alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,990,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  765,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,421,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,179,040
<PP&E>                                      42,526,866
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,792,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,549,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,054,125
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,392,475
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,689
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,188,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,549,026
<SALES>                                      3,689,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,689,524
<CGS>                                        2,850,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,610,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             567,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,097,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,097,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                  (2,356,111)
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,453,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.03)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 746 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 746

Commemorating the passage of 3 years since the tragic building collapse 
                in Surfside, Florida, on June 24, 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2024

 Mr. McConnell (for Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida)) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commemorating the passage of 3 years since the tragic building collapse 
                in Surfside, Florida, on June 24, 2021.

Whereas June 24, 2024, marks 3 years since portions of the Champlain Towers 
        South condominium building in Surfside, Florida, catastrophically 
        collapsed; and
Whereas, in the aftermath of the devastating collapse--

    (1) 1 of the largest rescue and recovery operations in the history of 
the United States commenced to locate scores of residents who were 
unaccounted for and believed to be in the collapsed building;

    (2) first responders from across the State of Florida immediately 
answered the call of duty, including firefighters, uniformed police 
officers, rescue and recovery crews, emergency medical technicians, 
physicians, nurses, and others rushing to save the lives of individuals 
trapped in the building;

    (3) international rescue crews and emergency support organizations from 
Israel and Mexico responded to the site to aid in the search and recovery 
efforts;

    (4) National Urban Search and Rescue Response System task forces from 
Florida, Virginia, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, and 
emergency specialists from California, deployed to Surfside, Florida, to 
provide critical support;

    (5) teams worked tirelessly around the clock to rescue survivors and 
recover the remains of individuals killed in the tragic collapse; and

    (6) on June 30, 2021, the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology announced it would launch a formal investigation into the cause 
of the collapse: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the passage of 3 years since the tragic 
        building collapse in Surfside, Florida, on June 24, 2021;
            (2) honors the survivors and the 98 lives lost in the 
        collapse of the Champlain Towers South condominium building and 
        offers heartfelt condolences to the families, loved ones, and 
        friends of the victims;
            (3) commends the bravery and selfless service demonstrated 
        by the local, State, national, and international teams of first 
        responders deployed in the aftermath of the collapse; and
            (4) expresses support for the survivors and community of 
        Surfside, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
Demarkus BOYKIN v. Kimberly BOYKIN

2160223

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1











CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Trøim, Director and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 23, 2011








/s/ Tor Olav Trøim


Tor Olav Trøim


Principal Executive Officer
Josaa. MEZA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3961

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

Vectrus Systems Corporation ) ASBCA Nos. 63472-ADR, 63523-ADR

)

Under Contract No. FA3002-17-C-0001 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Joseph G. Martinez, Esq. 

Mikaela R. Colvin, Esq.

Natalie M. Seelig, Esq.

 Dentons US LLP

 Denver, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Caryl A. Potter III, Esq.

 Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Christian Robertson II, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ARNETT

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment 

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent 

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $162,000. 

This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further interest shall be 

paid. 

Dated: February 21, 2024

(Signatures continued)

LAURA J. ARNETT

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63472-ADR, 63523-ADR,

Appeals of Vectrus Systems Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board’s 

Charter.

Dated: February 22, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1179 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-967, K2025-966.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31738 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021320EN.01001101.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/11

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus AB

(Case C-248/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Deduction of the input tax paid during the stage of construction of a building - Optional tax liability scheme - Abandonment of the initially planned activity - Adjustment of the deduction of the input tax paid - Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law)

(2021/C 320/12)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteverket

Defendant: Skellefteå Industrihus AB

Operative part of the order

Articles 137, 168, 184 to 187, 189 and 192 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which requires a property owner who was granted the right to benefit from the optional tax liability scheme during the construction of a building that he or she intended to let out, and who deducted the input value added tax (VAT) charged on the purchases relating to that building project, to repay immediately all that VAT, plus any applicable interest, on the ground that the planned project that gave rise to the right of deduction did not result in any taxed activity, but as not precluding national legislation which, in such a situation, establishes an obligation to adjust the input VAT paid.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
Yusuf SHABAZZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4677

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

J.B. STELL GAINES, SR., )

ID # 843480, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:04-CV-1185-D

 )

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED July 27, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01185-D Document 23 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 172
# C_2016296EN.01003301.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/33

---

Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360o)

o

(Case T-333/16)

(2016/C 296/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘360o’ — Application for registration No 14 042 188

Trade mark at issue:

o

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2016 in Case R 2287/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the period ended December 31, 2006 I, Victor Roskey, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the issuer, certify that:

1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                     |     |                                                                                 
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
March 30, 2007 | By: | /s/ Victor RoskeyVictor Roskey
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the issuer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Patricia M. BUTZ, Appellant, v. Stanley K. SMITH and Nancy J. Smith, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q accompanying this statement.



The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of XM Satellite Radio Inc. (Inc.), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q of Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inc.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Hugh PaneroHugh PaneroPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2004/s/ Joseph J. EuteneuerJoseph J. EuteneuerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 16, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inc. and will be retained by Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 906 of


the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
7, 2008





By:
            /s/ Stephen K. GardnerStephen
      K. GardnerChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Stuart Rogers, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MAX Resource Corp. (the Company);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 24, 2008/s/Stuart RogersStuart Rogers, President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2018319EN.01001001.xml

| 10.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘E LATS’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-154/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 311(1)(1) - Special arrangements for second-hand goods - Definition of ‘second-hand goods’ - Goods containing precious metals or precious stones resold by a trader - Processing of those goods after sale - Recovery of the precious metals or precious stones - Concept of ‘precious metals or precious stones’))

(2018/C 319/11)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SIA ‘E LATS’

Respondent: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Operative part of the judgment

Article 311(1)(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘second-hand goods’ does not cover used goods containing precious metals or precious stones if those goods are no longer capable of performing their initial function and have retained only the functionalities inherent in those metals and stones, which is for the national court to determine taking into account all the objective circumstances relevant in each individual case.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

---