alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_science(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

Project        June 19, 2018        Mineral Resource Assessment of U.S. Territories of the Caribbean Basin Archipelago including Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands and Adjacent Areas
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 451 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 451

   Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares 
 during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2023

    Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Moran) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares 
 during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND HOUSEWARES DURING 
              THE HOLIDAY SEASON FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 
              BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules 
or regulations of the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may collect from another Senator, officer of the Senate, 
        or employee of the Senate within a Senate building or other 
        office secured for a Senator nonmonetary donations of clothing, 
        toys, food, and housewares for charitable purposes related to 
        serving persons in need or members of the Armed Forces and the 
        families of those members during the holiday season, if the 
        charitable purposes do not otherwise violate any rule or 
        regulation of the Senate or Federal law; and
            (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may work with a nonprofit organization with respect to 
        the delivery of donations described under paragraph (1).
    (b) Expiration.--The authority provided by this resolution shall 
expire at the end of the first session of the 118th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRIS CAPLANIS,

Appellant,

v.

AUTONATION, INC., including all of its affiliates, subsidiary companies, 

dealerships, officers, directors, employees, and agents,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2796

[August 15, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-15373 CACE 

(08).

Chris Caplanis, Black Canyon City, Arizona, pro se.

Kevin R. Jackson of the Law Offices of Kevin Jackson P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2021297EN.01004301.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/43

---

Order of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Birkenstock Sales v EUIPO (Wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe)

(Case T-365/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for an EU trade mark consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 297/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Birkenstock Sales GmbH (Linz am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Menebröcker and K. Middelhoff, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 (Case R 1706/2019-1), concerning an application for registration of a sign consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Birkenstock Sales GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Birkenstock Sales GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
Terry Lee NEVILLS, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2822

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021471EN.01004502.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Società agricola Vivai Maiorana and Others v Commission

(Case T-116/20) (1)

(Agriculture - Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 - Protective measures against pests of plants - List of Union regulated non-quarantine pests - Threshold above which the presence of a Union regulated non-quarantine pest on plants for planting has an unacceptable economic impact - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 - Professional Associations - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 471/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss (Curinga, Italy), Confederazione Italiana Agricoltori — CIA (Rome, Italy), MIVA — Moltiplicatori Italiani Viticoli Associati (Faenza, Italy) (represented by: E.Scoccini and G. Scoccini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Emmerechts, A. Vitro and S. Barbagallo, acting as Agents), European Parliament (represented by: L. Knudsen and G. Mendola, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of parts A, B, C, F, I and J of annex IV to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2019 (JO 2019, L 319, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss, Confederazione Italiana Agricoltori — CIA and MIVA — Moltiplicatori Italiani Viticoli Associati to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss, Confederazione Italiana Agricoltori — CIA and MIVA — Moltiplicatori Italiani Viticoli Associati to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
# C_2021009EN.01000302.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa (Romania) lodged on 23 April 2020 — SC Novart Engineering SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Tulcea

(Case C-170/20)

(2021/C 9/04)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Constanţa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Novart Engineering SRL

Defendant: Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Tulcea

By order of 12 November 2020, the Court (Tenth Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling manifestly inadmissible.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

Science Animations        November 30, 2018        Shaking of Atwood Building, Mw 7.0 November 30, 2018, Anchorage quake

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

Science Animations        March 30, 2016        Shaking in the Atwood Building in Anchorage, Alaska

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
# C_2023271EN.01002202.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2023 — Stone Brewing v EUIPO — Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) (STONE BREWING)

(Case T-200/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark STONE BREWING - Earlier EU word mark STONES - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 271/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stone Brewing Co. LLC (Escondido, California, United States) (represented by: M. Kloth, R. Briske and D. Habel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Ltd (Burton Upon Trent, United Kingdom) (represented by G. Orchison, Solicitor, and J. Abrahams KC)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 January 2020 (Case R 1524/2018-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Stone Brewing Co. LLC to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stone Brewing Co. LLC to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Ltd;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 99.7

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report of Enterra Energy Trust (the Issuer) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof, I, Blaine Boerchers, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                     |     |                                                                  
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
March 31, 2008 | By: | SignedBlaine Boerchers
Blaine Boerchers
Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - (-)rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Super Energy Investments
  Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December
  31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, Ni Jinrong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ni Jinrong 
  Ni Jinrong 
  Chief Financial Officer
  November 12, 2003

---
# C_2022257EN.01000602.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Proceedings brought by RR, JG

(Case C-505/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union - Directive 2014/42/EU - Article 4 - Confiscation - Article 7 - Freezing - Article 8 - Procedural guarantees - Freezing and confiscation of property belonging to a person unconnected with the criminal proceedings - National legislation not providing for third party remedies during court proceedings and not allowing for the possible return of the property before the end of the criminal proceedings)

(2022/C 257/08)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: RR, JG

Intervener: Spetsializirana prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 8(1) of Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which, where property is frozen as the instrumentalities or alleged proceeds of an offence, the owner of that property, a third party acting in good faith, has no right, during the judicial phase of the criminal proceedings, to apply to the competent court for the return of that property. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 8(1) of Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which, where property is frozen as the instrumentalities or alleged proceeds of an offence, the owner of that property, a third party acting in good faith, has no right, during the judicial phase of the criminal proceedings, to apply to the competent court for the return of that property.

| 2. | Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/42 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which excludes the confiscation of property belonging to a third party acting in good faith and used as an instrumentality of an offence, even where that property has been made available by that third party for the permanent use of the accused person. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/42 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which excludes the confiscation of property belonging to a third party acting in good faith and used as an instrumentality of an offence, even where that property has been made available by that third party for the permanent use of the accused person.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
Andrew JOSEPH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 07, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2021110EN.01002201.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Appeal Tribunal for Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) made on 30 December 2020 — CG v Department for Communities in Northern Ireland

(Case C-709/20)

(2021/C 110/23)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Appeal Tribunal (Northern Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CG

Defendant: Department for Communities in Northern Ireland

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of The Universal Credit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 which was inserted by The Social Security (Income-related Benefits) (Updating and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2019), which excludes from entitlement to Social Security benefits EU nationals with a domestic right of residence (Limited Leave to Remain) [in this case ‘pre-settled status’ under the Appendix EU of the UK Immigration Rules] unlawfully discriminatory (either directly or Indirectly) pursuant to Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and inconsistent with the UK’s obligations under the European Communities Act 1972? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of The Universal Credit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 which was inserted by The Social Security (Income-related Benefits) (Updating and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2019), which excludes from entitlement to Social Security benefits EU nationals with a domestic right of residence (Limited Leave to Remain) [in this case ‘pre-settled status’ under the Appendix EU of the UK Immigration Rules] unlawfully discriminatory (either directly or Indirectly) pursuant to Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and inconsistent with the UK’s obligations under the European Communities Act 1972?

| 2. | If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, and Regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of The Universal Credit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 is held to be indirectly discriminatory, is Regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of The Universal Credit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 justified pursuant to Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Inconsistent with the UK's obligations under the European Communities Act 1972? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, and Regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of The Universal Credit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 is held to be indirectly discriminatory, is Regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of The Universal Credit Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 justified pursuant to Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Inconsistent with the UK's obligations under the European Communities Act 1972?

---