alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of WGNB Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Haack, Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
March 10, 2009




/s/
      Steven J. HaackSteven
      J. HaackTreasurer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Wayne Badovinus, certify that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Design Within Reach, Inc.; 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 16, 2005
# C_2018436EN.01000801.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2018 — French Republic v European Parliament

(Case C-73/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Institutional law - Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union - European Parliament - Concept of ‘budget session’ held in Strasbourg (France) - Article 314 TFEU - Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session in Brussels (Belgium)))

(2018/C 436/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, D. Colas, B. Fodda and E. de Moustier, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Crowe and U. Rösslein, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: D. Holderer and C. Schiltz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the European Parliament;

| 3. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.

---
Terrill L. PALMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, 
during the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress the Speaker of the House and 
the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting 
jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and 
the Minority Leader of the Senate,

              

 may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to 
assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 3, 2025.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John Zdanowski, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HouseValues, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2005
# C_2022198EN.01003501.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — Kühne v Parliament

(Case T-468/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Policy of Parliament staff mobility - Reassignment in the interest of the service)

(2022/C 198/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Verena Kühne (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Schmechel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and B. Schäfer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 2 July 2020 reassigning the applicant to the Liaison Office in Luxembourg (Luxembourg).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mrs Verena Kühne to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mrs Verena Kühne to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0529

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JASSIE LAYDELL WESTERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 29, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2023

02/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0529
Exhibit 32.1



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital
Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                      
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ John H. Homier                   
|             |  | John H. Homier,                      
|             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

s0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

139990 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139990 

 COA: 294201 

Wayne CC: 79-929795-FM 

RONALD BENNETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                          |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady     
|                      |  |  |  |                          |  | Steven E. Brady                                  
|                      |  |  |  |                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck
|                      |  |  |  |                          |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                      |  |  |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
#### Walter D. Payne and Ida L. Payne, His Wife, *Appellants,*v. H. F. Kreis, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 16, 1927.

*M. C. Nicholas,*for Appellants;

*Willard & Knight,*and *George E. Holt,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00055]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1214 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1020, K2025-1019.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00055 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald H. Spair, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald H. Spair                                                
|Ronald H. Spair Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

March 10, 2009
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00179-CR

EX PARTE PEDRO PENA

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 01-CR-0765-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 13, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0485 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CORY LEVI GOODMAN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 3, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 27 2022

04/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0485
STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony HINGLE

NO. 2018-KP-1421

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

Denied.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 93 

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 

on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2023 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the 

Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint Committee 

of Congress on the Library. 

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

2 they are hereby, elected members of the following joint 

3 committees of Congress: 

4 JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: Ms. Klobuchar, 

5 Mr. Merkley, Mr. Padilla, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. Hagerty. 

6 JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY: 

7 Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Warner, Mr. Ossoff, Mrs. Fischer, 

8 and Mrs. Hyde-Smith. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certifications of**

**Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Design Within Reach, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray Brunner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 20, 2007 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Design Within Reach, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Hellmann, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. Thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 20, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DesignWithin Reach, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Juan Carlos CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.