alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 906 of


the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H.
Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
7, 2008





By:
            /s/ John H. HomierJohn
      H. HomierPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
In re: Joseph Pete Castner Case No. 24-50067-rlj-7

DECLARATION CONCERNING DEBTOR’S

AMENDED SCHEDULES A/B

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY INDIVIDUAL DEBTORS

I declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing Amended Schedules A/B

consisting of 8 pages, and that it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

Date: June 4, 2024

/s/ Joseph Pete Castner 

Joseph Pete Castner

Case 24-50067-rlj7 Doc 21 Filed 06/04/24 Entered 06/04/24 13:40:25 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
In Re: Newhouse v. Cannon Legacy Builders, LLC

Case No. 24−40553−elm7 −7

Adv. No. 24−04032−elm

SUMMONS SERVICE EXECUTED

I,___________________________________________________________________________

of**_________________________________________________________________________

certify:

 If service was made by personal service, by residence service, or pursuant to state law, I further certify that I am,

and all times during service of process was, not less than 18 years of age and not a party to the matter concerning

which service of process was made;

 That on the __________ day of ____________________________________,_______ I served a copy of the

within summons, together with the complaint filed in this proceeding, on

the defendant in this proceeding, by {describe here the mode of service}

the said defendant at

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on ___________________ _____________________________

(Date) (Signature)

**____________________________________________________________________

State mailing address

Kenneth A. Hill

Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C.

6th May 2024

Cannon Legacy Builders, LLC

First class mail, postage prepaid, & certified mail return receipt requested.

Cannon Legacy Builders, LLC

Reg. Agent: Jacob Cannon

925 W. Bear Creek Rd.

Glenn Heights, TX 75154

5/6/2024 /s/ Kenneth A. Hill

QSLWM, P.C., 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800, Dallas, TX 75201

Case 24-04032-elm Doc 4 Filed 05/06/24 Entered 05/06/24 16:32:22 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Ronnie Odell PARKER v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES

CR-16-0747

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,060-01

EX PARTE DONELL MARQUIS FOLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F49439-A IN THE 249TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM JOHNSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

delivery of a controlled substance, 4 to 200 grams, as a habitual felon, and he was sentenced to

twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He was also convicted of two counts of delivery of a controlled

substance, 1 to 4 grams, which counts resulted in suspended sentences and community supervision.

Applicant alleges that his guilty pleas were involuntary due to the ineffective assistance of

his trial counsel and that counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. Trial counsel has provided a

response. Counsel’s response and the habeas record show that the claims pertaining to the conviction
2

in count 1 that resulted in a twenty-five year sentence lack merit. These claims are denied. The

claims pertaining to the convictions in counts 2 and 3 are dismissed. Applicant may not challenge

these counts of conviction in an Article 11.07 habeas application because such a challenge must be

raised under Article 11.072 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ex parte Hiracheta, 307 S.W3d 323

(Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Villanueva v. State, 252 S.W.3d 391 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

Filed: January 13, 2016

Do not publish
Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 1 Filed 04/18/00 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 1 Filed 04/18/00 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 1 Filed 04/18/00 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 1 Filed 04/18/00 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 1 Filed 04/18/00 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
 

 Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 1 Filed 04/18/00 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
# C_2021329EN.01002601.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — MCM Products v EUIPO — The Nomad Company (NOMAD)

(Case T-285/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - European Union word mark NOMAD - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Lack of descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 329/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MCM Products AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Eichhammer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Kondás and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: The Nomad Company BV (Zevenaar, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Tigu, lawyer

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2020 (Case R 854/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between MCM Products and The Nomad Company.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders MCM Products AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders MCM Products AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the "Report") of Sea Sun
Capital Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, the
undersigned, Graham Millington, the President and Chief Executive Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   May 6, 2005                       /s/ Graham Millington
                                           -----------------------
                                           Graham Millington
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**TROY JAMELL GELLISPIE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 45 MM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for** 

**Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31424]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Career Development for Early Career Investigators Study 
Section.
    Date: February 12-13, 2025.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 
8B, Rockville, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 
Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 827-3101, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 26, 2024.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31424 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31646]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
NC-20007]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of North Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4827-DR), dated 
September 28, 2024.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Helene.

DATES: Issued on December 20, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024 through December 18, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: January 7, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated September 28, 2024, 
is hereby amended to update the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning September 25, 2024 and continuing through December 18, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-31646 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
# C_2021502EN.01002202.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Square v EUIPO — ($ Cash App)

(Case T-211/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark $ Cash App - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2021/C 502/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, Solicitor, and by K. Lüder and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2020 (Case R 810/2019-1), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark $ Cash App.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Square, Inc. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Square, Inc. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and                                 |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |
| (2)             | The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of      operations of theregistrant. |

|   | /s/          Peter T. Socha                           |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Peter      T. Socha                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | Title:       Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                   |

----
# C_2021110EN.01001301.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

(Case C-92/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union - Community Customs Code - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Second indent of Article 239(1) - Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties - Special situation - Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation - Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect - Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory - Failure to present goods to customs)

(2021/C 110/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rottendorf Pharma GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld

Operative part of the judgment

The second indent of Article 239(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code must be interpreted as meaning that, first, an economic operator may claim repayment of the customs duties which it has paid only where that operator is in a special situation and there is no manifest negligence or deception on its part and, second, that the fact that the goods concerned were re-exported to a third country without entering the economic network of the European Union is insufficient to establish that that economic operator was in such a special situation. The same conclusion applies where the conduct giving rise to the imposition of the customs duties concerned was caused by an error in the information contained in the computer system of that economic operator, since that error could have been avoided if the same economic operator had taken account of the conditions contained in the authorisation granted to it.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPCTY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC. 

 Debtor. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 22-31641-mv-7 

(Chapter 7) 

SCOTT M. SIEDEL, TRUSTEE 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HUDSON CLEAN ENERGY ENTERPRISES, 

LLC, ALLIANCE TEXAS HOLDINGS, LLC; 

NEIL Z. AUERBACH, JUDITH AUERBACH, 

AUERBACH PARTNERS, L.P, JAMES 

GOODMAN, JAMES FRINZI, GOODMAN 

INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, GENESIS 

NETWORKS, INC., GENESIS NETWORKS 

GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, AUERBACH 

CHILDREN’S DYNASTY TRUST U/A/D 

OCTOBER 9, 2012, and AUERBACH FAMILY 

DYNASTY TRUST U/A/D OCTOBER 9, 2012, 

 Defendant(s). 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING 

NO: 23-03090-mvl 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed May 2, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-03090-mvl Doc 38 Filed 05/03/24 Entered 05/03/24 14:41:15 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Came on consideration the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, filed by Wick 

Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP (“WPGM”), in the above-captioned case. The Court finds that 

proper notice of the Motion has been provided and good cause exists to permit WPGM to withdraw 

as counsel for Defendant James Frinzi (“Mr. Frinzi”). Therefore, it is hereby: 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED; it is further 

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court and all parties are directed to remove WPGM as 

counsel for Mr. Frinzi on the docket and any applicable service list, including the Court’s CM/ECF 

electronic notification list, maintained in the Bankruptcy Case. 

ORDERED Mr. Frinzi may be contacted as follows: 3736 Bee Cave Road, Suite 1164, 

Austin, Texas 78746, James@frinzi.net. 

# # # END OF ORDER # # # 

PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: 

Jason M. Rudd, Tex. Bar No. 24028786 

Paul T. Elkins, Tex. Bar No. 24092383 

WICK PHILLIPS GOULD & MARTIN, LLP 

3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 500 

Dallas, Texas 75204 

Telephone: (214) 692-6200 

Facsimile: (214) 692-6255 

jason.rudd@wickphillips.com 

paul.elkins@wickphillips.com 

Case 23-03090-mvl Doc 38 Filed 05/03/24 Entered 05/03/24 14:41:15 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
C.M., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    (LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation of our report dated July 6, 2001 relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Silverline Technologies Limited and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated
statement of income and cash flow for each of the years in the three years
period ended December 31, 2000, in the Annual Report in Form 20-F of Silverline
Technologies Limited for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002.

                                        /s/ Deloitte Haskins & Sells
                                        ----------------------------
                                        DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS

Place: Mumbai
Date:  January 28, 2003
# C_2023164EN.01002001.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/20

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel

(Case C-574/20, (1) Finanzamt Österreich)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social security - Family benefits - Indexation based on price - Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law - No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings - Question manifestly inadmissible)

(2023/C 164/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XO

Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Examination of the first question referred for a preliminary ruling has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, in the light of Article 45 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Examination of the first question referred for a preliminary ruling has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, in the light of Article 45 TFEU.

| 2. | The second question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria) is manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The second question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria) is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.

---