alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                 |                                 |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                     | CAPITAL              RESOURCE FUNDING, INC.          |
|                                |                                            |                            |
| Date: October              19, 2005 | By:                                        | /s/ David              R. Koran |
|                                     | David R. KoranChief                Executive Officer |
Case 3:04-cv-00910-M Document 8 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 45
BTXN 189 (rev. 08/06)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Oliver Dwight McQueen Jr. Case No.: 24−31665−sgj13

 Chapter No.: 13

Debtor(s)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THIRTY−DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RECEIVE CREDIT

COUNSELING AND FILE CERTIFICATE OF SAME

 The Court, after consideration of the Debtor's Request For Thirty−Day Extension of Time to receive Credit

Counseling and file certificate of same, finds that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(3)(A), circumstances do not exist

that merit a waiver of certificate of credit counseling as set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1).

IT IS ORDERED that the Request is DENIED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.

# # # End of Order # # #

Signed June 5, 2024

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.
98-CT-00417-SCT
Michael Sheldon POOLE v. Melanie Holley POOLE

2160239

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Erik Michael FINSTAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-273

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.
Justin Terrell CHISHOLM v. STATE

CR-16-0266

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; notice of cancellation of open hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing on January 10, 2025.

# DATES:

January 10, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

                    The announcement for this hearing was previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 31, 2024 at 89 FR 61498.                

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: January 3, 2025.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2025-00191 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 1 of 17 PageID 93
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 2 of 17 PageID 94
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 3 of 17 PageID 95
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 4 of 17 PageID 96
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 5 of 17 PageID 97
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 6 of 17 PageID 98
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 7 of 17 PageID 99
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 8 of 17 PageID 100
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 9 of 17 PageID 101
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 10 of 17 PageID 102
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 11 of 17 PageID 103
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 12 of 17 PageID 104
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 13 of 17 PageID 105
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 14 of 17 PageID 106
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 15 of 17 PageID 107
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 16 of 17 PageID 108
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 27 Filed 07/09/01 Page 17 of 17 PageID 109
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 1 of 29 PageID 2682
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 2 of 29 PageID 2683
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 3 of 29 PageID 2684
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 4 of 29 PageID 2685
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 5 of 29 PageID 2686
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 6 of 29 PageID 2687
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 7 of 29 PageID 2688
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 8 of 29 PageID 2689
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 9 of 29 PageID 2690
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 10 of 29 PageID 2691
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 11 of 29 PageID 2692
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 12 of 29 PageID 2693
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 13 of 29 PageID 2694
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 14 of 29 PageID 2695
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 15 of 29 PageID 2696
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 16 of 29 PageID 2697
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 17 of 29 PageID 2698
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 18 of 29 PageID 2699
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 19 of 29 PageID 2700
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 20 of 29 PageID 2701
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 21 of 29 PageID 2702
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 22 of 29 PageID 2703
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 23 of 29 PageID 2704
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 24 of 29 PageID 2705
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 25 of 29 PageID 2706
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 26 of 29 PageID 2707
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 27 of 29 PageID 2708
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 28 of 29 PageID 2709
Case 3:03-cv-03050-B Document 181 Filed 03/01/05 Page 29 of 29 PageID 2710
Anthony V. BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 2059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00267]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12618]

Determination Pursuant to Section 451 of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 Regarding FY 2022 Peacekeeping Operations Funds

    Pursuant to section 451 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the 
``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2261), section 1-100(a)(1) of Executive Order 
12163, and Delegation of Authority No. 513, I hereby authorize, 
notwithstanding any other provision of law, the use of up to 
$16,000,000 made available to carry out provisions of the Act (other 
than the provisions of chapter 1 of part I of the Act) to provide 
assistance authorized by part I of the Act in support of countries 
providing personnel for the Multinational Security Support (MSS) 
mission in Haiti.
    This Determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be promptly reported to the Congress. This Determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 16, 2024.
Richard R. Verma,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2025-00267 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40418

(Summary Calendar)

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO ARTURO GUERRERO,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. L-95-CR-14)

- - - - - - - - - -

December 8, 1995

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Mario Arturo Guerrero appeals from his conviction for

possession with intent to distribute marijuana on the ground that

the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress. He

contends that law enforcement officers did not possess reasonable

suspicion to justify the stop of his vehicle because the tip from

the confidential informant was not reliable. We have reviewed the
2

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by

the district court.

AFFIRMED.
Charles PATTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-954

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED.
/**
 * @file
 * Global utilities.
 *
 */

jQuery("#elibDownloadBar img").attr("src","/themes/custom/dot_cms/images/icons/application-pdf.png");
STATE of Louisiana v. Lawrence NIXON

NO. 2018-KO-1631

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Bin Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      October 16, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Bin
      WangBin
      WangPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Edward Dane JEFFUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 10 Filed 05/30/00 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7700

MICHAEL RAY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Corrections; BOYD

BENNETT, Director of Prisons; JOHN AND JANE

DOES, Utilization Review Board; CURTIS BOWE,

P.A.; MARVIN L. POLK; PAULA SMITH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,

District Judge. (CA-03-708-5-FL)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Williams v. Beck, No. CA-03-708-5-FL

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
III 

Calendar No. 522 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 837 

[Report No. 118–230] 

Authorizing the President of the Senate to certify the report of the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate regarding 

the refusal of Dr. Ralph de la Torre to appear and testify before 

the Committee. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Mr. SANDERS, from the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, reported the following original resolution; which was placed on the 

calendar 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the President of the Senate to certify the report 

of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate regarding the refusal of Dr. Ralph 

de la Torre to appear and testify before the Committee. 

Whereas the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions of the Senate (referred to in this preamble as 

the ‘‘Committee’’) is currently conducting a duly authorized investigation into the bankruptcy of Steward Health 

Care Systems LLC; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 837 RS 

Whereas, on July 25, 2024, the Committee issued a duly authorized subpoena to Dr. Ralph de la Torre, Chairman 

and Chief Executive Officer of Steward Health Care Systems LLC, directing him to testify before the Committee 

on September 12, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.; 

Whereas, on September 4, 2024, counsel for Dr. de la Torre 

submitted to the Committee objections to the compelled 

testimony under the subpoena issued by the Committee 

and indicated Dr. de la Torre’s intent to decline to comply with the subpoena; 

Whereas, having considered the legal objections that had been 

submitted by counsel for Dr. de la Torre, the Committee 

overruled those objections in their entirety on September 

5, 2024, and ordered and directed that Dr. de la Torre 

comply with the subpoena issued by the Committee to 

testify at 10:00 a.m. on September 12, 2024; and 

Whereas Dr. de la Torre has refused to comply with the subpoena by the Committee as ordered and directed by the 

Committee: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That pursuant to sections 102 and 104 of 

2 the Revised Statutes (2 U.S.C. 192, 194), the President 

3 of the Senate shall certify the report of the Committee 

4 on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, 

5 detailing the refusal of Dr. Ralph de la Torre, Chairman 

6 and Chief Executive Officer of Steward Health Care Sys7 tems LLC, to appear and testify before the Committee, 

8 to the United States Attorney for the District of Colum9 bia, to the end that Dr. de la Torre be proceeded against 

10 in the manner and form provided by law. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 522 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 837 

[Report No. 118–230] 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the President of the Senate to certify 

appear and testify before the Committee. garding the refusal of Dr. Ralph de la Torre to cation, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate rethe report of the Committee on Health, EduSEPTEMBER 23, 2024 

Placed on the calendar 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Joseph Romano and Lino Ruiz, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 20, 1927.

*Whitaker Brothers,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Wh-itfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Isaac WILDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 15, 2019

Affirmed.
// sticky Masthead
(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
		$(window).scroll(function() {
			if ($(this).scrollTop() > 1) {
    		$('.sticky-top').addClass("sticky-top-shrink");
			}
  		else {
				$('.sticky-top').removeClass("sticky-top-shrink");
			}
		});
	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));

//Homepage Priorities Card Zoom
(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
		$('.card-zoom').mouseover(function() {
      $(this).find('.card-image-zoom').css('transform', 'scale(1.2)');
    });
    $('.card-zoom').mouseout(function() {
      $(this).find('.card-image-zoom').css('transform', 'scale(1)');
    });
	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));

// ultimenu Caret
(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';

		$( ".has-ultimenu span.caret" ).click(function() {
			$('.has-ultimenu span.caret.checked').not(this).removeClass('checked');
			$( this ).toggleClass( "checked" );
		});

	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));

// Main Nav
(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
		// place your new code here.
	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2023

NO. 03-22-00640-CR

Jontay Antoine Pitts, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s

judgment adjudicating guilt. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
#### J. M. Willson, *Appellant,*v. Milton L’Ecluse, *Appellee.*

Division A.

Decision Filed October 14, 1927.

*Johnston & Garrett,*for Appellant;

*Ellis E. Davis,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and upon briefs and argument of counsel .for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**PENNSYLVANIA LAND HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED**  **LIABILITY COMPANY, AND**

**PENNSYLVANIA SERVICES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE**  **CORPORATION, AND GENERAL**
**PARTNER, TRADING AS CUMBERLAND COAL RESOURCES, LP, A DELAWARE** 
**LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,**

**Respondents**

**v.**

**ROBERT W. REED AND KAREN REED,**

**Petitioners :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 293 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this m atter.**