alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Update of FAA-AEE Emissions 

Programs Update

Presented to:		REDAC Environment & Energy

		Subcommittee 

By: 		Ralph Iovinelli

		Manager, Emissions Division, AEE-300

		FAA Office of Environment & Energy

Date:		March 17, 2015

Federal Aviation

Administration

Federal Aviation

Administration

1

Emissions Research Roadmap

FY15 Emissions Projects

FY16/17 Emissions R&D Expectations

Primary Emissions Activities

2

Federal Aviation

Administration

3

EmissionsSource Characterization

Certificationand Regulations

EmissionsTools Development

ClimateImpactsResearch

Guidance

AviationEmissionsModeling

HealthImpactsResearch

EMISSIONS RESEARCH ROADMAP

Federal Aviation

Administration

FY15 Emissions Projects

COE02: nvPM Engine Measurements and Standard

COE13: Access2 Microphysical Modeling

COE14:  CO2 Standard

COE18: Modeling AQ Health Impacts

COE19: Airport AQ Impacts Modeling

COE20: Rapid Global AQ Modeling (Adjoint)

NAS-wide Energy Efficiency

COE21:  APMT-Impacts Climate Global Tool Development

COE22:  Evaluation of FAA Climate Impacts Tools

COE24:  Alternative Fuels Emissions Data Analysis

2012 Contrails Observational Dataset Development

2050 Climate Modeling Scenarios

Regional Climate Model Dev.

4

Federal Aviation

Administration

Work will finish on CO2 standard development – move on to domestic implementation

Wrap up nvPM emissions measurements and continue work to develop standard

Finish development of metric and method for quantifying domestic air quality impacts

Expand worldwide air quality modeling to have higher fidelity grids over Europe and Asia while explicitly including uncertainties in underlying emissions inventories

Develop and implement plan to examine climate impacts that are unique to aviation to enable solution development

FY16/17 Emissions R&D Expectations

5

Federal Aviation

Administration

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image1.jpeg

# image4.emf

# image5.png
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OFCEO AND CFOPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Precision Auto Care, Inc. (the “Registrant”), on Form 10-KSBfor the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), Robert R. Falconi, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant and Mark P. Francis, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Registrant, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to hisknowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of the operations of the Registrant.
|                       | **Signature** | ** **                             | ** ** | ** **               | **Title** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Date** | ** ** | ** ** |
|-----------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|-----------|------------|------------|------------|----------|------------|------------|
| /s/ ROBERT R. FALCONI |          | President and  Chief Executive Officer |       | September 19,  2007 |      |
| Robert R. Falconi     |          |                                   |       |                     |      |
| /s/ MARK P. FRANCIS   |          | Chief Financial  Officer               |       | September 19,  2007 |      |
| Mark P. Francis       |          |                                   |       |                     |      |

 

[A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Precision Auto Care, Inc. andwill be retained by Precision Auto Care, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

----
Henry PENICK v. The MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE F&AM OF ALABAMA

1160145

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7646 

ALICE WHEELER CAIRNS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-208)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 9, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alice Wheeler Cairns, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alice Wheeler Cairns seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Cairns that failure

to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Cairns failed to object to

the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Cairns has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2022482EN.01001701.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Sogia Ellas v Commission

(Case T-347/20) (1)

(State aid - Activities linked to the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products - Aid schemes granted by Greece in the form of interest subsidies and State guarantees on existing and new loans to compensate for damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences - Decision declaring the aid schemes incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid - Aid limited to disaster-hit geographical areas - Advantage - Selectivity - Market economy operator principle - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Length of the procedure - Protection of legitimate expectations - Limitation period - Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589)

(2022/C 482/24)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Sogia Ellas AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P. Bernitsas, M. Androulakaki, A. Patsalia and E. Kalogiannis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and T. Ramopoulos, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Myloi Sogias AE (Maroussi, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/394 of 7 October 2019 concerning the measures SA.39119 (2016/C) (ex 2015/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by the Hellenic Republic in the form of interest subsidies and guarantees linked to the fires of 2007 (the present decision covers only the agricultural sector) (OJ 2020 L 76, p. 4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sogia Ellas AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sogia Ellas AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Myloi Sogias AE to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Myloi Sogias AE to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.

---
EX-10.7




 Exhibit 10.7 
  





 
  

			
	Memorandum of Understanding
	To:	  	iRhythm
	From:	  	Jason Sieloff
	Date:	  	2/16/2015
	Re:	  	Areas of clarification in the Manufactures Service Agreement (MSA)

 During our contract review there were a few items that needed clarification and agreement from IRhythm. This memorandum of
understanding is to clarify the intent of the items in the Manufactures Service Agreement (MSA) effective on February 28, 2009 between Jabil and IRhythm. 
  

	1.	Section 5.1 “Jabil Warranty” (MSA) states IPC-A 610D class 2 workmanship. IRhythm understands that IPC standards change from time to time and that Jabil will be held at a minimum revision D. However, if
new revision provides better than requirements Jabil may implement that requirement. If a change occurs as a result per the change control process IRhythm will be notified as defined in the Manufactures Service Agreement. 


2. 
 By signing this memorandum of understanding IRhythm
understands Jabil to follow guidelines in the agreements based on the understanding listed above. 
  

							
	IRythm	 		 	Jabil
				
	 Matthew C. Garrett
	 		 		 	 Jason Sieloff

	Name	 		 		 	Name
				
	 /s/ Matthew C. Garrett
	 		 		 	 /s/ Jason Sieloff

	Signature	 		 		 	Signature
				
	 2/17/15
	 		 		 	 2-16-2015

	Date	 		 		 	Date


  
 1
Iris Nell Spinks JOURDAN, Robin Rene Jourdan and Misty Michelle Jourdan Appe v. ALLMERICA FINANCIAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2018-02105

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
# C_2016296EN.01002701.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/27

---

Action brought on 19 June 2016 — Cafés Pont v EUIPO — Giordano Vini (Art’s Café)

(Case T-309/16)

(2016/C 296/36)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cafés Pont, SL (Sabadell, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. M. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Giordano Vini SpA (Diano d’Alba, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Art’s Café’ — European Union trade mark No 5 622 345

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 01/04/2016 in Case R 1110/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | deliver a judgment granting the application, revoking the cancellation on the grounds of non-use of European Union trade mark No 5 622 345 and confirming the use of that trade mark; and |
| --- | --- |

—

deliver a judgment granting the application, revoking the cancellation on the grounds of non-use of European Union trade mark No 5 622 345 and confirming the use of that trade mark; and

| — | order the defendant and any interveners to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and any interveners to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) and (b) and Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) and (b) and Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 128 

To require the Assistant Secretary for the Countering Weapons of Mass 

Destruction Office of the Department of Homeland Security to treat 

illicit fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Ms. BOEBERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Assistant Secretary for the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office of the Department of 

Homeland Security to treat illicit fentanyl as a weapon 

of mass destruction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fentanyl is a WMD 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 128 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF ILLICIT FENTANYL AS A WEAPON 

2 OF MASS DESTRUCTION. 

3 The Assistant Secretary for the Countering Weapons 

4 of Mass Destruction Office of the Department of Home5 land Security shall treat illicit fentanyl as a weapon of 

6 mass destruction for purposes of title XIX of the Home7 land Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 590 et seq.). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
STATE of Louisiana v. Vernell DAY

NO. 2018-KO-1228

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Denied.
Breontay MCMILLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0565

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019

Affirmed.
exv4w29



 



Exhibit 4.29



Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions of
this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject
to the confidential treatment request. Omissions are designated as
“[*****]” or “*****”. A complete
version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission
pursuant to an application for confidential treatment under
Rule 24b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


MODIFICATION 0001 TO

SUBCONTRACT 200-2002-00010 (BXTR)




Only Applicable to Goods and Services Ordered




Under Subcontract Item 0001B By Delivery Order 0001



In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein, Acambis Inc.
(hereinafter “Contractor”) and Baxter Healthcare Corporation (hereinafter 2nd
Subcontractor) hereby enter into this bilateral Modification 0001 to
Subcontract 200-2002-00010 (BXTR) as follows:



This Modification 0001 only applies to the performance of Subcontract Item
0001B as ordered under Subcontract Delivery Order 0001.




Description of Modification



     Item 0001B



     [ **** ]



2nd Subcontractor shall submit to the Contractor a proposal for equitable
adjustment, if any, of the Subcontract price(s) associated with this
Modification within 30-days after the Contractual Officer requests such a
proposal. In the event that the parties are unable to agree, any dispute
between Contractor and [*****] Subcontractor regarding the amount of any equitable
adjustment to price resulting from this modification shall be resolved in
accordance with Clauses H.22, Disputes, and H.23, Governing Law, of the
Subcontract.




ACAMBIS CONFIDENTIAL-PROPRIETARY INFORMATION



 







 





Subcontract No. 200-2002-00010 (BXTR)

Modification 0001



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Modification 0001 to
be effective as of      April 2002.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Acambis Inc.	 	Baxter Healthcare Corporation
	(Contractor)	 	(2nd Subcontractor)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	


	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	[ **** ]	 	[ **** ]
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Execution Date: 9 May 02	 	Execution Date: April 30, 2002




ACAMBIS CONFIDENTIAL-PROPRIETARY INFORMATION





2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Judy E. Naus, certify that:


1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Biotel Inc.;


2
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely, to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(d)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  February 11, 2008
        By:
        /s/ Judy E. NausChief Financial Officer




---
# C_2016364EN.01002401.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/24

---

Action brought on 5 August 2016 — Schniga v CPVO (Gala Schnico)

(Case T-445/16)

(2016/C 364/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Schniga GmbH (Bolzano, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Community plant variety right at issue: Gala Schnico — Community plant variety right application No 2009/1807

Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 22 April 2016 in Case A005/2014.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order CPVO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order CPVO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 76, 8, 57(3) and 75 of Regulation No 2100/94. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 76, 8, 57(3) and 75 of Regulation No 2100/94.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. David Billy PARKER, Jr.

No. 2018-K-2000

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU**

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

In my view, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a juror pursuant to La. C.Cr.P. art. 796 and under unique circumstances presented. Accordingly, I would grant the State's writ application, reverse the court of appeal, reinstating the jury verdict sentence imposed by the trial court.
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-57962 and 333-89866) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-45954, 333-45956, 333-55614 and 333-55946)
of Avaya Inc. of our report dated November 27, 2002 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated November 27, 2002 relating to
the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
December 23, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 695 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 695

  Expressing support for the designation of May 2024 as ``Motorcycle 
                       Safety Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2024

    Mr. Peters (for himself and Ms. Ernst) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of May 2024 as ``Motorcycle 
                       Safety Awareness Month''.

Whereas, according to the Motorcycle Industry Council, motorcycling is a great 
        tradition enjoyed by an estimated 30,000,000 individuals annually in the 
        United States, representing approximately 9 percent of the population;
Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix;
Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having 
        little impact on the transportation infrastructure of the United States;
Whereas the motorcycling community promotes rider safety education, licensing, 
        and motorcycle awareness;
Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes 
        through training and safety education, personal responsibility, and 
        increased public awareness;
Whereas, according to the Motorcycle Industry Council, approximately 87 percent 
        of motorcycles are operated on highways in conjunction with other 
        vehicles;
Whereas motorcyclist fatalities occur more frequently than passenger vehicle 
        motorist fatalities;
Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users and will help 
        decrease motorcycle crashes; and
Whereas the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration promotes Motorcycle 
        Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to be properly licensed, 
        receive training, and wear personal protective equipment, and to remind 
        all riders and motorists to always share the road: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of May 2024 as ``Motorcycle 
        Safety Awareness Month'';
            (2) recognizes the contribution of motorcycles to the 
        transportation mix;
            (3) encourages motorcycle awareness by all road users;
            (4) recognizes that motorcyclists have a right to the road 
        and that all motorists should safely share the roadways;
            (5) encourages rider safety education, training, and proper 
        gear for safe motorcycle operation; and
            (6) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```