alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96-97]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31472]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: AC25-41-000.
    Applicants: Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Phillips 66 Pipeline, LLC submits request for 
Commission approval to use Account 705, Prior Period Adjustments to 
Beginning Retained Income, in its 2024 FERC Form 6.
    Filed Date: 12/26/24.
    Accession Number: 20241226-5097.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/16/25.

    Docket Numbers: RP25-304-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TPC 2024-12-23 Negotiated Rate 
Agreement Amendments to be effective 12/24/2024.
    Filed Date: 12/23/24.
    Accession Number: 20241223-5244.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/6/25.

    Docket Numbers: RP25-305-000.
    Applicants: Honeoye Storage Corporation, RWE Clean Energy Wholesale 
Services, Inc., Citadel Energy Marketing LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release 
Regulations, et al. of Honeoye Storage Corporation, et al.
    Filed Date: 12/23/24.
    Accession Number: 20241223-5261.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/6/25.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

[[Page 97]]

    Dated: December 26, 2024.
Carlos D. Clay,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31472 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2007 |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                              
|                      |  | Steven E. Brady                                  
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      | 
|Date: August 13, 2007 |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                         
|                      |  | Donald F. Morgenweck                             
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ANVIL
HOLDINGS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED JANUARY 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                           3,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,211
<INVENTORY>                                     39,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,569
<PP&E>                                          62,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,005
<BONDS>                                        127,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           41,473
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,947)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,852
<SALES>                                        198,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,930
<CGS>                                          146,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   568
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (627)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,821
<EPS-BASIC>                                      15.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    15.34


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00365]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Tuesday, January 28, 2025.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the 
matter Secretary of Labor v. Morton Salt, Inc., Docket No. CENT 2022-
0176. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that 
violations of 30 CFR 57.3200 and 57.11053(c) were not significant and 
substantial.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/
(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
    Phone Number for Listening to Meeting: 1-(866) 236-7472.
    Passcode: 678-100.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 6, 2025.
Sarah L. Stewart,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2025-00365 Filed 1-6-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
```
Franklin J. NERO, Appellant, v. MAYAN MAINSTREET INVESTORS I, LLC and Margaret Nero A/K/A Margaret M. Nero, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1051

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 22, 2019

AFFIRMED.
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 281 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule relating to 

removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears 

from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2025 

Ms. HAGEMAN (for herself, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. STAUBER, and Mr. 

DOWNING) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final 

rule relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal list 

of endangered and threatened wildlife, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grizzly Bear State 

5 Management Act of 2025’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 281 IH

1 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO GREAT2 ER YELLOWSTONE ECOSYSTEM POPULATION 

3 OF GRIZZLY BEARS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

6 Interior shall reissue the final rule entitled ‘‘Endangered 

7 and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Great8 er Yellowstone Ecosystem Population of Grizzly Bears 

9 From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened 

10 Wildlife’’ (82 Fed. Reg. 30502 (June 30, 2017)) without 

11 regard to any other provision of law that applies to the 

12 issuance of that final rule. 

13 (b) NO JUDICIAL REVIEW.—The reissuance of the 

14 final rule described in subsection (a) (including this sec15 tion) shall not be subject to judicial review. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Lucas Anthony ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3942

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 28, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 5, 2019

Lucas Anthony Roberts, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Michael David SPEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3189

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016371EN.01001601.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/16

---

Action brought on 29 July 2016 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO (BRENT INDEX)

(Case T-430/16)

(2016/C 371/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. (Atlanta, Georgia, United States) (represented by: P. Heusler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘BRENT INDEX’ — Application for registration No 14 284 947

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2016 in Case R 8/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay de costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay de costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Robert James BURR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3031

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Angel RIOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3459

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

Affirmed.
# C_2019016EN.01002501.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’ AS, formerly ‘Balcia Insurance’ SE v ‘Baltijas Apdrošināšanas Nams’ AS

(Case C-648/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 72/166/EEC - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ - Accident involving two vehicles parked in a car park - Material damage to a vehicle caused by a passenger from a neighbouring vehicle opening the vehicle door))

(2019/C 16/31)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’ AS, formerly ‘Balcia Insurance’ SE

Defendant:‘Baltijas Apdrošināšanas Nams’ AS

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘use of vehicles’, set out in that provision, covers a situation in which the passenger of a vehicle parked in a car park, in opening the door of that vehicle, scraped against and damaged the vehicle parked next to it.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 26.2.2017.

---
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-B) PLC (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: June 14, 2011





/s/ Kate Blankenship


Kate Blankenship


Principal Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

_________________________________________

JUAN RUBIO, PRO SE, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:04-CV-0320

§

SILVERHAWK SECURITY, §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff JUAN RUBIO, acting pro se, has filed suit pursuant to Title 42, United

States Code, Section 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act complaining against the

above-named defendant.

Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that the plaintiff is responsible

for service of a summons and complaint upon each defendant within the time allowed under

subdivision (m) of Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "If service of the summons and

complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the

court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action

without prejudice as to the defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time;

provided that, if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for

service for an appropriate period." Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Plaintiff filed suit on December 1, 2004 and was granted an extension of time

until June 24, 2005 in which to file proof of service. More than one-hundred-twenty days have

elapsed since filing, and the extension has expired without further submission from plaintiff.

Plaintiff has failed to file proof of service on the defendant after notice pursuant

 

 Case 2:04-cv-00320-J Document 13 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 25
2

to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and has not shown any further extension would

be appropriate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

This Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m), FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FOR FAILURE

TO SERVE THE DEFENDANT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

The Clerk will mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff and to any attorney of

record by first class mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this 5th day of July, 2005.

/s/ Mary Lou Robinson 

MARY LOU ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 2:04-cv-00320-J Document 13 Filed 07/05/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 26
# C_2016106EN.01003801.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/38

---

Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Sovena Portugal — Consumer Goods v OHIM — Mueloliva (FONTOLIVA)

(Case T-24/16)

(2016/C 106/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sovena Portugal — Consumer Goods, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: D. Martins Pereira, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mueloliva, SL (Cordoba, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘FONTOLIVA’ — International registration No 1 107 792 designating the European Union

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2015 in Case R 1813/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | admit this action; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit this action;

| — | dismiss the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | rectify the contested decision, based on the grounds in this action and declare the granting of protection to International Trademark No 1 107 792 FONTOLIVA in respect of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

rectify the contested decision, based on the grounds in this action and declare the granting of protection to International Trademark No 1 107 792 FONTOLIVA in respect of the European Union;

| — | condemn OHIM in the incurred expenses by the applicant, including the expenses made in the case which run with OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn OHIM in the incurred expenses by the applicant, including the expenses made in the case which run with OHIM;

| — | condemn the other party in the case to bear the applicant’s costs in the OHIM proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn the other party in the case to bear the applicant’s costs in the OHIM proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Lapse of earlier Spanish trademark No 780 071 FUENOLIVA; |
| --- | --- |

—

Lapse of earlier Spanish trademark No 780 071 FUENOLIVA;

| — | Insufficiency of the evidence of genuine use of earlier trademark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Insufficiency of the evidence of genuine use of earlier trademark;

| — | Inexistence of likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) CTMR; |
| --- | --- |

—

Inexistence of likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) CTMR;

| — | Existence of two earlier trademarks FONTOLIVA in Spain. |
| --- | --- |

—

Existence of two earlier trademarks FONTOLIVA in Spain.

---
Mildred GOODE, James Cambron, Jean E. Ouimette, Waedene Masters, Molly Perry, Bart Gawlikowski, Christel Lukasik, Charles E. Martin, Brenda Gawlikowski , Ryan Williams, Jerry Balke, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF LAKE HELEN, a Municipality of the State of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

d1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

142492

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 142492

COA: 300585

Wayne CC: 10

- 000312

- FC

ANTHONY HOWARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2010

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of James River Coal Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter T. Socha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.











May 10, 2011