UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to 

Commission file number: 0-50231

Federal National Mortgage Association

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Fannie Mae

Federally chartered corporation 52-0883107 1100 15th Street, NW 800 232-6643

Washington, DC 20005

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

(Address of principal executive 

offices, including zip code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, 

including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

None N/A N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required 

to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be 

submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such 

shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a 

smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” 

“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Large accelerated filer ☑ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period 

for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange 

Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes☐ No ☑ 

As of July 15, 2022, there were 1,158,087,567 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I—Financial Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Item 1. Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

Note 2—Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Note 3—Mortgage Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

Note 4—Allowance for Loan Losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

Note 5—Investments in Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97

Note 6—Financial Guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

Note 7—Short-Term and Long-Term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

Note 8—Derivative Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

Note 9—Segment Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

Note 10—Concentrations of Credit Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

Note 11—Netting Arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113

Note 12—Fair Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114

Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

Note 14—Regulatory Capital Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Summary of Our Financial Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Liquidity Provided in the First Half of 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Legislation and Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Key Market Economic Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Consolidated Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Retained Mortgage Portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Guaranty Book of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Business Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Single-Family Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Single-Family Mortgage Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Single-Family Market Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Single-Family Business Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

Single-Family Business Financial Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Multifamily Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Multifamily Mortgage Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Multifamily Business Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Multifamily Business Financial Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

Liquidity and Capital Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

Risk Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

Critical Accounting Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

Impact of Future Adoption of New Accounting Guidance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q i
Forward-Looking Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

Item 4. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

PART II—Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

Item 1. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

Item 5. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

Item 6. Exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q ii
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial 

Condition and Results of Operations

We have been under conservatorship, with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) acting as conservator, since 

September 6, 2008. As conservator, FHFA succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of the company, and of any 

shareholder, officer or director of the company with respect to the company and its assets. The conservator has since 

provided for the exercise of certain functions and authorities by our Board of Directors. Our directors owe their fiduciary 

duties of care and loyalty solely to the conservator. Thus, while we are in conservatorship, the Board has no fiduciary 

duties to the company or its stockholders.

We do not know when or how the conservatorship will terminate, what further changes to our business will be made 

during or following conservatorship, what form we will have and what ownership interest, if any, our current common and 

preferred stockholders will hold in us after the conservatorship is terminated or whether we will continue to exist following 

conservatorship. Members of Congress and the Administration continue to express the importance of housing finance 

system reform. 

We are not currently permitted to pay dividends or other distributions to stockholders. Our agreements with the U.S. 

Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) include a commitment from Treasury to provide us with funds to maintain a 

positive net worth under specified conditions; however, the U.S. government does not guarantee our securities or other 

obligations. Our agreements with Treasury also include covenants that significantly restrict our business activities. For 

additional information on the conservatorship, the uncertainty of our future, and our agreements with Treasury, see 

“Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform” and “Risk Factors—GSE and 

Conservatorship Risk” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”).

You should read this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

(“MD&A”) in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes in this report 

and the more detailed information in our 2021 Form 10-K. You can find a “Glossary of Terms Used in This Report” in 

our 2021 Form 10-K. 

Forward-looking statements in this report are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to 

significant uncertainties and changes in circumstances, as we describe in “Forward-Looking Statements.” Future events 

and our future results may differ materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements due to a variety of 

factors, including those discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and in our 2021 Form 10-K. 

Introduction

Fannie Mae is a leading source of financing for mortgages in the United States, with $4.3 trillion in assets as of June 30, 

2022. Organized as a government-sponsored entity, Fannie Mae is a shareholder-owned corporation. Our charter is an 

act of Congress, which establishes that our purposes are to provide liquidity and stability to the residential mortgage 

market and to promote access to mortgage credit. We were initially established in 1938.

Our revenues are primarily driven by guaranty fees we receive for assuming the credit risk on loans underlying the 

mortgage-backed securities we issue. We do not originate loans or lend money directly to borrowers. Rather, we work 

primarily with lenders who originate loans to borrowers. We securitize those loans into Fannie Mae mortgage-backed 

securities that we guarantee (which we refer to as Fannie Mae MBS or our MBS). 

Effectively managing credit risk is key to our business. In exchange for assuming credit risk on the loans we acquire, we 

receive guaranty fees. These fees take into account the credit risk characteristics of the loans we acquire. Guaranty 

fees are set at the time we acquire loans and do not change over the life of the loan. How long a loan remains in our 

guaranty book is heavily dependent on interest rates. When interest rates decrease, a larger portion of our book of 

business turns over as more loans refinance. On the other hand, as interest rates increase, fewer loans refinance and 

our book turns over more slowly. Since guaranty fees are set at the time a loan is originated, the impact of any change 

in guaranty fees on future revenues depends on the rates at which loans in our book of business turn over and new 

loans are added.

MD&A | Introduction

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 1
Executive Summary

Summary of Our Financial Performance

Quarterly Condensed Consolidated Results

(Dollars in billions)

$8.4

$7.9

$7.2

$4.7

$7.1

$4.6

Net revenues Net income Comprehensive income Q2 2021 Q2 2022

• Net revenues decreased $0.5 billion in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021,

primarily due to lower amortization income as a result of a higher interest rate environment in the second 

quarter of 2022, which slowed refinancing activity driving lower prepayment volumes. This was partially offset 

by higher base guaranty fee income due to higher average charged guaranty fees and an increase in the size 

of our guaranty book of business, as well as an increase in income from portfolios primarily due to higher yields 

on assets in our other investments portfolio in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 

2021.

• Net income decreased $2.5 billion in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, 

driven primarily by a shift to credit-related expense in the second quarter of 2022 from credit-related income in 

the second quarter of 2021. 

• Net worth increased to $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 from $51.8 billion as of March 31, 2022. The increase 

is attributable to $4.6 billion of comprehensive income for the second quarter of 2022.

MD&A | Executive Summary

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 2
Year-to-Date Condensed Consolidated Results

(Dollars in billions)

$15.2 $15.4

$12.1

$9.1

$12.1

$9.1

Net revenues Net income Comprehensive income First Half 2021 First Half 2022

• Net revenues increased by $0.2 billion, in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021, primarily 

due to higher base guaranty fee income driven by higher average charged guaranty fees and an increase in the 

size of our guaranty book of business, as well as higher income from portfolios. This was partially offset by 

lower amortization income as a result of a higher interest rate environment in the first half of 2022, which 

slowed refinancing activity driving lower prepayment volumes.

• Net income decreased $3.1 billion in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021, primarily driven 

by a shift to credit-related expense in the first half of 2022 from credit-related income in the first half of 2021. 

• Net worth increased to $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 from $47.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. The 

increase is attributable to $9.1 billion of comprehensive income for the first half of 2022.

Financial Performance Outlook 

We expect lower amortization income in 2022 compared with 2021, driven by reduced refinancing activity due to a 

higher mortgage interest-rate environment in 2022. In addition, we expect modest credit-related expense in 2022

compared with significant credit-related income in 2021. We expect those factors to result in lower net income in 2022

compared with 2021. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for a discussion of how home prices, interest rates and 

other macroeconomic factors can affect our financial results.

MD&A | Executive Summary

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 3
Liquidity Provided in the First Half of 2022

Through our single-family and multifamily business segments, we provided $447 billion in liquidity to the mortgage 

market in the first half of 2022, enabling the financing of approximately 1.7 million home purchases, refinancings and 

rental units. 

Fannie Mae Provided $447 Billion in Liquidity in the First Half of 2022

Unpaid Principal Balance Units

$215B 646K

Single-Family Home Purchases

$197B 727K

Single-Family Refinancings

$35B 292K

Multifamily Rental Units

We continued our commitment to green financing in the first half of 2022, issuing a total of $5.2 billion in multifamily 

green MBS, $767 million in single-family green MBS, and $781 million in multifamily green resecuritizations. We also 

issued $4.7 billion in multifamily social MBS and $381 million in multifamily social resecuritizations in the first half of 

2022. These green and social bonds were issued in alignment with our Sustainable Bond Framework, which guides our 

issuances of sustainable debt bonds and sustainable MBS that support energy and water efficiency and housing 

affordability.

Legislation and Regulation

The information in this section updates and supplements information regarding legislative, regulatory, conservatorship 

and other developments affecting our business set forth in “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and 

Housing Finance Reform” and “Business—Legislation and Regulation” in our 2021 Form 10-K, as well as in “MD&A—

Legislation and Regulation” in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (“First Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q”). 

Also see “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K and in this report for discussions of risks relating to legislative and 

regulatory matters.

Equitable Housing Finance Plan

In June 2022, we released our first Equitable Housing Finance Plan, which provides a three-year roadmap for our 

actions to advance equity in housing finance by working to remove barriers to affordable rental housing and 

homeownership experienced by members of underserved populations, particularly racial and ethnic groups with a 

significant homeownership rate disparity. Fannie Mae's Equitable Housing Finance Plan focuses on empowering Black 

renters and homeowners in three key areas:

• Housing Preparation: Helping Black consumers prepare early for sustainable homeownership and access to 

quality rental housing through credit building and financial education.

• Buying or Renting: Removing unnecessary obstacles Black people face in shopping for, acquiring, renting, or 

mortgaging a home.

• Moving in and Maintaining: Enhancing sustainable homeownership so that renters and homeowners can 

withstand disruptions or temporary hardships and remain stably housed.

We are focusing in this initial plan on the needs of Black homeowners and renters, a population for whom inequities 

caused by past discriminatory housing practices are particularly profound. While our solutions seek to address the 

effects of discrimination against Black homeowners and renters, we expect they will benefit borrowers and renters in all 

populations. In the future, we expect to expand the focus of our equitable housing efforts to address challenges faced 

by other populations who have been historically underserved by the housing finance system, including Latino 

homeowners and renters.

Amendment to Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework: Public Disclosure

In June 2022, FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework by introducing new 

public disclosure requirements. The requirements include quarterly quantitative and annual qualitative disclosures 

MD&A | Executive Summary

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 4
related to risk management, corporate governance, capital structure, and capital requirements and buffers under the 

framework’s standardized approach. We expect to provide our first reporting under the rule, based on data as of 

December 31, 2022, in February 2023.

Amendment to Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework: Annual Capital Plans

In June 2022, FHFA published a final rule that requires us to submit annual capital plans to FHFA and provide prior 

notice for certain capital actions. The rule also incorporates the determination of the stress capital buffer into the capital 

planning process. 

The final rule mandates that our capital plans include:

• an assessment of the expected sources and uses of capital over the planning horizon;

• estimates of projected revenues, expenses, losses, reserves, and pro forma capital levels under a range of 

scenarios;

• a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon;

• a discussion of how we will, under expected and stressful conditions, maintain capital commensurate with the 

business risks and continue to serve the housing market; and

• a discussion of any expected changes to our business plan that are likely to have a material impact on our 

capital adequacy or liquidity.

The rule requires that we submit our first capital plan by May 20, 2023.

Upfront Fee for Commingled Securities and Review of the Enterprise Regulatory 

Capital Framework

On June 14, 2022, we announced a new upfront fee of 50 basis points to create structured securities that include 

Freddie Mac securities, effective July 1, 2022. We imposed the fee to partially address the cost of capital we are 

required to hold to guarantee Freddie Mac’s securities. Freddie Mac imposed a similar fee. 

On June 23, 2022, FHFA Director Sandra L. Thompson issued a statement regarding the fees in which she affirmed 

FHFA’s ongoing commitment to Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities, or UMBS®, the common mortgage-backed 

securities issued by both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In her statement, Director Thompson indicated that FHFA would 

continue to monitor UMBS and the to-be-announced (“TBA”) market to ensure they function as intended and that FHFA 

would continue regular engagement with stakeholders. On June 30, 2022, FHFA issued a follow-up statement indicating 

that, in light of extensive engagement with mortgage market participants since the announcement of the fee and FHFA’s 

ongoing commitment to UMBS, FHFA would explore alternatives to ensure the long-term viability of UMBS, including 

conducting a review of the enterprise regulatory capital framework in the near-term to ensure the framework 

appropriately reflects the risks of commingled securities. For additional information about UMBS and our structured 

securities that include Freddie Mac securities, please see “Guaranty Book of Business” in this report and “Business—

Mortgage Securitizations—Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities, or UMBS” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Appointment of FHFA Director

On June 22, 2022, Sandra L. Thompson was sworn in as the Director of FHFA, following confirmation of her 

appointment by the Senate in May. Director Thompson had been the Acting Director of FHFA since June 2021.

LIBOR Transition: Proposed Federal Rulemaking

On July 19, 2022, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) published proposed 

regulations that provide default rules for certain contracts that use LIBOR as the benchmark reference interest rate. The 

proposed rules implement the “Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act” (the “LIBOR Act”), which President Biden signed 

into law in March 2022. The LIBOR Act establishes a clear and uniform process for replacing LIBOR as the benchmark 

reference interest rate in existing contracts that do not contain a clearly defined or practicable replacement benchmark 

rate for when LIBOR is discontinued. LIBOR is currently expected to no longer be published after June 30, 2023. Under 

the proposed rules, references to the most common tenors of LIBOR in these contracts will be replaced as a matter of 

law, without the need to be amended, to instead reference the benchmark interest rate identified by the Federal Reserve 

in the proposal. 

The replacement benchmark rates identified by the Federal Reserve in the proposal are based on the Secured 

Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and include appropriate “tenor spread adjustments” to reflect historical spreads 

between LIBOR and SOFR. The proposal provides for separate replacement benchmark rates for derivatives 

transactions, consumer loans, contracts where a government-sponsored entity is a party, and all other affected 

MD&A | Legislation and Regulation

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 5
contracts. For our LIBOR derivatives trades that mature after June 2023, the related contracts provide that LIBOR will 

be replaced with SOFR once LIBOR ceases to be published, and these contract provisions are the same as the 

replacement provisions contained in the proposed rules. For consumer loans, such as single-family adjustable-rate 

mortgage loans and related MBS, the Federal Reserve has proposed as the LIBOR benchmark replacement (1) a term 

SOFR rate with the same term as the LIBOR rate that is being replaced (such as 12-month term SOFR to replace 12-

month term LIBOR) plus (2) the applicable tenor spread adjustment specified in the proposed rules. For non-consumer 

contracts where Fannie Mae is a party, such as our multifamily loans and securities, Connecticut Avenue Securities® 

and REMIC securities, the Federal Reserve has proposed as the LIBOR benchmark replacement (1) the 30-day 

average SOFR rate plus (2) the applicable tenor spread adjustment specified in the proposed rules. Comments on the 

proposed rule are due 30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register.

The LIBOR Act establishes a safe harbor for market participants that act in accordance with such legislation, shielding 

them from litigation for selecting and implementing the Federal Reserve-identified replacement rate and related 

conforming changes. The LIBOR Act and the proposed rule, if adopted as proposed, reduce the risks to us associated 

with the approaching cessation of LIBOR.

Key Market Economic Indicators

Below we discuss how varying macroeconomic conditions can influence our financial results across different business 

and economic environments. Our forecasts and expectations are based on many assumptions, subject to many 

uncertainties and may change, perhaps substantially, from our current forecasts and expectations. For further 

discussion on housing activity, see “Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Market” and “Multifamily 

Business—Multifamily Mortgage Market.” 

Selected Benchmark Interest Rates

3.13% 3.02%

5.70%

1.57%

1.83%

4.38%

0.66%

1.47%

3.01%

0.64%

1.43%

3.09%

0.30%

0.15%

2.29%

0.10% 0.05%

1.50%

30-year FRM rate1 30-year Fannie Mae MBS par coupon rate2 10-year Treasury rate2 10-year swap rate2 3-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR)2 Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)3 06/30/20 09/30/20 12/31/20 03/31/21 06/30/21 09/30/21 12/31/21 03/31/22 06/30/22

(1) Refers to the U.S. weekly average fixed-rate mortgage rate according to Freddie Mac's Primary Mortgage Market Survey®

. These rates are 

reported using the latest available data for a given period.

(2) According to Bloomberg.

(3) Refers to the daily rate per the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

MD&A | Legislation and Regulation

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 6
How Interest Rates Can Affect Our Financial Results

• Net interest income. In a rising interest-rate environment, our other investments portfolio and certain mortgagerelated assets earn more interest income while our mortgage loans tend to prepay more slowly. We amortize 

various cost basis adjustments over the life of the mortgage loan, including those relating to loan-level price 

adjustments we receive as upfront fees at the time we acquire single-family loans. As a result, any prepayment 

of a loan results in an accelerated realization of those upfront fees as income. Therefore, as loan prepayments 

slow, the accelerated realization of amortization income also slows. Conversely, in a declining interest-rate 

environment, our other investments portfolio and certain mortgage-related assets earn less interest income 

while our mortgage loans tend to prepay faster, typically resulting in the opposite trend of higher net 

amortization income from cost basis adjustments on mortgage loans and related debt.

• Fair value gains (losses). We have exposure to fair value gains and losses resulting from changes in interest 

rates, primarily through our mortgage commitment derivatives and risk management derivatives, which we 

mark to market through earnings. Fair value gains and losses on our mortgage commitment derivatives 

fluctuate depending on how interest rates and prices move between the time a commitment is opened and 

when it settles. The net position and composition across the yield curve of our risk management derivatives 

changes over time. As a result, interest rate changes (increases or decreases) and yield curve changes 

(parallel, steepening or flattening shifts) will generate varying amounts of fair value gains or losses in a given 

period.

• Credit-related income (expense). Increases in mortgage interest rates tend to lengthen the expected lives of 

our loans, which generally increases the expected impairment and provision for credit losses on loans, 

particularly those modified in troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) arrangements. Decreases in mortgage interest 

rates tend to shorten the expected lives of our loans, which reduces the impairment and provision for credit 

losses on such loans. See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” and “Note 

1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information on our adoption of Accounting 

Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Troubled Debt 

Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures (“ASU 2022-02”) on January 1, 2022, resulting in the prospective 

discontinuation of TDR accounting, and its impact on our financial results. 

Single-Family Quarterly Home Price Growth Rate(1)

6.6%

4.5%

2.8%

5.2% 5.7%

Fannie Mae national home price index 2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22

(1) Calculated internally using property data on loans purchased by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other third-party home sales data. Fannie 

Mae’s home price index is a weighted repeat-transactions index, measuring average price changes in repeat sales on the same properties. 

Fannie Mae’s home price index excludes prices on properties sold in foreclosure. Fannie Mae’s home price estimates are based on 

preliminary data and are subject to change as additional data becomes available. 

How Home Prices Can Affect Our Financial Results

• Actual and forecasted home prices impact our provision or benefit for credit losses as well as the growth and 

size of our guaranty book of business.

• Changes in home prices affect the amount of equity that borrowers have in their homes. Borrowers with less 

equity typically have higher delinquency and default rates.

• As home prices increase, the severity of losses we incur on defaulted loans that we hold or guarantee 

decreases because the amount we can recover from the properties securing the loans increases. Declines in 

home prices increase the losses we incur on defaulted loans.

MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 7
• As home prices rise, the principal balance of loans associated with purchase money mortgages may increase, 

causing growth in the size of our guaranty book. Additionally, rising home prices can increase the amount of 

equity borrowers have in their home, which may lead to an increase in origination volumes for cash-out 

refinance loans with higher principal balances than the existing loan. Replacing existing loans with newly 

acquired cash-out refinances can affect the growth and size of our guaranty book.

• Home price growth in the first half of 2022 was driven by low levels of housing supply relative to the level of 

demand. We believe some of this demand was driven by home buyers accelerating home purchases in the first 

quarter in anticipation of mortgage interest-rate increases.

• Our most recent forecast of home price growth is that it will slow from an estimated annual growth rate of 

18.9% in 2021 to 16.0% in 2022, with most of this growth having already occurred in the first half of the year. 

Some recent market indicators suggest that home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than 

indicated by our home price forecast. We expect slower home price growth in the second half of 2022 and in 

2023, driven by elevated mortgage interest rates, a slowing economy and reduced affordability, especially for 

low- and moderate-income borrowers. Some regions of the country may also experience home price declines in 

the latter half of 2022.

New Housing Starts

(1)

1,591 1,569

1,679

1,720 1,651

1,112 1,104 1,170 1,187 1,074

479 465

509 533

577

(2.3)%

(0.7)%

6.0% 1.4%

(9.5)%

8.1%

(3.0)%

9.4% 4.7% 8.4%

% quarterly change in multifamily housing starts % quarterly change in single-family housing starts Multifamily starts (in thousands)

Single-family starts (in thousands)

2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22

(1) According to U.S. Census Bureau and subject to revision.

How Housing Activity Can Affect Our Financial Results

• Two key aspects of economic activity that can impact supply and demand for housing and thus mortgage 

lending are the rates of household formation and housing construction.

• Household formation is a key driver of demand for both single-family and multifamily housing as a newly formed 

household will either rent or purchase a home. Thus, changes in the pace of household formation can affect 

prices and credit performance as well as the degree of loss on defaulted loans.

• Growth of household formation stimulates homebuilding. Homebuilding has typically been a cyclical leader, 

weakening prior to a slowdown in U.S. economic activity and accelerating prior to a recovery, which contributes 

to the growth of GDP and employment. However, the housing sector’s performance may vary from its historical 

precedent due to the many uncertainties surrounding future economic or housing policy as well as the impact of 

labor and material shortages on the economy and the housing market.

MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 8
• With regard to housing construction, a decline in housing starts results in fewer new homes being available for 

purchase and potentially a lower volume of mortgage originations. Construction activity can also affect credit 

losses through its impact on home prices. If the growth of demand exceeds the growth of supply, prices will 

appreciate and impact the risk profile of newly originated home purchase mortgages, depending on where in 

the housing cycle the market is. A reduced pace of construction is often associated with a broader economic 

slowdown and may signal expected increases in delinquency and losses on defaulted loans. 

• We expect that elevated mortgage rates leading to diminished home purchase affordability, alongside slowing 

economic growth, will constrain home sales through the remainder of 2022. Additionally, the pace of new 

construction continues to be affected by supply chain disruptions and labor shortages. Given these constraints, 

we expect both single-family home sales and housing starts to decline in 2022 compared with 2021.

GDP, Unemployment Rate and Personal Consumption

(33.4)%

41.4%

3.4%

11.4% 12.0%

2.0% 2.5% 1.8% 1.0%

(31.2)%

33.8%

4.5% 6.3% 6.7%

2.3%

6.9%

(1.6)% (0.9)%

11.0%

7.9% 6.7% 6.0% 5.9% 4.7% 3.9% 3.6% 3.6%

Growth (decline) in U.S. personal consumption, annualized percentage change1 Growth (decline) in GDP, annualized percentage change1 U.S. unemployment rate, as of period end2 2Q20 3Q20 4Q20 1Q21 2Q21 3Q21 4Q21 1Q22 2Q22

(1) Real GDP growth (decline) and personal consumption growth (decline) are based on the quarterly series calculated by the Bureau of 

Economic Analysis and are subject to revision. 

(2) According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and subject to revision.

How GDP, the Unemployment Rate and Personal Consumption Can Affect Our 

Financial Results

• Changes in GDP, the unemployment rate and personal consumption can affect several mortgage market 

factors, including the demand for both single-family and multifamily housing and the level of loan delinquencies, 

which in turn can lead to credit losses.

• Economic growth is a key factor for the performance of mortgage-related assets. In a growing economy, 

employment and income are typically rising, thus allowing borrowers to meet payment requirements, existing 

homeowners to consider purchasing and moving to another home, and renters to consider becoming 

homeowners. Homebuilding typically increases to meet the rise in demand. Mortgage delinquencies typically 

fall in an expanding economy, thereby decreasing credit losses.

• In a slowing economy, employment, income growth and housing activity typically slow as an early indicator of 

reduced economic activity. Typically, as an economic slowdown intensifies, households reduce their spending. 

MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 9
This reduction in consumption then accelerates the slowdown. An economic slowdown can lead to employment 

losses, impairing the ability of borrowers and renters to meet mortgage and rental payments, thus causing loan 

delinquencies to rise. Home sales and mortgage originations also typically fall in a slowing economy.

• While GDP declined in the first half of 2022, we currently expect modest GDP growth for the remainder of the 

year, resulting in minimal GDP growth for 2022. We expect that a modest recession is likely to occur beginning 

in the first quarter of 2023, resulting in an increase in the unemployment rate. We expect our economic outlook 

will be influenced by a number of factors that are subject to change, such as the persistence of inflationary 

pressures, the speed at which expected monetary policy tightening is adjusted, the impact of the Russian war 

in Ukraine on the global economy, the continuance of supply chain disruptions, the degree to which labor 

supply expands, and other potential impacts of the continued COVID-19 pandemic.

See “Risk Factors” in this report and “Risk Factors—Market and Industry Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for further 

discussion of risks to our business and financial results associated with interest rates, home prices, housing activity and 

economic conditions.

Consolidated Results of Operations

This section discusses our condensed consolidated results of operations and should be read together with our 

condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. 

Summary of Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 Variance 2022 2021 Variance

(Dollars in millions)

Net interest income $ 7,808 $ 8,286 $ (478) $ 15,207 $ 15,028 $ 179 

Fee and other income 81 103 (22) 164 190 (26) 

Net revenues 7,889 8,389 (500) 15,371 15,218 153 

Investment gains (losses), net (49) 646 (695) (151) 691 (842) 

Fair value gains (losses), net 529 (446) 975 1,009 338 671 

Administrative expenses (795) (746) (49) (1,603) (1,494) (109) 

Credit-related income (expense):

Benefit (provision) for credit losses (218) 2,588 (2,806) (458) 3,353 (3,811) 

Foreclosed property income (expense) (33) (41) 8 6 (36) 42 

Total credit-related income (expense) (251) 2,547 (2,798) (452) 3,317 (3,769) 

TCCA fees(1) (841) (758) (83) (1,665) (1,489) (176) 

Credit enhancement expense(2) (332) (274) (58) (610) (558) (52) 

Change in expected credit enhancement 

recoveries(3) (47) (44) (3) 13 (75) 88 

Other expenses, net(4) (228) (280) 52 (464) (599) 135 

Income before federal income taxes 5,875 9,034 (3,159) 11,448 15,349 (3,901) 

Provision for federal income taxes (1,222) (1,882) 660 (2,387) (3,204) 817 

Net income $ 4,653 $ 7,152 $ (2,499) $ 9,061 $ 12,145 $ (3,084) 

Total comprehensive income $ 4,649 $ 7,120 $ (2,471) $ 9,050 $ 12,086 $ (3,036) 

(1) TCCA fees refers to the expense recognized as a result of the 10 basis point increase in guaranty fees on all single-family residential 

mortgages delivered to us on or after April 1, 2012 pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 and as extended by 

the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which we remit to Treasury. For more information on TCCA fees, see “Note 1, Summary of 

Significant Accounting Policies—Related Parties—Transactions with Treasury.”

(2) Consists of costs associated with our freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily include our Connecticut Avenue Securities®

(“CAS”) and Credit Insurance Risk TransferTM (“CIRTTM”) programs, enterprise-paid mortgage insurance (“EPMI”) and certain lender risksharing programs.

(3) Includes estimated changes in benefits from our freestanding credit enhancements as well as any realized amounts.

(4) Consists of debt extinguishment gains and losses, housing trust fund expenses, loan subservicing costs, servicer fees paid in connection 

with certain loss mitigation activities, and gains and losses from partnership investments. 

MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 10
Net Interest Income

Our primary source of net interest income is guaranty fees we receive for managing the credit risk on loans underlying 

Fannie Mae MBS held by third parties.

Guaranty fees consist of two primary components: 

• base guaranty fees that we receive over the life of the loan; and

• upfront fees that we receive at the time of loan acquisition primarily related to single-family loan-level price 

adjustments and other fees we receive from lenders, which are amortized into net interest income as cost basis 

adjustments over the contractual life of the loan. We refer to this as amortization income.

We recognize almost all of our guaranty fee revenue in net interest income because we consolidate the substantial 

majority of loans underlying our Fannie Mae MBS in consolidated trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

Guaranty fees from these loans account for the difference between the interest income on loans in consolidated trusts 

and the interest expense on the debt of consolidated trusts.

The timing of when we recognize amortization income can vary based on a number of factors, the most significant of 

which is a change in mortgage interest rates. In a rising interest-rate environment, our mortgage loans tend to prepay 

more slowly, which typically results in lower net amortization income. Conversely, in a declining interest-rate 

environment, our mortgage loans tend to prepay faster, typically resulting in higher net amortization income. 

We also recognize net interest income on the difference between interest income earned on the assets in our retained 

mortgage portfolio and our other investments portfolio (collectively, our “portfolios”) and the interest expense associated 

with the debt that funds those assets. See “Retained Mortgage Portfolio” and “Liquidity and Capital Management—

Liquidity Management—Other Investments Portfolio” for more information about our portfolios.

We recognize fair value changes attributable to movements in benchmark interest rates for mortgage loans and funding 

debt, and for related interest-rate swaps in hedging relationships, as a component of net interest income, including the 

amortization of hedge-related basis adjustments on mortgage loans or funding debt and any related interest accrual on 

the swaps. The income or expense associated with this activity is presented in the “Income from hedge accounting” line 

item in the table below. See “MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations—Hedge Accounting Impact” and “Note 1, 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information about our hedge accounting 

program.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 11
The table below displays the components of our net interest income from our guaranty book of business, which we 

discuss in “Guaranty Book of Business,” and from our portfolios, as well as from hedge accounting.

Components of Net Interest Income

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 Variance 2022 2021 Variance

(Dollars in millions)

Net interest income from guaranty book of 

business:

Base guaranty fee income(1) $ 4,078 $ 3,420 $ 658 $ 7,975 $ 6,617 $ 1,358 

Base guaranty fee income related to TCCA 

fees(2) 841 758 83 1,665 1,489 176 

Net amortization income(3) 2,121 3,736 (1,615) 4,495 6,262 (1,767) 

Total net interest income from guaranty 

book of business 7,040 7,914 (874) 14,135 14,368 (233) 

Net interest income from portfolios(4) 711 306 405 953 572 381 

Income from hedge accounting 57 66 (9) 119 88 31 

Total net interest income $ 7,808 $ 8,286 $ (478) $ 15,207 $ 15,028 $ 179 

Income from hedge accounting included in net 

interest income:

Fair value gains (losses) on designated risk 

management derivatives in fair value 

hedges $ (231) $ 317 $ (548) $ (1,528) $ (861) $ (667) 

Fair value gains (losses) on hedged mortgage 

loans held for investment and debt of 

Fannie Mae(5) 404 (284) 688 1,789 875 914 

Contractual interest income (expense) 

accruals related to interest-rate swaps 

designated as hedging instruments (2) 54 (56) 37 108 (71) 

Discontinued hedge-related basis adjustment 

amortization (114) (21) (93) (179) (34) (145) 

Total income from hedge accounting in net 

interest income $ 57 $ 66 $ (9) $ 119 $ 88 $ 31 

(1) Excludes revenues generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue 

from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us. 

(2) Represents revenues generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental 

revenue from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us. 

(3) Net amortization income refers primarily to the amortization of premiums and discounts on mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts. 

These cost basis adjustments represent the difference between the initial fair value and the carrying value of these instruments as well as 

upfront fees we receive at the time of loan acquisition. It does not include the amortization of cost basis adjustments resulting from hedge 

accounting, which is included in income from hedge accounting. 

(4) Includes interest income from assets held in our retained mortgage portfolio and our other investments portfolio, as well as other assets 

used to support lender liquidity. Also includes interest expense on our outstanding Connecticut Avenue Securities debt.

(5) Amounts are recorded as cost basis adjustments on the hedged loans or debt and amortized over the hedged item’s remaining contractual 

life beginning at the termination of the hedging relationship. See “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” for additional information on the effect of 

our fair value hedge accounting program and related disclosures.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 12
Net interest income decreased in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, primarily as a 

result of lower net amortization income, partially offset by higher base guaranty fee income and higher income from 

portfolios. Net interest income increased in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021, primarily as a result 

of higher base guaranty fee income and higher income from portfolios, partially offset by lower net amortization income. 

More specifically, our net interest income was impacted in the periods by:

• Lower net amortization income. Throughout the second quarter and first half of 2022, we were in a higher 

interest-rate environment and observed lower volumes of refinancing activity compared with the second quarter 

and first half of 2021, which drove fewer prepayments. Lower prepayment volumes result in a slower turnover 

of our book of business. As a result, we had lower amortization income in the second quarter and first half of 

2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, with most of the decrease in amortization income 

occurring in the second quarter of 2022.

• Higher base guaranty fee income. An increase in the size of our guaranty book of business combined with 

higher average charged guaranty fees were the primary drivers of the increase in base guaranty fee income for 

the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021.

• Higher income from portfolios. Higher income from portfolios in the second quarter and first half of 2022 

compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, was primarily driven by higher yields on assets in our 

other investments portfolio as a result of increases in interest rates as well as a decrease in interest expense 

on our funding debt due to a decrease in the average outstanding balance. 

We expect refinancing activity to be significantly lower throughout 2022 compared with 2021 levels as we expect 

interest rates to remain elevated throughout 2022, resulting in fewer borrowers who may benefit from refinancing. As a 

result, we expect lower amortization income in 2022 compared with 2021.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 13
Analysis of Net Interest Income

The table below displays an analysis of our net interest income, average balances and related yields earned on assets 

and incurred on liabilities. For most components of the average balances, we use a daily weighted average of unpaid 

principal balance net of unamortized cost basis adjustments. When daily average balance information is not available, 

such as for mortgage loans, we use monthly averages. 

Analysis of Net Interest Income and Yield(1)

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Average 

Balance 

Interest 

Income/ 

(Expense)

Average 

Rates 

Earned/

Paid

Average 

Balance

Interest 

Income/ 

(Expense)

Average 

Rates 

Earned/

Paid

(Dollars in millions)

Interest-earning assets:

Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae $ 63,702 $ 945 5.93 % $ 99,364 $ 782 3.15 %

Mortgage loans of consolidated 

trusts 4,021,070 28,137 2.80 3,712,015 24,150 2.60 

Total mortgage loans(2) 4,084,772 29,082 2.85 3,811,379 24,932 2.62 

Mortgage-related securities 4,994 34 2.72 6,637 42 2.53 

Non-mortgage-related securities(3) 131,686 284 0.86 132,921 98 0.29 

Securities purchased under 

agreements to resell 16,171 28 0.69 61,428 4 0.03 

Advances to lenders 5,508 27 1.96 7,910 31 1.57 

Total interest-earning assets $ 4,243,131 $ 29,455 2.78 % $ 4,020,275 $ 25,107 2.50 %

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Short-term funding debt $ 3,125 $ (5) 0.64 % $ 3,790 $ (1) 0.11 %

Long-term funding debt 143,064 (539) 1.51 246,045 (673) 1.09 

CAS debt 10,046 (128) 5.10 14,321 (149) 4.16 

Total debt of Fannie Mae 156,235 (672) 1.72 264,156 (823) 1.25 

Debt securities of consolidated 

trusts held by third parties 4,024,468 (20,975) 2.08 3,742,947 (15,998) 1.71 

Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 4,180,703 $ (21,647) 2.07 % $ 4,007,103 $ (16,821) 1.68 %

Net interest income/net interest yield $ 7,808 0.74 % $ 8,286 0.81 %

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 14
For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Average 

Balance 

Interest 

Income/ 

(Expense)

Average 

Rates 

Earned/

Paid

Average 

Balance

Interest 

Income/ 

(Expense)

Average 

Rates 

Earned/

Paid

(Dollars in millions)

Interest-earning assets:

Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae $ 65,006 $ 1,574 4.84 % $ 103,372 $ 1,607 3.11 %

Mortgage loans of consolidated 

trusts 3,983,347 54,650 2.74 3,658,573 46,678 2.55 

Total mortgage loans(2) 4,048,353 56,224 2.78 3,761,945 48,285 2.57 

Mortgage-related securities 5,234 57 2.18 7,018 84 2.39 

Non-mortgage-related securities(3) 141,707 427 0.60 148,576 215 0.29 

Securities purchased under 

agreements to resell 18,260 34 0.37 60,769 12 0.04 

Advances to lenders 6,233 53 1.69 9,438 73 1.54 

Total interest-earning assets $ 4,219,787 $ 56,795 2.69 % $ 3,987,746 $ 48,669 2.44 %

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Short-term funding debt $ 4,019 $ (6) 0.30 % $ 6,768 $ (4) 0.12 %

Long-term funding debt 158,158 (1,089) 1.38 252,853 (1,433) 1.13 

CAS debt 10,444 (247) 4.73 14,561 (302) 4.15 

Total debt of Fannie Mae 172,621 (1,342) 1.55 274,182 (1,739) 1.27 

Debt securities of consolidated 

trusts held by third parties 3,995,645 (40,246) 2.01 3,693,674 (31,902) 1.73 

Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 4,168,266 $ (41,588) 2.00 % $ 3,967,856 $ (33,641) 1.70 %

Net interest income/net interest yield $ 15,207 0.72 % $ 15,028 0.75 %

(1) Includes the effects of discounts, premiums and other cost basis adjustments.

(2) Average balance includes mortgage loans on nonaccrual status. Interest income from yield maintenance revenue and the amortization of 

loan fees, primarily consisting of upfront cash fees, was $1.4 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, for the second quarter of 2022 and first 

half of 2022, compared with $2.4 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively, for the second quarter of 2021 and first half of 2021.

(3) Consists of cash, cash equivalents and U.S. Treasury securities.

Analysis of Deferred Amortization Income

We initially recognize mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at 

fair value. The difference between the initial fair value and the carrying value of these instruments is recorded as a cost 

basis adjustment, either as a premium or a discount, in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We amortize these 

cost basis adjustments over the contractual lives of the loans or debt. On a net basis, for mortgage loans and debt of 

consolidated trusts, we are in a premium position with respect to debt of consolidated trusts, which represents deferred 

income we will recognize in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as 

amortization income in future periods. 

Deferred Amortization Income Represented by Net Premium Position

on Debt of Consolidated Trusts

(Dollars in billions)

$27.5 $26.3

$23.4

6/30/2021 12/31/2021 6/30/2022

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 15
Investment Gains (Losses), Net

Investment gains (losses), net primarily includes gains and losses recognized on the sale of available-for-sale (“AFS”) 

securities, the sale of loans, gains and losses recognized on the consolidation and deconsolidation of securities, and 

lower of cost or fair value adjustments on held-for-sale (“HFS”) loans. 

The shift from net investment gains in the second quarter and first half of 2021 to net investment losses in the second 

quarter and first half of 2022 was primarily driven by a significant decrease in the volume of single-family reperforming 

loan sales coupled with lower loan sale prices in 2022.

Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

The estimated fair value of our derivatives, trading securities and other financial instruments carried at fair value may 

fluctuate substantially from period to period because of changes in interest rates, the yield curve, mortgage and credit 

spreads and implied volatility, as well as activity related to these financial instruments. 

As discussed below in “Impact of Hedge Accounting on Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net,” we apply fair value hedge 

accounting to reduce earnings volatility in our financial statements driven by changes in interest rates. Accordingly, we 

recognize the fair value gains and losses and the contractual interest income and expense associated with risk 

management derivatives designated in qualifying hedging relationships in net interest income.

The table below displays the components of our fair value gains and losses, which includes the impact of hedge 

accounting.

Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses) attributable to:

Net contractual interest income (expense) on interest-rate swaps $ (30) $ 61 $ (2) $ 104 

Net change in fair value during the period (219) 374 (1,702) (637) 

Impact of hedge accounting 233 (371) 1,491 753 

Risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses), net (16) 64 (213) 220 

Mortgage commitment derivatives fair value gains (losses), net 844 (553) 2,416 529 

Credit enhancement derivatives fair value losses, net (29) (18) (51) (108) 

Total derivatives fair value gains (losses), net 799 (507) 2,152 641 

Trading securities gains (losses), net (665) 161 (2,435) (597) 

Long-term debt fair value gains (losses), net(1) 558 (89) 1,637 284 

Other, net(2) (163) (11) (345) 10 

Fair value gains (losses), net $ 529 $ (446) $ 1,009 $ 338 

(1) Consists of fair value gains and losses on CAS and non-CAS debt held at fair value.

(2) Consists primarily of fair value gains and losses on mortgage loans held at fair value.

Fair value gains, net in the second quarter and first half of 2022 were primarily driven by:

• increases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives due to gains on commitments to sell mortgagerelated securities as prices decreased during the commitment period due to rising interest rates and widening 

of the secondary spread, which is the spread between the 30-year MBS current coupon yield and 10-year U.S. 

Treasury rate; and

• gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, also due to rising interest rates 

and widening of the secondary spread.

These gains were partially offset by fair value losses in the second quarter and first half of 2022 on trading securities, 

primarily driven by increases in U.S. Treasury yields, which resulted in losses on fixed-rate securities held in our other 

investments portfolio.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 16
Fair value losses, net in the second quarter of 2021 were primarily driven by decreases in the fair value of mortgage 

commitment derivatives due to losses on commitments to sell mortgage-related securities as prices increased during 

the commitment period as interest rates declined. These losses were partially offset by gains on trading securities due 

to decreases in U.S. Treasury yields during the second quarter of 2021, which resulted in gains on fixed-rate securities 

held in our other investments portfolio as prices rose.

Fair value gains, net in the first half of 2021 were primarily driven by:

• increases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives due to gains on commitments to sell mortgagerelated securities as prices decreased during the commitment period as interest rates increased; and 

• gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, due to increases in interest 

rates.

These gains were partially offset by fair value losses in the first half of 2021 on trading securities, primarily driven by 

increases in interest rates during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in losses on fixed-rate securities held in our 

other investments portfolio.

Impact of Hedge Accounting on Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

Our earnings can experience volatility due to interest-rate changes and differing accounting treatments that apply to 

certain financial instruments on our balance sheet. To help address this volatility, we began applying fair value hedge 

accounting in January 2021 to reduce the current-period impact on our earnings related to changes in specified 

benchmark interest rates. Hedge accounting aligns the timing of when we recognize fair value changes in hedged items 

attributable to these benchmark interest-rate movements with fair value changes in the hedging instrument. For 

additional discussion on the purpose and structure of our hedge accounting program, see “Risk Management—Market 

Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management—Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk.”

The table below displays the amount of contractual interest accruals and fair value gains and losses related to 

designated interest-rate swaps in qualifying hedging relationships that are recognized in “Net interest income” rather 

than “Fair value gains (losses), net” as a result of hedge accounting. Derivatives not in hedging relationships are not 

affected. 

Impact of Hedge Accounting on Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Net contractual interest income (expense) accruals related to interest-rate swaps 

designated as hedging instruments recognized in net interest income $ (2) $ 54 $ 37 $ 108 

Fair value gains (losses) on derivatives designated as hedging instruments recognized in 

net interest income (231) 317 (1,528) (861) 

Fair value gains (losses), net recognized in net interest income from hedge accounting $ (233) $ 371 $ (1,491) $ (753) 

Credit-Related Income (Expense)

Our credit-related income or expense can vary substantially from period to period based on a number of factors, such 

as changes in actual and forecasted home prices or property valuations, fluctuations in actual and forecasted interest 

rates, borrower payment behavior, events such as natural disasters or pandemics, the types, volume and effectiveness 

of our loss mitigation activities, including forbearances and loan modifications, the volume of foreclosures completed 

and the redesignation of loans from held for investment (“HFI”) to held for sale (“HFS”).

In recent periods, changes in actual and projected interest rates have been a significant driver of our credit-related 

income (expense) as these changes drive prepayment speeds, which impacts the measurement of the economic 

concessions granted to borrowers on modified loans. However, pursuant to our adoption of Accounting Standards 

Update (“ASU”) 2022-02 on January 1, 2022, we prospectively discontinued TDR accounting and no longer measure 

the economic concession for restructurings occurring on or after the adoption date. This accounting also results in the 

elimination of any existing economic concession related to a loan that was previously designated as a TDR if such loan 

is restructured on or after January 1, 2022. Although increases in interest rates were a meaningful driver of our creditrelated expense in the first half of 2022, we expect the decrease in the balance of loans that were previously designated 

as TDRs will reduce the sensitivity of our credit-related income (expense) to interest rate volatility over time. See “Note 

1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance” and “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” for more 

information about our adoption of ASU 2022-02.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 17
Our credit-related income or expense and our related loss reserves can also be impacted by updates to the models, 

assumptions and data used in determining our allowance for loan losses. Although we believe the estimates underlying 

our allowance as of June 30, 2022 are reasonable, they are subject to uncertainty. Changes in future economic 

conditions and loan performance from our current expectations may result in volatility in our allowance for loan losses 

and, as a result, our credit-related income or expense. See “Critical Accounting Estimates” for additional information 

about how our estimate of credit losses is subject to uncertainty.

Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses

The table below provides a quantitative analysis of the drivers of our single-family and multifamily benefit or provision for 

credit losses and the change in expected credit enhancement recoveries. The benefit or provision for credit losses 

includes our benefit or provision for loan losses, accrued interest receivable losses and our guaranty loss reserves, and 

excludes credit losses on our available for sale (“AFS”) securities. Many of the drivers that contribute to our benefit or 

provision for credit losses overlap or are interdependent. The attribution shown below is based on internal allocation 

estimates.

Components of Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses and Change in Expected Credit 

Enhancement Recoveries

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses:

Changes in loan activity(1)(2) $ (252) $ 33 $ (591) $ (30) 

Redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS (54) 678 (4) 985 

Actual and forecasted home prices(3) 272 1,124 538 2,303 

Actual and projected interest rates (288) 304 (891) (588) 

Release of economic concessions(4) 203 — 603 — 

Changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan 

delinquencies(2)

 — 210 — 337 

Other(5) (87) 204 (131) 208 

Single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses (206) 2,553 (476) 3,215 

Multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses:

Changes in loan activity(1)(2) 21 (21) 11 (140) 

Actual and projected interest rates (112) 41 (161) 22 

Actual and projected economic data 82 6 88 321 

Estimated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic(2)

 — 23 — 77 

Other(5) (3) (14) 80 (142) 

Multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses (12) 35 18 138 

Total benefit (provision) for credit losses $ (218) $ 2,588 $ (458) $ 3,353 

Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries:(6)

Single-family $ (43) $ (57) $ 26 $ (73) 

Multifamily (4) 7 (13) (15) 

Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries for active loans $ (47) $ (50) $ 13 $ (88) 

(1) Primarily consists of loan acquisitions, liquidations and amortization of modification concessions granted to borrowers and write-offs of 

amounts determined to be uncollectible. For multifamily, changes in loan activity also includes changes in the allowance due to loan 

delinquencies and the impact of changes in debt service coverage ratios (“DSCRs”) based on updated property financial information, 

which is used to assess loan credit quality.

(2) Beginning January 1, 2022, changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies are included in “Changes in 

loan activity.”

(3) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, amounts attributed to actual and forecasted home prices include an adjustment to 

modeled results to reflect some recent market conditions that suggest home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than 

indicated by our home price forecast for the quarter.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 18
(4) Represents the benefit from the release of economic concessions related to loans previously designated as TDRs that received loss 

mitigation arrangements during the period due to the adoption of ASU 2022-02.

(5) Includes provision for allowance on accrued interest receivable. For single-family, also includes changes in the reserve for guaranty losses 

that are not separately included in the other components. For multifamily, also includes the impact of model enhancements implemented in 

the first quarter of 2021. 

(6) Includes increase (decrease) in expected credit enhancement recoveries only for active loans. Recoveries received after foreclosure, 

which are included in “Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries” in “Summary of Condensed Consolidated Results of 

Operations,” are not included.

Single-Family Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses 

The largest driver of our single-family provision for credit losses in the second quarter and first half of 2022 was an 

increase in actual and projected interest rates as of June 30, 2022 compared with March 31, 2022 and December 31, 

2021. As mortgage rates increase, we expect a decrease in future prepayments on single-family loans, including 

modified loans accounted for as TDRs. Lower expected prepayments extend the expected lives of these TDR loans, 

which increases the expected impairment relating to economic concessions provided on them, resulting in a provision 

for credit losses.

Some of the provision from increased actual and projected interest rates in the first half of 2022 was offset by a benefit 

from actual and forecasted home price growth. While home price growth was strong in the second quarter and first half 

of 2022, some recent market indicators suggest that home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than 

indicated by our home price forecast, which reduced the benefit from home price growth recognized in the second 

quarter and first half of 2022. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional information about how home prices 

affect our credit loss estimates, including a discussion of home price appreciation and our home price forecast. Also see 

“Critical Accounting Estimates” for more information about our home price forecast.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for credit losses in the second quarter of 2021 were:

• Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth. During the second quarter of 2021, home price growth 

was very strong. We also increased our expectations for home price growth on a national basis for full-year 

2021.

• Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS. We redesignated 

certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS, as we no longer intended to hold them for the 

foreseeable future or to maturity. Upon redesignation of these loans, we recorded the loans at the lower of cost 

or fair value with a write-off against the allowance for loan losses. Amounts recorded in the allowance related to 

these loans exceeded the amounts written off, resulting in a benefit for credit losses.

• Benefit from lower actual and projected interest rates. Actual and projected interest rates decreased as of June 

30, 2021 compared with March 31, 2021.

• Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies as discussed 

below.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for credit losses in the first half of 2021 were:

• Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth.

• Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS consistent with the 

discussion above.

• Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies. In both the first 

and second quarters of 2021, management used its judgment to reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was 

previously applied to the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The 

decrease in uncertainty as of June 30, 2021 compared with the end of 2020 was primarily driven by the 

passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provided additional economic stimulus and helped 

support continued economic recovery. In addition, the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination program in 

the United States contributed to a significant increase in business activity and an improved economy in 2021, 

decreased uncertainty surrounding the post-pandemic recovery. There was also decreased political uncertainty, 

as well as a decrease in the number of borrowers in a COVID-19-related forbearance, lessening expectations 

of credit losses. However, management continued to apply its judgment and supplemented model results as of 

June 30, 2021 as uncertainty remained regarding the loss mitigation outcomes of borrowers still in forbearance 

and the future course of the pandemic, including the impact on the economy of the spread of new variants of 

the virus and low vaccination rates in certain areas of the country.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 19
The impact of the factors above was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and projected interest rates. Actual 

and projected interest rates were higher as of June 30, 2021 compared with December 31, 2020. 

Multifamily Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily provision for credit losses in the second quarter of 2022 was a 

provision for higher actual and projected interest rates. This provision was partially offset by a benefit from actual and 

projected economic data, including strong property value growth, driven by continued demand for multifamily housing. 

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily benefit for credit losses in the first half of 2022 was a benefit from 

actual and projected economic data. This benefit was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and projected 

interest rates.

The primary factors that contributed to our multifamily benefit for credit losses in the second quarter and first half of 

2021 were: 

• Benefit from actual and projected economic data. In the second quarter and first half of 2021, property value 

forecasts increased due to continued demand for multifamily housing. In addition, improved job growth led to an 

increase in projected average property net operating income, which reduced the probability of loan defaults,

resulting in a benefit for credit losses for the second quarter and first half of 2021.

• Benefit from lower expected credit losses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to our single-family 

provision for credit losses described above, in both the first and second quarters of 2021, management used its 

judgment to further reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was previously applied to the loss projections 

developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The remaining non-modeled adjustment as of 

June 30, 2021, reflected management’s judgment that uncertainty remained surrounding the subsequent 

course of the pandemic, including new strains of the virus and its effect on the economy.

MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 20
Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

This section discusses our condensed consolidated balance sheets and should be read together with our condensed 

consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. 

Summary of Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of

June 30, 

2022

December 31, 

2021 Variance

(Dollars in millions)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents and securities purchased under agreements to 

resell $ 57,030 $ 63,191 $ (6,161) 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents 34,303 66,183 (31,880) 

Investments in securities 65,576 89,043 (23,467) 

Mortgage loans:

Of Fannie Mae 62,780 66,127 (3,347) 

Of consolidated trusts 4,035,220 3,907,744 127,476 

Allowance for loan losses (6,069) (5,629) (440) 

Mortgage loans, net of allowance for loan losses 4,091,931 3,968,242 123,689 

Deferred tax assets, net 12,402 12,715 (313) 

Other assets 27,725 29,792 (2,067) 

Total assets $ 4,288,967 $ 4,229,166 $ 59,801 

Liabilities and equity

Debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ 144,455 $ 200,892 $ (56,437) 

Of consolidated trusts 4,064,192 3,957,299 106,893 

Other liabilities 23,913 23,618 295 

Total liabilities 4,232,560 4,181,809 50,751 

Fannie Mae stockholders’ equity:

Senior preferred stock 120,836 120,836 — 

Other net deficit (64,429) (73,479) 9,050 

Total equity 56,407 47,357 9,050 

Total liabilities and equity $ 4,288,967 $ 4,229,166 $ 59,801 

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Restricted cash and cash equivalents declined from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 primarily driven by a 

decrease in prepayments due to lower refinance volumes for loans of consolidated trusts, resulting in lower cash 

balances held in trust at period end. For information on our accounting policy for restricted cash and cash equivalents, 

see “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Investments in Securities

Investment in securities declined from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 as we used short-term liquid assets that 

accumulated in prior periods to fund our operations and to pay off maturing debt during the first half of 2022. For further 

discussion, see “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management.”

Mortgage Loans, Net of Allowance

The mortgage loans reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets are classified as either HFS or HFI and 

include loans owned by Fannie Mae and loans held in consolidated trusts. 

Mortgage loans, net of allowance for loan losses increased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021, 

driven by loan acquisitions outpacing liquidations and sales. 

For additional information on our mortgage loans, see “Note 3, Mortgage Loans,” and for additional information on 

changes in our allowance for loan losses, see “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses.” 

MD&A | Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 21
Debt

The decrease in debt of Fannie Mae from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 was primarily due to the maturity of 

long-term debt, which was not replaced with new issuances as our funding needs remained low. The increase in debt of 

consolidated trusts from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 was primarily driven by sales of Fannie Mae MBS, which 

are accounted for as issuances of debt of consolidated trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, since the 

MBS certificate ownership is transferred from us to a third party. See “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity 

Management—Debt Funding” for a summary of activity in short-term and long-term debt of Fannie Mae. Also see “Note 

7, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt” for additional information on our total outstanding debt.

Stockholders’ Equity

Our stockholders’ equity (also referred to as our net worth) increased to $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022, compared 

with $47.4 billion as of December 31, 2021, due to the $9.1 billion in comprehensive income recognized during the first 

half of 2022.

The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increased to $173.3 billion as of June 30, 2022 and 

will further increase to $177.9 billion as of September 30, 2022 due to the $4.6 billion increase in our net worth during 

the second quarter of 2022. For more information about how this liquidation preference is determined, see “Business—

Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform—Treasury Agreements—Senior Preferred Stock” 

in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Liquidity and Capital Management—Capital Management—Capital Activity” in this report.

Retained Mortgage Portfolio

We use our retained mortgage portfolio primarily to provide liquidity to the mortgage market through our whole loan 

conduit and to support our loss mitigation activities, particularly in times of economic stress when other sources of 

liquidity to the mortgage market may decrease or withdraw. Previously, we also used our retained mortgage portfolio for 

investment purposes.

Our retained mortgage portfolio consists of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities that we own, including 

Fannie Mae MBS and non-Fannie Mae mortgage-related securities. Assets held by consolidated MBS trusts that back 

mortgage-related securities owned by third parties are not included in our retained mortgage portfolio. 

The chart below separates the instruments within our retained mortgage portfolio, measured by unpaid principal 

balance, into three categories based on each instrument’s use:

• Lender liquidity, which includes balances related to our whole loan conduit activity, supports our efforts to 

provide liquidity to the single-family and multifamily mortgage markets.

• Loss mitigation supports our loss mitigation efforts through the purchase of delinquent loans from our MBS 

trusts. 

• Other represents assets that were previously purchased for investment purposes. The majority of the balance 

of “Other” as of June 30, 2022 consisted of Fannie Mae reverse mortgage securities and reverse mortgage 

loans. We expect the amount of assets in “Other” will continue to decline over time as they liquidate, mature or 

are sold.

Retained Mortgage Portfolio

(Dollars in billions)

$50.7

$32.0

$37.6

$41.9

$20.9

$17.4

$109.2

$91.3

Lender liquidity Loss mitigation Other 12/31/2021 6/30/2022

The decrease in our retained mortgage portfolio as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021 was primarily 

due to a decrease in our lender liquidity portfolio driven by sales of Fannie Mae securities and a decline in mortgage 

MD&A | Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 22
refinance activity leading to lower acquisition volumes through the whole loan conduit. This was partially offset by an 

increase in our loss mitigation portfolio driven by an increase in our purchase of delinquent loans from MBS trusts as 

they exit COVID-19-related forbearance.

The table below displays the components of our retained mortgage portfolio, measured by unpaid principal balance. 

Based on the nature of the asset, these balances are included in either “Investments in securities” or “Mortgage loans of 

Fannie Mae” in our Summary of Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets shown above.

Retained Mortgage Portfolio

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Lender liquidity:

Agency securities(1) $ 20,372 $ 34,509 

Mortgage loans 11,701 16,174 

Total lender liquidity 32,073 50,683 

Loss mitigation mortgage loans(2) 41,864 37,601 

Other:

Reverse mortgage loans 7,218 9,908 

Mortgage loans 3,816 3,954 

Reverse mortgage securities(3) 5,490 6,146 

Other(4) 859 929 

Total other 17,383 20,937 

Total retained mortgage portfolio $ 91,320 $ 109,221 

Retained mortgage portfolio by segment:

Single-family mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities $ 85,739 $ 101,518 

Multifamily mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities $ 5,581 $ 7,703 

(1) Consists of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae mortgage-related securities, including Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie 

Mae. Excludes Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae reverse mortgage securities and Fannie Mae-wrapped private-label securities.

(2) Includes single-family loans on nonaccrual status of $8.5 billion and $11.0 billion, and multifamily loans on nonaccrual status of $233 

million and $340 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. 

(3) Consists of Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae reverse mortgage securities.

(4) Consists of private-label and other securities, Fannie Mae-wrapped private-label securities and mortgage revenue bonds.

The amount of mortgage assets that we may own is capped at $250 billion and will decrease to $225 billion on 

December 31, 2022 under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury. In addition, we 

are currently required to cap our mortgage assets at $225 billion per instruction from FHFA. See “Business—

Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information 

on our portfolio cap.

We include 10% of the notional value of interest-only securities in calculating the size of the retained portfolio for the 

purpose of determining compliance with the senior preferred stock purchase agreement retained portfolio limits and 

associated FHFA guidance. As of June 30, 2022, 10% of the notional value of our interest-only securities was $1.8 

billion, which is not included in the table above.

Under the terms of our MBS trust documents, we have the option or, in some instances, the obligation, to purchase 

mortgage loans that meet specific criteria from an MBS trust. The purchase price for these loans is the unpaid principal 

balance of the loan plus accrued interest. If a delinquent loan remains in a single-family MBS trust, the servicer is 

responsible for advancing the borrower’s missed scheduled principal and interest payments to the MBS holders for up 

to four months, after which time we must make these missed payments. In addition, we must reimburse servicers for 

advanced principal and interest payments. The cost of purchasing most delinquent loans from a single-family Fannie 

Mae MBS trust and holding them in our retained mortgage portfolio is currently less than the cost of advancing 

delinquent payments to security holders. 

In support of our loss mitigation strategies, we purchased $11.2 billion of loans from our single-family MBS trusts in the 

first half of 2022, the substantial majority of which were delinquent, compared with $3.7 billion of loans purchased from 

single-family MBS trusts in the first half of 2021. We purchased more loans out of trust in the first half of 2022 than in 

MD&A | Retained Mortgage Portfolio

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 23
the first half of 2021 because the forbearance periods for many loans that entered into a COVID-19-related forbearance 

began expiring in late 2021. The size of our retained mortgage portfolio will be impacted by the volume of loans we 

ultimately buy, the timing of those purchases, and the length of time those loans remain in our retained mortgage 

portfolio. See “Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Problem 

Loan Management—Single-Family Loans in Forbearance” and “Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk 

Management—Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Foreclosure Prevention—Multifamily Loan Forbearance” for 

information on our loans in forbearance.

Guaranty Book of Business

Our “guaranty book of business” consists of: 

• Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, excluding the portions of any structured securities we issue that are backed by 

Freddie Mac securities; 

• mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio; and 

• other credit enhancements that we provide on mortgage assets. 

“Total Fannie Mae guarantees” consists of: 

• our guaranty book of business; and 

• the portions of any structured securities we issue that are backed by Freddie Mac securities. 

We and Freddie Mac issue single-family uniform mortgage-backed securities, or “UMBS.” In this report, we use the term 

“Fannie Mae-issued UMBS” to refer to single-family Fannie Mae MBS that are directly backed by fixed-rate mortgage 

loans and generally eligible for trading in the to-be-announced (“TBA”) market. We use the term “Fannie Mae MBS” or 

“our MBS” to refer to any type of mortgage-backed security that we issue, including UMBS, Supers®, Real Estate 

Mortgage Investment Conduit securities (“REMICs”) and other types of single-family or multifamily mortgage-backed 

securities.

Some Fannie Mae MBS that we issue are backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities. When we resecuritize 

Freddie Mac securities into Fannie Mae-issued structured securities, such as Supers and REMICs, our guaranty of 

principal and interest extends to the underlying Freddie Mac securities. However, Freddie Mac continues to guarantee 

the payment of principal and interest on the underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have resecuritized. Although our 

guaranty of the underlying Freddie Mac securities requires us to hold additional capital under the enterprise regulatory 

capital framework, prior to July 1, 2022, we did not charge an incremental fee to create structured securities that include 

Freddie Mac securities. Effective July 1, 2022, we began charging an upfront fee of 50 basis points to include Freddie 

Mac securities in our structured securities. For more information regarding this upfront fee, see “Legislation and 

Regulation—Upfront Fee for Commingled Securities and Review of the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework.” 

References to our single-family guaranty book of business exclude Freddie Mac-acquired mortgage loans underlying 

Freddie Mac securities that we have resecuritized.

Our issuance of structured securities backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities creates additional off-balance 

sheet exposure. Our guaranty extends to the underlying Freddie Mac security included in the structured security, but we 

do not have control over the Freddie Mac mortgage loan securitizations. Because we do not have the power to direct 

matters (primarily the servicing of mortgage loans) that impact the credit risk to which we are exposed, which constitute 

control of these securitization trusts, we do not consolidate these trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, 

giving rise to off-balance sheet exposure. See “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management—Off-Balance 

Sheet Arrangements” and “Note 6, Financial Guarantees” for information regarding our maximum exposure to loss on 

unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and Freddie Mac securities.

MD&A | Retained Mortgage Portfolio

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 24
The table below displays the composition of our guaranty book of business based on unpaid principal balance. Our 

single-family guaranty book of business accounted for 89% of our total guaranty book of business as of June 30, 2022

and December 31, 2021. 

Composition of Fannie Mae Guaranty Book of Business

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

SingleFamily Multifamily TotalSingleFamily Multifamily Total

(Dollars in millions)

Conventional guaranty book of business(1) $ 3,639,402 $ 429,005 $ 4,068,407 $ 3,536,613 $ 419,463 $ 3,956,076 

Government guaranty book of business(2) 13,550 660 14,210 16,777 718 17,495 

Guaranty book of business 3,652,952 429,665 4,082,617 3,553,390 420,181 3,973,571 

Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae(3) 247,559 — 247,559 212,259 — 212,259 

Total Fannie Mae guarantees $ 3,900,511 $ 429,665 $ 4,330,176 $ 3,765,649 $ 420,181 $ 4,185,830 

(1) Refers to mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities that are not guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.

(2) Refers to mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.

(3) Consists of off-balance sheet arrangements of approximately (i) $205.2 billion and $177.8 billion in unpaid principal balance of Freddie 

Mac-issued UMBS backing Fannie Mae-issued Supers as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively; and (ii) $42.4 billion and 

$34.5 billion in unpaid principal balance of Freddie Mac securities backing Fannie Mae-issued REMICs as of June 30, 2022 and December 

31, 2021, respectively.

The Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended, including by the Housing 

and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (together, the “GSE Act”) requires us to set aside each year an amount equal to 

4.2 basis points of the unpaid principal balance of our new business purchases and to pay this amount to specified HUD

and Treasury funds in support of affordable housing. In March 2022, we paid $598 million to the funds based on our 

new business purchases in 2021. For the first half of 2022, we recognized an expense of $188 million related to this 

obligation based on $446.7 billion in new business purchases during the period. We expect to pay this amount to the 

funds in 2023, plus additional amounts to be accrued based on our new business purchases in the second half of 2022. 

See “Business—Legislation and Regulation—GSE-Focused Matters—Affordable Housing Allocations” in our 2021 Form 

10-K for more information regarding this obligation.

Business Segments

We have two reportable business segments: Single-Family and Multifamily. The Single-Family business operates in the 

secondary mortgage market relating to single-family mortgage loans, which are secured by properties containing four or 

fewer residential dwelling units. The Multifamily business operates in the secondary mortgage market relating primarily 

to multifamily mortgage loans, which are secured by properties containing five or more residential units.

The chart below displays net revenues and net income for each of our business segments for the first half of 2022

compared with the first half of 2021. Net revenues consist of net interest income and fee and other income.

Business Segment Net Revenues and Net Income

(Dollars in billions) 

$13.3 $13.0

$10.9

$7.6

Single-Family net revenues

Single-Family net income

First Half 2021 First Half 2022

$1.9

$2.4

$1.2 $1.5

Multifamily net revenues

Multifamily net income

First Half 2021 First Half 2022

MD&A | Guaranty Book of Business

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 25
In the following sections, we describe each segment’s business metrics, financial results and credit performance. For an 

overview of how we are compensated for and manage the risk of credit losses through the life cycle of our loans and 

how we measure our credit risk, see “Business—Managing Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Single-Family Business

This section supplements and updates information regarding our Single-Family business segment in our 2021 Form 10-

K. See “MD&A—Single-Family Business” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the primary 

business activities, lenders, investors and competition of our Single-Family business.

Single-Family Mortgage Market

Housing activity decreased in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the first quarter of 2022. Total existing home 

sales averaged 5.4 million units annualized in the second quarter of 2022, compared with 6.1 million units in the first 

quarter of 2022, according to data from the National Association of REALTORS®. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 

new single-family home sales averaged an annualized rate of approximately 612,000 units in the second quarter of 

2022, compared with approximately 776,000 units in the first quarter of 2022. 

The 30-year fixed mortgage rate averaged 5.52% in June 2022, compared with 4.17% in March 2022, according to 

Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey®.

According to the July forecast from our Economic and Strategic Research Group, we forecast that total originations in 

the U.S. single-family mortgage market in 2022 will decrease from 2021 levels by approximately 43%, from an 

estimated $4.47 trillion in 2021 to $2.53 trillion in 2022, and the amount of refinance originations in the U.S. single-family 

mortgage market will decrease from an estimated $2.61 trillion in 2021 to $756 billion in 2022. We estimate that 

approximately two-thirds of the single-family refinance originations we forecast for 2022 occurred during the first half of 

2022. Our July forecast is based on data available as of July 11, 2022. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for 

additional discussion of how housing activity can affect our financial results and the uncertainties that may affect our 

forecasts and expectations. 

Single-Family Market Activity

Single-Family Mortgage-Related Securities Issuances Share

Our single-family Fannie Mae MBS issuances were $174.5 billion for the second quarter of 2022, compared with $388.5 

billion for the second quarter of 2021. This decrease was driven by a lower volume of refinance activity in the second 

quarter of 2022 due to higher mortgage rates. Based on the latest data available, the chart below displays our estimated 

share of single-family mortgage-related securities issuances in the second quarter of 2022 as compared with that of our 

primary competitors for the issuance of single-family mortgage-related securities. 

Single-Family Mortgage-Related Securities Issuances Share

Second Quarter 2022

Fannie Mae: 36%

Freddie Mac: 29%

Ginnie Mae: 29%

Private-label securities: 6%

We estimate our share of single-family mortgage-related securities issuances was 37% in the first quarter of 2022 and 

40% in the second quarter of 2021.

MD&A | Business Segments

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 26
Presentation of Our Single-Family Guaranty Book of Business

For purposes of the information reported in this “Single-Family Business” section, we measure the single-family 

guaranty book of business using the unpaid principal balance of our mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS 

outstanding. By contrast, the single-family guaranty book of business presented in the “Composition of Fannie Mae 

Guaranty Book of Business” table in the “Guaranty Book of Business” section is based on the unpaid principal balance 

of the Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, rather than the unpaid principal balance of the underlying mortgage loans. These

amounts differ primarily as a result of payments we receive on underlying loans that have not yet been remitted to the 

MBS holders or instances where we have advanced missed borrower payments on mortgage loans to make required 

distributions to related MBS holders. As measured for purposes of the information reported below, our single-family 

conventional guaranty book of business was $3,613.9 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $3,483.1 billion as of December 

31, 2021.

Single-Family Business Metrics

Net interest income for our Single-Family business is driven by the guaranty fees we charge and the size of our singlefamily conventional guaranty book of business. The guaranty fees we charge are based on the characteristics of the 

loans we acquire. We may adjust our guaranty fees in light of market conditions and to achieve return targets. As a 

result, the average charged guaranty fee on new acquisitions may fluctuate based on the credit quality and product mix 

of loans acquired, as well as market conditions and other factors. 

The charts below display our average charged guaranty fees, net of TCCA fees, on our single-family conventional 

guaranty book of business and on new single-family conventional loan acquisitions, along with our average single-family 

conventional guaranty book of business and our single-family conventional loan acquisitions for the periods presented. 

Select Single-Family Business Metrics

(Dollars in billions) 

45.2 bps 45.9 bps

47.9 bps

51.7 bps

Q2 2021 Q2 2022

$3,324.6

$3,590.6

$373.3

$172.3

Q2 2021 Q2 2022

Average charged guaranty fee on single-family 

conventional guaranty book of business, net of TCCA 

fees(1) 

Average single-family conventional guaranty book 

of business(2)

Average charged guaranty fee on new single-family 

conventional acquisitions, net of TCCA fees(1)

Single-family conventional acquisitions

(1) Excludes the impact of a 10 basis point guaranty fee increase implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is 

remitted to Treasury and not retained by us.

(2) Our single-family conventional guaranty book of business primarily consists of single-family conventional mortgage loans underlying 

Fannie Mae MBS outstanding. It also includes single-family conventional mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage 

portfolio, and other credit enhancements that we provide on single-family conventional mortgage assets. Our single-family conventional 

guaranty book of business does not include: (a) mortgage loans guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government; or (b) 

Freddie Mac-acquired mortgage loans underlying Freddie Mac-issued UMBS that we have resecuritized. Our average single-family 

conventional guaranty book of business is based on quarter-end balances.

Average charged guaranty fee on newly acquired conventional single-family loans is a metric management uses to 

measure the price we earn as compensation for the credit risk we manage and to assess our return. Average charged 

guaranty fee represents, on an annualized basis, the average of the base guaranty fees charged during the period for 

our single-family conventional guaranty arrangements, which we receive monthly over the life of the loan, plus the 

recognition of any upfront cash payments, including loan-level price adjustments, based on an estimated average life at 

the time of acquisition. We use loan-level price adjustments, including various upfront risk-based fees, to price for the 

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Business Metrics

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 27
credit risk we assume in providing our guaranty. FHFA must approve changes to the national loan-level price 

adjustments we charge and can direct us to make other changes to our single-family guaranty fee pricing. 

Our average charged guaranty fee on newly acquired conventional single-family loans, net of TCCA fees, increased in 

the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, due to the overall weaker credit risk profile of our 

second quarter 2022 acquisitions driven by the increased share of our acquisitions that were purchase loans, versus 

refinancings, in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021. We generally charge higher 

guaranty fees on loans with weaker credit risk characteristics. See “Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—

Single-Family Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring” below for a description of key risk characteristics of our singlefamily acquisitions in the second quarter of 2022 and second quarter of 2021. 

In January 2022, FHFA announced targeted increases to the upfront fees we charge for certain high-balance loans and 

second home loans. High-balance loans are mortgages originated in certain designated areas above the baseline 

conforming loan limit. The new fees became effective for loans purchased on or after April 1, 2022, and for loans 

delivered into an MBS trust with an issue date on or after April 1, 2022. High-balance loans will continue to be eligible 

for our existing affordable loan products, HomeReady® and HFA PreferredTM, which offer caps on loan-level price 

adjustments for eligible borrowers. In addition, the high-balance upfront fees will not be charged on loans to first time 

homebuyers in high-cost areas with incomes at or below 100% of area median income. The portion of our acquisitions 

attributed to high-balance and second home loans decreased in second quarter of 2022 compared with the first quarter 

of 2022.

Single-Family Business Financial Results(1)

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 Variance 2022 2021 Variance

(Dollars in millions)

Net interest income(2) $ 6,573 $ 7,323 $ (750) $ 12,828 $ 13,217 $ (389) 

Fee and other income 60 80 (20) 121 142 (21) 

Net revenues 6,633 7,403 (770) 12,949 13,359 (410) 

Investment gains (losses), net (27) 658 (685) (93) 722 (815) 

Fair value gains (losses), net 543 (386) 929 1,070 354 716 

Administrative expenses (671) (619) (52) (1,354) (1,242) (112) 

Credit-related income (expense)(3) (231) 2,525 (2,756) (467) 3,204 (3,671) 

TCCA fees(2) (841) (758) (83) (1,665) (1,489) (176) 

Credit enhancement expense (270) (219) (51) (480) (445) (35) 

Change in expected credit enhancement 

recoveries(4) (43) (57) 14 26 (73) 99 

Other expenses, net(5) (199) (315) 116 (397) (602) 205 

Income before federal income taxes 4,894 8,232 (3,338) 9,589 13,788 (4,199) 

Provision for federal income taxes (1,008) (1,725) 717 (1,994) (2,887) 893 

Net income $ 3,886 $ 6,507 $ (2,621) $ 7,595 $ 10,901 $ (3,306) 

(1) See “Note 9, Segment Reporting” for information about our segment allocation methodology.

(2) Reflects the impact of a 10 basis point guaranty fee increase implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is 

remitted to Treasury. The resulting revenue is included in “Net interest income” and the expense is recognized as “TCCA fees.” 

(3) Consists of the benefit or provision for credit losses and foreclosed property income or expense. 

(4) Consists of increase (decrease) in benefits recognized from our single-family freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily relate to 

our CAS and CIRT programs. 

(5) Consists primarily of debt extinguishment gains and losses, housing trust fund expenses, servicer fees paid in connection with certain loss 

mitigation activities, and loan subservicing costs.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Business Metrics

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 28
Net Interest Income

The decrease in single-family net interest income for the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second 

quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily driven by lower net amortization income due to lower prepayment volumes, 

partially offset by higher base guaranty fee income and higher income from portfolios. 

See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income” for more information on the factors that contributed to 

our single-family net interest income.

Investment Gains (Losses), Net

The shift from net investment gains in the second quarter and first half of 2021 to net investment losses in the second 

quarter and first half of 2022 was primarily driven by a significant decrease in the volume of single-family reperforming 

loan sales coupled with lower loan sale prices in 2022.

The drivers of investment gains (losses), net for the Single-Family segment are consistent with the drivers of investment 

gains (losses), net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, which we 

discuss in “Consolidated Results of Operations—Investment Gains (Losses), Net.”

Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

Fair value gains, net in the second quarter and first half of 2022 were driven by gains as a result of increases in the fair 

value of mortgage commitment derivatives and gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at 

fair value, which were partially offset by losses on trading securities.

Fair value losses, net in the second quarter of 2021 were primarily driven by decreases in the fair value of mortgage 

commitment derivatives, partially offset by gains on trading securities.

Fair value gains, net in the first half of 2021 were driven by gains as a result of increases in the fair value of mortgage 

commitment derivatives and gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, which 

were partially offset by losses on trading securities.

The drivers of fair value gains, net for the Single-Family segment are consistent with the drivers of fair value gains, net 

in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, which we discuss in “Consolidated 

Results of Operations—Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net.” 

For information on the implementation of our hedge accounting program and its impact on our financial statements, see 

“Consolidated Results of Operations—Hedge Accounting Impact” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Consolidated Results of 

Operations—Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net” in this report.

Credit-Related Income (Expense)

The largest driver of credit-related expense for the second quarter and first half of 2022 was a provision for higher actual 

and projected interest rates due to interest rate increases in the first half of 2022. Some of the provision from increased 

actual and projected interest rates in the second quarter and first half of 2022 was offset by a benefit from actual and 

forecasted home price growth.

Credit-related income for the second quarter of 2021 was driven by a benefit for credit losses due primarily to strong 

actual and forecasted home price growth, the redesignation of certain reperforming loans from HFI to HFS, lower actual 

and projected interest rates, and a reduction in our allowance for loan losses for changes in assumptions regarding 

COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies.

Credit-related income for the first half of 2021 was driven by a benefit for credit losses due primarily to strong actual and 

forecasted home price growth, the redesignation of certain reperforming loans from HFI to HFS and a reduction in our 

allowance for loan losses for changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies. The 

impact of those factors was partially offset by higher actual and projected interest rates.

See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” for more information on the primary 

factors that contributed to our single-family credit-related income or expense. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant 

Accounting Policies” and “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” for additional information on our adoption of ASU 2022-02 on 

January 1, 2022 and the prospective discontinuation of TDR accounting.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Business Financial Results

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 29
Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

This section updates our discussion of single-family mortgage credit risk management in our 2021 Form 10-K. For an 

overview of key elements of our mortgage credit risk management, see “Business—Managing Mortgage Credit Risk” in 

our 2021 Form 10-K. For additional information on our acquisition and servicing policies, underwriting and servicing 

standards, quality control process, repurchase requests, and representation and warranty framework, see “MD&A—

Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 30
Single-Family Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring

The following table displays our single-family conventional business volumes and our single-family conventional 

guaranty book of business, based on certain key risk characteristics that we use to evaluate the risk profile and credit 

quality of our single-family loans. 

We provide additional information on the credit characteristics of our single-family loans in quarterly financial 

supplements, which we furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with current reports on Form 8-

K and make available on our website. Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference 

into this report.

Key Risk Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume and Guaranty Book 

of Business(1)

Percent of Single-Family Conventional 

Business Volume at Acquisition(2)

Percent of Single-Family Conventional

Guaranty Book of Business(3)

As of

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021 June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Original loan-to-value (“LTV”) 

ratio:(4)

<= 60% 21 % 31 % 25 % 33 % 27 % 27 %

60.01% to 70% 12 16 14 16 15 15 

70.01% to 80% 33 31 33 31 33 33 

80.01% to 90% 12 10 10 9 10 10 

90.01% to 95% 17 10 13 9 10 10 

95.01% to 100% 5 2 5 2 4 4 

Greater than 100% — * * * 1 1 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Weighted average 75 % 70 % 73 % 69 % 72 % 72 %

Average loan amount $ 300,556 $ 281,749 $ 299,852 $ 282,169 $ 204,264 $ 198,865 

Loan count (in thousands) 573 1,325 1,373 2,742 17,692 17,515 

Estimated mark-to-market LTV 

ratio:(5)

<= 60% 70 % 61 %

60.01% to 70% 16 19 

70.01% to 80% 9 13 

80.01% to 90% 4 5 

90.01% to 100% 1 2 

Greater than 100% * *

Total 100 % 100 %

Weighted average 50 % 54 %

FICO credit score at origination:

< 620 *% — % * % — % 1 % 1 %

620 to < 660 4 3 4 2 4 4 

660 to < 680 5 3 5 3 4 3 

680 to < 700 8 6 8 5 6 7 

700 to < 740 22 18 21 18 19 19 

>= 740 61 70 62 72 66 66 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Weighted average 746 757 747 759 753 753 

Debt-to-income (“DTI”) ratio at 

origination:(6)

<= 43% 68 % 78 % 70 % 79 % 77 % 77 %

43.01% to 45% 10 8 10 8 8 9 

Greater than 45% 22 14 20 13 15 14 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Weighted average 37 % 34 % 36 % 34 % 35 % 34 %

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 31
Percent of Single-Family Conventional 

Business Volume at Acquisition(2)

Percent of Single-Family Conventional

Guaranty Book of Business(3)

As of

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021 June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Product type:

Fixed-rate:(7)

Long-term 91 % 82 % 88 % 83 % 85 % 84 %

Intermediate-term 8 17 11 17 14 15 

Total fixed-rate 99 99 99 100 99 99 

Adjustable-rate 1 1 1 * 1 1 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Number of property units:

1 unit 98 % 98 % 98 % 98 % 97 % 97 %

2-4 units 2 2 2 2 3 3 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Property type:

Single-family homes 91 % 91 % 91 % 91 % 91 % 91 %

Condo/Co-op 9 9 9 9 9 9 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Occupancy type: 

Primary residence 91 % 93 % 91 % 92 % 90 % 90 %

Second/vacation home 2 3 3 3 4 4 

Investor 7 4 6 5 6 6 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Loan purpose:

Purchase 64 % 35 % 52 % 30 % 38 % 36 %

Cash-out refinance 26 22 30 21 22 21 

Other refinance 10 43 18 49 40 43 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Geographic concentration:(8)

Midwest 13 % 13 % 12 % 13 % 14 % 14 %

Northeast 12 14 13 14 16 16 

Southeast 27 23 26 22 23 23 

Southwest 24 19 22 18 19 18 

West 24 31 27 33 28 29 

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Origination year:

2016 and prior 20 % 23 %

2017 3 4 

2018 2 3 

2019 5 6 

2020 27 30 

2021 34 34 

2022 9 — 

Total 100 % 100 %

* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional business volume or guaranty book of business.

(1) Second-lien mortgage loans held by third parties are not reflected in the original LTV or the estimated mark-to-market LTV ratios in this 

table. 

(2) Calculated based on the unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category at time of acquisition.

(3) Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid 

principal balance of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.

(4) The original LTV ratio generally is based on the original unpaid principal balance of the loan divided by the appraised property value 

reported to us at the time of acquisition of the loan. Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 32
(5) The aggregate estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio is based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan as of the end of each reported 

period divided by the estimated current value of the property, which we calculate using an internal valuation model that estimates periodic 

changes in home value. Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.

(6) Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.

(7) Long-term fixed-rate consists of mortgage loans with maturities greater than 15 years, while intermediate-term fixed-rate loans have 

maturities equal to or less than 15 years. 

(8) Midwest consists of IL, IN, IA, MI, MN, NE, ND, OH, SD and WI. Northeast consists of CT, DE, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, PR, RI, VT and 

VI. Southeast consists of AL, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA and WV. Southwest consists of AZ, AR, CO, KS, LA, MO, NM, OK, 

TX and UT. West consists of AK, CA, GU, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA and WY.

Characteristics of our New Single-Family Loan Acquisitions

Refinancing activity began to taper beginning in the second half of 2021 and remains at lower levels, as a large portion 

of our single-family guaranty book of business had already recently refinanced and interest rates increased. Accordingly, 

the share of our single-family loan acquisitions consisting of refinance loans (versus home purchase loans) decreased 

to 36% in the second quarter of 2022 compared with 65% in the second quarter of 2021. Typically, home purchase 

loans have higher LTV ratios than refinance loans. This trend contributed to an increase in the percentage of our singlefamily loan acquisitions with LTV ratios over 80%, from 22% in the second quarter of 2021 to 34% in the second quarter

of 2022. The decline in refinance share also contributed to a decline in the percentage of loans we acquired with a FICO 

credit score of 740 or greater, from 70% in the second quarter of 2021 to 61% in the second quarter of 2022, as well as 

an increase in the percentage of loans we acquired with a FICO credit score less than 680, from 6% in the second 

quarter of 2021 to 9% in the second quarter of 2022. 

Our share of acquisitions of loans with DTI ratios above 45% increased to 22% in the second quarter of 2022 compared 

with 14% in the second quarter of 2021. This increase was also driven by the higher share of home purchase 

acquisitions, which tend to have higher DTI ratios than refinance loan acquisitions. 

For a discussion of factors that may impact the volume and credit characteristics of loans we acquire in the future, see 

“MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Portfolio 

Diversification and Monitoring” in our 2021 Form 10-K. In this section of our 2021 Form 10-K, we also provide more 

information on the credit characteristics of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business, including 

high-balance loans, reverse mortgages and mortgage products with rate resets. 

Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk

Our charter generally requires credit enhancement on any single-family conventional mortgage loan that we purchase or 

securitize if it has an LTV ratio over 80% at the time of purchase. We generally achieve this through primary mortgage 

insurance. We also enter into various other types of transactions in which we transfer mortgage credit risk to third 

parties.

Our approved monoline mortgage insurers’ financial ability and willingness to pay claims is an important determinant of 

our overall credit risk exposure. For a discussion of our exposure to and management of the institutional counterparty 

credit risk associated with the providers of these credit enhancements, see “MD&A—Risk Management—Institutional 

Counterparty Credit Risk Management” and “Note 13, Concentrations of Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Risk 

Management—Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management” and “Note 10, Concentrations of Credit Risk” in this 

report. Also see “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 33
The table below displays information about loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business covered 

by one or more forms of credit enhancement, including mortgage insurance or a credit risk transfer transaction. For a 

description of primary mortgage insurance and the other types of credit enhancements specified in the table, see 

“MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit 

Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K. 

Single-Family Loans with Credit Enhancement

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Unpaid 

Principal 

Balance

Percentage of 

Single-Family 

Conventional 

Guaranty 

Book of 

Business

Unpaid 

Principal 

Balance

Percentage of 

Single-Family 

Conventional 

Guaranty 

Book of 

Business

(Dollars in billions)

Primary mortgage insurance and other $ 734 20 % $ 697 20 %

Connecticut Avenue Securities 681 19 512 14 

Credit Insurance Risk Transfer 276 7 168 5 

Lender risk-sharing 61 2 70 2 

Less: Loans covered by multiple credit enhancements (328) (9) (253) (7) 

Total single-family loans with credit enhancement $ 1,424 39 % $ 1,194 34 %

Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk

In addition to primary mortgage insurance, our Single-Family business has developed other risk-sharing capabilities to 

transfer portions of our single-family mortgage credit risk to the private market. Our credit risk transfer transactions have 

been designed to transfer a portion of the losses we expect would be incurred in an economic downturn or a stressed 

credit environment. Generally, benefits are received after the underlying property has been liquidated and all applicable 

proceeds, including private mortgage insurance benefits, have been applied to reduce the loss. As described in “MD&A

—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and 

Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk—Credit Risk Transfer Transactions” in our 2021 Form 10-K, we have used primarily 

three single-family credit risk transfer programs: Connecticut Avenue Securities® (“CAS”), Credit Insurance Risk 

TransferTM (“CIRTTM”), and lender risk-sharing.

In the first half of 2022, we transferred a portion of the mortgage credit risk on single-family mortgage loans with an 

unpaid principal balance of $381.8 billion at the time of the transactions; substantially all of the loans in these credit risk 

transfer transactions were acquired in 2021.

The factors we expect will affect the extent to which we engage in single-family credit risk transfer transactions in the 

future and the structure of those transactions include our risk appetite, future market conditions, the cost of the 

transactions, FHFA guidance or requirements (including FHFA’s scorecard), the capital relief provided by the 

transactions, and our overall business and capital plans.

In March 2022, FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework. Among other 

changes, the amendment refined the risk-based capital treatment of credit risk transfer transactions. These changes to 

the enterprise regulatory capital framework increase the capital relief afforded by credit risk transfer transactions.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 34
The table below displays the aggregate mortgage credit risk transferred to third parties and retained by Fannie Mae 

pursuant to our single-family credit risk transfer transactions. The table does not include the credit risk transferred on 

single-family transactions that were cancelled or terminated as of June 30, 2022. The table below also excludes 

coverage obtained through primary mortgage insurance. The risk in force of these transactions, which refers to the 

maximum amount of losses that could be absorbed by credit risk transfer investors, was approximately $42 billion as of

June 30, 2022, compared with approximately $36 billion as of June 30, 2021. Because of the large number of mortgage 

prepayments in recent periods, the first loss retention layer on each credit risk transfer transaction has increased as a 

percentage of the outstanding reference pool. As a result, to the extent that these deals were impacted by refinancing 

activity, the losses on the remaining covered reference pools must generally reach a higher percentage of the remaining 

outstanding balance before those credit risk transfer transactions will pay any benefits to us. In addition, home price 

appreciation since we entered into the transactions reduces the likelihood that we will incur losses on the covered loans 

large enough to receive a benefit from these transactions.

Outstanding as of June 30, 2022

(Dollars in billions)

Senior Fannie Mae(1)

$978

Outstanding 

Reference 

Pool(4)(6)

$1,033

Mezzanine Fannie Mae(1)

$3

CIRT(2)(3)

$13

CAS(2)

$13

Lender RiskSharing(2)

$4

First Loss Fannie Mae(1)

$10

CAS(2)(5)

$10

Lender RiskSharing(2)

$2

(1) Credit risk retained by Fannie Mae in CAS, CIRT and lender risk-sharing transactions. Tranche sizes vary across programs.

(2) Credit risk transferred to third parties. Tranche sizes vary across programs.

(3) Includes mortgage pool insurance transactions covering loans with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $1.4 billion outstanding as 

of June 30, 2022. 

(4) For CIRT and some lender risk-sharing transactions, “Reference Pool” reflects a pool of covered loans. 

(5) For CAS transactions, “First Loss” represents all B tranche balances.

(6) For CAS and some lender risk-sharing transactions, represents outstanding reference pools, not the outstanding unpaid principal balance 

of the underlying loans. The outstanding unpaid principal balance for all loans covered by credit risk transfer programs, including all loans 

on which risk has been transferred in lender risk-sharing transactions, was approximately $1,018 billion as of June 30, 2022.

The following table displays information about the credit enhancement recovery receivables we have recognized within 

“Other assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Single-Family Credit Enhancement Receivables

As Of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Freestanding credit enhancement receivables $ 123 $ 99 

Primary mortgage insurance receivables, net of allowance(1) 53 54 

(1) Amount is net of a valuation allowance of $463 million and $479 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The 

vast majority of this valuation allowance related to deferred payment obligations associated with unpaid claim amounts for which 

collectability is uncertain.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 35
The following table displays the approximate cash paid or transferred to investors for credit risk transfer transactions 

outstanding. The cash represents the portion of the guaranty fee paid to investors as compensation for taking on a 

share of the credit risk.

Credit Risk Transfer Transactions

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Cash paid or transferred for: (Dollars in millions)

CAS transactions(1) $ 419 $ 415 

CIRT transactions 143 158 

Lender risk-sharing transactions 82 140 

(1) Consists of cash paid for interest expense net of LIBOR or SOFR, as applicable, on outstanding CAS debt and amounts paid for both CAS 

REMIC® and CAS Credit-linked notes (“CLN”) transactions. 

Cash paid or transferred to investors for CIRT transactions includes cancellation fees paid on certain CIRT transactions 

where we determined that the cost of these deals exceeded the expected remaining benefit. The table excludes cash 

paid upon the repurchase of legacy CAS debt. In July 2022, we paid $2.4 billion to repurchase a portion of our 

outstanding CAS debt.

The table below displays the primary characteristics of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of 

business without credit enhancement as of the specified dates.

Single-Family Loans without Credit Enhancement

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Unpaid 

Principal 

Balance

Percentage of 

Single-Family 

Conventional 

Guaranty Book 

of Business

Unpaid 

Principal 

Balance

Percentage of 

Single-Family 

Conventional 

Guaranty Book 

of Business

(Dollars in billions)

Low LTV ratio or short-term(1) $ 1,199 33 % $ 1,167 34 %

Pre-credit risk transfer program inception(2) 289 8 324 9 

Recently acquired(3) 682 19 983 28 

Other(4) 583 16 565 16 

Less: Loans in multiple categories (563) (15) (750) (21) 

Total single-family loans without credit enhancement $ 2,190 61 % $ 2,289 66 %

(1) Represents loans with an LTV ratio less than or equal to 60% or loans with an original maturity of 20 years or less.

(2) Represents loans that were acquired before the inception of our credit risk transfer programs. Also includes Refi PlusTM loans.

(3) Represents loans that were recently acquired and have not been included in a reference pool.

(4) Includes adjustable-rate mortgage loans, loans with a combined LTV ratio greater than 97%, non-Refi Plus loans acquired after the 

inception of our credit risk transfer programs that became 30 or more days delinquent prior to inclusion in a credit risk transfer transaction 

and loans that were delinquent as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

Single-Family Problem Loan Management

Our problem loan management strategies focus primarily on reducing defaults to avoid losses that would otherwise 

occur and pursuing foreclosure alternatives to mitigate the severity of the losses we incur. See “MD&A—Single-Family 

Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Problem Loan Management” in our 2021

Form 10-K for a discussion of delinquency statistics on our problem loans, efforts undertaken to manage our problem 

loans, metrics regarding our loan workout activities, real estate owned (“REO”) management and other single-family 

credit-related information. The discussion below updates some of that information. We also provide ongoing credit 

performance information on loans underlying single-family Fannie Mae MBS and loans covered by single-family credit 

risk transfer transactions. For loans backing Fannie Mae MBS, see the “Forbearance and Delinquency Dashboard” 

available in the MBS section of our Data Dynamics® tool, which is available at www.fanniemae.com/datadynamics. For 

loans covered by credit risk transfer transactions, see the “Deal Performance Data” report available in the CAS and 

CIRT sections of the tool. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report. Information in Data Dynamics 

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 36
may differ from similar measures presented in our financial statements and other public disclosures for a variety of 

reasons, including as a result of variations in the loan population covered, timing differences in reporting and other 

factors.

Single-Family Serious Delinquency Rates

The tables below display the delinquency status of loans and changes in the volume of seriously delinquent loans in our 

single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on the number of loans. Single-family seriously delinquent 

loans are loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process, expressed as a percentage of our 

single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on loan count. Management monitors the single-family 

serious delinquency rate as an indicator of potential future credit losses and loss mitigation activities. Serious 

delinquency rates are reflective of our performance in assessing and managing credit risk associated with single-family 

loans in our guaranty book of business. Typically, higher serious delinquency rates result in a higher allowance for loan 

losses. 

For purposes of our disclosures regarding delinquency status, we report loans receiving COVID-19-related payment 

forbearance as delinquent according to the contractual terms of the loan. Pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 

Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), for purposes of reporting to the credit bureaus, servicers must report a borrower 

receiving a COVID-19-related payment accommodation during the covered period, such as a forbearance plan or loan 

modification, as current if the borrower was current prior to receiving the accommodation and the borrower makes all 

required payments in accordance with the accommodation. 

Delinquency Status and Activity of Single-Family Conventional Loans

As of

June 30, 

2022

December 31, 

2021

June 30, 

2021

Delinquency status:

30 to 59 days delinquent 0.84 % 0.86 % 0.74 %

60 to 89 days delinquent 0.19 0.20 0.20 

Seriously delinquent (“SDQ”): 0.81 1.25 2.08 

Percentage of SDQ loans that have been delinquent for more than 

180 days 68 75 79 

Percentage of SDQ loans that have been delinquent for more than 

two years 19 9 6 

For the Six Months Ended 

June 30,

2022 2021

Single-family SDQ loans (number of loans):

Beginning balance 218,329 495,806 

Additions 84,409 139,375 

Removals:

Modifications and other loan workouts (104,559) (174,618) 

Liquidations and sales (22,083) (37,811) 

Cured or less than 90 days delinquent (33,462) (58,812) 

Total removals (160,104) (271,241) 

Ending balance 142,634 363,940 

Our single-family serious delinquency rate decreased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021 and June 

30, 2021 as a result of single-family borrowers exiting forbearance through a loan workout or by otherwise reinstating 

their loan. As of June 30, 2022, single-family loans in forbearance comprised 27% of our single-family seriously 

delinquent loans.

The table below displays the serious delinquency rates for, and the percentage of our seriously delinquent single-family 

conventional loans represented by, the specified loan categories. Percentage of book amounts represent the unpaid 

principal balance of loans for each category divided by the unpaid principal balance of our total single-family 

conventional guaranty book of business. The reported categories are not mutually exclusive.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 37
Single-Family Conventional Seriously Delinquent Loan Concentration Analysis

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021 June 30, 2021

Percentage 

of Book 

Outstanding

Percentage 

of Seriously 

Delinquent 

Loans(1)

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate

Percentage 

of Book 

Outstanding

Percentage 

of Seriously 

Delinquent 

Loans(1)

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate

Percentage 

of Book 

Outstanding

Percentage 

of Seriously 

Delinquent 

Loans(1)

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate

States:

California 19 % 10 % 0.59 % 19 % 11 % 1.01 % 20 % 12 % 1.84 %

Florida 6 8 0.92 6 8 1.59 6 9 2.81 

Illinois 3 5 1.08 3 5 1.55 3 5 2.51 

New Jersey 3 4 1.17 3 5 1.90 3 5 3.33 

New York 5 8 1.54 5 7 2.24 5 7 3.71 

All other states 64 65 0.76 64 64 1.16 63 62 1.88 

Vintages:

2004 and prior 1 11 2.75 1 10 3.48 1 10 5.04 

2005-2008 1 15 4.45 2 14 5.87 2 15 8.75 

2009-2022 98 74 0.63 97 76 1.01 97 75 1.69 

Estimated mark-tomarket LTV ratio:

<= 60% 70 80 0.82 61 73 1.27 57 66 2.02 

60.01% to 70% 16 12 0.83 19 16 1.37 19 17 2.41 

70.01% to 80% 9 5 0.67 13 8 1.08 15 11 2.16 

80.01% to 90% 4 2 0.52 5 2 0.88 7 4 1.70 

90.01% to 100% 1 1 0.46 2 1 0.51 2 1 1.21 

Greater than 100% * * 9.40 * * 12.41 * 1 20.48 

Credit enhanced:(2)

Primary MI & other(3) 20 29 1.40 20 29 2.14 20 27 3.31 

Credit risk transfer(4) 28 27 0.84 21 32 1.80 21 34 3.21 

Non-credit enhanced 61 55 0.69 66 53 0.98 65 52 1.63 

* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional guaranty book of business.

(1) Calculated based on the number of single-family loans that were seriously delinquent for each category divided by the total number of 

single-family conventional loans that were seriously delinquent.

(2) The credit-enhanced categories are not mutually exclusive. A loan with primary mortgage insurance that is also covered by a credit risk 

transfer transaction will be included in both the “Primary MI & other” category and the “Credit risk transfer” category. As a result, the “Credit 

enhanced” and “Non-credit enhanced” categories do not sum to 100%. The total percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty 

book of business with some form of credit enhancement as of June 30, 2022 was 39%. 

(3) Refers to loans included in an agreement used to reduce credit risk by requiring primary mortgage insurance, collateral, letters of credit, 

corporate guarantees, or other agreements to provide an entity with some assurance that it will be compensated to some degree in the 

event of a financial loss. Excludes loans covered by credit risk transfer transactions unless such loans are also covered by primary 

mortgage insurance.

(4) Refers to loans included in reference pools for credit risk transfer transactions, including loans in these transactions that are also covered 

by primary mortgage insurance. For CAS and some lender risk-sharing transactions, this represents the outstanding unpaid principal 

balance of the underlying loans on the single-family mortgage credit book, not the outstanding reference pool, as of the specified date. 

Loans included in our credit risk transfer transactions have all been acquired since 2009.

Single-Family Loans in Forbearance

As a part of our relief programs, we have authorized our servicers to permit payment forbearance to borrowers 

experiencing a COVID-19-related financial hardship for up to 12 months without regard to the delinquency status of the 

loan, and for borrowers already in forbearance as of February 28, 2021, for a total of up to 18 months, provided that the 

forbearance does not result in the loan becoming greater than 18 months delinquent. We believe that the substantial 

majority of borrowers who will ultimately request COVID-19-related relief have already done so. 

As of June 30, 2022, the unpaid principal balance of single-family loans in forbearance was $12.3 billion compared with 

$23.6 billion as of December 31, 2021. The percentage of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of 

business in forbearance has declined to 0.3% as of June 30, 2022 compared with 0.7% as of December 31, 2021. As of 

June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 66% of the single-family loans in forbearance were seriously delinquent. We 

expect many of the loans in forbearance will resolve their delinquency through a payment deferral, loan modification, or 

other form of loan workout.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 38
The table below displays the status as of June 30, 2022 of the single-family loans in our guaranty book of business that 

received a forbearance in 2020, 2021 or 2022. The vast majority of these forbearance arrangements were offered to 

borrowers who experienced a COVID-19-related financial hardship. Many of these borrowers have successfully 

resolved their forbearance arrangement, primarily through payment deferral, reinstatement or modification. In addition, 

many of the loans that received a forbearance arrangement have subsequently liquidated, primarily as a result of 

refinancing. By contrast, we expect that a higher percentage of loans that have yet to resolve their forbearance will 

receive a modification.

As of June 30, 2022, 91% of single-family loans that received a forbearance and subsequently received a payment 

deferral were current, and 88% of single-family loans that received a forbearance and subsequently received a 

completed modification were current. See “Loan Workout Metrics” for additional information about actions we have 

taken to help reinstate loans to current status.

Status of Single-Family Forbearance Loans

As of June 30, 2022

Number of 

Loans

Percentage of 

Loans with 

Forbearance 

by Category

Loans that received a forbearance, by status:(1)

Active forbearance 57,793 4 %

Payment deferral 387,215 27 

Modification(2) 87,993 6 

Reinstated(3) 274,443 19 

Delinquent at time of exit or repayment plan(4) 43,018 3 

Total loans that received a forbearance in our single-family guaranty book of business 850,462 59 

Loans that have received a forbearance, but paid off 596,508 41 

Total loans that have received a forbearance(5) 1,446,970 100 %

(1) Loans are classified based on their status as of period end; therefore, loans may move from one category to another.

(2) Includes 16,225 loans that are in trial modifications.

(3) Represents loans that are no longer in forbearance but are current according to the original terms of the loan. Also includes loans that 

remained current throughout the forbearance arrangement and continue to perform.

(4) Consists of 42,275 loans that were delinquent upon the expiration of the forbearance arrangement and 743 delinquent loans that exited 

forbearance through a repayment plan.

(5) Includes 5,415 loans that were in forbearance as of January 1, 2020.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 39
The table below displays the status as of December 31, 2021 for single-family loans in our guaranty book of business 

that received a forbearance in 2020 or 2021. As of December 31, 2021, 93% of loans that received a forbearance and 

subsequently received a payment deferral were current, and 86% of loans that received a forbearance and 

subsequently received a completed modification were current.

Status of Single-Family Forbearance Loans 

As of December 31, 2021

Number of 

Loans

Percentage of 

Loans with 

Forbearance 

by Category

Loans that received a forbearance, by status:(1)

Active forbearance 117,440 8 %

Payment deferral 380,070 27 

Modification(2) 65,383 5 

Reinstated(3) 291,039 21 

Delinquent at time of exit or repayment plan(4) 63,069 4 

Total loans that received a forbearance in our single-family guaranty book of business 917,001 65 

Loans that have received a forbearance, but paid off 497,288 35 

Total loans that have received a forbearance(5) 1,414,289 100 %

(1) Loans are classified based on their status as of period end; therefore, loans may move from one category to another.

(2) Includes 33,444 loans that are in trial modifications.

(3) Represents loans that are no longer in forbearance but are current according to the original terms of the loan. Also includes loans that 

remained current throughout the forbearance arrangement and continue to perform.

(4) Consists of 60,638 loans that were delinquent upon the expiration of the forbearance arrangement and 2,431 delinquent loans that exited 

forbearance through a repayment plan.

(5) Includes 5,415 loans that were in forbearance as of January 1, 2020.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 40
Loan Workout Metrics

As a part of our credit risk management efforts, loan workouts represent actions we take to help reinstate loans to 

current status and help homeowners stay in their home or to otherwise avoid foreclosure. Our loan workouts reflect 

various types of home retention solutions, including repayment plans, payment deferrals, and loan modifications. Our 

loan workouts also include foreclosure alternatives, such as short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure. 

The chart below displays the unpaid principal balance of our completed single-family loan workouts by type, as well as 

the number of loan workouts, for the first half of 2021 compared with the first half of 2022. This table does not include 

loans in an active forbearance arrangement, trial modifications, loans to certain borrowers who have received 

bankruptcy relief and repayment plans that have been initiated but not completed. Completed Loan Workout Activity

(Dollars in billions)

$3.7

$11.1

$34.7

$12.3

$39.0

$23.6

189.3

111.8

Modifications1 Other2 Payment deferrals Number of loan workouts (in thousands)

First Half 2021 First Half 2022

(1) There were approximately 25,000 loans and 17,300 loans in a trial modification period that was not yet complete as of June 30, 2022 and 

2021, respectively.

(2) Other was $212 million and $577 million for the first half of 2022 and the first half of 2021, respectively. Other includes repayment plans 

and foreclosure alternatives. Repayment plans reflect only those plans associated with loans that were 60 days or more delinquent. 

The overall decline in loan workout activity was driven by fewer outstanding COVID-19-related forbearances in the first 

half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021. While payment deferral has been the primary loan workout solution for 

borrowers exiting forbearance to date, modifications have become an increasing proportion of our home retention 

solutions in 2022.

As we indicated in “Single-Family Loans in Forbearance,” we believe that the substantial majority of borrowers who will 

ultimately request COVID-19-related relief have already done so. The total amount of principal and interest deferred to 

the end of the loan term for single-family loans that received a payment deferral in the first half of 2022 was

$706 million, of which $430 million was deferred interest. For the first half of 2021, the total amount of principal and 

interest deferred was $1.8 billion, of which $1.1 billion was deferred interest.

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 41
Single-Family REO Management

If a loan defaults, we may acquire the property through foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The table below 

displays our REO activity by region. Regional REO acquisition trends generally follow a pattern that is similar to, but 

lags, that of regional delinquency trends.

Single-Family REO Properties

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Single-family REO properties (number of properties):

Beginning of period inventory of single-family REO properties(1) 7,166 7,973 

Acquisitions by geographic area:(2)

Midwest 760 481 

Northeast 550 509 

Southeast 509 514 

Southwest 351 229 

West 112 94 

Total REO acquisitions(1) 2,282 1,827 

Dispositions of REO (1,811) (3,437) 

End of period inventory of single-family REO properties(1) 7,637 6,363 

Carrying value of single-family REO properties (dollars in millions) $ 1,137 $ 916 

Single-family foreclosure rate(3) 0.03 % 0.02 %

REO net sales price to unpaid principal balance(4) 117 % 109 %

Short sales net sales price to unpaid principal balance(5) 91 % 83 %

(1) Includes held-for-use properties, which are reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of “Other assets.” 

(2) See footnote 8 to the “Key Risk Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume and Guaranty Book of Business” table for 

states included in each geographic region.

(3) Estimated based on the annualized total number of properties acquired through foreclosure or deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure as a percentage 

of the total number of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.

(4) Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on disposition of REO properties during the respective periods, excluding those 

subject to repurchase requests made to our sellers or servicers, divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans at 

the time of foreclosure. Net sales price represents the contract sales price less selling costs for the property and other charges paid by the 

seller at closing. 

(5) Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on properties sold in short sale transactions during the respective periods divided by 

the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans. Net sales price includes borrower relocation incentive payments and 

subordinate lien(s) negotiated payoffs. 

In response to the pandemic and with instruction from FHFA, we prohibited our servicers from completing foreclosures 

on our single-family loans through July 31, 2021, except in the case of vacant or abandoned properties. In addition, our 

servicers were required to comply with a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) rule that prohibited certain 

new single-family foreclosures on mortgage loans secured by the borrower’s principal residence until after December 

31, 2021. As a result, our foreclosure volumes were slightly higher in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 

2021. 

In April 2022, FHFA announced a suspension of foreclosure activities for up to 60 days for borrowers who apply for 

assistance under Treasury’s Homeowner Assistance Fund.

Single-Family Credit Loss Metrics and Loan Sale Performance

The single-family credit loss metrics and loan sale performance measures below present information about losses or 

gains we realized on our single-family loans during the periods presented. The amount of these losses or gains in a 

given period is driven by foreclosures, pre-foreclosure sales, post-foreclosure REO activity, mortgage loan 

redesignations, and other events that trigger write-offs and recoveries. The single-family credit loss metrics we present 

are not defined terms and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures reported by other 

companies. Management uses these measures to evaluate the effectiveness of our single-family credit risk 

management strategies in conjunction with leading indicators such as serious delinquency and forbearance rates, which 

are potential indicators of future realized single-family credit losses. 

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 42
We believe these measures provide useful information about our single-family credit performance and the factors that 

impact it.

The table below displays the components of our single-family credit loss metrics and loan sale performance.

Single-Family Credit Loss Metrics and Loan Sale Performance 

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Write-offs $ (40) $ (4) $ (56) $ (23) 

Recoveries 88 79 124 84 

Foreclosed property income (expense) (25) (28) 9 (11) 

Credit gains 23 47 77 50 

Write-offs on the redesignation of mortgage loans from HFI to 

HFS(1) (209) (146) (222) (200) 

Net credit gains and write-offs on the redesignations (186) (99) (145) (150) 

Gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments(2) (24) 604 (91) 635 

Net credit gains, write-offs on the redesignations and gains 

(losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments $ (210) $ 505 $ (236) $ 485 

Credit gain ratio (in bps)(3) 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.3 

Net credit gains, write-offs on the redesignations and gains 

(losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments ratio (in 

bps)(3) (2.3) 6.1 (1.3) 3.0 

(1) Consists of the lower of cost or fair value adjustment at time of redesignation.

(2) Consists of gains or losses realized on the sales of nonperforming and reperforming mortgage loans during the period and temporary 

lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments on HFS loans, which are recognized in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed 

consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

(3) Calculated based on the annualized amount of “Credit gains” and “Net credit gains, write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on 

sales and other valuation adjustments” divided by the average single-family conventional guaranty book of business during the period.

The increase in our single-family write-offs on redesignations in the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with 

the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily driven by higher lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments in the 

month of redesignation due to price declines on our HFS loans as interest rates rose.

We had losses on sales and other valuation adjustments in the second quarter and first half of 2022 primarily due to 

losses on subsequent lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments. Recent market conditions, including higher 

interest rates in the second quarter and first half of 2022, have reduced the demand for reperforming loans and resulted 

in lower sales volumes as well as price declines on our HFS loans. In the second quarter and first half of 2021, we had 

gains on sales and other valuation adjustments due to higher levels of loan sales as well as gains on subsequent lowerof-cost-or-market valuation adjustments driven by price increases on our HFS loans as a result of the market recovery 

following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We expect a gradual increase in our single-family write-offs in 2022 as a result of an increase in foreclosure activity, due 

in part to the expiration of the CFPB rule that prohibited certain new single-family foreclosures on mortgage loans 

secured by the borrower’s principal residence until after December 31, 2021. See “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K 

for additional information on the potential credit risk impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

For information on our credit-related income or expense, which includes changes in our allowance, see “Consolidated 

Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” and “Single-Family Business Financial Results.”

MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 43
Multifamily Business

This section supplements and updates information regarding our Multifamily business segment in our 2021 Form 10-K. 

See “MD&A—Multifamily Business” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the primary business 

activities, lenders, competition and market share of our Multifamily business.

Multifamily Mortgage Market

Multifamily market fundamentals, which include factors such as vacancy rates and rents, remained positive during the 

second quarter of 2022, primarily due to pent-up demand for multifamily housing stemming from ongoing job growth, 

higher wages, and favorable demographics.

• Vacancy rates. Based on preliminary third-party data, we estimate that the national multifamily vacancy rate for 

institutional investment-type apartment properties was 4.8% as of June 30, 2022, unchanged from March 31, 

2022, but down from an estimated 5.5% as of June 30, 2021. The national multifamily vacancy rate remained 

below its average rate of about 5.3% over the last 10 years.

• Rents. Based on preliminary third-party data, we estimate that effective rents increased by 2.5% during the 

second quarter of 2022 compared with an increase of 2.0% during the first quarter of 2022 and an increase of 

3.0% during the second quarter of 2021. We expect annualized rent growth for 2022 will be between 6.0% and 

7.0%.

Vacancy rates and rents are important to loan performance because multifamily loans are generally repaid from the 

cash flows generated by the underlying property. Several years of improvement in these fundamentals have helped to 

increase property values in most metropolitan areas. Based on preliminary multifamily property sales data, transaction 

volumes for early 2022 remained elevated, with capitalization rates staying low. While we expect market fundamentals 

will lead commercial real estate investors to remain interested in the multifamily sector this year despite higher interest 

rates, we do not expect annual sales to reach 2021 levels.

Multifamily construction underway remains elevated. While more than 580,000 multifamily units are scheduled to be 

delivered in 2022, we expect that ongoing supply chain issues make it more likely that the number of units completed 

this year will be closer to 400,000.

We expect the multifamily sector to continue benefiting from continued job growth, with rent growth moderating but 

remaining above normalized levels over the remainder of the year.

Multifamily Business Metrics

Through the secondary mortgage market, we support rental housing for the workforce population, for senior citizens and 

students, and for those with the greatest economic need. Approximately 93% of the multifamily units we financed in the 

second quarter of 2022 that were potentially eligible for housing goals credit were affordable to those earning at or 

below 120% of the median income in their area, providing support for both workforce housing and affordable housing.

Multifamily New Business Volume

(Dollars in billions)

$10.9

$18.7

$32.4

$34.7

112,000

156,000

317,000 292,000

Multifamily new business volume1 Multifamily new units financed2 Q2 2021 Q2 2022 First Half 2021 First Half 2022

(1) Reflects unpaid principal balance of multifamily Fannie Mae MBS issued, multifamily loans purchased, and credit enhancements provided 

on multifamily mortgage assets during the period.

(2) Reflects new units financed by first liens; excludes second liens on units for which we had financed the first lien, as well as manufactured 

housing rentals. Units financed reported for prior periods have been updated in this report to exclude previously included second liens and 

manufactured housing rentals. Second liens and manufactured housing rentals are included in unpaid principal balance.

MD&A | Multifamily Business

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 44
In October 2021, FHFA announced that the multifamily loan purchase cap for 2022 will be $78 billion. A minimum of 

50% of loan purchases must be mission-driven, focused on specified affordable and underserved market segments. In 

addition, 25% of loan purchases must be affordable to residents earning 60% or less of area median income, up from 

the 20% requirement in 2021.

For information on how conservatorship may affect our business activities, see “Risk Factors—GSE and 

Conservatorship Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Presentation of Our Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business

For purposes of the information reported in this “Multifamily Business” section, we measure our multifamily guaranty 

book of business using the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS. By contrast, the 

multifamily guaranty book of business presented in the “Composition of Fannie Mae Guaranty Book of Business” table 

in the “Guaranty Book of Business” section is based on the unpaid principal balance of Fannie Mae MBS outstanding. 

These amounts differ primarily as a result of payments we receive on underlying loans that have not yet been remitted 

to the MBS holders. 

Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business

(Dollars in billions) 

$401.9

$425.7

76.8

79.5

Unpaid principal balance of multifamily guaranty book of business1 Average charged guaranty fee rate on multifamily guaranty book of business (in basis points), at end of period

6/30/2021 6/30/2022

(1) Our multifamily guaranty book of business primarily consists of multifamily mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, 

multifamily mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio, and other credit enhancements that we provide on 

multifamily mortgage assets. It does not include non-Fannie Mae multifamily mortgage-related securities held in our retained mortgage 

portfolio for which we do not provide a guaranty.

Average charged guaranty fee represents our effective revenue rate relative to the size of our multifamily guaranty book 

of business. Management uses this metric to assess the return we earn as compensation for the multifamily credit risk 

we manage. Average charged guaranty fee is impacted by the rate at which loans in our book of business turn over as 

well as the guaranty fees we charge, which are set at the time we acquire the loans. Our multifamily guaranty fee pricing 

is primarily based on the individual credit risk characteristics of the loans we acquire and the aggregate credit risk 

characteristics of our multifamily guaranty book of business. Our multifamily guaranty fee pricing is also influenced by 

market forces such as the availability of other sources of liquidity, our mission-related goals, the FHFA volume cap, 

interest rates, MBS spreads, and the management of the overall composition of our multifamily guaranty book of 

business. While our average charged guaranty fee increased as of June 30, 2022 from June 30, 2021, recent market 

volatility and uncertainty, combined with strong market competition, has resulted in lower charged guaranty fees for 

some new acquisitions to offset the borrowers’ higher borrowing costs.

MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Business Metrics

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 45
Multifamily Business Financial Results(1)

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 Variance 2022 2021 Variance

(Dollars in millions)

Net interest income $ 1,235 $ 963 $ 272 $ 2,379 $ 1,811 $ 568 

Fee and other income 21 23 (2) 43 48 (5) 

Net revenues 1,256 986 270 2,422 1,859 563 

Fair value losses, net (14) (60) 46 (61) (16) (45) 

Administrative expenses (124) (127) 3 (249) (252) 3 

Credit-related income (expense)(2) (20) 22 (42) 15 113 (98) 

Credit enhancement expense(3) (62) (55) (7) (130) (113) (17) 

Change in expected credit enhancement 

recoveries(4) (4) 13 (17) (13) (2) (11) 

Other income (expenses), net(5) (51) 23 (74) (125) (28) (97) 

Income before federal income taxes 981 802 179 1,859 1,561 298 

Provision for federal income taxes (214) (157) (57) (393) (317) (76) 

Net income $ 767 $ 645 $ 122 $ 1,466 $ 1,244 $ 222 

(1) See “Note 9, Segment Reporting” for information about our segment allocation methodology.

(2) Consists of the benefit or provision for credit losses and foreclosed property income or expense. 

(3) Primarily consists of costs associated with our Multifamily CIRTTM (“MCIRTTM”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM

(“MCASTM”) programs as well as amortization expense for certain lender risk-sharing programs.

(4) Consists of change in benefits recognized from our freestanding credit enhancements that primarily relate to our Delegated Underwriting 

and Servicing (“DUS®”) lender risk-sharing. 

(5) Consists of investment gains or losses, gains or losses from partnership investments, debt extinguishment gains or losses, and other 

income or expenses.

Net Interest Income

Multifamily net interest income increased in the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter

and first half of 2021 primarily due to higher guaranty fee income as a result of an increase in the size of our multifamily 

guaranty book of business combined with an increase in average charged guaranty fees and higher yield maintenance

revenue related to the prepayment of multifamily loans. 

Credit-Related Income (Expense)

Credit-related expense for the second quarter of 2022 was the result of an increase in our credit loss reserves primarily 

due to higher actual and projected interest rates, partially offset by solid multifamily market fundamentals. 

Credit-related income for the first half of 2022 was primarily driven by solid multifamily market fundamentals, partially 

offset by higher actual and projected interest rates.

Credit-related income for the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily driven by a benefit from actual and 

projected economic data and lower expected losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” for more information on our multifamily 

benefit or provision for credit losses. 

Other Income (Expenses), Net

The shift from other income in the second quarter of 2021 to other expenses in the second quarter of 2022 and the 

increase in other expenses from the first half of 2021 to the first half of 2022 were mostly driven by a shift from debt 

extinguishment gains in the second quarter of 2021 to debt extinguishment losses in the second quarter of 2022. The 

debt extinguishment losses were primarily due to increases in interest rates during the commitment period on our 

commitments to purchase Fannie Mae MBS, which resulted in the decline of MBS prices. As a result of our 

consolidation accounting, these purchases are accounted for as debt extinguishments.

MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Business Financial Results

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 46
Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

This section supplements and updates our discussion of multifamily mortgage credit risk management in our 2021 Form 

10-K in “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management.” For an overview of key 

elements of our mortgage credit risk management, see “Business—Managing Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 

10-K.

Multifamily Acquisition Policy and Underwriting Standards

Our Multifamily business is responsible for pricing and managing the credit risk on our multifamily guaranty book of 

business, with oversight from our Enterprise Risk Management division. Multifamily loans that we purchase or that back 

Fannie Mae MBS are underwritten by a Fannie Mae-approved lender and may be subject to our underwriting review 

prior to closing, depending on the product type, loan size, market and/or other factors. Our underwriting standards 

generally include, among other things, property cash flow analysis and third-party appraisals.

Additionally, our standards for multifamily loans specify maximum original LTV ratio and minimum original debt service 

coverage ratio (“DSCR”) values that vary based on loan characteristics. Our experience has been that original LTV ratio 

and DSCR values have been reliable indicators of future credit performance. At underwriting, we evaluate the DSCR 

based on both actual and underwritten debt service payments. The original DSCR is calculated using the underwritten 

debt service payments for the loan, which assumes both principal and interest payments, including stressed 

assumptions in certain cases, rather than the actual debt service payments. Depending on the loan’s interest rate and 

structure, using the underwritten debt service payments will often result in a more conservative estimate of the debt 

service payments (for example, loans with an interest-only period). This approach is used for all loans, including those 

with full and partial interest-only terms.

The following table displays certain key risk characteristics of our multifamily guaranty book of business that we use to 

evaluate the risk profile and credit quality of our multifamily loans.

Key Risk Characteristics of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business 

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021 June 30, 2021

Weighted-average original LTV ratio 65 % 65 % 66 %

Original LTV ratio greater than 80% 1 1 1 

Original DSCR less than or equal to 1.10 12 11 11 

Full term interest-only loans 35 33 31 

Partial term interest-only loans(1) 50 51 52 

(1) Consists of mortgage loans that were underwritten with an interest-only term, regardless of whether the loan is currently in its interest-only 

period.

We provide additional information on the credit characteristics of our multifamily loans in quarterly financial 

supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K. Information in our quarterly financial 

supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report. 

Transfer of Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk

We primarily transfer risk through our Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS®”) program, which delegates to DUS 

lenders the ability to underwrite and service multifamily loans, in accordance with our standards and requirements. See 

“MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Transfer of Multifamily Mortgage Credit 

Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a description of our DUS program.

Our DUS model typically results in our lenders sharing approximately one-third of the credit risk on our multifamily 

loans, either on a pro-rata or tiered basis. Loans serviced by DUS lenders and their affiliates represented substantially 

all of our multifamily guaranty book of business as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. In certain situations, to 

effectively manage our counterparty risk, we do not allow the lenders to fully share in one-third of the credit risk, but 

have them share in a smaller portion.

While not a large portion of our multifamily guaranty book of business, our non-DUS lenders typically also have lender 

risk-sharing, where the lenders typically share or absorb losses based on a negotiated percentage of the loan or the 

pool balance.

To complement our front-end lender-risk sharing program, we engage in back-end credit risk transfer transactions 

through our Multifamily CIRTTM (“MCIRTTM”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) transactions. 

MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 47
Through these transactions, we transfer a portion of the credit risk associated with a reference pool of multifamily 

mortgage loans to insurers, reinsurers, or investors. 

We transfer multifamily credit risk through lender risk-sharing at the time of acquisition, but our multifamily back-end 

credit risk transfer activity occurs later, typically up to a year or more after acquisition. We did not enter into any new 

back-end credit risk transfer transactions in the first half of 2022. The factors that we expect will affect the extent to 

which we engage in multifamily credit risk transfer transactions in the future and the structure of those transactions 

include our risk appetite, future market conditions, the cost of the transactions, FHFA guidance or requirements 

(including FHFA’s scorecard), the capital relief provided by the transactions, and our overall business and capital plans.

The table below displays the total unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans and the percentage of our multifamily 

guaranty book of business, based on unpaid principal balance, that is covered by a back-end credit risk transfer 

transaction. The table does not reflect front-end lender risk-sharing arrangements, as only a small portion of our 

multifamily guaranty book of business is not covered by these arrangements.

Multifamily Loans in Back-End Credit Risk Transfer Transactions

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Unpaid 

Principal 

Balance

Percentage of 

Multifamily 

Guaranty Book 

of Business

Unpaid 

Principal 

Balance

Percentage of 

Multifamily 

Guaranty Book 

of Business

(Dollars in millions)

MCIRT $ 79,290 19 % $ 84,894 20 %

MCAS 25,752 6 27,088 7 

Total $ 105,042 25 % $ 111,982 27 %

Multifamily Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring

As part of our ongoing credit risk management process, we and our lenders monitor the performance and risk 

characteristics of our multifamily loans and the underlying properties on an ongoing basis throughout the loan term at 

the asset and portfolio level. We closely monitor loans with an estimated current DSCR below 1.0, as that is an indicator 

of heightened default risk. The percentage of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business, calculated based on 

unpaid principal balance, with a current DSCR less than 1.0 was approximately 3% as of June 30, 2022 and 2% as of 

December 31, 2021.

We also manage our exposure to refinancing risk for multifamily loans maturing in the next several years. Interest rates 

have increased significantly since the beginning of the year and may increase further. Rising interest rates may reduce 

the ability of multifamily borrowers to refinance their loans, which often have balloon balances at maturity. We provide 

additional information on the maturity schedule of our multifamily loans in quarterly financial supplements, which we 

furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website. Information in our quarterly 

financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.

For additional information on credit risk characteristics of our multifamily loans and other factors that we monitor to 

assess the performance of our Multifamily business, see “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit 

Risk Management—Multifamily Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring” in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “Note 3, Mortgage 

Loans” for the internal risk categories we use to determine our loan credit quality.

Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Foreclosure Prevention

In addition to the credit performance information on our multifamily loans provided below, we provide information about 

multifamily loans in a COVID-19-related forbearance that back MBS and whole loan REMICs in a “Multifamily MBS 

COVID-19 Forbearance List” in the “Data Collections” section of our DUS Disclose® tool, available at 

www.fanniemae.com/dusdisclose. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report.

Delinquency Statistics on our Multifamily Problem Loans

The percentage of our multifamily loans classified as substandard in our guaranty book of business increased as of 

June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021. Substandard loans are loans that have a well-defined weakness that 

could impact their timely full repayment. While the majority of the substandard loans in our multifamily guaranty book of 

business are currently making timely payments, we continue to monitor the performance of our substandard loan 

population. Loans classified as substandard increased as of June 30, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021, primarily 

MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 48
as a result of the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. While overall DSCR on the book has improved, there 

were a greater number of properties reporting low DSCRs in their latest annual statements. The increase was largely 

driven by seniors housing loans, which were disproportionally impacted by the pandemic. For more information on our 

credit quality indicators, including our population of substandard loans, see “Note 3, Mortgage Loans.” 

Our multifamily serious delinquency rate decreased to 0.34% as of June 30, 2022 compared with 0.42% as of 

December 31, 2021 and 0.53% as of June 30, 2021, primarily as a result of loans that received forbearance resolving 

their delinquency through completion of their repayment plans or otherwise reinstating. Our multifamily serious 

delinquency rate consists of multifamily loans that were 60 days or more past due based on unpaid principal balance, 

expressed as a percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business. The percentage of loans in our multifamily 

guaranty book of business that were 180 days or more delinquent was 0.19% as of June 30, 2022, compared with 

0.23% as of December 31, 2021.

Management monitors the multifamily serious delinquency rate as an indicator of potential future credit losses and loss 

mitigation activities. Serious delinquency rates are reflective of our performance in assessing and managing credit risk 

associated with multifamily loans in our guaranty book of business. Typically, higher serious delinquency rates result in 

a higher allowance for loan losses.

Our multifamily serious delinquency rate, excluding loans that have received a forbearance since the start of the 

pandemic, was 0.03% as of June 30, 2022, compared with 0.04% as of December 31, 2021. We monitor the multifamily 

serious delinquency rate excluding loans that received a forbearance to better understand the impact that forbearance 

activity has had on the rate and to monitor loans that are seriously delinquent not as a result of COVID-19 or natural 

disasters.

Multifamily Loan Forbearance

As of June 30, 2022, the vast majority of our multifamily loans that have received forbearance were associated with a 

COVID-19-related financial hardship, but only a small portion of these loans remained in forbearance. As of June 30, 

2022, there were 7 multifamily loans with an unpaid principal balance of $41 million in active forbearance, compared 

with 22 loans with an unpaid principal balance of $363 million as of December 31, 2021. 

For additional information on our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily 

Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Foreclosure Prevention” in our 2021

Form 10-K. We also provide additional information on multifamily forbearances in our quarterly financial supplements, 

which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website. Information in our 

quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Multifamily REO Management

The number of multifamily foreclosed properties held for sale was 31 properties with a carrying value of $349 million as 

of June 30, 2022, compared with 31 properties with a carrying value of $302 million as of December 31, 2021. We 

expect additional foreclosures on loans that received a COVID-19 forbearance that are unable to successfully cure their 

delinquency through a repayment plan or other modification.

Multifamily Credit Loss Performance Metrics

The amount of multifamily credit loss or income we realize in a given period is driven by foreclosures, pre-foreclosure 

sales, REO activity and write-offs, net of recoveries. Our multifamily credit loss performance metrics are not defined 

terms and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We 

believe our multifamily credit losses, and our multifamily credit losses net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit, may be 

useful to stakeholders because they display our credit losses in the context of our multifamily guaranty book of 

business, including the benefit we receive from loss-sharing arrangements. Management views multifamily credit 

losses, net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit, as a key metric related to our multifamily business model and our 

strategy to share multifamily credit risk. 

MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 49
The table below displays the components of our multifamily credit loss performance metrics, as well as our multifamily 

initial write-off severity rate and write-off loan count. 

Multifamily Credit Loss Performance Metrics 

For the Three Months Ended 

June 30,

For the Six Months Ended 

June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Write-offs(1) $ — $ (13) $ — $ (47) 

Recoveries 10 18 17 19 

Foreclosed property income (expense) (8) (13) (3) (25) 

Credit gains (losses) 2 (8) 14 (53) 

Freestanding loss-sharing benefit (reduction in 

benefit)(2) (3) 6 (10) 21 

Credit gains (losses), net of freestanding losssharing benefit $ (1) $ (2) $ 4 $ (32) 

Credit gain (loss) ratio (in bps)(3) 0.2 (0.8) 0.7 (2.7) 

Credit gain (loss) ratio, net of freestanding losssharing benefit (in bps)(2)(3) (0.1) (0.2) 0.2 (1.6) 

Multifamily initial write-off severity rate(4) 6.9 % 14.5 % 5.6 % 14.0 %

Multifamily write-off loan count 1 6 5 15 

(1) Write-offs associated with non-REO sales are net of loss sharing.

(2) Represents expected benefits that we receive from write-offs as a result of certain freestanding credit enhancements, primarily multifamily 

DUS lender risk-sharing transactions. These benefits are recorded in “Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries” in our 

condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. 

(3) Calculated based on the annualized amount of “Credit gains (losses)” and “Credit gains (losses), net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit,” 

divided by the average multifamily guaranty book of business during the period. 

(4) Rate is calculated as the initial write-off amount divided by the average defaulted unpaid principal balance. The rate excludes write-offs not 

associated with foreclosures or other liquidation events (such as a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or a short-sale) and any costs, gains or 

losses associated with REO after initial acquisition through final disposition. Write-offs are net of lender loss-sharing agreements.

MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 50
Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information

The table below displays select credit ratios on our single-family conventional guaranty book of business and our 

multifamily guaranty book of business, as well as the inputs used in calculating these ratios.

Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Singlefamily Multifamily TotalSinglefamily Multifamily Total

(Dollars in millions)

Credit loss reserves as a 

percentage of:

Guaranty book of business 0.15 % 0.16 % 0.15 % 0.15 % 0.17 % 0.15 %

Nonaccrual loans at amortized 

cost 45.31 51.94 45.96 25.63 54.49 27.35 

Nonaccrual loans as a 

percentage of:

Guaranty book of business 0.33 % 0.31 % 0.33 % 0.57 % 0.30 % 0.54 %

Select financial information used 

in calculating credit ratios:

Credit loss reserves(1) $ (5,477) $ (684) $ (6,161) $ (5,088) $ (686) $ (5,774) 

Guaranty book of business(2) 3,613,859 425,750 4,039,609 3,483,054 413,090 3,896,144 

Nonaccrual loans at amortized 

cost 12,088 1,317 13,405 19,851 1,259 21,110 

Components of credit loss 

reserves:

Allowance for loan losses $ (5,389) $ (680) $ (6,069) $ (4,950) $ (679) $ (5,629) 

Allowance for accrued interest 

receivable (88) (1) (89) (138) (2) (140) 

Reserve for guaranty losses(3) — (3) (3) — (5) (5) 

Total credit loss reserves(1) $ (5,477) $ (684) $ (6,161) $ (5,088) $ (686) $ (5,774) 

(1) Our multifamily credit loss reserves exclude the expected benefit of freestanding credit enhancements on multifamily loans of $222 million

as of June 30, 2022 and $235 million as of December 31, 2021, which are recorded in “Other assets” in our condensed consolidated 

balance sheets.

(2) Represents conventional guaranty book of business for single-family.

(3) Reserve for guaranty losses is recorded in “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Our nonaccrual loans decreased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021 primarily as a result of loan 

modifications, which bring a loan current, and loans which were able to otherwise return to accrual status.

MD&A | Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 51
Consolidated Write-off Ratio and Select Credit Information

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Singlefamily Multifamily TotalSinglefamily Multifamily Total

(Dollars in millions)

Select credit ratio:

Write-offs, net of recoveries annualized, as 

a percentage of the average guaranty 

book of business (in bps) 1.8 (0.9) 1.5 0.9 (0.5) 0.7

Select financial information used in 

calculating credit ratio:

Write-offs, net of recoveries $ 161 $ (10) $ 151 $ 71 $ (5) $ 66 

Average guaranty book of business(1) 3,590,621 422,770 4,013,391 3,324,618 400,511 3,725,129 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Singlefamily Multifamily TotalSinglefamily Multifamily Total

(Dollars in millions)

Select credit ratio:

Write-offs, net of recoveries annualized, as 

a percentage of the average guaranty 

book of business (in bps) 0.9 (0.8) 0.7 0.8 1.4 0.9

Select financial information used in 

calculating credit ratio:

Write-offs, net of recoveries $ 154 $ (17) $ 137 $ 139 $ 28 $ 167 

Average guaranty book of business(1) 3,554,766 419,544 3,974,310 3,283,380 395,190 3,678,570 

(1) Average guaranty book of business is based on quarter-end balances.

Liquidity and Capital Management

Liquidity Management

This section supplements and updates information regarding liquidity management in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “MD&A

—Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information, 

including discussions of our primary sources and uses of funds, our liquidity and funding risk management practices and 

contingency planning, factors that influence our debt funding activity, factors that may impact our access to or the cost 

of our debt funding and factors that could adversely affect our liquidity and funding. Also see “Risk Factors—Liquidity 

and Funding Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of liquidity and funding risks. 

Debt Funding

We are currently subject to a $300 billion debt limit under our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, 

which will decrease to $270 billion as of December 31, 2022. The unpaid principal balance of our aggregate 

indebtedness was $148.3 billion as of June 30, 2022. Pursuant to the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase 

agreement, we are prohibited from issuing debt without the prior consent of Treasury if it would result in our aggregate 

indebtedness exceeding our outstanding debt limit. The calculation of our indebtedness for purposes of complying with 

our debt limit reflects the unpaid principal balance and excludes debt basis adjustments and debt of consolidated trusts.

Outstanding Debt 

Total outstanding debt of Fannie Mae includes short-term and long-term debt and excludes debt of consolidated trusts. 

Short-term debt of Fannie Mae consists of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and, 

MD&A | Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 52
therefore, does not include the current portion of long-term debt. Long-term debt of Fannie Mae consists of borrowings 

with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year. 

The following chart and table display information on our outstanding short-term and long-term debt based on original 

contractual maturity. Our long-term debt continued to decrease in the first half of 2022 as our funding needs remained 

low and were primarily satisfied through cash and other liquid assets that accumulated in prior periods.

Debt of Fannie Mae(1)

(Dollars in billions)

$200.9

$144.5

$65.6

$14.5

$132.5

$122.4

Short-term debt2 Long-term debt maturing within one year

Long-term debt, excluding portion maturing within one year

12/31/2021 6/30/2022

(1) Outstanding debt balance consists of the unpaid principal balance, premiums and discounts, fair value adjustments, hedge-related basis 

adjustments and other cost basis adjustments. Reported amounts include net discount unamortized cost basis adjustments and fair value

adjustments of $3.9 billion and $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

(2) Short-term debt was $7.6 billion and $2.8 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Selected Debt Information

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in billions)

Selected Weighted-Average Interest Rates(1)

Interest rate on short-term debt 0.95 % 0.03 %

Interest rate on long-term debt, including portion maturing within one year 2.16 % 1.55 %

Interest rate on callable long-term debt 1.59 % 1.44 %

Selected Maturity Data

Weighted-average maturity of debt maturing within one year (in days) 105 109 

Weighted-average maturity of debt maturing in more than one year (in months) 53 57 

Other Data

Outstanding callable long-term debt $ 45.5 $ 47.0 

Connecticut Avenue Securities debt(2) 9.6 11.2 

(1) Excludes the effects of fair value adjustments and hedge-related basis adjustments.

(2) Represents CAS debt issued prior to November 2018. See “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk 

Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk—Credit Risk Transfer Transactions” in our 2021

Form 10-K for information regarding our Connecticut Avenue Securities.

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 53
We intend to repay our short-term and long-term debt obligations as they become due primarily through cash from 

business operations, the sale of other liquid assets and the issuance of additional debt securities.

For information on the maturity profile of our outstanding long-term debt, see “Note 7, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt.”

Debt Funding Activity 

The table below displays activity in debt of Fannie Mae. This activity excludes the debt of consolidated trusts and 

intraday borrowing. The reported amounts of debt issued and paid off during each period represent the face amount of 

the debt at issuance and redemption.

Although we had a substantial increase in short-term debt issued during the second quarter and first half of 2022

compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, most of the short-term debt issued was paid off during the 

quarter, and we ended the second quarter with $7.6 billion in outstanding short-term debt. As our funding needs 

remained low, we did not issue new long-term debt in the first half of 2022. The increase in long-term debt paid off 

during the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily 

due to a higher volume of maturing shorter duration long-term debt in the second quarter and first half of 2022.

Activity in Debt of Fannie Mae

For the Three Months Ended 

June 30,

For the Six Months Ended 

June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Issued during the period:

Short-term:

Amount $ 19,468 $ 8,284 $ 67,945 $ 13,426 

Weighted-average interest rate(1) 0.79 % (0.02) % 0.27 % (0.01) %

Long-term:(2)

Amount $ — $ — $ — $ 2,815 

Weighted-average interest rate — % — % — % 0.59 %

Total issued:

Amount $ 19,468 $ 8,284 $ 67,945 $ 16,241 

Weighted-average interest rate 0.79 % (0.02) % 0.27 % 0.09 %

Paid off during the period:(3)

Short-term:

Amount $ 14,452 $ 8,861 $ 61,679 $ 23,320 

Weighted-average interest rate(1) 0.45 % * 0.14 % 0.06 %

Long-term:(2)

Amount $ 38,561 $ 21,777 $ 58,914 $ 30,227 

Weighted-average interest rate 0.99 % 1.03 % 1.00 % 1.03 %

Total paid off:

Amount $ 53,013 $ 30,638 $ 120,593 $ 53,547 

Weighted-average interest rate 0.84 % 0.73 % 0.56 % 0.61 %

 * Represents a weighted-average interest rate of less than 0.005%. 

(1) Includes interest generated from negative interest rates on certain repurchase agreements, which offset our short-term funding costs. 

(2) Includes credit risk-sharing securities issued as CAS debt prior to November 2018. For information on our credit risk transfer transactions, 

see “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and 

Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk—Credit Risk Transfer Transactions” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

(3) Consists of all payments on debt, including regularly scheduled principal payments, payments at maturity, payments resulting from calls 

and payments for any other repurchases. Repurchases of debt and early retirements of zero-coupon debt are reported at original face 

value, which does not equal the amount of actual cash payment.

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 54
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We enter into certain business arrangements to facilitate our statutory purpose of providing liquidity to the secondary 

mortgage market and to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Some of these arrangements are not 

recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets or may be recorded in amounts different from the full contract 

or notional amount of the transaction, depending on the nature or structure of, and the accounting required to be applied 

to, the arrangement. These arrangements are commonly referred to as “off-balance sheet arrangements” and expose us 

to potential losses in excess of the amounts recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements result primarily from the following: 

• our guaranty of mortgage loan securitization and resecuritization transactions over which we have no control, 

which are reflected in our unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS net of any beneficial ownership interest we retain, 

and other financial guarantees that we do not control; 

• liquidity support transactions; and 

• partnership interests. 

The total amount of our off-balance sheet exposure related to unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS net of any beneficial 

interest that we retain, and other financial guarantees was $261.1 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $226.4 billion as of 

December 31, 2021. The majority of the other financial guarantees consists of Freddie Mac securities backing Fannie 

Mae structured securities. See “Guaranty Book of Business” and “Note 6, Financial Guarantees” for more information 

regarding our maximum exposure to loss on unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and Freddie Mac securities.

Our total outstanding liquidity commitments to advance funds for securities backed by multifamily housing revenue 

bonds totaled $5.2 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $5.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. These commitments require us 

to advance funds to third parties that enable them to repurchase tendered bonds or securities that are unable to be 

remarketed. We hold cash and cash equivalents in our other investments portfolio in excess of these commitments to 

advance funds.

We make investments in various limited partnerships and similar legal entities, which consist of low-income housing tax 

credit investments, community investments and other entities. When we do not have a controlling financial interest in 

those entities, our condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect only our investment rather than the full amount of the 

partnership’s assets and liabilities. See “Note 2, Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets—Unconsolidated 

VIEs” for information regarding our limited partnerships and similar legal entities.

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 55
Other Investments Portfolio

The chart below displays information on the composition of our other investments portfolio. The balance of our other 

investments portfolio fluctuates as a result of changes in our cash flows, liquidity in the fixed-income markets, and our 

liquidity risk management framework and practices.

Our other investments portfolio decreased during the first half of 2022 primarily due to a decrease in our holdings of 

U.S. Treasury securities, including those classified as cash and cash equivalents. We used cash and other liquid assets 

that accumulated in prior periods to fund our operations and to pay off maturing debt during the first half of 2022. Other Investments Portfolio

(Dollars in billions)

$42.4 $41.6

$83.6

$60.9

$133.2

$104.5

12/31/2021 6/30/2022

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

Securities purchased under agreements to resell(2)

U.S. Treasury securities

(1) Cash equivalents are composed of overnight repurchase agreements and U.S. Treasuries that have a maturity at the date of acquisition of 

three months or less.

(2) We held $2.0 billion and $7.2 billion in securities purchased under agreements to resell as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 

respectively. 

Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2022. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents decreased from 

$108.6 billion as of December 31, 2021 to $75.9 billion as of June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by cash 

outflows from (1) payments on outstanding debt of consolidated trusts, (2) the redemption of funding debt, which 

outpaced issuances, primarily for the reasons described above, and (3) purchases of loans held for investment.

Partially offsetting these cash outflows were cash inflows from (1) the sale of Fannie Mae MBS to third parties and (2) 

proceeds from repayments of loans.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents increased from 

$115.6 billion as of December 31, 2020 to $125.3 billion as of June 30, 2021. The increase was primarily driven by cash 

inflows from (1) the sale of Fannie Mae MBS to third parties and (2) proceeds from repayments and sales of loans.

Partially offsetting these cash inflows were cash outflows primarily from (1) payments on outstanding debt of 

consolidated trusts, (2) purchases of loans held for investment, and (3) the redemption of funding debt, which outpaced 

issuances, primarily for the reasons described above.

Credit Ratings

Our credit ratings from the major credit ratings organizations, as well as the credit ratings of the U.S. government, are 

primary factors that could affect our ability to access the capital markets and our cost of funds. For more information on 

our credit ratings, see “MD&A—Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management—Credit Ratings” in our 2021

Form 10-K.

The table below displays the credit ratings issued by the three major credit rating agencies.

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 56
Fannie Mae Credit Ratings

As of June 30, 2022

S&P Moody’s Fitch

Long-term senior debt AA+ Aaa AAA

Short-term senior debt A-1+ P-1 F1+

Preferred stock D Ca(hyb) C/RR6

Outlook Stable Stable Stable

(for Long-Term Senior Debt) (for AAA rated Long-Term 

Issuer Default Ratings)

In July 2022, Fitch affirmed our “AAA” long-term issuer default rating and revised our rating outlook to stable from 

negative, following its affirmation of the United States’ “AAA” issuer default rating with a stable outlook. Fitch noted that 

Fannie Mae’s long-term issuer default rating is directly linked to the United States’ long-term issuer default rating, based 

on Fitch’s view of the U.S. government’s direct financial support of Fannie Mae.

Capital Management

Capital Requirements

FHFA published a final rule establishing a new enterprise regulatory capital framework for the GSEs in December 2020. 

FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework in March 2022. We refer to the rule’s 

requirements, as amended, as the “enterprise regulatory capital framework.” The enterprise regulatory capital 

framework establishes new supplemental leverage and risk-based capital requirements for the GSEs. Under the 

leverage capital requirements, we must maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of 2.5% of adjusted total assets. Under the riskbased capital requirements, we must maintain minimum common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total 

capital ratios of 4.5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, of risk-weighted assets. For more information on the enterprise 

regulatory capital framework, see “Business—Legislation and Regulation—GSE-Focused Matters—Capital” in our 2021 

Form 10-K, “Legislation and Regulation—Final Rule Amending the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework” in our 

First Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q and the discussion of amendments to the enterprise regulatory capital framework in 

“Legislation and Regulation” in this report. The enterprise regulatory capital framework requires substantially higher 

levels of capital than the previously applicable statutory minimum capital requirement. 

Although the enterprise regulatory capital framework went into effect in February 2021, we are not required to hold 

capital according to the framework’s requirements until the date of termination of our conservatorship, or such later date 

as may be ordered by FHFA.

Beginning in 2022, on a quarterly basis, we are required to report to FHFA and disclose in an appropriate publicly 

available filing or other document our regulatory capital levels, buffers, adjusted total assets, and total risk-weighted 

assets under the standardized approach of the enterprise regulatory capital framework. 

The enterprise regulatory capital framework provides a granular assessment of credit risk specific to different mortgage 

loan categories, as well as components for market risk and operational risk. The enterprise regulatory capital framework 

includes the following requirements:

• Supplemental capital requirements relating to the amount and form of the capital we hold, based largely on 

definitions of capital used in U.S. banking regulators’ regulatory capital framework. The enterprise regulatory 

capital framework specifies complementary leverage and risk-based requirements, which together determine 

the requirements for each tier of capital;

• A requirement that we hold prescribed capital buffers that can be drawn down in periods of financial stress and 

then rebuilt over time as economic conditions improve. If we fall below the prescribed buffer amounts, we must 

restrict capital distributions such as stock repurchases and dividends, as well as discretionary bonus payments 

to executives, until the buffer amounts are restored. The prescribed capital buffers represent the amount of 

capital we are required to hold above the minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements.

◦ The prescribed leverage buffer amount (“PLBA”) represents the amount of tier 1 capital we are 

required to hold above the minimum tier 1 leverage capital requirement;

◦ The risk-based capital buffers consist of three separate components: a stability capital buffer, a stress 

capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. Taken together, these risk-based buffers comprise 

the prescribed capital conservation buffer amount (“PCCBA”). The PCCBA must be comprised entirely 

of common equity tier 1 capital; and

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 57
• Specific minimum percentages, or “floors,” on the risk-weights applicable to single-family and multifamily 

exposures, as well as retained portions of credit risk transfer transactions.

The table below sets forth information about our capital requirements under the standardized approach of the enterprise 

regulatory capital framework. Available capital for purposes of the enterprise regulatory capital framework excludes the 

stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion) and other amounts specified in footnote 3 to the table below. 

Because of these exclusions, we had a deficit in available capital as of June 30, 2022, even though we had positive net 

worth under GAAP of $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022.

We had a $262 billion shortfall of our available capital (deficit) to the adjusted total capital requirement (including 

buffers) of $185 billion under the standardized approach of the rule as of June 30, 2022. Our capital shortfall decreased 

$10 billion from $272 billion as of March 31, 2022, primarily as a result of an increase in our retained earnings and lower 

capital requirements due to single-family CRT issuances and home price appreciation. 

Capital Metrics under the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework as of June 30, 2022(1)

(Dollars in billions)

Stress capital buffer $ 34 

Stability capital buffer 45 

Adjusted total assets $ 4,545 Countercyclical capital buffer — 

Risk-weighted assets 1,325 Prescribed capital conservation buffer amount $ 79 

Minimum 

Capital Ratio 

Requirement

Minimum 

Capital 

Requirement

Applicable 

Buffers(2)

Total Capital 

Requirement 

(including 

Buffers)

Available 

Capital 

(Deficit)(3)

Capital 

Shortfall(4)

Risk-based capital:

Total capital(5) 8.0 % $ 106 N/A $ 106 $ (58) $ (164) 

Common equity tier 1 capital 4.5 60 $ 79 139 (96) (235) 

Tier 1 capital 6.0 80 79 159 (77) (236) 

Adjusted total capital 8.0 106 79 185 (77) (262) 

Leverage capital:

Core capital(6) 2.5 114 N/A 114 (64) (178) 

Tier 1 capital 2.5 114 23 137 (77) (214) 

(1) Ratios are calculated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for risk-based capital metrics and as a percentage of adjusted total assets 

for leverage capital metrics.

(2) The applicable buffer for common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total capital is the PCCBA, which is composed of a stress 

capital buffer, a stability capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. The applicable buffer for tier 1 capital (leverage based) is the 

PLBA. The stress capital buffer and countercyclical capital buffer are each calculated by multiplying prescribed factors by adjusted total 

assets as of the last day of the previous calendar quarter. The 2022 stability capital buffer is calculated by multiplying a factor determined 

based on our share of mortgage debt outstanding by adjusted total assets as of December 31, 2020. The prescribed leverage buffer for 

2022 is set at 50% of the 2022 stability buffer. Going forward the stability buffer and the prescribed leverage buffer will be updated with an 

effective date that depends on whether the stability capital buffer increases or decreases relative to the previously calculated value.

(3) Available capital (deficit) for all line items excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion). Available capital (deficit) 

for all line items except total capital and core capital also deducts a portion of deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets arising from 

temporary differences between GAAP and tax requirements are deducted from capital to the extent they exceed 10% of common equity. 

As of June 30, 2022, this resulted in the full deduction of deferred tax assets ($12.4 billion) from our available capital (deficit). Available 

capital (deficit) for common equity tier 1 capital also excludes the value of the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock ($19.1 billion).

(4) Our capital shortfall consists of the difference between the applicable capital requirement (including buffers) and the applicable available 

capital (deficit).

(5) The sum of (a) core capital (see definition in footnote 6 below); and (b) a general allowance for foreclosure losses, which (i) shall include 

an allowance for portfolio mortgage losses, an allowance for non-reimbursable foreclosure costs on government claims, and an allowance 

for liabilities reflected on the balance sheet for estimated foreclosure losses on mortgage-backed securities; and (ii) shall not include any 

reserves made or held against specific assets; and (c) any other amounts from sources of funds available to absorb losses that the 

Director of FHFA by regulation determines are appropriate to include in determining total capital.

(6) The sum of (a) the stated value of our outstanding common stock (common stock less treasury stock); (b) the stated value of our 

outstanding non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock; (c) our paid-in capital; and (d) our retained earnings (accumulated deficit). Core 

capital does not include: (a) accumulated other comprehensive income or (b) senior preferred stock.

As a result of our capital shortfall, our maximum payout ratio under the enterprise regulatory capital framework as of 

June 30, 2022 was 0%. While it is not applicable until we are required to comply with the capital requirements under the 

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 58
enterprise regulatory capital framework, our maximum payout ratio represents the percentage of eligible retained 

income that we are permitted to pay out in the form of distributions or discretionary bonus payments under the 

enterprise regulatory capital framework. The maximum payout ratio for a given quarter is the lowest of the payout ratios 

determined by our capital conservation buffer and our leverage buffer. See “Note 14—Regulatory Capital Requirements” 

in this report for information on our capital ratios as of June 30, 2022 under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.

Capital Activity

Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, no dividends were payable to Treasury for the second quarter of 

2022 and none are payable for the third quarter of 2022. 

Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, through and including the capital reserve end date, any increase 

in our net worth during a fiscal quarter results in an increase in the same amount of the aggregate liquidation preference 

of the senior preferred stock in the following quarter. The capital reserve end date is defined as the last day of the 

second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the 

capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.

As a result of these terms governing the senior preferred stock, the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior 

preferred stock increased by $4.4 billion to $173.3 billion as of June 30, 2022, due to the $4.4 billion increase in our net 

worth in the first quarter of 2022. The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock will further increase 

to $177.9 billion as of September 30, 2022, due to the $4.6 billion increase in our net worth in the second quarter of 

2022. See “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform—Treasury Agreements” in 

our 2021 Form 10-K for more information on the terms of our senior preferred stock, including how the aggregate 

liquidation preference is determined.

Increases in our net worth improve our capital position and our ability to absorb losses; however, increases in our net 

worth also increase the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock by the same amount until the 

capital reserve end date as discussed above.

Treasury Funding Commitment

Treasury made a commitment under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under 

certain circumstances if we have a net worth deficit. As of June 30, 2022, the remaining amount of Treasury’s funding 

commitment to us was $113.9 billion. See “Note 11, Equity” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information on the funding 

commitment provided by Treasury under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.

Risk Management

Our business activities expose us to the following major categories of risk: credit risk (including mortgage credit risk and 

institutional counterparty credit risk), market risk (including interest-rate risk), liquidity and funding risk, and operational 

risk (including cyber/information security risk, third-party risk and model risk), as well as strategic risk, compliance risk 

and reputational risk. See “MD&A—Risk Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of our management of 

these risks. This section supplements and updates that discussion but does not address all of the risk management 

categories described in our 2021 Form 10-K. 

Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management

This section supplements and updates our discussion of institutional counterparty credit risk management in our 2021

Form 10-K. See “MD&A—Risk Management—Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management” and “Risk Factors—

Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of our exposure to institutional counterparty credit risk and our 

strategy for managing this risk. Also see “Note 10, Concentrations of Credit Risk” in this report for an update on our 

counterparty credit risk exposure.

Change in Non-Depository Seller and Servicer Liquidity Requirements

A large portion of the loans in our single-family guaranty book, including a large portion of our seriously delinquent 

loans, are serviced by non-depository servicers. Compared with depository financial institutions, these institutions pose 

additional risks to us because they may not have the same financial strength or operational capacity, or be subject to 

the same level of regulatory oversight, as our largest depository mortgage servicer counterparties. Unlike for depository 

servicers, much of the capital of non-depository servicers is represented by the value of mortgage servicing rights, 

which is subject to variability based on market conditions and therefore is an important factor in determining capital 

adequacy. We require single-family non-depository servicers to meet minimum liquidity requirements to maintain 

MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 59
eligibility with Fannie Mae. We actively monitor the financial condition and capital adequacy of these non-depository 

servicers, including their compliance with our requirements.

In February 2022, FHFA re-proposed the minimum financial eligibility requirements for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 

sellers and servicers. If adopted as proposed, the requirements will increase capital and liquidity requirements for our 

single-family non-depository sellers and servicers.

Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management

We are subject to market risk, which includes interest-rate risk and spread risk. These risks arise from our mortgage 

asset investments. Interest-rate risk is the risk that movements in benchmark interest rates could adversely affect the 

fair value of our assets or liabilities or our future earnings. Spread risk represents the change in an instrument’s fair 

value that relates to factors other than changes in the benchmark interest rate.

We are exposed to interest-rate risk through our “net portfolio,” which we define as our retained mortgage portfolio 

assets; other investments portfolio; outstanding debt of Fannie Mae used to fund the retained mortgage portfolio assets 

and other investments portfolio; and mortgage commitments and risk management derivatives. Our goal is to manage 

interest-rate risk from our net portfolio to be neutral to movements in interest rates and volatility on an economic basis, 

subject to model constraints and prevailing market conditions. We actively manage the interest-rate risk of our net 

portfolio through the use of interest-rate derivatives and by issuing a broad range of both callable and non-callable debt 

instruments.

We are also exposed to interest-rate risk in connection with mortgage assets held by our consolidated MBS trusts. One 

exposure is cost basis adjustments that often result from upfront cash fees exchanged at the time of loan acquisition, 

which include buy-ups, buy-downs, and loan-level risk-based price adjustments. Another exposure is the float income 

earned by MBS trusts on the short-term reinvestment of loan payments received from borrowers in highly liquid 

investments with short maturities, such as U.S. Treasury securities. This float income is paid to us as trust management 

income and recorded within “Net interest income” in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Changes in interest rates can influence mortgage prepayment rates and float reinvestment yields. Therefore, they 

impact the timing of when we recognize amortization income related to cost basis amounts as well as the amount of 

float income generated by MBS trusts, thereby impacting our earnings. Typically, interest-rate driven changes in the 

timing of income recognition related to cost basis amortization are partially offset by interest-rate driven changes in the 

amount of float income earned. See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income—Analysis of Deferred 

Amortization Income” for more information on our outstanding net cost basis adjustments related to consolidated MBS 

trusts. 

We do not currently actively manage or hedge, on an economic basis, our spread risk or the interest-rate risk arising 

from cost basis adjustments and float income associated with mortgage assets held by our consolidated MBS trusts.

For additional information on the impact of interest-rate risk on our earnings, see “Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate 

Risk” below.

This section supplements and updates information regarding market risk management in our 2021 Form 10-K. See 

“MD&A—Risk Management—Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management” and “Risk Factors—

Market and Industry Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information, including our sources of interest-rate risk 

exposure, business risks posed by changes in interest rates, and our strategy for managing interest-rate risk. 

MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 60
Measurement of Interest-Rate Risk

The table below displays the pre-tax market value sensitivity of our net portfolio to changes in the level of interest rates 

and the slope of the yield curve as measured on the last day of each period presented. 

The table below also provides the daily average, minimum, maximum and standard deviation values for duration gap 

and for the most adverse market value impact on the net portfolio to changes in the level of interest rates and the slope 

of the yield curve for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021. Our practice is to allow interest rates to go below 

zero in the downward shock models unless otherwise prevented through contractual floors. 

For information on how we measure our interest-rate risk, see our 2021 Form 10-K in “MD&A—Risk Management—

Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management.”

Interest-Rate Sensitivity of Net Portfolio to Changes in Interest-Rate Level and Slope of Yield 

Curve

As of (1)(2)

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Rate level shock:

-100 basis points $ (126) $ (184) 

-50 basis points (48) (69) 

+50 basis points 32 54 

+100 basis points 54 75 

Rate slope shock:

-25 basis points (flattening) (7) (8) 

+25 basis points (steepening) 6 8 

For the Three Months Ended June 30, (1)(3)

2022 2021

Duration 

Gap

Rate Slope 

Shock 25 bps

Rate Level 

Shock 50 bps

Duration 

Gap

Rate Slope 

Shock 25 bps

Rate Level 

Shock 50 bps

Market Value Sensitivity Market Value Sensitivity

(In years) (Dollars in millions) (In years) (Dollars in millions)

Average (0.03) $ (5) $ (36) 0.02 $ (11) $ (60) 

Minimum (0.05) (8) (62) (0.04) (17) (118) 

Maximum 0.02 — (12) 0.10 (3) (18) 

Standard deviation 0.02 2 13 0.03 4 27 

(1) Computed based on changes in U.S. LIBOR interest-rates swap curve. Changes in the level of interest rates assume a parallel shift in all 

maturities of the U.S. LIBOR interest-rate swap curve. Changes in the slope of the yield curve assume a constant 7-year rate, a shift of 

16.7 basis points for the 1-year rate (and shorter tenors) and an opposite shift of 8.3 basis points for the 30-year rate. Rate shocks for 

remaining maturity points are interpolated. 

(2) Measured on the last business day of each period presented. 

(3) Computed based on daily values during the period presented.

The market value sensitivity of our net portfolio varies across a range of interest-rate shocks depending upon the 

duration and convexity profile of our net portfolio. The market value sensitivity of the net portfolio is measured by 

quantifying the change in the present value of the cash flows of our financial assets and liabilities that would result from 

an instantaneous shock to interest rates, assuming spreads are held constant. For the subset of floating-rate liabilities 

and assets that are indexed to LIBOR or SOFR, the interest component of their future cash flows is calculated using the 

projection of the corresponding index rate. For all assets and liabilities, the discount factor used to calculate the present 

value of the future cash flows is constructed using the LIBOR yield curve.

LIBOR rate quotes will cease on June 30, 2023, and after that date the interest accrued on floating-rate instruments that 

are contractually indexed to LIBOR will reset based on SOFR. Before that LIBOR cessation date, the portfolio interestrate risk measurement process will transition from using LIBOR to using SOFR as the benchmark interest rate. This 

change is not expected to have a significant impact on measurement of our interest-rate risk on our financial results.

MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 61
We use derivatives to help manage the residual interest-rate risk exposure between the assets and liabilities in our net 

portfolio. Derivatives have enabled us to keep our economic interest-rate risk exposure at consistently low levels in a 

wide range of interest-rate environments. The table below displays an example of how derivatives impacted the net 

market value exposure for a 50 basis point parallel interest-rate shock. For additional information on our derivative 

positions, see “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” in our 2021 Form 10-K and in this report.

Derivative Impact on Interest-Rate Risk (50 Basis Points)

As of (1)

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Before derivatives $ (306) $ (539) 

After derivatives (48) (69) 

Effect of derivatives 258 470 

(1) Measured on the last business day of each period presented.

Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk

While we manage the interest-rate risk of our net portfolio with the objective of remaining neutral to movements in 

interest rates and volatility on an economic basis, our earnings can experience volatility due to interest-rate changes 

and differing accounting treatments that apply to certain financial instruments on our balance sheet. Specifically, we 

have exposure to earnings volatility that is driven by changes in interest rates in two primary areas: our net portfolio and 

our consolidated MBS trusts. The exposure in the net portfolio is primarily driven by changes in the fair value of risk 

management derivatives, mortgage commitments, and certain assets, primarily securities, that are carried at fair value. 

The exposure related to our consolidated MBS trusts relates to changes in our credit loss reserves and to the 

amortization of cost basis adjustments resulting from changes in interest rates.

We apply fair value hedge accounting to address some of the exposure to interest rates, particularly the earnings 

volatility related to changes in benchmark interest rates, including LIBOR and SOFR. Although our hedge accounting 

program is designed to address the volatility of our financial results associated with changes in fair value related to 

changes in the benchmark interest rates, earnings variability driven by other factors, such as spreads or changes in cost 

basis amortization recognized in net interest income, remains. In addition, our ability to effectively reduce earnings 

volatility is dependent upon the volume and type of interest-rate swaps available, which is driven by our interest-rate risk 

management strategy discussed above. As our range of available interest-rate swaps varies over time, our ability to 

reduce earnings volatility through hedge accounting may vary as well. When the shape of the yield curve shifts 

significantly from period to period, hedge accounting may be less effective. In our current program, we establish new 

hedging relationships daily to provide flexibility in our overall risk management strategy. 

See “MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations—Hedge Accounting Impact” and “Note 1, Summary of Significant 

Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” in this report for additional information 

on our fair value hedge accounting policy and related disclosures.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United 

States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that 

affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in our condensed consolidated financial 

statements. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management judgment and 

estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We describe our most 

significant accounting policies in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in this report and in our 2021 

Form 10-K.

We evaluate our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update 

them as necessary based on changing conditions. Management has discussed any significant changes in judgments 

and assumptions in applying our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. See 

“Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of the risks associated with the need for management to make 

judgments and estimates in applying our accounting policies and methods. We have identified one of our accounting 

estimates, allowance for loan losses, as critical because it involves significant judgments and assumptions about highly 

complex and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different judgments and assumptions could have a 

material impact on our reported results of operations or financial condition.

MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 62
Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of single-family and multifamily HFI loan receivables that we expect will not 

be collected related to loans held by Fannie Mae or by consolidated Fannie Mae MBS trusts. The expected credit losses 

are deducted from the amortized cost basis of HFI loans to present the net amount expected to be received. 

The allowance for loan losses involves substantial judgment on a number of matters including the development and 

weighting of macroeconomic forecasts, the reversion period applied, the assessment of similar risk characteristics, 

which determines the historic loss experience used to derive probability of loan default, the valuation of collateral, and 

the determination of a loan’s remaining expected life. Our most significant judgments involved in estimating our 

allowance for loan losses relate to the macroeconomic data used to develop reasonable and supportable forecasts for 

key economic drivers, which are subject to significant inherent uncertainty. Most notably, for single-family, the model 

uses forecasted single-family home prices as well as a range of possible future interest rate environments, which drive 

prepayment speeds and impact the measurement of the economic concession provided on loans modified in a 

restructuring which are accounted for as a TDR. For multifamily, the model uses forecasted rental income and property 

valuations. For purposes of the macroeconomic sensitivities disclosed below, we have determined that our single-family 

home price forecast and interest rate forecast are the most significant judgments used in our estimation of credit losses 

for the periods presented below.

In future periods, changes in projected interest rates may not be as significant to our measurement of expected credit 

losses. Pursuant to our adoption of ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 2022, we prospectively discontinued TDR accounting 

and no longer measure the economic concession for loan modifications occurring on or after the adoption date. In 

addition, modifications to loans previously designated as TDRs that occur on or after January 1, 2022, are accounted for 

under the newly adopted ASU and result in the elimination of any prior economic concession recorded in the allowance 

related to such loans. Although increases in interest rates were a meaningful driver of our credit-related expense in the 

first half of 2022, we expect the decrease in the balance of loans that were previously designated as TDRs will reduce 

the sensitivity of our credit-related income (expense) to interest rate volatility over time. See “Note 1, Summary of 

Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance” for more information about our adoption of ASU 2022-02.

Quantitative Component

We use a discounted cash flow method to measure expected credit losses on our single-family mortgage loans and an 

undiscounted loss method to measure expected credit losses on our multifamily mortgage loans. The models use 

reasonable and supportable forecasts for key macroeconomic drivers. 

Our modeled loan performance is based on our historical experience of loans with similar risk characteristics adjusted to 

reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Our historical loss experience and our loan loss 

estimates capture the possibility of a multitude of events, including remote events that could result in credit losses on 

loans that are considered low risk. Our credit loss models, including the macroeconomic forecast data used as key 

inputs, are subject to our model oversight and review processes as well as other established governance and controls. 

Qualitative Component, including Management Adjustments 

Our process for measuring expected credit losses is complex and involves significant management judgment, including 

a reliance on historical loss information and current economic forecasts that may not be representative of credit losses 

we ultimately realize. Management adjustments may be necessary to take into consideration external factors and 

current macroeconomic events that have occurred but are not yet reflected in the data used to derive the model outputs. 

Qualitative factors and events not previously observed by the models through historical loss experience are also 

considered, as well as the uncertainty of their impact on credit loss estimates. 

In the second quarter of 2022, management supplemented model results to reflect some recent market indicators that 

suggest home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than indicated by model results for the quarter. See 

“Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional information on recent market conditions.

Macroeconomic Variables and Sensitivities

Our credit-related income or expense can vary substantially from period to period based on forecasted macroeconomic 

drivers; primarily home prices and interest rates related to our single-family book of business. We develop regional 

forecasts for single-family home prices using a multi-path simulation that captures home price projections over a fiveyear period, which is the period for which we can develop reasonable and supportable forecasts. After the five-year 

period, the home price forecast reverts to a historical long-term growth rate. Additionally, our model projects the range of 

possible interest rate scenarios over the life of the loan. This process captures multiple possible outcomes of what could 

be more or less favorable economic environments for the borrower, and therefore will increase or decrease the 

likelihood of default or prepayment depending on the environment in each path of the simulation. 

MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 63
The table below provides information about our most significant key macroeconomic inputs used in determining our 

single-family allowance for loan losses: forecasted home price growth rates and interest rates. Although the model 

consumes a wide range of possible regional home price forecasts and interest rate scenarios that take into account 

inherent uncertainty, the forecasts below represent the mean path of those simulations used in determining the 

allowance for each quarter through the six months ended June 30, 2022, and for each quarter during the year ended 

December 31, 2021, and how those forecasts have changed between periods of estimate. Below we present the two 

succeeding periods used in our estimate of expected credit losses. The forecasts consider periods beyond those 

presented below. 

Select Single-Family Macroeconomic Model Inputs(1)

Forecasted home price growth rate by period of estimate:(2)

For the Full Year ending December 31,

2022 2023 2024

Second Quarter 2022 16.0 % 4.4 % 0.5 %

First Quarter 2022 10.8 3.2 1.3 

For the Full Year ending December 31,

2021 2022 2023

Fourth Quarter 2021 18.8 % 8.2 % 2.9 %

Third Quarter 2021 18.4 7.9 2.4 

Second Quarter 2021 14.8 5.4 2.5 

First Quarter 2021 8.8 2.5 1.7 

Forecasted 30-year interest rates by period of estimate:(3)

Through the 

end of 

December 31,

For the Full Year ending 

December 31,

2022 2023 2024

Second Quarter 2022 5.7 % 5.4 % 5.2 %

First Quarter 2022 4.7 4.8 4.7 

Through the 

end of 

December 31,

For the Full Year ending 

December 31,

2021 2022 2023

Fourth Quarter 2021 3.2 % 3.5 % 3.7 %

Third Quarter 2021 3.1 3.4 3.7 

Second Quarter 2021 3.1 3.4 3.6 

First Quarter 2021 3.1 3.3 3.6 

(1) These forecasts are provided here solely for the purpose of providing insight into our credit loss model. Forecasts for future periods are 

subject to significant uncertainty, which increases for periods that are further in the future. We provide our most recent forecasts for certain 

macroeconomic and housing market conditions in “Key Market Economic Indicators.” In addition, each month our Economic & Strategic 

Research group provides its forecast of economic and housing market conditions, which are available in the “Research and Insights” 

section of our website, www.fanniemae.com.

(2) These estimates are based on our national home price index, which is calculated differently from the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home 

Price Index and therefore results in different percentages for comparable growth. We continually update our home price growth estimates 

and forecasts as new data become available. As a result, the forecast data in this table may also differ from the forecasted home price 

growth rate presented in “Key Market Economic Indicators,” because that section reflects our most recent forecast as of the filing date of 

this report, while this table reflects the quantitative forecast data we used in our model to estimate credit losses for the periods shown. 

Management continues to monitor macroeconomic updates to our inputs in our credit loss model from the time they are approved as part 

of our established governance process, through the date of filing, to ensure the reasonableness of the inputs used to calculate estimated 

credit losses. The forecast data excludes the impact of any qualitative adjustments.

MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 64
(3) Forecasted 30-year interest rates represent the mean of possible future interest rate environments that are simulated by our interest rate 

model and used in the estimation of credit losses. Forecasts through the end of December 31, 2022 and 2021 represent the average 

forecasted rate from the quarter-end through the calendar year end of December 31st. The fourth quarter of 2021 interest rate represents 

the 30-year interest rate as of December 31, 2021. This table reflects the forecasted interest rate data we used in estimating credit losses 

for the periods shown and does not reflect changes in interest rates that occurred after the forecast date. 

It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one factor or input might affect the overall credit loss estimates, 

because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for loan losses. 

Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all 

geographies or loan types, and changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement 

in one factor or input may offset deterioration in others. Changes in our assumptions and forecasts of economic 

conditions could significantly affect our estimate of expected credit losses and lead to significant changes in the 

estimate from one reporting period to the next. 

As noted above, our allowance for loan losses is sensitive to changes in home prices and interest rate changes. To 

consider the impact of a hypothetical change in home price appreciation, assuming a one-percentage point increase in 

the home price growth rate for the first twelve months of the forecast, on a normalized basis, with all other factors held 

constant, the single-family allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2022 would decrease by approximately 2%. 

Conversely, assuming a one-percentage point decrease in the home price growth rate for the first twelve months of the 

forecast, on a normalized basis, the single-family allowance for loan losses would increase by approximately 2%. 

To consider the impact of a hypothetical change in 30-year interest rates, assuming a 50-basis point increase in 

estimated 30-year interest rates, with all other factors held constant, the single-family allowance for loan losses as of 

June 30, 2022 would increase by approximately 3%. Conversely, assuming a 50-basis point decrease in 30-year 

interest rates, the single-family allowance for loan losses would decrease by approximately 3%. 

These sensitivity analyses are hypothetical and are provided solely for the purpose of providing insight into our credit 

loss model inputs. In addition, sensitivities for home price and interest rate changes are non-linear. As a result, changes 

in these estimates are not incrementally proportional. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an indication of the 

impact of home price appreciation and 30-year interest rates on the estimate of the allowance for credit losses. For 

example, it is not intended to imply management’s expectation of future changes in our forecasts or any other variables 

that may change as a result.

We provide more detailed information on our accounting for the allowance for loan losses in “Note 1, Summary of 

Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses” for additional 

information about our current period benefit (provision) for loan losses.

See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional information about how home prices can affect our credit loss 

estimates, including a discussion of home price appreciation and our home price forecast. Also see “Consolidated 

Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” for information on how our home price forecast impacted our 

single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses.

Impact of Future Adoption of New Accounting Guidance

We identify and discuss the expected impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements of recently issued 

accounting guidance in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, we and our senior management may from time to 

time make forward-looking statements in our other filings with the SEC, our other publicly available written statements, 

and orally to analysts, investors, the news media and others. Forward-looking statements often include words such as 

“expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “would,” “should,” “could,” 

“likely,” “may,” “will” or similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements in this report include, among others, 

statements relating to our expectations regarding the following matters:

• our future financial performance and the factors that will affect such performance;

• economic, mortgage market and housing market conditions (including expectations regarding economic growth, 

home price growth, refinance volumes and interest rates), the factors that will affect those conditions, and the 

impact of those conditions on our business and financial results; 

• our business plans and their impact;

MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 65
• our plans relating to and the effects of our credit risk transfer transactions, as well as the factors that will affect 

our engagement in future transactions;

• volatility in our financial results and the impact of our adoption of hedge accounting on such volatility; 

• the size and composition of our retained mortgage portfolio;

• the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance;

• our payments to HUD and Treasury funds under the GSE Act;

• the risks to our business;

• future forbearances, modifications and write-offs relating to the loans in our guaranty book of business and the 

factors that will affect them;

• the performance of loans in our book of business, including loans in forbearance, and the factors that will affect 

such performance;

• how we intend to meet our debt obligations; and 

• our response to legal and regulatory proceedings and their impact on our business or financial condition.

Forward-looking statements reflect our management’s current expectations, forecasts or predictions of future conditions, 

events or results based on various assumptions and management’s estimates of trends and economic factors in the 

markets in which we are active and that otherwise impact our business plans. Forward-looking statements are not 

guarantees of future performance. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and 

uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, 

from the anticipated results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements. 

There are a number of factors that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ materially from those 

described in our forward-looking statements, including, among others, the following: 

• uncertainty regarding our future, our exit from conservatorship and our ability to raise or earn the capital 

needed to meet our capital requirements; 

• significant challenges we face in retaining and hiring qualified executives and other employees; 

• the duration, spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; the actions taken to contain the virus or treat its 

impact, including government actions to mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic and COVID-19 

vaccination rates; the effectiveness of available COVID-19 vaccines over time and against variants of the 

coronavirus; the nature, extent and success of the forbearance, payment deferrals, modifications and other loss 

mitigation options we provide to borrowers affected by the pandemic; accounting elections and estimates 

relating to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; borrower and renter behavior in response to the pandemic 

and its economic impact; the extent to which any future outbreaks or increases in new COVID-19 cases affect 

economic growth; and the pace and extent to which borrowers, renters and counterparties who continue to be 

negatively impacted by the pandemic recover; 

• the impact of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement and the enterprise regulatory capital framework, 

as well as future legislative and regulatory requirements or changes, governmental initiatives, or executive 

orders affecting us, such as the enactment of housing finance reform legislation, including changes that limit 

our business activities or our footprint or impose new mandates on us; 

• actions by FHFA, Treasury, HUD, the CFPB, the SEC or other regulators, Congress, the Executive Branch, or 

state or local governments that affect our business;

• changes in the structure and regulation of the financial services industry; 

• the potential impact of a change in the corporate income tax rate, which we expect would affect our net income 

in the quarter of enactment as a result of a change in our measurement of our deferred tax assets and our net 

income in subsequent quarters as a result of the change in our effective federal income tax rate;

• the timing and level of, as well as regional variation in, home price changes; 

• future interest rates and credit spreads; 

• developments that may be difficult to predict, including: market conditions that result in changes in our net 

amortization income from our guaranty book of business, fluctuations in the estimated fair value of our 

derivatives and other financial instruments that we mark to market through our earnings; and developments that 

affect our loss reserves, such as changes in interest rates, home prices or accounting standards, or events 

such as natural or other disasters, the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, or other 

disruptive or catastrophic events;

MD&A | Forward-Looking Statements

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 66
• uncertainties relating to the discontinuance of LIBOR, or other market changes that could impact the loans we 

own or guarantee or our MBS; 

• disruptions or instability in the housing and credit markets;

• the size and our share of the U.S. mortgage market and the factors that affect them, including population 

growth and household formation;

• growth, deterioration and the overall health and stability of the U.S. economy, including U.S. GDP, 

unemployment rates, personal income, inflation and other indicators thereof;

• changes in fiscal or monetary policy; 

• our and our competitors’ future guaranty fee pricing and the impact of that pricing on our competitive 

environment and guaranty fee revenues; 

• the volume of mortgage originations;

• the size, composition, quality and performance of our guaranty book of business and retained mortgage 

portfolio; 

• the competitive environment in which we operate, including the impact of legislative, regulatory or other 

developments on levels of competition in our industry and other factors affecting our market share; 

• how long loans in our guaranty book of business remain outstanding; 

• the effectiveness of our business resiliency plans and systems;

• changes in the demand for Fannie Mae MBS, in general or from one or more major groups of investors;

• our conservatorship, including any changes to or termination (by receivership or otherwise) of the 

conservatorship and its effect on our business; 

• the investment by Treasury, including the impact of past or potential future changes to the terms of the senior 

preferred stock purchase agreement, and their effect on our business, including restrictions imposed on us by 

the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, the senior preferred stock, and the warrant, as 

well as the extent that these or other restrictions on our business and activities are applied to us through other 

mechanisms even if we cease to be subject to these agreements and instruments; 

• adverse effects from activities we undertake to support the mortgage market and help borrowers, renters, 

lenders and servicers; 

• actions we may be required to take by FHFA, in its role as our conservator or as our regulator, such as actions 

in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in the type of business we do, or actions relating to UMBS or 

our resecuritization of Freddie Mac-issued securities; 

• limitations on our business imposed by FHFA, in its role as our conservator or as our regulator; 

• our current and future objectives and activities in support of those objectives, including actions we may take to 

reach additional underserved borrowers or address barriers to sustainable housing opportunities and advance 

equity in housing finance; 

• the possibility that changes in leadership at FHFA or the Administration may result in changes that affect our 

company or our business;

• our reliance on Common Securitization Solutions, LLC (“CSS”), a limited liability company we own jointly with 

Freddie Mac, and the common securitization platform CSS operates for a majority of our single-family 

securitization activities; provisions in the CSS limited liability company agreement that permit FHFA to add 

members to the CSS Board of Managers, limiting the ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to control 

decisions of the Board; and changes FHFA may require in our relationship with or in our support of CSS;

• a decrease in our credit ratings; 

• limitations on our ability to access the debt capital markets; 

• constraints on our entry into new credit risk transfer transactions;

• significant changes in forbearance, modification and foreclosure activity; 

• the volume and pace of future nonperforming and reperforming loan sales and their impact on our results and 

serious delinquency rates; 

• changes in borrower behavior; 

MD&A | Forward-Looking Statements

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 67
• actions we may take to mitigate losses, and the effectiveness of our loss mitigation strategies, management of 

our REO inventory and pursuit of contractual remedies; 

• defaults by one or more institutional counterparties; 

• resolution or settlement agreements we may enter into with our counterparties; 

• our need to rely on third parties to fully achieve some of our corporate objectives; 

• our reliance on mortgage servicers; 

• changes in GAAP, guidance by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and changes to our accounting 

policies; 

• changes in the fair value of our assets and liabilities; 

• the stability and adequacy of the systems and infrastructure that impact our operations, including ours and 

those of CSS, our other counterparties and other third parties; 

• the impact of interdependence between the single-family mortgage securitization programs of Fannie Mae and 

Freddie Mac in connection with UMBS;

• operational control weaknesses; 

• our reliance on models and future updates we make to our models, including the assumptions used by these 

models; 

• domestic and global political risks and uncertainties, including the impact of the Russian war in Ukraine and the 

potential expansion of military hostilities; 

• natural disasters, environmental disasters, terrorist attacks, widespread health emergencies or pandemics, 

infrastructure failures, or other disruptive or catastrophic events; 

• severe weather events, fires, floods or other climate change events or impacts, including those for which we 

may be uninsured or under-insured or that may affect our counterparties, and other risks resulting from climate 

change and efforts to address climate change and related risks;

• cyber attacks or other information security breaches or threats; and 

• the other factors described in “Risk Factors” in this report and in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Readers are cautioned not to unduly rely on the forward-looking statements we make and to place these forwardlooking statements into proper context by carefully considering the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 

10-K and in this report. These forward-looking statements are representative only as of the date they are made, and we 

undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or 

otherwise, except as required under the federal securities laws. 

MD&A | Forward-Looking Statements

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 68
Item 1. Financial Statements

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — (Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)

As of

June 30, 

2022

December 31, 

2021

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents $ 41,639 $ 42,448 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents (includes $28,346 and $59,203, respectively, related to 

consolidated trusts) 34,303 66,183 

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (includes $13,391 and $13,533, respectively, related to 

consolidated trusts) 15,391 20,743 

Investments in securities:

Trading, at fair value (includes $3,824 and $4,224, respectively, pledged as collateral) 64,811 88,206 

Available-for-sale, at fair value (with an amortized cost of $764 and $827, respectively) 765 837 

Total investments in securities 65,576 89,043 

Mortgage loans:

 Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value 4,579 5,134 

Loans held for investment, at amortized cost:

Of Fannie Mae 58,241 61,025 

Of consolidated trusts 4,035,180 3,907,712 

 Total loans held for investment (includes $4,071 and $4,964, respectively, at fair value) 4,093,421 3,968,737 

Allowance for loan losses (6,069) (5,629) 

Total loans held for investment, net of allowance 4,087,352 3,963,108 

Total mortgage loans 4,091,931 3,968,242 

Advances to lenders 4,622 8,414 

Deferred tax assets, net 12,402 12,715 

Accrued interest receivable, net (includes $8,968 and $8,878 related to consolidated trusts and net of 

allowance of $89 and $140, respectively) 9,565 9,264 

Acquired property, net 1,485 1,259 

Other assets 12,053 10,855 

Total assets $ 4,288,967 $ 4,229,166 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Liabilities:

Accrued interest payable (includes $8,777 and $8,517, respectively, related to consolidated trusts) $ 9,355 $ 9,186 

Debt:

Of Fannie Mae (includes $1,866 and $2,381, respectively, at fair value) 144,455 200,892 

Of consolidated trusts (includes $18,418 and $21,735, respectively, at fair value) 4,064,192 3,957,299 

Other liabilities (includes $1,870 and $1,245, respectively, related to consolidated trusts) 14,558 14,432 

Total liabilities 4,232,560 4,181,809 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) — — 

Fannie Mae stockholders’ equity:

Senior preferred stock (liquidation preference of $173,257 and $163,672, respectively) 120,836 120,836 

Preferred stock, 700,000,000 shares are authorized—555,374,922 shares issued and outstanding 19,130 19,130 

Common stock, no par value, no maximum authorization—1,308,762,703 shares issued and 

1,158,087,567 shares outstanding 687 687 

Accumulated deficit (76,873) (85,934) 

Accumulated other comprehensive income 27 38 

Treasury stock, at cost, 150,675,136 shares (7,400) (7,400) 

Total stockholders’ equity (See Note 1: Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior 

Preferred Stock for information on the related dividend obligation and liquidation preference) 56,407 47,357 

Total liabilities and equity $ 4,288,967 $ 4,229,166 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 Financial Statements | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 69
FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and 

Comprehensive Income — (Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) 

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

Interest income:

Trading securities $ 309 $ 122 $ 465 $ 262 

Available-for-sale securities 9 18 19 37 

Mortgage loans 29,082 24,932 56,224 48,285 

Securities purchased under agreements to resell 28 4 34 12 

Other 27 31 53 73 

Total interest income 29,455 25,107 56,795 48,669 

Interest expense:

Short-term debt (5) (1) (6) (4) 

Long-term debt (21,642) (16,820) (41,582) (33,637) 

Total interest expense (21,647) (16,821) (41,588) (33,641) 

Net interest income 7,808 8,286 15,207 15,028 

Benefit (provision) for credit losses (218) 2,588 (458) 3,353 

Net interest income after benefit (provision) for credit losses 7,590 10,874 14,749 18,381 

Investment gains (losses), net (49) 646 (151) 691 

Fair value gains (losses), net 529 (446) 1,009 338 

Fee and other income 81 103 164 190 

Non-interest income 561 303 1,022 1,219 

Administrative expenses:

Salaries and employee benefits (398) (365) (805) (752) 

Professional services (198) (184) (407) (398) 

Other administrative expenses (199) (197) (391) (344) 

Total administrative expenses (795) (746) (1,603) (1,494) 

Foreclosed property income (expense) (33) (41) 6 (36) 

TCCA fees (841) (758) (1,665) (1,489) 

Credit enhancement expense (332) (274) (610) (558) 

Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries (47) (44) 13 (75) 

Other expenses, net (228) (280) (464) (599) 

Total expenses (2,276) (2,143) (4,323) (4,251) 

Income before federal income taxes 5,875 9,034 11,448 15,349 

Provision for federal income taxes (1,222) (1,882) (2,387) (3,204) 

Net income 4,653 7,152 9,061 12,145 

Other comprehensive loss:

Changes in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of 

reclassification adjustments and taxes (2) (31) (7) (54) 

Other, net of taxes (2) (1) (4) (5) 

Total other comprehensive loss (4) (32) (11) (59) 

Total comprehensive income $ 4,649 $ 7,120 $ 9,050 $ 12,086 

Net income $ 4,653 $ 7,152 $ 9,061 $ 12,145 

Dividends distributed or amounts attributable to senior preferred stock (4,649) (7,120) (9,050) (12,086) 

Net income attributable to common stockholders $ 4 $ 32 $ 11 $ 59 

Earnings per share:

Basic $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 $ 0.01 

Diluted 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

Basic 5,867 5,867 5,867 5,867 

Diluted 5,893 5,893 5,893 5,893 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 Financial Statements | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 70
FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — 

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021

Net cash provided by operating activities $ 24,163 $ 40,039 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:

Purchases of loans held for investment (166,414) (395,301) 

Proceeds from repayments of loans acquired as held-for-investment of Fannie Mae 4,588 5,840 

Proceeds from sales of loans acquired held-for-investment of Fannie Mae 4,122 7,435 

Proceeds from repayments and sales of loans acquired as held for investment of consolidated trusts 297,790 603,947 

Advances to lenders (114,263) (212,678) 

Proceeds from disposition of acquired property and preforeclosure sales 1,438 2,157 

Net change in federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell 5,352 (15,688) 

Other, net (1,248) 1,911 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 31,365 (2,377) 

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:

Proceeds from issuance of debt of Fannie Mae 167,585 101,875 

Payments to redeem debt of Fannie Mae (221,707) (139,184) 

Proceeds from issuance of debt of consolidated trusts 308,293 650,713 

Payments to redeem debt of consolidated trusts (343,855) (641,462) 

Other, net 1,467 72 

Net cash used in financing activities (88,217) (27,986) 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents (32,689) 9,676 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 108,631 115,623 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 75,942 $ 125,299 

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest $ 49,255 $ 53,676 

Income taxes 1,900 2,750 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 Financial Statements | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 71
FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in 

Equity — (Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in millions)

Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity

Shares Outstanding

Senior

Preferred 

Stock

Preferred

Stock

Common

Stock

Accumulated

Deficit

Accumulated 

Other

Comprehensive

Income

Treasury

Stock

Total

Equity

Senior

Preferred Preferred Common

Balance as of March 31, 2022 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (81,526) $ 31 $ (7,400) $ 51,758 

Comprehensive income:

Net income — — — — — — 4,653 — — 4,653 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:

Changes in net unrealized gains on availablefor-sale securities (net of taxes of $2) — — — — — — — (6) — (6) 

Reclassification adjustment for gains included 

in net income (net of taxes of $1) — — — — — — — 4 — 4 

Other (net of taxes of $1) — — — — — — — (2) — (2) 

Total comprehensive income 4,649 

Balance as of June 30, 2022 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (76,873) $ 27 $ (7,400) $ 56,407 

Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity

Shares Outstanding

Senior

Preferred 

Stock

Preferred

Stock

Common

Stock

Accumulated

Deficit

Accumulated 

Other

Comprehensive

Income

Treasury

Stock

Total

Equity

Senior

Preferred Preferred Common

Balance as of December 31, 2021 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (85,934) $ 38 $ (7,400) $ 47,357 

Comprehensive income:

Net income — — — — — — 9,061 — — 9,061 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:

Changes in net unrealized gains on availablefor-sale securities (net of taxes of $4) — — — — — — — (15) — (15) 

Reclassification adjustment for gains included 

in net income (net of taxes of $2) — — — — — — — 8 — 8 

Other (net of taxes of $1) — — — — — — — (4) — (4) 

Total comprehensive income 9,050 

Balance as of June 30, 2022 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (76,873) $ 27 $ (7,400) $ 56,407 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial Statements | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 72
FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in 

Equity — (Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in millions)

Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity 

Shares Outstanding

Senior

Preferred 

Stock

Preferred

Stock

Common

Stock

Accumulated

Deficit

Accumulated 

Other

Comprehensive

Income

Treasury

Stock

Total

Equity

Senior

Preferred Preferred Common

Balance as of March 31, 2021 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (103,117) $ 89 $ (7,400) $ 30,225 

Comprehensive income:

Net income — — — — — — 7,152 — — 7,152 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:

Changes in net unrealized gains on available-

 for-sale securities (net of taxes of $1) — — — — — — — 2 — 2 

Reclassification adjustment for gains included

 in net income (net of taxes of $9) — — — — — — — (33) — (33) 

Other (net of taxes of $1) — — — — — — — (1) — (1) 

Total comprehensive income 7,120 

Balance as of June 30, 2021 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (95,965) $ 57 $ (7,400) $ 37,345 

Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity

Shares Outstanding

Senior

Preferred 

Stock

Preferred

Stock

Common

Stock

Accumulated

Deficit

Accumulated 

Other

Comprehensive

Income

Treasury

Stock

Total

Equity

Senior

Preferred Preferred Common

Balance as of December 31, 2020 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (108,110) $ 116 $ (7,400) $ 25,259 

Comprehensive income:

Net income — — — — — — 12,145 — — 12,145 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:

Changes in net unrealized gains on availablefor-sale securities (net of taxes of $1) — — — — — — — (4) — (4) 

Reclassification adjustment for gains included 

in net income (net of taxes of $13) — — — — — — — (50) — (50) 

Other (net of taxes of $2) — — — — — — — (5) — (5) 

Total comprehensive income 12,086 

Balance as of June 30, 2021 1 556 1,158 $ 120,836 $ 19,130 $ 687 $ (95,965) $ 57 $ (7,400) $ 37,345 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial Statements | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 73
FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae is a leading source of financing for mortgages in the United States. We are a shareholder-owned 

corporation organized as a government-sponsored entity (“GSE”) and existing under the Federal National Mortgage 

Association Charter Act (the “Charter Act” or our “charter”). Our charter is an act of Congress, and we have a purpose 

under that charter to provide liquidity and stability to the residential mortgage market and to promote access to 

mortgage credit. Our regulators include the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), the U.S. Department of Housing 

and Urban Development (“HUD”), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury (“Treasury”). The U.S. government does not guarantee our securities or other obligations. 

We have been under conservatorship, with FHFA acting as conservator, since September 6, 2008. See below and “Note 

1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 

2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”) for additional information on our conservatorship and the impact of U.S. government support 

of our business.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 

30, 2022 and related notes should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related 

notes included in our 2021 Form 10-K. 

Basis of Presentation 

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance 

with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information 

and with the SEC’s instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the 

information and note disclosures required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of 

management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been 

included. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as the accounts 

of other entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been 

eliminated. Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 may not necessarily be indicative of the results 

for the year ending December 31, 2022.

Use of Estimates

Preparing condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make 

estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets 

and liabilities as of the dates of our condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as our reported amounts of 

revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management has made significant estimates in a variety of areas 

including, but not limited to, the allowance for loan losses. Actual results could be different from these estimates.

Conservatorship

On September 7, 2008, the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of FHFA announced several actions taken by 

Treasury and FHFA regarding Fannie Mae, which included: (1) placing us in conservatorship, with FHFA acting as our 

conservator, and (2) the execution of a senior preferred stock purchase agreement by our conservator, on our behalf, 

and Treasury, pursuant to which we issued to Treasury both senior preferred stock and a warrant to purchase common 

stock. 

Under the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended, including by the 

Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (together, the “GSE Act”), the conservator immediately succeeded to (1) 

all rights, titles, powers and privileges of Fannie Mae, and of any stockholder, officer or director of Fannie Mae with 

respect to Fannie Mae and its assets, and (2) title to the books, records and assets of any other legal custodian of 

Fannie Mae. The conservator subsequently issued an order that provided for our Board of Directors to exercise 

specified functions and authorities. The conservator also provided instructions regarding matters for which conservator 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 74
decision or notification is required. The conservator retains the authority to amend or withdraw its order and instructions 

at any time.

The conservatorship has no specified termination date and there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding our 

future, including how long we will continue to exist in our current form, the extent of our role in the market, the level of 

government support of our business, how long we will be in conservatorship, what form we will have and what 

ownership interest, if any, our current common and preferred stockholders will hold in us after the conservatorship is 

terminated and whether we will continue to exist following conservatorship. Under the GSE Act, the Director of FHFA 

must place us into receivership if they make a written determination that our assets are less than our obligations or if we 

have not been paying our debts, in either case, for a period of 60 days. In addition, the Director of FHFA may place us 

into receivership at the Director’s discretion at any time for other reasons set forth in the GSE Act, including if we are 

critically undercapitalized or if we are undercapitalized and have no reasonable prospect of becoming adequately 

capitalized. Should we be placed into receivership, different assumptions would be required to determine the carrying 

value of our assets, which would lead to substantially different financial results. Treasury has made a commitment under 

the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under certain circumstances if we have a net 

worth deficit. We are not aware of any plans of FHFA (1) to fundamentally change our business model, or (2) to reduce 

the aggregate amount available to or held by the company under our equity structure, which includes the senior 

preferred stock purchase agreement.

Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred 

Stock

We discuss more fully our senior preferred stock and the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, as 

amended, including Treasury’s funding commitment, in “Note 11, Equity” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Treasury has made a commitment under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under 

certain circumstances if we have a net worth deficit. Pursuant to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, we 

have received a total of $119.8 billion from Treasury as of June 30, 2022, and the amount of remaining funding available 

to us under the agreement is $113.9 billion. We have not received any funding from Treasury under this commitment 

since the first quarter of 2018. We had positive net worth of $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022.

The dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock permit us to retain increases in our net worth until our net worth 

exceeds the amount of adjusted total capital necessary for us to meet the capital requirements and buffers under the 

enterprise regulatory capital framework established by FHFA. 

The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increased to $173.3 billion as of June 30, 2022 and 

will further increase to $177.9 billion as of September 30, 2022, due to the $4.6 billion increase in our net worth in the 

second quarter of 2022.

Related Parties

Because Treasury holds a warrant to purchase shares of Fannie Mae common stock equal to 79.9% of the total number 

of shares of Fannie Mae common stock, we and Treasury are deemed related parties. 

FHFA’s control of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has caused Fannie Mae, FHFA and Freddie Mac to be deemed 

related parties. Additionally, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac jointly own Common Securitization Solutions, LLC (“CSS”), a 

limited liability company created to operate a common securitization platform; as a result, CSS is deemed a related 

party. As a part of our joint ownership, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and CSS are parties to a limited liability company 

agreement that sets forth the overall framework for the joint venture, including Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s rights 

and responsibilities as members of CSS. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and CSS are also parties to a customer services 

agreement that sets forth the terms under which CSS provides mortgage securitization services to us and Freddie Mac, 

including the operation of the common securitization platform, as well as an administrative services agreement. CSS 

operates as a separate company from us and Freddie Mac, with all funding and limited administrative support services 

and other resources provided to it by us and Freddie Mac.

In the ordinary course of business, Fannie Mae may purchase and sell securities issued by Treasury and Freddie Mac. 

These transactions occur on the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated 

parties. Some of the structured securities we issue are backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities. Fannie 

Mae and Freddie Mac each have agreed to indemnify the other party for losses caused by: its failure to meet its 

payment or other specified obligations under the trust agreements pursuant to which the underlying resecuritized 

securities were issued; its failure to meet its obligations under the customer services agreement; its violations of laws; or 

with respect to material misstatements or omissions in offering documents, ongoing disclosures and related materials 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 75
relating to the underlying resecuritized securities. Additionally, we make regular income tax payments to and receive tax 

refunds from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), a bureau of Treasury.

Transactions with Treasury

Our administrative expenses were reduced by $3 million and $5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 

2021 respectively, and $7 million and $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, due to 

reimbursements from Treasury and Freddie Mac for expenses incurred as program administrator for Treasury’s Home 

Affordable Modification Program and other initiatives under Treasury’s Making Home Affordable Program.

In December 2011, Congress enacted the Temporary Payroll Cut Continuation Act of 2011 (“TCCA”) which, among other 

provisions, required that we increase our single-family guaranty fees by at least 10 basis points and remit this increase 

to Treasury. To meet our obligations under the TCCA and at the direction of FHFA, we increased the guaranty fee on all 

single-family residential mortgages delivered to us by 10 basis points effective April 1, 2012. The resulting fee revenue 

and expense are recorded in “Interest income: Mortgage loans” and “TCCA fees,” respectively, in our condensed 

consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

In November 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was enacted, which extended to October 1, 2032 our 

obligation under the TCCA to collect 10 basis points in guaranty fees on single-family residential mortgages delivered to 

us and pay the associated revenue to Treasury. In January 2022, FHFA advised us to continue to pay these TCCA fees 

to Treasury with respect to all single-family loans acquired by us before October 1, 2032, and to continue to remit these 

amounts to Treasury on and after October 1, 2032 with respect to loans we acquired before this date until those loans 

are paid off or otherwise liquidated.

We recognized $841 million and $758 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 respectively, and 

$1.7 billion and $1.5 billion in TCCA fees during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, of which 

$841 million had not been remitted to Treasury as of June 30, 2022. 

The GSE Act requires us to set aside certain funding obligations, a portion of which is attributable to Treasury’s Capital 

Magnet Fund. These funding obligations, recognized in “Other expenses, net” in our condensed consolidated 

statements of operations and comprehensive income, are measured as the product of 4.2 basis points and the unpaid 

principal balance of our total new business purchases for the respective period, with 35% of this amount payable to 

Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund. We recognized a total of $28 million and $57 million in “Other expenses, net” for the 

three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 respectively, and $66 million and $119 million for the six months ended 

June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, in connection with Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund, of which $66 million has not 

been remitted as of June 30, 2022.

Transactions with FHFA

The GSE Act authorizes FHFA to establish an annual assessment for regulated entities, including Fannie Mae, which is 

payable on a semi-annual basis (April and October), for FHFA’s costs and expenses, as well as to maintain FHFA’s 

working capital. We recognized FHFA assessment fees, which are recorded in “Administrative expenses” in our 

condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of $31 million and $35 million for the 

three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $63 million and $72 million for the six months ended 

June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Transactions with CSS and Freddie Mac

We contributed capital to CSS, the company we jointly own with Freddie Mac, of $16 million and $18 million for the 

three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $38 million and $45 million for the six months ended 

June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Earnings per Share 

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is presented for basic and diluted EPS. We compute basic EPS by dividing net income 

attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during 

the period. However, as a result of our conservatorship status and the terms of the senior preferred stock, no amounts 

would be available to distribute as dividends to common or preferred stockholders (other than to Treasury as the holder 

of the senior preferred stock). Net income attributable to common stockholders excludes amounts attributable to the 

senior preferred stock. Weighted average common shares include 4.7 billion shares for the periods ended June 30, 

2022 and 2021 that would have been issued upon the full exercise of the warrant issued to Treasury from the date the 

warrant was issued through June 30, 2022 and 2021. 

The calculation of diluted EPS includes all the components of basic earnings per share, plus the dilutive effect of 

common stock equivalents such as convertible securities and stock options. Weighted average shares outstanding is 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 76
increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential 

common shares had been issued. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, our diluted EPS 

weighted-average shares outstanding includes $26 million shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible preferred 

stock. 

New Accounting Guidance

Adoption of ASU 2022-02

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02, 

Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures (“ASU 

2022-02”) in March 2022. The amendments in ASU 2022-02 eliminate the accounting guidance for troubled debt 

restructurings (“TDRs”) by creditors while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan restructurings by creditors 

when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Specifically, rather than applying the recognition and measurement 

guidance for TDRs, an entity would apply the loan refinancing and restructuring guidance to determine whether a 

modification or other form of restructuring results in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan.

Additionally, the amendments in this ASU require that an entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of 

origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases in the existing vintage disclosures.

The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, for creditors that have adopted the 

amendments in Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): 

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period and such 

election may be made individually to adopt the guidance related to TDRs, including related disclosures, and the 

presentation of gross write-offs in the vintage disclosure. ASU 2022-02 requires prospective transition for the 

disclosures related to loan restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty and the presentation of gross 

write-offs in the vintage disclosures. The guidance related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs may be 

adopted on a prospective or modified retrospective transition method. 

We elected to early adopt the guidance related to the elimination of the recognition and measurement of TDRs and the 

enhancement of disclosures for loan restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as of January 1, 2022, 

using the prospective transition method. As of our adoption date, all restructurings, including restructurings for 

borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, are evaluated to determine whether they result in a new loan or a 

continuation of an existing loan. Loan restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are generally 

accounted for as a continuation of the existing loan as the terms of the restructured loans are typically not at market 

rates. At adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2022, there was no material impact on our financial statements.

When a single-family loan is restructured under ASU 2022-02, we continue to measure impairment on the loan using a 

discounted cash flow approach that utilizes a prepayment-adjusted discount rate that is based on the loan’s restructured 

terms. Under the TDR accounting model, we used the discount rate that was in effect prior to the restructuring to 

measure impairment. Using the interest rate that was in effect prior to the restructuring resulted in the recognition, in the 

allowance for loan losses, of the economic concession that we granted to borrowers as part of the loan restructuring. 

Using a post-restructuring interest rate does not result in the recognition of an economic concession in the allowance for 

loan losses. 

As we have elected a prospective transition, the economic concession on a loan that was previously restructured and 

accounted for as a TDR will continue to be measured in our allowance for loan losses using the discount rate that was 

in effect prior to the restructuring and the economic concession may increase or decrease as we update our cash flow 

assumptions related to the loan’s expected life. Further, the component of the allowance for loan losses representing 

economic concessions will decrease as the borrower makes payments in accordance with the restructured terms of the 

mortgage loan and as the loan is sold, liquidated, or subsequently restructured. 

In general, the accounting for restructurings made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty upon adoption of the 

ASU is consistent with the accounting that we applied to troubled debt restructurings under section 4013 of the 

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 

2021, which provided temporary relief from the accounting and reporting requirements for certain troubled debt 

restructurings related to COVID-19 beginning March 2020 through January 1, 2022.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 77
We plan to adopt the disclosure guidance related to the presentation of gross write-offs by year of origination in our 

vintage disclosures upon the effective date of ASU 2022-02, January 1, 2023. We do not expect the adoption of the

guidance requiring gross write-offs by year of origination in our vintage disclosures to have a material impact on our 

financial statements.

Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method

On March 28, 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-01, Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method, which clarifies the 

guidance on fair value hedge accounting of interest rate risk portfolios of financial assets. The ASU expands the scope 

of the current last-of-layer method to allow entities to apply this method, renamed the portfolio layer method, to nonprepayable financial assets and to designate multiple hedge relationships within a single closed portfolio of financial 

assets. Additionally, the ASU clarifies that basis adjustments related to existing portfolio layer hedge relationships 

should not be considered when measuring credit losses on the financial assets included in the closed portfolio. Further, 

the ASU clarifies that any reversal of fair value hedge basis adjustments associated with an actual breach should be 

recognized in interest income immediately.

The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods 

within those years. We plan to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2023. The adoption of this guidance is not 

expected to have a material impact on our financial statements. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 78
2. Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets

We have interests in various entities that are considered to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The primary types of 

entities are securitization and resecuritization trusts, limited partnerships and special purpose vehicles (“SPVs”). These 

interests include investments in securities issued by VIEs, such as Fannie Mae MBS created pursuant to our 

securitization transactions and our guaranty to the entity. We consolidate the substantial majority of our single-class 

securitization trusts because our role as guarantor and master servicer provides us with the power to direct matters 

(primarily the servicing of mortgage loans) that impact the credit risk to which we are exposed. In contrast, we do not 

consolidate single-class securitization trusts when other organizations have the power to direct these activities unless 

we have the unilateral ability to dissolve the trust. We also do not consolidate our resecuritization trusts unless we have 

the unilateral ability to dissolve the trust. Historically, the vast majority of underlying assets of our resecuritization trusts 

were limited to Fannie Mae securities that were collateralized by mortgage loans held in consolidated trusts. However, 

with our issuance of uniform mortgage-backed securities (“UMBS®”), we include securities issued by Freddie Mac in 

some of our resecuritization trusts. The mortgage loans that serve as collateral for Freddie Mac-issued securities are 

not held in trusts that are consolidated by Fannie Mae.

Unconsolidated VIEs

We do not consolidate VIEs when we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Our unconsolidated VIEs include 

securitization and resecuritization trusts, limited partnerships, and certain SPVs designed to transfer credit risk. The 

following table displays the carrying amount and classification of our assets and liabilities that relate to our involvement 

with unconsolidated securitization and resecuritization trusts.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Assets and liabilities recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets 

related to unconsolidated mortgage-backed trusts:

Assets:

Trading securities:

Fannie Mae $ 800 $ 984 

Non-Fannie Mae 2,619 3,030 

Total trading securities 3,419 4,014 

Available-for-sale securities:

Fannie Mae 458 495 

Non-Fannie Mae 174 200 

Total available-for-sale securities 632 695 

Other assets 33 35 

Other liabilities (38) (41) 

Net carrying amount $ 4,046 $ 4,703 

Our maximum exposure to loss generally represents the greater of our carrying value in the entity or the unpaid 

principal balance of the assets covered by our guaranty. Our involvement in unconsolidated resecuritization trusts may 

give rise to additional exposure to loss depending on the type of resecuritization trust. Fannie Mae non-commingled 

resecuritization trusts are backed entirely by Fannie Mae MBS. These non-commingled single-class and multi-class 

resecuritization trusts are not consolidated and do not give rise to any additional exposure to loss as we already 

consolidate the underlying collateral. 

Fannie Mae commingled resecuritization trusts are backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities. The guaranty 

that we provide to these commingled resecuritization trusts may increase our exposure to loss to the extent that we are 

providing a guaranty for the timely payment and interest on the underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have not 

previously guaranteed. Our maximum exposure to loss for these unconsolidated trusts is measured by the amount of 

Freddie Mac securities that are held in these resecuritization trusts. 

Our maximum exposure to loss related to unconsolidated securitization and resecuritization trusts, which includes but is 

not limited to our exposure to these Freddie Mac securities, was approximately $254 billion and $220 billion as of June 

30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The total assets of our unconsolidated securitization and 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 79
resecuritization trusts were approximately $290 billion and $250 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 

respectively.

The maximum exposure to loss for our unconsolidated limited partnerships and similar legal entities, which consist of 

low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) investments, community investments and other entities, was $363 million and 

the related net carrying value was $356 million as of June 30, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, the maximum exposure 

to loss was $292 million and the related net carrying value was $288 million. The total assets of these limited 

partnership investments were $3.8 billion and $3.7 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

The maximum exposure to loss related to our involvement with unconsolidated SPVs that transfer credit risk represents 

the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest payable of obligations issued by the Connecticut Avenue Securities® 

(“CAS”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) SPVs. The maximum exposure to loss related to 

these unconsolidated SPVs was $16.7 billion and $10.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 

respectively. The total assets related to these unconsolidated SPVs were $16.7 billion and $10.4 billion as of June 30, 

2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

The unpaid principal balance of our multifamily loan portfolio was $416.3 billion as of June 30, 2022. As our lending 

relationship does not provide us with a controlling financial interest in the borrower entity, we do not consolidate these 

borrowers regardless of their status as either a VIE or a voting interest entity. We have excluded these entities from our 

VIE disclosures. However, the disclosures we have provided in “Note 3, Mortgage Loans,” “Note 4, Allowance for Loan 

Losses” and “Note 6, Financial Guarantees” with respect to this population are consistent with the FASB’s stated 

objectives for the disclosures related to unconsolidated VIEs.

Transfers of Financial Assets

We issue Fannie Mae MBS through portfolio securitization transactions by transferring pools of mortgage loans or 

mortgage-related securities to one or more trusts or special purpose entities. We are considered to be the transferor 

when we transfer assets from our own retained mortgage portfolio in a portfolio securitization transaction. For the three

months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the unpaid principal balance of portfolio securitizations was $77.0 billion and 

$197.1 billion, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the unpaid principal balance of portfolio 

securitizations was $179.8 billion and $413.9 billion, respectively. The substantial majority of these portfolio 

securitization transactions generally do not qualify for sale treatment. Portfolio securitization trusts that do qualify for 

sale treatment primarily consist of loans that are guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.

We retain interests from the transfer and sale of mortgage-related securities to unconsolidated single-class and multiclass portfolio securitization trusts. As of June 30, 2022, the unpaid principal balance of retained interests was $1.0 

billion and its related fair value was $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2021, the unpaid principal balance of retained 

interests was $1.1 billion and its related fair value was $2.0 billion. For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 

2021, the principal, interest and other fees received on retained interests was $108 million and $144 million, 

respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the principal, interest and other fees received on 

retained interests was $222 million and $287 million, respectively.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 80
3. Mortgage Loans

We own single-family mortgage loans, which are secured by four or fewer residential dwelling units, and multifamily 

mortgage loans, which are secured by five or more residential dwelling units. We classify these loans as either held for 

investment (“HFI”) or held for sale (“HFS”). For purposes of our notes to the condensed consolidated financial 

statements, we report the amortized cost of HFI loans for which we have not elected the fair value option at the unpaid 

principal balance, net of unamortized premiums and discounts, hedge-related basis adjustments, other cost basis 

adjustments, and accrued interest receivable in these “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” disclosures. For purposes of our 

condensed consolidated balance sheets, we present accrued interest receivable, net separately from the amortized cost 

of our loans held for investment. We report the carrying value of HFS loans at the lower of cost or fair value and record 

valuation changes in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and 

comprehensive income.

For purposes of the single-family mortgage loan disclosures below, we display loans by class of financing receivable 

type. Financing receivable classes used for disclosure consist of: “20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate,” “15-

year or less, amortizing fixed-rate,” “Adjustable-rate,” and “Other.” The “Other” class primarily consists of reverse 

mortgage loans, interest-only loans, negative-amortizing loans and second liens. 

The following table displays the carrying value of our mortgage loans and allowance for loan losses.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family $ 3,623,404 $ 3,495,573 

Multifamily 416,341 403,452 

Total unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans 4,039,745 3,899,025 

Cost basis and fair value adjustments, net 58,255 74,846 

Allowance for loan losses for HFI loans (6,069) (5,629) 

Total mortgage loans(1) $ 4,091,931 $ 3,968,242 

(1) Excludes $9.4 billion and $9.1 billion of accrued interest receivable, net of allowance as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

The following table displays information about our redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS and the sales of mortgage 

loans during the period. 

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family loans redesignated from HFI to HFS:

Amortized cost $ 3,192 $ 6,305 $ 4,373 $ 9,417 

Lower of cost or fair value adjustment at time of redesignation(1) (209) (146) (222) (200) 

Allowance reversed at time of redesignation 155 824 218 1,185 

Single-family loans sold:

Unpaid principal balance $ 4,310 $ 7,317 $ 4,310 $ 7,525 

Realized gains, net 71 653 71 655 

(1) Consists of the write-off against the allowance at the time of redesignation.

The amortized cost of single-family mortgage loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process was $4.6 

billion as of June 30, 2022 and $4.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. As a result of our various loss mitigation and 

foreclosure prevention efforts, we expect that a portion of the loans in the process of formal foreclosure proceedings will 

not ultimately foreclose.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 81
Aging Analysis

The following tables display an aging analysis of the total amortized cost of our HFI mortgage loans by portfolio 

segment and class of financing receivable, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option.

As of June 30, 2022

30 - 59 

Days 

Delinquent

60 - 89 

Days 

Delinquent

Seriously 

Delinquent(1)

Total 

Delinquent Current Total

Loans 90 

Days or 

More 

Delinquent 

and 

Accruing 

Interest

Nonaccrual 

Loans with 

No 

Allowance

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year 

or more, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate $ 23,117 $ 5,016 $ 23,501 $ 51,634 $ 3,045,736 $ 3,097,370 $ 15,579 $ 4,635 

15-year or less, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate 1,863 263 990 3,116 520,848 523,964 805 122 

Adjustable-rate 164 29 178 371 25,577 25,948 130 39 

Other(2) 624 164 1,126 1,914 31,752 33,666 566 379 

Total single-family 25,768 5,472 25,795 57,035 3,623,913 3,680,948 17,080 5,175 

Multifamily(3) 174 N/A 1,392 1,566 416,287 417,853 28 77 

Total $ 25,942 $ 5,472 $ 27,187 $ 58,601 $ 4,040,200 $ 4,098,801 $ 17,108 $ 5,252 

As of December 31, 2021

30 - 59 

Days 

Delinquent

60 - 89 

Days 

Delinquent

Seriously 

Delinquent(1)

Total 

Delinquent Current Total

Loans 90 

Days or 

More 

Delinquent 

and 

Accruing 

Interest

Nonaccrual 

Loans with 

No 

Allowance

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year 

or more, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate $ 22,862 $ 5,192 $ 38,288 $ 66,342 $ 2,902,763 $ 2,969,105 $ 24,236 $ 6,271 

15-year or less, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate 2,024 326 1,799 4,149 529,278 533,427 1,454 193 

Adjustable-rate 161 36 374 571 25,771 26,342 287 63 

Other(2) 786 204 1,942 2,932 35,013 37,945 1,008 545 

Total single-family 25,833 5,758 42,403 73,994 3,492,825 3,566,819 26,985 7,072 

Multifamily(3) 114 N/A 1,693 1,807 404,398 406,205 317 107 

Total $ 25,947 $ 5,758 $ 44,096 $ 75,801 $ 3,897,223 $ 3,973,024 $ 27,302 $ 7,179 

(1) Single-family seriously delinquent loans are loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process. Multifamily seriously 

delinquent loans are loans that are 60 days or more past due. 

(2) Reverse mortgage loans included in “Other” are not aged due to their nature and are included in the current column. 

(3) Multifamily loans 60-89 days delinquent are included in the seriously delinquent column.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 82
Credit Quality Indicators

The following tables display the total amortized cost of our single-family HFI loans by class of financing receivable, year 

of origination and credit quality indicator, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. The estimated 

mark-to-market loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio is a primary factor we consider when estimating our allowance for loan losses 

for single-family loans. As LTV ratios increase, the borrower's equity in the home decreases, which may negatively 

affect the borrower's ability to refinance or to sell the property for an amount at or above the outstanding balance of the 

loan.

As of June 30, 2022, by Year of Origination(1)

2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 Prior Total

(Dollars in millions)

Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:(2)

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate:

Less than or equal to 80% $ 190,136 $ 937,515 $ 856,222 $ 157,885 $ 75,387 $ 695,506 $ 2,912,651 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 47,716 84,022 5,527 1,037 606 1,262 140,170 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 36,786 5,414 1,270 375 102 273 44,220 

Greater than 100% 1 11 9 11 13 284 329 

Total 20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 274,639 1,026,962 863,028 159,308 76,108 697,325 3,097,370 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate:

Less than or equal to 80% 31,599 196,511 143,922 22,168 8,165 119,586 521,951 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 802 745 44 6 1 3 1,601 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 374 31 1 — — 2 408 

Greater than 100% — — — — — 4 4 

Total 15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 32,775 197,287 143,967 22,174 8,166 119,595 523,964 

Adjustable-rate:

Less than or equal to 80% 1,920 6,755 2,009 894 1,001 12,698 25,277 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 310 207 7 1 2 3 530 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 125 15 1 — — — 141 

Greater than 100% — — — — — — — 

Total adjustable-rate 2,355 6,977 2,017 895 1,003 12,701 25,948 

Other:

Less than or equal to 80% — — — 31 238 24,297 24,566 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% — — — — 2 151 153 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% — — — — 1 71 72 

Greater than 100% — — — — — 71 71 

Total other — — — 31 241 24,590 24,862 

Total $ 309,769 $ 1,231,226 $ 1,009,012 $ 182,408 $ 85,518 $ 854,211 $ 3,672,144 

Total for all classes by LTV ratio:(2)

Less than or equal to 80% $ 223,655 $ 1,140,781 $ 1,002,153 $ 180,978 $ 84,791 $ 852,087 $ 3,484,445 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 48,828 84,974 5,578 1,044 611 1,419 142,454 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 37,285 5,460 1,272 375 103 346 44,841 

Greater than 100% 1 11 9 11 13 359 404 

Total $ 309,769 $ 1,231,226 $ 1,009,012 $ 182,408 $ 85,518 $ 854,211 $ 3,672,144 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 83
As of December 31, 2021, by Year of Origination(1)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Prior Total

(Dollars in millions)

Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:(2)

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate:

Less than or equal to 80% $ 798,830 $ 881,290 $ 177,909 $ 87,825 $ 111,059 $ 666,327 $ 2,723,240 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 129,340 39,689 2,689 1,056 622 1,687 175,083 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 66,667 2,278 544 229 57 460 70,235 

Greater than 100% 21 12 9 16 22 467 547 

Total 20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 994,858 923,269 181,151 89,126 111,760 668,941 2,969,105 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate:

Less than or equal to 80% 196,163 157,076 25,390 9,595 20,715 121,027 529,966 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 2,576 259 16 4 2 7 2,864 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 579 5 — 1 1 4 590 

Greater than 100% — — — — 2 5 7 

Total 15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 199,318 157,340 25,406 9,600 20,720 121,043 533,427 

Adjustable-rate:

Less than or equal to 80% 6,166 2,235 1,065 1,236 2,524 12,501 25,727 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 438 25 7 4 2 3 479 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 135 1 — — — — 136 

Greater than 100% — — — — — — — 

Total adjustable-rate 6,739 2,261 1,072 1,240 2,526 12,504 26,342 

Other:

Less than or equal to 80% — — 34 268 655 26,930 27,887 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% — — — 3 6 275 284 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% — — — 1 2 133 136 

Greater than 100% — — — 1 1 141 143 

Total other — — 34 273 664 27,479 28,450 

Total $ 1,200,915 $ 1,082,870 $ 207,663 $ 100,239 $ 135,670 $ 829,967 $ 3,557,324 

Total for all classes by LTV ratio:(2)

Less than or equal to 80% $ 1,001,159 $ 1,040,601 $ 204,398 $ 98,924 $ 134,953 $ 826,785 $ 3,306,820 

Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90% 132,354 39,973 2,712 1,067 632 1,972 178,710 

Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100% 67,381 2,284 544 231 60 597 71,097 

Greater than 100% 21 12 9 17 25 613 697 

Total $ 1,200,915 $ 1,082,870 $ 207,663 $ 100,239 $ 135,670 $ 829,967 $ 3,557,324 

(1) Excludes $8.8 billion and $9.5 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, of mortgage loans guaranteed or insured, 

in whole or in part, by the U.S. government or one of its agencies, which represents primarily reverse mortgages for which we do not 

calculate an estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio.

(2) The aggregate estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio is based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan divided by the estimated current 

value of the property as of the end of each reported period, which we calculate using an internal valuation model that estimates periodic 

changes in home value. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 84
The following tables display the total amortized cost of our multifamily HFI loans by year of origination and credit-risk 

rating, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. Property rental income and property valuations 

are key inputs to our internally assigned credit risk ratings.

As of June 30, 2022, by Year of Origination

2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 Prior Total

(Dollars in millions)

Internally assigned credit risk rating:

Non-classified(1) $ 25,484 $ 66,316 $ 77,400 $ 61,574 $ 52,228 $ 116,500 $ 399,502 

Classified(2)

 — 134 911 2,676 1,966 12,664 18,351 

Total $ 25,484 $ 66,450 $ 78,311 $ 64,250 $ 54,194 $ 129,164 $ 417,853 

As of December 31, 2021, by Year of Origination

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Prior Total

(Dollars in millions)

Internally assigned credit risk rating:

Non-classified(1) $ 58,986 $ 79,602 $ 64,278 $ 55,552 $ 44,037 $ 87,549 $ 390,004 

Classified(2) 21 595 2,288 2,114 4,091 7,092 16,201 

Total $ 59,007 $ 80,197 $ 66,566 $ 57,666 $ 48,128 $ 94,641 $ 406,205 

(1) A loan categorized as “Non-classified” is current or adequately protected by the current financial strength and debt service capability of the 

borrower. 

(2) Represents loans classified as “Substandard” or “Doubtful.” Loans classified as “Substandard” have a well-defined weakness that 

jeopardizes the timely full repayment. “Doubtful” refers to a loan with a weakness that makes collection or liquidation in full highly 

questionable and improbable based on existing conditions and values. We had loans with an amortized cost of $37 million classified as 

doubtful as of June 30, 2022 and loans with an amortized cost of less than $1 million classified as doubtful as of December 31, 2021.

Loss Mitigation Options for Borrowers Experiencing Financial 

Difficulty

As part of our loss mitigation activities, we may agree to modify the contractual terms of a loan to a borrower 

experiencing financial difficulty. In addition to loan modifications, we also provide other loss mitigation options to assist 

borrowers who experience financial difficulties.

Below we provide disclosures relating to loan restructurings where borrowers were experiencing financial difficulty, 

including restructurings that resulted in an insignificant payment delay. The disclosures exclude loans classified as held 

for sale and those for which we have elected the fair value option. 

Single-Family Loan Restructurings

We offer several types of restructurings to single-family borrowers that may result in a payment delay, interest rate 

reduction, term extension, or combination thereof. We do not typically offer principal forgiveness.

We offer the following types of restructurings to single-family borrowers that only result in a payment delay:

• a forbearance plan is a short-term loss mitigation option which grants a period of time (typically 3-month 

increments) during which the borrower’s monthly payment obligations are reduced or suspended. A 

forbearance plan does not impact our reporting of when a loan is considered past due, which remains based on 

the contractual terms of the loan. Borrowers may exit a forbearance plan by repaying all past due amounts to 

fully reinstate the loan, paying off the loan in full, or entering into another loss mitigation option, such as a

repayment plan, a payment deferral, or a loan modification. The vast majority of forbearance plans offered 

since 2020 relate to a COVID-19-related financial hardship where we have authorized our servicers to offer a 

forbearance plan for up to 18 months for eligible borrowers;

• a repayment plan is a short-term loss mitigation option that allows borrowers a specific period of time to return 

the loan to current status by paying the regular monthly payment plus additional agreed-upon delinquent 

amounts (generally for a period up to 12 months and the monthly repayment plan amount must not exceed 

150% of the contractual mortgage payment). A repayment plan does not impact our reporting of when a loan is 

considered past due, which remains based on the contractual terms of the loan. At the end of the repayment 

plan, the borrower resumes making the regular monthly payment; and

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 85
• a payment deferral is a loss mitigation option which defers the repayment of the delinquent principal and 

interest payments and other eligible default-related amounts that were advanced on behalf of the borrower by 

converting them into a non-interest-bearing balance due at the earlier of the payoff date, the maturity date, or 

sale or transfer of the property. The remaining mortgage terms, interest rate, payment schedule, and maturity 

date remain unchanged, and no trial period is required. The number of months of payments deferred varies 

based on the types of hardships the borrower is facing.

We also offer single-family borrowers loan modifications, which contractually change the terms of the loan. Our loan 

modification programs generally require completion of a trial period of three to four months where the borrower makes 

reduced monthly payments prior to receiving the modification. During the trial period, the mortgage loan is not 

contractually modified and continues to be reported as past due according to its contractual terms. The reduced 

payments that are made by the borrower during the trial period will result in a payment delay with respect to the original 

contractual terms of the loan. After successful completion of the trial period, and the borrower’s execution of a 

modification agreement, the mortgage loan is contractually modified. 

Our loan modifications include the following concessions: 

• capitalization of past due amounts, a form of payment delay, which capitalizes interest and other eligible default 

related amounts that were advanced on behalf of the borrower that are past due into the unpaid principal 

balance and 

• a term extension, which typically extends the contractual maturity date of the loan to 40 years from the effective 

date of the modification.

In addition to these concessions, loan modifications may also include an interest rate reduction, which reduces the 

contractual interest rate of the loan, or a principal forbearance, which is another form of payment delay that includes 

forbearing repayment of a portion of the principal balance as a non-interest bearing amount that is due at the earlier of 

the payoff date, the maturity date, or sale or transfer of the property. 

Multifamily Loan Restructurings

For multifamily borrowers, loan restructurings include short-term forbearance plans and loan modification programs, 

which primarily result in term extensions of up to one year with no change to the loan’s interest rate. In certain cases, 

we may make more significant modifications of terms for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, such as reducing the 

interest rate, converting to interest-only payments, extending the maturity for longer than one year, providing principal 

forbearance, or some combination of these terms. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 86
Restructurings for Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

The following table displays the amortized cost of HFI mortgage loans that were restructured during the three and six 

months ended June 30, 2022, presented by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. 

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022

Payment Delay (Only)

Forbearance 

Plan 

Payment 

Deferral

Trial 

Modification 

and 

Repayment 

Plans

Payment 

Delay and 

Term 

Extension(1)

Payment 

Delay, Term 

Extension 

and Interest 

Rate 

Reduction(1) Total

Percentage 

of Total by 

Financing 

Class(2)

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year 

or more, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate $ 11,213 $ 5,203 $ 3,815 $ 769 $ 4,671 $ 25,671 1 %

15-year or less, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate 571 287 154 — — 1,012 *

Adjustable-rate 61 27 28 — 4 120 *

Other 231 121 144 46 148 690 2 

Total single-family 12,076 5,638 4,141 815 4,823 27,493 1 

 Multifamily 23 — — — 11 34 *

Total(3) $ 12,099 $ 5,638 $ 4,141 $ 815 $ 4,834 $ 27,527 1 

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Payment Delay (Only)

Forbearance 

Plan

Payment 

Deferral

Trial 

Modification 

and 

Repayment 

Plans

Payment 

Delay and 

Term 

Extension(1)

Payment 

Delay, Term 

Extension 

and Interest 

Rate 

Reduction(1) Total

Percentage 

of Total by 

Financing 

Class(2)

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year 

or more, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate $ 14,428 $ 11,518 $ 6,064 $ 1,831 $ 9,165 $ 43,006 1 %

15-year or less, 

amortizing 

fixed-rate 735 653 253 1 1 1,643 *

Adjustable-rate 84 77 53 — 12 226 1 

Other 319 304 232 139 374 1,368 4 

Total single-family 15,566 12,552 6,602 1,971 9,552 46,243 1 

Multifamily 237 — — — 11 248 *

Total(3) $ 15,803 $ 12,552 $ 6,602 $ 1,971 $ 9,563 $ 46,491 1 

* Represents less than 0.5% of total by financing class.

(1) Represents loans that received a contractual modification.

(2) Based on the amortized cost basis as of period end, divided by the period end amortized cost basis of the corresponding class of financing 

receivable. 

(3) Excludes $269 million and $1.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively, for loans that paid off prior to period 

end. Also excludes loans that liquidated either through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a short sale. Loans may move from one 

category to another, as a result of the restructuring(s) they received during the period. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 87
Our estimate of future credit losses uses a lifetime methodology, derived from modeled loan performance based on the 

historical experience of loans with similar risk characteristics, adjusted to reflect current conditions, our current loss 

mitigation activities and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The credit loss model considers extensive historical loss 

experience, which would include the impact of the loss mitigation programs that we offer to borrowers experiencing 

financial difficulty, and also includes the impact of projected loss severities as a result of a loan default. The manner in 

which these loss mitigation programs are factored into our loss estimates do not vary by portfolio segment.

The following tables summarize the financial impacts of loan modifications and payment deferrals made to single-family 

HFI loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, presented by class of financing receivable. We discuss 

the qualitative impacts of forbearance plans, repayment plans, and trial modifications earlier in this footnote. As a result, 

those loss mitigation options are excluded from the table below. 

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022

Weighted-Average 

Interest Rate 

Reduction 

Weighted-Average 

Term Extension 

(in Months) 

Average Amount 

Capitalized as a 

Result of a 

Payment Delay(1) 

Loan by class of financing receivable(2):

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 1.45 % 180 $ 22,997 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 1.88 51 18,394 

Adjustable-rate 0.78 — 19,528 

Other 1.81 183 22,666 

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Weighted-Average 

Interest Rate 

Reduction

Weighted-Average 

Term Extension 

(in Months)

Average Amount 

Capitalized as a 

Result of a 

Payment Delay(1) 

Loan by class of financing receivable(2):

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 1.52 % 179 $ 23,372 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 2.69 61 20,361 

Adjustable-rate 0.53 — 23,406 

Other 1.87 185 24,310 

(1) Represents the average amount of delinquency-related amounts that were capitalized as part of the loan balance. Amounts are in whole 

dollars.

(2) Excludes the financial effects of modifications for loans that were paid off or otherwise liquidated as of period end. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 88
The following table displays the amortized cost of HFI loans that received a completed modification or payment deferral 

on or after January 1, 2022, the date we adopted ASU 2022-02, through June 30, 2022 and that defaulted in the period 

presented. The substantial majority of loans that received a completed modification or a payment deferral during the 

second quarter of 2022 did not default during the period. For purposes of this disclosure, we define loans that had a 

payment default as single-family loans with completed modifications that are two or more months delinquent during the 

period; or multifamily loans with completed modifications that are one or more months delinquent during the period. For 

loans that receive a forbearance plan, repayment plan or trial modification, these loss mitigation options generally 

remain in default until the loan is no longer delinquent as a result of the payment of all past-due amounts or as a result 

of a loan modification or payment deferral. Therefore, forbearance plans, repayment plans and trial modifications are 

not included in default tables below. 

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022(1)

Payment Delay 

as a Result of a 

Payment 

Deferral (Only)

Payment Delay 

and Term 

Extension(1)

Payment Delay, 

Term Extension 

and Interest 

Rate 

Reduction(1) Total

(Dollars in Millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate $ 492 $ 62 $ 109 $ 663 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 21 1 — 22 

Adjustable-rate 3 — 1 4 

Other 14 5 9 28 

Total single-family 530 68 119 717 

 Multifamily — — — — 

Total loans that subsequently defaulted(2) $ 530 $ 68 $ 119 $ 717 

(1) The substantial majority of loans that subsequently defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 2022, defaulted during the second 

quarter; therefore we are not separately presenting a table for the three months ended June 30, 2022. 

(2) Represents amortized cost as of period end. Excludes loans that liquidated either through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a 

short sale.

The following table displays an aging analysis of HFI mortgage loans that were restructured on or after January 1, 2022, 

the date we adopted ASU 2022-02, through June 30, 2022, presented by portfolio segment and class of financing 

receivable. The substantial majority of loans that received a completed modification or a payment deferral during the 

second quarter of 2022 were not delinquent.

As of June 30, 2022

30-59 Days 

Delinquent 

60-89 Days 

Delinquent(1)

Seriously 

Delinquent 

Total 

Delinquent Current Total 

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, 

amortizing fixed-rate $ 2,351 $ 1,680 $ 15,203 $ 19,234 $ 13,130 $ 32,364 

15-year or less, amortizing 

fixed-rate 112 87 649 848 507 1,355 

Adjustable-rate 14 8 103 125 71 196 

Other 65 44 440 549 504 1,053 

Total single-family loans 

modified 2,542 1,819 16,395 20,756 14,212 34,968 

 Multifamily — — 237 237 11 248 

Total loans restructured(2) $ 2,542 $ 1,819 $ 16,632 $ 20,993 $ 14,223 $ 35,216 

(1) Multifamily loans 60-89 days delinquent are included in the seriously delinquent column.

(2) Represents the amortized cost basis as of period end.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 89
Troubled Debt Restructuring Disclosures Prior to Our Adoption of ASU 2022-02

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2022-02, we accounted for a modification to the contractual terms of a loan that resulted in 

granting a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties as a TDR. In addition to formal loan modifications, 

we accounted for informal restructurings as a TDR if we deferred more than three missed payments to a borrower 

experiencing financial difficulty. We also classified bankruptcy relief provided to certain borrowers as TDRs. However, 

our TDR accounting described herein was suspended for most of our loss mitigation activities through our election to 

account for certain eligible loss mitigation activities occurring between March 2020 and January 1, 2022 under the 

COVID-19 relief granted pursuant to the CARES Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021. On January 1, 

2022, we adopted ASU 2022-02, which eliminated TDR accounting prospectively for all restructurings occurring on or 

after January 1, 2022. Loans that were restructured in a TDR prior to the adoption of ASU 2022-02 will continue to be 

accounted for under the historical TDR accounting until the loan is paid off, liquidated or subsequently modified. See 

“Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information on the COVID-19 

relief from TDR accounting and disclosure requirements, and “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in 

this report for more information on our adoption of ASU 2022-02.

The substantial majority of the loan modifications accounted for as TDRs resulted from a payment delay, term 

extension, interest rate reduction or a combination thereof. The average term extension of a single-family modified loan 

was 145 months and the average interest rate reduction was 0.61 percentage points for the three months ended June 

30, 2021. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the average term extension of a single-family modified loan was 

142 months and the average interest rate reduction was 0.57 percentage points.

The following table displays the number of loans and amortized cost of loans classified as a TDR during the period.

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

Number of Loans Amortized Cost

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 2,907 $ 458 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 308 26 

Adjustable-rate 37 6 

Other 174 17 

Total single-family 3,426 507 

Multifamily — — 

Total TDRs 3,426 $ 507 

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

Number of Loans Amortized Cost

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 5,896 $ 929 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 677 54 

Adjustable-rate 78 12 

Other 328 35 

Total single-family 6,979 1,030 

Multifamily — — 

Total TDRs 6,979 $ 1,030 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 90
For loans that defaulted in the periods presented and that were classified as a TDR in the twelve months prior to the 

default, the following table displays the number of loans and the amortized cost of these loans at the time of payment 

default. For purposes of this disclosure, we defined loans that had a payment default as: single-family and multifamily 

loans with completed modifications that liquidated during the period, either through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of 

foreclosure, or a short sale; single-family loans with completed modifications that are two or more months delinquent 

during the period; or multifamily loans with completed modifications that are one or more months delinquent during the 

period. 

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

Number of Loans Amortized Cost

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 1,562 $ 262 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 103 8 

Adjustable-rate 6 1 

Other 211 38 

Total single-family 1,882 309 

Multifamily — — 

Total TDRs that subsequently defaulted 1,882 $ 309 

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

Number of Loans Amortized Cost

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate 3,972 $ 675 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 197 14 

Adjustable-rate 15 3 

Other 493 91 

Total single-family 4,677 783 

Multifamily — — 

Total TDRs that subsequently defaulted 4,677 $ 783 

Nonaccrual Loans

For loans negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to recognize interest income for up to six 

months of delinquency provided that the loan was either current as of March 1, 2020 or originated after March 1, 2020. 

For single-family loans, we continue to accrue interest income beyond six months of delinquency provided that the 

collection of principal and interest continues to be reasonably assured. Multifamily loans that are in a forbearance 

arrangement are placed on nonaccrual status when the borrower is six months past due unless the loan is both well 

secured and in the process of collection. For single-family and multifamily loans in a forbearance arrangement that are 

placed on nonaccrual status, cash payments for interest are applied as a reduction of accrued interest receivable until 

the receivable has been reduced to zero, and then recognized as interest income. For loans that have been negatively 

impacted by COVID-19, we establish a valuation allowance for expected credit losses on the accrued interest receivable 

balance applying the process that we have established for both single-family and multifamily loans. The credit expense 

related to this valuation allowance is classified as a component of the provision for credit losses. Accrued interest 

receivable is written off when the amount is deemed to be uncollectible. Loans that are in active forbearance plans are 

not evaluated for write-off. For loans not subject to the COVID-19-related guidance, we have elected not to measure an 

allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable balances as we have a nonaccrual policy to ensure the timely 

reversal of unpaid accrued interest. See “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses” for additional information about our 

current-period provision for loan losses.

For loans not subject to the COVID-19-related nonaccrual policy we discontinue accruing interest when we believe 

collectability of principal and interest is not reasonably assured, which for a single-family loan we have determined, 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 91
based on our historical experience, to be when the loan becomes two months or more past due according to its 

contractual terms. Single-family and multifamily loans are reported past due if a full payment of principal and interest is 

not received within one month of its due date. 

Interest income previously accrued but not collected is reversed through interest income at the date the loan is placed 

on nonaccrual status. For single-family loans on nonaccrual status, we recognize income when cash payments are 

received. We return a non-modified single-family loan to accrual status at the point when the borrower brings the loan 

current.

As a part of our single-family loss mitigation activities, we restructure loans where the borrower is experiencing financial 

difficulty. For the purpose of income recognition, we require the borrower to complete a performance period for those 

loss mitigation arrangements that bring the loan current via the capitalization of the past due principal and interest (i.e., 

contractual modifications and payment deferrals). In that regard, our contractual modifications generally include a trial 

period (a performance period of generally 3 to 4 months) that the borrower has to complete before the loan is 

permanently modified. The loans that receive these contractual modifications are not returned to accrual status until the 

borrower has successfully made all required payments during the trial period and the modification is made permanent. 

As payment deferrals do not include a trial period, these restructurings are not returned to accrual status until the 

borrower has made three consecutive contractual payments. If interest is capitalized pursuant to either a loan 

modification or a payment deferral, any capitalized interest that had not been previously recognized as interest income 

is recorded as a discount to the loan and amortized over the life of the loan.

For loans that have not been negatively impacted by COVID-19, we place a multifamily loan on nonaccrual status when 

the loan becomes two months or more past due according to its contractual terms unless the loan is well secured such 

that collectability of principal and accrued interest is reasonably assured. For multifamily loans on nonaccrual status, we 

apply any payment received on a cost recovery basis to reduce principal on the mortgage loan. We return a multifamily 

loan to accrual status when the borrower cures the delinquency of the loan.

The table below displays the accrued interest receivable written off through the reversal of interest income for 

nonaccrual loans. 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Accrued interest receivable written off through the reversal of interest income:

Single-family $ 15 $ 21 

Multifamily 1 — 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Accrued interest receivable written off through the reversal of interest income:

Single-family $ 32 $ 129 

Multifamily 1 1 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 92
The tables below include the amortized cost of and interest income recognized on our HFI single-family and multifamily 

loans on nonaccrual status by class, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. 

As of For the Three 

Months Ended 

June 30, 2022

For the Six 

Months Ended 

June 30, 2022

June 30, 

2022

March 31, 

2022

December 31, 

2021

Amortized Cost Total Interest Income Recognized(1)

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixedrate $ 10,241 $ 13,692 $ 17,599 $ 34 $ 82 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 245 331 430 1 2 

Adjustable-rate 59 84 107 — — 

Other 698 913 1,101 2 5 

Total single-family 11,243 15,020 19,237 37 89 

Multifamily 1,317 1,258 1,259 8 14 

Total nonaccrual loans $ 12,560 $ 16,278 $ 20,496 $ 45 $ 103 

As of For the Three 

Months Ended 

June 30, 2021

For the Six 

Months Ended 

June 30, 2021

June 30, 

2021

March 31, 

2021

December 31, 

2020

Amortized Cost Total Interest Income Recognized(1)

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family:

20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixedrate $ 24,728 $ 30,173 $ 22,907 $ 95 $ 180 

15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate 596 945 853 2 3 

Adjustable-rate 179 284 270 — 1 

Other 1,761 2,583 2,475 6 11 

Total single-family 27,264 33,985 26,505 103 195 

Multifamily 2,220 2,153 2,069 4 13 

Total nonaccrual loans $ 29,484 $ 36,138 $ 28,574 $ 107 $ 208 

(1) Interest income recognized includes amortization of any deferred cost basis adjustments while the loan is performing and that is not 

reversed when the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. For loans negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, also includes amounts 

accrued but not collected prior to the loan being placed on nonaccrual status. For single-family, interest income recognized includes 

payments received on nonaccrual loans held as of period end.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Mortgage Loans

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 93
4. Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain an allowance for loan losses for HFI loans held by Fannie Mae and by consolidated Fannie Mae MBS 

trusts, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. When calculating our allowance for loan losses, 

we consider the unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums and discounts, and other cost basis 

adjustments of HFI loans at the balance sheet date. We record write-offs as a reduction to our allowance for loan losses 

at the point of foreclosure, completion of a short sale, upon the redesignation of nonperforming and reperforming loans 

from HFI to HFS or when a loan is determined to be uncollectible.

The following table displays changes in our allowance for single-family loans, multifamily loans and total allowance for 

loan losses. The benefit or provision for loan losses excludes provision for accrued interest receivable losses, guaranty 

loss reserves and credit losses on available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. Cumulatively, these amounts are 

recognized as “Benefit (provision) for credit losses” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and 

comprehensive income. 

For the Three Months Ended June 30, For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Single-family allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance $ (5,241) $ (8,547) $ (4,950) $ (9,344) 

Benefit (provision) for loan losses (248) 2,493 (530) 3,164 

Write-offs 248 149 275 220 

Recoveries (84) (77) (117) (79) 

Other (64) (82) (67) (25) 

Ending Balance $ (5,389) $ (6,064) $ (5,389) $ (6,064) 

Multifamily allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance $ (658) $ (1,081) $ (679) $ (1,208) 

Benefit (provision) for loan losses (12) 35 16 130 

Write-offs — 14 — 47 

Recoveries (10) (18) (17) (19) 

Ending Balance $ (680) $ (1,050) $ (680) $ (1,050) 

Total allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance $ (5,899) $ (9,628) $ (5,629) $ (10,552) 

Benefit (provision) for loan losses (260) 2,528 (514) 3,294 

Write-offs 248 163 275 267 

Recoveries (94) (95) (134) (98) 

Other (64) (82) (67) (25) 

Ending Balance $ (6,069) $ (7,114) $ (6,069) $ (7,114) 

Our benefit or provision for loan losses can vary substantially from period to period based on a number of factors, such 

as changes in actual and forecasted home prices or property valuations, fluctuations in actual and forecasted interest 

rates, borrower payment behavior, events such as natural disasters or pandemics, the type, volume and effectiveness of 

our loss mitigation activities, including forbearances and loan modifications, the volume of foreclosures completed, and 

the redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS. Our benefit or provision can also be impacted by updates to the models, 

assumptions, and data used in determining our allowance for loan losses.

In recent periods, changes in actual and projected interest rates have been a meaningful driver of our benefit or 

provision for loan losses as these changes drive prepayment speeds and impact the measurement of the economic 

concessions granted to borrowers on modified loans. However, pursuant to our adoption of ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 

2022, we prospectively discontinued TDR accounting and no longer measure the economic concession for 

restructurings occurring on or after the adoption date. This accounting also results in the elimination of any existing 

economic concession related to a loan that was previously designated as a TDR if such loan is restructured on or after 

January 1, 2022. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance” for more 

information about our adoption of ASU 2022-02.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Allowance for Loan Losses

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 94
The largest driver of our single-family provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 was 

an increase in actual and projected interest rates as of June 30, 2022 compared with March 31, 2022 and December 

31, 2021. As mortgage rates increase, we expect a decrease in future prepayments on single-family loans, including 

modified loans accounted for as TDRs. Lower expected prepayments extend the expected lives of these TDR loans, 

which increases the expected impairment relating to economic concessions provided on them, resulting in a provision 

for loan losses.

Some of the provision from increased actual and projected interest rates in the first half of 2022 was offset by a benefit 

from actual and forecasted home price growth. While home price growth was strong in the second quarter and first half 

of 2022, some recent market indicators suggest that home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than 

indicated by our home price forecast, which reduced the benefit from home price growth recognized in the second 

quarter and first half of 2022. 

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 

2021 were:

• Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, home price 

growth was very strong. We also increased our expectations for home price growth on a national basis for fullyear 2021. 

• Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS. We redesignated 

certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS, as we no longer intended to hold them for the 

foreseeable future or to maturity. Upon redesignation of these loans, we recorded the loans at the lower of cost 

or fair value with a write-off against the allowance for loan losses. Amounts recorded in the allowance related to 

these loans exceeded the amounts written off, resulting in a benefit for loan losses.

• Benefit from lower actual and projected interest rates. Actual and projected interest rates decreased as of June 

30, 2021 compared with March 31, 2021. 

• Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies as discussed 

below.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2021

were:

• Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth.

• Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS consistent with the 

discussion above.

• Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies. For the three 

and six months ended June 30, 2021, management used its judgment to reduce the non-modeled adjustment 

that was previously applied to the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for 

uncertainty. The decrease in uncertainty as of June 30, 2021 compared with the end of 2020 was primarily 

driven by the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provided additional economic stimulus 

and helped support continued economic recovery. In addition, the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination 

program in the United States contributed to a significant increase in business activity and an improved 

economy in 2021, decreased uncertainty surrounding the post-pandemic recovery. There was also decreased 

political uncertainty, as well as a decrease in the number of borrowers in a COVID-19-related forbearance, 

lessening expectations of loan losses. However, management continued to apply its judgment and 

supplemented model results as of June 30, 2021 as uncertainty remained regarding the loss mitigation 

outcomes of borrowers still in forbearance and the future course of the pandemic, including the impact on the 

economy of the spread of new variants of the virus and low vaccination rates in certain areas of the country.

The impact of the factors above was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and projected interest rates. Actual 

and projected interest rates were higher as of June 30, 2021 compared with December 31, 2020. 

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 

2022, was a provision expense from higher actual and projected interest rates. This provision was partially offset by a 

benefit from actual and projected economic data, including strong property value growth, driven by continued demand 

for multifamily housing.

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily benefit for loan losses in the six months ended June 30, 2022, was 

a benefit from actual and projected economic data. This benefit was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and 

projected interest rates.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Allowance for Loan Losses

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 95
The primary factors that contributed to our multifamily benefit for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 

30, 2021 were:

• Benefit from actual and projected economic data. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, property 

value forecasts increased due to continued demand for multifamily housing. In addition, improved job growth 

led to an increase in projected average property net operating income, which reduced the probability of loan 

defaults resulting in a benefit for loan losses for the second quarter and first half of 2021.

• Benefit from lower expected credit losses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to our single-family 

provision for loan losses described above, for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, 

management used its judgment to further reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was previously applied to 

the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The remaining non-modeled 

adjustment as of June 30, 2021, reflected management’s judgment that uncertainty remained surrounding the 

subsequent course of the pandemic, including new strains of the virus and its effect on the economy.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Allowance for Loan Losses

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 96
5. Investments in Securities

Trading Securities

Trading securities are recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in “Fair value gains 

(losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The following table 

displays our investments in trading securities.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Mortgage-related securities:

Fannie Mae $ 1,295 $ 1,576 

Other agency(1) 2,508 2,893 

Other mortgage-related securities 112 137 

Total mortgage-related securities (includes $469 million and $593 million, 

respectively, related to consolidated trusts) 3,915 4,606 

Non-mortgage-related securities(2) 60,896 83,600 

Total trading securities $ 64,811 $ 88,206 

(1) Consists of Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae mortgage-related securities.

(2) Primarily includes U.S. Treasury securities.

The following table displays information about our net trading gains (losses).

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Net trading gains (losses) $ (665) $ 161 $ (2,435) $ (597) 

Net trading gains (losses) recognized in the period related to securities 

still held at period end (546) 156 (2,173) (586) 

Available-for-Sale Securities

We record AFS securities at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, recorded net of tax, as a component of “Other 

comprehensive loss” and we recognize realized gains and losses from the sale of AFS securities in “Investment gains 

(losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. We define the 

amortized cost basis of our AFS securities as unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums and discounts, 

and other cost basis adjustments. We record an allowance for credit losses for AFS securities that reflects the 

impairment for credit losses, which are limited to the amount that fair value is less than the amortized cost. Impairment 

due to non-credit losses are recorded as unrealized losses within “Other comprehensive loss.”

The following tables display the amortized cost, allowance for credit losses, gross unrealized gains and losses in 

accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”), and fair value by major security type for AFS securities.

As of June 30, 2022

Total 

Amortized 

Cost

Allowance 

for Credit 

Losses(1)

Gross 

Unrealized 

Gains in 

AOCI

Gross 

Unrealized 

Losses in 

AOCI

Total Fair 

Value

(Dollars in millions)

Fannie Mae $ 461 $ — $ 11 $ (14) $ 458 

Other agency(2) 10 — — — 10 

Other mortgage-related securities 293 — 6 (2) 297 

Total $ 764 $ — $ 17 $ (16) $ 765 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Investments in Securities

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 97
As of December 31, 2021

Total 

Amortized 

Cost

Allowance 

for Credit 

Losses(1)

Gross 

Unrealized 

Gains in 

AOCI

Gross 

Unrealized 

Losses in 

AOCI

Total Fair 

Value

(Dollars in millions)

Fannie Mae $ 492 $ — $ 14 $ (11) $ 495 

Other agency(2) 12 — — — 12 

Other mortgage-related securities 323 — 10 (3) 330 

Total $ 827 $ — $ 24 $ (14) $ 837 

(1) Total allowance for credit losses is less than $0.5 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

(2) Other agency securities consist of securities issued by Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.

Fannie Mae and Other Agency Securities

Our Fannie Mae and other agency AFS securities consist of securities issued by us, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. The 

principal and interest on these securities are guaranteed by the issuing agency. We believe that the guaranty provided 

by the issuing agency, the support provided to the agencies by the U.S. government, the importance of the agencies to 

the liquidity and stability in the secondary mortgage market, and the long history of zero credit losses on agency 

mortgage-related securities are all indicators that there are currently no credit losses on these securities, even if the 

security is in an unrealized loss position. In addition, we generally hold these securities that are in an unrealized loss 

position to recovery. As a result, unless we intend to sell the security, we do not recognize an allowance for credit losses 

on agency mortgage-related securities. 

Non-Agency Mortgage-Related Securities

As of June 30, 2022, substantially all of our non-agency mortgage-related securities were in an unrealized gain position.

The following table displays additional information regarding gross unrealized losses and fair value by major security 

type for AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, excluding allowance for credit losses. 

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Less Than 12 

Consecutive Months

12 Consecutive 

Months or Longer

Less Than 12 

Consecutive Months

12 Consecutive 

Months or Longer

Gross 

Unrealized 

Losses in 

AOCI

Fair 

Value

Gross 

Unrealized 

Losses in 

AOCI

Fair 

Value

Gross 

Unrealized 

Losses in 

AOCI

Fair 

Value

Gross 

Unrealized 

Losses in 

AOCI

Fair 

Value

(Dollars in millions)

Fannie Mae $ (12) $ 158 $ (2) $ 36 $ (5) $ 225 $ (6) $ 102 

Other mortgage-related securities (2) 9 — — (3) 3 — — 

Total $ (14) $ 167 $ (2) $ 36 $ (8) $ 228 $ (6) $ 102 

The following table displays the gross realized gains (losses) and proceeds on sales of AFS securities.

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months Ended 

June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

 Gross realized gains $ — $ 46 $ — $ 59 

 Total proceeds (excludes initial sale of securities from new portfolio 

securitizations) — 467 — 582 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Investments in Securities

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 98
The following table displays net unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities and other amounts recorded within our 

accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.

As of 

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

 Net unrealized gains on AFS securities for which we have not recorded an 

allowance for credit losses $ 2 $ 9 

Net unrealized losses on AFS securities for which we have recorded an 

allowance for credit losses (2) (2) 

Other 27 31 

Accumulated other comprehensive income $ 27 $ 38 

Maturity Information

The following table displays the amortized cost and fair value of our AFS securities by major security type and remaining 

contractual maturity, assuming no principal prepayments. The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities is not 

a reliable indicator of their expected life because borrowers generally have the right to prepay their obligations at any 

time.

As of June 30, 2022

Total 

Carrying 

Amount(1)

Total

Fair 

Value

One Year or Less

After One Year 

Through Five Years

After Five Years 

Through Ten Years After Ten Years

Net 

Carrying 

Amount(1)

Fair 

Value

Net 

Carrying 

Amount(1)

Fair 

Value

Net 

Carrying 

Amount(1)

Fair 

Value

Net 

Carrying 

Amount(1)

Fair 

Value

(Dollars in millions)

Fannie Mae $ 461 $ 458 $ — $ — $ 3 $ 3 $ 13 $ 14 $ 445 $ 441 

Other agency 10 10 — — — — 1 1 9 9 

Other mortgage-related 

securities 293 297 4 4 20 20 15 15 254 258 

Total $ 764 $ 765 $ 4 $ 4 $ 23 $ 23 $ 29 $ 30 $ 708 $ 708 

(1) Net carrying amount consists of amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses on AFS debt securities but does not include any 

unrealized fair value gains or losses.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Investments in Securities

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 99
6. Financial Guarantees

We recognize a guaranty obligation for our obligation to stand ready to perform on our guarantees to unconsolidated 

trusts and other guaranty arrangements. These off-balance sheet guarantees expose us to credit losses primarily 

relating to the unpaid principal balance of our unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and other financial guarantees. The 

maximum remaining contractual term of our guarantees is 30 years; however, the actual term of each guaranty may be 

significantly less than the contractual term based on the prepayment characteristics of the related mortgage loans. We 

measure our guaranty reserve for estimated credit losses for off-balance sheet exposures over the contractual period 

for which they are exposed to the credit risk, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the issuer. 

As the guarantor of structured securities backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac-issued securities, we extend our 

guaranty to the underlying Freddie Mac securities in our resecuritization trusts. However, Freddie Mac continues to 

guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have resecuritized. 

When we began issuing UMBS, we entered into an indemnification agreement under which Freddie Mac agreed to 

indemnify us for losses caused by its failure to meet its payment or other specified obligations under the trust 

agreements pursuant to which the underlying resecuritized securities were issued. As a result, and due to the funding 

commitment available to Freddie Mac through its senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, we have 

concluded that the associated credit risk is negligible. Accordingly, we exclude from the following table Freddie Mac 

securities backing unconsolidated Fannie Mae-issued structured securities of approximately $247.6 billion and 

$212.3 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

The following table displays our off-balance sheet maximum exposure, guaranty obligation recognized in our condensed 

consolidated balance sheets and the potential maximum recovery from third parties through available credit 

enhancements and recourse related to our financial guarantees.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Maximum 

Exposure

Guaranty 

Obligation

Maximum 

Recovery(1)

Maximum 

Exposure

Guaranty 

Obligation

Maximum 

Recovery(1)

(Dollars in millions)

Unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS $ 3,385 $ 15 $ 3,294 $ 3,733 $ 16 $ 3,626 

Other guaranty arrangements(2) 10,110 79 2,087 10,423 85 2,117 

Total $ 13,495 $ 94 $ 5,381 $ 14,156 $ 101 $ 5,743 

(1) Recoverability of such credit enhancements and recourse is subject to, among other factors, the ability of our mortgage insurers and the 

U.S. government, as a financial guarantor, to meet their obligations to us. For information on our mortgage insurers, “Note 10, 

Concentrations of Credit Risk.”

(2) Primarily consists of credit enhancements and long-term standby commitments.

7. Short-Term and Long-Term Debt

Short-Term Debt

The following table displays our outstanding short-term debt (debt with an original contractual maturity of one year or 

less) and weighted-average interest rates of this debt.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Outstanding

WeightedAverage 

Interest Rate(1) Outstanding

WeightedAverage 

Interest Rate(1)

(Dollars in millions)

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(2) $ 1,466 1.45 % $ — — %

Short-term debt of Fannie Mae 7,590 0.95 2,795 0.03 

(1) Includes the effects of discounts, premiums and other cost basis adjustments.

(2) Represents agreements to repurchase securities for a specified price, with repayment generally occurring on the following day, reported as 

“Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Financial Guarantees

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 100
Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt represents debt with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year. The following table 

displays our outstanding long-term debt.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Maturities Outstanding(1)

WeightedAverage 

Interest 

Rate(2) Maturities Outstanding(1)

WeightedAverage 

Interest 

Rate(2)

(Dollars in millions)

Senior fixed: 

Benchmark notes and bonds 2022 - 2030 $ 78,400 2.33 % 2022 - 2030 $ 89,618 2.13 %

Medium-term notes(3) 2022 - 2031 37,718 0.61 2022 - 2031 38,312 0.60 

Other(4) 2023 - 2038 6,852 4.04 2023 - 2038 7,045 3.73 

Total senior fixed 122,970 1.91 134,975 1.78 

Senior floating:

Medium-term notes(3) 2022 4,025 1.28 2022 51,583 0.32 

Connecticut Avenue Securities(5) 2023 - 2031 9,617 5.40 2023 - 2031 11,166 4.30 

Other(6) 2037 253 9.26 2037 373 7.17 

Total senior floating 13,895 4.38 63,122 1.05 

Total long-term debt of Fannie Mae(7) 136,865 2.16 198,097 1.55 

Debt of consolidated trusts 2022 - 2061 4,064,192 2.17 2022 - 2061 3,957,299 1.89 

Total long-term debt $ 4,201,057 2.17 % $ 4,155,396 1.88 %

(1) Outstanding debt balance consists of the unpaid principal balance, premiums and discounts, fair value adjustments, hedge-related basis 

adjustments, and other cost basis adjustments.

(2) Excludes the effects of fair value adjustments and hedge-related basis adjustments.

(3) Includes long-term debt with an original contractual maturity of greater than 1 year and up to 10 years, excluding zero-coupon debt.

(4) Includes other long-term debt with an original contractual maturity of greater than 10 years and foreign exchange bonds. 

(5) Consists of CAS debt issued prior to November 2018, a portion of which is reported at fair value. See “Note 2, Consolidations and 

Transfers of Financial Assets” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information about our CAS structures issued beginning November 2018.

(6) Consists of structured debt instruments that are reported at fair value.

(7) Includes unamortized discounts and premiums, fair value adjustments, hedge-related cost basis adjustments, and other cost basis 

adjustments in a net discount position of $3.9 billion and $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Short-Term and Long-Term Debt

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 101
8. Derivative Instruments

Derivative instruments are an integral part of our strategy in managing interest-rate risk. Derivative instruments may be 

privately-negotiated, bilateral contracts, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We refer to our derivative 

transactions made pursuant to bilateral contracts as our over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative transactions and our 

derivative transactions accepted for clearing by a derivatives clearing organization as our cleared derivative 

transactions. We typically do not settle the notional amount of our risk management derivatives; rather, notional 

amounts provide the basis for calculating actual payments or settlement amounts. The derivative contracts we use for 

interest-rate risk management purposes consist primarily of interest-rate swaps and interest-rate options. See “Note 8, 

Derivative Instruments” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information on interest-rate risk management.

We account for certain forms of credit risk transfer transactions as derivatives. In our credit risk transfer transactions, a 

portion of the credit risk associated with losses on a reference pool of mortgage loans is transferred to a third party. We 

enter into derivative transactions that are associated with some of our credit risk transfer transactions, whereby we 

manage investment risk to guarantee that certain unconsolidated VIEs have sufficient cash flows to pay their contractual 

obligations.

We enter into forward purchase and sale commitments that lock in the future delivery of mortgage loans and mortgagerelated securities at a fixed price or yield. Certain commitments to purchase mortgage loans and purchase or sell 

mortgage-related securities meet the criteria of a derivative. We typically settle the notional amount of our mortgage 

commitments that are accounted for as derivatives.

We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at their fair 

value on a trade date basis. Fair value amounts, which are (1) netted to the extent a legal right of offset exists and is 

enforceable by law at the counterparty level and (2) inclusive of the right or obligation associated with the cash collateral 

posted or received, are recorded in “Other assets” or “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

See “Note 12, Fair Value” for additional information on derivatives recorded at fair value. We present cash flows from 

derivatives as operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Fair Value Hedge Accounting

As discussed in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K, we implemented a fair 

value hedge accounting program in January 2021. Pursuant to this program, we may designate certain interest-rate 

swaps as hedging instruments in hedges of the change in fair value attributable to the designated benchmark interest 

rate for certain closed pools of fixed-rate, single-family mortgage loans or our funding debt. For hedged items in 

qualifying fair value hedging relationships, changes in fair value attributable to the designated risk are recognized as a 

basis adjustment to the hedged item. We also report changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument in the 

same condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income line item used to recognize the 

earnings effect of the hedged item’s basis adjustment. The objective of our fair value hedges is to reduce GAAP 

earnings volatility related to changes in benchmark interest rates.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Derivative Instruments

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 102
Notional and Fair Value Position of our Derivatives

The following table displays the notional amount and estimated fair value of our asset and liability derivative 

instruments, including derivative instruments designated as hedges.

As of June 30, 2022 As of December 31, 2021

Notional 

Amount

Estimated Fair Value

Notional 

Amount

Estimated Fair Value

Asset 

Derivatives

Liability 

Derivatives

Asset 

Derivatives

Liability 

Derivatives

(Dollars in millions)

Risk management derivatives designated as 

hedging instruments:

Swaps:(1)

Pay-fixed $ 5,920 $ — $ — $ 4,347 $ — $ — 

Receive-fixed 45,943 — — 40,686 — — 

Total risk management derivatives designated 

as hedging instruments 51,863 — — 45,033 — — 

Risk management derivatives not designated 

as hedging instruments:

Swaps:(1)

Pay-fixed 74,548 — — 56,817 — — 

Receive-fixed 75,951 — (3,514) 56,874 — (1,131) 

Basis 41,250 35 — 250 152 — 

Foreign currency 302 — (69) 336 25 (34) 

Swaptions:(1)

Pay-fixed 4,631 151 (3) 4,341 52 (2) 

Receive-fixed 1,481 9 (33) 1,091 10 (21) 

Total risk management derivatives not 

designated as hedging instruments 198,163 195 (3,619) 119,709 239 (1,188) 

Netting adjustment(2) — 63 3,540 — (237) 1,173 

Total risk management derivatives portfolio 250,026 258 (79) 164,742 2 (15) 

Mortgage commitment derivatives:

Mortgage commitments to purchase whole 

loans 7,096 36 (12) 13,192 17 (5) 

Forward contracts to purchase mortgagerelated securities 44,811 358 (93) 58,021 83 (34) 

Forward contracts to sell mortgage-related 

securities 72,054 237 (393) 111,173 69 (158) 

Total mortgage commitment derivatives 123,961 631 (498) 182,386 169 (197) 

Credit enhancement derivatives 24,099 3 (45) 19,256 — (21) 

Derivatives at fair value $ 398,086 $ 892 $ (622) $ 366,384 $ 171 $ (233) 

(1) Centrally cleared derivatives have no ascribable fair value because the positions are settled daily.

(2) The netting adjustment represents the effect of the legal right to offset under legally enforceable master netting arrangements to settle with 

the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and received. Cash collateral posted was $3.7 billion and 

$966 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Cash collateral received was $83 million and $30 million as of June 

30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Derivative Instruments

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 103
We record all gains and losses, including accrued interest, on derivatives while they are not in a qualifying designated 

hedging relationship in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and 

comprehensive income. The following table displays, by type of derivative instrument, the fair value gains and losses, 

net on our derivatives. 

For the Three Months 

Ended June 30,

For the Six Months 

Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Risk management derivatives:

Swaps:

Pay-fixed $ 1,174 $ (695) $ 3,299 $ 1,512 

Receive-fixed (1,106) 757 (3,366) (1,098) 

Basis (63) 19 (131) (27) 

Foreign currency (36) 4 (60) (4) 

Swaptions:

Pay-fixed 54 (58) 98 49 

Receive-fixed (10) 30 (13) (209) 

Futures (1) — (1) 1 

Net contractual interest income (expense) on interest-rate swaps (28) 7 (39) (4) 

Total risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses), net (16) 64 (213) 220 

Mortgage commitment derivatives fair value gains (losses), net 844 (553) 2,416 529 

Credit enhancement derivatives fair value losses, net (29) (18) (51) (108) 

Total derivatives fair value gains, net $ 799 $ (507) $ 2,152 $ 641 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Derivative Instruments

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 104
Effect of Fair Value Hedge Accounting

The following table displays the effect of fair value hedge accounting on our condensed consolidated statements of 

operations and comprehensive income, including gains and losses recognized on fair value hedging relationships.

For the Three Months Ended June 30, For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021 2022 2021

Interest 

Income: 

Mortgage 

Loans

Interest 

Expense: 

LongTerm 

Debt

Interest 

Income: 

Mortgage 

Loans

Interest 

Expense: 

LongTerm 

Debt

Interest 

Income: 

Mortgage 

Loans

Interest 

Expense: 

LongTerm 

Debt

Interest 

Income: 

Mortgage 

Loans

Interest 

Expense: 

LongTerm 

Debt

(Dollars in millions)

Total amounts presented in our 

condensed consolidated 

statements of operations and 

comprehensive income $ 29,082 $ (21,642) $ 24,932 $ (16,820) $ 56,224 $ (41,582) $ 48,285 $ (33,637) 

Gains (losses) from fair value 

hedging relationships: 

Mortgage loans HFI and related 

interest-rate contracts:

Hedged items $ (344) $ — $ 106 $ — $ (582) $ — $ 70 $ — 

Discontinued hedge related 

basis adjustment amortization 5 — — — 5 — — — 

Derivatives designated as 

hedging instruments 337 — (106) — 564 — (70) — 

Interest accruals on hedging 

instruments (9) — (5) — (17) — (5) — 

Debt of Fannie Mae and related 

interest-rate contracts:

Hedged items — 748 — (390) — 2,371 — 805 

Discontinued hedge-related 

basis adjustment amortization — (119) — (21) — (184) — (34) 

Derivatives designated as 

hedging instruments — (568) — 423 — (2,092) — (791) 

Interest accruals on derivative 

hedging instruments — 7 — 59 — 54 — 113 

Total effect of fair value hedges $ (11) $ 68 $ (5) $ 71 $ (30) $ 149 $ (5) $ 93 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Derivative Instruments

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 105
Hedged Items in Fair Value Hedging Relationships

The following table displays the carrying amounts of the hedged items that have been in qualifying fair value hedges

recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, including the hedged item's cumulative basis adjustments and 

the closed portfolio balances under the last-of-layer method. The hedged item carrying amounts and total basis 

adjustments include both open and discontinued hedges. The amortized cost and designated UPB consists only of open 

hedges as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

As of June 30, 2022

Carrying 

Amount Assets 

(Liabilities)

Cumulative Amount of Fair Value 

Hedging Basis Adjustments Included in 

the Carrying Amount

Closed Portfolio of Mortgage Loans 

Under Last-of-Layer Method

Total Basis 

Adjustments(1)(2)

Remaining 

Adjustments - 

Discontinued Hedge

Total Amortized 

Cost Designated UPB

(Dollars in millions)

Mortgage loans HFI $ 242,843 $ (443) $ (443) $ 70,938 $ 5,649 

Debt of Fannie Mae (76,004) 3,468 3,468 N/A N/A

As of December 31, 2021

Carrying 

Amount Assets 

(Liabilities)

Cumulative Amount of Fair Value 

Hedging Basis Adjustments Included in 

the Carrying Amount

Closed Portfolio of Mortgage Loans 

Under Last-of-Layer Method

Total Basis 

Adjustments(1)(2)

Remaining 

Adjustments - 

Discontinued Hedge

Total Amortized 

Cost Designated UPB

(Dollars in millions)

Mortgage loans HFI $ 174,080 $ 134 $ 134 $ 56,786 $ 4,389 

Debt of Fannie Mae (72,174) 1,281 1,281 N/A N/A

(1) No basis adjustment associated with open hedges, as all hedges are designated at the close of business with a one-day term.

(2) Based on the unamortized balance of the hedge-related cost basis.

Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to interest-rate derivative contracts. We are exposed to 

the risk that a counterparty in a derivative transaction will default on payments due to us, which may require us to seek 

a replacement derivative from a different counterparty. This replacement may be at a higher cost, or we may be unable 

to find a suitable replacement. We manage our derivative counterparty credit exposure relating to our risk management 

derivative transactions mainly through enforceable master netting arrangements, which allow us to net derivative assets 

and liabilities with the same counterparty or clearing organization and clearing member. For our OTC derivative 

transactions, we require counterparties to post collateral, which may include cash, U.S. Treasury securities, agency debt 

and agency mortgage-related securities.

See “Note 11, Netting Arrangements” for information on our rights to offset assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2022 and 

December 31, 2021. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Derivative Instruments

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 106
9. Segment Reporting

We have two reportable business segments, which are based on the type of business activities each perform: SingleFamily and Multifamily. Results of our two business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were a standalone business. The sum of the results for our two business segments equals our condensed consolidated results of 

operations. For additional information related to our business segments, including basis of organization and other 

segment activities, see “Note 10, Segment Reporting” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Segment Allocations and Results 

The majority of our revenues and expenses are directly associated with each respective business segment and are 

included in determining its operating results. Those revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable to a 

particular business segment are allocated based on the size of each segment’s guaranty book of business. The 

substantial majority of the gains and losses associated with our risk management derivatives, including the impact of 

hedge accounting, are allocated to our Single-Family business segment.

The following table displays our segment results.

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

SingleFamily Multifamily TotalSingleFamily Multifamily Total

(Dollars in millions)

Net interest income(1) $ 6,573 $ 1,235 $ 7,808 $ 7,323 $ 963 $ 8,286 

Fee and other income(2) 60 21 81 80 23 103 

Net revenues 6,633 1,256 7,889 7,403 986 8,389 

Investment gains (losses), net(3) (27) (22) (49) 658 (12) 646 

Fair value gains (losses), net(4) 543 (14) 529 (386) (60) (446) 

Administrative expenses (671) (124) (795) (619) (127) (746) 

Credit-related income (expense):(5)

Benefit (provision) for credit losses (206) (12) (218) 2,553 35 2,588 

Foreclosed property income (expense) (25) (8) (33) (28) (13) (41) 

Total credit-related income (expense) (231) (20) (251) 2,525 22 2,547 

TCCA fees(6) (841) — (841) (758) — (758) 

Credit enhancement expense(7) (270) (62) (332) (219) (55) (274) 

Change in expected credit enhancement 

recoveries(8) (43) (4) (47) (57) 13 (44) 

Other income (expenses), net (199) (29) (228) (315) 35 (280) 

Income before federal income taxes 4,894 981 5,875 8,232 802 9,034 

Provision for federal income taxes (1,008) (214) (1,222) (1,725) (157) (1,882) 

Net income $ 3,886 $ 767 $ 4,653 $ 6,507 $ 645 $ 7,152 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Segment Reporting

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 107
For the Six Months Ended June 30,

2022 2021

SingleFamily Multifamily TotalSingleFamily Multifamily Total

(Dollars in millions)

Net interest income(1) $ 12,828 $ 2,379 $ 15,207 $ 13,217 $ 1,811 $ 15,028 

Fee and other income(2) 121 43 164 142 48 190 

Net revenues 12,949 2,422 15,371 13,359 1,859 15,218 

Investment gains (losses), net(3) (93) (58) (151) 722 (31) 691 

Fair value gains (losses), net(4) 1,070 (61) 1,009 354 (16) 338 

Administrative expenses (1,354) (249) (1,603) (1,242) (252) (1,494) 

Credit-related income (expense):(5)

Benefit (provision) for credit losses (476) 18 (458) 3,215 138 3,353 

Foreclosed property expense 9 (3) 6 (11) (25) (36) 

Total credit-related income (expense) (467) 15 (452) 3,204 113 3,317 

TCCA fees(6) (1,665) — (1,665) (1,489) — (1,489) 

Credit enhancement expense(7) (480) (130) (610) (445) (113) (558) 

Change in expected credit enhancement 

recoveries(8) 26 (13) 13 (73) (2) (75) 

Other income (expenses), net (397) (67) (464) (602) 3 (599) 

Income before federal income taxes 9,589 1,859 11,448 13,788 1,561 15,349 

Provision for federal income taxes (1,994) (393) (2,387) (2,887) (317) (3,204) 

Net income $ 7,595 $ 1,466 $ 9,061 $ 10,901 $ 1,244 $ 12,145 

(1) Net interest income primarily consists of guaranty fees received as compensation for assuming and managing the credit risk on loans 

underlying Fannie Mae MBS held by third parties for the respective business segment, and the difference between the interest income 

earned on the respective business segment’s mortgage assets in our retained mortgage portfolio and the interest expense associated with 

the debt funding those assets. Revenues from single-family guaranty fees include revenues generated by the 10 basis point increase in 

guaranty fees pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us. Also includes 

yield maintenance revenue we recognized on the prepayment of multifamily loans.

(2) Single-family fee and other income primarily consists of compensation for engaging in structured transactions and providing other lender 

services. Multifamily fee and other income consists of fees associated with Multifamily business activities, including credit enhancements 

for tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue bonds.

(3) Single-family investment gains and losses primarily consist of gains and losses on the sale of mortgage assets. Multifamily investment 

gains and losses primarily consist of gains and losses on resecuritization activity. 

(4) Single-family fair value gains and losses primarily consist of fair value gains and losses on risk management and mortgage commitment 

derivatives, trading securities, fair value option debt, and other financial instruments associated with our single-family guaranty book of 

business. Multifamily fair value gains and losses primarily consist of fair value gains and losses on MBS commitment derivatives, trading 

securities and other financial instruments associated with our multifamily guaranty book of business. 

(5) Credit-related income or expense is based on the guaranty book of business of the respective business segment and consists of the 

applicable segment’s benefit or provision for credit losses and foreclosed property income or expense on loans underlying the segment’s 

guaranty book of business. 

(6) Consists of the portion of our single-family guaranty fees that is remitted to Treasury pursuant to the TCCA.

(7) Single-family credit enhancement expense consists of costs associated with our freestanding credit enhancements, which include primarily 

costs associated with our Credit Insurance Risk TransferTM (“CIRTTM”), Connecticut Avenue Securities® (“CAS”) and enterprise-paid 

mortgage insurance (“EPMI”) programs. Multifamily credit enhancement expense primarily consists of costs associated with our Multifamily 

CIRTTM (“MCIRTTM”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) programs as well as amortization expense for certain 

lender risk-sharing programs. Excludes CAS transactions accounted for as debt instruments and credit risk transfer programs accounted 

for as derivative instruments.

(8) Consists of change in benefits recognized from our freestanding credit enhancements, primarily from our CAS and CIRT programs as well 

as certain lender risk-sharing arrangements, including our multifamily Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS®”) program. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Segment Reporting

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 108
10. Concentrations of Credit Risk

Risk Characteristics of our Guaranty Book of Business

One of the measures by which we gauge our credit risk is the delinquency status of the mortgage loans in our guaranty 

book of business. 

For single-family and multifamily loans, we use this information, in conjunction with housing market and other economic 

data, to structure our pricing and our eligibility and underwriting criteria to reflect the current risk of loans with higher-risk 

characteristics, and in some cases we decide to significantly reduce our participation in riskier loan product categories. 

Management also uses this data together with other credit risk measures to identify key trends that guide the 

development of our loss mitigation strategies.

We report the delinquency status of our single-family and multifamily guaranty book of business below. We report loans 

receiving payment forbearance as delinquent according to the contractual terms of the loans.

Single-Family Credit Risk Characteristics

For single-family loans, management monitors the serious delinquency rate, which is the percentage of single-family 

loans, based on the number of loans, that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process, and loans that 

have higher risk characteristics, such as high mark-to-market LTV ratios.

The following tables display the delinquency status and serious delinquency rates for specified loan categories of our 

single-family conventional guaranty book of business.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

30 Days 

Delinquent

60 Days 

Delinquent

Seriously 

Delinquent(1)

30 Days 

Delinquent

60 Days 

Delinquent

Seriously 

Delinquent(1)

Percentage of single-family conventional 

guaranty book of business based on UPB 0.71 % 0.15 % 0.73 % 0.73 % 0.16 % 1.20 %

Percentage of single-family conventional 

loans based on loan count 0.84 0.19 0.81 0.86 0.20 1.25 

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Percentage of 

Single-Family

Conventional

Guaranty Book of 

Business

Based on UPB

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate(1)

Percentage of 

Single-Family

Conventional

Guaranty Book of 

Business

Based on UPB

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate(1)

Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:

80.01% to 90% 4 % 0.52 % 5 % 0.88 %

90.01% to 100% 1 0.46 2 0.51 

Greater than 100% * 9.40 * 12.41 

Geographical distribution:

California 19 0.59 19 1.01 

Florida 6 0.92 6 1.59 

Illinois 3 1.08 3 1.55 

New Jersey 3 1.17 3 1.90 

New York 5 1.54 5 2.24 

All other states 64 0.76 64 1.16 

Vintages:

2004 and prior 1 2.75 1 3.48 

2005-2008 1 4.45 2 5.87 

2009-2022 98 0.63 97 1.01 

* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional guaranty book of business.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Concentrations of Credit Risk

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 109
(1) Based on loan count, consists of single-family conventional loans that were 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process as of 

June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021. 

Multifamily Credit Risk Characteristics

For multifamily loans, management monitors the serious delinquency rate, which is the percentage of multifamily loans, 

based on unpaid principal balance, that are 60 days or more past due, and loans with other higher risk characteristics to 

determine the overall credit quality of our multifamily book of business. Higher risk characteristics include, but are not 

limited to, current debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) below 1.0 and original LTV ratios greater than 80%. We stratify 

multifamily loans into different internal risk categories based on the credit risk inherent in each individual loan.

The following tables display the delinquency status and serious delinquency rates for specified loan categories of our 

multifamily guaranty book of business.

As of

June 30, 2022(1) December 31, 2021(1)

30 Days 

Delinquent

Seriously 

Delinquent(2)

30 Days 

Delinquent

Seriously 

Delinquent(2)

Percentage of multifamily guaranty book of business 0.04 % 0.34 % 0.03 % 0.42 %

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Percentage of 

Multifamily 

Guaranty Book 

of Business(1)

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate(2)(3)

Percentage of 

Multifamily 

Guaranty Book 

of Business(1)

Serious 

Delinquency 

Rate(2)(3)

Original LTV ratio:

Greater than 80% 1 % 0.13 % 1 % 0.13 %

Less than or equal to 80% 99 0.34 99 0.42 

Current DSCR below 1.0(4) 3 6.71 2 13.90 

(1) Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid 

principal balance of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business.

(2) Consists of multifamily loans that were 60 days or more past due as of the dates indicated. 

(3) Calculated based on the unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans that were seriously delinquent divided by the aggregate unpaid 

principal balance of multifamily loans for each category included in our multifamily guaranty book of business.

(4) Our estimates of current DSCRs are based on the latest available income information from annual statements for these properties.

Other Concentrations

Mortgage Insurers. Mortgage insurance “risk in force” refers to our maximum potential loss recovery under the 

applicable mortgage insurance policies in force and is generally based on the loan-level insurance coverage percentage 

and, if applicable, any aggregate pool loss limit, as specified in the policy.

The following table displays our total mortgage insurance risk in force by primary and pool insurance, as well as the total 

risk-in-force mortgage insurance coverage as a percentage of the single-family conventional guaranty book of business.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Risk in Force

Percentage of 

Single-Family 

Conventional 

Guaranty Book 

of Business Risk in Force

Percentage of 

Single-Family 

Conventional 

Guaranty Book 

of Business

(Dollars in millions)

Mortgage insurance risk in force:

Primary mortgage insurance $ 183,771 $ 176,587 

Pool mortgage insurance 247 261 

Total mortgage insurance risk in force $ 184,018 5% $ 176,848 5%

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Concentrations of Credit Risk

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 110
The table below displays our mortgage insurer counterparties that provided approximately 10% or more of the risk-inforce mortgage insurance coverage on mortgage loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business. 

Percentage of Risk-in-Force 

Coverage by Mortgage Insurer

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Counterparty:(1)

Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. 19 % 19 %

Arch Capital Group Ltd. 19 19 

Radian Guaranty, Inc. 17 17 

Enact Mortgage Insurance Corp.(2) 17 17 

Essent Guaranty, Inc. 16 16 

National Mortgage Insurance Corp. 11 11 

Others 1 1 

Total 100 % 100 %

(1) Insurance coverage amounts provided for each counterparty may include coverage provided by affiliates and subsidiaries of the 

counterparty.

(2) Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corp. was renamed Enact Mortgage Insurance Corp. effective February 7, 2022.

We have counterparty credit risk relating to the potential insolvency of, or non-performance by, monoline mortgage 

insurers that insure single-family loans we purchase or guarantee. There is risk that these counterparties may fail to 

fulfill their obligations to pay our claims under insurance policies. On at least a quarterly basis, we assess our mortgage 

insurer counterparties’ respective abilities to fulfill their obligations to us. Our assessment includes financial reviews and 

analyses of the insurers’ portfolios and capital adequacy. If we determine that it is probable that we will not collect all of 

our claims from one or more of our mortgage insurer counterparties, it could increase our loss reserves, which could 

adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and net worth.

When we estimate the credit losses that are inherent in our mortgage loans and under the terms of our guaranty 

obligations, we also consider the recoveries that we expect to receive from primary mortgage insurance, as mortgage 

insurance recoveries reduce the severity of the loss associated with defaulted loans if the borrower defaults and title to 

the property is subsequently transferred. Mortgage insurance does not cover credit losses that result from a reduction in 

mortgage interest paid by the borrower in connection with a loan modification, forbearance of principal, or forbearance 

of scheduled loan payments. We evaluate the financial condition of our mortgage insurer counterparties and adjust the 

contractually due recovery amounts to ensure that expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date are included in 

our loss reserve estimate. As a result, if our assessment of one or more of our mortgage insurer counterparties’ ability to 

fulfill their respective obligations to us worsens, it could increase our loss reserves. Our estimated benefit from 

mortgage insurance, which is based on estimated credit losses as of period end, reduced our loss reserves by $559 

million as of both June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. 

As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had outstanding receivables of $516 million and $533 million, 

respectively, recorded in “Other assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets related to amounts claimed on 

insured, defaulted loans excluding government-insured loans. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we 

assessed these outstanding receivables for collectability, and established a valuation allowance of $463 million and 

$479 million, respectively.

Mortgage Servicers and Sellers. Mortgage servicers collect mortgage and escrow payments from borrowers, pay taxes 

and insurance costs from escrow accounts, monitor and report delinquencies, and perform other required activities, 

including loss mitigation, on our behalf. Our mortgage servicers and sellers may also be obligated to repurchase loans 

or real estate owned (“REO”) properties, reimburse us for losses or provide other remedies under certain 

circumstances, such as if it is determined that the mortgage loan did not meet our underwriting or eligibility 

requirements, if certain loan representations and warranties are violated or if mortgage insurers rescind coverage. Our 

representation and warranty framework does not require repurchase for loans that have breaches of certain selling 

representations and warranties if they have met specified criteria for relief.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Concentrations of Credit Risk

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 111
Our business with mortgage servicers is concentrated. The table below displays the percentage of our single-family 

guaranty book of business serviced by our top five depository single-family mortgage servicers and top five nondepository single-family mortgage servicers (i.e., servicers that are not insured depository institutions), and identifies 

one servicer that serviced 10% or more of our single-family guaranty book of business as of December 31, 2021, based 

on unpaid principal balance.

Percentage of Single-Family

Guaranty Book of Business

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with its affiliates) 9 % 10 %

Remaining top five depository servicers 12 11 

Top five non-depository servicers 23 23 

Total 44 % 44 %

Compared with depository financial institutions, our non-depository servicers pose additional risks because they may 

not have the same financial strength or operational capacity, or be subject to the same level of regulatory oversight as 

depository financial institutions.

The table below displays the percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business serviced by our top five 

multifamily mortgage servicers, and identifies two servicers that serviced 10% or more of our multifamily guaranty book 

of business based on unpaid principal balance. 

Percentage of Multifamily

Guaranty Book of Business

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Walker & Dunlop, LLC 13 % 12 %

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with its affiliates) 11 11 

Remaining top five servicers 24 24 

Total 48 % 47 %

If a significant mortgage servicer or seller counterparty, or a number of mortgage servicers or sellers, fails to meet their 

obligations to us, it could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We mitigate these risks in 

several ways, including: 

• establishing minimum standards and financial requirements for our servicers;

• monitoring financial and portfolio performance as compared with peers and internal benchmarks; and

• for our largest mortgage servicers, conducting periodic financial reviews to confirm compliance with servicing 

guidelines and servicing performance expectations.

We may take one or more of the following actions to mitigate our credit exposure to mortgage servicers that present a 

higher risk:

• require a guaranty of obligations by higher-rated entities;

• transfer exposure to third parties;

• require collateral;

• establish more stringent financial requirements;

• work with underperforming servicers to improve operational processes; and

• suspend or terminate the selling and servicing relationship if deemed necessary.

Derivatives Counterparties. For information on credit risk associated with our derivative transactions and repurchase 

agreements see “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” and “Note 11, Netting Arrangements.”

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Concentrations of Credit Risk

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 112
11. Netting Arrangements

We use master netting arrangements, which allow us to offset certain financial instruments and collateral with the same 

counterparty, to minimize counterparty credit exposure. The tables below display information related to derivatives, 

securities purchased under agreements to resell, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are 

subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that are either offset or not offset in our 

condensed consolidated balance sheets.

As of June 30, 2022

Gross 

Amount 

Offset(1)

Net Amount 

Presented in 

our Condensed 

Consolidated 

Balance Sheets

Amounts Not Offset in our 

Condensed Consolidated 

Balance Sheets

Gross 

Amount

Financial 

Instruments(2) Collateral(3)

Net 

Amount

(Dollars in millions)

Assets:

OTC risk management derivatives $ 195 $ 59 $ 254 $ — $ — $ 254 

Cleared risk management derivatives — 4 4 — — 4 

Mortgage commitment derivatives 631 — 631 (461) — 170 

Total derivative assets 826 63 889 (4) (461) — 428 

Securities purchased under agreements 

to resell(5) 49,191 — 49,191 — (49,191) — 

Total assets $ 50,017 $ 63 $ 50,080 $ (461) $ (49,191) $ 428 

Liabilities:

OTC risk management derivatives $ (3,619) $ 3,619 $ — $ — $ — $ — 

Cleared risk management derivatives — (79) (79) — 79 — 

Mortgage commitment derivatives (498) — (498) 461 — (37) 

Total derivative liabilities (4,117) 3,540 (577) (4) 461 79 (37) 

Securities sold under agreements to 

repurchase(6) (1,466) — (1,466) — 1,461 (5) 

Total liabilities $ (5,583) $ 3,540 $ (2,043) $ 461 $ 1,540 $ (42) 

As of December 31, 2021

Gross 

Amount 

Offset(1)

Net Amount 

Presented in 

our Condensed 

Consolidated 

Balance Sheets

Amounts Not Offset in our 

Condensed Consolidated 

Balance Sheets

Gross 

Amount

Financial 

Instruments(2) Collateral(3)

Net 

Amount

(Dollars in millions)

Assets:

OTC risk management derivatives $ 239 $ (237) $ 2 $ — $ — $ 2 

Cleared risk management derivatives — — — — — — 

Mortgage commitment derivatives 169 — 169 (133) — 36 

Total derivative assets 408 (237) 171 (4) (133) — 38 

Securities purchased under agreements 

to resell(5) 64,843 — 64,843 — (64,843) — 

Total assets $ 65,251 $ (237) $ 65,014 $ (133) $ (64,843) $ 38 

Liabilities:

OTC risk management derivatives $ (1,188) $ 1,183 $ (5) $ — $ — $ (5) 

Cleared risk management derivatives — (10) (10) — 10 — 

Mortgage commitment derivatives (197) — (197) 133 56 (8) 

Total liabilities $ (1,385) $ 1,173 $ (212) (4) $ 133 $ 66 $ (13) 

(1) Represents the effect of the right to offset under legally enforceable master netting arrangements to settle with the same counterparty on a 

net basis, including cash collateral posted and received and accrued interest.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Netting Arrangements

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 113
(2) Mortgage commitment derivative amounts reflect where we have recognized both an asset and a liability with the same counterparty under 

an enforceable master netting arrangement but we have not elected to offset the related amounts in our condensed consolidated balance 

sheets.

(3) Represents collateral received that has not been recognized and not offset in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as 

collateral posted which has been recognized but not offset in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Does not include collateral held 

or posted in excess of our exposure. The fair value of non-cash collateral we pledged which the counterparty was permitted to sell or 

repledge was $3.0 billion and $2.5 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The fair value of non-cash collateral 

received was $49.2 billion and $64.9 billion, of which $26.6 billion and $25.6 billion could be sold or repledged as of June 30, 2022 and 

December 31, 2021, respectively. None of the underlying collateral was sold or repledged as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

(4) Excludes derivative assets of $3 million as of June 30, 2022 and derivative liabilities of $45 million and $21 million recognized in our 

condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, that were not subject to enforceable 

master netting arrangements. We had no derivative assets recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 

2021 that were not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements.

(5) Includes $28.7 billion and $29.1 billion in securities purchased under agreements to resell classified as “Cash and cash equivalents” in our 

condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Includes $5.1 billion and $15.0 billion

in securities purchased under agreements to resell classified as “Restricted cash and cash equivalents” in our condensed consolidated 

balance sheets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

(6) Represents agreements to repurchase securities for a specified price, with repayment generally occurring on the following day, reported as 

“Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Derivative instruments are recorded at fair value and securities purchased under agreements to resell are recorded at 

amortized cost in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. For a discussion of how we determine our rights to offset 

the assets and liabilities presented above with the same counterparty, including collateral posted or received, see “Note 

14, Netting Arrangements” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

12. Fair Value

We use fair value measurements for the initial recording of certain assets and liabilities and periodic remeasurement of 

certain assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. 

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value measurement guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and sets forth 

disclosures around fair value measurements. This guidance applies whenever other accounting guidance requires or 

permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that 

prioritizes the inputs into the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority, 

Level 1, to measurements based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The 

next highest priority, Level 2, is given to measurements of assets and liabilities based on limited observable inputs or 

observable inputs for similar assets and liabilities. The lowest priority, Level 3, is given to measurements based on 

unobservable inputs.

We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. 

See “Note 15, Fair Value” in our 2021 Form 10-K for information on the valuation control processes and the valuation 

techniques we use for fair value measurement and disclosure as well as our basis for classifying these measurements 

as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy in more specific situations. If the inputs used to measure assets 

or liabilities at fair value change, it may also result in a change in classification between levels 1, 2, and 3. We made no 

material changes to the valuation control processes or the valuation techniques for the six months ended June 30, 

2022.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Netting Arrangements

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 114
Recurring Changes in Fair Value 

The following tables display our assets and liabilities measured in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair 

value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition, including instruments for which we have elected the fair 

value option.

Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2022

Quoted Prices 

in Active 

Markets for 

Identical Assets 

(Level 1)

Significant 

Other 

Observable 

Inputs

(Level 2)

Significant 

Unobservable 

Inputs

(Level 3)

Netting 

Adjustment(1)

Estimated Fair 

Value

(Dollars in millions)

Recurring fair value measurements:

Assets:

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ — $ 1,219 $ 76 $ — $ 1,295 

Other agency — 2,508 — — 2,508 

Other securities — 112 — — 112 

Non-mortgage-related securities(3) 60,883 13 — — 60,896 

Total trading securities 60,883 3,852 76 — 64,811 

Available-for-sale securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae — 54 404 — 458 

Other agency — 10 — — 10 

Other securities — 8 289 — 297 

Total available-for-sale securities — 72 693 — 765 

Mortgage loans — 3,472 599 — 4,071 

Other assets:

Risk management derivatives:

Swaps — — 35 — 35 

Swaptions — 160 — — 160 

Netting adjustment — — — 63 63 

Mortgage commitment derivatives — 631 — — 631 

Credit enhancement derivatives — — 3 — 3 

Total other assets — 791 38 63 892 

Total assets at fair value $ 60,883 $ 8,187 $ 1,406 $ 63 $ 70,539 

Liabilities:

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ — $ 1,613 $ 253 $ — $ 1,866 

Of consolidated trusts — 18,266 152 — 18,418 

Total long-term debt — 19,879 405 — 20,284 

Other liabilities:

Risk management derivatives:

Swaps — 3,583 — — 3,583 

Swaptions — 36 — — 36 

Netting adjustment — — — (3,540) (3,540) 

Mortgage commitment derivatives — 498 — — 498 

Credit enhancement derivatives — — 45 — 45 

Total other liabilities — 4,117 45 (3,540) 622 

Total liabilities at fair value $ — $ 23,996 $ 450 $ (3,540) $ 20,906 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 115
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021

Quoted Prices 

in Active 

Markets for 

Identical Assets 

(Level 1)

Significant 

Other 

Observable 

Inputs

(Level 2)

Significant 

Unobservable 

Inputs 

(Level 3)

Netting 

Adjustment(1)

Estimated Fair 

Value

(Dollars in millions)

Recurring fair value measurements:

Assets:

Cash equivalents, including restricted cash equivalents(2) $ 250 $ — $ — $ — $ 250 

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae — 1,519 57 — 1,576 

Other agency — 2,893 — — 2,893 

Other securities — 137 — — 137 

Non-mortgage-related securities(3) 83,581 19 — — 83,600 

Total trading securities 83,581 4,568 57 — 88,206 

Available-for-sale securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae — 64 431 — 495 

Other agency — 12 — — 12 

Other securities — 8 322 — 330 

Total available-for-sale securities — 84 753 — 837 

Mortgage loans — 4,209 755 — 4,964 

Other assets:

Risk management derivatives:

Swaps — 25 152 — 177 

Swaptions — 62 — — 62 

Netting adjustment — — — (237) (237) 

Mortgage commitment derivatives — 169 — — 169 

Total other assets — 256 152 (237) 171 

Total assets at fair value $ 83,831 $ 9,117 $ 1,717 $ (237) $ 94,428 

Liabilities:

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ — $ 2,008 $ 373 $ — $ 2,381 

Of consolidated trusts — 21,640 95 — 21,735 

Total long-term debt — 23,648 468 — 24,116 

Other liabilities:

Risk management derivatives:

Swaps — 1,165 — — 1,165 

Swaptions — 23 — — 23 

Netting adjustment — — — (1,173) (1,173) 

Mortgage commitment derivatives — 197 — — 197 

Credit enhancement derivatives — — 21 — 21 

Total other liabilities — 1,385 21 (1,173) 233 

Total liabilities at fair value $ — $ 25,033 $ 489 $ (1,173) $ 24,349 

(1) Derivative contracts are reported on a gross basis by level. The netting adjustment represents the effect of the legal right to offset under 

legally enforceable master netting arrangements to settle with the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and 

received.

(2) Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents are composed of U.S. Treasuries that have a maturity at the date of acquisition of three 

months or less.

(3) Primarily includes U.S. Treasury securities. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 116
The following tables display a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using 

significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The tables also display gains and losses due to changes in fair value, 

including both realized and unrealized gains and losses, recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of 

operations and comprehensive income for Level 3 assets and liabilities. 

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022

Total Gains (Losses)

(Realized/Unrealized) 

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

Net Income 

Related to 

Assets and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2022(4)(5)

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

OCI Related 

to Assets 

and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2022(1)

Balance, 

March 31, 

2022

Included 

in Net 

Income

Included 

in Total 

OCI 

(Loss)(1) Purchases(2) Sales(2) Issues(3) Settlements(3)

Transfers 

out of 

Level 3

Transfers 

into 

Level 3

Balance, 

June 30, 2022

(Dollars in millions)

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 47 $ (2) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (1) $ (5) $ 37 $ 76 $ (1) $ — 

Total trading securities $ 47 $ (2) (5)(6) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (1) $ (5) $ 37 $ 76 $ (1) $ — 

Available-for-sale 

securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 418 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (14) $ — $ — $ 404 $ — $ (1) 

Other securities 309 — (1) — — — (19) — — 289 — (1) 

Total available-for-sale 

securities $ 727 $ — 

(6)(7)

$ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ (33) $ — $ — $ 693 $ — $ (2) 

Mortgage loans $ 668 $ (23) (5)(6) $ — $ — $ (2) $ — $ (41) $ (16) $ 13 $ 599 $ (23) $ — 

Net derivatives 57 (75) (5) — — — — 11 — — (7) (64) — 

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ (307) $ 54 (5) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (253) $ 54 $ — 

Of consolidated 

trusts (161) — 

(5)(6)

 — — — — 9 — — (152) 1 — 

Total long-term debt $ (468) $ 54 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 9 $ — $ — $ (405) $ 55 $ — 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 117
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Total Gains (Losses)

(Realized/Unrealized) 

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

Net Income 

Related to 

Assets and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2022(4)(5)

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

OCI Related 

to Assets 

and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2022(1)

Balance, 

December 31, 

2021

Included 

in Net 

Income

Included 

in Total 

OCI 

(Loss)(1) Purchases(2) Sales(2) Issues(3) Settlements(3)

Transfers 

out of 

Level 3

Transfers 

into 

Level 3

Balance, 

June 30, 2022

(Dollars in millions)

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 57 $ (8) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (1) $ (14) $ 42 $ 76 $ (3) $ — 

Total trading securities $ 57 $ (8) (5)(6) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (1) $ (14) $ 42 $ 76 $ (3) $ — 

Available-for-sale 

securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 431 $ 1 $ (4) $ — $ — $ — $ (24) $ — $ — $ 404 $ — $ (3) 

Other securities 322 (8) (2) — — — (22) (2) 1 289 — (2) 

Total available-for-sale 

securities $ 753 $ (7) 

(6)(7)

$ (6) $ — $ — $ — $ (46) $ (2) $ 1 $ 693 $ — $ (5) 

Mortgage loans $ 755 $ (48) (5)(6) $ — $ — $ (2) $ — $ (82) $ (60) $ 36 $ 599 $ (42) $ — 

Net derivatives 131 (157) (5) — — — — 19 — — (7) (138) — 

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ (373) $ 120 (5) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (253) $ 120 $ — 

Of consolidated 

trusts (95) 2 

(5)(6)

 — — — (86) 27 1 (1) (152) 3 — 

Total long-term debt $ (468) $ 122 $ — $ — $ — $ (86) $ 27 $ 1 $ (1) $ (405) $ 123 $ — 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 118
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021

Total Gains (Losses)

(Realized/Unrealized) 

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

Net Income 

Related to 

Assets and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2021(4)(5)

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

OCI Related 

to Assets 

and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2021(1)

Balance, 

March 31, 

2021

Included 

in Net 

Income

Included 

in Total 

OCI 

(Loss)(1) Purchases(2) Sales(2) Issues(3) Settlements(3)

Transfers 

out of 

Level 3

Transfers 

into 

Level 3

Balance, 

June 30, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 109 $ (4) $ — $ 3 $ — $ — $ — $ (32) $ 65 $ 141 $ 1 $ — 

Total trading securities $ 109 $ (4) (5)(6) $ — $ 3 $ — $ — $ — $ (32) $ 65 $ 141 $ 1 $ — 

Available-for-sale 

securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 189 $ 1 $ 5 $ — $ — $ — $ (4) $ (107) $ — $ 84 $ — $ 3 

Other securities 422 4 (1) — — — (57) — — 368 — 1 

Total available-for-sale 

securities $ 611 $ 5 

(6)(7)

$ 4 $ — $ — $ — $ (61) $ (107) $ — $ 452 $ — $ 4 

Mortgage loans $ 820 $ 21 (5)(6) $ — $ 85 $ (44) $ — $ (53) $ (29) $ 32 $ 832 $ 22 $ — 

Net derivatives 166 7 (5) — — — — 21 — — 194 28 — 

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ (382) $ (15) (5) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (397) $ (15) $ — 

Of consolidated 

trusts (58) — 

(5)(6)

 — — — — 4 — (1) (55) — — 

Total long-term debt $ (440) $ (15) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 4 $ — $ (1) $ (452) $ (15) $ — 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 119
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

Total Gains (Losses)

(Realized/Unrealized) 

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

Net Income 

Related to 

Assets and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2021(4)(5)

Net 

Unrealized 

Gains 

(Losses) 

Included in 

OCI Related 

to Assets 

and 

Liabilities 

Still Held as 

of June 30, 

2021(1)

Balance, 

December 31, 

2020

Included 

in Net 

Income

Included 

in Total 

OCI 

(Loss)(1) Purchases(2) Sales(2) Issues(3) Settlements(3)

Transfers 

out of 

Level 3

Transfers 

into 

Level 3

Balance, 

June 30, 2021

(Dollars in millions)

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 94 $ (5) $ — $ 3 $ — $ — $ — $ (39) $ 88 $ 141 $ 2 $ — 

Other agency 1 — — — — — — (1) — — — — 

Total trading securities $ 95 $ (5) (5)(6) $ — $ 3 $ — $ — $ — $ (40) $ 88 $ 141 $ 2 $ — 

Available-for-sale 

securities:

Mortgage-related:

Fannie Mae $ 195 $ 1 $ 2 $ — $ — $ — $ (7) $ (107) $ — $ 84 $ — $ 3 

Other securities 453 7 — — — — (92) — — 368 — 4 

Total available-for-sale 

securities $ 648 $ 8 

(6)(7)

$ 2 $ — $ — $ — $ (99) $ (107) $ — $ 452 $ — $ 7 

Mortgage loans $ 861 $ 29 (5)(6) $ — $ 85 $ (44) $ — $ (100) $ (52) $ 53 $ 832 $ 28 $ — 

Net derivatives 333 (125) (5) — — — — (14) — — 194 (139) — 

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ (416) $ 19 (5) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (397) $ 19 $ — 

Of consolidated 

trusts (83) 1 

(5)(6)

 — — — — 8 20 (1) (55) — — 

Total long-term debt $ (499) $ 20 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 8 $ 20 $ (1) $ (452) $ 19 $ — 

(1) Gains (losses) included in “Other comprehensive loss” are included in “Changes in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of 

reclassification adjustments and taxes” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

(2) Purchases and sales include activity related to the consolidation and deconsolidation of assets of securitization trusts.

(3) Issues and settlements include activity related to the consolidation and deconsolidation of liabilities of securitization trusts.

(4) Amount represents temporary changes in fair value. Amortization, accretion and the impairment of credit losses are not considered 

unrealized and are not included in this amount.

(5) Gains (losses) are included in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive 

income.

(6) Gains (losses) included in “Net interest income” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income 

includes amortization of cost basis adjustments.

(7) Gains (losses) are included in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and 

comprehensive income.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 120
The following tables display valuation techniques and the range and the weighted average of significant unobservable 

inputs for our Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding instruments for which 

we have elected the fair value option. Changes in these unobservable inputs can result in significantly higher or lower 

fair value measurements of these assets and liabilities as of the reporting date.

Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2022

Fair Value

Significant Valuation 

Techniques

Significant 

Unobservable

Inputs(1) Range(1)

Weighted - 

Average(1)(2)

(Dollars in millions)

Recurring fair value measurements:

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related securities:

Agency(3) $ 76 Various

Available-for-sale securities:

Mortgage-related securities:

Agency(3) 367 Consensus

 37 Various

Total agency 404 

Other securities 153 Discounted Cash Flow Spreads (bps) 258.0 - 565.0 549.9

 91 Single Vendor

 45 Various

Total other 289 

Total available-for-sale securities $ 693 

Net derivatives $ 35 Dealer Mark

 (42) Discounted Cash Flow

Total net derivatives $ (7) 

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021

Fair Value

Significant Valuation 

Techniques

Significant 

Unobservable

Inputs(1) Range(1)

Weighted - 

Average(1)(2)

(Dollars in millions)

Recurring fair value measurements:

Trading securities:

Mortgage-related securities:

Agency(3) $ 57 Various

Available-for-sale securities:

Mortgage-related securities:

Agency(3) 379 Consensus

 52 Various

Total agency 431 

Other securities 175 Discounted Cash Flow Spreads (bps) 409.0 - 443.0 422.0

 94 Single Vendor Spreads (bps) 9.3 - 49.4 27.2

 53 Various

Total other 322 

Total available-for-sale securities $ 753 

Net derivatives $ 152 Dealer Mark

 (21) Discounted Cash Flow

Total net derivatives $ 131 

(1) Valuation techniques for which no unobservable inputs are disclosed generally reflect the use of third-party pricing services or dealers, and 

the range of unobservable inputs applied by these sources is not readily available or cannot be reasonably estimated. Where we have 

disclosed unobservable inputs for consensus and single vendor techniques, those inputs are based on our validations performed at the 

security level using discounted cash flows.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 121
(2) Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the instruments. 

(3) Includes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities.

In our condensed consolidated balance sheets, certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a 

nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair 

value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when we evaluate loans for impairment). We had no Level 1 

assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021. 

We held $226 million and $38 million in Level 2 assets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, 

composed of mortgage loans held for sale that were impaired. We had no Level 2 liabilities that were measured at fair 

value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

The following table displays valuation techniques for our Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. 

Fair Value Measurements as of

Valuation Techniques

June 30, 

2022

December 31, 

2021

(Dollars in millions)

Nonrecurring fair value measurements:

Mortgage loans:(1)

Mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value Consensus $ 1,818 $ 201 

Single Vendor 951 1,383 

Total mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value 2,769 1,584 

Single-family mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost Internal Model 1,072 867 

Multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost Appraisal 8 37 

Broker Price Opinion 50 118 

Internal Model 7 23 

Total multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized 

cost 65 178 

Acquired property, net:

Single-family Accepted Offer 14 13 

Appraisal 73 73 

Internal Model 85 75 

Walk Forward 55 37 

Various 4 11 

Total single-family 231 209 

Multifamily Various 16 34 

Total nonrecurring assets at fair value $ 4,153 $ 2,872 

(1) When we measure impairment, including recoveries, based on the fair value of the loan or the underlying collateral and impairment is 

recorded on any component of the mortgage loan, including accrued interest receivable and amounts due from the borrower for advances 

of taxes and insurance, we present the entire fair value measurement amount with the corresponding mortgage loan.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 122
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table displays the carrying value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments. The fair value of 

financial instruments we disclose includes commitments to purchase multifamily and single-family mortgage loans that 

we do not record in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of these commitments are included as 

“Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses.” The disclosure excludes all non-financial 

instruments; therefore, the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities does not represent the underlying fair value of 

our total consolidated assets and liabilities.

As of June 30, 2022

Carrying 

Value

Quoted 

Prices in 

Active 

Markets for 

Identical 

Assets 

(Level 1)

Significant 

Other 

Observable 

Inputs 

(Level 2)

Significant 

Unobservable 

Inputs 

(Level 3) 

Netting 

Adjustment

Estimated 

Fair Value

(Dollars in millions)

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents, including 

restricted cash and cash equivalents $ 75,942 $ 42,142 $ 33,800 $ — $ — $ 75,942 

Securities purchased under agreements 

to resell 15,391 — 15,391 — — 15,391 

Trading securities 64,811 60,883 3,852 76 — 64,811 

Available-for-sale securities 765 — 72 693 — 765 

Mortgage loans held for sale 4,579 — 643 4,200 — 4,843 

Mortgage loans held for investment, net 

of allowance for loan losses 4,087,352 — 3,557,672 180,362 — 3,738,034 

Advances to lenders 4,622 — 4,622 — — 4,622 

Derivative assets at fair value 892 — 791 38 63 892 

Guaranty assets and buy-ups 85 — — 173 — 173 

Total financial assets $ 4,254,439 $ 103,025 $ 3,616,843 $ 185,542 $ 63 $ 3,905,473 

Financial liabilities:

Securities sold under agreements to 

repurchase $ 1,466 $ — $ 1,466 $ — $ — $ 1,466 

Short-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae 7,590 — 7,589 — — 7,589 

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae 136,865 — 137,063 604 — 137,667 

Of consolidated trusts 4,064,192 — 3,663,125 36,785 — 3,699,910 

Derivative liabilities at fair value 622 — 4,117 45 (3,540) 622 

Guaranty obligations 94 — — 78 — 78 

Total financial liabilities $ 4,210,829 $ — $ 3,813,360 $ 37,512 $ (3,540) $ 3,847,332 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 123
As of December 31, 2021

Carrying 

Value

Quoted 

Prices in 

Active 

Markets for 

Identical 

Assets 

(Level 1)

Significant 

Other 

Observable 

Inputs 

(Level 2)

Significant 

Unobservable 

Inputs 

(Level 3)

Netting 

Adjustment

Estimated 

Fair Value

(Dollars in millions)

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents, including 

restricted cash and cash equivalents $ 108,631 $ 64,531 $ 44,100 $ — $ — $ 108,631 

Securities purchased under agreements 

to resell 20,743 — 20,743 — — 20,743 

Trading securities 88,206 83,581 4,568 57 — 88,206 

Available-for-sale securities 837 — 84 753 — 837 

Mortgage loans held for sale 5,134 — 178 5,307 — 5,485 

Mortgage loans held for investment, net 

of allowance for loan losses 3,963,108 — 3,796,917 209,090 — 4,006,007 

Advances to lenders 8,414 — 8,413 1 — 8,414 

Derivative assets at fair value 171 — 256 152 (237) 171 

Guaranty assets and buy-ups 92 — — 207 — 207 

Total financial assets $ 4,195,336 $ 148,112 $ 3,875,259 $ 215,567 $ (237) $ 4,238,701 

Financial liabilities:

Short-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae $ 2,795 $ — $ 2,795 $ — $ — $ 2,795 

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae 198,097 — 205,142 799 — 205,941 

Of consolidated trusts 3,957,299 — 3,951,537 32,644 — 3,984,181 

Derivative liabilities at fair value 233 — 1,385 21 (1,173) 233 

Guaranty obligations 101 — — 101 — 101 

Total financial liabilities $ 4,158,525 $ — $ 4,160,859 $ 33,565 $ (1,173) $ 4,193,251 

For a detailed description and classification of our financial instruments, see “Note 15, Fair Value” in our 2021 Form 10-

K.

Fair Value Option

We elected the fair value option for loans and debt that contain embedded derivatives that would otherwise require 

bifurcation. Under the fair value option, we elected to carry these instruments at fair value instead of bifurcating the 

embedded derivative from such instruments.

Interest income for the mortgage loans is recorded in “Interest income: Mortgage loans” and interest expense for the 

debt instruments is recorded in “Interest expense: Long-term debt” in our condensed consolidated statements of 

operations and comprehensive income.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 124
The following table displays the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the financial instruments for which we have 

made fair value elections.

As of

June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021

Loans(1)

Long-Term 

Debt of 

Fannie Mae

Long-Term Debt 

of Consolidated 

Trusts Loans(1)

Long-Term 

Debt of 

Fannie Mae

Long-Term Debt 

of Consolidated 

Trusts

(Dollars in millions)

Fair value $ 4,071 $ 1,866 $ 18,418 $ 4,964 $ 2,381 $ 21,735 

Unpaid principal balance 4,119 1,833 17,677 4,601 2,197 19,314 

(1) Includes nonaccrual loans with a fair value of $52 million and $86 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. 

Includes loans that are 90 days or more past due with a fair value of $72 million and $125 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 

2021, respectively.

Changes in Fair Value under the Fair Value Option Election

We recorded losses of $187 million and $378 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and losses of 

$5 million and gains of $20 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 from changes in the fair value of 

loans recorded at fair value in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations 

and comprehensive income.

We recorded gains of $558 million and $1.6 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and losses of 

$89 million and gains of $284 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, from changes in 

the fair value of long-term debt recorded at fair value in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated 

statements of operations and comprehensive income.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

We are party to various types of legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of 

claimants. We also are subject to regulatory examinations, inquiries and investigations, and other information gathering 

requests. In some of the matters, indeterminate amounts are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits 

considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to 

specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to 

invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. This variability in pleadings, together with our and our counsel’s actual 

experience in litigating or settling claims, leads us to conclude that the monetary relief that may be sought by plaintiffs 

bears little relevance to the merits or disposition value of claims. 

We have substantial and valid defenses to the claims in the proceedings described below and intend to defend these 

matters vigorously. However, legal actions and proceedings of all types are subject to many uncertain factors that 

generally cannot be predicted with assurance. Accordingly, the outcome of any given matter and the amount or range of 

potential loss at particular points in time is frequently difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will 

evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how courts will apply the 

law. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel may view the 

evidence and applicable law.

On a quarterly basis, we review relevant information about all pending legal actions and proceedings for the purpose of 

evaluating and revising our contingencies, accruals and disclosures. We establish an accrual only for matters when a 

loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of such loss. We are often unable to estimate the possible 

losses or ranges of losses, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development, where plaintiffs 

seek indeterminate or unspecified damages, where there may be novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the 

proceedings, or where settlement negotiations have not occurred or progressed. Given the uncertainties involved in any 

action or proceeding, regardless of whether we have established an accrual, the ultimate resolution of certain of these 

matters may be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of 

the loss or liability imposed and the level of our net income or loss for that period. 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Fair Value

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 125
In addition to the matters specifically described below, we are involved in a number of legal and regulatory proceedings 

that arise in the ordinary course of business that we do not expect will have a material impact on our business or 

financial condition.

Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation

A consolidated class action (“In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action 

Litigations”) and a non-class action lawsuit, Fairholme Funds v. FHFA, filed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 

shareholders against us, FHFA as our conservator, and Freddie Mac are pending in the U.S. District Court for the 

District of Columbia, with trials scheduled to begin on October 17, 2022. The lawsuits challenge the August 2012 

amendment to each company’s senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury

Plaintiffs in these lawsuits filed amended complaints on November 1, 2017 alleging that the net worth sweep dividend 

provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to the August 2012 amendments nullified 

certain of the shareholders’ rights, particularly the right to receive dividends. Plaintiffs seek damages, equitable and 

injunctive relief, and costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs in the class action represent a class of 

Fannie Mae preferred shareholders and classes of Freddie Mac common and preferred shareholders. On September 

28, 2018, the court dismissed all of the plaintiffs’ claims except for their claims for breach of an implied covenant of good 

faith and fair dealing. On March 21, 2022, we, FHFA and Freddie Mac filed a motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ 

remaining claim and plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment. 

Given the stage of these lawsuits, the substantial and novel legal questions that remain, and our substantial defenses, 

we are currently unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss arising from this litigation.

14. Regulatory Capital Requirements

FHFA published a final rule establishing a new enterprise regulatory capital framework for the GSEs in December 2020. 

FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework in March 2022. We refer to the rule’s 

requirements, as amended, as the “enterprise regulatory capital framework.” The enterprise regulatory capital 

framework establishes new supplemental leverage and risk-based capital requirements for the GSEs. Under the 

leverage capital requirements, we must maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of 2.5% of adjusted total assets. Under the riskbased capital requirements, we must maintain minimum common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total 

capital ratios of 4.5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, of risk-weighted assets. The enterprise regulatory capital framework 

requires substantially higher levels of capital than the previously applicable statutory minimum capital requirement. 

Although the enterprise regulatory capital framework went into effect in February 2021, we are not required to hold 

capital according to the framework’s requirements until the date of termination of our conservatorship, or such later date 

as may be ordered by FHFA.

The enterprise regulatory capital framework provides a granular assessment of credit risk specific to different mortgage 

loan categories, as well as components for market risk and operational risk. The enterprise regulatory capital framework

includes the following requirements:

• Supplemental capital requirements relating to the amount and form of the capital we hold, based largely on 

definitions of capital used in U.S. banking regulators’ regulatory capital framework. The enterprise regulatory 

capital framework specifies complementary leverage and risk-based requirements, which together determine 

the requirements for each tier of capital;

• A requirement that we hold prescribed capital buffers that can be drawn down in periods of financial stress and 

then rebuilt over time as economic conditions improve. If we fall below the prescribed buffer amounts, we must 

restrict capital distributions such as stock repurchases and dividends, as well as discretionary bonus payments 

to executives, until the buffer amounts are restored. The prescribed capital buffers represent the amount of 

capital we are required to hold above the minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements.

◦ The prescribed leverage buffer amount (“PLBA”) represents the amount of tier 1 capital we are 

required to hold above the minimum tier 1 leverage capital requirement; 

◦ The risk-based capital buffers consist of three separate components: a stability capital buffer, a stress 

capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. Taken together, these risk-based buffers comprise 

the prescribed capital conservation buffer amount (“PCCBA”). The PCCBA must be comprised entirely 

of common equity tier 1 capital; and

• Specific minimum percentages, or “floors,” on the risk-weights applicable to single-family and multifamily 

exposures, as well as retained portions of credit risk transfer transactions.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Commitments and Contingencies

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 126
The table below sets forth information about our capital requirements under the standardized approach of the enterprise 

regulatory capital framework. Available capital for purposes of the enterprise regulatory capital framework excludes the 

stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion) and other amounts specified in footnote 2 to the table. 

Because of these exclusions, we had a deficit in available capital as of June 30, 2022, even though we had positive net 

worth under GAAP of $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022.

As of June 30, 2022, we had a $262 billion shortfall of our available capital (deficit) to the adjusted total capital 

requirement (including buffers) of $185 billion under the standardized approach of the rule as shown in the table below.

As of June 30, 2022, our risk-based adjusted total capital requirement (including buffers) represented the amount of 

capital needed to be fully capitalized under the standardized approach to the rule.

Capital Metrics under the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework as of June 30, 2022(1)

(Dollars in billions)

Adjusted total assets $ 4,545 

Risk-weighted assets 1,325 

Amounts Ratios

Available 

Capital 

(Deficit)(2)

Minimum 

Capital 

Requirement

Total Capital 

Requirement 

(including 

Buffers)(4)

Available 

Capital 

(Deficit) 

Ratio(3)

Minimum 

Capital Ratio 

Requirement

Total Capital 

Requirement 

Ratio (including 

Buffers)

Risk-based capital:

Total capital(5) $ (58) $ 106 $ 106 (4.4) % 8.0 % 8.0 %

Common equity tier 1 capital (96) 60 139 (7.2) 4.5 10.5 

Tier 1 capital (77) 80 159 (5.8) 6.0 12.0 

Adjusted total capital (77) 106 185 (5.8) 8.0 14.0 

Leverage capital:

Core capital(6) (64) 114 114 (1.4) 2.5 2.5 

Tier 1 capital (77) 114 137 (1.7) 2.5 3.0 

(1) Ratios are calculated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for risk-based capital metrics and as a percentage of adjusted total assets 

for leverage capital metrics.

(2) Available capital (deficit) for all line items excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion). Available capital (deficit) 

for all line items except total capital and core capital also deducts a portion of deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets arising from 

temporary differences between GAAP and tax requirements are deducted from capital to the extent they exceed 10% of common equity. 

As of June 30, 2022, this resulted in the full deduction of deferred tax assets ($12.4 billion) from our available capital (deficit). Available 

capital (deficit) for common equity tier 1 capital also excludes the value of the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock ($19.1 billion).

(3) Ratios are negative because we had a deficit in available capital for each tier of capital.

(4) The applicable buffer for common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total capital is the PCCBA, comprised of a stress capital 

buffer, a stability capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. The applicable buffer for tier 1 capital (leverage based) is the PLBA. 

The stress capital buffer and countercyclical capital buffer are each calculated by multiplying prescribed factors by adjusted total assets as 

of the last day of the previous calendar quarter. The 2022 stability capital buffer is calculated by multiplying a factor determined based on 

our share of mortgage debt outstanding by adjusted total assets as of December 31, 2020. The prescribed leverage buffer for 2022 is set 

at 50% of the 2022 stability buffer. Going forward the stability buffer and the prescribed leverage buffer will be updated with an effective 

date that depends on whether the stability capital buffer increases or decreases relative to the previously calculated value.

(5) The sum of (a) core capital (see definition in footnote 6 below); and (b) a general allowance for foreclosure losses, which (i) shall include 

an allowance for portfolio mortgage losses, an allowance for non-reimbursable foreclosure costs on government claims, and an allowance 

for liabilities reflected on the balance sheet for estimated foreclosure losses on mortgage-backed securities; and (ii) shall not include any 

reserves made or held against specific assets; and (c) any other amounts from sources of funds available to absorb losses that the 

Director of FHFA by regulation determines are appropriate to include in determining total capital.

(6) The sum of (a) the stated value of our outstanding common stock (common stock less treasury stock); (b) the stated value of our 

outstanding non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock; (c) our paid-in capital; and (d) our retained earnings (accumulated deficit). Core 

capital does not include: (a) accumulated other comprehensive income or (b) senior preferred stock.

As a result of our capital shortfall, our maximum payout ratio under the enterprise regulatory capital framework as of 

June 30, 2022 was 0%. While it is not applicable until we are required to comply with the capital requirements under the 

enterprise regulatory capital framework, our maximum payout ratio represents the percentage of eligible retained 

income that we are permitted to pay out in the form of distributions or discretionary bonus payments under the 

enterprise regulatory capital framework. The maximum payout ratio for a given quarter is the lowest of the payout ratios 

determined by our capital conservation buffer and our leverage buffer.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | Regulatory Capital Requirements

Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 127
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about 

Market Risk

Information about market risk is set forth in “MD&A—Risk Management—Market Risk Management, including InterestRate Risk Management.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Overview

We are required under applicable laws and regulations to maintain controls and procedures, which include disclosure 

controls and procedures as well as internal control over financial reporting, as further described below.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance 

that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, 

summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and 

procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that 

information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated 

and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to 

allow timely decisions regarding our required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and 

procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can 

provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply 

its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief 

Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of 

June 30, 2022, the end of the period covered by this report. As a result of management’s evaluation, our Chief 

Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at 

a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of filing this report. 

Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of filing this report 

because they did not adequately ensure the accumulation and communication to management of information known to 

FHFA that is needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws. As a result, we were not able 

to rely upon the disclosure controls and procedures that were in place as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of this filing, 

and we continue to have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness is 

described in more detail below under “Description of Material Weakness.” Based on discussions with FHFA and the 

structural nature of this material weakness, we do not expect to remediate this material weakness while we are under 

conservatorship.

Description of Material Weakness

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard 2201 defines a material weakness as a 

deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable 

possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or 

detected on a timely basis.

Management has determined that we continued to have the following material weakness as of June 30, 2022 and as of 

the date of filing this report:

• Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have been under the conservatorship of FHFA since September 6, 

2008. Under the GSE Act, FHFA is an independent agency that currently functions as both our conservator and 

our regulator with respect to our safety, soundness and mission. Because of the nature of the conservatorship 

under the GSE Act, which places us under the “control” of FHFA (as that term is defined by securities laws), 

some of the information that we may need to meet our disclosure obligations may be solely within the 

knowledge of FHFA. As our conservator, FHFA has the power to take actions without our knowledge that could 

be material to our shareholders and other stakeholders, and could significantly affect our financial performance 

or our continued existence as an ongoing business. Although we and FHFA attempted to design and implement 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 128
disclosure policies and procedures that would account for the conservatorship and accomplish the same 

objectives as a disclosure controls and procedures policy of a typical reporting company, there are inherent 

structural limitations on our ability to design, implement, test or operate effective disclosure controls and 

procedures. As both our regulator and our conservator under the GSE Act, FHFA is limited in its ability to design 

and implement a complete set of disclosure controls and procedures relating to Fannie Mae, particularly with 

respect to current reporting pursuant to Form 8-K. Similarly, as a regulated entity, we are limited in our ability to 

design, implement, operate and test the controls and procedures for which FHFA is responsible.

Due to these circumstances, we have not been able to update our disclosure controls and procedures in a manner that 

adequately ensures the accumulation and communication to management of information known to FHFA that is needed 

to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws, including disclosures affecting our condensed 

consolidated financial statements. As a result, we did not maintain effective controls and procedures designed to ensure 

complete and accurate disclosure as required by GAAP as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of filing this report. Based 

on discussions with FHFA and the structural nature of this weakness, we do not expect to remediate this material 

weakness while we are under conservatorship.

Mitigating Actions Related to Material Weakness

As described above under “Description of Material Weakness,” we continue to have a material weakness in our internal 

control over financial reporting relating to our disclosure controls and procedures. However, we and FHFA have 

engaged in the following practices intended to permit accumulation and communication to management of information 

needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws:

• FHFA has established the Division of Conservatorship Oversight and Readiness, which is intended to facilitate 

operation of the company with the oversight of the conservator.

• We have provided drafts of our SEC filings to FHFA personnel for their review and comment prior to filing. We 

also have provided drafts of external press releases, statements and speeches to FHFA personnel for their 

review and comment prior to release.

• FHFA personnel, including senior officials, have reviewed our SEC filings prior to filing, including this quarterly 

report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2022 (“Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q”), and engaged in 

discussions regarding issues associated with the information contained in those filings. Prior to filing our 

Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q, FHFA provided Fannie Mae management with written acknowledgment that it 

had reviewed the Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q, and it was not aware of any material misstatements or 

omissions in the Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q and had no objection to our filing the Second Quarter 2022

Form 10-Q.

• Our senior management meets regularly with senior leadership at FHFA, including, but not limited to, the

Director.

• FHFA representatives attend meetings frequently with various groups within the company to enhance the flow 

of information and to provide oversight on a variety of matters, including accounting, credit and market risk 

management, external communications and legal matters.

• Senior officials within FHFA’s Office of the Chief Accountant have met frequently with our senior finance 

executives regarding our accounting policies, practices and procedures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, whether 

any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter have materially 

affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes 

in our internal control over financial reporting from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 that management believes have 

materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

In the ordinary course of business, we review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes 

that we believe will improve these controls and increase efficiency, while continuing to ensure that we maintain effective 

internal controls. Changes may include implementing new, more efficient systems, automating manual processes and 

updating existing systems. 

Controls and Procedures

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 129
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information in this item supplements and updates information regarding certain legal proceedings set forth in “Legal 

Proceedings” in our 2021 Form 10-K and our First Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q. We also provide information regarding 

material legal proceedings in “Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies,” which is incorporated herein by reference. In 

addition to the matters specifically described or incorporated by reference in this item, we are involved in legal and 

regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business that we do not expect will have a material impact on 

our business or financial condition. However, litigation claims and proceedings of all types are subject to many factors 

and their outcome and effect on our business and financial condition generally cannot be predicted accurately. 

We establish an accrual for legal claims only when a loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of 

such loss. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for 

those claims. If certain of these matters are determined against us, FHFA or Treasury, it could have a material adverse 

effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, including our net worth. 

Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation

Since June 2013, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed lawsuits in multiple federal 

courts against one or more of the United States, Treasury and FHFA, challenging actions taken by the defendants 

relating to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac senior preferred stock purchase agreements and the conservatorships of 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Some of these lawsuits also contain claims against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The 

legal claims being advanced by one or more of these lawsuits include challenges to the net worth sweep dividend 

provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to August 2012 amendments to the 

agreements, the payment of dividends to Treasury under the net worth sweep dividend provisions, and FHFA’s decision 

to require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to draw funds from Treasury to pay dividends to Treasury prior to the August 

2012 amendments. The plaintiffs seek various forms of equitable and injunctive relief as well as damages. The cases 

that remain pending after March 31, 2022 are as follows:

District of Columbia (In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action 

Litigations and Fairholme Funds v. FHFA). Fannie Mae is a defendant in two cases pending in the U.S. District Court for 

the District of Columbia, including a consolidated class action. In both cases, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stockholders 

filed amended complaints on November 1, 2017 against us, FHFA as our conservator and Freddie Mac. On September 

28, 2018, the court dismissed all the plaintiffs’ claims in these cases, except for their claims for breach of an implied 

covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Trials in these cases are scheduled to begin on October 17, 2022. Both cases 

are described in “Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies.” 

Southern District of Texas (Collins, et al. v. Yellen, et al.). On October 20, 2016, preferred and common stockholders 

filed a complaint against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. On May 22, 

2017, the court dismissed the case. On September 6, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting en 

banc, affirmed the district court’s dismissal of claims against Treasury, but reversed the dismissal of claims against 

FHFA. 

On June 23, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court held that FHFA did not exceed its statutory powers as conservator when it 

agreed to the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the third amendment to the senior preferred stock purchase 

agreements in August 2012. The court also held that the provision of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 

that restricts the President’s power to remove the FHFA Director without cause violates the Constitution’s separation of 

powers and, thus, the FHFA Director may be removed by the President for any reason. The court rejected plaintiffs’ 

request to rescind the third amendment to the senior preferred stock purchase agreements. However, the Supreme 

Court remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings on the sole issue of whether the stockholders 

suffered compensable harm related to the constitutional claim during the limited time-period when a Senate-confirmed 

FHFA Director was in office. On March 4, 2022, the Fifth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further 

proceedings on the compensable harm issue. On June 3, 2022, the stockholders filed an amended complaint and on 

July 18, 2022, FHFA and Treasury moved to dismiss that complaint.

Western District of Michigan (Rop et al. v. FHFA et al.). On June 1, 2017, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie 

Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. 

District Court for the Western District of Michigan. FHFA and Treasury moved to dismiss the case on September 8, 

2017, and plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on October 6, 2017. On September 8, 2020, the court denied 

plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal 

with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on October 27, 2020 and the case remains pending before that court.

Other Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 130
District of Minnesota (Bhatti et al. v. FHFA et al.). On June 22, 2017, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie 

Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. 

District Court for the District of Minnesota. The court dismissed the case on July 6, 2018. On October 6, 2021, the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s ruling and remanded the 

case to the district court to determine whether the stockholders suffered compensable harm and are entitled to 

retrospective relief. On January 26, 2022, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On March 11 and March 14, 2022, 

Treasury and FHFA each filed motions to dismiss the new complaint. 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Wazee Street Opportunities Fund IV L.P. et al. v. FHFA et al.). On August 16, 2018, 

common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against 

FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. FHFA and Treasury moved to 

dismiss the case on November 16, 2018, and plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on December 21, 2018. 

This case is currently stayed.

U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Numerous cases are pending against the United States in the U.S. Court of Federal 

Claims. Fannie Mae is a nominal defendant in four of these cases: Fisher v. United States of America, filed on 

December 2, 2013; Rafter v. United States of America, filed on August 14, 2014; Perry Capital LLC v. United States of 

America, filed on August 15, 2018; and Fairholme Funds Inc. v. United States, which was originally filed on July 9, 2013, 

and amended publicly to include Fannie Mae as a nominal defendant on October 2, 2018. Plaintiffs in these cases 

allege that the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to the 

August 2012 amendment constitute a taking of Fannie Mae’s property without just compensation in violation of the U.S. 

Constitution. The Fisher plaintiffs are pursuing this claim derivatively on behalf of Fannie Mae, while the Rafter, Perry 

Capital and Fairholme Funds plaintiffs are pursuing the claim both derivatively and directly against the United States. 

Plaintiffs in Rafter also allege direct and derivative breach of contract claims against the government. The Perry Capital 

and Fairholme Funds plaintiffs allege similar breach of contract claims, as well as direct and derivative breach of 

fiduciary duty claims against the government. Plaintiffs in Fisher request just compensation to Fannie Mae in an 

unspecified amount. Plaintiffs in Rafter, Perry Capital and Fairholme Funds seek just compensation for themselves on 

their direct claims and payment of damages to Fannie Mae on their derivative claims. The United States filed a motion 

to dismiss the Fisher, Rafter and Fairholme Funds cases, as well as other cases where Fannie Mae is not a nominal 

defendant, on August 1, 2018. On December 6, 2019, the court entered an order in the Fairholme Funds case that 

granted the government’s motion to dismiss all the direct claims but denied the motion as to the derivative claims 

brought on behalf of Fannie Mae. On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to hear 

the appeal of the court’s December 6, 2019 order. The Federal Circuit also agreed to hear appeals in cases where 

Fannie Mae is not a nominal defendant. In the Fisher case, the court denied the government’s motion to dismiss on 

May 8, 2020 and, on August 21, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied the Fisher plaintiffs’ request for interlocutory appeal. 

On February 22, 2022, in the Fairholme Funds case and other cases on appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the 

dismissal of the plaintiffs’ direct claims, but reversed the U.S. Court of Federal Claims’ ruling on plaintiffs’ derivative 

claims, holding that those claims should also be dismissed. On July 22, 2022, the plaintiffs in Fairholme Funds and 

plaintiffs in other cases where Fannie Mae is not a nominal defendant filed petitions with the Supreme Court seeking 

review of the Federal Circuit’s decision. 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the information in this report, you should carefully consider the risks relating to our business that we 

identify in “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K. This section supplements and updates that discussion. Also refer to 

“MD&A—Risk Management,” “MD&A—Single-Family Business” and “MD&A—Multifamily Business” in our 2021 Form 

10-K and in this report for more detailed descriptions of the primary risks to our business and how we seek to manage 

those risks.

The risks we face could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and 

net worth, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our past results or the results contemplated by any 

forward-looking statements we make. We believe the risks described in the sections of this report and our 2021 Form 

10-K identified above are the most significant we face; however, these are not the only risks we face. We face additional 

risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial.

Our business and financial results are affected by general economic conditions, including home prices and 

employment trends, and changes in economic conditions or financial markets may materially adversely affect 

our business and financial condition.

In general, a prolonged period of slow growth in the U.S. economy or any deterioration in general economic conditions 

or financial markets could materially adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition. Our 

business is significantly affected by the status of the U.S. economy, including home prices and employment trends, as 

Other Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 131
well as economic output levels, interest and inflation rates, and shifts in fiscal and monetary policies. As described in 

“MD&A—Key Market Economic Indicators” in this report, we currently expect that a modest recession is likely to occur 

beginning in the first quarter of 2023, resulting in an increase in the unemployment rate. We also expect slower home 

price growth in the second half of 2022 and in 2023, driven by elevated mortgage interest rates, a slowing economy and 

reduced affordability, and that some regions of the country may experience home price declines in the latter half of 

2022.

In recent years, the Federal Reserve has purchased a significant amount of mortgage-backed securities issued by us, 

Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. The Federal Reserve began to taper these purchases in November 2021 and concluded 

its asset purchase program in March 2022. In March 2022, the Federal Reserve stated that it would reinvest principal 

payments from its holdings of both agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities into agency mortgage-backed 

securities, and that it expected to begin reducing its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities. In 

May 2022, the Federal Reserve announced its plans to reduce its securities holdings over time by reinvesting principal 

payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities only to the extent those payments exceed monthly 

caps; the cap was initially set at $17.5 billion per month beginning on June 1, 2022, and it will increase to $35 billion per 

month in September 2022. The Federal Reserve has also raised the target range for the federal funds rate several 

times this year to address inflation, and we expect it to raise the target range further before the end of 2022. The 

strength in inflation also contributed to the sharp rise in mortgage rates since the first quarter, and mortgage rates may 

continue to rise. The increase in mortgage interest rates has already led to a slowdown in housing demand and a 

reduction in our business volume. Further rate increases and declines in housing demand would likely further reduce 

our business volume, demand for our mortgage-backed securities, and the pace of home price appreciation, which 

could adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition. 

Global economic conditions can also adversely affect our business and financial results. Changes or volatility in market 

conditions resulting from deterioration in or uncertainty regarding global economic conditions can adversely affect the 

value of our assets, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition. 

Differing rates of economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic around the world along with continued dislocations 

in supply chains remain a concern for policy makers and financial markets. To the extent global economic conditions 

negatively affect the U.S. economy, they also could negatively affect the credit performance of the loans in our book of 

business. 

Volatility or uncertainty in global or domestic political conditions also can significantly affect economic conditions and 

financial markets. Global or domestic political unrest also could affect economic growth and financial markets. For 

example, the Russian war in Ukraine and related economic sanctions imposed on Russia, as well as any further actions 

by Russia, the United States or others relating to this conflict, may further impact the global economy and financial 

markets, which could further increase inflationary pressure and interest rates, as well as negatively affect economic 

growth and result in disruptions in the financial markets. We describe in “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K the risks 

to our business posed by changes in interest rates and changes in spreads. In addition, future changes or disruptions in 

financial markets could significantly change the amount, mix and cost of funds we obtain, as well as our liquidity 

position.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of 

Proceeds

Common Stock

Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the OTCQB, operated by OTC Markets 

Group Inc., under the ticker symbol “FNMA.”

Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

Under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, we are prohibited from selling or 

issuing our equity interests without the prior written consent of Treasury except under limited circumstances, which are 

described in “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform—Treasury Agreements

—Covenants under Treasury Agreements” in our 2021 Form 10-K. During the quarter ended June 30, 2022, we did not 

sell any equity securities.

Information about Certain Securities Issuances by Fannie Mae

Pursuant to SEC regulations, public companies are required to disclose certain information when they incur a material 

direct financial obligation or become directly or contingently liable for a material obligation under an off-balance sheet 

arrangement. The disclosure must be made in a current report on Form 8-K under Item 2.03 or, if the obligation is 

Other Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 132
incurred in connection with certain types of securities offerings, in prospectuses for that offering that are filed with the 

SEC.

Because the securities we issue are exempted securities under the Securities Act of 1933, we do not file registration 

statements or prospectuses with the SEC with respect to our securities offerings. To comply with the disclosure 

requirements of Form 8-K relating to the incurrence of material financial obligations, in accordance with a “no-action” 

letter we received from the SEC staff in 2004, we report our incurrence of these types of obligations in offering circulars 

or prospectuses (or supplements thereto) that we post on our website within the same time period that a prospectus for 

a non-exempt securities offering would be required to be filed with the SEC. To the extent we incur a material financial 

obligation that is not disclosed in this manner, we would file a Form 8-K if required to do so under applicable Form 8-K 

requirements. 

The website address for disclosure about our debt securities is www.fanniemae.com/debtsearch. From this address, 

investors can access the offering circular and related supplements for debt securities offerings under Fannie Mae’s 

universal debt facility, including pricing supplements for individual issuances of debt securities.

Disclosure about our obligations pursuant to the MBS we issue, some of which may be off-balance sheet obligations, 

can be found at www.fanniemae.com/mbsdisclosure. From this address, investors can access information and 

documents about our MBS, including prospectuses and related prospectus supplements.

We are providing our website address solely for your information. Information appearing on our website is not 

incorporated into this report.

Our Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the second quarter of 2022.

Dividend Restrictions 

Our payment of dividends is subject to the following restrictions: 

Restrictions Relating to Conservatorship. Our conservator announced on September 7, 2008 that we would not pay any 

dividends on the common stock or on any series of preferred stock, other than the senior preferred stock. In addition, 

FHFA’s regulations relating to conservatorship and receivership operations prohibit us from paying any dividends while 

in conservatorship unless authorized by the Director of FHFA. The Director of FHFA has directed us to make dividend 

payments on the senior preferred stock on a quarterly basis for every dividend period for which dividends were payable.

Restrictions Under Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock. The senior preferred stock 

purchase agreement prohibits us from declaring or paying any dividends on Fannie Mae equity securities (other than 

the senior preferred stock) without the prior written consent of Treasury. In addition, the provisions of the senior 

preferred stock provide for dividends each quarter through and including the capital reserve end date in the amount, if 

any, by which our net worth as of the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds an applicable capital 

reserve amount. The applicable capital reserve amount is the amount of adjusted total capital necessary for us to meet 

the capital requirements and buffers set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital framework. The capital reserve end 

date is defined as the last day of the second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained 

capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital 

framework. After the capital reserve end date, the amount of quarterly dividends to Treasury will be equal to the lesser 

of any quarterly increase in our net worth and a 10% annual rate on the then-current liquidation preference of the senior 

preferred stock. As a result, our ability to retain earnings in excess of the capital requirements and buffers set forth in 

the enterprise regulatory capital framework will be limited. For more information on the terms of the senior preferred 

stock purchase agreement and senior preferred stock, see “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and 

Housing Finance Reform” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Additional Restrictions Relating to Preferred Stock. Payment of dividends on our common stock is also subject to the 

prior payment of dividends on our preferred stock and our senior preferred stock. Payment of dividends on all 

outstanding preferred stock, other than the senior preferred stock, is also subject to the prior payment of dividends on 

the senior preferred stock. 

Statutory Restrictions. Under the GSE Act, FHFA has authority to prohibit capital distributions, including payment of 

dividends, if we fail to meet our capital requirements. If FHFA classifies us as significantly undercapitalized, approval of 

the Director of FHFA is required for any dividend payment. Under the Charter Act and the GSE Act, we are not permitted 

to make a capital distribution if, after making the distribution, we would be undercapitalized. The Director of FHFA, 

however, may permit us to repurchase shares if the repurchase is made in connection with the issuance of additional 

shares or obligations in at least an equivalent amount and will reduce our financial obligations or otherwise improve our 

financial condition. 

Other Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 133
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None. 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits listed below are being filed or furnished with or incorporated by reference into this report. 

3.1 Fannie Mae Charter Act (12 U.S.C. § 1716 et seq.) as amended through July 25, 2019 (Incorporated by 

reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 

30, 2019, filed October 31, 2019.)

3.2 Fannie Mae Bylaws, as amended through January 29, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to 

Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 14, 

2019.)

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

101. INS Inline XBRL Instance Document* - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File 

because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document

101. SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*

101. CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation*

101. DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition*

101. LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label*

101. PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation*

104 Cover Page Interactive Data File* (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

Item Description

* The financial information contained in these Inline XBRL documents is unaudited.

Other Information

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 134
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be 

signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Federal National Mortgage Association

By: /s/ David C. Benson

David C. Benson

President and Interim Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 29, 2022

By: /s/ Chryssa C. Halley

Chryssa C. Halley

Executive Vice President and 

Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 29, 2022

Signatures

Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q 135