alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
------------


CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hong-Kee Lee, CFO of KSign International, Inc. certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
     March 31, 2004.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made. Not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this
     quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
          oft his quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Dated: May 27, 2004


/s/ Hong-Kee Lee
    ------------------
     Hong-Kee Lee, CFO
# C_2021368EN.01002201.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Ryanair and Laudamotion v Commission (Austrian Airlines; Covid-19)

(Case T-677/20) (1)

(State aid - Austrian air transport market - Aid granted by Austria to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic - Subordinated loan to Austrian Airlines - Decision not to raise any objections - Aid previously granted to the parent company of the recipient - Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence - Freedom of establishment - Free provision of services - Equal treatment - Duty to state reasons)

(2021/C 368/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland), Laudamotion GmbH, (Schwechat, Austria) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, F. Tomat and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: R. Kanitz, J. Möller and P.-L. Krüger, acting as Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: A. Posch, J. Schmoll, G. Eberhard and S. Weber, acting as Agents), Austrian Airlines AG, (Vienna, Austria), (represented by: A. Zellhofer, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 4684 final of 6 July 2020 on State aid SA.57539 (2020/N) — Austria — COVID-19 — Aid to Austrian Airlines.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Austria and Austrian Airlines AG to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Austria and Austrian Airlines AG to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---
MANGO'S TROPICAL CAFÉ, INC., Appellant, v. Raquel SANTANA and Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 3D18-354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DIST RICT OF TEXAS F ORT WORTH N O . 2 - 0 9 - 3 0 4 - C R T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S S T A T E V
. R O B E R T V A L D E Z A P P E L L E E

- - - - - - - - - - F R O M C O U N T Y C R I M I N A L C O U R T N O
. 2 O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N 1 

### AN D J U D G M E N T

- - - - - - - - - - W e h a v e c o n s i d e r e d t h e “ S t a t e ’ s M o t i o n T o D i s m i s s A p p e a l
. ” T h e m o t i o n c o m p l i e s w i t h r u l e 4 2
. 2 ( a ) o f t h e r u l e s o f a p p e l l a t e p r o c e d u r e . T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 2
. 2 ( a )
. N o d e c i s i o n o f t h i s c o u r t h a v i n g b e e n d e l i v e r e d b e f o r e w e r e c e i v e d t h i s m o t i o n , w e g r a n t t h e m o t i o n a n d d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l
. S e e i d
. ; T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 3
. 2 ( f )
. I t i s f u r t h e r o r d e r e d t h a t t h e S t a t e s h a l l p a y a l l c o s t s o f t h i s a p p e a l , f o r w h i c h l e t e x e c u t i o n i s s u e . S e e T e x . C o d e C r i m . P r o c . A n n . a r t . 4 4
. 0 1 ( f ) ( V e r n o n S u p p . 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 )
. P E R C U R I A M
P A N E L : M E I E R , J
. ; L I V I N G S T O N , C
. J
. ; a n d D A U P H I N O T , J
. D O N O T P U B L I S H T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 7
. 2 ( b )

1
 S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 7
. 4
.D E L I V E R E D : A p r i l 2 2 , 2 0 1 0
# C_2022051EN.01002801.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2021 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission

(Case T-293/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition - Admission criterion related to professional experience - Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice - Manifest error of assessment)

(2022/C 51/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Vanesa Ruiz-Ruiz (Alkmaar, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, T. Lilamand and I. Melo Sampaio, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the decision of the Selection Board of 20 September 2019 refusing the applicant’s request for review of the decision not to admit her to the next phase of the open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 and, secondly, of the decision of the appointing authority of 7 February 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of 20 September 2019 refusing the request for review of Ms Vanesa Ruiz-Ruiz’s exclusion from competition EPSO/AD/371/19; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of 20 September 2019 refusing the request for review of Ms Vanesa Ruiz-Ruiz’s exclusion from competition EPSO/AD/371/19;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Interviews        June 1, 2022        Landers Rupture — Jonathan Fieldwork

Interviews        November 17, 2010        Completion of Continent - Wide Soil Survey

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!

Interviews        September 15, 2010        Making Waves: Hypoxia in U.S. Coastal Waters

Interviews        August 30, 2009        The Water Beneath Our Feet: New Study on California's Central Valley Groundwater Level Decline

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet

Interviews        November 30, 2009        Urban Hydrology: Restoration and Monitoring of Johnson Creek in Portland, Oregon

Interviews        April 18, 2011        USGS Hydrologic Investigation of West Africa's Congo River (part 3)

Interviews        September 6, 2011        Stranger than Fiction: The Secret Lives of Freshwater Mussels

Interviews        August 24, 2009        Pharmaceuticals in Urban Streams in Northwest Oregon
Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 7

Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 7

Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 7

Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 7

Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 7

Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 7

Case 24-30985-mvl7    Doc 1    Filed 04/02/24    Entered 04/02/24 10:32:37    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 7
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31716]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1154 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-939, K2025-940.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31716 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
BTXN 104b/105b (rev. 09/11)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Milan Sai Joint Venture, LLC Case No.: 24−33560−mvl11

 Chapter No.: 11

Debtor(s)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

 The Court, having considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel M. Eliades, to represent

Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., related to document 30, ORDERS this application be:

 Granted − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall deposit the application fee to

the account of the Non−Appropriated Fund.

 Denied − The Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas shall return the admission fee to the

applicant.

# # # End of Order # # #

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed November 15, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-33560-mvl11 Doc 32 Filed 11/15/24 Entered 11/15/24 16:30:59 Desc

Page 1 of 1
Shucarlos Deon TELLIS v. STATE

CR-16-0617

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 7, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________ 

NO. 14-11-00710-CV

_____________

MICHAEL A. POKLAR, Appellant

V.

ARTHUR BROWN, M.D., PH.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-64368

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 14, 2011. On May 30, 2012, 

the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and McCally.
Christopher Scott THOMPSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Carlee Nicole Ring, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5015

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
1

Open Action Items – Updated September 01, 2015
# C_2023235EN.01002801.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — eins energie in sachsen v Commission

(Case T-318/20) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity market - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Lack of standing - Lack of active participation - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 235/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG (Chemnitz, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by T. Funke and A. Dlouhy, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 — RWE/E.ON Assets) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG.

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.

---
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 2475 LT Case No. 2021
- CF
- 000822 -A

_____________________________ M ARCUS S HAW , Appella nt, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County. James R. Baxley, Judge. Marcus S haw, Bonifay, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee. December 12, 2023 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., J AY , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 766 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 766

Recognizing September 17, 2024, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing September 17, 2024, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes September 17, 2024, as ``National Voter 
        Registration Day''; and
            (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the United 
        States--
                    (A) to register to vote;
                    (B) to verify with the appropriate State or local 
                election official that the name, address, and other 
                personal information on record is current; and
                    (C) to go to the polls on election day and vote if 
                the voting-eligible citizen would like to do so.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.2 Report of Independent Accountants**

Board of DirectorsAmSouth Bank 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Officer’s Certificate of Servicer that AmSouth Bank, as Servicer (the “Company”), a whollyowned subsidiary of AmSouth Bancorporation, has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under Sections 4.1 through 4.9, 5.1(a) and (c), 5.2, 5.4, 5.5(a) and (b), 5.6 and 5.7 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)dated October 1, 2000, as of December 31, 2002 and for the year then ended. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based onour examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with specified requirements. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with theaforementioned requirements for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the board of directorsand management of the Company and should not be referred to or distributed for any purpose to anyone who is not authorized to receive such information as specified in the Agreement or in the Exhibits attached. However, this report is a matter ofpublic record as a result of being included as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 10-K prepared by the Company and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of AmSouth Auto Receivables, LLC and its distribution is not limited.

|             | */s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP* |
|------------------|-----------------------------|
| *Birmingham*     |
| *March 24, 2003* |