alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Anthony J. Massetti, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Avaya Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: December 7, 2010
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                   ROSENTHAL
                                BUSINESS CREDIT

                                 A DIVISION OF
                          ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC.


                                                                November 1, 2005

Alliance Distributors Holding, Inc.
15-15 132nd Street
College Point, NY 11356

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Financing Agreement entered
into between us dated November 11, 2004 and as amended and/or supplemented (the
"Financing Agreement").

      This will confirm that, effective November 1, 2005, the Financing
Agreement is amended as follows:

      1.    Section 1.14 is deleted in its entirety, and the following is
            substituted in its place:

      "1.14 "Margin" shall mean one and one half percent (1.5%) per annum."

      2.    Section 1.15 is deleted in its entirety, and the following is
            substituted in its place:

      "1.15 "Maximum Credit Facility" shall mean $10,000,000."

      3.    Section 1.16 14 is deleted in its entirety, and the following is
            substituted in its place:

      "1.16 "Maximum Inventory Loan" shall mean $3,500,000".

      4.    The second sentence of Section 2.1 is deleted in its entirety, and
            the following is substituted in its place:

      "The Receivable Availability shall mean an amount equal to eighty five
percent (85%) (the "Receivables Advance Percentage") of the Net Amount of
Eligible Receivables which have been validly assigned to Lender and in which
Lender holds a perfected security interest pursuant to the terms hereof ranking
prior to and free and celar of all interests, claims, and rights of others."

      5.    Section 6.9 is deleted in its entirety, and the following is
            substituted in its place:

      "6.9 Borrower shall, until payment in full of all Obligations to Lender
and termination of this Agreement, cause to be maintained at the end of each
fiscal quarter (i.e. December, March, June, September) Tangible Net Worth is an
amount not less than $2,900,000, Working Capital of not less than $2,500,000 and
a ratio of total debt to Tangible Net Worth of no greater than 3.25 to 1."

<PAGE>

      In consideration of our agreement to amend the Financing Agreement as set
forth above, you hereby agree to pay us a fee of $10,000 which is fully earned
and chargeable to your account as of the date hereof.

      Except as hereinabove specifically set forth, the Financing Agreement
shall continue unmodified.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL

                                             By: /s/ James Occhiogrosso
                                                 ----------------------
                                             James Occhiogrosso
                                             Senior Vice President

Agreed:

ALLIANCE DISTRIBUTORS HOLDING, INC.

By: /s/ Jay Gelman
    -----------------------
    Jay Gelman
    Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6838

HARRY RIZER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAUL KIRBY, Warden, Northern Regional Jail/ Correctional Facility, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-20-2) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry Rizer, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie K. Kiser, WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Harry Rizer appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Rehearing.” We dismiss theappeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 3-03-CR-134-D

) (3-05-CV-247-D)

KATHERINE WILLIS )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on June 15, 2005, as supplemented

by the Supplemental Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on

August 4, 2005, are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

By August 16, 2005 order, the court granted defendant an extension through October 14,

2005 to file her objections. She filed them, however, on August 23, 2005. In a letter to the court

postmarked August 25, 2005, it is apparent that defendant has presented the objections she asks the

court to consider. Accordingly, the court concludes that it may act on the Findings, Conclusions,

and Recommendation and Supplemental Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

Signed August 30, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cr-00134-D Document 89 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 213
Exhibit 23.3





PWC — Gaveglio, Aparicio y Asociados S. Civil de R. L.





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-215029) and Form S-8 (No.333-58298, No.333-129152, No.333-147448, No.333-161459, No.333-168588 and No.333-183142) of Belmond Ltd. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 24, 2019 relating to the financial statements of Ferrocarril Transandino S.A., which appears in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Belmond Ltd.











Gaveglio, Aparicio y Asociados S. Civil de R. L.


Lima, Peru


April 24, 2019











Countersigned by:/s/ Francisco PatiñoFrancisco PatiñoPeruvian Certified Public AccountantRegister No. 01-25611
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Edward
W. Martin, III, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of American Casino &
Entertainment Properties LLC (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best
of  my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of the Registrant (the
“Report”):





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





By:
                /s/
      Edward W. Martin, IIIEdward
      W. Martin, IIIChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer ofAmerican
      Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC





Date:
November 13, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 1 of 13 PageID 135
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 2 of 13 PageID 136
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 3 of 13 PageID 137
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 4 of 13 PageID 138
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 5 of 13 PageID 139
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 6 of 13 PageID 140
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 7 of 13 PageID 141
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 8 of 13 PageID 142
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 9 of 13 PageID 143
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 10 of 13 PageID 144
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 11 of 13 PageID 145
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 12 of 13 PageID 146
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 21 Filed 06/20/03 Page 13 of 13 PageID 147
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00225-CR

Richard B. Reed

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1413225R)

July 14, 2016

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Daup hinot______

________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Kari FAMBRO, Appellant, v. Deborah FAMBRO and John Dickson, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1855

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1214 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1020, K2025-1019.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00055 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Kenneth J. O'BRIEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE James Robert CASEY

CR-16-1270

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - (-)guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Data Visualization        May 17, 2023        USGS Science in the American Territories
Shawn J. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3924

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

EDWARDS, J.

Appellant, Shawn J. Jones, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss a severed charge for possession of a firearm by a felon, arguing that collateral estoppel barred any further prosecution after he was previously tried by a jury and found not guilty of murder with a firearm. We disagree and affirm.

Appellant was indicted for murder with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. After successfully moving to sever the felon-in-possession charge for a separate trial, Appellant proceeded to jury trial on the murder with a firearm charge. The only percipient witness, Sims, testified that he saw Appellant outside holding a handgun and heard him say that he was going to rob and kill the next person he saw. Sims retreated to his home and four or five minutes later heard gunshots. The victim was shot and killed. No eyewitnesses to the shooting came forward. Nor was there any evidence to connect the handgun Sims saw Appellant holding to the shooting. The jury found Appellant not guilty of murder while discharging, possessing, or carrying a firearm.

Then, Appellant filed a motion to dismiss the remaining, previously severed, charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon on the ground that collateral estoppel barred further prosecution. In *1274order for collateral estoppel to prevent further prosecution, the issue sought to be foreclosed "must necessarily have been determined in the defendant's favor" in the earlier trial. *State v. Short* , 513 So.2d 679, 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Collateral estoppel does not prevent future litigation "if the verdict [already rendered] could be grounded upon an issue other than that which the defendant seeks to foreclose from consideration." *State v. Strong* , 593 So.2d 1065, 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The trial court denied Appellant's motion to dismiss, finding that the jury could have believed Sims' testimony that he saw Appellant in possession of a firearm five minutes before hearing gunshots, while it found that Appellant was not guilty of murder because of that five-minute gap in time and the lack of evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Appellant shot the victim. We agree with the trial court and the State that whether Appellant was a convicted felon simply in possession of a firearm was not presented to the jury, was not necessarily the basis for the jury's verdict, and was not determined in Appellant's favor in the murder-with-firearm trial. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's denial of Appellant's motion to dismiss because collateral estoppel did not bar prosecution on the felon-in-possession charge.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-106378 and 333-107163) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-45954,333-45956, 333-55614, 333-55946 and 333-103475) ofAvaya Inc. of our report dated December 8, 2006 relating to the financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, whichis incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPFlorham Park, New JerseyDecember 8, 2006

----
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 691 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community Gardening Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2014 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MORAN, Ms. 

PINGREE of Maine, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Ms. LEE of 

California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community 

Gardening Awareness Month. 

Whereas countless American families live with hunger every 

day; 

Whereas countless American families do not have access to 

fresh produce in their neighborhoods; 

Whereas community gardens conserve limited resources and 

promote sustainability; 

Whereas community gardens provide an important and nutritious source of fresh produce donations for local food 

pantries and social service agencies; 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 691 IH 

Whereas community gardens enable individuals to gain control over the quality, variety, and cost of their food supply; 

Whereas community gardening encourages Americans of diverse cultural and economic backgrounds to work together, foster a better sense of community, and improve 

the quality of their lives; 

Whereas community-based youth and school gardening programs encourage personal self-esteem and a healthy attitude toward learning; 

Whereas community gardening and greening projects provide 

a catalyst for neighborhood and community development; 

Whereas community gardens reduce city heat and preserve 

open spaces for both present and future generations; 

Whereas community gardens and other green spaces provide 

a more livable environment in American municipalities 

and present a positive local image to a community’s residents and visitors; and 

Whereas August is an appropriate month to designate as National Community Gardening Awareness Month: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Community Gardening 

3 Awareness Month, including— 

4 (1) raising awareness about the importance of 

5 community gardens and urban agriculture; 

6 (2) improving access to public land for the cre7 ation of sustainable food projects; 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 691 IH 

1 (3) encouraging further growth of community 

2 gardens and other opportunities that increase food 

3 self-reliance, improve fitness, contribute to a cleaner 

4 environment, and enhance community development; 

5 and 

6 (4) supporting cooperative efforts among Fed7 eral, State, and local governments and nonprofit or8 ganizations to promote the development and expan9 sion of community gardens and to increase their ac10 cessibility to disadvantaged population groups. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS