alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016402EN.01005001.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/50

---

Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Amedei (For you)

(Case T-480/16)

(2016/C 402/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Berger, M. Wolter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Amedei Srl (Pontedera, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘For you’ — Application for registration No 12 267 571

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2016 in Case R 851/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject Opposition No B 2 342 452 filed against the EUTM application No 12 267 571; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject Opposition No B 2 342 452 filed against the EUTM application No 12 267 571;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 4.2(i)  


 
 

AGREEMENT TO EXTEND MEZZANINE REVOLVING PROMISSORY NOTE
  and WORKING CAPITAL PROMISSORY NOTE
  
    JULY 15, 2003    
    


        This Agreement to extend the Mezzanine Revolving Promissory Note, dated March 31, 2002, in the principal amount not to exceed $3,500,000.00 from
2ndSwing, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("Maker") to David R. Pomije ("Holder") and
Working Capital Promissory Note, dated March 31, 2002, in the amended principal amount of $4,500,000.00 from Maker to Holder ("Agreement to
Extend") is entered into effective July 15, 2003: 


        For
value received, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


	1.
	In
the event an initial public offering ("Offering") is closed on or before the current maturity date of the Mezzanine Revolving
Promissory Note of March 31, 2004, the maturity date of the Mezzanine Revolving Promissory Note shall be extended to March 31, 2006, but all other terms and conditions of the Mezzanine
Revolving Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect.



	2.
	In
the event such Offering closes on or before the current maturity date of the Working Capital Promissory Note of March 31, 2004, the maturity date of the Working Capital
Promissory Note shall be extended to March 31, 2006 and the principal amount of such note on or after the current maturity date shall be reduced from $4,500,000.00 to $1,500,000.00, but all
other terms and conditions of the Working Capital Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect.



	3.
	Whether
or not an Offering occurs, the maturity date on the notes referenced in Numbers 1 and 2 above is extended from March 31, 2004 to June 30, 2004.



	4.
	The
Mezzanine Financing Letter Agreement dated March 31, 2002 by and between Maker and Holder which sets forth, among other things, the consideration to create the Mezzanine
Revolving Promissory Note, is likewise amended so that reference to the Maturity Date (as therein defined) shall be amended if such Offering closes on or before the amended maturity date of
June 30, 2004, so that the Maturity Date becomes either June 30, 2004, or March 31, 2006, as applicable. All other terms and conditions of the March 31, 2002 Mezzanine
Financing Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed and delivered this Agreement to Extend. 



	 	 	MAKER:
	
 	
 	

2nd SWING, INC.,

a Minnesota corporation
	

 	
 	

By:	

 Stanley A. Bodine
 Its Chief Executive Officer
	

 	
 	
HOLDER:
	

 	
 	


	 	 	David R. Pomije











QuickLinks


AGREEMENT TO EXTEND MEZZANINE REVOLVING PROMISSORY NOTE and WORKING CAPITAL PROMISSORY NOTE JULY 15, 2003
# C_2016175EN.01002101.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/21

---

Action brought on 18 March 2016 — Prada v EUIPO — The Rich Prada International (THE RICH PRADA)

(Case T-111/16)

(2016/C 175/25)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Prada SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Rich Prada International PT (Surabaya, Indonesia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘THE RICH PRADA’ — Application for registration No 10 228 948

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 January 2016 in Joined Cases R 3076/2014-2 and R 3186/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in part, thereby granting Opposition Proceedings No B 2 012 477 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in part, thereby granting Opposition Proceedings No B 2 012 477 in its entirety;

| — | in the alternative, uphold the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, uphold the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in its entirety;

| — | reverse the order to Prada SA to bear the costs of the appeal to the Board of Appeal, in the amount of €550, and order The Rich Prada International PT to pay such costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

reverse the order to Prada SA to bear the costs of the appeal to the Board of Appeal, in the amount of €550, and order The Rich Prada International PT to pay such costs;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the procedure.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019044EN.01000401.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — J. Portugal Ramos Vinhos SA v Adega Cooperativa de Borba CRL

(Case C-629/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Trade mark law - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 3(1)(c) - Grounds for invalidity - Word marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve in trade to designate the characteristics of goods or services - Other characteristics of goods or services - Production facility for a product - Word mark composed of a sign designating wine products and of a geographical name, constituting a word element of the trade mark proprietor’s business name))

(2019/C 44/05)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal de Justiça

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J. Portugal Ramos Vinhos SA

Defendant: Adega Cooperativa de Borba CRL

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1)(c) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the registration of a trade mark consisting of a word sign, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, designating wine products and including a geographical name, must be refused, where that sign contains, in particular, a term which is commonly used to designate facilities or sites in which those products are produced and is also one of the word elements of the business name of the legal entity seeking to register that trade mark.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 891 

Recognizing the contributions of election workers across the country and 

the importance of their work to the democracy of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2024 

Mr. COONS (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the contributions of election workers across the 

country and the importance of their work to the democracy of the United States. 

Whereas the right to vote is foundational to our democracy; 

Whereas there are over 200,000,000 citizens in the United 

States registered to vote; 

Whereas November 5, 2024, is Election Day; 

Whereas, on Election Day, voters across the country will cast 

their votes for the presidency, their representatives in 

Congress, State and local representatives, ballot measures, and other matters; 

Whereas, in our electoral system, the counties of the United 

States are traditionally responsible for administering elecVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:50 Nov 13, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR891.IS SR891

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 891 IS 

tions on the ground, managing polling locations, and hiring and training election workers; 

Whereas, across the United States, there are approximately 

10,000 local election jurisdictions; 

Whereas counties manage over 100,000 voting locations 

throughout the United States, with more than 630,000 

workers at these locations tasked with administering the 

election each cycle; 

Whereas a majority of election workers are over the age of 

60; 

Whereas many jurisdictions are facing challenges with recruiting election workers to administer elections; and 

Whereas election workers are on the frontlines of protecting 

our democracy, including ensuring the security of the voting systems of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the contribution of election work3 ers across the United States; and 

4 (2) recognizes that the work of election workers 

5 is critical to the democracy of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2019423EN.01000401.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien - Austria) – Adelheid Krah v Universität Wien

(Case C-703/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of persons - Article 45 TFEU - Workers - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(1) - Postdoctoral senior lecturers - Limitation on the recognition of previous professionally-relevant periods of service completed in another Member State - System of pay linking a higher rate of pay to the duration of employment with the current employer)

(2019/C 423/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Adelheid Krah

Defendant: Universität Wien

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45(1) TFEU must be interpreted as precluding rules of a university of a Member State, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which, for the purposes of a worker’s salary grading as postdoctoral senior lecturer with that university, take into account only a maximum of four years of previous periods of service completed by that worker in another Member State, if that service was equivalent or indeed identical to that required of the worker in the performance of those duties of postdoctoral senior lecturer.

Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union must be interpreted as not precluding such rules if the service previously completed in another Member State was not equivalent, but merely beneficial to the performance of those duties of postdoctoral senior lecturer.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 9.4.2018.

---
Emily BEASLEY v. Leon CANNIZZARO in His Capacity as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans

NO. 2018-C-2085

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 258 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 258

 To cancel certain proposed changes to loan level price adjustments by 
 the Federal National Mortgage Association and credit fees charged by 
              the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

  Mrs. Bice introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To cancel certain proposed changes to loan level price adjustments by 
 the Federal National Mortgage Association and credit fees charged by 
              the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CANCELLATION OF CHANGES.

    The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the enterprises, as defined 
in section 1303 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and 
Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4502), may not implement the changes 
to the single-family pricing framework announced by the Federal Housing 
Finance Agency on January 19, 2023, in an announcement entitled ``FHFA 
Announces Updates to the Enterprises' Single-Family Pricing 
Framework'', and set forth in Federal National Mortgage Association 
Lender Letter LL-2023-01 and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 
Bulletin 2023-1, and the changes, Lender Letter, and Bulletin shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”).  Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(b) or 15d - 14(b) and to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Ronaldo Iabrudi, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify that:

(i)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 8, 2017

By:          /s/ Ronaldo Iabrudi                                              

Name:     Ronaldo Iabrudi

Title:       Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CRSI Group, Inc.
(the "Company") certifies that:

     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment #1) of the Company
for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

April 6, 2006                         /s/ Juan C. Ferreira
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Juan C. Ferreira (Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chief Financial Officer)
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO

 RIGHTS AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT, dated as of September 26, 2016 (this “Amendment”), is made and entered into by
and between Air T, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, a New York limited liability trust company, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Rights Agreement referred to below. 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain Rights Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2014 (the “Rights
Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Rights have not ceased to be redeemable pursuant to Section 23 of the Rights
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent, at the direction of the Company pursuant to Section 27 of the
Rights Agreement, are entering into this Amendment to amend the Rights Agreement as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 

SECTION 1. Amendment to the Rights Agreement. Effective as of the date hereof, the Rights Agreement shall be amended as follows:

  

	 	a.	Section 1(p) of the Rights Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows: 


“Final Expiration Date” means September 26, 2016. 

SECTION 2. Reference to Agreement. Each reference in the Rights Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereof,” or
“hereunder” or words of like import, and all references to the Rights Agreement in any and all agreements, instruments, documents, notes, certificates and other writings of every kind and nature shall be deemed to mean the Rights Agreement
as modified and amended by this Amendment and as the same may be further amended, modified or supplemented in accordance with the terms thereof. 

SECTION 3. No Other Amendments. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Rights Agreement and other documents, instruments and
agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 
 SECTION 4.
Other Provisions. Sections 28 (Successors; Certain Covenants), 29 (Benefits of this Agreement), 30 (Governing Law), 31 (Severability), 32 (Descriptive Headings) and 34 (Counterparts) of the Rights Agreement are hereby incorporated by
reference into this Amendment and shall apply to this Amendment, mutatis mutandis, as if fully set forth herein. 
 [Signatures
appear on following page] 
  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the
day and year first above written. 
  

			
	AIR T, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Candice L. Otey
	Name:	 	Candice L. Otey
	Title:	 	Vice President- Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


  
  

			
	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC, as Rights Agent
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mike Nespoli
	Name:	 	Mike Nespoli
	Title:	 	 Executive Director, Relationship

Management
***Exhibit 7.1***

 

 

|                                                            | 2013    | 2012    | 2011    | 2010     | 2009    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|---------------|--------------|
| Other financial data                                            | %       | %       | %       | %        | %       |
| Dividend  payout ratio (1)                                 | —      | —      | —      | 1,389.4  | —      |
| Return  on average total assets (2)                        | —      | —      | —      | 0.4      | —      |
| Return  on average ordinary shareholders' equity (3)       | —      | —      | —      | 17.8     | —      |
| Average  owners' equity as a percentage of average total assets | 10.9    | 3.3     | 2.4     | 2.2      | 3.0     |
| Capital  ratio – Tier 1                                   | 23.2    | 13.9    | 12.0    | 11.0     | 19.9    |
| Total                                                           | 26.1    | 19.8    | 17.5    | 15.8     | 25.5    |
| Ratio  of earnings to fixed charges only (4)               |    |    |    |     |    |
|   –  including interest on deposits             | 0.71    | 0.13    | 0.39    | 1.26     | —      |
|   –  excluding interest on deposits             | 0.30    | —      | 0.84    | 1.86     | —      |

 

Notes:

(1)    Dividend payout ratio represents dividends paidand current year final dividends proposed as a percentage of net profitattributable to ordinary shareholders. 

(2)    Return on average total assets represents profitfor the year as a percentage of average total assets. Negative ratios have beenexcluded.

(3)    Return on average ordinary shareholders' equityrepresents profit attributable to ordinary shareholders expressed as apercentage of average ordinary shareholders' equity. Negative ratios have beenexcluded.

(4)    For this purpose, earnings consist of incomebefore tax plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of total interest expense,including or excluding interest on deposits. Deposits include banks and totalcustomer accounts. Negative ratios have been excluded. The coverage deficiencyfor total fixed charges excluding interest on deposits for the year ended 31December 2013 is €142 million (31 December 2012 - €887 million and 31 December2011 - €186 million). The earnings for the year ended 31 December 2009 wasinadequate to cover total fixed charges excluding interest on deposits andtotal fixed charges including interest on deposits.  

 

 

 

----