[Cite as State v. Cox, 2023-Ohio-377.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO, :

Plaintiff-Appellee, :

 Nos. 111636, 111640,

v. : and 111651

BRIAN L. COX, JR., :

Defendant-Appellant. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: February 9, 2023

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Case Nos. CR-21-660012-A, CR-21-660090-A, CR-22-669956-A,

DL-21-100138, DL-21-100881, and DL-21-111153

Appearances:

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting 

Attorney, and Sean Kilbane, Assistant Prosecuting 

Attorney, for appellee. 

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Lauren 

Hammersmith, Assistant State Public Defender, for 

appellant. 
ANITA LASTER MAYS, A.J.:

Defendant-appellant Brian L. Cox, Jr.(“Cox”) appeals the trial court’s 

judgment sentencing him to an indefinite prison term pursuant to the Reagan Tokes 

Law. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.

Cox was charged in three complaints in Cuyahoga County Juvenile 

Court.1 After the court found probable cause in relation to all counts in each 

complaint, Cox’s cases were transferred to the general division of the common pleas 

court. Cox entered guilty pleas to one count of aggregated robbery in Cuyahoga C.P. 

No. CR-21-660012; two counts of aggravated robbery (with three-year firearm 

specifications), one count of robbery, and one count of aggravate burglary (with a 

three-year firearm specification) in Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-21-660090; and one 

count of robbery in Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-22-669956. Cox agreed to a 

recommended sentence with a range of 14 to 18 years. The trial court sentenced Cox 

to an aggregate prison sentence of 14 to 16.5 years, subject to the Reagan Tokes Law 

indefinite sentencing scheme. 

Cox’s trial counsel objected to the imposition of the Reagan Tokes 

Law citing that it was unconstitutional. Cox filed this appeal and assigned one error 

for our review:

The Reagan Tokes Law violates the Ohio and U.S. Constitutions, Cox’s 

sentence is contrary to law. R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); Sixth and Fourteenth 

Amendments of the U.S. Constitution; Articles I, II, and III of the U.S. 

1 Cox’s three juvenile cases were DL-21-100138, DL-21-100881, and DL-21-111153.
Constitution; and Article I, Sections 5, 10, and 16 of the Ohio 

Constitution.

I. Law and Analysis

In Cox’s sole assigned error, he argues that his sentence violates the 

separation-of-powers doctrine and does not satisfy the requirements of due process, 

and thereby violates his constitutional rights. 

Cox’s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court’s en banc 

decision in State v. Delvallie, 2022-Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist.).

Judgment affirmed.

It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the 

common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to 

Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

______________________________________

ANITA LASTER MAYS, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, J., and 

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR

N.B. Administrative Judge Anita Laster Mays is constrained to apply Delvallie’s

en banc decision. For a full explanation of her analysis, see State v. Delvallie, 

2022-Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist.) (Laster Mays, J., concurring in part and 

dissenting in part).

Judge Mary Eileen Kilbane joined the dissenting opinion by Judge Lisa B. Forbes 

and the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by Administrative Judge 

Anita Laster Mays in Delvallie and would have found the Reagan Tokes Law 

unconstitutional.