alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.33


 


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


 





This Amendment To Executive Employment Agreement
(“Amendment”), dated June 30, 2015, hereby amends the Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated the July 1, 2013 between Reprints Desk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Research Solutions,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Research Solutions”), and Ian Palmer (“Executive”), an individual.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
have complied with the terms of the Agreement until the date hereof; and


 


WHEREAS, Reprints Desk
and Executive wish to amend the terms of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for
the mutual promises and other consideration described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Section 1(d) Term is amended as follows:



 


Term. The term of employment of Executive by
the Company pursuant to this Employment Agreement shall be for the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on June
30, 2017, or such earlier date that Employee’s employment is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Employment
Agreement.


 


		2.	Section 2(a) Base Salary is amended as follows:



 


Base Salary. In consideration of the services
to be rendered under this Agreement, the Company shall pay Executive a salary at the rate of One Hundred Eighty Three Thousand
Nine Hundred Dollars ($183,900) per year (“Base Salary”). The Base Salary shall be paid in accordance with the
Company’s regularly established payroll practice. Executive’s Base Salary will be reviewed from time to time in accordance
with the established procedures of the Company for adjusting salaries for similarly situated employees and may be adjusted in the
sole discretion of the Company.


 


Except as expressly amended or modified
herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved and shall remain in full force and
effect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall govern.


 


This Amendment and all acts and transactions
pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.


 


This Amendment may be executed and delivered
by facsimile signature and in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


REPRINTS DESK, INC.: 


 





	By:   	 	 	Name and
Title:  	 Peter Derycz, CEO	 




 


 


RESEARCH SOLUTIONS, INC.: 


 





	By:   	 	 	Name  and Title:  	 Peter Derycz, CEO	 


 


 


EXECUTIVE:


 





	By:   	 	 	Name:   	 	 







 


 





	Address:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                ASSURANCES LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to NEON Communications, Inc. that
its audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

                          /s/ NEON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


Westborough, Massachusetts
April 16, 2002
# C_2021148EN.01000502.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/5

---

Appeal brought on 2 December 2020 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 23 September 2020 in Case T-174/19, Guillaume Vincenti v EUIPO

(Case C-653/20 P)

(2021/C 148/06)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: Guillaume Vincenti

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | set aside the judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 in Case T-174/19, Guillaume Vincenti v EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

1.

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 in Case T-174/19, Guillaume Vincenti v EUIPO;

| 2. | order the applicant to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the applicant to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal is based on two grounds of appeal:

First, the General Court misapplied Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by ruling that the official must be heard before a decision not to promote him is taken.

On the one hand, the General Court failed to recognise that there is no subjective right to promotion and that non-promotion does not constitute an infringement of rights.

On the other hand, the General Court also failed to recognise that non-promotion is not comparable to a punitive administrative act.

Second, the General Court held that it cannot be excluded that the decision could reasonably have led to a different result if EUIPO had heard the official beforehand. In that regard, there is a failure to state reasons because the General Court did not examine the applicant’s arguments.

---
Exhibit 32.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the "Company"), herby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant
and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: March 30, 2007                 /s/ Kenneth Faith
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      CFO
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-02-00215- CV
Dr e sse r Indus tr ie s, Inc ., App e lla nt

v. Dorot hy A. Lehmann, et al., Appellees

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MILAM COUNTY , 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 26,342 -B , HO NORAB LE EDWARD P. M AGRE, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Dr esser

Industries, Inc. has n o t i fied this Court that its bankruptcy pr oc e e din g that ca

us e d its ap pe a l to be sta

y e d ha s te rm inate d. Ac c or din g ly , w e re ins tate the a pp e a l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 8.3(a) . Appellant has a lso notified us that the par ties have se ttled the underlying proce eding s and has moved t o dismiss its appea l. We g rant the motion and dismi ss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a)
.

W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Mar ch 3, 2006
# C_2021310EN.01003501.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/35

---

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — One Voice v ECHA

(Case T-663/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Substance homosalate - Exclusive use for the manufacture of cosmetic products - Compliance check of registrations - Article 41(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Time limit for bringing an action - Article 21(5) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 - Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 310/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: One Voice (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Ghersi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere and L. Bolzonello, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision A-009-2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the compliance check of a registration dossier for homosalate.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | One Voice is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

One Voice is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 714 

Recognizing and supporting individuals born with congenital disabilities or 

malformations due to thalidomide exposure. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. KENNEDY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting individuals born with congenital 

disabilities or malformations due to thalidomide exposure. 

Whereas July 14th, 2024, is ‘‘National Thalidomide Survivor 

Awareness Day’’; 

Whereas thalidomide is a sedative drug that was widely used 

in the late 1950s to treat nausea in pregnant women; 

Whereas thalidomide treatment resulted in irreversible side 

effects among babies, including stillbirths and congenital 

disabilities or malformations; 

Whereas such congenital disabilities or malformations include 

the shortening or absence of limbs, the malformation of 

hands and feet, sensory impairment, facial disfigurement, 

and damage to the brain, internal organs, and skeletal 

structure, among other disabilities; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 714 IS 

Whereas an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 children worldwide 

died at birth or were born with congenital disabilities or 

malformations attributable to thalidomide exposure; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are at least 20 survivors 

of thalidomide exposure in the State of Louisiana alone; 

Whereas thalidomide survivors face unique hardships requiring many to rely on adapted vehicles, electronic wheelchairs, and prosthetic limbs; 

Whereas the reliance on adaptive technologies imposes great 

financial burden on thalidomide survivors; 

Whereas thalidomide survivors are often unable to maintain 

full-time employment due to their impairments; 

Whereas the experience of thalidomide victims has greatly influenced the passage of modern drug safety laws; and 

Whereas thalidomide survivors have not received recognition 

or support from the Federal Government: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and supports individuals born 

3 with congenital disabilities or malformations due to 

4 thalidomide exposure; and 

5 (2) urges the recognition of such exposure in 

6 United States history and the long-term hardships 

7 affecting survivors of thalidomide exposure to this 

8 day. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Rafael Iglesias CASTELLANOS, a/k/a Rafael an Iglesias Castellanos, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



With reference to the Quarterly Report of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Black, Vice-President, Finance of the Company, certify, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ MICHAEL BLACK      
|MICHAEL BLACK          
|Vice-President, Finance
|August 9, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of James River Coal Company (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Peter T. Socha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | The Report fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

December 13, 2004

| | /s/    
  Peter T. Socha          | 
| | --------------------------------- | 
| | Peter T. Socha                    | 
| | Title:  Chief
  Executive Officer |
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105604-105605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31073]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without

[[Page 105605]]

change and will not be modified to remove personal or business 
information including confidential, contact, or other identifying 
information. Comments should not include any information such as 
confidential information that would not be appropriate for public 
disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 13, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. Robert M. Kahn and Kristin Kahn, both of Newton, Iowa; Michael 
S. Albright and Mollie Albright, both of Sioux City, Iowa; and Megan 
Kahn, Basalt, Colorado; to join the Kahn Family Control Group, a group 
acting in concert, to retain voting shares of United Iowa Bancshares 
Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of FNNB Bank, both of 
Newton, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-31073 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 519 

Congratulating the South Dakota State University Jackrabbits on winning 

the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football 

Championship Subdivision title. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. ROUNDS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the South Dakota State University Jackrabbits on winning the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association Division I Football Championship Subdivision title. 

Whereas, on January 7, 2024, the South Dakota State University (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘SDSU’’) Jackrabbits defeated the University of Montana Grizzlies by 

a score of 23-3 in the 2024 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) 

Division I Football Championship Subdivision (referred 

to in this preamble as the ‘‘FCS’’) championship game 

in Frisco, Texas; 

2 

•SRES 519 ATS 

Whereas the SDSU Jackrabbits football program, for the second consecutive year, have won the national championship; 

Whereas the SDSU Jackrabbits finished the 2023–2024 season undefeated with an overall record of 15 wins and 0 

losses, with 8 wins and 0 losses in the Missouri Valley 

Football Conference, and earned the #1 seed in the FCS 

playoffs; 

Whereas the SDSU Jackrabbits have qualified for the FCS 

playoffs in each of the past 12 seasons; 

Whereas, during the 2023–2024 season, the SDSU Jackrabbits— 

(1) averaged 37.33 points and 449.9 yards per 

game; and 

(2) allowed only 9.27 points and 257.2 yards per 

game on average; 

Whereas the Head Coach Jimmy Rogers was introduced as 

the 21st head football coach for SDSU on January 20, 

2023; 

Whereas Coach Rogers was awarded the Stats Perform 2023 

Eddie Robinson Award, given to the FCS coach of the 

year; and 

Whereas President Barry Dunn and Athletic Director Justin 

Sell have cultivated a standard of excellence within 

SDSU athletics and guided the athletic programs at 

SDSU to national prominence: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates and honors the South Dakota 

3 State University football team on a successful season 

4 and for winning the 2024 National Collegiate AthVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:35 Jan 11, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR519.ATS SR519
3 

•SRES 519 ATS 

1 letic Association Division I Football Championship 

2 Subdivision title; 

3 (2) recognizes the hard work, dedication, deter4 mination, and commitment of the South Dakota 

5 State University football players, coaches, and staff; 

6 and 

7 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

8 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu9 tion to— 

10 (A) the President of South Dakota State 

11 University, Barry Dunn; 

12 (B) the Athletic Director of South Dakota 

13 State University, Justin Sell; and 

14 (C) the Head Coach of the South Dakota 

15 State University Jackrabbits football team, 

16 Jimmy Rogers. 

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 17, 2010 

p0915 

Order 

 

September 17, 2010 

140384(34) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140384 

 COA: 287034 

Ingham CC: 08-000412-AR 

SIRDAREAN ADAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2010 

order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated June 25, 2010. 

On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 judgment 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for a new appeal. The defendant requested 

the appointment of appellate counsel in the district court while the prosecutor’s 

interlocutory appeal was pending in the Court of Appeals, but counsel was not appointed 

until after the Court of Appeals issued its judgment on November 19, 2009. 

Consequently, the defendant was not represented by counsel during the prosecutor’s 

interlocutory appeal. On remand, the defendant is entitled to appointed appellate counsel. 

Davis, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I was 

on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).