alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 112 Filed 02/01/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1708
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 112 Filed 02/01/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1709
Case 3:03-cv-00418-N Document 112 Filed 02/01/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1710
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - multimedia_webcam(10)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(10)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)

## By Year

Interviews        April 18, 2011        USGS Hydrologic Investigation of West Africa's Congo River (part 3)
Case 2:03-cr-00114-J Document 43 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 154
W.C., Jr. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160719

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Continan Communications, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.


Date: April 14, 2008                        Name: /s/ Geoffrey A. Fox
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Geoffrey A. Fox
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Federal Aviation Administration 

National Part 139 CertAlert

**Advisory**Cautionary**Non-Directive**Advisory**Cautionary**Non-Directive**Advisory**Cautionary**Non-Directive**

No. 22-08

Date: November 29, 2022

To: All Title 14 CFR Part 139 Airport Operators

Subject: Deicing/Anti-Icing Product Awareness

Point of Contact: Alberto Rodriguez, AAS-300, (202) 256-1651

Email: alberto.rodriguez@faa.gov

1. Purpose. This CertAlert provides guidance and awareness on specifications for FAArecommended airside pavement deicer and anti-icer products.

2. Background. The FAA provides specifications or, in certain instances, references the

specifications of third parties, such as professional associations like the Society of Automotive

Engineers (SAE) Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) and the U.S. military (MIL-SPEC),

for deicing/anti-icing products. These specifications require vendors to provide airport operators

with a certification stating the product conforms to the applicable specification. Additionally,

the vendor is required to provide a safety data sheet (SDS) for product acceptability.

The FAA does not recommend the use of deicing/anti-icing products that do not meet the

associated specifications for that product type.

For additional clarity:

o Liquid deicing/anti-icing products should meet the specifications in the current edition

of SAE AMS 1435, Liquid Runway Deicing/Anti-Icing Product.

o Solid deicing/anti-icing products should meet the specifications in the current edition of

SAE AMS 1431, Solid Runway Deicing/Anti-Icing Product.

o Liquefied Solid (making a liquid from a solid product) deicing/anti-icing products

should meet the specifications in the current edition of SAE AMS 1435, Liquid Runway

Deicing/Anti-Icing Product.

3. Action. When using approved chemicals, airport operators should ensure the products being

used meet all standards and are in conformance with the appropriate specification. Airport

operators should be particularly mindful when mixing/brining a solid product to create a

liquefied solid. In its “liquefied solid” form, the resulting product must meet the liquid
11/29/2022 FAA Part 139 CertAlert No. 22-08

2

______________________________

deicing/anti-icing specification (SAE AMS 1435, Liquid Runway Deicing/Anti-Icing Product)

as the original solid product specification is no longer applicable.

4. Refer to Advisory Circular 150/5200-30, Airport Field Condition Assessments and Winter Operations

Safety, paragraph 4.6, for additional information.

Birkely M. Rhodes, Manager 

Airports Safety and Operations Division, AAS-300
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 (the Periodic Report), I, C. Lourenco Goncalves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    C. LOURENCO
GONCALVES         
|                      |  |  |  | C. Lourenco Goncalves                
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of SINO ASSURANCE, INC.,  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009  (the "Report"), I, Guokang Tu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Guokang Tu, CEO and Chairman  Date:March 31, 2010
# C_2020209EN.01000902.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 4 March 2020 — VG v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

(Case C-121/20)

(2020/C 209/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VG

Defendant: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Question referred

Is the answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling in the cases before the Court registered under numbers C-225/19 and C-226/19 different if it has been made known or has become known which country it is that objected to the issuing of a visa to the applicant during the prior consultation as referred to in Article 22 of the Visa Code? (1)

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (OJ 2009 L 243, p. 1).

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00020]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1194 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-991, K2025-990.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00020 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 639 

Expressing support for the designation of the month of April 2024 as 

‘‘Parkinson’s Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11 (legislative day, APRIL 10), 2024 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the month of April 

2024 as ‘‘Parkinson’s Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas Parkinson’s disease— 

(1) affects over 1,000,000 individuals in the United 

States with nearly 90,000 individuals diagnosed each 

year; 

(2) is the fastest-growing and second most common 

neurodegenerative disease in the world; 

(3) is believed to be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, but the exact cause in 

most individuals is still unknown; and 

(4) is the 15th leading cause of death in the United 

States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 639 IS 

Whereas, by the year 2037, it is estimated that the number 

of individuals in the United States with Parkinson’s disease will nearly double, and Parkinson’s disease will cost 

the United States at least $80,000,000,000 annually; 

Whereas the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease can include dementia and cognitive impairment, tremors, slowness of 

movement and rigidity, gait and balance difficulties, 

speech and swallowing difficulties, depression, and a variety of other symptoms; 

Whereas there are millions of family caregivers, friends, and 

loved ones whose lives are greatly affected by Parkinson’s 

disease; and 

Whereas more research, education, and community support 

services are needed— 

(1) to find better treatments and a cure for Parkinson’s disease; and 

(2) to maintain the dignity of individuals living with 

Parkinson’s disease: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of the 

3 month of April 2024 as ‘‘Parkinson’s Awareness 

4 Month’’; 

5 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Parkinson’s 

6 Awareness Month; 

7 (3) continues to support research to find better 

8 treatments and a cure for Parkinson’s disease; 

9 (4) recognizes the individuals living with Par10 kinson’s disease who participate in vital clinical 

11 trials to advance the knowledge of the disease; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 639 IS 

1 (5) commends the dedication of organizations, 

2 volunteers, researchers, and millions of individuals 

3 across the United States working to improve the 

4 quality of life of people living with Parkinson’s dis5 ease and their families. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00040]

[[Page 1206]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 573 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1014, K2025-1013.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00040 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Jacquelin D. LANGLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3610

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
William S. NEMITZ and Debra G. Nemitz, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4713

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN RE BAR ADMISSION OF CFN-2071

NO. 2019-BA-0171

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 7, 2019

Granted. Petitioner is allowed to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination. Upon satisfactorily passing the examination, petitioner may apply to this court for the appointment of a commissioner in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 9, to take evidence and report to this court as to whether petitioner has the appropriate character and fitness to be admitted to the bar and allowed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,759-01

EX PARTE KENNETH WAYNE ACY JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. A-14-1120-SA-W-1 IN THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault and one count of unlawful

possession of a firearm by a felon and was sentenced to imprisonment. He filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal through no fault of his own. The

trial court has entered findings and recommends that a late appeal be granted. The trial court’s

findings and recommendation are supported by the habeas record and applicable law. Ex parte Axel,

757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). 

Relief is granted. Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of his convictions in cause
2

number A-14-1120-SA from the 51st District Court of Tom Green County. Within ten days from

the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him on direct appeal. All deadlines shall be calculated as if Applicant was sentenced

on the date of this Court’s mandate. Should Applicant decide to appeal, he must file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the TexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: January 29, 2020

Do not publish
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-04-538-CR

KEVIN BERNARD HACKETT					       		APPELLANT

A/K/A KEVIN B. HACKETT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

						----------

	We have considered appellant’s  “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 							 										PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 15, 2006
Joshua BOUIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

Joshua Bouie, Crawfordville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus in Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 2007-CF-5701-A. We affirm the trial court's order and caution Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: §

FREDRICK LEE PRESS PLUMBING, LLC §

DEBTOR § BANKRUPTCY CASE NO. 23-32662

ORDER ON DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF PREPETITION WAGES IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS

(Docket No. 17)

The Court, having reviewed the pleading finds that a need exists to order the relief herein and that it is in the 

best interest of the Debtor, the Debtor’s estate, and Debtor’s creditors to authorize payment of pre-petition W-2 

Employees and other benefits. Failure to timely disburse payment to the W-2 Employees would likely result in the 

termination of the relationships between the Debtor and its W-2 Employees whose continued services are essential to 

the Debtor’s business operations; and that each of the persons who are to receive payments would, if treated as 

creditors in this proceeding, be entitled to priority under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(4)(B). It is accordingly,

ORDERED that the Debtor be authorized to remit payment to the W-2 Employees in the amount not to 

exceed $46,000.00 in wages and payroll taxes as such payments become due in the ordinary course of business, It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Debtor be authorized to pay up to $13,000.00 in insurance and other health

benefits as such payments become due in the ordinary course of business.

 # # # END OF ORDER # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed November 16, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-32662-mvl11 Doc 23 Filed 11/16/23 Entered 11/16/23 16:27:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# C_2021422EN.01001402.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Vieta Audio (Vita)

(Case T-561/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Vita - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered)

(2021/C 422/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and P. Ruess, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Vieta Audio, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 June 2020 (Case R 425/2020-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Vieta Audio and Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---