alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:03-cv-01299-M Document 1 Filed 06/10/03 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1
Case 3:03-cv-01299-M Document 1 Filed 06/10/03 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
Case 3:03-cv-01299-M Document 1 Filed 06/10/03 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
Case 3:03-cv-01299-M Document 1 Filed 06/10/03 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
Case 3:03-cv-01299-M Document 1 Filed 06/10/03 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
# C_2021310EN.01002902.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/29

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT8)

(Case T-420/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT8 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)

(2021/C 310/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1611/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1611/2019-4) is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1611/2019-4) is annulled.

| 2. | EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.

---
#### Florence Guidy, Lucy Anderson, a Minor, and J. M. Guidy in His Own Right and as Next Friend of the Said Lucy Anderson, *Appellants,*v. A. J. Miller and Ella G. Brock, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed July 25, 1927.

*D. W. Berry,*for Appellants;

*Daniel & Blalce*and *J. A. J. Hathaway,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1210-1211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00059]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 1211]]

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1218 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1024, K2025-1023.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00059 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1195 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-992, K2025-991.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00021 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021035EN.01002001.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/20

---

Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2020 in Case T-446/18, Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-310/20 P)

(2021/C 35/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf (represented by: P. Lange, A. Auler, M. Wenz and C. Möller, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Hamburg

By order of 29 October 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
# C_2018104EN.01005401.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/54

---

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2018 — Stips v Commission

(Case T-740/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 104/70)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.

1

---
# C_2021148EN.01001702.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/17

---

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — ML v Commission

(Case T-567/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Public procurement - Call for tenders - Sustainable catering services for the Commission in Brussels and its surrounding areas - Rejection of the tender of a tenderer - Annulment of the call for tenders - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 148/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ML (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2020 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of the call for tenders OIB/2019/CPN/039 concerning sustainable catering services for the Commission in the Brussels-Capital Region and surrounding areas and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the losses allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | There is no longer any need to rule on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay half of the costs incurred by ML. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay half of the costs incurred by ML.

| 3. | ML shall bear half of its costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

ML shall bear half of its costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Keith WILLETT, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4342

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Catherine Stone Curtis, pro hac vice

MCGINNIS LOCHRIDGE LLP

State Bar No. 24074100

P.O. Box 720788

McAllen, Texas 78504

956.489.5958

ccurtis@mcginnislaw.com

Attorney for Ag Credit, Agricultural Credit Association, a/k/a Ag Credit, ACA

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE:

BELA FLOR NURSERIES, INC., et al.,

Debtors.

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 23-42469-mxm11

CHAPTER 11

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please take notice that the undersigned appears for Ag Credit, Agricultural Credit 

Association, a/k/a Ag Credit, ACA, a party in interest in this case, and pursuant to Rules 2002 and 

9007 of the Bankruptcy Rules, requests that all notices given, or required to be given, in this case and 

all papers served, or required to be served, in this case, be given to and served upon the undersigned 

at the office, address and telephone number set forth below. 

Please take further notice that pursuant to Section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the 

foregoing request includes the notices and papers referred to in the Rules specified above and also 

includes, without limitation, notices of any orders, applications, complaints, demands, hearings, 

motions, petitions, pleadings or requests, and any other documents brought before this Court in 

this case, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, and whether transmitted or conveyed 

by mail, delivery, telephone, telegraph, telefax, telex or otherwise.

Case 23-42469-mxm11 Doc 56 Filed 09/01/23 Entered 09/01/23 11:36:25 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Notwithstanding the aforementioned, please take note that the undersigned attorneys and 

law firm are not authorized by Ag Credit, Agricultural Credit Association, a/k/a Ag Credit, ACA

to accept service of process on behalf of Ag Credit, Agricultural Credit Association, a/k/a Ag 

Credit, ACA.

By: /s/ Catherine S. Curtis

Catherine Stone Curtis, pro hac vice

MCGINNIS LOCHRIDGE LLP

CATHERINE STONE CURTIS

STATE BAR NO. 24074100

P.O. BOX 720788

MCALLEN, TEXAS 78504

956.489.5958

CCURTIS@MCGINNISLAW.COM

ATTORNEYS FOR AG CREDIT, 

AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ASSOCIATION, 

A/K/A AG CREDIT, ACA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Appearance has been served via email using the 

Court’s ECF system upon the appropriate parties listed for electronic service this 1st day of September 

2023.

/s/ Catherine S. Curtis

Catherine Curtis

Case 23-42469-mxm11 Doc 56 Filed 09/01/23 Entered 09/01/23 11:36:25 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the
“Report”), I, Robert John DeCecco III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      November 22, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Robert John DeCecco IIIRobert
      John DeCecco IIIPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




63
Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 201 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 3829
 

 Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 201 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 3830
Keith Bouvier JONES, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Johnny EDWARDS v. STATE

CR-15-0335

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2017144EN.01006303.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/63

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — Perifereia Stereas Elladas v Commission

(Case T-731/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/98)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.

1

---
# C_2020137EN.01003702.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/37

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 12 February 2020 — Anklagemyndigheden v VAS Shipping ApS

(Case C-71/20)

(2020/C 137/51)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Anklagemyndigheden

Defendant: VAS Shipping ApS

Question referred

Does Article 49 TFEU preclude legislation of a Member State which requires third-country crew members on a vessel flagged in a Member State and owned by a shipowner who is a national of another EU Member State to have a work permit, unless the vessel enters ports of the Member State on at most 25 occasions calculated continuously over the last year?

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00027]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1201 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-999, K2025-998.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00027 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “report”) of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

c) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 5, 2006
# C_2020433EN.01004001.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/40

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Silistra (Bulgaria) lodged on 16 October 2020 — DB, LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsiya na Ministerstvoto na vatreshnite raboti

(Case C-520/20)

(2020/C 433/49)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Silistra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: DB, LY

Defendant: Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsiya na Ministerstvoto na vatreshnite raboti

Question referred

Must Article 39 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), and in particular Article 39(3) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that it allows national rules and administrative practices under which, if the competent executing authority has valid reason to conclude that the alert entered in the SIS is not covered by the objectives for which it has been registered, and in particular the objectives laid down in Article 38(1), that authority can and must refuse to execute it?

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1530
BARBARA J. NEWSOME-BALTROP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAYCO AMERICAN CORPORATION; FM SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-978-A) Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: January 16, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara J. Newsome-Baltrop, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Lang Lowndes, BUTLER, MACON, WILLIAMS, PANTELE & LOWNDES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Barbara J. Newsome-Baltrop appeals the district court's ordergranting summary judgment to Defendants in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Newsome-Baltrop v. Payco American Corp. , No. CA-95-978-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED