alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016343EN.01004602.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/46

---

Action brought on 29 July 2016 — Martín Osete v EUIPO — Rey (AN IDEAL WIFE)

(Case T-427/16)

(2016/C 343/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Isabel Martín Osete (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Wellens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Daniella Rey (Toulouse, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘AN IDEAL WIFE’ — EU trade mark No 5 276 894

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2016 in Case R 1528/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Frederick Ike ODOM v. STATE

CR-16-0960

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2024-N-0604]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing this notice to withdraw the December 5, 2024,                         **Federal Register**                         notice entitled “Yong Sheng Jiao; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order” because the document provided the incorrect bases for debarment and omitted edited language. A corrected notice document is published elsewhere in this                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Fikes, Office of Scientific Integrity, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 4232, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-9603.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 5, 2024 (89 FR 96655), FDA published a notice entitled “Yong Sheng Jiao; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order.” The notice incorrectly reflected language for debarment and omitted edited language. The published document did not evince all changes and edits relevant to this notice. For this reason, the notice, Docket No. FDA-2024-N-0604, as published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 5, 2024, is hereby withdrawn.                

Dated: December 31, 2024.

George M. Warren,

Director, Office of Scientific Integrity.

[FR Doc. 2025-00125 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
**CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND
        PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
        connection with this Quarterly Report of Equity Ventures Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Colette Kim, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
        Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
  1.
              Such
                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
                  30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                  or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
                  the period ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                  of Equity Ventures Group, Inc.


*By:
        /s/Colette Kim*
 Colette
        Kim,
 President,
        Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
        Financial Officer, Secretary &
 Director
  November
        12, 2007
Darrell KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1482

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2


Chief
Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.,SECTION
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”),
herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Date:
      April 15, 2009
              
              /s/ Kenneth
      FaithKenneth
      Faith, CFO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HIGHMARK, INC. §

 §

VS. §

 §

ALLCARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT § CIVIL NO. 4:03-CV-1384-Y

SYSTEMS, INC. §

ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL AND VACATING SANCTIONS

(with special instruction to clerk of Court)

Before the Court is the Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal and Motion

to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal (doc. #635) and the Motion to Enter

Order Vacating Sanctions (doc. #634), both filed by V. Bryan Medlock

and his firm, Sidley Austin, LLP (“Sidley Austin”). On August 9,

2010, the Court entered an order vacating sanctions imposed on certain

of the defense attorneys involved in this case. The Court addressed

the sanctions against Medlock and Sidley Austin, noting that the

sanctions should be vacated but, out of concern that their notice

of appeal had divested the Court of jurisdiction, the Court did not

rule on the sanctions imposed against them. In the notice of

withdrawal and motion to dismiss, Medlock and Sidley Austin explain

that because they timely filed a Rule 59(e) motion to reconsider,

the effect of their notice of appeal was suspended until the Court

ruled on the motion. Additionally, Medlock and Sidley Austin have

confirmed that no appeal has been docketed with the United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and, therefore, there is

no case to be remanded to this Court on the issue of sanctions.

Consequently, the Court GRANTS the notice of withdrawal and motion

Case 4:03-cv-01384-Y Document 637 Filed 08/12/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID 18380
2

to dismiss the appeal.

Further, for the reasons set out in the Court’s August 9 order,

and for the reasons set out in the motion to vacate sanctions, the

Court GRANTS the motion to vacate sanctions and ORDERS that the

sanctions imposed against Medlock and Sidley Austin are VACATED.

The clerk of Court is DIRECTED to refund all sums paid by Medlock

and Sidley Austin, as a result of the sanctions imposed previously.

SIGNED August 12, 2010.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-01384-Y Document 637 Filed 08/12/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID 18381
EX-10.1H



 Exhibit 10.1(h) 

PLEDGE SUPPLEMENT 
 This
Pledge Supplement is dated as of October 3, 2016 and is provided in accordance with the terms of the Pledge Agreement referenced below. The undersigned directs that this Pledge Supplement be attached to the Pledge Agreement, dated as of
October 3, 2016 by and among GREEN PLAINS I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, GREEN PLAINS II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and each other person who joined thereto as a Pledgor, and Maranon Capital, L.P., in its capacity as
Agent (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Pledge Agreement”; capitalized terms used and not defined herein having the meanings assigned thereto in the Pledge
Agreement) and that the equity interests listed below shall be deemed to be part of the Pledged Collateral. 
 The undersigned hereby
certifies that the representations and warranties in Section 4 of the Pledge Agreement are true and correct, as to the shares and other property pledged pursuant to this Pledge Supplement. The undersigned further agrees that this Pledge
Supplement may be attached to the Pledge Agreement and that the Pledged Securities listed on this Pledge Supplement are a part of the Pledged Securities referred to in the Pledge Agreement and shall secure all Obligations referred to in the Pledge
Agreement. 
  

													
	 Issuer
	  	 Class
or
Other
Description of
Pledged
Securities
	  	Certificate
Number (if
applicable)	  	Number of
Pledged
Securities	  	Total
Outstanding
Securities	  	Percentage of
Total
Outstanding
Securities
Pledged	 
	 SCI Ingredients Holdings, Inc.
	  	Common Stock	  	C-2	  	100	  	100	  	 	100	% 

 - REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK; SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS - 







 
			
	GREEN PLAINS II LLC
		
	 By
	 	 /s/ Todd Becker

	Name:	 	 Todd Becker

	Title:	 	 President and Chief Executive Officer
Felicia JEFFERSON, Appellant, v. Kimberla MILLER and Anthony Miller, Appellees.

Nos. 4D18-1423 & 4D18-1424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Halbert James HUNTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jacki JOHNSON, Hardee County Tax Collector, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. RAPID SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2067

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry K. McGuire Sr.,
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Operations, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Garry K. McGuire Sr.
---------------------------------------
Garry K. McGuire Sr.
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Operations

December 23, 2002

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Valdez WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-266

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 36 Filed 07/12/07 Entered 07/12/07 20:47:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 36 Filed 07/12/07 Entered 07/12/07 20:47:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 36 Filed 07/12/07 Entered 07/12/07 20:47:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 36 Filed 07/12/07 Entered 07/12/07 20:47:47 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 1 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 1

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

 Mr. Biggs of Arizona submitted the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine 
justices consisting of one chief justice and eight associate 
justices.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022119EN.01004301.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/43

---

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Luna Italia v EUIPO — Luna (LUNA SPLENDIDA)

(Case T-571/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark LUNA SPLENDIDA - Earlier EU figurative mark Luna - Relative ground for refusal - Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 119/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Luna Italia Srl (Cantù, Italy) (represented by: N. Papakostas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Luna AE (Agios Stefanos, Greece) (represented by: M. Sioufas, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 June 2020 (Case R 1895/2019 5), concerning invalidity proceedings between Luna and Luna Italia.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Luna Italia Srl is ordered to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Luna AE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Luna Italia Srl is ordered to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Luna AE.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

---
# C_2017424EN.01003701.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/37

---

Order of the General Court of 17 October 2017 — Andreassons Åkeri and Others v Commission

(Case T-746/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Social security - Commission decision to close an EU Pilot procedure - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Refusal of the Commission to bring infringement proceedings - Act not open to challenge - Lack of direct concern - Manifest inadmissibility - Application seeking the issue of an injunction - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

(2017/C 424/53)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Andreassons Åkeri i Veddige AB (Veddige, Sweden), Luke Transport AB (Laholm, Sweden), Zimit Transportförmedling AB (Veddige) (represented by: C. von Quitzow, Professor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision contained in the letter of 10 August 2016 concerning the outcome of EU Pilot Procedure 7504/15/EMPL.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Andreassons Åkeri i Veddige AB, Luke Transport AB and Zimit Transportförmedling AB shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Andreassons Åkeri i Veddige AB, Luke Transport AB and Zimit Transportförmedling AB shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0337]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under section 309 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 06/06-0337 issued to LongueVue Capital Partners II, LP., said license is hereby declared null and void.

Thomas Morris,

Director, Patient Capital Investments, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2025-00332 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 867 

Designating September 2024 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2024 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord 

Injury Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas, approximately 306,000 individuals in the United 

States live with spinal cord injuries, which cost society 

billions of dollars in health care costs and lost wages; 

Whereas there are approximately 18,000 new spinal cord injuries in the United States each year; 

Whereas more than 42,000 individuals with spinal cord injuries are veterans; 

Whereas motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries; 

Whereas almost half of all spinal cord injuries sustained by 

individuals 30 years of age or younger occur as a result 

of a vehicular accident; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 867 IS 

Whereas the average remaining years of life for individuals 

living with spinal cord injuries has not improved significantly since the 1980s; 

Whereas there is an urgent need to develop new 

neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and 

Whereas increased education and investment in research are 

key factors in improving outcomes for individuals living 

with spinal cord injuries, enhancing the quality of life of 

individuals with spinal cord injuries, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2024 as ‘‘National 

3 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments, therapies, and a cure for spinal cord in8 juries; 

9 (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies 

10 that offer promise and hope to individuals living 

11 with paralysis; and 

12 (5) commends the dedication of national, re13 gional, and local organizations, researchers, doctors, 

14 volunteers, and people across the United States who 

15 are working to improve the quality of life of individVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:45 Sep 27, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR867.IS SR867

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 867 IS 

1 uals living with spinal cord injuries and their fami2 lies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 8 Filed 04/21/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID 62
T.S. v. CHEROKEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160505

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.