IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WI CHIT A FALLS DIVISION 

VICTORIA KLEIN and 

ASHLEY SWADLEY, 

Plaintiffs, 

VS. 

O'NEAL, INC., d/b/a O'NEAL, JONES& 

FELDMAN PHARMACEUTICALS, 

CVS CAREMARK, as a Successor to 

CVS REVCO D.S., INC., as a Successor to 

REVCO D.S., INC., and to RETRAC, INC., 

f/k/a Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., 

Defendants, 

vs. 

FEDERAL INSURANCE CO., 

a/k/a CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE 

COMPANIES; 

Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CA 7:03-CV-102-D 

CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF MOTIONS TO APPROVE 

ATTORNEYS' FEES, NON-TAXABLE EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, 

COMPENSATION FOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, 

AND AN AMENDMENT TO PARAGRAPH Vl.(F) 

OF THE E-FEROL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE, 

PURSUANT TO RULES 23(e) and (h) and 54(d)(2), FED. R. CIV. P. 

ATTENTION: 

THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN TO EACH CLASS MEMBER OF THE E-FEROL CLASS ACTION 

OF THE FILING AND HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS IN THEEFEROL CLASS ACTION: (1) MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES 

OF LITIGATION, AND COMPENSATION FOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVES; AND (2) 

MOTION TO AMEND PARAGRAPH VI.(F) OF THE E-FEROL SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT AND RELEASE 

This Notice is given to E-Ferol class members of the conclusion of the litigation to recover the 

insurance proceeds from the three insurance carriers (the non-participating carriers) who refused 

to fund their part of the E-Ferol class settlement as described in the Notice. E-Ferol class counsel 

have pursued these companies as set out in this Notice for over seven (7) years. On March 12, 

2018, the final chapter of this litigation was concluded against Federal Insurance Company 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\ not-classSettlementFEDERAL.1616.121018 EXHIBIT 

A 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 24078
when the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment 

rendered by Judge Fitzwater on December 2, 2016, awarding the entire proceeds of the 

Federal policy to the E-Ferol class. Klein v. Federal insurance Co., 220 F.Supp.3d 747, 

affirmed, 714 Fed. Appx., 441 (51h Cir. 2018). These opinions are on the E-Ferol class action 

website (www.eferolclassaction.com). On October 16, 20 18, Judge Fitzwater ruled that Federal 

owed post-judgment interest and Federal has not appealed that decision and paid all principal and 

interest to the E-Ferol class action trust account. Thus, all litigation to obtain the settlement 

approved by the federal district court in 2010 has concluded. ollowing the hearing on the 

motions described in this notice (and assuming no class member appeals), class counsel will 

proceed as quickly as possible to conclude this final distribution. 

THIS IS THE FINAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS 

IN THE E-FEROL CLASS ACTION 

Your Legal Rights May be Affected by this Notice. 

Please Read It Carefully. 

I. 

THE E-FEROL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 

The E-Ferol class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Texas, Wichita Falls Division, on May 29, 2003. The case was certified as a class on May 11, 

2004. On February l 61h and 171h, 2010, Chief United States District Court Judge, Sidney Fitzwater, 

conducted a fairness hearing, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e) and (h), to determine whether the 

proposed settlement of the E-Ferol class action was fair, reasonable, and adequate to all class 

members. Following two days of testimony, introduction of numerous exhibits, and the argument 

of counsel, and briefing by all parties, Chief Judge Fitzwater issued a Memorandum Opinion, on 

April 9, 2010, finding that the proposed settlement was fair, adequate, and reasonable. The court 

also approved attorneys' fees and expenses. Klein v. O'Neal, 705 F.Supp.2d 632 (N.D. Tex. 2010) 

(Fitzwater, C.J.) ("Klein III"). The court's opinion is located on the E-Ferol class action website, 

www .eferolclassaction.com. 

On June 18, 2010, the district court entered final judgment in this cause, subject to further litigation 

as may be required in connection with three (3) non-participating insurers as described in the 

Settlement Agreement and Release (Pacer doc. no. 306-2). 

Following the entry of judgment, one class member filed a notice of appeal which was resolved 

by settlement with the appealing class member. The district court approved that settlement on 

November 19, 2010 (Pacer doc. no. 475). Following a resolution of Medicare/Medicaid issues, 

the district court directed class counsel to distribute the settlement proceeds from the participating 

insurers, beginning on July 18, 2011 (Pacer doc. no. 523). The distribution of those proceeds was 

completed by January 18, 2013. 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\not·classSettlementFEDERAL.1616.121018 2 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 2 of 9 PageID 24079
II. 

POST SETTLEMENT LITIGATION 

The Non-Participating Insurance Companies 

The initial settlement fund distribution, which began in July 2011 , did not include approximately 

$20 million of the total settlement amount of $110 million settlement which was insured by the 

three non-participating insurance companies who insured Revco D.S., Inc. and Carter-Glogau 

Laboratories, Inc., n/k/a Retrac, Inc., the manufacturer of E-Ferol. At the time E-Ferol was 

marketed Carter-Glogau was a wholly owned subsidiary of drugstore chain Revco D.S., Inc. These 

insurance companies, described in the Settlement Agreement and Release as non-participating 

insurance companies, included Mission Insurance Co., International Insurance Co., n/k/a 

Westchester Fire Insurance Co. and Federal Insurance Co. 

A. 

Mission Insurance Co. 

Mission Insurance Co. had become insolvent and was placed in receivership by the Los Angeles 

Superior Court of the State of California on October 31, 1985. Insurance companies are not 

covered by the federal bankruptcy laws and when they become insolvent, they are taken over and 

placed in receivership in the state in which the insurance company has its home office. The State 

of California oversaw and, thus, administered the Mission receivership through the California 

Commissioner of Insurance, pursuant to California insurance insolvency laws. California 

insurance insolvency laws do not provide for tolling of any of the required deadlines for submitting 

a claim because of minority or any other disability. 

Despite the fact that no E-Ferol recipient had filed a claim within the court-ordered deadline in 

1988, class counsel petitioned the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles who 

oversees the Mission receivership requesting, on equitable grounds, that E-Ferol class members 

be allowed to file their claims, despite not having filed a claim within the deadline at a time when 

E-Ferol recipients were toddlers and their parents unaware of their receipt of E-Ferol. On March 

25, 2013, the Superior Court denied class plaintiffs' petition to be allowed to intervene in the trust 

administered by the Commissioner oflnsurance and consequently, no recovery was obtained from 

Mission. 

B. 

Westchester Fire Insurance Co. 

Following notice to each class member, on September 19, 2014, the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas conducted a second fairness hearing and approved the settlement 

with Westchester Fire Insurance Co., f/kla International Insurance Co. of approximately $2 

million. Class members were awarded the same proportionate share of that settlement fund as 

they received from the initial settlement. 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\ not-classSettlementFEDERAL.1 616.121 018 3 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 3 of 9 PageID 24080
c. 

Federal Insurance Co. 

As the last of the non-participating insurance carriers, Federal Insurance Co.'s excess liability 

policy insured Revco D.S., Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., 

the manufacturer of E-Ferol. In an agreement, known as the Non-Waiver Agreement, Federal 

placed its $15 million policy limit in escrow subject to a decision by the federal district court on 

whether the Federal policy covered the liability of Revco and its subsidiary for injuries and death 

due to E-Ferol. In 2016, both Federal and class plaintiffs filed motions for summary judgment 

both claiming that the coverage dispute could be resolved as a matter of law without the necessity 

of a determination of fact issues by a jury. On September 9, 2016, Judge Sidney A Fitzwater, of 

the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, who has presided over the class 

action for almost 15 years, heard oral argument on both motions for summary judgment. On 

December 2, 2016, Judge Fitzwater issued his Memorandum Opinion, Order and Judgment 

granting class plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the question of insurance coverage and 

denying Federal's motion for summary judgment. Federal promptly appealed. Klein v. Federal 

Insurance Co., 220 F.Supp.3d 747 (N.D. Tex. 2010) (Fitzwater, J.). 

On March 7, 2018, lead class counsel, Art Brender, presented oral argument on behalf of the EFerol class before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, Louisiana. On 

March 12, 2018, the Court of Appeals affirmed Judge Fitzwater' s judgment awarding the insurance 

proceeds from the Federal insurance policy to class plaintiffs. Klein v. Federal Insurance Co., 714 

Fed. Appx. 441 (51h Cir. 2018). 

Federal then paid the proceeds of its policy, together with accrued pre-judgment interest to class 

plaintiffs' trust account. Federal, however, refused to pay the post-judgment interest that accrued 

during the fourteen (14) months the case was on appeal. Class counsel then filed a motion to 

compel payment with Judge Fitzwater who issued a judgment on October 18, 2018, awarding the 

class $157,217.00 in post judgment interest. Klein v. Federal Insurance Co., 2018 WL 5084888 

(N.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2018) (FitZwater, S.J.). Federal advised class counsel on November 2, 2018 

that it would not appeal. The post-judgment interest was also placed into the E-Ferol class action 

trust account. Thus, the total recovery from Federal is the sum of $15,204,876.45. 

III. 

WHAT THE JUDGMENT WILL MEAN FOR YOU 

This litigation completes the litigation against the non-participating insurance companies and 

thus, this notice is for the final distribution of funds in the E-Ferol class action. Each E-Ferol 

class member will receive the same percentage of the funds according to the category to 

which each class member was previously assigned and approved by the district court in 2010, 

less the proportionate share of attorney's fees, litigation and distribution expenses, and 

compensation to class representatives. 1 

1 Proceeds are distributed to each E-Ferol recipient within each category as in the previous distribution. Surviving 

heirs will receive that portion of the settlement amount allocated to a deceased recipient as required in the Settlement 

Agreement and Release, and pursuant to the order of the probate court with authority over the deceased's estate. 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\not-classSettlementFEDERAL. 1616.1 21 01 8 4 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 4 of 9 PageID 24081
IV. 

ATTORNEYS' FEES REQUEST 

1. The judgment and accrued interest are subject to an award of attorneys' fees, litigation and 

distribution expenses (non-taxable costs), and compensation to class representatives to be 

determined by U.S. District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater at the Hearing on the date and time 

set out in paragraph VIII. of this notice. The E-Ferol Class claims are based on common 

law causes of action, i.e., negligence; negligent misrepresentation; and product liability. 

There is no fee shifting statute involved in this judgment. 

2. Class counsel base their claim for attorneys' fees on the creation of a common benefit fund. 

See, Trustee v. Greenough, 105 U.S. 527, (1882); Sprague v. Ticonic Nat 'l Bank, 307 U.S. 

161 (1939); Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc y, 421 U.S. 240, 258-59, 95 S.Ct. 

1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Boeing Co. v. Van Gernert, 444 U.S. 472, 478, 100 S.Ct. 

745, 62 L.Ed.2d 676 (1980); Union Asset Mgmnt. Holding, A.G. v. Dell, Inc., 669 F.3d 

632, 642-46 (51h Cir. 2012) (citing, with approval, Judge Fitzwater's opinion on attorneys' 

fees, in Klein v. 0 'Neal, Inc. ("Klein Ill"), supra, p. 643, fn. 30. 

3. Class counsel did not receive a fee or other compensation from the original settlement for 

any recovery from these three non-participating insurance companies, including Federal. 

See, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 220 F.Supp.3d at 771. Consequently, class counsel 

are requesting an attorneys' fee in the same percentage, thirty percent (30%), as determined 

by the court to be fair, reasonable, and necessary in the initial settlement and in the 

settlement with Westchester. 

4. Class counsel will request of an attorney's fee of $2,052,658.32 to lead class counsel, Art 

Brender; $1,824,585.18 to class counsel, Dwain Dent, and $684,2 19.44 to class counsel, 

Fred Streck. In addition, lead class counsel, Art Brender, will request a litigation expense 

reimbursement of$98,807.35; class counsel, Dwain Dent, $125,339.25; and class counsel, 

Fred Streck, $6,485.52. The litigation expenses represent the costs of administering the 

settlement fund, including costs and expenses of travel, postage, and express charges, 

employee time, and other expenses incurred in litigation with the non-participating 

insurance carriers. All documents relevant to this fee request, including Class Plaintiffs' 

Motion Pursuant to Rules 23(h) and 54(d)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P., for Award of Attorneys' 

Fees, Expenses of Litigation, and Compensation for Class Representatives, will be filed 

with the U.S. District Court Clerk, 1000 Lamar St., Room 203, Wichita Falls, Texas 76301, 

and will also be posted on the E-Ferol Class Action website www.eferolclassaction.com 

and on the Pacer system. 

5. Class counsel have also requested compensation of $35,000.00 each for class 

representatives, Victoria Klein and Ashley Swadley, for their efforts on behalf of the class 

during the years following the initial recovery and in connection with the decisions made 

on behalf of the class in the Federal litigation. 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\not·classSettlementFEDERAL. 1616. 12 1018 5 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 5 of 9 PageID 24082
6. Class counsel have requested an additional $200,000.00 be added to the administrative 

fund to be used in administering this judgment and providing a final report to the district 

court. 

7. The administration expense will be used to pay for expenses of the E-Ferol class action 

trust account with Cadence Bank, travel, postage, express charges, employee time and 

other expenses necessary to the distribution of the settlement fund. The administrative 

fund will also be used, if necessary, to advance legal fees to local attorneys where class 

members have probate and trust matters necessary to the distribution of the settlement fund 

and are financially unable to pay the costs prior to distribution. All such advances will be 

reimbursed by the class member to the administrative fund when the distribution is made 

to the class member. At the conclusion of all litigation and after the approval of all 

expenditures from the administrative fund by the district court, any remaining funds will 

be distributed pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release and any amendments 

thereto, approved by the district court. Class representatives are requesting that any funds 

that are not able to be distributed to a class member following reasonable efforts to locate 

the class member be distributed to a charity who sponsors medical research or provides 

other services to premature infants. This is subject to the approval of Judge Fitzwater. 

8. Class counsel's request for reasonable attorney's fee and litigation expenses incurred in 

pursuit of the litigation on behalf of the E-Ferol Class, is consistent with the Manual for 

Complex Litigation§§ 21.7 and 14.12 (41h ed. 2009). 

9. There has been no discussion or any agreement between plaintiffs' class counsel and 

defendants' counsel concerning attorneys' fees. The only provision with regard to 

attorneys' fees is that the funds to be distributed from the escrow account includes any and 

all attorneys' fees and expenses, including court costs. 

10. The request for attorneys' fee is subject to approval by the District Court. Any class 

member may object to any portion of the proposed motion for award of attorneys' fees and 

costs and compensation of class representatives. 

11. Class counsel have agreed upon a distribution of attorneys' fees among counsel as follows: 

Lead Counsel - Art Brender 45% 

Class Counsel - Dwain Dent 40% 

Class Counsel - Fred L. Streck, III 15% 

v. 

AMENDMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE, 

PARAGRAPH Vl.(F) "DISBURSEMENT OF UNPAID FUNDS" TO ALLOW CY PRES 

DISTRIBUTION OF UNPAID SETTLEMENT FUNDS 

Under paragraph VI.(F), of the E-Ferol Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release, styled 

"Disbursement of Unpaid Funds," any E-Ferol settlement funds not distributed, including any 

waiver of settlement proceeds by a class member, or any failure by a class member to sign and 

\mg\klein,v. \lit\not-classSettlementFEDERAL. 1 616.121 01 8 6 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 6 of 9 PageID 24083
return the release and/or W-9 form, or any class member unable to be located despite reasonable 

efforts by class counsel are considered to have been waived and those proceeds are to be distributed 

pro rata to the class members who have complied with the terms of the agreement. While the funds 

for the initial distribution were distributed within the eighteen months as set out in the Settlement 

Agreement and Release, the subsequent distribution of the Westchester settlement is continuing to 

take place. Despite diligent efforts by class counsel, a number of class members in the Westchester 

settlement have not completed and returned the required release and W-9 or are unable to be 

located despite considerable effort and expense by class counsel. 

Consequently, class representatives have proposed an amendment to the Settlement Agreement 

and Release, subject to the approval of the district court, that would require that all distributions, 

except those involved in litigation or administrative delays due to probate, special needs trust, or 

some other event which the district court finds should excuse the strict application of this 

requirement, be completed within six (6) months of the earliest distribution made of the remaining 

funds and within ninety (90) days of the first contact with a class member after approval of this 

provision. After the expiration of six ( 6) months, should there be any unclaimed funds remaining, 

class counsel will file a report with the district court, advising the court of the efforts made to 

locate and/or obtain compliance from the class members who have not received their distribution. 

If the district court finds that reasonable efforts to locate these class members have failed; or that 

a class member has waived his or her distribution; or that a class member has failed to cooperate 

with the requirements of the Settlement Agreement and Release, the court will find that the 

distribution to such class member has lapsed and will order any remaining funds not used for 

administrative expenses necessary in completing the settlement, be donated to a charity selected 

by the district court that is compliant with Internal Revenue Code 50l(c)(3) and whose charitable 

efforts are consistent with the underlying litigation, such as funding medical research in the area 

of disorders of premature infants. The district court will consider this motion at the hearing set 

out in paragraph VIII. 

VI. 

AGREEMENT WITH MOTIONS 

IF YOU AGREE WITH THE MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES, 

EXPENSES, AND COMPENSATION TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, AND WITH 

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND 

RELEASE THEN: 

YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION WHATSOEVER 

You will received your settlement proceeds as promptly as possible following the expiration 

of thirty (30) days after the district court rules upon these motions.2 

2 Assuming there are no appeals to the court's ruling. 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\not-classSettlementFEDERAL.1616.121018 7 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 7 of 9 PageID 24084
VII. 

OBJECTION TO MOTION(S) 

If you object to the motion for award for attorneys' fees, expenses, and compensation to class 

representatives, and/or the amendment of the Settlement Agreement and Release, you must submit 

your objection in writing and your objection must be received by the clerk of the court at the 

address below no later than February 19 , 2019, at 5:00 p.m. CST. You must address your 

objection to the Clerk of this Court, U.S. Courthouse, 1000 Lamar St., Room 203, Wichita Falls, 

Texas 76301 and send a copy of your objection to lead counsel for the E-Ferol class, Art Brender, 

the Brender Law firm, 600 81h Ave., Fort Worth, Texas 76104; and to lead counsel for the 

defendants, Dawn S. Walker, of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, & Feld, LLP, 112 E. Pecan Street, 

Suite 1010, San Antonio, Texas 78205-1512. 

If you object to either or both motions and you wish to appear in person to argue your objection(s) 

or have an attorney appear on your behalf, either you or your attorney must, at least ten (10) days 

before the above deadline, submit a written notice of your intention to appear in person to the clerk 

of this court at the above address with a copy of your notice served on lead class counsel and lead 

defense counsel. Any oral presentation at the hearing will be limited to the issues raised and timely 

submitted in writing as set out above. 

By not objecting to either motion, you will waive any right to object and to appeal from approval 

of attorneys' fees, expenses, and compensation to class representatives, and amendment of the 

Settlement Agreement and Release or to challenge any other matter related in any way to the 

attorneys' fees, expenses, and compensation to class representatives, and amendment of the 

Settlement Agreement and Release. 

VIII. 

QUESTIONS 

DO NOT CONT ACT THE COURT OR COURT CLERK with questions about these 

motions. 

Any class member who has a question concerning the motion for award of attorneys' fees, 

expenses, and compensation to class representatives, and/or amendment of the Settlement 

Agreement and Release should contact class counsel listed below, by telephone, e-mail, or 

facsimile. 

Lead Class Counsel 

E-FEROL CLASS COUNSEL 

Art Brender 

State Bar No. 02954500 

The Brender Law Firm 

600 Eighth Ave. 

Fort Worth, Texas 7 6104 

(81 7) 334-0171, telephone 

(817) 334-0274, telecopier 

\mg\ klein,v.\lit\ not-classSettlementFEDERAL.1616.121018 8 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 8 of 9 PageID 24085
Class Counsel 

e-mai 1: mainoffice@brenderlawfirm.com 

Dwain Dent 

State Bar No. 05760500 

The Dent Law Firm 

1120 Penn Street 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

(817) 332-2889, telephone 

(817) 332-5809, telecopier 

(1-800) 245-3368, toll free 

e-mail: thedentlawfirm@cs.com 

Fred L. Streck, III 

State Bar No. 19374350 

STRECK & DA VIS LAW 

555 S. Summit Ave. 

Fort Worth, Texas 76104 

(817) 332-3117, telephone 

(817) 549-8898, telecopier 

e-mail: fred.streck@streckdavislaw.com 

The hearing on any objection to the motion for award of attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, 

and compensation to class representatives, and/or amendment of the Settlement Agreement and 

Release will be held on the~ day of March , 2019, at 2:00 .m., before the Hon. 

Sidney A. Fitzwater, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, U.S. 

Courthouse, 1100 Commerce St., Room 1525, Dallas, Texas. The hearing will be held pursuant 

to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 23(e) and (h) and 54(d), and is for the purpose of 

determining whether the attorneys' fees, expenses, compensation to class representatives, and 

amendment of the Settlement Agreement and Release are fair, reasonable, and adequate to the EF erol class as a whole and whether the request of class counsel for attorneys' fees, and litigation 

expenses is reasonable and necessary. The court will not consider any other matter nor will 

the court reconsider any matter pertaining to the E-Ferol class action. 

IF THE COURT APPROVES THE ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES, 

COMPENSATION TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, AND/OR AMENDMENT OF THE 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE, YOU WILL BE CONTACTED ABOUT 

THE DISBURSEMENT OF SETTLEMENT FUNDS BY CLASS COUNSEL ONCE FINAL 

JUDGMENT HAS BEEN ENTERED. THE JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE FINAL AND 

DISTRIBUTION CANNOT COMMENCE UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE 

DISTRICT COURT HAS ENTERED AN ORDER AND JUDGMENT.3 

Signed on this the~ day of \)e L , 2018. 

S;;;;,~~ 

3 This assumes there is no appeal. 

\mg\klein,v.\lit\not· classSett lementFEDERAL.1616.121018 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the Northern District of Texas 

1000 Lamar St., Room 203 

Wichita Falls, Texas 76301 

9 

Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 864 Filed 12/12/18 Page 9 of 9 PageID 24086