alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 18 PageID 9061
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 18 PageID 9062
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 3 of 18 PageID 9063
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 4 of 18 PageID 9064
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 5 of 18 PageID 9065
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 6 of 18 PageID 9066
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 7 of 18 PageID 9067
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 8 of 18 PageID 9068
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 9 of 18 PageID 9069
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 10 of 18 PageID 9070
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 11 of 18 PageID 9071
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 12 of 18 PageID 9072
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 13 of 18 PageID 9073
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 14 of 18 PageID 9074
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 15 of 18 PageID 9075
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 16 of 18 PageID 9076
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 17 of 18 PageID 9077
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01634-G Document 366 Filed 12/21/05 Page 18 of 18 PageID 9078
DISMISS; Opinion Filed October 13, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00434-CV

JOSE VAZQUEZ, Appellant

V.

BETTY VAZQUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-23331

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Evans

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated September 15, 2015, we 

notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his 

brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his 

brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with 

the Court regarding the status of his brief.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

150434F.P05

/David W. Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOSE VAZQUEZ, Appellant

No. 05-15-00434-CV V.

BETTY VAZQUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-23331.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices 

Lang and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee BETTY VAZQUEZ recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant JOSE VAZQUEZ.

Judgment entered this 13th day of October, 2015.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - (-)new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 5, 2019        New U.S. Geological Survey Report Assesses Risk of Once-Per-Century Geomagnetic Superstorm to the Northeastern United States
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1152 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-937, K2025-938.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31112 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Resource Funding, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Koran, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for the quarter
      ending August 31, 2006, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






October
      18, 2006




CAPITAL
      RESOURCE FUNDING, INC.


By:  /s/
        David Koran
 David Koran
 Chief Executive Officer
 And President for the quarter ending August 31, 2006
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 13, 2011 | By:  | /s/ Robert DeCecco III                                                                                                           |   |
|---------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |      | Robert DeCecco III                                                                                                               |   |
|                |      | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
# C_2022064EN.01000302.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/3

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto Este — Penafiel — Juízo Trabalho — Portugal) — B v O, P, OP, G, N

(Case C-691/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU law - Principles - Article 18 TFEU - Equal treatment - Discrimination on grounds of nationality - Prohibition - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Joint and several liability of companies which form part of a group for debts resulting from an employment contract entered into by one of those companies - Exclusion by the legislation of the Member State concerned of companies that have their seat in another Member State)

(2022/C 64/04)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto Este — Penafiel — Juízo Trabalho

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: B

Defendants: O, P, OP, G, N

Operative part of the order

The principle of non-discrimination, implemented by Article 49 TFEU, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which a company, established in a Member State other than that in which the company which it controls is established, cannot be held jointly and severally liable for that latter company’s debts resulting from an employment contract.

---

(1)  OJ C 110, 29.3.2021.

---
Case 3:03-cv-02543-N Document 12 Filed 02/10/04 Page 1 of 5 PageID 42
Case 3:03-cv-02543-N Document 12 Filed 02/10/04 Page 2 of 5 PageID 43
Case 3:03-cv-02543-N Document 12 Filed 02/10/04 Page 3 of 5 PageID 44
Case 3:03-cv-02543-N Document 12 Filed 02/10/04 Page 4 of 5 PageID 45
Case 3:03-cv-02543-N Document 12 Filed 02/10/04 Page 5 of 5 PageID 46
#### B. P. Downing, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed December 13, 1927.

*Davis & Pepper,*Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error;

*Marks, Marks & Holt*and *W. T. Hendry,*Attorneys for ■Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.-

In this case the writ of error must be dismissed because the record fails to show a final disposition of the cause in the Circuit Court.

The record discloses that during the progress of the trial, when all evidence had been submitted, the defendant filed a motion for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant. The bill of exceptions contains the following recitation immediately after the motion for an instructed verdict:

“After hearing the arguments upon the above motion of the defendant, the court announced that it would grant the said motion. Thereupon, the plaintiff hearing that the *1097court would grant said motion asked to take a non-suit and the same was granted. ’ ’

The record fails to show any further disposition of the matter. It contains no judgment of non-suit, nor does it contain any order dismissing the cause.

The mere recitation that “the plaintiff hearing that the court would grant said motion, asked to take a non-suit and the same was granted” contained in the record proper and in the bill of exceptions is not a sufficient order or judgment to constitute the basis for writ of error as contemplated under the provisions of Section 2907, Revised General Statutes of Florida.

The Writ of Error is dismissed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Case 3:03-cv-01788-D Document 18 Filed 04/18/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 75
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01788-D Document 18 Filed 04/18/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 76
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31685]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1103 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-878, K2025-879.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31685 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31760]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement Under the Clean Air Act

    On December 31, 2024, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
Consent Decree in the civil action United States v. White's Diesel 
Performance In. [sic] d/b/a White's Diesel Performance Inc. and White's 
Diesel, Civ. No. 8:24-cv-01791-SDM-SPF (M.D. Fla.). The complaint 
alleged that those defendants sold or installed illegal devices 
intended to defeat factory-installed pollution control devices, in 
violation of the Clean Air Act. The Consent Decree prohibits the 
defendants from selling or installing such devices in the future and 
requires the settling defendants to pay a civil penalty of $10,000, 
based on the defendants' limited financial ability to pay a larger sum.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the Settlement Agreement. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and 
should refer to Settlement Agreement among the United States and 
White's Diesel Performance, Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-12438. All 
comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the 
publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by 
email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................  [email protected].
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any comments submitted in writing may be filed in whole or in part 
on the public court docket without notice to the commenter.
    During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be 
examined at and downloaded from this Justice Department website: 
https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. If you require assistance 
accessing the Consent Decree you may request assistance by email or by 
mail to the addresses provided above for submitting comments.

Scott Bauer,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-31760 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```
# C_2020191EN.01001001.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 9 March 2020 — XI v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants

(Case C-129/20)

(2020/C 191/14)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: XI

Respondent: Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants

Question referred

Must clauses 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 2.3(b) of the framework agreement on parental leave concluded on 14 December 1995 between the general cross-industry organisations UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, which was implemented by Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, (1) be interpreted as precluding the application of a provision of national law, such as Article 29bis of the amended Law of 16 April 1979 laying down the general regulations applicable to State officials in the version resulting from the Law of 22 December 2006 (Mémorial, A, 2006, No 242, p. 4838), which makes the grant of parental leave subject to the twofold condition that the worker is lawfully employed in a workplace and affiliated in that regard to the social security scheme, first, without interruption for a continuous period of at least 12 months immediately preceding the start of the parental leave and, secondly, at the time of the birth or of the reception of the child or children to be adopted, compliance with that second condition being required even if the birth or reception occurred more than 12 months before the start of the parental leave?

---

(1)  OJ 1996 L 145, p. 4.

---
# C_2022368EN.01000301.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/3

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against VD

(Case C-654/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Transport - Directive 2006/126/EC - Driving licences - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 49 - Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties - Driving a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence - Penalties - Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Absence of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 368/03)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad — Sofia

Party to the main criminal proceedings

VD

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Apelativen sad Sofia (Court of Appeal, Sofia, Bulgaria), by decision of 9 November 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6908

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND CRAIG JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cr-00199-LCB-2)

Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 27, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Craig Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6908 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Craig Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of 

a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 

326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court 

did not abuse its discretion in denying Johnson’s compassionate release motion. See 

United States v. Ferguson, 55 F.4th 262, 271 (4th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. United States v. Johnson, No. 1:15-cr-00199-LCB-2 (M.D.N.C. July 

26, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6908 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1189 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-984, K2025-983.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31744 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P