alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

 
     Section 2. Miscellaneous.     (a) All of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement are incorporated herein by referencewith the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. Except as expressly amended hereby,the Loan Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.     (b) This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with thelaws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of law.     (c) Borrower hereby (1) unconditionally ratifies and confirms, renews and reaffirms all of itsobligations under the Loan Agreement and all of the terms, covenants and conditions thereunder(except for conditions precedent and any representations or warranties made as of a specific date),(2) acknowledges and agrees that such obligations remain in full force and effect, binding on andenforceable against it in accordance with the terms, covenants and conditions of the LoanAgreement, without impairment and (3) represents, warrants and covenants that it is not in defaultunder the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents beyond any applicable notice and cureperiods, and there are no defenses, offsets or counterclaims against the Indebtedness.[Signatures Appear on Following Page]
2

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged and agreed, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of thedate first hereinabove set forth.           **BORROWER****:**             W2007 ACEP FIRST MEZZANINE A BORROWER,L.P., a Delaware limited partnership             By: W2007 ACEP First Mezzanine A Gen-Par,
SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ALPS SOUTH, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3005

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied. Denied.
© 2022 Fannie Mae. Trademarks of Fannie Mae. 1 of 2

Refinance Application-Level Index (RALI) Dictionary 

Refinance Application-Level Index Dataset 

Fannie Mae's Refinance Application-Level Index (RALI) is a weekly series that sources data from Fannie Mae’s automated 

underwriting system, Desktop Underwriter® (DU®), to provide the market timely, comprehensive, and ongoing tracking of 

refinance activity and historical trends.

The RALI was created to provide sharper insights around future prepayments to mortgage markets and to improve 

transparency into the overall size of the refinance mortgage market. The index leverages DU loan application data to 

provide market participants with near real-time insights into the direction and scope of market refinance and prepayment 

activity. Utilizing DU’s broad market footprint, the RALI provides contemporary and historical views of refinance application 

activity. This additional transparency into market-wide, real-time refinance and prepayment trends can support more 

accurate tracking, modeling, and planning by mortgage market participants.
© 2022 Fannie Mae. Trademarks of Fannie Mae. 2 of 2

Appendix 

Refinance Application-Level Index

Field

Position

Field Name Description Type Max 

Length

Format

1 WK_Ending Ending date for the weekly period (Saturday –

Friday) that encapsulates loan volumes and count

Date 10 MM-DD-YYYY

2 WK_RALI_$ Indexed value representing the Unpaid Principal 

Balance of refinanced casefiles observed in the 

week

Integer 4 100 – 9999

3 WK_RALI_CT Indexed value representing the loan count of 

refinanced casefiles observed in the week

Integer 4 100 – 9999
Case 2:03-cv-00266-J Document 8 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 100
Case 3:03-cv-00535-G Document 21 Filed 03/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 71
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00535-G Document 21 Filed 03/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 72
Exhibit 99.9

[RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON LOGO]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNT

As
independent public accountants to Axcan Pharma Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form F-10
No. 333-104275) pertaining to the resale of Axcan Pharma Inc.'s $125,000,000 41/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2008 (the "Notes") and the common shares
issuable upon conversion of the Notes and in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-97879) pertaining to the Axcan Pharma Inc. Stock Option Plan as
Amended and Restated on December 19, 2000 and in the related prospectus of our report dated November 11, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Axcan
Pharma Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Form 40-F for the year ended September 30, 2003.

Date:
January 23, 2004
Montreal, Quebec

|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Raymond Chabot Grant Thorton                                      
|                                                                      
|Raymond Chabot Grant Thorton
Chartered accountants
General Partnership

Suite 1900
National Bank Tower
600 De La Gauchetiere Street West
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4L8
Telephone: (514) 878-2691
Internet: www.rcgt.com

Member
of Grant Thornton International

1

---

QuickLinks
Tiffanie Angelia MITCHELL v. STATE

CR-16-0385

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX-4.6



 Exhibit 4.6

Amendment No. 8 

International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan 

Pursuant to Article X of the International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, as subsequently amended from
time to time (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2013, unless an alternative effective date is specified in the manner set forth below. 

1. Article II relating to “Definitions” is amended by modifying Section 2.27(a)(4) by removing the word “or” at the end thereof. 

2. Article II relating to “Definitions” is amended by modifying Section 2.27(a)(5) by replacing the period at the end thereof with the phrase
“; or”. 
 3. Article II relating to “Definitions” is amended by adding Section 2.27(a)(6) which shall read as follows: 

“(6) effective as of January 1, 2013, any Employee who is not employed pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between
Employee representatives and the Employer.” 
  

	4.	Article IV is amended by restating Section 4. 10(a) to read as follows: 

 “(a) A
Participant may change the amount of his Pre-Tax Contributions and/or Post-Tax Contributions as soon as is practicable after giving notice to the Plan Administrator (in the manner prescribed by the Plan Administrator).” 

 

	5.	Article V is amended by restating Section 5.3(c)(2) to read as follows: 

 “(2)
Frequency. A Participant may make a change as soon as is practicable after giving notice to the Plan Administrator. The change will be made effective as soon as administratively possible.” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Amendment has been executed on this     day of
            , 2012 
  

			
	INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
		
	BY:	 	 /s/ Susan B. Esler

	ITS:	 	Authorized Representative



  
 1
# C_2020359EN.01000203.xml

| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 15 July 2020 — Facebook Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

(Case C-319/20)

(2020/C 359/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Facebook Ireland Limited

Respondent: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

Question referred

Do the rules in Chapter VIII, in particular in Article 80(1) and (2) and Article 84(1), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (1) preclude national rules which — alongside the powers of intervention of the supervisory authorities responsible for monitoring and enforcing the Regulation and the options for legal redress for data subjects — empower, on the one hand, competitors and, on the other, associations, entities and chambers entitled under national law, to bring proceedings for breaches of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, independently of the infringement of specific rights of individual data subjects and without being mandated to do so by a data subject, against the infringer before the civil courts on the basis of the prohibition of unfair commercial practices or breach of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 17 2000

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 97-6163

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 95-00158-CR-5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GOLDIN INDUSTRIES, INC.,

GOLDIN OF ALABAMA, INC., et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, 

DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON,

 Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether

hearing en banc should be granted, and a majority of the judges in this court in active
2

service having voted in favor of granting a hearing en banc solely on the issue of

whether this court’s holding in United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11thCir. 1982),

that the person named in an indictment need not be distinct from the enterprise named

therein for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), should be overturned.

IT IS ORDERED that the issue shall be heard by this court en banc.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may adopt the supplemental briefs

that they have submitted on this issue as their en banc briefs. Alternatively, if either

party wishes to augment its brief, it may do so by filing such brief within seven (7)

days of this order, in which event the other party may file a reply brief within seven

(7) days thereafter. The briefs shall conform to the requirements for en banc briefs

provided in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35 and the attendant local rules.
Exhibit 11.1

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                                       2005
                                                                       ----
        Basic:

        Net Loss                                                   $(560,460)
                                                                   ==========

        Average shares:
           Common shares issued                                    93,769,177
                                                                   ----------
           Average shares outstanding                              90,278,841
                                                                   ==========

        Net income per common share, basic                            $(0.00)
                                                                      =======


        Diluted:

        Net Loss                                                   $(560,460)
                                                                   ==========

        Average shares:
           Common shares issued                                    99,507,536
                                                                   ----------
           Average shares outstanding                              90,278,841
                                                                   ==========

        Net income per common share, basic                            $(0.00)
                                                                      =======
Exhibit 10.5


 


 


	 	Protea
                           Biosciences, Inc. 


1311 Pineview
Dr, Suite 501


Morgantown, WV
26507










 


 





Greg W. Kilby

671 Kadar Drive | West Chester, PA 19382 | Phone: 484 868-6542 | greg_kilby@yahoo.com


 


 


 


September 4th, 2016


 


Mr. Stephen Turner

CEO & President

Protea Biosciences, Inc.






 


Dear Stephen,


 


It is with extreme regret that I send
you my notice of resignation as Protea's Vice President and chief operating officer, effective september 15th,
2016. This is due to health and personal reasons. I would be happy to continue my relationship with the company in the capacity
of part time consultant.

I have enjoyed my tenure at the company and wish you success in the future."


 


Sincerely,


 




 


 


 





Greg W. Kilby, Ph.D.
EX PARTE Dale W. GILLEY, Jr.

CR-16-0974

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        October 31, 2010        Endocrine Disruptors and Intersex Fish in Minnesota Lakes
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 15 Filed 04/04/01 Page 1 of 4 PageID 14
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 15 Filed 04/04/01 Page 2 of 4 PageID 15
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 15 Filed 04/04/01 Page 3 of 4 PageID 16
Case 3:00-cv-00022-P Document 15 Filed 04/04/01 Page 4 of 4 PageID 17
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1126 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-907, K2025-908.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31690 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 106542)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Initiative: Engineering and Optimization of Molecular Technologies for Functional Dissection of Neural Circuits (UM1).                    

*Date:*                         February 4, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca Steiner Garcia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-4525, email:                         *steinerr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2024.

Bruce A. George, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30956 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 1 of 13 PageID 91
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 2 of 13 PageID 92
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 3 of 13 PageID 93
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 4 of 13 PageID 94
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 5 of 13 PageID 95
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 6 of 13 PageID 96
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 7 of 13 PageID 97
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 8 of 13 PageID 98
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 9 of 13 PageID 99
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 10 of 13 PageID 100
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 11 of 13 PageID 101
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 12 of 13 PageID 102
Case 3:03-cv-00761-P Document 16 Filed 05/06/03 Page 13 of 13 PageID 103
# C_2022148EN.01000401.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — Philips Orăştie S.R.L. v Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

(Case C-487/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of fiscal legislation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 179 and 183 - Right to deduct VAT - Conditions - Compensation or refund of excess VAT - Additional liabilities - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

(2022/C 148/05)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Philips Orăştie S.R.L.

Defendant: Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Operative part of the judgment

The first paragraph of Article 179 and the first paragraph of Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as well as the principle of equivalence, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which lays down detailed procedural rules governing actions for the refund of value added tax (VAT), based on an infringement of the common system of VAT, less favourable than those applicable to similar actions based on an infringement of domestic law relating to duties and taxes other than VAT.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7062** 

DAVID ALLEN JONES , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden, Perry CI , Respondent

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cv - 01857

- MBS )

Submitted : November 9, 2010 Decided: December 1, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opin ion
. David Allen Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Allen Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies

r elief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Devon BOWEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-562

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.