alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4 - Certificates pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

                                 Certifications

In connection with the annual report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the "Company") filed
under cover of a Form 40-F for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Leon F. Gosselin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  January 27, 2003                         /s/ Leon F. Gosselin
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Leon F. Gosselin
                                                Chairman of the Board, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the annual report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the "Company") filed
under cover of a Form 40-F for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jean Vezina, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  January 27, 2003                         /s/ Jean Vezina
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jean Vezina
                                                Vice President, Finance and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(6)
              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(27)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - virginia(1)

## By Year

              - 2021(1)

staff profileWilliam Leith

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet
TRM/jar

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HIGHMARK, INC. §

 §

VS. §

 §

ALLCARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT § CIVIL NO. 4:03-CV-1384-Y

SYSTEMS, INC. §

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

On October 14, 2008, the Court entered a final judgment in this

case, assessing costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 against the party

incurring them. This was in error as it failed to take into account

the fact that, on September 2, 2008, this Court partially granted

summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff. See FED. R. CIV. P. 54

(providing for the recovery of costs by the “prevailing party”); see

also Fogleman v. ARAMCO, 920 F.2d 278, 285 (5th Cir. 1991) (“[A] party

need not prevail on every issue in order to be entitled to costs.”).

Therefore, the Court hereby amends its previous entry of final judgment

to tax costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 against defendant Allcare Health

Management Systems, Inc. 

SIGNED October 15, 2008.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 4:03-cv-01384-Y Document 508 Filed 10/15/08 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12906
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 385-386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31585]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary

List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of

[[Page 386]]

the Treasury, the following countries require or may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
Yemen

Lindsay Kitzinger,
International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2024-31585 Filed 1-2-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 691-692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31675]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

[[Page 692]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 553 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-886, K2025-887.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31675 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50135 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO HERRERA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1681-ALL-EP

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Herrera-Rodriguez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Herrera complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Herrera thus contends that his sentence should not exceed theNo. 03-50135 -2- two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Herrera acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
# C_2022171EN.01004601.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/46

---

Order of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — OG v EIB

(Case T-695/20) (1)

(2022/C 171/63)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.

---
Gloria M. PINO f/k/a Gloria Pino Blume, Appellant, v. Craig D. BLUME, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1341

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christopher E. MORRIS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5285

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 15, 2019

Christopher E. Morris, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Ronnie ROSSER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-258

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KEVIN REID ALTHOUSE, 

TDCJ No. 861608,

Plaintiff,

VS.

COUNTY OF DALLAS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:00-CV-0039-G-BN

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a

recommendation in this case. See docket entry 159. An objection was filed by the

plaintiff Kevin Reid Althouse. See docket entry 160. The district court reviewed de novo

those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which

objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and

recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court ACCEPTS the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The court therefore DENIES the plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b) or to

Reopen Case due to Extraordinary Circumstances (docket entry 158) and DIRECTS

the Clerk of Court to reopen and then close this case for statistical purposes.

SO ORDERED.

March 9, 2021.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:00-cv-00039-G-BN Document 161 Filed 03/09/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 422
Christina PAYLAN, Appellant, v. Brian BISHOP, in His Individual Capacity, and Mark Detrio, in His Individual Capacity, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4117

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 4, 2019.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.(1)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Steve T. Laflin, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of International Isotopes, Inc;



2

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



(c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



(d)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date April 30, 2008



/s/ Steve T. Laflin

Steve T Laflin, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of International Isotopes, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Form 10-K), I, Steve T. Laflin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as such, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

To my knowledge, the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|               |                        
|-------------- | -----------------------
|March 31, 2011 | /s/ Steve T. Laflin    
|               | Steve T. Laflin        
|               | Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021481EN.01002401.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Dermavita Company v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM)

(Case T-372/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark JUVEDERM - Genuine use of the mark - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered - Use with the consent of the proprietor - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 481/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dermavita Company S.a.r.l. (Beirut, Lebanon) (represented by: D. Todorov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Zajfert, J. Crespo Carrillo and V.J. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Allergan Holdings France SAS (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor, and T. de Haan, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2020 (Case R 877/2019-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Dermavita Company and Allergan Holdings France.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dermavita Company S.a.r.l. to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dermavita Company S.a.r.l. to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2711-2712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Notice of Supplemental Funding Opportunity

AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of intent to award supplemental funding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the public that Substance Abuse and 
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is supporting 
administrative supplements in scope of the parent award for the five 
(5) eligible grant recipients funded under the FY 2020 National 
Consumer and Consumer Supporter Technical Assistance Centers, Notice of 
Funding Opportunity (NOFO) SM-20-001. The total available funding is 
$1,806,000 and each of the five recipients may receive up to $361,200. 
This supplemental funding will extend the project period by 12 months 
to March 30, 2026, as SAMHSA completes the agency's efforts to update 
the program for the field's current needs. Recipients will use the 
funding to continue to provide technical assistance to promote 
evidence-based care for adults with serious mental illness within the 
scope of their active grant award.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damie Jackson-Diop, Public Health 
Advisor, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, telephone (240) 276-0424; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 2712]]

    Funding Opportunity Title: FY 2020 National Consumer and Consumer 
Supporter Technical Assistance Centers (Consumer and Consumer Supporter 
TA Centers), SM-20-001.
    Assistance Listing Number: 93.243.

    Authority: Section 520A of the Public Health Service Act.
    Justification: Eligibility for this supplemental funding is limited 
to the current five recipients. These grant recipients have the 
capacity and expertise to provide technical assistance to promote 
evidence-based care for adults with serious mental illness.
    This is not a formal request for application. Assistance will only 
be provided to the five Consumer and Consumer Supporter TA Center 
recipients funded in FY 2020 under the National Consumer and Consumer 
Supporter Technical Assistance Centers, SM-20-001, based on the receipt 
of a satisfactory application and associated budget that is approved by 
a review group.

    Dated: January 6, 2025.
Ann Ferrero,
Public Health Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2025-00427 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
```
# C_2016441EN.01002401.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/24

---

Action brought on 23 September 2016 — France v Commission

(Case T-682/16)

(2016/C 441/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, D. Colas and D. Segoin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 4287 final of 12 July 2016, notified on 13 July 2016, suspending monthly payments to France under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 4287 final of 12 July 2016, notified on 13 July 2016, suspending monthly payments to France under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549). This plea has two limbs.






  — | First limb: the French authorities implemented in full the action plan including clear progress indicators established following consultation with the Commission to which the contested decision refers. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549). This plea has two limbs.

—

First limb: the French authorities implemented in full the action plan including clear progress indicators established following consultation with the Commission to which the contested decision refers.

| — | Second limb: the contested decision is based on factors which were not envisaged in the action plan. |
| --- | --- |

—

Second limb: the contested decision is based on factors which were not envisaged in the action plan.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality.

---