alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Larry L. Eastland, Chief Executive Officer of Great American Family Parks, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Great American Family Parks, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: May 14, 2007   /s/ Larry L. Eastland Larry L. Eastland Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021513EN.01002601.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — T i D kontrolni sistemi v EUIPO –Sigmatron (Signalling apparatuses and devices)

(Case T-503/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing signalling apparatuses and devices - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Declaration of invalidity of a prior design - No effect - Disclosure of the earlier design - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2021/C 513/38)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: T i D kontrolni sistemi EOOD (Varna, Bulgaria) (represented by: P. Priparzhenski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Georgieva and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sigmatron EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Kostov, lawyer).

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2020 (Case R 956/2019-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Sigmatron and T i D kontrolni sistemi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders T i D kontrolni sistemi EOOD to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders T i D kontrolni sistemi EOOD to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
# C_2021028EN.01001001.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/10

---

Appeal brought on 30 April 2020 by Tiziano Vizzone against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 4 March 2020 in Case T-658/19 Vizzone v Commission

(Case C-191/20 P)

(2021/C 28/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Tiziano Vizzone (represented by: M. Bettani, S. Brovelli)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 25 November 2020, the Court (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered Mr Tiziano Vizzone to bear his own costs.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 415 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Samsel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Samsel. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Samsel, Cr. No. 21- 

537, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the 

production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a former 

employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:04 Oct 19, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR415.ATS SR415
2 

SRES 415 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized 

3 to provide relevant testimony in the case of United States 

4 v. Samsel, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

5 should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Schwager, and any current or former officer 

8 or employee of the Secretary’s office, in connection with 

9 the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 

10 resolution. 

Æ
Willie James JONES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

Willie James Jones, Lake Butler, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and, Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

Willie Jones petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging, inter alia, that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to appeal the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. We grant the writ. Pursuant to our decision in *Clay v. State* , 226 So.3d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), the motion for judgment of acquittal was meritorious.

*1249Because a second appeal would be redundant, we remand for the trial court to enter a judgment of acquittal. *See**Delgado v. State* , 174 So.3d 1071, 1074 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ("Because a new appeal would be redundant, we remand with directions for the trial court to vacate Delgado's judgment and sentence ... on count two.")

PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED with instructions.

EVANDER, C.J., GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
# C_2022011EN.01002401.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Di Bernado v Commission

(Case T-41/20) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition - Conditions of admission - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Insufficient professional experience - Article 266 TFEU - Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court - Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment - Article 2 of Annex III to the Statute - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Liability)

(2022/C 11/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Danilo Di Bernado (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the selection board in the open competition on the basis of tests EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 of 13 Mars 2019, taken with a view to complying with the judgment of 29 November 2018, Di Bernardo v Commission (T-811/16, not published, EU:T:2018:859), not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the recruitment of secretaries/clerks at grade SC 1 in the field of financial support and, secondly, compensation for the harm that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Danilo di Bernardo to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Danilo di Bernardo to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1178 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-966, K2025-965.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31737 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021079EN.01003801.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/38

---

Order of the General Court of 13 January 2021 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA)

(Case T-189/20) (1)

(2021/C 79/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 9 PageID 70
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 9 PageID 71
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 3 of 9 PageID 72
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 4 of 9 PageID 73
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 5 of 9 PageID 74
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 6 of 9 PageID 75
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 7 of 9 PageID 76
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 8 of 9 PageID 77
 

 Case 3:03-cr-00224-L Document 33 Filed 05/19/06 Page 9 of 9 PageID 78
Brian Nephi MCLELLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1911

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NO. SCWC

- 28901

IN THE SUPRE ME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee

- Cross

- Appellant ,

vs. Robert J. McKnight , Jr., Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant

- Cross

- Appellee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO S

. 28431 & 28901 ; CR. NO. 06

- 1

- 0352(1) )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Trader , in place of Duffy , J., recused )
Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant

- Cross

- Appellee Robert
J. McKnight , Jr. ’s application for writ of certiorari, filed April 19 , 2012, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling

.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, May 31, 2012. Benjamin E. Lowenthal , /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for p etitioner/ d efendant

a ppellant

- c ross - a ppellee /s/ Paula A. Nakayama on the a pplication and r eply

. /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry, and Marissa H.I. Luning, /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for r espondent/ p laintiff

a ppellee

- c ross - a ppellant /s/ Rom A. Trader on the r esponse . Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-28901 31-MAY-2012 09:24 AM
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 12, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert C. McPherson, III                                              
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021431EN.01002902.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (EDUCTOR)

(Case T-84/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark EDUCTOR - Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR - Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 16(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Article 6bis of the Paris Convention)

(2021/C 431/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary) (represented by: V. Luszcz, C. Sár and É. Ulviczki, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2019 (Case R 1310/2019-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Qx World and Mandelay.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 November 2019; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 November 2019;

| 2. | Orders Qx World Kft., EUIPO and Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Qx World Kft., EUIPO and Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.

---
# C_2016296EN.01004001.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/40

---

Action brought on 1 July 2016 — adp Gauselmann v EUIPO (MULTI FRUITS)

(Case T-355/16)

(2016/C 296/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘MULTI FRUITS’ — Application for registration No 13 646 542

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2016 in Case R 1043/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the ground of appeal and annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the ground of appeal and annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of


the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H.
Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date: May
10, 2010




/s/
      John
      H. HomierJohn
      H. HomierPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Douglas A. JENNINGS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0297

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1633.

#### Milne Manufacturing Company *v.*Cowart.

Him, C. J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in *Huntley Manufacturing Co.*v. *Nixon Grocery Co.,*ante, 46 (64 S. E. 279), and eases there cited. *Jxidgmenb affirmed.*

*308Complaint, from • city court of Miller county — Judge Bush. December 4, 1908.

Submitted February 25, —

Decided June 15, 1909.

*P. D. Rich,*for plaintiff in error. *W. I. Geer,*contra
Exhibit 23.1

       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To: Nuclear Solutions, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-141159 of Nuclear Solutions, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report, which includes
an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern dated March 28, 2007, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Nuclear Solutions, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2006.


                                    /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2007