alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 2016
E&E Findings and Recommendations (1)

 Environmental assessment tools developed as part of 

E&E RE&D program:

 Enabled ICAO to adopt CO2 emission standard per plan

 Demonstrated US’s global leadership in ICAO 

environmental agenda

 Validated the five pillar strategy (including tools and 

policy) adopted for the E&E RE&D program

 nvPM standard in development – recommend 

commitment of resources and leveraging opportunities 

to build necessary database and analyses to lead 

standard development
E&E Findings and Recommendations (2)

 Intra-agency and Inter-agency collaboration in 

defining and executing the E&E RE&D portfolio is 

achieving robust results.

 Recommend continued collaboration

 Develop joint work plans to achieve greater benefits 

from collaboration

 CLEEN program matured technologies for product 

insertion opportunities in the near term

 Recommend continued commitment; high value due to 

greater than 1:1 cost share

 Maintain well balanced CLEEN-II portfolio
E&E Findings and Recommendations (3)

 Research tasks defined in Noise roadmap 

implemented (sleep disturbance, annoyance, health) 

and making good progress

 Critical for:

 Understanding noise impact on communities and developing 

objective measures

 Identifying significant shifts in public perception / acceptance

 Examining policies in light of new understanding

 Recommend continued support and collaborative 

analyses of data
E&E Findings and Recommendations (4)

 Environmental impact of UAS will be a growing issue

 Recommend development of plan to assess and 

understand the impact – especially noise

 Evaluate applicability of current tools

 Explore collaborative opportunities to acquire data and 

develop assessment models

 Determine need for policy changes based on data
A.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0072

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020247EN.01000502.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 27 February 2020 — Regione Puglia v Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare and Others

(Case C-110/20)

(2020/C 247/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Regione Puglia

Defendant: Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero dei beni e delle attività culturali e del turismo, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Commissione tecnica di verifica dell’impatto ambientale

Question referred

Is Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 (1) to be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that described which on the one hand recommends, for the purpose of issuing a hydrocarbons exploration permit, an area of a specified extent, granted for a specific period of time — in the present case, an area of 750 square kilometres for six years — and on the other hand allows those limits to be exceeded by the issue of multiple exploration permits for adjacent areas to the same legal entity, provided that they are issued following separate administrative procedures?

---

(1)  Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (OJ 1994 L 164, p. 3).

---
HB: 4887-7484-1762.2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

---------------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: § Case No. 23-42469-mxm11 

 § 

BELA FLOR NURSERIES, INC., et al. 1, § Chapter 11 

 § 

 Debtors. § (Jointly Administered) 

---------------------------------------------------------------x 

ORDER DENYING 

DEBTORS’ SECOND EMERGENCY MOTION UNDER BANKRUPTCY CODE 

§ 1121(d) FOR EXTENSION OF DEBTORS’ EXCLUSIVITY PERIOD

The Court has considered the Debtors' Second Emergency Motion Under Bankruptcy Code 

§ 1121(d) for Extension of Debtors' Exclusivity Period (the “Motion”)2

 (Dkt. No. 359), filed by 

Bela Flor Nurseries, Inc. (“Bela Flor”), CHIC Holdings, LLC (“CHIC”), MFAF Holdings, LLC 

(“MFAF”), and SMB Holdings, Inc. (“SMB”), as debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectively, 

the “Debtors”), and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief requested 

1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification 

number, are Bela Flor Nurseries, Inc. (9030), CHIC Holdings, LLC (8235), MFAF Holdings, Inc. (3033), and SMB 

Holdings, LLC (8149). The Debtors’ mailing address is 7494 State Highway 42 S, Henderson TX 75654. 2 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Order shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Motion.

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Signed March 20, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

____________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 23-42469-mxm11 Doc 419 Filed 03/20/24 Entered 03/20/24 10:48:58 Desc

Main Document Page 1 of 2
HB: 4887-7484-1762.2

therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the Order of Reference of Bankruptcy Cases 

and Proceedings Nunc Pro Tunc, Miscellaneous Rule No. 33 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 1984), and upon 

all of the proceedings had before the Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause 

appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Motion is DENIED. 

### END OF ORDER ### 

Submitted By: 

Buffey E. Klein

State Bar No. 24032515 

Buffey.Klein@huschblackwell.com 

HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP 

19000 N Pearl Street, Suite 1800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 999-6100; fax (214) 999-6170 

Lauren Hayes 

Texas Bar No. 24081961 

Lauren.Hayes@huschblackwell.com 

Amber Fly 

State Bar No. 24101761 

Amber.Fly@huschblackwell.com 

HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP 

111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 

Austin, Texas 78701 

(512) 472-5458; fax (512) 479-1101 

Attorneys for the Debtors and 

Debtors-in-Possession

Case 23-42469-mxm11 Doc 419 Filed 03/20/24 Entered 03/20/24 10:48:58 Desc

Main Document Page 2 of 2
DeForest KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-909

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021310EN.01001001.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Nysie (Poland) lodged on 21 December 2020 — Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (CJIB) v AP

(Case C-699/20)

(2021/C 310/12)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Nysie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (CJIB)

Defendant: AP

By order of 8 June 2021, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Nysie, II Wydział Karny (District Court, Nysa, 2nd Criminal Division) (Poland) to be manifestly inadmissible.

---
Hector FLORES, Appellant, v. ALAN MARSHALL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a Florida for Profit Corporation, Alan H. Marshall, and Aparna Sriram a/k/a Aparna Spiram a/k/a Aparna Srirna, Appellees.

No. 4D18-863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael Tyson LEE v. STATE

CR-16-0703

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ORDER - Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSH WHITAKER, MONIQUE §

JANNETTE and LESLIE GREER, §

§

Plaintiffs, § CIVIL ACTION NO.

§

v. § 3:03-CV-0411-P

§

WEST VILLAGE LIMITED § CLASS ACTION

PARTNERSHIP and PPC/IMA §

INTOWN VILLAGE LIMITED §

PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., §

§

Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs. §

_______________________________________________________________________

PATRICIA SAPP, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. §

§ 3:06-CV-1018-P

CWS APARTMENT HOMES, L.L.C., §

ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Came on for consideration the Eighth Supplemental Joint Status Report of the Parties

regarding the progress on settlement or the result of mediation. The Court hereby directs

the Parties to mediate this case within the next thirty (30) days. If the Parties cannot agree

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 297 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2853
ORDER - Page 2

on a mediator, they must notify the Court, which will assign a mediator to the case. The

Court hereby grants the Parties an additional thirty (30) days from this date to resolve this

dispute.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the parties are

hereby instructed to submit a supplementation to their Eighth Supplemental Joint Status

Report to the Court on or before April 9, 2010.

SIGNED this the 10 day of March 2010. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 297 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2854
Iris Nell Spinks JOURDAN, Robin Rene Jourdan and Misty Michelle Jourdan Appe v. ALLMERICA FINANCIAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2018-C-2086

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
BTXN 210 (rev. 04/10)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Zaks Stores, Inc. Case No.: 94−30986−hdh7

 Chapter No.: 7

Debtor(s)

ORDER DENYING PAYMENT OF A DIVIDEND FROM UNCLAIMED FUNDS

 The Court finds that Coe & Dru, Inc. filed an Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds on 11/3/2010 in the

amount of $1,452.25.

 The Court, after review of the application, finds:

no documents of proof are provided with the application

insufficient documentation has been provided with the application

no funds are on record for the claimant

the application was not served on the US Attorney

Other: no identification credentials provided; no statement of the signing

agents authority

 It is therefore ORDERED that the Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds is denied without prejudice.

# # # End of Order # # #

Signed December 15, 2010

 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 ENTERED

TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK

 THE DATE OF ENTRY IS

 ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge
Emerging issues/Future opportunities

1. **4G LTE Mobile Broadband**: Emerging WiFi broadband technology for data radios will increase Internet Protocol-based bandwidth on the order of 20 times from current technology.  The commercial deployment of this advancement will occur over the next two years and mature over the next ten, enabling new operating concepts to be deployed in many forms including applications on mobile, EFB-classes, and panel mounted devices in the cockpit.  The decision-sharing relationship between the flight deck, the FOC and the ANSP can be reshaped through this technology.  FAA awareness of this advancement will be vital to the R&D required to support appropriate management of safety and security of advancements made possible through this technology.

2. **Big Data for ATM**:  Applications of big data for operational problem solving, system optimization, and disruption management in non-aviation fields have been maturing over recent years.  As the use of big data in aviation develop, FAA R&D into the means by which the FAA data relevant to NAS operations can be best integrated and made available to airspace users and managers.

3. **Portables and Wear-ables in the Cockpit**:  Moore’s Law on computing power and Gilder’s Law on bandwidth continue to play out in ways affecting the functionality, power, weight, and form factors affecting avionics systems.  The development of even more advanced portable devices, including “wear-ables” is plausible next step in the user interfaces made possible for the cockpit and perhaps FOC and airspace managers.  The implementation of low-power Bluetooth systems for system management and control may become relevant to the implementation of such capabilities.  The FAA R&D into the human factors, certification, security, and operational approvals supporting these advancements will be relevant to the pace of advancement of these concepts in the marketplace.

140804 Holmes TaskStatement-REDAC-2014.docx

July 29, 2014
EX PARTE Larry BUTLER

CR-16-0676

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
# C_2020209EN.01001901.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/19

---

Action brought on 23 April 2020 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-169/20)

(2020/C 209/26)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and C. Perrin, Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, in not applying depreciation to the environmental component when calculating the value applicable to used vehicles imported into Portuguese territory, purchased in other Member States, in the calculation of registration tax, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 110 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, in not applying depreciation to the environmental component when calculating the value applicable to used vehicles imported into Portuguese territory, purchased in other Member States, in the calculation of registration tax, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 110 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Portuguese legislation at issue provides for discrimination between the taxation of imported vehicles and the taxation imposed on similar national vehicles. The detailed rules and method of calculation in force almost always result in imported vehicles being taxed more heavily.

That situation is all the more worrying, since it is contrary to the settled case-law of the Court of Justice: the Portuguese legislation on the calculation of the tax applicable to used vehicles purchased in other Member States has already been the subject of previous infringement proceedings and various judgments of the Court of Justice.

The Portuguese legislation does not ensure that the used vehicles imported from other Member States are taxed in an amount not exceeding the tax reflected in similar used national vehicles. This may be explained by the fact that, as a result of the amendment of the legislation in 2016, depreciation is not applied to the environmental component used to calculate the value of a used vehicle.

Accordingly, the depreciation table enacted by the national legislation does not result in a reasonable approximation of the actual value of the used imported vehicle. Consequently, the amount paid to register a used imported vehicle exceeds the amount for a similar used vehicle already registered in Portugal, which constitutes an infringement of Article 110 TFEU and the case-law of the Court of Justice.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SOUTHERN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and VICTOR A. GARCIA, ET AL.,

Appellees.

No. 4D15-786

[November 18, 2015]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Eli Breger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2012CA004804XXXXMB.

Anthony A. Arsali, Lantana, for appellant.

David F. Knobel and Jeremy W. Harris of Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock 

& Kennedy, CHTD, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Arsali v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, 38 Fla. L. Weekly 

S562 (Fla. July 11, 2013).

GROSS, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Table 2.6
A98A0480.

#### FOWLER et al. v. CITY OF MARIETTA.

(522 SE2d 711)

Decided September 21, 1999.

*Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, John H. Moore, J. Kevin Moore,*for appellants.

*Haynie & Litchfield, Douglas R. Haynie,*for appellee.

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

In *City of Marietta v. Edwards,*271 Ga. 349 (519 SE2d 217) (1999), the Supreme Court reversed Division 1 of this Court’s opinion in *Fowler v. City of Marietta,*233 Ga. App. 622 (504 SE2d 726) (1998). Therefore, we vacate that Division of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson, C. J., McMurray, R J., Andrews, P. J., Smith, Eldridge and Ellington, JJ, concur.*
# C_2023304EN.01002001.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Net Technologies Finland v REA

(Case T-358/20) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Personnel costs - Reimbursement of sums paid - Eligibility of costs relating to in-house consultants - Burden of proof)

(2023/C 304/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Net Technologies Finland Oy, (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Research Executive Agency (REA), (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by M. Le Berre, lawyer,)

Re:

By its action based on Article 272 TFEU, the applicant seeks a declaration that, first, the costs for in-house consultants are eligible and, secondly, that the claim for reimbursement of the amounts of EUR 171 342,97 and EUR 17 134,30 in respect of an unjustified contribution and liquidated damages, respectively, is unfounded.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the costs for internal consultants, rejected by the Research Executive Agency (REA) in the amount of EUR 184 642,84, constitute eligible costs under the grant agreement, bearing the reference FP7SEC2012312484, concluded with a view to carrying out the project ‘Inter System Interoperability for Tetra — TetraPol Networks’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the costs for internal consultants, rejected by the Research Executive Agency (REA) in the amount of EUR 184 642,84, constitute eligible costs under the grant agreement, bearing the reference FP7SEC2012312484, concluded with a view to carrying out the project ‘Inter System Interoperability for Tetra — TetraPol Networks’;

| 2. | Declares that debit notes No 3242005825 concerning the recovery of the sum of EUR 171 342,97 in respect of an unjustified contribution and EUR 17 134,30 in respect of liquidated damages, issued by the REA are unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that debit notes No 3242005825 concerning the recovery of the sum of EUR 171 342,97 in respect of an unjustified contribution and EUR 17 134,30 in respect of liquidated damages, issued by the REA are unfounded;

| 3. | Orders the REA to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the REA to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31433]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2610-012]

Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment; Northern 
States Power Company

    On December 30, 2022, Northern States Power Company filed a 
relicense application for the 1.5-megawatt Saxon Falls Hydroelectric 
Project No. 2610. The project is located on the Montreal River in 
Gogebic County, Michigan and Iron County, Wisconsin.
    In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on October 10, 
2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for 
environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the 
record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not 
anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 
Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on 
the application to relicense the project.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's 
regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating 
to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1734709041. 40 CFR 
1501.5(c)(4) (2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested 
parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and 
considered in the Commission's final licensing decision.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].
    The application will be processed according to the following 
schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission issues EA......................  December 23, 2025.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Nicholas 
Ettema by telephone at (312) 596-4447 or by email at 
[email protected].

    Dated: December 23, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31433 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```