alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016191EN.01004401.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/44

---

Appeal brought on 14 March 2016 by Inge Barnett, Suzanne Ditlevsen, Annie Madsen against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 February 2016 in Case F-66/15, Barnett and others v EESC

Barnett and others

EESC

(Case T-158/16 P)

(2016/C 191/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Inge Barnett (Roskilde, Denmark), Suzanne Ditlevsen (Copenhagen, Denmark), Annie Madsen (Frederiksberg, Denmark) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-66/15, Barnett and others v EESC; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-66/15, Barnett and others v EESC;

Barnett and others

EESC

giving judgment itself,

| — | annul the decisions contained in the pension slips of June 2014 by which the correction coefficient applicable to the applicants’ pensions is reduced from 1 January 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions contained in the pension slips of June 2014 by which the correction coefficient applicable to the applicants’ pensions is reduced from 1 January 2014;

| — | order the EESC to pay the costs in both sets of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EESC to pay the costs in both sets of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on two pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-148/16 P, Barnett and Mogensen v Commission.

Barnett and Mogensen

Commission

---
#### Willie Gary, *Petitioner,*v. J. R. Merritt, Sheriff of St. Lucie County, Florida, *Defendant.*

Division B.

Decision Filed November 9, 1927.

*Alto Adams*and *W. PL. Wolfe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*'Fred PL. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This ease comes to this Court on writ of error to judgment of the Circuit Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida denying petition for writ of *habeas corpus.*

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the *916opinions in the case of White v. Penton filed by this Court October 28, 1926, and reported in 110 Sou. 533 and in Ex Parte Amos filed in this Court January 11, 1927, and reported in 112 Sou. 289, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Antonio CONILL-VALDES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2826

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

Antonio Conill-Valdes, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

*880Petitioner's "Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Discretionary Belated Appeal" of the lower court's June 27, 2018 order denying his successive motion for postconviction relief, filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, is denied on the merits. *See**Dawson v. State* , 847 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ; *Peterson v. State* , 746 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

AMENDED PETITION DENIED.

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ JOHNNY LEE WEAVER , Claimant

- Appellant ,
v. Eric K. Shinseki , SECRETARY OF VETER ANS AFFAIRS, Re spondent

- Appe l lee.

__________________________ 201 3- 7130

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 1 2-19 48 , Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Upon consideration of Johnny Lee Weaver ’s unopposed motion to withdraw his appeal, Case: 13-7130 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 09/30/2013WEAVER v. SHINSEKI 2

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted

. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s21 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 30, 2013 Case: 13-7130 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 09/30/2013
##### 



EXHIBIT
13.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report of Enterra Energy Trust (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John Kalman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   /s/ John KalmanJohn KalmanChief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2005
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nova Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Lee W. Chung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Lee W. Chung                                    Dated: August 15, 2006
    -------------------------------------------------
        Lee W. Chung
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
```
# C_2020390EN.01001701.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 28 February 2020 — Slovenský plynárenský priemysel, a.s. v Finančné riaditel’stvo Slovenskej republiky

(Case C-113/20)

(2020/C 390/24)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Slovenský plynárenský priemysel, a.s.

Defendant: Finančné riaditel’stvo Slovenskej republiky

By order of 1 October 2020, the Court (Sixth Chamber) ruled as follows:

Council Directive 90/435/EEC (1) of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States does not apply in a situation in which in which the tax authorities of a Member State recover from the taxpayer unpaid corporation tax in respect of a tax period preceding the accession of that Member State to the European Union by means of a tax adjustment issued after that accession.

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 225, p. 6.

---
Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 12 PageID 2262
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 12 PageID 2263
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 3 of 12 PageID 2264
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 4 of 12 PageID 2265
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 5 of 12 PageID 2266
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 6 of 12 PageID 2267
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 7 of 12 PageID 2268
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 8 of 12 PageID 2269
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 9 of 12 PageID 2270
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 10 of 12 PageID 2271
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 11 of 12 PageID 2272
 

 Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 226 Filed 01/26/06 Page 12 of 12 PageID 2273
flisniiss and Opinion Filed November 29, 2012

In The 

## tittrt nfkppia1 ift1! 1itrict nf 

## ixa t 

## at1a No._05-12-01425-CR CIIAUNCEY JARAY WASHINGTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial DistrictCourt Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 30317-86 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before ChiefJustice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers Appellanthas filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and this decisionbe certifiedbelow for observance. 

### See TEx. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
PER CURIAM DoNotPublish TEx. R. App. P. 47 121425F.U05
# C_2016402EN.01005901.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/59

---

Action brought on 16 September 2016 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (Second Display)

(Case T-659/16)

(2016/C 402/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Second Display’ — Application for registration No 14 362 248

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 June 2016 in Case R 106/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s First Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s First Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 read in conjunction with Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 read in conjunction with Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2016156EN.01005201.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/52

---

Action brought on 1 March 2016 — Aydin v EUIPO — Kaporal France (ROYAL & CAPORAL)

(Case T-95/16)

(2016/C 156/70)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Savas Aydin (Pantin, France) (represented by: F. Watrin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kaporal France (Marseilles, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ROYAL & CAPORAL’ — Application for registration No 12 587 663

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 December 2015 in Case R 867/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to register the trade mark ROYAL & CAPORAL (application No 12 587 663); |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to register the trade mark ROYAL & CAPORAL (application No 12 587 663);

| — | order the unsuccessful parties to pay the costs and expenses. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the unsuccessful parties to pay the costs and expenses.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 12.2 CERTIFICATION  I, Christopher Cherry, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MAX Resource Corp. ;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April1, 2010  / s / Christopher CherryChristopher Cherry, CFO (Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00087]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2246-065]

Yuba County Water Agency; Notice of Reasonable Period of Time for 
Water Quality Certification Application

    On December 30, 2024, the Yuba County Water Agency submitted to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its 
application for Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality 
certification filed with the California State Water Resources Control 
Board (Water Board), in conjunction with the above captioned project. 
The submittal also included a response from the Water Board stating 
that it received the application on the same day. Pursuant to section 
5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ we hereby notify the Water 
Board of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 5.23(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: December 30, 2024.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: 
December 30, 2025.
    If the Water Board fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying 
authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: December 31, 2024.
Debbie-Anne Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-00087 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Michael Anthony PLANES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2306

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the amended quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  February 25, 2005

/s/ Bryan Kenyon
Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |
| (2)             | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                registrant. |

| /s/                      Peter T. Socha                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Peter                  T. Socha                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Title:                   Chief Executive                  Officer                                                                                                                                                  |
Case 3:03-cv-00471-R Document 19 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70