alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 692-693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract

[[Page 693]]

1173 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-961, K2025-960.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31721 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Case 24-41622-mxm13 Doc 27 Filed 07/18/24 Entered 07/18/24 07:33:29 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 24-41622-mxm13 Doc 27 Filed 07/18/24 Entered 07/18/24 07:33:29 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Mauricio MEZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Economic Forecast: June 2019

18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 2018 2019 2020

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 2.2 4.2 3.4 2.2 3.1 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.3 3.0 2.1 1.5

 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) 0.5 3.8 3.5 2.5 1.3 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.0 1.6 2.6 1.9 1.9

 Residential Fixed Investment -3.4 -1.3 -3.6 -4.7 -3.5 0.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 -0.2 0.0 -0.5 -3.3 1.2 0.7

 Business Fixed Investment 11.5 8.7 2.5 5.4 2.3 2.0 2.0 3.1 2.2 2.7 1.7 1.2 7.0 2.3 2.0

 Government Consumption & Investment 1.5 2.5 2.6 -0.4 2.5 3.0 2.3 1.3 1.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.5 2.3 1.8

Billions of Chained 2012$

 Net Exports -902 -841 -950 -956 -904 -905 -905 -920 -930 -948 -972 -996 -912 -908 -961

 Change in Business Inventories 30 -37 90 97 126 86 72 74 53 38 42 48 45 89 45

Percent Change: Quarterly YoY, Annual Q4/Q4

 Consumer Price Index 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.7

 Core Consumer Price Index (ex. Food & Energy) 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.2 1.8 1.9

 PCE Chain Price Index 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8

 Core PCE Chain Price Index (ex. Food & Energy) 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7

Change: Quarterly Mo. Avg., Thous., Annual Mil.

 Employment, Total Nonfarm 214 232 222 216 210 159 170 172 172 174 172 173 2.7 2.1 2.1

 Percent Change: YoY 1.7 1.6 1.4

Percent

 Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.5 3.9 3.8 4.2

 Federal Funds Rate 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 2.3 2.1

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.3 2.2 1.7

10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.9 2.3 2.2

 --------------- 2018 --------------- --------------- 2019 --------------- --------------- 2020 ---------------

June 10, 2019

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from May 31, 2019.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic and Strategic Research

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or 

expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, 

analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. 

Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the 

views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.
Michael BRANTLEY, Jr., et al. v. The CITY OF GRETNA and Red Flex Traffic Systems, Inc.

NO. 2019-CC-0015

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
# C_2021329EN.01002401.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Pshonka v Council

(Case T-268/20) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Retention of the applicant’s name on the list - Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

(2021/C 329/31)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Artem Viktorovych Pshonka (Kramatorsk, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Pekař and P. Mahnič, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2020 L 71, p. 10), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2020 L 71, p. 1), in so far as those acts maintain the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Artem Viktorovych Pshonka was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Artem Viktorovych Pshonka was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

AUTHER W. CALLICUT, §

§

Petitioner, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-1525-M

v. §

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

§

Respondent. §

___________________________________ §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On November 27, 2007, United States Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan made Findings and a

Recommendation. No objections were filed. The Court thus reviews the Findings and

Recommendation for plain error. Finding no plain error, the Court accepts the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SIGNED this 15th day of January, 2008.

_________________________________

BARBARA M.G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Oscar L. FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2738

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael HALEY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jonathon L. HOOKER, DOC #T97816, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.2

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management
Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  MARCH 20, 2006


                      BY: /s/ MORRIS KUNOFSKY
                         -------------------------
                         MORRIS KUNOFSKY
                         CHIEF  FINANCIAL OFFICER
Case 3:03-cv-01682-B Document 81 Filed 04/04/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 441
Case 3:03-cv-01682-B Document 81 Filed 04/04/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 442
Case 3:03-cv-01682-B Document 81 Filed 04/04/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 443
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1208 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1006, K2025-1005.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00034 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accellent Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RonSparks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  August 9, 2005

 
| /s/ Ron Sparks          |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Ron Sparks              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
William Henry THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1928

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Becki Ruth MAAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-0107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Stricken.
Certifications

I, Carl Suter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
30, 2007, of Cygni Investments, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting;

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 15, 2007


/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter
(Principal Executive Officer)
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
  





 
 NUMBER SHARES Anthera INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AUTHORIZED: 17,000 SERIES X CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SHARES,
$0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS This Certifies That is the owner of Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Series X Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 Par Value of ANTHERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. transferable on the books of
this Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Articles of Incorporation and the
Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. Dated: Countersigned: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER TRUST& COMPANY, LLC 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11219 By Transfer Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer SVP,
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY ANTHER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. DELAWARE SEAL CORPORATE Mountain Financial Print & Design, LLC 







 



 
 ANTHERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY TRANSFER FEE: AS REQUIRED The following abbreviations,
when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM—as tenants in common TEN ENT—as tenants by the entireties UNIF
GIFT MIN ACT—Custodian JT TEN—as joint tenants with right (Cust) (Minor) of survivorship and not as under Uniform Gifts to Minors tenants in common Act Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. (State) PLEASE
INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE Shares of the Preferred Stock represented by
the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: 20 , Signature: X Signature(s)
Guaranteed: Signature: X THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE
GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
# C_2021138EN.01003301.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/33

---

Order of the General Court of 11 February 2021 — Sam McKnight v EUIPO — Carolina Herrera (COOL GIRL)

(Case T-176/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 138/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sam McKnight Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Carolina Herrera Ltd (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: E. Stoyanov Edissonov and I. Robledo McClymont, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2020 (Case R 689/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Carolina Herrera and Sam McKnight.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sam McKnight Ltd and Carolina Herrera Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sam McKnight Ltd and Carolina Herrera Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
# C_2020297EN.01003201.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/32

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 25 June 2020 — CO, ME, GC and 42 Others v MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service, Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-283/20)

(2020/C 297/43)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: CO, ME, GC and 42 Others

Defendants: MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service, Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo

Question referred

Should Articles 8.3 and 10.3 of Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO, (1) before its amendment by Council Decision 2014/349/CFSP of 12 June 2014, (2) where necessary in combination with any other possibly relevant provisions, be read as conferring on the Head of Mission, personally and on his or her own behalf, the status of employer of the international civilian staff members employed in the service of the EULEX KOSOVO Mission during the period before 12 June 2014 or, having regard, in particular, to Articles 8.5 and 9.3 of Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP before its amendment on 12 June 2014, as conferring the status of employer on the European Union and/or an institution of the European Union such as the European Commission, the European External Action Service, the Council of the European Union or any other institution on behalf of which the Head of Mission acted until that date by virtue of a mandate, delegation of power or any other form of representation to be determined where necessary?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 42, p. 92.

(2)  Council Decision 2014/349/CFSP of 12 June 2014 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ 2014 L 174, p. 42).

---