alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020279EN.01002902.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2020 — XX v OO

(Case C-220/20)

(2020/C 279/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XX

Defendant: OO

Intervener: WW

Question referred

Do Articles 2, 4(3), 6(1) and 9 of the Treaty on [European] Union and Articles 67(1) and (4), 81 and 82 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in conjunction with Articles 1, 6, 20, 21, 31, 34, 45 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude national provisions such as Articles 42, 83 and 87 of Decree Law No 18 of 17 March 2020, the decision of the Council of Ministers of 31 January 2020 declaring a state of national health emergency for six months until 31 July 2020 and Articles 14 and 263 of Decree Law No 34 of 19 May 2020 extending the national state of emergency for Covid-19 and the paralysis of civil and criminal justice and of the administrative work of Italian courts until 31 January 2021, taken together, in so far as they undermine the independence of the referring court and infringe the principle of due process as well as the connected rights to personal dignity, liberty and security, equality before the law, non-discrimination, fair and just working conditions, access to social security benefits and freedom of movement and of residence?

---
# C_2022002EN.01003601.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Nissan Motor v EUIPO — VDL Groep (VDL E-POWER)

(Case T-755/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark VDL E-POWER - Earlier national figurative marks e-POWER - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 2/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nissan Motor Co. Ltd (Yokohama-shi, Japan) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: VDL Groep BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Rijks, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2020 (Case R 2914/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nissan Motor and VDL Groep.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nissan Motor Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and of VDL Groep BV. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nissan Motor Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and of VDL Groep BV.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Equity Ventures Group      Inc. |

| By:                | /s/   ColetteKim                                          |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Colette      KimChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer |
Alexander ALLEN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Simone Groseh a/k/a Simone S. Grossett a/k/a Simone Coley, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1210

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Dwayne Jarrel JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1220 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1026, K2025-1025.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00061 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2022318EN.01003501.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — LA International Cooperation v Commission

(Case T-609/20) (1)

(Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument - OLAF investigation - Commission decision imposing an administrative sanction - Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union for a period of four years - Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database - Financial regulation - Unlimited jurisdiction - Proportionality of the sanction)

(2022/C 318/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LA International Cooperation Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: B. O’Connor and M. Hommé, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Pethke, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, LA International Cooperation Srl, formerly Lattanzio e Associati SpA, seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 20 July 2020 excluding it, for a period of four years, from participating in procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union and participation in procedures for the award of funds governed by Council Regulation (EU) 2015/323 of 2 March 2015 on the financial regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund (OJ 2015 L 58, p. 17), and ordered the publication of that exclusion on the Commission’s website.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LA International Cooperation Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LA International Cooperation Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Sea Sun Capital  Corporation on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, we Graham J. Millington,
President  of the Company  and Rodney  Koch,  Chairman  of the Company  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report  complies with the  requirements of section 12(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


November 22, 2004


/s/ Graham J. Millington
-------------------------------
Graham J. Millington, President



/s/ Rodney Koch
-------------------------------
Rodney Koch, Chairman
REPORT OF ( CONCLUDED) SECTION 341 MEETING

AND TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING CONFIRMATION

Case No. 24-42896-MXM

IN RE: 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

DONYEAL CUNNINGHAM and FLORETTA CUNNINGHAM

DEBTOR(S),

$0.00

Meeting Information: Meeting Date: September 25, 2024 Time: 1:30 pm

Original Date: September 25, 2024

1. Debtor(s) Appeared? D1: D2:

ID Checked: ID Checked:

SS Checked: SS Checked:

YES YES

YES YES

YES YES

2. Debtor(s) attorney/paralegal appeared? Debtor(s) attorney\firm: 

representing NORRED LAW PLLC

YES Clayton Everett

3. Creditors Appeared: none representing 

4. 341 Meeting: CONCLUDED

5. Payment Information:

Current monthly payment per Plan: $2,697.00 First Payment due: 9/14/2024

$ rec'd as of 9/27/2024 $2,696.46 Length of Plan: 60 months 

Base Amount per Plan: $161,820.00

Confirmation Issues: REFER TO LEGAL: YES

The tests for Confirmation have/have not been met, as follows:

N 6. Disposable Income(monthly): $4,266.71 x 60 ACP = Unsecured Pool per Trustee: $256,002.60

N 7. Base Amount is sufficient. UCP per Plan: $0.00

Y 8. Debtor is Eligible (Unsecured & Priority under $419,275.00; Secured under $1,257,850.00.)

9. Best Interest: Exemptions: Federal: NO State: 

Y Texas

Non-exempt Property Description and Equity in 

each item: 

cash-40

bank accts-3240.96

Security deposits-425

 Total Equity in non-exempt prop. $ 3705.96 Total Non-Exempt Equity per Plan: $3,705.96

Y 11. Exemptions Proper: If no, explain: 

Y 12. Feasibility: Surplus per I & J: $2,848.03 

Step Balloon Unemployed Negative Surplus/ 

Insuff Surplus

_ _ _ _ _ Projected Income Other:

Plan Payments: Which Debtor Start Date Pmt Amt Frequency # of Periods

D1 09/14/2024 $2,697.00 MO 60

Y 13. Good Faith Petition and Plan: 

a. Plan Payment at least 90 % I minus J $ $2,563.23

b. Plan does not contain non-standard language. 

c. Other:

N/A 14. Domestic Support Obligation: Debtor testified that all post-petition DSO have been paid.

Y 15. Debtor testified that previous 4 years tax returns have been 

 filed with the IRS. If no, year(s) not filed: 

Year(s) not provided to Trustee's office: 

N 16. Business Case Meeting Required? 

Case 24-42896-mxm13 Doc 24 Filed 09/27/24 Entered 09/27/24 16:07:59 Desc

Page 1 of 2
Debtor(s): DONYEAL CUNNINGHAM and FLORETTA CUNNINGHAM Page 2

Case No. 24-42896-MXM 

Y 17. Debtor Attorney Fees meet Guidelines.

By: 

Brittany Kitchen

Presiding Officer

/s/ Brittany Kitchen

18. Legal Department Notes: Trustee recommends confirmation based on the above representations except:

Objection to be Filed?: YES

Objection Type: DI - Disposable Income

IN - Insufficient

By: Angela Allen

 Attorney for Trustee / Trustee

Case 24-42896-mxm13 Doc 24 Filed 09/27/24 Entered 09/27/24 16:07:59 Desc

Page 2 of 2
# C_2021252EN.01000501.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/5 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) lodged on 6 October 2020 — Banco de Santander S.A. v YC (Case C-503/20) (2021/C 252/06) Language of the case: Spanish Referring court Audiencia Provincial de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Parties to the main proceedings Appellant: Banco de Santander S.A. Respondent: YC By order of 25 March 2021, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) stated that the first question is manifestly inadmissible, and its reply to the second question is that Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit, ( 1 ) as amended by Council Directive 90/88/EEC of 22 February 1990 ( 2 ) and Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, ( 3 ) must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation, as interpreted in national case-law, which establishes the annual percentage rate of charge that may be placed on the consumer under a credit agreement in order to combat usury, provided that that legislation does not contravene the rules harmonised by those directives as regards, in particular, information obligations. ( 1 )  OJ L 42, 12.2.1987, p. 48. ( 2 )  OJ L 61, 10.3.1990, p. 14. ( 3 )  OJ L 133, 22.5.2008, p. 66.

---
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 16, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Steven E. Brady                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Steven E. Brady President
and Chief Executive Officer

|                        |  |  |  |                                                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 16, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald F. Morgenweck                                              
|                        |  |  |  | Donald F. Morgenweck Chief
Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 882 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 882

  Designating the week of September 23 through September 27, 2024, as 
                    ``National Clean Energy Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2024

   Ms. Collins (for herself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Romney, Mr. Reed, Mr. 
Whitehouse, Ms. Warren, Mr. Warnock, Ms. Smith, Mr. Coons, Mr. Tillis, 
 Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Graham, Mr. King, Mr. Cassidy, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. 
Hickenlooper) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of September 23 through September 27, 2024, as 
                    ``National Clean Energy Week''.

Whereas, across the United States, clean and readily abundant forms of energy 
        are powering more homes and businesses than ever before;
Whereas clean energy generation is readily available from zero- and low-
        emissions sources;
Whereas the clean energy sector is a growing part of the economy and has been a 
        key driver of economic growth in the United States in recent years;
Whereas technological innovation can further reduce costs, enhance reliability, 
        and increase deployment of clean energy sources;
Whereas the report of the Department of Energy entitled ``United States Energy & 
        Employment Report 2024'' found that, in 2023, the energy and energy 
        efficiency sectors in the United States employed approximately 8,350,000 
        individuals;
Whereas the scaling of affordable and exportable clean energy is essential to 
        reducing global emissions;
Whereas clean energy jobs contribute to the growth of local economies; and
Whereas innovative clean energy solutions and clean energy jobs are part of the 
        energy future of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 23 through September 
        27, 2024, as ``National Clean Energy Week'';
            (2) encourages individuals and organizations across the 
        United States to support commonsense solutions that address the 
        economic, environmental, and energy needs of the United States 
        in the 21st century;
            (3) supports reliable and affordable energy for the people 
        of the United States; and
            (4) recognizes the role of entrepreneurs and small 
        businesses in ensuring the leadership of the United States in 
        the global energy marketplace and in supporting low-cost, 
        clean, and reliable energy in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of James River Coal Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter T. Socha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

|November   ___, 2005 |                                  
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                     | /s/   Peter T. Socha             
|                     |                                  
|                     | Peter T.   Socha                 
|                     | Title:    Chief Executive Officer

---
Order entered April 12 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00247
- CR CARSTEN HEDEMANN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 1434917
- R



### O RDER On April 11, 2019, the State filed its second motion for extension of time to file brief and tendered its appellee’s brief in this case. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief filed as
of the date of this order

.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL PRESIDING JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BARRY D. CROW, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:03-CV-1438-N

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed June 24, 2005.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:03-cv-01438-N Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 28