alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        This action was issued on December 31, 2024. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         for relevant dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 202-622-2490 or                         *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​contact-ofac.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website:                     *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

## Notice of OFAC Action

On December 31, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 740)          ( print page 741)    

Lawrence M. Scheinert,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2024-31655 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 PageID 115
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 9 PageID 116
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 3 of 9 PageID 117
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 4 of 9 PageID 118
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 5 of 9 PageID 119
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 6 of 9 PageID 120
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 7 of 9 PageID 121
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 8 of 9 PageID 122
Case 2:03-cr-00123-J Document 48 Filed 05/25/06 Page 9 of 9 PageID 123
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 520 

Congratulating the University of Michigan Wolverines football team for winning the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic Association College Football 

National Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. PETERS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Michigan Wolverines football team for winning the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic Association College Football National Championship. 

Whereas, on January 8, 2024, the University of Michigan 

Wolverines football team (referred to in this preamble as 

the ‘‘Michigan Wolverines’’) won the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic Association College Football National 

Championship, defeating the University of Washington 

Huskies by a score of 34–13; 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 520 ATS 

Whereas this victory follows a thrilling and historic Rose 

Bowl playoff victory and the team’s 3rd consecutive Big 

Ten Conference Championship Game victory; 

Whereas the Michigan Wolverines played an undefeated season, becoming the first football team in school history to 

achieve a perfect 15–0 record in a single season; 

Whereas, this season, the Michigan Wolverines became the 

first college football program in history to win 1,000 

games; 

Whereas 46 players on this championship-winning team are 

also Fall 2023 Academic All-Big Ten honorees; 

Whereas this national championship victory marks the 12th 

time in program history the Michigan Wolverines have 

won the prestigious title of national champions; 

Whereas this victory is a testament to the dedication, perseverance, and hard work ethic of the players, coaches, and 

staff of the Michigan Wolverines football program; and 

Whereas this remarkable team has made the entire State of 

Michigan deeply proud: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Michigan 

3 Wolverines football team for an incredible season 

4 and for winning the 2024 National Collegiate Ath5 letic Association Football National Championship; 

6 (2) recognizes the achievements of all players, 

7 coaches, and staff who contributed to the team’s 

8 success; and 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 520 ATS 

1 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

2 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu3 tion to— 

4 (A) the President of the University of 

5 Michigan, Santa Ono; 

6 (B) the Athletic Director of the University 

7 of Michigan, Warde Manuel; and 

8 (C) the Head Coach of the University of 

9 Michigan Wolverines football team, Jim 

10 Harbaugh. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EX PARTE Jimmy Lee WATKINS

CR-16-0968

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Case 4:03-cv-01003-A Document 1 Filed 09/12/03 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1
Case 4:03-cv-01003-A Document 1 Filed 09/12/03 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2
Case 4:03-cv-01003-A Document 1 Filed 09/12/03 Page 3 of 3 PageID 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN LOPEZ,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 154 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Case 3:03-cr-00212-M Document 422 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1230
# C_2019044EN.01005701.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/57

---

Order of the General Court of 19 November 2018 — Credito Fondiario SpA v SRB

(Case T-661/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Setting of the 2016 ex-ante contribution - Period for bringing an action - Out of time - Plea of illegality - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/73)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Credito Fondiario SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, S. Frazzani, A. Neri and F. Iacovone, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: B. Meyring, A. Villani and M. Caccialanza, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, A. Steiblytė and K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based, first, on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), to the extent that they concern the applicant, and, second, on Article 277 TFEU.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Credito Fondiario SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Credito Fondiario SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).

| 3. | The European Commission and the Italian Republic shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission and the Italian Republic shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

---
William J. BRYAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021079EN.01002001.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 November 2020 — Criminal proceedings against VD

(Case C-654/20)

(2021/C 79/26)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad — Sofia

Party to the main proceedings

VD

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties allow national legislation which provides for both administrative and criminal liability for the same act, namely driving a motor vehicle while subject to a coercive administrative measure in the form of a driving licence suspension, in the absence of any criteria allowing for an objective distinction to be made between the two types of liability? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties allow national legislation which provides for both administrative and criminal liability for the same act, namely driving a motor vehicle while subject to a coercive administrative measure in the form of a driving licence suspension, in the absence of any criteria allowing for an objective distinction to be made between the two types of liability?

| 2. | Should the Court of Justice of the European Union answer the first question in the negative, what powers does the national court have to ensure the effective application of the principles of EU law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Should the Court of Justice of the European Union answer the first question in the negative, what powers does the national court have to ensure the effective application of the principles of EU law?

| 3. | Is a penalty involving deprivation of liberty of up to three years and the imposition of a fine of 200 to 1 000 Bulgarian leva (BGN) proportionate for the purpose of Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as regards the criminal offence of driving a motor vehicle while subject to a coercive administrative measure in the form of a driving licence suspension? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is a penalty involving deprivation of liberty of up to three years and the imposition of a fine of 200 to 1 000 Bulgarian leva (BGN) proportionate for the purpose of Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as regards the criminal offence of driving a motor vehicle while subject to a coercive administrative measure in the form of a driving licence suspension?

---
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 1 of 27 PageID 223
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 2 of 27 PageID 224
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 3 of 27 PageID 225
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 4 of 27 PageID 226
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 5 of 27 PageID 227
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 6 of 27 PageID 228
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 7 of 27 PageID 229
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 8 of 27 PageID 230
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 9 of 27 PageID 231
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 10 of 27 PageID 232
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 11 of 27 PageID 233
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 12 of 27 PageID 234
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 13 of 27 PageID 235
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 14 of 27 PageID 236
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 15 of 27 PageID 237
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 16 of 27 PageID 238
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 17 of 27 PageID 239
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 18 of 27 PageID 240
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 19 of 27 PageID 241
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 20 of 27 PageID 242
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 21 of 27 PageID 243
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 22 of 27 PageID 244
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 23 of 27 PageID 245
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 24 of 27 PageID 246
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 25 of 27 PageID 247
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 26 of 27 PageID 248
Case 1:03-cv-00031-C Document 63 Filed 04/08/03 Page 27 of 27 PageID 249
Christopher D. TRAYLOR v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS

NO. 2019-CI-0078

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Refinance customers having existing 

energy improvement debt to pay o

WHAT DOES

IT COVER?

Energy and water system upgrades, 

including solar and HVAC

Financing to pay o existing 

energy-related debt

Property improvements for natural 

disaster resilience

A long-term, fixed-rate or adjustable-rate mortgage that helps 

borrowers finance energy upgrades during the purchase of a 

home or refinance of their current one. It can be combined 

with other loan products for additional flexibility and savings.

WHEN IS IT

A GOOD FIT?

Buying an older home

Improving the comfort, safety and 

resilience of a current home

Plus, HomeStyle Energy loans qualify lenders for a $500 loan level price adjustment (LLPA) credit

Sources

1 NRDC | "Study Highlights Energy Burden for Households and How Energy Eiciency Can Help"

2 Fannie Mae Insights: How Homeowners and Homebuyers Can Make Their Home More Energy-Eicient

Any questions? Click here to have a Fannie Mae representative contact you.

READ THE FULL FANNIE MAE

ENERGY EFFICIENCY REPORT

IT’S TIME FOR ECO-CONSCIOUS CHANGE

On average, low-income families spend:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY HELPS MAKE 

HOUSING AFFORDABLE & SUSTAINABLE

Fannie Mae Insights: How Homeowners and

Homebuyers Can Make Their Home More Energy-Eicient

Energy Saving Tips

Weatherization Assistance Program

ENERGY STAR® Rebate Finder

Home Energy Score Resources

RESNET HERS® Index

National Association of State Energy Oicials

HOMESTYLE® ENERGY LOAN

FANNIE MAE'S

them about their financing 

options and incentives

INFORM VISIT

HomeStyle Energy Mortgage 

for more details

WE WANT TO EMPOWER YOU

TO EMPOWER YOUR BORROWERS

CLICK THE LINKS BELOW TO ACCESS

VALUABLE RESOURCES FOR YOUR BORROWERS

THE SOLUTION

BUT 47% OF BORROWERS

SEE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AS COST-PROHIBITIVE2

HELP MORE BORROWERS

MAKE THEIR HOMES MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT

Of their monthly budget

on energy costs 8%

1

Of homeowners say they are willing

to invest in energy-eicient products 74% 2
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 15-1545V 

Filed: August 28, 2018 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DAVID MERRITT, * UNPUBLISHED 

 * 

Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

 * Bell’s Palsy; Influenza (“Flu”) 

v. * Vaccine 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Jeffrey Pop, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pop and Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Adriana Teitel, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master: 

 On December 17, 2015, David Merritt [“Mr. Merritt or “petitioner”] filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that 

he developed Bell’s palsy after receiving the influenza [“flu”] vaccine on November 11, 2013.

Stipulation, filed August 27, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that the aforementioned 

immunization caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 

 

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the 

Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-

347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision 

will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s 

inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party 

has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is 

a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes 

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 

privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

 Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On August 27, 2018, the parties 

filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms. 

 

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment: 

A lump sum of $35,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, David 

Merritt. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available 

under § 300aa-15(a). 

 I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and 

on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance 

with this decision.3

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Special Master 

 

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
# C_2016090EN.01002201.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/22

---

Action brought on 8 January 2016 — La tarte tropézienne v OHIM (LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE 1955. SAINT-TROPEZ)

(Case T-7/16)

(2016/C 090/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: La tarte tropézienne (Cogolin, France) (represented by: T. Cuche, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE 1955. SAINT-TROPEZ’ — Application for registration No 1 212 405

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 October 2015 in Case R 720/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Hold and rule that the present action is admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Hold and rule that the present action is admissible;

| — | Find that international registration No 1.212.405 is validly protected in the European Union in respect of the following goods: ‘flour and preparations made from cereals; sugar; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; spices; dough for cakes; cakes; frozen cakes; pancakes’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Find that international registration No 1.212.405 is validly protected in the European Union in respect of the following goods: ‘flour and preparations made from cereals; sugar; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; spices; dough for cakes; cakes; frozen cakes; pancakes’;

| — | In consequence, annul in part the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 October 2016 in so far as it refused protection in the European Union of international registration No 1.212.405 in respect of the following goods: ‘flour and preparations made from cereals; sugar; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; spices; dough for cakes; cakes; frozen cakes; pancakes’; |
| --- | --- |

—

In consequence, annul in part the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 October 2016 in so far as it refused protection in the European Union of international registration No 1.212.405 in respect of the following goods: ‘flour and preparations made from cereals; sugar; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; spices; dough for cakes; cakes; frozen cakes; pancakes’;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2022237EN.01004702.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS

(Case T-425/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - EEAS staff - Psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment - Reasonable time - Liability)

(2022/C 237/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KU (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, R. Spáč, G. Pasqualetti and E. Orgován, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 17 September 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance and, secondly, compensation for the harm which she claims to have suffered as a result of psychological harassment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KU to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KU to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---