alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr., certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Centale, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report; 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: August 20, 2007 /s/ Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr. Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020209EN.01001301.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 12 March 2020 — JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar

(Case C-135/20)

(2020/C 209/19)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JS

Defendant: Câmara Municipal de Gondomar

Questions referred

| 1. | Should EU law, in particular Clause 5 of the framework agreement annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, (1) be interpreted as precluding national legislation which in all cases prohibits the conversion of fixed-term employment contracts concluded by public law entities into contracts of an indefinite duration? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Should EU law, in particular Clause 5 of the framework agreement annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, (1) be interpreted as precluding national legislation which in all cases prohibits the conversion of fixed-term employment contracts concluded by public law entities into contracts of an indefinite duration?

| 2. | Should Directive 1999/70/EC be interpreted as requiring the conversion of the contracts as being the only means to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Should Directive 1999/70/EC be interpreted as requiring the conversion of the contracts as being the only means to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts?

---

(1)  Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)pennsylvania(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 5, 2019        New U.S. Geological Survey Report Assesses Risk of Once-Per-Century Geomagnetic Superstorm to the Northeastern United States
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Videsh Sanchar
Nigam Limited, a limited liability corporation incorporated in the Republic of
India (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:

         1.)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.)      the  information contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of June 30, 2002 or as mentioned therein.

         The foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of
complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.


Dated: September 26, 2002                       /s/ Shailendra Kumar Gupta
                                                -------------------------------
                                                SHAILENDRA KUMAR GUPTA
                                                Managing Director




Dated: September 26, 2002                       /s/ Arun Gupta
                                                -------------------------------
                                                ARUN GUPTA
                                                Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022119EN.01003401.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 January 2022 — 1031023 B.C. v EUIPO — Bodegas San Valero (Representation of a circle drawn by a brush)

(Case T-366/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a circle drawn by a brush - Earlier national figurative mark ORIGIUM 1944 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 119/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: 1031023 B.C. Ltd (Richmond, British Columbia, Canada) (represented by: M. González Gordon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bodegas San Valero, S. Coop. (Cariñena, Spain) (represented by: J. García Domínguez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2020 (Case R 2142/2019-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas San Valero and 1031023 B.C.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders 1031023 B.C. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Bodegas San Valero, S. Coop. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders 1031023 B.C. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Bodegas San Valero, S. Coop.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
D'Angelo Lavelle DIXON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41558 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN HONORIO ESPARZA-CANO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-597-ALL

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Honorio Esparza-Cano raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Calvin MAYS, Jr. v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES

CR-16-0643

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Safety
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

700 

KA 12-01328 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEITH LYMAN, ALSO KNOWN AS KEITH J. LYMAN, ALSO 

KNOWN AS KEITH JOSEPH LYMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County

(Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), rendered January 12, 2011. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault on

a peace officer.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,

upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault on a peace officer

(Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.08). We are unable to review defendant’s

contentions that his plea was not voluntary or that the sentence is

unduly harsh and severe inasmuch as the stipulated record on appeal

does not include the transcript of the plea proceeding, nor has

defendant complied with this Court’s request to provide the

presentence report (see Matter of Planned Parenthood of Niagara County

v Maerten, 6 AD3d 1162, 1163; Matter of Santoshia L., 202 AD2d 1027,

1028; cf. People v Douglas, 288 AD2d 859, 859, lv denied 97 NY2d 681;

see generally People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772, 774). 

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Michael SHARP, Appellant, v. Heide SHARP, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1173

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

___________________________ No. 12

- 15135 Non

- Argument Calendar

___________________________ Agency No. A088

- 741

- 397

MING ZHENG , Petitioner ,
versus US ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

.

______________________________ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

_______________________________ ( July 12, 2013 )

B efore WILSON, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Case: 12-15135 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM:

Ming Zheng seeks review of the BIA’s final order affirming the IJ’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief. Briefly stated, the petition presents these issues: 1. Whet her substantial evidence supports the denial of Zheng’s application for asylum based upon an adverse

- credibility determination. 2. Whether substantial evidence supports the BIA’s alternative finding that Zheng failed to demonstrate either past persecutio n or a well

- founded fear of future persecution. “Substantial evidence” review must be a highly deferential one. See Forgue v. U.S. Att’y Gen. , 401 F.3d 1282 , 1286 (11th Cir. 2005). The BIA ’s adverse

- credibility determination was supported by “specific, cogent reasons”

-- including Zheng’s swearing to two different dates of entry into the United States

-- and was supported by substantial evidence. Under the law, “persecution” is an extreme concept and “fear” has an objectionably reasonable el ement. See Sepulveda v. U.S. Att’y Gen. , 401 F.3d 1226, 1231 (11th Cir. 200 5 ); Kazemzadeh v. U.S. Att’y Gen. , 577 F.3d 1341, 1353 (11th Cir. 2009); Al Najjar v. Ashcroft, 257 F.3d 1262 , 1289 (11th Cir. 2001). Even if Zheng had been credible, the BIA also found that Zheng did not meet his

Case: 12-15135 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 2 of 33 burden of showing either past persecution or a well

- founded fear of persecution on account of his political opinion . This finding was supported by substantial evidence: the level of mistreatment was not sufficiently extr eme and the record does not compel the conclusion that the Chinese government was aware of Zheng’s low

- level political activity or that it would actually target him as a result of the activity

. Because Zheng failed to establish his eligibility for asylum, he has necessarily failed to meet the higher standard s for withholding of removal or for CAT relief

. See Forgue , 401 F.3d at 1288 n.4. The BIA’s discussion was announced adequately. The B IA is not required to address specifically each piece of evidence. See Carrizo v. U.S. Att’ y Gen. , 652 F.3d 1326 , 1332 (11th Cir. 2011).
PETITION DENIED. Case: 12-15135 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        December 7, 2020        Bird Banding Lab, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service—Centennial Presentation

Presentations and Events        October 22, 2020        100 Years of Service to Migratory Bird Conservation in North America
EXHIBIT 32



                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Annual Report of Bravo Resource Partners Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Tyrone
R. Carter, the Chief Executive Officer and Ernest Staggs, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

Date: January 11, 2006
                                   By: /s/ Tyrone R. Carter
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Tyrone R. Carter, Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Ernest Staggs
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                      Ernest Staggs, Chief Financial Officer
EX PARTE Cordero Raynard CHAPMAN

CR-16-1031

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Shelby Cir. Ct.
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 1 of 30 PageID 144
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 2 of 30 PageID 145
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 3 of 30 PageID 146
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 4 of 30 PageID 147
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 5 of 30 PageID 148
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 6 of 30 PageID 149
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 7 of 30 PageID 150
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 8 of 30 PageID 151
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 9 of 30 PageID 152
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 10 of 30 PageID 153
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 11 of 30 PageID 154
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 12 of 30 PageID 155
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 13 of 30 PageID 156
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 14 of 30 PageID 157
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 15 of 30 PageID 158
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 16 of 30 PageID 159
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 17 of 30 PageID 160
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 18 of 30 PageID 161
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 19 of 30 PageID 162
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 20 of 30 PageID 163
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 21 of 30 PageID 164
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 22 of 30 PageID 165
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 23 of 30 PageID 166
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 24 of 30 PageID 167
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 25 of 30 PageID 168
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 26 of 30 PageID 169
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 27 of 30 PageID 170
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 28 of 30 PageID 171
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 29 of 30 PageID 172
Case 3:03-cv-00594-N Document 35 Filed 03/31/04 Page 30 of 30 PageID 173
Anthony D. MCBRIDE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3205

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 731 

Honoring the memory of the victims of the heinous attack at the Pulse 

nightclub on June 12, 2016. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memory of the victims of the heinous attack 

at the Pulse nightclub on June 12, 2016. 

Whereas, on June 12, 2016, a gunman inspired by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria targeted the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he killed 49 innocent victims and wounded dozens more in a despicable attack; 

Whereas the attack at the Pulse nightclub was an attack on 

the LGBTQ community, the Hispanic community, the 

City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and the United 

States; 

Whereas the Orlando community continues to mourn the 

tragic loss of life but has demonstrated remarkable 

strength, unity, and resilience in the aftermath of the 

horrendous event; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 731 ATS 

Whereas June 12 is designated as ‘‘Pulse Remembrance 

Day’’ in the State of Florida to honor the victims and 

survivors of the senseless attack; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

those affected by the tragedy; and 

Whereas June 12, 2024, marks 8 years since the lives of the 

49 innocent victims were tragically cut short by this 

senseless act of terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates the 49 innocent victims 

3 killed in the attack at the Pulse nightclub in Or4 lando, Florida, on June 12, 2016, and offers heart5 felt condolences to the families, loved ones, and 

6 friends of the victims; 

7 (2) honors the dozens of survivors of the attack 

8 and pledges continued resolve to stand against ter9 rorism and hate; and 

10 (3) expresses gratitude to the brave law en11 forcement and emergency medical personnel who re12 sponded to the attack. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Trend Mining Company (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
        Loucks, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 September
        19, 2005
  /s/
Thomas
        A. Loucks Thomas
        A.
        Loucks
 Principal
        Executive Officer
  75