alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 884 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 884

  Designating the week of September 22 through September 28, 2024, as 
                ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

 Mrs. Hyde-Smith (for herself and Mr. Warnock) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of September 22 through September 28, 2024, as 
                ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Week''.

Whereas the last Sunday in September--

    (1) is designated as ``Gold Star Mother's Day'' under section 111 of 
title 36, United States Code; and

    (2) was first designated as ``Gold Star Mother's Day'' under the Joint 
Resolution entitled ``Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in 
September as `Gold Star Mother's Day', and for other purposes'', approved 
June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895);

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the loss of a loved 
        one who died in service to the United States;
Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in the line of duty 
        while serving in the Armed Forces;
Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, through their service, 
        bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United 
        States;
Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members and veterans of the 
        Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those 
        individuals, inspires all individuals in the United States to sacrifice 
        and work diligently for the good of the United States; and
Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members of the Armed Forces 
        and the families of veterans of the Armed Forces should never be 
        forgotten: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 22 through September 
        28, 2024, as ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Week'';
            (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made by--
                    (A) the families of members of the Armed Forces who 
                made the ultimate sacrifice in order to defend freedom 
                and protect the United States; and
                    (B) the families of veterans of the Armed Forces; 
                and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Gold Star Families Remembrance Week by--
                    (A) performing acts of service and good will in 
                their communities; and
                    (B) celebrating families in which loved ones made 
                the ultimate sacrifice so that others could continue to 
                enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.11



TO:        Kurt Hoffman

FM:        John P. Ryan

SUBJ:      Amended Employment Agreement

DATE:      July 1, 2001


This letter outlines the terms of my employment agreement with Trend Mining
Company as of July 1, 2001.

From July 1, 2001 my compensation per month shall be 7500 shares per month. This
compensation is a retainer and is in exchange for my services as Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company. I will undertake these duties to the best of my
abilities and will be available for consultation, meetings, conference call,
advice and support as needed.

This agreement may be cancelled by you or by the action of the Board upon thirty
days notice. Similarly, it may be cancelled by me with thirty days notice.



Sincerely,


/s/ John Ryan
John Ryan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I, Kurt Hoffman, President of Trend Mining, hereby confirm the terms of Mr.
Ryan's agreement as outlined above.



/s/ Kurt Hoffman
Kurt Hoffman, President
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 1 of 10



     

    




 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 2 of 10



     

    




 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 3 of 10



     

    




 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 4 of 10



     

    




 





 






    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 5 of 10



     

    

 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 6 of 10



     

    

 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 7 of 10



     

    




 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 8 of 10



     

    




 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 9 of 10



     

    




 





 



    	SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT	 	 PAGE 10 of 10
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 2425-057]
 On January 3, 2022, the PE Hydro Generation, LLC filed a new major license application for the 1,600-kilowatt (kW) Luray and 1,400-kW Newport Hydroelectric Project No. 2425 (project). The two-development Luray and Newport Project is located on the South Fork of the Shenandoah River near the Towns of Luray (Luray Development) and Newport (Newport Development) in Page County, Virginia. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on October 18, 2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to license the project.[1] The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members, and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or 
                    *OPP@ferc.gov.*( print page 1125) The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
December 31, 2025.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Kristine Sillett at (202) 502-6575 or 
                    *kristine.sillett@ferc.gov.* Dated: December 31, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1734604406. 40 CFR 1501.5(c)(4) (2024). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2025-00088 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 586 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary 

Embolism Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2024 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Deep Vein Thrombosis 

and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas deep vein thrombosis (referred to in this preamble 

as ‘‘DVT’’) is a condition that occurs when a blood clot 

forms in the deep veins of the body, such as in the arm, 

abdomen, around the brain, and most commonly in the 

leg; 

Whereas a potentially life-threatening complication of DVT is 

a pulmonary embolism (referred to in this preamble as a 

‘‘PE’’), where a blood clot breaks off, travels through the 

blood stream, and lodges in the lung; 

Whereas DVT and PEs are serious but often preventable 

medical conditions; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 586 ATS 

Whereas DVT and PEs affect as many as 900,000 individuals in the United States each year; 

Whereas DVT and PEs kill an estimated 60,000 to 100,000 

individuals in the United States each year, and 1 out of 

4 individuals who have a PE die without warning; 

Whereas deaths caused by DVT and PEs are often preventable; 

Whereas DVT and PEs are among the leading causes of preventable hospital deaths in the United States; 

Whereas DVT and PEs are common complications faced by 

cancer patients, and survival rates are lower for individuals with cancer who also have blood clots; 

Whereas pregnancy increases the risk of DVT and PEs, and 

that risk remains elevated for up to 3 months after giving birth; 

Whereas immobility, surgery, older age, and a family history 

of clotting and thrombophilia increase the risk of DVT 

and PEs; 

Whereas DVT and PEs contribute to up to $10,000,000,000 

in incremental medical costs each year in the United 

States; and 

Whereas the establishment of March as ‘‘Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month’’ would 

raise awareness about these life-threatening but preventable conditions: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Deep Vein 

3 Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness 

4 Month’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 586 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the importance of raising aware2 ness of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embo3 lisms. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
John J. CHAMBERLAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Daryll GOODING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4348

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2022463EN.01002601.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB

(Case T-761/20) (1)

(Public procurement - Tendering procedure - Exclusion from the procurement procedure - Abnormally low offer - Attempts to unduly influence the decision-making process - Failure to observe the rules on communication - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons - Misuse of powers - Non-contractual liability)

(2022/C 463/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Sfyri and M. Koutrouli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: I. Koepfer and J. Krumrey, acting as Agents, and by A. Rosenkötter, lawyer)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of (i) the decision of the Procurement Committee of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 1 October 2020 to exclude its tenders for the three lots in the procurement procedure Provision of services and works for IT application delivery, (ii) the decision of the ECB Procurement Review Body of 9 December 2020 and (iii) all the related subsequent decisions of the ECB; second, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, it seeks compensation for the damage it allegedly suffered as a result of that exclusion.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.

---
# C_2016243EN.01004301.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/43

---

Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Haverkamp v EUIPO — Sissel (Foot mat)

(Case T-227/16)

(2016/C 243/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reinhard Haverkamp (Kindberg, Austria) (represented by: A. Waldenberger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sissel GmbH (Bad Dürkheim, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the design at issue:

Design at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the design ‘Foot mat’ — International registration designating the European Union No DM/072187-0001

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 in Case R 2618/2014-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings, the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the invalidity proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings, the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the invalidity proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 235 

To recognize the Margaret Woodbury Strong Museum in Rochester, New 

York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Mr. MORELLE (for himself and Mr. LANGWORTHY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To recognize the Margaret Woodbury Strong Museum in 

Rochester, New York. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Museum of 

5 Play Recognition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MUSEUM OF PLAY IN 

7 ROCHESTER, NEW YORK. 

8 (a) CONGRESSIONAL RECOGNITION.—Congress— 

9 (1) recognizes that the Margaret Woodbury 

10 Strong Museum, DBA Strong Museum, located in 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 235 IH

1 Rochester, New York, is the only museum of its kind 

2 that exists for the exclusive purpose of exploring the 

3 ways in which play encourages learning, creativity, 

4 and discovery, and how it illuminates cultural his5 tory; and 

6 (2) officially designates the Margaret Woodbury 

7 Strong Museum as the National Museum of Play. 

8 (b) EFFECT OF RECOGNITION; DESIGNATION.—The 

9 National Museum of Play recognized in subsection (a) is 

10 not a unit of the National Park System and the designa11 tion under subsection (a) shall not be construed to require 

12 or permit Federal funds to be expended for any purpose 

13 related to the Museum. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2016106EN.01004301.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/43

---

Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Fink (NANA FINK)

(Case T-39/16)

(2016/C 106/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nadine Fink (Basle, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘NANA FINK’ — International registration designating the European Union No IR 1 111 651

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2015 in Case R 679/2014-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in opposition proceedings B 2 125 543 (International trade mark registration No IR 1 111 651); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in opposition proceedings B 2 125 543 (International trade mark registration No IR 1 111 651);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 13.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-A) PLC (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Trøim, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: June 14, 2011





/s/ Tor Olav Trøim


Tor Olav Trøim


Principal Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Jordan T. HICKS

NO. 2018-KO-1918

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nova Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Vahan Kololian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Vahan Kololian                                  Dated: November 14, 2006
    ---------------------------------
    Vahan Kololian
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 144 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 144

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide that the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 
   does not apply to certain reports required to be submitted by the 
          Tennessee Valley Authority, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tennessee Valley Authority Salary 
Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. SALARY DISCLOSURE; EXCEPTION TO REPORT ELIMINATION.

    Section 9 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 
831h) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``a financial 
        statement'' and all that follows through ``$1,500 a year'' and 
        inserting ``a report of the total number of employees at the 
        management level or above, to include all executives and board 
        members, that shall include the names, salaries, and duties of 
        such employees, that are receiving compensation at or greater 
        than the maximum rate of basic pay for grade GS-15 of the 
        General Schedule'';
            (2) by striking all that precedes ``The Board shall'' and 
        inserting the following:

``SEC. 9. FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    ``(a) Report on Compensation.--
            ``(1) In general.--''; and
            (3) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Exemption.--The information concerning salaries of 
        employees of the Corporation contained in, or filed with, the 
        report described in paragraph (1) is exempt from--
                    ``(A) disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of title 
                5, United States Code; and
                    ``(B) the requirements of the Access to 
                Congressionally Mandated Reports Act (Public Law 117-
                263).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 15, 2025.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 144

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide that the Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 
   does not apply to certain reports required to be submitted by the 
          Tennessee Valley Authority, and for other purposes.
```
Betty Caitlin Nicole SMITH, Appellant, v. Zachary Taylor DANIEL, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3222

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.