alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019220EN.01000301.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2019 — Italian Republic v Council of the European Union

(Case C-611/17) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Common fisheries policy - Conservation of resources - International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas - Total allowable catch (TAC) for Mediterranean swordfish - Regulation (EU) 2017/1398 - Fixing of fishing opportunities for 2017 - Exclusive competence of the European Union - Determination of the reference period - Reliability of the basic facts - Scope of judicial review - Article 17 TEU - Management of the EU’s interests within international bodies - Principle of relative stability - Conditions under which applicable - Principles of non-retroactivity, legal certainty, legitimate expectation and non-discrimination)

(2019/C 220/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and E. Moro, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: V. Ester Casas and subsequently by M.J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: F. Moro and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bin
Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      October 15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Bin
      WangBin
      WangPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 574 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1015, K2025-1014.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00041 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3) and related Prospectuses of Equity Office Properties Trust for the
registration of: 25,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest pertaining to
the Equity Office Properties Trust Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan
(registration statement no. 333-81303); 21,545,034 common shares of beneficial
interest, as amended (registration statement no. 333-86079); 1,012,623 common
shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-88481); 137,427
common shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-69619);
6,854,451 common shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no.
333-62213); 20,210,129 common shares of beneficial interest (registration
statement no. 333-59069); 6,000,000 5.25% Series B convertible, cumulative
preferred shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-61105);
$1.5 billion common shares of beneficial interest, preferred shares of
beneficial interest, common share warrants and preferred share warrants
(registration statement no. 333-58729); 1,628,009 common shares of beneficial
interest (registration statement no. 333-58687); and 8,205,059 common shares of
beneficial shares of beneficial interest (registration statement no. 333-40401);
and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the Equity Office
Properties Trust 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan (registration
statement no. 333-72187) and the Amended and Restated 1997 Share Option and
Share Award Plan (registration statement no. 333-72205), of our report dated
February 8, 2000, except for Note 24, as to which the date is February 15, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Equity
Office Properties Trust and Equity Office Predecessors included in the 1999
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Equity Office Properties Trust.



                                                     Ernst & Young LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 2000
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tor Olav Trøim, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
   
 Date:
March 31,
2008
  
 /s/ Tor Olav
Troim
 Tor Olav
Troim
 Principal
Executive Officer
David T. SKITTLETHORP and Nancy Skittlethorp, Appellants, v. SPACE COAST CREDIT UNION, Appellee.

No. 4D18-653

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017104EN.01004801.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/48

---

Action brought on 8 December 2016 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v INEA

(Case T-871/16)

(2017/C 104/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: Y. de Vries, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 17 July 2015 on the rejection of the applicant’s proposal in response to the call for proposals in the context of the Connecting Europe Facility and on the basis of the Multi-annual Work Programme adopted in 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 17 July 2015 on the rejection of the applicant’s proposal in response to the call for proposals in the context of the Connecting Europe Facility and on the basis of the Multi-annual Work Programme adopted in 2014;

| — | order the defendant to take a new decision with respect to the applicant’s proposal, taking account of the judgment of the General Court referred to in the application, within three months from the date of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to take a new decision with respect to the applicant’s proposal, taking account of the judgment of the General Court referred to in the application, within three months from the date of the judgment;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment of the applicant’s proposal.






  — | The applicant submits reasons why in its view the defendant’s evaluation of the applicant’s proposal against the award criteria relevance, impact and quality was deficient. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment of the applicant’s proposal.

—

The applicant submits reasons why in its view the defendant’s evaluation of the applicant’s proposal against the award criteria relevance, impact and quality was deficient.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment






  — | The applicant submits reasons why in its view the defendant drew an inappropriate distinction between its proposal relating to emission abatement technologies and similar proposals by its competitors which have been selected for funding. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment

—

The applicant submits reasons why in its view the defendant drew an inappropriate distinction between its proposal relating to emission abatement technologies and similar proposals by its competitors which have been selected for funding.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                       EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE PROTECTION PLAN

WHEREAS the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Santa Fe
International Corporation ("Board") having been expressly authorized by the
Board, has effective November 22, 1999, authorized and approved an amendment of
the definition of "Change of Control" contained within the Santa Fe
International Corporation Employee Severance Protection Plan ("Plan") to address
a "merger of equals" transaction; and

WHEREAS, Section 8.2 of the Plan authorizes the Board in this instance to amend
the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Santa Fe International Corporation Employee Severance
Protection Plan, which was adopted effective June 13, 1997, is hereby amended
effective November 22, 1999 as follows:

1.   A new subparagraph (f) of Section 2.6 "Change of Control" thereof is ADDED
     to the Plan to read as follows:

          (f) there is consummated a `merger of equals' (which for purposes of
          this Subsection shall mean a merger with another company of relatively
          equal size) to which the Company is a party as a result of which the
          persons who were equityholders of the Company immediately prior to the
          effective date of such merger shall have beneficial ownership of less
          than 55% of the combined voting power for election of members of the
          Board (or equivalent) of the surviving entity or its parent following
          the effective date of such merger, provided that the Board shall have
          authority to increase said percentage as may in its sole discretion be
          deemed appropriate to cover a specific transaction.


Dated:  December 1, 1999



By: /s/ Cary A. Moomjian
    --------------------------------------------
    Santa Fe International Corporation
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ronaldo Iabrudi,certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F ofCOMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO; 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.[OMITTED];

4.The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company andhave: 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financialreporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c)evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on evaluation; and 

d)disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annualreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and to the audit committee of the company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: April 15,2015

By: /s/Ronaldo IabrudiName: Ronaldo IabrudiTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Charles A. POINDEXTER, II, DOC #R767273, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1857

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 
| /s/ Kenneth U. Kuk                                     |   | Date: August 15, 2005 |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
| Kenneth U. Kuk                                         |   |
| Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                          |   |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG AmericaCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
# C_2019016EN.01002402.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/24

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v Baby Dan A/S

(Case C-592/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Headings and subheadings 4421, 7326, 7318 15 90, 7318 19 00 and 9403 90 10 - Article specially designed to mount child safety gates - Dumping - Validity of Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 - Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China - World Trade Organisation (WTO) Anti-Dumping Agreement - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) - Definition of Community industry))

(2019/C 16/30)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteministeriet

Defendant: Baby Dan A/S

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The Combined Nomenclature listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions resulting, successively, from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007, and from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1031/2008 of 19 September 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that an article, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows a movable child safety gate to be mounted to a wall or a door frame, does not constitute part of those gates and must be classified under subheading 7318 15 90 of the Combined Nomenclature. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Combined Nomenclature listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions resulting, successively, from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007, and from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1031/2008 of 19 September 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that an article, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows a movable child safety gate to be mounted to a wall or a door frame, does not constitute part of those gates and must be classified under subheading 7318 15 90 of the Combined Nomenclature.

| 2. | Examination of the fourth question referred has not revealed any factors of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Examination of the fourth question referred has not revealed any factors of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.

---
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                               |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                               |   |
| Date:      January 23, 2009 |   | /s/      Charles B. Crowell   |   |
|                        |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
|                        |   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
|                        |   |                               |   |

----

----