alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DeMarco•Mitchell, PLLC

Robert T. DeMarco

Michael S. Mitchell

1255 West 15th St., 805

Plano, TX 75075

T 972-578-1400

F 972-346-6791

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

IN RE:

Eagle Trucklines, Inc.,

Debtor.

Case No.: 23-42504-ELM-11

Chapter: 11

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY

[11 U.S.C. § 329(a)]

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Rule 2016(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 

Procedure, I certify that I am the attorney for the above named Debtor and that compensation 

paid to me or my law firm within one (1) year before the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be 

paid to me or my firm, for services (“Services”) rendered or to be rendered on behalf of the above 

referenced Debtor in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy cases is as follows:

Prepetition Services: DeMarco Mitchell, PLLC, (“DM”) agreed to accept payment on an hourly 

basis plus costs for prepetition Services relating to the Debtor’s bankruptcy case. DM incurred 

fees in the amount of $2,042.55 and expenses in the amount of $1,738.00 prior to the 

commencement of the case sub judice (“Petition Date”).

Prepetition Retainer: DM received a retainer of $9,238.00 prior to the Petition Date. After 

deducting the total fees and expenses incurred by the Debtor Prepetition, the remainder held in 

trust by DM is $5,458.45.

Postpetition Services: DM has agreed to accept payment on an hourly basis plus costs for 

postpetition services subject to approval by this Court.

Sharing of Compensation: DM has not agreed to share the above disclosed compensation with 

any other person unless they are members or associates of DM.

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or 

arrangement for payment to me or DM for representation of the Debtor in the above referenced 

bankruptcy case.

Case 23-42504-elm11 Doc 14 Filed 08/31/23 Entered 08/31/23 12:10:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
FORM 2016(b) Page 2

Dated: August 31, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert T. DeMarco

DeMarco•Mitchell, PLLC

Robert T. DeMarco, Texas Bar No. 24014543

Email robert@demarcomitchell.com

Michael S. Mitchell, Texas Bar No. 00788065

Email mike@demarcomitchell.com

1255 W. 15th Street, 805

Plano, TX 75075

T 972-578-1400

F 972-346-6791

Proposed Counsel for Debtor and Debtor-inPossession

Case 23-42504-elm11 Doc 14 Filed 08/31/23 Entered 08/31/23 12:10:53 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tata Communications Limited, a
limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of India (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers best knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

Date: October 14, 2011



/s/    Vinod
KumarVinod KumarManaging Director and Group CEO/s/    Sanjay
BawejaSanjay BawejaChief Financial Officer
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 18 Filed 05/15/24 Entered 05/15/24 17:26:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 556 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 556

 To provide for the printing of the Senate Manual for the One Hundred 
                          Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the printing of the Senate Manual for the One Hundred 
                          Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved, That a revised edition of the Senate Manual for the One 
Hundred Eighteenth Congress be prepared by the Committee on Rules and 
Administration and printed as a Senate document, and that 1,500 
additional copies shall be printed and bound for the use of the Senate, 
bound and delivered as may be directed by the Committee on Rules and 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4

AMENDMENT TO THE 

ASHLAND INC. EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN 

WHEREAS, Ashland Inc. (the “Corporation”) established the Ashland Inc. Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”)
originally effective as of June 1, 1964 for the benefit of employees eligible to participate therein; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
Article 20 of the Plan, the Corporation, as sponsor of the Plan, has retained the authority to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; and 

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act for federal tax law purposes;
consequently, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19 detailing the rules for identifying same-sex spouses in a qualified retirement plan (collectively, the “Guidance”); and 

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to conform to the Guidance; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended
retroactively to be effective as of June 26, 2013 as follows: 
 I. The following definition of Spouse shall be added to Section 2.1 of the Plan: 

“Spouse” shall mean the spouse of a Member determined by Federal law applicable to Code §401(a) as announced in
Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19; provided that to the extent required by a qualified domestic relations order pursuant to the terms of this Plan, a former Spouse of the Member shall be treated as the Spouse of the Member. 

 

	II.	The term “spouse” wherever found in the Plan shall be amended to be a capitalized word and carry with it the definition of Spouse as provided herein. 


 

	III.	In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged. 








 [signature page immediately follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed
this 26 day of Sept., 2014. 
  

									
	ATTEST:	 		 	ASHLAND INC.
				
	/s/ Peter J. Ganz	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Robin Swanson
	Secretary	 		 		 	Director, Global HR Opns. & Benefits


  
 -2-
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10994

Summary Calendar

 

MORGAN S. GILMER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JACQUES I. KIERE, ET AL.,

Defendants,

JACQUES I. KIERE; JOHN DOE,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CV-2710-G

- - - - - - - - - -

May 1, 1997

Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Morgan S. Gilmer, Texas prisoner # 666666, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights action against Jacques I. Kiere,

the Sheriff of Rockwall County, and John Doe, the jail captain

responsible for the health and safety of the prisoners, pursuant
No. 96-10994

- 2 -

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We liberally construe Gilmer’s pro

se brief as arguing that the district court erred in dismissing

the case for failure to state an Eighth Amendment violation,

requiring Gilmer to meet the heightened pleading requirements in

responding to the defendants’ assertion of qualified immunity,

denying his motion to amend his complaint, and denying leave to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal on grounds of frivolousness. 

We have reviewed Gilmer’s brief and the record and conclude that

the judgment of the district court should be AFFIRMED. Gilmer v.

Kiere, No. 3:94-CV-2710-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 725 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 725

   Affirming the legal status of contraception following the Supreme 
 Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 
                            U.S. 215 (2022).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Daines, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
Marshall, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Budd, and Mr. Rounds) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Affirming the legal status of contraception following the Supreme 
 Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 
                            U.S. 215 (2022).

Whereas, in 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs 
        v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), overturning 
        the Court's prior decisions in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and 
        Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992);
Whereas, in issuing Dobbs, the Supreme Court invalidated any Federal judicial 
        precedent suggesting that the Constitution of the United States 
        guarantees the right of a woman to abort her unborn child;
Whereas the Supreme Court, ``to ensure that [its] decision [was] not 
        misunderstood or mischaracterized,'' explicitly emphasized that the 
        Dobbs decision ``concern[ed] the constitutional right to abortion and no 
        other right'' and that ``nothing in [its] opinion should be understood 
        to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion'';
Whereas the sole effect of the decision in Dobbs was to return ``the authority 
        to regulate abortion . . . to the people and their elected 
        representatives'';
Whereas some, for political advantage and with the aim of sowing confusion and 
        fear, have suggested that the Court's decision in Dobbs restricts the 
        ability or legal right of women to access contraception in the several 
        States; and
Whereas Congress has the authority, under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution 
        of the United States, ``to enforce, by appropriate legislation,'' the 
        rights belonging to the People of the United States, as guaranteed by 
        the Constitution of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) construes the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. 
        Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), as 
        having no effect on the legal right of a woman to access 
        contraception; and
            (2) interprets Dobbs to in no way require the various 
        agencies of the Federal Government to alter rules, regulations, 
        or policies governing access to contraception.
                                 <all>
```
CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED
                 BASED ON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

                  OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED
                  WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

04/01/01

                             Memorandum of Agreement
                International Telecommunications Services between
                            Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
                                       And
                     CONCERT GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED

                     Accounting Rate and Division of Revenue



This  memorandum  dated April 1, 2001  represents  an agreement  between  Videsh
Sanchar  Nigam  Ltd.  (VSNL)  and  Concert  Global  Network   Services   Limited
("Concert") to apply the following Total  Accounting Rate for Telephone  Service
between VSNL in India and Concert in the United States,  which includes  Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands.

EFFECTIVE DATE         ACCOUNTING RATE        CARRIER               CONCERT
---------------       ----------------     ----------------     ----------------
April 1, 2001-
March 31, 2002        $[text redacted]     $[text redacted]     $[text redacted]

The  accounting  rate shall be applied  to each  conversation  minute of use and
shall be shared equally. Minutes of traffic upon which settlements are paid will
be measured using accumulated seconds.

The  concurrence  below evidences the intent of the regional  representative  of
Concert to present this  agreement  for approval by  Concert's  duly  authorized
representative.

This agreement  shall become binding only upon execution by the duly  authorized
representatives  of Concert and VSNL,  and, where  applicable,  upon  submission
and/or acceptance of the agreement by regulatory authorities.


Concurred on behalf of Concert:              Approved on behalf VSNL

/S/ JOY DALLEY                               /S/ S.S. BODH
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Name:    Joy Dalley                          Name:    S. S. Bodh
Title:   Regional Route Management           Title:   General Manager
Date:    APRIL 1, 2001                       Date:    19/4/2001
         --------------------------                   --------------------------

Approved on behalf of Concert:

/S/ MICHAEL KARL FOR
---------------------------------------
Name:    Thomas Luciano
Title:   Vice President, Traffic and Route Management-ICS
Date:    1 JUNE 2001
         -------------------------------------------------
Ronald BAKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-5056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
EXHIBIT  32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Xtreme  Companies,  Inc.,  a  Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Annual  Report  for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") of
the  Company  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.



Date:  April  14,  2006



/s/  Kevin  Ryan
----------------------
Kevin  Ryan
President
Chief  Executive  Officer
Director



Date:  April  14,  2006


/s/  Laurie  A.  Phillips
------------------------
Laurie  A.  Phillips
Chief  Financial  Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00691-CR

Eddie Lynn Tackett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY 

NO. D-16-0544-SB, THE HONORABLE BRAD GOODWIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due December 18, 2017. On counsel’s 

motions, the time for filing was extended to March 19, 2018. Appellant’s counsel has now filed 

a third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant in 

part the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than April 17, 

2018. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will 

result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on March 30, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Do Not Publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Feasibility Trials of the 
NIH Music-based Interventions Toolkit for Brain Disorders of Aging 
(R34 Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: February 14, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Center for Complementary and Integrative 
Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Baila S. Hall, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, 
NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 443-9285, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31209 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
A.B., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1426

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 8.1

MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES

Our operations are conducted principally by Ambev,
and, in the case of our HILA-Ex, Latin America South and Canadian operations, by direct and indirect subsidiaries of Ambev. The following is a list of the significant companies that Ambev controlled, either directly or indirectly, as of
December 31, 2012:



| |  |  | Ambev owns 100%, directly and indirectly of Ambev Luxemburgo (incorporated in Luxemburg) which owns 100% of Labatt Brewing Co. Ltd. (incorporated in
Canada). These entities explore the production of beer in Canada.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ambev owns 100% of economic and voting interest in Quilmes International (Bermuda) Ltd., which, through its subsidiaries, produces and sells beer and
soft drinks in Argentina and other South American countries.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Arosuco Aromas e Sucos Ltda. (incorporated in Brazil) produces concentrates for our soft drinks and crowns. Ambev controls 100% of the voting and total
equity of this entity.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Eagle Distribuidora de Bebidas S.A. (incorporated in Brazil). Ambev controls 100% of the voting and total equity of this entity.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Jalua Spain S.L (incorporated in Spain). Ambev controls 100% of the voting and total equity of this entity.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Monthiers S.A. (incorporated in Uruguay). Ambev controls 100% of the voting and total equity of this entity.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ambev Brasil Bebidas S.A. (incorporated in Brazil) produces and sells beer and soft drinks in Brazil. Ambev controls 100% of the voting and total
equity of this entity.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | CRBS S.A (incorporated in Brazil) produces and sells beer and soft drinks in Brazil. Ambev controls 100% of the voting and total equity of this entity.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tobias MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 40 Filed 07/16/02 Page 1 of 3 PageID 167
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 40 Filed 07/16/02 Page 2 of 3 PageID 168
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 40 Filed 07/16/02 Page 3 of 3 PageID 169