alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023007EN.01002301.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — MV v Commission

(Case T-624/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/364/19 (AD 7) - Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition - Competition eligibility requirements - Insufficient professional experience - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Rules on languages - Equal treatment)

(2023/C 7/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MV (represented by G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by T. Lilamand and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the competition selection board of 29 October 2019 rejecting his request for review of the decision of 5 June 2019 not to admit him to the next stage of Open Competition EPSO/AD/364/19 — Security Officers (AD 7), the notice of competition and the draft list of officials selected to take part in the competition and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by him as a result of those acts.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders MV to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders MV to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE BRETT A. PANTALONE 

AND DANIEL P. HOMILLER

____________________ 

2012-1301 

(Serial No. 10/869,388) 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

EDWARD H. GREEN, III, Coasts & Bennett, PLLC, of 

Cary, North Carolina, for appellants. 

RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, 

United States Patent and Trademark Office, of 

Alexandria, Virginia. With him on the brief were 

WILLIAM LAMARCA and JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate 

Solicitor. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and Reyna, Circuit 

Judges). 
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 4, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
# C_2021128EN.01003502.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — MKR Design (PANTHÉ)

(Case T-117/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark PANTHÉ - Earlier national word and figurative marks PANTHER and earlier EU figurative mark P PANTHER - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark)

(2021/C 128/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MKR Design Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Dragotti, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 December 2019 (Case R 378/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés and MKR Design.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglés, SA, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglés, SA, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
STATE EX REL. Ahmed Rashad MORNING v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1262

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX § 6.
BTXN 050 (rev. 07/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

Tres Peliculas, LLC 

320 W. Las Colinas Blvd.

Bldg.2

Irving, TX 75039

 Case No.: 24−41977−mxm7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

NOTICE OF FILING OF PROOF OF CLAIM

 In accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 3004, notice is hereby given that on 06/25/2024

a Proof of Claim was filed by the trustee on behalf of Michael Bone in the total amount of $1617.10.

 A Proof of Claim filed by a creditor pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3002(c) or Rule 3003(c) shall supersede the

claim that has been filed on your behalf.

 To file a Proof of Claim, please visit www.txnb.uscourts.gov. Should you have any questions regarding this

matter, please contact our Help Desk at (800) 442−6850.

DATED: 6/27/24 FOR THE COURT:

Kevin McNatt, Clerk of Court

by: /s/Sheniqua Whitaker, Deputy Clerk

Case 24-41977-mxm7 Doc 28 Filed 06/27/24 Entered 06/27/24 06:49:12 Desc

Chapter 13 Notice to Creditor Page 1 of 1
Clarence THORPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00187-CV

In the Interest of D.D., et al., Children,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-PA-01580

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 20, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant Saretha Davis has filed a docketing statement in which she moves for dismissal

of this appeal. No opposition to the motion has been filed. We grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
# C_2021471EN.01004701.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Univers Agro v EUIPO — Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic (AGATE)

(Case T-592/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark AGATE - Absolute ground for refusal - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 471/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Univers Agro EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Hernández-Martí Pérez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic Co. Ltd (Dongying, China) (represented by: J. Erdozain López, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2020 (Case R 725/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic and Univers Agro.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Agro EOOD to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agro EOOD to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
2nd Quarter 2008 ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Dunaway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ William J. Dunaway       
|William J. Dunaway           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|                             
|July 15, 2008                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## United States Court of App eals
F O R T H E E I G H T H C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 37 79

__ __ __ __ __ _ In re: Lelan d Wil li am

Jac ob s; * Caro lyn Lou is e Jo hn so n- Ja co bs , *
* Deb to rs , *

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- *
* Lela nd W il li am

Jac ob s, *
* App el la nt , *
* App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e * Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

. Edu cat io na l Cr ed it * Man ag em en t Co rp or at io n, * [UNPUBLISHED]
* App el le e. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: Ju ne 14 , 20 12 Fi le d: Ju ne 25 , 20 12

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re MUR PHY, ARNOLD, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.Lela nd Ja co bs ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de r af f i r mi n g th e ba nk ru pt cy 1

co ur t’s jud gm en t, whi ch de ni ed Ja co bs ’s req ue st to di sc ha rg e--b as ed on th e “ un du e

2 ha rd sh ip ” pr ov is io n in 11 U.S.C. § 52 3( a)(8 )--h is st ud en t lo an de bt to Edu cat io na l Cred it Man ag em en t Co rp or at io n.

Hav in g care fu ll y rev ie wed th e reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we
co nc lu de th at th e de ni al of Ja co bs ’s req ue st was ap pr op ria te , fo r th e reasons dis cu ss ed by th e ba nk ru pt cy co ur t an d th e di st ric t co ur t. See In re Lon g, 32 2 F.3 d 54 9, 55 3- 55 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (Eig ht h Ci rcu it ap pl ie s “ to ta li ty-of-t he -ci rcu m st an ces te st ” in de t e r mi n i ng whe th er st ud en t lo an de bt sh ou ld be di sc ha rg ed ba se d on un du e ha rd sh ip ; de sc rib in g fact s an d ci rcu m st an ces ba nk ru pt cy co ur t s h ou ld co ns id er in

ev al ua ti ng to ta li ty of ci rcu m st an ces ); se e al so Edu c. Cred it Mg m t. Co rp

. v. Je sp ers on , 57 1 F

. 3 d 77 5, 77 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (d eb to r be ars rig or ou s bu rd en of pr ov in g un du e ha rd sh ip by pr ep on de ran ce of ev id en ce); Bu rg s v. Si ss el , 74 5 F.2 d 52 6, 52 8 (8 th Ci r. 19 84 ) (p er cu ria m ) (p ro se li ti ga nt s are no t ex cu se d fro m ha vi ng to co mp l y w i th

su bs ta nt iv e an d pr oc ed ur al la w; pr o se li ti ga nt sh ou ld rece iv e m ean in gf ul no ti ce of wha t is ex pe ct ed of hi m , bu t co ur t is no t pe rm it te d to act as co un se l fo r ei th er pa rty).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Jo hn R. Tun he im , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Mi nn es ot a. The Hon or ab le Greg or y F

. Kis he l, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Ban kr up tc y 2 Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

.

- 2

-
# C_2022237EN.01000901.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-510/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Environment - Directive 2008/56/EC - Marine environmental policy - Article 5 - Marine strategies - Article 17(2) and (3) - Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets - Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limts, details of any updates made following the reviews)

(2022/C 237/10)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria (represented by: T. Mitova, L. Zaharieva and T. Tsingileva, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing, within the prescribed time limits, first, to review in a coordinated manner, as specified in Article 5 of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), the initial assessment and the determination of good environmental status, and, secondly, to send to the European Commission details of the updates made following those reviews, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17(2)(a) and (b) and Article 17(3) of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing, within the prescribed time limits, first, to review in a coordinated manner, as specified in Article 5 of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), the initial assessment and the determination of good environmental status, and, secondly, to send to the European Commission details of the updates made following those reviews, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17(2)(a) and (b) and Article 17(3) of that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
EX PARTE Brandon ROEHRIG

CR-16-0658

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
# C_2021128EN.01001101.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 24 December 2020 — GJ v Ryanair DAC

(Case C-712/20)

(2021/C 128/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GJ

Defendant: Ryanair DAC

Question referred

Is a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sheffield Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Cosmo Palmieri, a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Cosmo Palmieri


Cosmo Palmieri,

 Director

April 14, 2004
# C_2023278EN.01001801.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2023 — IMG v Commission

(Case T-752/20) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - OLAF investigations - Press leaks - Material and non-material damage - Causal link - Imputability of the leaks - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Confidentiality of legal advice)

(2023/C 278/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: International Management Group (IMG) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, J.-F. Brakeland and S. Delaude, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the material and non-material damage which it claims to have suffered as a result of the unlawfulness of the conduct of the European Commission and of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) following a report concerning the applicant drawn up by OLAF.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that the document produced by International Management Group (IMG) as Annex A.21 to the application be removed from the case file; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that the document produced by International Management Group (IMG) as Annex A.21 to the application be removed from the case file;

| 2. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action;

| 3. | Orders IMG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders IMG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                       Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
AmSouth Bank

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Officer's
Certificate of Servicer that AmSouth Bank, as Servicer (the "Company"), a wholly
owned subsidiary of AmSouth Bancorporation, has fulfilled all its obligations in
all material respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October
1, 2000 ("Agreement") during the three month period ended December 31, 2000.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those requirements.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the three month period ended December 31,
2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the board of
directors and management of the Company and should not be referred to or
distributed for any purpose to anyone who is not authorized to receive such
information as specified in the Agreement or in the Exhibits attached.  However,
this report is a matter of public record as a result of being included as an
exhibit to the annual report on Form 10-K prepared by the Company and filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of AmSouth Auto Receivables,
LLC and its distribution is not limited.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


March 28, 2001
# C_2022368EN.01001904.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 31 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Avis Autovermietung Gesellschaft mbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

(Case C-701/20) (1)

(2022/C 368/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

---