alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital
Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Bernardy, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                                 
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard A. Bernardy                         
|             |  | Richard A. Bernardy,                            
|             |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March 7, 2014 |   | /s/ Martin B. Oring                            |   |
|                           |   | Martin B. Oring                                     |   |
|                           |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----

----
# C_2016090EN.01002301.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/23

---

Action brought on 15 January 2016 — Gauff v OHIM — H.P. Gauff Ingenieure (GAUFF)

(Case T-13/16)

(2016/C 090/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Molnar)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Gauff’ — Community mark No 6 327 977

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2015 in Case R 549/2015-1

Contested decision:

Form of order

Form of order

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; or
  in the alternative, send the case back to OHIM for further examination of the disputed matters that were, in error, not examined; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision; or

in the alternative, send the case back to OHIM for further examination of the disputed matters that were, in error, not examined;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 53, 56, 57, 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Regulation No 2868/95 as well as infringement of the right to be heard and failure to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 53, 56, 57, 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Regulation No 2868/95 as well as infringement of the right to be heard and failure to state reasons.

---
# C_2016078EN.01003301.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/33

---

Action brought on 4 January 2016 — K&K Group v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (Pret A Diner)

(Case T-2/16)

(2016/C 078/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: K&K Group AG (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pret a Manger (Europe) Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Pret A Diner’ — International registration No 1 113 460

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings.

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2015 in Case R 2825/2014-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(5), 15(1), 42(2) and 42(3) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(5), 15(1), 42(2) and 42(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 22 of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 22 of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **Certification
        required by Rule 13a-14(b) or**
 **Rule
        15d-14(b) and Section 906 of**
 **the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H.
        Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 Date:  August
        8, 2007
 
 By:
              /s/
                  John H. HomierJohn
                  H. HomierPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer
 
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Inyx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
      the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack Kachkar, Chief Executive
      Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.









By: /s/
      Jack
      Kachkar





Jack
      Kachkar,


Chief
      Executive Officer and
      Director





March
      31,
      2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2015

p0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2015

150344

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 150344

COA: 322277

Clinton CC: 06-008035-FH

JEFFREY LEE COCHRAN, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Michael BRANTLEY, Jr., et al. v. CITY OF GRETNA and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc.

NO. 2018-CC-2115

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

Denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20599

Summary Calendar

__________________

FIRST LAKE CORPORATION, substituted

for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SALIH M. YILMAZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-94-1523

- - - - - - - - - -

May 14, 1996

Before KING, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Salih M. Yilmaz appeals the grant of summary judgment for

the plaintiff in an action to recover on a promissory note. 

Yilmaz argues that his summary judgment evidence, the affidavit

of his accountant/business adviser, was proper evidence which

raised a question of material fact concerning whether the Federal

Deposit Insurance Corporation accelerated the promissory note,
2

which had the legal effect of beginning the running of

limitations. 

To establish his affirmative defense of the running of

limitations, and thus to defeat the FDIC's summary judgment

motion, Yilmaz had the burden to establish valid acceleration and

its necessary precondition, default. Yilmaz relies on the

affidavit of Jordan Fruehauf, his accountant/business adviser. 

Fruehauf attested that "Yilmaz made two or three payments on the

note after the FDIC was appointed as the liquidator, but ceased

payments thereafter and the note was in default. The fact was

confirmed to [Fruehauf] by a representative of the FDIC." The

affidavit fails to give the dates of the specific payments or the

dates for which payments were not made and it has no supporting 

exhibits, such as business records or bank statements. The FDIC

relies on the amended affidavit of Victor Black, the account

officer assigned by the FDIC to monitor Yilmaz' case. Black's

affidavit attests to the facts that the note matured on May 5,

1988; that the last payment received on the note was dated August

1, 1988; that Yilmaz defaulted on the note on May 5, 1988; that

Yilmaz sent notification to the FDIC, through Fruehauf, on August

27, 1988 to the effect that no further payments would be made by

Yilmaz until the FDIC renegotiated the loan; and that formal

demand for the entire unpaid principal amount of the note and all

accrued interest was made to Yilmaz by the FDIC by letter dated

August 20, 1991. Fruehauf's vague affidavit is not enough to
3

create a fact issue about the maturity date of the note and the

date the statute of limitations commenced to run. 

Because Yilmaz failed to carry his summary judgment burden

in demonstrating a genuine dispute of material fact on his

affirmative defense of limitations, the district court's grant of

summary judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leon F. Gosselin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | /s/LEON F. GOSSELINLeon F. Gosselin
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer January 21, 2005
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Christopher T. Seaver, Chief Executive
Officer of Hydril Company, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
that: (1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 11, 2005
    
    /s/ Chris D. NorthChris D. NorthChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 



AMENDMENT NO. 8


TO


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED


CINEDIGM CORP. 2000 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN







AMENDMENT NO. 8, dated as of September 8, 2016 (this "Amendment"), to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the "Plan") of Cinedigm Corp. (f/k/a Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. and f/k/a Access Integrated Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation").


WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the Plan, effective as of June 1, 2000; and


WHEREAS, the Corporation deems it to be in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders to amend the Plan in order to specify the permitted uses, with respect to future grants, of shares subject to earlier grants that were terminated, forfeited, expired or cancelled and/or for which such shares were never issued.



NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1. Section 5.2 shall be revised and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:


"The total number of shares of Stock (including Restricted Stock, if any) optioned or granted under this Plan during the term of the Plan shall not exceed 1,430,000 shares. If an Award expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or, with respect to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units or Performance Shares, is forfeited to, or repurchased by, the Company due to failure to vest, then the unpurchased Shares (or for Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights the forfeited or repurchased Shares), which were subject thereto will become available for future grant or sale under the Plan (unless the Plan has terminated). With respect to Stock Appreciation Rights, the gross Shares issued (i.e., Shares actually issued pursuant to a Stock Appreciation Right, as well as the Shares that represent payment of the exercise price and any applicable tax withholdings) pursuant to a Stock Appreciation Right will cease to be available under the Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise price of an Award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an Award will not become available for future grant or sale under the Plan. To the extent an Award under the Plan is paid out in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan. For purposes of clarification, no Shares purchased by the Company with proceeds received from the exercise of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right will become available for issuance under this Plan."


2. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set forth above.


3. In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full force and effect.







CINEDIGM CORP.

















By:   /s/ Christopher J. McGurk                                                      


       Name: Christopher J. McGurk


       Title:   Chairman and CEO
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 6 Filed 06/10/03 Page 1 of 4 PageID 21
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 6 Filed 06/10/03 Page 2 of 4 PageID 22
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 6 Filed 06/10/03 Page 3 of 4 PageID 23
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 6 Filed 06/10/03 Page 4 of 4 PageID 24
STATE of Louisiana v. Orlin ALVAREZ-CHAVEZ

NO. 2019-KK-0285

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 22, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.2


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2006


/S/ Bryan Kenyon
--------------------------------------
Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer
Federal Aviation
Administration

ta
re a)
wey

IST RE

Memorandum

Date: August 19, 2009
To: Aircraft Accident file TEB-ATCT-0078
From: Teterboro Airport Traffic Control Tower

Subject: INFORMATION: Partial Transcript
Rircraft Accident, N71MC/N401LH
Hoboken, NJ, August 08, 2009

This transcriotion covers the Teterboro Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) CD
CD position for the time period from August 08, 2009, 1535 JTC, to August 08,
2009, 1547 UTC,

Agencies Making Transmissions Abbreviations

PA32, N71MC N7 IMC
TEB ATCT Clearance Delivery cb

I hereby certify that the following is a true tra
conversations vertai

ripticn of the recorded
ing to the subject aircraft accident involving N71MCc.

Staff Support Specialist

Teterboro ATCT

1535

(1536-1539)

549

1540:01 N?1Mc ah teterboro clearance lance november seven one mike
charlie

1540:05 cb lance november seven one mike charlie teterboro
clearance go ahead

1540:08 N71MC yeah with hotel and looking for v f r cewn te ah twenty
six november ocean city land ah ocean city new
jersey and ah looking to go down at thirty five hundred
feet would like advisories and i'm at ah meridian and ah
ready to taxi

1540:25 cD

and just say ah identifier for type


TEB-ATCT-9078

N71MC/N4012H

Page 2 of 2

1540727

1540:32

1540:593

1541:04

1541:27

1541:28

1541:31

1541:34
1542

(1543-1546

1547

N7 IMC

CB

cb

N71MC

N?LMC

cb

N?iMC

ah that i'm sorry it's a piper lance it's
two and ah slash golf

roger sir stand by for squawk

lance two mike charlie squawk zero three
contact tower for taxi

that's ah zero three two zero and that's
mike charlie and i'll contact the tower

ah clearance seven one mike charlie

one mike charlie go ahead

yeah is there a departure frequency

you expect ah one one niner point two

ene one niner point two

End of Transcript

two zero

ah sever

one
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in 

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the 

citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Filing Date: June 17, 2024

No. S-1-SC-38221

PEARL GONZALES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARGARET SALAZAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIFICATION FROM THE NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS

Clay Campbell, District Judge

New Mexico Legal Aid, Inc.

Tom Prettyman

Albuquerque, NM 

for Appellant

Pearl Gonzales

Pro se

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REVERSAL

PER CURIAM.

{1} WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, the Court accepted certification and held this 

matter in abeyance pending this Court’s disposition in Padilla v. Torres, No. S-1-SC35619;
{2} WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Padilla on February 5, 2024, 

reversing and remanding that matter to the metropolitan court for a new trial, see Padilla 

v. Torres, 2024-NMSC-007, ¶ 2, ___ P.3d ___;

{3} WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the issues presented in this matter are 

addressed by the Court’s opinion in Padilla;

{4} WHEREAS, the Court, therefore, exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B) 

NMRA to dispose of this matter by nonprecedential order; and

{5} WHEREAS, the Court having considered the foregoing and being sufficiently 

advised;

{6} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s February 1, 2022, order is 

WITHDRAWN as to the abeyance; and

{7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court is reversed and this matter is 

remanded to the metropolitan court for a new trial in accordance with Padilla.

{8} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR:

DAVID K. THOMSON, Chief Justice

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice

JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice