alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    | Inolife Technologies, Inc. |                                     |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                    |                       |                                     |   |
| Date: September 4, 2013 | By:                        | /s/ Gary Berthold                   |   |
|                    |                       | Gary BertholdPrincipal Executive Officer |   |
Matthew Walter MAHALICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-696

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 21 Filed 05/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 92
William Hakim BENTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trycera Financial, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 23, 2010
/s/ Bryan KenyonChief Financial Officer
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 648 

Directing the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission to transmit 

to the House of Representatives copies of any emails in the possession 

of the Commission that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) 

of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2014 

Mr. STOCKMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission 

to transmit to the House of Representatives copies of 

any emails in the possession of the Commission that 

were transmitted to or from the email account(s) of 

former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations 

Division Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 

and April 2011. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives direct 

2 the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission to 

3 transmit to the House of Representatives, no later than 

4 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

5 copies of any electronic communication in the possession 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 648 IH 

1 of the Chairman or the Federal Election Commission that 

2 was transmitted to or from any electronic mail account(s) 

3 used by former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organi4 zations Division Director Lois Lerner at any time between 

5 January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 806 

Recognizing May 22, 2024, as the 205th anniversary of the founding of 

Memphis, Tennessee, and acknowledging the role that Memphis has 

played in shaping the history, culture, and economy of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. HAGERTY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing May 22, 2024, as the 205th anniversary of 

the founding of Memphis, Tennessee, and acknowledging 

the role that Memphis has played in shaping the history, 

culture, and economy of the United States. 

Whereas, on May 22, 1819, the city of Memphis, Tennessee, 

was founded by John Overton, James Winchester, and 

Andrew Jackson atop the bluffs of the Mississippi River; 

Whereas due to its central geographic location, Memphis has 

served as one of the transportation and logistics hubs of 

the United States, connecting much of the United States 

by rail and by water; 

Whereas, since 1973, Memphis has served as the hub of the 

largest cargo airline in the world, Federal Express; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 806 ATS 

Whereas crucial events of the Civil Rights Movement and the 

fight for equal justice for all occurred in Memphis, including the 1968 strike by sanitation workers; 

Whereas the strike by sanitation workers prompted Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to travel to Memphis in April of 

1968, where he delivered his famous ‘‘I’ve Been to the 

Mountaintop’’ speech, just 1 day before his tragic assassination at the Lorraine Motel; 

Whereas, since 1962, Memphis has been home to St. Jude 

Children’s Research Hospital, which has provided treatment to children with cancer or other life-threatening diseases at no cost to families; 

Whereas Memphis has been called ‘‘Home of the Blues’’, with 

W.C. Handy—known as the ‘‘Father of the Blues’’—and 

his band playing in clubs throughout the historic Beale 

Street in downtown Memphis; 

Whereas Sun Studio, opened in Memphis in 1950, is a monument in rock and roll history, where icons like Johnny 

Cash, Elvis Presley, and Jerry Lee Lewis recorded some 

of their biggest hits; 

Whereas Graceland, the estate of Elvis Presley, is a music 

landmark, attracting hundreds of thousands of visitors 

every year; and 

Whereas the city of Memphis, in its more than 205-year history, has played a pivotal role in shaping the history, culture, and economy of the United States: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 806 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes the 205th anniversary of the 

2 founding of Memphis, Tennessee, as May 22, 2024; 

3 and 

4 (2) acknowledges the pivotal role that the city 

5 of Memphis has played in shaping the history, cul6 ture, and economy of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 1 of 28 PageID 104
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 2 of 28 PageID 105
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 3 of 28 PageID 106
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 4 of 28 PageID 107
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 5 of 28 PageID 108
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 6 of 28 PageID 109
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 7 of 28 PageID 110
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 8 of 28 PageID 111
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 9 of 28 PageID 112
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 10 of 28 PageID 113
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 11 of 28 PageID 114
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 12 of 28 PageID 115
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 13 of 28 PageID 116
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 14 of 28 PageID 117
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 15 of 28 PageID 118
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 16 of 28 PageID 119
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 17 of 28 PageID 120
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 18 of 28 PageID 121
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 19 of 28 PageID 122
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 20 of 28 PageID 123
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 21 of 28 PageID 124
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 22 of 28 PageID 125
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 23 of 28 PageID 126
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 24 of 28 PageID 127
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 25 of 28 PageID 128
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 26 of 28 PageID 129
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 27 of 28 PageID 130
 

 Case 5:03-cv-00165-C Document 17 Filed 08/06/03 Page 28 of 28 PageID 131
# C_2022237EN.01004801.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Correia v EESC

(Case T-750/20) (1)

(Civil service - EESC staff - Members of the temporary staff - Request for career reconstitution - Rejection of the request - Action for annulment - Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure - Time limit for lodging a complaint - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Legal certainty - Entitlement to reasonable career prospects - Absence of a right to career constitution - Obligation to carry out a consideration of the comparative merits - Liability - Non-material damage)

(2022/C 237/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Paula Correia (Woluwe-Saint-Étienne, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal García-Valdecasas and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) of 8 April 2020 by which the EESC rejected her request for career reconstitution, second, an order that the EESC pay remuneration arrears and derived financial benefits, together with late payment interest and, third, compensation for the non-material damage that she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) of 8 April 2020 rejecting Ms Paula Correia’s request for career constitution; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) of 8 April 2020 rejecting Ms Paula Correia’s request for career constitution;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the EESC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EESC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
# C_2022418EN.01001701.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission

(Case T-91/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Principle of good administration - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Reasonable time - Psychological harassment - Principle of legal certainty - Material and non-material damage)

(2022/C 418/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: WT (represented by: V. Villante, D. Rovetta and D. Birkenmaier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 by which the Commission imposed on her a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand and, second, compensation for the non-material and material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders WT to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders WT to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenço Gonçalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 24, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ C. Lourenço Gonçalves                                  
|                         |  |  |  | C. Lourenço Gonçalves President and
Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Exhibit 21 
Subsidiaries of Registrant  100 percent Owned

| | Byron
Bank 2445  84th Street, S.W.Byron Center, MI  49315
| | ---------------------------------------------------------

| | Byron Investment Services, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Bank)
2445  84th Street, S.W.
Byron Center, MI  49315
Byron Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)
5445  32nd Avenue
Hudsonville, MI 49426
OAK Title Insurance Agency, Inc. (100 percent owned subsidiary of Byron Investment Services)
2445  84th Street, S.W.
Byron Center, MI  49315
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUMAN SHEKHAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70735

Agency No. A079-573-197

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2010** 

Before: SKOPIL, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Suman Shekhar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a final

decision issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), affirming an

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and

Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We deny the petition for review.

FILED

OCT 05 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-2-

Shekhar contends she was persecuted and tortured in India on account of her

imputed political opinion. Both the IJ and BIA concluded, however, that Shekhar

was not credible. Substantial evidence supports that adverse credibility finding. 

See Martinez v. Holder, 557 F.3d 1059, 1060 (9th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S.

Ct. 1883 (2010) (citing standard).

The inconsistencies noted by the IJ and the BIA are apparent in the record

and go to the heart of Shekhar’s claims. See Li v. Holder, 559 F.3d 1096, 1102

(9th Cir. 2009) (noting adverse credibility finding must be based on “specific,

cogent reasons” found in the record, and at least one of the reasons “must go to the

heart of the asylum claim”). In particular, the inconsistencies in Shekhar’s

testimony and her husband’s testimony regarding the circumstances of their

respective arrests and detentions clearly support the adverse credibility finding. 

See Kin v. Holder, 595 F.3d 1050, 1057-58 (9th Cir. 2010) (upholding adverse

credibility finding based on inconsistencies in witnesses’ testimony regarding the

circumstances of their arrests). Moreover, Shekhar was given the opportunity to

explain the inconsistencies, but failed to provide persuasive explanations. See

Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting petitioner must

be given the opportunity to explain any perceived inconsistencies). 
-3-

Because Shekhar failed to establish her eligibility for asylum, she also failed

to meet the higher burden required for withholding of removal. See Kumar v.

Gonzales, 439 F.3d 520, 525 (9th Cir. 2006). Moreover, because Shekhar’s claim

of torture is based on the same statements and evidence found not to be credible,

her CAT claim was also properly rejected. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153,

1157 (9th Cir. 2003). Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider Shekhar’s request

for a grant of humanitarian asylum because she did not make such a request in the

administrative proceedings. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 676-78 (9th

Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1198 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-996, K2025-995.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00024 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Federal Aviation Administration 

National Part 139 CertAlert

No. 23-02

Category Description Numbe

Date: February 16, 2023

To: All Title 14 CFR part 139 Airport Operators

Subject: Airport Safety Management System 

Point of Contact: James Schroeder, AAS-310 (202) 267-4974

Email: james.schroeder@faa.gov

1. Purpose. This CertAlert apprises part 139 certificated airports of the pending publication of the

Airport Safety Management System (SMS) final rule.

2. Background. The final rule requiring SMS for certain part 139 certificated airports has been

approved and will be published in the Federal Register soon. SMS for part 139 airports

complements the Office of Airports’ existing SMS for airport planning and development by

delivering a comprehensive risk management program and approach to proactively address

safety at an organizational level. The new rule represents many years of study, research, and

development of airport safety into the SMS model.

a. SMS implementation will be required for certain airports that meet the qualifying

criteria under 14 CFR 139.401(a). In short, the qualifying triggering criteria require

that the airport:

i. Is classified as a Hub airport; or

ii. Has a 3-year rolling average of 100,000 operations per year; or

iii. Has international operations other than GA-only traffic.

b. As of the effective date of the rule, § 139.403 provides the following timelines for

qualifying airports:

i. 12-24 months to submit an Implementation Plan (IP) for approval (based

on triggering criteria); and

ii. 12 months to submit an Airport Certification Manual (ACM)

amendment/SMS manual after IP approval; and

iii. 36 months to fully implement the SMS after IP approval.

3. Resources.

a. For the published final rule and a comprehensive collection of resource information on

the rule, visit the FAA External SMS (SMS for part 139 Airports) webpage at

www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/safety_management_systems/external.

**Advisory**Cautionary**Non-Directive**Advisory**Cautionary**Non-Directive**Advisory**Cautionary**Non-Directive**
FAA Part 139 CertAlert No. 23-02

2/16/2023 

2

b. Refer to Advisory Circular 150/5200-37 (current edition), Safety Management Systems

for Airports, for guidance on implementing the rule.

c. The Airport Certification Status List (ACSL) identifies part 139 airports that are

required to implement this rule. The ACSL can be found on the FAA part 139 Airport

Certification Status List webpage at

https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/part139_cert/part_139_airport_certifi

cation_status_list.

d. Please direct any questions through your assigned Airport Certification Safety

Inspector, or your Regional SMS Coordinator.

The FAA will hold an industry outreach webinar on this rule in the coming weeks. We will 

share more information on the date and time shortly.

______________________________

Birkely M. Rhodes, Manager 

Airports Safety and Operations Division, AAS-300