Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2025 / Notices 103 

agrichemical retailers and refilling 

establishments, custom blenders and 

commercial applicators of agricultural 

pesticides. The records have to be 

maintained by the owners and operators 

of such businesses and made available 

to inspectors to ensure that businesses 

are in compliance with containment 

requirements. These inspections are 

generally conducted by the states, 

which enforce Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 

regulations through cooperative 

agreements with EPA. 

Form number(s): None. 

Respondents/affected entities: Entities 

potentially affected are those that are 

part of the regulated community 

affected by the container design and 

residue removal regulations which 

includes businesses that formulate 

pesticide products or repackage 

pesticide products into refillable 

containers. The ICR includes a list of 

potentially affected entities with North 

American Industrial Classification 

System (NAICS) codes provided to 

assist in determining potential 

applicability. NAICS codes identified in 

question 12 of the ICR. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory under FIFRA sections 3, 8, 

19 and 25 (7 U.S.C. 136f, 136q, and 

136w). 

Estimated number of potential 

respondents: 23,586. 

Frequency of response: On Occasion. 

Total estimated burden: 180,763 

hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 

CFR 1320.3(b). 

Total estimated costs: $10,864,047 

(per year), includes $419,875 

annualized capital investment or 

maintenance and operational costs. 

Changes in the estimates: There is no 

change in the number of burden hours 

as there are no programmatic updates or 

changes for this ICR. The change in 

costs for the regulated community is 

$1,830,391. The change in costs for the 

Agency is $1,747. The increase in costs 

for both are based on BLS wage rate 

adjustments. There is also an increase in 

capital costs of $83,975 as a result of an 

increase in costs for agricultural 

pesticide refiller. These are adjustments. 

Courtney Kerwin, 

Director, Information Engagement Division. 

[FR Doc. 2024–31490 Filed 12–31–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–0463, OMB 3060–0692, 3060– 

1299; FR ID 270454] 

Information Collections Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

the Commission) invites the general 

public and other Federal Agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Pursuant to the Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC 

seeks specific comment on how it might 

‘‘further reduce the information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 

employees.’’ 

DATES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted on or before February 3, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. Your comment must be 

submitted into www.reginfo.gov per the 

above instructions for it to be 

considered. In addition to submitting in 

www.reginfo.gov also send a copy of 

your comment on the proposed 

information collection to Cathy 

Williams, FCC, via email to PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

Include in the comments the OMB 

control number as shown in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) go 

to the web page http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the 

section of the web page called 

‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on 

the downward-pointing arrow in the 

‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the Title 

of this ICR and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number. A copy of the FCC 

submission to OMB will be displayed. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. No person shall 

be subject to any penalty for failing to 

comply with a collection of information 

subject to the PRA that does not display 

a valid OMB control number. 

As part of its continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork burdens, as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the FCC 

invited the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. Pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4), the FCC seeks specific 

comment on how it might ‘‘further 

reduce the information collection 

burden for small business concerns with 

fewer than 25 employees.’’ 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0463. 

Title: Telecommunications Relay 

Services and Speech-to-Speech Services 

for Individuals with Hearing and 

Speech Disabilities; Structure and 

Practices of the Video Relay Service 

Program; Misuse of internet Protocol 

(IP) Captioned Telephone Service, CG 

Docket Nos. 03–123, 10–51, and 13–24. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit; Individuals or household; State, 

Local and Tribal Government. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 5,075 respondents; 8,468 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.1 

hours (6 minutes) to 80 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annually, 

semi-annually, eight times a year, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
104 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2025 / Notices 

monthly, on occasion, one-time, and 

quarterly reporting requirements; 

Recordkeeping and Third-Party 

Disclosure requirements. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefit. The statutory 

authority for the information collection 

requirements is found at section 225 of 

the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 225. 

The law was enacted on July 26, 1990, 

in Title IV of the Americans with 

Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 

101–336, 104 Stat. 327, 366–69. 

Total Annual Burden: 15,850 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $348,000. 

Needs and Uses: On December 21, 

2001, the Commission released the 2001 

TRS Cost Recovery Order, document 

FCC 01–371, published at 67 FR 4203, 

January 29, 2002, in which the 

Commission, among other things: 

(1) required internet-based TRS 

providers to submit certain projected 

TRS-related cost and demand data to the 

TRS Fund administrator to be used to 

calculate the rate; and 

(2) directed the TRS Fund 

administrator to expand its data 

collection forms accordingly. 

In 2003, the Commission released the 

2003 Second Improved TRS Order, 

published at 68 FR 50973, August 25, 

2003, which among other things 

required that TRS providers offer certain 

local exchange carrier (LEC)-based 

improved services and features where 

technologically feasible, including a 

speed dialing requirement which may 

entail voluntary recordkeeping for TRS 

providers to maintain a list of telephone 

numbers. See also 47 CFR 

64.604(a)(3)(vi)(B). 

In 2007, the Commission released the 

Section 225/255 VoIP Report and Order, 

published at 72 FR 43546, August 6, 

2007, extending the disability access 

requirements that apply to 

telecommunications service providers 

and equipment manufacturers under 47 

U.S.C. 225, 255 to interconnected voice 

over internet protocol (VoIP) service 

providers and equipment 

manufacturers. As a result, under rules 

implementing section 225 of the Act, 

interconnected VoIP service providers 

are required to publicize information 

about telecommunications relay services 

(TRS) and 711 abbreviated dialing 

access to TRS. See also 47 CFR 

64.604(c)(3). 

In 2007, the Commission also released 

the 2007 Cost Recovery Report and 

Order and Declaratory Ruling, 

published at 73 FR 3197, January 17, 

2008, in which the Commission: 

(1) adopted a new cost recovery 

methodology for interstate traditional 

TRS, interstate speech-to-speech service 

(STS), captioned telephone service 

(CTS), and internet Protocol captioned 

telephone service (IP CTS) based on the 

Multi-state Average Rate Structure 

(MARS) plan, under which interstate 

TRS compensation rates are determined 

by weighted average of the states’ 

intrastate compensation rates, and 

which includes for STS additional 

compensation approved by the 

Commission for STS outreach; 

(2) adopted a cost recovery 

methodology for internet Protocol (IP) 

Relay based on a price cap like 

methodology; 

(3) adopted a cost recovery 

methodology for video relay service 

(VRS) that adopted tiered rates based on 

call volume; 

(4) clarified the nature and extent that 

certain categories of costs are 

compensable from the Fund; and 

(5) addressed certain issues 

concerning the management and 

oversight of the Fund, including 

prohibiting financial incentives offered 

to consumers to make relay calls. 

The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order 

requires that state relay administrators 

and TRS providers submit to the TRS 

Fund administrator the following 

information annually, for intrastate 

traditional TRS, STS, and CTS: 

(1) the per-minute compensation 

rate(s) and other compensation received 

for the provision of TRS; 

(2) whether the rate applies to session 

minutes or conversation minutes, which 

are a subset of session minutes; 

(3) the number of intrastate session 

minutes; and 

(4) the number of intrastate 

conversation minutes. 

Also, STS providers must file a report 

annually with the TRS Fund 

administrator and the Commission on 

their specific outreach efforts directly 

attributable to the additional 

compensation approved by the 

Commission for STS outreach. 

In 2011, to help prevent waste, fraud, 

and abuse, the Commission adopted 

three VRS orders to curtail these 

harmful practices. Each of these orders 

(collectively, the 2011 VRS Orders) 

included information collection 

requirements. 

On April 6, 2011, in document FCC 

11–54, the Commission released the 

2011 Fraud Prevention Order, published 

at 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011, which 

included several measures designed to 

eliminate the waste, fraud and abuse, 

while ensuring that VRS remains a 

viable and a valuable communication 

tool for Americans who use it on a daily 

basis. 

On July 28, 2011, in document FCC 

11–118 the Commission released the 

VRS Certification Order, published at 76 

FR 47469, August 5, 2011, amending its 

rules for certifying internet-based TRS 

providers as eligible for payment from 

the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund) for their 

provision of internet-based TRS. 

On October 17, 2011, in document 

FCC 11–155, the Commission released 

the Second VRS Certification Order, 

published at 76 FR 67070, October 31, 

2011, addressing three petitions related 

to the VRS Certification Order by 

revising the burdens contained in the 

requirements for the submission of 

documentation of a provider’s VRS 

equipment and technologies and the 

submission of documentation regarding 

sponsorship arrangements. 

The following are the final 

information collection requirements 

contained in the 2011 VRS Orders: 

(1) The Chief Executive Officer (CEO), 

Chief Financial Officer (CFO), or other 

senior executive of a TRS provider shall 

certify, under penalty of perjury, that: 

(1) minutes submitted to the Interstate 

TRS Fund (Fund) administrator for 

compensation were handled in 

compliance with the Commission’s 

rules and are not the result of 

impermissible financial incentives to 

generate calls, and (2) cost and demand 

data submitted to the Fund 

administrator related to the 

determination of compensation rates are 

true and correct. 

(2) VRS providers shall: (a) submit to 

the Commission and the TRS Fund 

administrator a call center report twice 

a year and (b) notify the Commission 

and the TRS Fund administrator at least 

30 days prior to any change to their call 

centers’ locations. 

(3) VRS providers shall submit 

detailed call data records (CDRs) and 

speed of answer compliance data to the 

Fund administrator. 

(4) TRS providers shall use an 

automated record keeping system to 

capture the CDRs and shall submit such 

data electronically in standardized form 

to the TRS Fund administrator. 

(5) Internet-based TRS providers shall 

retain the CDRs that are used to support 

payment claims submitted to the Fund 

administrator for a minimum of five 

years, in an electronic format. 

(6) VRS providers shall: (a) maintain 

copies of all third-party contracts or 

agreements and make them available to 

the Commission and the TRS Fund 

administrator upon request; and (b) 

describe all agreements in connection 

with marketing and outreach activities 

in their annual submissions to the TRS 

Fund administrator. 

(7) TRS providers shall provide 

information about their TRS 

whistleblower protections to all 

employees and contractors, in writing. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2025 / Notices 105 

In 2018, the Commission released the 

IP CTS Modernization Order, published 

at 83 FR 30082, June 27, 2018, in which 

the Commission: 

(1) determined that it would 

transition the methodology for IP CTS 

cost recovery from the MARS plan to 

cost-based rates and adopted interim 

rates; and 

(2) added two cost reporting 

requirements for IP CTS providers: (i) In 

annual cost data filings and 

supplementary information provided to 

the TRS Fund administrator, IP CTS 

providers that contract for the supply of 

services used in the provision of TRS, 

shall include information about 

payments under such contracts, 

classified according to the substantive 

cost categories specified by the TRS 

Fund administrator; and (ii) in the 

course of an audit or otherwise upon 

demand, IP CTS providers must make 

available any relevant documentation. 

47 CFR 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(D)(1), (6). 

In December 2023, the FCC released 

the 2023 VRS Improvements Order, 

document FCC 23–116, published at 89 

FR 20125, March 21, 2024, amending its 

rules (1) increase from 50% to 80% the 

portion of monthly VRS minutes that 

may be handled by communications 

assistants (CAs) working at home; (2) 

modify the amount of prior interpreting 

experience required of VRS CAs who 

work at home; and (3) allow VRS 

providers to use contract CAs, subject to 

conditions, for up to 30% of their 

monthly call minutes. 47 CFR 

64.604(c)(5)(iii)(D)(8), (d)(1)(iii)(C), 

(d)(2)(iv). The Commission also 

modified when VRS providers may seek 

compensation for VRS calls that 

originate from international IP addresses 

from users traveling abroad. 47 CFR 

64.604(d)(6). 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0692. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title: Sections 76.802 and 76.804, 

Home Wiring Provisions; Section 

76.613, Interference from a Multichannel Video Programming Distributor 

(MVPD). 

Form Number: N/A. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households; Business or other for-profit 

entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 22,000 respondents and 

253,010. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.083– 

2 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement; Recordkeeping 

requirement; Annual reporting 

requirement; Third party disclosure 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection is contained 

in Sections 1, 4, 224, 251, 303, 601, 623, 

624 and 632 of the Communications Act 

of 1934, as amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 36,114 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: No cost. 

Needs and Uses: In the Cable 

Television Consumer Protection and 

Competition Act of 1992, Congress 

directed the FCC to adopt rules 

governing the disposition of home 

wiring owned by a cable operator when 

a subscriber terminates service. The 

rules at 76.800 et seq., implement that 

directive. The intention of the rules is 

to clarify the status and provide for the 

disposition of existing cable operatorowned wiring in single family homes 

and multiple dwelling units upon the 

termination of a contract for cable 

service by the home owner or MDU 

owner. Section 76.613(d) requires that 

when Multichannel Video Programming 

Distributors (MVPDs) cause harmful 

signal interference MVPDs may be 

required by the District Director and/or 

Resident Agent to prepare and submit a 

report regarding the cause(s) of the 

interference, corrective measures 

planned or taken, and the efficacy of the 

remedial measures. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1299. 

Title: Section 20.23(b)(1), (3)–(5), (7); 

(c)(1)–(2), (3), (3)(iii)–(iv), (4)(i)–(ii), (v); 

and (d), Contraband wireless devices in 

correctional facilities. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, and state, local or tribal. 

Estimated Number of Respondents 

and Responses: 54 respondents and 

4,740 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 1–10 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: One-time 

application and self-certification 

response, one-time DCFO authorization 

request response, on occasion qualifying 

request response, on occasion reversal 

response, recordkeeping requirement, 

third party notification requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for the currently approved 

information collection is contained in 

sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 301, 302, 303, 

307, 308, 309, 310, and 332 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 

154(j), 301, 302a, 303, 307, 308, 309, 

310, and 332. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 

21,767 hours. 

Total Annual Costs: No costs. 

Needs and Uses: On July 13, 2021, the 

Commission released a Second Report 

and Order and Second Further Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, Promoting 

Technological Solutions to Combat 

Contraband Wireless Devices in 

Correctional Facilities, GN Docket No. 

13–111, in which the Commission took 

further steps to facilitate the 

deployment and viability of 

technological solutions used to combat 

contraband wireless devices in 

correctional facilities. In the Second 

Report and Order, the Commission 

adopted a framework requiring the 

disabling of contraband wireless devices 

detected in correctional facilities upon 

satisfaction of certain criteria. The 

Commission further addressed issues 

involving oversight, wireless provider 

liability, and treatment of 911 calls. 

Finally, the Commission adopted rules 

requiring advance notice of certain 

wireless provider network changes to 

promote and maintain contraband 

interdiction system effectiveness. 

In establishing rules requiring 

wireless providers to disable contraband 

wireless devices in correctional 

facilities and adopting a framework to 

enable designated correctional facility 

officials (DCFOs) relying on an 

authorized Contraband Interdiction 

System (CIS) to submit qualifying 

requests to wireless providers to disable 

contraband wireless devices in 

qualifying correctional facilities, the 

Commission found that a rules-based 

process will provide a valuable 

additional tool for departments of 

corrections to address contraband 

wireless device use. The framework 

includes a two-phase authorization 

process: (1) CIS applicants will submit 

applications to the Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) 

describing the legal and technical 

qualifications of the systems; and (2) 

CIS applicants will perform on-site 

testing of approved CISs at individual 

correctional facilities and file a selfcertification with the Commission. After 

both phases are complete, DCFOs will 

be authorized to submit qualifying 

requests to wireless providers to disable 

contraband devices using approved CISs 

at each correctional facility. In addition, 

the Commission adopted rules requiring 

wireless providers to notify certain 

types of CIS operators of major technical 

changes to ensure that CIS effectiveness 

is maintained. The Commission found 

that these rules will provide law 

enforcement with the tools necessary to 

disable contraband wireless devices, 

which, in turn, will help combat the 

serious threats posed by the illegal use 

of such devices. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
106 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2025 / Notices 

The new information collection in 47 

CFR 20.23(b)(1) regarding the 

application to obtain new CIS 

certification will be used by the Bureau 

to determine whether to certify a system 

and ensure that the systems are 

designed to support operational 

readiness and minimize the risk of 

disabling a non-contraband device, and 

ensure, to the greatest extent possible, 

that only devices that are in fact 

contraband will be identified for 

disabling. Bureau certification will also 

enable targeted industry review of 

solutions by allowing interested 

stakeholders to provide feedback on the 

application for certification, including 

the proposed test plan. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(b)(3) include the requirement that 

the CIS operator must file with the 

Bureau a self-certification that complies 

with paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of section 

20.23, confirming that the testing at that 

specific correctional facility is complete 

and successful, and the CIS operator 

must serve notice of the testing on all 

relevant wireless providers prior to 

testing and provide such wireless 

providers a reasonable opportunity to 

participate in the tests. Self-certification 

will help the Bureau to ensure that 

qualifying requests identify contraband 

wireless devices accurately and in 

accordance with legal requirements. In 

addition to being used by the Bureau, 

the self-certification will be relied upon 

by the DCFO in conjunction with 

qualifying requests for disabling at a 

particular correctional facility. The 

serving of notice to the wireless 

providers will give them awareness and 

an opportunity to participate in the 

process. 

The new information collections in 47 

CFR 20.23(b)(4) requires that wireless 

providers objecting to the certification 

filing submit objections to the Bureau 

within five business days and serve the 

DCFO and the CIS operator, which 

allows all stakeholders to participate in 

the process and raise objections. Section 

20.23(b)(5) requires that CIS operators 

retest and recertify their systems at least 

every three years and comply with the 

same requirements as for initial selfcertification. This requirement will 

enable the Bureau to ensure the ongoing 

accuracy and reliability of a given CIS 

at a particular facility. Section 

20.23(b)(7) requires that a CIS operator 

retain records for at least five years and 

provide them upon request to the 

Bureau, which will support the Bureau’s 

efforts to identify issues with CIS 

operations, resolve interference issues, 

and resolve complaints related to 

misidentification of contraband devices. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(c)(1)–(2) include the requirement 

that individuals that seek to be 

recognized on the Commission’s DCFO 

list must sent a letter to the Contraband 

Ombudsperson in order for the 

Commission to approve that person for 

the qualified DCFO list and provide 

certainty to wireless providers that 

disabling requests are made by duly 

authorized individuals. Qualifying 

requests that include the required 

information will be used by wireless 

carriers to prevent use of contraband 

devices on their network and on other 

wireless provider networks. 

The new collections 47 CFR 

20.23(c)(3)(iii)–(iv) provide that, upon 

receiving a disabling request from a 

DCFO, the wireless provider must verify 

the request, may reject the request and 

must notify the DCFO whether it is 

accepting or rejecting the request. This 

process ensures that a wireless provider 

responds to a DCFO within a reasonable 

timeframe—while giving the provider 

an opportunity to determine if there is 

an error—and to give the DCFO time to 

respond quickly if the request has been 

rejected. The wireless provider may 

contact the customer of record to notify 

them of the disabling and involve them 

in the process. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(c)(4) provide that a wireless 

provider may reverse a disabled device 

where it determines that the device was 

erroneously identified as contraband, 

and the wireless provider must notify 

the DCFO of the reversal. The wireless 

provider may choose to involve the 

DCFO in the review and reversal 

process. The DCFO must also provide 

notice to the Contraband Ombudsperson 

of the number of erroneously disabled 

devices. This process ensures the 

integrity of the contraband device 

disabling process by giving the wireless 

provider the opportunity to reverse a 

disabled device—with the ability to 

extend review to the DCFO—and by 

creating safeguards to make sure that the 

process is efficient and reliable. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(d) regarding notification from 

CMRS licensees to MAS operators of 

technical changes to their network are 

required so that MAS operators are 

given sufficient time to make necessary 

adjustments to maintain the 

effectiveness of their interdiction 

systems. In order to ensure that issues 

regarding notification to solutions 

providers of more frequent, localized 

wireless provider network changes are 

appropriately considered, CMRS 

licensees and MAS operators must 

negotiate in good faith to reach an 

agreement for notification for those 

types of network adjustments not 

covered by the notice requirement. 

CMRS licensees must provide notice of 

technical changes associated with an 

emergency immediately after the 

exigency to ensure that MAS operators 

continue to be notified of network 

changes that could impact MAS 

effectiveness. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Katura Jackson, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2024–31456 Filed 12–31–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–0773; FR ID 271228] 

Information Collection Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

the Commission) invites the general 

public and other Federal Agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Pursuant to the Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC 

seeks specific comment on how it might 

‘‘further reduce the information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 

employees.’’ The Commission may not 

conduct or sponsor a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) control number. No 

person shall be subject to any penalty 

for failing to comply with a collection 

of information subject to the PRA that 

does not display a valid OMB control 

number. 

DATES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted on or before February 3, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. Your comment must be 

submitted into www.reginfo.gov per the 

above instructions for it to be 

considered. In addition to submitting in 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1