alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

denied

NO. 15-0120

IN THE INTEREST OF M.N.M., A

CHILD

§

§

§

§

§

§

Kaufman County,

5th District.

March 20, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

August 7, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 7th day of August, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Cedric BEAULIEU v. SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD

NO. 2018-CA-0818

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

FEBRUARY 27, 2019

Rachel Conner, CONNER & SOTHERN, 3015 Magazine Street, New Orleans, LA 70115, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT

Darryl Harrison, SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD, 625 St. Joseph Street, New Orleans, LA 70165, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE

(Court composed of Chief Judge James F. McKay, III, Judge Terri F. Love, Judge Edwin A. Lombard )

Judge Edwin A. Lombard

This matter was filed as an appeal on September 21, 2018, on behalf of Cedric Beaulieu. Pursuant to an order to show cause, however, counsel for Mr. Beaulieu conceded the appeal should be dismissed and the pleadings considered as an application for supervisory writ. *See* Rules 3-1.1 and 3-1.3 of the Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed and, after review of the record in light of the argument presented and applicable law, we deny Mr. Beaulieu's writ application.

***Relevant Facts and Procedural History***

In August 2016, after a pre-termination hearing, Mr. Beaulieu was terminated from his employment with the Sewerage and Water Board (S & WB) on August 31, 2016. A timely notice of appeal of this decision was properly filed but on March 16, 2017, counsel filed an Appeal Withdrawal form on behalf of Mr. Beaulieu.

In April 2018, counsel sought to reinstate Mr. Beaulieu's appeal of his termination with the Civil Service Commission. At a hearing before the Civil Service Commission, counsel indicated that she had filed the Appeal Withdrawal form based in part on communications from Erica Burkhalter of the Civil Service Management Services member Erica Burkhalter who, according to counsel, indicated that no further continuances would be granted by the Civil Service hearing examiner.

The Civil Service Commission denied Mr. Beaulieu's Motion to Reinstate Appeal. In its Minute Entry of the hearing signed by three Commissioners on June 18, 2018, the Civil Service Commission noted that review of the communications between counsel and Ms. Burkhalter revealed only an inquiry as to the status of the case with no representations made regarding *922continuances. In addition, the Civil Service Commissioners reasoned:

> ... It is reasonable that an appointing authority would rely upon the withdrawal of an appeal as the conclusion of the matter. Reviving an appeal more than a year after the withdrawal has far-reaching implications for the speedy resolution of employment disputes in the classified service. Over time, memories fade and evidence is destroyed or lost. The appeals process was intended to be a quicker alternative to litigation in court. Opening long abandoned appeals introduces an element of uncertainty that the Commission finds unacceptable.

***Conclusion***

After review of the record, we find no error in the decision of the Civil Service Commission. Accordingly, Mr. Beaulieu's appeal is dismissed and his writ application denied.

**APPEAL DISMISSED; APPEAL CONVERTED TO WRIT; WRIT DENIED**
Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 1 of 10 PageID 67
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 2 of 10 PageID 68
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 3 of 10 PageID 69
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 4 of 10 PageID 70
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 5 of 10 PageID 71
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 6 of 10 PageID 72
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 7 of 10 PageID 73
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 8 of 10 PageID 74
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 9 of 10 PageID 75
 

 Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 16 Filed 02/24/05 Page 10 of 10 PageID 76
1 See e.g., PLAINTIFF/INTERVENOR’S FIRST AMENDED PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, pgs. 6-7, Findings of Fact 14(a), 16(a), 17(a).

2 For example: Plaintiff’s Exhibit 7, pg. 23, paragraph 3.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

AMP PLUS, INC. d/b/a ELCO §

LIGHTING §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

and §

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:04-CV-2636-R

AS SUBROGEE OF AMP PLUS, INC. § ECF

D/B/A ELCO LIGHTING §

§

v. §

§

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS §

INCORPORATED §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The Court has reviewed PLAINTIFF/INTERVENOR’S FIRST AMENDED PROPOSED

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (filed November 2, 2006). The court finds

that the document contains insufficient citations.1

 Citations to any exhibit or document having

multiple pages should include page numbers. Paragraph numbers and line numbers should also be

included where appropriate.2

 The court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to resubmit Findings of Fact and

Conclusions of Law with sufficient citations by Wednesday, November 22, 2006. 

It is SO ORDERED.

Signed this 16th day of November, 2006.

____________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02636-R Document 135 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1122
# C_2021310EN.01003302.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/33

---

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2021 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective cover for computer hardware)

(Case T-564/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a protective cover for computer hardware - Ground for invalidity - Unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Request that witnesses be heard - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 310/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor GmbH (Bensheim, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zagg Inc. (Midvale, Utah, United States) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2020 (Case R 296/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between TrekStor and Zagg.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | TrekStor GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

TrekStor GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 289 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 with respect to the Acer access 

and development program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself and Ms. BALINT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 with respect to 

the Acer access and development program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting All Pro5 ducers Act of 2025’’ or the ‘‘SAP Act of 2025’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACER ACCESS AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 12306 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

8 U.S.C. 1632c) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

10 subsections (f) and (g), respectively; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 289 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(e) CONSULTATIONS.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning with the first re5 quest for applications under this section that occurs 

6 at least 1 year after the date of the enactment of 

7 the SAP Act of 2025, not later than 6 months be8 fore such a request for applications, the Secretary 

9 shall solicit input from maple industry stakeholders 

10 with respect to the research and education priorities 

11 of the maple industry. 

12 ‘‘(2) CONSIDERATION.—The Secretary shall 

13 consider the information provided through the con14 sultation required under paragraph (1) when making 

15 grants under this section.’’; and 

16 (3) in subsection (g), as so redesignated, by 

17 striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
SGM BUILDING GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. SWF PREMIUM REAL ESTATE LLC., d/b/a Engel & Volkers, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4375

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 1, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.John P. Calamos, Sr.Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Co-Chief Investment Officer
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF A.A., A.A., A.W.

No. 2018-CJ-2060

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2019

Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, § 6.
Mia Joy TORRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1932

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Appellant's community control, but remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order that conforms to its oral pronouncement finding violations of conditions five and nine. *See**Smith v. State*, 49 So.3d 833, 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("A written order must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncements, and the oral pronouncements control." (citing *Williams v. State*, 604 So.2d 8, 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) ) ).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with Instructions.

BERGER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Brannon Steiner LAFORCE v. Sharon Badon LAFORCE

2160162

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017 Reh. denied September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James Keith LARRY v. STATE

CR-16-0579

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2912-D

VS. §

 §

MUTUALS.COM, INC., et al., §

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER

The March 3, 2005 motion of the United States for a continued stay of proceedings is

granted. To reduce the administrative burdens on the court and the parties during the pendency of

the stay, the court directs the clerk of court to close this case for statistical purposes. A party may

move at any time for the court to reopen the case statistically and may move the court to lift the stay.

SO ORDERED.

March 30, 2005. 

___________________________________

 SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:03-cv-02912-D Document 41 Filed 03/30/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 203
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS 2025-1 Phase I 
and Phase II: Adjuvant Discovery and Down-Selection for Vaccines 
against Infectious and Immune-Mediated Diseases (Topic 140).
    Date: February 6-7, 2025.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G58, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Anuja Mathew, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G58, Rockville, MD 
20892, 301-761-6911, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 2, 2025.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00100 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Case 5:04-cv-00097-C-BG Document 21 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 92
Case 2:03-cv-00424-J Document 14 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
# C_2021035EN.01003202.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/32

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 November 2020 — Reprensus GmbH v S-V Pavlovi Trejd EOOD

(Case C-591/20)

(2021/C 35/44)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Reprensus GmbH

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: S-V Pavlovi Trejd EOOD

Question referred

Are points 1(a) and 2 of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) (OJ 2012 L 351) to be interpreted as meaning that jurisdiction for matters relating to tort or delict exists in respect of an action for damages if the applicant was induced to conclude a purchase contract and pay the purchase price by means of intentional deception?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40534

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL JUAREZ-SANCHEZ, also known as Hipolito Sanchez-Juarez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1625-ALL

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Juarez-Sanchez (Juarez) appeals his guilty plea

conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United

States. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional

in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). His

constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Juarez

contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that
No. 05-40534

-2-

a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres

in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly rejected such arguments

on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United

States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Juarez properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review. Because Juarez has shown no error in the judgment of the

district court, that judgment is AFFIRMED.
Tavares Survell EVANS Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2621

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gibbons 

—00"11 , J. 

Douglas 

Here, the challenged affidavit indicates that the person who analyzed 

petitioner's blood alcohol content is a senior forensic specialist employed 

by the Carson City Sheriffs Office crime laboratory and possesses 

professional and academic training that qualifies him to perform analyses 

to determine the presence of alcohol in the blood. Accordingly, the forensic 

specialist met the statutory definition of chemist and the affidavit was 

admissible in the preliminary hearing. 

Petitioner's reliance on Cramer v. State, DMV is misplaced as 

that case concerned whether the challenged affidavit was inadmissible 

because the scientist who had performed the blood alcohol test had not 

been qualified as an expert in a court of record. 126 Nev. , 240 P.3d 8 

(2010). We specifically declined to address the issue of whether a chemist 

who submits an affidavit pursuant to NRS 50.320 must be qualified as an 

expert because that issue was not raised on appeal, and we did not 

comment on the 2009 amendment to NRS 50.320 that defined "chemist." 

Id at n.3, 240 P.3d at 11 n.3; see 2009 Nev. Stat., ch. 16, § 1, at 32. 

Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that the district court 

manifestly abused its discretion by denying his pretrial habeas petition, 

see NRS 34.160; State v. Dist. Ct. (Armstrong), 127 Nev. , 267 P.3d 

777, 780 (2011) (defining manifest abuse of discretion), we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
3 

_rk 

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge 

State Public Defender/Carson City 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City District Attorney 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
STAR POINTE CAPITAL, LLC, AS TRUSTEE OF the 3057 HALEY LANE LAND TRUST, Appellant, v. Robert M. SCHVEY, et al., Appellee.

No. 1D17-4836

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 928 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 928

 Honoring the life of Nebraska community leader John Edmund Gottschalk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2024

  Mr. Ricketts (for himself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the life of Nebraska community leader John Edmund Gottschalk.

Whereas John Edmund Gottschalk was born in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1943;
Whereas John Edmund Gottschalk served as the chief executive officer and 
        publisher of the Omaha World-Herald from 1989 to 2008, which he ran with 
        tremendous integrity and led its modernization effort;
Whereas John Edmund Gottschalk was inducted into the Omaha Business Hall of Fame 
        and the Nebraska Press Association Hall of Fame and was recognized in 
        1994 for his civic leadership and philanthropy by being named as the 
        98th King of Aksarben;
Whereas John Edmund Gottschalk's extensive civic life included such varied 
        positions as chairman of the United Service Organizations Board of 
        Governors, national president of the Boy Scouts of America, and chairman 
        of Omaha Performing Arts;
Whereas John Edmund Gottschalk was dedicated to the preservation of downtown 
        Omaha, and as an avid outdoorsman, he fought to conserve Nebraska's 
        wildlife for future generations; and
Whereas, together with his wife, John Edmund Gottschalk fostered over 100 
        infants awaiting adoption: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) has heard with profound sorrow and deep regret the 
        announcement of the death of John Edmund Gottschalk;
            (2) honors the life and legacy of John Edmund Gottschalk 
        for his unwavering dedication to Nebraska as a civic leader and 
        philanthropist; and
            (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Senate 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the family of 
        John Edmund Gottschalk.
                                 <all>
```