alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1180 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-968, K2025-967.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31739 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JESSIE J. SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-305

[June 2, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Gillen, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502014CF010800A.

Jessie J. Smith, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
OFFICE OF THE STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

6851 N.E. Loop 820, Suite 300

North Richland Hills, TX 76180-6608

(817) 770-8500

Fax (817) 770-8511

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE:

WAEL SAMIR FALTS

Case No: 24-43547-MXM

Court Hearing:

Time & Date: 8:30 AM on

Debtor, Thursday, December 19, 2024

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

TO THE HONORABLE MARK X MULLIN, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

Now comes Tim Truman, the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, and files this his "Trustee's Objection to 

Confirmation" of the Plan heretofore filed herein by Debtor, and for the same would respectfully show the 

Court as follows:

Based on information provided by the Debtor, the Trustee is unable to determine if the Plan meets the 

requirements of 11 U.S.C. Section 1322 and 11 U.S.C. Section 1325. In this regard the Trustee would show the 

following: 

WAEL SAMIR FALTS did not appear for the Section 341 Meeting of Creditors that was to be conducted on 

11/13/2024. Until the financial affairs of the Debtor are examined, the Trustee is unable to recommend 

Confirmation of the Plan.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Trustee prays that said Plan not be confirmed unless 

and until it has been modified to cure all objections set forth hereinabove, and for general relief.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Angela D. Allen

Tim Truman, Bar # 20258000

Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

Angela Allen, Bar # 007869700

Staff Attorney

Case 24-43547-mxm13 Doc 36 Filed 11/14/24 Entered 11/14/24 09:53:20 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
24-43547-MXM WAEL SAMIR FALTS

Trustee's Objection to Confirmation Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing "Trustee's Objection to Confirmation" was 

served on all parties listed below in the manner listed below on or before November 15, 2024.

 /s/ Angela D. Allen

Tim Truman, Angela Allen

BY FIRST CLASS MAIL:

WAEL SAMIR FALTS, 19 WYCK HILL LN, ROANOKE, TX 76262-0000

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE:

LEINART LAW FIRM, 10670 N CENTRAL EXPWY #320, DALLAS, TX 75231

MCCREARY VESELKA BRAGG & ALLEN, PO BOX 1269, ROUND ROCK, TX 78680

LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON LLP, 2777 N STEMMONS FWY #1000, DALLAS, TX 75207

AKERMAN, 2001 ROSS AVE #3600, DALLAS, TX 75201

United States Trustee, 1100 COMMERCE STREET, ROOM 976, DALLAS, TX 75242

Case 24-43547-mxm13 Doc 36 Filed 11/14/24 Entered 11/14/24 09:53:20 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2020433EN.01005102.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/51

---

Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Sharpston v Council and Representatives of the Governments of the Member States

(Case T-550/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States to appoint an Advocate General to the Court of Justice - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 433/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eleanor Sharpston (Schoenfels, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Forwood, Barrister, and J. Flynn QC)

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and A. Sikora-Kalėda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Decision (EU) 2020/1251 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 2 September 2020 appointing three Judges and an Advocate General to the Court of Justice (OJ 2020 L 292, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the appointment of Mr Athanasios Rantos to the post of Advocate General at the Court of Justice.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief before the General Court and the Court of Justice in Cases T-550/20 R, C-423/20 P(R) and C-424/20 P(R). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief before the General Court and the Court of Justice in Cases T-550/20 R, C-423/20 P(R) and C-424/20 P(R).

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 10.10.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Jay Gelman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Alliance Distributors
Holding Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 22, 2006

                              /s/ Jay Gelman
                              -------------------------------------
                              Jay Gelman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                              Chairman of the Board
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135280 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan

________________ _______________ ____________ Robert P. Young, Jr.
IN RE JOIE ARCHER, ANDREW NIERESCHER II, Stephen J. Markman, Justices and CHEYENNE NIERESCHER, Minors.

________________ _______________ ____________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 135280 COA: 275650 Oakland CC

JENNY NIERESCHER, Respondent-Appellant, Family Division: 06-723807-NA

and

ANDREW NIERESCHER, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2007
Clerk
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - (-)washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        December 1, 2000        May 18, 1980 Mount St. Helens Eruption: Stories from USGS Scientists
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

DANIEL JOSEPH D’ANTONIO,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2448 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 177 DB 2017

Attorney Registration No. 312293

(Lackawanna County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1

st day of March, 2018, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint 

Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Daniel Joseph D’Antonio is 

suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years. 

He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent shall pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the 

investigation and prosecution of this matter.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020359EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/6 |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain) lodged on 5 August 2020 — CZ v Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Catalunya (TEAR de Catalunya)

(Case C-366/20)

(2020/C 359/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (High Court of Justice, Catalonia, Spain)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CZ

Defendant: Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Catalunya (Regional Tax Tribunal of Catalonia) (TEAR de Catalunya)

Questions referred

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | Is a provision of national law such as Article 39(2) of the Ley del Impuesto sobre la Renta de las Personas Físicas (Income Tax Law) 35/2006 of 28 November 2006, as amended by Article 3(2) of Law 7/2012 of 29 October 2012, which ‘in all cases’ classes [goods, assets or rights] as ‘unjustified capital gains’, on which tax must be paid in the earliest period which has not yet become time-barred, in the event of failure to comply with the formal aspects of the requirement to provide information via ‘Form 720’ on goods located abroad or rights and assets deposited abroad, or where the information is submitted late, without having regard to the rules on limitation established in the Ley General Tributaria (General Tax Law) 58/2003, other than in the cases of ‘declared income’ or income arising in periods during which the individual was not a tax resident in Spain, contrary to EU law, specifically Articles 63 and 65 TFEU and the fundamental principles of free movement, equal treatment and non-discrimination? |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | If the reply is in the negative, on the grounds that it is proportionate, is a provision of national law such as Article 39(2) of the Income Tax Law 35/2006 of 28 November 2006, which has the consequences set out above, contrary to EU law, specifically Articles 63 and 65 TFEU and the fundamental principles of free movement, equal treatment, non-discrimination and proportionality, where the income in question has been declared late, but before any form of tax audit has been commenced or notified and no tax information exchange request has been made, although there is such an arrangement in place with the third-party State? |

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald Wilen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   December 2, 2003              By: /s/ Ronald Wilen
                                           ---------------------------------
                                               Ronald Wilen
                                               Chairman and Chief Executive
                                               Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Peter SMITH, Appellant, v. Michelle SMITH, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019

Clifton H. Gorenflo, of Gray, Gorenflo & Partlow, P.A., Sanford, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31151]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1162 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-947, K2025-948.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31151 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32





ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.





Section 1350 Certification





The undersigned hereby certify that this report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.





/s/ John M. Scott III/s/ Martin O’GradyJohn M. Scott IIIMartin O’GradyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerVice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer





Dated: June 14, 2013





[A signed original of this written certification has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 1 of 8 PageID 122
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 2 of 8 PageID 123
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 3 of 8 PageID 124
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 4 of 8 PageID 125
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 5 of 8 PageID 126
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 6 of 8 PageID 127
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 7 of 8 PageID 128
Case 4:03-cv-00277-Y Document 17 Filed 04/14/03 Page 8 of 8 PageID 129
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the annual report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A forthe period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, Michael Lee, as chief executive officer ofAlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of his knowledge: 

> 
1.This  10-KSB/A report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the  Exchange Act; and 
2.The  information contained in this 10-KSB/A report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.   /s/ Michael LeeMichael LeeChief Executive OfficerMay 18, 2005
Vincent Alexander BROOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1957

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1525

MICHAEL R. FULLER; NANCY J. HALSTEAD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; NLI/PLC/MACO III,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-421-A)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Fuller, Nancy J. Halstead, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their request for preliminary injunctive relief or, in the

alternative, a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fuller v.

Virginia, No. CA-96-421-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3241

_____________________________

AKIL Z. FLAGG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

July 17, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Akil Z. Flagg, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.