Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2025 / Notices 311 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5137. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–815–000. 

Applicants: American Electric Power 

Service Corporation. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

AEPSC submits OPCo and AMPT 

Coordination Agreement SA# 7450 to be 

effective 1/1/2025. 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5016. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–816–000. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

Original NSA, SA No. 7449; Queue No. 

W3–003/AD2–026/AE1–156 to be 

effective 2/26/2025. 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5034. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–817–000. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: GIA, 

No. 7446; A18/AA1–043/AD2–035/ 

AF2–030 & Cancellation of No. 4807; 

AD2–035 to be effective 12/2/2024. 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5050. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–818–000. 

Applicants: Ameren Transmission 

Company of Illinois. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

2024–12–27_SA 4423 ATXI–MJMEUCSikeston TIA to be effective 2/26/2025. 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5117. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–819–000. 

Applicants: Woodward Energy 

Storage, LLC. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 

Application for Market-Based Rate 

Authorization to be effective 2/26/2025. 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5155. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–820–000. 

Applicants: Indianapolis Power & 

Light Co, AES Pike County Energy 

Storage, LLC. 

Description: Request for 

Authorization to Undertake Affiliate 

Sales of AES Pike County Energy 

Storage, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 12/23/24. 

Accession Number: 20241223–5464. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/25. 

Docket Numbers: ER25–821–000. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. 

Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: GIA, 

SA No. 7453; AF2–150/AG1–039 & 

Cancellation of ISA, SA 6963; Queue 

AF2–150 to be effective 12/4/2024. 

Filed Date: 12/27/24. 

Accession Number: 20241227–5171. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/25. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following public utility 

holding company filings: 

Docket Numbers: PH25–2–000. 

Applicants: KKR & Co. Inc. 

Description: KKR & Co. Inc. submits 

FERC 65–B Waiver Notification. 

Filed Date: 12/23/24. 

Accession Number: 20241223–5457. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/25. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system (https://

elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgen

search.asp) by querying the docket 

number. 

Any person desiring to intervene, to 

protest, or to answer a complaint in any 

of the above proceedings must file in 

accordance with Rules 211, 214, or 206 

of the Commission’s Regulations (18 

CFR 385.211, 385.214, or 385.206) on or 

before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 

specified comment date. Protests may be 

considered, but intervention is 

necessary to become a party to the 

proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/ 

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

The Commission’s Office of Public 

Participation (OPP) supports meaningful 

public engagement and participation in 

Commission proceedings. OPP can help 

members of the public, including 

landowners, environmental justice 

communities, Tribal members and 

others, access publicly available 

information and navigate Commission 

processes. For public inquiries and 

assistance with making filings such as 

interventions, comments, or requests for 

rehearing, the public is encouraged to 

contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or OPP@

ferc.gov. 

Dated: December 27, 2024. 

Carlos D. Clay, 

Acting Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–31564 Filed 1–2–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket Nos. IC25–2–000] 

Commission Information Collection 

Activities (FERC–517); Comment 

Request; Extension 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection 

and request for comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission 

(Commission or FERC) is soliciting 

public comment on the currently 

approved information collection, FERC– 

517 (Safety of Waterpower Projects and 

Project Works) represented by OMB 

Control No. 1902–0319. There are no 

changes to the information collection. 

DATES: Comments on the collection of 

information are due March 4, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit copies of 

your comments (identified by Docket 

No. IC25–2–000) by one of the following 

methods: 

Electronic filing through https://

www.ferc.gov, is preferred. 

• Electronic Filing: Documents must 

be filed in acceptable native 

applications and print-to-PDF, but not 

in scanned or picture format. 

• For those unable to file 

electronically, comments may be filed 

by USPS mail or by other delivery 

methods: 

Æ Mail via U.S. Postal Service Only: 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

Secretary of the Commission, 888 First 

Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. 

Æ All other delivery services: Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 

Secretary of the Commission, 12225 

Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852. 

Instructions: All submissions must be 

formatted and filed in accordance with 

submission guidelines at: https://

www.ferc.gov. For user assistance, 

contact FERC Online Support by email 

at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by 

phone at (866) 208–3676 (toll-free). 

Docket: Users interested in receiving 

automatic notification of activity in this 

docket or in viewing/downloading 

comments and issuances in this docket 

may do so at https://www.ferc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kayla Williams may be reached by 

email at DataClearance@FERC.gov, 

telephone at (202) 502–6468. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
312 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2025 / Notices 

1The Regional Engineer is a member of the 

Commission’s staff. 

2Section 12.13 specifies how to verify the 

authenticity of a document submitted in accordance 

with 18 CFR part 12. 

Title: FERC–517 (Safety of 

Waterpower Projects and Project 

Works). 

OMB Control No.: 1902–0319. 

Type of Request: Three-year extension 

of the FERC–517 information collection 

requirements with no changes to the 

current reporting requirements. 

Abstract: This information collection 

will assist in the assessment of the 

safety of waterpower projects and 

project works licensed by the 

Commission. The Commission will use 

the information collection activities to 

evaluate project-specific dam and public 

safety assessments, determine whether 

those assessments are sufficient for the 

protection of life, health, and property, 

and to ensure that project works are 

being maintained in an adequate 

condition of repair. 

The information is necessary in order 

to determine the urgency, priority, and 

scope of potential safety improvements 

or risk reduction measures that might be 

needed for the protection of life, health, 

and property. 

The following reports are required 

and are a part of FERC–517: 

18 CFR Part 12, Subpart B (Reports and 

Records) 

The regulations at 18 CFR 12.10(a) 

and (b) require applicants and licensees 

to report promptly to the Regional 

Engineer 1 any incident resulting in 

death or serious injury that occurs at the 

relevant project. Section 12.10(a) 

requires an oral report to the Regional 

Engineer by telephone of any condition 

affecting the safety of a project or 

projects works, ‘‘as soon as practicable 

after that condition is discovered.’’ 

Section 12.10(b) requires a written 

report that includes a description of the 

cause and location of the accident, 

which must be submitted within the 

time specified by the Regional Engineer. 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.10(b) 

requires a written report of any death, 

serious injury, or rescue. Such reports 

must describe any remedial actions 

taken or proposed to avoid or reduce the 

chance of similar occurrences in the 

future and must be verified in 

accordance with section 12.13.2

Section 12.10(b)(3), section 

12.10(b)(2)(ii) provides that deaths that 

are not project-related may be reported 

by providing a copy of a clipping from 

a newspaper article, if available. Section 

12.10(b)(2)(iii) provides that serious 

injuries and rescues that are not projectrelated do not require a written report. 

The initial report must be made by 

email or telephone as soon as 

practicable after the condition is 

discovered, ‘‘preferably within 72 

hours.’’ 

18 CFR Part 12, Subpart D (Review, 

Inspection, and Assessment by 

Independent Consultant) 

Overview of Subpart D 

Regulations at 18 CFR part 12 subpart 

D pertain to project safety inspections 

by independent consultants. These 

inspections sometimes are colloquially 

called ‘‘Part 12D inspections.’’ These 

inspections are licensee-facilitated and 

are in addition to the project safety 

inspections conducted regularly by 

Commission staff. 

Subpart D requires two tiers of 

independent consultant inspections for 

licensed project developments that meet 

the criteria shown at section 12.30. 

Subpart D adopted a two-tier structure 

that includes two types of inspections: 

a comprehensive assessment (CA) and a 

periodic inspection (PI). Each 

comprehensive assessment will be 

performed at a ten-year interval, with 

the periodic inspection occurring 

midway between comprehensive 

assessments. A periodic inspection will 

focus on a project’s performance over 

the previous five years, and will include 

a field inspection, a review of project 

operations, an in-depth review of 

monitoring data trends and behavior, 

and an evaluation of whether any 

potential failure modes are occurring. A 

comprehensive assessment will build on 

a periodic inspection with a deep dive 

into every aspect of a project, including 

a detailed review of the design basis, 

analyses of record, and construction 

history; an evaluation of spillway 

adequacy; a Potential Failure Mode 

Analysis; and a Risk Analysis. 

Engineering Guidelines—Chapters 15 & 

16 

Chapter 15 of the Engineering 

Guidelines provides guidance on a 

Supporting Technical Information 

Document (STID). A STID serves as a 

compendium of knowledge and 

information about a project and greatly 

facilitates the review and evaluation of 

the safety and performance of project 

works by licensees, consultants, and 

Commission staff. The STID consists of 

a hard copy and a digital reference. It is 

required for all projects subject to 18 

CFR 12D and is used for assessing the 

completeness and appropriateness of 

technical information. 

The STID summarizes the project 

elements and details that, except in the 

event of detailed studies or 

construction, do not change 

significantly over time. The digital 

reference (e.g., a CD, DVD, or other form 

of electronic media) includes a 

compilation of all available source 

material and additional supporting 

information, formatted so that the 

licensee, commission staff, or 

consultants can identify and retrieve the 

information they need. A searchable 

electronic version of the hard copy 

material must be included on the digital 

reference. The licensee is responsible 

for compiling the information for the 

STID and for creating and maintaining 

the document for use by themselves, the 

Part 12D independent consultants, and 

Commission staff. 

Chapter 16 of the Engineering 

Guidelines requires licensees to submit 

a detailed Part 12D Inspection Plan 

prior to conducting either type of 

inspection (i.e., a periodic inspection or 

comprehensive assessment) that 

describes the scope of the inspection, 

proposes an Independent Consultant 

Team, and establishes the proposed 

schedule. Section 16–3.3.1 of chapter 16 

of the Engineering Guidelines provides 

that the Part 12D Inspection Plan must 

include the following information: 

• Project name, FERC number, and 

state(s) where the project is located; 

• Type of Part 12D Inspection 

(Comprehensive Assessment or Periodic 

Inspection), and a reminder that a Risk 

Analysis must be completed for a 

Comprehensive Assessment; 

• A brief description of the project 

features; 

• A proposed team of Independent 

Consultants, including the identification 

and assessment of technical disciplines 

to be represented on the team of 

Independent Consultants; the names 

and resumes for the Independent 

Consultants; a list of supporting team 

member roles and their intended areas 

of expertise; and the names and resumes 

of facilitators for any Potential Failure 

Mode Analysis or Risk Analysis as 

needed; and 

• A schedule for Part 12D Inspectionrelated activities. 

Under chapter 16, members of the 

Independent Consultant Team are 

required to prepare a Pre-Inspection 

Preparation Report to document their 

initial findings from their review of 

project documentation, instrumentation 

data, and other information prior to the 

field inspection. Chapter 16 provides an 

outline for this PRA activity. 

Chapter 16 also provides outlines for, 

and describes the scope of, the periodic 

inspections and comprehensive 

assessments that are required in 18 CFR 

part 12 subpart D. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2025 / Notices 313 

3Section 12.61(a) provides that a Chief Dam 

Safety Engineer is the designated individual, who 

is a licensed engineer, who oversees the 

implementation of the ODSP and has primary 

responsibility for ensuring the safety of the 

licensee’s dam(s) and other project features. 

4Section 12.61(b) provides that a Chief Dam 

Safety Coordinator is not required to be a licensed 

engineer but has the same responsibilities as a Chief 

Dam Safety Engineer. 5Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or 

financial resources expended by persons to 

generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 

information to or for a Federal agency. For further 

explanation of what is included in the information 

collection burden, refer to 5 CFR part 1320. 

6The Commission staff believes that industry is 

similarly situated to the Commission in terms of 

cost for wages and benefits. Based on FERC’s 

current annual average cost of $207,786 (for salary 

plus benefits) for a full-time equivalent, the average 

hourly cost is $100/hour. Therefore, the hourly cost 

used in the burden calculation is $100. 

Chapters 17 and 18 provide additional 

details and licensee guidance for 

conducting a Potential Failure Mode 

Analysis and a Level 2 Risk Analysis, 

which are required components of a 

comprehensive assessment. 

Independent Consultant Team 

Proposals and Reports 

The regulations at 18 CFR 12.31(a) 

and 12.31(b), respectively, list specific 

qualifications that are required of 

independent consultants and 

independent consultant teams. The 

regulation at 18 CFR 12.34(a) requires 

that the licensee obtain written approval 

of the independent consultant team 

from the Director of the Division of Dam 

Safety and Inspections (D2SI) prior to 

performing a periodic inspection or 

comprehensive assessment. 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.34(b) 

requires that the licensee submit a 

detailed independent consultant team 

proposal to the Director of D2SI at least 

180 days prior to performing a periodic 

inspection or comprehensive 

assessment. As part of this, the licensee 

must submit documentation of the 

experience and qualifications for all 

members of the independent consultant 

team, including one or more 

independent consultants and additional 

contributing members, as needed. This 

enables the Commission staff to evaluate 

the breadth and depth of the team’s 

experience and ensure that it is 

commensurate with the scale, 

complexity, and technical disciplines of 

the project and type of review being 

performed. The Commission intends for 

a comprehensive assessment to require 

a higher level of experience and 

expertise than a periodic inspection, 

due to the broader scope of the 

comprehensive assessment. 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.34(c) 

authorizes the Director of D2SI to 

disapprove an independent consultant 

team member, regardless of 

demonstrated experience and 

qualifications, for good cause, such as 

having a report rejected by the 

Commission within the preceding five 

years. This provision allows the 

Commission to ensure that independent 

consultants’ inspections are performed 

by qualified parties. 

18 CFR Part 12, Subpart F (Owner’s 

Dam Safety Program) 

Overview of Subpart F 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.60 

provides that subpart F applies to all 

licensees with dams or other project 

works with a high or significant hazard 

potential. The terms ‘‘High hazard 

potential’’ and ‘‘Significant hazard 

potential and ‘‘Low hazard potential’’ 

are defined at section 12.3(b)(13). 

Owner’s Dam Safety Program (ODSP) 

Document 

Section 12.62 provides that any ODSP 

Document that includes one or more 

dams or project features with a high 

hazard potential must designate a Chief 

Dam Safety Engineer.3 Other ODSPs 

may designate either a Chief Dam Safety 

Engineer or Chief Dam Safety 

Coordinator.4 Section 12.62 also 

requires that the ODSP must be signed 

by the Owner and, as applicable, the 

Chief Dam Safety Engineer or the Chief 

Dam Safety Coordinator. 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.63 

requires the following additional 

contents of an ODSP document: 

(a) Dam safety policy, objectives, and 

expectations; 

(b) Responsibilities for dam safety; 

(c) Dam safety training program; 

(d) Communication, coordination, 

reporting, and reports; 

(e) Record keeping and databases; and 

(f) Continuous improvement; 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.64 

requires any ODSP to be reviewed by 

the licensee’s dam safety staff and 

discussed with senior management on 

an annual basis. In addition, section 

12.64 requires that any findings, 

analysis, corrective measures, or 

revisions be submitted to the D2SI 

Regional Engineer for possible revision. 

This requirement applies to any licensee 

with a dam or other project feature with 

a high or significant hazard potential. 

ODSP Qualification Statement for 

External Audit or Peer Review 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.65 

applies to licensees of one or more dams 

or other project features classified as 

having a high hazard potential. Section 

12.65(a) requires an independent 

external audit or peer review of the 

ODSP and its implementation. The 

audit or peer review is required to be 

performed at an interval not to exceed 

five years. 

Before the audit or peer review, 18 

CFR 12.65(b) requires the licensee to 

submit to the Regional Engineer a 

statement of qualifications of the 

prospective auditor(s) or peer review 

team. The licensee must receive written 

acceptance of the statement of 

qualifications before performing the 

audit or peer review. 

ODSP External Audit or Peer Review 

Report 

The regulation at 18 CFR 12.65(c) 

requires the auditor(s) or peer review 

team to document their findings in a 

report. The report must be reviewed by: 

• The project’s owner, 

• The Chief Dam Safety Engineer or 

Chief Dam Safety Coordinator, and 

• Management having responsibility 

in the area(s) audited or reviewed. 

Subsequently, the report on the audit 

or peer review must be submitted to the 

Regional Engineer. 

ODSP Request for Extension of Time 

Typically, the Commission’s letters to 

licensees pertaining to ODSPs and 

ODSP audits require submittal of a plan 

and schedule or report within a set 

period of time (e.g., provide a plan and 

schedule within 30 days from the date 

of this letter). Although neither the 

ODSP regulations nor any of the existing 

ODSP guidance documents expressly 

contemplate extension of time requests, 

there are times when a licensee cannot 

meet that schedule and therefore files a 

letter with Commission staff requesting 

an extension of time to complete ODSPrelated tasks. 

Estimate of Annual Burden: 5 The 

Commission estimates the burden and 

cost 6 for this information collection as 

follows: 

In the tables below, the burden 

estimates for team proposals and reports 

involving PIs and CAs, define a single 

response as the consolidated filings 

during the typical ten-year cycle for 

Independent Consultant’s Safety 

Inspections (one PI and one CA each 

during the ten-year period). Therefore, 

the estimated average number of annual 

responses for the consolidated filings is 

averaged over the ten-year period and 

represented as 0.1 responses on average 

per year. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
314 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2025 / Notices 

7 Includes direct and contracting burden and cost. 

8 Includes direct and contracting burden and cost. 

9This information collection activity applies to 

each licensee with dams or other project features 

with a high or significant hazard potential, but with 

fewer than three such dams or other project 

features. 

10This information collection activity applies to 

each licensee with three or more dams or project 

features with a high or significant hazard potential. 

11This information collection activity applies to 

each licensee with dams or other project features 

with a high hazard potential, but with fewer than 

three such dams or project features. The burden 

estimates for this activity include direct and 

contracting burdens and costs. 

12This information collection activity applies to 

each licensee with three or more dams or project 

features with a high hazard potential. The burden 

estimates for this information collection activity 

include direct and contracting burdens and costs. 

FERC–517—DIRECT AND INDIRECT ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST CHANGES

A. 

Type of response 

B. 

Number of 

respondents 

C. 

Avg. number 

of annual 

responses per 

respondent 

D. 

Avg. annual 

burden hrs. and 

cost per response 

E. 

Total 

number of 

annual 

responses 

F. 

Total annual burden hrs. 

and cost 

 (col. B × col. C) (col. D × col. E) 

Applicant’s or Licensee’s Report of 

Project-Related Deaths, Serious Injuries, or Rescues.

65 2.14 2 hrs.; $200 ............. 139.10 278.20 hrs.; $27,820. 

Ind. Cons. Team Proposals and Reports 

on PIs and CAs—Simple Facility 7.

375 0.1 12 hrs.; $1,200 ........ 37.50 450 hrs.; $45,000. 

Ind. Cons. Team Proposals and Reports 

on PIs and CAs—Complex Facility 8.

375 0.1 32.6 hrs.; $3,260 ..... 37.50 1,222.50 hrs.; $122,250. 

Licensee’s Request for Exemption ........... 10 1 2 hrs.; $200 ............. 10 20 hrs.; $2,000. 

ODSP Document—Small Program 9 ......... 180 0.2 60 hrs.; $6,000 ........ 36 2,160 hrs.; $216,000. 

ODSP Document—Large Program 10 ....... 45 0.2 120 hrs.; $12,000 .... 9 1,080 hrs.; $108,000. 

ODSP Document Revision ........................ 225 1 6 hrs.; $600 ............. 225 1,350 hrs.; $135,000. 

ODSP Qualification Statement for External Audit or Peer Review.225 0.2 8 hrs.; $800 ............. 45 360 hrs.; $36,000. 

ODSP External Audit or Peer Review Report—Small Program 11.180 0.2 62 hrs.; $6,200 ........ 36 2,232 hrs.; $223,200. 

ODSP External Audit or Peer Review Report—Large Program 12.45 0.2 242 hrs.; $24,200 .... 9 2,178 hrs.; $217,800. 

ODSP Request for Extension of Time ...... 5 1 4 hrs.; $400 ............. 5 20 hrs.; $2,000. 

Total Hours and Costs ....................... 1,730 ........................ .................................. 589 11,350.5 hrs.; 

$1,135,050. 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(1) whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden and cost of the collection 

of information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility 

and clarity of the information collection; 

and (4) ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Dated: December 27, 2024. 

Carlos D. Clay, 

Acting Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–31565 Filed 1–2–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2020–0413; FRL–12540– 

01–OMS] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget for Review 

and Approval; Comment Request; 

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 

Section 8(b) Reporting Requirements 

for TSCA Inventory Notifications 

(Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) has submitted an 

information collection request, Toxic 

Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 

8(b) Reporting Requirements for TSCA 

Inventory Notifications (EPA ICR 

Number 2565.05 and OMB Control 

Number 2070–0201), to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). 

This is a proposed extension of the ICR, 

which is currently approved through 

January 31, 2025. Public comments were 

previously requested via the Federal 

Register on Tuesday, April 23, 2024. 

This notice allows for an additional 30 

days for public comments. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 3, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID Number EPA– 

HQ–OPPT–2020–0413, to EPA online 

using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method) or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20460. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

Submit written comments and 

recommendations to OMB for the 

proposed information collection within 

30 days of publication of this notice to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Sleasman, Mission Support 

Division (7602M), Office of Chemical 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1