alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - new mexico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

General        August 2, 2018        370.410.1 - Training - General Provision

General        December 29, 2023        Science Information Service (SIS)

General        July 11, 2019        Giuseppina Mattietti

General        July 11, 2019        Madalyn Blondes

General        July 11, 2019        Sally Sennert

General        May 1, 2019        General Questions To Pose While Exploring Topographic Maps

General        July 11, 2019        Alanna Simpson

General        July 11, 2019        Geoff Gilleaudeau

General        July 11, 2019        Jacob Richardson

General        July 11, 2019        William F. Hoover

General        July 11, 2019        Jess Rodysill

General        January 24, 2023        Don't Take It for Granite

General        August 3, 2018        429.1 - Space Management

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

General        March 1, 2018        Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer: Clifford I. Voss

General        July 30, 2020        New Mexico Water Science Center Sediment Laboratory
# C_2016111EN.01003301.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/33

---

Action brought on 1 February 2016 — Alfonso Egüed v EUIPO — Jackson Family Farms (BYRON)

(Case T-45/16)

(2016/C 111/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nelson Alfonso Egüed (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jackson Family Farms LLC (Santa Rosa, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘BYRON’ — Application for registration No 10 581 619

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings/Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2015 in Case R 822/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision;

| — | grant the application for registration of the EU trademark No 10581619 ‘BYRON’ for all goods covered in classes 18, 25 and 33 (being the latter the contested class in the present proceedings); |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the application for registration of the EU trademark No 10581619 ‘BYRON’ for all goods covered in classes 18, 25 and 33 (being the latter the contested class in the present proceedings);

| — | order the intervener to bear the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to bear the costs of the procedure.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 with respect to the common law tort of passing off. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 with respect to the common law tort of passing off.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSH WHITAKER, MONIQUE §

JANNETTE, AND LESLIE GREER, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO.

§ 3:03-CV-0411-P

WEST VILLAGE LIMITED §

PARTNERSHIP et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

The Order of August 24, 2007 transferring this matter to the docket of the Honorable

Wm. F. Sanderson, Jr. is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 21 day of December 2007. st

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 279 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2812
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

 

I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 14, 2005
Ronald G. NAGY, Appellant, v. Gordon LOWNDS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Albert E. Bergeron, Vice-President—Chief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

|   |   | /s/ Albert E. Bergeron                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                               |
|   |   | Albert E. Bergeron                            |
|   |   | Vice-President—Chief   Financial Officer |
|   |   | August 9, 2007                                |

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016175EN.01001701.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/17

---

Action brought on 17 March 2016 — Philip Morris Brands v EUIPO — Explosal (Superior Quality Cigarettes FILTER CIGARETTES Raquel)

(Case T-105/16)

(2016/C 175/20)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Philip Morris Brands Sàrl (Neuchâtel, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Explosal Ltd (Larnaca, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in black and white containing the word elements ‘Superior Quality Cigarettes FILTER CIGARETTES Raquel’ — EU trade mark No 10 008 084

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 January 2016 in Case R 2775/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and either reject EUTM application no. 10008084 for all goods or, subsidiarily, send the case back to the Board of Appeal for further consideration of the prohibitions laid down by Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in light of the submitted evidence of repute and enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and either reject EUTM application no. 10008084 for all goods or, subsidiarily, send the case back to the Board of Appeal for further consideration of the prohibitions laid down by Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in light of the submitted evidence of repute and enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier trade mark;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own the costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to pay their own the costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2017006EN.01005301.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/53

---

Action brought on 9 November 2016 — BSH Electrodomesticos España v EUIPO — DKSH International (Ufesa)

(Case T-785/16)

(2017/C 006/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA (Huarte-Pamplona, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DKSH International Ltd. (Zurich, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Ufesa’ — Application for registration No 10 857 29

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 July 2016 in Case R 1691/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Antonio M. NEAL, DOC #124111, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021035EN.01005102.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/51

---

Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Ultra Tef-Gel)

(Case T-192/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 35/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tikal Marine Systems GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: M. Mahnkopf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ultra Safety Systems Inc. (Magonia Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, A. von Mühlendahl and P. Böhner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2020 (Case R 2499/2018-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Ultra Safety Systems and Tikal Marine Systems.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry K. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|/s/GARRY K. MCGUIRE SR.Garry K. McGuire Sr. Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President, Corporate DevelopmentDecember 12, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2246-065]

                    On December 30, 2024, the Yuba County Water Agency submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the California State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board), in conjunction with the above captioned project. The submittal also included a response from the Water Board stating that it received the application on the same day. Pursuant to section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify the Water Board of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     December 30, 2024.                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     December 30, 2025.                

If the Water Board fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: December 31, 2024.

Debbie-Anne Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 5.23(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-00087 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
CLAYTON PROVIDERS, INC. v. James ROPER et al.

2160771

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATION  I, Larry L. Eastland, Chief Executive Officer of Great American Family Parks, Inc., certify that:  1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Great American Family Parks, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007;  2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.       The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   (a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;   (b)      evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   (c)      disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);   (a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: November 19, 2007   /s/ Larry L. Eastland Larry L. Eastland Chief Executive Officer