alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1714.

#### Mock *v.*Waters.

Complaint, from city court of Sylvania — Judge Boykin. January 28, 1909.

Argued April 1, —

Decided July 31, 1909.

Eehearing denied September 28, 1909.

*J. W. Overstreet, A. B. Lovett,*for plaintiff.

*E. K. Overstreet,*for defendant.

Hill, C. *J.*

1. The ruling of the court in allowing the amendment to the-answer is made the subject of specific exception and proper assignment of error; and the final judgment is also excepted to, because of the antecedent ruling in allowing the amendment, which ruling affected the final result. The assignments of error are therefore squarely within the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in *Lyndon*v. *Georgia Ry.*& *Electric Co.,*129 *Ga.*353 (58 S. E. 1047).

2. The act creating the city court of Sylvania (Acts of 1902, p. 170) makes it a “city court” within the meaning of that term as used in the constitution of this State, as construed by the Supreme Court in *Welborne*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*793 (40 S. E. 857). We therefore decline to certify to the Supreme Court the constitutional question raised by the defendant in error as to the jurisdiction of this court to review by writ of error the rulings of the city court of Sylvania, the question of constitutional construction involved having been already passed upon by the Supreme Court in the *Welborne*case. *Fews*v. *State,*1 *Ga. App.*122 (58 S. E. 64).

3. The amendment to the answer was properly allowed as against general demurrer; for, irrespective of the merits of the other defenses asserted, it set up that the note sued on had been paid in part, which, if proved, would prevent a recovery of the full amount sued for. This is true although the plaintiff afterwards conceded the truth of the plea in this respect. An admission that a plea is well founded is no reason for striking it. *Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2020068EN.01005701.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/57

---

Action brought on 8 January 2020 — Dr. Spiller v EUIPO — Rausch (Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller)

(Case T-6/20)

(2020/C 68/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dr. Spiller GmbH (Siegsdorf, Germany) (represented by: J. Stock and M. Geitz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rausch AG Kreuzlingen (Kreuzlingen, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller — Application for registration No 11 091 204

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2019 in Case R 2206/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31734]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1175 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-963, K2025-962.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31734 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  OrderPro  Logistics,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
L. Windorski,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company and I, Patricia L. Green,
Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350  as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
21st day of August2003.

/s/ Richard L. Windorski
--------------------------------------------
Richard L. Windorski
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Patricia L. Green
--------------------------------------------
Patricia L. Green
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PetroHunter Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carmen J. Lotito, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


  /s/ CARMEN J. LOTITO
-----------------------------------------
Carmen J. Lotito, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021329EN.01002701.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Acciona v EUIPO — Agencia Negociadora PB (REACCIONA)

(Case T-362/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark REACCIONA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Existence of domestic legal proceedings - No proper reason for non-use)

(2021/C 329/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Acciona SA (Alcobendas, Spain) (represented by: J. Erdozain López, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Agencia Negociadora PB SL (Las Rozas de Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros and F. Ortega Sánchez, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 652/2019-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Agencia Negociadora PB and Acciona.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Acciona SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Agencia Negociadora PB SL. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Acciona SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Agencia Negociadora PB SL.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Holding Company("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2005,hereby certify asfollows:

|  |          |                                                                                           |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                     |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | The information in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations for Nalco. |

|  | /s/ WILLIAM H.JOYCE                                    William H. Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date:November 10, 2005 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ BRADLEY J.BELL                                      Bradley J. Bell Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer Date: November 10, 2005 |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20948 and #20949; Missouri Disaster Number MO-20009]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-4855-DR), dated January 1, 2025. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.
 DATES: Issued on January 1, 2025. *Incident Period:*
                         November 3, 2024 through November 9, 2024. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         March 3, 2025. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         October 1, 2025.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on January 1, 2025, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Carter, Crawford, Dent, Douglas, Howell, Oregon, Ozark, Phelps, Pulaski, Reynolds, Shannon, Texas, Washington, Wright. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 20948C and for economic injury is 209490. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Alejandro C. Contreras, Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.


[FR Doc. 2025-00148 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Omar T. ALSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3909

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Resource Funding, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Liu,
      Ming Fen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company for the quarter ending November
      30, 2006, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:







(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










January
      16, 2007 CAPITAL RESOURCE FUNDING, INC.








By:  /s/
      Liu, Ming Fen


Liu,
      Ming
      Fen


Chief
      Financial Officer
VBX, INC., Appellant, v. SKY FLY UNIVERSAL, INC., Cool & Start Aviation, Inc., Andrea Rojas a/k/a Maria Andrea Rojas, Sandra Rojas and David Rojas, Appellees.

No. 4D18-2073

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

Bar No.01344800

860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

Hurst, TX 76054

Phone: (817) 916-4710

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO.: 24-42309-MXM-13

VU TRAN DANG

1709 LUELLA CT

HURST, TX 76054

SSN/TIN: XXX-XX-8878

KELLY THI PHAM

1709 LUELLA CT

HURST, TX 76054

SSN/TIN: XXX-XX-7030

DEBTORS HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 2024 at 8:30 AM 

NOTICE OF CONTINUED HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

A previously scheduled hearing for this matter has been continued. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright, Staff Attorney

 Bar No. 24068273

 PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

 Bar No. 01344800

 860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

 Hurst, TX 76054

 (817) 916-4710 Phone

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on or before the date of filing. Service was 

accomplished electronically on Debtors' attorney and all parties entitled to electronic notice and by first class mail on 

the Debtors and the parties listed below, if any. 

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright

VU TRAN DANG

KELLY THI PHAM

1709 LUELLA CT

HURST, TX 76054
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH EX REL. ANDREW**
**DARVIN HERSH,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**MARK GARMAN, SUPERINTENDENT,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 87 MM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of August, 2016, the Application for L eave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is** DENIED

**.**
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Casino & Entertainment PropertiesLLC (the “Registrant”) for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisReport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe Registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:                                                      /s/ DENISE BARTON    Denise Barton    *Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary ofAmerican Casino & EntertainmentProperties LLC*   Date:August 9, 2007
23
Keith Anthony NEWTON v. STATE

CR-16-0216

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1 NOT DESIGNATED FOR P UBLICATION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANS AS

N o
. 1 15 , 132
S TATE OF K ANSAS , Appellee ,

v
. A NTHONY H EGWOOD , Appellant

.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appe al from Wyandotte District Court; M ICHAEL A. R USSELL , judge. Opinion filed December 1 , 2017

. Affirmed.

Gerald E. Wells , of Jerry Wells Attorney

- at

- Law , of Lawrence, w as on the brief for appellant.

Jerome A. Gorman , district attorney, and Derek Schmidt , attorney general, were on the brief for appellee.

P ER C URIAM : Anthony Hegwood appeals the district court's summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm.
Hegwood asserted he was entitled to relief under State v. Murdock , 299 Kan. 312, 323 P.3d 846 (2014) , overruled by State v. Keel , 302 Kan. 560, 35 7 P.3d 251 (2015), cert. denied 136 S. Ct. 865 (2016)

. Murdock related to the calculation of a criminal defendant's criminal history score under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA) when a defendant's c riminal history includes out

- of

- state robberies committed prior to the enactment of the KSGA. 299 Kan. at 314, 318

- 19.2

T he district court summarily denied Hegwood's claims based on its conclusion that Murdock did not apply to Hegwood's sentence s for aggravated robbery, which were imposed on May 13, 1993

— before the July 1, 1993, effective date of the KSGA

. See K.S.A. 21

- 4704(a) ("For purposes of sentencing, the following sentencing guidelines for nondrug crimes shall be applied in felony cases for crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993.") ; see also K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21

- 6802(c) (Revised Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act "shall have no application to crimes committed prior to July 1, 1993"). Murdock , which limited its analysis to situations where the KSGA applied, would not have any effect on Hegwood's sentence s
.
The district court appoint ed counsel for Hegwood's appeal, and before us Hegwood concedes he is not entitled to relief under Murdock because his sentence s w ere imposed prior to enactment of the KSGA . Therefore, Murdock w ould not impact his pre

KSGA sent ence s, even if it had not been overruled after Hegwood filed his motion to correct an illegal sentence

. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude the district court adequately addressed the issues. The district court's dismissal is affir med under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.042(b)(2) (2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 48) (the appeal is without merit).

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0586

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GREGORY GEORGE DENNY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including September 21, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

JMK

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2020

07/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0586