alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016441EN.01001902.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/19

---

Action brought on 12 September 2016 — Gall Pharma v EUIPO — Pfizer (Styriagra)

(Case T-662/16)

(2016/C 441/24)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Gall Pharma GmbH (Judenburg, Austria) (represented by: D. Reichelt and L. Figura, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pfizer Inc. (New York, New York, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for registration of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Styriagra’ — EU trade mark application No 12 161 469

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 June 2016 in Case R 724/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the opposition (Opposition Procedure No 002286568) to Community trade mark No 000233890; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the opposition (Opposition Procedure No 002286568) to Community trade mark No 000233890;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
```

                                                               EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nova Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Vahan Kololian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By:    /s/ Vahan Kololian                            Dated: August 15, 2005
  ----------------------------------------------
        Vahan Kololian
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paula M. Lewis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeside Financial
      Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  November
      14, 2008





/S/Paula M. Lewis,President & CEO of ManagerLakeside Financial Group, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

J. Erik Fyrwald, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Holding Company (Nalco) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalcos 10-Q financial report (the Report) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2009,
hereby certify as follows:



| | a. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations for Nalco.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. ERIK FYRWALDJ. Erik FyrwaldChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 28, 2009/s/ BRADLEY J. BELLBradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer Date:
October 28, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 270 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 270

 To authorize the waiver of costs of activities relating to evacuation 
  of United States citizens when their lives are endangered by war or 
                           acts of terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2025

 Mr. Dunn of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the waiver of costs of activities relating to evacuation 
  of United States citizens when their lives are endangered by war or 
                           acts of terrorism.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF COSTS OF ACTIVITIES RELATING TO EVACUATION OF 
              UNITED STATES CITIZENS WHEN THEIR LIVES ARE ENDANGERED BY 
              WAR OR ACTS OF TERRORISM.

    Section 4 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 
U.S.C. 2671) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) With regard to the repatriations loan program, the Secretary 
of State is authorized to waive the costs of activities relating to 
evacuation of United States citizens when their lives are endangered by 
war or acts of terrorism.''.
                                 <all>
```
Tauric GRIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3751

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Courtney Jamal FULLER

1160776 (CR-15-0936)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
# C_2020209EN.01000801.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 3 March 2020 — JY

(Case C-118/20)

(2020/C 209/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JY

Defendant: Wiener Landesregierung

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the situation of a natural person who, like the appellant in cassation in the main proceedings, has renounced her only nationality of a Member State of the European Union, and thus her citizenship of the Union, in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State, having been given a guarantee by the other Member State of grant of the nationality applied for, and whose possibility of recovering citizenship of the Union is subsequently eliminated by revocation of that guarantee, fall, by reason of its nature and its consequences, within the scope of EU law, such that regard must be had to EU law when revoking the guarantee of grant of citizenship?
  If the first question is answered in the affirmative, |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the situation of a natural person who, like the appellant in cassation in the main proceedings, has renounced her only nationality of a Member State of the European Union, and thus her citizenship of the Union, in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State, having been given a guarantee by the other Member State of grant of the nationality applied for, and whose possibility of recovering citizenship of the Union is subsequently eliminated by revocation of that guarantee, fall, by reason of its nature and its consequences, within the scope of EU law, such that regard must be had to EU law when revoking the guarantee of grant of citizenship?

If the first question is answered in the affirmative,

| 2. | Is it for the competent national authorities, including any national courts, involved in the decision to revoke the guarantee of grant of nationality of the Member States, to establish whether the revocation of the guarantee that prevented the recovery of citizenship of the Union is compatible with the principle of proportionality from the point of view of EU law in terms of its consequences for the situation of the person concerned? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it for the competent national authorities, including any national courts, involved in the decision to revoke the guarantee of grant of nationality of the Member States, to establish whether the revocation of the guarantee that prevented the recovery of citizenship of the Union is compatible with the principle of proportionality from the point of view of EU law in terms of its consequences for the situation of the person concerned?

---
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Geoffrey O. Last, Chief Financial Officer of Digital Ecosystems
  Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ Geoffrey O. Last   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | GEOFFREY O. LAST       
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | August 19, 2005        

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Douglas W. LEWIS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kelvin JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman,certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period coveredby this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2007-B (the “ExchangeAct periodic reports”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodicreports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-Dfor the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodicreports;

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing the activities performedby the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conductedin preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under theservicing agreement; and

 

5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have beenincluded as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in thisreport. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports havebeen disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated party: Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

 

March 28, 2008

 
|   |   |                                                            |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                            |
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Bierman                                           |
|   | Name:  | Steven C. Bierman                                               |
|   | Title: | President (senior officer  in charge of the servicing function) |
|   |   |                                                            |

 

----

 

 

 

 

* *
Case 4:04-cv-00788-A Document 15 Filed 03/02/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 158
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00788-A Document 15 Filed 03/02/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 159
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00788-A Document 15 Filed 03/02/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 160
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00788-A Document 15 Filed 03/02/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 161
 

 Case 4:04-cv-00788-A Document 15 Filed 03/02/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 162
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |     |                                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID J. CURD                    
| |     | David J. Curd
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

The Board of Directors 

XM Satellite Radio Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-106823 on Form S-4 of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries of our reportdated February 5, 2004, except for Note 9(f), which is as of March 3, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of XM Satellite Radio Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 and our report dated February 5, 2004 on the related schedule, which appear in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form10-K of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries. Those reports contain an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 142, *Goodwill and Other IntangibleAssets*, as of January 1, 2002. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

McLean, VA 

March 30, 2004
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00018

- CR

Lewis Edward Campbell

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 30th District Court

o f Wichita County (52,792

- A )

December 10, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 20-F of Golden State Petro (IOM
1-A) PLC;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal  controls;  and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 30, 2003

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
-------------------------
Tor Olav Troim
Principal Executive Officer

02089.0007 #413882
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   |                                         |                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                   | **OCCULOGIX,                INC.**           |
|                                              |                                    |                              |
| Date:   November                8, 2006 | By:                                | /s/ Elias                Vamvakas |
|                                                   |  Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                   |                                         |
Danny Wayne ROBINSON v. STATE

CR-16-0683

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.