alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31739]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1180 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-968, K2025-967.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31739 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 108 Filed 01/14/04 Page 1 of 3 PageID 643
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 108 Filed 01/14/04 Page 2 of 3 PageID 644
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 108 Filed 01/14/04 Page 3 of 3 PageID 645
Case 3:03-cv-01379-M-BD Document 7 Filed 08/11/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 32
Case 3:03-cv-01379-M-BD Document 7 Filed 08/11/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 33
Case 3:03-cv-01379-M-BD Document 7 Filed 08/11/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 34
OLS.doc-17/OLS-PALS,N/Northern/WICHITA FALLS/00000000081216 Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

IN RE: § CASE NO. 02-70068-HDH-13

§

RICHARD GONZALEZ NAVARRO and §

IRMA VIRGENMINA NAVARRO, §

Debtor § CHAPTER 13

§

GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, §

Movant § FINAL HEARING DATE: 12/12/2005

§

v. § TIME: 09:00 AM

§

RICHARD GONZALEZ NAVARRO and §

IRMA VIRGENMINA NAVARRO; §

and WALTER O'CHESKEY, §

Trustee §

Respondents § JUDGE HARLIN D. HALE

ORDER LIFTING STAY

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ENTERED

TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK

THE DATE OF ENTRY IS

ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

The following constitutes the order of the Court.

Signed December 15, 2005 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 02-70068-hdh13 Doc 52 Filed 12/16/05 Entered 12/16/05 11:27:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
OLS.doc-17/OLS-PALS,N/Northern/WICHITA FALLS/00000000081216 Page 2

On this day came on before the Court the Motion of GMAC MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, Movant, for Relief from the Automatic Stay. The Court is advised the Parties 

agree to the lifting of the Stay and the Motion should be granted. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the stay afforded by 11 U.S.C. §362 is terminated with respect to 

Movant on the following described property, to wit:

LOT NO. THIRTEEN (13), IN BLOCK NO. TWENTY (20), SUNNYSIDE HEIGHTS, 

SECTION TWO (2), AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, WICHITA 

COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO PLAT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 7, PAGE 15, 

WICHITA COUNTY, PLAT RECORDS.

### End of Order ###

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE

BARRETT BURKE WILSON CASTLE

DAFFIN & FRAPPIER, L.L.P.

Case 02-70068-hdh13 Doc 52 Filed 12/16/05 Entered 12/16/05 11:27:55 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30705]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2025-1)]

Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board has adopted the first quarter 
2025 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor and cost index filed by the 
Association of American Railroads.

DATES: Applicability Date: January 1, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. If you 
require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 
please call (202) 245-0245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) is an 
index formulated to represent changes in railroad costs incurred by the 
nation's largest railroads over a specified period of time. The Surface 
Transportation Board (Board) is required by law to publish the RCAF on 
at least a quarterly basis. Each quarter, the Association of American 
Railroads computes three types of RCAF figures and submits those 
figures to the Board for approval. The Board has reviewed the 
submission and adopts the RCAF figures for the first quarter of 2025. 
The first quarter 2025 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.944. The first quarter 
2025 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.367. The first quarter 2025 RCAF-5 is 0.347. 
Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is 
available at www.stb.gov.

    Decided: December 18, 2024.

    By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz.
Stefan Rice,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-30705 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
### 1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1545V Filed: August 28, 2018

* * * * * * * * * * * * * DAVID MERRITT, * UNPUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

* Bell ’ s P alsy; Influenza ( “ Flu ” )

v. * Vaccine

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * Jeffrey Pop, Esq.

, Jeffrey S. Pop and Associates, Beverly Hills, CA

, for petitioner. Adriana Teitel, Esq

. , US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Roth , Special Master:

On December 17, 2015, David Merritt [ “ Mr . Merritt or “petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Petitioner alleges that he developed Bell ’ s palsy after receiving the influenza [ “ flu ” ] vaccine on November 11, 2013. Stipulation, filed August 27, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that the aforementioned

immunization caused petitioner ’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E -Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id

.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).

### 2

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On August 27, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $35,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, David
Merritt. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be av ailable under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipula tion attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance
with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth

Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 11, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00055

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M .E.J, W.D.J, AND T.M .J , CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 07

- 10155

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Francis, and Fillmore

The Court has before it appellant Zoe Michelle Jackman’s May 30, 2013 unopposed

motion to dism iss appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(a).

PER CURIAM

130055F.P05– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.J, W.D.J, AND

T.M.J, CHILDREN

No. 05

- 13

- 00055

- CV On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 07

- 10155.
Opinion delivered per curiam. Justices
O'Neill, Francis and Fillmore sitting for the

Court.

In accordance with this C ourt’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee William David Jackman recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Zoe Michelle Jackman.

Judgment entered this 11 th day of June, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

In re: 

CHRISTOPHER BRANDON JUDGE and 

RAQUELLE ANN JUDGE 

 Debtor(s) 

_____________________________ 

KRISTIN NEWMAN 

Plaintiff 

vs. 

CHRISTOPHER BRANDON JUDGE ET 

AL. 

Defendants 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO.: 23-41465-ELM7 

__________________________________ 

ADVERSARY NO.: 23-04066-ELM 

AGREED PROPOSED ORDER 

Before the Court is the Agreed Motion for Continuance. [Doc. No. 7] Having considered 

the Motion, the Court concludes that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that TRIAL is to be set before the Honorable Edward 

L. Morris at 501 W. 10th Street, Room 204, Fort Worth, TX 76102 the month of August. Docket 

call for this trial will be held on February 3, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. via WebEx either by video 

participation (https://us-courts.webex.com/meet/morris) or telephonic participation (Dial-In: 1-

Case 23-04066-elm Doc 10-1 Filed 07/22/24 Entered 07/22/24 09:50:53 Desc

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
2

650-476-3207; Meeting ID: 473 581 124). A pretrial conference shall be scheduled by the parties 

at least seven (7) calendar days prior to trial docket call in a complex adversary proceeding if the 

parties anticipate that trial will exceed one day or if there are preliminary matters that should be 

addressed by the Court prior to the commencement of trial. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Michael S. Newman

Michael S. Newman 

Bar No 14963900 

8813 N. Tarrant Pkwy., Ste. 252 

North Richland Hills, TX 76182 

Phone: 817-656-8100 

Email: mike@newmanlawtx.com 

Kristin Newman 

Bar No 24102279 

1409 Kaitlyn Lane 

Keller, TX 76248 

T: 817-480-5877 

E-Mail: kristinnewman@me.com 

/s/Clayton Everett 

Clayton L. Everett 

Bar No. 24065212 

Norred Law, PLLC 

515 E. Border Street 

Arlington, Texas 76010 

Email: clayton@norredlaw.com 

Case 23-04066-elm Doc 10-1 Filed 07/22/24 Entered 07/22/24 09:50:53 Desc

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
Joe Nathan HILL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2967

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
George Franklin PFEIFFER v. Yvonne Joyce PFEIFFER

2160116

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert O'TOOLE, Appellant, v. Iris BEAUGRAND, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 2, 2009

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David J. Curd                    
|David J. Curd
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017014EN.01005001.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/50

---

Action brought on 8 November 2016 — InvoiceAuction B2B v EUIPO (INVOICE AUCTION)

(Case T-789/16)

(2017/C 014/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: InvoiceAuction B2B GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Jonas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘INVOICE AUCTION’ — Application for registration No 13 821 095

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 August 2016 in Case R 2201/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Jordan THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4116

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 192 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 192

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require Amtrak to include 
   information on base pay and bonus compensation of certain Amtrak 
                  executives, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Amtrak Executive Bonus Disclosure 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMTRAK REPORTS AND AUDITS.

    Section 24315(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, and make available to the public on 
        the website of Amtrak,'' after ``submit to Congress''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) provide the annual base pay and any bonus 
        compensation paid to a member of the executive leadership team 
        (including the chief executive officer, president, and 
        officers) of Amtrak, including the criteria and metrics used to 
        determine any such bonus compensation; and''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 2025.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 192

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require Amtrak to include 
   information on base pay and bonus compensation of certain Amtrak 
                  executives, and for other purposes.
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Jeffery GUILLORY

No. 2018-KH-0668

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

*887Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DONALD TERRELL BANKS, §

Defendant-Petitioner, §

 § NO. 3:06-CV-1800-N (BF)

v. § (3:03-CR-078-N) (BF)

 § ECF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § 

Plaintiff-Respondent. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the

Court is of the opinion that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge are correct.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. The Court notes that in view of recent action by

the United States Sentencing Commission, Petitioner may move for a reduction in his sentence

under the new Guideline for cocaine base on or after March 3, 2008, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.

3582(c)(2).

SIGNED December 13, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3) and related Prospectuses of Equity Office Properties Trust for the
registration of: 9,558,824 common shares of beneficial interest, pertaining to
the $325 million in exchangeable notes (registration statement no. 333-47754);
25,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest pertaining to the Equity Office
Properties Trust Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (registration
statement no. 333-81303); 21,545,034 common shares of beneficial interest, as
amended (registration statement no. 333-86079); 1,012,623 common shares of
beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-88481); 137,427 common
shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-69619); 6,854,451
common shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-62213);
20,210,129 common shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no.
333-59069); 6,000,000 5.25% Series B convertible, cumulative preferred shares of
beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-61105); $1.5 billion common
shares of beneficial interest, preferred shares of beneficial interest, common
share warrants and preferred share warrants (registration statement no.
333-58729); 1,628,009 common shares of beneficial interest (registration
statement no. 333-58687); and 8,205,059 common shares of beneficial shares of
beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-40401); and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the Equity Office Properties
Trust 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan (registration statement
no. 333-72187); the Amended and Restated 1997 Share Option and Share Award Plan
(registration statement nos. 333-72205) and the 1995 and 1997 stock option
agreements, stock option agreements under the Cornerstone 1998 long-term
incentive plan (registration statement no. 333-39920), of our report dated
February 5, 2001, except for Note 25, as to which the date is February 23, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Equity
Office Properties Trust included in the 2000 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Equity
Office Properties Trust. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the
caption "Selected Financial Data" in the 2000 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Equity Office Properties Trust.




                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 23, 2001
N.S. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160276

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.