alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Coleman, Willis and Senior Judge Hodges Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2829-96-3 JUDGE WILLIAM H. HODGES JULY 8, 1997 WILLIE M. GIBSON

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION Michael F. Blair (Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, on brief), for appellant. Susan D. Oglebay for appellee.

Westmoreland Coal Company (employer) appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) reinstating Willie Gibson's (claimant) temporary total disability benefits as of April 9, 1996. Employer contends that the commission erred in ruling upon the merits of claimant's April 24, 1996

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 change-in-condition application when it reviewed the deputy commissioner's decision on employer's March 15, 1996 1 change-in-condition application. Because we find that the commission improperly considered claimant's April 24, 1996 change-in-condition application, we reverse and remand this case to the commission so that it may consider that application pursuant to proper commission procedures. The deputy commissioner's decision dealt solely with the issue presented by employer's March 15, 1996 application. The commission did not docket claimant's April 24, 1996 application for hearing. Moreover, claimant's application was not consolidated with employer's application nor did the deputy commissioner consider claimant's application in rendering his decision. The commission's adjudication of claimant's application, with no prior notice to employer, deprived employer of due process and did not comply with the commission's procedures set forth in its own rules. See Rules 1.2 through 1.6, and 2, Rules of the Virginia Workers' Compensation

Commission ; see also Sergio's Pizza v. Soncini , 1 Va. App. 370, 376, 339 S.E.2d 204, 207 (1986) ("The procedure utilized [by the commission] must afford the parties minimal due process safeguards."). Accordingly, we remand this case to the commission so that

1 The parties and the commission referred to employer's application as filed on March 15, 1996. However, the record indicates that the application was filed on March 22, 1996.3 it may consider claimant's change-in-condition application in

accordance with its rules.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31629]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Wednesday, January 8, 2025.

PLACE: You may observe this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to 
observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select 
``Newsroom,'' then select ``Events.'' From there, access the linked 
``Instructions for board meeting visitors'' and complete the described 
registration process.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The following matters will be considered:

 Approval of Minutes for December 12, 2024
 Update on Farm Credit System Funding Conditions

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: If you need more information or 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-31629 Filed 12-31-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7176
In Re: WALTER JACOB DAVIS, a/k/a Marcus Swanson, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-73, CA-01-59) Submitted: September 18, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Jacob Davis, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Walter Jacob Davis, a North Carolina inmate, petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to act on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Our review of the district court docket sheet in that action reveals that after Davis filed his mandamus petition, the district court entered a final order dismissing Davis’ § 2255 motion. Accordingly, although we grant Davis leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2021338EN.01002002.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Micron Technology v EUIPO (INTELLIGENCE, ACCELERATED)

(Case T-386/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark INTELLIGENCE, ACCELERATED - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 338/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Micron Technology, Inc. (Boise, Idaho, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 (Case R 2873/2019-1), relating to an application for registration of the word sign INTELLIGENCE, ACCELERATED as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Micron Technology, Inc., to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Micron Technology, Inc., to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.

---
Marcia SUPRIA, Appellant, v. GOSHEN MORTGAGE, LLC, in substitution for the original Plaintiff Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, as trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2012-13, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  Treasurer  and Chief
Financial  Officer of Nuclear  Solutions,  Inc., (the "Company"),  herby certify
that,  to the best of my  knowledge,  the  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the
Company for the period ended  December 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated May 19, 2005.                                   /s/ John Dempsey
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      John Dempsey
                                                      V.P. and CFO
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1140 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-923, K2025-924.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31109 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 2 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 3 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 4 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 5 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 6 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 7 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 8 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 9 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 10 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 11 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 12 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 13 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 14 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 15 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 16 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 17 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 18 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 19 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 20 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 21 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 22 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 23 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 24 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 25 of 26Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 320-17 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 26 of 26
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1204 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1002, K2025-1001.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00030 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Ava Electris CANNIE Eva Electris Cannie Eva Helene Cannie, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 7, 2018

Ava Electris Cannie, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Ray, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
# C_2021242EN.01003902.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hell Energy Magyarország v EUIPO (HELL)

(Case T-323/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark HELL - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 242/54)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Hell Energy Magyarország Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and B. Mező, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Kondás and P. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2020 (Case R 1712/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign HELL as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 March 2020 (Case R 1712/2019-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 March 2020 (Case R 1712/2019-2);

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 780 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 780

   Recognizing August 1, 2024, as ``National Poll Worker Recruitment 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing August 1, 2024, as ``National Poll Worker Recruitment 
                                 Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes August 1, 2024, as ``National Poll Worker 
        Recruitment Day'';
            (2) recognizes the need for, and appreciation of, the 
        service of poll workers; and
            (3) encourages eligible people to help American citizens to 
        vote in the 2024 elections by serving as poll workers.
                                 <all>
```
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Valentina Tuss, Chief Executive Officer of Digital Ecosystems
  Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ Valentina Tuss     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | VALENTINA TUSS         
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | August 19, 2005        

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Nancy WANNALL and Gary Wannall, Appellants, v. GADSDEN COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, and Town of Havana, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1654

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 20, 2019

Marie A. Mattox and James Garrity of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

William B. Armistead and Gwendolyn P. Adkins of Coppins Monroe, P.A., Tallahassee; and Jeff F. Dodson of McConnaughhay, Coonrod, Pope, Weaver & Stern, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appelles.

Per Curiam.

Appellants seek review of an order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees. We find any foreseeable zone of risk did not extend to Appellants. Accordingly, Appellees did not owe a duty of care to Appellants, and we affirm the trial court's order. *See**Parker v. Murphy* , 510 So.2d 990 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the sheriff after a prisoner twice escaped and attacked appellant and her husband holding there was no special relationship between the sheriff and appellant, and thus, no duty of care).

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
NUMBER 13-11-00551-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JUAN ANTONIO CASTILLO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

On December 3, 2013, this Court granted appellant's fourth motion to supplement 

the record and granted appellant’s extension to file the brief until January 2, 2014. On 

January 13, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had not 

been filed and requested a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days. 
2

Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an appellate brief in this 

matter.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means 

necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: 

(1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has 

failed to file a brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) 

whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether 

appellant's counsel should be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled 

to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and 

state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a 

supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental 

reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record 

and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or 

before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
3

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered and filed the 31st

day of January, 2014.