alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DEFARRON KEITH HILL, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-04-CV-1123-D 

§

WMC MORTGAGE CORP., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 23, 2005, the

Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are

accepted as the Findings and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SO ORDERED.

September 20, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:04-cv-01123-D Document 42 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 328
# C_2021422EN.01001401.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Wong (GT RACING)

(Case T-463/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT RACING - Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing bold curved, vertical and horizontal lines - Earlier EU word mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Earlier non-registered national marks - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Rules governing common-law action for passing off - No misrepresentation - Use in the course of trade of more than mere local significance - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom)

(2021/C 422/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Wai Leong Wong (Glasgow, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 May 2020 (Case R 1612/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Mr Wong.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.

---
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                           |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Date:       February 11, 2010 |   | /s/      Martin B. Oring  |   |
|                               |   | Martin      B. Oring           |   |
|                               |   | Chief      Executive Officer   |   |
|                               |   |                           |   |

----

----
# C_2022109EN.01002302.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/23

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Boquoi Handels v EUIPO (Representation of an ice crystal on a blue circular background)

(Case T-734/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for registration of a figurative sign representing an ice crystal on a blue circular background - Partial rejection of the application - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 109/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Boquoi Handels OHG (Grünwald, Germany) (represented by: S. Lorenz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Graul and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2020 (Case R 522/2020-2), concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing an ice crystal on a blue circular background as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Boquoi Handels OHG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Boquoi Handels OHG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
Exhibit 10.1






USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


 


September 28, 2016


 


Mr. Leland P. Maxwell 


401 Dartmouth Road 


Bryn Mawr, PA 19010


 


Dear Lee:


 


I am pleased to confirm the extension of your appointment as interim Chief Financial Officer of USA Technologies, Inc. ("USAT"). In connection with this extension, your compensation will increase to $25,000 per month effective October 1, 2016. Your appointment as interim Chief Financial Officer of USAT will end on March 31, 2017.


 


Except as specifically set forth above, all of the terms and conditions in the letter from USAT to you dated January 27, 2016 shall not be amended or modified in any respect whatsoever and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


The terms of this letter are contingent upon approval thereof by our Board of Directors, which is expected to be no later than Wednesday, September 28, 2016.


 


Please indicate your written acceptance by signing this letter and returning it to me.







	 	
Sincerely,


	 	 
	 	
/s/ Stephen P. Herbert


	 	
Stephen P. Herbert,


	 	
Chief Executive Officer


	 	 
	
Accepted and Agreed to:

	 
	 	 
	
/s/ Leland P. Maxwell

	 
	
Leland P. Maxwell

	 
	 	 
	
Dated: 9-23-16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<CASH>                                  32,146,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           19,126,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            (1,506,000)
<INVENTORY>                              7,159,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         9,578,000
<PP&E>                                 186,852,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         (68,572,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         429,797,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   59,320,000
<BONDS>                                355,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     1,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,626,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         429,797,000
<SALES>                                 21,138,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       154,551,000
<CGS>                                   18,875,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           33,087,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        60,144,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      26,154,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          5,261,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              (279,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      4,982,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,670,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals** 
**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20653

**Al Rushaid Parker Drilling, Limited,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus

**National Oilwell Varco, L.P.,**

Defendant

— Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CV

- 3390

Before **Smith, Barksdale,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Plaintiff Al Rushaid Parker Drilling, L imited , raises numerous argu

ments for setting aside the arbitration award at issue

. The district court was
correct that none of those conten tions has the slightest merit . There is no basis for either vacating the award under section 10 of the Federal Arbitrati on
Act or sending the case back to arbi tration.
The judgment is **AFFIRM ED** 

.

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir. R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 2, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20653 Document: 00516565084 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2022
James SOLOMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1510

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1





BDO — Pazos, López de Romaña, Rodriguez  S. Civil de R.L.





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-215029) and Forms S-8 (No.333-58298, No. 333-129152, No. 333-147448, No. 333-161459, No. 333-168588 and No. 333-183142) of our report dated June 21, 2017 except for Notes 1(b), 2 and 7 which are as of June 26, 2018 , relating to the financial statements of Perurail S.A., which appears in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Belmond Ltd. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2016.








Pazos, López de Romaña, Rodriguez S. Civil de R.L.


Lima, Peru


June 26, 2018








Countersigned by:/s/ Liliana Córdova MejíaLiliana Córdova MejíaCertified Chartered Public AccountantRegister No. 01-17661
Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 15 PageID 385
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 15 PageID 386
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 3 of 15 PageID 387
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 4 of 15 PageID 388
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 5 of 15 PageID 389
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 6 of 15 PageID 390
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 7 of 15 PageID 391
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 8 of 15 PageID 392
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 9 of 15 PageID 393
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 10 of 15 PageID 394
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 11 of 15 PageID 395
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 12 of 15 PageID 396
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 13 of 15 PageID 397
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 14 of 15 PageID 398
 

 Case 2:04-cv-00119-J Document 62 Filed 11/02/05 Page 15 of 15 PageID 399
# C_2020209EN.01000601.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 24 February 2020 — Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi, MX, NY, OZ v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-96/20)

(2020/C 209/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi, MX, NY, OZ

Defendant: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 9(2) of Directive 2002/98/EC setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, by identifying as minimum conditions of qualification for appointment to the position of responsible person of a blood establishment the possession of an academic qualification ‘in the field of medical or biological sciences’, it confers directly on individuals having a degree in either discipline the right to carry out the duties of responsible person within a blood establishment? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 9(2) of Directive 2002/98/EC setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, by identifying as minimum conditions of qualification for appointment to the position of responsible person of a blood establishment the possession of an academic qualification ‘in the field of medical or biological sciences’, it confers directly on individuals having a degree in either discipline the right to carry out the duties of responsible person within a blood establishment?

| 2. | Does European Union law accordingly permit national law to exclude individuals having a degree in biological sciences from carrying out the duties of responsible person within a blood establishment or preclude it from doing so? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does European Union law accordingly permit national law to exclude individuals having a degree in biological sciences from carrying out the duties of responsible person within a blood establishment or preclude it from doing so?

---

(1)  Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components and amending Directive 2001/83/EC (OJ 2003 L 33, p. 30).

---
Certificate Number: 00281-TXN-DE-038860626

Bankruptcy Case Number: 24-42896

00281-TXN-DE-038860626

CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION

I CERTIFY that on September 12, 2024, at 7:59 o'clock AM CDT, Donyeal

Cunningham completed a course on personal financial management given by

internet by Tim Truman, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, a provider approved

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 111 to provide an instructional course concerning personal

financial management in the Northern District of Texas.

Date: September 12, 2024 By: /s/Amy Tate-Almy

Name: Amy Tate-Almy

Title: Debtor Education Director

Case 24-42896-mxm13 Doc 20 Filed 09/12/24 Entered 09/12/24 19:13:20 Desc

Page 1 of 1
Jerry ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0445. JOANA ESTRADA VELAZQUEZ v. ALEJANDRO ROJAS

PEREZ.

Joana Estrada Velazquez filed this application for discretionary appeal from a

final divorce decree. This application is hereby GRANTED. See Court of Appeals

Rule 31 (b) (4). Velazquez may file a notice of appeal within 10 days of this order.

The clerk of the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the

record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Respondent Alejandro Rojas Perez filed a motion to dismiss the application

based upon Velazquez’s failure to transmit a complete record. Although failure to

transmit sufficient material may be a basis for denying an application, see Court of

Appeals Rule 31 (f), such is not a basis for dismissal. Accordingly, the motion to

dismiss is DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 22, 2022

07/22/2022
Lonnie Wayne GREER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG America Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date:  May 10, 2006 | /s/ Kenneth U. Kuk                                                                             |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Kenneth U. Kuk

Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
Irene PICCA, Appellant, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.

No. 1D17-527

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of ClearPoint
Business Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 (the “Report”) that:




(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




CLEARPOINT
      BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.Date:
      November 16, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Michael
      D. TrainaMichael
      D. TrainaChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
# C_2020209EN.01002901.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/29

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 May 2020 — Csordas and Others v Commission

(Case T-146/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - Civil service - Elections for the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee - Regularity - Supervisory obligation of the institution - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case)

(2020/C 209/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Annamaria Csordas (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Adrian Sorin Cristescu (Luxembourg), Jean Putz (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg), Miguel Vicente Nunez (Luxembourg) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska, T. Lilamand and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 91(4) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union seeking, principally, in the first place, suspension of the operation of (i) the memo of 26 November 2019 from the polling office declaring the results of the elections for the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee, (ii) the Commission’s decision of 28 November 2019 concerning the calculation of the representativeness of representative trade unions and staff associations in the institution, (iii) the mandate of the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee resulting from the elections of November 2019, (iv) the appointment by the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee of its delegates to the Commission’s Central Staff Committee, and (v) any other decision concerning the allocation of additional resources to the Commission’s staff representatives, and, in the second place, an order requiring the Commission to retain the outgoing Staff Committee until the judgment is handed down in the main proceedings, while limiting its mandate to current business, and, in the alternative, an order requiring the Commission, first, to limit to current business the mandate of the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee resulting from the elections of November 2019 and, second, an order requiring that local section to appoint to the Commission’s Central Staff Committee the representatives proposed by Union Syndicale Luxembourg.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6626

DENNIS GALLIPEAU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LINDA MICKENS-HAM,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

JANE DOE; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; OFFICER MACK,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(3:09-cv-01883-TMC)

Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se. Justin Tyler Bagwell, 

DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Gallipeau appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his motion to reconsider a prior order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham, No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 

2014). We deny Gallipeau’s motion to place this case in 

abeyance, and his motion to consolidate, and we dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED