alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023035EN.01008101.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/81

---

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Timberland Europe v Commission

(Case T-782/16) (1)

(2023/C 35/102)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 11, 2022

NO. 03-20-00571-CV

AMLI Downtown Austin, L.P., Appellant

v.

Peli Peli Austin, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

REVERSED AND RENDERED – OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 26, 2022. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the portion of the trial court’s judgment ruling in favor of Peli Peli Austin, LLC on its breach of 

lease claim. Therefore, the Court reverses that portion of the trial court’s judgment and renders 

judgment that Peli Peli take nothing. Peli Peli shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in 

this Court and in the court below.
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 23 Filed 04/16/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 86
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 23 Filed 04/16/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 87
# C_2017038EN.01005401.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/54

---

Action brought on 15 December 2016 — Mass Response Service v Commission

(Case T-885/16)

(2017/C 038/70)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mass Response Service GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: J.-M. Schultze, S. Pautke and C. Ehlenz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the measures of the Commission through the merger control unit of the Directorate General for competition in the course of the implementation of the third requirement (‘non-MNO remedy’) of Decision M.7018, in particular its view expressed in the emails of 24 October 2016 and of 29 October 2016 that the non-MNO remedy is limited to pure service providers, excluding MVNOs (mobile virtual network operators) such as the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the measures of the Commission through the merger control unit of the Directorate General for competition in the course of the implementation of the third requirement (‘non-MNO remedy’) of Decision M.7018, in particular its view expressed in the emails of 24 October 2016 and of 29 October 2016 that the non-MNO remedy is limited to pure service providers, excluding MVNOs (mobile virtual network operators) such as the applicant;

| — | in the alternative, annul Decision C(2014) 4443 final in Case M.7018; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Decision C(2014) 4443 final in Case M.7018;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-884/16, Multiconnect v Commission.

Multiconnect

Commission

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MELODY BUTCHER §

 §

VS. §

 § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-250-Y

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of the Social §

Security Administration §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 14, 2005, the United States magistrate judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings”) in

the above-styled and -numbered cause. In his findings, the magistrate

judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration of the United States (“the Commissioner”)

denying plaintiff Melody Butcher’s claim for disability insurance

benefits be affirmed. The magistrate judge’s order gave all parties

until October 5 to serve and file with the Court written objections to

his proposed findings. 

Subsequently, the plaintiff filed her objections, asking this

Court to reject the findings of the magistrate judge. The defendant

did not file a response.

After carefully reviewing the findings, record, case law, and the

plaintiff’s objections, the Court concludes that the findings should

be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this

Court for the reasons stated therein.

Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED November 30, 2005.

TRM/kat

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00250-Y Document 30 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 137
# C_2022073EN.01004502.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/45

---

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

(Case T-744/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility - Definitive anti-dumping duty - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 73/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, G. Pandey and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1428 of 12 October 2020 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2020 L 336, p. 8).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Airoldi Metalli SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Airoldi Metalli SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The European Parliament, Airoldi Metalli and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Parliament, Airoldi Metalli and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
Supplementary
Agreement to the Cooperation Agreement between Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and


 


Guo
Zhao Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.


 


Party
A: Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Party A)


 


Party
B: Guo Zhao Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Party B)


 


Unless
otherwise specified, the definition of all terms herein shall be identical to that in the Cooperation Agreement between Benefactum
Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Guo Zhao Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Original
Agreement”) signed by on April 5, 2015.


 


Whereas:


 


The
Parties have signed the Cooperation Agreement between Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Guo Zhao
Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. on April 5, 2015, and hereby entered into the following supplementary agreement concerning the matters
not covered in the Cooperative Agreement between Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Guo Zhao Financial
Leasing Co., Ltd., based on the principle of mutual benefit and reciprocity upon friendly negotiation.


 


Supplementary
contents are as follows:


 


The
following provision is added to “II. Basic requirements on the transfer of creditor’s rights”: Creditor’s
rights corresponding to the projects financed by Party B on Party A’s platform by means of transferring creditor’s
rights are only allowed to be transferred one time on Party A’s platform, after being transferred on Party A’s platform:
Party B shall no longer transfer such creditor’s rights on other platforms or through other channels. In case of violation,
Party B shall assume all the legal liabilities, as well as all the losses caused to Party A and the investors of Party A’s
platform.


 


Effectiveness
of this agreement:


 


After
taking effect, this agreement becomes an integral part of the Cooperative Agreement between Benefactum Alliance Business Consultant
(Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Guo Zhao Financial Leasing Co., Ltd., having the same legal force with such Cooperative Agreement.


 


Except
for the terms revised expressly herein, the remainder of the original agreement shall remain in full effect.


 


	Party
    A (seal): 	 	Party
    B (seal):
	Legal
    Representative: 	 	Legal
    Representative:
	(or
    authorized representative):	 	(or
authorized representative):
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Date:
    Apr.5, 2015 	 	Date:
    Apr.5, 2015
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 April 15, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter is written pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of
Regulation S-X.

     Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) has represented to the Metals USA, Inc.
management that the audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 was
subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was
appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

Very truly yours,

Terry L. Freeman
Chief Accounting Officer

                                       75
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31677]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1095 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-870, K2025-871.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31677 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 99.1

                       HEADLANDS MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.
                Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1997-2

                              Officer's Certificate

In connection with the above-referenced trust and pursuant to Section 3.13 of
the related Pooling and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement"), Headlands Mortgage
Company (as "Master Servicer") hereby confirms the following:

(i)   a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during 1997 and of
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned's
      supervision; and

(ii)  to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the
      Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
      for the calendar year 1997.

                                    HEADLANDS MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.


                                    By: /s/ Gilbert J. MacQuarrie
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                        Gilbert J. MacQuarrie
                                        Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary


                                       10
Ray JAMES v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-01195-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: February 8, 2019 Closed: April 4, 2019

Motion Desc: Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
   
   **CERTIFICATIONS**
   I, S. Gregory Clevenger, certify that:
  (1)
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mpower Holding Corporation;(2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and(5)
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  
   
  Date:
August 6, 2004
By:
/s/ S. Gregory ClevengerS. Gregory ClevengerPrincipal Financial Officer
STATE of Louisiana OBO T.J. and T.J., Minor Children of Tomika Clofer v. Dexter JOHNSON

NO. 2019-CC-343

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ST. JOHN**

Writ denied.

Hughes, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

If applicant is correct in his assertion that he was never served with process, any resulting judgment is an absolute nullity under La. Code Civ. P. art. 2002. As the court explained in *Nunez v. Superior Hosp. Sys., Inc.* , 14-668 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/23/14), 166 So.3d 1004, 1008, such a nullity can be asserted at any time.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 132 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act to 

extend certain contract prepayment authority. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Ms. BOEBERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the 

Nation Act to extend certain contract prepayment authority. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Western Water Accel5 erated Revenue Repayment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE WIIN ACT. 

7 (a) OFFSETS AND WATER STORAGE ACCOUNT.—Sec8 tion 4011(d)(2) of the Water Infrastructure Improve9 ments for the Nation Act (Public Law 114–322) is amend10 ed by inserting ‘‘that are directed by project-specific statVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:13 Jan 29, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H132.IH H132

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 132 IH

1 utes in effect prior to the date of passage of this Act to 

2 accounts other than the General Reclamation Fund’’ be3 fore the semicolon. 

4 (b) EXTENSION OF PREPAYMENT AUTHORITY.—Sec5 tion 4013 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for 

6 the Nation Act (Public Law 114–322) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

8 inserting a semicolon; 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and 

10 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) section 4011.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Raymond A. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-4026

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Willie James BILLUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Susan Barnes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 30, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Susan Barnes          
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Susan Barnes                 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
STATE of Louisiana v. Teddy AGUILLARD

NO. 2018-K-1207

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-15 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Feldman Mall Properties, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
     5)
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
    By:
    /s/ Thomas WirthName:
    Thomas WirthTitle:
    President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 3 Filed 05/23/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID 15
Case 3:03-cv-01900-M Document 21 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 133
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 103 

To provide Members of Congress lawful access to certain Indian land to 

assess the security of the international boundary between the United 

States and Mexico located on that Indian land, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BIGGS of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide Members of Congress lawful access to certain 

Indian land to assess the security of the international 

boundary between the United States and Mexico located 

on that Indian land, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Border 

5 Security Assessment Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 103 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO INDIAN RESERVATIONS FOR BORDER 

2 SECURITY ASSESSMENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—A member of Congress and any 

4 Congressional staff accompanying that member shall have 

5 lawful access to any Indian reservation that includes 50 

6 or more contiguous miles of the international boundary be7 tween the United States and Mexico for the purpose of 

8 obtaining information for assessing national security, pub9 lic safety, and the security of the international boundary. 

10 Such lawful access shall extend to any roadways or ease11 ments on Indian country. 

12 (b) DEFINITION OF INDIAN COUNTRY.—For the pur13 poses of this section, the term ‘‘Indian country’’ shall have 

14 the meaning given that term in section 1151 of title 18, 

15 United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 4:03-cv-01384-Y Document 679 Filed 06/11/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID 20044