alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Daniel C. HOWARD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4372

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2023104EN.01002302.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — SJ v Commission

(Case T-659/20) (1)

(Directive 2014/25/EU - Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors - Implementing decision on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25 to railway passenger transport in Sweden - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard)

(2023/C 104/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SJ AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: J. Karlsson and M. Johansson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Baches Opi, P. Ondrůšek and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: M. Salborn Hodgson, H. Eklinder, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, H. Shev, R. Shahsavan Eriksson and O. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Article 2 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1193 of 2 July 2020 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to railway passenger transport in Sweden (OJ 2020 L 262, p. 18), by which the European Commission decided that Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 243) continued to apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable activities related to the provision of commercially operated railway passenger services to be carried out in the territory of Sweden.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 2 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1193 of 2 July 2020 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to railway passenger transport in Sweden; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 2 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1193 of 2 July 2020 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to railway passenger transport in Sweden;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 1st Quarter 2005 ending November 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert V. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert V. JohnsonRobert V. Johnson Chief Financial Officer February 28, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Nellie Austin, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed August 1, 1927.

*S. K. Gillis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*497
      *J. B. Johnson,*Attorney General, and if. *E. Carter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

In this ease the judgment is affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Annie Fields v. State of Florida, filed at this term of the Court.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Silvergraph International, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/James R. Simpson James R. Simpson Chief Executive Officer Date: April 16, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 687-688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

[[Page 688]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1188 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-983, K2025-982.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31743 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

With reference to the Quarterly Report of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Abrams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANIEL ABRAMS      
|DANIEL ABRAMS          
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2006
# C_2016175EN.01002201.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/22

---

Action brought on 21 March 2016 — Arctic Cat v EUIPO — Slazengers (Representation of a panther)

(Case T-113/16)

(2016/C 175/26)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arctic Cat, Inc. (Thief River Falls, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: M. Hartmann and S. Fröhlich, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Slazengers Ltd (Burnham, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark (Representation of a panther) — International registration designating the European Union No 941 684

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2016 in Case R 2953/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision insofar as the appeal was dismissed and the partial refusal of protection of IR No 941 684 in respect of the European Union for the goods claimed in class 25 (‘Power sport vehicle-specific clothing, including protective outwear, balaclavas and face masks’) was confirmed; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision insofar as the appeal was dismissed and the partial refusal of protection of IR No 941 684 in respect of the European Union for the goods claimed in class 25 (‘Power sport vehicle-specific clothing, including protective outwear, balaclavas and face masks’) was confirmed;

| — | allow protection of IR No 941 684 in respect of the European Union also for the goods claimed in class 25 (‘Power sport vehicle-specific clothing, including protective outwear, balaclavas and face masks’); |
| --- | --- |

—

allow protection of IR No 941 684 in respect of the European Union also for the goods claimed in class 25 (‘Power sport vehicle-specific clothing, including protective outwear, balaclavas and face masks’);

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | order Slazengers Ltd to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Slazengers Ltd to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
J.S., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1222

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Affirmed.
# C_2020036EN.01003801.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/38

---

Action brought on 6 December 2019 – CrossFit v EUIPO – Hochwarter (CROSSBOX)

(Case T-835/19)

(2020/C 36/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CrossFit Inc. (Scotts Valley, California, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marlis Hochwarter (Vienna, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark CROSSBOX – European Union trade mark No 12 503 471

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 in Case R 1832/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Anton Caron COOLEY

NO. 2018-KO-1160

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

Denied.
EX PARTE Alvin WHITE

CR-14-1321

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. granted.
# C_2017249EN.01002802.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/28

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 May 2017 — Enrico Colombo and Corinti Giacomo v Commission

(Case T-690/16 R)

((Interim measures - Public procurement - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2017/C 249/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Enrico Colombo SpA (Sesto Calende, Italy) and Corinti Giacomo (Ispra, Italy) (represented by: R. Colombo and G. Turri, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: P. Rosa Plaza, S. Delaude and L. Di Paolo, acting as Agents) and Carmet Sas di Fietta Graziella & C.

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures ordering, first, suspension of implementation of the Commission measures leading to the rejection of the applicants’ tender in the context of the call for tenders JRC/IPR/2016/C.4/0002/OC and, secondly, in essence, suspension of the contract concluded between the Commission and the successful tenderer in respect of that call for tenders.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures insofar as it is directed against Carmet Sas di Fietta Graziella & C. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures insofar as it is directed against Carmet Sas di Fietta Graziella & C.

| 2. | The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.

| 3. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2022463EN.01004302.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/43

---

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — KRBL v EUIPO — P.K. Overseas (INDIA SALAM Pure Basmati Rice)

(Case T-45/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Expiry of the international registration of the mark applied for - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 463/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KRBL Ltd (Delhi, India) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Crawcour, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: P.K. Overseas Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 November 2019 (Case R 766/2019-4).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | KRBL Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

KRBL Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.

---
Case 2:04-cv-00088-J Document 29 Filed 12/28/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 96
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

     WHEREAS, Avaya Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"Company"), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under
the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002; and

     WHEREAS, the undersigned is a Director (and/or Officer) of the Company, as
indicated below his or her signature:

     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Garry K.
McGuire Sr. and Charles D. Peiffer and each of them, as attorneys, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name, place and stead
of the undersigned, and in the capacity of the undersigned as a Director and
Officer of the Company, to execute and file such Form 10-K and any amendments or
supplements thereto, with all exhibits thereto, hereby giving and granting to
said attorneys, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or
cause to be done, by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney
this 19th day of December 2002.


By:  /s/ Donald K. Peterson                     By:  /s/ Paula Stern
    -------------------------------                 ----------------------------
    Name:  Donald K. Peterson                       Name:  Paula Stern
    Title: Chairman of the Board,                   Title: Director
           President and CEO


By:  /s/ Mark Leslie                            By: /s/ Ronald L. Zarrella
    -------------------------------                 ----------------------------
    Name:  Mark Leslie                              Name:  Ronald L. Zarrella
    Title: Director                                 Title: Director


By:  /s/ Philip A. Odeen
    -------------------------------
    Name:  Philip A. Odeen
    Title: Director


By: /s/ Dan C. Stanzione
    -------------------------------
    Name:  Dan C. Stanzione
    Title: Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market Leader, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ian Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jacqueline Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: November 4, 2009



/s/ IAN MORRISIan MorrisChief Executive Officer and President/s/ JACQUELINE DAVIDSONJacqueline DavidsonChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
| 1. | The Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period  ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: June 6, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Gary Berthold                  |   |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Gary Berthold (Chief Executive Officer) |   |

| Date: June 6, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Gary Berthold                  |   |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Gary Berthold (Chief Financial Officer) |   |
# C_2022073EN.01003901.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — HB v EIB

(Case T-689/20) (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Dismissal - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Lack of competence of the author of the act)

(2022/C 73/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: HB (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking annulment of the decision of the EIB of 27 April 2020 terminating the applicant’s employment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders HB to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders HB to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB).

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---