alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 30 8 . EVERETT v . W EAVER et a l.

Th e Co u rt h av in g recei v ed fro m t h e ap p el l an t n o o p p o s i ti o n to t h e M OTION

TO D ISM ISS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF A P PELLEES, an d t he ap p el l an t h av i n g

fai l ed t o fi l e an en um erat i o n of erro rs an d b ri ef, t h e m o t i o n t o d is m i ss i s h ereb y

GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## 11/30/2015 November 30, 2015
Jessie JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3937

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Mario Dwayne Brown, * From the 142nd District Court

 of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR52672.

Vs. No. 11-20-00033-CR * December 16, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is an

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

we modify the trial court’s judgment and the district clerk’s bill of costs to delete 

the $4,600 court-appointed attorney’s fees that were assessed against Appellant.

As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 106721-106722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31256]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12623]

Proposal To Extend the Cultural Property Agreement Between the 
United States and Chile

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Proposal to extend the Memorandum of Understanding Between the 
Government of the United States of America and the Government of the 
Republic of Chile Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on 
Categories of Archaeological Material of Chile (``the Chile 
Agreement'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Davis Lehmann, Cultural 
Heritage Center, Bureau of Educational

[[Page 106722]]

and Cultural Affairs: (202) 904-0878; [email protected]; include 
``Chile'' in the subject line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of 
the Chile Agreement is hereby proposed.
    A copy of the Chile Agreement, the Designated List of categories of 
material currently restricted from import into the United States, and 
related information can be found at the Cultural Heritage Center 
website: https://culturalheritage.state.gov.

Allison R. Davis Lehmann,
Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2024-31256 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2022073EN.01004401.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/44

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 December 2021 — OJ v Commission

(Case T-709/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - Civil service - Recruitment - Open competition - EPSO decision to refuse the extension of the dates of the multiple choice computer-based tests - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2022/C 73/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: OJ (represented by: H.-E. von Harpe, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and L. Hohenecker, agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the selection procedure of Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 concerning the establishment for the Commission of a reserve list of administrators in the field of international cooperation and aid to non-member countries.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed;

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Willowtree Advisor, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cynthia Allison, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2005.



| | /s/ Cynthia Allison                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Cynthia Allison                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer















---
No. pp-plow-2015 tOH-IS

Taj th£

Av?Ti/i/, T&AS ORIGINAL

THE STAT£ 0FTEXAS

fn>m fi\pfe*Afto. 0b-H-00OS3-c&

Trial GwseM>, 3£G-*2fl W-20L?

RECEIVED ^1

COURT OF CR!?.WAU-:--.;'5

JUL 30 2015

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

' JUL 30 2^5

Abel Acosta,Clerk
Xtflevt+H~y o-POWg^, Parties,a*d Co^seJ

T>£ ft (WOM&U ScAT, U*fcw --hrv*l Co^ijuj^

TWSTATE tfPTRaS

%<ocJh ft Duke, - Cjou^seJ-fr^ V&M**+ 1D(? £K^fcL%, <£>( /%(C^ey

Molly fryfr*fre-Grtff*A a*d JbmtUh ^fc-k^So^ - &Xu/v$e_J -£r s-fefe 2-(AP Q^awlale.

U, 9ft. Zoo /fe£bKlyJert 750y\ Qtm \)
IrJ&/ Q-PAvcthorffi-eS ,_r_~. - <- [it

Sp4,Htoe*fr Q-ZtytMty &r*>l ArjUM^t' /

5'jiict&ntoflt" °-r -/^e G15 e. j ( St-fafe**^} °f fr&ceJ+tJl \j-K4vru _______ I

QrvuJl ft"- A^r^K/ i

P^er&r (lzlief__ _ . —

(^rtfkJlePServKZ „ . . :—•— :

/\ ftf&clty ^ .

e o
Xn*/#> opAuthorities

Ploeteri/.S+'ctt' _

States,

TSx*5 f€^/Code j/ H2.072

Ie^s#«J«s tfApfklbfc fl***l>»* A*1*- &&< -3

dec

_ I

1
TIL te^l ^e W7*., (Cfi~ V* 1130). tethxtsv* ^W/d %olrs \*w*m *turret IkfiH^fOwlh* *"* ***!**>

Vre, fe+K to^rJ1Ae^oPle^co^U^ aflTM»*t tri4 <wte cteoXbA _>a

g-roc,Jt for &m*J

Tke, CourtofApt6*** (ZcreJfK Mdty f^fe-*^ u*tf fe^//y

Tk it/Ja me*^of "H^ Co^AaPApp^stoa^^ soieL o^ requiredVe>*^> IsVW-e

CrPfCz actor- jo 'fte. e^c/wSfc^ ofall oi^er CoMft^/crhofy tursl^^t uwttr-"H^Gbrfkfy ntwe-ty ea.«scfa>K or^i**^ A»* le$*lly Crrd(^t <^^es tiZ&wl3ff>2tt-2?L^fifl^oj? ff. (fc>W2) fcetfiv (S aff^prraH u^erT&APR-tfp3(eL\ 5*€,*tsoTPcfa.c>H,

diets, -z>a ®« f^ ^e f^ue. T£Af° g Up 3k)

/ k& tvflftiwe, Wa> afe/> fetf s/^ frSieftfc&rf' "fa Support jiu^f <\ y-easo^j l^fe^d^

an&Us e</e* hee*. oled^ed£<AC-&h ^^co^sirh4eyM ir\ f-ft. prtor (Vicctr^/ib^s xV"
./\ppt\\(tt Ca<a*s<A.5 kacl sfa/iar- clt-Pfiotli-rtS* V& refuse quttLvdi fiz^ /i^eS^r/gtr

fo&kst G&Artregvcby fybfeut, &*&* t^t fr^tl c&«AA^d^cAM fhts laiJ~H&

^p^o^r kdtewdy JlnxPtelsfetukr mfU& k^h/y o£ fkfa** &P \cu^ 'vj^^ta^^erhysr«cA

Q^tfyS A$ "P~- QS'tipph'ed u*<j>r$frkcfa>*»l!ly offkeSh^h -far tfyii&n&5 oro^erbfe^fk(

Pp.fitf^A^rp^i9 '^ ^"O r&v/£,rS^ ^ft Oovurchw avjreform ^j^^ie^f^

has U -Ported *>y t/J./V/^f^j^^ $-f*fe JJSU .(i &>\*jercK±Zl®° &*»AJt U Sh. 2#/^/<^*y,7e>«* 75^6? **u<M>

tU SWe AcseW-.^ /ffo**/, #0 #*> (2^/W^^ 727/1 o^v Y*»* /*e

^7fh^/^^ty/2"D,9•

YPcSLuH&-U*/t

^a^/—^^3^2H-2ZO

1
Robert Pernell PILCHER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Videsh Sanchar
Nigam Limited, a limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of India
(the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
such officer's best knowledge, that:

         1.       the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

         The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of
complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

Dated: September 29, 2003                     /s/ Shailendra Kumar Gupta
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Shailendra Kumar Gupta
                                              Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 29, 2003                     /s/ Amitabh Khanna
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Amitabh Khanna
                                              Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of eTelcharge.com, Inc.(the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl O.
Sherman Sr., Chief Executive of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d)); and
         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Carl O. Sherman Sr.
-------------------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

May 21, 2003
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Allen Bernard MOSS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2022213EN.01001001.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022 — Solar Ileias Bompaina AE v European Commission

(Case C-429/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Market for electricity generated from renewable energy sources - National legislation which allegedly has the effect of conferring an unlawful advantage on electricity suppliers - Complaint to the European Commission - Rejection decision without initiating the formal investigation procedure - Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Article 1(h) - Concept of ‘interested party’ - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 213/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Solar Ileias Bompaina AE (represented by: A. Metaxas, dikigoros, and A. Bartosch, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Solar Ileias Bompaina AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Solar Ileias Bompaina AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 26.10.2020.

---
Tony E. DENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2443

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation: and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
April 16, 2007



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson         
|Paul G. Anderson             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2018112EN.01003101.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/31

---

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — Campailla v European Union

(Case T-759/16) (1)

1

((Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Liability of the European Union - Decisions delivered by the General Court and by the Court of Justice - Action dismissed by the General Court as inadmissible - Appeal dismissed as inadmissible on the ground of lack of representation - Action manifestly inadmissible))

(2018/C 112/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Massimo Campailla (Holtz, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: initially J. Inghelram and L. Tonini Alabiso, and subsequently J. Inghelram and V. Hanley-Emilsson, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the order of 6 October 2011, Campailla v Commission (C-265/11 P, not published, EU:C:2011:644).

Campailla

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Massimo Campailla shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Massimo Campailla shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.17.

1

---
EXHIBIT 4.33
                                                                    ------------

May 28, 2003

Mr. John Holloran
EXFO Gnubi Products Group Inc.



RE: TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
-----------------------------

Dear John:

This is to confirm our discussion on May 28, 2003 where we agreed to the terms
of your departure from the EXFO organization. It is understood that adequate
integration of our Protocol activity shall be completed prior to your departure.

         o        Your last day of employment will be Friday, December 26, 2003.

         o        Either party may decide on an earlier termination date by
                  giving thirty days prior written notice but in no case may
                  termination occur prior to October 31, 2003.

         o        Your salary will continue to include the premium for the
                  interim General Manager role. However, such premium shall be
                  considered as a staying bonus starting with the date of this
                  letter.

         o        You will continue to receive your salary (including the
                  staying bonus) for a period of four weeks after your
                  termination date, unless you decide to leave earlier than
                  December 26, 2003.

I greatly appreciate your contribution to EXFO and your professionalism and I am
confident that our continued collaboration will be rewarding for both of us
until your departure. Rest assured that should additional opportunities present
themselves, I would not hesitate to request that you continue your contributions
to EXFO. Should you require any references, you can be assured of my utmost
support.

If you are in agreement that this represents the terms of our discussion, kindly
sign below where indicated and return to my attention.

Best regards,

/s/ GERMAIN LAMONDE

Germain Lamonde
President and
Chief Executive Officer

Agreed to on this _______ day of June, 2003.


____________________________________
JOHN HOLLORAN
* After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that

oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, this appeal is submitted on the briefs and the

record. See

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 (Submitted August 31, 2005 * )

Decided September 1, 2005

Before

Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 04-1788

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

,

v.

ROBERT ROSS,

Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 00 CR 690

Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

, Judge.

O R D E R

Robert Ross pleaded guilty to one count of distributing cocaine base, 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1). In his written plea agreement, Ross waived his right to appeal “any

sentence within the maximum provided in the statute of conviction (or the manner in

which that sentenced was determined), in exchange for concessions made by the United

States.” The district court, applying the sentencing guidelines as mandatory,

calculated a

range of 168 to 210 months and sentenced Ross to 168 months’

UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53No. 04-1788 Page 2

imprisonment. This sentence is below the statutory maximum of incarceration for life. Nevertheless Ross challenged his sentence, arguing that the district court’s application

of the sentencing guidelines was erroneous under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct.

738 (2005), and seeking a limited remand, see United States v. Paladino

, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). But in a letter to the court and in his reply brief Ross concedes that

our decision in United States v. Bownes

, 405 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2005), which we issued after Ross filed his opening brief, erased any doubt that an appeal waiver without an “escape hatch” will be strictly enforced against an appellant who challenges his

sentence based on Booker

. Because Ross’s plea agreement contains no such “escape

hatch” that would allow him to appeal if the law changed in his favor, we must enforce

the waiver. See United States v. Lockwood , No. 04-2511, 416 F.3d 604, 608 (7th Cir. July 2005); United States v. Cieslowski

, 410 F.3d 353, 364 (7th Cir. 2005). Therefore, the appeal is D ISMISSED

.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary ofAmerican Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2007 of the Registrant (the “Report”): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.     By: /s/ Denise Barton Denise Barton    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of    American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC  Date:August 9, 2007
25