alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 750 

Commending the Professional Women’s Hockey League Minnesota for winning 

the inaugural Professional Women’s Hockey League title on May 29, 2024. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

JULY 31, 2024 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Professional Women’s Hockey League Minnesota for winning the inaugural Professional Women’s 

Hockey League title on May 29, 2024. 

Whereas the inaugural season of the Professional Women’s 

Hockey League (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘PWHL’’) began on January 1, 2024; 

Whereas 6 teams, located in Montre ́al, Toronto, New York, 

Boston, Ottawa, and Minneapolis–Saint Paul, competed 

in the PWHL inaugural season; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota won the 2024 Walter Cup, defeating PWHL Boston 3–0 in game 5 of the PWHL 

Finals; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 750 ATS 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota is the first ever PWHL champion; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota captain Kendall Coyne Schofield 

enters history as the first player ever to lift the Walter 

Cup; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota forward Taylor Heise was voted 

the Ilana Kloss Playoff Most Valuable Player after leading the PWHL Playoffs in goals by scoring 5 goals and 

finishing tied for first in points by scoring 8 points; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota goalie Nicole Hensley made 17 

saves in game 5 of the PWHL Finals, marking the second time in the PWHL Finals that she prevented an opposing team from scoring any goals; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota recorded 4 playoff wins in which 

the opposing team failed to score any goals; 

Whereas PWHL Minnesota forward Grace Zumwinkle won 

the inaugural Rookie of the Year Award after scoring 11 

goals and 19 points in 24 games and tying for the lead 

in points among first-year professionals in the PWHL; 

and 

Whereas the innovative and competitive play of the entire 

PWHL inspired the people of the United States and Canada and led the PWHL to set multiple attendance 

records throughout the 2024 season: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Professional Women’s Hock3 ey League (referred to in this resolution as the 

4 ‘‘PWHL’’) Minnesota for winning the inaugural 

5 PWHL title; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 750 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the dedication, perseverance, 

2 hard work, and togetherness of the players, coaches, 

3 and staff in winning a championship; 

4 (3) congratulates the fans, players, coaches, 

5 and staff of PWHL Minnesota for a great season; 

6 (4) recognizes the dedication, perseverance, and 

7 hard work of the players, coaches, staff, and league 

8 administration in creating and operating a profes9 sional sports league; and 

10 (5) congratulates the fans, players, coaches, 

11 and staff of the entire PWHL for a great first sea12 son. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 526 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID 15965
Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 526 Filed 07/11/11 Page 2 of 4 PageID 15966
Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 526 Filed 07/11/11 Page 3 of 4 PageID 15967
Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 526 Filed 07/11/11 Page 4 of 4 PageID 15968
Edward G. WINN, DOC #S28549, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1618

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2022084EN.01003801.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — MG v EIB

(Case T-573/20) (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Remuneration - Family allowances - Refusal to grant allowances to non-custodial parent - Conciliation procedure - Reasonable time - Liability)

(2022/C 84/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: MG (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the EIB’s letters of 11 October 2018, 7 January 2019 and 30 July 2020 on the basis of which the applicant was deprived of the entitlement of family allowances and derived financial rights and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to pay the sum of EUR 500 to MG in respect of the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to pay the sum of EUR 500 to MG in respect of the non-material damage suffered;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders MG and the EIB to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders MG and the EIB to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                    AND
                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitelight Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002
(the "Report"), I, Eric C. Bronk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

/s/ Eric C.  Bronk
Eric C. Bronk
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 14, 2002
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| 1. |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Bin Wang   Bin                WangPresident                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer)  /s/                Ming Fen Liu    Ming                Fen LiuChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
George Garland WOOD, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-758

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2040

CHRISTOPHER T. MANGUM, individually and d/b/a Wrightsville Beach Jet Ski Rentals
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,
and

WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH JET SKI RENTALS, INC.; MITCHELL CARSON SEITTER, individually and d/b/a Carolina Coast Watersports, LLC; CAROLINA COAST WATERSPORTS, LLC
, Plaintiffs,

v.
TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, a North Carolina Corporation and Body Politic; TIMOTHY OWENS, individually & in his officia l capacity as Town Manager; JOHN WESSELL, individually & in his official capacity as Town Attorney
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 7:19

- cv

- 00029

- FL )

Submitted : February 18, 2021 Decided: February 22, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Christopher T. Mangum, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Edes, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH COLLIER HANLEY & EDES PLLC, Wilmington, North Carolina; Melody Jewell Jolly, Elizabeth C. King, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in th is circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Christopher T. Magnum, who proceeds in this court pro se, seeks to appeal the
district court’s order denying the various postjudgment motions filed by Magnum’s former

counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not t imely filed

. In civil cases, p arties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final
judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its final order on August 24, 2020. The district court did
not receive Magnum’s notice of appeal until Thursday, September 24, 2020. * Because
Magnum failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of
the appeal period, we grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss this appeal. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Given that Magnum was not incarcerated when he filed the notice of appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(c), the so

- called “prison mailbox rule
, ” is not applicable in this case.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00221]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m. EST, Friday, January 10, 2025.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Matters relating to the CFTC's bargaining 
position and related issues concerning ongoing negotiations over CFTC 
employee compensation and benefits. In the event that the time, date, 
or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, 
along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be 
posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: January 3, 2025.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-00221 Filed 1-3-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Martha BARTLETT, Appellant, v. KALEIDOSCOPE THEATRE, INC., Appellee.

No. 1D18-2952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016419EN.01005701.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/57

---

Action brought on 3 October 2016 — Enoitalia v EUIPO — La Rural Viñedos y Bodegas (ANTONIO RUBINI)

(Case T-707/16)

(2016/C 419/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Enoitalia, Corte Vigna, Baldo, Belvino, Ca' del Lago, Invino, Vinuva, Cantine Borsari, Ca' Montini, E.I., Enoi, V.E.B., Cbe, Ca.Pi SpA (Enoitalia SpA) (Calmasino di Bardolino, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: La Rural Viñedos y Bodegas SA Ltda (Capital Federal, Argentina)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor: Applicant

Proprietor:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ANTONIO RUBINI’ — EU trade mark No 9 526 955

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2016 in Case R 1085/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph MOREHEAD

NO. 2018-KO-0528

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.
Juan Francisco VEGA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2487

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Affirmed.
# Exhibit 32.1

Each
of Patrick K. Gill, Chief Executive Officer, and James A. Luyk, Chief Financial Officer,
of OAK Financial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 which
          this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
          ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of OAK Financial Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 10, 2006

| |  | /s/ Patrick K. Gill
Patrick K. GillChief Executive Officer
/s/ James A. Luyk
James A. LuykChief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this
certification has been provided to OAK Financial Corporation and will be retained by OAK
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
#### Security Finance Company, a Corporation, *Petitioner,*v. J. W. Gardener, *Respondent.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed August 1, 1927.

*Fabisinshi & Caro,*Attorneys for Petitioner;

*K. V. McClellan,*Attorney for Respondent.

Bueord, J.

In this case there was certiorari to the Circuit Court of Gulf County, Florida, to review the judgment of that court affirming the judgment of the County Judge’s Court of that county against the petitioner in a civil suit in which the respondent, has secured judgment against petitioner in an action to enforce a statutory lien upon certain property.

The judgment was had upon a declaration which entirely fails to state any cause of action against the defendant. It is not alleged in the declaration that the defendant was in any capacity owner of the property described in the declaration upon which a lien was claimed, nor is it alleged by inference, or otherwise, that the defendant had become in any manner obligated or bound to pay the plaintiff the sum claimed, or any other sum. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $87.35, together with the *550further sum of $10.00 as attorney’s fees, as provided by Section 3525, Revised General Statutes of Florida. This Court has held in a number of cases that the provision in this statute which allows solicitor’s fees in favor of the material men and laborers is unconstitutional. See Lowe v. East & West Coast Rwy., 79 Fla. 43, 83 Sou. 671; Crim v. Drake, 86 Fla. 470, 89 Sou. 349.

Because of the reasons stated, it appears that the essential requirements of the law were not complied with in the obtaining of the judgment as disclosed by the record.

The judgment of the County Judge’s Court affirmed by the Circuit Court is quashed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1970

In Re: RANDY LEE HAMMITT; SANDRA MARIE

HAMMITT,

Petitioners.

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

(CA-03-278-3)

Submitted: September 14, 2005 Decided: September 19, 2005

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Lee Hammitt and Sandra Marie Hammitt, Petitioners Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Randy Lee Hammitt and Sandra Marie Hammitt petition for

a writ of prohibition, seeking an order preventing the district

court from enforcing a civil forfeiture order.

A writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that is

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief

sought. See In re Vargas, 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983).

A writ of prohibition may not be used as a substitute for appeal.

See In re Missouri, 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981).

Because the Hammitts do not have a clear right to the

relief they seek, and because they may appeal any final adverse

judgment in the district court proceeding, the relief sought is not

available by way of a writ of prohibition. Accordingly, we deny

the petition. We also deny the motion to stay proceedings in the

district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
STATE of Louisiana v. Hakeem J. MARTIN

NO. 2018-KH-2040

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Case 3:03-cv-00776-K Document 5 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 23
Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 19 PageID 719
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 19 PageID 720
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 3 of 19 PageID 721
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 4 of 19 PageID 722
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 5 of 19 PageID 723
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 6 of 19 PageID 724
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 7 of 19 PageID 725
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 8 of 19 PageID 726
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 9 of 19 PageID 727
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 10 of 19 PageID 728
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 11 of 19 PageID 729
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 12 of 19 PageID 730
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 13 of 19 PageID 731
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 14 of 19 PageID 732
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 15 of 19 PageID 733
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 16 of 19 PageID 734
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 17 of 19 PageID 735
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 18 of 19 PageID 736
 

 Case 3:03-cv-03061-P Document 65 Filed 05/09/05 Page 19 of 19 PageID 737
Exhibit
12.2


Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of EXFO, hereby certifies, that:





1.
            The
      annual report of Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2008 of EXFO
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      EXFO.








Date:           November
26, 2008.











/s/Germain
Lamonde


Germain
Lamonde


Chairman
of the Board,


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
R.A.G. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160944

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Etowah Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
# C_2016364EN.01002502.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/25

---

Action brought on 10 August 2016 — sheepworld v EUIPO (Beste Freunde)

(Case T-450/16)

(2016/C 364/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: sheepworld AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: S. von Rüden, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Beste Freunde’ — Application for registration No 14 170 013

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2016 in Case R 93/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---