alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of InoLife Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:





1. The Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period  ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





June 6, 2011
By:
/s/ Gary BertholdGary Berthold (Chief Executive Officer)





June 6, 2011
By:
/s/ Gary BertholdGary Berthold (Chief Financial Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31618]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL RIGHTS COLD CASE RECORDS REVIEW BOARD

[Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0006-N]

Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release

AGENCY: Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 195 
pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA) related to seven civil rights cold case incidents to which the 
Review Board assigned the unique identifiers 2024-003-018, 2024-003-
023, 2024-003-035, 2024-003-038, 2024-003-051, 2024-003-067, and 2024-
003-068. NARA did not propose any postponements of disclosure. On 
December 20, 2024, the Review Board determined that the records should 
be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. 
By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) 
of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that 
requires the Review Board to publish in the Federal Register its 
determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the 
Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, 
Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014, [email protected].
    Authority: Pub. L. 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489 (44 U.S.C. 2107).

    Dated: December 30, 2024.
Stephannie Oriabure,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2024-31618 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-SY-P
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2005



/s/ Carl Suter
------------------------------------
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation byreference in the following Registration Statements:
(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-152816)pertaining to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan of Airvana, Inc.
(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144724)pertaining to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of Airvana, Inc.
(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-157500) pertaining to the2007 Stock Incentive Plan of Airvana, Inc.
of our report dated March 9,2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Airvana, Inc.and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof Airvana, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3, 2010.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,
Christopher T. Seaver, Chief Executive Officer of Hydril Company, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that: (1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 4, 2004
    /s/ Christopher T. SeaverChristopher T. SeaverChief Executive Officer
Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 18 PageID 2537
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 18 PageID 2538
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 3 of 18 PageID 2539
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 4 of 18 PageID 2540
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 5 of 18 PageID 2541
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 6 of 18 PageID 2542
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 7 of 18 PageID 2543
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 8 of 18 PageID 2544
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 9 of 18 PageID 2545
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 10 of 18 PageID 2546
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 11 of 18 PageID 2547
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 12 of 18 PageID 2548
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 13 of 18 PageID 2549
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 14 of 18 PageID 2550
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 15 of 18 PageID 2551
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 16 of 18 PageID 2552
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 17 of 18 PageID 2553
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00888-P Document 128 Filed 05/27/05 Page 18 of 18 PageID 2554
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1121-140]

On June 8, 2023, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (licensee), filed a long-term variance request to remove the current compliance requirement for the ramping rate from license Article 33(d) for the Battle Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 1121. Because the Commission determined that the licensee's request would require an amendment to Article 33(d) of the project license, the Commission issued a public notice for the licensee's request on June 30, 2023. On August 9, 2023, Commission staff requested additional information from the licensee to address comments received from the California State Water Resources Control Board during the public notice period. Finally, on November 14, 2024, the licensee filed a request to withdraw its long-term variance request regarding the license Article 33(d) ramping rate for North Battle Creek Dam.

                    No motion in opposition to the request for withdrawal has been filed, and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,[1]                                          the withdrawal of the application became effective on November 29, 2024, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.                

Dated: December 23, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 385.216(b) (2024).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-31435 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Case 3:03-cv-01205-P Document 29 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 145
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01205-P Document 29 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 146
# C_2023024EN.01003301.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2022 — Sciessent v Commission

(Cases T-122/20 and T-123/20) (1)

(Biocidal products - Active substances - Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite - Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 - Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Efficacy - Active substances for use in treated articles - Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves - Competence of the Commission - Principle of non-discrimination - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations)

(2023/C 24/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sciessent LLC (Beverly, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and P. Sellar, lawyers, and V. McElwee, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: R. Shahsavan Eriksson, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, H. Shev, H. Eklinder and O. Simonsson, acting as Agents), European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its actions pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1960 of 26 November 2019 not approving silver zeolite as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 7 (OJ 2019 L 306, p. 42) and Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1973 of 27 November 2019 not approving silver copper zeolite as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 7 (OJ 2019 L 307, p. 58).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-122/20 and T-123/20 for the purposes of the present judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-122/20 and T-123/20 for the purposes of the present judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Sciessent LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Sciessent LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-452 and 731-TA-1129-1130 (Third Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on raw flexible magnets from China and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on raw flexible magnets from China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2] 

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on June 3, 2024 (89 FR 47607) and determined on September 6, 2024, that it would conduct expedited reviews (89 FR 81938, October 9, 2024).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on December 20, 2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5574 (December 2024), entitled                     *Raw Flexible Magnets from China and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-452 and 731-TA-1129-1130 (Third Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 20, 2024.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Jason E. Kearns did not participate.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-31085 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
R.R. v. A.C.

2160964

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Randolph Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 11, 2004 

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- Page Solo

TRM/chr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

BETTY SCOTT §

§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:03-CV-529-Y

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Court has made an independent review of the following matters

in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States magistrate judge filed on

April 7, 2005; and

3. Plaintiff's objections to the proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation of the United States

magistrate judge filed on May 2, 2005.

This Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's findings. 

It is ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation

of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED. The

decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 28, 2005.

 

 Case 4:03-cv-00529-Y Document 25 Filed 10/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 103
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
3rd Quarter 2006 ending May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Robert V. Johnson   
|Robert V. Johnson       
|(Chief Financial Officer

July 17, 2006

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



38
# C_2021382EN.01002502.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/25

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — AI v ECDC

(Case T-79/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - ECDC staff - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Damage to reputation - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Dismissal of application - Right to be heard - Absence of prima facie evidence - Duty of care - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 382/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AI (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (represented by: A. Iber and J. Mannheim, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of ECDC’s decision of 5 April 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of 10 April 2018 and, in so far as necessary, of ECDC’s decision of 4 November 2019 rejecting the complaint against the decision of 5 April 2019 and, secondly, compensation for the damage suffered.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | AI is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

AI is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ALLEN W OODYAR

D , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. C HARLES L. R

YAN; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-15899 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00342-SLG-JFM M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Sharon L. Gle a son, Distric t Judge , Pre siding

Nove m be r 18, 2013 ** B e fore : SILVER

M AN, B YB EE a

nd PREGER SON, C irc uit Judge s. Alle n W oody ard a

ppe a ls pro sethe distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of his re que st for pre l im ina ry injunc tive re lie f a ga inst de fe nda nt prison offic ia ls. W e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1292(a)(1), and we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED NOV 27 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Our sole inquiry is whe the r the distric t

c o urt a buse d its disc re tion in deny ing pre l im ina ry injunc tive re lie f, and we c onc l ude the distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion. W

inte r v . N atural Re sourc e s De fe n seC ounc il , 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing fa c tors for distric t c ourt to c onside r); Sports Form, Inc . v . Unite d Pre ss Int’l , 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th C ir. 1982) (e xpla ining lim ite d sc ope of re vie w). 1 AFFIRM E D.

1 Appe lla nt’ s m otion to e xpe dite is de n ie d a s m oot. 2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SS.1350)

         Pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss.1350),  the undersigned,  George Mellides,  Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Essential  Reality,  Inc. a Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does  hereby
certify,  to his knowledge,  that: The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended  December 31, 2002 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                ------------------------------
                                                George Mellides
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer

June __, 2003

<PAGE>