alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
American Lorain Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Si Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2010

/s/ Si
Chen Si Chen Chief Executive Officer

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of GeoPetro Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stuart J. Doshi ,Chief Executive Officer, and J. Chris Steinhauser, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge,that:

(1)  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: May 15, 2007 | /s/ Stuart J. Doshi                                            |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Stuart J. Doshi                                                |
|                | President, Chief Executive Officer   and Chairman of the Board |
|                |                                                           |
| Dated: May 15, 2007 | /s/ J. Chris Steinhauser                                       |
|                | J. Chris Steinhauser                                           |
|                | Chief Financial Officer                                        |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to GeoPetro Resources Company and will beretained by GeoPetro Resources Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----

*                 Thiscertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL - Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PATRICIA SAPP, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. §

§ 3:06-CV-1018-P

CWS APARTMENT HOMES, L.L.C., §

ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

________________________________________________________________________

JOSH WHITAKER, MONIQUE §

JANNETTE and LESLIE GREER, §

§

Plaintiffs, § CIVIL ACTION NO.

§

v. § 3:03-CV-0411-P

§

WEST VILLAGE LIMITED § CLASS ACTION

PARTNERSHIP and PPC/IMA §

INTOWN VILLAGE LIMITED §

PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., §

§

Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, §

§

v. §

§

DALMAC CONSTRUCTION CO., §

§

Defendant/Cross-Defendant. §

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 278 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2810
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL - Page 2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Comes now Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs West Village

Limited Partnership and PPC/IMA Intown Village Limited Partnership and

Defendant/Cross-Defendant DalMac Construction Co. in the above referenced action and

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure file this Stipulation of

Dismissal without prejudice as the Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs West

Village, et al., no longer desire to pursue their claim. It is therefore

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the above referenced cause of action

is hereby dismissed without prejudice in all respects.

SIGNED this the 21 day of December, 2007. st

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AGREED AS TO FORM & CONTENT:

 /s/ Edward B. Cloutman, III /s/ J. Keith Webb by permission/ebc 

Edward B. Cloutman, III J. Keith Webb

(Bar No. 044 110 00) (Bar No. 007 918 92)

Law Offices of Miller & McCarthy, P.C.

 Edward B. Cloutman, III Turtle Creek Centre

3301 Elm Street 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1950

Dallas, Texas 75226-2562 Dallas, Texas 75219

(214) 939-9222 (469) 916-2552

(214) 939-9229 (Telecopier) (469) 916-2555 (Telecopier)

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/CROSS- COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

WEST VILLAGE, ET AL. CROSS-DEFENDANT 

DALMAC CONSTRUCTION CO.

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 278 Filed 12/21/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2811
# C_2021357EN.01001602.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/16

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — JT, NQ v Ryanair DAC

(Case C-516/20) (1)

(2021/C 357/22)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
# C_2016106EN.01004101.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/41

---

Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel)

(Case T-31/16)

(2016/C 106/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Juwel’ — Application for registration No 12 426 888

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2015 in Case R 2571/2014-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Neither Article 7(1)(b) nor Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 is applicable. |
| --- | --- |

—

Neither Article 7(1)(b) nor Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 is applicable.

---
# C_2021035EN.01005101.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/51

---

Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Tikal Tef-Gel)

(Case T-185/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 35/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tikal Marine Systems GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: M. Mahnkopf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ultra Safety Systems Inc. (Magonia Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, A. von Mühlendahl and P. Böhner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2020 (Case R 2500/2018-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Ultra Safety Systems and Tikal Marine Systems.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
# C_2021349EN.01003401.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Griba v CPVO (Gala Perathoner)

(Case T-182/20) (1)

(Plant varieties - Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Perathoner apple variety - Technical examination - Testing location - Equal treatment - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 349/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Griba Baumschulgenossenschaft landwirtschaftliche Gesellschaft (Terlano, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger, lawyer)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (represented by: M. Ekvad, O. Lamberti and F. Mattina, acting as Agents, and by A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 17 January 2020 (Case A 004/2016) concerning an application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Perathoner apple variety.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Griba Baumschulgenossenschaft landwirtschaftliche Gesellschaft to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Griba Baumschulgenossenschaft landwirtschaftliche Gesellschaft to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
Margaret STEWART a/k/a Margaret Rose Stewart, Appellant, v. CIT BANK, N.A. f/k/a OneWest Bank, N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2120

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Raymond Donovan WILLIAMS v. STATE

2160578

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 25, 2017 Reh. denied September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
A.D. v. CULLMAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160629

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 240.13a-14

OF GENERAL RULES ANDREGULATIONS OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Frank Ferramosca, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Anvil Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report.

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared.

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation;

 

c)              disclosed in this annual report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| **/s/**Frank Ferramosca      | ** **          |
|------------------------------|---------------------|
| **Vice  President and**      |
| Principal Financial  Officer |
|                         |
| Date:                        | April 28, 2006 |   |
|                              |                     |  |  |

 

----
**Exhibit 4.39**

* *

*FederalSupervisory Service for Communications*

 

**AddendumNo. 2**

 

**toLicense No. 30261 (Account Series A 030163)**

**datedDecember 30, 2003**

 

The line “Start of services’ rendering (not later than)” of theLicensee title-page shall be revised to read as follows:

 

“December 30, 2005”

 

 
| **Deputy Manager,**                                 |       |                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|
| **Federal Supervisory Service for  Communications** | ** ** | **S. A. Malyanov   ** |
| ** **                                          | ** ** | ** **                           |
| ** **                                          | ** ** | ** **                           |
| ** **                                          | ** ** | April 26, 2005                       |

 

----
Anthony J. LOSTAGLIO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Suzanne ADAMS, Steven Adams, Tedd Annis, Bruce Bedner, Denise Bedner, Charles A. Bedner, Suzanne M. Bedner, Stephen W. Bedner, Maria Y. Bedner, William F. Dudley, Jr., et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Case No. 5D17-2542 5D18-177

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE McArthur LYNCH, Jr.

CR-16-0988

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Case 24-33949-sgj15    Doc 1    Filed 12/02/24    Entered 12/03/24 14:57:17    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 3

Case 24-33949-sgj15    Doc 1    Filed 12/02/24    Entered 12/03/24 14:57:17    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 3

Case 24-33949-sgj15    Doc 1    Filed 12/02/24    Entered 12/03/24 14:57:17    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 3
STATE of Louisiana v. Irwin GOMEZ-COLON

NO. 2019-KK-0035

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1187 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-982, K2025-981.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31742 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 8, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23-1481

Lower Tribunal No. F17-1567B

Bobby McGhee,

Appellant, 

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Javier Enriquez, Judge.

Bobby McGhee, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Walter BRANUM and Karen Branum, Appellants, v. Pat FRANK, as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3706

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the
Quarterly Report of James River Coal Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samuel M. Hopkins, II, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1)
                        The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
                        The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
      registrant.
 November
3, 2009
  /s/    
      Samuel M. Hopkins, IISamuel M. Hopkins,
      IITitle:  Chief
      Accounting
Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Kurt A. Braun, certify that: 

1.      I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc; 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)      Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)      [Intentionallyomitted] 

(c)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.