alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |     |                                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID J. CURD                            
| |     | David J. Curd
Interim Chief Financial Officer



November 17, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
3rd Quarter 2007 ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson         
|Paul G. Anderson             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

July 13, 2007

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



48.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3) and related Prospectuses of Equity Office Properties Trust for the
registration of: 9,558,824 common shares of beneficial interest, pertaining to
the $325 million in exchangeable notes (registration statement no. 333-47754);
25,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest pertaining to the Equity Office
Properties Trust Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (registration
statement no. 333-81303); 21,545,034 common shares of beneficial interest, as
amended (registration statement no. 333-86079); 1,012,623 common shares of
beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-88481); 137,427 common
shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-69619); 6,854,451
common shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-62213);
20,210,129 common shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no.
333-59069); 6,000,000 5.25% Series B convertible, cumulative preferred shares of
beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-61105); $1.5 billion common
shares of beneficial interest, preferred shares of beneficial interest, common
share warrants and preferred share warrants (registration statement no.
333-58729); 1,628,009 common shares of beneficial interest (registration
statement no. 333-58687); and 8,205,059 common shares of beneficial shares of
beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-40401); and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the Equity Office Properties
Trust 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan (registration statement
no. 333-72187); the Amended and Restated 1997 Share Option and Share Award Plan
(registration statement nos. 333-72205) and the 1995 and 1997 stock option
agreements, stock option agreements under the Cornerstone 1998 long-term
incentive plan (registration statement no. 333-39920), of our report dated
February 5, 2001, except for Note 26, as to which the date is February 23, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Equity
Office Properties Trust included in the 2000 Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of
Equity Office Properties Trust. We also consent to the reference to our firm
under the caption "Selected Financial Data" in the 2000 Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) of Equity Office Properties Trust.




                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
June 4, 2001
**EXHIBIT 18.1**

 

November 17, 2005 

 

Board of Directors 

ECC Capital Corporation 

 

As stated in note L to the condensed consolidated financial statements of ECC Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for amortization of deferred loan fees and costs. Specifically, the Company amortized deferred loans fees and costs related to its held-for-investment loan portfolio over thecontractual life of the individual loans using the effective yield method through the period ended June 30, 2005. Upon prepayment of any loan, the unamortized fees and costs were charged against interest income. The Company’sheld-for-investment loan portfolio comprises a large number of similar loans for which prepayments are probable and can be estimated. Due to the anticipated prepayment patterns of its loan portfolio, management believes it preferable to amortizedeferred fees and costs over the life of the held-for-investment loan portfolio using the effective yield method in a manner that anticipates prepayments as permitted by paragraph 19 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 91,*Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases*. Amortizing fees and costs in a manner that anticipates prepayments will result in a more ratable allocation ofinterest income over the life of the components of the Company’s held-for-investment loan portfolio. 

 

Management believes the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it better matches the loan fees and costs with the expected life and benefit periods of the loans. At your request,we have reviewed and discussed with management the circumstances, business judgment, and planning that formed the basis for making this change in accounting principle. 

 

It should be recognized that professional standards have not been established for selecting among alternative principles that exist in thisarea or for evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting principles. Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely for purposes of the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and itshould not be used or relied on for any other purpose. 

 

Based on our review anddiscussion, we concur with management’s judgment that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances. In formulating this position, we are relying on management’s business planning and judgment, which we do notfind unreasonable. 

 

We have not audited any consolidated financial statementsof ECC Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2004. Accordingly, we are unable to express an opinion on whether the method of accounting for the effect of the change is in conformitywith accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or if the financial information included in Part I of this Form 10-Q is fairly presented. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
# C_2018083EN.01000502.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Frédéric Jahin v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé

(Case C-45/17) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 11 - Levies on income from assets contributing to the financing of the social security scheme of a Member State - Exemption for nationals of the European Union affiliated to a social security scheme of another Member State - Natural persons affiliated to a social security scheme of a third country - Difference of treatment - Restriction - Justification))

(2018/C 083/07)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Frédéric Jahin

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which a national of that Member State who resides in a third country other than a Member State of the European Economic Area (EEA) or the Swiss Confederation and is affiliated to a social security scheme in that third country is subject, in that Member State, to levies on income from assets for the purpose of contributing to the social security scheme established by that Member State, whereas an EU national covered by a social security scheme of another Member State is exempted therefrom by reason of the principle that the legislation of a single Member State only is to apply in matters of social security pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

CAROLYN R. BECKHAM §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 7-04-CV-191-R

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of Social Security §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 22, 2006, the

Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are

accepted as the Findings and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SO ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2006.

 _____________________________________

 JERRY BUCHMEYER

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

FILED

September 8, 2006

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 7:04-cv-00191-R Document 26 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 103
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3202-3203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00575]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Department of 
Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Rescindment of a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 and Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-108, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission or FERC) proposes to rescind an existing system 
of records notice (SORN). Specifically, the following SORN is being 
proposed for rescindment ``Commission Employee Performance Files 
(FERC--38)''. The basis for rescindment is explained below.

DATES: Comments on this rescindment notice must be received no later 
than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. If 
no public comment is received during the period allowed for comment or 
unless otherwise published in the Federal Register by FERC, the 
rescindment will become effective a minimum of 30 days after the date 
of publication in the Federal Register. If FERC receives public 
comments, FERC shall review the comments to determine whether any 
changes to the notice are necessary.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in writing to Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426 or 
electronically to [email protected]. Comments should indicate that they 
are submitted in response to ``Commission Employee Performance Files 
(FERC--38).''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney Chapman, Director, Workforce 
Relations Division, Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO), Office of the 
Executive Director, Federal Energy Regulatory

[[Page 3203]]

Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6475.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ``Commission Employee Performance Files 
(FERC--38)'' was identified for rescindment from FERC's Privacy Act 
systems of records inventory because the system of records is 
duplicative, and the records are covered by a government-wide System of 
Records Notice (SORN). OMB requires that each agency provide assurance 
that system of records do not duplicate any existing agency or 
government-wide system of records. The Commission is rescinding this 
SORN because the records are covered by OPM/GOVT-2, Employee 
Performance File System Records, 87 FR 5874 (February 2, 2022).

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
    Commission Employee Performance Files (FERC-38).

HISTORY:
    65 FR 21754 (April 24, 2000).

    Dated: January 7, 2025.
Carlos D. Clay,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00575 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Richard PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7318

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA00-1961-DKC)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Albert Curtis Mills seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Corcoran, No. CA-00-

1961-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016296EN.01003202.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/32

---

Action brought on 15 June 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (360o)

o

(Case T-332/16)

(2016/C 296/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘360o’ — Application for registration No 14 042 162

Trade mark at issue:

o

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2016 in Case R 2288/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of the rules of law relating to its application as set out in Article 65(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

Ex1.6                                                              Exhibit 10.29

                                                  June 1, 1999

Mr. Jerry Little
12101 Wolf Valley Drive
Clifton, VA  21024
                           Re:  Employment Agreement

Dear Jerry:

It is my pleasure to welcome you to Precision Auto Care, Inc. ("PACI" or the
"Company") and to extend this formal offer of employment.  You will assume the
role of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.  Your employment with
PACI will commence June 1, 1999, and you will be compensated at an monthly rate
of $20,000 per month.  As a full-time associate of PACI, you are eligible to
participate in the bonus plans of the Company and shall be able to participate
in retirement, group insurance, medical, dental, vacation and any other programs
available to executive employees of the Company.  While you are permitted to
retain your relationships with other companies, you agree to devote a
substantial portion of your time to the Company.

Pursuant to the terms of the Company's existing Stock Option Plan, a copy is
attached hereto, you shall be granted non-qualified stock options to purchase
35,000 shares of common stock of the Company.  Subject to the terms and
conditions of the Stock Option Plan, the grant date shall be June 1, 1999, at
the closing price set for the Company's common stock on the NASDAQ National
Market.  The vesting schedule shall be contingent upon 17,500 shares vesting
upon completion of the fiscal year end audit and filing of the 10K for the
period ending June 30, 1999.  The balance of 17,500 shares shall vest upon
satisfactory completion of the installation of the Platinum system for all of
the Company's principal business units.  Ernst & Young will render an opinion as
to the successful completion of the Platinum installation.

The Company agrees to reimburse you for any and all reasonable expenses incurred
in discharging your responsibilities as Chief Financial Officer. Either party
may terminate this employment agreement by tendering 90 day notice; provided,
however, that the employee shall be entitled to retain any vested options.

We are excited that you will become a part of the Precision Auto Care team.

                                                   Sincerely,

                                                   Charles L. Dunlap
                                                   President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
Attachment

cc:  Lynn Caruthers (w/o attachs)
     Pam Mazza (w/o attachs)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CLEARVIEW CINEMA GROUP, INC. DECEMBER 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUANTIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001038754
<NAME> CLEARVIEW CINEMA GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,105
<PP&E>                                          36,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,408)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,350
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,352
<SALES>                                         17,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,262
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-104917 on Form S-3and Registration Statement No. 333-117452 on Form S-8 of: 1) ourreport dated February 18, 2005, relating to the financial statements ofMetals USA, Inc., (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph referring to the application of fresh startaccounting in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7 “FinancialReporting for Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code” and thelack of comparability of financial information between reporting periods), and2) our report dated April 28, 2005 relating to management’s assessment onthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Metals USA, Inc. for the yearended December 31, 2004.

 

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP

 

Houston, Texas

May 26, 2005

 

----