alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 7.1







|                                                               | 2015 | 2014    | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------- | ---- | ---- | ----
|Other financial data                                           | %    | %       | %    | %    | %   
|Dividend payout ratio (1)                                      | —    | (300.0) | —    | —    | —   
|Average owners' equity as a percentage of average total assets | 18.8 | 9.0     | 4.2  | 3.3  | 2.4 
|Capital ratio - Tier 1                                         | 30.1 | 24.5    | 23.2 | 13.9 | 12.0
|Capital ratio - Total                                          | 42.5 | 33.9    | 26.1 | 19.8 | 17.5
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges only (3)                    |      |         |      |      |     
|– including interest on deposits                               | 0.84 | 0.83    | 0.73 | 0.13 | 0.89
|– excluding
    interest on deposits                           | 0.77 | 0.71    | 0.35 | —    | 0.57



Notes:



| | (1) | Dividend payout ratio represents dividends declared on
a per share basis as a percentage of net (loss)/profit attributable to ordinary shareholders.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Return on average ordinary shareholders' equity represents
profit attributable to ordinary shareholders expressed as a percentage of average ordinary shareholders' equity. Negative ratios
have been excluded.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | For this purpose, earnings consist of income before tax
plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of total interest expense, including or excluding interest on deposits. Deposits include
banks and total customer accounts. The coverage deficiency for total fixed charges excluding interest on deposits for the year
ended 31 December 2015 is €48 million (2014 - €57 million; 2013 - €142 million; 2012 - €887 million; 2011
- €186 million).
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2022165EN.01001102.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Vigo — Spain) — CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)

(Case C-389/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Article 4(1) - Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex - Domestic workers - Protection against unemployment - Exclusion - Particular disadvantage to female workers - Legitimate social policy objectives - Proportionality)

(2022/C 165/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Vigo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CJ

Defendant: Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)

Re:

Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as precluding a national provision excluding unemployment benefits from the social security benefits granted to domestic workers by a statutory social security scheme, since that provision places female workers at a particular disadvantage as compared with male workers and is not justified by objective factors wholly unrelated to discrimination based on sex.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.

---
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 270 

To authorize the waiver of costs of activities relating to evacuation of United 

States citizens when their lives are endangered by war or acts of terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. DUNN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the waiver of costs of activities relating to 

evacuation of United States citizens when their lives 

are endangered by war or acts of terrorism. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF COSTS OF ACTIVITIES RELATING 

4 TO EVACUATION OF UNITED STATES CITI5 ZENS WHEN THEIR LIVES ARE ENDANGERED 

6 BY WAR OR ACTS OF TERRORISM. 

7 Section 4 of the State Department Basic Authorities 

8 Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2671) is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 270 IH

1 ‘‘(e) With regard to the repatriations loan program, 

2 the Secretary of State is authorized to waive the costs of 

3 activities relating to evacuation of United States citizens 

4 when their lives are endangered by war or acts of ter5 rorism.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Jason YOUNG and Sun Young, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2012

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Tracy GROENENDAAL and Ronald Soriano, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REFLECTION ISLES MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Prohibition is denied. Motion to review is denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Brian K. BANKS

NO. 2018-KO-0586

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
------------------------------------------------

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Golden State Petro (IOM
     1-B) PLC;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and 15d-15(f)) for the
     Company and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2005

/s/ Kate Blankenship
-------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Director
Slip Op. 23- 189 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BROOKLYN BEDDING, LLC, et al. , P laintiffs , v. Ct. No. 21-00285 UNITED STATES, Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge Defendant. ORDER 1 [The court sustains the Department of Commerce’s remand redetermination.] 2 3 Dated: December 22 , 2023 Baker , Judge: This antidumping duty ca se has returned from a remand 4 in which the court ordered the Department of Commerce to verify a Thai mat5 tress importer’s data insofar as the Depar tment relied upon that data. The im6 porter thereafter withdrew from both the Commerce proceedings and this liti7 gation. No remaining party opposes the remand redeterminat ion, and the court 8 therefore sustains it. A se parate judgment will enter. See USCIT R. 58(a). 9 Dated: /s/ M. Miller Baker 10 December 22 , 2023 New York, New York M. Miller Baker, Judge 11
**Exhibit 8.1**
| **Subsidiary** | ** ** | **Country of Incorporation** |
|----------------|------------|------------------------------|
| 1.             |       | Astrakhan Mobile             |   | Russian Federation |
| 2.             |       | Mar Mobile GSM               |   | Russian Federation |
| 3.             |       | MSS                          |   | Russian Federation |
| 4.             |       | Volgograd Mobile             |   | Russian Federation |
| 5.             |       | MTS Kostroma                 |   | Russian Federation |
| 6.             |       | MTS-Capital                  |   | Russian Federation |
| 7.             |       | MTS LLP                      |   | Russian Federation |
| 8.             |       | MTS-Komi Republic            |   | Russian Federation |
| 9.             |       | MTS-Tver                     |   | Russian Federation |
| 10.            |       | Novitel                      |   | Russian Federation |
| 11.            |       | Primtelefon                  |   | Russian Federation |
| 12.            |       | Dagtelecom                   |   | Russian Federation |
| 13.            |       | Sibintertelecom              |   | Russian Federation |
| 14.            |       | Sweet-Com                    |   | Russian Federation |
| 15.            |       | MTS Bermuda Ltd.             |   | Bermuda |
| 16.            |       | UMC                          |   | Ukraine |
| 17.            |       | Uzdunrobita                  |   | Uzbekistan |
| 18.            |       | BCTI                         |   | Turkmenistan |
| 19.            |       | MTS Belarus                  |   | Belarus |
| 20.            |       | MTS Finance                  |   | Luxembourg |

 

----
LIBERTY HOME EQUITY SOLUTIONS, INC., f/k/a Genworth Financial Home Equity Access, Inc., Appellant, v. Patsy RAULSTON a/k/a Patsy I. Raulston, et al., Appellee.

No. 4D18-1729

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In re : FIDEL H. PAJAR

ILLO, De btor,

------------------------------ FIDEL H. PAJARILLO,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt, v. SFR INVESTM ENTS POOL 1, LLC ; e t a l., De fe nda

n ts-Appe lle e s. No. 14-15977 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-01935-R C J M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da R obe rt C live Jone s, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 16, 2016 ** B e fore : LEAVY, B ER ZON, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. 

# FIL ED N OV 22 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).Fide l H. Pa ja rillo a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism issing for fa ilure to prose c ute his a ppe a l of the ba

nkruptc y c o urt’ s orde r dism issing his a dve rsary proc e e ding. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 158. W e re vie w for an a b use of disc re tion. In reFitzsimmons , 920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th C ir. 1990). W e va c a te and re m and. The distric t c ourt a

b use d its disc re tion in dism issing Pa ja rillo’ s ba nkruptc y a ppe a l be c a

use it did not e xplic itly c onside r a lte rnative sa n c t ions. Se e id. at 1474 (“ [U] nle ss the re are e gre gious c irc um sta n c e s , the distric t

c ourt m u st, a s the ge ne ra l rule re quire s, e xplic itly

c onside r re lative fa

ult a nd a l te rnative sa

nc tions.” ); In re Hill , 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th C ir. 1985) (fa ilure to c onside r a lte rnative sa nc tions is a n a buse of disc re tion). In light of our disposition, we do not c onside r Pa

j arillo’ s othe r argum e nts on a ppe a l. The pa rtie s sha ll be ar the ir own c osts on a ppe a l. The m andate sha ll issueforthwith. V ACAT E D and RE M ANDE D .

1 4 - 1 5 9 7 7 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00110]

[[Page 1176]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Study Section.
    Date: February 5-6, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G74, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Hailey P. Weerts, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G74, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5931, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 2, 2025.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00110 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
# C_2016251EN.01003901.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/39

---

Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)

(Case T-223/16)

(2016/C 251/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Massive Bionics, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Galindo Martens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple, Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘DriCloud’ — Application for registration No 11 723 509

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 03/03/2016 in Case R 339/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
---

Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 27, 2017 “Chet Idziszek”Chet Idziszek
    President and Chief Executive Officer


---
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 1 of 8 PageID 82
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 2 of 8 PageID 83
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 3 of 8 PageID 84
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 4 of 8 PageID 85
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 5 of 8 PageID 86
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 6 of 8 PageID 87
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 7 of 8 PageID 88
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 14 Filed 04/25/03 Page 8 of 8 PageID 89
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
     (logo)        Suite 1200                          Telephone (714) 436-7100
                   695 Town Center Drive               Facsimile: (714) 436-7200
                   Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'REPORT

To Long Beach Mortgage Company:

We have examined  management's  assertion  about Long Beach  Mortgage  Company's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, included in the
accompanying  management  assertion.  Management is  responsible  'or Long Beach
Mortgage  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum  servicing  standards.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  about  Long  Beach  Mortgage  Company's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal  determination on Long Beach Mortgage  Company's  compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Long Beach Mortgage Company complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche


March 28, 1997



Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41068

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR TOVAR-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:16-CR-192-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor TovarMartinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tovar-Martinez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41068 Document: 00514122385 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 16-41068

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41068 Document: 00514122385 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017