alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-12400

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:98-cr-00006-LSC-TMP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO ANTON LEE,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(April 22, 2020)

Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mario Lee, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court’s 

order granting Lee’s uncontested motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 

Case: 19-12400 Date Filed: 04/22/2020 Page: 1 of 3
2

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Government has moved for summary affirmance of the 

District Court’s order.

Summary disposition is appropriate where “the position of one of the parties 

is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to 

the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 

(5th Cir. 1969).1

 Here, while Lee appealed the District Court’s order reducing his 

sentence, his arguments on appeal do not pertain to that order, but instead request 

habeas corpus relief and ask the Court to vacate his sentence. Lee, in 2001, 

already filed a motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which 

the District Court denied, and Lee was denied a certificate of probable cause to 

appeal to this Court.2

 Any further request for habeas corpus relief would be 

deemed second or successive and would require leave of this Court, which Lee has 

not requested or received. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). 

To the extent that Lee is challenging the District Court’s order reducing his 

sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), we grant the Government’s motion 

for summary affirmance because Lee has presented no argument in support of this 

challenge. To the extent that Lee is contesting the legality of his conviction and 

1 All decisions of the former Fifth Circuit announced before October 1, 1981, are binding 

precedent in the Eleventh Circuit. Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 

1981) (en banc).

2 Lee later petitioned the District Court for a writ of coram nobis, which the District 

Court denied and this Court affirmed.

Case: 19-12400 Date Filed: 04/22/2020 Page: 2 of 3
3

sentence and attempting to relitigate issues presented in his previous § 2255 

motion without leave of this Court, we are without jurisdiction to entertain these 

arguments and they must be dismissed. 

DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART.

Case: 19-12400 Date Filed: 04/22/2020 Page: 3 of 3
Akem GRASSAREE v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-01107-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: January 29, 2019 Closed: April 4, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
Paul Anthony WHITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 64 Filed 01/21/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 354
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 64 Filed 01/21/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 355
#onhare In the 

t&e fomire or 

rail1 wbs thePa finy pmvlofoR stating thbt 

me wife to relinquisi~ -. her shere of We oorefae dtspodtive prtwiafoacp of the toatawmtary 

trust created by the will of Albert drndly wore he follkwar 

I. : 

(b) l/6 ts a 00~. end 2/6 to a tar for a 

prriecl llkewls6 siaammd by the 3 e or Mm. 

andly, PxwMed, tmtever, that: 

:" ,(Il.,,zr ei%ltbr the &tvoP the dwghs8r 

pradeaeasod hh hndly, thq sham OS 

au&h deaeaeed atLUd 8houXd g;o to hfo 

or hather ahlldrwi, if any, to be used for 

theiraupportendedumtian. 

. U in the aontiaganay but ferth 3.n 

abovr t&m tare no ohlldrea of the 

duueamd sod or ~&u&hter the sham of 

the der3edant 8hould mm& in the estate. 

(a) ff b&-a. iiaudly pradeaea*ed t!m mara arid 

daugmar l/J of tha iaaw uaa to go to the 

roli and i/3 to the daugkiter fer a period of 

ten yew8 biter #rs, hmily*a death, provfded, 

howtiver, tbatt 

ox- her chfldren, U any. 
2) 

1) 

If in t&e c0U.iqeacy set forth ia 

above the deceased pemum left no 

child or atildnn, ~uoh person*e tlhare 

Wig LO l-%LWiKi in the Wt%t8. 

ial 2/j to the daughter and l/J to tne eor4 

to be paid ten yas-a after 34~s. ikuadly’rs 

death provided the recipient thereof w&8 

than alive. 

lb) ff either the son or dauater falled to 

Uv8 until ten per8 after Sm. Mandlg~s 

iieat~h, the blare of euch pwoon use to be: 

(1) Pald to ~umiving ainildren, If any, 

upanthel~attaini~ their majority. 

ahudrea, the corpuu was to go to four named 

ergnnisatloaxa Jsnnodlately upon Cirr. kWdly*5 

dwithr 

{d), dk, 84W8&S pt4pfAIcIII 184 gadr With ML; 

speut to powilble amouata rete&ied in &he 

eata* under the contlngeney met forth ln 

If(b) (2) above+ 

. . . . 

Wba r3 6s of the iaaoma benel%alar%e8 Ln the InsWit trust 

W%r% 1 fs ted to the life of the settler and a etatad period 

~haaftar; BO in tke Bethsh GRPB, the right8 af the c~iaiadwmau ware loxpprr8~ly asrde oontiugent u n their king olive 

a6 a at&ted period after the death of C fG sattlorr uador the 

d~oi~iano’froxi other status, umy of uUoh- aso cited in t,hs 

above quotation, the pmioeuc% of any OIM of thoiba &otorr 

ulll mke for the taxrtnlty a4 a trust; their aiwa~rariw 

in the iaotaat aaue yrmiden a trip10 bar to croaten$ion8 thnt 

the trust Is tan wcelflpt*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation of the Arts and the Humanities

###### Institute of Museum and Library Services

# AGENCY:

Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), National Foundation of the Arts and the Humanities (NFAH).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The National Museum and Library Services Board, which advises the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services in awarding national awards and medals, will meet by teleconference on February 6, 2025, to review nominations for the 2024 National Medal for Museum and Library Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 6, from 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time until adjourned.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will convene virtually.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Katherine Maas, Chief of Staff and Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Institute of Museum and Library Services, Suite 4000, 955 L'Enfant Plaza North SW, Washington, DC 20024; (202) 653-4798;                         *kmaas@imls.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Museum and Library Services Board is meeting pursuant to the National Museum and Library Service Act, 20 U.S.C., 9105a, and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) as amended, 5 U.S.C. App. to review nominations for the 2025 National Medal for Museum and Library Service.

The meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to subsections (c)(4), (c)(6) and (c)(9) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code, as amended. The closed meeting will consider information that may disclose: Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; and information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action.

Dated: January 3, 2025.

Brianna Ingram,

Paralegal Specialist.

[FR Doc. 2025-00275 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
H.M.A. IV v. J.M. and J.M.

2160691

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of SYNAVANT Inc. (the "Company") on Forms S-8 (No. 333-46040 and
333-46038) of our report dated February 15, 2002, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Atlanta,
Georgia
March 25, 2001

---

QuickLinks
Case 3:04-cv-01468-K Document 13 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
# C_2020313EN.01001801.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/18

---

Appeal brought on 30 July 2020 by Liviu Dragnea against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2020 in Case T-738/18, Dragnea v Commission

(Case C-351/20 P)

(2020/C 313/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Liviu Dragnea (represented by: C. Toby, O. Riffaud, B. Entringer, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the disputed order of the General Court in whole; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the disputed order of the General Court in whole;

| — | annul the Commission decision (OCM(2018)20575) sent to the legal representative of the applicant by letter dated 1 October 2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision (OCM(2018)20575) sent to the legal representative of the applicant by letter dated 1 October 2018;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging a breach of articles 9(1), 9(2) and 9(4) of the OLAF Regulation (1) and a violation of the rights of defence of the applicant in the investigations, including the right to be heard and the respect of the presumption of innocence.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of sound administration in relation to the investigations as well as the refusal to open an investigation on the conduct of the OLAF investigation.

Third plea in law, alleging a violation of the right of access to documents concerning the OLAF investigations.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ 2013, L 248, p. 1).

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Micah David Brown, Appellant

No. 06-23-00039-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR21-131). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice 

Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Micah David Brown, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 6, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CRVII BOCA TC, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership,

Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF BOCA RATON and THE CITY OF BOCA RATON 

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-238

[April 23, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jeffrey Dana Gillen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502018CA012974XXXXMB.

Richard Sarafan, Benjamin P. Bean, and W. Barry Blum of Genovese 

Joblove & Battista, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Laura K. Wendell and Jamie A. Cole of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & 

Bierman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

May, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.2


                  CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT, L.P.
                RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                        (In Thousands, Except Ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           1997             1996                1995
                                          -------          -------             ------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>                 <C>
Earnings
--------
  Net loss(2)                             (12,091)         (10,487)            (9,939)
  Fixed Charges                            14,076           12,405             10,439
                                          -------          -------             ------
    Earnings                                1,985            1,918                500
                                          =======          =======             ======

Fixed Charges
-------------
  Interest Expense                         14,076           12,405             10,439
  Interest Element of Rentals                 -                -                  -
  Amortization of debt costs                  -                -                  -
                                          -------          -------             ------
    Total Fixed Charges                    14,076           12,405             10,439
                                          =======          =======             ======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (1)        -                -                  -
</TABLE>

(1) Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 were
    insufficient to cover fixed charges by $12,091, $10,487 and $9,939,
    respectively. As a result of such deficiencies, the ratios are not
    presented above.

(2) Net loss excludes equity in loss of unconsolidated limited partnerships.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 882 

Designating the week of September 23 through September 27, 2024, as 

‘‘National Clean Energy Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. REED, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WARNOCK, Ms. SMITH, Mr. COONS, 

Mr. TILLIS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. KING, Mr. CASSIDY, Mrs. 

CAPITO, and Mr. HICKENLOOPER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of September 23 through September 

27, 2024, as ‘‘National Clean Energy Week’’. 

Whereas, across the United States, clean and readily abundant forms of energy are powering more homes and businesses than ever before; 

Whereas clean energy generation is readily available from 

zero- and low-emissions sources; 

Whereas the clean energy sector is a growing part of the 

economy and has been a key driver of economic growth 

in the United States in recent years; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 882 ATS 

Whereas technological innovation can further reduce costs, 

enhance reliability, and increase deployment of clean energy sources; 

Whereas the report of the Department of Energy entitled 

‘‘United States Energy & Employment Report 2024’’ 

found that, in 2023, the energy and energy efficiency sectors in the United States employed approximately 

8,350,000 individuals; 

Whereas the scaling of affordable and exportable clean energy 

is essential to reducing global emissions; 

Whereas clean energy jobs contribute to the growth of local 

economies; and 

Whereas innovative clean energy solutions and clean energy 

jobs are part of the energy future of the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of September 23 

3 through September 27, 2024, as ‘‘National Clean 

4 Energy Week’’; 

5 (2) encourages individuals and organizations 

6 across the United States to support commonsense 

7 solutions that address the economic, environmental, 

8 and energy needs of the United States in the 21st 

9 century; 

10 (3) supports reliable and affordable energy for 

11 the people of the United States; and 

12 (4) recognizes the role of entrepreneurs and 

13 small businesses in ensuring the leadership of the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 882 ATS 

1 United States in the global energy marketplace and 

2 in supporting low-cost, clean, and reliable energy in 

3 the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2021490EN.01004401.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/44

---

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2021 — NB v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-648/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Decision not to appoint the applicant to grade AST 10 - Time limit for lodging a complaint - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: NB (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and A. Ysebaert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the decision not to appoint the applicant to grade AST 10; second, and so far as necessary, of the decision to appoint A to that grade; and, third, purely in the alternative, of all the decisions to appoint other officials to that grade.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | NB shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

NB shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.

---
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
John H. Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  November
9, 2010




/s/ John H. HomierJohn
      H. HomierPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH EX REL. ANDREW 

DARVIN HERSH, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

MARK GARMAN, SUPERINTENDENT, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 MM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden State Petroleum Transport
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Tr0im, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: March 31, 2006


/s/ Tor Olav Tr0im
-----------------------
Tor Olav Tr0im
Principal Executive Officer

SK 02089 0007 657678
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guosheng Fu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 14, 2010





/s/ Guosheng FuGuosheng Fu, Principal Executive Officer
Edward KNAPP, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3644

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.