alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7595

MARCUS D. KELLY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-95-3799-3-23BC)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus D. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Kelly v. South Carolina, No. CA-95-3799-

3-23BC (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

As independent registered publicaccountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-119562 on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and all related financial statement schedules, which reports are included in this Annual Report on form 10-K of CallWave, Inc.

/s/ MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C. 

MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C. 

Los Angeles,California 

September 12, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Holding Company (‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with the filing of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the ‘‘Report’’) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2007, hereby certify as follows:

|  |          |                                                                                             |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                       |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations for Nalco. |

|        |  |  |                                                                                                   |
|--------|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCE                                                                              |
|   |  |  | William H. JoyceChairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 9, 2007               |
|   |  |  | /s/ BRADLEY J. BELL                                                                               |
|   |  |  | Bradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 9, 2007 |

----
# C_2020371EN.01000701.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/7

---

Appeal brought on 11 September 2020 by Christoph Klein against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) made on 2 July 2020 in Case T-562/19, Christoph Klein v European Commission

(Case C-430/20 P)

(2020/C 371/04)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Christoph Klein (represented by: H.-J. Ahlt, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 in Case T-562/19; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 in Case T-562/19;

| — | declare the action admissible and that the European Commission breached its obligations under the Treaty by failing to act in the safeguard procedure initiated by the Federal Republic of Germany on 7 January 1998 concerning the CE-marked medical device ‘Inhaler Broncho-Air’ and not issuing a decision in accordance with Article 8(2) of Directive 93/42/EEC (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action admissible and that the European Commission breached its obligations under the Treaty by failing to act in the safeguard procedure initiated by the Federal Republic of Germany on 7 January 1998 concerning the CE-marked medical device ‘Inhaler Broncho-Air’ and not issuing a decision in accordance with Article 8(2) of Directive 93/42/EEC (1);

| — | in the alternative, set aside the order of the General Court and refer the case back to the General Court for judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, set aside the order of the General Court and refer the case back to the General Court for judgment;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The General Court distorted facts and evidence, erred in its classification of the facts and infringed EU law, namely Article 265 TFEU and the right to a fair hearing, in so far as it found that the action was brought out of time and that the appellant did not have standing to bring proceedings in his own right.

In addition, the General Court misinterpreted EU law and infringed Article 8(2) of Directive 93/42.

Finally, the order of the General Court under appeal is vitiated by a failure to state reasons.

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medicinal devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1).

---
# C_2021217EN.01004102.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Albert Darboven Holding v EUIPO (WINDSOR-CASTLE)

(Case T-93/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark WINDSOR-CASTLE - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Laudatory character)

(2021/C 217/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Albert Darboven Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer, A. Söder and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2019 (Case R 2448/2018-1) relating to an application for registration of the word mark WINDSOR-CASTLE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2019 (Case R 2448/2018-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2019 (Case R 2448/2018-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Criminal No. 3:03-CR-422-D

VS. §

 §

CAROLYN HARDIN VEAD, et al., §

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case,

including the fee applications, and the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the

court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted. For the

reasons set out in the magistrate judge’s April 29, 2005 findings and recommendation, the court

certifies that the services rendered by Messrs. Ackerman and Jett were in an extended case and that

excess payment is necessary for fair compensation. The court also adopts the recommendation with

respect to the services rendered by J. Randall Price, Ph.D., and certifies that his fees were reasonably

incurred and necessary to provide fair compensation for services of an unusual character or duration.

SO ORDERED.

May 16, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cr-00422-D Document 230 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 624
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Great American Family Parks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry L. Eastland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great American Family Parks, Inc. and will be retained by Great American Family Parks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    Dated: August 9, 2007 /s/ Larry L Eastland Name: Larry L. Eastland Title: Chief Executive Officer
Lisa BATTAGLIA, Appellant, v. Bruce BATTAGLIA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1036

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 9, 2019

John Nicholas Klein IV, of The Klein Practice PLLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Michelle P. Smith, of Law Office of Michelle P. Smith, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*1294AFFIRMED. *See**Macar v. Macar*, 803 So.2d 707 (Fla. 2001).

ORFINGER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Briana L. MAYES v. Austyn P. MAYES

2160309

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Edward Jack GARVIN, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 14, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 7, 2019

Edward Jack Garvin, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

In Re:

DANIELLE VERONICA SAVOY

Debtor

Case No. 24-30209-MVL-13

Order Denying Confirmation

On April 04, 2024 , came on for consideration the Confirmation of the plan filed February 12, 2024 by the Debtor.

The Court finds that good cause exists for the entry of this Order; it is therefore

ORDERED THAT Confirmation is hereby denied.

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed April 10, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-30209-mvl13 Doc 31 Filed 04/10/24 Entered 04/10/24 15:28:58 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Order Denying Confirmation, Page 2

24-30209-MVL-13

DANIELLE VERONICA SAVOY

### End of Order ###

Signed: /s/ Thomas D. Powers

Thomas D. Powers, Trustee

State Bar # 16218700

Office of the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

105 Decker Ct

Suite 1150 11th Floor

Irving, TX 75062

(214) 855-9200 / (214) 965-0757 (Fax)

Case 24-30209-mvl13 Doc 31 Filed 04/10/24 Entered 04/10/24 15:28:58 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation: and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 13, 2007



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Robert V. Johnson        
|Robert V. Johnson            
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)



47.
IN RE: Victor Roy LORASO, III

NO. 2019-B-0444

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2019

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the representation by the Chief Disciplinary Counsel that respondent has agreed to the entry of an order of interim suspension,

IT IS ORDERED that Victor Roy Loraso, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 31239, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.
Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

In re: § 

 § Case No. 24-44071-ELM 

VILROSE VENTURES, LLC, § 

 § Chapter 11 

 Debtor. § 

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR DEBTOR TO APPEAR 

BY AND THROUGH A DULY ADMITTED ATTORNEY AT LAW 

 On November 4, 2024, a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy 

Code (the “Petition”) was filed on behalf of Vilrose Ventures, LLC (the “Debtor”), thereby 

initiating the above-captioned case. 

 According to the Petition, the Debtor is corporation (which the Bankruptcy Code defines 

as effectively including a limited liability company). See Docket No. 1 (Petition) (response to Item 

6); see also 11 U.S.C. § 101(9) (definition of “corporation”). As such, the Debtor may not appear 

before the Court in this case except by and through an attorney at law admitted to practice before 

the Court. See Southwest Express Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 670 F.2d 53, 55 (5th

Cir. 1982) (holding that corporation may only appear in federal court by and through an attorney 

at law). Here, however, the Petition was neither signed nor filed with the Court by an attorney for 

the Debtor admitted to practice before the Court and, to date, no attorney has made a formal 

appearance in the case on behalf of the Debtor. See Petition (response to Item 17); see also case 

docket. 

 

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed November 7, 2024

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-44071-elm11 Doc 10 Filed 11/07/24 Entered 11/07/24 11:28:47 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
 Page 2 

 Consequently, it is hereby: 

ORDERED that a deadline of 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) on November 25, 

2024 (the “Appearance Deadline”), be and is hereby fixed for the Debtor to retain an attorney at 

law admitted to practice before this Court and for such attorney to file a written notice of 

appearance in the case to formally appear as counsel for the Debtor in the case; it is further 

ORDERED that, in the absence of compliance with such requirement by the Appearance 

Deadline, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice for want of prosecution. 

# # # END OF ORDER # # # 

Case 24-44071-elm11 Doc 10 Filed 11/07/24 Entered 11/07/24 11:28:47 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2022244EN.01002501.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Group Nivelles v EUIPO — Easy Sanitary Solutions (Shower drainage channel)

(Case T-327/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel - Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Scope - Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry - Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Identification of the earlier design - Earlier whole design - Determination of the features of the contested design - Global comparison)

(2022/C 244/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Group Nivelles NV (Gingelom, Belgium) (represented by: J. Jonkhout, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and G. Predonzani, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Easy Sanitary Solutions BV (Oldenzaal, Netherlands) (represented by: F. Eijsvogels, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2020 (Case R 2664/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Group Nivelles and Easy Sanitary Solutions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Group Nivelles NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Group Nivelles NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 21, 2020

No. 04-20-00444-CR

IN RE Robert Anthony WARDEN

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On September 10, 2020, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining 

of the trial court’s refusal to rule on his post-conviction motion for DNA/Scientific testing. On 

October 2, 2020, the trial court provided this court with a copy of its October 2, 2020, order 

denying relator’s “Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Scientific Testing.” Because relator has 

received the requested relief, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a). All other requested relief is denied.

It is so ORDERED on October 21, 2020.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of October, 2020.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-022-CR-C, styled State of Texas v. Robert Anthony Warden, pending in 

the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable William D. Old, III presiding.
Raymond SORIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3787

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2019]

Raymond Soria, Cross City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


MW Bancorp, Inc.


2110 Beechmont Avenue


Cincinnati, OH 45230


 


September 23, 2016


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, DC 20549


 


Re: MW Bancorp, Inc. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


MW Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("MWBC"),
is today filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 (the "Form 10-K"), as executed
on September 23, 2016.


 


Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item
601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, MWBC hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements
defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not
being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument represents long-term debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of
MWBC and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


 


	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 
	/s/ Gregory P. Niesen	 
	Gregory P. Niesen	 
	President and CEO