alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1219 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1025, K2025-1024.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00060 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021490EN.01003501.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Rivière and Others v Parliament

(Case T-88/20) (1)

(Institutional law - European Parliament - Measure adopted by the President of the European Parliament forbidding national flags being placed on the desks of Members of Parliament - Standards of conduct of Members of Parliament - Article 10(3) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Jérôme Rivière (Nice, France) and the 10 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants: Gunnar Beck (Neuss, Germany), Philippe Olivier (Draveil, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the measure adopted by the President of the European Parliament on 13 January 2020 forbidding Members of Parliament from displaying the national flag on their desks.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Mr Jérôme Rivière and the 10 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Jérôme Rivière and the 10 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament;

| 3. | Orders Mr Gunnar Beck and Mr Philippe Olivier to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Gunnar Beck and Mr Philippe Olivier to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.

---
# C_2021357EN.01003402.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/34

---

Order of the General Court of 2 July 2021 — MD v Commission

(Case T-552/20) (1)

(2021/C 357/52)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---
# C_2019016EN.01002401.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/24

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2018 — BPC Lux 2 Sàrl v European Commission, Portuguese Republic

(Case C-544/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - State aid - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Aid granted by the Portuguese authorities for the resolution of the financial institution Banco Espírito Santo SA - Creation and capitalisation of a Bridge Bank - Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Interest in bringing proceedings - Action before the national courts seeking annulment of the decision to put Banco Espírito Santo into resolution))

(2019/C 16/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: BPC Lux 2 Sàrl (represented by: J. Webber and M. Steenson, Solicitors, B. Woolgar, Barrister, and K. Bacon QC)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents), Portuguese Republic

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 19 July 2017, BPC Lux 2 and Others v Commission (T-812/14, not published, EU:T:2017:560); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 19 July 2017, BPC Lux 2 and Others v Commission (T-812/14, not published, EU:T:2017:560);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”),
I, Robert John DeCecco III, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date:
      May 17, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Robert John DeCecco IIIRobert
      John DeCecco IIIChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and
              Principal
      Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

 §

Plaintifff, §

 § Criminal No. 3:03-CR-333-D 

VS. § (Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0387-D)

 §

STEVEN L. NAGY, ID # 31163-177, § 

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

July 21, 2007 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court

concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted, and defendant’s motion to

vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied with prejudice.

 Defendant’s copy of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation was returned to the

court as undeliverable on August 1, 2007, based on his release from prison. Nevertheless, the “in

custody” determination is made as of the time the habeas petition or motion to vacate is filed. See

Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 454 n.5 (5th Cir. 2000). Additionally, because defendant is subject

to a three-year term of supervised release, he remains “in custody” despite his release from

imprisonment. See id. Thus the “in custody” requirement is satisfied despite defendant’s recent

release.
- 2 -

Defendant’s release neither renders the § 2255 motion moot nor deprives the court of

jurisdiction to consider the motion to vacate.

SO ORDERED.

August 27, 2007.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
BARBEQUE INTEGRATED, INC., Appellant, v. WIN-DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

Monica M. McNulty, Carrie Ann Wozniak, and David S. Wood, of Akerman, LLP, Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Barbeque Integrated, Inc. ("BBI"), appeals the trial court's order denying its motion for attorney's fees filed under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2017). BBI had previously obtained a final summary judgment in its favor against the appellee, Win-Development, LLC, and thereafter sought an award of attorney's fees under its earlier offer of judgment served pursuant to this statute. The trial court denied the motion, relying on the Third District Court of Appeal's holding in *Wheaton v. Wheaton* , 217 So.3d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), that the failure to comply with the email service provisions of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516 rendered an offer of judgment served under section 768.79 and proposal for settlement served under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 unenforceable.1

*1292Subsequent to the trial court entering the order under review, the Florida Supreme Court quashed the Third District Court's decision in *Wheaton* , holding that the plain language of section 768.79, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 does not require service by email and thus the email service provisions of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516 do not apply. *Wheaton v. Wheaton* , 261 So.3d 1236, 1244 (Fla. 2019). Accordingly, we reverse the order denying BBI's motion for attorney's fees and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1

The trial court also based its denial order on this court's opinion in *Goersch v. City of Satellite Beach* , 252 So.3d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). In *Goersch* , we addressed whether a motion for sanctions brought pursuant to section 57.105(4), Florida Statutes (2015), must be served in strict conformity with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516. *Id.* at 309. We held that it did and, in doing so, we specifically aligned ourself with the now-quashed decision of the Third District Court in *Wheaton* . *Id.* at 312. However, *Goersch* is not directly applicable here as it did not involve the offer of judgment statute, and we therefore decline to address its continuing viability subsequent to the Supreme Court's opinion in *Wheaton* . Furthermore, a request for the Florida Supreme Court to exercise discretionary jurisdiction to review *Goersch* is currently pending in Case Number SC18-1429.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00204-CR

Benito Aguilar GARZA, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-05-13044-CR

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 16, 2014

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On June 17, 2014, we notified Appellant Benito Aguilar Garza, Jr. that the trial court clerk 

filed a notification of late clerk’s record stating that the clerk’s record has not been filed because 

(1) Appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, 

and (2) Appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. We ordered Appellant to provide 

written proof to this court on or before June 27, 2014, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid 

or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal 
04-14-00204-CR

without paying the clerk’s fee. We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond within the time 

provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

To date, Appellant has not filed any response with this court. We, therefore, dismiss this 

appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
# C_2021349EN.01003502.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Cole Haan v EUIPO — Samsøe & Samsøe Holding (Ø)

(Case T-399/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Ø - Earlier international figurative mark φ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 349/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cole Haan LLC (Greenland, New Hampshire, United States) (represented by: G. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Samsøe & Samsøe Holding A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: C. Jardorf, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 April 2020 (Case R 1375/2019-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Samsøe & Samsøe Holding and Cole Haan.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cole Haan LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cole Haan LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Samsøe & Samsøe Holding A/S to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Samsøe & Samsøe Holding A/S to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Climes THIBEAUX a/k/a Nathaniel Thibeaux

NO. 2017-K-1909

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

*289Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and docket.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

CLARK, J., would grant and docket.
# C_2021044EN.01002501.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 9 November 2020 — Ligebehandlingsnævnet as representative of A v HK/Danmark and HK/Privat

(Case C-587/20)

(2021/C 44/30)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ligebehandlingsnævnet as representative of A

Defendant: HK/Danmark and HK/Privat

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: Fagbevægelsens Hovedorganisation (FH)

Question referred

Must Article 3(1)(a) of the Employment Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that a politically elected sector convenor of a trade union is covered by the scope of the directive in the circumstances described [in the request for a preliminary ruling]?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE S

341 AND 342 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA

BAR ADMISSION RULES :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 807

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of October , 201 9 , upon the recommendation of the Board

of Law Examiners

, the proposal having been submitted without publication in the interests

of justice and efficient administration pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3) :

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of

Pennsylvania that Rule 341 and Rule 342 of the Bar Admission Rules are amended in

the attached form s

.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pennsylvania Rule of Judicial

Administration No. 103(b) and shall be effective immediately.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
GREEN LIFE LUXURY HOMES, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Kenny WINTERHALTER, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4463

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - (-)district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 5, 2019        New U.S. Geological Survey Report Assesses Risk of Once-Per-Century Geomagnetic Superstorm to the Northeastern United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(751)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - (-)documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - (-)other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

About        February 5, 2024        California's History of Large Storms & Floods

Records        March 26, 2019        1973 Space Images of Mississippi Floods News Release

Records        March 28, 2019        1973 Time Lapse Space View of Mississippi Floods Article

About        November 15, 2023        2023 Quarter 4 USGS Stream Discharge and National Snow and Ice Data Center Data

About        June 9, 2023        River and Coastal Processes Team

Records        February 27, 2019        USGS Streamflow Peaks of Record Resulting from Hurricane Irene
Case 3:04-cv-00403-K Document 11 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 28
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO 
 VALSPAR
CORPORATION 
 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

AND ADOPTION AGREEMENT 

WHEREAS, The Valspar Corporation (the “Company”) has entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
March 19, 2016, by and among the Company, The Sherwin-Williams Company (“Parent”) and Viking Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company
(the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent; 
 WHEREAS, the
Company maintains the Valspar Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), which was adopted by the Company pursuant to the Adoption Agreement executed on April 1, 2014 (the
“Adoption Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Adoption
Agreement in connection with the Merger. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Adoption Agreement shall be
amended as follows, effective (except as otherwise specified herein) as of the date that this Amendment to Valspar Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan and Adoption Agreement (this “Amendment”) is executed pursuant to
authorization granted by the Board of Directors of the Company: 
 Amendment of Deferred Compensation Plan 

1. Contingent upon the Merger becoming effective, and effective as of the time the Merger becomes effective (the “Effective
Time”), Section 10.2 of the Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof, and in no event shall the following sentence be amended or deleted from the Deferred Compensation Plan prior
to the day after the first anniversary of the Effective Time: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plan may not be terminated
pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B) in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 19, 2016, by and among The Valspar Corporation, The Sherwin-Williams
Company and Viking Merger Sub, Inc.” 
 Amendment of Adoption Agreement 

2. Section 4.01(a)(i)(a) of the Adoption Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the maximum percentage amount of “50%”
specified therein with respect to base salary and replacing such percentage amount with “80%”. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the 27th day of September, 2016. 
  

			
	THE VALSPAR CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony L. Blaine

		 	Name: Anthony L. Blaine
		 	Title: Senior Vice President, Human Resources