIP Credit Agreement). See DIP Credit Agreement, ¶ 2.11(c)(viii), 2.12. At the 

time of filing this Motion, the Debtors anticipate making such prepayment in accordance with 

the DIP Credit Agreement and the Final DIP Order.

BASIS FOR RELIEF

I. Partial Payment of the Prepetition Secured Claim Is Justified and Should Be 

Approved.

23. The Court may authorize the Debtors to partially pay the Prepetition Secured 

Claims from the NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(b) of the 

Bankruptcy Code. Section 105(a) provides a bankruptcy court with broad powers in the 

administration of a case under the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (“The court may issue 

any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this 

title.”). Provided that a bankruptcy court does not employ its equitable powers to achieve a 

result not contemplated by the Bankruptcy Code, the exercise of its section 105(a) power is 

proper for the purpose of preserving and protecting the debtor’s estate. See Chiasson v. J. Louis 

Matherne & Assocs. (In re Oxford Mgmt., Inc.), 4 F.3d 1329, 1334 (5th Cir. 1993) (“The powers 

granted by that statute must be exercised in a manner that is consistent with the Bankruptcy 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 10 of 18
11

Code.”); FiberTower Network Servs. Corp. v. FCC (In re FiberTower Network Servs. Corp.), 

482 B.R. 169, 182 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2012) (quoting Bear v. Coben (In re Golden Plan of Cal., 

Inc.), 829 F. 2d 705, 713 (9th Cir. 1986)). 

24. Section 363(b) provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he [debtor], after notice and a 

hearing, may use, sell, or lease, other than in the ordinary course of business, property of the 

estate.” 11 U.S.C. § 363(b)(1). The Fifth Circuit has held that section 363(b) requires a debtor 

to articulate a “business justification for using, selling, or leasing the property outside of the 

ordinary course of business.” In re Continental Air Lines, Inc., 780 F.2d 1223, 1226 (5th Cir.

1986) (citing In re Lionel Corp., 722 F.2d 1063, 1071 (2d Cir. 1983)); see also In re ASARCO, 

L.L.C., 650 F.3d 593, 601 (5th Cir. 2011) (“The business judgment standard in section 363 is 

flexible and encourages discretion.”); In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp., 242 B.R. 147, 153 

(D. Del. 1999) (use of assets outside the ordinary course of business permitted if “sound business 

purpose justifies such actions”); Comm. of Asbestos-Related Litigants v. Johns-Manville Corp. 

(In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 60 B.R. 612, 616 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986) (“Where the debtor 

articulates a reasonable basis for its business decisions (as distinct from a decision made 

arbitrarily or capriciously), courts will generally not entertain objections to the debtor’s 

conduct.”). 

25. Further, courts routinely authorize debtors to pay prepetition secured claims 

outside of a plan of reorganization under section 363(b). See In re Capmark Fin. Grp. Inc., 438 

B.R. 471, 511-12 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010) (listing examples of different contexts where secured 

claims are often paid prior to a plan and noting that “secured creditors are often paid in 

connection with a sale of all or substantially all of a debtor’s assets under section 363 of the 

Bankruptcy Code”); In re Energy Future Holding Corp., 527 B.R. 157, 169 (D. Del. 2015), aff’d 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 11 of 18
12

sub nom. In re Energy Future Holdings Corp., 648 F. App’x 277 (3d Cir. 2016) (approving 

settlement that involved debtors’ payment of prepetition secured claims before confirmation of 

chapter 11 plan); see also In re Claar Cellars LLC, No. 20-00044-WLH11, 2020 WL 1238924, 

at *7 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Mar. 13, 2020) (approving use of cash collateral to pay prepetition 

secured claim prior to a chapter 11 plan confirmation). Bankruptcy Courts have approved 

similar relief in other cases. See, e.g., In re Waypoint Leasing Holdings Ltd., Case No. 18-13648 

(SMB) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2019) [Docket No. 444] (“Upon Closing and, with respect to 

the Supporting WAC Lenders, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan & Asset Sale 

Support Agreement, the Debtors shall make a partial distribution to the Affected Participating 

Lenders, in full and final satisfaction and release of that portion of such Affected Participating 

Lenders’ claims in an amount equal to such Affected Participating Lenders’ allocable share of 

net proceeds”); In re Katy Indus., 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 3942, *37 (Bankr. D. Del. June 19, 2017) 

(“[t]he proceeds of the Sale shall be paid on the Closing Date over to the Debtors and applied in 

accordance with the Final Cash Collateral Order and Final DIP Order and, then, otherwise 

distributed in accordance with the priorities set forth in the Bankruptcy Code. On and after the 

Closing Date, payments applied to the ‘Prepetition Debt’ (as defined in the Final Cash Collateral 

Order) shall be final”); In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc., 569 B.R. 693, 697 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 

June 2, 2017) (“[secured lender] will be paid the net Sale Proceeds at Closing on account of the 

Postpetition Loans and Prepetition Debt”). 

26. Here, the partial payment of the Prepetition Secured Claims is a sound exercise of 

the Debtors’ business judgment and justified under the Court’s equitable powers because the

partial payment significantly advances the Debtors’ chapter 11 objectives of maximizing value 

for all stakeholders. First, the partial payment of the Prepetition Secured Claims will provide for 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 12 of 18
13

interest savings under the Prepetition Credit Agreement of approximately $14.3 million.

7

Second, the Debtors have negotiated for $25 million to be set aside in a segregated cash 

collateral account, which prevents all of the sale proceeds from leaving the Debtors’ estates and 

which may be subject to use as cash collateral on such terms and conditions to be agreed upon by 

the Debtors and the Prepetition Agent, should the remaining DIP Facility availability prove 

insufficient. Third, a partial paydown of the Prepetition Secured Claims would only affect 

timing of payment to the Prepetition Lenders and not the Prepetition Lenders’ right to such 

proceeds, given that there now is no dispute that the NA L&A Assets are Prepetition Collateral 

and the Prepetition Lenders’ liens attach to the net cash proceeds received by the Debtors on 

account of the NA L&A Assets. See Sale Order, ¶ 8 (“This Order: (i) is and shall be effective as 

a determination that other than Assumed Liabilities or as otherwise provided in the APA, upon 

the Closing, all Interests of any kind or nature whatsoever existing as to the NA L&A Assets 

have been unconditionally released, discharged, and terminated, and that the conveyances 

described herein have been effected, with such Interests and liens attaching in order of priority, 

with the same validity, enforceability, security, and perfection which they have now against such 

NA L&A Assets”); ¶ 10 (stating that the “net cash proceeds received by the Debtors on account of 

the NA L&A Assets constitute Prepetition Collateral (as defined in the Final DIP Order) . . . .”) 

(emphasis added). As such, partial paydown of the Prepetition Secured Claims is a result 

contemplated by the general scheme of the Bankruptcy Code and would be within the Court’s 

equitable powers. 

27. Notably, no harm to any other creditor is risked by the partial payment of the 

Prepetition Secured Claims because the Prepetition Lenders already have a secured claim that 

7 Inclusive of interest savings from paydown of obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement and assumes an 

emergence in early July 2024. 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 13 of 18
14

must be repaid ahead of unsecured creditors and the concessions provided by the Prepetition 

Lenders will inure to the benefit of such unsecured creditors. See In re Claar Cellars LLC, 2020 

WL 1238924, at *7 (authorizing debtor to use cash collateral under section 363(b) to pay 

prepetition claim of secured creditor “because those interim distributions advance significant 

bankruptcy objectives without causing material (or perhaps any) harm to any other creditor.”).

II. Cause Exists to Modify the Automatic Stay to Effectuate the Relief Requested.

28. Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code operates to stay any act to obtain 

possession of property from the estate, or to exercise control over property of the estate. 

11 U.S.C. § 362(a). However, section 362(d)(1) permits a bankruptcy court, upon request, to 

modify or terminate the automatic stay for “cause.” 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1). Certain courts have 

suggested that, absent court authority, application of sale proceeds to prepetition debt would be a 

violation of the automatic stay. See, e.g., Hull v. Cenlar FSB (In re Gistic), 2020 Bankr. LEXIS 

10, *24 (Bankr. D. Maine Jan. 3, 2020) (holding that there existed a plausible claim for a 

violation of the automatic stay when the defendants applied sale proceeds to prepetition debt); 

Gordon v. Taylor (In re Taylor), 430 B.R. 305, 313 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2010) (concluding that 

creditor violated stay under section 362(a)(6) by applying postpetition payment to prepetition 

loan); Krivohlavek v. Boys Town Fed. Credit Union (In re Krivohlavek), 405 B.R. 312, 316 

(B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2009) (concluding that creditor's application of funds to payment of debt 

constituted an act to collect a debt prohibited by section 362(a)(6)).

29. As noted by the Capmark court, secured creditors are often paid in connection 

with a sale of all or substantially all of a debtor’s assets under section 363 of the Bankruptcy 

Court and that a sale of assets under section 363 can be thought of as nothing more than 

conversion of assets from a “going concern” to cash. In re Capmark Fin. Grp. Inc., 438 B.R. at 

512. After such a conversion or “liquidation” of a debtor’s assets, “one can argue that a motion 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 14 of 18
15

for stay relief would almost certainly be granted to allow the secured creditor to proceed against 

the cash.” Id. The Capmark court further noted that “[r]ather than requiring the filing of a stay 

relief motion, the order approving the sale often allows for the immediate payment of all or part 

of the secured creditor’s claim.” Id. 

30. The Debtors seek authority under section 362(d) of the Bankruptcy Code to 

modify the automatic stay solely to the extent necessary to permit the partial paydown of the 

Prepetition Secured Claims. As noted above, the Prepetition Lenders have liens that attach to the 

proceeds of the NA L&A Sale and, therefore, the Prepetition Lenders are secured creditors 

entitled to the NA L&A Net Sale Proceeds. For the articulated reasons, the Debtors submit that 

the relief requested herein—including the modification of the automatic stay—is warranted and 

justified by the facts and circumstances of these chapter 11 cases. 

WAIVER OF BANKRUPTCY RULES 4001(A)(3), 6004(A) AND 6004(H)

31. The Debtors request that the Court enter an order providing that notice of the 

relief requested herein satisfies Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and that the Debtors have established 

cause to exclude such relief from the fourteen-day stay period under Bankruptcy 

Rules 4001(a)(3) and 6004(h), which is necessary to implement the relief requested in 

this Motion.

RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

32. Nothing contained herein or any action taken pursuant to relief requested is 

intended to be or shall be construed as (a) an admission as to the amount of, basis for, or validity 

of any claim against a Debtor entity under the Bankruptcy Code or other applicable 

nonbankruptcy law; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’ or any party in interest’s rights to dispute any 

claim or interest on any grounds; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any claim; (d) a waiver of 

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 15 of 18
16

the Debtors’ or any other party in interest’s rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other 

applicable law; (e) an implication or admission that any particular claim is of a type specified or 

defined in this Motion or any order granting the relief requested in this Motion or a finding that 

any particular claim is an administrative expense claim or other priority claim; (f) a request for or 

approval to assume, adopt, or reject any agreement, contract, program, policy, or lease under 

section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code; or (g) an admission as to the validity, priority, 

enforceability, or perfection of any lien on, security interest in, or other encumbrance on property 

of the Debtors’ estates. Likewise, if the Court grants the relief sought herein, any payment made 

pursuant to the Court’s order is not intended to be and should not be construed as an admission to 

the validity of any claim.

NOTICE

33. Notice of this Motion has been provided by email, facsimile, or first class mail to 

the Complex Service List [Docket No. 406]. The Debtors submit that, in light of the nature of 

the relief requested, no other or further notice need be given. 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 16 of 18
17

WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request entry of the Proposed Order, 

substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, granting the relief requested herein and 

granting such other relief as is just and proper.

Dated: March 29, 2024

Dallas, Texas /s/ Thomas R. Califano

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Thomas R. Califano (24122825)

Rakhee V. Patel (00797213)

Jeri Leigh Miller (24102176)

Parker G. Embry (24126826)

2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 981-3300

Facsimile: (214) 981-3400

Email: tom.califano@sidley.com

rpatel@sidley.com

jeri.miller@sidley.com

parker.embry@sidley.com

and

Andres Barajas (admitted pro hac vice)

Weiru Fang (admitted pro hac vice)

787 Seventh Avenue

New York, New York 10019

Telephone: (212) 839-5300

Facsimile: (212) 839-5599

Email: andres.barajas@sidley.com

weiru.fang@sidley.com

Attorneys for the Debtors

and Debtors in Possession

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 17 of 18
Certificate of Service

I certify that on March 29, 2024, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served 

by the Electronic Case Filing System for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern 

District of Texas.

/s/ Thomas R. Califano

Thomas R. Califano

Case 23-80004-swe11 Doc 484 Filed 03/29/24 Entered 03/29/24 22:08:49 Desc

Main Document Page 18 of 18