alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing owner ofCampbell Alternative Asset Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:  /s/ Bruce L. Cleland   Bruce L. Cleland   Chief Executive Officer   March 30, 2007  
E 2
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00335 -CV In re Car roll Gle nn S cott ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM BE L L C OU N T Y M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The motion for lea

ve to file pe tition for writ of m andamus is dismiss ed. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and He nson Filed: June 29, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3



               CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED
                  BASED ON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

                   OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED
                   WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


                             MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                   VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED (VSNL / INDIA)
                                       AND
               BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE LIMITED (UK - BT)

1.   This memorandum between VSNL and UK-BT represents an agreement by VSNL and
     UK-BT to apply the following accounting rates and settlement method as
     specified below in paragraph 2 for settlement of International Telephone
     service between India and United Kingdom.

2.   Total Accounting rates and the settlement of International Telephone
     service are agreed for the period beyond April 1, 2002 as follows:

2.1  PERIOD OF APPLICATION      ACCOUNTING RATES ON SENDER PAYS TRANSIT BASIS
     01-04-2002 ONWARDS         SDR [TEXT REDACTED]  P.M. SENDER PAYS TRANSIT

2.2  ACCOUNTING/SETTLEMENT PERIOD             MONTHLY BASIS

3.   The application period's accounting rates shall be applied to each
     conversation minute of International switch service (subscriber-dialed ,
     operator-handled).

4.   This agreement supersedes all prior agreements on the subject as indicated
     above between VSNL and BT (UK). This agreement shall become binding upon
     execution by the duly authorized representative of BT (UK) and VSNL and
     where applicable upon submission and /or acceptance of the agreement by
     regulatory authorities.

5.   TAR to be reviewed in Sept. 2002.


<TABLE>
<S>                                                  <C>
Signed for and on Behalf of                          Signed for and on Behalf of
VSNL / India                                         BT Telecom (UK)



/s/ K.P. Tiwari                                      /s/ Peter Nott
---------------------------                          ---------------------------
</TABLE>

                                       1

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>                                                  <C>
K.P.Tiwari                                           Mr. Peter Nott
Executive Director (OPS)                             Managing Director
VSNL, INDIA                                          BT Global carrier services
Date: 20/5/2002                                      United Kingdom
</TABLE>

                                       2
# C_2021009EN.01002002.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/20

---

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Valiante v Commission

(Case T-13/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil Service - Officials - Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10) - Submission of the application by means of the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations - Separate application to be admitted to the competition submitted at the same time to the appointing authority - Eligibility criteria - Selection board’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application - Appointing authority’s decision refusing the applicant’s request to disregard one of the conditions set out in the competition notice in order to admit him to the competition - Challenge to the appointing authority’s decision not that of the selection board - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 9/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Diego Valiante (Antwerp-Berchem, Belgium) (represented by: R. Wardyn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 14 March 2019 by which that institution’s appointing authority rejected the applicant’s application to be admitted to the internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10), on the ground that he did not fulfil the condition set out in the related competition notice concerning the holding of grade AD 8.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Diego Valiante shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Diego Valiante shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

              Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated May 24, 2004.

                                                         /s/ Patrick Herda
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         Patrick Herda
EXHIBIT 15.1





REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





To the Board of Directors and


Stockholders of Ribapharm Inc:





We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of Ribapharm Inc. as of June 30, 2002 and the related condensed statements of income for each of the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and the condensed statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.





We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of
interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.





Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed interim financial statements for them to
be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





We previously audited in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, and the related statements of income, of stockholders equity and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein),
and in our report dated March 8, 2002, except for Note 1 as it relates to the recapitalization, as to which the date is April 10, 2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.





/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Los Angeles,
California


August 7, 2002
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 2 of 12 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 3 of 12 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 4 of 12 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 5 of 12 PageID 5
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 6 of 12 PageID 6
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 7 of 12 PageID 7
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 8 of 12 PageID 8
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 9 of 12 PageID 9
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 10 of 12 PageID 10
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 11 of 12 PageID 11
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 1 Filed 04/14/03 Page 12 of 12 PageID 12
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: 

JUDGE MARK X MULLIN

CHAPTER 13

CASE NUMBER: 23-42283-MXM

SHERRY LYNN FRANCIS

DEBTOR

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER APPROVING TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING CLAIMS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION the Trustee's Recommendation Concerning Claims ("TRCC") filed on or about 

February 02, 2024 [Docket #43]. 

The Court finds that notice was and is appropriate under the circumstances.

No Response or Objection was filed by any Party.

The Court hereby APPROVES the TRCC with the following changes, if any:

NONE

# # # END OF ORDER # # #

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Signed March 20, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

____________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 23-42283-mxm13 Doc 46 Filed 03/20/24 Entered 03/20/24 12:34:01 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
---

---

*       *       *       *       *





EXHIBIT
      32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Centale, Inc. (the
“Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
      or
      78o(d)); and




2.           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










November
                13, 2007
            /s/
                Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr.Thaddeus
                A. Wier, Jr. (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer)



























































---
Harry Martin WALSH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4097

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
# C_2021242EN.01004302.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair I; Covid-19)

(Case T-388/20) (1)

(State aid - Finnish air transport market - Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - State guarantee on a loan - Decision not to raise any objections - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State - Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition - Equal treatment - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Duty to state reasons)

(2021/C 242/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent), French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier and P. Dodeller, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by: H. Leppo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 3387 final of 18 May 2020 on State Aid SA.56809 (2020/N) — Finland — COVID-19: State loan guarantee for Finnair.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
Charles R. JONES v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS

NO. 2018-C-1744

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

PER CURIAM

Granted. Under the specific facts presented, we find that relator, insofar as he was statutorily mandated to serve on a state board in his ex officio capacity as a sitting judge, is not subject to the Code of Ethics. *See* La. R.S. 42:1167 ("[a]ll judges, as defined by the Code of Judicial Conduct, shall be governed exclusively by the provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct..."). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

WEIMER, J., would grant for additional briefing and docket for oral argument.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.
No. 07-16-00136-CV

Joe B. Neuhoff and Nancy M. 

Neuhoff; Thomas H. Neuhoff and Judy 

A. Neuhoff; Robert V. Neuhoff and 

Andrea D. Neuhoff; and Boca Vail, 

Inc.

 Appellants

v.

Piranha Partners, Randolph Mundt, 

and Thomas H. Owen, Jr., Individually 

and as partners of Piranha Partners, 

and Charles Ray Owen

 Appellees

§

§

§

§

From the 31st District Court 

 of Wheeler County

September 20, 2016

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 20, 2016, it is ordered, 

adjudged and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the 31st 

District Court of Wheeler County, Texas, for further proceedings in accordance with this 

Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O o
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lee Wiskowski, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, I ,
Douglas Stukel, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company and, I, Derry L.
Behm, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 15, 2004

                                      /s/ Lee Wiskowski
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Lee Wiskowski, Co-Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Douglas Stukel
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Douglas Stukel, Co-Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Derry L.Behm
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Derry L. Behm, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guosheng Fu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 14, 2011





/s/ Guosheng FuGuosheng Fu, Principal Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - documents_file-149220(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

              - california(2)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Partner Collaborations Advance Hazard Understanding

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Real-time Techniques Help to Monitor Hazards

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Boots-on-Ground Evaluations
Howard Lee HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2190

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.