alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021297EN.01004201.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — KZ v Commission

(Case T-453/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2019 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Plea of illegality - Leave on personal grounds - Ineligibility for promotion)

(2021/C 297/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KZ (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Commission, published in Administrative Notices No 32-2019 of 14 November 2019, not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials promoted in the 2019 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KZ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KZ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                    AND
                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Carl Suter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 14, 2003
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 70 

Expressing support for the designation of February 1, 2023, as ‘‘George 

Washington Carver Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mrs. BRITT, and 

Mr. WARNOCK) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of February 1, 2023, 

as ‘‘George Washington Carver Day’’. 

Whereas George Washington Carver was one of the greatest 

agricultural scientists and humanitarians in the United 

States in the 20th century; 

Whereas George Washington Carver was born enslaved in 

Missouri circa 1864 and eventually pursued higher education at Simpson College in Iowa; 

Whereas George Washington Carver was the first Black student and first Black faculty member at Iowa State University and later earned international renown at 

Tuskegee University in Alabama where he served as a 

faculty member for more than 45 years and as Agricultural Director; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 70 ATS 

Whereas George Washington Carver gained an international 

reputation for his research, teaching, and outreach and 

created hundreds of agricultural products, including new 

varieties of peanuts, soybeans, sweet potatoes, and other 

crops; and 

Whereas the humanitarian efforts of George Washington 

Carver changed the lives of countless farmers and families in poverty: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of February 1, 2023, as ‘‘George Washington Carver 

3 Day’’ to celebrate and commemorate the enduring legacy 

4 and contributions of George Washington Carver to the 

5 United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2022095EN.01003101.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Skechers USA v EUIPO (ARCH FIT)

(Case T-598/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark ARCH FIT - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 95/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Skechers USA, Inc. II (Manhattan Beach, California, United States) (represented by: T. Holman and A. Reid, Solicitors, and J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2020 (Case R 2631/2019-1), relating to an application for registration of the word sign ARCH FIT as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Skechers USA, Inc. II to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Skechers USA, Inc. II to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.

---
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jean Vezina, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
|   | /s/ Jean Vezina                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Jean Vezina

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

January 6, 2006

 

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Expert



G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
                                                            330 E. Warm Springs
                                                            Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                                   702.257.1984
                                                             702.362.0540 (fax)


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



May 13, 2002

To Whom It May Concern:

I have issued my report dated May 13, 2002, accompanying the financial
statements of Nuclear Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period of February
27, 1997 (inception date) through December 31, 2001.  I hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Annual Report of Nuclear
Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-KSB (File No. 000-31959).

Signed,


/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
-----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA

<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/ RULE 15d-14(a) OF**

**THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,**

**AS AMENDED**

 

I, Larry C. Heaton II, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Curon Medical, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  March 29, 2005
# C_2021072EN.01001001.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/10

---

Appeal brought on 17 July 2020 by Veselin Atanasov Vasilev against the order of the General Court delivered on 7 July 2020 in Case T-273/20, Vasilev v Bulgaria

(Case C-320/20 P)

(2021/C 72/12)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Appellant: Veselin Atanasov Vasilev (represented by: B. Kolev, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: Republic of Bulgaria

By order of 12 January 2021, the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded.

---
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 Subsidiaries of Hydril Company
Percentage of Voting Securities Owned by Hydril Company Hydril General LLC (Delaware)
    
    
    100
    %Hydril Company LP (Delaware)
    
    
    1
    %Hydril Limited LLC LP (Delaware)
    
    
    100
    %Hydril Company LP LP (Delaware)
    
    
    99
    %Hydril Acquisition Sub, Inc. LP (Delaware)
    
    
    100
    %3084408 Nova Scotia Company
    
    
    100
    %RF Ironworks Limited Partnership
    
    
    (1)99
    %Hydril Canadian Company Limited Partnership
    
    
    (4)99.9
    %3078778 Nova Scotia Company
    
    
    100
    %3083489 Nova Scotia Company
    
    
    100
    %Hydril S.A. (Switzerland)
    
    
    (2)53
    %Hydril U.K. Ltd. (England, U.K.)
    
    
    100
    %Rototec Ltd. (Scotland, U.K.)
    
    
    100
    %Hydril Private Ltd. (Republic of Singapore)
    
    
    100
    %Technical Drilling & Production Services Nigeria, Ltd. (Nigeria)
    
    
    60
    %P.T. Hydril Indonesia
    
    
    (3)99
    %Hydril S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
    
    
    100
    %Bettis de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
    
    
    100
    %SubSea MudLift Drilling Company, LLC (Delaware)
    
    
    100
    %
   (1)
    
    3078778 Nova Scotia Company owns the remaining 1% equity interest in RF Ironworks Limited Partnership.(2)
    
    Hydril Private Ltd. owns the remaining 47% equity interest in Hydril S.A.(3)
    
    Hydril Company owns the remaining 1%.(4)
    
    3083489 Nova Scotia Company owns the remaining 0.1% equity interest in Hydril Canadian Company Limited Partnership.
# C_2022148EN.01002302.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — OJ v Commission

(Case T-709/20) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Recruitment - Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 - Decision to refuse to extend the test dates for a competition - Time limits set for passing a selection test in a test centre - Right to a fair procedure - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Equal treatment)

(2022/C 148/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: OJ (represented by: H.-E. von Harpe, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, in essence, annulment of the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 30 January 2020, by which that office refused to extend the date of the selection test for competition EPSO/AD/380/19.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders OJ to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OJ to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
#### B. F. McCoy, Appellant, v. Bessie Wetherell Coats, and E. Rossel Coats, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed December 20, 1927.

*Bo/rt A. Riley,*for Appellant;

*Gardiner*c6 *Brass,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders and decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court, that there is no error in the said orders and decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders and decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0308. EVERETT v. WEAVER et al.

The Court having received from the appellant no opposition to the MOTION

TO DISMISS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF APPELLEES, and the appellant having

failed to file an enumeration of errors and brief, the motion to dismiss is hereby

GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/30/2015

November 30, 2015
!

!"!#$

%&'(

)*+,
-

.

/	-,(

0!#!1!234567897:

 	;(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

=>?@ ABC?@ DE F GH;	;(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I JKK--(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 LM,&(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<GJ(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

N;	HO(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

P 	;Q-K+,-HR&STTUO	KH&R-(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

V '+	H&K*W(<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

X JK;H++K,&<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<	&KU-&+OW	;;*H&R,,K-+	&KH&R

,Y+M*	,Y+MMHRM-+Z,Q+,Y+M-+	+,Y<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

	&KH--QK+M*	OHZ&-&Q;*,Y<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

[ JK;H++K+,U	Z+HZ*Y,+MY,OO,\H&RZ,Q+-(

]^_C@` abcB??B^de>@f`

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

7ghijhklmn

opqrpstuvwxyzzyu{

|pzw}~uqrswq

xppruqrwsw

yw

wqpy

 

uvwpqrpspzw}p{

tuvwxyzzyu{opqrps

wuyuzwuzuqwpq

 

zzyspy 



¡y qypq¢p

¡y qypqxp tusuq} 

£¤¥¦§ ̈©a«©¬¥­®¥¬ ̄°±2¥±3¤ ̈© ́μ

££¶

· ̧1o ̧» ̧»

Case 23-43535-mxm11 Doc 17 Filed 11/20/23 Entered 11/20/23 09:07:35 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
	




	







	
 	




!

"#$		%


	



 


	







!

""&


	










!

"'(

)
*

+,	

-	

.

/0

 	1234567869



!

:5;93<=11>865;83? @5A9B3C5?DE;F>9

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

"HI	!GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

"JI	K!GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

LMNOPNQRST

U

U

U

VWX

YZ[\]^Y__[`

abacYdefgg`hXi`gj`kljfm`cnbb

oZppZqkrstuabc

Case 23-43535-mxm11 Doc 17 Filed 11/20/23 Entered 11/20/23 09:07:35 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
	




			
 	 !"#$%&'"()'*%)+,"'(-./,"00)'1)234+-56"3#7++8#9:;:<=>;?@A:B??CAC9 

	
DD	!"#$%D 



 EFGFHI<		  
	
		I<D	 JKLLMMNFGHOPFI<		  
	
	Q
R
DJKLLMM	Q	SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS T	U  SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Q
	U VWXYZ[\\[W]^_`a_b ccdcedfgfh /s/ Jake William Gordon

Case 23-43535-mxm11 Doc 17 Filed 11/20/23 Entered 11/20/23 09:07:35 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
HEATED PAVEMENTS (RPD 155)

Outcomes
        - Greater Airport Operational Safety
        - Improved System Efficiency
        - Reduced Environmental Impact

Rationale

The heated pavement project seeks to develop advanced materials, processes, and construction techniques to economically heat airport pavements for winter operations.

Projects	

Contract Funds ($K)
|                                         |        | FY14   | FY15 | FY16 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|------|------|
| Geothermal Heated Pavement              |        |        |      |      |
| Heated Pavements Economic Analysis      |        | $400   |      |      |
| Advanced Materials for Heated Pavements |        | $300   | $250 | $300 |
| Advanced Construction Techniques        |        | $300   | $250 | $350 |
|                                         | TOTAL: | $1,000 | $500 | $650 |

*

RPD 155: Heated Pavements Requirements for 2015
| Testing - Advanced materials for heated pavements.                                                | 250 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
| Testing - Advanced construction techniques for                                  heated pavements. | 250 |
||
||
||
||
| TOTAL                                                                                             | 500 |

RPD 155: Heated PavementsRequirements for 2016
|  Advanced materials for heated pavements                | 300 |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----|
| Advanced construction techniques for heated   pavements. | 350 |
||
||
||
||
| TOTAL                                                    | 650 |
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
      McKeever, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 10, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                James McKeever
              James
                  McKeeverInterim
                  Chief Financial
                  Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31708]

[[Page 698]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1145 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-930, K2025-931.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31708 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Markeisha THOMAS v. Adrian R. EDMONDS

2160864

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.