alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
[Staples Letterhead]


Shira Goodman                                     September 26, 2016 
40 Montrose Street 
Newton, MA 02458 


Dear Shira, 


Congratulations on your promotion to Chief Executive Officer, effective September 25, 2016.


Details of your compensation in connection with your new position are set forth below. 


Salary 
You will receive a weekly salary of $21,153.84 ($1,100,000 if annualized) which will be your salary for all hours worked. Your salary will next be reviewed effective May 1, 2017.


The monthly stipend of $30,500 you received during the period you served as interim Chief Executive Officer will cease effective September 24, 2016.


Bonus Eligibility
You will be eligible for a bonus target of 150% of salary, subject to the terms of Staples’ Executive Officer Incentive Plan. Bonus awards are based on actual results against pre-established Company financial goals.
For FY16, you will be eligible for (i) a bonus target of 85% of salary earned between January 31, 2016 and June 13, 2016, (ii) a bonus target of 150% of salary and stipend earned between June 14, 2016 and September 24, 2016, and (iii) a bonus target of 150% of salary earned between September 25, 2016 and January 28, 2017.


Long Term Incentive
Your long term equity incentive awards will be delivered solely in the form of performance share awards under the terms of the Staples’ 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. The target value of your annual performance share award will be $7,250,000. Your first grant with a target value of $7,250,000 will be made following the March 2017 Compensation Committee meeting. 


The value of all grants is equivalent to the actual expense the company incurs for this grant. Performance shares vest 100% three years from grant, based on Company performance. Ultimately, the actual value to you will be the number of shares awarded multiplied by the fair market value on the date the award vests. 


The Board of Directors currently intends to grant Performance Share Awards to associates at your level annually in March, but we cannot guarantee the level or existence of any future awards. 


All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.


On behalf of the Board and Staples shareholders, we wish you continued success in your new role. 


Sincerely, 


Paul F. Walsh 
Chair, Compensation Committee
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Christopher D. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      OmniReliant Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by OmniReliant Holdings, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





February
      14, 2007





/s/
              Christopher D. Phillips*Christopher D.
              Phillips**Interim Chief Executive
              Officer,**Chief Financial
              Officer*
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David Barnard, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Design Within Reach, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 4, 2004 |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ DAVID BARNARD      
|                     |  | David Barnard          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022109EN.01002301.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/23

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Shoe)

(Case T-684/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a shoe - Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 - Grounds for invalidity - Lack of novelty - No individual character - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 109/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Schabenberger, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 (Case R 1649/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Legero Schuhfabrik and Rieker Schuh.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
Richard Francis CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        February 2, 2024        Generalized potentiometric maps of the Fort Union, Hell Creek, and Fox Hills aquifers within the Standing Rock Reservation
Robert LEWIS, Appellant, v. U.S. HOSPITALITY OF TAMPA BAY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2560

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Robert Lewis, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed as from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5) ("Orders entered on an *authorized and timely* motion for relief from judgment are reviewable by the method prescribed by this rule. Motions for rehearing directed to these orders will not *383toll the time for filing a notice of appeal." (emphasis added) ).

KELLY, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
McDaniel

& Associates Consultants Ltd.

Principals

P. A. Welch P. Eng.

B.

H. Emslie P. Eng.

B. Kowalski P. Eng.

G. M.Heath P. Eng.R. F. Ott P. Geol.

B. J. Wurster P.Eng.

Consent of McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of our reports entitled "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Forecast Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006" and "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Constant Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006", dated February 20, 2007, evaluating reserves of Enterra Energy Corp. of December 31, 2006, included in the 2006 Annual Information Form of Entena Energy Trust (the "AIF"), and to the references to our firm in the AIF.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of references to our firm and of information derived from our reports entitled "Entena Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Forecast Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006" and "Enterra Energy Corp., Evaluation of Oil & Gas Reserves, Based on Constant Prices and Costs, As of December 31, 2006", both dated February 20, 2007 evaluating reserves of Enterra Energy Corp. of December 31, 2006, appearing in the annual report on Foim 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, into the registration statement on Form F-10 Registration Statement (No. 333-129601), the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120996) and the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-113609 and 333-115318).

Sincerely,

McDaniel& Associates Consultants Ltd.

[mcdanielsconsent002.gif]

C. B. Kowalski, P. Eng.

Calgary, Alberta

Dated: March 30, 2007



2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255 - 5 Avenue SW, Calgary, AB T2P 3G6 Tel: (403) 262-5506 Fax: (403) 233-2744www.mcdan.com
EX PARTE M.A.M.J.

(In re: M.W. v. M.J.)

2160824

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADIN LINARES

- GONZALEZ; SINDY

AGUILAR

- DELINARES, AKA Sindy Aguilar De Linares,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 73814

Agency Nos. A095

- 783

- 915

A095

- 784

- 047

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 24

, 2020 * *

Before: TROTT, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Adin Linares

- Gonzalez and Sindy Aguilar

- Delinares, natives and citizens of

Guatemala , petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal pro ceedings. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 14

- 73814

jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.

2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Petitio ners do not adequately challenge in their opening brief the BIA’s

denial of their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel and

based on a material change in country conditions. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder

,

706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued

in a party’s opening brief are waived). Petitioners also do not challenge the BIA’s

denial of their request to reopen pursuant to its sua sponte authority

, or the BIA’s

denial of their request for voluntary departure

. Id

. Thus, these issues are waived.

We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners’ only specific contention that their

proceedings should be reopen ed so that they can seek prosecutorial discretion. See

Vilchiz

- Soto v. Holder , 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EXHIBIT 10.18


 


OFFER
LETTER FOR THE POSITION

OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


 


June 02, 2004


 


Mr. Mark E. Saad


250 Mercer Street B1306


New York, NY 10012


 


We are pleased to offer you
the position of Chief Financial Officer at a salary of $25,000 per month (equivalent
to $300,000 per year if computed on an annual basis), payable
semi-monthly.  You will report to
Christopher J. Calhoun, MacroPore’s President and Chief Executive Officer.  Your start date in your new position will be
as soon as possible.


 


To assist in your relocation
to San Diego, we are pleased to reimburse your reasonable costs of relocation
up to a maximum of $125,000.  (Please be
advised that some of this reimbursement could be taxable income to you.)


 


You will receive MacroPore’s benefit package for
executive officers, including PPO medical insurance for you and your family,
group life insurance, group and supplemental long-term disability insurance,
and participation in our 401(k) plan and our Flexible Spending Account Plan.  Your benefits will also include an auto
allowance of $800 per month, and an annual reimbursement of $2,000 for your tax
return preparation fees.  Your paid time
off per year will be four (4) weeks.


 


	
  /s/ CJC

  	
   

  	
  /s/ MES

  	
   

  
	
  CJC Initial

  	
   

  	
  MES Initial

  	
   

  



 


Upon your acceptance of this
offer I will recommend to the MacroPore Board of Directors that you be granted
an option to purchase 190,000 shares of the common stock of the Company at the
fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Vesting
of the option grant will begin as of the date of grant, with 25% of the options
vesting on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, and 1/48th
of the options vesting each month thereafter. 
The grant and its terms will be contingent upon the Board’s
approval.  The options will be
exercisable once they vest, subject to your remaining an employee of the
Company, as described in the stock option agreement you will receive from the
Company


 


You will have a target annual
bonus of 25% of your base salary; prorated for the 2004 over the number of
months you are an employee.  This bonus
is generally paid in January of each year and is based upon your achievement of
mutually agreed-upon performance objectives and the Company’s performance during
the preceding year.


 


Employment with MacroPore is
“at will” and may be terminated without cause by either party.  This letter describes a written offer of
employment and does not constitute a contract.


 


Mark, this letter describes
an exciting opportunity to work together to continue to build a successful
organization.  We would be pleased to
have you join our company.


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ Christopher J. Calhoun

  	
   

  
	
  Christopher
  J. Calhoun

  
	
  President
  and Chief Executive Officer

  



 


Acceptance:


I understand and accept the
above offer


 


	
  Signature:

  	
  /s/ Mark E.
  Saad

  	
   

  	
  6-2-04

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Mark E. Saad

  	
  Date
James Riley DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 859 

Supporting the designation of September 2024 as ‘‘National Recovery 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Mr. KING (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of September 2024 as ‘‘National 

Recovery Month’’. 

Whereas the theme for National Recovery Month is ‘‘Every 

Person. Every Family. Every Community.’’; 

Whereas nearly 108,000 individuals in the United States suffered a fatal drug overdose during 2023, the first annual 

decrease in drug overdose deaths since 2018; 

Whereas overdose deaths involving opioids decreased from an 

estimated 84,181 in 2022 to 81,083 in 2023; 

Whereas overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily 

fentanyl) decreased in 2023 compared to 2022, but overdose deaths from cocaine and psychostimulants (like 

methamphetamine) increased; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 859 IS 

Whereas, in 2023, there were approximately 22,219,000 

adults in the United States who considered themselves to 

be in recovery from substance use disorder; 

Whereas individuals with substance use disorder may face 

stigma from health professionals as well as from friends 

and family; 

Whereas it has been demonstrated that stigma can be a barrier to accessing treatment and engaging in recovery for 

individuals with substance use disorder; and 

Whereas peer-supported communities offer individuals with 

substance use disorder better success in recovery by addressing the personal and emotional effects of addiction 

and easing reintegration: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of patient, pro3 vider, and societal education for the prevention of 

4 substance use disorder; 

5 (2) supports efforts to explore the means by 

6 which integrated care, community, and helping indi7 viduals obtain a sense of purpose can lead to effec8 tive and sustainable treatment of substance use dis9 order; 

10 (3) shows appreciation and gratitude for family 

11 members, friends, and other individuals who support 

12 individuals in recovery from substance use disorder; 

13 and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 859 IS 

1 (4) supports the designation of September 2024 

2 as ‘‘National Recovery Month’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Resource Funding, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laura
      Koran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
      on my knowledge:







(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










April
      10,
      2006







/s/
      Laura Koran


Laura
      Koran


Chief
      Financial Officer
# C_2017178EN.01002102.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/21

---

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Palos Caravina v CdT

(Case T-725/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Officials - Recruitment - Communication of information concerning the appointment of a third party - Third paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Maria José Palos Caravina (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno and P. Singer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: M. Garnier and J. Rikkert, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of, first, the CdT’s decision of 23 December 2015 refusing to provide the applicant with information concerning the appointment of a third party and, second, the CdT’s decision of 5 July 2016 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant against that refusal.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Maria José Palos Caravina. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Maria José Palos Caravina.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.

1

---
# C_2021138EN.01001602.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 23 September 2020 — Ts.M.Ts., T.M.M.

(Case C-455/20)

(2021/C 138/21)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ts.M.Ts., T.M.M.

By order of 27 January 2021, the Court (Sixth Chamber) removed the case from the register.

---