alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020137EN.01003101.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/31

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 January 2020 — Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster

(Case C-9/20)

(2020/C 137/43)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136

Defendant: Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 167 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of valued added tax (1) preclude a provision of national law according to which the right of input tax deduction already arises at the time the transaction is performed, even if, under national law, the tax claim against the supplier or service provider arises only when the remuneration is received and the remuneration has not yet been paid? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 167 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of valued added tax (1) preclude a provision of national law according to which the right of input tax deduction already arises at the time the transaction is performed, even if, under national law, the tax claim against the supplier or service provider arises only when the remuneration is received and the remuneration has not yet been paid?

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the negative: Does Article 167 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of valued added tax preclude a provision of national law according to which the right of input tax deduction cannot be asserted for the tax period in which the remuneration has been paid if the tax claim against the supplier or service provider arises only when the remuneration is received, the service has already been provided in an earlier tax period and, under national law, due to the matter being time-barred, it is no longer possible to assert the input tax claim for that earlier tax period? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the negative: Does Article 167 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of valued added tax preclude a provision of national law according to which the right of input tax deduction cannot be asserted for the tax period in which the remuneration has been paid if the tax claim against the supplier or service provider arises only when the remuneration is received, the service has already been provided in an earlier tax period and, under national law, due to the matter being time-barred, it is no longer possible to assert the input tax claim for that earlier tax period?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3382

_____________________________

CHRISTOPHER DEMETRIUS 

SIMPKINS JR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

May 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Robert GIBSON, Successor in Interest to Joseph P. Karam, Jr., Appellant, v. Lorie FISCHER, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1253

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|                                                       |   |                                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |   |                                               |   |
| Date:  December      18, 2009.    |   | /s/ Ernest E. Staggs      Jr                  |   |
|                                                       |   | Ernest      E. Staggs Jr., Chief Executive Officer |   |

|         |   |                                                   |
|--------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|         |   |                                                   |   |
|    |   | /s/ Ernest E. Staggs      Jr                      |   |
|         |   | Ernest      E. Staggs Jr., Principal Financial Officer |   |
Elena C. WHITE, Appellant, v. Benjamin T. WHITE, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 64013
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 8 PageID 64014
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 3 of 8 PageID 64015
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 4 of 8 PageID 64016
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 5 of 8 PageID 64017
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 6 of 8 PageID 64018
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 7 of 8 PageID 64019
 

 Case 3:03-cv-01769-B Document 955 Filed 05/11/10 Page 8 of 8 PageID 64020
TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF AMERICA d/b/a Transport America v. Rodney CLAYTON

2160750

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
----

|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Trust. |

|            |                      |                               |   |   |
|-----------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|            |                      |                               |
| By:   | /s/      Blaine Boerchers |                               |   |
|            | Name:           | Blaine      Boerchers              |   |   |
|            | Title:          | Chief      Financial Officer  |   |   |
|            |

----
# C_2021128EN.01001001.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 21 December 2020 — Orde van Vlaamse Balies, IG, Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers, CD, JU v Vlaamse Regering

(Case C-694/20)

(2021/C 128/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Grondwettelijk Hof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Orde van Vlaamse Balies, IG, Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers, CD, JU

Defendant: Vlaamse Regering

Question referred

Does Article 1(2) of Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 (1) of 25 May 2018 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements infringe the right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the right to respect for private life as guaranteed by Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in that the new Article 8ab(5) which it inserted in Council Directive 2011/16/EU (2) of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC, provides that, where a Member State takes the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement where the reporting obligation would breach the legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State, that Member State is obliged to require the intermediaries to notify, without delay, any other intermediary or, if there is no such intermediary, the relevant taxpayer, of their reporting obligations, in so far as the effect of that obligation is to oblige a lawyer acting as an intermediary to share with another intermediary, not being his client, information which he obtains in the course of the essential activities of his profession, namely, representing or defending clients in legal proceedings and giving legal advice, even in the absence of pending legal proceedings?

---

(1)  OJ 2018 L 139, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2011 L 64, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1169 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-955, K2025-955.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31158 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1127 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-908, K2025-909.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31691 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
James Earnest WATTS v. STATE of Mississippi

2018-CT-00225-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: December 27, 2018 Closed: March 7, 2019

Motion Desc: Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 725 

Affirming the legal status of contraception following the Supreme Court’s 

decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 

215 (2022). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. DAINES, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. BUDD, and Mr. ROUNDS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Affirming the legal status of contraception following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s 

Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022). 

Whereas, in 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued 

its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), overturning the Court’s 

prior decisions in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), 

and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992); 

Whereas, in issuing Dobbs, the Supreme Court invalidated 

any Federal judicial precedent suggesting that the Constitution of the United States guarantees the right of a 

woman to abort her unborn child; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 725 IS 

Whereas the Supreme Court, ‘‘to ensure that [its] decision 

[was] not misunderstood or mischaracterized,’’ explicitly 

emphasized that the Dobbs decision ‘‘concern[ed] the 

constitutional right to abortion and no other right’’ and 

that ‘‘nothing in [its] opinion should be understood to 

cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion’’; 

Whereas the sole effect of the decision in Dobbs was to return ‘‘the authority to regulate abortion . . . to the people 

and their elected representatives’’; 

Whereas some, for political advantage and with the aim of 

sowing confusion and fear, have suggested that the 

Court’s decision in Dobbs restricts the ability or legal 

right of women to access contraception in the several 

States; and 

Whereas Congress has the authority, under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ‘‘to enforce, by appropriate legislation,’’ the rights belonging to 

the People of the United States, as guaranteed by the 

Constitution of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) construes the Supreme Court’s decision in 

3 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 

4 597 U.S. 215 (2022), as having no effect on the 

5 legal right of a woman to access contraception; and 

6 (2) interprets Dobbs to in no way require the 

7 various agencies of the Federal Government to alter 

8 rules, regulations, or policies governing access to 

9 contraception. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1153 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-938, K2025-939.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31715 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal 3rdquarter 2009 ending May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson         
|Paul G. Anderson             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

July 10, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



With reference to the Quarterly Report of Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Fyfe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ DAVID FYFE         
|DAVID FYFE             
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1181 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-969, K2025-968.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31740 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P