alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016475EN.01002102.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/21

---

Action brought on 25 October 2016 — Stips v Commission

(Case T-740/16)

(2016/C 475/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Adolf Stips (Besozzo, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

Declare and rule that

| — | the European Commission is ordered to make good in full the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of the delay encountered in the organisation of the 2013 re-grading exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Commission is ordered to make good in full the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of the delay encountered in the organisation of the 2013 re-grading exercise;

| — | in any event, the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging the loss which he suffered which is attributable exclusively to the disregard by the Commission of its duty of sound administration, enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The applicant argues, firstly, that the list of re-graded staff was not adopted by the Commission within a reasonable period, that is to say before 31 December 2013. He adds, secondly, that the material harm which is allegedly suffered is real and quantifiable and, thirdly, that there is a causal link between the Commission’s administrative error and the loss which he suffered.

---
**Exhibit 21 - Subsidiaries of Registrant - 100 percent Owned**

 

Byron Bank

2445  84th Street, S.W.

Byron Center, MI  49315

 

Byron Investment Services, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Bank)

2445  84th Street, S.W.

Byron Center, MI  49315

 

Byron Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)

5445  32nd Avenue

Hudsonville, MI 49426

 

OAK Title Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)

2445  84th Street, S.W.

Byron Center, MI  49315

 

Byron Acquisition LLC (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Bank)

2445  84th Street, S.W.

Byron Center, MI  49315

 

OAK Employee Leasing Company (79 percent owned subsidiary of the Registrant)

2445  84th Street, S.W.

Byron Center, MI  49315

 

----
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 149 

To ensure that Members of Congress and Congressional staff receive health 

care from the Department of Veterans Affairs instead of under the 

Federal Health Benefits Program or health care exchanges. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. DAVIDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure that Members of Congress and Congressional staff 

receive health care from the Department of Veterans 

Affairs instead of under the Federal Health Benefits 

Program or health care exchanges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lead by Example Act 

5 of 2025’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 149 IH

1 SEC. 2. HEALTH CARE FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF 

2 VETERANS AFFAIRS TO MEMBERS OF CON3 GRESS AND CONGRESSIONAL STAFF. 

4 (a) HEALTH CARE BENEFITS.—Notwithstanding any 

5 other provision of law, beginning January 3, 2027, the 

6 only health care plan that the Federal Government may 

7 make available to Members of Congress and Congressional 

8 staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress 

9 or Congressional staff shall be health care provided 

10 through the Department of Veterans Affairs, including at 

11 facilities of the Department and non-Department facilities 

12 pursuant to chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, 

13 and any other provision of law authorizing the Secretary 

14 of Veterans Affairs to furnish such care to veterans, as 

15 if such Members and staff were veterans. 

16 (b) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than Sep17 tember 15, 2025, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and 

18 the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall 

19 jointly submit to Congress a plan to carry out subsection 

20 (a), including recommendations for any legislative actions 

21 the Secretary and the Director determine necessary to 

22 carry out such subsection. 

23 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

24 (1) The term ‘‘Congressional staff’’ means the 

25 employees described in section 2107(1) of title 5, 

26 United States Code. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 149 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means a 

2 Member of the Senate or the House of Representa3 tives, a Delegate to the House of Representatives, 

4 and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico. 

5 (3) The term ‘‘non-Department facility’’ has 

6 the meaning given that term in section 1701 of title 

7 38, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Jose Dolores RAMIREZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2021019EN.01004301.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/43

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 21 October 2020 — PF, MF v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine, Sea Fisheries Protection Authority

(Case C-564/20)

(2021/C 19/44)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: PF, MF

Respondents: Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine, Sea Fisheries Protection Authority

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the Single Control Authority in a Member State in notifying and certifying to the European Commission under Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 of the Control Regulation (1) limited to notifying the data as to catch in a particular fishing ground logged by fishers under Articles 14 and 15 of the Regulation when the Single Control Authority for good reason believes the logged data to be grossly unreliable or is it entitled to employ reasonable, scientifically valid methods to treat and certify the logged data so as to achieve more accurate outtake figures for notification to the European Commission? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the Single Control Authority in a Member State in notifying and certifying to the European Commission under Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 of the Control Regulation (1) limited to notifying the data as to catch in a particular fishing ground logged by fishers under Articles 14 and 15 of the Regulation when the Single Control Authority for good reason believes the logged data to be grossly unreliable or is it entitled to employ reasonable, scientifically valid methods to treat and certify the logged data so as to achieve more accurate outtake figures for notification to the European Commission?

| 2. | Where the Authority is so satisfied, based on reasonable grounds, can it lawfully utilise other data flows such as fishing licenses, fishing authorisations, vessel monitoring system data, landing declarations, sales notes and transport documents? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Where the Authority is so satisfied, based on reasonable grounds, can it lawfully utilise other data flows such as fishing licenses, fishing authorisations, vessel monitoring system data, landing declarations, sales notes and transport documents?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 (OJ 2009, L 343, p. 1).

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Cameron LEWIS

NO. 2018-KO-1811

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6152

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BENJAMIN SANJURJO , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:98

- cr
- 00338

- REP

- RCY

- 2 )

Submitted : May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Benjamin Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2) (2012) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanjurjo , No. 3:98

- cr
- 00338

- REP

- RCY

- 2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 1, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
BONIFACE-HIERS CYCLES, INC., Appellant, v. CAPE PUBLICATIONS, INC., d/b/a/ Florida Today, Gannett Co., Inc., and Wayne Price, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 757 

Designating the week of May 5, 2024, through May 11, 2024, as ‘‘Tardive 

Dyskinesia Awareness Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2024 

Mr. MULLIN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of May 5, 2024, through May 11, 

2024, as ‘‘Tardive Dyskinesia Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas many people living with serious mental illnesses, including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder, or gastrointestinal 

disorders and symptoms, including gastroparesis, upset 

stomach, nausea, and vomiting, may be treated with 

medications that work as dopamine receptor blocking 

agents, such as antipsychotics and antiemetics; 

Whereas, while ongoing treatment with medications can be 

necessary for serious mental illnesses or gastrointestinal 

disorders, prolonged use of medications is associated with 

tardive dyskinesia (referred to in this preamble as 

‘‘TD’’); 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 757 ATS 

Whereas TD is an involuntary movement disorder that is 

characterized by uncontrollable, abnormal, and repetitive 

movements of the face, torso, limbs, and fingers or toes; 

Whereas even mild symptoms of TD can impact an individual 

physically, socially, and emotionally; 

Whereas TD affects approximately 600,000 individuals in the 

United States and approximately 65 percent of individuals with TD have not been diagnosed, making it important to raise awareness about the symptoms; 

Whereas it is important and recommended by the American 

Psychiatric Association that individuals taking medications be monitored for TD by a health care provider; 

Whereas clinical research has led to approval of treatments 

for adults with TD by the Food and Drug Administration; 

Whereas recognition and treatment of TD can make a positive impact in the lives of many individuals experiencing 

psychotic and mood disorders; and 

Whereas the Senate can raise awareness of TD among the 

public and medical community: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

3 May 5, 2024, through May 11, 2024, as ‘‘Tardive 

4 Dyskinesia Awareness Week’’; 

5 (2) encourages each individual in the United 

6 States to become better informed about and aware 

7 of Tardive Dyskinesia; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 757 ATS 

1 (3) encourages individuals experiencing uncon2 trollable, abnormal, and repetitive movements to 

3 consult a health care provider regarding their symp4 toms. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 1 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 2 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 3 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 4 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 5 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 6 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 7 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 8 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 9 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 10 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 11 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 12 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 13 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 14 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 15 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 16 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 17 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 18 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 19 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 20 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 21 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 22 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 23 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 24 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 25 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 26 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 27 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 28 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 29 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 30 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 31 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 32 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 33 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 34 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 35 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 36 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 37 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 38 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 39 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 40 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 41 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 42 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 43 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 44 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 45 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 46 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 47 of 48Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 240-4 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 48 of 48
C.H. v. MARENGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160572

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
JOHN RIVER CARTAGE, INC. v. LOUISIANA GENERATING, LLC, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0122

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

Denied.
Case 2:03-cv-00115-J Document 18 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 66
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

official business state of texas; PENALTY FOR v PRIVATE USE ".r .^SPQ^

02 1M 0004279596 $ 00.26s 

# MOZEE-STANLEYORSON Wct-fejfi^PWrHK,,,«««««»1 On this day, the application for 11 07^Writ ofhfabeas Corpus has been received 

### and presentedtothe Court. ^ "T""^A^ ^^^^ 

## •" ^ ft STANLEY ORSON M/fiZEEV Abel Acosta, Clerk 

# RETURN TO SENDER

tm nw iAS COUNTY JA 

# NOT IN DALLAS tUU

•- ^'r.^;;.»i9-.-»>*
# C_2023164EN.01005101.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/51

---

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2023 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament

(Case T-485/20) (1)

(2023/C 164/67)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.

---
# C_2016402EN.01005302.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/53

---

Action brought on 5 September 2016 — Dehtochema Bitumat v European Chemicals Agency

(Case T-630/16)

(2016/C 402/63)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dehtochema Bitumat, s.r.o. (Bělá pod Bezdězem, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Holý, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul and declare to be invalid the decision of the European Chemicals Agency of 7 July 2016, according to which the applicant is to continue to be considered a large enterprise and as a result of which the applicant is not entitled to the fee reduction for a medium-sized enterprise, and allow the implementation of that decision to be deferred. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and declare to be invalid the decision of the European Chemicals Agency of 7 July 2016, according to which the applicant is to continue to be considered a large enterprise and as a result of which the applicant is not entitled to the fee reduction for a medium-sized enterprise, and allow the implementation of that decision to be deferred.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

According to the applicant, the defendant by the abovementioned decision and its actions misused its power and infringed the principles of legality and legal certainty.

The applicant claims that in verifying the status of a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME), the defendant incorrectly assessed the independence of the applicant’s enterprise and incorrectly included in the calculation a number of employees and an amount of the applicant’s enterprise’s annual turnover plus allegedly linked or partner enterprises, which are not linked with the applicant’s enterprise or its partner enterprises under Commission Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 or Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.

The applicant submits that its declaration as to the incorrect size of the enterprise, which it made at the defendant’s request dated 2 June 2016, was essentially made with confidence in the defendant’s assessment and with the promise of a lower fee.

The applicant points out that its registration had been suspended and it had expressly informed the defendant that it has not produced the relevant products (substances subject to registration) since 2011.

The applicant claims that it follows from Article 13(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 that the right to a fee reduction on registration arises where it is possible to demonstrate such an entitlement and that it is thus appropriate, contrary to what is contended by the defendant, to allow the applicant to establish that entitlement.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of ClearPoint
Business Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) that:




(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




CLEARPOINT
      BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.Date:
      November 17, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Michael
      D. TrainaMichael
      D. TrainaChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Equity Ventures Group Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Colette Kim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Equity Ventures Group Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Equity Ventures Group Inc. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Colette Kim*

Colette KimChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: November 14, 2005