alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0 

U.S. Department 800 Independence Ave. , SW. 

of Transportation Washington, DC 20591 

Federal Aviation 

Administration · 

April 24, 2017 

Mr. Stephens J. Williams 

12 September Road 

Ston-s, CT 06268-2806 

Dear Mr. Williams, 

This letter responds to your request for legal interpretation from the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) Office of Chief Counsel received on November 16, 2016. In your letter, 

you asked specific questions pertaining to Sport Pilot proficiency checks and flight reviews. An 

additional letter, dated March 27, 2017, was also received by the FAA Office of Chief Counsel 

in which you asked a specific question concerning the status of an authorized instructor during a 

Sport Pilot proficiency check. The Chief Counsel's office has detennined that your questions 

require a policy detennination rather than a legal interpretation. As such, your inquiry was 

refen-ed to the FAA's General Aviation and Commercial Division (AFS-800) as the responsible 

policy office. 

In your letters you have asked the following questions: 

Does the proficiency check required by§ 61.321(b) for a Sport Pilot or higher certificated 

pilot also meet the proficiency check or practical test requirement for the§ 61.56(d) flight 

review exemption requirement? 

An ainnan who has passed the pilot proficiency check required by Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 61.321(b) need not accomplish a flight review within the 

preceding twenty four calendar months, as prescribed in§ 61.56(d)(l). 

May the § 61.321 proficiency check and § 61.56 flight review be conducted simultaneously? 

An ainnan who has passed the pilot proficiency check required by§ 61 .321 (b) need not 

accomplish a flight review within the preceding twenty four calendar months, as prescribed in § 

61.56(d)(l). 

What is the status of the authorized instructor while conducting the Sport Pilot proficiency 

check with respect to 14 CFR § 61.47? 

In accordance with § 61.413(a)(9), a flight instructor with a sport pilot rating has the authority to 

conduct proficiency checks for additional category and class privileges to an ainnan's sport pilot 

certificate. 14 CFR § 61.1 states, in pertinent part, that an examiner is a person who is authorized 

by the Administrator to conduct pilot proficiency tests. The sport pilot flight instructor 
2 

conducting a proficiency check would be acting in the capacity of an examiner and would not be 

the PIC during the flight. 

If you have any further questions please contact the General Aviation and Commercial Division 

at (202) 267-1100. 

Sincerely, 

Digitally signed by BRADLEY J 

BRADLEY J PALMER PALMER 

Date: 2017.04.24 09:51 :23 -04'00' 

for James A. Viola 

Manager, General Aviation and Co1mnercial Division 

Flight Standards Service
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-112350) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Plan, 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan, and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Eyetech
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2004, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
March 23, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40856 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus AGUSTIN VALLE-TOVAR, also known as Arturo Morales-Olvera, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-160-1

-------------------- February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Augustin Valle-Tovar appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Valle-Tovar acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedNo. 00-40856 -2- States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Jan. 26, 2001)(No. 00-8299). Valle-Tovar’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1137 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-920, K2025-921.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31106 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**MARK ANDREW SALOMAN**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 29 DB 2015 (No. 50 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 71195** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 4 th**  **day of August, 2015, the Report and Recommendation o f**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated July 27, 2015, is appro ved and it is ORDERED that**  **Mark Andrew Saloman, who has been on Inactive Status, h as never been suspended or**  **disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and**  **learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,**  **hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba r of this Commonwealth. The**  **expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall**  **be paid by the Petitioner.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1202 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1000, K2025-999.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00028 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021019EN.01002101.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 21 October 2020 — L Fund v Finanzamt D

(Case C-537/20)

(2021/C 19/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: L Fund

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Finanzamt D

Other party to the proceedings: Bundesministerium der Finanzen (Germany)

Question referred

Does Article 56 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now: Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) conflict with a rule in a Member State, by virtue of which domestic specialised property funds with exclusively foreign investors are exempt from corporate income tax, while foreign specialised property funds with exclusively foreign investors are subject to limited liability for corporate income tax on their rental income obtained within the Member State?

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 463

- C V

Style: Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh

Date motion filed * : June 14

, 201 8

Type of motion: Motion f o r E xten sion of Time to F ile Brief

Party filing motion: Pro se Appellant Sherry Antoinette Smith

Document to be filed: N/A

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due D ate: N/A

Date Requested: N/A (60 days requested)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

 Denied ( without prejudice )

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Although the court reporter’s June 5, 2018 info sheet states that the report er’s record

has not been filed due to a lack of request and payment by appellant, the clerk’s record

h as not been filed and is due by July 2, 2018. Accordingly, appellant’s extension

request is denied without prejudice to refiling after the clerk’s record and, if

requested, the reporter’s records are filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a) (stating that

appellant’s brief will be due 30 days after later of filing of clerk’s or reporter’s record).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Date: June 1 9 , 2018
# C_2021329EN.01002901.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Makk v EUIPO — Ubati Luxury Cosmetics (PANTA RHEI)

(Case T-501/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark PANTA RHEI - Earlier EU word mark PANTA RHEI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 329/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stefan Makk (Graz, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek and L. Lapinskaite, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ubati Luxury Cosmetics, SL (Alcobendas, Spain) (represented by: C. Vendrell, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2020 (Case R 2337/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ubati Luxury Cosmetics and Mr Makk.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Stefan Makk to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Stefan Makk to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GLORIA FAYE WILSON

In Re: Case # 24-31238-MVL-13

Debtor

Order Discharging Standing Trustee and

Terminating Further Liability on Bond 

It appearing to the Court that Thomas D. Powers, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee in the above styled case 

pending under Chapter 13 of Title 11 of the United States Code, has filed a Final Report and Accounting 

showing that the estate in this case has been fully administered; that the Standing Trustee does not hold 

any funds to be paid or distributed in this case; that he should be discharged and further liability on the 

said Trustee's Bond with respect to this case be terminated; and that this case has previously been 

Converted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Thomas D. Powers, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee in this case, is discharged; that he and the 

sureties on his Trustee's Bond are relieved from liability with respect to this case, except such liability as 

may have accrued heretofore; and that such Bond is cancelled.

# # # End of Order # # #

Thomas D. Powers

Chapter 13 Trustee

105 Decker Ct

Suite 1150 11th Floor

Irving, TX 75062

(214) 855-9200 / (214) 965-0758 (Fax)

Approved: 

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed October 8, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00640

- CR

Jontay Antoine Pitts , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAK ER, TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment adju dicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having

reviewed the record and the part ies’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s

judgment adjudicating guilt

. Be c ause appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Thomas Douglas ARTHUR v. STATE

CR-16-0776

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Telvin JORDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134167 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134167 

 COA: 274191 
 Wayne CC: 1991-009329 

STEPHEN WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
# C_2023007EN.01002001.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB

(Case T-270/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Appraisal report - 2018 appraisal exercise - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of impartiality - Right to a fair hearing - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Liability)

(2023/C 7/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JS (represented by L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by L. Forestier, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, lodged at the Court Registry on 7 May 2020, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of his appraisal report for 2018 and of the decision of 22 January 2020 rejecting his complaint and, secondly, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders JS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 23

- 00318

- CR

__________________

DIANA SOTO , Appellant

V.

THE ST A TE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 22CC

- CR

- 00914

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Diana Soto filed a motion to dismiss h er appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

Soto and h er attorney signed the motion. See id . We grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See id . 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 23, 2024

Opinion Delivered J anuary 24, 2024

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(55)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(9)
              - georgia(7)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(34)
              - maine(12)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(11)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - (-)mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(6)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(29)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(18)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Photography        January 12, 2016        Night Flooding in Natchez

Photography        December 31, 2005        Photo sets of Waveland, Mississippi, pre- and post-Katrina
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(10)
              - products_publications(19)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - (-)colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 21, 2017        Monitoring Land-Atmosphere Exchange of Moisture to Understand Drought

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments