alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 841 

Designating September 2024 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Mr. SCHUMER (for Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, 

Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. REED, Mr. CASEY, Mr. HAWLEY, and Mr. GRAHAM)) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2024 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas each year more than 14,500 children under the age 

of 19 in the United States are diagnosed with cancer; 

Whereas every year more than 1,500 children in the United 

States lose their lives to cancer; 

Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death from 

disease after infancy and one of the leading causes of 

death overall for children in the United States; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer in 

the United States has increased from 58 percent in the 

mid-1970s to 85 percent in 2024, representing a significant improvement from previous decades; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 841 ATS 

Whereas 60 to 90 percent of children in the United States 

who survive cancer will develop at least one chronic 

health condition, and some survivors may face a late effect from treatment that can be severe or life-threatening; and 

Whereas childhood cancer occurs frequently and spares no racial or ethnic group, socioeconomic class, or geographic 

region: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2024 as ‘‘National 

3 Childhood Cancer Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) requests that the Federal Government, 

5 States, localities, and nonprofit organizations ob6 serve the month with appropriate programs and ac7 tivities, with the goal of increasing public knowledge 

8 of the risks of childhood cancer; 

9 (3) encourages survivors of childhood cancer to 

10 continue to receive ongoing monitoring and care 

11 throughout their adult lives; 

12 (4) recognizes the human toll of childhood can13 cer and pledges to make the prevention of and cure 

14 for childhood cancer a public health priority; 

15 (5) reminds the people of the United States of 

16 the bravery of children who are diagnosed with can17 cer; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 841 ATS 

1 (6) commends and honors the courage of such 

2 children. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CallWave, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Stubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                     
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: September 26, 2008 |  | /S/    MARK
STUBBS                  
|                         |  | Mark Stubbs, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019206EN.01000201.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 April 2019 (Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Repsol Butano SA (C-473/17), DISA Gas SAU (C-546/17) v Administración del Estado

(Joined Cases C-473/17 and C-546/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Energy - Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) sector - Consumer protection - Requirement of general economic interest - Maximum price of a bottle of gas - Home delivery obligation - Article 106 TFEU - Directives 2003/55/EC, 2009/73/EC and 2006/123/EC - Interpretation of the judgment of 20 April 2010, Federutility and Others (C-265/08, EU:C:2010:205) - Principle of proportionality)

(2019/C 206/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Repsol Butano SA (C-473/17), DISA Gas SAU (C-546/17)

Defendant: Administración del Estado

Interveners: Redexis Gas SL, Repsol Butano SA (C-546/17)

Operative part of the judgment

The condition of proportionality laid down in Article 15(3)(c) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market must be interpreted as not precluding measures such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which set a maximum price for bottled liquefied petroleum gas and which require certain operators to carry out home delivery of that gas, provided that those measures are maintained only for a limited duration and do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objective of general economic interest pursued.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.

OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elias Vamvakas,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Elias Vamvakas
--------------------------------
Name:  Elias Vamvakas
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 6, 2005


                                      -29-
RETURN OF SUMMONS Page 1

David B. Miller

Texas Bar No. 00788057

david@schneidlaw.com

SCHNEIDER MILLER REYNOLDS, P.C.

300 N. Coit Road, Suite 1125

Richardson, Texas 75080

Telephone: (972) 479-1112

Facsimile: (972) 479-1113

T. Micah Dortch

Texas Bar No. 24044981

micah@dll-law.com

Dortch Lindstrom Livingston Law Group

2613 Dallas Parkway, Suite 220

Plano, TX 75093

Telephone: 214-252-8258

Facsimile: 888-653-3299

Special Counsel for the Trustee Areya Holder Aurzada

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: § CASE NO. 22-30500-swe7

DENNIS JAMES ROGERS II, §

 Debtor. § CHAPTER 7 

_____________________________________________________________________________

AREYA HOLDER AURZADA, §

CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE §

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF §

DENNIS JAMES ROGERS II §

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Adversary No. 24-03028

§

FUNDERZ.NET, LLC, §

 Defendant. §

RETURN OF SUMMONS

Case 24-03028-swe Doc 4 Filed 05/17/24 Entered 05/17/24 12:50:24 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
RETURN OF SUMMONS Page 2

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

Pursuant to this Court’s Trial Setting and Alternative Scheduling Order, Plaintiff states as 

follows:

On May 6, 2024, I served the Summons, Original Complaint, and the Trial Setting and 

Alternative Scheduling Order on the Texas Secretary of State.

Dated: May 18, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ David B. Miller 

David B. Miller

Texas Bar No. 00788057

david@schneidlaw.com

SCHNEIDER MILLER REYNOLDS, P.C.

300 N. Coit Road, Suite 1125

Richardson, Texas 75080

Telephone: (972) 479-1112

Facsimile: (972) 479-1113

and

T. Micah Dortch

Texas Bar No. 24044981

micah@dll-law.com

Dortch Lindstrom Livingston Law Group

2613 Dallas Parkway, Suite 220

Plano, TX 75093

Telephone: 214-252-8258

Facsimile: 888-653-3299

Special Counsel for the Trustee 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on May 18, 2024, I caused a copy of the foregoing to 

be served on all parties eligible to receive service through the Electronic Case Filing System for the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas by electronic mail.

By: /s/ David B. Miller 

David B. Miller

Case 24-03028-swe Doc 4 Filed 05/17/24 Entered 05/17/24 12:50:24 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                   |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                              
|                      |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady                                  
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                      |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6659

TYWANN D. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVE M. DIXON; PAULA W. CREED; MICHAEL ROACH,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CHRISTOPHER J. DIAZ; ROBERT C. MARTIN, JR.;

AMBER L. MORTON; CLIFFORD W. VAUGHN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-99-281)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tywann D. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Payne Scherer, II,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tywann D. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Smith v. Dixon, No. CA-99-281 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2016410EN.01002302.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/23

---

Action brought on 14 September 2016 — Crocs v EUIPO — Gifi Diffusion (Footwear)

(Case T-651/16)

(2016/C 410/33)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Crocs, Inc. (Niwot, Colorado, United States) (represented by: J. Guise, D. Knight, L. Cassidy, H. Seymour, Solicitors, M. Berger, N. Hadjadj Cazier, H. Haouideg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gifi Diffusion (Villeneuve-sur-Lot, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the design at issue:

Design at issue: Community design ‘Footwear’ — Community design No 257 001-0001

Design at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 06/06/2016 in Case R 853/2014-3

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and find that the website disclosures did not constitute a prior disclosure within the meaning of Article 7; upheld the contested registered Community design and dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and find that the website disclosures did not constitute a prior disclosure within the meaning of Article 7; upheld the contested registered Community design and dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity;

| — | make an award of costs in its favour. |
| --- | --- |

—

make an award of costs in its favour.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002.

---
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Cristina Wasiak

Cristina Wasiak
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 34 Filed 12/17/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 144
Case 3:04-cv-01153-H Document 34 Filed 12/17/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 145
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KARIN JACOBS, et al., §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-1968-D

VS. §

 §

WILLIAM K. TAPSCOTT, JR., §

et al., §

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER

The court will conduct a hearing on defendants’ motions for

judgment as a matter of law on Friday, March 30, 2007 at 3:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

February 22, 2007.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-01968-D Document 148 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1733
Brian LEWIS v. LOUISIANA STATE JUDICIAL REVIEW BOARD

NO. 2018-C-1856

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Denied.
Case 3:04-cv-01544-K Document 8 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 29
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 5 Filed 12/19/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 15
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 5 Filed 12/19/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 16
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 5 Filed 12/19/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 17
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 5 Filed 12/19/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 18
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to require the Federal Crop 

Insurance Corporation to carry out research and development regarding 

a policy to insure table, wine, and juice grapes against losses due to 

a freeze event, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Mr. LANGWORTHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to require the 

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to carry out research and development regarding a policy to insure 

table, wine, and juice grapes against losses due to a 

freeze event, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grape Research And 

5 Protection Expansion Act’’ or the ‘‘GRAPE Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 292 IH

1 SEC. 2. POLICY TO INSURE TABLE, WINE, AND JUICE 

2 GRAPES AGAINST LOSSES DUE TO A FREEZE 

3 EVENT. 

4 Section 522(c) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 

5 U.S.C. 1522(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(20) TABLE, WINE, AND JUICE GRAPES.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year 

9 after the date of the enactment of this para10 graph, the Corporation shall carry out research 

11 and development, or offer to enter into 1 or 

12 more contracts with 1 or more qualified persons 

13 to carry out research and development, regard14 ing a policy to insure table, wine, and juice 

15 grapes against losses due to a freeze event. 

16 ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY OF POLICY.—Notwith17 standing the last sentence of section 508(a)(1), 

18 and section 508(a)(2), not later than 18 

19 months after the date of the enactment of this 

20 paragraph, the Corporation shall make available 

21 a policy described in subparagraph (A) if the 

22 requirements of section 508(h) are met. 

23 ‘‘(C) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years 

24 after the date of enactment of this paragraph, 

25 the Corporation shall submit to the Committees 

26 on Appropriations and Agriculture of the House 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 292 IH

1 of Representatives and the Committees on Ap2 propriations and Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

3 Forestry of the Senate a report that includes— 

4 ‘‘(i) the results of the research con5 ducted under subparagraph (A); and 

6 ‘‘(ii) a description of the policies made 

7 available under this paragraph.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSICA FRANCIA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CITY OF SAN JACINTO,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-55483

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02654-DMG-OP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 11, 2013** 

Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSON, Chief District

Judge.*** 

FILED

OCT 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, Chief District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the District of North Dakota, sitting by designation.
Petitioner Jessica Francia appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of the City of San Jacinto on each of her claims under 42 U.S.C. §

1983 and the California Constitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1291 and now affirm. 

“A threshold requirement to a substantive or procedural due process claim is

the plaintiff’s showing of a liberty or property interest protected by the Constitution.” 

Wedges/Ledges of Calif., Inc. v. City of Phx., 24 F.3d 56, 62 (9th Cir. 1994). Francia

has no legally protected property interest in unrestricted and unmodified access to her

business. People v. Ayon, 352 P.2d 519, 522 (Cal. 1960). 

Francia's claim for inverse condemnation under Article I, Section 19 of the

California Constitution fails for the same reason. The California Supreme Court has

expressly held “[t]he property owner has no constitutional right to compensation

simply because the streets upon which his property abuts are improved so as to affect

the traffic flow on such streets. If loss of business or of value of the property results,

that is noncompensable.” Ayon, 352 P.2d at 522. 

Finally, because Francia has failed to establish that the City deprived her of a

federal constitutional right, she cannot establish liability under Monell v. Department

of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 690–91 (1978). 

For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s order granting summary judgment

in favor of San Jacinto on all claims is AFFIRMED.
BRUNSWICK SEAFOOD, INC. d/b/a Dularge Seafood Processing and Lenue Green v. WILLIAMS LAW GROUP, LLC; Smitko Law, A Professional Law Corporation; The Law Offices of Jerri G. Smitko, APLC ; Naquin & Carmouche, LLC ; Naquin Law Firm, LLC ; John J. Bean CPA, Inc. ; Conrad S.P. Williams; David Ardoin; Matthew D. Ory; Jerri G. Smitko ; Catherine Gauthier and John J. Bean

NO. 2019-C-0335

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

Writ denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would grant this writ for the following reasons:

This is a summary judgment legal malpractice case. Both sides have competing, contradictory, and irreconcilable expert opinions and reports. When there are two competing experts with opposing views, the fact finder must make the determination as to whom to rely upon. This requires a review and weighing of the facts and evidence presented. A trial court judge is not permitted to weigh evidence or judge credibility in a summary judgment proceeding. That is precisely what occurred in this case. There are genuine issues of material fact presented which prohibit the grant of summary judgment. I would grant this writ, reverse the lower courts' grant of summary judgment, deny defendants' motion *1023for summary judgment, and remand for further proceedings.
Michael Joseph NILIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.