alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 20-F of Golden State Petro (IOM
1-A) PLC;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal  controls;  and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 30, 2003

/s/ Kate Blankenship
-------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Principal Financial Officer

02089.0007 #413882
Terrance SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 28, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.John P. Calamos, Sr.Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand Co-Chief Investment Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Equity OfficeProperties Trust (the “Company”), each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his / her knowledge, on the datehereof:
(a)  the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, filed on the datehereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b)  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Richard D. Kincaid       Richard D. Kincaid   *President and Chief Executive Officer*           Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Marsha C. Williams       Marsha C. Williams   *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
# C_2017046EN.01002601.xml

| 13.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/26

---

Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)

(Case T-893/16)

(2017/C 046/29)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Xiaomi, Inc. (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. Raab and C. Tenkhoff, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MI PAD’ — Application for registration No 12 780 987

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 363/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION        REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In        connection with the filing of the financial statements of China Sun Group High-Tech Co.        (“Registrant”) for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 (the        “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s        knowledge, that:

| 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements                    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                    and |
|----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly                    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                    operations of Registrant. |
|----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:          October 15, 2007

|   | /s/ Bin                    Wang                                                                                                              Bin Wang                    President and Chief Executive Officer                    (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Ming Fen                    Liu                                                                                                        Ming Fen Liu                    Chief Financial Officer                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00282]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

[Docket ID: USN-2024-HQ-0013]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
10, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Department of the Navy 
Reasonable Accommodations Tracker; SECNAV Form 12306/1; OMB Control 
Number 0703-0063.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 2,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 667.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to track, monitor, review, and process requests for reasonable 
accommodations applicants for employment. This information is collected 
by the Department of the Navy Equal Employment Opportunity personnel 
involved in the Reasonable Accommodation process and data input into 
the Reasonable Accommodation Tracker (electronic information system) 
pursuant to Executive Order 13163. Official Reasonable Accommodation 
case files are secured with access granted on a strictly limited basis.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2025-00282 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
**Exhibit 32**

 

ORIENT-EXPRESSHOTELS LTD.

 

Section 1350Certification

 

The undersigned hereby certify that this report ofOrient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.

 
| /s/ Paul M. White                     |   | /s/ Martin O’Grady          |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| Paul M. White                         |   | Martin O’Grady              |
| President and                         |   | Vice President—Finance  and |
| Chief Executive Officer               |   | Chief Financial Officer          |
|                                  |   |                             |
|                                  |   |                             |
| Dated:   June 29, 2009 |   |                             |

 

 

[A signed original of this written certification hasbeen provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained byOrient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.]

 

----
# C_2016343EN.01004801.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/48

---

Action brought on 29 July 2016 — Martín Osete v EUIPO — Rey (AN IDEAL HUSBAND)

(Case T-429/16)

(2016/C 343/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Isabel Martín Osete (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Wellens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Daniella Rey (Toulouse, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘AN IDEAL HUSBAND’ — EU trade mark No 5 231 808

Trade mark at issue:

o

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2016 in Case R 1526/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 908 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. BRAUN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is difficult to detect in the early stages of the disease due to 

the late onset of symptoms, which lowers survival rates; 

Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in 

the lining of the stomach; 

Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most commonly diagnosed type of cancer worldwide; 

Whereas, in 2024, an estimated— 

(1) 26,890 cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed 

in the United States; and 

(2) 10,880 individuals in the United States will die 

from stomach cancer; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 908 IS 

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 36.4 percent, and the 5-year survival rate is 

just 7 percent when diagnosed at a late, or distant, stage; 

Whereas early-onset gastric cancer, gastric cancer presenting 

at the age of 45 or younger, appears to be rising for reasons that are unclear; 

Whereas helicobacter pylori has been identified as a risk factor for stomach cancer that often goes undetected and 

untreated; 

Whereas, in the United States, there are disparities in stomach cancer incidence and mortality among racial and ethnic minorities; 

Whereas a diagnosis of stomach cancer is often delayed, because stomach cancer usually does not have symptoms 

early on, making it hard to detect; 

Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer, including risk factors and symptoms, among 

patients and health care providers could improve timely 

diagnosis of stomach cancer; 

Whereas more research into prevention, early detection, and 

treatment for stomach cancer is needed; and 

Whereas November 2024 is an appropriate month to observe 

Stomach Cancer Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer 

3 Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, 

5 and education about, stomach cancer among health 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 908 IS 

1 care providers and the general public of the United 

2 States; 

3 (3) recognizes the need for additional research 

4 to understand stomach cancer risk factors, as well 

5 as prevention, early detection, and treatment for 

6 stomach cancer; and 

7 (4) encourages States, territories, and localities 

8 of the United States to support the goals of Stom9 ach Cancer Awareness Month. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Filed 9/29/14 Seabloom v. Wendel CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CYNTHIA SEABLOM,

Cross

- complainant and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTINE WENDEL,

Cross

- d efendant and Appellant. B248665

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. KC063482)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Dan

Thomas Oki, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

______

Christine Wendel, in pro. per., for Cross

- defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Cross

- complainant and Respondent.

______2

Christine Wendel appealed from the May 7, 2013 order appointing a receiver in a

cross

- action brought against her by Cynthia Seablom and an underlying action between

CPS Signage & Marketing Corporation, a company affiliated with Wendel, and Seablom.

Wendel contends that the May 7, 2013 order is void because the trial court did not direct

the posting of a bond along with the receiver appointm ent

. The court, however, entered a

subsequent order on May 20, 2013, in which it did direct the posting of a bond as a

condition of the receiver appointment. Wendel maintains that the court lacked

jurisdiction to enter the May 20, 2013 order because s he already had filed a notice of

appeal from the May 7, 2013 order. But Wendel did not appeal from the May 20, 2013

order and accordingly has no basis to challenge it. T he May 20, 2013 order thus is intact

and directs the posting of a bond, which is Wendel’ s only complaint about the May 7,

2013 order. As a result, Wendel’s appeal from the May 7, 2013 order based on the

failure to direct the posting of a bond is moot.

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

.

ROTHSCHILD, P. J.

We concur:

JOHNSON, J.

MILLER, J. *

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, Assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant

to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
Case 3:04-cv-00489-K Document 50 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 918
**EXHIBIT 32.2**  **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER** **Pursuant    to** **Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of American    Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC (the    “Registrant”), certify that to the best of my    knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    for the period ended September 30, 2006 of the Registrant    (the “Report”):     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Registrant.      By: /s/  DENISE    BARTON    Denise Barton*Senior Vice President, Chief Financial**Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of**American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC*     Date: November 9, 2006
1 The fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) states that the “court shall have

power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment

affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without

remanding the cause for a rehearing.” See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89

(1991). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MARY JANE PARKS §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-220-Y

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On April 4, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings

and conclusions”) in the above-styled and -numbered cause. An

order issued that same day gave all parties until April 25, 2005,

to serve and file with the Court written objections to the proposed

findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge. The Court has

not received any written objections. As a result, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required.

Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s

findings and conclusions for plain error and has found none. 

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court finds that

the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the

Commissioner is REVERSED and the action REMANDED, pursuant to the

fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),1 for further administrative

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00220-Y Document 18 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 100
2

proceedings for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s

findings and conclusions.

SIGNED April 29, 2005.

TRM/kat

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00220-Y Document 18 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 101