alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018408EN.01002001.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich — Poland) — Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej v Mariusz Wawrzosek

(Case C-176/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 2008/48/EC - Order for payment procedure founded on a promissory note that secures the obligations arising from a consumer credit agreement))

(2018/C 408/24)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej

Defendant: Mariusz Wawrzosek

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which permits issue of an order for payment founded on a valid promissory note that secures a claim arising from a consumer credit agreement, where the court dealing with an application for an order for payment does not have the power to examine whether the terms of that agreement are unfair, if the detailed rules for exercising the right to lodge an objection against such an order do not enable observance of the rights which the consumer derives from that directive to be ensured.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.

---
[Cite as State v. Morrison , 2022-Ohio-104.] 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNT Y STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

- v - HENRY C. MORRISON, Defendant-Appellant. CASE NOS. 2021-A-0039 2021-A-0040 2021-A-0041 2021-A-0043 Criminal Appeals from the Court of Common Pleas

Trial Court Nos. 2021 CR 00405 2021 CR 00349 2021 CR 00096 2021 CR 00078

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Decided: Januar y 18, 2022 Jud g ment: Appeals dismissed

Colleen Mary O’Toole, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH 44047 ( For Plaintiff-Appellee )

.

Henry C. Morrison , pro se, PID# A783322, North Central Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1812, Marion, OH 43302 ( Defendant-Appellant )

.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J. {¶1} On December 9, 2021, appellant, Henry C. Morrison, pro se, file d a notice of appeal in Ashtabula C.P. No. 2021 CR 00405 (11th Dist. No. 2 021-A-0039) and 2021 CR 00349 (11th Dist. No. 2021-A-0040) from the trial court’s Oc tober 12, 2021 sentencing entry.2 Case Nos. 2021-A-0039, 2021-A-0040, 2021-A-0041, 2021-A-0043 {¶2} On the same date, appellant filed a notice of appeal in 2021 CR 00096 (11th Dist. No. 2021-A-0041) and 2021 CR 00078 (11th Dist. No. 2021-A -0043) from the trial court’s September 17, 2021 sentencing entry. {¶3} The appeals were consolidated by this court on December 23, 202 1. {¶4} A timely notice of appeal was due in 2021-A-0039 and 2021-A-004 0 no later than November 12, 2021, which was not a holiday or weekend. Th us, the appeals are untimely filed by 27 days. {¶5} A timely notice of appeal was due in 2021-A-0041 and 2021-A-004 3 by October 18, 2021, which was not a holiday or weekend. Thus, th e appeals are untimely filed by approximately one and one-half months. {¶6} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is fi nal upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R. 4(A)(1). {¶7} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the followin g classes of cases: {¶8} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * * {¶9} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right * * *.” App.R. 5(A). {¶10} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set for th in App.R. 4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, th is court is without3 Case Nos. 2021-A-0039, 2021-A-0040, 2021-A-0041, 2021-A-0043 jurisdiction to consider his appeals. Appellant has a remedy o f filing an untimely criminal appeal under App.R. 5(A). {¶11} Appeals dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.,

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.
Marquise HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 183 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 183

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide for a 
   lifetime National Recreational Pass for law enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. McClintock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide for a 
   lifetime National Recreational Pass for law enforcement officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Officer Recreation 
Pass Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL PASSES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.

    Section 805(b) of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 
U.S.C. 6804(b)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (2) the 
following:
            ``(3) Law enforcement officer discount.--The Secretary 
        shall make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands 
        Pass available, without charge and for the lifetime of the 
        passholder, to any law enforcement officer. For the purposes of 
        this paragraph, the term `law enforcement officer' means any 
        officer, agent, or employee of the Federal Government, a State, 
        a unit of local government, or an Indian Tribe, authorized by 
        law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the 
        prevention, detection, or investigation of any violation of 
        criminal law, or authorized by law to supervise sentenced 
        criminal offenders.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/01-0416]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under section 309 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company license number 01/01-0416 issued to Brookside Mezzanine Fund II, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

Thomas Morris,

Director, Patient Capital Investments, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2025-00131 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 21**

**PRECISIONAUTO CARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES**
|                                                  | **Subsidiary** | ** **  | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------|-------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
| WE JAC Corporation                               |           | Delaware    |
| Colorado  Tune, Inc.                        |           | Colorado    |
| Precision Tune  Auto Care, Inc.             |           | Virginia    |
| PTW, Inc.                                   |           | Washington  |
| Precision Building  Solutions, Inc.         |           | Delaware    |
| Miracle  Partners, Inc.                     |           | Delaware    |
| Miracle  Industries, Inc.                   |           | Ohio        |
| PAC Mexican  Delaware Holding Company, Inc. |           | Delaware    |
| Precision Auto  Care Mexico I, S. de R.L.        |           | Mexico      |
| Precision Auto  Care Mexico II, S. de R.L.       |           | Mexico      |
| Promotora de  Franquicias Praxis S.A. de C.V.    |           | Mexico      |
| Praxis  Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                |           | Mexico      |
| Praxis Auto  Partes, S.A. de C.V.                |           | Mexico      |
| Praxis  Afinaciones Puerto Rico, Inc.       |           | Puerto Rico |
| Precision  Franchising LLC                       |           | Virginia    |
| Precision  Printing, Inc.                   |           | Virginia    |
| Acc-u-tune                                       |           | California  |
| National 60  Minute Tune, Inc.              |           | Washington  |
| Sixar Occidente,  S.A. de C.V                    |           | Mexico      |
| Sixar  Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                  |           | Mexico      |
| Premier  Accesorios, S.A. de C.V                 |           | Mexico      |
| Sixar  Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V                  |           | Puerto Rico |
| Sixar  Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V                  |           | Mexico      |
| Precision Tune Auto Care  (Canada) Inc.          |           | Ontario     |

 

 

----
# C_2016402EN.01005802.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/58

---

Action brought on 12 September 2016 — PM v ECHA

(Case T-656/16)

(2016/C 402/69)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PM (represented by: C. Zambrano Almero, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should admit its action against decision No SME(2016) 3198 and annul that decision on the basis that PM is a small and medium-sized enterprise and therefore, since the correct amount of charges required by law with regard to such an enterprise have been paid, the registration applied for should be granted.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant raises a single plea, based on the definition of a small and medium-sized enterprise set out in Article 2(1) of the annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC on the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. The applicant, together with the group of undertakings that it is a part of, claims that it satisfies the conditions laid down in that article.

---
# C_2018328EN.01002001.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/20

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö — Sweden) — A v Migrationsverket

(Case C-404/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Asylum policy - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 31(8) and Article 32(2) - Manifestly unfounded application for international protection - Concept of safe country of origin - No national rules concerning that concept - Applicant’s representations considered to be reliable but insufficient having regard to the satisfactory protection offered by the applicant’s country of origin))

(2018/C 328/24)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A

Defendant: Migrationsverket

Operative part of the judgment

Article 31(8)(b) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in conjunction with Article 32(2) of that directive, must be interpreted as not allowing an application for international protection to be regarded as manifestly unfounded in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which, first, it is apparent from the information on the applicant’s country of origin that acceptable protection can be ensured for him in that country and, secondly, the applicant has provided insufficient information to justify the grant of international protection, where the Member State in which the application was lodged has not adopted rules implementing the concept of safe country of origin.

---

(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.

---
Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1191
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 1192
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 1193
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 1194
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 1195
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 1196
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 1197
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 1198
 

 Case 3:04-cv-02597-P Document 46 Filed 07/01/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 1199
Rizwan AHMED, as Assignee of Rehan Naseer, et al., Appellants, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and United General Title Insurance Company, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-1248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2018052EN.01001302.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/13

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Torino — Italy) — IJDF Italy Srl v Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando

(Case C-344/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer contracts - Directive 93/13/EEC - National legislation making it possible to sue the principal debtor and the guarantor before the same court - Derogation from the rules establishing jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice))

(2018/C 052/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: IJDF Italy Srl

Applicant:

Defendants: Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando

Defendants:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that they are not applicable in the context of a dispute relating to the establishment of jurisdiction concerning related cases, since that dispute does not come within the scope of Directive 93/13.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.

1

---
# C_2016260EN.01004901.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/49

---

Action brought on 30 May 2016 — Dominator International v EUIPO (DREAMLINE)

(Case T-285/16)

(2016/C 260/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dominator International GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: N. Gugerbauer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DREAMLINE’ — Application for registration No 1 222 091

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 March 2016 in Case R 1669/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134167 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134167 COA: 274191 Wayne CC: 1991-009329 STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing en titlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

The undersigned hereby certifies,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to his knowledge:

1.   The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Horizon  PCS,  Inc.  for the year ended
     December 31, 2002 as filed March 28, 2003 with the  Securities and Exchange
     Commission,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The  information  contained in the annual  report fairly  presents,  in all
     material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of
     Horizon PCS, Inc.



Date: March 28, 2003               /s/ William A. McKell
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   William A. McKell, Chairman of the Board,
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   of Horizon PCS, Inc.






1589938
BTXN 208 (rev. 07/09)

IN RE: Tommy's

Fort Worth, LLC

[367] Emergency Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Sale

of Walloon Lake Inventory and Associated Equipment, Free and Clear

of All Liens, Claims, and Encumbrances, (II) Rejecting Certain Leases,

and (III) Granting Related Relief

 Case #

24−90000−elm11

DEBTOR

TYPE OF HEARING

Mark Andrews,

Chapter 11 Trustee VS

PLAINTIFF /

MOVANT

DEFENDANT /

RESPONDENT

Aaron Kaufman

ATTORNEY ATTORNEY

EXHIBITS

TRUSTEE'S EXH 1− 4 attached at Dkt [407] (175

pgs; 5 docs) Witness and Exhibit List for Emergency

Hearing Scheduled on August 27, 2024 filed by

Trustee Mark E. Andrews

Shelley Warren 8/27/2024 Edward L. Morris

REPORTED BY HEARING

DATE JUDGE PRESIDING

Case 24-90000-elm11 Doc 418 Filed 08/27/24 Entered 08/27/24 14:20:31 Desc

Court Admitted Exhibits Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  __/s/ Eppie Wong____________
Eppie Wong, CFO and a director Date:  August 14, 2008
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 50 Filed 04/27/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 85
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 50 Filed 04/27/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 86
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 50 Filed 04/27/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 87
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 50 Filed 04/27/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 88
Case 4:04-cr-00179-A Document 50 Filed 04/27/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 89
Benjamin G. PARRISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3094

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018013EN.01001004.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Jonathan Heintges v Germanwings GmbH

(Case C-74/17) (1)

1

(2018/C 013/15)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

1

---