alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BTXN 218 (rev. 07/17)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

High Plains Radio Network, LLC Case No.: 24−70089−swe11

 Chapter No.: 11

Debtor(s)

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DEFICIENT DOCUMENT(S)

 The Court, after review of the Motion to extend deadline to file deficient document(s) (excluding credit counseling

and creditor matrix) in the above−entitled and numbered case, finds that the Motion should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline to file the deficient document(s), (excluding credit counseling

and creditor matrix) in this case is extended to 4/24/2024.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed April 10, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-70089-swe11 Doc 47 Filed 04/10/24 Entered 04/10/24 13:29:34 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# C_2023127EN.01006002.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/60

---

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2023 — Mylan Ireland v EMA

(Case T-653/20) (1)

(2023/C 127/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
Field Instrumentation and Testing (RPD 137)

Contract Funds ($K)

*
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 45 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the current influx of migrants 

is causing a crisis at the southern border. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2023 

Mrs. BRITT (for herself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Mrs. FISCHER, 

Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

WICKER, and Mr. BOOZMAN) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the current influx 

of migrants is causing a crisis at the southern border. 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the 

2 current influx of migrants at the southern land border of 

3 the United States constitutes a crisis. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2021513EN.01002801.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/28

---

Order of the General Court of 22 October 2021 — Fachverband Spielhallen and LM v Commission

(Case T-510/20) (1)

(State aid - Tax treatment of operators of public casinos in Germany - Complaint - Preliminary examination stage - Commission decision finding that there is no State aid - Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Levy on the profits - Advantage - Selectivity - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 513/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Fachverband Spielhallen eV (Berlin, Germany) and LM (represented by: A. Bartosch and R. Schmidt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: R Kanitz and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 8819 final of 9 December 2019 on State aid SA.44944 (2019/C ex 2019/FC) — Tax treatment of public casinos operators in Germany and SA.53552 (2019/C ex 2019/FC) — Alleged guarantee for public casinos operators in Germany (Wirtschaftlichkeitsgarantie), inasmuch as it rejects the complaint lodged by the applicants against the fact that the sums paid by operators of public casinos to the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) as a levy on the profits were deductible from the tax bases for the trade tax and the income or corporation tax.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 22, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00356-CV

SANDRA ROONEY, Appellant

V.

JAMES ROONEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-DCV-162786

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed January 17, 2014. No clerk’s record 

has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal 

informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On June 18, 2014, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
EX PARTE Kelvin WRENN

CR-16-0886

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
# C_2022095EN.01003201.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN)

(Case T-699/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN - Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Phonetic similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 95/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fashion Energy Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. Müller and F. Togo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Retail Royalty Co. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 (Case R 426/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Retail Royalty and Fashion Energy.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fashion Energy Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fashion Energy Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
Clayton L. Everett, State Bar No. 24065212

NORRED LAW, PLLC | 515 E. Border Street | Arlington, Texas 76010

Telephone: (817) 704-3984 | clayton@norredlaw.com

Attorney for the Debtors

United States Bankruptcy Court 

Northern District of Texas

Fort Worth Division

In re:

Marcos Gonzalez-Lopez

Debtor

Case No. 23-43977-elm

Chapter 13

DEBTORS’ RESPONSE TO TRUSTEE’S

NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS BANKRUPTCY CASE

Marcos Gonzalez-Lopez (“Debtor”) file this response in opposition to Trustee’s Notice of 

Intent to Certify Case for Dismissal (“Notice”) [Docket. No. 62].

Debtor was hospitalized in December 2023 due to a health crisis and was unable to work. 

Debtor’s non-filing spouse has also been unable to work in the last month due to a medical issue. 

Debtor has been able to go back to work, and recently, he has worked overtime with his employer 

to increase his income. Debtor’s non-filing spouse has been medically released to go back to work 

on or about May 9, 2024 and will be able to contribute funds toward the plan payments.

Debtor intends to make a full payment on or before May 14 and another full payment on 

or before May 26, 2024. 

For these reasons, the trustee’s motion should be denied.

DATED: May 1, 2024. Respectfully submitted:

By: /s/ Clayton L. Everett 

Clayton L. Everett | State Bar No. 24065212

clayton@norredlaw.com

Norred Law, PLLC

515 E. Border St.; Arlington, Texas 76010

Telephone: (817)704-3984

Attorney for Marcos Gonzalez-Lopez

Case 23-43977-elm13 Doc 63 Filed 05/01/24 Entered 05/01/24 12:28:20 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 1, 2024, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was served to all parties receiving notice electronically in this case via the CM/ECF system.

/s/ Clayton L. Everett

Clayton L. Everett

Case 23-43977-elm13 Doc 63 Filed 05/01/24 Entered 05/01/24 12:28:20 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                     TO THE ARTICLE OF INCORPORATION
                                   OF
                          HOLOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC.



     Pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Business Code Sec. 16-10a-1001
et. seq., the Undersigned corporation adopts the following amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation.

 1.     The following amendment of the Articles of Incorporation was
        adopted by the shareholder consent on January 22 2001, said
        articles are hereby amended and shall read as follows:
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Article I
                                  Name

       The name of the corporation is Emission Control Devices, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 2.     The number of shares outstanding at the time of adoption was
        986,964; and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was the
        same.

 3.     The number of shares represented at the meeting of the shareholders
        was 800,000. All shares voted in favor of the amendment. The shares
        represented a majority of the issued and outstanding shares. There
        were no shares voting against the amendment.


Effective the 22nd day of January 2001


                                 /s/ Justeene Blankenship
                               ------------------------
                                  Justeene Blankenship
                                  President and Secretary
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


 


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


September 27, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 266


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on September 26, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-212803) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
# C_2020287EN.01002901.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 June 2020 — Criminal proceedings against ZX

(Case C-282/20)

(2020/C 287/46)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

ZX

Questions referred

Is a provision of national law, namely Article 248(3) of the Nakazatelno protsesualen kodeks (Bulgarian Code of Criminal Procedure), which does not provide for a procedural rule for the rectification, after completion of the first hearing in criminal proceedings (preliminary hearing), of substantive ambiguities and shortcomings in the bill of indictment which infringe the accused person’s right to be informed of the accusation, compatible with Article 6(3) of Directive 2012/13 (1) and with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

If the answer to that question is in the negative: Would an interpretation of the national provisions governing amendment of the bill of indictment that allows the public prosecution service to rectify those substantive ambiguities and shortcomings in the bill of indictment at the hearing, so as to take proper and effective account of the accused person’s right to be informed of the accusation, be in keeping with the aforesaid provisions and with Article 47 of the Charter, or would it be in keeping with those provisions to refrain from applying national legislation prohibiting the staying of court proceedings and referral of the case back to the public prosecution service with directions to draft a new bill of indictment?

---

(1)  Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1).

---
Case 24-32457-mvl11    Doc 1    Filed 08/16/24    Entered 08/16/24 18:33:15    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 4

Case 24-32457-mvl11    Doc 1    Filed 08/16/24    Entered 08/16/24 18:33:15    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 4

Case 24-32457-mvl11    Doc 1    Filed 08/16/24    Entered 08/16/24 18:33:15    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 4

Case 24-32457-mvl11    Doc 1    Filed 08/16/24    Entered 08/16/24 18:33:15    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 4
NUMBER 13-20-00517-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE V.G.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On December 23, 2020, the 

Court abated this matter and remanded to the trial court for entry of a certification of 

defendant’s right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 25.2(d). On January 14, 2021, the Court 

received findings from the trial court indicating appellant does not have the right to appeal. 

On October 21, 2020, appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in 

cause number 07-CR-3875-F in the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, 

seeking relief from a 2008 conviction for capital murder. On November 12, 2020, the trial 

court denied the relief sought in the application. On November 13, 2020, the Court of 
2

Criminal Appeals received an application for writ of habeas corpus seeking relief in the 

same trial court cause number. On November 30, 2020, appellant filed a notice of appeal 

in this Court wherein he attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial habeas corpus relief.

Jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests 

exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 

11.07, § 5 (Vernon Supp. 2011); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of 

Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 

53 S.W .3d 715, 717–18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Therefore, this Court does not have jurisdiction over this matter.

Accordingly, we reinstate the cause and the appeal is dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

4th day of February, 2021.
# C_2021072EN.01002501.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Oatly v EUIPO (IT’S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS)

(Case T-253/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark IT’S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 72/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Oatly AB (Malmö, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2020 (Case R 2446/2019-5), regarding an application for registration of the word sign IT’S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2020 (Case R 2446/2019-5), regarding an application for registration of the word sign IT’S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS as an EU trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2020 (Case R 2446/2019-5), regarding an application for registration of the word sign IT’S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS as an EU trade mark;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Oatly AB. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Oatly AB.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.

---
Case 3:03-cv-01404-B Document 5 Filed 07/10/03 Page 1 of 5 PageID 25
Case 3:03-cv-01404-B Document 5 Filed 07/10/03 Page 2 of 5 PageID 26
Case 3:03-cv-01404-B Document 5 Filed 07/10/03 Page 3 of 5 PageID 27
Case 3:03-cv-01404-B Document 5 Filed 07/10/03 Page 4 of 5 PageID 28
Case 3:03-cv-01404-B Document 5 Filed 07/10/03 Page 5 of 5 PageID 29
# C_2020054EN.01006101.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/61

---

Action brought on 17 December 2019 – Franz Schröder v EUIPO – RDS Design (MONTANA)

(Case T-855/19)

(2020/C 54/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG (Delbrück-Nordhagen, Germany) (represented by: L. Pechan and N. Fangmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: RDS Design ApS (Allerød, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark MONTANA – International registration designating the European Union No 1 211 278

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2019 in Case R 1006/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity and declare the International trademark registration No. 1 211 278 invalid for the European Union for the contested goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity and declare the International trademark registration No. 1 211 278 invalid for the European Union for the contested goods;

| — | order EUIPO and, if appropriate, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, if appropriate, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---