alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BTXN 176 (rev. 12/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

David Lyn Luttrell Case No.: 24−41512−mxm13

 Chapter No.: 13

Debtor(s)

NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO FILE A STATEMENT OF COMPLETION OF

COURSE IN PERSONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(Official Form 423)

Notice is hereby given that, subject to limited exceptions, a debtor must complete an instructional course in personal

financial management in order to receive a discharge under chapter 13 (11 USC § 1328) . Pursuant to Rule 1007(b)(7)

of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the debtor(s) must complete and file Debtor's Certification of Completion of

Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management (Official Form 423)* as described in 11 U.S.C. §

111.

Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that Official Form 423 must be filed before a discharge can

be entered. Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that the debtor(s) must file Official Form 423 no

later than the date when the last payment was made by the debtor as required by the plan or the filing of a motion for

a discharge under § 1141(d)(5)(B) or § 1328(b) of the Code. Failure to file the certification will result in the case

being closed without an entry of discharge. If the debtor(s) subsequently file(s) a Motion to Reopen the Case to allow

for the filing of the Official Form 423, the debtor(s) must pay the full reopening fee due for filing the motion.

DATED: 7/22/24 FOR THE COURT:

Kevin McNatt, Clerk of Court

*NOTE: Official Form 423 (Debtor's Certification of Completion of Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management) must be

filed in all individual chapter 13 and chapter 7 cases even if the U.S. Trustee has not approved any credit counseling agency or financial

management course for the applicable district. See Rule 1007(b)(7).

Case 24-41512-mxm13 Doc 32 Filed 07/22/24 Entered 07/22/24 18:25:10 Desc Ntc

of req to file FM cert Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1215 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1021, K2025-1020.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00056 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 1207)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1216 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1022, K2025-1021.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00057 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
- /usr/local/bin/fax/tiff_tmp/skt/303cv03030/00879001.tif
- /usr/local/bin/fax/tiff_tmp/skt/303cv03030/00879002.tif
- /usr/local/bin/fax/tiff_tmp/skt/303cv03030/00879003.tif
- /usr/local/bin/fax/tiff_tmp/skt/303cv03030/00879004.tif
- /usr/local/bin/fax/tiff_tmp/skt/303cv03030/00879005.tif
- /usr/local/bin/fax/tiff_tmp/skt/303cv03030/00879006.tif
Case 2:03-cr-00047-J Document 918 Filed 05/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2411
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Douglas A.
Michels, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of OraSure Technologies, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: December 5, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas A. Michels               
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Douglas A. Michels                   
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2021278EN.01001401.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht — Germany) — L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-8/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Border controls, asylum and immigration - Asylum policy - Directive 2013/32/EU - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Application for international protection - Grounds of inadmissibility - Article 2(q) - Concept of ‘subsequent application’ - Article 33(2)(d) - Rejection by a Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the rejection of a previous application made by the person concerned in a third State with which the European Union has concluded an agreement on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining an application for asylum lodged in one of the States parties to that agreement - Final decision taken by the Kingdom of Norway)

(2021/C 278/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: L.R.

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment

Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in conjunction with Article 2(q) thereof, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides for the possibility of rejecting as inadmissible an application for international protection, within the meaning of Article 2(b) of that directive, made to that Member State by a third-country national or a stateless person whose previous application seeking the grant of refugee status, made to a third State implementing Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, in accordance with the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway — Declarations, had been rejected by that third State.

---

(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.

---
# C_2021452EN.01002601.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Kande Mumpompa v Council

(Case T-97/20) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures - Right to private and family life - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Plea of illegality)

(2021/C 452/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alex Kande Mumpompa (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/2109 of 9 December 2019 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2019 L 318, p. 134), and, second, Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/2101 of 9 December 2019 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2019 L 318, p. 1) in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Alex Kande Mupompa to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Alex Kande Mupompa to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the period ended December 31, 2006 I, Keith Conrad, President and Chief Executive Officer of the issuer, certify that:

1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

|                     |     |                                                                   
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
March 30, 2007 | By: | /s/ Keith ConradKeith Conrad
President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the issuer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



---
K.C.H., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2708

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ex10a.htm


Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-149434) and Amendment No. 508 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
Levert STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2380

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021310EN.01003101.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/31

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT5)

(Case T-422/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT5 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)

(2021/C 310/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1600/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1600/2019-4) is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1600/2019-4) is annulled.

| 2. | EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

RICKY L. AKERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No.

Defendant. ) 1:04-CV-159-C

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

August 30, 2005 (Doc. 14). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on

September 13, 2005 (Doc 16). The court has made a de novo determination of the Report and

Recommendation after consideration of Plaintiff’s objections, the submissions of the parties, and

the transcript of the administrative proceedings. 

The court finds the objections to be without merit. The court further finds that the ALJ

applied the correct legal standards and that substantial evidence supports his decision. The court

also finds that the Report and Recommendation applied the correct legal standards

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the

court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

 

 Case 1:04-cv-00159-C Document 18 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 78
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

Dated this 19th day of September, 2005.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:04-cv-00159-C Document 18 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 79
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31682]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service TM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1100 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-875, K2025-876.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31682 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2016222EN.01003301.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/33

---

Action brought on 1 May 2016 — Interbank Deposit Protection Fund v Commission

(Case T-198/16)

(2016/C 222/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Interbank Deposit Protection Fund (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini and G. Faella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul European Commission Decision C(2015) 9526 final of 23 December 2015 on the State aid SA.39451 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul European Commission Decision C(2015) 9526 final of 23 December 2015 on the State aid SA.39451 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN);

| — | in the alternative, annul that decision in so far as it concerns the assessment and classification of the aid element inherent in measure 3; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul that decision in so far as it concerns the assessment and classification of the aid element inherent in measure 3;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs;

| — | order any other measure, including any measure of inquiry, which it deems appropriate. |
| --- | --- |

—

order any other measure, including any measure of inquiry, which it deems appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision contested in the present action is the same one contested in Case T-98/16, Italy v Commission, and Case T-196/16, Banca Tercas v Commission.

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in those two cases.

---
# C_2022084EN.01003601.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — FT and Others v Commission

(Case T-224/20) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Commission staff posted to a third country - Interim update of correction coefficients - Manifest error of assessment - Retroactive effect - Legal certainty - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

(2022/C 84/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: FT and 22 other applicants whose names are listed in annex to the judgment (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the applicants’ salary statements for the month of June 2019 in so far as they apply, for the first time, the correction coefficients fixed, with retroactive effect, on 1 August 2018.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FT and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FT and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
R.A.G. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160942

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Etowah Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
Juan SOTO, DOC #Y29598, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.