alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023252EN.01003801.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — KD v EUIPO

(Case T-650/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Members of Staff of EUIPO - Contract for a fixed period - Non-renewal - Competent authority - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Liability - Non-material damage)

(2023/C 252/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KD (represented by: S. Pappas, D.-A. Pappa and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, K. Tóth and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew her contract and, secondly, compensation in respect of the non-material damage she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew the contract of KD; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2020 not to renew the contract of KD;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by KD; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by KD;

| 4. | Orders KD to bear a quarter of her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders KD to bear a quarter of her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               |   |                          |   |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Ray Smith            |   |
|               |   | Ray Smith, President          |   |
|               |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|               |   |                          |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

§

PATSY LACOMBE, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 6:03-CV-066-C

§

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, §

Commissioner of Social Security, §

§

 Defendant. §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

August 10, 2005 (Doc. 38). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on

August 24, 2005 (Doc. 39). The court has made a de novo determination of the Report and

Recommendation after consideration of Plaintiff’s objections, the submissions of the parties, and

the transcript of the administrative proceedings. 

The court finds the objections to be without merit. The court further finds that the ALJ

applied the correct legal standards and that substantial evidence supports his decision. The court

also finds that the Report and Recommendation applied the correct legal standards

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the

court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

 

 Case 6:03-cv-00066-C Document 40 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 114
-2-

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

DATED August 29, 2005.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 6:03-cv-00066-C Document 40 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 115
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00063]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1222 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1028, K2025-1027.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00063 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Arey Johnny MULLINS v. STATE

CR-16-0748

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:00-cr-00205-D Document 44 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 62
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 10 Filed 01/22/04 Page 1 of 5 PageID 32
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 10 Filed 01/22/04 Page 2 of 5 PageID 33
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 10 Filed 01/22/04 Page 3 of 5 PageID 34
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 10 Filed 01/22/04 Page 4 of 5 PageID 35
Case 3:03-cv-02910-P Document 10 Filed 01/22/04 Page 5 of 5 PageID 36
# C_2016222EN.01002902.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/29

---

Action brought on 26 April 2016 — repowermap v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER)

(Case T-188/16)

(2016/C 222/37)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: repowermap.org (Bern, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Repower AG (Brusio, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘REPOWER’ — International registration No 1 020 351

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2016 in Case R 2311/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare the trade mark at issue invalid for all of the services and goods not declared invalid by the contested decision, with the exception of the packaging and storage of goods (Class 39); travel arrangement (Class 39); fire-extinguishing apparatus (Class 9); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the trade mark at issue invalid for all of the services and goods not declared invalid by the contested decision, with the exception of the packaging and storage of goods (Class 39); travel arrangement (Class 39); fire-extinguishing apparatus (Class 9);

| — | order EUIPO and Repower AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Repower AG to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
A.D., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
First Amendment to Development Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) made as of July 22, 2004, by and between
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (“BSC”), a Delaware corporation, and CORAUTUS GENETICS INC. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation (each a “Party,” and collectively, the
“Parties”). 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the
Investment Agreement, dated July 30, 2003, between BSC and Company (the “Investment Agreement”), BSC and Company agreed, subject to the conditions set forth therein, to enter into a Loan Agreement, an Investor Rights Agreement, a
Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”), a Distribution Agreement and a Patent Sublicense Agreement; 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to such agreements, the Parties agreed to cooperate to develop products that use VEGF-2 for the treatment of diseases of the
heart or peripheral vascular system; 
  
 WHEREAS, the
Development Agreement requires the Company to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete Clinical Development of the Final Product in accordance with an established schedule set forth in Section 2.03 of the Development Agreement; 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend certain of the dates in the
schedule set forth in Section 2.03 of this Agreement; and 
  
 WHEREAS, capitalized terms that are not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Development Agreement. 
  

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual representations, agreements and covenants set forth herein, and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties desire to amend the Development Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2.03 (a). Section 2.03 (a) of the Development Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

  
 “(a) ***” 
  

	2.	Section 2.03 (b). Section 2.03 (b) of the Development Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

  
 “(b) ***” 
  

	3.	All provisions of the Development Agreement, except to the extent specifically amended as provided above, are hereby in all respects ratified and confirmed.


  

	4.	This Amendment may be signed in one or more counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. 

  

	“***”	indicates redacted confidential information pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed with the SEC. 

  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	 CORAUTUS GENETICS INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard E. Otto

	 	 	 	 	 Richard E. Otto

	 	 	 	 	 President and Chief Executive Officer



  

					
	 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lawrence C. Best

	 	 	 	 	 Lawrence C. Best

	 	 	 	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Paul D. BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Dave ANDERSON, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0853

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 803 

Recognizing the importance of purple martins to United States ecosystems, 

tourism, and history by designating August 10, 2024, as ‘‘Purple Martin 

Conservation Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. FETTERMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of purple martins to United 

States ecosystems, tourism, and history by designating 

August 10, 2024, as ‘‘Purple Martin Conservation Day’’. 

Whereas purple martins (Progne subis) are the largest swallows in North America and have 3 subspecies that are 

unique to North and South America; 

Whereas, every year, approximately 8,700,000 purple martins 

migrate from South America to North America for breeding season, visiting 48 out of 50 States, as well as portions of southern Canada and Mexico; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 803 ATS 

Whereas, beginning in July of each year, adult and juvenile 

purple martins congregate at roosts and migrate to South 

America for the winter months; 

Whereas, thousands of years ago, Native Americans began 

providing man-made dwellings for purple martins after 

recognizing their utility as pest and insect regulators; 

Whereas habitat loss and the spread of non-native invasive 

bird species have pushed purple martins to transition to 

man-made dwellings, upon which purple martins now depend for survival east of the Rocky Mountains; 

Whereas, in the face of population decline, successful conservation efforts of modern birders in the United States 

have helped the purple martin to remain a species of 

least concern; and 

Whereas, in 2024, there are more than 220,000 active purple 

martin colonies across the United States that offer aesthetic benefits, foster tourism, maintain ecological diversity, and provide immense educational opportunity for 

children and adults alike: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates August 10, 2024, as ‘‘Purple 

3 Martin Conservation Day’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the economic, educational, histor5 ical, and aesthetic value that purple martins offer to 

6 people of the United States of all ages. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2022148EN.01002401.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/24

---

Order of the General Court of 11 February 2022 — OP v Commission

(Case T-736/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment)

(2022/C 148/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: OP (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 of 5 February 2020 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of that competition.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | OP shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

OP shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Commitment John Palmer

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00588

- CV

Trial court case number: 1584989

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County , Texas

A p pe llant , John Palmer, h as filed a notice of appeal for the June 30, 2020 order for an

initial commitment pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 46B.073

. S ince then,

appellant has filed several motions in this Court :

• “ An Amended Motion to Sta y the J udgment/Order, Dated 06 /30/2020[,] or Stay

the Ficti [ t i ] ous M otions [] Referenced in the Order ” (filed September 14, 2020);

• A “ Motion to Stay the J u d gment/Order[] Dated 06/ 30/2020 ” (filed September 23

, 2020);

• A “ Request for a No Cash B o nd, or in the Alternative an Affordable Bond ” (filed

September 23, 2020);

• A “ Motion to Dismiss Trial Court Cause No. 1584 9 89 Due to the Fabr ication of

False Evi dence and Official Oppression ” (filed September 2 3

, 2020) ;

• A “ Se cond Amen ded Request to Stay the J u dgment on the Non [

- ] existing

‘ Written Moti o n ’

. . . ‘ Defendant ’ s Motion ’ referenced in the Order, 06/30/2020 ”

(filed September 2 8

, 2020) ; and

• A n “ Amended Mot i on for a P.R. or No Cash Bond ” (filed October 6, 2020)

.

The order from which appellant appeals i ndicates he is r epresented by court

- appointed

trial counsel below. N either a civil nor a cr iminal defendant is entitl ed to hybrid representation.

T E X

. R. C IV . P. 7 ; Posner v. Dallas C ty

. Child Welfare Unit of Tex. Dep ’ t of Human Serv s

. , 784

S.W.2d 585, 588 (Tex. App

. — Eastland 1990, writ denied) ; Patrick v. State

, 906 S.W.2d 481,

498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995 ). Accordingly, a p pellant ’ s moti ons are denied.

It is so ORDERED.Ju dge’s signature:

_________ /s/ Russell Lloyd

_________ Acting individually

Date: October 27, 2020
|   | (a) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended      June 30, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange      Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                        |  /s/           EDWARD W. MARTIN, III |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Edward      W. Martin, III                                         |
|                       | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer of                      |
|                       | American      Casino & Entertainment Properties LLC            |
|                       |                                                               |
| Date:      August 11, 2010 |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS 2025-1 Development of Diagnostics for Mycoplasma genitalium Infection (Topic 143).                    

*Date:*                         January 27-29, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118, Hamilton, MT 59840 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dylan P. Flather, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Natl Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 S. 4th Street, RML 31/31118A, Hamilton, MT 59840, (406) 802-6209,                         *dylan.flather@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 2, 2025.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00106 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0405

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATHAN BRYCE HARDIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 28, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2022

10/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0405