alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016410EN.01002301.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/23

---

Action brought on 15 September 2016 — Camerin v Parliament

(Case T-647/16)

(2016/C 410/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laure Camerin (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the application admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the application admissible;

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Annul, if necessary, the rejection decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, if necessary, the rejection decision;

| — | Order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action brought against the decision taken on 1 December 2015 by the Secretary General of the S&D Group in the European Parliament, refusing to extend the applicant’s service beyond the age of 65 years until 31 December 2016 (the contested decision), the applicant relies on a single plea in law, divided into two parts.

| — | First part, alleging infringement of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations of Officials, a manifest error of assessment and infringement of the principle of sound administration. |
| --- | --- |

—

First part, alleging infringement of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations of Officials, a manifest error of assessment and infringement of the principle of sound administration.

| — | Second part, alleging infringement of the sixth paragraph of Article 1 of Annex II to the Staff Regulations of Officials. |
| --- | --- |

—

Second part, alleging infringement of the sixth paragraph of Article 1 of Annex II to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

---
Juan Jose SAPEG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 19-20, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas F. Conway, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-507-9685,                         *thomas.conway@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 2, 2025.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-00111 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
S.T. and J.T. v. M.I.

2160713

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Barbour Cir. Ct. for trial de novo, pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
# C_2021028EN.01002601.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 3 November 2020 — Apollo Tyres (Hungary) Kft. v Innovációért és Technológiáért Felelős Miniszter

(Case C-575/20)

(2021/C 28/41)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Apollo Tyres (Hungary) Kft.

Defendant: Innovációért és Technológiáért Felelős Miniszter

Question referred

Can Directive 2003/87/EC, (1) and paragraph 3 of Annex I thereof in particular, be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of deciding upon the inclusion of the [combustion of fuels] by a particular installation in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union (the EU ETS), [the calculation of] the total rated thermal input of the installation should take account of the fact that certain equipment that is part of the installation in question is subject to a restriction (which has been verified)?

---

(1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32, Special edition in Hungarian Chapter 15 Volume 007 P. 631).

---
# C_2016175EN.01001801.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/18

---

Action brought on 17 March 2016 — zero v EUIPO — Hemming (ZIRO)

(Case T-106/16)

(2016/C 175/21)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: zero Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Oliver Hemming (Cadbury, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘ZIRO’ — EU trade mark application No 12 264 958

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 in Case R 71/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Terrance COOPER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellee.

No. 1D18-338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 7, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 32,458 4 PATRICIA GUNDERSEN, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY 7 Charles Cruse Currier, District Judge 8 Gary K. King, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Patricia Gundersen 12 Roswell, NM 13 Pro Se Appellant 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 VANZI, Judge. 16 {1} Defendant appeals pro se from the dist rict court’s ruling finding her guilty of 17 expired registration and failure to have operating tail lamps. [RP 2] Our notice 182 proposed to dismiss for lack of a final order, but provided that if Defendant secured 1 a final order from the district court w ithin the time for filing a memorandum in 2 opposition, and provided this Court with a c opy thereof, we would proceed to calendar 3 this case on the merits. Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition, wherein she 4 stated that she was unable to secure a final order from the district court. We 5 accordingly dismiss her appeal for lack of a final order. 6 {2} For the same reasons provided in our initial notice, we dismiss for lack of a 7 final order. In doing so, we acknowledge De fendant’s reference to another appeal she 8 filed in this Court, which Defendant asserts contained a similar finality problem, yet 9 was calendared on the merits. [MIO 2-6] Wedecline to revisit the other appeal, as 10 that is not the case presently before this C ourt. Nor do we have authority to exercise 11 supervisory or superintending control over the district court. See N.M. Const. Art. VI, 12 § 3 (Supreme court; original jurisdiction; supervisory control; extraordinary writs). 13 {3} For the reasons set forth herein and in our notice, we dismiss for lack of a final 14 order. 15 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 16

__________________________________ 17 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 183 WE CONCUR: 1

_________________________________ 2 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 3

_________________________________ 4 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 5
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 1205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00029]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1203 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1001, K2025-1000.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00029 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2022051EN.01003001.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2021 — Schmid v EUIPO — Landeskammer für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Steiermark (Steirisches Kürbiskernöl g.g.A)

(Case T-700/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Steirisches Kürbiskernöl g. g. A GESCHÜTZTE GEOGRAFISCHE ANGABE - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark including badges, emblems or escutcheons - Emblem of one of the areas of action of the European Union - Protected geographical indications - Article 7(1)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 51/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gabriele Schmid (Halbenrain, Austria) (represented by: A. Ginzburg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Hanf and M. Eberl, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Landeskammer für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Steiermark (Graz, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2020 (Case R 2186/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Landeskammer für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Steiermark and Ms Schmid.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 September 2020 (Case R 2186/2019-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 September 2020 (Case R 2186/2019-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Gabriele Schmid; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Gabriele Schmid;

| 3. | Orders Landeskammer für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Steiermark to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Landeskammer für Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Steiermark to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0431 __________________________________________________________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

HEATHER ARLETA CALLANTINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s MOTION FOR EXTENSION of time and 

good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time 

until, and including, October 14, 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2021

09/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0431
EXHIBIT 5

Case 24-90016-mxm11 Doc 46-5 Filed 11/01/24 Entered 11/01/24 10:32:03 Desc

Exhibit 5 Page 1 of 3
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

LULA WILLIAMS, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

MATT MARTORELLO, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00461-REP

CONSENT MOTION TO VACATE

Plaintiffs, by counsel, hereby move the Court to vacate the October 18, 2024 Order (ECF 

1562). Plaintiffs believe that the order was intended to apply only to Case 3:19cv314 (in which 

Mr. Martorello is not a party) and not intended to require Mr. Martorello or his counsel or a 

representative of his participate or attend the proceedings on November 13, 2024. Because it was 

entered in Case 3:17-cv-00461 where Mr. Martorello is the only remaining defendant, however 

Mr. Martorello has taken the position that the entry of the order and its requirement that he have a 

representative attend the proceedings on November 13, 2024 is a violation of the automatic stay. 

See Oct. 24, 2024 Letter from Winikka. To avoid this conflict and because Plaintiffs do not believe 

it was intended to apply in this case, Plaintiffs have agreed to seek vacatur of the order in its 

entirety as Plaintiffs do not believe it was the intention of the Court to require Martorello to 

participate in the proceedings, through his counsel or otherwise, on November 13, 2024, including 

submission of a settlement conference memorandum.

Plaintiffs further note that they intend to proceed on November 13, 2024, because similar 

orders were entered in Galloway 2 where non-bankruptcy defendants remain. 

Case 3:17-cv-00461-REP Document 1564 Filed 10/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 62800 Case 24-90016-mxm11 Doc 46-5 Filed 11/01/24 Entered 11/01/24 10:32:03 Desc

Exhibit 5 Page 2 of 3
2

Respectfully submitted,

LULA WILLIAMS, et al.,

By Kristi C. Kelly

Kristi Cahoon Kelly (VSB #72791)

Andrew Joseph Guzzo (VSB #82170)

KELLY GUZZO, PLC

3925 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 202

Fairfax, VA 22030

Telephone : (703) 424-7570

Facsimile : (703) 591-0167 

E-mail: kkelly@kellyguzzo.com

E-mail: aguzzo@kellyguzzo.com 

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 3:17-cv-00461-REP Document 1564 Filed 10/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 62801 Case 24-90016-mxm11 Doc 46-5 Filed 11/01/24 Entered 11/01/24 10:32:03 Desc

Exhibit 5 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACTION OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of Nalco Holding Company("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2004,hereby certify as follows:

|          |                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|          |                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation for Nalco. |

|  | /s/ WILLIAM H.JOYCE |
|--|---------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | WilliamH. Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:   November 17, 2004 |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ BRADLEY J.BELL |
|--|--------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | Bradley J.Bell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:   November 17, 2004 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Case 2:04-cv-00008-J Document 8 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 29
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6327

LUKE D. PATTERSON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

R. M. WOLFE, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00075-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luke D. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6327 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Luke D. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider 

the court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

Patterson v. Wolfe, No. 3:21-cv-00075-GMG-RWT (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 15, 2023). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6327 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2020

No. 04-20-00120-CV

IN RE Brandon HJELLA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On February 24, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay 

pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. On February 25, 2020, this court 

invited the respondent and the real party in interest, Red McCombs Energy Motors, Ltd., to file a

response to the petition in this court no later than March 11, 2020. Our February 25, 2020 order

stated as follows:

Relator’s request for a stay is GRANTED, in part. The trial court’s orders

regarding payment of attorney’s fees, including its January 30, 2020, “Order 

Granting Motion for Attorney’s Fees” and all proceedings on “Plaintiff’s Motion 

to Enforce Attorney’s Fees Order, to Show Cause and to Enter Sanctions” are

STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.

On February 28, 2020, Red McCombs Energy Motors, Ltd. filed a motion asking this 

court to either reconsider or clarify its order granting the partial stay. The motion is GRANTED

IN PART. Our February 25, 2020 stay order does not preclude Red McCombs Energy Motors, 

Ltd. from seeking a final judgment in the underlying case and seeking an award of contingent 

appellate fees.

Red McCombs Energy Motors, Ltd. is ORDERED to seek entry of a final judgment from 

the trial court and file in this court a copy of the final judgment no later than April 14, 2020.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CI15792, styled Red McCombs Motors, Ltd. v. Brandon Hjella, 

pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presiding.
It is so ORDERED on March 27, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Danny Brett BECKNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 1 of 7 PageID 9
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 2 of 7 PageID 10
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 3 of 7 PageID 11
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 4 of 7 PageID 12
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 5 of 7 PageID 13
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 6 of 7 PageID 14
Case 2:03-cv-00207-J Document 2 Filed 01/08/03 Page 7 of 7 PageID 15