alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

Innovative Airport Sensor Technologies (RPD 154)

Contract Funds ($K)‏

Outcomes

• Investigation of the feasibility of using innovative detection technology/sensors on civil airports and/or integrating with existing systems.

• Enables a consistent set of standard protocols to be established for determining the feasibility and performance capabilities of like sensors regardless of their prospective application. 

Rationale

Establishes a major program area and an expertise that does not exist today and allows the SRM process to be satisfied by a single POC and would establish a single home for documentation of these kinds of efforts.

* Non-AJP-6300 Funds/Managed by AJP-6300
| Projects                              | FY14    | FY15    | FY16    |
|---------------------------------------|---------|---------|---------|
| Low Cost Surface Surveillance         | 1,480   | 1,140   | 1,100   |
| ADS-B Vehicle Evaluation              | 0       | 50      | 50      |
| Sensor Performance Assessment Support | 60      | 60      | 60      |
| TOTAL                                 | $ 1,540 | $ 1,250 | $ 1,210 |

*
Jerome SPARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 13, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . *See* *Hight v. State,* 253 So.3d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Gerber, C.J., Taylor and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Michael D. GLOVER v. Teri Lee GLOVER

2160593

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
1567.

#### Wolff *v.*Turner.

Appeal, from Bibb superior court — Judge Felton. December 1, 1908.

Powell, J.

Where premises are prepared by a landlord and rented to the tenant for the purpose of carrying on therein a shoe store, and the rent contract contains a clause that “in ease the premises are rendered untenantable by fire the rent is to cease from the date of the fire,” the premises become untenantable, so as to authorize the tenant to quit the premises and cease paying rent, when, as a result of fire, the building is damaged to such an extent that it is unfit for carrying on the business of operating a shoe store, and can not be restored to a fit condition by ordinary repairs such as can be made without unreasonable interruption of the business of the tenant. The evidence in the record is such as to raise a substantial conflict as to whether the premises had become untenantable. The jury, by consent of the parties, viewed the premises. The charge of the court was a fair presentation of the law of the case, free from harmful error. The court, therefore, did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*367Argued January 28, —

Decided June 29, 1909.

*Hardeman, Jones ■& Johnston,*for plaintiff.

*John P. Boss,*for defendant.
# C_2018104EN.01004201.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/42

---

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — QF v Commission

(Case T-846/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain professional football clubs - Preferential tax rate applied in connection with corporate tax - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market - No interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 104/54)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: QF (represented by: L. Ruiz Ezquerra, R. Oncina Borrego, I. Sobrepera Millet and A. Hernández Pardo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 4046 final of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.29769 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Spain for certain football clubs.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate is dismissed.

| 2. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 3. | There is no longer any need to rule on the applications to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no longer any need to rule on the applications to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona.

| 4. | QF shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

QF shall pay the costs.

| 5. | QF, the European Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

5.

QF, the European Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

1

---
# C_2016136EN.01003801.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/38

---

Action brought on 23 February 2016 — International Gaming Projects v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (TRIPLE EVOLUTION)

(Case T-82/16)

(2016/C 136/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: M. Garayalde Niño, A. Alpera Plazas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘TRIPLE EVOLUTION’ — Application for registration No 11 968 138

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2015 in Case R 725/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | admit the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit the application;

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order the registration of the EU mark TRIPLE EVOLUTION in all the goods and services it seeks protection; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the registration of the EU mark TRIPLE EVOLUTION in all the goods and services it seeks protection;

| — | order EUIPO and/or the opponent to bear the fees and costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and/or the opponent to bear the fees and costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | The Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the confronted signs. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the confronted signs.

---
Robert L. WATTIGNY, Sr. v. HOSKIN HOMES L.L.C., and BS Rentals of Louisiana, L.L.C.

NO. 2019-C-0044

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 25 Filed 03/18/03 Entered 03/18/03 09:51:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
/s/ Harold C. Abramson

_______________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge Dated: March 17, 2003

Case 02-32368-bjh13 Doc 25 Filed 03/18/03 Entered 03/18/03 09:51:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2022109EN.01002201.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/22

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Shoe)

(Case T-682/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a shoe - Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 - Grounds for invalidity - Lack of novelty - No individual character - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 109/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Schabenberger, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 (Case R 1650/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Legero Schuhfabrik and Rieker Schuh.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
# C_2021471EN.01003201.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/32

---

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 1 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — Generálna prokuratura Slovenskej republiky v M.B.

(Case C-78/20) (1)

(2021/C 471/41)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Jonathan Symonds, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novartis AG;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 23, 2013   By:
/s/  JONATHAN   SYMONDSJonathan Symonds Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0345

_________________ JAYLENE CECELIA PHILLIPS,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. LEONIE CANDICE WEBB,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

______________

___ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Yvonne Laird , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 4 2023

01/04/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0345
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 572 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1013, K2025-1012.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00065 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MAX Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 30, 2006





/s/ David Pearce

------------------------------------

David Pearce, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JAMIE BANDA, BOP No. 31229-177, §

 §

Petitioner, §

 §

v. § No. 3:03-CR-0355-M

 § No. 3:05-CV-0318-M

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

 §

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson made findings, conclusions, and a

recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections and the District Court has made a de novo

review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was

made. The Court notes that petitioner did not raise the ineffective assistance of counsel argument

which is contained in his objections in his § 2255 motion, but even if he had, he has not satisfied

the standard enunciated in Strickland v.Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The availability of the

safety valve and the determination of whether a defendant should receive an additional one point

for acceptance of responsibility are both in the sole discretion of the government. Id. The

objections are therefore overruled. The Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

September 13, 2005.

_________________________________

Barbara M. G. Lynn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cr-00355-M Document 201 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 587
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 107152-107153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases,

[[Page 107153]]

Initial Review Group; Fellowships in Diabetes Endocrinology and 
Metabolic Diseases Fellowships in Diabetes Endocrinology and 
Metabolic Diseases.
    Date: February 12, 2025.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, 
Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Thomas A. Tatham, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney, 
National Institute of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm 7021, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-3993, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31181 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
: U.S. DISTRICT COURT
| NORTHERN DiSTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT__FILED

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT oF TEXA
AMARILLO DIVISION JUL 15 2008
Lo
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

JEFF P. CARLILE § Deputy

§
v. § 2:05-CV-0150

8 (2:04-CR-0023 (1))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and
DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE

Defendant has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence by a person in federal
custody. A Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge and
filed on June 23, 2008. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed of record
as of this date.

The United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the record in this
case and has examined the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The District
Judge is of the opinion the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be, and hereby
is, ADOPTED. It is the further ORDER of the Court that this motion to vacate, set aside or correct
sentence is, in all things, DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this (ge day of Seedy 2008.

MARY LOU R@B IN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:03-cv-00684-N Document 177 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1370
Case 3:03-cv-00684-N Document 177 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1371