alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.1


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE 


ECO-STIM
ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.


2015
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT (the “First Amendment”) to the Eco-Stim Energy Solutions, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is made by Eco-Stim Energy Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


W
I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS,
the Company previously adopted the Plan, under which the Company is authorized to grant equity-based incentive awards to certain
employees and other service providers of the Company and its subsidiaries;


 


WHEREAS,
Paragraph XIII of the Plan provides that the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) may amend the
Plan from time to time, except that any amendment to increase the number of shares of common stock of the Company (the “Shares”)
that may be issued under the Plan must be approved by the stockholders of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Board now desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of Shares available for awards under the Plan by 200,000 Shares,
subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, the Plan shall be amended as of June 30, 2016, subject to approval by the Company’s
stockholders, as set forth below:


 


1.
The first sentence of Paragraph V(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“Subject
to adjustment in the same manner as provided in Paragraph XII with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to Options then outstanding,
the aggregate maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan, and the aggregate maximum number of
shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan through Incentive Stock Options, shall not exceed 1,200,000 shares (which
number includes (i) the 500,000 shares of Common Stock originally available for issuance pursuant to the Prior Plan, including
shares of Common Stock previously issued pursuant to an Award (or made subject to an Award that has not expired or been terminated)
granted under the Prior Plan prior to the Effective Date), (ii) the 500,000 shares of Common Stock made available for issuance
under the Plan in connection with the amendment and restatement of the Plan, effective May 14, 2015, and (iii) an additional 200,000
shares of Common Stock first being made available for issuance under the Plan in connection with the First Amendment to the Plan,
effective June 30, 2016).”


 


FURTHER
RESOLVED, that except as amended hereby, the Plan shall continue to read in the current state and is specifically ratified
and reaffirmed.


 


[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank.]
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-149449) and Amendment No. 354 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


September 29, 2016
# C_2021072EN.01001401.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 23 November 2020 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v LE

(Case C-629/20)

(2021/C 72/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Respondent: LE

Question referred

Does a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 544 

Designating the week beginning February 5, 2024, as ‘‘National Tribal 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. DAINES, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. WARREN, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. SMITH, Mr. 

HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BENNET, 

Ms. ROSEN, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. LANKFORD, 

Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. THUNE, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. FISCHER, 

and Mr. KELLY) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning February 5, 2024, as 

‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 34 Tribal Colleges and Universities operating on more than 90 campuses in 15 States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are tribally chartered or federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the 

Federal Government; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities serve students from 

more than 230 federally recognized Indian tribes; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 544 ATS 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities offer students access to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural traditions and values, including indigenous languages, 

which— 

(1) enhances Indian communities; and 

(2) enriches the United States as a nation; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities provide access to 

high-quality postsecondary educational opportunities 

for— 

(1) American Indians; 

(2) Alaska Natives; and 

(3) other individuals that live in some of the most 

isolated and economically depressed areas in the United 

States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are accredited institutions of higher education that prepare students to succeed in the global and highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities have open enrollment policies, and approximately 13 percent of the students at Tribal Colleges and Universities are non-Indian 

individuals; and 

Whereas the collective mission and the considerable achievements of Tribal Colleges and Universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning February 5, 

3 2024, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities 

4 Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups to observe National Tribal Colleges 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 544 ATS 

1 and Universities Week with appropriate activities 

2 and programs to demonstrate support for Tribal 

3 Colleges and Universities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 1 of 25 PageID 1
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 2 of 25 PageID 2
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 3 of 25 PageID 3
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 4 of 25 PageID 4
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 5 of 25 PageID 5
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 6 of 25 PageID 6
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 7 of 25 PageID 7
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 8 of 25 PageID 8
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 9 of 25 PageID 9
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 10 of 25 PageID 10
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 11 of 25 PageID 11
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 12 of 25 PageID 12
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 13 of 25 PageID 13
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 14 of 25 PageID 14
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 15 of 25 PageID 15
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 16 of 25 PageID 16
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 17 of 25 PageID 17
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 18 of 25 PageID 18
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 19 of 25 PageID 19
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 20 of 25 PageID 20
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 21 of 25 PageID 21
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 22 of 25 PageID 22
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 23 of 25 PageID 23
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 24 of 25 PageID 24
Case 2:03-cv-00200-J Document 1 Filed 07/10/03 Page 25 of 25 PageID 25
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-31033

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OCTAVIO SILVA DIAZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(93-CR-382)

_________________________________________________________________

August 1, 1996

Before DAVIS, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Octavio Silva Diaz appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846,

contending that the district court erred by denying his motion for

judgment of acquittal based on improper venue. Pursuant to our

review of the record, we find no reversible error. See United

States v. Caldwell, 16 F.3d 623, 624 (5th Cir. 1994) (venue for

conspiracy is proper in any district where agreement was formed or
- 2 -

an overt act occurred). Accordingly, the judgment is

AFFIRMED.
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 40 Filed 10/15/03 Page 1 of 2 PageID 242
Case 2:03-cv-00140-J Document 40 Filed 10/15/03 Page 2 of 2 PageID 243
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1172 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-960, K2025-959.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31720 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Justin D. TRAXINGER, Appellant, v. Ashley Ann GARCIA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2817

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 1 of 12 PageID 24
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 2 of 12 PageID 25
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 3 of 12 PageID 26
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 4 of 12 PageID 27
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 5 of 12 PageID 28
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 6 of 12 PageID 29
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 7 of 12 PageID 30
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 8 of 12 PageID 31
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 9 of 12 PageID 32
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 10 of 12 PageID 33
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 11 of 12 PageID 34
Case 3:03-cv-02619-K Document 4 Filed 10/24/03 Page 12 of 12 PageID 35
# C_2022257EN.01001701.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Income Tax Tribunal of Gibraltar (United Kingdom) made on 21 December 2020 — Fossil (Gibraltar) Limited v Commissioner of Income Tax

(Case C-705/20)

(2022/C 257/22)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Income Tax Tribunal of Gibraltar (United Kingdom)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Fossil (Gibraltar) Limited

Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax

Question referred

Would the provision of tax relief by the Commissioner of Income Tax under the ITA 2010 for tax paid in the US in respect of the Appellant’s royalty income, infringe the Decision (1) or is otherwise prevented by it?

---

(1)  Commission Decision (EU) 2019/700 of 19 December 2018 on the State Aid SA.34914 (2013/C) implemented by the United Kingdom as regards the Gibraltar Corporate Income Tax Regime (notified under document C(2018) 7848) (OJ 2019, L 119, p. 151).

---
Case 2:03-cr-00117-J Document 39 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 101
EX PARTE Nathaniel PICKETT

CR-16-0938

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Elmore Cir. Ct.
# C_2023063EN.01004601.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/46

---

Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission

(Case T-280/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Removal from post - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 63/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Vernier and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of, first, the decision of the European Commission of 28 June 2019 to impose the penalty of removing the applicant from his post, without reduction of his pension rights, and, secondly, when necessary, the decision of 12 July 2016 rejecting his complaint.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | CX and the Commission shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

CX and the Commission shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
# C_2022284EN.01002601.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission

(Case T-593/20) (1)

(State aid - Maritime transport - Service of general economic interest - Decision declaring the aid unlawful - Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Rescue aid - Compatibility with the internal market - Period of six months - Extension - Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan - Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty - Tax exemption - Advantage - Selective nature - Effect on trade between Member States - Adverse effect on competition - Excessive duration of the procedure - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Principle of good administration)

(2022/C 284/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tirrenia di navigazione SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: B. Nascimbene and F. Rossi Dal Pozzo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1412 of 2 March 2020 on the measures SA.32014, SA.32015, SA.32016 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Italy for Tirrenia di Navigazione and its acquirer Compagnia Italiana di Navigazione (OJ 2020 L 332, p. 45).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tirrenia di navigazione SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tirrenia di navigazione SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Troy Donell GAINES

NO. 2018-KO-O698

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Report of Independent Accountants**

 

Board of Directors 

AmSouth Bank 

 

We have examined management’s assertions, included in the accompanying Officer’sCertificate of Servicer that AmSouth Bank, as Servicer (the “Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmSouth Bancorporation, has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under Sections 4.1 through 4.9, 5.1(a) and (c), 5.2, 5.4,5.5(a) and (b), 5.6 and 5.7 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated October 1, 2000, as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with thoserequirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with specified requirements. 

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned requirements for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects. 

 

*Birmingham, Alabama*

*March 12, 2004*

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board

          - [Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0006-N]

# AGENCY:

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 195 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) related to seven civil rights cold case incidents to which the Review Board assigned the unique identifiers 2024-003-018, 2024-003-023, 2024-003-035, 2024-003-038, 2024-003-051, 2024-003-067, and 2024-003-068. NARA did not propose any postponements of disclosure. On December 20, 2024, the Review Board determined that the records should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the                         **Federal Register**                         its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014,                         *info@coldcaserecords.gov*.                    

*Authority:*Pub. L. 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489 (44 U.S.C. 2107).                    

Dated: December 30, 2024.

Stephannie Oriabure,

Chief of Staff.

[FR Doc. 2024-31618 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-SY-P
Case 3:03-cr-00355-M Document 190 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 531
Roderick Raymond MELTON v. STATE

CR-16-0598

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marvin Lee HOUSAND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.