alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit No. 32.2 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofAmerican Lorain Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Jing Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1) 

The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 16, 2008 

/s/ Jing Wu                                   Jing Wu Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will beretained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
# C_2021289EN.01003701.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/37

---

Order of the General Court of 31 May 2021 — König Ludwig International v EUIPO (Royal Bavarian Beer)

(Case T-332/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark Royal Bavarian Beer - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Unitary character of the EU trade mark - Article 1(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 289/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG (Geltendorf, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler and J. Stock, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2020 (Case R 1714/2019-4), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Royal Bavarian Beer.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments
# C_2017392EN.01003101.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/31

---

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinWärme)

(Case T-719/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark berlinWärme - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law))

(2017/C 392/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and D. Hanf, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2016 (Case R 618/2016-1), relating to the application for registration of the word sign berlinWärme as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 411, 28.11.2016.

1

---
Case 24-30124-mvl13 Doc 7 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 16:13:10 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 24-30124-mvl13 Doc 7 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 16:13:10 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 24-30124-mvl13 Doc 7 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 16:13:10 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 24-30124-mvl13 Doc 7 Filed 01/16/24 Entered 01/16/24 16:13:10 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Garry K.McGuire, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, CorporateDevelopment of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ GARRY  K. MCGUIRE                                                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Garry K. McGuire                                                            |
| *Chief Financial Officer and  Senior Vice President, Corporate Development* |
| May 9, 2006                                                            |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 16, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20783 Conference Calendar

DARRELL J. HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DORSETT BROTHERS; ET AL., Defendants, DORSETT BROTHERS; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CV-2059

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Darrell J. Harper filed a civil complaint against Dorsett Brothers Concrete Supply, Inc., and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for $4,000,000, alleging that he had been dismissed from his employment with Dorsett Brothers because of his race. The district court dismissed his complaint because it violated an injunction entered December 23, 2002.No. 04-20783 -2- Harper has filed a motion in this court seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Because Harper does not address the reason for the district court’s dismissal of his complaint, he has failed to establish a nonfrivolous ground for appeal. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); F ED . R. A PP . P. 24(a). His IFP motion is DENIED. As the appeal contains no nonfrivolous issues, it is
DISMISSED. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. We previously cautioned Harper that the filing or prosecution of frivolous appeals would subject him to sanctions. Harper v. City of Houston , No. 04-20787 (5th Cir. June 21, 2005) (unpublished). That appeal, too, involved the district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with the December 23, 2002, injunction. Because this appeal was briefed prior to our warning, we decline to sanction Harper at this time. However, we reiterate our warning. Harper should review all pending appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous.
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Clinical 
Trials of Mind and Body Interventions (MB).
    Date: February 27-28, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Center for Complementary and Integrative, 
Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: BAILA S Hall, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, 
NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 443-9285, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 27, 2024.
David W Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31478 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

	
	





 ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE C- SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESTRICTIVE LEGEND SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY BY CUSIP 14070T 10 2 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK WITH A
PAR VALUE OF $1.00 OF CAPSTAR FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. transferable on the books of CapStar Financial Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”) by the registered holder in person or by Attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender of
this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Tennessee, and to the Charter and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent of the Corporation. WITNESS the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: PRESIDENT CORPORATE SECRETARY AMERICAN FINANCIAL
PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS COUNTER SIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 







 



 
 UPON REQUEST, THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH IN WRITING WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH SHAREHOLDER WHO OR THAT SO REQUESTS A STATEMENT OF THE
DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES, AND LIMITATIONS APPLICABLE TO EACH AUTHORIZED CLASS OF CAPITAL STOCK AND THE VARIATIONS IN RIGHTS, PREFERENCES, AND LIMITATIONS DETERMINED FOR EACH SERIES THEREOF AS WELL AS THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS TO DETERMINE VARIATIONS FOR FUTURE SERIES THEREOF. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian     TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties (Cust) (Minor) JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship not as tenants in common
under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act [GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE](State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign and transfer unto TAXPAYER IDENTIFYING NUMBER PLEASE PRINT
OR TYPE — NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE SHARES    TAXPAYER IDENTIFYING NUMBER PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE — NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE SHARES    of the capital stock represented by the
within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated 20    IMPORTANT A NOTARY SEAL IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION SUCH AS A COMMERCIAL BANK, TRUST COMPANY, SAVINGS AND LOAN, CREDIT UNION OR BROKER. Medallion
Signature(s) guarantee:
Exhibit 13.2
 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EXFO Inc., hereby certifies, that:
 
 1.
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2012 of EXFO fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EXFO.
 
 
 Date:           November 26, 2012
 
 
 
 /s/Pierre Plamondon
 Pierre Plamondon, CPA, CA
 Vice-President, Finance
 and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CR-0078-N (06)

) No. 3:04-CV-2658-N

CHRISTOPHER JERMAINE JACKSON, ) ECF

ID # 30672-177, )

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED July 19, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:03-cr-00078-N Document 642 Filed 07/19/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3793
# C_2021242EN.01004102.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Denmark; COVID-19)

(Case T-378/20) (1)

(State aid - Danish air transport market - Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic - Guarantee - Decision not to raise any objections - Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market - Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence - Freedom of establishment - Free provision of services - Equal treatment - Duty to state reasons)

(2021/C 242/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.C. Laprévote, S. Rating, I.G. Metaxas-Maranghidis and V. Blanc, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Tomat, L. Flynn and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren and M. Søndahl Wolff, acting as Agents, and by R. Holdgaard, lawyer), French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier and P. Dodeller, acting as Agents), SAS AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: F. Sjövall, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 2416 final of 15 April 2020 on State Aid SA.56795 (2020/N) — Denmark — Compensation for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to Scandinavian Airlines.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the French Republic and SAS AB to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the French Republic and SAS AB to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 691 

Expressing support for the designation of May 17, 2024, as ‘‘DIPG Pediatric 

Brain Cancer Awareness Day’’ to raise awareness of, and encourage 

research on, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma tumors and pediatric cancers 

in general. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. REED, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. HYDESMITH, and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 17, 2024, 

as ‘‘DIPG Pediatric Brain Cancer Awareness Day’’ to 

raise awareness of, and encourage research on, diffuse 

intrinsic pontine glioma tumors and pediatric cancers 

in general. 

Whereas diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (referred to in this 

preamble as ‘‘DIPG’’) tumors regularly affect 200 to 300 

children in the United States each year; 

Whereas brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related 

death among children; 

Whereas DIPG tumors are the leading cause of pediatric 

brain cancer deaths; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 691 ATS 

Whereas, with respect to a child who is diagnosed with a 

DIPG tumor and receives treatment for a DIPG tumor, 

the median amount of time that the child survives after 

diagnosis is approximately 11 months; 

Whereas, with respect to an individual who is diagnosed with 

a DIPG tumor, the rate of survival 5 years after diagnosis is approximately 2 percent; 

Whereas the average age at which a child is diagnosed with 

a DIPG tumor is between 5 and 10 years, resulting in 

a life expectancy approximately 70 years shorter than the 

average life expectancy in the United States; and 

Whereas the prognosis for children diagnosed with DIPG tumors has not meaningfully improved during the past 50 

years: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports designating May 17, 2024, as 

3 ‘‘DIPG Pediatric Brain Cancer Awareness Day’’; 

4 (2) supports efforts— 

5 (A) to better understand diffuse intrinsic 

6 pontine glioma (referred to in this resolution as 

7 ‘‘DIPG’’) tumors; 

8 (B) to develop effective treatments for 

9 DIPG tumors; and 

10 (C) to provide comprehensive care for chil11 dren with DIPG tumors and their families; and 

12 (3) encourages all individuals in the United 

13 States to become more informed about— 

14 (A) DIPG tumors; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 691 ATS 

1 (B) pediatric brain cancer in general; and 

2 (C) challenges relating to research on pedi3 atric cancers and ways to advance that re4 search. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2021502EN.01002502.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Yadex International v EUIPO — Sütas Süt Ürünleri (PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz)

(Case T-560/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz - Earlier international figurative mark Süzme Peynir - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 502/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: N. Johnson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sütas Süt Ürünleri AS (Bursa, Turkey) (represented by: O. Ruhl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2020 (Case R 2126/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Sütas Süt Ürünleri and Yadex International.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Yadex International GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Yadex International GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---