alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016441EN.01003401.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/34

---

Appeal brought on 12 October 2016 by Giorgio Cocchi and Nicola Falcione against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 August 2016 in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission

(Case T-724/16 P)

(2016/C 441/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Giorgio Cocchi (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) and Nicola Falcione (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission;

and, giving judgment itself:

| — | Annul the decision of 9 March 2011 refusing the requests for assistance; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 9 March 2011 refusing the requests for assistance;

| — | Order the Commission pay the amounts of EUR 22 000 to Mr Falcione and EUR 35 000 to Mr Cocchi, in respect of the damage which they have suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission pay the amounts of EUR 22 000 to Mr Falcione and EUR 35 000 to Mr Cocchi, in respect of the damage which they have suffered;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of both instances. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal erred in law in its assessment of the appellants’ interest in pursuing the proceedings. The appellants, it is claimed, have more than a mere administrative interest in having their appeal upheld.

---
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50019

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eugene Durst Self, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-66-1

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Eugene Durst Self, federal prisoner # 76522-080, was sentenced to

concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 and 36 months, and concurrent fiveyear terms of supervised release, upon revocation of his supervised release. 

Self was originally convicted and sentenced before 2010 of conspiracy to 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 2, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50019 Document: 00516001768 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2021
No. 21-50019

2

possess with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, and 

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii), and (b)(1)(C).

Now Self appeals the denial of his motion to reduce his revocation 

sentence under the First Step Act. He argues that the district court abused 

its discretion in denying his motion, and that the district court erroneously 

denied his motion because his sentence was imposed after revocation of his 

supervised release.

Contrary to Self’s contention, the district court considered the merits 

of his motion, and there is no indication that the district court determined 

that he was not eligible based on an erroneous legal interpretation of the Act. 

The district court considered the applicable factors provided in § 404 of the 

Act, the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and the applicable policy 

statements issued by the Sentencing Commission, and determined on the 

merits that a sentencing reduction was not warranted. Self has not shown 

that the district court committed an error of law or based its decision on a 

clearly erroneous view of the evidence. See United States v. Batiste, 980 F.3d 

466, 469 (5th Cir. 2020). Self has not demonstrated that the district court 

abused its discretion in denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 

the Act. See United States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. 

denied, 140 S. Ct. 2699 (2020). The district court’s denial of his motion is 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50019 Document: 00516001768 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/02/2021
# Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries
of Registrant  100 percent Owned

| | Byron
Bank2445 84th Street, S.W.Byron Center, MI 49315
| | ------------------------------------------------------

| | Byron
Investment Services, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Bank)
                  2445  84th Street, S.W. Byron
Center, MI 49315
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Byron
Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)
                  5445  32nd Avenue Hudsonville, MI
49426
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | OAK
 Title  Insurance  Agency,  Inc.  (100  percent  owned  subsidiary  of Byron  Investment
Services)                  2445  84th Street, S.W. Byron
Center, MI 49315
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

Per 45 CFR Chapter XXI § 2102.3, the next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for January 16, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. and will be held via online videoconference. Items of discussion may include buildings, infrastructure, parks, memorials, and public art.

                    Draft agendas, the link to register for the online public meeting, and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our website:                     *www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda, as well as any public testimony, should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by emailing                     *cfastaff@cfa.gov;*                     or by calling 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

      ( print page 4727)    
Dated January 6, 2025, in Washington, DC.

Zakiya N. Walters,

Administrative Officer.

[FR Doc. 2025-00418 Filed 1-14-25; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-P
A.P. and W.P. v. BALDWIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160499

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

In re: 

Lion Star Nacogdoches Hospital, LLC, 

Debtor. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CHAPTER 11 

Case No. 23-43535-mxm11 

REQUEST FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES, PLEADINGS, AND ORDERS 

Pursuant to Rule 2002 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Nacogdoches 

County Hospital District (“NCHD”), without consenting to or waiving any rights with respect to 

jurisdiction under Title 11 of the United States Code, hereby requests that notices of any actions 

taken, adversary proceedings, contested matters, or motions filed by any other party-in-interest, 

including the Debtor be served on NCHD at the following addresses: 

Deborah D. Williamson 

Patrick L. Huffstickler 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 1800 

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

(210) 554-5500 

(210) 226-8395 (Fax) 

dwilliamson@dykema.com

phuffstickler@dykema.com

Alexandria R. Rahn 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

1717 Main Street, Suite 4200 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 462-6400 

(214) 462-6401 

arahn@dykema.com

Further, pursuant to Rule 2002 of the Bankruptcy Rules, NCHD’s request includes the 

notices and papers referred to in the rules specified above and also includes, without limitation, 

Case 23-43535-mxm11 Doc 5 Filed 11/17/23 Entered 11/17/23 13:59:00 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

notices of any orders, pleadings, motions, applications, complaints, demands, hearings, requests 

or petitions, disclosure statements, answering or reply papers, memoranda and briefs in support 

of any of the foregoing and any other documents brought before this Court with respect to these 

proceedings, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, whether transmitted or 

conveyed by mail, electronic mail, delivery, telephone, telecopy, or otherwise. 

Dated: November 17, 2023 

Respectfully submitted, 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

112 E. Pecan St., Suite 1800 

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

(210) 554-5500 

(210) 226-8395 (Fax) 

By: /s/ Deborah D. Williamson 

Deborah D. Williamson 

Texas State Bar No. 21617500 

ATTORNEYS FOR NACOGDOCHES 

COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served 

electronically upon those parties registered to receive electronic notice via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system on this 17th day of November, 2023. 

/s/ Deborah D. Williamson 

Deborah D. Williamson 

Case 23-43535-mxm11 Doc 5 Filed 11/17/23 Entered 11/17/23 13:59:00 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 804 

Recognizing Edmundo Gonza ́lez Urrutia as the President-elect of Venezuela. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. KAINE, Mr. 

CASSIDY, and Mr. BENNET) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Edmundo Gonza ́lez Urrutia as the Presidentelect of Venezuela. 

Whereas, on July 28, 2024, Venezuela held Presidential elections, the first in the country since the widely discredited 

Presidential election in 2018; 

Whereas the elections were neither free nor fair, and the 

process lacked respect for fundamental freedoms, with 

the Carter Center stating, ‘‘Venezuela’s 2024 presidential 

election did not meet international standards of electoral 

integrity and cannot be considered democratic.’’; 

Whereas President Joe Biden has publicly stated the need for 

an immediate release of full, transparent, and detailed 

voting data by Venezuelan authorities; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 804 IS 

Whereas the data released by the vast majority of polling centers showed that the leader of the opposition, Edmundo 

Gonza ́lez Urrutia, won with an overwhelming number of 

votes; 

Whereas the Venezuelan people have demonstrated their desire to live in peace and political freedom, represented by 

a democratically elected President of their choosing; 

Whereas many international organizations and heads of state 

have voiced concern with the lack of transparency 

throughout the electoral process; and 

Whereas numerous countries have either called for transparency in the tally of election results or have rejected 

the results outright based on clear evidence of fraud, including Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Spain, 

and Uruguay: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the victory of Edmundo Gonza ́lez 

3 Urrutia in the Presidential election in Venezuela 

4 held on July 28, 2024; 

5 (2) notes that such recognition is widely shared 

6 around the world; 

7 (3) asserts that the victory of Edmundo 

8 Gonza ́lez marks the return of a democratically elect9 ed leader at the national level in Venezuela; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 804 IS 

1 (4) stands in solidarity with the Venezuelan 

2 people in their democratic aspirations to live freely 

3 without repression. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Hugh Martin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  | /s/    Hugh Martin                   
|                   |  | Hugh Martin                          
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2017202EN.01002803.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/28

---

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — Generis — Farmacêutica v EUIPO — Corpak MedSystems (CORGRIP)

(Case T-744/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 202/46)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J.
Fiore, Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

| |                                           | 
| | ----------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Dennis
 J. Fiore                      | 
| |                                           | 
| | Dennis J.
 Fiore                         
| | Vice
 President - Chief Financial Officer
| | September
 30, 2009                      

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by
U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2018436EN.01006402.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/64

---

Order of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v INEA

(Case T-871/16) (1)

(2018/C 436/90)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 30.4.2017.

---
# C_2018408EN.01002701.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/27

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 September 2018 — Agria Polska sp. z o.o., Agria Chemicals Poland sp. z o.o., Agria Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Star Agro Analyse und Handels GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-373/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Rejection of a complaint by the European Commission - Lack of Union interest))

(2018/C 408/34)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Appellants: Agria Polska sp. z o.o., Agria Chemicals Poland sp. z o.o., Agria Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Star Agro Analyse und Handels GmbH (represented by: P. Graczyk, adwokat, and W. Rocławski, radca prawny)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski and A. Dawes, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Agria Polska sp. z o.o., Agria Chemicals Poland sp. z o.o. and Agria Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agria Polska sp. z o.o., Agria Chemicals Poland sp. z o.o. and Agria Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Star Agro Analyse und Handels GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Star Agro Analyse und Handels GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SAMUEL ORELLANA,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:04-CV-2114-G

)

) ECF

)

)

)

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the court finds that

the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct,

and they are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.

June 29, 2006.

 

 Case 3:04-cv-02114-G Document 21 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 112
* After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted w ithout oral argument. This Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, exceptunder the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. T he court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R . 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### AUG 16 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
BILL ROBERT CATHEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY GIBSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Respondents-Appellees. No. 99-7047 (D.C. No. CIV 98-CV-268-S) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , EBEL and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
Petitioner-Appellant Bill Robert Cathey (“Cathey”) is currently incarcerated at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, Ok lahoma pursuant to a state conviction and sentence which became final prior to the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 19 96 (“AEDPA”). Accordingly,- 2 -

he had until April 24, 1997, plus “any time during which a properly filed application for State postconviction or other colla teral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending,” in order t o file his federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Hoggro v. Boone , 150 F.3d 1223, 1226-27 (10th Cir. 1998); 28 U.S.C. § 22 44(d)(2). Here, Cathey filed his federal habeas petition in t he United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma on June 8, 1998. The district court determined that, at most, the time for Cathey to fi le his federal habeas petition should have been tolled 122 days, which would have given him until the end of August 1997 to meet AEDPA’s timing requirements. B ecause Cathey filed his federal habeas petition on June 8, 1998, the distri ct court dismissed the petition as time barred. The district court also denied Cathey a certificate of appealability (“COA”). Before this court, in support of his application fo r a COA, Cathey argues that, in violation of the United States Supreme Cou rt’s decision in Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the Oklahoma Court of Crimin al Appeals erroneously concluded that his state postconviction application was untimely, which led the federal district court to conclude erroneously thathis federal habeas petition was time barred. We find that Cathey’s argument is wit hout merit. Because he has- 3 -

failed to make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), we deny Cathey’ s application for a COA.

The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   May 6, 2010/s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.John P. Calamos, Sr.Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

and Co-Chief Investment Officer