alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  May 17, 2004

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
George Z. BENIAMINOV and Argman Group, Appellants, v. Natalyz KUZINA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1815

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Donald Edward BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021163EN.01002802.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ EST 1929)

(Case T-68/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ EST 1929 - Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 163/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hauz 1929 Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Lyberis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Houzz, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2019 (Case R 885/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Houzz and Hauz 1929.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hauz 1929 Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hauz 1929 Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - virginia(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2021(1)

staff profileWilliam Leith
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of NexxNow, Inc. (the
“Company”) certifies that:
  1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period  ended
December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 February
      17, 2008
                /s/ Sterling
      ShepperdSterling
      Shepperd (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
    Officer)
James S. DUNCAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-0112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 05, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of prohibition is denied.
Case 3:03-cv-01618-P Document 32 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 4 PageID 173
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01618-P Document 32 Filed 02/05/10 Page 2 of 4 PageID 174
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01618-P Document 32 Filed 02/05/10 Page 3 of 4 PageID 175
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01618-P Document 32 Filed 02/05/10 Page 4 of 4 PageID 176
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 1 of 16 PageID 37
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 2 of 16 PageID 38
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 3 of 16 PageID 39
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 4 of 16 PageID 40
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 5 of 16 PageID 41
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 6 of 16 PageID 42
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 7 of 16 PageID 43
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 8 of 16 PageID 44
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 9 of 16 PageID 45
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 10 of 16 PageID 46
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 11 of 16 PageID 47
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 12 of 16 PageID 48
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 13 of 16 PageID 49
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 14 of 16 PageID 50
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 15 of 16 PageID 51
Case 3:03-cv-00620-M Document 11 Filed 04/15/03 Page 16 of 16 PageID 52
Runway Simulator

*

  April 1&2, 2014

Runway Simulator (RPD 139)

Contract Funds ($K)

TOTALS:

*
# C_2021148EN.01000501.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku (Poland) lodged on 22 July 2020 — Raiffeisen Bank International AG v UI and MB

(Case C-329/20)

(2021/C 148/05)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Raiffeisen Bank International AG

Defendants: UI and MB

By order of 11 February 2021, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) ruled that the request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku (Poland) lodged on 22 July 2020 is manifestly inadmissible.

---
Maurice BARNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 17 Filed 09/14/23 Entered 09/14/23 13:19:49 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21-0644 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KAITLYN DAWN POLICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 23, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 21 2022

04/21/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0644
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**FOURTHAMENDMENT TO**

**MANAGEMENTAGREEMENT**

 

This FOURTH AMENDMENT TOMANAGEMENT AGREEMENT, (this “Fourth Amendment”), dated as of June 9, 2005,is entered into by and among KRG Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limitedliability company (“KRG”) and Accellent Inc., a Maryland corporation formerlyknown as UTI Corporation (“Accellent” or the “Company”).

 

**RECITALS**

 

A.            KRG and Accellent are parties to that certain ManagementAgreement dated July 6, 1999 (“Management Agreement”) as amended by theFirst Amendment to Management Agreement, dated May 31, 2000 (the “FirstAmendment”), the Second Amendment to Management Agreement, dated January 31,2001 (the “Second Amendment”), and the Third Amendment to Management Agreement,dated June 30, 2004 (the “Third Amendment”). The Management Agreement, asamended by the First Amendment, the Second Amendment and the Third Amendment,is referred to herein as the “Agreement.”

 

B.            KRG and Accellent wish to amend theAgreement so as to increase the cap amount of certain fees which may be paid toKRG from $750,000 to $1,750,000.

 

C.            Unless otherwise amended herein, capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in theAgreement.

 

**AGREEMENT**

 

NOW THEREFORE, inconsideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, theparties hereto amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1.  Section 3(c) of the Agreement ishereby amended by deleting the reference in Section 3(c) to “$750,000”and replacing it with “$1,750,000.”

 

2.  Other than the amendments and modificationsspecifically contained herein, the Agreement remains unmodified and in fullforce and effect.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGEFOLLOWS]

 

----

 

SIGNATURES

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, KRG and Accellent  have causedthis Fourth Amendment to be signed by their respective officers thereunto dulyauthorized as of the date first written above.

 
| ** ** | **KRG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC** |
|------------|-------------------------------|
|       |                          |
|       |                          |
|       | By:                           | /s/  Bruce L. Rogers |
|       |                          | Name: |   Bruce L.  Rogers |
|       |                          | Title: |      Managing  Director |
|       |                          |   |
|       |                          |   |
| ** ** | **ACCELLENT INC.**            |
| ** ** | ** **                    | ** ** |
| ** ** | ** **                    | ** ** |
|       | By:                           | /s/  Stewart A. Fisher |
|       |                          | Name: |  Stewart  A. Fisher |
|       |                          | Title: |     Chief  Financial Officer, Executive Vice |
|       |                          |   |     President,  Treasurer and Secretary |
|            |                               |  |  |  |

 

**[SIGNATUREPAGE TO FOURTH AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT]**

 

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Damon L. PATTERSON

NO. 2019-KH-0061

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 6, 2011





/s/ Stephen K. GardnerStephen K. GardnerChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
**Exhibit 4.51**

 

Federal Supervisory Service for Communications

 

**AddendumNo. 2**

 

**toLicense No. 30267  (Account Series A 030169)**

**datedDecember 30, 2003**

 

The line “ Start of services’ rendering (not later than)” on the titlepage shall be revised to read as follows: “December 30, 2005”

                
| **Deputy Manager,**                                |       |               |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------|
| **Federal Supervisory Service for Communications** | ** ** | **S. A. Malyanov** |
| ** **                                         | ** ** | ** **         |
| ** **                                         | ** ** | ** **         |
| ** **                                         | 26.04.2005 |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

General        August 1, 2023        22-23. Geoelectromagnetic hazard science for modern society
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40182 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. JO S E JIM E N E Z
- P A L A C IO S , al so kn ow n as Jose Ji m en ez- P al aci o, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e Sou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 5 : 0 7
- CR- 1 0 7 9
- ALL B e fo r e H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS , a n d C L E M E N T , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney app oi n t ed t o represent Jose Ji m en ez- P al aci os has m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 7 38 ( 19 67 ) . J i m e ne z - Pal ac i o s ha s no tf i l e d ar e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r ivo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l . A c c o r d in g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G RA N TE D , c o uns e l i s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he r r e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n , an d the A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 579 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1036, K2025-1035.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00046 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
ex1038.htm












LOAN AGREEMENT


April 29, 2016







Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) of Parcela 29, Perales Viejo Vallenar, III Region Chile, advanced USD$25,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 2857 Sumter Valley Circle, Henderson, NV 89052.  The Lender advanced the funds on April 29, 2016.







The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) from April 26, 2016.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.







 


The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.


 


LENDER                                                                                    BORROWER


Richard N. Jeffs                                                                      Cell MedX Corp.







Per:                                                                                             Per:












/s/ Richard N. Jeffs                                                                /s/ Yanika Silina                                                                      


Richard N. Jeffs                                                                      Yanika Silina, CFO
















  





  











  








PROMISSORY NOTE







Principal Amount:  USD$25,000                                                                                                                                April 29, 2016












For value received Cell MedX Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum of $25,000 lawful money of United States (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from April 29, 2016 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.







For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.







The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.







The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.



























BORROWER


Cell MedX Corp.







Per:












/s/ Yanika Silina


Yanika Silina, CFO
**Exhibit 32**

 

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

 

Section 1350 Certification

 

The undersigned herebycertify that this report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periodspresented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in thereport.

 

| /s/ Paul M. White                       |   | /s/ Martin O’Grady                                 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Paul M. White                           |   | Martin O’Grady                                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer   |   | Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                    |   |                                                    |
|                                    |   |                                                    |
| Dated:    April 24, 2009 |   |                                                    |

 

 

[A signed original ofthis written certification has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. andwill be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

 

----
ORDER - Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL MARGOLIES and §

THE MARGOLIES FAMILY TRUST, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § No. 3:03-CV-0572-P

§

DARWIN DEASON, DOUGLAS R. §

DEASON and DAVID L. NEELY, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Status Report of the parties filed on January 31, 2007. The

Court delayed issuing a scheduling order in this case pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion

to Reinstate Counterclaims filed on March 26, 2007. An order has now issued resolving that

Motion.

Defendants request a period of discovery to address the issue of when Plaintiffs were

placed on inquiry notice of their state law claims. Plaintiffs oppose reopening discovery noting

that the issue of limitations was previously in the case and the discovery deadline has long passed

under the Court’s scheduling order.

The Court agrees with Plaintiffs and finds that Defendants have not shown good cause for

reopening discovery. Defendants state that they did not conduct discovery on this issue because

they believed Plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred as a matter of law. However, in their Motion

for Summary Judgment, Defendants argued that certain events put Plaintiffs on inquiry notice of

their state law claims well before the lawsuit was filed. In any event, that Defendants chose to

Case 3:03-cv-00572-P Document 90 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER - Page 2 of 2

take a narrow approach to their case and the conduct of discovery is not good cause for reopening

expired deadlines in the scheduling order. Parties are under an obligation to not piecemeal

litigation. The parties should have conducted discovery on all issues relevant to the pending

claims. Defendants elected not to do so, and the Court will not allow a second opportunity to do

what should have already been done.

Defendants’ request for additional discovery is denied. The Court will issue an amended

scheduling order by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 18 day of May 2007. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00572-P Document 90 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Finance Holdings LLC(‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the‘‘Report’’) with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending March  31,2006, hereby certify as follows:

|          |                                                                                            |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |

|          |                                                                                                                                     |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations for Nalco. |

|        |  |                                                                                                              |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
|   |  | /s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCE                                                                                         |
|   |  | William H. JoyceChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer Date:    May  10,  2006              |
|   |  | /s/BRADLEY J. BELL                                                                                           |
|   |  | Bradley J. BellExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer Date:    May10,  2006 |
|        |

----