alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022002EN.01003702.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/37

---

Order of the General Court of 3 November 2021 — Aurubis v Commission

(Case T-729/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Greenhouse gases - Allocation of emission allowances - Request to transfer emission certificates to Germany - Request made in the context of national proceedings for interim relief aimed at guaranteeing the effectiveness of the preliminary ruling procedure in Case C-271/20 - Commission refusal decision - Locus standi - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 2/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and J. Hoss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 8 December 2020 refusing the request of the Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle (German Emissions Trading Authority) to transfer, as a protective measure, to the national holding account of the Federal Republic of Germany or, in the alternative, to the applicant’s operator holding account, by 31 December 2020 at the latest, a number of greenhouse gas emission allowances corresponding to the number of additional allowances covered by the application filed by the applicant with the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Administrative Court, Berlin, Germany) for the free allocation of emission allowances for the third greenhouse gas emission allowance trading period.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Aurubis AG shall pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Aurubis AG shall pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

---
# C_2022207EN.01000301.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-139/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation of energy products used by energy-intensive businesses - Directive 2003/96/EC - Article 17(1)(b) and (4) - Businesses covered by the EU Emissions Trading System - Exemption from excise duty)

(2022/C 207/03)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: initially, M. Siekierzyńska and A. Armenia, and, subsequently, A. Armenia, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF DEBTOR TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING CERTAIN LISTS, SCHEDULES, 

AND STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY RULE 1007 (RE: DOCKET NO. 40)

4875-2598-8274, v. 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: §

§

HIGH PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, LLC, §

§

CASE NO. 24-70089

§

DEBTOR. §

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF DEBTOR TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

FILING CERTAIN LISTS, SCHEDULES, AND STATEMENTS 

PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY RULE 1007 (RE: DOCKET NO. 40) 

On this day came on for consideration the Motion of Debtor to Extend Time for Filing 

Certain Lists, Schedules, and Statements Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1007 (Docket No. 40) (the 

“Motion”) filed herein on April 8, 2024 by High Plains Radio Network, LLC, debtor and debtor 

in possession (“HPRN” or the “Debtor”). The Court finds and concludes that upon review of the 

record of this case that sufficient notice was provided in accordance with the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedures and/or the Local Bankruptcy Rules and with respect to the Motion that 

cause exists to grant the relief requested therein.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the deadline under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007 for 

the Debtor to file the schedules, statement of financial affairs, and other remaining lists due 

under Rule 1007 is extended to APRIL 24, 2024. 

### END OF ORDER ###

Case 24-70089-swe11 Doc 40-1 Filed 04/08/24 Entered 04/08/24 16:55:11 Desc

Proposed Order Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 627 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 627

    Honoring the memory of Jereima ``Jeri'' Bustamante on the sixth 
                      anniversary of her passing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2024

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Honoring the memory of Jereima ``Jeri'' Bustamante on the sixth 
                      anniversary of her passing.

Whereas Jereima ``Jeri'' Bustamante (referred to in this preamble as ``Jeri 
        Bustamante'') lived the American Dream;
Whereas, after moving from Panama to the United States with her family, Jeri 
        Bustamante--

    (1) attended Miami Beach Senior High School; and

    (2) earned a Bachelor's Degree in Communication and Media Sciences and 
a Master's Degree in Public Administration from Florida International 
University;

Whereas Jeri Bustamante had a tireless work ethic and a passion for 
        communication and paid for her education by working while enrolled in 
        school;
Whereas that tireless work ethic propelled Jeri Bustamante to professional 
        success, beginning with an internship at a Miami television station and 
        culminating in a period of service as press secretary to Governor Rick 
        Scott;
Whereas the enthusiasm, compassion, tenacity, and vibrant energy of Jeri 
        Bustamante are greatly missed by her family, friends, and coworkers;
Whereas the spirit of Jeri Bustamante lives on through the Jereima Bustamante 
        Memorial Scholarship, which aims to help graduates of Miami Beach Senior 
        High School achieve their goals and pursue the American Dream through a 
        college education; and
Whereas April 8, 2024, marks 6 years since the life of Jeri Bustamante was 
        tragically cut short in a fatal boating accident: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the life and memory of Jereima ``Jeri'' 
        Bustamante (referred to in this resolution as ``Jeri 
        Bustamante'');
            (2) offers heartfelt condolences to the family, loved ones, 
        and friends of Jeri Bustamante;
            (3) recognizes that living the American Dream remains 
        possible for any individual who, following the example of Jeri 
        Bustamante, works hard to pursue and achieve a goal; and
            (4) encourages the recipients of the Jereima Bustamante 
        Memorial Scholarship to carry on the legacy of Jeri Bustamante.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ming Fen Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 14, 2011




/s/ Ming Fen LiuMing Fen Liu, Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer
# C_2017178EN.01003401.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/34

---

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2017 — La Patrouille v EUIPO — Alpha Industries (Représentation d'une figure avec des angles)

(Case T-709/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 178/52)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.

1

---
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 17, 2011    | By:    | /s/ Tyrone R. Carter            |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |   | Tyrone R. Carter,                    |   |
|                                                 |   | Acting Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                                                 |   |                                 |   |
|                                                 | By:    | /s/ Tyrone R.  Carter |   |
|                                                 |   | Tyrone R. Carter,               |   |
|                                                 |   | Acting Principal Financial Officer   |   |
#### Marian Estelle Turner, Joined by Her Husband, John A. Turner, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. J. P. Coxie, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 21, 1927.

*Watson & Phipps,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Wm. J. Wood,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
# C_2020297EN.01002701.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Midden-Nederland (Netherlands) lodged on 29 May 2020 — X, Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens

(Case C-245/20)

(2020/C 297/36)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Midden-Nederland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: X, Z

Defendant: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens

Question referred

| 1. | Is Article 55(3) of the General Data Protection Regulation (1) to be interpreted as meaning that ‘processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity’ can be understood to mean the provision by a judicial authority of access to procedural documents containing personal data, where such access is granted by making copies of those procedural documents available to a journalist, as described in the present order for reference?






  a. | In answering that question, is it relevant whether the national supervisory authority’s supervision of that form of data processing affects independent judicial decisions in specific cases? |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 55(3) of the General Data Protection Regulation (1) to be interpreted as meaning that ‘processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity’ can be understood to mean the provision by a judicial authority of access to procedural documents containing personal data, where such access is granted by making copies of those procedural documents available to a journalist, as described in the present order for reference?

a.

In answering that question, is it relevant whether the national supervisory authority’s supervision of that form of data processing affects independent judicial decisions in specific cases?

| b. | In answering that question, is it relevant that, according to the judicial authority, the nature and purpose of the data processing is to inform a journalist in order to enable the journalist to better report on a public hearing in court proceedings, thereby serving the interests of openness and transparency in the administration of justice? |
| --- | --- |

b.

In answering that question, is it relevant that, according to the judicial authority, the nature and purpose of the data processing is to inform a journalist in order to enable the journalist to better report on a public hearing in court proceedings, thereby serving the interests of openness and transparency in the administration of justice?

| c. | In answering that question, is it relevant whether there is any express legal basis for such data processing under national law? |
| --- | --- |

c.

In answering that question, is it relevant whether there is any express legal basis for such data processing under national law?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

---
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 26 Filed 04/29/04 Page 1 of 4 PageID 100
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 26 Filed 04/29/04 Page 2 of 4 PageID 101
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 26 Filed 04/29/04 Page 3 of 4 PageID 102
Case 3:03-cv-02153-L Document 26 Filed 04/29/04 Page 4 of 4 PageID 103
Case 4:03-cr-00226-A Document 59 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 171
# C_2020423EN.01002402.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 30 July 2020 — CHEP Equipment Pooling NV v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-396/20)

(2020/C 423/36)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CHEP Equipment Pooling NV

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Question referred

Must Article 20(1) of Council Directive 2008/9/EC (1) of 12 February 2008 laying down detailed rules for the refund of value added tax, provided for in Directive 2006/112/EC, to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund but established in another Member State (Directive 2008/9/EC) be interpreted as meaning that, even where there are clear numerical discrepancies (not involving a proportional deduction) between the refund application and the invoice that are to the disadvantage of the taxable person, the Member State of refund may deem that there is no need to request additional information and that it has received all the relevant information on which to make a decision in respect of the refund?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 44, p. 23.

---
Marcus Darnell BUTLER v. STATE

CR-16-0623

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Holding Company("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2005, herebycertify as follows:

|          |                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|          |                                                                                                                                     |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations for Nalco. |

|  | /s/WILLIAM H. JOYCE                         WilliamH. Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date:    May12, 2005 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ BRADLEY J.BELL                             Bradley J.Bell Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer Date:    May 12, 2005 |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANDREW TOLIVER, ID # 891053, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CV-1402-D

 )

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED April 18, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cv-01402-D Document 17 Filed 04/18/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 100
Case 4:03-cr-00226-A Document 71 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 5 PageID 189
Case 4:03-cr-00226-A Document 71 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 5 PageID 190
Case 4:03-cr-00226-A Document 71 Filed 03/27/06 Page 3 of 5 PageID 191
Case 4:03-cr-00226-A Document 71 Filed 03/27/06 Page 4 of 5 PageID 192
Case 4:03-cr-00226-A Document 71 Filed 03/27/06 Page 5 of 5 PageID 193
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


10-Q




| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and                      
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |     |                     
| | --- | --------------------
| | By: | /s/ RICHARD P. BROWN

| |                                               
| | ----------------------------------------------
| |                                               
| | Richard P. Brown                              
| | President and Chief Executive Officer of      
| | American Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:00-CR-0443-D

) No. 3:03-CV-1232-D

JEROME MACK HARDY, )

ID # 1063665, )

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of

the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED January 31, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:00-cr-00443-D Document 59 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal 3rdQuarter 2008 ending May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson         
|Paul G. Anderson             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|                             
|September 3, 2008            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



5