alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
American Lorain Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Yilun Jin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2010

/s/ Yilun
JinYilun JinChief Financial Officer

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 535 

Recognizing January 30, 2024, as ‘‘Help America Vote Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing January 30, 2024, as ‘‘Help America Vote 

Day’’. 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes January 30, 2024, as ‘‘Help 

3 America Vote Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the need for, and appreciation of, 

5 the service of poll workers; 

6 (3) encourages eligible people to help American 

7 citizens to vote in the 2024 elections by serving as 

8 poll workers; and 

9 (4) encourages voters to contact or visit the 

10 website of their local election office for accurate and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 535 ATS 

1 up-to-date information on voter registration and 

2 casting a ballot. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8819
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4952
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13,668)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       103
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE of Louisiana v. Darrell HAMPTON

NO. 2018-KP-1929

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant in part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

89 FR 105048.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, January 9, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The meeting was rescheduled for Tuesday, January 14, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2025-00017 Filed 1-2-25; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
IN RE: Shannon Jay THOMAS

NO. 2019-B-0230

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent was arrested and charged with simple battery. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Shannon Jay Thomas, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25522, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, retroactive to December 20, 2018, the date of his interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LAWRENCE ) BONGIOVANNI, III, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2889 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, Nicholas Martino, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Susan D. Dunlevy and Blain A. Goff, Assistant Attorney Generals, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-43373) and Amendment No. 26 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08569), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 21, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account Q for the interests in a separate account under group flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 1st Quarter 2005 ending November 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson   
|Paul G. Anderson       
|Chief Executive Officer



January 13, 2006



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



24
Nicholas PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-468

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

Affirmed.
Robb Kachur SEBASTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Rex Alan SHERER v. Lisa Lee SHERER

2160258

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
B. Joseph GRIFFITH and Jill S. Griffith, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLINGTON CHASE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC., et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
August 2015
Findings and Recommendations

 Noise is a challenge with implementation of 

Performance Based Navigation procedures

 E&E R&D portfolio is highly leveraged

 CLEEN program is achieving maturation and 

validation of environmental technologies

 Public communication of research successes is 

important

 E&E R&D portfolio is well balanced

 Environmental impact of UAS is a watch item
Case 3:04-cv-00405-BH Document 27 Filed 08/11/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 119
Case 3:04-cv-00405-BH Document 27 Filed 08/11/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 120
Case 3:04-cv-00405-BH Document 27 Filed 08/11/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 121
Case 3:04-cv-00405-BH Document 27 Filed 08/11/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 122
# C_2021242EN.01004101.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO (GEWÜRZSOMMELIER)

(Case T-348/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark GEWÜRZSOMMELIER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Neologism)

(2021/C 242/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Freistaat Bayern (Germany) (represented by: V. Lehmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2020 (Case R 2430/2019-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign GEWÜRZSOMMELIER as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Freistaat Bayern to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Freistaat Bayern to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 26, 2013

NO. 03
- 12
- 00581
- CR

Shaurisha Jenell Steele, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E JONES, JUSTICES GO ODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED
-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court ’s judgment revoking Steele’s community supervision : IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
DECREED by the Court that the trial court’s judgment revoking Steele’s community supervision is in all things affirmed; and it app earing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this deci sion be certified below
for observance

.
NUMBER 13-12-00227-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

JOSE LUIS GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

JOANNA ANAYA, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jose Luis Garcia, appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at 

Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas. On April 16, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.5(e). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e). The Clerk directed appellant to file an 

amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of 
2

that notice. On July 9, 2012, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been 

corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not 

cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or 

corrected the defect.

An appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to 

comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified 

time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c). The Court, having considered the documents on 

file, and appellant’s failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be 

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of 

prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. See id.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

20th day of August, 2012.
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 1 of 14 PageID 31
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 2 of 14 PageID 32
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 3 of 14 PageID 33
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 4 of 14 PageID 34
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 5 of 14 PageID 35
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 6 of 14 PageID 36
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 7 of 14 PageID 37
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 8 of 14 PageID 38
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 9 of 14 PageID 39
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 10 of 14 PageID 40
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 11 of 14 PageID 41
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 12 of 14 PageID 42
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 13 of 14 PageID 43
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 5 Filed 04/14/03 Page 14 of 14 PageID 44
Heriberto RODRIGUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4057

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Larry LINDSEY

No. 2019-KH-0022

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he *1144fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DIANE A. NOYES,

Plaintiff,

VS.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security

Administration,

Defendant.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:03-CV-0535-G

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this

case, the court finds that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the

United States Magistrate are correct and they are adopted as the findings and

conclusions of the court. Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner is

AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

May 6, 2005.

 

 Case 3:03-cv-00535-G Document 26 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 95
# C_2022432EN.01002102.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — PB v Commission

(Case T-775/20) (1)

(Public supply contracts - Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council and the Ukrainian authorities - Irregularities in the procedure for awarding contracts - Recovery of amounts unduly paid - Debit note - Director of the company - Legal basis - Non-contractual liability)

(2022/C 432/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PB (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by E. Rebasti and I. Demoulin, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action, the applicant seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 7151 final of 22 October 2020 concerning the application of an administrative measure against the director of the company [Confidential], withdrawing the amounts unduly received under the contract with reference number TACIS/2006/101-510 and the contract with reference number CARDS/2008/166-429, and, second, under the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU, repayment of any amounts recovered by the European Commission on the basis of that decision together with the payment of EUR 10 000 in damages, subject to completion of the proceedings.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 7151 final of 22 October 2020 concerning the application of an administrative measure against the director of the company [Confidential], withdrawing the amounts unduly received under the TACIS/2006/101-510 and CARDS/2008/166-429 contracts; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 7151 final of 22 October 2020 concerning the application of an administrative measure against the director of the company [Confidential], withdrawing the amounts unduly received under the TACIS/2006/101-510 and CARDS/2008/166-429 contracts;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders PB, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union to each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders PB, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union to each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1150 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-935, K2025-936.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31713 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 99.6

CERTIFICATION OF THE ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report of Enterra Energy Trust (the Issuer) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof, I, Peter Carpenter, Chairman of the special committee of the board of directors, as Acting CEO of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                     |     |                                                                
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
March 31, 2008 | By: | SignedPeter Carpenter
Peter Carpenter
Chairman and Acting CEO