alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  ____Chan Chi Fai_________
Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO April 17, 2008
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 2709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00462]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS-2025-1 Phase I 
and II: Development of Medical Interventions for Treating Non-
Tuberculosis Mycobacterial (NTM) Infections (Topic 144).
    Date: February 3, 2025.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Contact Person: Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC-9823, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5199, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2025.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00462 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
FAA-HB083-168

Instrument

Procedures H
Q

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration
Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 79 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:04-cv-01861-B Document 79 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 2 of 2
Ernesto OLIVERA-SANTIAGO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2018455EN.01001401.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Germany) — Günter Hartmann Tabakvertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v Stadt Kempten,

(Case C-425/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Directive 2014/40/EU - Ban on placing tobacco for oral use on the market - Definitions of ‘chewing tobacco’ and ‘tobacco for oral use’ - Paste composed of finely ground tobacco (Thunder Chewing Tobacco) and porous cellulose sachet portions filled with finely ground tobacco (Thunder Frosted Chewing Bags)))

(2018/C 455/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Günter Hartmann Tabakvertrieb GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Stadt Kempten

Intervener: Landesanwaltschaft Bayern

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(8) of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC, read in conjunction with Article 2(6) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that only tobacco products which can be consumed in the proper sense only by chewing constitute tobacco products intended to be chewed within the meaning of those provisions, which it is for the national court to determine on the basis of all the relevant objective characteristics of the products concerned, such as their composition, their consistency, their method of dispensation and, where appropriate, their actual use by consumers.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
# C_2016270EN.01004601.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/46

---

Action brought on 3 May 2016 — Keturi kambariai v EUIPO — Coffee In (coffee inn)

(Case T-202/16)

(2016/C 270/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: UAB Keturi kambariai (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: R. Pumputienė, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AS Coffee In (Tallinn, Estonia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark with the colour claim ‘black, orange, white’ containing the word elements ‘coffee inn’ — Application for registration No 11 475 233

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 in Case R 137/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and, consequently, reject the opposition and authorise the registration of the mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, consequently, reject the opposition and authorise the registration of the mark applied for;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 10.4





FORM OF LETTER OF CREDIT





TEXT

CONTENTSSeq of Total

1/1Form of DC:

IrrevocableDC No:

SDCNPH170334Date of Issue:

020524Expiry Date and Place:

030628 at our counterApplicant:

Successful Union LimitedHong KongBeneficiary:

Pioneer Forest, Inc.One Faneuil Hall MarketplaceBoston, MA 02109, USADC amt:

USD2000000Max or Amt:

Not ExceedingAvailable with/by:

Issuing Bank at sight by paymentDrafts at:

SightDrawee:

Issuing Bank





Additional Conditions:





We hereby issue this irrevocable standby documentary credit in your favour which is available upon presentation of your draft(s) at sight drawn on the issuing bank bearing
the clause: Drawn under Standby Documentary Credit No. SDCNPH170334 dated 23/5/2002 of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited up to an aggregate amount of USD2,000,000.00 accompanied by:





1)  Beneficiarys signed statement certifying: The amount of the draft represents funds due to
Beneficiary under a certain Promissory Note dated 28th May 2002 issued, signed and sealed by Successful Union Limited, demand for payment has been made and payment has not been received from Successful Union Limited or any other sources.





2)  Original of the Promissory Note dated 28th May 2002, issued, signed and sealed by
Successful Union Limited.





+  Presentation Period: 29th May 2003 to 28th June 2003.





+  Partial drawings not allowed.





+  All documents must be signed.





+  All documents called for under this credit are original and must be clearly marked on their face as original, except those which the credit specifically states can be
copy(ies).





+  All banking charges except DC opening commission are for
account of beneficiary.





+  Documents must be presented through your banker within the
validity of this standby DC.




---




+  We hereby engage with you that all draft(s) drawn in
compliance with the terms of this standby documentary credit will be duly honoured if presented to the above mentioned drawee bank on or before the 28th June 2003. Except so far as otherwise stipulated, documentary credit is subject to the Uniform
Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision), International Chamber of Commerce Publication No.500 except Articles 8, 23-39, 41, 43 and 46.





Info to Presenting Bk:





+  All drawings must be advised
by telecommunication to the issuing office.





+  Documents must be dispatched by courier
service in one lot after your advice of presentation to The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, ESD Div, 5/F HSBC Building Mong Kok, 673 Nathan Road, Mong Kok, Kowloon, Hong Kong.





Confirmation Instructions without
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:    12/17/07                    By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     ---------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
Stephen Vincent BARONE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2999

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

Stephen Vincent Barone, Trenton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the January 30, 2018 order regarding restitution, filed in Case No. 2014-CF-000593-A-O, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

EDWARDS, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ. concur.
Christopher LOWRY-ROJAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3849

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS. DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEQMM#ERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION | FILED
|
i
| NOV | 5 2007
CYNTHIA JEAN NUGENT, : | CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
B
Plaintiff, § . Deputy
: _
v. 8 2:04-CV-0256
§
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, §
Commissioner of Social Security, §
§
Defendant. §

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION and AFFIRMING DECISION OF COMMISSIONER

Plaintiff has appealed the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
denying plaintiff disability benefits. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and
Recommendation on October 25, 2007, recommending therein that the decision of the Commissioner
be affirmed. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on November 8, 2007.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the
record in this case. The undersigned hereby OVERRULES plaintiff’s objections to the Report and
Recommendation, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and AFFIRMS
the administrative decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this [él Lflear A 2007.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0267

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID LOUIS TRENK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 29, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 24 2020

12/24/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0267
Case 3:04-cr-00318-N Document 49 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 182
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00140 - CV RAY WINN, APPELLANT

V. SALLY LAWSON, APPELL EE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Bell County, Texas Trial Court No. 74271, Honorable Jeanne Parker, Presiding



### July 2 2 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant , Ray Winn, appeals from a judgment entered on January 29 , 2015 . The clerk ’ s record has been filed. On June 1 2 , 201 5 , the court reporter filed three volumes of the reporter’s record
. However, the third volume, the exhibits volu me, was blank. The c lerk of this c ourt contacted the court reporter and advised him of the situation. The reporter advised he would promptly file the third volume. Because the third volume had not been received by the court, we issued a letter on July 1, 2015 directing the court reporter to file the third volume of the record no later than July 13,2

2015. To date, the court reporter has failed to file the third volume of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the County Court at Law No. 1 of Bell C ounty (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately determine, through hearing or otherwise;

1) whether a third volume of the r eporter’s record exists; 2) whether all exhibits tendered to and received by the trial cour t in the trial of this cause appear in the reporter’s record filed by the reporter with this court; and, if not, 3) the reasonable date by which all evidence and proceedings omitted from the current reporter’s record can be transcribed into written form and filed with the clerk of this court in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of his right to appeal. If t he trial court convenes a hearing to address this matter, it shal l cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issue s , and 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law an d all orders it may issue in response to the directives contained in this order . Additionally, the trial court shall then cause the supplemental clerk ’ s and reporter ’ s records to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before August 2 1 , 2015. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before August 21 , 2015 . It is so ordered. Per Curiam
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL EDUARDO VILLEGAS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1475 ) AMANDA JAYNE WALTEMATH, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Amy Williams, Judge. Daniel Eduardo Villegas, pro se. Zachary L. Bayne of Allen Dell, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:04-cv-00549-H Document 9 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Golden State Petroleum
     Transport Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarise and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

 Date:  April 2, 2007


/s/ Tor Olav Troim
-----------------------------
Tor Olav Troim
Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 12.00

PANDA GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                            ------------------------------------------------------------
                                              1995         1996         1997         1998         1999
                                            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income (loss) before minority interest,
    income taxes and extraordinary items    $  2,316     $ (8,916)    $(32,468)    $(26,903)    $ 72,782

Interest expense .......................      11,716       19,414       55,329       57,199       50,997
Amortization of debt issue costs .......         554          494        1,418        1,656        1,646
Capitalized interest ...................       5,793       11,055        2,057        7,344       13,641
                                            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
   Total fixed charges .................      18,063       30,963       58,804       66,199       66,284

Earnings before fixed charges ..........      14,586       10,992       24,279       31,952      125,425

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .....        0.81         0.36         0.41         0.48         1.89

Deficiency in coverage of fixed charges     $ (3,477)    $(19,971)    $(34,525)    $(34,247)    $      -
</TABLE>