alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jean Vezina, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
|   | /s/ Jean Vezina                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Jean Vezina

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 

December 28, 2005

 

 

 

 

----
Robert B. FRANCIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-121

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2022237EN.01004701.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Flašker v Commission

(Case T-392/20) (1)

(State aid - Measures granted by Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies - Preliminary examination phase - Decision of the Commission finding no State aid and, possibly, that there is existing aid - Decision adopted without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Serious difficulties)

(2022/C 237/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Petra Flašker (Grosuplje, Slovenia) (represented by: K. Zdolšek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas and C. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: B. Jovin Hrastnik, acting as Agent)

Re:

By her action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 1724 final of 24 March 2020 closing the examination of measures concerning the public pharmacy Lekarna Ljubljana in the light of the State aid rules in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU (Case SA.43546 (2016/FC) — Slovenia).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 1724 final of 24 March 2020 closing the examination of measures concerning the public pharmacy Lekarna Ljubljana in the light of the State aid rules in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU (Case SA.43546 (2016/FC) — Slovenia) in so far as it concerns the assets under management of Lekarna Ljubljana; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 1724 final of 24 March 2020 closing the examination of measures concerning the public pharmacy Lekarna Ljubljana in the light of the State aid rules in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU (Case SA.43546 (2016/FC) — Slovenia) in so far as it concerns the assets under management of Lekarna Ljubljana;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Petra Flašker; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Petra Flašker;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Slovenia to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Slovenia to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
# C_2021163EN.01003001.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Golvabia Innovation v EUIPO (MaxWear)

(Case T-99/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark MaxWear - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 163/39)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Golvabia Innovation AB (Anderstorp, Sweden) (represented by: D. Thorbjörnsson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by T. von Schantz and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2019 (Case R 888/2019-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MaxWear as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Golvabia Innovation AB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Golvabia Innovation AB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
# C_2021028EN.01001402.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Sisal Entertainment SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

(Case C-480/20)

(2021/C 28/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Sisal Entertainment SpA

Respondent: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?

| 2. | Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?

---
Patricia Jean ANTON and Stanley Joseph Anton, Appellants, v. Herburt Kyle FLETCHER, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D18-2112 5D18-2968 5D18-2969 5D18-2970

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 26, 2019

Patricia Jean Anton and Stanley Joseph Anton, Kissimmee, pro se.

H. Kyle Fletcher, Jr., of the Fletcher Law Firm, P.A., Oviedo, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

*1279AFFIRMED. *See**In re Guardianship of Beck*, 204 So.3d 143, 152 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

ORFINGER, LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Debra L. DOLCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1675

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 17, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

*** ***

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

I, Jon Laria, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Parks! America, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. 

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

d)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
James H. CHADWICK, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 24-A POWER OF ATTORNEY WITH RESPECT TO REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY
COVERING NOTES, DEBENTURES, SUBORDINATED NOTES, SUBORDINATED
DEBENTURES, NOTES SOLD THROUGH SALES AGENTS OR UNDERWRITERS,
NOTES PURSUANT TO THE FORD INTEREST ADVANTAGE PROGRAM,
AND SECURITIES BACKED BY COMPANY RECEIVABLES The undersigned, an officer or director of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY (the Company), does
hereby constitute and appoint any officer of the Company and each of them, severally, his/her true
and lawful attorney and agent at any time and from time to time to do any and all acts and things
and execute in his/her name (whether on behalf of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, or as an officer or
director of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, or by attesting the Seal of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY or
otherwise) any and all instruments which said attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable in
order to enable FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and any requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, in connection
with a Registration Statement or Registration Statements and any and all amendments (including
post-effective amendments) to the Registration Statement or Registration Statements relating to the
issuance and sale of any of the above-captioned securities of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY authorized
by the Board of Directors of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY including specifically, but without
limitation thereto, power and authority to sign his/her name (whether on behalf of FORD MOTOR
CREDIT COMPANY or as an officer or director of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, or by attesting the seal
of FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY or otherwise) to such Registration Statement or Registration
Statements and to such amendments (including post-effective amendments) to the Registration
Statement or Registration Statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
any of the exhibits, financial statements or schedules, prospectuses or related documents filed
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and each of the
undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents, and each of them
shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys and agents shall have,
and may exercise, all the powers hereby conferred. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has signed his/her name hereto as of the
17th day of March, 2006.
# C_2021349EN.01003701.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Aldi v EUIPO (CUCINA)

(Case T-527/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark CUCINA - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 349/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, C. Fürsen and M. Minkner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Bosse and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2020 (Case R 463/2020-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign CUCINA as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
Opinion issued February 25 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 13

- 01074

- CV

——————————— BRYAN KEITH CRUM , Appellant

V.
KRISTIN BROOK CRUM , Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2001

- 50021

MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 6, 2014, appellant, Bryan Keith Crum, filed a motion to dismiss
this appeal. No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued.

A ccordingly, w e grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.1(a)(1).2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
#### Henry G. McNeal, *Appellant,*v. Nina May Brister et al., *Appellees.*

Decision Filed October 14, 1927.

*Forrest G. Cooper,*of Indianola, Miss.; *Guy A. Andrews,*and *Bradford G. Williams,*for Appellant;

*Peterson & Carver,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
# C_2021138EN.01005302.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/53

---

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2021 — Colombani v EEAS

(Case T-507/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
LAWSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2016

- 2146

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15

- cv

- 01550

- MCW, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
T HEODORE P ATRICK W ATSON , Watson & Associates, LLC, Aurora, CO, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by W OJCIECH K ORNACKI

.

M ICHAEL D. S NYDER , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Just ice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by B ENJAMIN C. M IZER , R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R

. , D OUGLAS K. M ICKLE ; C HRISTOPHERM C C LINTOCK , United States Small Business Administr ation, Washington, DC.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , R EYNA , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
# C_2021044EN.01004102.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/41

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division) — United Kingdom) — Daimler AG v Walleniusrederierna Aktiebolag, Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA, Wallenius Logistics AB, Wilhelmsen Ships Holding Malta Limited, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean AS, ‘K’ Line Holding (Europe) Limited, ‘K’ Line Europe Limited, Compañia Sudamericana de Vapores SA

(Case C-2/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/56)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
1950.

#### Joiner *v.*Moore.

Foreclosure of lien, from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan. May 5, 1909.

Submitted July 19, —

Decided July 31, 1909.

*J. L. Kent,*for plaintiff in error. *William Faircloth,*contra..

Powell, J.

Tlie assignments of error are wholly without merit. The ease was brought to this court apparently for the purpose of delay only.

*Judgment affirmed, with damages.*
# C_2022198EN.01003901.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — OT v Parliament

(Case T-757/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary penalty - Reprimand - Article 21a of the Staff Regulations - Error of assessment)

(2022/C 198/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OT (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Lázaro Betancor and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 19 December 2019 imposing a reprimand on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 19 December 2019 imposing a reprimand on the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 19 December 2019 imposing a reprimand on the applicant;

| 2. | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

---
DEEP SEA ATLANTIC N.V., a Suriname Naamloze Vennootschap, Appellant, v. MICAL SEAFOOD, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1603

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 6, 2019]

Daniel Lustig, Michael J. Pike and Dominique J. Torsiello of Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

William G. Salim, Jr. and Ari J. Glazer of Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We dismiss that portion of this appeal challenging an order denying dismissal under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j). We do not have jurisdiction of orders denying dismissal under this rule, as such orders are not orders determining "jurisdiction of the person." *Jennings v. Montenegro* , 792 So.2d 1258, 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We affirm on all other issues as appellant did not overcome the presumption that arises from a return of service that is regular on its face. *See**Koster v. Sullivan* , 103 So.3d 882, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Warner, Gross and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
# C_2022368EN.01001901.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — AZ v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Hollabrunn Korneuburg Tulln

(Case C-163/20) (1)

(2022/C 368/28)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
Donald O. LEE, Appellant, v. Robert E. LEE and Carol J. Colon, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.