alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

 

I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 14, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HouseValues, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and R. Barry Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 7, 2007



/s/ IAN MORRISIan MorrisChief Executive Officer and President/s/ R. BARRY ALLENR. Barry AllenChief Financial Officer andExecutive Vice President of Operations


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
# C_2018352EN.01000901.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 August 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Nefiye Yön v Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart

(Case C-123/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association - Decision No 2/76 - Article 7 - Standstill clause - Right of residence of family members of a Turkish worker - Visa requirement for admission to the territory of a Member State))

(2018/C 352/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nefiye Yön

Defendant: Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart

Interveners: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Decision No 2/76 of 20 December 1976 adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed in Ankara on 12 September 1963 by the Republic of Turkey, on the one hand, and by the Member States of the EEC and the Community, on the other, and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963, must be interpreted as meaning that a national measure, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, taken during the period from 20 December 1976 to 30 November 1980, which makes the grant, for the purposes of family reunification, of a residence permit to third-country nationals who are family members of a Turkish worker residing lawfully in the Member State concerned, subject to such nationals obtaining, before entering national territory, a visa for the purpose of that reunification, constitutes a ‘new restriction’ within the meaning of that provision. Such a measure may nevertheless be justified on the grounds of the effective control of immigration and the management of migratory flows, but may be accepted only provided that the detailed rules relating to its implementation do not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective pursued, which it is for the national court to verify.

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS 2025-1 Phase I 
and Fast Track: Devices and Materials-Based Platforms for the 
Delivery of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies (Topic 138).
    Date: January 24, 2025.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Samita S. Andreansky, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-2915, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 2, 2025.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-00101 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 133 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Ms. BOEBERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting American 

5 Energy Production Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTING AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION. 

7 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con8 gress that States should maintain primacy for the regula9 tion of hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas produc10 tion on State and private lands. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 133 IH

1 (b) PROHIBITION ON DECLARATION OF A MORATO2 RIUM ON HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.—Notwithstanding 

3 any other provision of law, the President may not declare 

4 a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing unless 

5 such moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - (-)connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(21)

## By Location

              - texas(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2023(1)
              - 2022(1)

social mediaTexas Flood Watch
# C_2022257EN.01001601.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Ascoli Piceno (Italy) lodged on 13 October 2020 — Criminal proceedings against OL

(Case C-517/20)

(2022/C 257/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Ascoli Piceno

Party to the main proceedings

OL

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the principles of freedom of establishment, non-discrimination and safeguarding of competition laid down in Articles 49, 56 and 106 TFEU, and the precept of reasonableness implicit therein, preclude national legislation which, as a result of a national provision or act having the force of law, has the effect of extending existing licences and other collection rights, issued by means of invitations to tender or a regularisation procedure (without a tender), the normal deadline for which had already been set for June 2016? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the principles of freedom of establishment, non-discrimination and safeguarding of competition laid down in Articles 49, 56 and 106 TFEU, and the precept of reasonableness implicit therein, preclude national legislation which, as a result of a national provision or act having the force of law, has the effect of extending existing licences and other collection rights, issued by means of invitations to tender or a regularisation procedure (without a tender), the normal deadline for which had already been set for June 2016?

| 2. | Do Articles 49, 56 and 106 TFEU preclude national legislation which, by means of the direct-award mechanism, implemented via an extension, not preceded by an invitation to tender, unduly seals off a national market? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do Articles 49, 56 and 106 TFEU preclude national legislation which, by means of the direct-award mechanism, implemented via an extension, not preceded by an invitation to tender, unduly seals off a national market?

| 3. | Do Articles 49, 56 and 106 TFEU preclude national legislation which, in the absence of a new tendering procedure, recognises all licences already declared unlawful by successive rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union as valid in the national market, thereby preventing the entry of new foreign operators? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Do Articles 49, 56 and 106 TFEU preclude national legislation which, in the absence of a new tendering procedure, recognises all licences already declared unlawful by successive rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union as valid in the national market, thereby preventing the entry of new foreign operators?

---
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald Wilen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   February 13, 2002              By: /s/ Ronald Wilen
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Ronald Wilen
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 12

Case 23-20296-rlj13    Doc 31    Filed 05/13/24    Entered 05/13/24 16:24:31    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 12
##### 



Exhibit 10.21 First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated
Equity Office Properties Trust
1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan
(Effective as of December 7, 2004) 
 WHEREAS, Equity Office Properties Trust (the Trust) has adopted the Second Amended and
Restated Equity Office Properties Trust 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Share Purchase Plan (Effective
as of October 5, 2004) (the Plan); and WHEREAS, the Trust desires to amend the Plan to eliminate the 31-day waiting period to become
an Eligible Employee; NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust hereby amends the Plan, effective December 7, 2004, in the following
respects: Section 2.7 is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 2.7 The term Eligible Employee shall mean each officer or employee of a Participating
Employer who is shown on the payroll records of a Participating Employer as a
benefits-eligible employee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the
Trust, as of the 7th day of December, 2004. EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUSTBy:        /s/ Stanley M. StevensName:   Stanley M. StevensTitle:    Executive Vice President, Chief LegalCounsel and Secretary
# C_2019432EN.01000201.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov

(Case C-324/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive 2014/41/EU - European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters - Article 5(1) - Form set out in Annex A - Section J - Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State)

(2019/C 432/02)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party in the main proceedings

Ivan Gavanozov

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) of Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters, read in conjunction with Section J of the form set out in Annex A to that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that the judicial authority of a Member State does not, when issuing a European Investigation Order, have to include in that section a description of the legal remedies, if any, which are provided for in its Member State against the issuing of such an order.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

---
# C_2016287EN.01003201.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/32

---

Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel v EUIPO — Tiertafel Deutschland (Tafel)

(Case T-326/16)

(2016/C 287/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel e.V. (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Koerl, E. Celenk and S. Vollmer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tiertafel Deutschland e.V. (Rathenow, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Tafel’ — EU trade mark No 8 985 541

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2016 in Case R 248/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2016111EN.01004001.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/40

---

Action brought on 15 February 2016 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Munich (Representation of a cross on the side of a sports shoe)

(Case T-68/16)

(2016/C 111/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Munich, SL (Capellades, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a cross on the side of a sports shoe — EU trade mark No 2 923 852

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2015 in Case R 2345/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to bear the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Eugene HARRIS, DOC #533148, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1615

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.