alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 1 of 15 PageID 31
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 2 of 15 PageID 32
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 3 of 15 PageID 33
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 4 of 15 PageID 34
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 5 of 15 PageID 35
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 6 of 15 PageID 36
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 7 of 15 PageID 37
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 8 of 15 PageID 38
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 9 of 15 PageID 39
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 10 of 15 PageID 40
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 11 of 15 PageID 41
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 12 of 15 PageID 42
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 13 of 15 PageID 43
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 14 of 15 PageID 44
Case 3:03-cv-01566-L Document 3 Filed 07/11/03 Page 15 of 15 PageID 45
# C_2021053EN.01002501.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för studiestöd (Sweden) lodged on 25 November 2020 — MCM v Centrala studiestödsnämnden

(Case C-638/20)

(2021/C 53/33)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Överklagandenämnden för studiestöd

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MCM

Defendant: Centrala studiestödsnämnden

Questions referred

May a Member State (the country of origin), in respect of a returning migrant worker’s child, notwithstanding Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(2) of Regulation [No] 492/2011, (1) and taking into consideration the budgetary interests of the country of origin, lay down a requirement for the child to have a connection with the country of origin in order to grant that child student financial aid to study abroad in the other EU Member State where the child’s parent previously worked (the host country), where

| (i) | after returning from the host country, the child’s parent has lived and worked in the country of origin for at least eight years, |
| --- | --- |

(i)

after returning from the host country, the child’s parent has lived and worked in the country of origin for at least eight years,

| (ii) | the child did not accompany his or her parent to the country of origin, but has remained since birth in the host country, and |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

the child did not accompany his or her parent to the country of origin, but has remained since birth in the host country, and

| (iii) | the country of origin lays down the same requirement of a connection for other nationals in the country of origin who do not satisfy the residence requirement and who apply for student financial aid for studies abroad in another country in the EU? |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

the country of origin lays down the same requirement of a connection for other nationals in the country of origin who do not satisfy the residence requirement and who apply for student financial aid for studies abroad in another country in the EU?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-62-2024]

Sanofi US Services Inc. submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facilities in Ridgefield, New Jersey within FTZ 49. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on December 18, 2024.

                    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/component(s) and specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's website—accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

The proposed finished product is Beyfortus® (Nirsevimab)—dosage form vaccine (duty-free).

The proposed foreign-status materials/components include Beyfortus® (Nirsevimab monoclonal antibody active pharmaceutical ingredient)—unmixed and mixed drug substance (duty-free).

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is February 18, 2025.                

A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information System” section of the Board's website.

                    For further information, contact Diane Finver at                     *Diane.Finver@trade.gov.*

Dated: December 31, 2024.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-31702 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Noel B. CAMPANHAC, Appellant, v. Riley LAURAMORE, Appellee. and Noel B. Campanhac, Appellant, v. Beverly Lauramore, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1001 Case No. 5D18-1002

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 8, 2019

Eric J. Friday, of Kingry & Friday, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellees.

HARRIS, J.

Appellant, Noel Campanhac, appeals the trial court's final judgments of injunction for protection against stalking in these related cases,1 arguing that there was insufficient evidence of stalking to support the injunctions. After considering the limited testimony and evidence presented below and without the benefit of briefs or any appearance by Appellees, we agree with Appellant that there was no competent, substantial evidence to support a finding of stalking. *See**Packal v. Johnson*, 226 So.3d 337, 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (holding that each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support injunction against stalking). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction.

REVERSED.

LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur.

1

This Court has consolidated these cases for purposes of this opinion only.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 557 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-913, K2025-914.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31723 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 9 Filed 06/16/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 46
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 9 Filed 06/16/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 47
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 9 Filed 06/16/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 48
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 9 Filed 06/16/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 49
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Garry K. McGuire Sr., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avaya Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 10, 2004

| |  | /s/GARRY K. MCGUIRE SR.Garry K. McGuire Sr. Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# C_2020399EN.01002202.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/22

---

Appeal brought on 24 April 2020 by STADA Arzneimittel AG against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2020 in Case T-487/18 — STADA Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-174/20 P)

(2020/C 399/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: STADA Arzneimittel AG (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 3 September 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the period ended December 31, 2005 I, Victor Roskey, Senior VP Finance & Administration and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the issuer, certify that:

1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



|Date: August 24, 2006 | By: | Signed Victor Roskey
Victor Roskey
Senior VP Finance & Administration and Interim Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the issuer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
# C_2021206EN.01002601.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — The Floow v Commission

(Case T-765/20 R)

(Application for interim relief - Grant agreement entered into as part of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) - Recovery of sums paid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 206/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Floow Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Howard, Barrister, and J. Berry, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and L. André, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures, first, suspending the operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 8138 final of 17 November 2020 on the recovery of EUR 161 990,80 plus interest due from the applicant and, second, prohibiting the Commission from enforcing the contested decision or recovering money, or extending and extrapolating its findings to the non-audited period of the project or to other projects.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Certifications

I, Carl Suter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
30, 2007, of Cygni Investments, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting;

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

<PAGE>
a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 15, 2007


/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President
(Principal Financial officer)
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 807 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, the following shall constitute the majority 

2 party’s membership on the following committees for the 

3 One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, or until their succes4 sors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN

6 AFFAIRS: Mr. Brown (Chair), Mr. Reed, Mr. Tester, Mr. 

7 Warner, Ms. Warren, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Cortez Masto, 

8 Ms. Smith, Mr. Warnock, Mr. Fetterman, Ms. Butler, Mr. 

9 Helmy. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 807 ATS 

1 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: Mr. Wyden (Chair), Ms. 

2 Stabenow, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Carper, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 

3 Brown, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Casey, Mr. Warner, Mr. White4 house, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Warren, Mr. 

5 Helmy. 

6 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Mr. Cardin 

7 (Chair), Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Coons, Mr. Murphy, Mr. 

8 Kaine, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Booker, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Van 

9 Hollen, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Helmy. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7062

DAVID ALLEN JONES,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden, Perry CI,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-01857-MBS)

Submitted: November 9, 2010 Decided: December 1, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Allen Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Allen Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Kevin SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5016

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2022024EN.01003201.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Guasch Pubill v EUIPO — Nap-Kings (Table linen)

(Case T-538/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing table linen - Disclosure of earlier design - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2022/C 24/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Marcos Guasch Pubill (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Guerras Mazón and M. Centell Ribas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nap-Kings, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Otero Iglesias, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2020 (Case R 1051/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Nap-Kings and Mr Guasch Pubill.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Marcos Guasch Pubill to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Marcos Guasch Pubill to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 26.10.2020.

---
Christina A. WINSEY-HERMAN, et al, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.