alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 107161-107162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31387]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-PWR-GOGA-37445; PS.SPWLA0133.00.1]

Minor Boundary Revision at Golden Gate National Recreation Area

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notification of boundary revision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The boundary of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (Park) is 
modified to include 211.7 acres of land located in in San Mateo County, 
California, immediately adjoining the Park boundary. The National Park 
Service intends to purchase the properties in fee from the Peninsula 
Open Space Trust, a non-profit land trust.

[[Page 107162]]

DATES: The effective date of this boundary revision is December 31, 
2024.

ADDRESSES: The boundary revision is depicted on Map No. 641/180428, 
dated February 14, 2024. This map is on file and available for 
inspection at the following locations: National Park Service, Land 
Resources Program, Interior Regions 8, 9, 10 and 12, 555 Battery 
Street, Suite 121, San Francisco, CA 94111, and National Park Service, 
Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Realty Officer, Truda Stella, 
National Park Service, Interior Regions 8, 9, 10 and 12, Land Resource 
Program Center, 555 Battery Street, Suite 121, San Francisco, CA 94111, 
telephone (206) 561-7978.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 16 U.S.C. 460bb-1 authorizes that, after 
advising the House Committee on Natural Resources and the Senate 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Secretary of the 
Interior may make minor revisions to the boundaries of the Park, when 
necessary, by publication of a revised drawing or other description in 
the Federal Register. The Committees have been notified of this 
boundary revision. The inclusion of these tracts in the Park boundary 
will address operational and management issues, provide preservation, 
and protect key natural resources in addition to expanding visitor 
recreational opportunities.

David Szymanski,
Regional Director, Interior Regions 8, 9, 10, and 12.
[FR Doc. 2024-31387 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
```
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 1 of 8 PageID 159
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 2 of 8 PageID 160
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 3 of 8 PageID 161
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 4 of 8 PageID 162
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 5 of 8 PageID 163
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 6 of 8 PageID 164
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 7 of 8 PageID 165
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 39 Filed 07/15/02 Page 8 of 8 PageID 166
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth Dwayne NIXON

NO. 2018-KH-2075

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
1713.

#### Warren *v.*The State.

Accusation of carrying concealed weapon, from city court of Tiftou- — -Judge Eve. January 23, 1909.

Submitted March 10,- —

Decided March 23, 1909.

*J. B. Murrow, J. J■ Murray,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. J. Wallace, solicitor,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

1. Ordinarily, to conceal a pistol in a sack •which is carried under the arm is a violation of section 341 of the Penal Code, which forbids carrying, about the person, a weapon concealed. *Boles*v. *State,*86 *Ga.*255 (12 S. E. 361).

2. Evidence obtained by the illegal seizure and search of a defendant’s person, which compels him to incriminate himself, is inadmissible against him. But incriminating facts discovered by another from an illegal search of the property or premises of the defendant are admissible against him. *Hughes*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*29 (58 S. E. 390); *Glover*v. *State,*4 *Ga. App.*455 (61 S. E. 862); *Croy*v. *State,*Id. 456 (61 S. E. 848); *Rogers*v. *State,*Id. 691 (62 S. E. 96); *Williams*v. *State,*100 *Ga.*511 (28 S. E. 624, 39 L. R. A. 269); *Duren*v. *Thomasville,*125 *Ga.*1 (53 S.E. 814).

3. It follows from the foregoing headnote that the court properly refused to charge the jury, “If you find, from the evidence, that the defendant was illegally arrested, and while under illegal restraint his person or property was searched and the evidence was obtained, then you would not be authorized to find him guilty.” This is not the law as applicable to facts discovered by search of a defendant’s property.

4. Where the accused was illegally arrested and his person searched, and no weapon was found thereon, but a pistol was subsequently found concealed in a sack which he had under his arm when arrested, and which, prior to the search of his person, he had voluntarily given to another to keep for him, evidence of this fact was admissible against him.

5. No error appears, and the evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract                               ( print page 689)                            1107 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-882, K2025-883.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31689 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Casino & Entertainment PropertiesLLC (the “Registrant”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisReport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe Registrant and have:          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and          c) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:                                                      /s/ DENISE BARTON    Denise Barton    *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial**Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of**American Casino & Entertainment**Properties LLC*   Date:November 9, 2007
23
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORTH WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: § Case 24-40747

§

ROBERT WYATT CONTRACTING LLC §

§

§

DEBTOR § Chapter 11

WITHDRAWAL OF CLAIM

TO: CLERK OF THE COURT

The Texas Workforce Commission hereby withdraws its Proof of Claim No. 28-1 in the 

amount of $781.42, dated 05/29/2024, which was filed with the Court 05/29/2024 for Texas 

Workforce Commission Account No. XX-XXX385-0.

Respectfully submitted, this 17

th day of September 2024.

 By: /s/ Ramon Narvaez-Colon______

 Account Examiner 

 Texas Workforce Commission

Case 24-40747-elm11 Doc 186 Filed 09/17/24 Entered 09/17/24 09:01:42 Desc

Main Document Page 1 of 1
# C_2022294EN.01000702.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln — Germany) — ACC Silicones Ltd v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern

(Case C-572/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Dividends from ‘free-float’ shares - Reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid by a non-resident company - Conditions - Free movement of capital - Principle of proportionality)

(2022/C 294/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ACC Silicones Ltd

Defendant: Bundeszentralamt für Steuern

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a provision of a Member State’s tax legislation which makes the reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid on dividends from shareholdings below the thresholds laid down by Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States, as amended by Council Directive 2003/123/EC of 22 December 2003, received by a company established in another Member State subject to proof that that tax cannot be set off or its set-off carried forward in favour of that company, or in favour of its direct or indirect shareholders, nor deducted by that company as work-related outgoings or an operating cost, whereas such a condition is not provided for as regards reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid by a resident company receiving the same type of income.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Patrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jim McDevitt,
      the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best
      of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                November 19, 2007By:
            /s/
                Patrick C. ShuttName: Patrick
                C. Shutt
              Title: Chief
                Executive Officer





By:
            /s/
                Jim McDevittName: Jim
                McDevitt
              Title: Chief
                Financial and Accounting Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.




Created
      by 10KWizard     www.10KWizard.com Source:
      CAPITAL GROWTH SYSTE, 10QSB, November 13, 2007
1 The re cord be fore the C ourt reflec ts that the p etitioner did no t timely file the no tice of app eal. Pursuant to T.R. A.P. 4(a), however, we have de cided to waive the ti mely fil ing in t his case.



# FILED January 26, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON JANUA RY 1998 SESSION ROBERT J. DYER, JR ., ) ) Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9612-CC-00443 ) vs. ) HENDERSON COUNTY ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) No. 95-066 ) Respondent. )
O R D E R This case represents an appeal from the dismissal of the petitioner’s second petition for post-conv iction relief. The petitioner was originally

convicted of firstdegree murder, child ki dnapping, forgery, pass ing forged paper and two counts of passing bad checks. This C ourt affirmed the convictions i n 1992, and the petitioner apparently did not seek an ap peal to the Supreme Court. The petitioner thereafter filed his first petition for post-conviction relief in 1992 . After the appointment of counsel and an evidentiary heari ng, the trial court deni ed relief. On appeal, this Cou rt affirmed the denial of the trial court, Robert June Dyer, Jr . v. State , No. 02C01-9207-CC-00161 (Tenn. Crim. App., April 7, 1993), and the Supreme Court denie d permission to appeal on August 2, 1993.

In the present petition, w hich was filed on May

23, 1995, the petitioner alleges that the trial court denied the petitioner a full and fair hearing on his first postconviction petition. The p ost-conviction court

dismissed the petition w ithout a hearing stating that the petitioner failed to raise a colorable claim for which post-c

onviction relief can be granted. 1

T.C.A. § 40-30-202(c) prov ides that no more than one petition for post-2

conviction relief may be filed attacking a sing le judgment, and mandates that the tr ial court shall summarily

dismiss any second or s ubsequent petition if a prior petition was filed and resolved on the meri ts by a court of competent jur isdiction. Since the petitioner previously

filed a petition that was r esolved on the merits by the trial court and by this Court on appeal, the petitioner's second petition was properly dismissed. Additionally, after reviewing the entire record on appeal, we find that the petitioner’s claim does not fall withi n one of the limited circumstances under which a prior petition may be re-opened. See T.C.A. § 40-30-217.

We conclude, therefore, that the trial court d id not err in dismissi ng the petitioner’s second petiti on for post-conviction r elief. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the judgment o f the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20 , Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Enter, this the ___ day of Januar y, 1998.

___________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE CONCUR:

_______________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

_______________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUD GE

_______________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E
**Exhibit 32**

 

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

 

Section 1350 Certification

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that this report of Orient-ExpressHotels Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods presented in the report.

 

 
| /s/ Paul M. White                                                                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul M. White  President and  Chief Executive Officer(acting  Chief Financial Officer) |   |

 

 

Dated:  February 29, 2008

 

[A signed original of this written certification has been provided toOrient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd.and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.]

 

1

----
# C_2022051EN.01002901.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2021 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (triple helicoid cheese)

(Case T-662/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing triple helicoid cheese - Earlier international design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Disclosure of the earlier design - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Different overall impression - Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2022/C 51/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Muratbey Gida Sanayí ve Tícaret AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: M. Schork, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: M. J. Dairies EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: D. Dimitrova and I. Pakidanska, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 August 2020 (Case R 1925/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between M. J. Dairies and Muratbey Gida Sanayí ve Tícaret.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Muratbey Gida Sanayí ve Tícaret AŞ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Muratbey Gida Sanayí ve Tícaret AŞ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
Christopher REDDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

§

Plaintiff, §

V. § No. 3:00-cr-228-B (01)

§

JAMES NORMAN HARTMAN, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.

Defendant’s motion (Doc. No. 210) is denied.

SO ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2013.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:03-cv-00285-J Document 6 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 22
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31722]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 556 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-910, K2025-911.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31722 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Robert SCHMIDT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.