alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 to 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 dated
June 23, 2014 
 by and between 

AXIS Specialty U.S. Services, Inc. (the “Company”) 

and 
 Peter W. Wilson (the
“Executive”) 
 Dated September 21, 2016 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an employment agreement dated as of June 23, 2014 (the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (“Holdings”), the Company and the Executive have
determined that it is in the best interests of the Company, Holdings and its shareholders to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of service thereof; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Section 3(a) of the Agreement (Term of Employment) is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “on December 31, 2016” in the second line thereof and replacing such reference with “December
31, 2019”. 

  

	 	2.	Section 3(a)(iv) of the Agreement (Without Cause) is hereby amended by: (i) deleting the reference to “December 31, 2016” in the fifth line thereof and replacing such reference with “December
31, 2019”; and deleting the reference to “June 30, 2016” in the last line thereof and replacing such reference with “June 30, 2019”. 

  

	 	3.	Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


[Signatures on Following Page] 
  

  
 1 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first above written.

  

			
	AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Noreen McMullan
	Name:	 	Noreen McMullan
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President


 Accepted and Agreed: 
  

	
	
	/s/ Peter W. Wilson
	Peter W. Wilson

  

  
 2
M.G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF LICENSING, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**I, David A. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(c)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Reserved]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 10, 2005        /s/ DAVID A. FISHER         Name: David A. Fisher    Title: *Chief Financial Officer*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas A. Michels                                  
|Douglas A. Michels President
and Chief Executive Officer

March 10, 2011
## NUMBER 13

- 12

- 00 227

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOSE LUIS GARCIA , A ppellant ,

v.

JOANNA ANAYA , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jose Luis Garcia , appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at

Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas. On April 16, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified
appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 9.5(e). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5(e). The Clerk directed appellant to file an
amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of2

that notice. On July 9, 2012, t he Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been
corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect w as not
cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or

corrected the defect.
An ap pellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to
comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified

time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c). The Court, having considered the d ocuments on file, and appellant’ s failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of
prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. Se e id.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 20th day of August , 20 12

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Edward Chan, CEO, COO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Edward Chan



Edward Chan, COO, CEO and

 a director

February 13, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

HARVEY L. PHYNON,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:04-CV-0012-G

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

After making the independent review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the

court finds that the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

Is is, therefore, ORDERED that the findings, conclusions and

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

October 26, 2005.

 

 Case 3:04-cv-00012-G Document 11 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 36
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      required by Rule 13a-14(b) or**


**Rule
      15d-14(b) and Section 906 of**


**the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      John H. Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  November
      9, 2007





By:
            /s/
                John H. HomierJohn
                H. HomierPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
Case 3:04-cv-01276-K Document 22 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 118
Case 3:04-cv-01276-K Document 22 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 119
Exhibit 32.1
------------


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

     In connection with the amended Annual Report of KSign  International,  Inc.
on Form  10-KSB  for the year  ending  December  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Seoung-Rag Choi, President, CEO and Director of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.


/s/ Seoung-Rag Choi
-------------------
Seoung-Rag Choi, President

November 29, 2004
# C_2022095EN.01003001.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS)

(Case T-549/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark SUPERZINGS - Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 95/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Magic Box Int. Toys SLU (Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Rivas Zurdo and E. López Leiva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: KMA Concepts Ltd. (Mahé, Seychelles) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll and I. Osinaga Lozano, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2020 (Case R 2511/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between KMA Concepts and Magic Box Int. Toys.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Magic Box Int. Toys SLU to bear its owns costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by KMA Concepts Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Magic Box Int. Toys SLU to bear its owns costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by KMA Concepts Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 19.10.2020.

---
Case 24-50137-rlj11    Doc 2    Filed 06/13/24    Entered 06/13/24 11:38:51    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 1
# C_2016296EN.01003501.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/35

---

Action brought on 22 June 2016 — Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo v EUIPO — Gianni Versace (VERSACE 19.69 ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO)

(Case T-336/16)

(2016/C 296/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo Srl (Busto Arsizio, Italy) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gianni Versace SpA (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘VERSACE 19.69 ABBIGLIAMENTO SPORTIVO’ — Application for registration No 11 992 435

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2016 in Case R 1005/2015-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the present action; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present action;

| — | annul the contested decision and, consequently, register mark No 11 992 435 in respect of all the goods claimed, without prejudice to those already granted; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, consequently, register mark No 11 992 435 in respect of all the goods claimed, without prejudice to those already granted;

| — | order the other party to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | The applicant maintains that the decision of 6 April 2016 is vitiated by the scant examination of the evidence demonstrating insufficient use of the marks activated by the other party, and by the failure to examine carefully the likelihood of confusion between the marks and the goods in question in the light of all the relevant factors. |
| --- | --- |

—

The applicant maintains that the decision of 6 April 2016 is vitiated by the scant examination of the evidence demonstrating insufficient use of the marks activated by the other party, and by the failure to examine carefully the likelihood of confusion between the marks and the goods in question in the light of all the relevant factors.

---
Edward Charles LEWIS v. STATE

CR-16-0271

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
December 15, 2015 

No. 14-15-00222-CR

In the Court of Appeals for the

Fourteenth District of Texas, at Houston 



Cause No. 1072790 

In the District Court for the 

180th District Court, Harris County, Texas 



CLARENCE MATHIS 

Appellant 

vs. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee 



STATE’S WAIVER OF OPPORTUNITY TO

RESPOND TO APPELLANT’S ANDERS BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

 Comes now the State of Texas, by the undersigned assistant district attorney, and 

respectfully waives the opportunity to file a brief in response to the Anders brief filed by the 

appellant’s counsel. The State would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.

 In keeping with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396 (1967), appointed counsel for the appellant has filed a brief containing the conclusion 

that this appeal is frivolous. The appellant has been notified of his right to review the 

appellate record and to file a pro se brief. 

II.

A review of the appellant’s brief reveals no question of constitutional dimension or 

other issue requiring review in the interest of justice. 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00222-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/22/2015 3:37:25 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/22/2015 3:37:25 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
December 15, 2015

III.

A copy of this instrument will be served on counsel for the appellant through 

eFile.txcourts.gov, on the date of the filing of this instrument with the clerk of this court.

THEREFORE, the State of Texas waives the opportunity to file a response to the 

Anders brief filed by the appellant’s attorney, and moves the Court to affirm the trial court’s 

judgment. 

DEVON ANDERSON

District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

/s/ Alan Curry

ALAN CURRY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 05263700

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net
Order entered November 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00439-CV

IN RE MOLLY WILKERSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-53554-2020

ORDER

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia

It has come to the Court’s attention that relator has been deemed a vexatious 

litigant and is subject to a prefiling order, but the Court does not have an order 

from the local administrative judge allowing this original proceeding. See TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 11.101, 11.102. Accordingly, pursuant to 

section 11.1035 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, this original 

proceeding is STAYED and will be dismissed without further notice unless, no 

later than November 18, 2021, relator obtains an order from the appropriate local 
administrative judge permitting the filing of this original proceeding and files the 

order with this Court. See id. 11.035(b).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00032]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1206 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1004, K2025-1003.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00032 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT C. MCPHERSON,
III                 
|                      |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III                        
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.