alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Jodie P. Morrison, certify that:





1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; and





2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








/s/ Jodie P. MorrisonJodie P. Morrison Interim Chief Executive Officer   Principal Executive Officer




















Date: April 30, 2018







































































































---





















Exhibit 31.2.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Scott A. Holmes, certify that:





1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; and





2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Scott A. Holmes  Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer























Date: April 30, 2018
Jonathan BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Raymond RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 517 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 517

  Congratulating the Columbus Crew for winning the 2023 Major League 
                              Soccer Cup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2023

     Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Vance) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating the Columbus Crew for winning the 2023 Major League 
                              Soccer Cup.

Whereas, on December 9, 2023, the Columbus Crew defeated the Los Angeles 
        Football Club by a score of 2 to 1 in Columbus, Ohio, in the 2023 Major 
        League Soccer (referred to in this preamble as the ``MLS'') Cup;
Whereas the Columbus Crew have captured their third MLS Cup in franchise history 
        and have brought the Philip F. Anschutz Trophy back to Columbus;
Whereas every member of the 2023 Columbus Crew team played an integral role in 
        bringing the MLS Cup to Columbus;
Whereas the Columbus Crew's fans set the franchise's single-season attendance 
        record in 2023 and helped provide a crucial home-field advantage in the 
        playoffs and Cup Final; and
Whereas the 2023 Columbus Crew have brought pride and elation to Columbus and 
        the entire State of Ohio by winning the 2023 MLS Cup: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the Columbus Crew for winning the 2023 
        Major League Soccer Cup;
            (2) recognizes the contributions and achievements of all 
        the players, coaches, and staff who contributed to the 2023 
        season;
            (3) applauds the fans of the Columbus Crew; and
            (4) respectfully directs the Secretary of the Senate to 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to--
                    (A) the president and general manager of the 
                Columbus Crew, Central Ohio native Tim Bezbatchenko;
                    (B) proud Ohioan and captain of the Columbus Crew, 
                Darlington Nagbe; and
                    (C) the board of directors of the Nordecke 
                supporters collective, one of the great fan bases in 
                Major League Soccer who helped ``Save The Crew''.
                                 <all>
```
BOVE GRAND, INC., d/b/a Westshore Pizza Village Center, Appellant, v. Angeline DIAMOND, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - (-)documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan

newsletter        November 30, 2014      Earth Science Matters - Volume 1, Fall 2014

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
Ronald RICKS v. STATE

CR-16-0006

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
# C_2022424EN.01000601.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt B v W AG

(Case C-538/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment - Articles 49 and 54 TFEU - Deduction of final losses incurred by a non-resident permanent establishment - State which has waived its power to impose taxes under a double taxation convention - Comparability of situations)

(2022/C 424/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt B

Defendant: W AG

Intervener: Bundesministerium der Finanzen

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 and 54 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding a tax system of a Member State under which a company resident in that Member State may not deduct from its taxable profits the final losses incurred by its permanent establishment situated in another Member State where the Member State of residence has waived its power to tax the profits of that permanent establishment under a double taxation convention.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.

---
Case 2:03-cv-00086-J Document 16 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 81
KOZMA INVESTIMENTOS, LTDA, Appellant, v. Edson Pereira DUDA and Natalina Sacchi Duda, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-602

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 14
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 21 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 10:55:54 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 14
# C_2022340EN.01004101.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/41

---

Order of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — JP v Commission

(Case T-638/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Open competition - Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 340/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JP (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 10 December 2019 by which the selection board for Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 refused, after review, to include her name on the reserve list of successful candidates in that competition, and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | JP shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

JP shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
# 3.1

Page 3 - &P	

# 3.2

Page 3 - &P	

# 3.3

Page 3 - &P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  ____Chan Chi Fai_________
Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO Date:  August 14, 2008
Henry Enrique COLLAZO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1799

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D. E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*398We affirm Appellant's conviction, but remand to the circuit court to correct a scrivener's error in the judgment and sentence, which should reflect that Appellant's conviction for count two was vacated at sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
# C_2021310EN.01003201.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/32

---

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2021 — TrekStor GmbH v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective cover for computer hardware)

(Case T-512/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a protective cover for computer hardware - Ground for invalidity - Unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Request that witnesses be heard - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 310/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor GmbH (Bensheim, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zagg Inc. (Midvale, Utah, United States) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2020 (Case R 294/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between TrekStor and Zagg.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | TrekStor GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

TrekStor GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.

---
#### W. G. Gilcrease, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed January 4, 1928.

Petition for Rehearing Denied February 1, 1928.

*1190
      *Davis*and *Pepper,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *H. E. Carter,*Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted of murder in the second degree in tbe Circuit Court of Taylor County. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment at bard labor in tbe State Penitentiary and seeks reversal of that judgment on tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence to sustain tbe verdict, error in tbe admission and rejection of testimony and tbe refusal of tbe trial court to give certain charges requested by tbe plaintiff in error.

We have examined the record carefully and while tbe conviction is predicated on circumstantial evidence we think it complies with tbe rule announced by this Court in Hall v. State, 90 Fla. 719, 107 So. 246 and cases there cited. It was, therefore, sufficient to sustain tbe conviction. We find no error in tbe admission or rejection of testimony and the charges requested seem to have been sufficiently covered in tbe general charge given at tbe conclusion of tbe trial.

*1191This Court has repeatedly called the attention of counsel to the vice of assigning innumerable errors. Hoopes v. Crane, 56 Fla. 395, 47 So. 992; Mitchell v. Mason, 65 Fla. 208, 61 So. 579; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Whitney, 65 Fla. 72, 61 So. 179; Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Knowles, 68 Fla. 400, 67 So. 122; Linsley v. State, 88 Fla. 135, 101 So. 273. Here we have a record of slightly over two hundred pages, yet there are one hundred and twenty-five errors assigned. That so many errors could have been made in the trial of a case like this is beyond the comprehension of an appellate court. The sole predicate for an assignment of error is an incorrect ruling of the trial court on some question of evidentiary, procedural or pure law presented to him in due course. It should then be assigned for the purpose of correcting the trial court and arriving at a proper determination of the real issues presented in the controversy. Assigned on any other basis an assignment is in bad taste and has no place in the record. •

The judgment of the Circiut Court of Taylor County is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion.

Strum, J., not participating.
IN RE: James E. MOORE, Jr.

NO. 2019-B-0163

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent was charged with multiple criminal offenses relating to substance use. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that James E. Moore, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 21758, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, retroactive to January 31, 2018, the date of his interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that following his suspension, respondent shall be placed on probation for a period to coincide with the term of his recovery agreement with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Clark, J., would reject consent discipline.
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-58298,No. 333-129152, No. 333-147448 and No. 333-161459 on Form S-8of our reports dated February 26, 2010 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule ofOrient-Express Hotels Ltd. and subsidiaries, which reports (1) express anunqualified opinion and include an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoptionof the non-controlling interest guidance from Accounting Standards Codification810, Consolidations (formerly SFAS 160, Non-Controlling Interests inConsolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB 51) and (2) expressan unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. andsubsidiaries internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and subsidiariesfor the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte  LLP       |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| London,  England        |
| February 26,  2010 |

 

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 23, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-01070-CV

ACQUIRE OILFIELD SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant

V.

WEBB TEX, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-08583

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel

Before the Court is the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal with 

prejudice because they have settled their differences. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

231070f.p05

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ACQUIRE OILFIELD 

SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant

No. 05-23-01070-CV V.

WEBB TEX, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-08583.

Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. 

Justices Reichek and Carlyle 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee 

WEBB TEX, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ACQUIRE 

OILFIELD SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of January, 2024.
Jerome NUBIN, Appellant, v. Frank SCHWARTZ, Administrator of South Florida Evaluation and Treatment Center, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christina ESTES v. TENNESSEE VALLEY PRINTING CO.

2160677

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4

AMENDMENT TO THE 

ASHLAND INC. EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN 

WHEREAS, Ashland Inc. (the “Corporation”) established the Ashland Inc. Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”)
originally effective as of June 1, 1964 for the benefit of employees eligible to participate therein; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant
to Article 20 of the Plan, the Corporation, as sponsor of the Plan, has retained the authority to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; and 

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act for federal tax law purposes;
consequently, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19 detailing the rules for identifying same-sex spouses in a qualified retirement plan (collectively, the “Guidance”); and 

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to conform to the Guidance; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended retroactively to be effective as of June 26, 2013 as
follows: 
  

	I.	The following definition of Spouse shall be added to Section 2.1 of the Plan: 


“Spouse” shall mean the spouse of a Member determined by Federal law applicable to Code §401(a) as announced in
Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and Notice 2014-19; provided that to the extent required by a qualified domestic relations order pursuant to the terms of this Plan, a former Spouse of the Member shall be treated as the Spouse of the Member. 

 

	II.	The term “spouse” wherever found in the Plan shall be amended to be a capitalized word and carry with it the definition of Spouse as provided herein. 


 

	III.	In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged. 

 [signature page immediately
follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed
this 26 day of Sept., 2014. 
  

							
	ATTEST:	 		 	ASHLAND INC.
				
	 /s/ Peter J. Ganz
	 		 	By:	  	 /s/ Robin Swanson

	Secretary	 		 	Director, Global HR Opns. & Benefits


  
 -2-