alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 783 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 783

 To correct the engrossment of the amendment of the Senate to S. 2073.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To correct the engrossment of the amendment of the Senate to S. 2073.

    Resolved, That in the engrossment of the amendment of the Senate to 
S. 2073, an Act to amend title 31, United States Code, to require 
agencies to include a list of outdated or duplicative reporting 
requirements in annual budget justifications, and for other purposes, 
the Secretary of the Senate shall amend the title of the bill so as to 
read ``An Act to protect the safety and privacy of children on the 
internet.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TearLab Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Elias VamvakasElias VamvakasChief Executive Officer




Dated:     May 12, 2011
Kyle Joseph GREBENOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6152

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BENJAMIN SANJURJO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00338-REP-RCY-2)

Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-REP-RCY-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 1, 2017). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2016136EN.01004301.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/43

---

Action brought on 26 February 2016 — Rheinmetall Waffe Munition v EUIPO (VANGUARD)

(Case T-93/16)

(2016/C 136/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH (Südheide, Germany) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ‘VANGUARD’ — Application for registration No 11 166 003

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2015 in Case R 69/2015-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 688-689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31689]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract

[[Page 689]]

1107 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-882, K2025-883.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31689 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                             [LOGO OF CHAUHAN & CO.]


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation our report dated September 3rd, 2001 relating
to the balance sheet and the related income statement of SeraNova India Pvt.
Ltd. for the year ended March 31, 2001, in the Annual  Reporting Form 20-F of
Silverline Technologies Limited for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002.


Place: Hyderabad                         For M/S. S. D. Chauhan & Co.
Date:  14th February, 2003                  Chartered Accountants

                                         /s/ S. D. Chauhan

                                         (S. D. Chauhan -- Proprietor)
                                             (Mem. No. 100/34827)
1 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10

- 3 937

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JESSIE M. SNYDER and

ROBERT L. SNYDER, DECEASED

Jessie M. Snyder,

Appellant

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 86

- 0466 )

District Judge: Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

___________________________________ _

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

May 27, 2011

Before: BARRY, JORDAN and GARTH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed June 1, 2011 )

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM2

Pro se appellant Jessie Snyder appeals the District Court’s order renewing the

government’s judgment lien pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3201(c)(2). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and will affirm the D istrict C ourt ’s judgment

.

In 1991, a consent judgment was entered in favor of the government and against

Snyder and her husband concerning the couple’s federal tax liabilities. The government

then filed an abstract of the judgment in Butler County, Pennsylvania. However, despite

its continu ing efforts, the government has been unable to collect th e judgment in ful l. In

2007, the government obtained an order of foreclosure and sale of properties belonging to

Snyder. Th e order has not been executed because the occupants of the properties have

refused to vacate the premises

.

Under federal law, the initial 1991 ju dgment lien was scheduled to expire after 20

years. See 28 U.S.C. § 3201(c)(1). However, § 3201(c)(2) authorizes a party to renew

the lien for an additional 20 years by filing notice with the court. The government here

did so, and on August 19, 2010, th e District Court approved the renewal of the judgment

lien. Snyder then filed a timely notice of appeal.

In her brief, Snyder does not challenge the District Court’s order renewing the

lien. Instead, she argues that, because she has provided the gover nment with , in her

words, a “public money certificate,” 1 she has fully discharged her debt. See generally

Trohimovich v. Dir. of Dep’ t of Labor & Indus. , 584 P.2d 467 , 469

- 70 (Wash. Ct. App.3

1978) (explaining the basis for and the legal frivolity of this argument). In her previous

appeals, Snyder has r epeatedly raised this argument, and we have rejected it each time.

See United States v. Snyder , 365 F. App’x 407 (3d Cir. 2010); United States v. Snyder

,

308 F

. App ’x 651 (3rd Cir. 2009); Snyder v. Everson

, 237 F

. App’x 734 (3d Cir. 2007).

We will not entertain it again. Accordingly, we will affirm the District Court’s order

renewing the government’s judgment lien.

1 This “public money certificate” was a personal note by Snyder promising to pay the

gove rnment $1.3 million.
2034.

#### Hampton *v.*The State.

Indictmeift for burglary, from Bibb superior court — Judge Whipple. June 18, 1909.

Submitted October 4, —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*W. D. •& Custis Nottingham, W. A. McClellan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter J. Grace, solicitor-general,*contra.

Russell, J.

The defendant’s guilt of the crime of burglary being wholly dependent upon the inference arising from the possession of stolen goods after the burglary, and this possession being shown by uncobtradicted and unimpeaehed testimony to be consistent with, defendant’s innocence of burglary, though he may have been guilty of receiving stolen goods, the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and a new trial should have been granted. *Judgment reversed.*

*Powell, J., disqualified.*
----

|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Trust. |

|            |                |                               |   |   |
|-----------------|---------------------|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|            |                |                               |
| By:   | /s/      Don Klapko |                               |   |
|            | Name:     | Don      Klapko                    |   |   |
|            | Title:    | Chief      Executive Officer  |   |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 105644)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1077 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-841, K2025-842.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30819 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Rickenson DECEMBRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4792

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, And Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
1

 A sentencing hearing is scheduled for October 20, 2006 before Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

VS. § 

§ NO. 3-04-CR-059-D 

EDWIN T. McBIRNEY III §

§ 

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The government has filed a motion for reconsideration of the February 25, 2004 order

releasing defendant on conditions. As grounds for its motion, the government alleges that defendant,

who has been convicted on multiple counts of mail fraud, making false statements, concealing

assets, and money laundering, is now a flight risk and should be detained pending sentencing.1

Defendant has filed a written response to the motion and both sides presented oral argument at a

hearing held on September 8, 2006. 

The court notes that this is the second time since defendant's conviction that the government

has sought reconsideration of the pretrial release order. At a hearing held on January 31, 2006, the

district judge denied a similar motion for two reasons:

First, as to some of the counts, the court has indicated a willingness

and an inclination to consider the defendant's postverdict motion and

wishes to address the merits of those motions. And although that at

this point [sic] does not rise to a level of a substantial issue, which

would be required at a later point for him to remain free, such as to

remain free while on appeal, an issue the court does not now address,

at least in--in analogous context the court takes that into account.

Additionally, based upon the defendant's conduct stemming from his

first conviction through his conduct in this case, where he's been on

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00059-D Document 133 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 986
 2

 The court denied all post-verdict motions, except defendant's motion and supplemental motion for judgment of

acquittal notwithstanding the verdict as to counts 13 and 22 of the superseding indictment. The government concedes

that acquittal on those counts has no effect on the sentencing guideline range. (See Gov't Mot. at 4 n.2).

bond for a period of almost two years, I do find at this point by clear

and convincing evidence that he's not a flight risk.

(Hrg. Tr., 1/31/06 at 64-65) (emphasis added). Although the government acknowledges this prior

ruling, it argues that "circumstances have changed since the Court denied said oral motion, which

circumstances support the government's contention that [defendant] is a flight risk." (Gov't Mot. at

1). The only circumstance that has changed since the district judge allowed the defendant to remain

free on bond is the August 21, 2006 ruling denying defendant's post-verdict motions.2

 That fact,

standing alone, does not make defendant a flight risk. This is particularly true where, as here,

defendant has complied with all conditions of his pretrial release and pretrial services does not

believe defendant will flee.

For these reasons, the government's motion for reconsideration [Doc. #127] is denied.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 8, 2006.

 

 Case 3:04-cr-00059-D Document 133 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 987
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 790 

Commending and congratulating the University of Connecticut men’s basketball team for winning the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic Association 

Men’s Basketball Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2024 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending and congratulating the University of Connecticut men’s basketball team for winning the 2024 

National Collegiate Athletic Association Men’s Basketball 

Championship. 

Whereas, on Monday, April 8, 2024, the University of Connecticut’s men’s basketball team (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘UConn Huskies’’) won the 2024 National 

Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) Men’s Basketball Championship 

with a 75–60 win over the Purdue University Boilermakers; 

Whereas this is the UConn Huskies’ sixth national championship, continuing the team’s undefeated streak in national 

championship games; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 790 ATS 

Whereas this is the UConn Huskies’ second consecutive national championship, becoming only the eighth NCAA Division I men’s basketball team to accomplish this feat; 

Whereas the UConn Huskies earned all 6 national titles since 

1999, a feat that no other college team has surpassed 

during that time; 

Whereas Tristen Newton was named the Most Outstanding 

Player of the NCAA tournament, averaging 14.5 points 

per game; 

Whereas the UConn Huskies won every NCAA tournament 

game by 14 points or more for a second straight year and 

set the record this year for the largest margin of victory 

over its 6-game run with 140 combined points; and 

Whereas, because the University of Connecticut is also home 

to the most successful NCAA Division I women’s basketball program, having won a record 11 national championships and appearing in their twenty-third Final Four this 

year, Storrs, Connecticut, is the Basketball Capital of the 

World: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the University of Connecticut 

3 men’s basketball team for winning the 2024 Na4 tional Collegiate Athletic Association Men’s Basket5 ball Championship; 

6 (2) congratulates the fans, students, and fac7 ulty of the University of Connecticut; and 

8 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

9 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu10 tion to— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 790 ATS 

1 (A) the President of the University of Con2 necticut, Radenka Maric; and 

3 (B) the Head Coach of the University of 

4 Connecticut men’s basketball team, Dan Hur5 ley. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1106 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-881, K2025-882.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31688 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Jashon MOBLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.