alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021310EN.01002501.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)

(Case T-368/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS - Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 310/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Smiley Miley, Inc. (Nashville, Tennessee, United States) (represented by: J.B. Devaureix, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cyrus Trademarks Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Trademarks and Smiley Miley.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0345

_________________

JAYLENE CECELIA PHILLIPS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 v.

LEONIE CANDICE WEBB,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Yvonne Laird, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 4 2023

01/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0345
# C_2016287EN.01002302.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/23

---

Action brought on 17 May 2016 — Cleversafe v EUIPO (Storage Beyond Scale)

(Case T-253/16)

(2016/C 287/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cleversafe, Inc. (Chicago, Illinois, États-Unis d'Amérique) (represented by: A. Lingenfelser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Storage Beyond Scale’ — Application for registration No 13 975 446

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2016 in Case R 2240/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | The words composing the trade mark are not limited to a laudatory meaning as proposed by the Examiner. |
| --- | --- |

—

The words composing the trade mark are not limited to a laudatory meaning as proposed by the Examiner.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 874 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 874

  Honoring the Southeast Region Little League baseball team from Lake 
   Mary, Florida, for winning the 2024 Little League Baseball World 
                                Series.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

   Mr. Rubio (for Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio)) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the Southeast Region Little League baseball team from Lake 
   Mary, Florida, for winning the 2024 Little League Baseball World 
                                Series.

Whereas, on August 25, 2024, the Southeast Region Little League baseball team 
        from Lake Mary Little League of Lake Mary, Florida, won the Little 
        League Baseball World Series;
Whereas this is the first time a Florida team has won the Little League Baseball 
        World Series in the 77-year history of the series;
Whereas the Southeast Region team achieved an undefeated record by obtaining 4 
        wins and 0 losses in the Southeast Region Tournament and 4 wins and 0 
        losses in the Little League Baseball World Series playoffs and winning 
        the championship game;
Whereas the Southeast Region team players, coaches, and managers showed 
        tremendous dedication and sportsmanship throughout the season toward the 
        goal of winning the Little League Baseball World Series Championship;
Whereas the Southeast Region team fans from Florida showed enthusiasm, support, 
        and courtesy for all of the players and coaches and the game of 
        baseball; and
Whereas, in the 77th Little League Baseball World Series championship game, the 
        Southeast Region baseball team faced the Asia-Pacific Region baseball 
        team from Kuei-Shan Little League of Taoyuan, Taiwan, and came away 
        victorious by a score of 2-1 in extra innings after a walk-off bunt: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors the Southeast Region Little League 
baseball team from Lake Mary, Florida, for winning the 2024 Little 
League Baseball World Series Championship.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022359EN.01006201.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/62

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — JF v EUCAP Somalia

(Case T-194/20) (1)

(Arbitration clause - International contract staff of EUCAP Somalia - Common Foreign and Security Policy mission - Non-renewal of employment contract following the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union - Right to be heard - Equal treatment - Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality - Transition period provided for in the agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Action for annulment - Action for damages - Acts inseparable from the contract - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 359/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JF (represented by: A. Kunst, lawyer)

Defendant: EUCAP Somalia (represented by: E. Raoult, lawyer)

Re:

By his action, the applicant, seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of EUCAP Somalia’s note of 18 January 2020 and the letter of 29 January 2020 by which it decided not to renew his contract of employment and, secondly, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the damage he suffered as a result of those acts, and, in the alternative, on the basis of Article 272 TFEU, that the contested acts be declared unlawful and compensation for the damage he suffered as a result of those acts.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders JF to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JF to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 10 Filed 10/20/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID 67
Case 3:03-cv-02249-P Document 10 Filed 10/20/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID 68
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-12-00203-CR

RANDOLPH BOWDEN, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 202nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-F-920-202

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Randolph Bowden has filed pro se a notice of appeal from his conviction of deadly 

conduct. On our review of the clerk’s record, we noted that the trial court’s certification of right 

of appeal stated that this was a plea agreement case and that Bowden has no right of appeal.

Unless a certification showing that a defendant has the right of appeal is in the record, we 

must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows Bowden has no right of appeal 

and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. 

State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 20, 2012

Date Decided: December 21, 2012

Do Not Publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00052]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1226 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1035, K2025-1034.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00052 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



1.  Practice Expert Services Corp. was incorporated in the State of California.

2.  Healthcare Administrative Management Corporation was incorporated in the
    State of California.

3.  Healthcare Billing Solutions was incorporated in the State of Montana.

4.  K.R. Johnson & Associates, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Idaho.

5.  National Health Care Management Services, Inc. was incorporated in the State
    of West Virginia.

6.  Physician Informatics, Inc., t/a PracticeOne, was incorporated in the State
    of Virginia.

7.  PracticeXpert of Idaho was incorporated in the State of Idaho.

8.  Practice Expert of Oklahoma, Inc. was incorporated in the State of
    Okalahoma.
Our efforts enable families in distress to 

keep their homes or avoid foreclosure.

more than

1.6M

loan workouts

since 2009

more 

than

1.3M

home

retention

solutions

more than

373,000

foreclosure

alternatives

SDQ loans are those on which homeowners 

are 90+ days past due in making mortgage 

payments or that are in the foreclosure process. 

The share of single-family loans we hold or 

guarantee that are seriously delinquent (SDQ) 

has declined 18 consecutive quarters. 

1Q

’10

1Q

’11

1Q

’12

1Q

’13

1Q

’14

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

SDQ RATE

2Q

’14

3Q

’14

(Substantially lower than

private market levels)

1.96%

as of 9/30/14

5.47%

as of 3/31/10

mortgage

refinancings

13.0

million

home

purchases

4.3 $4.3 Trillion million

rental units

2.5

million

This financing has enabled:

in liquidity to the mortgage market

Since 2009,

we have provided more than:

The country invested

$116.1 billion

in Fannie Mae 

from 2009 to 2012

Fannie Mae expects 

to have paid Treasury 

approximately

$134.5 billion

in dividends as 

of Dec. 31, 2014

FANNIE MAE

Dividends do not offset prior draws.

STRONG PROFITABLE+$

“NEW” BOOK

Loans acquired since 2009, with 

stronger standards, make up a 

growing share of our overall book.

“LEGACY” BOOK

Loans acquired 

pre-2009

SINGLE-FAMILY

BOOK OF BUSINESS

20%

80%

Since Fannie Mae entered 

conservatorship, we have helped to 

stabilize America’s housing market 

and made significant progress in 

supporting the recovery and helping 

to build a sustainable housing finance 

system for the future. We are helping 

homeowners in distress and enabling 

families to buy, refinance, or rent 

homes.

Since 2009, we’ve improved our 

performance and we’re making a difference in people’s lives.

Fannie Mae is making progress.

For more information, see our 2014 Third Quarter Form 10-Q,

filed with the SEC on November 6, 2014.

Data as of or through September 30, 2014, unless otherwise indicated.

Published November 6, 2014.

We enable families to buy, refinance, or rent homes.

We’re strengthening our book of business

and changing the industry.

We work with lenders 

to offer access to affordable 

mortgage credit.

Our third quarter results 

were strong.

We help homeowners 

who are facing hardship.

Our profits go back to

the American people.

$4.0 BILLION 

Comprehensive 

Net income income

$3.9 BILLION 

In Q3 2014 

we reported:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1192 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-987, K2025-986.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31747 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Madonna WHITTAKER, Appellant, v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor by merger to RBC Bank (USA), f/k/a RBC Centura Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Allen Daniel Holland, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-2916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 11, 2019

Madonna H. Whittaker, Windermere, pro se.

Sean K. Mills, of O'Kelley and Sorohan, Attorneys at Law, LLC, Maitland, for Appellee PNC Bank, National Association, as Successor by Merger to RBC Bank (USA), F/K/A RBC Centura Bank.

No Appearance for other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Madonna Whittaker, appeals the amended final judgment of foreclosure and the order denying her "Objection to Nonservice, Foreclosure Sale, etc.; and Motion to Strike, Quash and Vacate." Appellee, PNC Bank, N.A., concedes that the lower court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants Tenant I (who is Appellant), Tenant II, and Unknown Spouse of Allen Daniel Holland, because Appellee did not obtain personal service of process for the subject foreclosure action on those defendants. Accordingly, this Court reverses the final judgment and remands this cause to the trial court to enter an amended final judgment of foreclosure that does not include Appellant/Tenant I, Tenant II, and Unknown Spouse of Allen Daniel Holland as defendants or judgment debtors. The amended final judgment shall be effectively dated nunc pro tunc May 31, 2018. Appellee at its expense shall promptly cause to be recorded in the public land records of Orange County, Florida, and in every other county in which a judgment in this case was filed or recorded, certified copies of: (1) this opinion, (2) the mandate that will issue in this case, and (3) the amended final judgment called for herein.

Appellant lacks standing to assert any arguments on behalf of Allen Daniel Holland, and Appellee has not conceded error regarding obtaining judgment against Mr. Holland. Appellant's motion for attorney's fees is denied as there is no basis in law to grant same. Appellant's motion to tax her appellate costs is denied without prejudice for her to timely file a motion to tax appellate costs in the circuit court pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LAMBERT, EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020348EN.01000901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/9 |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg KG, represented by Peek & Cloppenburg Düsseldorf Komplementär B.V. v Peek & Cloppenburg KG, represented by Van Graaf Management GmbH

(Case C-371/20)

(2020/C 348/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, represented by the personally liable partner Peek & Cloppenburg Düsseldorf Komplementär B.V.

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, represented by the personally liable partner Van Graaf Management GmbH

Questions referred

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | Is there a ‘payment’ for product promotion within the meaning of the first sentence of point 11 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020348EN.01000901-E0001) only in the case where monetary consideration is provided for the use of editorial content in the media to promote a product, or does the term ‘payment’ cover every kind of consideration, irrespective of whether this consists of money, goods, services or assets of any other kind? |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | Does the first sentence of point 11 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC presuppose that the trader provides the media operator with a non-cash benefit as consideration for the use of editorial content and, if so, must such consideration also be assumed to be present in the case where the media operator reports on an advertisement organised in conjunction with a trader, where that trader has made image rights available to the media operator for the purposes of that report, both undertakings have contributed towards the costs and effort associated with that advertisement and the advertisement serves to promote sales of the products of both undertakings? |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020348EN.01000901-E0001)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive) ([OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2005_149_R_TOC)).

---
EX PARTE Anthony Wayne MCCAA

CR-16-1137

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
# C_2022244EN.01002701.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Planistat Europe and Charlot v Commission

(Case T-735/20) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - ‘Eurostat’ case - External investigation by OLAF - Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation - Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation - National criminal proceedings - Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final - No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

(2022/C 244/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Planistat Europe (Paris, France), Hervé-Patrick Charlot (Paris) (represented by: F. Martin Laprade, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Blanc, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 268 TFEU, the applicants seek compensation, first, for the non-material damage that Mr Charlot allegedly suffered as a result of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) having forwarded to the national authorities information relating to matters liable to be characterised as criminal, as well as of the complaint filed by the Commission with those authorities, and, secondly, for the material damage that they allegedly suffered as a result of the termination of contracts concluded between Planistat and the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Planistat Europe and Mr Hervé-Patrick Charlot to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Planistat Europe and Mr Hervé-Patrick Charlot to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---