alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20491 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JULIO CESAR GARCIA

- LONGORIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 210

- 2

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Garcia

- Longoria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia

- Longoria h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 13, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20491 Document: 00515268199 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2020No. 19

- 20491

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-20491 Document: 00515268199 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2020
1

 
     Section 2. Miscellaneous.     (a) All of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement are incorporated herein by referencewith the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. Except as expressly amended hereby,the Loan Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.     (b) This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with thelaws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of law.     (c) Borrower hereby (1) unconditionally ratifies and confirms, renews and reaffirms all of itsobligations under the Loan Agreement and all of the terms, covenants and conditions thereunder(except for conditions precedent and any representations or warranties made as of a specific date),(2) acknowledges and agrees that such obligations remain in full force and effect, binding on andenforceable against it in accordance with the terms, covenants and conditions of the LoanAgreement, without impairment and (3) represents, warrants and covenants that it is not in defaultunder the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents beyond any applicable notice and cureperiods, and there are no defenses, offsets or counterclaims against the Indebtedness.[Signatures Appear on Following Page]
2

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged and agreed, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of thedate first hereinabove set forth.           **BORROWER****:**             W2007 ACEP SECOND MEZZANINE A BORROWER,L.P., a Delaware limited partnership             By: W2007 ACEP Second Mezzanine A Gen-Par,
84841195.v1

BUTLER SNOW LLP

Martin Sosland (TX Bar No. 18855645) 

Candice Carson (TX Bar No. 24074006)

2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1400 

Dallas, Texas 75219 

Telephone: (469) 680-5502 

martin.sosland@butlersnow.com

candice.carson@butlersnow.com

Counsel for Fedex Supply Chain 

Logistics & Electronics, Inc.

BUTLER SNOW LLP

R. Campbell Hillyer (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Adam M. Langley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

6075 Poplar Avenue, Suite 500 

Memphis, TN 38119 

Telephone: (901) 680-7316 

Cam.hillyer@butlersnow.com

adam.langley@butlersnow.com

Admitted Pro Hac Vice as Counsel for Fedex 

Supply Chain Logistics & Electronics, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

In re: § Chapter 7

§

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC. § Case No. 22-31641 (MVL)

§

Debtor. §

§

SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE PLAINTIFF

V. ADV. No. 23-03091 (MVL)

FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS & 

ELECTRONICS, INC.

DEFENDANT

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND 

REQUEST FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES AND PLEADINGS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Butler Snow LLP appears on behalf of Fedex Supply 

Chain Logistics & Electronics, Inc. as counsel and requests that notices of all hearings and 

conferences and service of all papers in this adversary proceeding, including, without 

limitations, all papers and notices pursuant to rules 2002, 9007, and 9010 of the Federal Rules 

of Bankruptcy Procedure and sections 342 and 1109(b) (if applicable) of the United States 

Code be served upon the undersigned attorney as follows: 

Case 23-03091-mvl Doc 9 Filed 12/07/23 Entered 12/07/23 15:58:17 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
84841195.v1

BUTLER SNOW LLP

Adam M. Langley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) 

6075 Poplar Avenue, Suite 500 

Memphis, TN 38119 

Telephone: (901) 680-7316 

adam.langley@butlersnow.com

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 7th day of December 2023. 

By: /s/ Adam M. Langley 

BUTLER SNOW LLP

Adam M. Langley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

6075 Poplar Avenue, Suite 500 

Memphis, TN 38119 

Telephone: (901) 680-7316 

adam.langley@butlersnow.com

Case 23-03091-mvl Doc 9 Filed 12/07/23 Entered 12/07/23 15:58:17 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
84841195.v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Adam M. Langley, certify that the foregoing Notice of Appearance and Request for Service of 

Notices and Pleadings was filed electronically through the Court’s ECF system and served electronically 

on all parties enlisted to receive service electronically. 

Dated: December 7, 2023. 

/s/ Adam M. Langley 

 ADAM M. LANGLEY

Case 23-03091-mvl Doc 9 Filed 12/07/23 Entered 12/07/23 15:58:17 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                    [LETTERHEAD OF CHAITANYA C. DALAL & CO.]

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation our report dated January 29, 2003 relating to
the balance sheet and the related income statement of Silverline Technologies
Limited for the year ended March 31, 2002, in the Annual Report in Form 20-F of
Silverline Technologies Limited for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002.

Place: Mumbai                                      For Chaitanya C. Dalal & Co.
Date: 14th February, 2003                          (Chartered Accountant)
                                                   /s/ C.C. Dalal
                                                   C.C. Dalal
                                                   (Partner)
                                                   M.No. 35809
Ronnie ATMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 695)    

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1171 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-959, K2025-958.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31719 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1

 
     Section 2. Miscellaneous.     (a) All of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement are incorporated herein by referencewith the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. Except as expressly amended hereby,the Loan Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.     (b) This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with thelaws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of law.     (c) Borrower hereby (1) unconditionally ratifies and confirms, renews and reaffirms all of itsobligations under the Loan Agreement and all of the terms, covenants and conditions thereunder(except for conditions precedent and any representations or warranties made as of a specific date),(2) acknowledges and agrees that such obligations remain in full force and effect, binding on andenforceable against it in accordance with the terms, covenants and conditions of the LoanAgreement, without impairment and (3) represents, warrants and covenants that it is not in defaultunder the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents beyond any applicable notice and cureperiods, and there are no defenses, offsets or counterclaims against the Indebtedness.[Signatures Appear on Following Page]
2

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged and agreed, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of thedate first hereinabove set forth.             **BORROWER****:**               W2007 ACEP FIFTH MEZZANINE A    BORROWER, L.P., a Delaware limitedpartnership               By: W2007 ACEP Fifth Mezzanine A Gen-      Par, L.L.C., its general partner                 By: /s/ David Gutstadt                 Name: David Gutstadt        Title: Vice President               W2007 ACEP FIFTH MEZZANINE B    BORROWER, L.P., a Delaware limitedpartnership               By: W2007 ACEP Fifth Mezzanine B Gen-Par,      L.L.C., its general partner                 By: /s/ David Gutstadt                 Name: David Gutstadt        Title: Vice President  [Signatures continue on following page]Stratosphere
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31687]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1105 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-880, K2025-881.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31687 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
J.P. v. A.S.

2160846

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 1 of 28 PageID 38602Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 2 of 28 PageID 38603Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 3 of 28 PageID 38604Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 4 of 28 PageID 38605Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 5 of 28 PageID 38606Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 6 of 28 PageID 38607Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 7 of 28 PageID 38608Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 8 of 28 PageID 38609Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 9 of 28 PageID 38610Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 10 of 28 PageID 38611Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 11 of 28 PageID 38612Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 12 of 28 PageID 38613Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 13 of 28 PageID 38614Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 14 of 28 PageID 38615Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 15 of 28 PageID 38616Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 16 of 28 PageID 38617Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 17 of 28 PageID 38618Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 18 of 28 PageID 38619Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 19 of 28 PageID 38620Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 20 of 28 PageID 38621Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 21 of 28 PageID 38622Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 22 of 28 PageID 38623Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 23 of 28 PageID 38624Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 24 of 28 PageID 38625Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 25 of 28 PageID 38626Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 26 of 28 PageID 38627Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 27 of 28 PageID 38628Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 657 Filed 07/13/07 Page 28 of 28 PageID 38629
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

denied

NO. 15-0120

IN THE INTEREST OF M.N.M., A

CHILD §

§

§

§

§

§ Kaufman County,

5th District.

March 20, 2015

Petitioner 's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

August 7, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 7th day of August, 2015

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 556 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-910, K2025-911.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31722 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARI

- LYNNE EARLS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
TANI CANTIL

- SAKAUYE, in her administrative capacity as chair of the Judicial Council of California and Assigned Judges Program of the Judicial Council; PATRICIA M. LUCAS, Presiding Judge; in her capacity as presiding judge as described in CCP 391.7,
Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 15414
D.C. No. 3:17

- cv - 07122

- VC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17 , 2018 **

Before: WALLACE , SILVERMAN , and McKEOWN , Circuit Judges.
Mari

- Lynne Earls appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 20 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 15414

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims related to California’s Vexatious Litigant Statute, Cal. C iv. Proc. Code §§ 391

- 391.8. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under
the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine. Noel v. Hall , 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Johnson v . Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP , 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Earls’ s claims regarding past or future
enforcement of the prefiling order, and her inclusion on the Judicial Council’ s
vexatious lit igant list , because such claims constitute a f orbidden “de facto appeal”
of prior state court judgment s or are “inextricably intertwined” with th ose judgment s
. See Noel , 341 F.3d at 1163

- 65 (discussing proper application of the
Rooker

- Feldman doctrine); see also Henrichs v. Valley View Dev. , 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th Cir. 2007) (

Rooker

- Feldman doctrine barred plaintiff’s claim because the relief sought “would require the district court to determine that the state court’s decision was wrong and thus void”). To the extent Earls sought prospective relief
from a future denial of an application to file new litigation unrelated to the prior state court judgments, such a claim is not ripe. See Texas v. United States , 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (“A claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur
at all

. ” ( citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).3 18

- 15414

Dismissal of Earls’s first amended complaint without leave to amend was

not an abuse of discretion because amendment would have been futile. See Chappel v. Lab. Corp. , 232 F.3d 719, 725

- 26 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting forth standard
of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when
amendment would be futil e)

. AFFIRMED.
Richardson Arthur Johnson KENNEDY v. STATE

CR-15-1331

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





By: /s/ Harry BagotHarry BagotChief Executive Officer Dated: December 17, 2013.
Albert V. ROBERTSON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-CI-1893

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).

GENOVESE, J., recused.