alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


Board of Directors and Stockholders
Precision Auto Care, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
stockholder' equity (deficit), and cash flows of Precision Auto Care, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2000. Our audit also included the
financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a) for the year
ended June 30, 2000. These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and
cash flows of Precision Auto Care, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June
30, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule
for the year ended June 30, 2000, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

September 8, 2000,
except for Note 8, as to which the date is
October 11, 2000
McLean, Virginia
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated: May 9, 2010   /s/ Tristian R. Pico Tristan R. Pico Chief Executive Officer Parks! America, Inc.    /s/ Jon Laria Jon Laria Chief Financial Officer Parks! America, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parks! America, Inc. and will be retained by Parks! America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                      FIRST UNION STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1997-1
                            OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF
                                THE ADMINISTRATOR




The First National Bank of Chicago        Banker's Trust Company
One First National Plaza, Suite 0126      Four Albany Street
Chicago, IL  60670                        New York, New York  10006
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration      Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Fax      (312) 407-1708                   Fax      (212) 250-6439

First Union National Bank
100 Fidelity Plaza
North Brunswick, New Jersey 08905
Attn: Robert A. Dressel
Fax      (908) 828-4015


Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Master Servicing Agreement (the "Master
Servicing Agreement"), dated as of July 1, 1997, among First Union Student Loan
Trust 1997-1, as issuer (the "Issuer"), First Union National Bank, as master
servicer (the "Master Servicer") and administrator (the "Administrator"), and
The First National Bank of Chicago, as eligible lender trustee, the undersigned
officer hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
Administrator from the Closing Date (as defined in the Master Serving Agreement)
through December 31, 1997, and of its performance under the Master Servicing
Agreement and the Administration Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1997 (the
"Administration Agreement"), among the Issuer, the Administrator and Bankers
Trust Company, as indenture trustee, has been made under the supervision of the
undersigned officer, and (ii) to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer
based on such review, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Master Serving Agreement and the Administration Agreement through such
period.


                                               FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, as
                                               Administrator


                                               By: /s/  Steven R. Johnson
                                                   ------------------------
Date: April 29, 1998                           Name:  Steven R. Johnson
                                               Title:   Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

J.T. TAYLOR, )

)

Petitioner )

)

v. ) 3:04-CV-2346-R

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division, )

)

Respondent )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 22nd day of September, 2005.

_________________________________

JERRY BUCHMEYER

SR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

FILED

September 22, 2005

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02346-R Document 24 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 104554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30559]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; R03 Medical Transition to Aging Research.
    Date: February 18, 2025.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 
8B, Rockville, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Ivan Tadeu Rebustini, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 
5601 Fishers Lane, Room 100, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 555-1212, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 17, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-30559 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
[mcdanielconsent002.gif]

| | McDaniel
& ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.
Oil & Gas Reservoir Evaluations
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



CONSENT OF MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, to our reports entitled "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Forecast Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2005", dated February 13, 2006 and "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Constant Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2005", dated February 22, 2006 (the "Reports"), included in the 2005 Revised Annual Information Form of Enterra Energy Trust (the "AIF"), and to the references to our name in the AIF.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of references to our firm and of information derived from our Reports evaluating Enterra Energy Corp.'s reserves as of December 31, 2005 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, into the registration statement on Form F-10 Registration Statement (No. 333-129601), the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120996) and the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-113609 and 333-115318).

Sincerely,



McDANIEL& ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.



/s/ Phil Welch



PA. Welch, P. Eng.

President & Managing Director



Calgary, Canada

August 11, 2006





Suite 2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255 - 5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G6

Tel: (403) 262-5506 Fox: (403) 233-2744 Email: mcdaniel@mcdan.com Website: www.mcdan.com
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 42 Filed 10/27/03 Page 1 of 5 PageID 228
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 42 Filed 10/27/03 Page 2 of 5 PageID 229
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 42 Filed 10/27/03 Page 3 of 5 PageID 230
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 42 Filed 10/27/03 Page 4 of 5 PageID 231
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 42 Filed 10/27/03 Page 5 of 5 PageID 232
# C_2016106EN.01004201.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/42

---

Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Sony Computer Entertainment Europe v OHIM — Vieta Audio (Vita)

(Case T-35/16)

(2016/C 106/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vieta Audio, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Vita’ — Community trade mark registration No 9 993 361

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2015 in Case R 2232/2014-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                     Pinecrest Services, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Pinecrest Services, Inc. certifies pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   March 27, 2006
                                   /s/ April L. Marino
                                   ____________________________________
                                   April L. Marino
                                   Principal Executive and Financial Officer
Mary Jane TERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jessica J. Yeary, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate and Benjamin L. Hoffman, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*567Mary Jane Terry was convicted of manufacturing cannabis in violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes. On appeal, she contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. We agree and reverse.

Officers responded to the home where Terry and at least two other people lived. The officers immediately noticed marijuana plants growing outside. One officer honked his horn, hoping a resident would come outside. Terry did, and the officers asked her if there was marijuana growing on the property. Terry acknowledged there was, showing officers the plants.

We review de novo an order denying a motion for judgment of acquittal. *Pagan v. State* , 830 So.2d 792, 803 (Fla. 2002). We will reverse only if we conclude no "rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." *Id.* Here, although there was ample evidence that Terry was aware of the marijuana plants, there was no evidence from which a jury could conclude that she was responsible for the "production, preparation, propagation, compounding, cultivating, growing, conversion, or processing of a controlled substance." *See* § 893.02(15)(a), Fla. Stat. (defining "manufactured" for purposes of § 893.13 ). We therefore conclude that the trial court should have granted an acquittal.

REVERSED .

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Elijah BOWDEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0037

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1154 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-939, K2025-940.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31716 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Order entered July 23, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00060-CR

JOHN ABRA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-76089-L

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 19, 2018 request for appointed counsel. Appellant is 

currently represented by counsel who filed an Anders brief.

We DENY appellant’s motion. The Court will appoint new counsel for appellant only if 

it determines there is an arguable issue for appeal. See Jeffery v. State, 903 S.W.2d 776, 780 

(Tex. App.—Dallas 1995, no pet.). 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 51 Filed 10/18/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 277
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 51 Filed 10/18/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 278
Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 1 of 18 PageID 42
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 2 of 18 PageID 43
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 3 of 18 PageID 44
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 4 of 18 PageID 45
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 5 of 18 PageID 46
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 6 of 18 PageID 47
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 7 of 18 PageID 48
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 8 of 18 PageID 49
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 9 of 18 PageID 50
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 10 of 18 PageID 51
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 11 of 18 PageID 52
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 12 of 18 PageID 53
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 13 of 18 PageID 54
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 14 of 18 PageID 55
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 15 of 18 PageID 56
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 16 of 18 PageID 57
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 17 of 18 PageID 58
 

 Case 3:04-cv-00299-N Document 6 Filed 06/22/04 Page 18 of 18 PageID 59
IN RE: Sean C. BRAZIL

NO. 2019-B-0081

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent submitted false and inflated billing records to his law firm. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that his conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 8.4(a) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Sean C. Brazil, Louisiana Bar Roll number 36810, be and he hereby is disbarred, retroactive to June 15, 2018, the date of his interim suspension. His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael D. Traina, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael D. Traina  
|                        |  |     |  | Michael D. Traina      
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer