alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021310EN.01002901.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/29

---

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — Silver and Others v Council

(Case T-252/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on withdrawal - United Kingdom nationals - Loss of EU citizenship - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 310/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Joshua Silver (Bicester, United Kingdom) and the six other applicants whose names are set out in the annex (represented by: P. Tridimas, Barrister, D. Harrison and A. von Westernhagen, Solicitors)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and J. Ciantar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking partial annulment of Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission, British in Europe, Plaid Cymru — The Party of Wales, European Democracy Lab, ECIT and European Alternatives Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission, British in Europe, Plaid Cymru — The Party of Wales, European Democracy Lab, ECIT and European Alternatives Ltd.

| 3. | Mr Joshua Silver and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Joshua Silver and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

| 4. | Mr Silver and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex, the Council, the Commission, British in Europe, Plaid Cymru — The Party of Wales, European Democracy Lab, ECIT and European Alternatives Ltd shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Mr Silver and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex, the Council, the Commission, British in Europe, Plaid Cymru — The Party of Wales, European Democracy Lab, ECIT and European Alternatives Ltd shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.

---
INTHE COURT OFAPPEALS FORTHE FIFTHDISTRICT OFTEXAS ATDALLAS Justin Douglas Heaton, Appellant 

### v. No. 05-12-00001-CR The State ofTexas, Appellee State's Motion ForLeave to Supplement State's Brief

TOTHEHONORABLEJUSTICES OFTHIS COURT: The State ofTexas respectfully requests that this Court grant her Motion for Leave to Supplement State's Brief in the above-styled and -numbered case, in accordance with Rule 38.7 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, and shows the following: 1. This case is on appeal from the Criminal District CourtNo. 1 ofDallas County Texas, incause no. F11-00397-H. 2. Appellant was convicted of Manslaughter, Tex. Penal Code § 19.04, with a deadly weapon fmding, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12 § 3(g), and enhanced by a prior felony conviction, Tex. Penal Code§ 12.42(b). He was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. 3. This case is set for submission on oral argument for Tuesday, February 19, 2013, at 9:00a.m. 4. The State now requests, by this motion, leave fo supplement the State's Brief thatwas filed on October 3, 2012, for the following reasons:
a. Page 1 of the State's Brief, under "Statement of the Case," states that "Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of second degree felony intoxication manslaughter

....Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.08(a) and 49.01(a) (West 2011)." 

# oRIGINALb. This statement of the case is incorrect. Appellant was convicted of manslaughter as shown above. The error is apparently due to a misstatement onthe writtenjudgment.
c. The attorney of record for the State is no longer employed by the District Attorney's Office, and the undersigned Assistant District Attorney was made aware of the case and this error on Thursday, February 14, 2013. d. The State reasonably believes that justice requires correcting this error before the Courtthrough a SupplementalBrief. The State therefore prays that this Court grant this Motion for Leave to Supplement State's Briefand accept the SupplementalBriefherein flied.
Respectfully submitted,

CraigWatkins CriminalDistrictAttorney Dallas County,Texas



### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true copy of the foregoing Motion was served on David L. Richards, attorney for Appellant, at 3001 West Fifth Street, Ste. 800 on February 15, 2013, andby e-mail to DaveRichards@sbsglobal.net.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1205 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1003, K2025-1002.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00031 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00234-CV

Garry White

v.

Officer J. Bevan, Patricia Aristimono, M.D., Benson Alfred, Officer J. Garue, Jesse Hurley,

L.V.N., Dr. Twalisha Williams, Beatrice Gutierrez, and Officer Wanida Harrell

(No. 2013-506,098 IN 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Reporter's record

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Statewide efiling fee

Filing

$45.00

$25.00

$50.00

$20.00

$100.00

UNKNOWN

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

Lubbock County









Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on February 10, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
Randall GASKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1089

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Randall Gaskins was convicted of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and grand theft of $ 100 or more from a dwelling or curtilage. On appeal, Gaskins challenges the judgment and sentence entered on the grand theft conviction. We affirm.

The sole issue on appeal is whether Gaskins' trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis that the State failed to present sufficient evidence establishing the stolen property's value. At trial, the victim testified only as to what he had paid for the stolen items.

Ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be raised on direct appeal "when ineffectiveness is obvious on the face of the appellate record, the prejudice caused by the conduct is indisputable, and a tactical explanation for the conduct is inconceivable." *Larry v. State* , 61 So.3d 1205, 1207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (quoting *Corzo v. State* , 806 So.2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ). Gaskins' claim does not meet the second element-indisputable prejudice. It is not clear from the face of the record that had trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal, the State would have been incapable of reopening its case to prove the value of the stolen property at the time of the offense. Thus, we decline to address Gaskins' ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal and affirm without prejudice for Gaskins to raise this claim in a timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. *See**Beazley v. State* , 148 So.3d 552, 554-55 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (noting that appellant may raise issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in motion for postconviction relief even though appellate court was unwilling to decide issue on direct appeal).

AFFIRMED, without prejudice to Gaskins asserting his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a timely filed motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850.

COHEN, LAMBERT, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Marquis Antonio CORBITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2591

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF A.T.

NO. 2019-CJ-G222

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avaya Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin J. Kennedy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|/S/    KEVIN J.
KENNEDY                                                             
|Kevin J. Kennedy President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

December 7, 2010
# C_2021513EN.01003701.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/37

---

Order of the General Court of 26 October 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — Caterpillar (SPEEDCAT)

(Case T-515/20) (1)

(2021/C 513/54)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
WEST PACE, LLC v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

2160474

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(1)
              - (-)oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

publication        February 15, 2023        Generalized additive model estimation of no-flow fractions and L-moments to support flow-duration curve quantile estimation using selected probability distributions for bay and estuary restoration in the Gulf States

publication        January 1, 1973        Reconnaissance of the water resources of Beaver County, Oklahoma

map        September 1, 1996        Maps showing petroleum exploration intensity and production in major Cambrian to Ordovician reservoir rocks in the Anadarko Basin

publication        January 1, 1963        Geology and ground-water features of salt springs, seeps, and plains in the Arkansas and Red River basins of western Oklahoma and adjacent parts of Kansas and Texas
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

In re:

Mark Tilford

Debtor,

Case No. 24-41773-mxm

Chapter 13

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CHAPTER 13

SCHEDULES AND OTHER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS

The request for Motion for Extension of Time to File Chapter 7 Schedules and Other 

Required Documents filed by the Debtor is GRANTED. The Debtor shall file the Required 

Documents on or before June 20, 2024.

### End Of Order ###

Case 24-41773-mxm13 Doc 11-1 Filed 06/06/24 Entered 06/06/24 12:37:38 Desc

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
Prepared by:

Clayton Everett, State Bar No. 24065212

clayton@norredlaw.com

Norred Law, PLLC

515 E. Border St., Arlington, Texas 76010

O: (817) 704-3984; F: (817) 524-6686

Attorney for Debtor

Case 24-41773-mxm13 Doc 11-1 Filed 06/06/24 Entered 06/06/24 12:37:38 Desc

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
# C_2021310EN.01002401.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories (HYAL)

(Case T-215/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark HYAL - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Right to be heard - Audi alteram partem rule - Obligation to state reasons - Sound administration and equal treatment - Article 165(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2021/C 310/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fidia farmaceutici SpA (Abano Terme, Italy) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H.P. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska, V. Ruzek and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories SA (Athens, Greece) (represented by: C. Chrysanthis, P.-V. Chardalia and A. Vasilogamvrou, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 January 2020 (Case R 613/2019-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories and Fidia farmaceutici.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fidia farmaceutici SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fidia farmaceutici SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
Pedro OTERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 577 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1018, K2025-1017.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00044 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Steve SAINTLOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Andre SHEFFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2016296EN.01003101.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/31

---

Action brought on 27 June 2016 — Hello Media v EUIPO — Hola (#hello digitalmente diferentes)

(Case T-330/16)

(2016/C 296/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hello Media, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hola, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘#hello digitalmente diferentes’ — Application for registration No 12 440 574

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21/04/2016 in Case R 1979/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject opposition B 2 336 348 to the application for a European Union trade mark No 12 440 574; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject opposition B 2 336 348 to the application for a European Union trade mark No 12 440 574;

| — | order the grant of European Union trade mark No 12 440 574 ‘#hello digitalmente diferentes’ (with graphic); |
| --- | --- |

—

order the grant of European Union trade mark No 12 440 574 ‘#hello digitalmente diferentes’ (with graphic);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Okyeame WOODARD

NO. 2018-KH-1005

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.

CRICHTON, J., recused.