```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3036-3037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00273]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

37 CFR Parts 1, 41, and 42

[Docket No. PTO-P-2022-0033]
RIN 0651-AD64

Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees During Fiscal Year 2025

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is 
correcting several minor typographical and other nonsubstantive 
inadvertent errors in the preamble and amendatory instructions to a 
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on November 20, 2024. 
That final rule set or adjusted patent fees as authorized by the Leahy-
Smith America Invents Act (AIA), as amended by the Study of 
Underrepresented Classes Chasing Engineering and Science Success Act of 
2018 (SUCCESS Act). These corrections do not result in any substantive 
changes to the final rule.

DATES: The final rule correction is effective January 19, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Brett Lockard, Director, 
Forecasting and Analysis Division, at 571-272-0928 or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 20, 2024, the USPTO published a 
final rule setting or adjusting patent fees as authorized by the AIA, 
as amended by the SUCCESS Act. See 89 FR 91898. Subsequent to the 
publication of that final rule, it was discovered that the preamble 
discussion and several amendatory instructions contained inadvertent 
errors requiring correction. For example, in the preamble, example 10, 
which provides guidance for ``Adding timely benefit claims under 35 
U.S.C. 120 after filing; multiple fees due,'' contained an incorrect 
internal cross-reference to the subject application. The subject 
application in the example should be ``J'' and not ``I.'' Also, in 
table 20, in the entry for Sec.  1.17(m)(2), for a ``Petition to excuse 
applicant's failure to act within prescribed time limits in an 
international design application, delay less than or equal to two 
years,'' the table reflected that the final rule fee applicable to a 
micro entity for this action was ``$54,'' which is incorrect. The 
correct fee should be ``$452.'' In addition, in the regulatory text at 
Sec.  42.15(e), the description of the fee did not reflect changes made 
by an intervening final rule published on October 10, 2024, entitled 
``Expanding Opportunities To Appear Before the Patent Trial and Appeal 
Board'' (89 FR 82172), which revised the terminology used to reference 
counsel recognized pro hac vice before the Patent Trial and Appeal 
Board. This correction updates the description of the fee in paragraph 
(e) to reflect the revision made by the October 10, 2024 final rule. No 
changes are being made to the fee amount that was published in the 
November 20, 2024, final rule. This final rule corrects these errors, 
as well as other minor typographical errors in the amendatory 
instructions. These changes are administrative in nature and are 
intended to provide clarification to impacted entities to avoid any 
potential confusion.

Rulemaking Considerations

Administrative Procedure Act

    This final rule corrects typographical and format errors in a 
rulemaking setting and adjusting patent fees. The changes in this final 
rule involve rules of agency practice and procedure and/or interpretive 
rules and do not require notice-and-comment rulemaking. See Perez v. 
Mortg. Bankers Ass'n, 135 S.Ct. 1199, 1204 (2015) (explaining that 
interpretive rules ``advise the public of the agency's construction of 
the statutes and rules which it administers'' and do not require 
notice-and-comment rulemaking when issued or amended); Cooper Techs. 
Co. v. Dudas, 536 F.3d 1330, 1336-37 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (stating that 5 
U.S.C. 553, and thus 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2)(B), do not require notice-and 
comment rulemaking for ``interpretative rules, general statements of 
policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice''); and 
JEM Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C., 22 F.3d 320, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1994) 
(explaining that rules are not legislative because they do not 
``foreclose effective opportunity to make one's case on the merits'').
    Moreover, the Director of the USPTO, pursuant to authority at 5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(1), finds good cause to adopt the changes in 
this final rule without prior notice and an opportunity for public 
comment or a 30-day delay in effectiveness, as such procedures would be 
unnecessary, impracticable, and contrary to the public interest. As 
discussed above, the changes in this rulemaking involve correcting 
minor typographical and other nonsubstantive errors in the final rule 
published on November 20, 2024, which itself underwent notice and 
comment and a delay in effective date. These changes are administrative 
in nature and are intended to provide clarification to impacted 
entities to avoid any potential confusion that could result if these 
errors are not corrected prior to the effective date of the November 
20, 2024, final rule. Therefore, good cause exists to dispense with the 
requirement for prior notice and an opportunity for public comment and 
a 30-day delay in effectiveness.

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2024-26821 appearing on page 91898 in the Federal 
Register of Wednesday, November 20, 2024, the following corrections are 
made:

0
1. On page 91913, in the first column, Example 10: Adding timely 
benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 after filing; multiple fees due is 
corrected to read as follows:
    Example 10: Adding timely benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 after 
filing; multiple fees due. Application J is a nonprovisional 
application filed on July 5, 2029. The ADS present upon J's filing 
contains a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C.

[[Page 3037]]

120 to nonprovisional application O filed on February 2, 2021, which is 
the only benefit claim in the application. J's EBD is February 2, 2021, 
which is more than six but not more than nine years, earlier than J's 
actual filing date of July 5, 2029. In this example, the Sec.  
1.17(w)(1) fee of $2,700 is due upon J's filing. The applicant pays the 
fee. Two months after J's filing, the applicant files a second ADS 
containing the previously added benefit claim to O and a new benefit 
claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 to nonprovisional application N filed on 
March 2, 2020. This newly added benefit claim causes J's EBD to become 
March 2, 2020, which is more than nine years earlier than J's actual 
filing date of July 5, 2029, and thus prompts the fee in Sec.  
1.17(w)(2). Because the fee in Sec.  1.17(w)(1) was previously paid, 
the previous payment is subtracted from the amount now due under Sec.  
1.17(w)(2). Accordingly, the amount due upon filing of the second ADS 
is $1,300 (the current fee amount of $4,000 set forth in Sec.  
1.17(w)(2) less the $2,700 previously paid under Sec.  1.17(w)(1)).
0
2. On page 91971, in table 20, in the third entry for ``1.17(m)(2)'' 
(fee code 3784), in the ``Final rule fee'' column, ``$54'' is corrected 
to read ``$452''.

Sec.  1.17  [Corrected]

0
3. On page 92004, in the second column:
0
a. In amendatory instruction 3.f for Sec.  1.17, ``table 21 and 22'' is 
corrected to read ``tables 21 and 22'';
0
b. In amendatory instruction 3.h. for Sec.  1.17, ``Redesigning tables 
19 through 21'' is corrected to read ``Redesignating tables 19 through 
21''.

0
4. On page 92004, in the third column, in Sec.  1.17, in paragraph (f), 
in the first line in note 1 to table 10 to paragraph (f), add ``Sec.  
'' before ``1.36(a)''.

0
5. On page 92005, at the top of the second column, in Sec.  1.17, in 
paragraph (h), in note 3 to table 14 to paragraph (h), add ``Sec.  '' 
before ``1.84''.

Sec.  1.492  [Corrected]

0
6. On page 92010, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 15 
for Sec.  1.492, the instruction ``Section 1.492 is amended by revising 
table 1 in paragraph (a), tables 2 through 5 in paragraphs (b)(2) 
through (4),'' is corrected to read ``Section 1.492 is amended by 
revising table 1 in paragraph (a), tables 3 through 5 in paragraphs 
(b)(2) through (4),''.

Sec.  42.15  [Corrected]

0
7. On page 92011, in the third column, in Sec.  42.15, paragraph (e) is 
corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (e) Fee for counsel who are not registered practitioners, and who 
are not seeking automatic recognition pursuant to Sec.  42.10(c)(2), to 
appear pro hac vice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board: $269.00.
* * * * *

0
8. On page 92011, in the third column, in Sec.  42.15, in paragraph 
(f), ``$452'' is corrected to read ``$452.00''.

Derrick L. Brent,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting 
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2025-00273 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
```