alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021490EN.01003902.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX)

(Case T-591/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark UNI-MAX - Earlier EU figurative marks uni and uni-ball - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 490/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Unimax Stationery (Daman, India) (represented by: A. Hempel and C. Grünewald, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mitsubishi Pencil Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: J. Fesenmair, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2020 (Case R 371/2020-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mitsubishi Pencil and Unimax Stationery.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Unimax Stationery to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Unimax Stationery to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.

---
# C_2023235EN.01002701.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — EnergieVerbund Dresden v Commission

(Case T-317/20) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity market - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Standing to bring proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Definition of ‘single concentration’ - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to be heard - Definition of the market - Analysis period - Analysis of market power - Decisive influence - Manifest errors of assessment - Duty of care)

(2023/C 235/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH (Dresden, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by T. Funke and A. Dlouhy, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 — RWE/E.ON Assets) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
Annette H. RICHARD a/k/a Annette Richard, Appellant, v. GENERATION MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1285

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Enterra Energy Trust (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, E. Keith Conrad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ E. Keith ConradE. Keith Conrad
Chief Executive Officer
July 14, 2005
 101
**Exhibit 10.17**
**Compensation of Directors**
     **Nonemployee Directors****:**Compensation of Nonemployee Directors, aside from thatprovided pursuant to the Company’s incentive plans, is as follows:
     **Retainer:**
Base: $8250 per quarter
Serving as a committee chair: Additional $15,000 per year
     **Compensation for Attendance at Meetings:**
$1,100 per day for each Board meeting
$1,100 per day for each Committee meeting
     **Reimbursement of Expenses:**Reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attendingmeetings of the Board of Directors or committees thereof and for other expenses incurred in theircapacity as directors.
     **Deferred Share Units:**In 2004, each nonemployee director was granted 2,500 deferred shareunits. The deferred share units vest and become payable in full on June 1, 2007. Upon vesting,the deferred share units are settled in cash at the then fair market value of the common stock on aone-for-one basis. See the form of deferred share unit agreement filed as an exhibit to theCompany’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for more information.
     **Employee Directors****:**As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Richard C. Seaver is regarded as anemployee of Hydril and is paid $125,000 per year. Directors who are employees of Hydril receive noadditional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. See the Company’s other disclosuresin its reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and exhibits filed therewith regardingexecutive compensation for a description of compensation.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Sun Group High-Tech Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guosheng Fu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 14, 2011





/s/ Guosheng FuGuosheng Fu, Principal Executive Officer
J.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-806

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

WALLIS, J.

Appellant appeals the trial court's entry of judgments and sentences in Brevard County Circuit Court case numbers 05-2016-CJ-001268-A, 05-2016-CJ-002292-A, 05-2016-CJ-002328-A, 05-2016-CJ-002367-A, 05-2017-CJ-000634-A, 05-2017-CJ-000635-A, and 05-2018-CJ-000700-A. We find that the trial court failed to include written findings supporting its placement of Appellant in case numbers 05-2018-CJ-000700-A, 05-2017-CJ-000634-A, and 05-2017-CJ-000635-A. We remand for the trial court to include these written findings pursuant to *R.S. v. State*, 204 So.3d 990 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). We affirm the judgments and sentences in case numbers 05-2016-CJ-001268-A, 05-2016-CJ-002292-A, 05-2016-CJ-002328-A, and 05-2016-CJ-002367-A without further discussion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED with Instructions.

ORFINGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

PAUL ANDREW SILMAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50393

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03879-WQH-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 5, 2013** 

Pasadena, California

Before: HAWKINS, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Paul Andrew Silman appeals his sentence of 65 months

incarceration followed by three years of supervised release. We have jurisdiction

FILED

MAR 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we need

not recount them here.

In his plea agreement, Defendant validly waived his right to appeal his

conviction and sentence. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182–83

(9th Cir. 2000), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Rahman, 642 F.3d

1257, 1259 (9th Cir. 2011). His arguments that the Government breached the plea

agreement are meritless. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. United States v.

Michlin, 34 F.3d 896, 898 (9th Cir. 1994).

DISMISSED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1586-1587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00152]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20946 and #20947; OREGON Disaster Number OR-
20006]

Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Oregon

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-4854-
DR), dated January 1, 2025.
    Incident: Wildfires.

DATES: Issued on January 1, 2025.
    Incident Period: July 10, 2024 through August 23, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: March 3, 2025.

[[Page 1587]]

    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: October 1, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on January 1, 2025, Private 
Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a 
governmental nature may file disaster loan applications online using 
the MySBA Loan Portal https://lending.sba.gov or other locally 
announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance 
customer service center by email at [email protected] or 
by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Gilliam, Grant, Umatilla, Wasco, Wheeler.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.250
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.250
For Economic Injury:
  NonProfit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.      3.250
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 209465 
and for economic injury is 209470.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro C. Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2025-00152 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 2015 2016 2017

National Income and Product Accounts (Chained 2009$)

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 0.6 3.9 2.0 1.4 1.1 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.7

 Personal Consumption Expenditures 1.8 3.6 3.0 2.4 1.5 4.2 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.7 2.6 2.0

 Residential Fixed Investment 10.1 9.3 8.2 10.1 15.6 -4.8 2.2 5.1 5.2 4.0 3.7 3.5 9.4 4.3 4.1

 Business Fixed Investment 1.6 4.1 2.6 -2.1 -4.5 0.5 3.0 2.2 0.5 0.5 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.9

 Government Consumption & Investment -0.1 2.6 1.8 0.1 1.3 0.7 1.4 0.7 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.9

Billions of Chained 2009$

 Net Exports -541 -535 -546 -552 -547 -549 -565 -579 -578 -578 -579 -584 -543 -560 -580

 Change in Business Inventories 113 114 86 78 68 48 54 51 44 42 45 49 98 55 45

Price Indices

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

GDP Price Index 0.1 2.1 1.3 0.9 0.4 1.2 1.7 1.4 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.1 1.2 2.0

Consumer Price Index -2.9 2.4 1.4 0.8 -0.3 2.7 3.1 1.6 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2 0.4 1.8 2.3

Consumer Price Index excl. Food & Energy 1.7 2.3 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.1

Employment

Unemployment Rate (Percent) 5.5 5.4 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 5.3 4.9 4.7

Employment, Total Nonfarm (% Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4) 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 0.9 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 2.0 1.4 1.2

Interest Rates (Percent)

Federal Funds Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.5

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.7

10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.1 1.7 1.7

July 11, 2016

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from June 30, 2016.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic & Strategic Research Group

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or expected results, 

are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other 

views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views 

could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie 

Mae or its management.

 Economic Forecast: July 2016

 --------------- 2015 --------------- --------------- 2016 --------------- --------------- 2017 ---------------
PROMISSORY NOTE


$475.00                                                      March 31, 2004
                                                          Newport Beach, CA


     On Demand FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned promises to pay in
lawful money of the United States of America to the order of Cygni
Capital, LLC, nominee or assignee, the sum of FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY
FIVE DOLLARS ($475.00), with interest from March 31, 2004 until paid
at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.

     Should interest not be paid, it shall thereafter bear interest as
the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed
an amount equal to simple interest on the principal at the maximum
rate permitted by law.  The undersigned hereby waives presentment of
payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and
diligence in bringing suit, and further agrees, in case suit is
instituted, to collect this Promissory Note or any portion thereof, to
pay such additional sum for attorneys' fees as the Court may adjudge
reasonable in such suit.


                                   CYGNI INVESTMENTS, INC.

                                   By:  /s/ Carl Suter
                                        Carl Suter, President
# C_2022148EN.01000302.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXXX v HR Rail SA

(Case C-485/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability - Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post - Staff member completing training as part of recruitment - Article 5 - Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities - Requirement to reassign to another post - Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer)

(2022/C 148/04)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XXXX

Defendant: HR Rail SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘reasonable accommodation’ for disabled persons, within the meaning of that article requires that a worker, including someone undertaking a traineeship following his or her recruitment, who, owing to his or her disability, has been declared incapable of performing the essential functions of the post that he or she occupies, be assigned to another position for which he or she has the necessary competence, capability and availability, unless that measure imposes a disproportionate burden on the employer.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-32363) pertaining to the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 1997
Non-Employee Director Plan of Metals USA, Inc. of our report dated October 4,
1996, with respect to the financial statements of Affiliated Metals Company as
of August 31, 1996 and for the fifty-two weeks then ended included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Metals USA, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 27, 1998
Timothy Edward PRUITT v. Paige Pruitt SPRAYBERRY

2160576

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0197 IN THE MATTER OF: S.T.S., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2021

12/07/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0197
# C_2018104EN.01005402.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/54

---

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2018 — QE v Eurojust

(Case T-850/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 104/71)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

1

---
Federal Aviation 

Administration

Memorandum 

Date: July 13, 2007 

From: Orlando International ATCT 

To: Aircraft Accident File MCO-ATCT-0088 

Subject: INFORMATION: Partial Transcript 

 Aircraft Accident; N501N 

 Sanford, FL., July 10, 2007 

This transcription covers the Orlando International ATCT Radar Handoff North Position for the 

time period from July 10, 2007, 1228 UTC, to July 10, 2007, 1242 UTC. 

Agencies Making Transmissions Abbreviations

 Orlando International Radar Handoff North RHN 

Sanford International ATCT SFB 

I hereby certify that the following is a true transcription of the recorded conversations pertaining 

to the subject aircraft accident involving N501N. 

William Mitchell 

Support Specialist 

Orlando International ATCT 

1228 

(1229-1232) 

1233 

1233:03 RHN sanford tower north coordinator 

1233:05 SFB sanford here 
 

MCO-ATCT-0088 

N501N 

Page 2 of 3 

1233:06 RHN hey zero one november has got smoke in the cockpit declared an 

 emergency coming back 

1233:09 SFB zero one november r z 

 

 

1233:10 RHN s b 

1233:36 RHN sanford tower reference zero one november 

1233:38 SFB sanford tower 

1233:39 RHN he is going to turn off all runways all radios we do not know what runway 

he is going to land at 

1233:43 SFB where is he at right now this is sanford tower 

1233:47 RHN *(let me this is what i am just coordinating p k) a twin cessna there he is 

 

1233:52 SFB o k i got him now r z 

1233:53 RHN alright s b 

1234 

1235 

1236 

1236:32 SFB north satellite sanford 

1236:36 RHN coordinator for north go ahead sir 

1236:37 SFB yeah the plane did not make it to the field 

1236:39 RHN i am sorry 
 

MCO-ATCT-0088 

N501N 

Page 3 of 3 

1236:40 SFB the plane did not make it to the field 

1236:41 RHN where did he land 

1236:42 SFB it looks like he went down about a mile northwest of us a lot of smoke do 

 we know how many people were on board or anything 

1236:48 RHN no we did not get that information i will call you right back 

1236:50 SFB all right thanks r a 

1237 

(1239-1241) 

1242 

End of Transcript 

*This portion of the re-recording is not entirely clear, but represents the best interpretation 

possible under the circumstances.