alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

      ( print page 1212)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 571 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1029, K2025-1028.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00064 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021412EN.01001101.xml

| 11.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/11

---

Order of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — NG and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-646/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Road transport - Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 - Driver’s rest periods - Impossibility of taking certain rest periods in the vehicle - Return to the employer’s operational centre or to the place of residence for certain rest periods - Professional association - Standing to bring proceedings - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 412/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: NG and 17 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Martens, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: R. van de Westelaken and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Norberg, L. Vétillard and S. Emmerechts, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Article 1(6)(c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (OJ 2020 L 249, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | NG and the other parties whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

NG and the other parties whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
Exhibit 99.3



OFFICERS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICER



|    |  |                                                                        
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|To: |  | The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Owner Trustee                             
|    |  | The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, National Association, as
|    |  | Indenture Trustee                                                      
|    |  | Moodys Investors Service, Inc.                                        
|    |  | Standard & Poors Ratings Group                                        



Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale
and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2000 among AmSouth Auto Trust 2000-1, as Issuer, AmSouth Auto Receivables, LLC, as Seller, AmSouth Bank, as Servicer, and The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, National Association, as
Indenture Trustee (the Agreement), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of Servicer from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned
officers supervision and (ii) to the best of the undersigned officers knowledge, based on such review, Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout such period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate this 12th day of March, 2004.



AMSOUTH BANK as
ServicerBy:

/s/    Donald R. KimbleName:

Donald R. KimbleTitle:

Executive Vice President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - (-)wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 16, 2022        Landslides in Wyoming: Work, challenges, and case studies

Presentations and Events        November 18, 2021        PubTalk-11/2021: Busting Myths About One of the Largest Volcanic Systems in the World - The Top 10 Misconceptions about Yellowstone Volcanism
Clayton Foster TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 1 of 10 PageID 3127
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 2 of 10 PageID 3128
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 3 of 10 PageID 3129
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 4 of 10 PageID 3130
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 5 of 10 PageID 3131
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 6 of 10 PageID 3132
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 7 of 10 PageID 3133
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 8 of 10 PageID 3134
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 9 of 10 PageID 3135
Case 3:03-cv-01589-N Document 162 Filed 10/23/08 Page 10 of 10 PageID 3136
# C_2021019EN.01004902.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2020 — Buxadé Villalba and Others v Parliament

(Case T-32/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Member of the Parliament - Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election as Members of the European Parliament of two Spanish elected representatives - Locus standi of three other Members of the European Parliament - Lack of individual concern - Application for a declaratory judgment - Action partly inadmissible and partly brought before a court that is manifestly incompetent to hear it)

(2021/C 19/53)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Madrid, Spain) María Esperanza Araceli Aguilar Pinar (Madrid), Hermann Tertsch Del Valle-Lersundi (Madrid) (represented by: M. Castro Fuertes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the Parliament’s acknowledgment of the election as Members of the European Parliament of Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres, announced by the President of the Parliament at the plenary sitting of 13 January 2020.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as partly inadmissible and as partly brought before a court that is manifestly incompetent to hear it; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as partly inadmissible and as partly brought before a court that is manifestly incompetent to hear it;

| 2. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain and of Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain and of Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres;

| 3. | Orders Mr Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Mr Hermann Tertsch Del Valle-Lersundi and Ms María Esperanza Araceli Aguilar Pinar to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Mr Hermann Tertsch Del Valle-Lersundi and Ms María Esperanza Araceli Aguilar Pinar to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, Mr Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Comín i Oliveres to bear the costs relating to their respective applications to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, Mr Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Comín i Oliveres to bear the costs relating to their respective applications to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.

---
Randall C. PLACE, Esq., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sara Elizabeth HANLEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0157

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Motorsports and
Entertainment Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
Date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (4) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2002               By: /s/ Mark A. Paul
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Mark A. Paul, Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - (-)new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Presentations and Events        April 5, 2024        Press Conference — M 4.8 near Whitehouse Station, NJ

publication        January 1, 1951        Preliminary report on the geology and ground-water supply of the Newark, New Jersey, area

Presentations and Events        April 5, 2024        Press Conference — M 4.8 near Whitehouse Station, NJ (afternoon)

publication        January 1, 2013        Arsenic in New Jersey Coastal Plain streams, sediments, and shallow groundwater: effects from different geologic sources and anthropogenic inputs on biogeochemical and physical mobilization processes

publication        January 1, 1960        Factual data for public-supply wells and selected irrigation wells in Monmouth County, New Jersey

Research        February 21, 2018        New Jersey Ambient Groundwater-Quality Monitoring Network

publication        January 1, 1973        Geology and water resources of the Wharton Tract and the Mullica River basin in southern New Jersey
# C_2020201EN.01005601.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/56

---

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2020 — Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis v Parliament

(Case T-20/20) (1)

(2020/C 201/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
# C_2020443EN.01001601.xml

| 21.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 20 October 2020 — SIA EUROAPTIEKA v Ministru kabinets

(Case C-530/20)

(2020/C 443/17)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Satversmes tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA EUROAPTIEKA

Institution which adopted the contested act: Ministru kabinets

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the activities to which the contested provision refers be regarded as advertising of medicinal products within the meaning of Title VIII of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) (‘Advertising’)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the activities to which the contested provision refers be regarded as advertising of medicinal products within the meaning of Title VIII of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) (‘Advertising’)?

| 2. | Must Article 90 of Directive 2001/83/EC be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which extends the list of prohibited methods of advertising and imposes stricter restrictions than those expressly provided for in Article 90 of that directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 90 of Directive 2001/83/EC be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which extends the list of prohibited methods of advertising and imposes stricter restrictions than those expressly provided for in Article 90 of that directive?

| 3. | Must the legislation at issue in the main proceedings be considered to restrict advertising of medicinal products in order to encourage the rational use of such products, within the meaning of Article 87(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Must the legislation at issue in the main proceedings be considered to restrict advertising of medicinal products in order to encourage the rational use of such products, within the meaning of Article 87(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC?

---

(1)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67, Special edition in Latvian: Chapter 13 Volume 027 P. 69).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

) No. 3:03-CR-0350-R

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-0347-R

) ECF

MANUEL OROSIETA-MOJICA, )

ID # 31153-177, )

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and recommendation in this

case on movant/defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence brought pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the findings, conclusions and

recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the District Court accepts the findings, conclusions

and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2007.

___________________________________

JERRY BUCHMEYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Amendment to Advisory Board Agreement


 


This Amendment (the “Amendment”)
is made by and between Lans Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Dave Christensen of Enterprise
Technology Consulting, Inc. (the “Advisor”) parties to the agreement ADVISORY BOARD AGREEMENT dated September 17, 2015
(the “Agreement”). The effective date of this Amendment is September 17, 2016.


WHEREAS, the Company and Advisor
previously entered into an amendment to the Agreement on January 1, 2016; and


WHEREAS, the Company and Advisor
desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement for six (6) months;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the premises and mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


1.      
Exhibit A of the Agreement will be amended to extend the term of the Agreement for six (6)
months following the date of this Amendment. 


 


2.      
In all other respects, the remaining terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of the Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect to the extent provided in the Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment as of the date first written above.


	
        Lans Holding, Inc.

         

         

         

        By: /s/ Trevor Allen

        Trevor Allen, CEO
	
        Dave Christensen of Enterprise Technology Consulting, Inc.

         

         

         

        By: /s/ David Christensen

        David Christensen
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 5, 2017

NO. 03

- 17

- 00683

- CV

Jane Doe and John Doe, Appellant s

v.

Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC; Phi lip K. Broderick, Individually; Andres A. Arguello, Individually; Sam antha Fenwich, Individually; Schavon J. Jahn; and Albert Zavala, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FI ELD, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on September 5, 2017. Having

reviewed the record , it appears that the C our t lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. A ppellant s shall pay all costs relating to this

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00222-CV

Pryor Custom Homes, L.P.; RPCH Management, L.L.C.

and Edmund R. Pryor, Appellants

v.

Mid-Continent Casualty Company, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN401390, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismissthis appeal. We grant their motion

and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Waldrop

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: October 19, 2005