alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 269 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 269

 Designating July 22, 2023, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2023

 Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Hickenlooper, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Rounds, 
 Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Thune, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Hoeven, 
 Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kelly, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Ricketts) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                             July 18, 2023

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 22, 2023, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ``cowboys'', helped to establish 
        the American West;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, sound family 
        values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, geographic 
        boundaries, and political affiliations;
Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the 
        environment, is an excellent steward of the land and its creatures;
Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations;
Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the economy through the 
        work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who 
        contribute to the economic well-being of every State;
Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working ranch rodeo events 
        annually, making rodeo one of the most-watched sports in the United 
        States;
Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that 
        promote and encompass the livelihood of cowboys span every generation 
        and transcend race and gender;
Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and music and 
        occupies a central place in the public imagination;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and cowgirls to their 
        communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 22, 2023, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Matthew STROJEK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 4, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021217EN.01004401.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — KM v Commission

(Case T-374/20) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Surviving spouse - Survivor’s pension - Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Conditions for eligibility - Duration of the marriage - Plea of illegality - Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age - Proportionality)

(2021/C 217/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: KM (represented by: M. Müller-Trawinski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch and U. Rösslein, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission’s decision of 7 October 2019, refusing the request to grant a survivor’s pension to the applicant and, second, an order that the Commission adopt a new decision and grant a survivor’s pension to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 7 October 2019, refusing the request to grant a survivor’s pension to KM; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 7 October 2019, refusing the request to grant a survivor’s pension to KM;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by KM; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by KM;

| 4. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case 23-42519-elm13 Doc 23 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 11:01:45 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 7
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANGEL RAMOS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 2 63

- C R

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20060D05748 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Angel Ramos is attempting to appeal two judgments of conviction. We dismiss for want of

jurisdiction.

In a criminal case, a notice of appeal must be filed (1) within 30 days after the day sentence

is imposed or suspended in open court or (2) within 90 day s after the day sentence is imposed or

suspended in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.2(a).

The appellate court may extend the time to file the notice of appeal if it receives a motion for an

extension of time within 15 days of the notice of appeal due date. T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.3.

Here, b oth judgments of conviction in this case show that the trial court sentenced Ramos

on March 11, 2011. Ramos’ notice of appeal and motion for extension of time to file the notice of

appeal, filed October 21, 2019, are untimely. We are without jurisdiction to hear Ramos’ appeal.2

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

December 5 , 201 9

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do N ot P ublish)
Christopher SCHOFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Sheriff of Polk County, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Centale, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   February 14, 2007 /s/ Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr. Thaddeus A. Wier, Jr. (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
N.F., the Child, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter
      63
      of title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as an officer of Sea
      Sun
      Capital Corporation (“Sea Sun”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of
      Sea Sun on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies
      with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Sea
      Sun.








Dated:
      November 29, 2006





/s/ Graham
              MillingtonGraham Millington,
              Chief Executive Officer/s/ Gregory
              N. HellerGregory N. Heller, Chief Financial
              Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10221

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Austin Lavy Jackson, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:20-CR-55-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Defendant-Appellant Austin Lavy Jackson appeals the 240-month,

within-guidelinesterm of imprisonment imposed following his conviction for 

distribution and receipt of child pornography. He challenges only the 

substantive reasonableness of his sentence, asserting that it is greater than 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10221 Document: 00515984828 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2021
No. 21-10221

2

necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He alleges

that his sentence fails to reflect that: (1) He had “no prior arrests or 

convictions”; (2) “he never produced pornography or enticed others to be 

photographed or recorded”; (3) “he only shared the pornography with one 

other person and only on two occasions”; (4) “most of the pornography he 

viewed involved postpubescent teenage boys who were relatively close to his 

own age”; and (5) “he deleted his photos and videos prior to his arrest.”

We review a preserved challenge to the substantive reasonableness of 

the sentence imposed by the district court for abuse of discretion. See United 

States v. Johnson, 619 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir. 2010). We apply a rebuttable 

presumption of reasonableness when a sentence falls within a properly 

calculated guidelines range. United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th 

Cir. 2009).

The record reflects that the district court considered Jackson’s 

mitigation arguments and his request for a sentence below the guidelines 

range. The district court nevertheless concluded that a sentence within the 

guidelines range was warranted based on the § 3553(a) factors. Jackson has 

not shown that the district court did not account for a factor that should have 

received significant weight, gave significant weight to an improper factor, or 

made a clear error in balancing the sentencing factors. See id. His 

disagreement with the district court’s balancing of the sentencing factors is 

insufficient to rebut the presumption of reasonableness. See United States v. 

Koss, 812 F.3d 460, 472 (5th Cir. 2016).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-10221 Document: 00515984828 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2021
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------


In connection  with the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the "Report") of
Alpha Holding, Inc. now known as Sea Sun Capital Corporation (the "Company") for
the year ended December 31, 2003, the  undersigned,  Wayne Izumi, the Treasurer,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to the  best  of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2005                 /s/  Wayne Izumi
                                          -----------------------
                                          Wayne Izumi
                                          Treasurer
# C_2023134EN.01001602.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/16

---

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2023 — Hansol Paper v Commission

(Case T-693/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain heavyweight thermal paper originating in South Korea - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Sales through related companies - Construction of the export price - Injury to the Union industry - Calculation of price undercutting - Calculation of the injury margin - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2023/C 134/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hansol Paper Co. Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: B. Servais and V. Crochet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Thermal Paper Association (ETPA) (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Hobbelen and B. Vleeshouwers, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1524 of 19 October 2020 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain heavyweight thermal paper originating in the Republic of Korea (OJ 2020 L 346, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Hansol Paper Co. Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Hansol Paper Co. Ltd shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 579 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Kenyon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Kenyon. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Kenyon, Cr. No. 23- 

101, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the 

production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a former 

employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:11 Mar 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR579.ATS SR579

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 579 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized 

3 to provide relevant testimony in the case of United States 

4 v. Kenyon, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

5 should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Schwager, and any current or former officer 

8 or employee of the Secretary’s office, in connection with 

9 the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 

10 resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Chancy MALLORY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

Chancy Mallory, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Ciklin, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoPetro Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stuart J. Doshi, Chief Executive Officer, and Paul D. Maniscalco, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   May 16, 2011 | /s/   Stuart J. Doshi                                              |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Stuart   J. Doshi                                                  |
|                       | President,   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board     |
|                       |                                                               |
|                       |                                                               |
| Dated:   May 16, 2011 | /s/   Paul D. Maniscalco                                           |   |
|                       | Paul   D. Maniscalco                                               |
|                       | Interim   Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GeoPetro Resources Company and will be retained by GeoPetro Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----

*              This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
SAS Chair Opening 

& Report on REDAC 

Meeting 

2020 Fall REDAC SAS Meeting 

Virtual 

August 11-12, 2020 
• • • • • • • • 

• 

• 

• 

 

REDAC Meeting Report 

October 7, 2020 

Virtual 

Agenda 

• FAA Address/NextGen Perspective – Pam Whitley 

• FAA Aircraft Systems Information Security Protection 

(ASISP) – Isidore Venetos 

• Review of FAA Research Landscapes– Steve Summer 

• Subcommittee Reports and Discussion 

2 
• • • • 

• • • • 

• 

Subcommittee Reports 

Safety 

• Review of August meeting 

• Findings & Recommendations 

• FAA’s R&D Efforts during COVID-19 Pandemic - 2 Recommendations 

• Fatigue Risk Management R&D Portfolio - 2 Recommendations 

• Aircrew Stress Biomarker Research - 1 Recommendation 

• Ice Crystal Icing - 1 Recommendation 

3 
• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Subcommittee Reports 

Airports 

• Findings & Recommendations 

• COVID-19 Pandemic Impact - 2 Recommendations 

• Emerging Pavement Additives Research - 2 Recommendations 

• Airport Technology Research Program/UAS - 1 Recommendation 

4 
• • • • • • • • 

• 

• 

 

Subcommittee Reports 

Human Factors 

• Data Analytics for Operational Personnel - 1 Recommendation 

• Workforce Proficiency Training and Risks of Skill Degradation - 1 

Recommendation 

NAS Operations 

• Research Landscapes – 1 Recommendation 

• Resilient Autonomy in the Future NAS – 1 Recommendation 

• Flight Deck Data Exchange Requirements Program Coordination – 1 

Recommendation 

5 
• • • • 

• • • • 

• 

 

Subcommittee Reports 

Environment and Energy 

• Global Leadership – 1 Recommendation 

• Public Private Partnerships – 1 Recommendation 

• Sustainable Aviation Fuels – 1 Recommendation 

• Noise Research – 1 Recommendation 

6 
• • • • • • • • 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 

 

Final Report of Findings and Recommendation Submitted to 

Administrator Dickson – October 28, 2020 

Cross Cutting Observations 

• Impact of COVID-19 on NAS and R&D Requirements 

• Impact of Automation – advances, AI/ML 

Next REDAC Meeting Date: April 21, 2021 

Questions? 

7
Norman David FREEMAN, Appellant, v. Cyril C. DESILVA, Bay Medical Center, S. Chapman, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1588

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.