alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Wayne Badovinus, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Design Within Reach, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 4, 2004 |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ WAYNE BADOVINUS    
|                     |  | Wayne Badovinus        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
# C_2023235EN.01002802.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — GGEW v Commission

(Case T-319/20) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity market - Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Standing to bring proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Concept of a ‘single concentration’ - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to be heard - Definition of the market - Period of analysis - Analysis of market power - Decisive influence - Manifest errors of assessment - Duty of diligence)

(2023/C 235/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG (Bensheim, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by T. Funke and A. Dlouhy, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 — RWE/E.ON Assets) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG.

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 10.2


Director Fee Arrangements for Fiscal 2016


Each director of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") also is a director of Southern Bank (the "Bank"). For Fiscal 2016, each director receives a monthly fee of $900 for serving on the Company's Board of Directors and $1,100 for serving on the Bank's Board of Directors.  Certain directors serve on the regional loan committee and receive a monthly fee of $1,000 for their service.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Parks! America, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Dated: November 9, 2010   /s/ Tristan R. Pico Tristan R. Pico Chief Executive Officer Parks! America, Inc.    /s/ Jon Laria Jon Laria Chief Financial Officer Parks! America, Inc.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Parks! America, Inc. and will be retained by Parks! America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.6


 





GRANDPARENTS.COM, INC.


 


September 15, 2016


 


Lee Lazarus


301 East 79 Street


New York, NY 10075


 





	Re:	Executive Employment Agreement dated December 9, 2013 (the “Agreement”) between Grandparents.com, Inc. and you







 


Dear Lee:


 


This will serve as an amendment to the
Agreement. Any capitalized term used in this letter which is not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to it
in the Agreement. This letter amends the terms of the Agreement and your employment thereunder as follows:


 


1.                 
Term. The term of your employment shall be modified to end on August 31, 2019. Any subsequent renewals shall be subject
to the mutual agreement of the Company and the Executive.


 


2.                 
Merger or Sale. Section 5.D of the Agreement is hereby terminated and no payment is or shall be due from the Company
thereunder.


 


3.                 
Severance. If the severance payment for one year's salary becomes due under clause (ii) of Section 5.F of the Agreement,
such payment shall be payable in 12 equal monthly installments in accordance with the Company's regular payroll practices following
the date of termination. Additionally, clause (vi) of Section 5.F of the Agreement is hereby terminated.


 


4.                 
Ratification. Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Please indicate your acceptance of the
terms of this letter amendment to the Agreement by signing where indicated below and returning a copy to me.


  


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	GRANDPARENTS.COM, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Steve Leber
	 	 	Steve Leber, Chief Executive Officer


  


Accepted and Agreed


 


/s/ Lee Lazarus


Lee Lazarus
Ashley Joeline MCCORD v. STATE

CR-16-1271

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2021009EN.01002101.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/21

---

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Tratkowski v Commission

(Case T-14/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) - Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations - Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority - Eligibility conditions - Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application - Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time - Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition - Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 9/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Michal Tratkowski (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Wardyn, Radca Prawny)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 14 March 2019 by which the Appointing Authority of that institution rejected the applicant’s request to be admitted to Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) on the ground that he did not fulfil the condition, laid down in the relevant notice of competition, relating to him holding grade AD 10.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Michal Tratkowski shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Michal Tratkowski shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
Case 3:03-cr-00270-N Document 191 Filed 10/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 498
# C_2020433EN.01005002.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/50

---

Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Sharpston v Council and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States

(Case T-180/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 433/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eleanor Sharpston (Schoenfels, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Forwood and J. Robb, Barristers, and H. Mercer QC)

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and A. Sikora-Kalėda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFUE seeking partial annulment of the Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, of 29 January 2020.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT CARVER,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00299-CR

Appeal from the

362nd District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# F-2010-1716-D)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to represent himself on appeal. 

Appellant’s appointed counsel has previously filed a brief in this case and he has not filed a motion 

to withdraw. In order to determine whether Appellant is entitled to the relief requested in the 

motion, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court in order for the court to conduct 

a hearing in compliance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541, 45 

L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987). The trial 

court is directed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law related to the following:

1
1. whether Appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether Appellant’s request to remove appointed counsel and represent himself on 

appeal is an attempt to obstruct court procedure or interfere with the administration of 

justice;

3. whether Appellant is aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation on 

appeal;

4. whether Appellant is aware that if he persists in his desire for self-representation, the 

brief previously filed by appointed counsel will be stricken and will not be considered 

by the Court of Appeals for any purpose; and

5. whether Appellant’s decision to represent himself on appeal is competently and 

intelligently made.

A transcription of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s 

findings and orders must be certified and filed in this Court by July 8, 2013.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that deadline for these appeals are suspended pending further 

order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ. 

2
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 906 of


the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Stephen K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





June 24,
2010





/s/
      Stephen K. GardnerStephen
      K. GardnerChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: February 14, 2005 |   | By:  | /s/ Brian King                    |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------|
|                     |   |      |                                   |
|                     |   |      | Brian KingChief Executive Officer |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

27

----
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 67 Filed 02/19/04 Page 1 of 2 PageID 367
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 67 Filed 02/19/04 Page 2 of 2 PageID 368
# C_2021098EN.01000201.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/2

---

Appeal brought on 10 November 2020 by Ms Anne-Marie Klose against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-81/20, Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-600/20 P)

(2021/C 98/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Anne-Marie Klose (represented by: I. Seher, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 11 February 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided not to allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear her own costs.

---
MARSHALL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. J.V.

2160761

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020247EN.01000303.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/3

---

Appeal brought on 12 February 2020 by Hästens Sängar AB against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 December 2019 in Case T-658/18, Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Representation of a chequered gingham pattern)

(Case C-74/20 P)

(2020/C 247/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Hästens Sängar AB (represented by: M. Johansson, advokat, R. Wessman, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 28 May 2020 the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and that Hästens Sängar AB shall bear its own costs.

---
Kevin WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to **

**Section      1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code**

|         |                                                  |                                        |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|    |                                             |                                   |
|         |                                                  | /s/ Graham                  Millington |
|         | Graham                  Millington, President and CEO |
|         |                                                  |

|         |                                           |                                        |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|    |                                      |                                   |
|         |                                           | /s/ Gregory                  N. Heller |
|         | Gregory                  N. Heller, VP and CFO |
|         |                                           |

----
Viola GIGER, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D18-685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 13, 2019]

Viola Giger, Hollywood, pro se.

Alan M. Pierce of Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . *See**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee* , 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

Warner, Damoorgian and Levine, JJ., concur.
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE





This Convertible Debenture Agreement is made and effective the 29th day of August, 2003 between Imperial Consolidated Capital (the "Company") and W.L. McCullagh (the "Lender").



Whereas the Company desires to borrow money from the Lender upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Convertible Debenture Agreement;



This Agreement Witnesses that in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:



1)

The Lender agrees to advance tot he Company the principal sum of USD$12,500 ("Principal").

2)

The term of the loan is one year following the date of this Agreement set forth above.

3)

The Company agrees and promises to pay to the Lender the Principal, with interest thereon of ten percent (10%) per annum calculated annually, on or before the end of the term hereof and thereafter, on demand.

4)

The Company may pay the principal, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the end of the term without penalty.

5)

The Lender shall have the right to convert all or any portion of the Principal and interest earned thereon to common stock in the Company at a value of USD$0.10 per share, at any time prior to repayment of the loan, by providing the Company with written notice of conversion and an executed Subscription Agreement.  Upon receipt of notice and the Subscription Agreement, the Company shall forthwith issue to the Lender sufficient common shares to pay the amount that is subject to conversion.

6)

Notice of demand and presentment for payment are hereby waived.



Executed at Vancouver, British Columbia.







Imperial Consolidated Capital

Lender





Per:

/s/ "Kerry McCullagh"

/s/ "W.L. McCullagh"

Kerry McCullagh

W.L. McCullagh

4514 - 248 Street

Aldergrove, B.C.

Canada, V4W 1B6