alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents

**As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2011**

 

 

 

**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

 

**
 
**

**FORM 20-F**

 

**
 
**

**(Mark One)**

 

 

**For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011**

 

**For the Transition period from              to            **

 

**Commission File Number 001-15118**

 

**
 
**

**TATACOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED**

**(FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED)**

**(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)**

 

**
 
**

**Not Applicable**

**(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)**

**The Republic ofIndia**

**(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)**

**Sanjay Baweja**

 

**
 
**

**Tel No:+91-22-6657 8765**

**Facsimile: +91-22-6725 9029**

**Address: 6th floor, B Tower, Plots C21& C36, ‘G’ Block,**

**Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400 098, INDIA**

**(Name, telephone, facsimile number and address of company contact person)**

**VSB, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort, Mumbai—400001, INDIA**

**(Address of principal executive offices)**

 

**
 
**

**Securitiesregistered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:**
# C_2022073EN.01003801.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Sun West and Others v Commission

(Case T-623/20) (1)

(State aid - Production of electricity by photovoltaic installations - Obligation to purchase the electricity at a higher price than the market price - Rejection of a complaint - Second subparagraph of Article 12(1) and Article 24(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589)

(2022/C 73/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Sun West (Saint-Allouestre, France), JB Solar (Saint-Allouestre), Azimut56 (Saint-Allouestre) (represented by: S. Manna, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and B. Stromsky, Acting as agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 28 July 2020 rejecting the applicants’ complaint concerning State aid granted unlawfully by the French Republic to photovoltaic energy producers under pricing decrees of 10 July 2006, and 12 January and 31 August 2010, in order to have the aid declared incompatible with the internal market.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sun West, JB Solar and Azimut56 to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sun West, JB Solar and Azimut56 to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.

---
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed May 14, 2019. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00341-CV

CHARLES FRANKS, Appellant

V.

LIBERTY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-49231

CONCURRING OPINION

Because this court is bound by Tex. Ins. Code § 1952.104(3), the terms of the 

policy, and precedent, I concur in the majority opinion. However, automobile 

insurance contracts, such as the one in this case, should contain clear definitions and 

exclusion language that will be understood by the average policyholder, thereby 

allowing the policyholder to make a truly informed decision about the coverage 

purchased. 
2 

The purpose of the uninsured motorist statute is protection of insured 

motorists from irresponsible underinsured, uninsured, or unidentified motorists. 

Jankowiak v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 201 S.W.3d 200, 210 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (citing Stracener v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 

777 S.W.2d 378, 382 (Tex. 1989)). In this case, the motorist who caused the accident 

was unidentified, and there was no physical contact with appellant’s vehicle. Our 

courts have consistently held physical contact between the insured and any 

unidentified vehicle is required for coverage to apply under the 

uninsured/underinsured provisions of a policy such as the one in this case. Goen v. 

Trinity Universal In.Co. of Kansas, Inc., 715 S.W.2d 124, 126 (Tex. Civ. App.—

Texarkana, 1986, no writ); Mayer v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 870 S.W. 2d 623, 

625 (Tex. App—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, reh. overruled). The stated purpose of 

requiring actual physical in Tex. Ins. Code § 1952.104(3) is to prevent fraudulent 

claims against “phantom cars,” but in this case there is no dispute as to appellant’s 

claim that an unidentified driver existed and caused this wreck. 

Policyholders should be aware, when purchasing uninsured/underinsured 

coverage, that claims involving an unidentified, but undisputedly negligent driver, 

whose vehicle does not make physical contact with the unidentified driver’s vehicle, 

may be excluded from coverage, especially when the terms of the policy make it 

difficult to ascertain coverage.

 

 /s/ Margaret “Meg” Poissant

 Justice

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant. (Poissant, J. majority).
Marquis RIDDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1731

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jamil RASHID, aka Richard Lee McCoy, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5272

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021490EN.01004101.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL)

(Case T-732/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - EU word mark CRYSTAL - Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration - Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty of care - No review - Failure to comply with time limits)

(2021/C 490/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Freundlieb (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2020 (Case R 1056/2020-5), relating to an application for restitutio in integrum in relation to the right to apply for renewal of the EU word mark CRYSTAL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Andreas Freundlieb to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Andreas Freundlieb to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

---
Rebecca A. SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. James A. SCHWARTZ, as Administrator Ad Litem for the Estate of Steven P. Schwartz, Deceased, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-3406

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019.

Denied.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 894 

Designating December 1, 2024, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2024 

Mr. WARNOCK (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

NOVEMBER 21 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 20), 2024 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating December 1, 2024, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the United States; 

Whereas every individual traveling on roads and highways 

needs to drive in a safer manner in order to reduce 

deaths and injuries that result from motor vehicle crashes; 

Whereas, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, wearing a seat belt saves more than 

15,000 lives each year; 

Whereas Road Safe America, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization founded after the tragic death of Cullum Owings 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 894 RCS 

on December 1, 2002, in a preventable truck accident, 

has been committed to raising awareness about the importance of driving safely; 

Whereas the Senate wants all people of the United States to 

understand the life-saving importance of wearing a seat 

belt and encourages motorists to drive safely, not just 

during the holiday season, but every time they get behind 

the wheel; and 

Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is 1 of the busiest 

highway traffic days of the year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages— 

3 (A) high schools, colleges, universities, ad4 ministrators, teachers, primary schools, and 

5 secondary schools to launch campus-wide edu6 cational campaigns to urge students to focus on 

7 safety when driving; 

8 (B) national trucking firms— 

9 (i) to alert employee drivers to be es10 pecially focused on driving safely on the 

11 Sunday after Thanksgiving; and 

12 (ii) to publicize the importance of the 

13 day through use of Citizens Band (com14 monly known as ‘‘CB’’) radios and truck 

15 stops across the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

SRES 894 RCS 

1 (C) clergies to remind their members to 

2 travel safely when attending services and gath3 erings; 

4 (D) law enforcement personnel to remind 

5 drivers and passengers to drive safely, particu6 larly on the Sunday after Thanksgiving; and 

7 (E) all people of the United States to use 

8 the Sunday after Thanksgiving as an oppor9 tunity to educate themselves about highway 

10 safety; and 

11 (2) designates December 1, 2024, as ‘‘Drive 

12 Safer Sunday’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JULIE A. GALPIN

, *

* No. 1 7

- 588 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: August 4, 2021

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Influenza (“flu”) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * SIRVA; shoulder injury.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Richard H. Moeller

, Moore, Heffernan, et al.

, Sioux City, IA , for Petitioner;

Wei K. Tai , United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On August 3 , 20 21 , the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the

petition for compensation filed by Julie Galpin on May 2, 201 7 . Petitioner alleged

that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on August 2 6 , 201 6 , which is

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused

her to suffer from a right

- sided shoulder injury related to vaccination

administration (“SIRVA”). Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual

effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has

been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a

result of her condition.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from

SIRVA or any other injury.

1 T he E

- Government Act

, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and

Promotion of Electronic Government Services) , requires that the Court post this decision on its

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing

redaction of medical informati on or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4).

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. Th e undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $ 3 0,000.00 in the form of a check pa yable to

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according t o this decision and the attached

stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each

party fil ing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.
# C_2023179EN.01002701.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — Satabank v ECB

(Case T-72/20) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Supervised entity - Composite administrative procedure - Denial of access to the file - Decision 2004/258/EC - Access to ECB documents)

(2023/C 179/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Satabank plc (St Julian’s, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: G. Buono, A. Lefterov and E. Koupepidou, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action pursuant to Article 263 TFUE, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 26 November 2019 by which it rejected its request for access to the file concerning it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 26 November 2019 by which it rejected Satabank plc’s request for access to the file concerning it; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 26 November 2019 by which it rejected Satabank plc’s request for access to the file concerning it;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tata Communications Limited, a limited liability company incorporated
in the Republic of India (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers best knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to
be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

Date: October 14, 2008



/s/ Narasimhan SrinathNarasimhan SrinathManaging Director and CEO/s/ Rajiv DharRajiv DharChief Financial Officer




1
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leonard Gordon, Chief Financial Officer of Turinco, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                   

| | By:    | */s/
      Leonard Gordon*
| | ------ | --------------------------
| |        |                           
| | Name:  | Leonard Gordon            
| |        |                           
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer   
| |        |                           
| | Date:  | March 28, 2006            

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00061]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1220 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1026, K2025-1025.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00061 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Case 2:98-cv-00371-J Document 31 Filed 05/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
# C_2021028EN.01002301.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 30 October 2020 — DG v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-566/20)

(2021/C 28/36)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DG

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Question referred

Does a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 64 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 64

    To authorize testimony and representation in  United States v. 
                             GossJankowski.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2023

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To authorize testimony and representation in  United States v. 
                             GossJankowski.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. GossJankowski, Cr. No. 21-123, pending 
        in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of  United States v. GossJankowski, except 
concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager, and any current or former officer or employee of the 
Secretary's office, in connection with the production of evidence 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```