alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Holding Company("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2005, herebycertify as follows:

|          |                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|          |                                                                                                                                     |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations for Nalco. |

|        |  |                                                                                          |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
|   |  | /s/WILLIAM H. JOYCE                                                                      |
|   |  | William H. JoyceChairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 12,2005                |
|   |  | /s/BRADLEY J. BELL                                                                       |
|   |  | Bradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date:August 12, 2005 |
|        |

----
Greta Jameth MCDONALD v. SOUTHERN HAULERS, LLC

2160384

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 4:03-cv-00422-A Document 18 Filed 03/17/04 Page 1 of 1 PageID 122
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 696-697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31717]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract

[[Page 697]]

1155 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-940, K2025-941.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31717 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
A.N.S. v. P.C.N.

2160792

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Jefferson Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 1 of 37 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 2 of 37 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 3 of 37 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 4 of 37 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 5 of 37 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 6 of 37 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 7 of 37 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 8 of 37 PageID 8
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 9 of 37 PageID 9
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 10 of 37 PageID 10
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 11 of 37 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 12 of 37 PageID 12
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 13 of 37 PageID 13
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 14 of 37 PageID 14
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 15 of 37 PageID 15
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 16 of 37 PageID 16
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 17 of 37 PageID 17
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 18 of 37 PageID 18
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 19 of 37 PageID 19
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 20 of 37 PageID 20
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 21 of 37 PageID 21
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 22 of 37 PageID 22
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 23 of 37 PageID 23
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 24 of 37 PageID 24
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 25 of 37 PageID 25
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 26 of 37 PageID 26
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 27 of 37 PageID 27
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 28 of 37 PageID 28
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 29 of 37 PageID 29
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 30 of 37 PageID 30
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 31 of 37 PageID 31
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 32 of 37 PageID 32
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 33 of 37 PageID 33
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 34 of 37 PageID 34
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 35 of 37 PageID 35
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 36 of 37 PageID 36
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 1 Filed 09/30/03 Page 37 of 37 PageID 37
Roderick Maurice DUNSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2830

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 18, 2019

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


         DATED: JANUARY 24, 2005                      /S/ JEFFREY M. SMUDA
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      JEFFREY M. SMUDA
                                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas A. Michels                                  
|Douglas A. Michels President and Chief Executive Officer

March 15, 2010
# C_2021310EN.01003301.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/33

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT10)

(Case T-558/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT10 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)

(2021/C 310/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2020 (Case R 2554/2019 4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2020 (Case R 2554/2019-4) is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2020 (Case R 2554/2019-4) is annulled.

| 2. | EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31718]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1156 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-941, K2025-942.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31718 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2021242EN.01003901.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — France Agro v EUIPO — Chafay (Choumicha Saveurs)

(Case T-311/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Choumicha Saveurs - Absolute ground for refusal - Bad faith - Declaration of invalidity - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 242/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: France Agro (Avignon, France) (represented by: C. de Haas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A Folliard-Monguiral and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Choumicha Chafay (Casablanca, Morocco) (represented by: B. Lafont, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2020 (Case R 1621/2019-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Ms Chafay and France Agro.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders France Agro to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders France Agro to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
#### Otto Hanson, Appellant, v. Carl Lundberg and Hilda Lundberg, His Wife, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 7, 1927.

*Nisle*and *Yocelle,*for Appellant;

*Alto Adams,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

—

The decree in this case should be affirmed upon the authority of the opinions in the cases of Murphy v. Horne, 73 Fla. 803, 74 Sou. 973; and Hutchinson v. Stone, 79 Fla. 157, 84 Sou. 151, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 60 Filed 03/04/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 872
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 60 Filed 03/04/05 Page 2 of 5 PageID 873
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 60 Filed 03/04/05 Page 3 of 5 PageID 874
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 60 Filed 03/04/05 Page 4 of 5 PageID 875
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 60 Filed 03/04/05 Page 5 of 5 PageID 876
Federal Aviation 

Administration

Memorandum

Date: March 29, 2021 

To: All AME’s, IMS’s, RFS’s, AMCD, AAM-200 

From: Penny M. Giovanetti, D.O. Director, Medical Specialties Division, 

AAM-200 

Subject: Yellow Fever Vaccine

Background: We have been advised that the U.S stock of YF-VAX is depleted. Certain 

areas into which U.S. carriers fly require Yellow Fever vaccination. Stamaril has been 

made available in the U.S. as an investigational new drug although it has been in use in 

other countries since 1986, and was previously authorized in the U.S. during times of YFVAX depletion. The two vaccines are manufactured by the same company and have 

similar dosing, protection duration, safety, and efficacy. 

Policy: Effective immediately, Stamaril may be used by FAA certificated aircrew and air 

traffic controllers for Yellow Fever immunization. There is no mandatory no-fly time 

following vaccination. As always 14 CFR 61.53 applies and airmen should not fly if they 

are experiencing significant side effects.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-7080-C-64]

# AGENCY:

Office of Policy Development and Research, Chief Data Officer, HUD.

      ( print page 1537)    

# ACTION:

Notice, correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        HUD is publishing this notice to correct the heading on the notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 26, 2024. The heading should read 30-day Notice of Proposed Information Collection.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anna Guido, Clearance Officer, REE, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; email                         *Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov,*                         telephone 202-402-5534. This is not a toll-free number. HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit                         *https://www.fcc.gov/​consumers/​guides/​telecommunications-relay-service-trs.*

Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    HUD published an information collection notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 89 FR 105064 entitled “Indian Community Development Block Grant Information Collection”. This notice corrects the heading to read “30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection.                

Nacheshia Foxx,

Federal Register Liaison, Office of General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2025-00217 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiary Name                                    Jurisdiction of Incorporation
---------------                                    -----------------------------

Silverline Technologies, Inc.                      State of Delaware

Silverline Technologies U.K. Limited(1)            United Kingdom

Silverline Technologies (Canada), Inc.(1)          Canada

SeraNova, Inc.                                     New Jersey

SeraNova India Pvt Ltd.                            India

Sky Capital International Ltd.                     Hong Kong

CIT Canada Inc.(1)                                 Canada

CIT Egypt Inc. (1)                                 Egypt

EComServer Inc.                                    United States

-------------------------------------------------------
  (1)  A subsidiary of Silverline Technologies, Inc.
#### W. M. Thomas, Jr., and Sam J. Harrison, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. George Crist, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 9, 1928.

*Upchurch & Stephens*and *MacWilliams & Perry,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*David R. Dunham,*forDefendant in Error.

Per Curiam.'

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 1 of 14 PageID 74
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 2 of 14 PageID 75
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 3 of 14 PageID 76
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 4 of 14 PageID 77
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 5 of 14 PageID 78
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 6 of 14 PageID 79
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 7 of 14 PageID 80
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 8 of 14 PageID 81
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 9 of 14 PageID 82
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 10 of 14 PageID 83
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 11 of 14 PageID 84
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 12 of 14 PageID 85
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 13 of 14 PageID 86
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01905-N Document 19 Filed 04/11/05 Page 14 of 14 PageID 87
### The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** May 18, 2015
N o. 04

- 15

- 00224

- CR Julio Alejandro ZUNIGA , Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR0936

- W1 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
ORDER
On October 14, 2014 , the trial court imposed on Julio Zuniga in open court a sentence of fifteen years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

— Institutional Division

. On April 9, 2015 , A ppellant filed a notice of appeal with the trial court, but neither A ppellant nor the trial court clerk timely filed a notice of appeal , docketing statement, certification of defendant’s right of appeal, clerk’s record, or reporter’s record with this court . On April 17, 2015 , A ppellant filed a notice of appeal and docketing statement with this court. On May 1, 2015, Appellant filed a motion to consolidate cause number 04

- 15

- 00224

- CR and 04

- 15

- 00245

- CR. Therefore, we ORDER A ppellant to SHOW CAUSE in writi ng within ten days of the date of this order why either of these appeal s should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If A ppellant fails to show cause within the time provided , the appeal s will be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 4 3.2(f)

. All other appellate deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court