alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that

oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, this appeal is submitted on the briefs and the

record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(Submitted August 31, 2005*)

Decided September 1, 2005

Before

Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 04-1788

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROBERT ROSS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

 District Court for the

 Northern District of Illinois,

 Eastern Division.

No. 00 CR 690

Charles R. Norgle, Sr., Judge.

O R D E R

Robert Ross pleaded guilty to one count of distributing cocaine base, 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1). In his written plea agreement, Ross waived his right to appeal “any

sentence within the maximum provided in the statute of conviction (or the manner in

whichthat sentencedwas determined), in exchange for concessions made by the United

States.” The district court, applying the sentencing guidelines as mandatory,

calculated a range of 168 to 210 months and sentenced Ross to 168 months’

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
No. 04-1788 Page 2

imprisonment. This sentence is below the statutory maximum of incarceration for life.

Nevertheless Ross challenged his sentence, arguing that the district court’s application

of the sentencing guidelines was erroneous under United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct.

738 (2005), and seeking a limited remand, see United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471

(7th Cir. 2005). But in a letter to the court and in his reply brief Ross concedes that

our decision in United States v. Bownes, 405 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2005), which we issued

after Ross filed his opening brief, erased any doubt that an appeal waiver without an

“escape hatch” will be strictly enforced against an appellant who challenges his

sentence based on Booker. Because Ross’s plea agreement contains no such “escape

hatch” that would allow him to appeal if the law changed in his favor, we must enforce

the waiver. See United States v. Lockwood, No. 04-2511, 416 F.3d 604, 608 (7th Cir.

July 2005); United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 364 (7th Cir. 2005). Therefore,

the appeal is DISMISSED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**BARRY R. BUCHTER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 375 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal and the Application for Remand for Evidentia ry Hearing are**  DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   May 11, 2009/s/ Cristina WasiakCristina Wasiak
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer of**

**AdvanceAmerica, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.**

**Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(Adopted bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AdvanceAmerica, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,J. Patrick O’Shaughnessy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/  J. PATRICK O’SHAUGHNESSY                     |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                   |
|     | J.  Patrick O’Shaughnessy                         |
| * * | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

May 10, 2010

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Albert E.
Bergeron, Vice-PresidentChief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

| |                                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ Albert E. Bergeron                  
| |                                         
| | Albert E. Bergeron                      
| | Vice-PresidentChief
  Financial Officer
| | May 12, 2008                            

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping
Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of OccuLogix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elias Vamvakas,
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 OCCULOGIX,
      INC.Date:   November
      13, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Elias VamvakasChairman
      & Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:03-cv-01974-H Document 11 Filed 04/06/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 46
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01974-H Document 11 Filed 04/06/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 47
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01974-H Document 11 Filed 04/06/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 48
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01974-H Document 11 Filed 04/06/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 49
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01974-H Document 11 Filed 04/06/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 50
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.

John P. Calamos, Sr.Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand Co-Chief Investment Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 135 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 135

To designate the West Indian manatee as an endangered species under the 
        Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2025

Mr. Buchanan (for himself and Mr. Frost) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the West Indian manatee as an endangered species under the 
        Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Manatee Protection Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. WEST INDIAN MANATEE DESIGNATED ENDANGERED SPECIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
species known as the ``West Indian manatee'' (Trichechus manatus) shall 
be treated as an endangered species for purposes of the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
    (b) Listing of West Indian Manatee.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Secretary of the Interior shall include the 
species known as the ``West Indian manatee'' (Trichechus manatus) in 
the endangered species list published under section 4(c) of the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(c)).
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Illustrations        January 26, 2015        USGS SIM 3250: Geologic Map of the Agnesi Quadrangle (V–45), Venus

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers
# C_2021422EN.01001301.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types)

(Case T-96/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types - Absolute grounds for refusal - Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court - Referral of the case back to the Grand Board of Appeal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Error of law - Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Res judicata - Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal)

(2021/C 422/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2019 (Case R 1276/2017-G), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Limbic® Types as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2019 (Case R 1276/2017-G); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2019 (Case R 1276/2017-G);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
Case 3:04-cv-02102-D Document 3 Filed 09/28/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 11
Case 3:04-cv-02102-D Document 3 Filed 09/28/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 12
# C_2021242EN.01003602.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Klaus Berthold v EUIPO — Thomann (HB Harley Benton)

(Case T-284/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark HB Harley Benton - Earlier EU word mark HB - Earlier national trade name - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 242/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Klaus Berthold Besitzgesellschaft GmbH & Co. KG (Thalhausen, Germany) (represented by: E. Strauß, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Thomann GmbH (Burgebrach, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 March 2020 (Case R 1359/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Thomann GmbH and Klaus Berthold Besitzgesellschaft GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Klaus Berthold Besitzgesellschaft GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Klaus Berthold Besitzgesellschaft GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.

---
Stephen Alan WINGO, DOC #H51221, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4609

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

Affirmed.
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 1 of 7 PageID 74
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 2 of 7 PageID 75
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 3 of 7 PageID 76
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 4 of 7 PageID 77
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 5 of 7 PageID 78
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 6 of 7 PageID 79
Case 4:03-cv-00855-Y Document 19 Filed 03/15/04 Page 7 of 7 PageID 80
# C_2019423EN.01000301.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Paulo Nascimento Consulting — Mediação Imobiliária Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-692/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemptions - Article 135(1)(b) and (d) - Transactions relating to the granting, negotiation and management of credit - Transactions concerning debts, with the exception of the recovery of debt - Assignment for consideration, to a third party, of a position held in enforcement proceedings for recovery of a debt recognised by a judgment)

(2019/C 423/03)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paulo Nascimento Consulting — Mediação Imobiliária Lda

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption laid down by it in respect of transactions concerning the granting, negotiation or management of credit does not apply to a transaction which, for the taxable person, consists in assigning, to a third party, for consideration all the rights and obligations deriving from the taxable person’s position in enforcement proceedings for recovery of a debt recognised by a judgment, a debt the payment of which was secured by a right over immovable property awarded to that taxable person and made the subject of attachment.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.

---
**Exhibit 4.48**

 

Federal Supervisory Service for Communications

 

**AddendumNo. 2**

 

**toLicense No. 30266  (Account Series A 030168)**

**datedDecember 30, 2003**

 

The line “ Start of services’ rendering (not later than)” on the titlepage shall be revised to read as follows: “December 30, 2005”

 

 
| **Deputy Manager,**                                |       |               |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|
| **Federal Supervisory Service for Communications** | ** ** | **S. A. Malyanov** |
| ** **                                         | ** ** | ** **         |
| ** **                                         | ** ** | ** **         |
| ** **                                         | 26.04.2005 |

 

----
Exhibit 99.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Lynn Wiebe,  Chief Financial Officer of EnterraEnergy Trust (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

| (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the    fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15    U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |
| (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                         |

> 
 

```
/s/ Lynn Wiebe
					   	 																Lynn Wiebe
                                           			 														Chief Financial Officer
													                                            				March, 2004
```
**Exhibit21**

 

Subsidiariesof Registrant

 

Thefollowing subsidiaries are direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Company:

 

VBIInc., a Delaware corporation

GolfCard International Corp., a Delaware corporation

CampCoast to Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation

CoastMarketing Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation

GolfCard Resort Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation

TLEnterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation

GolfCard Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation

GSSEnterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation

WoodallPublications Corporation, a Delaware corporation

AGIProperties of Colorado, Inc., a Delaware corporation

AffinityGroup Thrift Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation

AffinityRoad and Travel Club, Inc., a Texas corporation

AffinityBrokerage, Inc., a Delaware corporation

CampingRealty, Inc., a Kentucky corporation

CampingWorld, Inc., a Kentucky corporation

CampingWorld Insurance Services of Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation

CWI,Inc., a Kentucky corporation

CWMichigan, Inc., a Delaware corporation

CWTexas, LP, a Minnesota limited partnership

EhlertPublishing Group, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

ExpositionGroup, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

AGIReal Estate Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Thunder Press, a Californiacorporation

Camping World RV Sales, Inc., aDelaware corporation

AdventureMall, Inc., aDelaware corporation

PowerSports Media, Inc., aDelaware corporation

AffinityAdvertising, LP, a Minnesota limited partnership

 

----