UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)




x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010


OR





o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the transition period from __________________ to __________________





Commission File Number  000-51129





JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Virginia

54-1602012(State or other jurisdiction

(I.R.S. Employerof incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)901 E. Byrd Street, Suite 1600Richmond, Virginia

23219(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (804) 780-3000





Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes    ý             No    o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).





Yes    o             No  o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer  ýNon-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  o
Smaller reporting company  o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


YesoNoý





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.


Yes    ý             No    o





The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of July 23, 2010 was 27,782,751.











FORM 10-Q INDEX





PagePART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3Item 1.
Financial Statements.
3Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
5Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
6Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009
7Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
8Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
9Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
17Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
30Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
31PART II
OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.
Legal Proceedings.
31Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
31Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
44Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
44Item 5.
Other Information.
44Item 6.
Exhibits.
45SIGNATURES
46













-2-





PART I                                FINANCIAL INFORMATION





ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES





Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


(in thousands)





June 30, 2010


December 31, 2009AssetsCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
190,305



107,931Receivables:Trade


58,749



43,289Other


388



260Total receivables


59,137



43,549Inventories:Coal


16,467



22,727Materials and supplies


11,404



10,462Total inventories


27,871



33,189Prepaid royalties


5,281



6,045Other current assets


3,065



3,292Total current assets


285,659



194,006Property, plant, and equipment, at cost:Land


7,751



7,194Mineral rights


231,528



231,919Buildings, machinery and equipment


394,062



362,654Mine development costs


43,136



41,069Total property, plant, and equipment


676,477



642,836Less accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization


319,707



288,748Property, plant and equipment, net


356,770



354,088Goodwill


26,492



26,492Restricted cash (note 2)


15,000



62,042Other assets


33,738



32,684Total assets

$
717,659



669,312See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.





-3-


JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES





Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


(in thousands, except share amounts)





June 30, 2010


December 31, 2009Liabilities and Shareholders' EquityCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable

$
39,411



46,472Accrued salaries, wages, and employee benefits


10,489



6,982Workers' compensation benefits


8,950



8,950Black lung benefits


1,782



1,782Accrued taxes


6,082



4,383Other current liabilities


14,436



15,439Total current liabilities


81,150



84,008Long-term debt


281,081



278,268Other liabilities:Noncurrent portion of workers' compensation benefits


51,890



50,385Noncurrent portion of black lung benefits


42,103



31,017Pension obligations


12,486



14,827Asset retirement obligations


41,575



39,843Other


633



622Total other liabilities


148,687



136,694Total liabilities


510,918



498,970Commitments and contingencies (note 4)Shareholders' equity:Preferred stock, $1.00 par value.  Authorized 10,000,000 shares


-



-Common stock, $.01 par value.  Authorized 100,000,000 shares;issued and outstanding 27,782,751 and 27,544,878 sharesas of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively


278



275Paid-in-capital


322,251



320,079Accumulated deficit


(93,663
)


(136,758
)Accumulated other comprehensive loss


(22,125
)


(13,254
)Total shareholders' equity


206,741



170,342Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$
717,659



669,312See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


-4-


JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES





Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations


(in thousands, except per share data)


(unaudited)








Three Months


Three MonthsEnded


EndedJune 30, 2010


June 30, 2009Revenues

$
183,045



171,649Cost of sales:Cost of coal sold


128,738



127,721Depreciation, depletion and amortization


16,209



15,922Total cost of sales


144,947



143,643Gross profit


38,098



28,006Selling, general and administrative expenses


9,823



10,559Total operating income


28,275



17,447Interest expense (note 2)


7,455



3,814Interest income


(12
)


(25
)Miscellaneous (income) expense, net


238



(90
)Total other expense, net


7,681



3,699Income before income taxes


20,594



13,748Income tax (benefit) expense


744



(2,430
)Net income

$
19,850



16,178Earnings per common share (note 5)Basic earnings per common share

$
0.72



0.59Diluted earnings per common share

$
0.71



0.59See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.








-5-


JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES





Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations


(in thousands, except per share data)


(unaudited)








Six Months


Six MonthsEnded


EndedJune 30, 2010


June 30, 2009Revenues

$
367,646



363,770Cost of sales:Cost of coal sold


258,055



260,428Depreciation, depletion and amortization


32,567



30,395Total cost of sales


290,622



290,823Gross profit


77,024



72,947Selling, general and administrative expenses


19,142



19,846Total operating income


57,882



53,101Interest expense (note 2)


14,836



7,867Interest income


(16
)


(50
)Miscellaneous (income) expense, net


196



(144
)Total other expense, net


15,016



7,673Income before income taxes


42,866



45,428Income tax (benefit) expense


(229
)


1,079Net income

$
43,095



44,349Earnings per common share (note 5)Basic earnings per common share

$
1.56



1.61Diluted earnings per common share

$
1.56



1.61See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


-6-





JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES


Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’


Equity and Comprehensive Income


(in thousands)


(unaudited)











Common

stock

shares


Common

stock par

value


Paid-in-

capital


Retained

earnings (accumulated

deficit)


Accumulated

other

comprehensive income (loss)


TotalBalances, January 1, 2009


27,393


$
274



272,366



(187,712
)


(19,690
)


65,238Net Income


-



-



-



50,954



-



50,954Amortization of pension actuarial amount


-



-



-



-



1,606



1,606Black lung obligation adjustment


-



-



-



-



(574
)


(574
)Pension liability adjustment


-



-



-



-



5,404



5,404Comprehensive income






















57,390Equity component of convertible debt offering, net of offeringcosts of $1,433


-



-



43,385



-



-



43,385Issuance of restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures


234



2



(2
)


-



-



-Repurchase of shares for tax withholding


(87
)


(1
)


(1,712
)


-



-



(1,713
)Exercise of stock options


5



-



75



-



-



75Stock based compensation


-



-



5,967



-



-



5,967Balances, December 31, 2009


27,545



275



320,079



(136,758
)


(13,254
)


170,342Net Income


-



-



-



43,095



-



43,095Amortization of pension actuarial amount


-



-



-



-



392



392Amortization of black lung actuarial amount


-



-



-



-



137



137Black lung obligation adjustment


-



-



-



-



(9,400
)


(9,400
)Comprehensive income






















34,224Issuance of restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures


284



3



(3
)


-



-



-Repurchase of shares for tax withholding


(46
)


-



(695
)


-



-



(695
)Stock based compensation


-



-



2,870



-



-



2,870Balances, June 30, 2010


27,783


$
278



322,251



(93,663
)


(22,125
)


206,741See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.





-7-














JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES





Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


(in thousands)


(unaudited)





Six Months


Six MonthsEnded


EndedJune 30, 2010


June 30, 2009Cash flows from operating activities:Net income

$
43,095



44,349Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash providedby operating activitiesDepreciation, depletion, and amortization


32,567



30,395Accretion of asset retirement obligations


1,642



1,586Amortization of debt discount and issue costs


3,935



587Stock-based compensation


2,870



3,086Loss on sale or disposal of property, plant, and equipment


318



-Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Receivables


(15,588
)


(9,724
)Inventories


4,538



(22,286
)Prepaid royalties and other current assets


991



(1,965
)Restricted cash


47,042



-Other assets


(830
)


4,015Accounts payable


(7,061
)


(1,370
)Accrued salaries, wages, and employee benefits


3,507



2,502Accrued taxes


1,004



(594
)Other current liabilities


(1,126
)


(7,246
)Workers' compensation benefits


1,505



2,152Black lung benefits


1,823



669Pension obligations


(1,949
)


1,072Asset retirement obligation


(461
)


(491
)Other liabilities


11



90Net cash provided by operating activities


117,833



46,827Cash flows from investing activities:Additions to property, plant, and equipment


(34,113
)


(30,318
)Net cash used in investing activities


(34,113
)


(30,318
)Cash flows from financing activities:Borrowings under Revolver


-



7,500Repayments under Revolver


-



(25,500
)Debt issuance costs


(1,346
)


-Proceeds from exercise of stock options


-



75Net cash used in financing activities


(1,346
)


(17,925
)Increase (decrease) in cash


82,374



(1,416
)Cash at beginning of period


107,931



3,324Cash at end of period

$
190,305



1,908





See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.





-8-





JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY


AND SUBSIDIARIES





Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements





(Unaudited)







(1)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other Information




Description of Business and Principles of Consolidation




James River Coal Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively the Company) mine, process and sell bituminous, steam- and industrial-grade coal through five operating complexes located throughout eastern Kentucky and one in southern Indiana. Substantially all coal sales and account receivables relate to the electric utility and industrial markets.





The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company presented in this report are unaudited. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009. The balances presented as of or for the year ended December 31, 2009 are derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.





Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in order to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Significant estimates made by management include the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, asset retirement obligations and amounts accrued related to the Company’s workers’ compensation, black lung, pension and health claim obligations. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for all periods presented.











(2)
Long Term Debt and Interest Expense




Long-term debt is as follows (in thousands):




June 30,

2010


December 31,

2009Senior Notes

$
150,000


$
150,000Convertible Senior Notes, net of discount


131,081



128,268Revolver


-



-Total long-term debt

$
281,081


$
278,268




Senior Notes




The $150 million of Senior Notes are due on June 1, 2012 (the Senior Notes).  The Senior Notes are unsecured and accrue interest at 9.375% per annum.  Interest payments on the Senior Notes are required semi-annually.  The Company may redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time at redemption prices ranging from 102.34% thru June 1, 2011 to 100% thereafter.





The Senior Notes limit the Company’s ability, among other things, to pay cash dividends.  In addition, if a change of control occurs (as defined in the Indenture), each holder of the Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a part of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus any accrued interest to the date of repurchase.


-9-





Convertible Senior Notes





During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company issued $172.5 million of 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes due on December 1, 2015 (the “Convertible Senior Notes”).   The Convertible Senior Notes are shown net of a $41.4 million discount as of June 30, 2010.  The discount on the Convertible Senior Notes relates to the $44.8 million of the proceeds that were allocated to the equity component of the Convertible Senior Notes at issuance.  The Convertible Senior Notes are unsecured and are convertible under certain circumstances and during certain periods at an initial conversion rate of 38.7913 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes, representing an initial conversion price of approximately $25.78 per share of the Company’s stock.  Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes is paid semi-annually.





None of the Convertible Senior Notes are currently eligible for conversion.  The Convertible Senior Notes are convertible at the option of the holders (with the length of time the Notes are convertible being dependent upon the conversion trigger) upon the occurrence of any of the following events:





·
At any time from September 1, 2015 until December 1, 2015;





·
If the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock for each of 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds 130% of the conversion price of the Notes in effect on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter;





·
If the trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes for each trading day during any five consecutive business day period, as determined following a request of a holder of Notes, was equal to or less than 97% of the “Conversion Value” of the Notes on such trading day; or





·
If the Company elects to make certain distributions to the holders of its common stock or engage in certain corporate transactions.





Revolving Credit Agreement





In January 2010, the Company amended and restated its existing Revolving Credit Agreement (as amended and restated the Revolving Credit Agreement is referred to as the Revolver).  The following is a summary of significant terms of the Revolver.





Maturity
February 2012Interest/Usage Rate
Company’s option of Base Rate(a) plus 3.0% or LIBOR plus 4.0% per annumMaximum Availability
Lesser of $65.0 million or the borrowing base(b)Periodic Principal Payments
None





(a)
Base rate is the higher of (1) the Federal Fund Rate plus 3.0%, (2) the prime rate and (3) a LIBOR rate plus 1.0%.(b)
The Revolver’s borrowing base is based on the sum of 85% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable plus 65% of the eligible inventory minus reserves from time to time set by administrative agent.  The eligible accounts receivable and inventories are further adjusted as specified in the agreement.  The Company’s borrowing base can also be increased by 95% of any cash collateral that the Company maintains in a cash collateral account.





The Revolver provides that the Company can use the Revolver availability to issue letters of credit. The Revolver provides for a 4.25% fee on any outstanding letters of credit issued under the Revolver and a 0.5% fee on the unused portion of the Revolver. The Revolver requires certain mandatory prepayments from certain asset sales, incurrence of indebtedness and excess cash flow. The Revolver includes financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum Adjusted EBITDA and a maximum Leverage Ratio and limit capital expenditures, each as defined by the agreement. However, the minimum Adjusted EBITDA and maximum Leverage Ratio covenants are only applicable if the Company’s unrestricted cash balance falls below $75.0 million and would remain in effect until the Company’s unrestricted cash exceeds $75.0 million for 90 consecutive days.





As of June 30, 2010, the Company has used $56.8 million of the $65.0 million available under the Revolver to secure outstanding letters of credits.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $15.0 million of cash in a restricted cash collateral account to ensure that the Company has adequate capacity under the Revolver to support its outstanding letters of credit.








-10-


Interest Expense and Other





The Company paid $11.1 million of interest during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company paid approximately $7.1 million and $7.6 million, respectively, in interest.





In connection with the amendment to the Revolver, the Company capitalized $1.3 million of costs in 2010.





The Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under its outstanding debt instruments as of June 30, 2010.





(3)
Equity




Preferred Stock and Shareholder Rights Agreement




The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $1.00 par value per share, the rights and preferences of which are established by the Board of the Directors. The Company has reserved 500,000 of these shares as Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock for issuance under a shareholder rights agreement (the Rights Agreement).





On May 25, 2004, the Company’s shareholders approved the Rights Agreement and declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (Right) for each two shares of common stock outstanding.  Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth (1/100) of a share of our Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, at a price of $200 per one one-hundredth of a Series A preferred share.  The Rights are not exercisable until a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (an Acquiring Person) has acquired or announced the intention to acquire 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock.





An amendment to the Rights Agreement reduced, until December 5, 2010, the threshold at which a person or group becomes an “Acquiring Person” under the Rights Agreement from 20% to 4.9% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common stock.  The Rights Agreement, as amended, exempts shareholders whose beneficial ownership as of November 3, 2009 exceeded 4.9% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common stock so long as they do not acquire more than an additional 0.5% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common stock without the advance approval of the Company’s board of directors.





In the event that the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction or 50% or more of the Company’s consolidated assets or earning power is sold after a person or group has become an Acquiring Person, each holder of a Right, other than the Rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person (which will thereafter be void), will receive, upon the exercise of the Right, that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of such transaction will have a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right.  In the event that any person becomes an Acquiring Person, each Right holder, other than the Acquiring Person (whose Rights will become void), will have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right.





The rights will expire May 25, 2014, unless that expiration date is extended. The Board of Directors may redeem the Rights at a price of $0.001 per Right at any time prior to the time that a person or group becomes an Acquiring Person.







Equity Based Compensation




Under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan), participants may be granted stock options (qualified and nonqualified), stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance shares. The total number of shares that may be awarded under the Plan is 2,400,000, and no more than 1,000,000 of the shares reserved under the Plan may be granted in the form of incentive stock options.  The Company currently has the following types of equity awards outstanding under the Plan.





Restricted Stock Awards





Pursuant to the Plan certain directors and employees have been awarded restricted common stock with such shares vesting over two to five years. The related expense is amortized over the vesting period.





Stock Option Awards





Pursuant to the Plan certain directors and employees have been awarded options to purchase common stock with such options vesting ratably over three to five years. The Company’s stock options have been issued at exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant.





-11-


Shares awarded or subject to purchase under the Plan that are not delivered or purchased, or revert to the Company as a result of forfeiture or termination, expiration or cancellation of an award or that are used to exercise an award or for tax withholding, will be again available for issuance under the Plan. At June 30, 2010, there were 605,943 shares available under the Plan for future awards.





The following table highlights the expense related to share-based payment for the periods ended June 30 (in thousands):




Three months ended


Six months endedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009Restricted stock

$
1,376



1,483


$
2,724



2,918Stock options


74



89



146



168Stock based compensation

$
1,450



1,572


$
2,870



3,086




The fair value of the restricted stock outstanding and issued is equal to the value of shares at the grant date. At this time, the Company does not expect any of its restricted shares or options to be forfeited before vesting. The fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company used a risk free rate of 3.9% and a volatility of 90% for options issued during 2010. The Company uses historical experience to estimate its volatility. The Company has assumed no dividends would be issued in valuing its options.





The following is a summary of activity related to restricted stock and stock option awards for the three months ended June 30, 2010:




Restricted Stock


Stock OptionsWeighted




WeightedAverage





AverageNumber of

Fair Value

Number of

ExerciseShares


at Issue


Shares


PriceDecember 31, 2009


717,652


$
21.86



276,000


$
16.34Granted


287,622



17.01



20,000



17.01Exercised/Vested


(134,388
)


26.09



-



-Canceled


(3,600
)


19.36



-



-June 30, 2010


867,286



19.60



296,000



16.39






The following table summarizes additional information about the stock options outstanding at June 30, 2010:




Range of

Exercise Price


Shares


Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)


Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value (1)

(in 000's)Outstanding at June 30, 2010

$10.80-$36.30



296,000


$
16.39



5.2


$
853Exercisable at June 30, 2010

$10.80-$36.30



256,004


$
15.95



4.7


$
826Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2010






296,000


$
16.39



5.2


$
853




(1)
The difference between a stock award's exercise price and the underlying stock's market price at June 30, 2010.No value is assigned to stock awards whose option price exceeds the stock's market price at June 30, 2010.


-12-




The following table summarizes the Company’s total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock based compensation as of June 30, 2010:




Weighted AverageRemaining PeriodUnearned


Of ExpenseCompensation


Recognition(in 000's)


(in years)Stock Options

$
540



2.4Restricted Stock


11,949



3.2Total

$
12,489







(4)
Commitments and Contingencies




The Company has established irrevocable letters of credit totaling $56.8 million as of June 30, 2010 to guarantee performance under certain contractual arrangements.  The letters of credit have been issued under the Company’s Revolver (see Note 2).





The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.







(5)
Earnings Per Share




Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and, when dilutive, potential common shares from the exercise of stock options and restricted common stock subject to continuing vesting requirements, pursuant to the treasury stock method.





-13-


The following table provides a reconciliation of the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):





Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009Basic earnings per common share:Net income

$
19,850


$
16,178


$
43,095


$
44,349Income allocated to participating securities


(632
)


(495
)


(1,249
)


(1,247
)Net income available to common shareholders

$
19,218


$
15,683


$
41,846


$
43,102Weighted average number of common andcommon equivalent shares outstanding:Basic number of common shares outstanding


26,862



26,734



26,845



26,713Dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock (participatingsecurities)


883



843



801



773Dilutive effect of stock options


49



54



49



39Diluted number of common shares andcommon equivalent shares outstanding


27,794



27,631



27,695



27,525Basic earnings per common share

$
0.72


$
0.59


$
1.56


$
1.61Diluted net income per common share:Net income

$
19,850


$
16,178


$
43,095


$
44,349Income allocated to participating securities


-



-



-



-Net income available to potential common shareholder

$
19,850


$
16,178


$
43,095


$
44,349Diluted net earnings per share

$
0.71


$
0.59


$
1.56


$
1.61




The Company’s Convertible Senior Notes are convertible at the option of the holders upon the occurrence of certain events (Note 2).  As of June 30, 2010, the 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes had not reached the specified threshold for conversion.





(6)
Pension Expense




The Company has in place a defined benefit pension plan under which all benefits were frozen in 2007. The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (amounts in thousands):





Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedJune 30


June 302010


2009


2010


2009Interest cost

$
940



915



1,880



1,830Expected return on plan assets


(922
)


(775
)


(1,844
)


(1,549
)Recognized net actuarial loss


196



402



392



803Net periodic cost

$
214



542



428



1,084





-14-


(7)
Pneumoconiosis (Black Lung) Benefits







The expense for black lung benefits consists of the following (amounts in thousands):




Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009Service Cost

$
471



306



814



612Interest cost


593



428



1,051



856Recognized net actuarial loss


137



—



137



—Total expense

$
1,201



734



2,002



1,468




In March 2010, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Act) was enacted into law and included a black lung provision that creates a rebuttable presumption that a miner with at least 15 years of service, with totally disabling pulmonary or respiratory lung impairment and negative radiographic chest x-ray evidence would be disabled due to pneumoconiosis and be eligible for black lung benefits.  The new Act also makes it easier for widows of miners to become eligible for benefits.  In the first quarter of 2010, the Company was able to make an initial evaluation of the impact of these changes on a limited population of current and potential future claimants, resulting in an estimated $9.4 million increase to the black lung obligation. This estimated increase in the black lung obligation was recorded along with an increase in the actuarial loss included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s balance sheet.  Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $0.4 million increase in the quarterly black lung expense related to the amortization of this additional actuarial loss and increases in the service and interest cost components.   As of June 30, 2010, the Company is not able to estimate the impact of this legislation on the obligations related to future claims from older terminated miners and possible re-filed claims, due to significant uncertainty around the number of claims that will be filed and how impactful the new award criteria will be to these claim populations.  The Company will continue to assess the impact of this legislation on its initial estimate as additional information becomes available and future regulations are issued.





(8)
Financial Instruments





The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by the Company using available market information. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, except for long-term debt obligations, the carrying amounts of all financial instruments approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.




The carrying value and fair value of our Senior Notes and Convertible Notes are as follows (in thousands)





June 30, 2010

December 31, 2009Carrying Value
Fair Value

Carrying Value
Fair ValueSenior Notes
$150,000
$152,225

$150,000
$153,750Convertible Senior Notes (excludes discount)
$172,500
$167,670

$172,500
$171,650







The fair values of our Senior Notes and Convertible Senior Notes are based on available market data at the date presented.  The carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes reflected in long-term debt in the table above reflects the full face amount of $172.5 million, which has been adjusted in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for a discount related to its convertible feature (Note 2).




(9)
Segment Information





The Company has two segments based on the coal basins in which the Company operates. These basins are located in Central Appalachia (CAPP) and in the Midwest (Midwest). The Company’s CAPP operations are located in eastern Kentucky and the Company’s Midwest operations are located in southern Indiana. Coal quality, coal seam height, transportation methods and regulatory issues are generally consistent within a basin. Accordingly, market and contract pricing have been developed by coal basin. The Company manages its coal sales by coal basin, not by individual mine complex. Mine operations are evaluated based on their per-ton operating costs. Operating segment results are shown below (in thousands).





-15-







Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedJune 30,


June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009RevenuesCAPP

$
153,560



144,853



309,124



312,488Midwest


29,485



26,796



58,522



51,282Corporate


-



-



-



-Total

$
183,045



171,649



367,646



363,770Depreciation, depletion and amortizationCAPP

$
13,467



12,651



26,955



23,808Midwest


2,727



3,260



5,582



6,561Corporate


15



11



30



26Total

$
16,209



15,922



32,567



30,395Total operating income (loss)CAPP

$
31,758



24,873



63,400



66,539Midwest


1,619



(901
)


4,656



(1,485
)Corporate


(5,102
)


(6,525
)


(10,174
)


(11,953
)Total

$
28,275



17,447



57,882



53,101Net earnings (loss) (1)CAPP

$
31,758



24,873



63,400



66,539Midwest


1,619



(901
)


4,656



(1,485
)Corporate


(13,527
)


(7,794
)


(24,961
)


(20,705
)Total

$
19,850



16,178



43,095



44,349





(1)  Income and expense items that are not included in operating income (loss) are not allocated to the CAPP and Midwest segments.





June 30,


December 31,2010


2009Total AssetsCAPP

$
494,237



421,825Midwest


101,939



88,815Corporate


121,483



158,672Total

$
717,659



669,312GoodwillCAPP

$
-



-Midwest


26,492



26,492Corporate


-



-Total

$
26,492



26,492









-16-





ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS








The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes contained herein and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.





Overview





We mine, process and sell bituminous, steam- and industrial-grade coal through six operating subsidiaries (“mining complexes”) located throughout eastern Kentucky and in southern Indiana.  We have two reportable business segments based on the coal basins in which we operate (Central Appalachia (CAPP) and the Midwest (Midwest)).  We derived 89% of our total revenues (contract and spot) in the six months ended June 30, 2010 from coal sales to electric utility customers and the remaining 11% from coal sales to industrial and other customers.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our mines produced 4.6 million tons of coal.  Our coal purchased for resale was less than 0.1 million tons for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  Of the 4.6 million tons we produced from Company operated mines, approximately 66% came from underground mines, while the remaining 34% came from surface mines.    For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we generated revenues of $367.6 million and net income of $43.1 million.





CAPP Segment





In Central Appalachia, our coal is primarily sold to customers in the southern portion of the South Atlantic region of the United States.  The South Atlantic Region includes the states of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland and Delaware.  We have been providing coal to customers in the South Atlantic region since our formation in 1988.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our CAPP segment produced 3.1 million tons of coal (including contract coal and purchased coal). Of the CAPP tons produced, 87% came from Company operated underground mines. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we shipped 3.2 million tons of coal and generated coal sale revenues of $309.1 million from our CAPP segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, South Carolina Public Service Authority and Georgia Power Company were our largest customers, representing approximately 41% and 31% of our total revenues, respectively.  No other CAPP customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues.





Midwest Segment





In the Midwest, the majority of our coal is sold in the East North Central Region, which includes the states of Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our Midwest mines produced approximately 1.4 million tons of coal. Of the Midwest tons produced, 81% came from Company operated surface mines. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we shipped 1.4 million tons of coal and generated coal sale revenues of $58.5 million from our Midwest segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our Midwest segment’s largest customer, Indianapolis Power and Light, represented approximately 11% of our total revenues. No other Midwest customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues.








Results of Operations





Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009





The following tables show selected operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands except per ton amounts).


-17-





Three Months Ended June 30,2010


2009Total


Per Ton


Total


Per TonVolume shipped (tons)


2,283






2,407Revenues

$
183,045



80.18


$
171,649



71.31Cost of coal sold


128,738



56.39



127,721



53.06Depreciation, depletion and amortization


16,209



7.10



15,922



6.61Gross profit


38,098



16.69



28,006



11.64Selling, general and administrative


9,823



4.30



10,559



4.39Operating income


28,275



12.39



17,447



7.25





Volume and Revenues by Segment





Three Months Ended June 30,2010


2009CAPP


Midwest


CAPP


MidwestVolume shipped (tons)


1,585



698



1,601



806Coal sales revenue

$
153,560



29,485



144,853



26,796Average sales price per ton

$
96.88



42.24



90.48



33.25





Coal sales revenue for the three months ended June 30, increased from $171.6 million in 2009 to $183.0 million in 2010. This increase was due to an increase in the average sales price per ton in the CAPP and Midwest regions, which was partially offset by a decrease in tons shipped in the CAPP and Midwest regions.





For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the CAPP region sold approximately 1.3 million tons of coal under long-term contracts (82% of total CAPP sales volume) at an average selling price of $103.99 per ton. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the CAPP region sold approximately 1.5 million tons of coal under long-term contracts (96% of total CAPP sales volume) at an average selling price of $90.69 per ton.  For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the CAPP region sold 0.3 million tons of coal (18% of total CAPP sales volume) under short term contracts (includes spot sales) at an average selling price of $65.00 per ton. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the CAPP region sold 0.1 million tons of coal (4% of total CAPP sales volume) under short term contracts (includes spot sales) at an average selling price of $84.54 per ton.





The Midwest’s region sales of coal were under long term contracts for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.  For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Midwest region sold 0.7 million tons at an average sales price of $42.24 per ton.  For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Midwest region sold 0.8 million tons at an average sales price of $33.25 per ton.





Operating Costs by Segment




Three Months Ended June 30,2010


2009CAPP


Midwest


Corporate


CAPP


Midwest


CorporateCost of coal sold

$
104,455



24,283



-



103,952



23,769



-Per ton


65.90



34.79



-



64.93



29.49



-Depreciation, depletion and amortization


13,467



2,727



15



12,651



3,260



11Per ton


8.50



3.91



-



7.90



4.04



-




-18-




Cost of Coal Sold




For the three months ended June 30, the cost of coal sold, excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization, increased from $127.7 million in 2009 to $128.7 million in 2010.  Our cost per ton of coal sold in the CAPP region increased from $64.93 per ton in the 2009 period to $65.90 per ton in the 2010 period.   With the exception of sales related costs which increased by $1.84 per ton, there were no significant changes in the major components of costs per ton of coal sold in the CAAP region as compared to the prior year.





Our cost per ton of coal sold in the Midwest increased $5.30 per ton from $29.49 in the 2009 period to $34.79 per ton in the 2010 period.  The major components of this increase include an increase in the variable costs of $1.92 per ton, labor and benefit costs of $1.25 per ton, preparation and loading costs of $0.89 per ton and sales related costs of $0.73 per ton.  The increase in the variable costs was primarily due to an increase in diesel and explosives costs.





Depreciation, depletion and amortization




For the three months ended June 30, depreciation, depletion and amortization increased from $15.9 million in 2009 to $16.2 million in 2010.  In the CAPP region, depreciation, depletion and amortization increased $0.8 million to $13.5 million or $8.50 per ton.  In the Midwest, depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $0.5 million to $2.7 million or $3.91 per ton.




Selling, general and administrative




Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from $10.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to $9.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in bank fees due to the elimination of our previous letter of credit facility.




Interest Expense




Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, increased from $3.8 million in 2009 to $7.5 million in 2010.  This increase was the result of an additional $3.5 million of interest on our convertible senior notes that were issued in the fourth quarter of 2009, including $1.4 million related to the amortization of the debt discount recorded on this issuance.





Income Taxes





Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 3.6% and our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was a benefit of 17.7%.  Our effective income tax rate is impacted primarily by changes in the amount of the valuation allowance recorded and the effects of percentage depletion.  Our three months ended June 30, 2009 effective tax rate includes a tax benefit due to a change in a previous estimate of our 2009 taxable income and the net operating loss carryfoward available for 2009.    For 2010, we expect that a portion of our available net operating loss carryforward will be utilized to reduce current tax expense, and therefore the previously established valuation allowance will be reduced.  The criteria for recording a valuation allowance are described in “Critical Accounting Estimates – Income Taxes.”  As of June 30, 2010, we had a $27.3 million valuation allowance against gross deferred tax assets.    Percentage depletion is an income tax deduction that is limited to a percentage of taxable income from each of our mining properties.  Because percentage depletion can be deducted in excess of cost basis in the properties, it creates a permanent difference and directly impacts the effective tax rate.  Fluctuations in the effective tax rate may occur due to the varying levels of profitability (and thus, taxable income and percentage depletion) at each of our mine locations.





Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009





The following tables show selected operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands except per ton amounts).





Six Months Ended June 30,2010


2009Total


Per Ton


Total


Per TonVolume shipped (tons)


4,683






5,038Revenues

$
367,646



78.51


$
363,770



72.21Cost of coal sold


258,055



55.10



260,428



51.69Depreciation, depletion and amortization


32,567



6.95



30,395



6.03Gross profit


77,024



16.45



72,947



14.48Selling, general and administrative


19,142



4.09



19,846



3.94Operating income


57,882



12.36



53,101



10.54








-19-


Volume and Revenues by Segment





Six Months Ended June 30,2010


2009CAPP


Midwest


CAPP


MidwestVolume shipped (tons)


3,247



1,436



3,445



1,593Coal sales revenue

$
309,124



58,522



312,488



51,282Average sales price per ton

$
95.20



40.75



90.71



32.19





Coal sales revenue for the six months ended June 30, increased from $363.8 million in 2009 to $367.6 million in 2010.  This increase was due to an increase in the average sales price per ton in the CAPP and Midwest regions, which was partially offset by a decrease in tons shipped in the CAPP and Midwest regions.





For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the CAPP region sold approximately 2.6 million tons of coal under long-term contracts (80% of total CAPP sales volume) at an average selling price of $102.62 per ton. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the CAPP region sold approximately 3.1 million tons of coal under long-term contracts (92% of total CAPP sales volume) at an average selling price of $91.18 per ton.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the CAPP region sold 0.6 million tons of coal (20% of total CAPP sales volume) under short term contracts (includes spot sales) at an average selling price of $64.92 per ton. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the CAPP region sold 0.3 million tons of coal (8% of total CAPP sales volume) under short term contracts (includes spot sales) at an average selling price of $85.49 per ton.





The Midwest’s region sales of coal were under long term contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Midwest region sold 1.4 million tons at an average sales price of $40.75 per ton.  For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Midwest region sold 1.6 million tons at an average sales price of $32.19 per ton.





Operating Costs by Segment




Six Months Ended June 30,2010


2009CAPP


Midwest


Corporate


CAPP


Midwest


CorporateCost of coal sold

$
211,195



46,860



-



215,436



44,992



-Per ton


65.04



32.63



-



62.54



28.24



-Depreciation, depletion and amortization


26,955



5,582



30



23,808



6,561



26Per ton


8.30



3.89



-



6.91



4.12



-






Cost of Coal Sold




For the six months ended June 30, the cost of coal sold, excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization, decreased from $260.4 million in 2009 to $258.1 million in 2010.  Our cost per ton of coal sold in the CAPP region increased from $62.54 per ton in the 2009 period to $65.04 per ton in the 2010 period.  The major component of the $2.50 increase in cost per ton of coal sold was an increase in our sales related costs of $1.72 per ton.  Our costs continue to be impacted by lower productivity due to increased federal and state regulatory scrutiny and a decrease in tons produced in response to market conditions.   For more detail regarding the increased regulatory activity see “Part II – Item 1A – Risk Factors – Underground mining is subject to increased regulation, and may require us to incur additional cost.”





Our cost per ton of coal sold in the Midwest increased $4.39 per ton from $28.24 in the 2009 period to $32.63 per ton in the 2010 period.  The major components of this increase include an increase in the variable costs of $1.49 per ton, labor and benefit costs of $0.97 per ton, preparation and loading costs of $0.88 per ton and sales related costs of $0.62 per ton.  The increase in the variable costs was primarily due to an increase in diesel and explosives costs.





-20-


Depreciation, depletion and amortization




For the six months ended June 30, depreciation, depletion and amortization increased from $30.4 million in 2009 to $32.6 million in 2010.  In the CAPP region, depreciation, depletion and amortization increased $3.1 million to $27.0 million or $8.30 per ton.  In the Midwest, depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $1.0 million to $5.6 million or $3.89 per ton.




Selling, general and administrative




Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from $19.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $19.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in bank fees due to the elimination of our previous letter of credit facility.




Interest Expense




Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, increased from $7.9 million in 2009 to $14.8 million in 2010.  This increase was the result of an additional $6.9 million of interest on our convertible senior notes that were issued in the fourth quarter of 2009, including $2.8 million related to the amortization of the debt discount recorded on this issuance.





Income Taxes





Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was a benefit of 0.5% and our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was 2.4%.  Our effective income tax rate is impacted primarily by changes in the amount of the valuation allowance recorded and the effects of percentage depletion.  Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 reflects a benefit for a tax election that allows us to utilize additional alternative minimum tax net operating losses in prior years.  For 2010, we expect that a portion of our available net operating loss carryforward will be utilized to reduce current tax expense, and therefore the previously established valuation allowance will be reduced.  The criteria for recording a valuation allowance are described in “Critical Accounting Estimates – Income Taxes.”  As of June 30, 2010, we had a $27.3 million valuation allowance against gross deferred tax assets.    Percentage depletion is an income tax deduction that is limited to a percentage of taxable income from each of our mining properties.  Because percentage depletion can be deducted in excess of cost basis in the properties, it creates a permanent difference and directly impacts the effective tax rate.  Fluctuations in the effective tax rate may occur due to the varying levels of profitability (and thus, taxable income and percentage depletion) at each of our mine locations.








Liquidity and Capital Resources





The following chart reflects the components of our debt as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:





June 30,

2010


December 31,

2009Senior Notes

$
150,000


$
150,000Convertible Senior Notes, net of discount


131,081



128,268Revolver


-



-Total long-term debt

$
281,081


$
278,268





Senior Notes and Convertible Senior Notes





There have been no changes to the terms of our Senior Notes or Convertible Senior Notes during 2010.  See Item 1 of Part I, “Financial Statements — Note 2 — Long Term Debt and Interest Expense” for a description of our Senior Notes and Convertible Senior Notes.





-21-


Revolving Credit Agreement





In January 2010, we amended and restated our existing Revolving Credit Agreement (as amended and restated the Revolving Credit Agreement is referred to as the Revolver).  The following is a summary of significant terms of the Revolver.





Maturity
February 2012Interest/Usage Rate
Company’s option of Base Rate(a) plus 3.0% or LIBOR plus 4.0% per annumMaximum Availability
Lesser of $65.0 million or the borrowing base (b)Periodic Principal Payments
None





(a)
Base rate is the higher of (1) the Federal Fund Rate plus 3.0%, (2) the prime rate and (3) a LIBOR rate plus 1.0%.(b)
The Revolver’s borrowing base is based on the sum of 85% of our eligible accounts receivable plus 65% of the eligible inventory minus reserves from time to time set by administrative agent.  The eligible accounts receivable and inventories are further adjusted as specified in the agreement.  The Company’s borrowing base can also be increased by 95% of any cash collateral that the Company maintains in a cash collateral account.





The Revolver provides that we can use the Revolver availability to issue letters of credit. The Revolver provides for a 4.25% fee on any outstanding letters of credit issued under the Revolver and a 0.5% fee on the unused portion of the Revolver. The Revolver requires certain mandatory prepayments from certain asset sales, incurrence of indebtedness and excess cash flow. The Revolver includes financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum Adjusted EBITDA and a maximum Leverage Ratio and limit capital expenditures, each as defined by the agreement. However, the minimum Adjusted EBITDA and maximum Leverage Ratio covenants are only applicable if our unrestricted cash balance falls below $75.0 million and would remain in effect until our unrestricted cash exceeds $75.0 million for 90 consecutive days.





As of June 30, 2010, we have used $56.8 million of the $65.0 million available under the Revolver to secure outstanding letters of credits.  As of June 30, 2010, we had $15.0 million of cash in a restricted cash collateral account to ensure that we have adequate capacity under the Revolver to support our outstanding letters of credit.





We were in compliance with all of the financial covenants under our outstanding debt instruments as of June 30, 2010.  We cannot assure you that we will remain in compliance in subsequent periods.  If necessary, we will consider seeking a waiver or other alternatives to remain in compliance with the covenants.  For more detail regarding the covenants under the Facilities, see Part II - Item 1A - Risk Factors - “We may be unable to comply with restrictions imposed by the terms of our indebtedness, which could result in a default under these instruments.”





Liquidity





As of June 30, 2010, we had total liquidity of approximately $198.5 million, consisting of $8.2 million of unused borrowing capacity under the Revolver and $190.3 million of cash and cash equivalents.   As of June 30, 2010, we have used $56.8 million of the Revolver’s availability to secure outstanding letters of credits





Our primary source of cash is expected to be sales of coal to our utility and industrial customers. The price of coal received can change dramatically based on market factors and will directly affect this source of cash.  Our primary uses of cash include the payment of ordinary mining expenses to mine coal, capital expenditures and benefit payments. Ordinary mining expenses are driven by the cost of supplies, including steel prices and diesel fuel. Benefit payments include payments for workers’ compensation and black lung benefits paid over the lives of our employees as the claims are submitted. We are required to pay these when due, and are not required to set aside cash for these payments. We have posted surety bonds secured by letters of credit or issued letters of credit with state regulatory departments to guarantee these payments.  We believe that our Revolver provides us with the ability to meet the necessary bonding requirements.





We believe that cash generated from operations, borrowings under our credit facilities and future debt and equity offerings, if any, will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures and scheduled debt payments throughout 2010 and for the next several years. Nevertheless, our ability to satisfy our working capital requirements and debt service obligations, or fund planned capital expenditures, will substantially depend upon our future operating performance (which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in the coal industry), debt covenants, and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.





In the event that the sources of cash described above are not sufficient to meet our future cash requirements, we will need to reduce certain planned expenditures, seek additional financing, or both. We may seek to raise funds through additional debt financing or the issuance of additional equity securities. If such actions are not sufficient, we may need to limit our growth, sell assets or reduce or curtail some of our operations to levels consistent with the constraints imposed by our available cash flow, or any combination of these options. Our ability to seek additional debt or equity financing may be limited by our existing and any future financing arrangements, economic and financial conditions, or all three. In particular, our Convertible Senior Notes, Senior Notes and Revolver restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness. We cannot provide assurance that any reductions in our planned expenditures or in our expansion would be sufficient to cover shortfalls in available cash or that additional debt or equity financing would be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.





-22-


Net cash from operating activities reflects net income adjusted for non-cash charges and changes in net working capital (including non-current operating assets and liabilities). Net cash provided by operating activities was $117.8 million and $46.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  We had net income of $43.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to net income of $44.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009.  In reconciling our net income to cash provided by operating activities, $41.3 million was added for non cash charges during 2010, as compared to $35.7 million added during 2009.  During 2010, our net income, as adjusted for non cash charges, was increased by $33.4 million as a result of changes in cash from our operating assets and liabilities.  The change in our operating assets and liabilities for 2010 included a $47.0 million decrease in restricted cash, a $7.1 million decrease in accounts payables and a $15.6 million increase in accounts receivable.  The change in our restricted cash is the result of replacing letters of credit that were secured by cash with letters of credit issued against our Revolver.  During 2009, our net income, as adjusted for non cash charges, was reduced by $33.2 million as a result of changes in cash from our operating assets and liabilities.  The change in our operating assets and liabilities for 2009 includes a $9.7 million increase in accounts receivable and a $22.3 million increase in inventory.





Net cash used in investing activities increased by $3.8 million to $34.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 and consisted of capital expenditures.  Capital expenditures primarily consisted of new and replacement mine equipment and various projects to improve the production and efficiency of our mining operations.





Net cash used by financing activities was $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and consisted of debt issuance costs on the amendment to the Revolver.  Net cash used by financing activities was $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and consisted primarily of net repayments on the Revolver.




Reserves




Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. (MM&A) prepared a detailed study of our CAPP reserves as of March 31, 2004 based on all of our geologic information, including our updated drilling and mining data. MM&A completed their report on our CAPP reserves in June 2004.  For the Triad properties, MM&A also prepared a detailed study of Triad’s reserves as of February 1, 2005 for the reserves obtained in the acquisition of Triad and as of April 11, 2006 for certain additional reserves acquired in the second quarter of 2006.  The MM&A studies were planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance of the subject demonstrated reserves.  In connection with the studies, MM&A prepared reserve maps and had certified professional geologists develop estimates based on data supplied by us and Triad using standards accepted by government and industry.  We have used MM&A’s March 31, 2004 study as the basis for our current internal estimate of our Central Appalachia reserves and MM&A’s February 1, 2005 and April 11, 2006 studies as the basis for our current internal estimate of our Midwest reserves.





Reserves for these purposes are defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.  The reserve estimates were prepared using industry-standard methodology to provide reasonable assurance that the reserves are recoverable, considering technical, economic and legal limitations.  Although MM&A has reviewed our reserves and found them to be reasonable (notwithstanding unforeseen geological, market, labor or regulatory issues that may affect the operations), MM&A’s engagement did not include performing an economic feasibility study for our reserves.  In accordance with standard industry practice, we have performed our own economic feasibility analysis for our reserves.  It is not generally considered to be practical, however, nor is it standard industry practice, to perform a feasibility study for a company’s entire reserve portfolio.  In addition, MM&A did not independently verify our control of our properties, and has relied solely on property information supplied by us.  Reserve acreage, average seam thickness, average seam density and average mine and wash recovery percentages were verified by MM&A to prepare a reserve tonnage estimate for each reserve.  There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and values of economically recoverable coal reserves as discussed in “Critical Accounting Estimates – Coal Reserves”.





Based on the MM&A reserve studies and the foregoing assumptions and qualifications, and after giving effect to our operations from the respective dates of the studies through June 30, 2010, we estimate that, as of June 30, 2010, we controlled approximately 229.8 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves in the CAPP region and 40.4 millions tons in the Midwest region.  The following table provides additional information regarding changes to our reserves since December 31, 2009 (in millions of tons):





CAPP


Midwest


TotalProven and Probable Reserves, as of December 31, 2009 (1)


231.2



39.9



271.1Coal Extracted


(3.2
)


(1.4
)


(4.6
)Acquisitions (2)


0.4



-



0.4Adjustments (3)


2.0



1.9



3.9Divesture (4)


(0.6
)


-



(0.6
)Proven and Probable Reserves, as of June 30, 2010 (1)


229.8



40.4



270.2


-23-





1) Calculated in the same manner, and based on the same assumptions and qualifications, as used in the MM&A studies described above, but these estimates have not been reviewed by MM&A.  Proven reserves have the highest degree of geologic assurance and are reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings, or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspections, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.  Probable reserves have a moderate degree of geologic assurance and are reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced.  The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.  This reserve information reflects recoverable tonnage on an as-received basis with 5.5% moisture.





(2) Represents estimated reserves on leases entered into or properties acquired during the relevant period.  We calculated the reserves in the same manner, and based on the same assumptions and qualifications, as used in the MM&A studies described above, but these estimates have not been reviewed by MM&A.





(3) Represents changes in reserves due to additional information obtained from exploration activities, production activities or discovery of new geologic information. We calculated the adjustments to the reserves in the same manner, and based on the same assumptions and qualifications, as used in the MM&A studies described above, but these estimates have not been reviewed by MM&A.





(4) Represents changes in reserves due to expired or transferred leases.





Key Performance Indicators





We manage our business through several key performance metrics that provide a summary of information in the areas of sales, operations, and general and administrative costs.





In the sales area, our long-term metrics are the volume-weighted average remaining term of our contracts and our open contract position for the next several years. During periods of high prices, we may seek to lengthen the average remaining term of our contracts and reduce the open tonnage for future periods. In the short-term, we closely monitor the Average Selling Price per Ton (ASP), and the mix between our spot sales and contract sales.





In the operations area, we monitor the volume of coal that is produced by each of our principal sources, including company mines, contract mines, and purchased coal sources. For our company mines, we focus on both operating costs and operating productivity. We closely monitor the cost per ton of our mines against our budgeted costs and against our other mines.





EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are also measures used by management to measure operating performance. We define EBITDA as net income (loss) plus interest expense (net), income tax expense (benefit) and depreciation, depletion and amortization. We regularly use EBITDA to evaluate our performance as compared to other companies in our industry that have different financing and capital structures and/or tax rates. In addition, we use EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets. EBITDA is not a recognized term under U.S generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) and is not an alternative to net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with US GAAP or an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of operating liquidity.  Adjusted EBITDA is used in calculating compliance with our debt covenants and adjusts EBITDA for certain items as defined in our debt agreements, including stock compensation and certain bank fees.  See “Other Supplemental Information  —  Reconciliation of Non-US GAAP Measures.”





In the selling, general and administrative area, we closely monitor the gross dollars spent. We also regularly measure our performance against our internally-prepared budgets.





Trends In Our Business





Near-term, the global economic slowdown has lowered demand for coal which has resulted in a decline in spot coal prices.  The price of spot coal has also been impacted by a decrease in the price of competing fuel sources including oil and natural gas.  The coal industry has made cutbacks in supply in response to decrease in demand for coal.  Due to the uncertainties in the global market place, we are unable to forecast the price or demand for coal over the next few years.  Long-term, we believe that the demand for coal worldwide will continue to be strong as supply challenges will continue in the regions that we mine coal.  We also believe that in the United States coal will continue to be one of the most economical energy sources.   A number of factors beyond our control impact coal prices, including:


-24-





·
the supply of domestic and foreign coal;


·
the demand for electricity;


·
the demand for steel and the continued financial viability of the domestic and foreign steel industries;


·
the cost of transporting coal to the customer;


·
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes;


·
world economic conditions


·
air emission standards for coal-fired power plants; and


·
the price and availability of alternative fuels for electricity generation.





As discussed previously, our costs of production have increased in recent years.  We expect the higher costs to continue for the next several years, due to a number of factors, including increased governmental regulations, high prices in worldwide commodity markets, and a highly competitive market for a limited supply of skilled mining personnel.





Our business is very sensitive to changes in supply and demand for coal and we carefully manage our mines to maximize operating results.  As our current long term contracts are fulfilled, our profitability in the future will be impacted by the price levels that we achieve on future long term contracts.  Events beyond our control could impact our profit margins.





Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements





In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantees, operating leases, indemnifications, and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit and performance or surety bonds.  Liabilities related to these arrangements are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets, and, except for the operating leases, we do not expect any material impact on our cash flow, results of operations or financial condition from these off-balance sheet arrangements.





We use surety bonds to secure reclamation, workers’ compensation and other miscellaneous obligations. At June 30, 2010, we had $103.2 million of outstanding surety bonds with third parties. These bonds were in place to secure obligations as follows: post-mining reclamation bonds of $59.3 million, workers’ compensation bonds of $40.3 million, wage payment, collection bonds, and other miscellaneous obligation bonds of $3.6 million. Surety bond costs have increased over time and the market terms of surety bonds have generally become less favorable. To the extent that surety bonds become unavailable, we would seek to secure obligations with letters of credit, cash deposits, or other suitable forms of collateral.





We also use bank letters of credit to secure our obligations for workers’ compensation programs, various insurance contracts and other obligations. As of June 30, 2010, we had $56.8 million of letters of credit outstanding.  The letters of credit are issued under our Revolver.





Critical Accounting Estimates





Overview





Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.  US GAAP require estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts for assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.  The estimates and judgments we make in connection with our consolidated financial statements are based on historical experience and various other factors we believe are reasonable under the circumstances.  Note 1 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements and to our annual consolidated financial statements filed on Form 10-K describes our significant accounting policies.  The following critical accounting policies have a material effect on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements.





Workers' Compensation





We are liable under various state statutes for providing workers’ compensation benefits.  Except as indicated, we are self insured for workers’ compensation at our Kentucky operations, with specific excess insurance purchased from independent insurance carriers to cover individual traumatic claims in excess of the self-insured limits.  For the period June 2002 to June 2005, workers compensation coverage was insured through a third party insurance company using a large risk rating plan.  Our operations in Indiana are insured through a third party insurance company using a large risk rating plan.





We accrue for the present value of certain workers’ compensation obligations as calculated annually by an independent actuary based upon assumptions for work-related injury and illness rates, discount rates and future trends for medical care costs.  The discount rate is based on interest rates on bonds with maturities similar to the estimated future cash flows.  The discount rate used to calculate the present value of these future obligations was 5.3% at December 31, 2009.  Significant changes to interest rates result in substantial volatility to our consolidated financial statements. If we were to decrease our estimate of the discount rate from 5.3% to 4.8%, all other things being equal, the present value of our workers’ compensation obligation would increase by approximately $1.9 million. A change in the law, through either legislation or judicial action, could cause these assumptions to change. If the estimates do not materialize as anticipated, our actual costs and cash expenditures could differ materially from that currently estimated. Our estimated workers’ compensation liability as of June 30, 2010 was $60.8 million.





-25-


Coal Miners' Pneumoconiosis





We are required under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended, as well as various state statutes, to provide pneumoconiosis (black lung) benefits to eligible current and former employees and their dependents. We provide for federal and state black lung claims through a self-insurance program for our Central Appalachia operations.   For the period between June 2002 and June 2005, all black lung liabilities were insured through a third party insurance company using a large risk rating plan.  Our operations in Indiana are insured through a third party insurance company using a large risk rating plan.





An independent actuary calculates the estimated pneumoconiosis liability annually based on assumptions regarding disability incidence, medical costs, mortality, death benefits, dependents and interest rates. The discount rate is based on interest rates on high quality corporate bonds with maturities similar to the estimated future cash flows. The discount rate used to calculate the present value of these future obligations was 5.8% at December 31, 2009. Significant changes to interest rates result in substantial volatility to our consolidated financial statements. If we were to decrease our estimate of the discount rate by 0.5% to 5.3%, all other things being equal, the present value of our black lung obligation would increase by approximately $2.2 million. A change in the law, through either legislation or judicial action, could cause these assumptions to change. If these estimates prove inaccurate, the actual costs and cash expenditures could vary materially from the amount currently estimated. Our estimated pneumoconiosis liability as of June 30, 2010 was $43.9 million.





In March 2010, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Act) was enacted into law and included a black-lung provision that creates a rebuttable presumption that a miner with at least 15 years of service, with totally disabling pulmonary or respiratory lung impairment and negative radiographic chest x-ray evidence would be disabled due to pneumoconiosis and be eligible for black lung benefits.  The new Act also makes it easier for widows of miners to become eligible for benefits.  In the first quarter of 2010, we were able to make an initial evaluation of the impact of these changes on a limited population of current and potential future claimants, resulting in an estimated $9.4 million increase to the black lung obligation. This estimated increase in the black lung obligation was recorded along with an increase in the actuarial loss included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on our balance sheet.  Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, we recorded a $0.4 million increase in the quarterly black lung expense related to the amortization of this additional actuarial loss and increases in the service and interest cost components.  As of June 30, 2010, we are not able to estimate the impact of this legislation on the obligations related to future claims from older terminated miners and possible re-filed claims, due to significant uncertainty around the number of claims that will be filed and how impactful the new award criteria will be to these claim populations.  We will continue to assess the impact of this legislation on our initial estimate as additional information becomes available and future regulations are issued.





Defined Benefit Pension





We have in place a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan under which all benefits were frozen in 2007.  The estimated cost and benefits of our non-contributory defined benefit pension plans are determined annually by independent actuaries, who, with our review and approval, use various actuarial assumptions, including discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets. In estimating the discount rate, we look to rates of return on high-quality, fixed-income investments with comparable maturities. At December 31, 2009, the discount rate used to determine the obligation was 5.9%. Significant changes to interest rates result in substantial volatility to our consolidated financial statements. If we were to decrease our estimate of the discount rate from 5.9% to 5.4%, all other things being equal, the present value of our projected benefit obligation would increase by approximately $4.5 million.  The expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is based on long-term historical return information and future estimates of long-term investment returns for the target asset allocation of investments that comprise plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used to determine expense was 7.5% for the period ended December 31, 2009. Significant changes to these rates would introduce volatility to our pension expense.  Our accrued pension obligation as of June 30, 2010 was $12.5 million.





Reclamation and Mine Closure Obligation





The Surface Mining Control Reclamation Act of 1977 establishes operational, reclamation and closure standards for all aspects of surface mining as well as many aspects of underground mining. Our asset retirement obligation liabilities consist of spending estimates related to reclaiming surface land and support facilities at both surface and underground mines in accordance with federal and state reclamation laws. Our total reclamation and mine-closing liabilities are based upon permit requirements and our engineering estimates related to these requirements. US GAAP requires that asset retirement obligations be initially recorded as a liability based on fair value, which is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. Our management and engineers periodically review the estimate of ultimate reclamation liability and the expected period in which reclamation work will be performed. In estimating future cash flows, we considered the estimated current cost of reclamation and applied inflation rates and a third party profit. The third party profit is an estimate of the approximate markup that would be charged by contractors for work performed on our behalf. The discount rate is our estimate of our credit adjusted risk free rate. The estimated liability can change significantly if actual costs vary from assumptions or if governmental regulations change significantly. The actual costs could be different due to several reasons, including the possibility that our estimates could be incorrect, in which case our liabilities would differ. If we perform the reclamation work using our personnel rather than hiring a third party, as assumed under US GAAP, then the costs should be lower. If governmental regulations change, then the costs of reclamation will be impacted. US GAAP recognizes that the recorded liability could be different than the final cost of the reclamation and addresses the settlement of the liability. When the obligation is settled, and there is a difference between the recorded liability and the amount paid to settle the obligation, a gain or loss upon settlement is included in earnings. Our asset retirement obligation as of June 30, 2010 was $46.7 million.





-26-


Contingencies





We are the subject of, or a party to, various suits and pending or threatened litigation involving governmental agencies or private interests. We have accrued the probable and reasonably estimable costs for the resolution of these claims based upon management’s best estimate of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Unless otherwise noted, management does not believe that the outcome or timing of current legal or environmental matters will have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.  See the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion on our contingencies.





Income Taxes





Deferred tax assets and liabilities are required to be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also required to be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we take into account various factors, including the expected level of future taxable income. We have also considered tax planning strategies in determining the deferred tax asset that will ultimately be realized. If actual results differ from the assumptions made in the evaluation of the amount of our valuation allowance, we record a change in valuation allowance through income tax expense in the period such determination is made.





We have recorded a $27.3 million valuation allowance against our gross deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2010 for the portion of the gross deferred tax asset that does not meet the more likely than not criteria to be realized.  In 2009 and 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit for the reduction in our valuation allowance related to the net operating loss carryforwards that we expect will be utilized.





Coal Reserves





There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and values of economically recoverable coal reserves. Many of these uncertainties are beyond our control. As a result, estimates of economically recoverable coal reserves are by their nature uncertain. Information about our reserves consists of estimates based on engineering, economic and geological data initially assembled by our staff and analyzed by Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. (MM&A). The reserve information has subsequently been updated by our staff. The updates to the reserves have been calculated in the same manner, and based on similar assumptions and qualifications, as used in the MM&A studies described above, but these updates to the reserve estimates have not been reviewed by MM&A.  A number of sources of information were used to determine accurate recoverable reserves estimates, including:





·
all currently available data;





·
our own operational experience and that of our consultants;





·
historical production from similar areas with similar conditions;





·
previously completed geological and reserve studies;





·
the assumed effects of regulations and taxes by governmental agencies; and





·
assumptions governing future prices and future operating costs.





Reserve estimates will change from time to time to reflect, among other factors:





·
mining activities;





·
new engineering and geological data;





·
acquisition or divestiture of reserve holdings; and





·
modification of mining plans or mining methods.





-27-


Each of these factors may in fact vary considerably from the assumptions used in estimating reserves. For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities of coal attributable to a particular group of properties, and classifications of these reserves based on risk of recovery and estimates of future net cash flows, may vary substantially. Actual production, revenue and expenditures with respect to reserves will likely vary from estimates, and these variances could be material. In particular, a variance in reserve estimates could have a material adverse impact on our annual expense for depreciation, depletion and amortization and on our annual calculation for potential impairment. For a further discussion of our coal reserves, see “Reserves.”





Evaluation of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets for Impairment





Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to periodic assessments of impairment.  Impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. We test goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Long-lived asset groups are tested for recoverability when changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Events that trigger a test for recoverability include material adverse changes in projected revenues and expenses, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results and significant negative industry or economic trends.





The estimates used to determine whether impairment has occurred to goodwill and long-lived assets are subject to a number of management assumptions.  We estimate the fair value of a reporting unit or asset group based on market prices (i.e., the amount for which the asset could be bought by or sold to a third party), when available.  When market prices are not available, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit or asset group using the income approach and/or the market approach, which are subject to a number of management assumptions.  The income approach uses cash flow projections.  Inherent in our development of cash flow projections are assumptions and estimates derived from a review of our operating results, approved operating budgets, expected growth rates and cost of capital.  We also make certain assumptions about future economic conditions, interest rates, and other market data.  Many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, and these assumptions and estimates can change in future periods.





Changes in assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination of fair value of an asset group, and therefore could affect the amount of potential impairment of the asset.  The following assumptions are key to our income approach:





·
We make assumptions about coal production, sales price for unpriced coal, cost to mine the coal and estimated residual value of property, plant and equipment.  These assumptions are key inputs for developing our cash flow projections.  These projections are derived using our internal operating budget and are developed on a mine by mine basis.  These projections are updated annually and reviewed by the Board of Directors.  Historically, the Company’s primary variances between its projections and actual results have been with regard to assumptions for future coal production, sales prices of coal and costs to mine the coal.  These factors are based on our best knowledge at the time we prepare our budgets but can vary significantly due to regulatory issues, unforeseen mining conditions, change in commodity prices, availability and costs of labor and changes in supply and demand.  While we make our best estimates at the time we prepare our budgets it is reasonably likely that these estimates will change in future budgets, due to the changing nature of the coal environment;·
Economic Projections – Assumptions regarding general economic conditions are included in and affect the assumptions used in our impairment tests.  These assumptions include, but are not limited to, supply and demand for coal, inflation, interest rates, and prices of raw materials (commodities); and·
Discount Rates – When measuring a possible impairment, future cash flows are discounted at a rate that we believe represents our cost of capital.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements




In the six months ended June 30, 2010, there were no accounting pronouncements that became effective that impacted our financial statements.





-28-


Other Supplemental Information





Reconciliation of Non-US GAAP Measures





EBITDA is a measure used by management to measure operating performance.  We define EBITDA as net income or loss plus interest expense (net), income tax expense (benefit) and depreciation, depletion and amortization (EBITDA), to better measure our operating performance.  We regularly use EBITDA to evaluate our performance as compared to other companies in our industry that have different financing and capital structures and/or tax rates.  In addition, we use EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets.





Adjusted EBITDA and the leverage ratio are the amounts used in our current debt covenants.  Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted for certain cash and non-cash charges and the leverage ratio limits are debt to a multiple of adjusted EBITDA.  Adjusted EBITDA and the leverage ratio are used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities such as incurring additional debt and making certain payments.





EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and the leverage ratio are not recognized terms under US GAAP and are not an alternative to net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with US GAAP or an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of operating liquidity.  Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and the leverage ratio may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.  Additionally, EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as they do not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax payments, interest payments and other contractual obligations.





The leverage ratio is calculated as the Company’s Senior Funded Indebtedness divided by annualized Adjusted EBITDA.  Adjusted EBITDA is calculated below.  The Senior Funded Indebtedness includes the amounts outstanding under our Revolver and the amount of letters of credits issued under our Revolver.  As of June 30, 2010, we had $56.8 million of Senior Funded Indebtedness outstanding.




Six months endedJune 302010


2009Net income

$
43,095



44,349Income tax (benefit) expense


(229
)


1,079Interest expense


14,836



7,867Interest income


(16
)


(50
)Depreciation, depletion, and amortization


32,567



30,395EBITDA (before adjustments)

$
90,253



83,640Other adjustments specified in our current debt agreement


4,377



6,590Adjusted EBITDA

$
94,630



90,230




FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION





From time to time, we make certain comments and disclosures in reports and statements, including this report, or statements made by our officers, which may be forward-looking in nature. Examples include statements related to our future outlook, anticipated capital expenditures, future cash flows and borrowings, and sources of funding. These forward-looking statements could also involve, among other things, statements regarding our intent, belief or expectation with respect to:





·
our cash flows, results of operation or financial condition;





·
the consummation of acquisition, disposition or financing transactions and the effect thereof on our business;





·
governmental policies and regulatory actions;





·
legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;





·
weather conditions or catastrophic weather-related damage;





·
our production capabilities;


-29-





·
availability of transportation;





·
market demand for coal, electricity and steel;





·
competition;





·
our relationships with, and other conditions affecting, our customers;





·
employee workforce factors;





·
our assumptions concerning economically recoverable coal reserve estimates;





·
future economic or capital market conditions; and





·
our plans and objectives for future operations and expansion or consolidation.





Any forward-looking statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual cash flows, results of operations, financial condition, cost reductions, acquisitions, dispositions, financing transactions, operations, expansion, consolidation and other events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements are also subject to a number of assumptions regarding, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions generally. These assumptions would be based on facts and conditions as they exist at the time such statements are made as well as predictions as to future facts and conditions, the accurate prediction of which may be difficult and involve the assessment of events beyond our control.





We wish to caution readers that forward-looking statements, including disclosures which use words such as “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” “could,” “estimate,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, and similar statements, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: a change in the demand for coal by electric utility customers, as well as the perceived benefits of alternative sources of energy; the loss of one or more of our largest customers; inability to secure new coal supply agreements or to extend existing coal supply agreements at market prices; our dependency on one railroad for transportation of a large percentage of our products; failure to exploit additional coal reserves; the risk that reserve estimates and pension and post-retirement benefit liabilities are inaccurate; failure to diversify our operations; increased capital expenditures; encountering difficult mining conditions; inherent complexities associated in mining in Central Appalachia including special dangers and risks of underground mining; increased costs of complying with mine health and safety regulations; bottlenecks or other difficulties in transporting coal to our customers; delays in the development of new mining projects; increased costs of raw materials; the effects of litigation, regulation, permits and competition; lack of availability of financing sources; our compliance with debt covenants; the risk that we are unable to successfully integrate acquired assets into our business; and the risk factors set forth in this Form 10-Q under Part II - Item 1A “Risk Factors.” Those are representative of factors that could affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements. These and the other factors discussed elsewhere in this document are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we undertake no obligation to update them.





ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Our $150 million Senior Notes and $172.5 million Convertible Senior Notes have a fixed interest rate and are not sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates.  Our Revolver has floating interest rates on borrowings based on our option of either the base rate or LIBOR rate.  Letters of credits secured by the Revolver have a fixed interest rate.  As of June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Revolver.  We currently do not use interest rate swaps to manage this risk.  A 100 basis point (1.0%) increase in the average interest rate for our floating rate borrowings would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $0.1 million for each $10 million of borrowings under the Revolver.





We manage our commodity price risk through the use of long-term coal supply agreements, which we define as contracts with a term of one year or more, rather than through the use of derivative instruments.  The percentage of our sales pursuant to long-term contracts was approximately 89% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.





All of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars, and, as a result, we do not have material exposure to currency exchange-rate risks.





We are not engaged in any foreign currency exchange rate or commodity price-hedging transactions and we have no trading market risk.


-30-








ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES




Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CAO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CAO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.





The Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CAO, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or the Company’s internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of the controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.








PART II


OTHER INFORMATION











ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





We are party to a number of legal proceedings incidental to our normal business activities, including a large number of workers’ compensation claims.  While we cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings, in our opinion, any liability arising from these matters individually and in the aggregate should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.





ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS





Certain Risks





For a discussion of certain risk factors that may impact our business, refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions” within this Form 10-Q.  The following are additional risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to our business.  It is possible that there are additional risks and uncertainties that affect our business that will arise or become material in the future.





Risks Related to the Coal Industry





Because the demand and pricing for coal is greatly influenced by consumption patterns of the domestic electricity generation industry, a reduction in the demand for coal by this industry would likely cause our revenues and profitability to decline significantly.





We derived 89% of our total revenues (contract and spot) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 92% of our total revenues in 2009, from our electric utility customers.  Fuel cost is a significant component of the cost associated with coal-fired power generation, with respect to not only the price of the coal, but also the costs associated with emissions control and credits (i.e., sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, etc.), combustion by-product disposal (i.e., ash) and equipment operations and maintenance (i.e., materials handling facilities).  All of these costs must be considered when choosing between coal generation and alternative methods, including natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric and others.





Weather patterns also can greatly affect electricity generation.  Extreme temperatures, both hot and cold, cause increased power usage and, therefore, increased generating requirements from all sources.  Mild temperatures, on the other hand, result in lower electrical demand, which allows generators to choose the lowest-cost sources of power generation when deciding which generation sources to dispatch.  Accordingly, significant changes in weather patterns could reduce the demand for our coal.





-31-


Overall economic activity and the associated demands for power by industrial users can have significant effects on overall electricity demand.  Downward economic pressures can cause decreased demands for power, by both residential and industrial customers.





Any downward pressure on coal prices, whether due to increased use of alternative energy sources, changes in weather patterns, decreases in overall demand or otherwise, would likely cause our profitability to decline.





Electric utility deregulation is expected to provide incentives to generators of electricity to minimize their fuel costs and is believed to have caused electric generators to be more aggressive in negotiating prices with coal suppliers.  To the extent utility deregulation causes our customers to be more cost-sensitive, deregulation may have a negative effect on our profitability.





Changes in the export and import markets for coal products could affect the demand for our coal, our pricing and our profitability.





We compete in a worldwide market. The pricing and demand for our products is affected by a number of factors beyond our control. These factors include:




·
currency exchange rates;
 ·
growth of economic development;
 ·
price of alternative sources of electricity;
 ·
world wide demand; and
 ·
ocean freight rates.


Any decrease in the amount of coal exported from the United States, or any increase in the amount of coal imported into the United States, could have a material adverse impact on the demand for our coal, our pricing and our profitability.





Increased consolidation and competition in the U.S. coal industry may adversely affect our revenues and profitability.





During the last several years, the U.S. coal industry has experienced increased consolidation, which has contributed to the industry becoming more competitive.  Consequently, many of our competitors in the domestic coal industry are major coal producers who have significantly greater financial resources than us.  The intense competition among coal producers may impact our ability to retain or attract customers and may therefore adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.





Fluctuations in transportation costs and the availability and dependability of transportation could affect the demand for our coal and our ability to deliver coal to our customers.





Increases in transportation costs could have an adverse effect on demand for our coal.  Customers choose coal supplies based, primarily, on the total delivered cost of coal.  Any increase in transportation costs would cause an increase in the total delivered cost of coal.  That could cause some of our customers to seek less expensive sources of coal or alternative fuels to satisfy their energy needs.  In addition, significant decreases in transportation costs from other coal-producing regions, both domestic and international, could result in increased competition from coal producers in those regions.  For instance, coal mines in the western United States could become more attractive as a source of coal to consumers in the eastern United States, if the costs of transporting coal from the West were significantly reduced.





Our Central Appalachia mines generally ship coal via rail systems.  During 2009, we shipped in excess of 95% of our coal from our Central Appalachia mines via CSX.  In the Midwest, we shipped approximately 63% of our produced coal by truck and the remainder via rail systems.  We believe that our 2010 transportation modes will be comparable to those used in 2009.  Our dependence upon railroads and third party trucking companies impacts our ability to deliver coal to our customers.  Disruption of service due to weather-related problems, strikes, lockouts, bottlenecks and other events could temporarily impair our ability to supply coal to our customers, resulting in decreased shipments.  Decreased performance levels over longer periods of time could cause our customers to look elsewhere for their fuel needs, negatively affecting our revenues and profitability.





In past years, the major eastern railroads (CSX and Norfolk Southern) have experienced periods of increased overall rail traffic due to an expanding economy and shortages of both equipment and personnel.  This increase in traffic could impact our ability to obtain the necessary rail cars to deliver coal to our customers and have an adverse impact on our financial results.





-32-


Shortages or increased costs of skilled labor in the Central Appalachian coal region may hamper our ability to achieve high labor productivity and competitive costs.





Coal mining continues to be a labor-intensive industry.  In times of increased demand, many producers attempt to increase coal production, which historically has resulted in a competitive market for the limited supply of trained coal miners in the Central Appalachian region.  In some cases, this market situation has caused compensation levels to increase, particularly for “skilled” positions such as electricians and mine foremen.  To maintain current production levels, we may be forced to respond to increases in wages and other forms of compensation, and related recruiting efforts by our competitors.  Any future shortage of skilled miners, or increases in our labor costs, could have an adverse impact on our labor productivity and costs and on our ability to expand production.





Government laws, regulations and other requirements relating to the protection of the environment, health and safety and other matters impose significant costs on us, and future requirements could limit our ability to produce coal.





We are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulations with respect to matters such as:





·
employee health and safety;·
permitting and licensing requirements;·
air quality standards;·
water quality standards;·
plant, wildlife and wetland protection;·
blasting operations;·
the management and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous materials generated by mining operations;·
the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous substances;·
reclamation and restoration of properties after mining operations are completed;·
discharge of materials into the environment, including air emissions and wastewater discharge;·
surface subsidence from underground mining; and·
the effects of mining operations on groundwater quality and availability.





Complying with these requirements, including the terms of our permits, has had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our costs of operations.  We could incur substantial costs, including clean up costs, fines, civil or criminal sanctions and third party claims for personal injury or property damage as a result of violations of or liabilities under these laws and regulations.





The coal industry is also affected by significant legislation mandating specified benefits for retired miners.  In addition, the utility industry, which is the most significant end user of coal, is subject to extensive regulation regarding the environmental impact of its power generating activities.  Coal contains impurities, including sulfur, mercury, chlorine and other elements or compounds, many of which are released into the air when coal is burned.  Stricter environmental regulations of emissions from coal-fired electric generating plants could increase the costs of using coal, thereby reducing demand for coal as a fuel source or the volume and price of our coal sales, or making coal a less attractive fuel alternative in the planning and building of utility power plants in the future.





New legislation, regulations and orders adopted or implemented in the future (or changes in interpretations of existing laws and regulations) may materially adversely affect our mining operations, our cost structure and our customers’ operations or ability to use coal.





The majority of our coal supply agreements contain provisions that allow the purchaser to terminate its contract if legislation is passed that either restricts the use or type of coal permissible at the purchaser’s plant or results in too great an increase in the cost of coal.  These factors and legislation, if enacted, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.





The passage of legislation responsive to the Framework Convention on Global Climate Change or similar governmental initiatives could result in restrictions on coal use.





The United States and more than 160 other nations are signatories to the 1992 Framework Convention on Global Climate Change, commonly known as the Kyoto Protocol, which is intended to limit or capture emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide.  In December 1997, the signatories to the convention established a potentially binding set of emissions targets for developed nations.  Although the specific emissions targets vary from country to country, the United States would be required to reduce emissions to 93% of 1990 levels over a five-year budget period from 2008 through 2012.  The U.S. Senate has not ratified the treaty commitments.  The current administration could support the effort to ratify the treaty.  With Russia’s ratification of the Kyoto Protocol in 2004, it became binding on all ratifying countries.  The implementation of the Kyoto Protocol in the United States and other countries, and other emissions limits, such as those adopted by the European Union, could affect demand for coal outside the United States.  If the Kyoto Protocol or other comprehensive legislation or regulations focusing on greenhouse gas emissions is enacted by the United States, it could have the effect of restricting the use of coal.  Other efforts to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and federal initiatives to encourage the use of natural gas also may affect the use of coal as an energy source.





-33-


We are subject to the federal Clean Water Act and similar state laws which impose treatment, monitoring and reporting obligations.





The federal Clean Water Act and corresponding state laws affect coal mining operations by imposing restrictions on discharges into regulated waters.  Permits requiring regular monitoring and compliance with effluent limitations and reporting requirements govern the discharge of pollutants into regulated waters.  New requirements under the Clean Water Act (such as the proposal discussed below in the risk factor “We must obtain governmental permits and approvals for mining operations, which can be a costly and time consuming process and result in restrictions on our operations”)and corresponding state laws could cause us to incur significant additional costs that adversely affect our operating results.





Regulations have expanded the definition of black lung disease and generally made it easier for claimants to assert and prosecute claims, which could increase our exposure to black lung benefit liabilities.





In January 2001, the United States Department of Labor amended the regulations implementing the federal black lung laws to give greater weight to the opinion of a claimant’s treating physician, expand the definition of black lung disease and limit the amount of medical evidence that can be submitted by claimants and respondents.  The amendments also alter administrative procedures for the adjudication of claims, which, according to the Department of Labor, results in streamlined procedures that are less formal, less adversarial and easier for participants to understand.  These and other changes to the federal black lung regulations could significantly increase our exposure to black lung benefits liabilities.





The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Act) was enacted into law on March 23, 2010 and included a black-lung provision that creates a rebuttable presumption that a miner with at least 15 years of service, with totally disabling pulmonary or respiratory lung impairment and negative radiographic chest x-ray evidence would be disabled due to pneumoconiosis and be eligible for black lung benefits.  The new Act also makes it easier for widows of miners to become eligible for benefits.  The enactment of this new legislation could significantly impact the Company’s future payments for black lung benefits.





In recent years, legislation on black lung reform has been introduced but not enacted in Congress and in the Kentucky legislature.  It is possible that additional legislation will be reintroduced for consideration by Congress.  If any of the proposals included in this or similar legislation is passed, the number of claimants who are awarded benefits could significantly increase.  Any such changes in black lung legislation, if approved, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.





Extensive environmental laws and regulations affect the end-users of coal and could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause the volume of our sales to decline.





The Clean Air Act and similar state and local laws extensively regulate the amount of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, mercury and other compounds emitted into the air from electric power plants, which are the largest end-users of our coal.  Compliance with such laws and regulations, which can take a variety of forms, may reduce demand for coal as a fuel source because they require significant emissions control expenditures for coal-fired power plants to attain applicable ambient air quality standards, which may lead these generators to switch to other fuels that generate less of these emissions and may also reduce future demand for the construction of coal-fired power plants.





The EPA has adopted more stringent National Ambient Air Quality Standards for nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide, both of which are emitted from coal-fired combustion units.  The EPA is considering whether to adopt a more stringent standard for ground-level ozone, to which emissions from coal combustion units can contribute.   The demand for coal could be affected at electric generating facilities located in geographic areas that exceed the modified standards.





The U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, has filed lawsuits against several investor-owned electric utilities and brought an administrative action against one government-owned utility for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act.  We supply coal to some of the currently-affected utilities, and it is possible that other of our customers will be sued.  These lawsuits could require the utilities to pay penalties, install pollution control equipment or undertake other emission reduction measures, any of which could adversely impact their demand for our coal.





A regional haze program initiated by the EPA to protect and to improve visibility at and around national parks, national wilderness areas and international parks restricts the construction of new coal-fired power plants whose operation may impair visibility at and around federally protected areas and may require some existing coal-fired power plants to install additional control measures designed to limit haze-causing emissions.





The Clean Air Act also imposes standards on sources of hazardous air pollutants.  These standards and future standards could have the effect of decreasing demand for coal.  So-called multi-pollutant bills, which could regulate additional air pollutants, have been proposed by various members of Congress.  If such initiatives are enacted into law, power plant operators could choose other fuel sources to meet their requirements, reducing the demand for coal.


-34-





As a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on April 2, 2007 in Massachusetts, et al.  v. EPA, 549 U.S.  497 (2007), finding that greenhouse gases fall within the Clean Air Act definition of “air pollutant,” the EPA was required to determine whether emissions of greenhouse gases “endanger” public health or welfare.  In December 2009, the EPA published its finding that current and projected concentrations of carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere threaten the public’s health and welfare.  This finding enables the EPA to proceed with a broad regulatory program for the control of greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide emissions.  The EPA has recently completed several rulemaking actions indicating its intent to do so, including, among others, a final greenhouse gas reporting rule for certain major stationary source permitting programs, final regulations to control greenhouse gas emissions from light duty vehicles, and a final “tailoring” rule explaining how it would implement the Clean Air Act’s Title V and prevention of significant deterioration permitting programs with respect to greenhouse gas emissions from major stationary sources.  In the second quarter of 2009, the U.S House of Representatives passed a bill that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 80% below 2005 levels by the middle of the century, and both houses of Congress are also actively considering new legislation that could establish a national cap on, or other regulation of, carbon emissions and other greenhouse gases.  Current proposals include a cap and trade system that would require the purchase of emission permits, which could be traded on the open market.  These proposals will make it more costly to operate coal-fired plants and could make coal a less attractive fuel for future power plants.  Any new or proposed requirements adversely affecting the use of coal could adversely affect our operations and results.





In December 2009, approximately 190 countries participated in the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.  The participants “took note” of a non-binding accord under which participating nations would report their commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by January 31, 2010.  Under this non-binding framework, the U.S. has committed to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, 42% below 2005 levels by 2030, and 83% below 2005 levels by 2050.





The permitting of new coal-fueled power plants has also recently been contested by state regulators and environmental organizations based on concerns relating to greenhouse gas emissions.  In addition, in September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its decision in Connecticut v.  AEP allowing plaintiffs’ claims that public utilities’ greenhouse gas emissions created a “public nuisance” to go to trial over defendants’ objections based upon political question, preemption and lack of standing.  The plaintiffs in this case are seeking various remedies, including injunctive relief.  These cases expose other significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions to similar litigation risk.  The effect of these recent cases may be mitigated in the event Congress adopts greenhouse gas legislation and because the EPA has finalized the adoption of greenhouse gas emission standards.  Nevertheless, increased efforts to control greenhouse gas emissions by state, federal, judicial or international authorities could result in reduced demand for coal.





The characteristics of coal may make it difficult for coal users to comply with various environmental standards related to coal combustion.  As a result, they may switch to other fuels, which would affect the volume or price of our sales.





Coal contains impurities, including sulfur, nitrogen oxide, mercury, chlorine and other elements or compounds, many of which are released into the air when coal is burned.  Stricter environmental regulations of emissions from coal-fired electric generating plants could increase the costs of using coal thereby reducing demand for coal as a fuel source, and the volume and price of our coal sales.  Stricter regulations could make coal a less attractive fuel alternative in the planning and building of utility power plants in the future.





For example, in order to meet the federal Clean Air Act limits for sulfur dioxide emissions from electric power plants, coal users may need to install scrubbers, use sulfur dioxide emission allowances (some of which they may purchase), blend high sulfur coal with low sulfur coal or switch to other fuels.  Each option has limitations.  Lower sulfur coal may be more costly to purchase on an energy basis than higher sulfur coal depending on mining and transportation costs.  The cost of installing scrubbers is significant and emission allowances may become more expensive as their availability declines.  Switching to other fuels may require expensive modification of existing plants.





In 2005, the EPA adopted federal rules intended to reduce the interstate transport of fine particulate matter and ozone through reductions in sulfur dioxides and nitrogen oxides through the eastern United States.  The reductions were to be implemented in stages, some through a market-based cap-and-trade program.  Such new regulations would likely require some power plants to install new equipment, at substantial cost, or discourage the use of certain coals containing higher levels of mercury.  The particular rules introduced by the EPA in March 2005 were subsequently struck down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on July 11, 2008.  On December 23, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit remanded consolidated cases to the EPA without vacatur of the Clean Air Interstate Rule in order that the EPA could remedy flaws in the Rule.  The EPA has issued a proposed Clean Air Transport Rule in response to the Court’s opinions issued on July 11, 2008 and December 23, 2008.  In 2010, the EPA issued a proposed rule to replace the 2005 rule.  The proposed rule calls for reductions of sulfur dioxides and nitrogen oxides that drift across state lines beginning in 2012.  New and proposed reductions in emissions of sulfur dioxides, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter or greenhouse gases may require the installation of additional costly control technology or the implementation of other measures, including trading of emission allowances and switching to other fuels.


-35-





We must obtain governmental permits and approvals for mining operations, which can be a costly and time consuming process and result in restrictions on our operations.





Numerous governmental permits and approvals are required for mining operations.  Our operations are principally regulated under permits issued by state regulatory and enforcement agencies pursuant to the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA).  Regulatory authorities exercise considerable discretion in the timing and scope of permit issuance.  Requirements imposed by these authorities may be costly and time consuming and may result in delays in the commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations.  In addition, we often are required to prepare and present to federal, state and local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that proposed exploration for or production of coal might have on the environment.  Further, the public may comment on and otherwise engage in the permitting process, including through intervention in the courts.  Accordingly, the permits we need may not be issued, or, if issued, may not be issued in a timely fashion, or may involve requirements that restrict our ability to conduct our mining operations or to do so profitably.





Prior to placing excess fill material in valleys in connection with surface mining operations, coal mining companies are required to obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (404 Permit).  Previously, this permit could be either a simplified Nationwide Permit #21 (NWP 21) or a more complicated individual permit.  Litigation respecting the validity of the NWP 21 permit program has been ongoing for several years.  Recently, the Corps announced its decision to suspend the use of NWP 21 in the Appalachian region comprised of six states including Kentucky where we operate.  Litigation respecting the issuance of certain Section 404 permits has also been ongoing for several years, focusing primarily on whether the Corps’ decision to issue such permits conformed to the requirements of the Clean Water Act and/or the National Environmental Policy Act The matters at issue in such litigation are such that a ruling for the plaintiffs could have an adverse impact on our planned surface mining operations.





In 2009, the EPA announced publicly that it will exercise its statutory right to more actively review Section 404 permitting actions by the Corps.  In the third quarter of 2009, the EPA announced that it would further review 79 surface mining permit applications, including four of our permits.  These 79 permits were identified as likely to impact water quality and therefore requiring additional review under the Clean Water Act.  EPA oversight could further delay and/or restrict the issuance of such permits, either of which events could have an adverse impact on our planned surface mining operations.  More recently, the EPA announced acceptable levels for the conductivity of water in streams receiving discharge from permitted coal mining sites in a six-state area of Central Appalachia including Kentucky where we operate.  If such levels of conductivity are permanently imposed, they could have a significant impact on our ability to secure Section 404 permits and have a material impact on our operations.  The National Mining Association, on behalf of its member companies including coal producers such as ourselves, recently filed suit against the EPA and the Corps contesting the legality of the foregoing enhanced review process and the imposition of such conductivity standard.





We have significant reclamation and mine closure obligations.  If the assumptions underlying our accruals are materially inaccurate, we could be required to expend greater amounts than anticipated.





The SMCRA establishes operational, reclamation and closure standards for all aspects of surface mining as well as many aspects of underground mining.  We accrue for the costs of current mine disturbance and of final mine closure, including the cost of treating mine water discharge where necessary.  Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles we are required to account for the costs related to the closure of mines and the reclamation of the land upon exhaustion of coal reserves.  The fair value of an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.  The present value of the estimated asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.  At June 30, 2010, we had accrued $46.7 million related to estimated mine reclamation costs.  The amounts recorded are dependent upon a number of variables, including the estimated future retirement costs, estimated proven reserves, assumptions involving profit margins, inflation rates, and the assumed credit-adjusted interest rates.  Furthermore, these obligations are unfunded.  If these accruals are insufficient or our liability in a particular year is greater than currently anticipated, our future operating results could be adversely affected.





Terrorist attacks and threats, escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or acts of war may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.





Terrorist attacks and threats, escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or acts of war may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  Our business is affected by general economic conditions, fluctuations in consumer confidence and spending, and market liquidity, which can decline as a result of numerous factors outside of our control, such as terrorist attacks and acts of war.  Future terrorist attacks against U.S. targets, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts involving the United States or its allies, or military or trade disruptions affecting our customers could cause delays or losses in transportation and deliveries of coal to our customers, decreased sales of our coal and extension of time for payment of accounts receivable from our customers.  Strategic targets such as energy-related assets may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other targets in the United States.  In addition, disruption or significant increases in energy prices could result in government-imposed price controls.  It is possible that any, or a combination, of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.





-36-





Risks Related to Our Operations





We have experienced operating losses and net losses in recent years and may experience losses in the future.





We experienced operating losses and net losses in the each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.  While we were profitable in the year ended December 31, 2009, we must continue to carefully manage our business, including the balance of our long-term and short-term sales contracts and our production costs.  Although we seek to balance our contract mix to achieve optimal revenues over the long term, the market price of coal is affected by many factors that are outside of our control.  Our production costs have increased in recent years, and we expect higher costs to continue for the next several years.  Additionally, certain of our long term contracts for sales of coal are priced substantially above current spot prices for coal.  Our profitability in the future will be impacted by the price levels that we achieve on future long term contracts.  Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve profitability in the future.








The loss of, or significant reduction in, purchases by our largest customers could adversely affect our revenues.





For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we generated approximately 89% of our total revenues from several long-term contracts and spot sales with electrical utilities, including 41% from South Carolina Public Service Authority, 31% from Georgia Power Company and 11% from Indianapolis Power and Light.  At December 31, 2009, we had coal supply agreements with these customers that expire in 2010 to 2012.  The execution of a substantial coal supply agreement is frequently the basis on which we undertake the development of coal reserves required to be supplied under the contract.





Many of our coal supply agreements contain provisions that permit adjustment of the contract price upward or downward at specified times.  Failure of the parties to agree on a price under those provisions may allow either party to either terminate the contract or reduce the coal to be delivered under the contract.  Coal supply agreements also typically contain force majeure provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by the customer or us for the duration of specified events beyond the control of the affected party.  Most coal supply agreements contain provisions requiring us to deliver coal meeting quality thresholds for certain characteristics such as:





·
British thermal units (Btu’s);·
sulfur content;·
ash content;·
grindability; and·
ash fusion temperature.





In some cases, failure to meet these specifications could result in economic penalties, including price adjustments, the rejection of deliveries or termination of the contracts.  In addition, all of our contracts allow our customers to renegotiate or terminate their contracts in the event of changes in regulations or other governmental impositions affecting our industry that increase the cost of coal beyond specified limits.  Further, we have been required in the past to purchase sulfur credits or make other pricing adjustments to comply with contractual requirements relating to the sulfur content of coal sold to our customers, and may be required to do so in the future.





The operating profits we realize from coal sold under supply agreements depend on a variety of factors.  In addition, price adjustment and other provisions may increase our exposure to short-term coal price volatility provided by those contracts.  If a substantial portion of our coal supply agreements are modified or terminated, we could be materially adversely affected to the extent that we are unable to find alternate buyers for our coal at the same level of profitability.  As a result, we might not be able to replace existing long-term coal supply agreements at the same prices or with similar profit margins when they expire.





Our operating results will be negatively impacted if we are unable to balance our mix of contract and spot sales.





We have implemented a sales plan that includes long-term contracts (one year or greater) and spot sales/ short-term contracts (less than one year).  We have structured our sales plan based on the assumptions that demand will remain adequate to maintain current shipping levels and that any disruptions in the market will be relatively short-lived.  If we are unable to maintain our planned balance of contract sales with spot sales, or our markets become depressed for an extended period of time, our volumes and margins could decrease, negatively affecting our operating results.





Our ability to operate our company effectively could be impaired if we lose senior executives or fail to employ needed additional personnel.





The loss of senior executives could have a material adverse effect on our business.  There may be a limited number of persons with the requisite experience and skills to serve in our senior management positions.  We may not be able to locate or employ qualified executives on acceptable terms.  In addition, as our business develops and expands, we believe that our future success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel.  We might not continue to be able to employ key personnel, or to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future.  Failure to retain senior executives or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.





-37-


Underground mining is subject to increased regulation, and may require us to incur additional cost.





Underground coal mining is subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to safety in underground coal mines and enforcement activities by federal and state regulators.  These laws and regulations, the most significant recently enacted of which is the federal MINER Act, which includes requirements for constructing and maintaining caches for the storage of additional self-contained self rescuers throughout underground mines; installing rescue chambers in underground mines; constant tracking of and communication with personnel in the mines; utilizing carbon dioxide monitors, installing cable lifelines from the mine portal to all sections of the mine to assist in emergency escape; submission and approval of emergency response plans; new and additional safety training; providing refuge alternatives; and improving flame-resistant conveyor belts and other fire protection measures.  In 2007, implementation of the MINER Act continued with new penalty regulations that significantly increased regular penalty amounts and special assessments.  In addition, a new emergency temporary standard was issued relating to mine seal requirements.  Various states also have enacted their own new laws and regulations addressing many of these same subjects.  These new laws and regulations will cause us to incur substantial additional costs, which will adversely impact our operating performance.





The U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) periodically notifies certain coal mines that a potential pattern of violations may exist based upon an initial statistical screening of violation history and pattern criteria review by MSHA.  Certain of our mines have received such notices in the past.  Upon receipt of such a notification, we conduct a comprehensive review of the operation that received the notification and prepare and submit to MSHA plans designed to enhance employee safety at the mine through better education, training, mining practices, and safety management.  Following implementation of the plans, MSHA conducts a complete inspection of the mine and further evaluates the situation and then advises the operator whether a pattern of violation exists and whether further action will be taken.  No pattern of violations has been found to exist at any of our mines that have received such notification.  The failure to remediate the situation resulting in a finding that a pattern of violation does exists at a mine could have a significant impact on our operations.





In 2010 a U.S House of Representatives committee approved a mine safety bill which would give MSHA additional powers to temporarily close mines, mandate additional safety training and impose larger penalties on companies and their executives.  If enacted this bill could further increase our costs and impact operating performance.





Increases in raw material costs could significantly impair our operating results.





Our coal mining operations use significant amounts of steel, petroleum products and other raw materials in various pieces of mining equipment, supplies and materials, including the roof bolts required by the room and pillar method of mining.  Recently and historically, petroleum prices and other commodity prices have been volatile.  If the price of steel or other of these materials increase, our operational expenses will increase, which could have a significant negative impact on our cash flow and operating results.





Coal mining is subject to conditions or events beyond our control, which could cause our quarterly or annual results to deteriorate.





Our coal mining operations are conducted, in large part, in underground mines and, to a lesser extent, at surface mines.  These mines are subject to conditions or events beyond our control that could disrupt operations, affect production and the cost of mining at particular mines for varying lengths of time and have a significant impact on our operating results.  These conditions or events have included:




·
variations in thickness of the layer, or seam, of coal;
 ·
variations in geological conditions;
 ·
amounts of rock and other natural materials intruding into the coal seam;
 ·
equipment failures and unexpected major repairs;
 ·
unexpected maintenance problems;
 ·
unexpected departures of one or more of our contract miners;
 ·
fires and explosions from methane and other sources;
 ·
accidental minewater discharges or other environmental accidents;
 ·
other accidents or natural disasters; and
 ·
weather conditions.


-38-


Mining in Central Appalachia is complex due to geological characteristics of the region and additional regulatory constraints.





The geological characteristics of coal reserves in Central Appalachia, such as depth of overburden and coal seam thickness, make them complex and costly to mine.  As mines become depleted, replacement reserves may not be available when required or, if available, may not be capable of being mined at costs comparable to those characteristic of the depleting mines.  In addition, as compared to mines in other regions permitting, licensing and other environmental and regulatory requirements are more costly and time consuming to satisfy.  These factors could materially adversely affect the mining operations and cost structures of, and customers’ ability to use coal produced by, operators in Central Appalachia, including us.





Our future success depends upon our ability to acquire or develop additional coal reserves that are economically recoverable.





Our recoverable reserves decline as we produce coal.  Since we attempt, where practical, to mine our lowest-cost reserves first, we may not be able to mine all of our reserves at a similar cost as we do at our current operations.  Our planned development and exploration projects might not result in significant additional reserves, and we might not have continuing success developing additional mines.  For example, our construction of additional mining facilities necessary to exploit our reserves could be delayed or terminated due to various factors, including unforeseen geological conditions, weather delays or unanticipated development costs.  Our ability to acquire additional coal reserves in the future also could be limited by restrictions under our existing or future debt facilities, competition from other coal companies for attractive properties or the lack of suitable acquisition candidates.





In order to develop our reserves, we must receive various governmental permits.  We have not yet applied for the permits required or developed the mines necessary to mine all of our reserves.  In addition, we might not continue to receive the permits necessary for us to operate profitably in the future. We may not be able to negotiate new leases from the government or from private parties or obtain mining contracts for properties containing additional reserves or maintain our leasehold interests in properties on which mining operations are not commenced during the term of the lease.





Factors beyond our control could impact the amount and pricing of coal supplied by our independent contractors and other third parties.





In addition to coal we produce from our Company-operated mines, we have mines that typically are operated by independent contract mine operators, and we purchase coal from third parties for resale.  For 2010, we anticipate less than 10% of our total production will come from mines operated by independent contract mine operators and from third party purchased coal sources.  Operational difficulties, changes in demand for contract mine operators from our competitors and other factors beyond our control could affect the availability, pricing and quality of coal produced for us by independent contract mine operators.  Disruptions in supply, increases in prices paid for coal produced by independent contract mine operators or purchased from third parties, or the availability of more lucrative direct sales opportunities for our purchased coal sources could increase our costs or lower our volumes, either of which could negatively affect our profitability.





We face significant uncertainty in estimating our recoverable coal reserves, and variations from those estimates could lead to decreased revenues and profitability.





Forecasts of our future performance are based on estimates of our recoverable coal reserves.  Estimates of those reserves were initially based on studies conducted by Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. in 2004 for our CAPP reserves and 2005 and 2006 for our Midwest reserves in accordance with industry-accepted standards which we have updated for current activity using similar methodologies.  A number of sources of information were used to determine recoverable reserves estimates, including:




·
currently available geological, mining and property control data and maps;
 ·
our own operational experience and that of our consultants;
 ·
historical production from similar areas with similar conditions;
 ·
previously completed geological and reserve studies;
 ·
the assumed effects of regulations and taxes by governmental agencies; and
 ·
assumptions governing future prices and future operating costs.


Reserve estimates will change from time to time to reflect, among other factors:




·
mining activities;
 ·
new engineering and geological data;
 ·
acquisition or divestiture of reserve holdings; and
 ·
modification of mining plans or mining methods.
 -39-


Therefore, actual coal tonnage recovered from identified reserve areas or properties, and costs associated with our mining operations, may vary from estimates. These variations could be material, and therefore could result in decreased profitability.





Our operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain required surety bonds.





Federal and state laws require bonds to secure our obligations to reclaim lands used for mining, to pay federal and state workers’ compensation and to satisfy other miscellaneous obligations.  As of June 30, 2010, we had outstanding surety bonds with third parties for post-mining reclamation totaling $59.3 million.  Furthermore, we have surety bonds for an additional $43.9 million in place for our federal and state workers’ compensation obligations and other miscellaneous obligations.  Insurance companies have informed us, along with other participants in the coal industry, that they no longer will provide surety bonds for workers’ compensation and other post-employment benefits without collateral.  We have satisfied our obligations under these statutes and regulations by providing letters of credit or other assurances of payment.  However, letters of credit can be significantly more costly to us than surety bonds.  The issuance of letters of credit under our Revolver also reduces amounts that we can borrow under our Revolver.  If we are unable to secure surety bonds for these obligations in the future, and are forced to secure letters of credit indefinitely, our profitability may he negatively affected.








Our work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect the stability of our production and reduce our profitability.





Our company owned mines are currently operated by union-free employees.  However, our subsidiaries’ employees have the right at any time under the National Labor Relations Act to form or affiliate with a union.  Any unionization of our subsidiaries’ employees, or the employees of third-party contractors who mine coal for us, could adversely affect the stability of our production and reduce our profitability.





The current administration has indicated that it will support legislation that may make it easier for employees to unionize.  Legislation has been proposed to the United States Congress to enact a law allowing our workers to choose union representation solely by signing election cards (“Card Check”), which would eliminate the use of secret ballots to elect union representation.  While the impact is uncertain, if Card Check legislation is enacted into law, it will be administratively easier to unionize coal mines and may lead to more coal mines becoming unionized.





We have significant unfunded obligations for long-term employee benefits for which we accrue based upon assumptions, which, if incorrect, could result in us being required to expend greater amounts than anticipated.





We are required by law to provide various long-term employee benefits.  We accrue amounts for these obligations based on the present value of expected future costs.  We employed an independent actuary to complete estimates for our workers’ compensation and black lung (both state and federal) obligations.  At June 30, 2010, the current and non-current portions of these obligations included $43.9 million for coal workers’ black lung benefits and $60.8 million for workers’ compensation benefits.





We use a valuation method under which the total present and future liabilities are booked based on actuarial studies.  Our independent actuary updates these liability estimates annually.  However, if our assumptions are incorrect, we could be required to expend greater amounts than anticipated.  All of these obligations are unfunded.  In addition, the federal government and the governments of the states in which we operate consider changes in workers’ compensation laws from time to time.  Such changes, if enacted, could increase our benefit expenses and payments.





We may be unable to adequately provide funding for our pension plan obligations based on our current estimates of those obligations.





We provide benefits under a defined benefit pension plan that was frozen in 2007.  As of June 30, 2010, we estimated that our obligation under the pension plan was underfunded by approximately $12.5 million.  If future payments are insufficient to fund the pension plan adequately to cover our future pension obligations, we could incur cash expenditures and costs materially higher than anticipated.  The pension obligation is calculated annually and is based on several assumptions, including then prevailing conditions, which may change from year to year.  In any year, if our assumptions are inaccurate, we could be required to expend greater amounts than anticipated.





-40-


Substantially all of our assets are subject to security interests.





Substantially all of our cash, receivables, inventory and other assets are subject to various liens and security interests under our debt instruments.  If one of these security interest holders becomes entitled to exercise its rights as a secured party, it would have the right to foreclose upon and sell, or otherwise transfer, the collateral subject to its security interest, and the collateral accordingly would be unavailable to us and our other creditors, except to the extent, if any, that other creditors have a superior or equal security interest in the affected collateral or the value of the affected collateral exceeds the amount of indebtedness in respect of which these foreclosure rights are exercised.





Our current leverage amount may harm our financial condition and results of operations.





Our total consolidated long-term debt as of June 30, 2010 was $281.1 million (net of a discount on our convertible notes of $41.4 million).  Our level of indebtedness could result in the following:





·
it could effect our ability to satisfy our outstanding obligations;·
a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will have to be dedicated to interest and principal payments and may not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes;·
it may impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future;·
it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; and·
it may make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business, our industry or the economy in general.





Our operations may not generate sufficient cash to enable us to service our debt.  If we fail to make a payment on our debt, this could cause us to be in default on our outstanding indebtedness





We may be unable to comply with restrictions imposed by the terms of our indebtedness, which could result in a default under these instruments.





Our debt instruments impose a number of restrictions on us.  A failure to comply with these restrictions could adversely affect our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility or result in an event of default under our debt instruments.  Our debt instruments contain financial and other covenants that create limitations on our ability to, among other things, utilize the full amount on our revolver for borrowings or to issue letters of credit or incur additional debt, and require us to maintain various financial ratios and comply with various other financial covenants.  The minimum Adjusted EBITDA and Leverage Ratio covenants are only applicable if our unrestricted cash falls below $75 million and remain in effect until our unrestricted cash exceeds $75 million for 90 consecutive days (the Trigger Event).  These most restrictive covenants include the following:





·
If we have a Trigger Event, our revolving credit facility requires that we achieve a minimum Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined in that agreement as “Consolidated EBITDA”.  Adjusted EBITDA is measured at the end of each quarter for the preceding 12 months.  If measured, the required minimum Adjusted EBITDA would range from $94.0 million to $105.0 million during 2010.  In order to meet the twelve month Adjusted EBITDA target at June 30, 2010, we needed Adjusted EBITDA of $38.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010.   Our Adjusted EBITDA in the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $94.6 million.  The most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure is net income.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had net income of $43.1 million.  Adjusted EBITDA is defined and reconciled to EBITDA and Net Loss under “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” in Part I – Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.·
If we have a Trigger Event, our revolving credit facility requires that our Leverage Ratio (as defined in the revolving credit facility) not exceed a specified multiple at the end of each quarter.  If measured, the Leverage Ratio would be permitted to be 0.68X to 0.62X during 2010.  Our Leverage Ratio was 0.38X as of June 30, 2010.·
Our revolving credit facility limits the Capital Expenditures (other than Mandated Capital Expenditures) (as both are defined in the revolving credit facility) that we may make or agree to make in any fiscal year.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we cannot make Capital Expenditures in excess of $75.0 million (excluding Mandatory Capital Expenditures).  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we made Capital Expenditures of $34.0 million (excluding Mandatory Capital Expenditures).


Additional detail regarding the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, including these covenants and the related definitions, can be found in our debt agreements, as amended, that have been filed as exhibits to our SEC filings.





-41-


In the event of a default, our lenders could terminate their commitments to us and declare all amounts borrowed, together with accrued interest and fees, immediately due and payable.  If this were to occur, we might not be able to pay these amounts or we might be forced to seek amendments to our debt agreements which could make the terms of these agreements more onerous for us and require the payment of amendment or waiver fees.  Failure to comply with these restrictions, even if waived by our lenders, also could adversely affect our credit ratings, which could increase our costs of debt financings and impair our ability to obtain additional debt financing.  While the lenders have, to date, waived any covenant violations and amended the covenants, there is no guarantee they will continue to do so if future violations occur.





Changes in our credit ratings could adversely affect our costs and expenses.





Any downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to borrow and result in more restrictive borrowing terms, including increased borrowing costs, more restrictive covenants and the extension of less open credit.  This, in turn, could affect our internal cost of capital estimates and therefore impact operational decisions.





Defects in title or loss of any leasehold interests in our properties could limit our ability to mine these properties or result in significant unanticipated costs.





We conduct substantially all of our mining operations on properties that we lease.  The loss of any lease could adversely affect our ability to mine the associated reserves.  Because we generally do not obtain title insurance or otherwise verify title to our leased properties, our right to mine some of our reserves has been in the past, and may again in the future be, adversely affected if defects in title or boundaries exist.  In order to obtain leases or rights to conduct our mining operations on property where these defects exist, we have had to, and may in the future have to, incur unanticipated costs.  In addition, we may not be able to successfully negotiate new leases for properties containing additional reserves.  Some leases have minimum production requirements.  Failure to meet those requirements could result in losses of prepaid royalties and, in some rare cases, could result in a loss of the lease itself.





Inability to satisfy contractual obligations may adversely affect our profitability.





From time to time, we have disputes with our customers over the provisions of long-term contracts relating to, among other things, coal quality, pricing, quantity and delays in delivery.  In addition, we may not be able to produce sufficient amounts of coal to meet our commitments to our customers.  Our inability to satisfy our contractual obligations could result in our need to purchase coal from third party sources to satisfy those obligations or may result in customers initiating claims against us.  We may not be able to resolve all of these disputes in a satisfactory manner, which could result in substantial damages or otherwise harm our relationships with customers.





We may be unable to exploit opportunities to diversify our operations.





Our future business plan may consider opportunities other than underground and surface mining in eastern Kentucky and southern Indiana.  We will consider opportunities to further increase the percentage of coal that comes from surface mines.  We may also consider opportunities to expand both surface and underground mining activities in areas that are outside of eastern Kentucky and southern Indiana.  We may also consider opportunities in other energy-related areas that are not prohibited by the Indenture governing our senior notes due 2012 or other financing agreements.  If we undertake these diversification strategies and fail to execute them successfully, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.





There are risks associated with our acquisition strategy, including our inability to successfully complete acquisitions, our assumption of liabilities, dilution of your investment, significant costs and additional financing required.





We may explore opportunities to expand our operations through strategic acquisitions of other coal mining companies.  We currently have no agreement or understanding for any specific acquisition.  Risks associated with our current and potential acquisitions include the disruption of our ongoing business, problems retaining the employees of the acquired business, assets acquired proving to be less valuable than expected, the potential assumption of unknown or unexpected liabilities, costs and problems, the inability of management to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, the difficulty of managing a larger company, the risk of becoming involved in labor, commercial or regulatory disputes or litigation related to the new enterprises and the difficulty of integrating the acquired operations and personnel into our existing business.





We may choose to use shares of our common stock or other securities to finance a portion of the consideration for future acquisitions, either by issuing them to pay a portion of the purchase price or selling additional shares to investors to raise cash to pay a portion of the purchase price.  If shares of our common stock do not maintain sufficient market value or potential acquisition candidates are unwilling to accept shares of our common stock as part of the consideration for the sale of their businesses, we will be required to raise capital through additional sales of debt or equity securities, which might not be possible, or forego the acquisition opportunity, and our growth could be limited.  In addition, securities issued in such acquisitions may dilute the holdings of our current or future shareholders.


-42-





Our currently available cash may not be sufficient to finance any additional acquisitions.





We believe that our cash on hand, the availability under our revolving credit facility and cash generated from our operations will provide us with adequate liquidity through 2010.  However, such funds may not provide sufficient cash to fund any future acquisitions.  Accordingly, we may need to conduct additional debt or equity financings in order to fund any such additional acquisitions, unless we issue shares of our common stock as consideration for those acquisitions.  If we are unable to obtain any such financings, we may be required to forego future acquisition opportunities.





Our current reserve base in southern Indiana is limited.





Our southern Indiana mining complex currently has rights to proven and probable reserves that we believe will be exhausted in approximately 13 years at 2009 levels of production, compared to our current Central Appalachia mining complexes, which have reserves that we believe will last an average of approximately 34 years at 2009 levels of production.  We intend to increase our reserves in southern Indiana by acquiring rights to additional exploitable reserves that are either adjacent to or nearby our current reserves.  If we are unable to successfully acquire such rights on acceptable terms, or if our exploration or acquisition activities indicate that such coal reserves or rights do not exist or are not available on acceptable terms, our production and revenues will decline as our reserves in that region are depleted.  Exhaustion of reserves at particular mines also may have an adverse effect on our operating results that is disproportionate to the percentage of overall production represented by such mines.





Surface mining is subject to increased regulation, and may require us to incur additional costs.





Surface mining is subject to numerous regulations related, among others, to blasting activities that can result in additional costs.  For example, when blasting in close proximity to structures, additional costs are incurred in designing and implementing more complex blast delay regimens, conducting pre-blast surveys and blast monitoring, and the risk of potential blast-related damages increases.  Since the nature of surface mining requires ongoing disturbance to the surface, environmental compliance costs can be significantly greater than with underground operations.  In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers imposes stream mitigation requirements on surface mining operations.  These regulations require that footage of stream loss be replaced through various mitigation processes, if any ephemeral, intermittent, or perennial streams are filled due to mining operations.  In 2008, the U.S. Department of Interior’s Office of Surface Mining imposed regulatory requirements applicable to excess spoil placement, including the requirement that operators return as much spoil as possible to the excavation created by the mine.  These regulations may cause us to incur significant additional costs, which could adversely impact our operating performance.





Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to limitation.





Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an annual limit on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in its stock ownership or equity structure.  Our ability to use net operating losses is limited by prior changes in our ownership, and may be further limited by the issuance of common stock in connection with the convertible notes issued in 2009, or by the consummation of other transactions.  As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to offset U.S. federal taxable income may become subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liabilities for us.








Risks Relating to our Common Stock





The market price of our common stock has been volatile and difficult to predict, and may continue to be volatile and difficult to predict in the future, and the value of your investment may decline.





The market price of our common stock has been volatile in the past and may continue to be volatile in the future. The market price of our common stock will be affected by, among other things:





·
variations in our quarterly operating results;·
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;·
sales of shares of our common stock by our officers and directors or by our shareholders;·
changes in general conditions in the economy or the financial markets;·
changes in accounting standards, policies or interpretations;·
other developments affecting us, our industry, clients or competitors; and·
the operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to us.





-43-





Any of these factors could have a negative effect on the price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, make it difficult to predict the market price for our common stock in the future and cause the value of your investment to decline.





Dividends are limited by  our revolving credit facility, senior notes and convertible senior notes.





We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the near future. In addition, covenants in our revolving credit facility, senior notes and convertible senior notes restrict our ability to pay cash dividends and may prohibit the payment of dividends and certain other payments.





Provisions of our articles of incorporation, bylaws and shareholder rights agreement could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could deter or prevent a change in control.





Some provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Virginia statutes, may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control. These provisions may make it more difficult for other persons, without the approval of our Board of Directors, to make a tender offer or otherwise acquire substantial amounts of our common stock or to launch other takeover attempts that a shareholder might consider to be in such shareholder's best interest. These provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.





We have a shareholder rights agreement which, in certain circumstances, including a person or group acquiring, or the commencement of a tender or exchange offer that would result in a person or group acquiring, beneficial ownership of more than 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, would entitle each right holder, other than the person or group triggering the plan, to receive, upon exercise of the right, shares of our common stock having a then-current fair value equal to twice the exercise price of a right.  In 2009, an amendment to the Rights Agreement reduced, until December 5, 2010, the threshold at which a person or group becomes an “Acquiring Person” under the Rights Agreement from 20% to 4.9% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of common stock.





This shareholder rights agreement provides us with a defensive mechanism that decreases the risk that a hostile acquirer will attempt to take control of us without negotiating directly with our Board of Directors. The shareholder rights agreement may discourage acquirers from attempting to purchase us, which may adversely affect the price of our common stock.








ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS





ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES





The following table contains information about purchases by us of our equity securities during the period covered by this report.





Period

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

Average Price

Paid per Share

Total Number of

Shares

Purchased as

Part of Publicly

Announced

Plans or

Programs

Maximum

Number of

Shares that May

Yet Be

Purchased

Under the Plans

or ProgramsMay 1- May 31, 2010(a)

46,149

$
15.06

N/A

N/A





(a)
The “Total Number of Shares Purchased” column consists of shares that were purchased from participants to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares pursuant to our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.





ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UNDER SENIOR SECURITIES


None.





ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION


None.


-44-








ITEM 6. EXHIBITS





The following exhibits are filed herewith:
ExhibitCertification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.1Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2

















































-45-


SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.











James River Coal Company







By:/s/  Peter T. Socha

Peter T. Socha

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer







By:/s/ Samuel M. Hopkins II

Samuel M. Hopkins, II

Vice President and

Chief Accounting Officer




August 6, 2010


-46-