alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joe Campbell, Josh Gavin, Chesley Gavin and E. O. McCurley, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed December 6, 1927.

*Philip D. Beall*and *John M. Coe,*Attorneys for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy*Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted of the offense of larceny of a heifer, the property of George Dewrell and T. M. Weeks, co-partners doing business under the firm name of Dewrell & Weeks. The only assignment of error which requires our attention is one which challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully considered the evidence as presented by the record before us and we fail to find sufficient legal evidence to establish, first, the fact that the heifer referred *1041to in the indictment was stolen; second, to establish the fact that the defendants, or either of them, participated in the larceny of the particular heifer referred to in the indictment, even if the same was stolen. We are mindful of the rule which has long obtained in this jurisdiction that, “Where there is substantial evidence to support the verdict the verdict will not be set aside as against the evidence, unless it may well be assumed that the jury were improperly influenced by conditions outside the evidence.” And, we are reluctant to reverse a judgment because of the insufficiency of the evidence when there has been sufficient evidence to warrant the trial court in submitting the issues to a jury, but in this case that *substantial*quality of the evidence to establish the necessary facts is lacking. The witnesses appear to have testified honestly, fairly and, as far as they know, to facts and circumstances, but they appear to have been without knowledge of the important facts necessary to establish the guilt of the accused. It, therefore, becomes our duty to reverse the judgment of the lower court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Exhibit 99.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and
the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of XM Satellite Radio Inc. (XM), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a)    the Form 10-K of XM for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)    information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of XM.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to XM and will be retained by XM and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: April 2, 2003



|By: |  | /s/    Hugh Panero                   
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|    |  | Hugh Panero                          
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | (principal executive officer)        



Date: April 2, 2003



|By: |  | /s/    Joseph J. Euteneuer                          
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|    |  | Joseph J. Euteneuer                                 
|    |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | (principal financial officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31715]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1153 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-938, K2025-939.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31715 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
William R. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 8
Case 24-33887-swe7 Doc 8 Filed 12/03/24 Entered 12/03/24 13:39:40 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 8
Latransezon MALLOY v. STATE

CR-16-0099

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021502EN.01002201.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Square v EUIPO — ($ Cash App)

(Case T-210/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark $ Cash App - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Equal treatment and principle of sound administration)

(2021/C 502/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, Solicitor, and by K. Lüder and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2020 (Case R 811/2019-1), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark $ Cash App.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Square, Inc. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Square, Inc. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CR-0188-N

) No. 3:05-CV-1488-N (BH)

ORALIA MICHELLE HINOJOSA, ) ECF

ID # 30816-177, ) 

 )

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED December 20, 2007.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:03-cr-00188-N Document 950 Filed 12/20/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2053
Exhibit
      32.2






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of James River Coal Company (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samuel
      M. Hopkins, II, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:






(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                registrant.








November
      2, 2007




/s/    
                Samuel M Hopkins, IISamuel
                M. Hopkins, IITitle: 
                Chief Accounting
                Officer
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 24 Filed 07/16/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 149
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 24 Filed 07/16/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 150
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 24 Filed 07/16/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 151
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-2891

___________________________

Dewayne Vesey

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Midwest Janitorial Services, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

 Submitted: October 25, 2016

Filed: October 28, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Dewayne Vesey appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se Title VII 1

complaint against his former employer. The district court based the dismissal on

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Southern District of Iowa. 
Vesey’s failure to bring his action within 90 days after receiving a right-to-sue letter. 

On appeal, Vesey suggests that equitable tolling should have applied.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper, and that

equitable tolling was not warranted. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (90-day

requirement); Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 851 (8th Cir. 2012)

(in Title VII action, if agency dismisses charge and notifies complainant of right to

sue, then complainant has 90 days to bring civil action in federal court); see also

Baldwin Cty. Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 & n.1 (1984) (per curiam)

(claimant was presumed to have received notice 3 days after its issuance); Hallgren

v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 331 F.3d 588, 590 (8th Cir. 2003) (discussing grounds for

equitable tolling).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(13)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(3)
              - hawaii(25)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - (-)montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        April 1, 2023        Geologic map of the Timber Hill basalt Sweetwater Hills, Montana
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CR-078-N (10)

) No. 3:06-CV-1112-N (BH)

JOHN EARL THOMAS, ) ECF

ID # 29807-177 )

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED August 6, 2008.

 

 DAVID C. GODBEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D'Angelo Lavelle DIXON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, Secretary and Jeff Thomas, Warden, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4235

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2022024EN.01003001.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Soapland v EUIPO — Norma (Manòu)

(Case T-504/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Manòu - Earlier national and international word marks MANOU - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks)

(2022/C 24/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Soapland GmbH & Co. OHG (Andernach, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and A. Graul, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG (Nuremberg, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2020 (Case R 1504/2019-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. and Soapland GmbH & Co.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Soapland GmbH & Co. OHG.to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Soapland GmbH & Co. OHG.to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



With reference to the Quarterly Report of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Abrams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANIEL ABRAMS      
|DANIEL ABRAMS          
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUAN RAMON TIBURCIO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 160 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of November, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 16, 2015

NO. 03-15-00441-CV

Youth Empowerment Services, Inc. d/b/a Higgs Carter King Gifted and

Talented Charter Academy, Appellant

v.

Texas Education Agency, and Michael Williams, in his Official Capacity as the 

Commissioner of Education, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on July 14, 2015. Appellant has filed 

a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

K. H., :

Petitioner : SEALED CASE

:

v. :

:

Department of Human Services, :

Respondent : No. 739 C.D. 2022

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, May 30 , 2024

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re argument , the application is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Annual Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc.
(“Camelot”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Robert P. Atwell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Camelot
Entertainment Group, Inc. and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of Camelot Entertainment Group,
Inc.









April 15,
2009




/s/
Robert P. Atwell


Robert P.
Atwell


Chief
Executive Officer
Eric JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0397

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Linda CYR and Paul Ernest Cyr, Appellants, v. Imani Zafaira Braz CABRERA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

Kate E. Watson of Adams/Coogler, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 2 - Certificates pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

                                 Certifications

In connection with the annual report of Axcan Pharma Inc.(the "Company") filed
under cover of a Form 40-F for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Leon F. Gosselin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 14, 2003                      /s/ Leon F. Gosselin
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Leon F. Gosselin
                                             Chairman of the Board, President
                                             and Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the annual report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the "Company") filed
under cover of a Form 40-F/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jean Vezina, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 14, 2003                       /s/ Jean Vezina
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jean Vezina
                                              Vice President, Finance and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Christopher STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Artis SCARBOROUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Phillip Tavarris COPELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1063

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Patrice KERR, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2021088EN.01003202.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/32

---

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — KC v Commission

(Case T-580/20) (1)

(Action for damages - State aid - Complaint - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 88/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KC (represented by: L. Frölich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant owing to the Commission’s failure to initiate, in a timely manner, the formal investigation procedure following the applicant’s State aid complaint (SA.46963).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders KC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders KC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.

---