alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Joseph Jimenez, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novartis AG;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 24, 2018   By:
/s/  JOSEPH   JIMENEZJoseph JimenezChief   Executive Officer
# C_2023083EN.01001801.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — EOC Belgium v Commission

(Case T-747/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Exemption of imports for a particular end-use - Action for annulment - Severability - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Actionable measure - Admissibility - First subparagraph of Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Duty imposed on a non-discriminatory basis - Equal treatment)

(2023/C 83/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: EOC Belgium (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: Y. Melin and I. Fressynet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, G. Luengo and M. Gustafsson, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Article 1(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 of 25 September 2020 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2020 L 315, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EOC Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EOC Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
# C_2021110EN.01001702.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/17 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 22 December 2020 — Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Case C-695/20) (2021/C 110/17) Language of the case: English Referring court First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Fenix International Limited Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs Question referred Is Article 9a of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 ( 1 ) of 15 March 2011, inserted by Article 1(1)(c) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 ( 2 ) of 7 October 2013, invalid on the basis that it goes beyond the implementing power or duty on the Council established by Article 397 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC ( 3 ) of 28 November 2006 insofar as it supplements and/or amends Article 28 of Directive 2006/112/EC? ( 1 )  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2011, L 77, p. 1). ( 2 )  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 of 7 October 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards the place of supply of services (OJ 2013, L 284, p. 1). ( 3 )  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006, L 347, p. 1).

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3032

IRENE M. MOORE,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DC0752080462-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Irene M. Moore moves for reconsideration of the court's January 16, 2009 order

revising the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as

respondent.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 13 2009

Date

cc:	Irene M. Moore

Joyce Friedman, Esq.

Tara J. Kilfoyle, Esq.

s20

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbal4

Clerk thStlidasejrciPrecLur—li

MAR 1 3 2009

JAN HORbsAY

CLERK

2009-3032	 2
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or
 Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen K. Gardner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  November 14, 2011
 
 /s/ Stephen K. GardnerStephen K. GardnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 4 Filed 04/14/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID 35
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(6)
              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(27)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

              - 2021(1)

Featured Films and Shorts        December 16, 2013        Hazards: Geomagnetic Storms

Presentations and Events        August 29, 2019        PubTalk 08/2019 — Pliocene World

staff profileWilliam Leith
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 24
- 00294
- CV

Appellant, LeAnn Marie Hilton// Cross
- Appellant, Andrea Skola

v. Appellee, Andrea Skola// Cross
- Appellee, LeAnn Marie Hilton

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 23
- 002920 , THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

On May 31, 2024 , this Court g ranted A ppellant and C ross - A ppellee LeeAnn Marie Hilton ’ s agreed motion to ab ate this app eal until July 1, 202 4 , to allow the trial court
to rule on a p ending post

- judgment motio n to modify

. Hilton has now filed a suggestion of bankrutpcy

. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. We ther efore reinstate this appeal , lift our prior abatement, and now a b a te t his appeal unti l a pa rty file s a motion to reinstate or a motion to sever. See id

. R. 8.2, 8.3. Hilton is ordered to inform this Court of the resolution of the bankruptcy proceeding or some other event that would allow this appeal to be r einstate d. Shou ld she fail to provid e su ch

n otice, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution on this Court’s or another party ’ s motion. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).Before Chief Justice Byr ne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Bankr up t cy File d : May 2 5 , 2024
STATE of Louisiana v. Tracy KENT

No. 2018-KH-0477

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

*894Denied. The claims are repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60427

Summary Calendar

 

MICHAEL HENRY SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:98-CV-49-BrS

- - - - - - - - - -

February 25, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Henry Smith appeals from the district court’s denial

of his petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1361. He argues that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus

ordering the Bureau of Prisons to to accept his administrative

appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the

reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Bureau of

Prisons, No. 5:98cv49BrS (S.D. Miss. May 8, 1998).
EXHIBIT 31.2

    Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
          Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    I, Terry Cononelos, Chief Financial Officer of Millennium Quest, Inc. (the
Registrant") certify that:

    1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

    2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

    3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

    4.     The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:

    a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

    5.     The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
controls; and

    6.    The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: August 17, 2004               /s/ Terry Cononelos
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Terry Cononelos, Chief Financial Officer
Gerrell SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Equity Ventures Group Inc. |

| By:                | /s/ Colette Kim                                    |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|     | Colette KimPresident, Secretary and Director  |
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONSI, James R. Simpson, being the Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1.     I have reviewed the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Silvergraph International, Inc.;2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)not applicablec)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)disclosed in the report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.August 20, 2007/s/ James R. SimpsonDateJames R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021206EN.01002501.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/25

---

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — SATSE v Commission

(Case T-484/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public health - Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC - List of biological agents known to infect humans - Directive (EU) 2020/739 - Inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 - Inclusion in risk group 3 of biological agents known to infect humans - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 206/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Sesmero González, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Valero and N. Ruiz García, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 of 3 June 2020 amending Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 in the list of biological agents known to infect humans and amending Commission Directive (EU) 2019/1833 (OJ 2020 L 175, p. 11).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany.

| 3. | Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) shall pay the costs of the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) shall pay the costs of the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

| 4. | SATSE, the Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany shall bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

SATSE, the Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany shall bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.

---
Slip Op. 23-189

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

BROOKLYN BEDDING, LLC, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. Ct. No. 21-00285 

UNITED STATES, Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge 

Defendant.

1 ORDER 

2 [The court sustains the Department of Commerce’s remand redetermination.] 

3 Dated: December 22, 2023 

4 Baker, Judge: This antidumping duty case has returned from a remand 

5 in which the court ordered the Department of Commerce to verify a Thai mat6 tress importer’s data insofar as the Department relied upon that data. The im7 porter thereafter withdrew from both the Commerce proceedings and this liti8 gation. No remaining party opposes the remand redetermination, and the court 

9 therefore sustains it. A separate judgment will enter. See USCIT R. 58(a). 

10 Dated: /s/ December 22, 2023 M. Miller Baker

11 New York, New York M. Miller Baker, Judge