alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021088EN.01004603.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/46

---

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — JD v EIB

(Case T-166/20) (1)

(2021/C 88/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
Timothy Arnell WHITE Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM
ENGINEERS





We hereby
consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F
(the "Annual Report") of Enterra Energy Trust (the "Registrant").
We hereby further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the
Registrant's Annual Information Form dated March 29, 2010 for the year
ended December 31, 2009, which document makes reference to our firm and our
report dated March 4, 2010, evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural
gas and natural gas liquids interests effective
December 31, 2009.











Signed
“P.A.
Welch”





P.A.
Welch, P. Eng.


President
& Managing Director


McDaniel
& Associates Consulting Ltd.


Calgary
Alberta Canada


March 29,
2010
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40952

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEMON DEWAYNE JACKO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CR-9-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 2, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Kemon Dewayne Jacko appeals his sentence after pleading guilty

to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. Jacko argues

that the district court erred by including the amount of cocaine

base, 27.97 grams, seized on July 26, 1996. He contends that this

amount wa s not relevant conduct; that the only information which

could connect his possession with intent to distribute cocaine base

on July 26, 1996, and October 31, 1997, was information he

proffered as part of his cooperation agreement; and he argues thatthe use of this information to determine his sentence violated his

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8 agreement with the Government. The district court

did not clearly err in finding that Jacko’s statements to the

police were not barred by § 1B1.8 from being considered to

determine his sentence. U nited States v. Gibson

, 48 F.3d 876, 878

(5th Cir. 1995). Jacko’s statement that he had sold drugs since

December 1993 bridges the relevant c onduct gap between July 26,

1996, and October 31, 1997.

Jacko argues that the district court erred by increasing his

offense level for possession of a firearm under § 2D1.1(b)(1).

However, Jacko concedes that if the July 26, 1996, conduct is

uphel d as being relevant conduct, the two-level increase for the

firearm possessed on July 26 would be properly assessed. Based on

his concession and our conclusion that the July 26, 1996, conduct

was properly considered as relevant conduct, we need not consider

this issue.

AFFIRMED.
Douglas MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1189 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-984, K2025-983.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31744 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2020247EN.01001502.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/15

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 May 2020 — Isopix v Parliament

(Case T-163/20 R and T-163/20 R II)

(Application for interim relief - Public supply contracts - Provision of photography services - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Partial manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility - Urgency - Prima facie case - Balancing of competing interests)

(2020/C 247/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isopix SA (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: P. Van den Bulck and J. Fahner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Wójcik and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU requesting, in Case T-163/20 R, suspension of the operation of the Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing the applicant that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer; and that the General Court order the Parliament to produce the tender analysis report and, in Case T-163/20 R II, suspension of the operation of the Parliament’s decision of 17 April 2020 informing the applicant that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had been rejected on the ground that it did not fulfil the selection criteria relating to financial and economic standing.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Operation of the European Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing Isopix SA that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer is suspended. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Operation of the European Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing Isopix SA that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer is suspended.

| 2. | The Parliament shall provide Isopix with a copy of the non-confidential version of the tender analysis report. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Parliament shall provide Isopix with a copy of the non-confidential version of the tender analysis report.

| 3. | The application for interim relief in Case T-163/20 R II is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The application for interim relief in Case T-163/20 R II is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 4. | The orders of 3 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R), and of 22 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R II) are rescinded. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The orders of 3 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R), and of 22 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R II) are rescinded.

| 5. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Costs are reserved.

---
**Exhibit        21.1**

**Creative        Vistas, Inc.**

**List        of subsidiaries**

| 1.   | Creative                Vistas Acquisition Corp. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | Cancable                Holding Corp. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------|
| 3.   | Iview                Holding Corp. |
|----------------|------------------------------------|
| 4.   | AC                Technical Systems Ltd. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------|
| 5.   | Cancable                Inc. |
|----------------|------------------------------|
| 6.   | Cancable,                Inc. |
|----------------|-------------------------------|
| 7.   | Iview                Digital Video Solutions Inc. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| 8.   | 2141306                Ontario Inc. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------|
| 9.   | Cancable                XL Inc. |
|----------------|---------------------------------|
| 10.   | XL                Digital Services Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|

----
Antonio WILBURN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2602

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

Board of Directors
Trend Mining Company
(Formerly Silver Trend Mining Company)
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho



                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of our review report dated February 16, 2001 (except for
Notes 14 and 15, as to which the date is May 17, 2001), on the financial
statements of Trend Mining Company (an exploration stage company) as of December
31, 2000, for the filing with and attachment to the Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.

Williams & Webster, P.S.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Spokane, Washington

May 21, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bravo Resource Partners Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:  June 16, 2011

/s/ Tyrone CarterTyrone Carter,  Acting Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Tyrone CarterTyrone Carter,  Acting Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.5


 


Magna Management LLC 


40 Wall Street, 58th Floor


New York, NY 10005


 


September 13, 2016


M I Acquisitions, Inc.

c/o Magna Management LLC


40 Wall Street, 58th Floor


New York, NY 10005


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) relating to the initial public offering of the securities of M I Acquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”)
and continuing until the consummation by the Company of its initial business combination or the distribution of the trust
account to the Company’s then public shareholders (as described in the Registration Statement), Magna Management LLC (the
“Firm”) shall make available to the Company certain general and administrative services, including the use of office
space, utilities and secretarial support, as may be required by the Company from time to time, at 40 Wall Street, 58th
Floor, New York, NY 10005 (or any successor location). In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay the Firm at the rate of $10,000
per month. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company’s audit committee determines that the Company lacks sufficient funds
outside of the trust account to pay its actual or anticipated expenses, all payments hereunder shall be deferred until the consummation
of its initial business combination. Any such deferred amount shall accrue without interest and be due and payable no later than
the date of the consummation of our initial business combination.







	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	MAGNA MANAGEMENT LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Joshua Sason
	 	Name:	Joshua Sason
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


	
        Agreed to and Accepted as of the date first written 
	 
	above by:	 
	 	 
	M I ACQUISITIONS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Joshua Sason	 
	Name:	Joshua Sason	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31733]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1174 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-962, K2025-961.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31733 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00085]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2587-066]

Northern States Power Company; Notice of Reasonable Period of 
Time for Water Quality Certification Application

    On December 16, 2024, the Michigan Department of Environment, Great 
Lakes, and Energy (Michigan EGLE) submitted to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) notice that it received a request 
for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification as 
defined in 40 CFR 121.5, from Northern States Power Company, in 
conjunction with the above captioned project on December 6, 2024. 
Pursuant to section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ we 
hereby notify Michigan EGLE of the following dates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: December 6, 2024.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year, December 6, 2025.
    If Michigan EGLE fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying 
authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: December 31, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00085 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
# C_2016364EN.01002001.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/20

---

Action brought on 31 July 2016 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-414/16)

(2016/C 364/18)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s application admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s application admissible and well-founded;

| — | as a consequence, annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant raises five pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-411/16, Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00437-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 352-323156-21

Before Womack, Kerr, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MCMAHAN’S FLOORING, INC., Appellant

V.

SHELLY MORRISON AND STEVE HOWE, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant’s “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss.” We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 28, 2022
NO. 07-05-0393-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	DECEMBER 21, 2006

	______________________________

	BARBARA STONE, 	

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2004-407,187; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	DISSENT

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion to the extent it holds that appellant’s consent was voluntary and sufficiently attenuated from the illegal entry and detention.  Simply put, there is no material distinction between the facts here and those in Grimaldo v. State, No. 07-04-0245-CR, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 1824 (Tex. App.–Amarillo March 8, 2006, no pet. h.); thus, the decision in Grimaldo controls the outcome at bar.   

	The decision to enter without a valid warrant was made once it was determined that the substance obtained from the house was contraband.  That is, the officers “decided to go ahead and make entry into the apartment, secure the persons inside, either until [they] could obtain a search warrant or [they] could obtain consent to search from whoever was in charge of the residence.”  So, the purpose of the officers was clear when they undertook to unlawfully enter the home with guns drawn.  They were intent on conducting a search, one way or the other.

	Additionally, it is difficult to deny that police observation of the contraband arose from the unlawful entry into and sweep of the location.  Again, no warrant authorized the entry or a search, the contraband they sought was not within plain view, and mere minutes lapsed from the decision to undertake forced entry to the discovery of the cocaine.  

	Finally, while it may be that appellant was told of her right to refuse consent, one can only wonder if her response evinced a legitimate choice.  By that time, the officers had already entered the home illegally with guns drawn, and seized all present without legal justification.  Nothing of record suggests that the officers would have left the premises or momentarily released their detainees had consent been denied.  The contrary would seem true given the general intent to search one way or another.  Nor can I discount the undeniable affect on one’s ability to think clearly of the unlawful presence of armed police officers roaming throughout the home.  

	As previously stated, the circumstances here are materially indistinguishable from those in Grimaldo.  So, I conclude that appellant’s motion to suppress should have been granted.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice

Publish.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Calamos Asset Management, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   May 11, 2009/s/ John P. Calamos, Sr.John P. Calamos, Sr.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Co-Chief Investment Officer