alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      12.2**


**Certification
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of EXFO, hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:





1.
            The
                annual report of Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2006 of
                EXFO
                fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                EXFO.








Date:  November
      23, 2006.











/s/ *Germain Lamonde*


Germain
      Lamonde


Chairman
      of the Board,


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
      63
      of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

 

I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 28, 2005
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.4



SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT


This Second Amendment to Purchase Agreement (the "Amendment"), dated as of July 19, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), is made by and between ACQUIPORT MILFORD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), and VEREIT ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Buyer”).


RECITALS


A.    Buyer and Seller have entered into that certain Purchase Agreement dated as of June 27, 2016, as the same was amended by that certain First Amendment to Purchase Agreement dated as of July 15, 2016 (as amended, the “Agreement”), for the purchase and sale of the improved property described and defined therein as the “Property.”  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


B.    Buyer and Seller desire to amend the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.


AGREEMENT


NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1.    Contingency Period.  Section 2.2 of the Agreement shall be and hereby is amended by omitting such section in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:
“Contingency Period.  The period of time commencing on the Effective Date and ending at 5:00 p.m. New York time on July 20, 2016.”    
2.    Ratification.  The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, and shall be binding on the parties’ respective successors and/or assigns.
3.    Counterpart Signatures.  This Amendment may be executed by the parties in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.






[signatures appear on the following page]


    1









The parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


	
		
	SELLER:
	ACQUIPORT MILFORD LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 

	By:
	LXP Manager Corp., a Delaware corporation,
its manager

	 
	 

	 
	By:      /s/Lara S. Johnson       
Name: Lara S. Johnson
Title: Vice President

	 
	 

	BUYER:
	VEREIT ACQUISITIONS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 

	 
	By:      /s/Todd J. Weiss     
Name: Todd J. Weiss
Title: Authorized Officer








    2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 803 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 803

     Recognizing the importance of purple martins to United States 
  ecosystems, tourism, and history by designating August 10, 2024, as 
                  ``Purple Martin Conservation Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2024

   Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Fetterman) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 19, 2024

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Recognizing the importance of purple martins to United States 
  ecosystems, tourism, and history by designating August 10, 2024, as 
                  ``Purple Martin Conservation Day''.

Whereas purple martins (Progne subis) are the largest swallows in North America 
        and have 3 subspecies that are unique to North and South America;
Whereas, every year, approximately 8,700,000 purple martins migrate from South 
        America to North America for breeding season, visiting 48 out of 50 
        States, as well as portions of southern Canada and Mexico;
Whereas, beginning in July of each year, adult and juvenile purple martins 
        congregate at roosts and migrate to South America for the winter months;
Whereas, thousands of years ago, Native Americans began providing man-made 
        dwellings for purple martins after recognizing their utility as pest and 
        insect regulators;
Whereas habitat loss and the spread of non-native invasive bird species have 
        pushed purple martins to transition to man-made dwellings, upon which 
        purple martins now depend for survival east of the Rocky Mountains;
Whereas, in the face of population decline, successful conservation efforts of 
        modern birders in the United States have helped the purple martin to 
        remain a species of least concern; and
Whereas, in 2024, there are more than 220,000 active purple martin colonies 
        across the United States that offer aesthetic benefits, foster tourism, 
        maintain ecological diversity, and provide immense educational 
        opportunity for children and adults alike: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 10, 2024, as ``Purple Martin 
        Conservation Day''; and
            (2) recognizes the economic, educational, historical, and 
        aesthetic value that purple martins offer to people of the 
        United States of all ages.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 14 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 14

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

   Mr. Davidson submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein),
    Section 1. That the following article is proposed as an amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 
intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution 
of the United States is hereby repealed, and the Congress shall have no 
power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source 
derived, except in time of war declared by the Congress.
    ``Section 2. Section 1 of this article shall take effect beginning 
2 years after ratification of this article. Not later than 180 days 
after such ratification, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit a 
report to the Congress containing recommendations for any legislation 
that may be necessary to implement this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:03-cr-00067-J Document 62 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 228
# C_2021182EN.01005301.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/53

---

Order of the General Court of 12 March 2021 — PNB Banka v ECB

(Case T-50/20) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Insolvency proceedings - Refusal by the ECB to accede to a request from the board of directors of a credit institution that the insolvency administrator of that institution be instructed to grant the lawyer authorised by that board access to the premises, information, staff and resources of that institution - Competence of the author of the act - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 182/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PNB Banka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, F. Bonnard and V. Hümpfner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the ECB’s decision of 19 November 2019 refusing to instruct the applicant’s insolvency administrator to grant the lawyer authorised by the applicant’s board of directors access to its premises, to the information that it holds and to its staff and resources.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | There is no need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Republic of Latvia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Republic of Latvia.

| 3. | PNB Banka AS shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

PNB Banka AS shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.

| 4. | PNB Banka, the ECB and the Republic of Latvia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

PNB Banka, the ECB and the Republic of Latvia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1128 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-909, K2025-910.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31704 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ISREAL LEONARD, ID # 882013, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CV-2888-D

 )

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and petitioner’s objections, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED January 23, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cv-02888-D Document 26 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 239
Dante HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph Lee THOMAS v. Gina HILL

2160198

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017 Reh. denied September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

High Plains Radio Network, LLC Case No.: 24−70089−swe11

 Chapter No.: 11

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Brandy A. Sargent, to represent

Vertical Bridge REIT, LLC, related to document 22, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed April 4, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-70089-swe11 Doc 32 Filed 04/04/24 Entered 04/04/24 15:46:02 Desc

Page 1 of 1
Troy HILL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied Date March 29, 2019

Troy Hill, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*1230The writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. *See**Erlinger v. Federico* , 242 So.3d 1177, 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (holding that unfavorable legal rulings do not provide grounds for disqualification).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LORENZO MILLS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 428 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of May, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131272 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131272 

 COA: 268886 

Calhoun CC: 04-004320-FH 

JAMES MICHAEL BATEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Sieharra Nichole HORNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Gina MCCLAIN v. NMP, LLC and Jessica Haggard

No. 2019-C-0059

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Writ denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.

HUGHES, J.,

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

The *Notice of Lis Pendens* , in proper form containing the caption of the litigation and complete property description, was recorded in the public records before the sale to VJI occurred. A title examination would have revealed the litigation involving the vendor's predecessor-in-title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 567 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-976, K2025-975.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31731 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management
Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 22, 2004


                                            BY: /s/ Sandra L. Livney
                                                --------------------------
                                                SANDRA L. LIVNEY
                                                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Case 3:03-cv-02615-G Document 2 Filed 10/24/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-02615-G Document 2 Filed 10/24/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID 12