Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Notices 2745 

of the Draft EIS, OSMRE selected the 

Partial Mining alternative as the 

preferred alternative. 

Summary of Expected Impacts 

Reasonably foreseeable effects of 

mining Federal coal were evaluated for 

the following resources in the Final EIS: 

• Air Quality (measured as 

concentration of criteria air pollutants 

regulated under the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards, Hazardous Air 

Pollutants, and Air Quality Related 

Values such as visibility [haze] and 

atmospheric deposition) 

• Emissions of greenhouse gases as 

they relate to climate change (measured 

in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent 

for both 20-year and 100-year global 

warming potentials) 

• Surface water and groundwater 

quality and quantity 

• Socio-economic effects (including 

changes to state and local taxes, 

royalties, fees, lease bids and bonuses, 

as well as payroll benefits as well as 

effects to Environmental Justice 

populations) 

• Federally listed threatened/ 

endangered species 

• Geology 

• Soils 

• Cultural Resources 

• Visual Resources 

• Wildlife 

Anticipated Permits and Authorizations 

None. 

Schedule for the Decision-Making 

Process 

The OSMRE anticipates releasing a 

ROD in February 2025. 

Public Participation 

In addition to making the Draft EIS 

available for public comment, OSMRE 

hosted one public meeting during the 

comment period. OSMRE received 452 

written comments, including comments 

from Federal and State agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and 

members of the public. OSMRE 

addressed these comments in the Final 

EIS. OSMRE considered the public 

comments received on the Draft EIS and 

during internal OSMRE review and 

incorporated them as appropriate into 

the Final EIS. Public comments and 

internal OSMRE review resulted in the 

addition of clarifying text. The revisions 

and edits have not significantly changed 

the impact analyses. 

Lead and Cooperating Agencies 

OSMRE is the lead agency for this 

EIS. No agencies indicated an interest in 

being a cooperating agency on the EIS. 

Decision Maker 

Department of the Interior Assistant 

Secretary for Land and Minerals 

Management. 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

OSMRE will take the analysis in the 

Final EIS into consideration as it makes 

a recommendation to the ASLM about 

the Federal mining plan modification 

associated with development of the 

LBA1 Federal coal tracts. The ASLM 

will consider OSMRE’s 

recommendation to decide whether the 

mining plan modification is approved, 

disapproved, or approved with 

conditions. OSMRE’s recommendation 

to the ASLM is based, at a minimum, on 

the documentation specified at 30 CFR 

746.13. 

David A. Berry, 

Regional Director, Unified Regions, 5, 7–11. 

[FR Doc. 2025–00410 Filed 1–10–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–05–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–1430] 

Certain Urine Splash Guards and 

Components Thereof; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 6, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of For Kids By Parents, Inc. of 

Potomac, Maryland. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain urine splash 

guards and components thereof by 

reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,870,619 

(‘‘the ’619 patent’’) and U.S. Patent No. 

11,812,901 (‘‘the ’901 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. The complainant requests that 

the Commission institute an 

investigation and, after the 

investigation, issue a general exclusion 

order, or in the alternative a limited 

exclusion order, and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 6, 2025, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 1 

and 2 of the ’619 patent and claims 1– 

3 of the ’901 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘a flat sheet of flexible 

material, a portion of which is divided 

into a plurality of attachment tabs, to be 

fashioned and, with the aid of an 

adhesive compound applied to the 

attachment tabs, affixed to the 

underside of a toilet seat to prevent 

urine egress through a gap between the 

toilet seat and toilet bowl;’’ 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
2746 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Notices 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

For Kids By Parents, Inc., 1385 

Kimblewick Road, Potomac, Maryland 

20854 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Shenzhenshi Dijiaaotuman Trading Co., 

Ltd. (d/b/a Tigaman), Shangfen 

Community, Minzhi Street, Longhua 

District No. 201, Longwu Industrial 

Zone, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, 

China 

Junyaxincaiwuzixunyouxiangongsi (d/ 

b/a Junyxin), Room 307, No. 15, 

Dong’an Dongshanli, Xiamen City, 

Jimei District, Fujian Province, 

361021 China 

Hezeyunjiangjixieshebeiyouxiangongsi 

(d/b/a Maomaohouse), No. 203, No. 2, 

Lane 4, Huangjin South Road, 

Nanwan Street, Longgang District, 

Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 

518000 China 

Shenzhenshiranbodianziyouxiangongsi 

(d/b/a Eurbus), Room 1205, No. 3, 

Yuandun Road, Danzhutou 

Community, Nanwan Street, 

Shenzhen, Longgang District, 518114 

China 

Hefeiweifengshidaishidaimaoyiyouxi

angongsi (d/b/a HealthSTEC), Baohe 

District, Room 104, Building 23, Area 

A, Wenchang Xincun, Hefei City, 

Anhui, 230000 China 

ShenzhenShi Julonghui Trading Co., 

Ltd. (d/b/a Edermurs), Bantian 

Subdistrict, Room 812, 8th Floor, 

Donglian E-Times Building, No. 4, 

Zhongxing Road, Ma’antang, 

Shenzhen, Longgang District, 

Guangdong Province, 518000 China 

Shenzhenshi Lishian Keji 

Youxiangongsi (d/b/a Lishian), Room 

601, No. 10, University City Pioneer 

Park, Lishan Road, Pingshan 

Community, Taoyuan street, Nanshan 

District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 

Province, 518000 China 

Shenzhen Paisi Industrial Co., Ltd. (d/ 

b/a Sunyoka123), Gangtou Industrial 

Zone, Yabian Community, Shajing 

Street, Room 506, Building B, Haoyi 

Commercial and Residential Building, 

Shenzhen, Bao’an District, Guangdong 

Province, 518125 China 

Guangzhou Lesenyu Dianzishangwu 

Youxiangongsi (d/b/a Le Sengyu), No. 

1268 Guangzhou Avenue Middle, 

803A (Room 2138), Guangzhou, 

Tianhe District, Guangdong Province, 

510620 China 

Shenzhen Sibaite Industrial Co., Ltd. (d/ 

b/a SeLucky), Gangtou Industrial 

Zone, Yabian Community, Shajing 

Street, Building B, 501, Haoyi 

Commercial and Residential Building, 

Shenzhen City, Bao’an District, 

Guangdong Province, 518104 China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 6, 2025. 

Susan Orndoff, 

Supervisory Attorney. 

[FR Doc. 2025–00431 Filed 1–10–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On January 6, 2025, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of 

Indiana in the lawsuit entitled United 

States v. Meyer Distributing, Inc., Civil 

Action No. 3:25–cv–4. 

The proposed Consent Decree would 

resolve Meyer’s liability alleged in the 

concurrently filed Complaint for 

violations of section 203(a)(3) of the 

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(3), 

arising from Meyer’s sale and offers to 

sell devices that bypass, defeat, or 

render inoperative emission controls 

installed on motor vehicles or motor 

vehicle engines in violation of the Clean 

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522(a). The 

Complaint alleges that Meyer sold or 

offered to sell over 600 types of devices 

within four distinct categories from 

January 1, 2018 through September 16, 

2020. The proposed Consent Decree 

requires Meyer to pay a civil penalty of 

$7.4 million, comply with the Clean Air 

Act going forward, complete a series of 

compliance measures to prevent future 

violations, and complete a mitigation 

project to offset some of the excess 

emissions caused by its violations in the 

region with the highest number of 

violative sales. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States v. Meyer 

Distributing, Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2– 

1–12694. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Any comments submitted in writing 

may be filed by the United States in 

whole or in part on the public court 

docket without notice to the commenter. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined and downloaded at this 

Justice Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

If you require assistance accessing the 

proposed Consent Decree, you may 

request assistance by email or by mail 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1