|
|
|
|
|
|

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

|
|
|
|

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

|    |                                                                                        
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

or

|    |                                                                                         
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission File No. 333-119231

|
|
|
|

NALCO FINANCE HOLDINGS LLC(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Delaware


61-1464558(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)


(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)1601 West Diehl Road
Naperville, IL 60563-1198
(630) 305-1000(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)Not applicable(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes[X]No[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘accelerated filer and large accelerated filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer[ ]


Accelerated filer[ ]


Non-accelerated filer[X]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes[ ]No[X]

|
|
|
|
|
|

---



QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
NALCO FINANCE HOLDINGS LLC
Quarter Ended September 30, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial InformationItem 1.


Financial Statements (Unaudited)Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006




2Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006




3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006




4Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – September 30, 2007




5Item 2.


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




13Item 3.


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk




28Item 4.


Controls and Procedures




28Part II. Other InformationItem 1.


Legal Proceedings




29Item 6.


Exhibits




29Signature




30


1

---



PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

|        |                     
|------- | --------------------
|Item 1. | Financial Statements

Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in millions)

(Unaudited)
September 30,
2007


December 31,
2006AssetsCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents



$
117.9




$
37.3Accounts receivable, less allowances of $20.5 in 2007 and $19.0 in 2006




792.5





695.3Inventories:Finished products




289.0





264.5Materials and work in process




82.9





76.2371.9





340.7Prepaid expenses, taxes and other current assets




91.4





94.1Total current assets




1,373.7





1,167.4Property, plant, and equipment, net




744.1





743.4Intangible assets:Goodwill




2,397.6





2,299.9Other intangibles, net




1,134.2





1,169.5Other assets




255.0





279.2Total assets



$
5,904.6




$
5,659.4Liabilities and unitholder’s equityCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable



$
291.2




$
288.2Short-term debt




91.2





150.2Other current liabilities




318.8





281.0Total current liabilities




701.2





719.4Other liabilities:Long-term debt




3,185.8





3,038.6Deferred income taxes




317.5





352.9Accrued pension benefits




389.4





430.7Other liabilities




257.1





250.0Minority interest




15.0





12.6Unitholder’s equity




1,038.6





855.2Total liabilities and unitholder’s equity



$
5,904.6




$
5,659.4


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

---



Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(dollars in millions)

Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Net sales



$
998.2




$
915.4




$
2,878.4




$
2,655.8Operating costs and expenses:Cost of product sold




548.2





506.2





1,588.4





1,480.7Selling, administrative, and research expenses




296.4





273.6





877.8





811.9Amortization of intangible assets




15.6





17.6





46.2





52.4Business optimization expenses




7.2





3.0





9.5





8.6Total operating costs and expenses




867.4





800.4





2,521.9





2,353.6Operating earnings




130.8





115.0





356.5





302.2Other income (expense), net




(1.9
)




0.1





(2.1
)




(0.5
)Interest income




2.7





2.4





7.2





6.4Interest expense




(68.9
)




(68.9
)




(205.3
)




(203.2
)Earnings before income taxes and minority interests




62.7





48.6





156.3





104.9Income tax provision




25.3





19.4





58.2





45.6Minority interests




(2.0
)




(1.7
)




(5.6
)




(5.2
)Net earnings



$
35.4




$
27.5




$
92.5




$
54.1


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

---



Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(dollars in millions)

Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Operating activitiesNet earnings



$
92.5




$
54.1Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:Depreciation




97.0





97.5Amortization




46.2





52.4Amortization of deferred financing costs and accretion of senior discount notes




33.7





32.5Other, net




(5.6
)




(13.6
)Changes in operating assets and liabilities




(68.3
)




(19.8
)Net cash provided by operating activities




195.5





203.1Investing activitiesAdditions to property, plant, and equipment, net




(70.3
)




(59.6
)Other, net




(12.9
)




1.8Net cash used for investing activities




(83.2
)




(57.8
)Financing activitiesCapital distributions




(37.0
)




—Changes in short-term debt, net




(20.8
)




29.3Proceeds from long-term debt




50.2





—Repayments of long-term debt




(24.1
)




(159.5
)Other, net




(4.0
)




(3.4
)Net cash used for financing activities




(35.7
)




(133.6
)Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents




4.0





0.4Increase in cash and cash equivalents




80.6





12.1Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period




37.3





30.8Cash and cash equivalents at end of period



$
117.9




$
42.9


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

---



Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

September 30, 2007

|   |                        
|-- | -----------------------
|1. | Description of Business

We are engaged in the worldwide manufacture and sale of highly specialized service chemical programs. This includes production and service related to the sale and application of chemicals and technology used in water treatment, pollution control, energy conservation, oil production and refining, steelmaking, papermaking, mining, and other industrial processes.

|   |                      
|-- | ---------------------
|2. | Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report for Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. Management believes these financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year data to conform to the current year presentation which had no effect on net earnings reported for any period.

|   |     
|-- | ----
|3. | Debt

Debt consists of the following:

(dollars in millions)


September 30,
2007


December 31,
2006Short-termChecks outstanding and bank overdrafts



$
23.6




$
25.8Notes payable to banks




10.1





0.9Current maturities of long-term debt




57.5





23.5Securitized trade accounts receivable facility




—





100.0$
91.2




$
150.2Long-termTerm loan A, due November 2009



$
68.7




$
81.0Term loan B, due November 2010




887.0





911.0Senior notes, due November 2011




948.9





928.1Senior subordinated notes, due November 2013




748.9





728.1Unsecured notes, due May 2008




27.8





27.8Senior discount notes, due February 2014




411.6





385.6Securitized trade accounts receivable facility




150.0





—Other




0.4





0.53,243.3





3,062.1Less: Current portion




57.5





23.5$
3,185.8




$
3,038.6


5

---



|   |                    
|-- | -------------------
|4. | Unitholder’s Equity

Unitholder’s equity consists of the following:

(dollars in millions)


September 30,
2007


December 31,
2006Capital account



$
751.1




$
743.3Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)




10.5





(52.9
)Accumulated other comprehensive income




277.0





164.8Total unitholder’s equity



$
1,038.6




$
855.2


The capital structure of the Company consists of one class of limited liability company interests represented by Units, which are identical with each other in every respect. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were 100 Units issued and outstanding, which were owned by Nalco Holding Company.

|   |                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------
|5. | Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

The components of net periodic pension cost and the cost of other postretirement benefits for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

Pension Benefits(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Service cost



$
7.2




$
7.7




$
21.4




$
22.3Interest cost




11.4





10.8





33.9





31.9Expected return on plan assets




(8.5
)




(7.5
)




(25.3
)




(22.2
)Prior service cost




—





0.1





0.1





0.1Net actuarial loss




0.1





0.1





0.4





0.3Settlement charge




0.1





—





0.1





0.4Net periodic cost



$
10.3




$
11.2




$
30.6




$
32.8


Other Postretirement Benefits(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Service cost



$
1.4




$
1.3




$
4.1




$
4.1Interest cost




2.1





2.1





6.2





6.1Prior service credit




(1.2
)




(1.0
)




(3.6
)




(3.0
)Net actuarial gain




(0.1
)




(0.1
)




(0.2
)




(0.2
)Net periodic cost



$
2.2




$
2.3




$
6.5




$
7.0


We now expect to contribute $85.4 million to our pension plans in 2007 compared to the $69.7 million we had expected to contribute as of December 31, 2006. The increase is mainly attributable to accelerating a portion of the contributions to be made to the principal U.S. pension plan in 2008, and resulted from guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service in August 2007 related to funding levels required by the Pension Protection Act of 2006.

|   |                               
|-- | ------------------------------
|6. | Business Optimization Expenses

We continue to redesign and optimize our business and work processes. Business process optimization expenses were $9.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as employee severance and related costs were partly offset by the impact of a $0.7 million reduction in the impairment provision

6

---



|   |                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------
|6. | Business Optimization Expenses(continued)

for a facility that was held for sale. The amount includes a $5.3 million non-cash charge that resulted from modifying the terms of some share-based compensation awards for certain exiting employees. Business process optimization expenses, consisting mostly of employee severance and related costs, were $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

|   |                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------
|7. | Summary of Other Income (Expense)

The components of other income (expense), net for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, include the following:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Franchise taxes



$
(0.7
)



$
(0.9
)



$
(2.3
)



$
(2.4
)Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries




0.1





0.5





1.0





3.1Foreign currency exchange adjustments




(1.2
)




0.3





(0.7
)




(2.7
)Other




(0.1
)




0.2





(0.1
)




1.5$
(1.9
)



$
0.1




$
(2.1
)



$
(0.5
)


|   |             
|-- | ------------
|8. | Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 37.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% primarily due to the tax treatment of the senior discount note interest expense, the incremental tax on dividends received from non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign taxes provided at other than the 35% U.S. statutory rate, U.S. state income taxes, nondeductible expenses, and other permanent differences.

The aforementioned items also contributed to the variation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

The nine months ended September 30, 2007, also include two discrete events related to our tax positions in The Netherlands. During the period, we completed our consultations with the tax authorities regarding their analysis of certain interest deductions incurred by our Dutch subsidiaries. The tax effect of these interest deductions represented $7.9 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits. The Dutch tax inspector has concluded that all of the interest deductions we considered at risk are valid deductions under the applicable law. Therefore, we have reversed the reserve, and reduced tax expense during the period by $7.9 million.

In addition, we determined that certain net loss carryforwards in The Netherlands are likely to expire without being utilized. Therefore, we established valuation allowances on those losses, which resulted in $2.3 million of additional tax expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

We also implemented various foreign reorganizations during the first nine months of 2007 that provide tax savings. As a result, our annual estimated tax expense for 2007 has been lowered, which reduced the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Nalco Finance Holdings LLC’s tax attributes are included in the tax return of its owner, Nalco Holding Company. Its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions, as required. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for periods prior to 2001. To the extent that we are subject to additional tax assessments greater than $150,000 that relate to tax periods before November 4, 2003, we are indemnified by our former shareholder, Suez, and therefore have recorded a receivable for the related indemnity claim. We record tax penalties and interest on tax deficiencies as part of income tax expense.

7

---



|   |                        
|-- | -----------------------
|8. | Income Taxes(continued)

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2006.

We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, we have recorded a decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $13.5 million. Because a portion of this amount is subject to the Suez indemnity, we have also reduced the receivable by their share of the exposures, or $5.6 million. The remaining $7.9 million has been credited to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007.

(dollars in millions)


Unrecognized
Tax Benefit


Suez
Portion


Nalco
PortionDecember 31, 2006 closing



$
26.0




$
8.6




$
17.4Change to adopt FIN 48




(13.5
)




(5.6
)




(7.9
)January 1, 2007 opening



$
12.5




$
3.0




$
9.5Unrecognized tax position



$
12.1




$
2.7




$
9.4Interest




0.4





0.3





0.1Penalties




—





—





—January 1, 2007 opening



$
12.5




$
3.0




$
9.5


As of January 1, 2007, full recognition of the $12.5 million of tax benefits not previously recorded would have resulted in a favorable impact to the income tax provision of $9.2 million, a reduction of goodwill of $0.3 million and a reduction of the Suez receivable of $3.0 million.

During the first nine months of 2007, we recognized $8.2 million of tax benefit primarily due to the settlement of the previously described interest deduction issues in The Netherlands. Therefore, recognition of the remaining January 1, 2007 unrecognized tax benefit would result in a favorable impact to the income tax provision of $1.0 million.

|   |                     
|-- | --------------------
|9. | Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income and its components, net of related tax, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, were as follows:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Net earnings



$
35.4




$
27.5




$
92.5




$
54.1Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes:Derivatives




(1.4
)




(0.6
)




(0.5
)




(1.2
)Net prior service credit




(0.8
)




—





(2.3
)




—Net actuarial loss




—





—





0.1





—Foreign currency translation adjustments




50.4





3.1





114.9





51.3Comprehensive income



$
83.6




$
30.0




$
204.7




$
104.2


8

---



|    |                    
|--- | -------------------
|10. | Segment Information

We provide integrated water treatment and process improvement services for industrial and institutional applications, using technologically advanced solutions, combining chemical products and equipment, and consistent, reliable on-site service and expertise. These solutions and services enable our customers to improve production yields, lower manufacturing costs, extend asset lives and maintain environmental standards at costs that represent a small share of their overall production expense.

We are organized based on the end markets we serve. The organization is comprised of the following four reportable segments:

Industrial and Institutional Services–   This segment serves the global water treatment and process chemical needs of the industrial, institutional, and municipal markets.

Energy Services–   This segment serves the process chemicals and water treatment needs of the global petroleum and petrochemical industries in both upstream and downstream applications.

Paper Services–   This segment serves the process chemicals and water treatment needs of the global pulp and paper industry.

Other–   This segment includes the Integrated Channels group, supply chain activities, and certain other operating expenses not allocated to a segment. It also includes our subsidiary in India and the Katayama Nalco joint venture.

We evaluate the performance of our segments based on ‘‘direct contribution’’, which is defined as net sales, less cost of products sold (excluding variances to standard costs), selling and service expenses, marketing expenses, research expenses and ‘‘capital charges’’ directly attributable to each segment. Each segment is assessed an internal non-GAAP ‘‘capital charge’’ based on trade accounts receivable, inventories and equipment specifically identifiable to the segment. The capital charges included in each segment’s direct contribution are eliminated to arrive at our consolidated direct contribution. There are no intersegment revenues. Prior year data have been reclassified between segments to conform to the current year presentation.

Net sales by reportable segment were as follows:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Industrial and Institutional Services



$
451.2




$
409.4




$
1,292.7




$
1,183.3Energy Services




300.8





267.3





865.0





773.4Paper Services




188.1





181.5





554.1





536.0Other




58.1





57.2





166.6





163.1Net sales



$
998.2




$
915.4




$
2,878.4




$
2,655.8


9

---



|    |                               
|--- | ------------------------------
|10. | Segment Information(continued)

The following table presents direct contribution by reportable segment and reconciles the total segment direct contribution to earnings before income taxes and minority interests:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Segment direct contribution:Industrial and Institutional Services



$
101.4




$
98.2




$
286.4




$
263.3Energy Services




64.0





58.3





187.0





162.2Paper Services




30.5





29.0





86.2





82.2Other




(13.4
)




(15.1
)




(53.8
)




(50.3
)Capital charge elimination




22.0





19.4





63.0





57.5Total segment direct contribution




204.5





189.8





568.8





514.9Expenses not allocated to segments:Administrative expenses




50.9





54.2





156.6





151.7Amortization of intangible assets




15.6





17.6





46.2





52.4Business optimization expenses




7.2





3.0





9.5





8.6Operating earnings




130.8





115.0





356.5





302.2Other income (expense), net




(1.9
)




0.1





(2.1
)




(0.5
)Interest income




2.7





2.4





7.2





6.4Interest expense




(68.9
)




(68.9
)




(205.3
)




(203.2
)Earnings before income taxes and minority interests



$
62.7




$
48.6




$
156.3




$
104.9


Administrative expenses primarily represent the cost of support functions, including information technology, finance, human resources and legal, as well as expenses for support facilities, executive management and management incentive plans.

|    |                             
|--- | ----------------------------
|11. | Contingencies and Litigation

Various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings are pending or threatened against us, arising from the ordinary course of business with respect to commercial, contract, intellectual property, product liability, employee, environmental and other matters. Historically, these matters have not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position. However, we cannot predict the outcome of any litigation or the potential for future litigation.

We have been named as a potentially responsible party (PRP) by the Environmental Protection Agency or state enforcement agencies at three pending waste sites where some financial contribution is or may be required. These agencies have also identified many other parties who may be responsible for clean up costs at these waste disposal sites. We are also remediating a small ground contamination that we discovered at our plant in Colombia. Our financial contribution to remediate these sites is not expected to be material. There has been no significant financial impact on us up to the present, nor is it anticipated that there will be in the future, as a result of these matters. We have made and will continue to make provisions for these costs if our liability becomes probable and when costs can be reasonably estimated.

Our undiscounted reserves for known environmental clean up costs were $1.9 million at September 30, 2007. These environmental reserves represent our current estimate of our proportional clean-up costs (and the cost to remediate the Colombia site) and are based upon negotiation and agreement with enforcement agencies, our previous experience with respect to clean-up activities, a detailed review by us of known conditions, and information about other PRPs. They are not reduced by any possible recoveries from insurance companies or other PRPs not specifically identified.

10

---



|    |                                        
|--- | ---------------------------------------
|11. | Contingencies and Litigation(continued)

Although we cannot determine whether or not a material effect on future operations is reasonably likely to occur, given the evolving nature of environmental regulations, we believe that the recorded reserve levels are appropriate estimates of the potential liability. Although settlement will require future cash outlays, it is not expected that such outlays will materially impact our liquidity position.

Expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, relating to environmental compliance and clean up activities, were not significant.

We have been named as a defendant in lawsuits based on claimed supply of allegedly defective or hazardous materials and the claimed presence of hazardous substances at our plants. The plaintiffs in these cases seek damages for alleged personal injury or potential injury resulting from exposure to our products or other chemicals. These matters have had ade minimisimpact on our business historically and we do not anticipate these matters will present any material risk to our business in the future. Notwithstanding, we cannot predict the outcome of any such lawsuits or the involvement we might have in these matters in the future.

On November 27, 2006, the U.K. Health and Safety Executive (‘‘HSE’’) issued a criminal summons charging our U.K. subsidiary with a violation of the Health and Safety at Work Act. The summons was re-issued in the Crown Court of Worcester on July 23, 2007. The charge relates to a legionella outbreak that is claimed to have originated at cooling towers owned by one of the subsidiary’s customers. The legionella outbreak is believed to have resulted in two fatalities and multiple injuries. The customer, H. P. Bulmer Limited, is also charged. Our subsidiary entered a guilty plea to a portion of the charge, exposing non-employees to a health risk, on September 3, 2007. Similarly, our subsidiary’s customer submitted a guilty plea. Our subsidiary will next present to the Crown Court its position as to the cause of the injuries and mitigation statement for any penalty. We have established an accrual in accordance with SFAS No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, that we consider appropriate in the circumstances. Based on information currently available, we do not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In the ordinary course of our business, we are also a party to a number of lawsuits and are subject to various claims relating to trademarks, employee matters, contracts, transactions, chemicals and other matters, the outcome of which, in our opinion, should not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position. However, we cannot predict the outcome of any litigation or the potential for future litigation. Were an unfavorable ruling to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations for the period in which the ruling occurs. We maintain accruals where the outcome of the matter is probable and can be reasonably estimated.

|    |           
|--- | ----------
|12. | Guarantees

No significant guarantees were outstanding at September 30, 2007, other than subsidiary-related performance guarantees.

We had $23.0 million of letters of credit outstanding at September 30, 2007.

|    |                                 
|--- | --------------------------------
|13. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for us as of the beginning of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. We are in the process of determining the effects, if any, that adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial statements.

11

---



|    |                                            
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|13. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements(continued)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status, measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. Those changes are to be reported in comprehensive income and as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. SFAS No. 158 does not change the amount of net periodic benefit cost included in net earnings. We adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 as of December 31, 2006, as required. We are required to adopt the measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 no later than December 31, 2008. Retrospective application of both the recognition and measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 is not permitted.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.This statement is intended to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. It also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The statement does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value, and it does not establish requirements for recognizing dividend income, interest income or interest expense. It also does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 159 as of the beginning of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. We are in the process of determining the effects, if any, that adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on our financial statements.

|    |                 
|--- | ----------------
|14. | Subsequent Event

On November 2, 2007, it was announced that Dr. William H. Joyce, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had stated his intention to retire on December 30, 2007. A search for a new CEO has begun, and a committee of independent directors will oversee the search process. The committee will consider both internal and external candidates for the role. Dr. Joyce has committed to work with the Board of Directors and management in transitioning to his successor through March 31, 2008.

At the same time, it was also announced that we had entered into an amended Employment and Consulting Agreement with Dr. Joyce concerning his remaining service as CEO through the remainder of 2007, his consulting services through March 2008, and certain compensation matters. As part of the agreement, Dr. Joyce will receive a grant of nonvested common stock of Nalco Holding Company, our direct parent company, valued at $12.0 million. Vesting of the stock will be subject to certain performance conditions and the Board’s reasonable satisfaction with Dr. Joyce’s assistance and support in the CEO search and transition process. This non-cash, share-based compensation expense to be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2007 will not affect Adjusted EBITDA, which is used to determine compliance with our debt covenants. It will, however, result in a reduction in net earnings of approximately $7.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.

The agreement with Dr. Joyce also resolves a disagreement relating to his previously granted equity incentives. Dr. Joyce had believed that his outstanding equity incentives under the Nalco LLC 2004 Unit Plan did not comport with a commitment made to him in connection with his hiring as CEO in 2003.

12

---



|        |                                                                                      
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations includes references to the Transactions, defined as the November 2003 acquisition of Ondeo Nalco Group, comprised of Nalco Company and Nalco International SAS Subsidiaries, by our subsidiary, Nalco Holdings LLC, from Suez (‘‘Suez’’) and the related financings in connection with such acquisition (the ‘‘Acquisition’’).

‘‘Safe Harbor’’ Statement Under Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the ‘‘Quarterly Report’’) includes ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenue or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, business trends and other information that is not historical information. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘projects,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘ believes,’’ ‘‘forecasts,’’ or future or conditional verbs, such as ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘could’’ or ‘‘may,’’ and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends and data are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs and projections will be achieved.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report. Additionally, important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this Quarterly Report. As stated elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others:

| |   |                          
| | - | -------------------------
| | • | our substantial leverage;

| |   |                                                                                       
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | limitations on flexibility in operating our business contained in our debt agreements;

| |   |                                                                           
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | increases in interest rates as a result of our variable rate indebtedness;

| |   |                                     
| | - | ------------------------------------
| | • | pricing pressure from our customers;

| |   |                                     
| | - | ------------------------------------
| | • | technological change and innovation;

| |   |                                               
| | - | ----------------------------------------------
| | • | risks associated with our non-U.S. operations;

| |   |                                         
| | - | ----------------------------------------
| | • | fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

| |   |                                                     
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------
| | • | high competition in the markets in which we operate;

| |   |                                                                 
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | adverse changes to environmental, health and safety regulations;

| |   |                                                
| | - | -----------------------------------------------
| | • | operating hazards in our production facilities;

| |   |                                            
| | - | -------------------------------------------
| | • | inability to achieve expected cost savings;

| |   |                                                   
| | - | --------------------------------------------------
| | • | difficulties in securing the raw materials we use;

| |   |                                                                                               
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our significant pension benefit obligations and the current underfunding of our pension plans;

| |   |                                                                
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our ability to realize the full value of our intangible assets;

| |   |                                                                                                                                        
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our ability to attract and retain skilled employees, particularly research scientists, technical sales professionals and engineers; and

| |   |                                                         
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------
| | • | our ability to protect our intellectual property rights.

There may be other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. For further information regarding risk factors, please refer to Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

13

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are measures used by management to measure operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is also used to determine our compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities such as incurring additional debt and making certain payments.

EBITDA is defined as net earnings plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted for certain cash and non-cash charges, as permitted under our senior discount note, senior note and senior subordinated note indentures and our senior credit facility. Free Cash Flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less capital expenditures and minority interest charges.

We believe EBITDA is useful to the investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. We consider the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance with our financing covenants. We believe Free Cash Flow provides investors with a measure of our ability to generate cash for the repayment of debt.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are not recognized terms under U.S. GAAP and do not purport to be alternatives to net earnings as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. The most direct comparable GAAP financial measures of each non-GAAP financial measure, as well as the reconciliation between each non-GAAP financial measure and the GAAP financial measure, are presented in the discussions of the non-GAAP financial measures below. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Executive Level Overview

Third quarter sales grew 9.0% nominally over the year-ago period to $998.2 million. On an organic basis, which excludes the impacts of changes in foreign currency translation rates and acquisitions and divestitures, sales were up 5.5%. Strong growth in Energy Services and Industrial and Institutional Services (I&IS) more than offset level sales organically in Paper Services and the Other segment.

Net earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 increased 28.7% to $35.4 million from the year-earlier $27.5 million.

Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter grew 6.7% to $195.3 million from the year-earlier $183.1 million. Continued difficulty in Europe combined with segment operating expenses growing faster than sales restrained the level of earnings improvement, even as gross margins improved.

Organic sales improvement varied by segment. Energy Services grew sales 12.5% nominally and 9.5% organically in the quarter, led by double-digit organic improvement in Oil Field Chemicals and by strong single-digit organic growth in both the Downstream and Adomite well service businesses.

Industrial and Institutional Services grew 10.2% nominally and organically at 6.1%. This growth was led by double-digit organic improvement in Asia/Pacific, an Emerging Markets business that includes Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Food and Beverage North America, a Colloidal Technologies group, and our Global and Pacific Mining businesses.

14

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Mining growth in I&IS was aided by the expansion of synfuel business that we expect will cease at the end of 2007. We have noted in previous disclosures that our waste coal agglomeration, or synfuel, business would likely cease at the end of this year as the legislation that provided tax credits supporting this business is set to expire. At current levels and fourth quarter projections, this would reduce expected 2008 sales by roughly $80 million and pre-tax earnings by $22 to $25 million. We do not expect the cessation of this business to result in material exit costs or unabsorbed overhead costs.

Paper Services sales were up 3.6% nominally and 0.4% organically. Organically, the North American and Asian businesses grew modestly, while Latin America and Europe declined slightly. The Latin America organic sales decline was largely the result of sales movements caused by the introduction of new business systems in Brazil.

Other segment sales increased 1.4% nominally, but declined 1.7% organically. Good growth in our Japanese Katayama Nalco joint venture and double-digit growth in India were offset by sales declines as we exited low-margin business.

Viewed regionally, Asia/Pacific sales increased by 9.2% organically, followed by strong North American organic growth of 8.6%. Organic sales were flat in Europe and Latin America. Latin America results were impacted, as had been expected, by introduction of new business systems in Brazil early in the quarter.

Europe continues to be constrained by ongoing internal operational challenges. We have very good people and a good business in Europe. Our problems primarily relate to growth rate. There are also issues we need to work on such as executing on fundamental disciplines and communicating the value we create for customers. David Johnson was named Group Vice President and President, European Operations at the end of the second quarter, and he recently completed relocation to European headquarters.

Gross profit margin improved modestly and, while segment profits improved overall, margins compressed in I&IS and Energy Services from the prior-year period. Margin declines in I&IS were driven by mix and an expansion of sales and service expense beyond the level that the growth would support. A substantial increase in selling expenses in Western Europe has not yet fueled sales growth, further hurting direct contribution margins. Energy Services margins dipped on higher operating expenses. Savings in administrative areas helped increase the Company’s operating margin to 13.1%, up 50 basis points compared to the same period of last year.

In Paper Services, we are making very good strides in rebuilding our North American margins through a combination of good, innovative technology, some incremental pricing and improved management discipline. Late last year, we formed five Expertise Centers in Paper Services. The charter of these centers is to ensure that our best technology is available to our accounts and that our field force is assisted and trained to sell these best practices. The focus for the first half of the year has been our largest market – North America – and this effort has been a key to our success. We expect the globalization of the Expertise Centers to show benefits in Europe, Asia and Latin America in 2008.

Business process optimization expenses in the third quarter were driven by non-cash charges that resulted from some share-based payments to exiting executives. These had not been anticipated at the beginning of the year when we provided guidance on business optimization charges. Because of the non-deductible nature of the charges, our effective tax rate at 40.4% was much higher in the quarter than we had expected.

15

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Free Cash Flow was weaker than expected at $99.9 million in the quarter as receivables expanded and we made previously unanticipated pension contributions. Net cash provided by operating activities is reconciled to Free Cash Flow as follows:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006Net cash provided by operating activities



$
124.6




$
141.3Minority interests




(2.0
)




(1.7
)Additions to property, plant, and equipment, net




(22.7
)




(22.1
)Free cash flow



$
99.9




$
117.5


Days sales outstanding increased by six days since both the beginning of the year and the year-ago period. Bringing the days outstanding back to year-end levels would increase Free Cash Flow by more than $60 million. Because of systems changes, inventory also increased to somewhat higher-than- expected levels. We expect cash improvement from both accounts receivable and inventory in the fourth quarter.

On August 28, the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 on the funding levels for plans required to maintain the lump sum payment option. Maintaining this option is important to us, in order to assist in retaining experienced sales engineers, district managers, researchers and others who have a tremendous wealth of skill and knowledge. Based on the guidance, we were prompted to move approximately $20 million in pension contributions planned for 2008 into 2007.

We have essentially all but completed our pension and post-retirement funding for the year, and expect to end the year with contributions to these plans at about $40 million above expense levels. This amount is about $20 million more than anticipated when Free Cash Flow guidance was provided at the beginning of the year.

We ended the quarter with $117.9 million in cash on hand, significantly more than the $30-$45 million range at which we had been operating. This additional cash on hand was a matter of timing. We would fully expect to be closer to year-end 2006 levels of cash on hand by the time we get to the end of this year. Among the cash requirements we have in the fourth quarter is a sizable semi-annual interest payment.

Year-to-date results

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased 8.4% from the year-ago period to $2.88 billion, with organic growth contributing 5.2% to the improvement. Energy Services continues to be our primary growth driver with organic sales up 9.0%. I&IS sales increased 5.6% organically and Paper Services grew 0.6% organically. Other segment sales remained relatively flat organically, up just 0.1% despite reasonable growth in India and Japan.

Net earnings increased 71.0% to $92.5 million from $54.1 million in the first three quarters of 2006.

Year-to-date Adjusted EBITDA rose 9.5% to $533.2 million from $487.1 million in the first nine months of 2006.

Fourth Quarter expectations

Looking forward to the fourth quarter, we believe we may fall somewhat short of reaching our 10% Adjusted EBITDA growth target, particularly given expectations of increased raw materials costs as we move through the fourth quarter. While we are taking actions to increase pricing now, we expect that most of an upcoming new round of pricing will begin taking effect January 1.

16

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

We said earlier in the year that the primary risk to hitting our targets in 2007 was a late in the year cost surge that did not provide us time to recover earnings with pricing, with the added cash flow challenge of inflating receivables on the pricing we would be able to capture. While we did not expect this scenario to occur, it is now quite likely that this is what we will see in the fourth quarter.

We still expect to achieve organic sales growth of better than 5%. However, the additional pension funding in the third quarter will restrict Free Cash Flow generation for 2007. In addition, our ability to generate more Free Cash Flow for 2007 than in 2006 is dependent on making good working capital progress in the quarter. The primary source of working capital cash is expected to be from receivables and inventory.

With major adjustments from our Nalco Business Transformation initiative now complete, we expect to see improvement across all areas of working capital. However, we did not gain the traction we expected in the third quarter. It is too early to say we have all our working capital challenges under control, but we clearly expect improvement here.

Retirement of Dr. William H. Joyce

On November 2, 2007, it was announced that Dr. William H. Joyce, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had stated his intention to retire on December 30, 2007. A search for a new CEO has begun, and a committee of independent directors will oversee the search process. The committee will consider both internal and external candidates for the role. Dr. Joyce has committed to work with the Board of Directors and management in transitioning to his successor through March 31, 2008.

At the same time, it was also announced that we had entered into an amended Employment and Consulting Agreement with Dr. Joyce concerning his remaining service as CEO through the remainder of 2007, his consulting services through March 2008, and certain compensation matters. As part of the agreement, Dr. Joyce will receive a grant of nonvested common stock of Nalco Holding Company, our direct parent company, valued at $12.0 million. Vesting of the stock will be subject to certain performance conditions and the Board’s reasonable satisfaction with Dr. Joyce’s assistance and support in the CEO search and transition process. This non-cash, share-based compensation expense to be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2007 will not affect Adjusted EBITDA, which is used to determine compliance with our debt covenants. It will, however, result in a reduction in net earnings of approximately $7.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.

The agreement with Dr. Joyce also resolves a disagreement relating to his previously granted equity incentives. Dr. Joyce had believed that his outstanding equity incentives under the Nalco LLC 2004 Unit Plan did not comport with a commitment made to him in connection with his hiring as CEO in 2003.

Results of Operations – Consolidated

Quarter Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to the Quarter Ended September 30, 2006

Net salesfor the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $998.2 million, a 9.0% increase from the $915.4 million reported for the three months ended September 30, 2006. On an organic basis, which excludes the impacts of changes in foreign currency translation rates and acquisitions and divestitures, net sales were up 5.5%. This growth was largely driven by our North American and Asia/Pacific regions whose organic sales increased 8.6% and 9.2%, respectively. Organic sales in Europe and Latin America were flat, but we had expected that Latin America results would be affected by the introduction of new business systems in Brazil early in the quarter.

Gross profit,defined as the difference between net sales and cost of product sold, of $450.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased by $40.8 million, or 10.0%, over the

17

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

$409.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. On an organic basis, gross profit increased by 6.3%. Contributing to the improvement was the impact of higher sales volumes and cost savings. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was 45.1% compared to 44.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2006.

Selling, administrative, and research expensesfor the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $296.4 million increased $22.8 million, or 8.3%, from $273.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. On an organic basis, selling, administrative, and research expenses increased 4.6%. This was mostly attributable to higher salaries, employee incentives, employee benefits, travel and bad debts. Partly offsetting these changes were lower insurance costs that mostly resulted from a $1.7 million settlement from one of our insurers.

Amortization of intangible assetswas $15.6 million and $17.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease was attributable to lower amortization of customer relationships, which are amortized using an accelerated method.

Business optimization expenses,representing mostly employee severance and related costs associated with the continuing redesign and optimization of business and work processes, were $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Current quarter expenses included $5.3 million of non-cash charges that resulted from some share-based payments to exiting executives.

Other income (expense), netwas a net expense of $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an unfavorable difference of $2.0 million from the net other income of $0.1 million reported in the year-ago quarter. An unfavorable change in foreign currency transaction gains and losses of $1.5 million contributed to most of the variance, with lower earnings by our affiliate entities accounting for the remainder.

Net interest expense,defined as the combination of interest income and interest expense, of $66.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 decreased by $0.3 million from the $66.5 million reported for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Translation rate changes due to the weaker U.S. dollar versus the euro increased interest expense by $1.2 million, and accretion of our senior discount notes was $0.8 million higher than a year ago. The net impact of a lower average debt level and higher interest rates on our variable rate debt compared to the year-ago period offset these increases.

The effective tax ratefor the three months ended September 30, 2007 was 40.4%. The rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% primarily due to the tax treatment of the senior discount note interest expense, the incremental tax on dividends received from non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign taxes provided at other than the 35% U.S. statutory rate, U.S. state income taxes, nondeductible expenses, and other permanent differences.

The aforementioned items also contributed to the variation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2006.

Minority interest expensewas $0.3 million higher than the $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Nearly all our non-wholly owned subsidiaries reported higher earnings in the current quarter versus last year.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

Net salesfor the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $2,878.4 million, an increase of 8.4% over the $2,655.8 million reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. On an organic basis, net sales were up 5.2%. Overall, growth was reported by all geographic regions, with only marginal improvement in Europe.

Gross profit,defined as the difference between net sales and cost of product sold, of $1,290.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 rose $114.9 million, or 9.8%, over the $1,175.1 million

18

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

for the first nine months of 2006. On an organic basis, gross profit increased by 6.5%. Contributing to the improvement was the impact of higher sales volumes and cost savings. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 44.8% compared to 44.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Selling, administrative, and research expensesfor the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $877.8 million increased $65.9 million, or 8.1%, from $811.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Organically, selling, administrative, and research expenses increased 4.8%. This was mostly attributable to higher salaries, employee incentives, employee benefits, training, travel, and outside consulting related to our work process redesign initiatives and the rationalization of our legal entity structure. Partly offsetting these changes were lower insurance costs, supplies and bad debt expenses in 2007.

Amortization of intangible assetswas $46.2 million and $52.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease was attributable to lower amortization of customer relationships, which are amortized using an accelerated method.

Business optimization expenses,representing mostly employee severance and related costs associated with the continuing redesign and optimization of business and work processes, were $9.5 million and $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Current year expenses included $5.3 million of non-cash charges that resulted from some share-based payments to exiting executives.

Other income (expense), netwas a net expense of $2.1 million and $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The $1.6 million unfavorable difference was mainly attributed to lower earnings by our affiliate entities and other miscellaneous charges, which were partly offset by a favorable change in foreign currency transaction gains and losses of $2.0 million.

Net interest expense,defined as the combination of interest income and interest expense, of $198.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased by $1.3 million from the $196.8 million reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Translation rate changes due to the weaker U.S. dollar versus the euro increased interest expense by $3.4 million, and accretion of our senior discount notes was $2.2 million higher than a year ago. The net impact of a lower average debt level and higher interest rates on our variable rate debt compared to the year-ago period partly offset these increases.

The effective tax ratefor the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 37.2%. The rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% primarily due to the tax treatment of the senior discount note interest expense, the incremental tax on dividends received from non-U.S. subsidiaries, foreign taxes provided at other than the 35% U.S. statutory rate, U.S. state income taxes, nondeductible expenses, and other permanent differences.

The aforementioned items also contributed to the variation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

As a result of adopting Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective January 1, 2007, we now record tax benefits based on the prescribed ‘‘more likely than not’’ standard. This reduced our liability for unrecognized tax benefits based on our previous ‘‘probable’’ standard by $13.5 million, of which $5.6 million was indemnified by our former shareholder, Suez. As a result, $7.9 million was credited to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007.

The nine months ended September 30, 2007 also include two discrete events related to our tax positions in The Netherlands. During the period, we completed consultations with the local tax authority regarding certain interest deductions. The tax authority concluded that the deductions are valid under local law. Therefore, we reversed an existing tax reserve, which resulted in a $7.9 million reduction in tax expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

19

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

In addition, we determined that certain net loss carryforwards in The Netherlands are likely to expire without being utilized. Therefore, we established valuation allowances on those losses, which resulted in $2.3 million of additional tax expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

We also implemented various foreign reorganizations during the first nine months of 2007 that provide tax savings. As a result, our annual estimated tax expense for 2007 has been lowered, which reduced the effective tax rate for the period.

Minority interest expensewas $0.4 million higher than the $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Higher earnings by most of our non-wholly owned subsidiaries, most notably Saudi Arabia and Japan, accounted for the increase.

Results of Operations – Segment Reporting

Quarter Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to the Quarter Ended September 30, 2006

Net salesby reportable segment for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 may be compared as follows:

Three Months Ended





Attributable to Changes
in the Following Factors(dollars in millions)


September 30,
2007


September 30,
2006


% Change


Currency
Translation


Acquisitions/
Divestitures


OrganicIndustrial & Institutional Services



$
451.2




$
409.4





10.2
%




4.1
%




—





6.1
%Energy Services




300.8





267.3





12.5
%




3.0
%




—





9.5
%Paper Services




188.1





181.5





3.6
%




3.2
%




—





0.4
%Other




58.1





57.2





1.4
%




3.1
%




—





(1.7
)%Net sales



$
998.2




$
915.4





9.0
%




3.5
%




—





5.5
%


The Industrial and Institutional Services division reported sales of $451.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a 10.2% increase over the $409.4 million for the year-ago-period. Organically, sales grew 6.1%. Most of the businesses within the division generated improved performance. Pacific and the North America-based businesses servicing the Mining and Metals and Food, Beverage and Pharmaceutical industries, as well as the Colloidal Technologies group, recorded double-digit sales growth, while notable increases were also made by our North America Power and Institutional businesses and our Emerging Markets business serving Eastern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Lower organic sales in Western Europe and businesses supporting the Marine and North America Manufacturing industries partly offset these gains.

The Energy Services division reported sales of $300.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a 12.5% gain over the $267.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Organically, sales improved by 9.5%. All businesses within the division reported notable increases.

The Paper Services division reported sales of $188.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a 3.6% increase over the $181.5 million reported for the third quarter of 2006. Organically, sales grew 0.4% from the year-ago period as a result of new products that were recently introduced to the market. Our Pacific and North America regions reported modest sales growth, while Latin America sales dropped as the implementation of new business processes in Brazil created distractions. Europe reported lower sales again quarter-over-quarter, with internal operational challenges contributing to most of the sales loss.

The ‘‘Other’’ segment reported $58.1 million of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a $0.9 million increase from the year-ago period. Improved performances were reported by our Katayama Nalco joint venture and subsidiary in India, offset by lower sales by our Integrated Channels group.

20

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Direct contributionis defined as the difference between net sales and operating costs, including cost of product sold, selling and service expenses, marketing expenses, research expenses and capital charges. Direct contribution by reportable segment for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 may be compared as follows:

Three Months Ended





Attributable to Changes
in the Following Factors(dollars in millions)


September 30,
2007


September 30,
2006


% Change


Currency
Translation


Acquisitions/
Divestitures


OrganicIndustrial & Institutional Services



$
101.4




$
98.2





3.3
%




3.7
%




—





(0.4
)%Energy Services




64.0





58.3





9.8
%




3.0
%




—





6.8
%Paper Services




30.5





29.0





5.2
%




3.2
%




—





2.0
%Other




(13.4
)




(15.1
)




10.8
%




(3.0
)%




—





13.8
%


Direct contribution of the Industrial and Institutional Services division was $101.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of 3.3% over the $98.2 million reported for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Organically, direct contribution dropped 0.4%. Despite increased sales volume, gross margin percentage fell. Operating expenses were up 7.2% organically, mostly due to increased salaries, employee incentives, travel, bad debt expenses, and capital charges which factor in the balance sheet impacts of the division’s customer consigned inventory and receivables.

The Energy Services division reported direct contribution of $64.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a 9.8% increase over the $58.3 million reported for the year-ago period. On an organic basis, direct contribution increased 6.8%. Higher sales volume and improved margins accounted for the increase. Operating expenses were up 15.1% organically, with the largest increases in salaries, employee incentives, employee benefits, travel expenses, outside services, and capital charges.

The Paper Services division reported direct contribution of $30.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a 5.2% increase from the direct contribution reported for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Organically, direct contribution increased 2.0% as a result of price gains and changes in product mix. Operating expenses were higher by 4.7% organically. Most of the expense increases were for salaries, employee benefits and travel. Bad debt expenses dropped quarter-over-quarter.

The direct contribution loss of $13.4 million reported in ‘‘Other’’ for the three months ended September 30, 2007, represented a decrease of $1.7 million from the $15.1 million direct contribution loss reported in the third quarter 2006, which was mostly attributable to variations in revenue recognition adjustments.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

Net salesby reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 may be compared as follows:

Nine Months Ended





Attributable to Changes
in the Following Factors(dollars in millions)


September 30,
2007


September 30,
2006


% Change


Currency
Translation


Acquisitions/
Divestitures


OrganicIndustrial & Institutional Services



$
1,292.7




$
1,183.3





9.3
%




3.7
%




—





5.6
%Energy Services




865.0





773.4





11.9
%




2.9
%




—





9.0
%Paper Services




554.1





536.0





3.4
%




2.8
%




—





0.6
%Other




166.6





163.1





2.1
%




2.0
%




—





0.1
%Net sales



$
2,878.4




$
2,655.8





8.4
%




3.2
%




—





5.2
%


21

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

The Industrial and Institutional Services division reported sales of $1,292.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a 9.3% increase over the $1,183.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. On an organic basis, sales rose 5.6%. Most of that growth came from Latin America, Pacific and the North America Mining, Chemical, Institutional and Food, Beverage and Pharmaceutical industries, as well as our Emerging Markets business in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, and the Colloidal Technologies group. Lower organic sales in Western Europe, Finishing Technologies, and North America Manufacturing partly offset these gains.

The Energy Services division reported sales of $865.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an 11.9% improvement over the $773.4 million for the year-ago-period. Organically, sales increased 9.0%. Both our Upstream oil field production and Downstream businesses accounted for the majority of this increase with strong organic growth. Our Adomite business also reported a more modest organic sales improvement.

The Paper Services division reported sales of $554.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a 3.4% increase over the $536.0 million reported for the first nine months of 2006. Organically, sales grew 0.6% from the year-ago period, as Latin America reported impressive growth and more modest growth was posted in the Pacific region. North America sales were flat and European sales declined on an organic basis.

Improved performances by our Katayama Nalco joint venture and subsidiary in India contributed to the 0.1% organic growth in sales reported by the ‘‘Other’’ segment. These increases were offset by lower sales performance by our Integrated Channels group.

Direct contributionby reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 may be compared as follows:

Nine Months Ended





Attributable to Changes
in the Following Factors(dollars in millions)


September 30,
2007


September 30,
2006


% Change


Currency
Translation


Acquisitions/
Divestitures


OrganicIndustrial & Institutional Services



$
286.4




$
263.3





8.8
%




3.6
%




—





5.2
%Energy Services




187.0





162.2





15.3
%




3.0
%




—





12.3
%Paper Services




86.2





82.2





4.9
%




2.6
%




—





2.3
%Other




(53.8
)




(50.3
)




(7.1
)%




(3.8
)%




—





(3.3
)%


Direct contribution of the Industrial and Institutional Services division was $286.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an improvement of 8.8% over the $263.3 million reported for the year-ago period. Organically, direct contribution improved 5.2%, as increased sales volume contributed to the improvement. Operating expenses were up 5.9% organically, mostly due to increased salaries, employee incentives, employee benefits, travel, bad debt expenses, and capital charges, which factor in the balance sheet impacts of the division’s customer consigned inventory and receivables.

The Energy Services division reported direct contribution of $187.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a 15.3% increase over the $162.2 million reported for the first nine months of 2006. On an organic basis, direct contribution rose 12.3%. Higher sales volume and improved margins accounted for the increase. Operating expenses were up 10.7% organically, with the largest increases in salaries, employee incentives, employee benefits, travel, bad debt expenses, and capital charges.

The Paper Services division reported direct contribution of $86.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a 4.9% increase over the direct contribution reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Organically, direct contribution was up 2.3% as a result of changes in product mix and growth in Latin America. Operating expenses were higher by 5.6% organically. Salaries, employee incentives, employee benefits, training, and travel expenses increased as bad debt expenses decreased.

22

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

The direct contribution loss of $53.8 million reported in ‘‘Other’’ for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, represented an increase of $3.5 million from the $50.3 million direct contribution loss reported in the first nine months of 2006, which was mostly attributable to an increase in Supply Chain variances.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating activities.Historically, our main source of liquidity has been our solid cash flow generated by operating activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cash provided by operating activities was $195.5 million, a decrease of $7.6 million from the same period last year. The improvement in net earnings was offset by higher contributions to the principal U.S. pension plan, higher working capital usage for receivables, and variable incentive payments made in 2007 as we exceeded our 2006 targets.

The increase in working capital usage for receivables is expected to be temporary, and resulted largely from the April 2007 upgrade to our current SAP enterprise-resource planning system and the implementation of several limited work process changes in North America and Europe that are primarily designed to improve our order-to-cash processes.

Variable incentive payments were not made in 2006 for 2005 variable incentive plans because actual results fell short of that year’s targets.

Investing activities.Cash used for investing activities was $83.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, which was mostly attributable to net property additions of $70.3 million.

Cash used for investing activities was $57.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This was mostly the result of net property additions of $59.6 million.

Financing activities.Net cash used for financing activities totaled $35.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, which was mostly attributable to capital distributions to our parent company of $37.0 million and term loan repayments of $41.9 million, partly offset by a $50.0 million increase in borrowings against our receivables facility. Upon the expiration of our $100 million receivables facility in June 2007, we entered into a new three-year receivables facility that provides up to $160 million in funding.

On July 31, 2007, the Board of Directors of Nalco Holding Company, our direct parent company, authorized a $300 million share repurchase program, and gave its management discretion in determining the conditions under which shares of Nalco Holding Company common stock may be purchased from time to time. The program has no stated expiration date, and there is no set timetable for share repurchases.

Nalco Holding Company does not generate any revenue, so cash required for its share repurchase program must be provided by us through capital distributions or loans, as permitted under the terms of our senior credit facilities and indentures. Capital distributions of $37.0 million were made to Nalco Holding Company through September 30, 2007, which it used to repurchase 1.5 million of its common shares.

Net cash used for financing activities totaled $133.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, which was mostly attributable to a net decrease in borrowings.

We are highly leveraged. Our liquidity requirements are significant, primarily due to debt service requirements as well as research and development and capital investment. Our primary source of liquidity will continue to be cash flow generated from operations, but we also have availability under a $250 million revolving credit facility and the aforementioned $160 million receivables facility, in each case subject to certain conditions. We believe that our financial position and financing structure will provide flexibility in worldwide financing activities and permit us to respond to changing conditions in credit markets.

23

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Senior credit facilities.On November 4, 2003, we entered into senior credit facilities which provided for a revolving credit facility, a $300 million six-year term loan A facility (including an €88.0 million tranche) which matures in November 2009 and a $1,300 million seven-year term loan B facility which matures in November 2010. Borrowings under the senior credit facilities bear interest at a floating base rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the term loan A facility is 1.00% with respect to base rate borrowings and 2.00% with respect to LIBOR or Eurocurrency borrowings and may be increased subject to changes in certain leverage ratios. The applicable margin for borrowings under the term loan B facility is 0.75% with respect to base rate borrowings and 1.75% with respect to LIBOR or Eurocurrency borrowings. The applicable margin for borrowings under the term loan B facility is not subject to adjustment.

In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the senior credit facilities, we are required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit facility in respect of the unutilized commitments at a rate equal to 0.50%. We also pay customary letter of credit fees.

The term loan A facility was scheduled to amortize each year in quarterly amounts at a rate of 5% per annum in year one, 10% per annum in year two, 15% per annum in year three, 20% per annum in year four and 25% per annum in each of years five and six.

The term loan B facility was scheduled to amortize each year in an amount equal to 1% per annum in equal quarterly installments for the first six years and nine months, with the remaining amount payable on November 4, 2010.

At September 30, 2007, the outstanding balance of the term loan A and term loan B facilities was $68.7 million and $887.0 million, respectively.

Principal amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility will be due and payable in full at maturity on November 4, 2009. At September 30, 2007, no borrowings were outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries (including Nalco Company) to sell assets, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, repay other indebtedness, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase certain capital stock, create liens on assets, make investments, loans or advances, make certain acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, amend certain material agreements governing our indebtedness, change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries (including Nalco Company) and enter into hedging agreements. In addition, the senior credit facilities require Nalco Company to maintain a number of covenants, the most significant being a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum capital expenditures limitation. We were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2007.

Senior notes, senior subordinated notes and senior discount notes.As part of the Transactions in November 2003, Nalco Company issued $665 million aggregate principal amount of 73⁄4% U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes due 2011, €200 million aggregate principal amount of 73⁄4% euro-denominated senior notes due 2011, $465 million aggregate principal amount of 87/8% U.S. dollar-denominated senior subordinated notes due 2013 and €200 million aggregate principal amount of 9% euro-denominated senior subordinated notes due 2013.

On January 21, 2004, Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Nalco Finance Holdings Inc. issued $694.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of 9.0% senior discount notes due 2014. Prior to February 1, 2009, interest will accrue on the notes in the form of an increase in the accreted value of such notes. The accreted value of each note will increase from the date of issuance until February 1, 2009 at a rate of 9.0% per annum, reflecting the accrual of non-cash interest, such that the accreted value will equal the principal amount at maturity on February 1, 2009. Cash interest payments on the

24

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

notes will be due and payable beginning in 2009. Our primary source of liquidity for such payments will be cash flow generated from the operations of subsidiaries, including Nalco Holdings LLC and Nalco Company. However, the terms of Nalco Company’s senior credit agreement limit the amount of dividends and other transfers by Nalco Holdings LLC and our other subsidiaries to the issuers of the senior discount notes. In addition, the terms of certain of the indentures governing the existing senior notes and senior subordinated notes of Nalco Company significantly restrict Nalco Company and our other subsidiaries from paying dividends, making distributions and otherwise transferring assets to the issuers of the senior discount notes. The ability of Nalco Company to make such payments is governed by a formula based on 50% of its consolidated net income (which, as defined in such indentures, excludes impairment charges, amortization charges from purchase accounting and any after-tax extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses).

In addition, as a condition to making such payments to the issuers based on such formula, Nalco Holdings LLC must have an Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense ratio of at least 2.0 to 1 after giving effect to any such payments. Notwithstanding such restrictions, such indentures permit an aggregate of $50.0 million of such payments to be made whether or not there is availability under the formula or the conditions to its use are met.

In December 2004, Nalco Finance Holdings LLC and Nalco Finance Holdings Inc. redeemed a portion of the senior discount notes with an accreted value of $162.3 million using proceeds from the November 2004 initial public offering of common stock of Nalco Holding Company. After the partial redemption, the aggregate principal amount at maturity of the notes declined to $460.8 million from $694.0 million.

The indentures governing the senior notes, the senior subordinated notes and senior discount notes limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:

| |   |                               
| | - | ------------------------------
| | • | incur additional indebtedness;

| |   |                                                                                  
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | pay dividends on or make other distributions or repurchase certain capital stock;

| |   |                          
| | - | -------------------------
| | • | make certain investments;

| |   |                                                          
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | • | enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;

| |   |                                                                  
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | limit dividends or other payments by our restricted subsidiaries;

| |   |                                                  
| | - | -------------------------------------------------
| | • | use assets as security in other transactions; and

| |   |                                                           
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | • | sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies.

Subject to certain exceptions, the indentures governing the senior notes, the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit our restricted subsidiaries and us to incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness.

Covenant compliance.The breach of covenants in our senior credit agreement that are tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA could result in a default under that agreement and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any such acceleration would also result in a default under our indentures. Additionally, under our debt agreements, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA.

Adjusted EBITDA is used to determine our compliance with many of the covenants contained in the indentures governing the notes and in our senior credit agreement. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude unusual items and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under the indentures and our senior credit facility. We believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA are appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance with our financing covenants.

25

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as follows:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Net earnings



$
35.4




$
27.5




$
92.5




$
54.1Interest, net




66.2





66.5





198.1





196.8Income tax provision




25.3





19.4





58.2





45.6Depreciation




33.0





32.8





97.0





97.5Amortization




15.6





17.6





46.2





52.4EBITDA



$
175.5




$
163.8




$
492.0




$
446.4Non-cash charges(1)




12.5





10.7





26.0





26.7Business optimization expenses(2)




7.2





3.0





9.5





8.6Unusual items(3)




1.6





6.8





10.8





9.4Other adjustments(4)




(1.5
)




(1.2
)




(5.1
)




(4.0
)Adjusted EBITDA



$
195.3




$
183.1




$
533.2




$
487.1


|
|
|
|

|(1) | Non-cash charges are further detailed on the following table:
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Asset write-offs



$
—




$
0.3




$
—




$
1.4Profit sharing expense and 401(k) funded by Suez




7.3





7.0





20.5





18.8Other




5.2





3.4





5.5





6.5Non-cash charges



$
12.5




$
10.7




$
26.0




$
26.7


Profit Sharing and 401(k) Expense Funded by Suez

In conjunction with the Acquisition, we entered into an agreement with Suez whereby Suez will reimburse us for certain profit-sharing and 401(k) matching contributions made by us to the Profit-Sharing Trust.

Other

Other non-cash charges include the non-cash impact on earnings of our equity investments and minority interests. Non-cash charges also includes the non-cash portion of rent expense under the sublease that we entered into with Suez in conjunction with the Acquisition.

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Business optimization expenses include costs associated with the redesign and optimization of work processes. See Note 6 to Item 1 for more information.

26

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

|    |                                                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|(3) | Unusual items are further detailed on the following table:

(dollars in millions)


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Three Months
ended
September 30,
2006


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2007


Nine Months
ended
September 30,
2006Pension settlement



$
0.1




$
—




$
0.1




$
0.4Loss (gain) on sales, net of expenses




(0.4
)




1.7





0.9





2.3Other unusual items




1.9





5.1





9.8





6.7$
1.6




$
6.8




$
10.8




$
9.4


|    |                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(4) | We are required to make adjustments to EBITDA for franchise taxes and 401(k) matching contributions.

Our covenant levels and ratios for the four quarters ended September 30, 2007 are as follows:

September 30, 2007Required


ActualSenior credit facility(1)Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio




1.80x





3.33xMaximum net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio




5.50x





3.78xIndentures(2)Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio required to incur additional debt pursuant to ratio provisions




2.00x





2.87x


|
|
|
|

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | During 2007, our senior credit facility requires us to maintain an Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio at a minimum of 1.80x and a net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio at a maximum of 5.50x, in each case for the most recent four quarter period. Failure to satisfy these ratio requirements would constitute a default under the senior credit agreement. If our lenders failed to waive any such default, our repayment obligations under the senior credit agreement could be accelerated, which would also constitute a default under our indentures.

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | Our ability to incur additional debt and make certain restricted payments under our indentures, subject to specified exceptions, is tied to an Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio of at least 2.0 to 1, except that we may incur certain debt and make certain restricted payments and certain permitted investments without regard to the ratio, such as up to an aggregate principal amount of $1,950 million (including $955.7 million that was outstanding under our term loan facilities as of September 30, 2007) and investments in similar business and other investments equal to 6% of our consolidated assets.

Local lines of credit.Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries have lines of credit to support local requirements. As of September 30, 2007, the aggregate outstanding balance under these local lines of credit was approximately $33.7 million. Certain of these lines of credit are equally and ratably secured with obligations under our senior credit facilities.

Receivables facility.Nalco Company entered into a three-year receivables facility on June 25, 2004 that provided up to $100 million in funding from a commercial paper conduit sponsored by JPMorgan Chase Bank, one of the lenders under Nalco Company’s senior credit facilities. The facility expired on June 25, 2007.

On June 22, 2007, Nalco Company entered into a new three-year receivables facility. This facility provides up to $160 million in funding from a commercial paper conduit sponsored by Bank of America, N.A., one of the lenders under Nalco Company’s senior credit facilities, based on availability of eligible receivables and satisfaction of other customary conditions.

27

---



|        |                                                                                                 
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Availability of funding under the receivables facility depends primarily upon the outstanding trade accounts receivable balance from time to time. Aggregate availability is determined by using a formula that reduces the gross receivables balance by factors that take into account historical default and dilution rates, excessive concentrations and average days outstanding and the costs of the facility. Based on the terms of this facility and on the criteria described above, as of September 30, 2007, approximately $233.6 million of our accounts receivable balance was considered eligible for financing under the program, of which $150.0 million would have been available for funding. As of September 30, 2007, we had $150.0 million of outstanding borrowings under this facility.

This facility is treated as a general financing agreement resulting in the borrowings and related receivables being shown as liabilities and assets, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheet and the costs associated with the receivables facility being recorded as interest expense.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 13 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part I, Item 1, for information on recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes to our exposures to market risk since December 31, 2006.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our ‘‘disclosure controls and procedures’’ (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2007.

|    |                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

28

---



Part II.    Other Information

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

On November 27, 2006, the U.K. Health and Safety Executive (‘‘HSE’’) issued a criminal summons charging our U.K. subsidiary with a violation of the Health and Safety at Work Act. The summons was re-issued in the Crown Court of Worcester on July 23, 2007. The charge relates to a legionella outbreak that is claimed to have originated at cooling towers at the subsidiary’s customers. The legionella outbreak is believed to have resulted in two fatalities and multiple injuries. The customer, H. P. Bulmer Limited, is also charged. Our subsidiary submitted a guilty plea to a portion of the charge, exposing non-employees to a health risk, on September 3, 2007. Similarly, our subsidiary’s customer submitted a guilty plea. Our subsidiary will next present to the Crown Court its position as to the cause of the injuries and a mitigation statement for any penalty. We have established an accrual in accordance with SFAS No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, that we consider appropriate in the circumstances. Based on information currently available, we do not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 6.    Exhibits

|    |                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------
|(a) | The following are included herein:

| |              |                                                                                                    
| | ------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

| |              |                                                                                                    
| | ------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

| |              |                                                                                                                        
| | ------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Exhibit 32.1 | Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

29

---



SIGNATURE

The registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

NALCO FINANCE HOLDINGS LLC/s/ BRADLEY J. BELLName:


Bradley J. BellTitle:


Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Dated: November 7, 2007

30

---