alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105619-105620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30874]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 105620]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel Biomarkers for AD & ADRD.
    Date: February 13, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 
8B, Rockville, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Anita T Tandle, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 
5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 276-5085, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 19, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-30874 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Aaron W. DUPREE and Amber Dupree, as Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. Dana M. SPEER, Individually and Jaymor Management Group, LLC., a Limited Liability Company, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3545

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 2, 2019

Margaret E. Kozan, of Margaret E. Kozan, P.A., Winter Park, and Michael J. Damaso, II, of Wooten Kimbrough, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

Samuel B. Spinner and Hinda Klein, of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for Appellee, Jaymor Management Group, LLC, a Limited Liability Company.

No Appearance for Other Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**Hernandez v. Tallahassee Med. Ctr., Inc.*, 896 So.2d 839, 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ("[T]he law is well established that an employee driving to and from work is not within the scope of employment so as to impose liability on the employer." (citing *Foremost Dairies, Inc. of the South v. Godwin*, 158 Fla. 245, 26 So.2d 773 (Fla. 1946) ; *Freeman v. Manpower, Inc.*, 453 So.2d 208, 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) ) ).

EVANDER, C.J. , GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**700 KA 12-01328**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEITH LYMAN, ALSO KNOWN AS KEITH J. LYMAN, ALSO KNOWN AS KEITH JOSEPH LYMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), rendered January 12, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault on a peace officer.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault on a peace officer (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.08). We are unable to review defendant’s contentions that his plea was not voluntary or that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe inasmuch as the stipulated record on appeal does not include the transcript of the plea proceeding, nor has defendant complied with this Court’s request to provide the presentence report ( see Matter of Planned Parenthood of Niagara County v Maerten , 6 AD3d 1162, 1163; Matter of Santoshia L. , 202 AD2d 1027, 1028; cf. People v Douglas , 288 AD2d 859, 859, lv denied 97 NY2d 681; see generally People v Kinchen , 60 NY2d 772, 774).

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# C_2021242EN.01004602.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/46

---

Order of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — ZU v Commission

(Case T-462/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Officials - Request for information - Rejection of a complaint - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Action manifestly inadmissible)

(2021/C 242/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio, L. Vernier and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, in the first place, annulment, first, of the Commission’s letter of 5 September 2019 refusing to answer the applicant’s questions and, second, of the Commission’s letter of 6 April 2020 rejecting his complaint and, in the second place, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of those measures.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | ZU shall pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ZU shall pay all of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 55 Filed 12/19/03 Page 1 of 6 PageID 286
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 55 Filed 12/19/03 Page 2 of 6 PageID 287
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 55 Filed 12/19/03 Page 3 of 6 PageID 288
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 55 Filed 12/19/03 Page 4 of 6 PageID 289
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 55 Filed 12/19/03 Page 5 of 6 PageID 290
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 55 Filed 12/19/03 Page 6 of 6 PageID 291
Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 320 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3036
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00047]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 580 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1030, K2025-1029.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00047 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:    3/16/07                      By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     ---------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10 QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date:  November 15, 2007


/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SYNAVANT Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne P. Yetter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/WAYNE P. YETTERWayne P. Yetter
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

March      ,
2003

---

QuickLinks
Mark PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Travious D. MOZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3049

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 15, 2019

AFFIRMED.
A.B., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3468

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

Howard L. Dimming, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*342Affirmed without prejudice to any right A.B. may have to seek collateral relief or relief under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d).

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 22 Filed 06/20/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID 148
# C_2021182EN.01005302.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/53

---

Order of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — 3M Belgium v ECHA

(Case T-160/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Identification of perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and of its salts as a substance of very high concern - Inclusion in the list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Time limit for bringing an action - Article 59(10) of Regulation No 1907/2006 - Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 182/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: 3M Belgium (Diegem, Belgium) (represented by: J.-P. Montfort and T. Delille, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision ECHA/01/2020 of ECHA of 16 January 2020 concerning the inclusion of perfluorobutanesulfonic acid and its salts in the list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC). |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC).

| 3. | 3M Belgium shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

3M Belgium shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.

| 4. | 3M Belgium, ECHA and CEFIC shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

3M Belgium, ECHA and CEFIC shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED
                 BASED ON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

                  OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED
                  WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

                           EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS
                             CORPORATION [ETISALAT]
                             HEAD OFFICE - ABU DHABI
                             P.O. Box 3838 Abu Dhabi
                              United Arab Emirates

                        INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RELATIONS
                   Telex (893) 23555 IBRETC Fax: +971 26336700
                             Telephone: +971 2208458

                                 TELEFAX MESSAGE

FROM:       MOHAMED [Illegible] M.S. AL SHARHAN

TO:         VSNL India
ATTN:       S.S. Bodh, Chief General Manager Finance
FAX NO.:    +91 22 269 052/262 5616/269 6052

TO:         Teleglobe Canada, Abu Dhabi Office
ATTN:       Radwan Moussalli, President, Regional Director
FAX NO.:    +02 6272 624

TO:         TELEGLOBE CANADA, Montreal
ATTN:       Monique Bellerose, Switched Transit Marketing
FAX NO.:    +91 514 868 7041/7275/7919/7234/7451/7729/7111/7033

OUR REF:    MHB/TAR/T101/India/T [Illegible] 1143
Date:       3rd June, 2000

SUBJECT:    TELEPHONE SERVICE BETWEEN UAE/INDIA VIA CANADA

Further to our  agreement  to reduce the TAR  between UAE and India to SDR [text
redacted] applying Sender Pays transit for all overflow routes. Please note that
since the termination  share of the destination  administration  is fixed at SDR
[text  redacted],  we have also  updated our  records  for the  subject  service
applying the fixed terminal  share of SDR [text  redacted]  w.e.f.  1-Jun.-2000.
Direct accounting to apply.

Both   administrations   are  kindly  requested  to  update  their  records  and
acknowledge.

Best regards,

/s/ Mohamed  [Illegible] M.S. Al Sharhan
# C_2022303EN.01004402.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/44

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau)

(Case T-83/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark tagesschau - Partial revocation - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 303/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: T. Wendt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Bayerischer Rundfunk (Munich, Germany) and the eight other interveners whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: B. Krause, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2019 (Case R 1487/2019-2).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








H.
      David
      Ramm, Chief Executive Officer, and John D. Giolli, Chief Financial Officer,
      of
      Millennium Cell Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), have executed this
      certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) and do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that to our knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
      dates
      and for the periods expressed in the Report.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.








/s/
      H.
      David Ramm


H.
      David
      Ramm


Chief
      Executive Officer


March
      27,
      2006








/s/
      John D. Giolli


John
      D.
      Giolli


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      27,
      2006
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC v. Carol GUILLORY

NO. 2019-CC-0027

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
Justin ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-4033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021357EN.01002501.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/25

---

Order of the General Court of 9 July 2021 — Kozhuvchanka uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci v EUIPO (NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER)

(Case T-357/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Geographical origin - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 357/39)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Drushtvo za proizvodvsto, trgovija i uslugi Kozhuvchanka d.o.o. uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci (Kavadarci, North Macedonia) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and P. Angelova Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 1729/2019-1), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Drushtvo za proizvodvsto, trgovija i uslugi Kozhuvchanka d.o.o. uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Drushtvo za proizvodvsto, trgovija i uslugi Kozhuvchanka d.o.o. uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7704

BROOKS JAMES TERRELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. RUPERT, Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO), Lee County 

USP, VA; HARRELL WATTS, Administrator National Inmate 

Appeals,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (7:11-cv-00024-JCT-RSB)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brooks James Terrell appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens 

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Terrell v. Rupert, No. 7:11-cv-00024-

JCT-RSB (W.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED