alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023104EN.01002301.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — BG v Parliament

(Case T-164/20) (1)

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Refusal of the request - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the Parliament and its prevention at the workplace - Right to be heard - Refusal to disclose the report of the Advisory Committee - Liability - Non-material harm)

(2023/C 104/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BG (represented by: A. Tymen, L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch, C. González Argüelles and I. Lázaro Betancor, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 20 May 2019 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment refused her request for assistance and, second, compensation for the non-material harm she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 20 May 2019 refusing the request for assistance lodged by BG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 20 May 2019 refusing the request for assistance lodged by BG;

| 2. | Orders the Parliament to pay BG, in respect of non-material harm suffered, an amount of EUR 2 500; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Parliament to pay BG, in respect of non-material harm suffered, an amount of EUR 2 500;

| 3. | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHARLES RAY FOUNTAIN,

Petitioner,

VS.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-1224-G

)

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:03-CR-329(09)-G

)

OPINION AND ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this

case, and the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the

magistrate judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of

the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the findings, conclusions and

recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

July 18, 2005.

Case 3:03-cr-00329-G Document 660 Filed 07/18/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1948
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number NC-20007]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4827-DR), dated September 28, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Tropical Storm Helene.                    

# DATES:

Issued on December 31, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         September 25, 2024 through December 18, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         February 6, 2025.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated September 28, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to February 6, 2025.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2025-00011 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
# C_2018123EN.01002102.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/21

---

Order of the General Court of 1 February 2018 — Collins v Parliament

(Case T-919/16) (1)

1

((Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision not to defend the privileges and immunities - Action manifestly inadmissible - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 123/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jane Maria Collins (Hotham, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Anderson, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alonso de León and M. Dean, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Concerning, first, an action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 25 October 2016 not to defend the immunity and privileges of the applicant, secondly, an action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly incurred as a result of that decision and, thirdly, a request that the General Court should rule on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of the applicant

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Jane Maria Collins is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Jane Maria Collins is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.

1

---
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 18 Filed 04/24/01 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 18 Filed 04/24/01 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44
EXHIBIT
      NO. 32.2





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management Solutions, Inc.,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
      ended
      December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                APRIL 13, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              MORRIS KUNOFSKYMORRIS
                KUNOFSKY
              CHIEF
                FINANCIAL OFFICER
lmfa-ex103_13.htm



EXHIBIT 10.3

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF R. DEAN AKERS

 

This (“Amendment”) is dated August 30, 2016, (“Effective Date”) to the Employment Agreement dated as of May 10, 2016, by and between LM Funding America, Inc., Delaware incorporated corporation (the “Company”), and R. Dean Akers (“Executive”).

WHEREAS: Executive has agreed to reduce his or her cash Salary compensation by an amount equal to 30% of the original agreed upon amount pro-rata, commencing on the effective date of this Amendment and continuing thereafter for the duration of the term of the original Employment Agreement at the request of the Board of Directors. This reduction is in connection with cost saving measures and a general reduction of salaries to the Company’s senior management. 

NOW THEREFORE: Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement, titled, “Compensation” is deleted in its entirety and hereby substituted with the following, to read:

(a)The Company agrees to pay to Executive a salary in cash (the “Salary”), as compensation for the services to be performed by Executive, at the rate of $200,000 $140,000 per calendar year, paid in accordance with the Company’s customary payroll procedures and subject to applicable withholding. During the Term, the Board shall have the right to increase, but not decrease, the Salary, except the Board may decrease the Salary in connection with a base salary decrease that is generally applicable to all members of the Company’s senior management.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Executive will be eligible for additional annual salary merit increases during the Term beginning in 2017 based on the evaluation of Executive’s performance as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. Executive’s salary as in effect from time to time shall constitute the “Salary” for purposes of this Agreement.  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.  

LM FUNDING AMERICA, INC.

By: /s/ Bruce M. Rodgers

      Bruce M. Rodgers, Chief Executive Officer

 

EXECUTIVE

/s/ R. Dean Akers

R. Dean Akers
# C_2021088EN.01001203.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 2 December 2020 — HW, ZF, MZ v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG

(Case C-652/20)

(2021/C 88/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: HW, ZF, MZ

Defendant: Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG

Question referred

Are the provisions of Article 11(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) to be interpreted as relating solely to the international jurisdiction of the Member States [of the European Union] or as also establishing the domestic (local) jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the beneficiary of the insurance policy is domiciled?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).

---
EX PARTE Ronald Cory LINKE

CR-16-1027

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|       |                     |     |                           |  | 
|------ | ------------------- | --- | ------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: | November 13,
  2006 | By: | /s/ Brian
  King          | 
|       |                     |     |                           | 
|       |                     |     | Brian King               
|       |                     |     | Chief
  Executive Officer



---
# C_2021053EN.01001801.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 5 November 2020 — SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca

(Case C-582/20)

(2021/C 53/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SC Cridar Cons SRL

Respondents: Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding national legislation pursuant to which the tax authorities, after issuing a notice of assessment refusing to grant a right to deduct input VAT, are permitted to suspend the examination of an administrative complaint pending the outcome of criminal proceedings that could provide additional objective evidence of the taxable person’s involvement in tax fraud? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding national legislation pursuant to which the tax authorities, after issuing a notice of assessment refusing to grant a right to deduct input VAT, are permitted to suspend the examination of an administrative complaint pending the outcome of criminal proceedings that could provide additional objective evidence of the taxable person’s involvement in tax fraud?

| 2. | Would the answer given by the Court of Justice of the European Union to the first question be different if, during the period for which examination of the administrative complaint is suspended, the taxable person benefits from provisional measures which suspend the effects of the refusal of the right to deduct VAT? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Would the answer given by the Court of Justice of the European Union to the first question be different if, during the period for which examination of the administrative complaint is suspended, the taxable person benefits from provisional measures which suspend the effects of the refusal of the right to deduct VAT?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
Bettie KEESE v. SEDGWICK CLAIM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and Walgreens Drug Store

NO. 2019-CC-0005

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
Gloria M. PINO, Appellant, v. Craig D. BLUME, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5167

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Affirmed.
Johnny Ray STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2175

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent/Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:03-CR-078-N

) No. 3:05-CV-1993-N 

EDWARD EARL LEATCH, ) ECF

ID # 29808-177, )

)

Movant/Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED January 24, 2008.

 

 DAVID C. GODBEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:03-cr-00078-N Document 660 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3924
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Notice of Hearing Page 1

Patrick J. Neligan, Jr.

State Bar. No. 14866000

John D. Gaither

State Bar No. 24055516

NELIGAN LLP

4851 LBJ Freeway, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75244

Telephone: 214-840-5300

pneligan@neliganlaw.com

jgaither@neliganlaw.com

Kristi C. Kelly, 

Admitted pro hac vice 

Andrew J. Guzzo,

Admitted pro hac vice 

KELLY GUZZO, PLC 

3925 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 202 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

(703) 424-7572 - Telephone

(703) 591-0167 - Facsimile

Email: kkelly@kellyguzzo.com

Email: aguzzo@kellyguzzo.com

Counsel for the Virginia Borrowers

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: § CHAPTER 11

§

MATTHEW MARTORELLO § CASE NO. 24-90016-mxm-11

§

DEBTOR §

______________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing on the Virginia Borrowers’ Motion For 

Recognition Of Class Proof Of Claim Pursuant To Rule 7023 And 9014 [Docket No. 76] is 

scheduled for Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 1:30 p.m.. (Central Time) before the Honorable 

Mark X. Mullin, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth 

Division, Room 128, U.S. Courthouse, 501 West Tenth Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. 

For WebEx Video Participation/Attendance: 

Link: https://us-courts.webex.com/meet/mullin

Meeting Number: 2310 650 8783

For WebEx Telephonic Only Participation/Attendance: 

Dial-In: 1.650.479.3207 

Access Code: 2310 650 8783 

WebEx Hearing Instructions may be obtained from Judge Mullin’s hearing/calendar site: 

https://www.txnb.uscourts.gov/judges-info/hearing-dates/judge-mullin-hearing-dates.

Case 24-90016-mxm11 Doc 91 Filed 12/10/24 Entered 12/10/24 12:06:02 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Notice of Hearing Page 2

Dated: December 10, 2024

/s/ Patrick J. Neligan, Jr.

Patrick J. Neligan, Jr.

State Bar. No. 14866000

John D. Gaither

State Bar No. 24055516

NELIGAN LLP

4851 LBJ Freeway, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75244

Telephone: 214-840-5300

pneligan@neliganlaw.com

jgaither@neliganlaw.com

/s/ Andrew J. Guzzo

Kristi C. Kelly, admitted pro hac vice

Andrew J. Guzzo, admitted pro hac vice 

KELLY GUZZO, PLC 

3925 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 202 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

(703) 424-7572 - Telephone

(703) 591-0167 - Facsimile

Email: kkelly@kellyguzzo.com

Email: aguzzo@kellyguzzo.com

Counsel for the Virginia Borrowers

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served 

via the Court’s ECF system on December 10, 2024.

/s/ Patrick J. Neligan, Jr.

Patrick J. Neligan, Jr.

Case 24-90016-mxm11 Doc 91 Filed 12/10/24 Entered 12/10/24 12:06:02 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Matthew MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 23, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Claire V. Madill, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant appeals the order revoking his probation, raising six issues. We find all of the issues except one to be without merit and affirm without discussion. As to that issue, the state concedes, and we find, that appellant was on community control rather than probation at the time of the violation. We therefore remand for the trial court to correct the revocation order to reflect a violation of community control. *See**Gaston v. State* , 698 So.2d 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) ; *Brown v. State* , 656 So.2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

*Affirmed and remanded with instructions.*

Gerber, C.J., Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 34 Filed 10/10/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 183
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 34 Filed 10/10/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 184
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 34 Filed 10/10/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 185
# C_2022128EN.01002201.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Canisius v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (CCLABELLE VIENNA)

(Case T-694/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA - Earlier EU word mark LABELLO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 128/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Maria Alexandra Canisius (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: H. Asenbauer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Fuhrmann and V. von Bomhard, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2020 (Case R 2233/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Beiersdorf and Ms Canisius.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Maria Alexandra Canisius to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Maria Alexandra Canisius to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Jason SPIKES

NO. 2018-KH-2079

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

*773WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
CUSIP NO. 92672L 10 7 
VIEWRAYTM 
Visibly Different 
AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 300,000,000 
PAR VALUE: $0.01 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF 
Shares of ViewRay, Inc. Common Stock 
transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or
by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
Dated: 
SECRETARY VIEWRAY, INC. 
CORPORATE 
SEAL 
DELAWARE 
PRESIDENT 
Countersigned & Registered: Globex Transfer, LLC 
(813) 344-4490 
By 
Authorized Signature
EX PARTE Earl Lee ALEXANDER

CR-16-1009

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 2 of 7 PageID 2
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 3 of 7 PageID 3
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 4 of 7 PageID 4
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 5 of 7 PageID 5
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 6 of 7 PageID 6
Case 3:00-cv-01311-L Document 1 Filed 06/16/00 Page 7 of 7 PageID 7